Podcasts about Lunsford

William Lunsford has been searching for Sasquatch for nearly half a century. Based out of Arkansas, William talks about how he's had over 50 encounters with the legendary 'Bigfoot'. He's even felt his life was in danger in one close encounter. He's dealt with Dogman and other high strangeness in the forest as well. But he still goes on the search frequently to help do his part in proving the existence of Sasquatch.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/spaced-out-radio--1657874/support.

Rod, Mo, Alex, and Chile talk about Memorial Day weekend, play The 7 And 10 Game, and Chile goes out in the wild with 50 pairs of sold out BuzzFest tickets to give out.

Rod, Mo, Alex, and Chile talk about the weekend, Tommy Lee's soon to be ex-wife getting catfished, and play another round of The Texas Hammer Game.

Deacon Lunsford - 5.18.25 by OLMC Parish

Dave Palumbo and Chris Aceto recap the HISTORIC battle at the Pittsburgh Pro between Derek Lunsford and Nick Walker, with Lunsford coming out victorious in "overtime" fashion. This sets up now for a truly epic New York Pro, which will see Nick Walker come in hungry for Olympia qualification against the likes of Sas Heirati, Regan Grimes, Wililam Bonac, and Michal Krizo. SHOP SPECIES NUTRITION: https://speciesnutrition.com/

If you've ever felt awkward, overwhelmed, or downright terrified about talking to your kids about sex—this episode is your new best friend.Today I'm joined by Alisha Lunsford, a sex-positive educator and parent partner who helps caregivers have real, open, age-appropriate conversations about bodies, boundaries, puberty, porn, and everything in between—without shame.In this episode, we explore:*Why it's never too early—or too late—to start talking*How to shift from "The Talk” to ongoing conversations*What to say (and what to do when you don't know what to say)*The role of shame and how to avoid passing it down*How to talk about consent and online safety without fearWhether your child is 4 or 14, this episode will help you move from cringe to confidence—so you can become the safe, trusted adult your child needs.✨Connect with Alisha:www.instagram.com/sexpertparenting If this episode gave you insight or courage, share it with a friend and tag us—we love hearing your takeaways!RESOURCES: Learn the S.T.O.P. Method for self-regulation: https://www.dianesorensen.net/stopJoin the Beautiful Behavior Facebookcommunity for more insights and perspectives in parenting and relationship building - ⁠⁠⁠https://www.facebook.com/groups/1234281357530027⁠⁠⁠Connect with me on Instagram or send me a message through my website:Website: https://www.dianesorensen.net/Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/dianesorensen.bb/⁠Email: dsorensen@dianesorensen.netThe Beautiful Behavior Programs will support you in setting firm boundaries that promote self-regulation, compassion and respect in all your relationships and parenting journey.  Reclaim your CALM, discover your TRUTH, and live FREE.  

In this powerful episode of Leaders of Today, Lorraine Connell sits down with Alisha to discuss the importance of open and honest conversations about health, bodies, and self-acceptance. Alisha shares her deeply personal journey of navigating her daughter's ovarian cancer diagnosis and how it led her and her husband to have candid discussions with their young children about health and body awareness. Beyond her family's experience, Alisha offers heartfelt advice to her teenage self—embracing self-acceptance and staying true to her inner voice. She emphasizes the significance of creating spaces where kids feel comfortable talking about their bodies and health without shame or fear. For parents looking to foster these important conversations, Alisha provides resources and guidance on age-appropriate sex education and encourages open, judgment-free discussions with children and teens. This episode is a must-listen for anyone seeking to empower young people with knowledge, confidence, and trust in themselves. Follow Alisha on IG  Follow Alisha on FB    #OpenConversations #HealthAwareness #SexEducation #ParentingMatters #YouthEmpowerment #BodyPositivity #LeadersOfToday

Deacon Lunsford - 4.6.25 by OLMC Parish

Save 10% off your Marek Health order by using code “MULLIGAN” at https://www.marekhealth.com/ #ad In this episode, Jordan Mulligan sits down with Derek Lunsford — reigning Arnold Classic Champion, former 212 Mr. Olympia, and the 18th Mr. Olympia of all time — for one of his most open and inspiring conversations yet. From growing up in a small Indiana town to sleeping in his car while chasing his dreams, Derek shares the raw truth behind the journey to the top of professional bodybuilding. He talks about the chip on his shoulder that pushed him early on, the mental shift that came with success, and how surrendering his life to God in 2020 transformed his outlook and motivation. For Derek, bodybuilding was never just about physique — it was about purpose, sacrifice, and becoming who he was truly called to be. He opens up about setbacks, the importance of failure, and the freedom that comes with no longer fearing it. With a deep respect for his competitors and a drive to do what's never been done, Derek reveals his goal of making history by winning the Arnold Classic, Pittsburgh Pro, and Mr. Olympia in the same year. He also reflects on the intense discipline behind the scenes — the training, the diet, the exhaustion, and the family support that makes it all possible. Whether you're into bodybuilding, personal growth, or stories of faith-fueled resilience, this episode is a must-listen. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Deacon Lunsford - 3.30.25 by OLMC Parish

In this inspiring episode, co-host Deb Barnett sits down with Heaven Lunsford, founder and esthetician at Southern Beauty Aesthetics in Marion, Illinois. Originally from Quincy and raised in Dix, Illinois, Heaven shares her journey from relocating to Marion to launching her business in 2022 with a vision and no local network. Through grit, community involvement, and a deep passion for helping others, Heaven has built a thriving aesthetic studio and is already planning her next phase: expansion. She discusses the challenges of marketing, the power of community support, and how being intentional about time and balance helps her succeed in both business and family life. 00:00 Introduction and Welcome 00:46 Meet Heaven Lunsford: Southern Beauty Aesthetics 01:01 Starting the Business Journey 02:09 Finding the Perfect Location 04:09 Building the Business from Scratch 05:23 Community Involvement and Support 08:44 Business Structure and Future Plans 13:11 Marketing Challenges and Successes 14:21 Navigating the Advertising Maze 14:57 Leveraging Resources for Business Growth 16:12 Behind the Scenes of Business Ownership 20:24 Balancing Family and Business 24:40 Future Plans and Final Thoughts Recorded at EThOs Small Business Incubator and Co-working Spaces in Marion, Illinois. https://members.ethosmarion.org/ SUBSCRIBE TO THE PODCAST

Watch the video podcast of this episode here: https://generationiron.com/victor-martinez-derek-lunsford-vs-nick-walker-pittsburgh/ Visit the Generation Iron official website for exclusive video content, feature films, and more: https://generationiron.com/ Follow us on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/generationiron/ Follow us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/GenerationIron/ Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/GenerationIron

Send us a textIn a case that resembles more than a few prosecutions of police officers in Minnesota, a former New Mexico police officer is fighting for his freedom in court. His wife shared details about the Soros-funded attorney general who led the case and the juror accused of lying with Liz Collin on her podcast.Lunsford family fundraiser: https://pipehitterfoundation.org/who-we-support/brad-lunsford/Support - https://alphanews.revv.co/donate-todayAlpha News Links - https://linktr.ee/AlphaNewsLiz Collin Reports - https://alphanews.buzzsprout.com/Support the show

Deacon Lunsford - 3.16.25 by OLMC Parish

By Dalia ColónSpring is upon us, so it's time to tackle all those projects we've been putting off. Maybe you need to organize the garage, file your taxes or flip your mattress. While you're making that checklist, remember to prep for spring cooking—planting warm-weather vegetables, gearing up your grill and, yes, cleaning out the pantry.But resetting for spring doesn't have to be intimidating. Here to help is Mackensy Lunsford, editor of USA Today's cooking website, Southern Kitchen. She's also a chef, cookbook author and senior dining reporter at the Tennessean.Mackensy recently chatted with Dalia from her home in Nashville. In this conversation, she shares advice for starting a spring garden, mitigating pests and planting vegetables that can withstand the South's heat and humidity. She also offers tips for organizing your pantry, embarking on a new-spend month (or at least spending less) in order to use up the nonperishables you already have and making the most of your grill. Finally, Mackensy suggests meal ideas that'll make all your hard work pay off.Related episodes: Couples in the Kitchen: Bryce Hudson & Ryan Ahmann How Plant City Became the Winter Strawberry Capital of the World Yee Farms Brings Chinese Vegetables and a “Sense of Pride” to Boynton Beach

By Dalia ColónSpring is upon us, so it's time to tackle all those projects we've been putting off. Maybe you need to organize the garage, file your taxes or flip your mattress. While you're making that checklist, remember to prep for spring cooking—planting warm-weather vegetables, gearing up your grill and, yes, cleaning out the pantry.But resetting for spring doesn't have to be intimidating. Here to help is Mackensy Lunsford, editor of USA Today's cooking website, Southern Kitchen. She's also a chef, cookbook author and senior dining reporter at the Tennessean.Mackensy recently chatted with Dalia from her home in Nashville. In this conversation, she shares advice for starting a spring garden, mitigating pests and planting vegetables that can withstand the South's heat and humidity. She also offers tips for organizing your pantry, embarking on a new-spend month (or at least spending less) in order to use up the nonperishables you already have and making the most of your grill. Finally, Mackensy suggests meal ideas that'll make all your hard work pay off.Related episodes: Couples in the Kitchen: Bryce Hudson & Ryan Ahmann How Plant City Became the Winter Strawberry Capital of the World Yee Farms Brings Chinese Vegetables and a “Sense of Pride” to Boynton Beach

Dave Palumbo and Chris Aceto break down 2025 ARNOLD CLASSIC!

Deacon Lunsford - 3.2.25 by OLMC Parish

In the final episode of Misunderstood: Unpacking the AUC, we sit down with Junias Lunsford-Peaks. In this conversation, we discuss why he chose Morehouse, unpack what it means to not be part of the in-groups and to have differing opinions, and explore the social hierarchies of Morehouse College and the culture that shapes the school.For the last time, we unpack the nuances of the people of the AUC. This time, we hear a different voice and perspective. Most importantly, we hope you enjoy being Misunderstood.

Dave Palumbo and Chris Aceto get into the meat and potatoes of the upcoming Arnold Classic 2025

>Join Jocko Underground

Let's make 2025 YOUR Year In The Gym With These Tips + Tons of fun listener questions. It's Just Bodybuilding 315 TIME STAMPS BELOW Big Ron Partlow, Dusty Hanshaw, Scott McNally

This week: a North Carolinian invents Vick's VapoRub, and Amelia Earhart actually keeps a New Year's resolution. The post History Matters: Lunsford’s Croup Salve appeared first on Chapelboro.com.

In the justice system, where legacies of decisions linger for decades, few cases have the staying power of the Menendez brothers. Convicted of murdering their parents in 1989, Lyle and Erik Menendez have spent more than three decades behind bars, with their case periodically reemerging in the public eye. Now, a new Los Angeles County District Attorney, Nathan Hochman, has taken office and is reshaping the case once again. One of Hochman's first moves was to replace two deputy prosecutors, Nancy Theberge and Brock Lunsford, who had filed a motion under former D.A. George Gascón's administration seeking to reduce the brothers' sentences. Theberge and Lunsford's motion argued that the brothers had shown substantial rehabilitation and should be resentenced to 50 years to life, which would make them eligible for parole. Hochman's decision to reassign them signals a potential shift away from Gascón's reform-oriented policies and has drawn significant attention to the direction Hochman intends to take with such high-profile cases. The January 30-31 resentencing hearing could determine the Menendez brothers' futures, but Hochman's office has not yet stated whether it will uphold or withdraw the resentencing request. Hochman's statements indicate a detailed review process, with an emphasis on examining the case files and treating each brother's case separately. Hochman's approach signals a departure from treating the Menendez brothers as a unit and instead evaluates the specifics of each individual's circumstances and actions. This perspective may allow for a more granular and balanced assessment of justice in a case that has been controversial for decades. The brothers' defense team, led by Mark Geragos, is also pursuing a habeas corpus petition based on newly emerged evidence of alleged sexual abuse by their father, Jose Menendez. The petition includes claims that Erik Menendez wrote letters detailing the abuse before the murders, as well as allegations from Roy Rosselló, a former member of the boy band Menudo, who said Jose Menendez sexually assaulted him. These revelations add another layer of complexity to the case, challenging the prosecution's original narrative that the murders were motivated solely by greed. The defense contends that these claims provide a broader context for understanding the brothers' actions, focusing on the psychological toll of prolonged abuse. Judge Michael Jesic, who postponed the resentencing hearing to allow the new administration time to review the case, acknowledged the significant volume of material involved. Hochman's office is also tasked with responding to the habeas corpus petition, a process that could influence the outcome of both the resentencing and broader legal proceedings. This decision underscores the intricate balancing act between revisiting past decisions and maintaining the integrity of the justice system. It also highlights the importance of judicial discretion in managing such a high-profile and emotionally charged case. The case has reignited public debate, with advocates for the brothers pointing to their alleged victimization and rehabilitation as grounds for leniency, while others argue that the brutal nature of the murders justifies their life sentences without parole. The Netflix series Monsters, which revisited the case, has further polarized public opinion, bringing new attention to the decades-old crime. By shedding light on the personal lives of the Menendez brothers and their upbringing, the series has sparked fresh discussions on the intersections of familial abuse, trauma, and criminal behavior. The widespread public interest underscores how deeply this case resonates with broader societal issues of power, family dynamics, and accountability. Governor Gavin Newsom's role also looms over the case, as the brothers have filed a clemency request. However, Newsom has deferred any decisions until after Hochman completes his review. This delay underscores the high stakes and intricate political dynamics surrounding the Menendez brothers' potential release. Newsom's cautious approach reflects the broader implications of granting clemency in a case that continues to polarize opinions across the political and social spectrum. The involvement of the governor further elevates the case to a state-wide platform, where its outcome could set a significant precedent for executive intervention in criminal sentencing. As the January hearing approaches, the Menendez brothers' case remains a flashpoint in discussions about justice, rehabilitation, and the evolving societal understanding of abuse and trauma. The decisions made in the coming months could not only shape the lives of Lyle and Erik Menendez but also set a precedent for how similar cases are handled in the future. The hearing promises to be a critical juncture, where the legal arguments, new evidence, and broader societal shifts converge to determine whether justice is best served by maintaining their sentences or by granting them a second chance. The Menendez brothers' journey from wealthy Beverly Hills teenagers to convicted murderers and now potential symbols of rehabilitation continues to captivate the public. It raises questions about the capacity of the justice system to adapt to new evidence and evolving perceptions of crime and punishment. Hochman's role in shaping the outcome of this case places him at the center of a legal and cultural crossroads, where each decision carries the weight of decades of debate over what justice truly means. This case, with its layers of legal complexity and emotional resonance, serves as a test of the justice system's ability to reconcile past convictions with new evidence and shifting public sentiment. In addition to the legal implications, the Menendez brothers' case also reflects broader trends in criminal justice reform. The focus on rehabilitation, the consideration of trauma, and the evolving perceptions of abuse survivors all come into play in this intricate legal drama. As society continues to grapple with questions of fairness and accountability, the case's outcome could offer insight into how the justice system may evolve to address similar cases in the future. This ongoing saga remains a profound reminder of the intersection between law, psychology, and societal change, making it one of the most compelling criminal cases of our time. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

A New D.A., A New Direction: The Menendez Brothers' Fate Hangs in the Balance  In the justice system, where legacies of decisions linger for decades, few cases have the staying power of the Menendez brothers. Convicted of murdering their parents in 1989, Lyle and Erik Menendez have spent more than three decades behind bars, with their case periodically reemerging in the public eye. Now, a new Los Angeles County District Attorney, Nathan Hochman, has taken office and is reshaping the case once again. One of Hochman's first moves was to replace two deputy prosecutors, Nancy Theberge and Brock Lunsford, who had filed a motion under former D.A. George Gascón's administration seeking to reduce the brothers' sentences. Theberge and Lunsford's motion argued that the brothers had shown substantial rehabilitation and should be resentenced to 50 years to life, which would make them eligible for parole. Hochman's decision to reassign them signals a potential shift away from Gascón's reform-oriented policies and has drawn significant attention to the direction Hochman intends to take with such high-profile cases. The January 30-31 resentencing hearing could determine the Menendez brothers' futures, but Hochman's office has not yet stated whether it will uphold or withdraw the resentencing request. Hochman's statements indicate a detailed review process, with an emphasis on examining the case files and treating each brother's case separately. Hochman's approach signals a departure from treating the Menendez brothers as a unit and instead evaluates the specifics of each individual's circumstances and actions. This perspective may allow for a more granular and balanced assessment of justice in a case that has been controversial for decades. The brothers' defense team, led by Mark Geragos, is also pursuing a habeas corpus petition based on newly emerged evidence of alleged sexual abuse by their father, Jose Menendez. The petition includes claims that Erik Menendez wrote letters detailing the abuse before the murders, as well as allegations from Roy Rosselló, a former member of the boy band Menudo, who said Jose Menendez sexually assaulted him. These revelations add another layer of complexity to the case, challenging the prosecution's original narrative that the murders were motivated solely by greed. The defense contends that these claims provide a broader context for understanding the brothers' actions, focusing on the psychological toll of prolonged abuse. Judge Michael Jesic, who postponed the resentencing hearing to allow the new administration time to review the case, acknowledged the significant volume of material involved. Hochman's office is also tasked with responding to the habeas corpus petition, a process that could influence the outcome of both the resentencing and broader legal proceedings. This decision underscores the intricate balancing act between revisiting past decisions and maintaining the integrity of the justice system. It also highlights the importance of judicial discretion in managing such a high-profile and emotionally charged case. The case has reignited public debate, with advocates for the brothers pointing to their alleged victimization and rehabilitation as grounds for leniency, while others argue that the brutal nature of the murders justifies their life sentences without parole. The Netflix series Monsters, which revisited the case, has further polarized public opinion, bringing new attention to the decades-old crime. By shedding light on the personal lives of the Menendez brothers and their upbringing, the series has sparked fresh discussions on the intersections of familial abuse, trauma, and criminal behavior. The widespread public interest underscores how deeply this case resonates with broader societal issues of power, family dynamics, and accountability. Governor Gavin Newsom's role also looms over the case, as the brothers have filed a clemency request. However, Newsom has deferred any decisions until after Hochman completes his review. This delay underscores the high stakes and intricate political dynamics surrounding the Menendez brothers' potential release. Newsom's cautious approach reflects the broader implications of granting clemency in a case that continues to polarize opinions across the political and social spectrum. The involvement of the governor further elevates the case to a state-wide platform, where its outcome could set a significant precedent for executive intervention in criminal sentencing. As the January hearing approaches, the Menendez brothers' case remains a flashpoint in discussions about justice, rehabilitation, and the evolving societal understanding of abuse and trauma. The decisions made in the coming months could not only shape the lives of Lyle and Erik Menendez but also set a precedent for how similar cases are handled in the future. The hearing promises to be a critical juncture, where the legal arguments, new evidence, and broader societal shifts converge to determine whether justice is best served by maintaining their sentences or by granting them a second chance. The Menendez brothers' journey from wealthy Beverly Hills teenagers to convicted murderers and now potential symbols of rehabilitation continues to captivate the public. It raises questions about the capacity of the justice system to adapt to new evidence and evolving perceptions of crime and punishment. Hochman's role in shaping the outcome of this case places him at the center of a legal and cultural crossroads, where each decision carries the weight of decades of debate over what justice truly means. This case, with its layers of legal complexity and emotional resonance, serves as a test of the justice system's ability to reconcile past convictions with new evidence and shifting public sentiment. In addition to the legal implications, the Menendez brothers' case also reflects broader trends in criminal justice reform. The focus on rehabilitation, the consideration of trauma, and the evolving perceptions of abuse survivors all come into play in this intricate legal drama. As society continues to grapple with questions of fairness and accountability, the case's outcome could offer insight into how the justice system may evolve to address similar cases in the future. This ongoing saga remains a profound reminder of the intersection between law, psychology, and societal change, making it one of the most compelling criminal cases of our time. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

Nathan Hochman had barely unpacked his office when his tenure as Los Angeles County District Attorney began with a seismic jolt. In his first major act, he dismissed two high-ranking deputies, Nancy Theberge and Brock Lunsford, who had become central figures in the simmering controversy surrounding Lyle and Erik Menendez. The Menendez brothers, infamous for the brutal 1989 murders of their parents, were the focus of a contentious resentencing appeal that had ignited public and legal debate alike. Hochman's decisive move sent shockwaves through the legal community, marking a clear departure from the policies of his predecessor, George Gascon. Theberge and Lunsford had been instrumental in a 57-page appeal filed just weeks earlier, advocating for a reduction in the brothers' life sentences without the possibility of parole. Their argument rested on evidence of rehabilitation. The proposed revision—50 years to life—would have made the Menendez brothers immediately eligible for parole after 34 years of incarceration. Critics lambasted the move as a slap in the face to justice, reigniting the fierce divide that had characterized public opinion since the sensational trial in the mid-1990s. Hochman's stance was unequivocal. He publicly criticized Gascon's approach to the Menendez case, accusing him of leveraging high-profile cases for political gain. By removing Theberge and Lunsford from their positions, Hochman made it clear that his administration would be taking a different path. Theberge, who had led the resentencing unit under Gascon, was transferred to the office of the Alternate Public Defender, while Lunsford was reassigned within the DA's office. These personnel shifts signaled a stark policy pivot—one that appeared to prioritize retribution over rehabilitation. Yet the personnel changes only deepened the intrigue. Shortly after Hochman's announcement, the DA's office declared that Antonio Aguilar would take over as head of the resentencing unit and the post-conviction and discovery division. However, Aguilar denied the appointment, despite his name being listed on the official roster of new appointments. The office, tight-lipped as ever, declined to clarify the discrepancy, leaving Observers speculated about the true state of affairs within the DA's administration. This lack of transparency only added fuel to the growing skepticism about Hochman's intentions and the broader direction of his administration.   The Menendez brothers' resentencing hearing, initially scheduled for mid-December, became another casualty of the administrative upheaval. Judge Michael Jesic postponed the hearing to late January, citing the need to give Hochman's team sufficient time to familiarize themselves with the voluminous case file. This delay added another layer of uncertainty to an already convoluted saga. Hochman now faced a critical decision: whether to proceed with the original recommendation for resentencing or to withdraw it, provided he could present a legitimate reason for doing so. Either choice carried significant risks, not only for the Menendez brothers but also for the credibility of the DA's office under its new leadership. With public scrutiny intensifying, Hochman's next move could set a precedent for how his tenure would be judged.   Meanwhile, Mark Geragos, the brothers' high-profile attorney, had been busy mounting a parallel offensive. Geragos filed a habeas corpus petition that introduced new evidence allegedly corroborating the brothers' claims of sexual abuse by their father. This revelation, Geragos argued, warranted a new trial. The petition awaited a response from the DA's office, which had initially been due in late November but requested an extension until December 20. The delay only heightened the tension, as all parties braced for a showdown in the courtroom. Geragos's strategy was clear: keep the focus on the alleged abuse and its potential impact on the original trial's outcome. This approach not only put pressure on Hochman but also revived public interest in the case, ensuring that every development was scrutinized by the media.   Complicating matters further was the Menendez brothers' clemency appeal to Governor Gavin Newsom. The governor deferred any action, citing respect for Hochman's review of the case. The clemency request represented a long-shot bid for freedom, but it also underscored the high stakes involved. Clemency, a rarely granted relief, would require compelling evidence of miscarriage of justice, rehabilitation, or extenuating circumstances. Newsom's decision to defer highlighted the gravity of the situation and the potential political ramifications of any action he might take. For the brothers, it was a sliver of hope in an otherwise daunting legal landscape.   The January 30–31 hearing loomed large on the horizon, poised to become a pivotal moment not just for the Menendez brothers but for the broader conversation about justice, rehabilitation, and the legacy of one of the most notorious cases in American legal history. The outcome of this hearing could redefine the narrative surrounding the Menendez brothers, shifting it from one of cold-blooded killers to victims of a deeply dysfunctional family dynamic. However, such a shift would not come easily. The prosecution's team was expected to vigorously oppose any motion that might appear to lessen the severity of the brothers' crimes.   What began as a family tragedy has evolved into a multifaceted legal drama, replete with power struggles, moral quandaries, and the ever-present specter of public scrutiny. Hochman's early moves have set the stage for a high-stakes confrontation, one that promises to test the limits of justice and redemption in a system often criticized for its rigidity. As the Menendez brothers await their day in court, the question remains: will this new chapter bring closure to a case that has haunted the public imagination for decades, or will it only deepen the mystery?   Adding to the drama is the renewed cultural fascination with the case, spurred in part by the Netflix series "Monsters," which revisited the Menendez brothers' story in a broader context of sensationalized family crimes. The series has reignited debates over the fairness of the original trial, the admissibility of abuse claims, and the role of public opinion in shaping legal outcomes. For many, the Menendez case serves as a litmus test for how society balances the scales of justice against the backdrop of human complexity. This renewed attention has amplified the stakes for all involved, from the DA's office to the defense team, and even the public officials who might be drawn into the fray.   As the clock ticks down to the January hearing, one thing is certain: the Menendez brothers' story is far from over. With new evidence, shifting legal strategies, and a public hungry for resolution, the next chapter promises to be as riveting and consequential as the events that have already unfolded. The question of justice—what it means, who deserves it, and how it should be administered—looms large, casting a shadow over the proceedings and ensuring that this case will remain etched in the annals of American legal history. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Nathan Hochman had barely unpacked his office when his tenure as Los Angeles County District Attorney began with a seismic jolt. In his first major act, he dismissed two high-ranking deputies, Nancy Theberge and Brock Lunsford, who had become central figures in the simmering controversy surrounding Lyle and Erik Menendez. The Menendez brothers, infamous for the brutal 1989 murders of their parents, were the focus of a contentious resentencing appeal that had ignited public and legal debate alike. Hochman's decisive move sent shockwaves through the legal community, marking a clear departure from the policies of his predecessor, George Gascon. Theberge and Lunsford had been instrumental in a 57-page appeal filed just weeks earlier, advocating for a reduction in the brothers' life sentences without the possibility of parole. Their argument rested on evidence of rehabilitation. The proposed revision—50 years to life—would have made the Menendez brothers immediately eligible for parole after 34 years of incarceration. Critics lambasted the move as a slap in the face to justice, reigniting the fierce divide that had characterized public opinion since the sensational trial in the mid-1990s. Hochman's stance was unequivocal. He publicly criticized Gascon's approach to the Menendez case, accusing him of leveraging high-profile cases for political gain. By removing Theberge and Lunsford from their positions, Hochman made it clear that his administration would be taking a different path. Theberge, who had led the resentencing unit under Gascon, was transferred to the office of the Alternate Public Defender, while Lunsford was reassigned within the DA's office. These personnel shifts signaled a stark policy pivot—one that appeared to prioritize retribution over rehabilitation. Yet the personnel changes only deepened the intrigue. Shortly after Hochman's announcement, the DA's office declared that Antonio Aguilar would take over as head of the resentencing unit and the post-conviction and discovery division. However, Aguilar denied the appointment, despite his name being listed on the official roster of new appointments. The office, tight-lipped as ever, declined to clarify the discrepancy, leaving Observers speculated about the true state of affairs within the DA's administration. This lack of transparency only added fuel to the growing skepticism about Hochman's intentions and the broader direction of his administration.   The Menendez brothers' resentencing hearing, initially scheduled for mid-December, became another casualty of the administrative upheaval. Judge Michael Jesic postponed the hearing to late January, citing the need to give Hochman's team sufficient time to familiarize themselves with the voluminous case file. This delay added another layer of uncertainty to an already convoluted saga. Hochman now faced a critical decision: whether to proceed with the original recommendation for resentencing or to withdraw it, provided he could present a legitimate reason for doing so. Either choice carried significant risks, not only for the Menendez brothers but also for the credibility of the DA's office under its new leadership. With public scrutiny intensifying, Hochman's next move could set a precedent for how his tenure would be judged.   Meanwhile, Mark Geragos, the brothers' high-profile attorney, had been busy mounting a parallel offensive. Geragos filed a habeas corpus petition that introduced new evidence allegedly corroborating the brothers' claims of sexual abuse by their father. This revelation, Geragos argued, warranted a new trial. The petition awaited a response from the DA's office, which had initially been due in late November but requested an extension until December 20. The delay only heightened the tension, as all parties braced for a showdown in the courtroom. Geragos's strategy was clear: keep the focus on the alleged abuse and its potential impact on the original trial's outcome. This approach not only put pressure on Hochman but also revived public interest in the case, ensuring that every development was scrutinized by the media.   Complicating matters further was the Menendez brothers' clemency appeal to Governor Gavin Newsom. The governor deferred any action, citing respect for Hochman's review of the case. The clemency request represented a long-shot bid for freedom, but it also underscored the high stakes involved. Clemency, a rarely granted relief, would require compelling evidence of miscarriage of justice, rehabilitation, or extenuating circumstances. Newsom's decision to defer highlighted the gravity of the situation and the potential political ramifications of any action he might take. For the brothers, it was a sliver of hope in an otherwise daunting legal landscape.   The January 30–31 hearing loomed large on the horizon, poised to become a pivotal moment not just for the Menendez brothers but for the broader conversation about justice, rehabilitation, and the legacy of one of the most notorious cases in American legal history. The outcome of this hearing could redefine the narrative surrounding the Menendez brothers, shifting it from one of cold-blooded killers to victims of a deeply dysfunctional family dynamic. However, such a shift would not come easily. The prosecution's team was expected to vigorously oppose any motion that might appear to lessen the severity of the brothers' crimes.   What began as a family tragedy has evolved into a multifaceted legal drama, replete with power struggles, moral quandaries, and the ever-present specter of public scrutiny. Hochman's early moves have set the stage for a high-stakes confrontation, one that promises to test the limits of justice and redemption in a system often criticized for its rigidity. As the Menendez brothers await their day in court, the question remains: will this new chapter bring closure to a case that has haunted the public imagination for decades, or will it only deepen the mystery?   Adding to the drama is the renewed cultural fascination with the case, spurred in part by the Netflix series "Monsters," which revisited the Menendez brothers' story in a broader context of sensationalized family crimes. The series has reignited debates over the fairness of the original trial, the admissibility of abuse claims, and the role of public opinion in shaping legal outcomes. For many, the Menendez case serves as a litmus test for how society balances the scales of justice against the backdrop of human complexity. This renewed attention has amplified the stakes for all involved, from the DA's office to the defense team, and even the public officials who might be drawn into the fray.   As the clock ticks down to the January hearing, one thing is certain: the Menendez brothers' story is far from over. With new evidence, shifting legal strategies, and a public hungry for resolution, the next chapter promises to be as riveting and consequential as the events that have already unfolded. The question of justice—what it means, who deserves it, and how it should be administered—looms large, casting a shadow over the proceedings and ensuring that this case will remain etched in the annals of American legal history. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In this episode, we dive deep into must see courses with Al Lunsford from LINKS Magazine, the go-to resource for golfers looking for the best places to play, visit, and live. Tune in for must-play courses from iconic Pebble Beach and Bandon Dunes to hidden gems like Winter Park and OMNI Homestead.More from Al & LINKS Magazine:https://linksmagazine.com @linksmagazine  See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In the second half of the first hour of "Connections with Evan Dawson" on Oct. 17, 2024, we talk with Jen Lunsford, candidate for NYS Assembly District 135, on her priorities if elected.

Explore the hidden culture war in Louisiana, as Michael Lunsford uncovers wasteful spending and lack of accountability in the allocation of public funds.

Andy is CEO and co-founder of BreachRx, which provides incident response management tooling to help organizations respond effectively, consistently, and in accordance with legal requirements. Andy has a JD, an MBA, and a philosophy degree, which combine for a unique skillset. He worked in data breach litigation early in his career, and before starting BreachRx he was a Director for a government consulting group specializing in technology litigation. BreachRx ties together his experience across his career, as he is uniquely knowledgable about the legal complications that arise when managing cyber incidents. In the episode, we jump from the evolution of data privacy to the importance of dedicated communication channels for breach response to the personal liability of executives in cyber incidents. Website: BreachRx Sponsor: VulnCheck

In episode 125, Jay and Matt bring on our first ever Mr. Olympia, none other than the reigning Mr. Olympia... Derek Lunsford! Bucked Up Energy - http://www.buckedup.com/shop/energy-drinks Pacific West Law - http://www.pacificwestinjury.com Fit Club Vegas - http://www.fitclubvegas.com Follow us on IG - https://www.instagram.com/cutlercast Jay Cutler IG - https://www.instagram.com/JayCutler Manager Matt IG - https://www.instagram.com/ManagerMatt1 Cutler Nutrition products https://bit.ly/2VUJSXO Check out my sponsors: https://linktr.ee/Mro4x  

Brian Lunsford, owner and CEO of Bring the Joy Ventures—the parent company of LunsPro Inspections, Kingfish Pest Control, JoyLights, Fix-it Flamingo, and Jacksonville Real Producers—rejoins The Boardroom Buzz to recount his journey as a business leader. After a successful pest control business sale in Atlanta, Brian and his wife Kristin are building synergistic businesses in Jacksonville with less personal risk. How could a liquidity event give you the capital and confidence to build again on your family's terms?  Mentorship and personal connections are key in any leadership position. Brian proactively sought out experienced individuals to learn from. At Bring the Joy Ventures, it's about collaboration and the abundance mentality over micro-managing and secrecy. How can you start building a network of mentors and peers to support your growth? Brian highlights the need for work-life balance, stressing that while work is important, it shouldn't overshadow family and personal growth. To Brian, family comes first. He encourages leaders to ensure their employees prioritize this balance too. How can you promote a healthier work-life balance within your team yet still exceed your business goals? Audio Mixing and Editing by www.verbell.ltd.

Segment 1: Doug Hagmann; 00:00-00:30Segment 2-3 Coach Dave Daubenmire, JR Harrison, Craig Mickel & Randy Lunsford 00:30-01:30PLEASE SUBSCRIBE to our channels on Rumble & Brighteon, and give us a “Like,” and PLEASE share this episode and this channel on your social media feed, and THANK YOU for your support!----------------------SPECIAL: This stuff works better than ANYTHING I've used! Nana Soma - https://iwantmyhealthback.com/hagmann- PLEASE click & definitely watch the videos at link. You'll thank me later.----------------------For complete information, please visit, bookmark, and share The Hagmann Report at our website: https://www.HagmannPI.comTIPS: (Anonymity guaranteed):doug@hagmannreport.com. | rt@hhagmannpi.comON THE GO? SUBSCRIBE TO HAGMANN'S PODCAST:iTunes:https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/hagmann-report/id631558915?uo=4Spotify: BANNED!iHeart: https://www.iheart.com/podcast/256-hagmann-report-30926499/Spreaker:https://www.spreaker.com/show/hagmann-reportFOLLOW HAGMANN AT:Twitter: https://twitter.com/HagmannReportGab: https://gab.com/DougHagmannGettr: https://gettr.com/user/doughagmannTruth Social: https://truthsocial.com/@DougHagmann

Perry Lunsford comes on the show to discuss his success in the Health Insurance Industry. APPLY TO BE ON THE PODCAST: https://forms.gle/qXvENTeurx7Xn8Ci9 BUSINESS INQUIRIES/SPONSORS: Jenna@DigitalSocialHour.com SPONSORS: Opus Pro: https://www.opus.pro/?via=DSH Deposyt Payment Processing: https://www.deposyt.com/seankelly Factor: https://www.factor75.com/dsh50 LISTEN ON: Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast... Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/5Jn7LXa... Sean Kelly Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/seanmikekelly/ Digital Social Hour works with participants in sponsored media and stays compliant with Federal Communications Commission (FCC) regulations regarding sponsored media. #ad Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Perry Lunsford comes on the show to discuss his success in the Health Insurance Industry. APPLY TO BE ON THE PODCAST: https://forms.gle/qXvENTeurx7Xn8Ci9 BUSINESS INQUIRIES/SPONSORS: Jenna@DigitalSocialHour.com SPONSORS: Opus Pro: https://www.opus.pro/?via=DSH Deposyt Payment Processing: https://www.deposyt.com/seankelly Factor: https://www.factor75.com/dsh50 LISTEN ON: Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast... Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/5Jn7LXa... Sean Kelly Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/seanmikekelly/ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices