Podcasts about russian mind

DON NICOLEONE SHOW IS THE MOST DYNAMIC SHOW ORBITING THE PLANET EARTH!! THE DON NICOLEONE SHOW BROADCAST LIVE WEEKDAYS 9 PM EST ON WGAG RADIO! CALL IN AND SPEAK TO DON NICOLEONE LIVE 1.515.605.9828 OR 1.425.569.5274 DON NICOLEONE IS IN THE ORDER OF THE SYBILLINE ORACLES SINCE 1982, THE ANCIENT AND MYSTIC ORDER OF SINCE 1996, THE ANCIENT EGIPTIAN ORDER SINCE 2001, AS WELL AS ASTARA MYSTIC ORDER SINCE 1976, THE GRAND DRAGON OF THE ORDER OF THE DRAGON SINCE 2002, AND SINCE 2002 THE SUPREME AL MUFTA "DIVA" OF THE AL MAHDI SHRINERS THE ONLY WOMAN CHOSEN BY THE GRAND AL MUFTI "DIVAN" IMPERIAL GRAND POTENTATE NOBLE: REV. DR. MALACHI Z. YORK-EL "AS SAYYID ISSA AL HAADI AL MAHDI" OF THE INTERNATIONAL SUPREME COUNCIL OF SHRINERS, INC. HEAD OF THE COUNCIL OF 9

After hearing about the terrible situation from TJs in the Ukraine and how to provide immediate help, Turbojugend Radio reached TJs from Russia and openly discussed the political situation in Russia... Real Punk Radio podcast Network brings you the best in Punk, Rock, Underground Music around! From Classic Oi!, Psychobilly and Hardcore to some Classic Rock n Roll and 90's indie Alt Rock greatness!! With Tons of Live DJ's that like to Talk Music From Garage Rock, to Ska.. We are True MUSIC GEEKS!

After hearing about the terrible situation from TJs in the Ukraine and how to provide immediate help, Turbojugend Radio reached TJs from Russia and openly discussed the political situation in Russia and got their perspective of the state of mind within the country of the aggressor. +++PLEASE CONTINIUE TO SUPPORT TJs IN THE  UKRAINE: https://www.facebook.com/groups/2456940071109199+++

Anti-Democracy Propaganda

Can people control your mind with social media? From Cambridge Analytica and Russian Facebook trolls to platforms de-platforming controversial creators, there's a deep concern about outside forces manipulating and meddling with our heads on social media. Are these problems the growing pains of the most revolutionary publishing invention since the printing press, or the seeds of something much more troubling in the future of tech? Find out with your hosts on this week's Told You So!

On today's episode, guest interviewer John Merino speaks with Nina Khrushcheva, a professor in the Graduate Program of International Affairs at The New School in New York City, where her research interests include global media and culture, world politics, Russian politics and culture, and propaganda and Hollywood. Nina presented an Amphitheater lecture during this week on "Russia and the West," on Wednesday, July 18. Nina is the author of Imagining Nabokov: Russia Between Art and Politics and The Lost Khrushchev: A Journey Into the Gulag of the Russian Mind, which is about her grandfather Leonid Khrushchev, the oldest son of former Soviet premier Nikita Khrushchev. Her latest book, In Putin's Footsteps: Searching for the Soul of an Empire Across Russia's Eleven Time Zones, is forthcoming in 2019. Follow her on Twitter at @ninakhrushcheva. Nina Khrushcheva's July 18 speech in the Amphitheater: Video and audio: online.chq.org/… Coverage in The Chautauquan Daily: chqdaily.com/… John Merino is the retired CEO of the Gebbie Foundation in Jamestown, New York, and the primary host of "Chautauqua Chronicles," a rebroadcast of CHQ&A on WRFA 107.9-FM, listener-supported radio in Jamestown.

Aug. 30, 2014. Nina Khrushcheva appears at the 2014 Library of Congress National Book Festival in Washington, D.C. Speaker Biography: Author and scholar Nina Khrushcheva is associate professor in the Graduate Program of International Affairs at the New School and a senior fellow of the World Policy Institute, where she is director of the Russia Project. She has written articles for Project Syndicate: Association of Newspapers Around the World, Newsweek, The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal and many other publications. In her part memoir, part investigative book, "The Lost Khrushchev: A Journey into the Gulag of the Russian Mind" (Tale Publishing), she gives a personal account of her family history and the story of her grandfather Leonid Khrushchev, eldest son of former Soviet premier Nikita Khrushchev. Khrushcheva explores questions about Leonid that have been perpetuated by the Russian media's questions about his position in World War II and what his life and death mean for contemporary Russia. For transcript, captions, and more information, visit http://www.loc.gov/today/cyberlc/feature_wdesc.php?rec=6465

There's a saying, sometimes attributed to Napoleon, “Scratch a Russian and you find a Tatar.” I've scratched a Russian (I won't say anything more about that) and I can tell you that the saying is false: all I found was more Russian. It's true, however, that Russians have always known a lot about Tatars because they've lived cheek-by-jowl with them for many centuries. Before the beginning of European contact with Russia in the sixteenth century, Russians didn't really think the Tatars were terribly exotic. They were just neighbors, albeit occasionally hostile and profoundly heretical ones. The same could be said of the early modern Russian view of, say, Poles and Germans. Things changed, however, when the Russians decided they weren't just “Russians” but were also “Europeans.” That happened, roughly, in the eighteenth century. The Europeans, not being terribly experienced with the peoples of eastern climes, had some rather odd notions about the folks they often called “Orientals.” Over time, the Europhilic Russian elite began to assimilate the Europeans' views of “Orientals.” The process by which they did so, and the cultural consequences thereof, are the topic of David Schimmelpenninck van der Oye‘s lucid, witty, and thought-provoking Russian Orientalism: Asia in the Russian Mind from Peter the Great to the Emigration (Yale UP, 2010). David explores how the Russians came to construct their own unique “Orient,” one that wasn't exactly like the Western version and yet was clearly different from the thing itself. For unlike their imaginative European counterparts, the Russians–in my reading–could never really accept the Western image of “Orientals.” They knew the Tatars and other Asian peoples too well and could see that the Western view didn't match. And then there was the needling suspicion that they themselves were “Orientals”. Thus Russian “Orientalism” was hardly the supposedly subtle yet powerful tool of pith-helmeted, empire-building, expansionists, but instead an attempt at self-understanding. Please become a fan of “New Books in History” on Facebook if you haven't already. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

There’s a saying, sometimes attributed to Napoleon, “Scratch a Russian and you find a Tatar.” I’ve scratched a Russian (I won’t say anything more about that) and I can tell you that the saying is false: all I found was more Russian. It’s true, however, that Russians have always known a lot about Tatars because they’ve lived cheek-by-jowl with them for many centuries. Before the beginning of European contact with Russia in the sixteenth century, Russians didn’t really think the Tatars were terribly exotic. They were just neighbors, albeit occasionally hostile and profoundly heretical ones. The same could be said of the early modern Russian view of, say, Poles and Germans. Things changed, however, when the Russians decided they weren’t just “Russians” but were also “Europeans.” That happened, roughly, in the eighteenth century. The Europeans, not being terribly experienced with the peoples of eastern climes, had some rather odd notions about the folks they often called “Orientals.” Over time, the Europhilic Russian elite began to assimilate the Europeans’ views of “Orientals.” The process by which they did so, and the cultural consequences thereof, are the topic of David Schimmelpenninck van der Oye‘s lucid, witty, and thought-provoking Russian Orientalism: Asia in the Russian Mind from Peter the Great to the Emigration (Yale UP, 2010). David explores how the Russians came to construct their own unique “Orient,” one that wasn’t exactly like the Western version and yet was clearly different from the thing itself. For unlike their imaginative European counterparts, the Russians–in my reading–could never really accept the Western image of “Orientals.” They knew the Tatars and other Asian peoples too well and could see that the Western view didn’t match. And then there was the needling suspicion that they themselves were “Orientals”. Thus Russian “Orientalism” was hardly the supposedly subtle yet powerful tool of pith-helmeted, empire-building, expansionists, but instead an attempt at self-understanding. Please become a fan of “New Books in History” on Facebook if you haven’t already. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

There’s a saying, sometimes attributed to Napoleon, “Scratch a Russian and you find a Tatar.” I’ve scratched a Russian (I won’t say anything more about that) and I can tell you that the saying is false: all I found was more Russian. It’s true, however, that Russians have always known a lot about Tatars because they’ve lived cheek-by-jowl with them for many centuries. Before the beginning of European contact with Russia in the sixteenth century, Russians didn’t really think the Tatars were terribly exotic. They were just neighbors, albeit occasionally hostile and profoundly heretical ones. The same could be said of the early modern Russian view of, say, Poles and Germans. Things changed, however, when the Russians decided they weren’t just “Russians” but were also “Europeans.” That happened, roughly, in the eighteenth century. The Europeans, not being terribly experienced with the peoples of eastern climes, had some rather odd notions about the folks they often called “Orientals.” Over time, the Europhilic Russian elite began to assimilate the Europeans’ views of “Orientals.” The process by which they did so, and the cultural consequences thereof, are the topic of David Schimmelpenninck van der Oye‘s lucid, witty, and thought-provoking Russian Orientalism: Asia in the Russian Mind from Peter the Great to the Emigration (Yale UP, 2010). David explores how the Russians came to construct their own unique “Orient,” one that wasn’t exactly like the Western version and yet was clearly different from the thing itself. For unlike their imaginative European counterparts, the Russians–in my reading–could never really accept the Western image of “Orientals.” They knew the Tatars and other Asian peoples too well and could see that the Western view didn’t match. And then there was the needling suspicion that they themselves were “Orientals”. Thus Russian “Orientalism” was hardly the supposedly subtle yet powerful tool of pith-helmeted, empire-building, expansionists, but instead an attempt at self-understanding. Please become a fan of “New Books in History” on Facebook if you haven’t already. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices