Podcasts about photorhabdus

On April 6-7 1862, some of the injured soldiers at the Battle of Shiloh were touched by angels that went to work healing their wounds with a glowing blessing. Except, the angels weren't really involved. At least, not directly. Listen this week to learn the scientific theory that explains the ethereal glow of the maimed infantry and the fascinating dynamic duo of symbiotes who probably made it happen.   Special note: Dr. Helen Shui is truly a doctor, but is working under a pseudonym for privacy reasons. Dr. Lynne Kramer is using her real name.  Music by Helen Shui and Caplixo. Cover art by Lynne Kramer.  Sources: Why Some Civil War Soldiers Glowed in the Dark by Matt Soniak Angel's Glow: Bioluminescence Uncovered on the Battlefield by Radhika Ganeshan Phosphorescence and Potential Antibiosis Secondary to Photorhabdus Luminescens Wound Contaminations at the Battle of Shiloh, Tennessee 1862 by E. Scott Sills, et al. Toxins and Secretion Systems of Photorhabdus luminescens by Athina Rodou, Dennis O. Ankrah, & Christos Stathopoulos Photorhabdus Luminescens: Virulent Properties and Agricultural Applications by Elizabeth Gerdes, et al.  Comparative genomics of the emerging human pathogen Photorhabdus asymbiotica with the insect pathogen Photorhabdus luminescens by Paul Wilkinson, et al.  Nematode via Encyclopedia Britannica (online) Isolation, Identification, and Molecular Characterization of Strains of Photorhabdus luminescens from infected humans in Australia by M.M. Peel, et al. Photorhabdus Species: Bioluminescent Bacteria as Human Pathogens? by John G. Gerrard, Samantha McNevin, David Alfredson, Ross Forgan-Smith, and Neil Fraser Human infection with Photorhabdus asymbiotica: an emerging bacterial pathogen by John Gerrard, Nicholas Waterfield, Renu Vohra, and Richard ffrench-Constant A Review of Clinical Cases of Infection with Photorhabdus Asymbiotica by John G Gerrard and Robert P Stevens Shiloh Pittsburg Landing via American Battlefield Trust Neonatal Bacteremia and Cutaneous Lesions Caused by Photorhabdus luminescens: A Rare Gram Negative Bioluminescent Bacterium by Ankhi Dutta, Anthony R Flores, Paula A Revell,  and Lisa Owens Please contact us with questions/concerns/comments at defunctdoctorspodcast@gmail.com. @defunctdoctorspodcast on Instagram, Facebook, X (Twitter), Threads, YouTube, and TikTok  Follow Lynne on Instagram @lynnedoodles555

Navikli smo da na bakterije gledamo kao na zle neprijatelje kojima je jedini cilj da nas inficiraju, ali da li je to baš uvek tako? Mi kažemo da nije - poslušajte i zašto. Bakterije o kojima pričamo su: Ideonella sakaiensis Geobacter metallireducens Magnetospirillum magneticum Gloeocapsa magma Streptomyces Deinococcus radiodurans Mesorhizobium loti Photorhabdus luminescens Caulobacter crescentus Aliivibrio

La Naturaleza ofrece multitud de ejemplos de relaciones de amor, o de interés, entre bacterias y otros organismos. Ciertas bacterias del género Photorhabdus viven en simbiosis con gusanos nematodos que infectan a insectos. El gusano libera a las bacterias en el interior del insecto, las bacterias lo matan y los gusanos se alimentan de sus restos. Después gusano y bacterias se asocian de nuevo para infectar a otra víctima. Otro ejemplo asombroso lo tenemos en unas bacterias que son necesarias para inducir la metamorfosis de ciertos animales marinos. Dos recientes estudios descubren ahora que las bacterias pueden generar estructuras moleculares que son diminutas jeringas con las que inyectan toxinas capaces de matar a las células o de inducir su metamorfosis. Estas nanojeringas han recibido el nombre genérico de “estrellas de la muerte”, aunque también se podría encontrar la forma de utilizarlas para liberar medicamentos y convertirlas en “estrellas de la vida”.

Bacteria constantly need to monitor their environment and adapt the bacterial group-coordinated behaviour to changing habitats like nutrition alterations or host variations. Commonly cell-cell communication via acyl homoserine lactones (AHLs)is used to synchronise the behaviour of a bacterial population dependent on cell size. This process is referred to as quorum sensing (QS) and predominantly occurs in Gram-negative bacteria. The typical QS system consists of a LuxI-synthase that synthesises AHLs, and a LuxR-type receptor, which then responds to these AHLs. Upon AHL-binding, the LuxR-type receptor regulates the expression of different target genes and thus influences several processes, like biofilm formation, virulence, antibiotic production or cell-cell interaction. Interestingly, many proteobacteria possess additional LuxR homologs, but lack a cognate LuxI-type synthase. Those LuxR-type receptors are referred to as LuxR orphans or LuxR solos and can expand the regulatory QS network. Photorhabdus species are insect pathogenic bacteria, living in symbiosis with entomopathogenic nematodes. They all possess an exceptionally high number of LuxR solos, but lack LuxI homologs and therefore do not produce AHLs. The function of these LuxR solos, their role in cell-cell communication and the identification of their cognate signalling molecules in Photorhabdus species is the main focus of this work. In this thesis a novel signalling molecule used for QS could be identified for the first time in P. luminescens. This novel QS molecule is an α-pyrone named photopyrone (PPY) and produced endogenously by the photopyrone synthase (PpyS). The PPYs are specifically recognized by the LuxR solo regulator PluR, which then activates expression of the pcf (Photorhabdus clumping factor) operon leading to cell clumping of P. luminescens cells. Moreover, the PpyS/PluR quorum sensing system and its induced cell clumping contribute to the overall toxicity of P. luminescens. Furthermore, a second novel signalling molecule sensed by a LuxR solo of Photorhabdus species could be identified besides PPYs. The insect and human pathogenic bacteria P. asymbiotica lacks a PpyS homolog as well as a LuxI homolog, but harbours a pcf operon and a homologue to PluR, which is named PauR. The signalling molecule sensed by the LuxR-type receptor PauR could be identified, which is neither an AHL nor a PPY. PauR recognises a 2,5-dialkylresorcinol (DAR) produced by the DarABC pathway. Upon binding of the cognate signalling molecule, Summary XII PauR activates expression of the pcf operon. This also leads to cell clumping in P. asymbiotica. Furthermore, the DarABC/PauR QS system also contributes to the overall pathogenicity of P. asymbiotica against Galleria mellonella insect larvae. A bioinformatics approach revealed a high number of LuxR solos present in P. temperata and P. asymbiotica like in P. luminescens. Thereby, several conserved motives of amino acids could be identified, which are potentially important for signalbinding and -specificity. Variations in these amino acid motifs are assumed to reflect the overall variety of signals that can be sensed by LuxR solos. Furthermore, the specificity of the two LuxR solos PluR and PauR towards their cognate signalling molecules, PPYs and DARs, respectively, was analysed. Thereby, it could be shown that the previously identified conserved amino acid motives in the signal-binding domain (SBD), the TYDQCS-motif of PluR and the TYDQYI-motif of PauR, are essential but not sufficient for ligand-binding. Similar as for AHLs, it was unclear how the signalling molecules PPYs and DARs can cross the bacterial cell membrane. In the last part of this thesis the import mechanism for the Photorhabdus-specific signalling compounds PPYs and DARs were identified. Initial evidence could be provided that the membrane-integrated transporter FadL is mainly involved in the import of these hydrophobic compounds, and that they are not transported via simple diffusion across the cell membrane, which is assumed for AHLs. In conclusion, the data that is compiled presents two LuxR solos of Photorhabdus species adapted to sense and respond to novel non-AHL signalling molecules used for QS. Therefore, this thesis reveals that cell-cell communication via LuxR-type receptors goes far beyond AHL-signalling in nature.

Vincent, Jo, Michael, and Elio discuss two examples of dynamic microbial symbioses that switch between mutualistic and pathogenic states.

Background: Photorhabdus luminescens is a Gram-negative luminescent enterobacterium and a symbiote to soil nematodes belonging to the species Heterorhabditis bacteriophora. P. luminescens is simultaneously highly pathogenic to insects. This bacterium exhibits a complex life cycle, including one symbiotic stage characterized by colonization of the upper nematode gut, and a pathogenic stage, characterized by release from the nematode into the hemocoel of insect larvae, resulting in rapid insect death caused by bacterial toxins. P. luminescens appears to sense and adapt to the novel host environment upon changing hosts, which facilitates the production of factors involved in survival within the host, host-killing, and -exploitation. Results: A differential fluorescence induction (DFI) approach was applied to identify genes that are up-regulated in the bacterium after infection of the insect host Galleria mellonella. For this purpose, a P. luminescens promoter-trap library utilizing the mCherry fluorophore as a reporter was constructed, and approximately 13,000 clones were screened for fluorescence induction in the presence of a G. mellonella larvae homogenate. Since P. luminescens has a variety of regulators that potentially sense chemical molecules, like hormones, the screen for up-regulated genes or operons was performed in vitro, excluding physicochemical signals like oxygen, temperature or osmolarity as variables. Clones (18) were obtained exhibiting at least 2.5-fold induced fluorescence and regarded as specific responders to insect homogenate. In combination with a bioinformatics approach, sequence motifs were identified in these DNA-fragments that are similar to 29 different promoters within the P. luminescens genome. By cloning each of the predicted promoters upstream of the reporter gene, induction was verified for 27 promoters in vitro, and for 24 promoters in viable G. mellonella larvae. Among the validated promoters are some known to regulate the expression of toxin genes, including tccC1 (encoding an insecticidal toxin complex), and others encoding putative toxins. A comparably high number of metabolic genes or operons were observed to be induced upon infection; among these were eutABC, hutUH, and agaZSVCD, which encode proteins involved in ethanolamine, histidine and tagatose degradation, respectively. The results reflect rearrangements in metabolism and the use of other metabolites available from the insect. Furthermore, enhanced activity of promoters controlling the expression of genes encoding enzymes linked to antibiotic production and/or resistance was observed. Antibiotic production and resistance may influence competition with other bacteria, and thus might be important for a successful infection. Lastly, several genes of unknown function were identified that may represent novel pathogenicity factors. Conclusion: We show that a DFI screen is useful for identifying genes or operons induced by chemical stimuli, such as diluted insect homogenate. A bioinformatics comparison of motifs similar to known promoters is a powerful tool for identifying regulated genes or operons. We conclude that signals for the regulation of those genes or operons induced in P. luminescens upon insect infection may represent a wide variety of compounds that make up the insect host. Our results provide insight into the complex response to the host that occurs in a bacterial pathogen, particularly reflecting the potential for metabolic shifts and other specific changes associated with virulence.

Background: Photorhabdus luminescens and Yersinia enterocolitica are both enteric bacteria which are associated with insects. P. luminescens lives in symbiosis with soil nematodes and is highly pathogenic towards insects but not to humans. In contrast, Y. enterocolitica is widely found in the environment and mainly known to cause gastroenteritis in men, but has only recently been shown to be also toxic for insects. It is expected that both pathogens share an overlap of genetic determinants that play a role within the insect host. Results: A selective genome comparison was applied. Proteins belonging to the class of two-component regulatory systems, quorum sensing, universal stress proteins, and c-di-GMP signalling have been analysed. The interorganismic synopsis of selected regulatory systems uncovered common and distinct signalling mechanisms of both pathogens used for perception of signals within the insect host. Particularly, a new class of LuxR-like regulators was identified, which might be involved in detecting insect-specific molecules. In addition, the genetic overlap unravelled a two-component system that is unique for the genera Photorhabdus and Yersinia and is therefore suggested to play a major role in the pathogen-insect relationship. Our analysis also highlights factors of both pathogens that are expressed at low temperatures as encountered in insects in contrast to higher (body) temperature, providing evidence that temperature is a yet under-investigated environmental signal for bacterial adaptation to various hosts. Common degradative metabolic pathways are described that might be used to explore nutrients within the insect gut or hemolymph, thus enabling the proliferation of P. luminescens and Y. enterocolitica in their invertebrate hosts. A strikingly higher number of genes encoding insecticidal toxins and other virulence factors in P. luminescens compared to Y. enterocolitica correlates with the higher virulence of P. luminescens towards insects, and suggests a putative broader insect host spectrum of this pathogen. Conclusion: A set of factors shared by the two pathogens was identified including those that are involved in the host infection process, in persistence within the insect, or in host exploitation. Some of them might have been selected during the association with insects and then adapted to pathogenesis in mammalian hosts.