Podcasts about Kada

Laidoje „Prie aikštelės“ viešėjo buvęs krepšininkas, Lietuvos profesionalių krepšininkų asociacijos vadovas Laimonas Kisielius. Pokalbio metu jis dalijosi įžvalgomis apie tai, kada sportininkams reikėtų pradėti ruoštis gyvenimui po profesionalios karjeros, kodėl svarbu investuoti ir laiku persiorientuoti į naują veiklą. Taip pat aptarėme, kokias galimybes ir pagalbą šiandien krepšininkams gali pasiūlyti Lietuvos profesionalių krepšininkų asociacija. Projektą finansuoja Medijų rėmimo fondas: https://www.medijufondas.lt Temos: Laimono karjeros pabaiga (0:00) Kada pradėti galvoti apie karjeros pabaigą? (04:53) Vėlyvas ruošimasis ateičiai (06:15) Psichologinis pasiruošimas (08:00) Žaidėjų „pasimetimas“ ir rebranding'as  (10:43) Pagrindinės finansinės klaidos (12:53) Investavimas ir finansinis raštingumas (17:51) Išsilavinimas vs Krepšinis (21:43) Studijų krypčių pasirinkimai (24:09) Išsilavinimo būtinybė (25:22) Karjeros kryptys (29:14) Sėkmingas persiorientavimas (31:07) Ką siūlo LPKA? (32:18) Asociacijos susikūrimas (36:30) Su kokiomis problemomis susiduria žaidėjai? (38:15) Trys patarimai krepšininkams (39:30)

The return of 32 women and children from Syria, who are linked to the self-proclaimed Islamic State group, has prompted concerns around community safety and discussions around mandatory Countering Violent Extremism (CVE) activities for at-risk individuals. - Dhuuk ciën tïk 32 ku mïth bɔ baai alɔŋ Syria, ku keek aa nuɛ̈ɛ̈t keek kɔc-rot cɔɔl ke ye kɔc akut Islamic State, aa ci diɛ̈ɛ̈r cɔl abɔ pialguöp akutnhom yiic ku ke wën ye yeen dhiɛ̈l wic bi Riɛ̈ɛ̈ŋ Tɔŋ Këëcapɛi (Countering Violent Extremism (CVE)) kä looi tɛn kɔc-wen lëu bi riääk keek yiök.

Kada užkandžių reikia, o kada užkandžiavimas kenkia sveikatai? Apklausos rodo, kad kas ketvirtas lietuvis kasdien užkandžiauja saldumynais. Laidoje „10-12“ – Ugnė Radzevičienė, dietistė, ir Ingrida Augutė, kognityvinės ir elgesio psichoterapijos specialistė, Intuityvaus valgymo konsultantė.Ved. Ignas Andriukevičius

Konuklarımız Kamer Alyanakyan ve Hatice Kaymakçı ile Büyükada'da yapılması planlanan lüks otomobil gösterisi Adalar'ın geleceği için ne anlama geldiğini ve Adalıların bu konuda ne düşündüğünü ele alıyoruz.   

Réécoutez le FG mix avec Kada du vendredi 5 juin 2026

Kviečiame sužinoti kokie renginiai mus kvies turiningai leisti laiką Dzūkijos sostinėje Alytuje šią savaitę!

Hearings for the Royal Commission on Antisemitism and Social Cohesion have revealed many victims and perpetrators of antisemitism in Australia are children. How do we discuss the issue in an age-appropriate way? - Pïŋpïŋ luk Royal Commission alɔŋ Antisemitism ku Ciɛ̈ɛ̈ŋ Mɛtmɛt aci nyuɔɔth kɔc juëëc ye yiɔɔŋ ku kɔc yeen looi kenë antisemitism aa mith. Ye kada lëu bi ɣok yeen jäämic kënë dhel wën thiäk kek ruun?

U ovoj epizodi pričamo o nečemu što često zaboravljamo – da ispod svih uvjerenja, strahova, uspoređivanja i samokritike već postoji osoba koja je vrijedna, sposobna i dovoljna. Kada počnemo otpuštati ograničavajuća uvjerenja i prestanemo se definirati kroz svoje pogreške, prošlost ili tuđa mišljenja, otvaramo prostor za nešto puno veće – slobodu da budemo ono što zaista jesmo.

Réécoutez FG Nomade avec Kada du jeudi 4 juin 2026

Rob is Watching Love Island?? Love Island USA is back for its latest season, and Rob Cesternino, Kirsten MacInnis, and Brian Scally dive into the action-packed premiere. As new singles enter the villa, the hosts tackle everything from steamy first impressions and shock couplings to the quirks of Love Island lingo and fan voting. With bombshells on the horizon and alliances forming, the cast and audience alike are ready to see who pairs up, who stirs the pot, and who goes home. The hosts jump right into the episode's major talking points—breakups on day one, dramatic entrances by bombshells Kada and Gabriel, and bold strategies like challenging the meaning of commitment within the first 30 hours. Rob Cesternino shares his first-timer's perspective, questioning iconic Islander terminology and marveling at the “lip sync for your life” opening. Meanwhile, Kirsten MacInnis and Brian Scally break down the tactical and social implications of the episode's most surprising moments, from challenge-driven kisses to early “explorers” declaring their intent to recouple. Bea and Sean split early, leading to debates about commitment and police PR on reality TV Zach and Kenzie face awkward territory as Zach's wandering eye draws Kenzie's frustration The group debates Love Island's use of health screenings and the practicalities of starting relationships with instant physical challenges Islander Sincere's real name comes under fun scrutiny, as the group wonders about authenticity and casting The arrival of the Love Island M&M's board game adds a playful twist to the recapping experience, cueing laughs about “head turns” and “love triangles” Is being “dumped” after just 30 hours fair game, or do bombshells like Kada and Gabriel shake up the villa too soon? Does public voting steer villa drama or spotlight the most “genuine” couples? The episode leaves plenty to dissect as connections form and fall apart in record time. Catch every twist, insider joke, and strategy breakdown by listening to the full Love Island recap—it's the only way to keep up with every coupling, challenge, and kiss! Chapters: 0:00 Bombshells and Love Island FOMO 6:07 Gabriel and Kada's Big Entrance 10:04 First Breakups Shake the Villa 13:13 Sean's Kinks and Hometown Drama 16:44 Kenzie Feels Zach's Betrayal 21:08 Love Island Voting Revealed 26:58 Couples Clash Over Trust 30:42 Breakfast Drama and Food Talk 33:21 Anaya's NBA Family Revealed 35:41 Bea's Survivor Connection Unveiled 42:27 Recoupling and Eliminations Explained 44:36 Love Island Relationships' Success Rate 46:20 Season Preview and Podcast Schedule LISTEN: Subscribe to the We Know Love Island podcast feed! WATCH: Watch and subscribe to the podcast on YouTube SUPPORT: Become a RHAP Patron for bonus content, access to Facebook and Discord groups plus more great perks!

Tužilac Radovan Lazić u razgovoru sa sudijom Miodragom Majićem otvoreno govori o greškama u proceni kolega, ceni napredovanja u pravosuđu i neophodnosti velikog reseta nakon promene režima. U novom izdanju Radar Foruma, sudija i pisac Miodrag Majić ugostio je Radovana Lazića, tužioca Apelacionog javnog tužilaštva u Novom Sadu, predsednika Upravnog odbora Centra za pravosudna istraživanja i člana Predsedništva Udruženja tužilaca Srbije. Predstavljajući svog gosta, Majić je istakao da je Lazić jedan od retkih tužilaca koji je uvek bio spreman da otvoreno govori o problemima u sistemu, ali je naglasio i da se njihova mišljenja o pojedinim društveno-pravnim procesima i te kako razlikuju, što ih, kako kaže, nikad nije sprečavalo da vode civilizovani dijalog. Na samom početku razgovora, Majić je otvorio pitanje dometa ustavnih reformi koje su, prema proklamovanim ciljevima, trebalo da donesu osamostaljivanje tužilačke organizacije. Radovan Lazić se osvrnuo na prethodna normativna rešenja, ali je naglasio da se pozitivni efekti ne mogu posmatrati izolovano od dubokih promena i buđenja koje se u međuvremenu dogodilo u samom društvu. „Iako je prošlo nekoliko godina od te reforme, sadržinski i dalje mislim isto što i tada. Kada je reč o normativnim rešenjima za tužilaštvo – jer se sudstvom nisam toliko bavio – podsetiću da je prema prethodnom Ustavu sve tužioce, koji su tada zapravo bili samo šefovi tužilaštava, birala Skupština na predlog Vlade. Takođe, i sve članove Državnog veća tužilaca birala je Narodna skupština, iako je bila vezana preliminarnim izborima kandidata u samom tužilaštvu. Ali šta nam je u praksi donelo to normativno okruženje? Teško je posmatrati izolovano njegove pozitivne efekte, jer su se u međuvremenu dogodile ozbiljne društvene promene. Pre svega, pokrenuo se studentski pokret i društvo se probudilo. Ljudi su postali svesni dugotrajne uzurpacije institucija – i tu više ne govorim o preuzimanju, već o otvorenom otimanju.“

Krašto apsaugos ministras Robertas Kaunas sako turintis Jungtinių Valstijų patikinimą, kad rotaciją baigiančius amerikiečių karius pakeis nauji, tačiau kada tai įvyks – neaišku. Naujienų agentūra BNS pranešė, kad amerikičiečių kariai palieka Lietuvą, o kada atvyks nauji ir kiek jų bus kol kas nėra aiškumo. JAV peržiūri savo pajėgų dislokavimą Europos šalyse. Neseniai buvo praneša, kad stabdomas 4 tūkstančių karių dislokavimas Lenkijoje, tačiau vėliau JAV prezidentas pareiškė, kad dislokuoja mūsų kaimyninėje šalyje 5 tūkstančius karių.JAV prezidentas Donaldas Trumpas naujuoju JAV ambasadoriumi Lietuvoje ketina skirti ne diplomatą, o su bankų priežiūra ir finansų reguliavimu dirbusį teisininką Keithą Noreiką. Ne diplomatus D. Trumpas jau paskyrė ir į ambasadas Latvijoje ir Estijoje.Prasidedant maudynių sezonui ugniagesiai gelbėtojai ragina visuomenę prie vandens telkinių ir juose elgtis atsakingai. Anot jų, per pastaruosius penkerius metu šalyje nuskendo 20 vaikų, 15 nepilnamečių – išgelbėti. Gelbėtojai sako, kad daugiausia žmonių skęsta kaimo vietovėse.Įdomių faktų rubrikoje istorija apie tai, kaip Maiklas Džeksonas gegužę vėl tapo populiariausiu atlikėju pasaulyje.Ved. A. Skamarakaitė

✓ Zašto NBA sudije sviraju previše ličnih grešaka, osim kada ne sviraju dovoljno? ✓ Kada je preterano meta-igranje prihvatljivo? ✓ Kako je finansijalizacija upropastila profesionalni sport?

Kviečiame sužinoti, kokie renginiai Dzūkijos sostinėje Alytuje vyks pirmąją kalendorinės vasaros savaitę.

When we're exposed to events or ideologies that go against our own beliefs, we can feel what experts call 'political grief'. Some say it's playing a role in the growing polarisation of our society. - Kada smo izloženi događajima ili ideologijama koje su u suprotnosti s našim uvjerenjima, možemo osjetiti ono što stručnjaci nazivaju „političkom tugom“. Neki smatraju da ona doprinosi sve većoj polarizaciji našeg društva.

When we're exposed to events or ideologies that go against our own beliefs, we can feel what experts call 'political grief'. Some say it's playing a role in the growing polarisation of our society. - Tɛ̈ ci ɣok ŋääny ke looi rot wala tɛ̈ktɛ̈k wën cië caath keek tɛdaan ye ɣok gɛɛm thin, ɣok aa leu buk yiök keek kë ye kɔc leŋ ŋiëëc cɔɔl tɛ̈n 'dhiëën ciɛ̈ɛ̈c'. Kɔc kɔ̈k aye kä lueel alëëŋ alɔŋ deen ye looi dit ci tektëk thook rot juäk baai panda.

Kur yra riba tarp nuovargio ir perdegimo? Kada poilsio jau nebepakanka, o nuolatinis skubėjimas, įtampa ir bandymas viską spėti tampa pavojingu gyvenimo režimu? Apie šiuolaikinio žmogaus santykį su darbu, poilsiu ir savo ribomis – pokalbis su psichologe, knygos „Perdegimo anatomija“ autore Ugne Juodyte.

Šiemet LRT radijas mini 100-metį, ta proga iki birželio 12-ąją vyksiančios radijo gimtadienio šventinės transliacijos, kalbamės su radiją kuriančiais, pavyzdžiu kitiems tapusiais radijo žmonėmis. Pokalbis su ilgamete kultūros laidų rengėja, LRT Klasikos laidų vedėja, žurnaliste Jolanta Kryževičiene.Kur yra riba tarp nuovargio ir perdegimo? Kada poilsio jau nebepakanka, o nuolatinis skubėjimas, įtampa ir bandymas viską spėti tampa pavojingu gyvenimo režimu? Apie šiuolaikinio žmogaus santykį su darbu, poilsiu ir savo ribomis – pokalbis su psichologe, knygos „Perdegimo anatomija“ autore Ugne Juodyte.Rubrika „LRT Girdi“: tvarkant vieną Vilniaus kelio ruožą, vairuotojai masiškai pažeidinėja taisykles, blokuoja sankryžą, o piktnaudžiavimui užkardyti niekas nesiima jokių veiksmų. Kiekviena kelionė, teigia į redakciją besikreipęs žmogus, varo į neviltį. Kaip modeliuojama eismo organizavimo tvarka kelio remonto atvejais?Prieš 16 metų sraiges Panevėžio rajone pradėjusi auginti Janina Krikštaponienė sako, kad iš sraigių galima pagaminti įvairiausių produktų – nuo burgundiškų sraigių iki spurgyčių. Tam, kad sraigių mėsa būtų tinkama maistui, ją tenka virti netgi 3 valandas. Dažniausiai sraigių produktus moteris pristato savo ūkyje edukacijų metu.10–12. Ved. Ignas Andriukevičius

Kviečiame sužinoti su kokiais renginiais Dzūkijos sostinėje Alytuje išlydėsime pavasarį ir pasitiksime vasarą!

Tazedirekt Sohbet'in bu bölümünde konuğum, sofraları, tarifleri ve özenli sunumlarıyla ilham veren Selin Kutucular. Selin'le ilkbahar sofralarının onda uyandırdığı duyguları, çocukluğundan bugüne uzanan aile sofralarını ve Büyükada'nın mutfak hafızasındaki yerini konuştuk.Selanik'ten Büyükada'ya taşınan aile hikâyelerinden, “Büyükada Yemekleri-Dedemin Sofrası” kitabına; mevsimsel sofraların öneminden son dakika misafirlerine hazırlanabilecek kurtarıcı tariflere uzanan çok keyifli bir sohbet oldu. Bir yandan da Selin'in imzası haline gelen özenli masa düzenlerinin inceliklerini ve “mükemmel masa”nın sırlarını keşfettik.Keyifli dinlemeler!

Ako želiš izravnu podršku na putu kako postići vrhunske rezultate bez sagorijevanja, pozivam te da se pridružiš mom programu Mentor pri ruci: https://saraperanic.com/mentor-pri-ruci/U novoj epizodi podcasta istražujem čest poduzetnički izazov s kojim se susreću mnoge žene - osjećaj frustracije jer mislimo da nismo napravile dovoljno, što nas izravno vodi u preplavljenost i kreativni zastoj. Kroz stvaran primjer klijentice koja balansira između dva kompleksna posla i brige o petomjesečnoj bebi, otkrivam kako unutarnji kritičar preuzima kontrolu kada imamo nerealna očekivanja od sebe. Umjesto da prepoznamo svoje trenutne životne okolnosti i proslavimo ono što smo postigle, često nam se javlja osjećaj srama i neadekvatnosti jer vjerujemo da bismo trebale raditi osam sati dnevno, dok je naše stvarno dostupno vrijeme zapravo svedeno na svega 20 ili 30 minuta fokusiranog rada.Ključni zaokret u poslovanju ne događa se onda kada magično dobijemo više sati u danu, već kada jasno definiramo što su nam prioriteti i kada se primijeni održiva strategija. U ovoj epizodi donosim praktične smjernice kako velike, zastrašujuće projekte rastaviti na manje zadatke prilagođene kratkim vremenskim blokovima, čime potpuno eliminiramo lutanje i neučinkovitost. Kada znamo točnu brojku minuta kojima raspolažemo i u skladu s tim posložimo svoje korake, naši dugoročni poslovni ciljevi postaju ostvarivi bez žrtvovanja privatnog života. Poslušaj epizodu i saznaj kako postići vrhunske rezultate bez sagorijevanja, a ako želiš moju izravnu podršku na tom putu, pridruži se mom programu Mentor pri ruci: https://saraperanic.com/mentor-pri-ruci/U ovoj epizodi ćeš saznati:Kako prepoznati nerealna očekivanja koja si postavljaš i zašto tvoj problem najčešće nije efikasnost, već ignoriranje trenutnih životnih okolnosti.Na koji način ti unutarnji kritičar krade dragocjeno vrijeme i kako osjećaj nedovoljnosti i osjećaj srama zamijeniti samopouzdanjem i fokusom.Kako maksimalno iskoristiti minimalno dostupno vrijeme (čak i ako je to samo 20 ili 30 minuta dnevno) bez lutanja i skakanja sa zadatka na zadatak.Formulu za određivanje prioriteta - kako iz onoga što te trenutno najviše „žulja“ u poslu definirati glavni projekt i ostvariti zadane ciljevi.Značenje pravila „ne možeš vrč vode preliti u jednu čašu“ i kako velike projekte uspješno rastaviti na male, lako savladive korake.Zašto za vrhunske rezultate nije presudna količina vremena, već jasna strategija koju u tom vremenu primjenjuješ.

Adalar Müzesi'nin Büyükada'da 22 Mayıs'ta açacağı Büyükada Rum Yetimhanesi Sergisi'ni konuklarımız serginin küratörü Deniz Koç ve Adalar Vakfı Adalar Müzesi Yönetim Kurulu Başkanı mimar Ali Erkurt ile konuşuyoruz. Büyükada Rum Yetimhanesi İstanbul'un en önemli miras yapılarından birisi ve yıllardır nasıl korunacağı ve kamusal hayata yeniden nasıl kavuşturulacağı tartışılıyor. Bu sergi, Büyükada Rum Yetimhanesi'nin barındırdığı hafızayı dönemin sosyal tarihi bağlamında ayrıntılı ele alıyor.  Sergi aynı zamanda Yetimhaneye ev sahipliği yapmış binanın korunması konusunda yıllarca verilmekte olan mücadeleyi de kapsamlı bir şekilde anlatıyor.

Adalar Müzesi'nin Büyükada'da 22 Mayıs'ta açacağı Büyükada Rum Yetimhanesi Sergisi'ni konuklarımız serginin küratörü Deniz Koç ve Adalar Vakfı Adalar Müzesi Yönetim Kurulu Başkanı mimar Ali Erkurt ile konuşuyoruz. Büyükada Rum Yetimhanesi İstanbul'un en önemli miras yapılarından birisi ve yıllardır nasıl korunacağı ve kamusal hayata yeniden nasıl kavuşturulacağı tartışılıyor. Bu sergi, Büyükada Rum Yetimhanesi'nin barındırdığı hafızayı dönemin sosyal tarihi bağlamında ayrıntılı ele alıyor.  Sergi aynı zamanda Yetimhaneye ev sahipliği yapmış binanın korunması konusunda yıllarca verilmekte olan mücadeleyi de kapsamlı bir şekilde anlatıyor.

In this profound exploration of Matthew 21:40-46, Tony Arsenal and Jesse Schwamb unpack the Parable of the Wicked Tenants and its devastating indictment of Israel's religious leadership. The hosts navigate the complex theological terrain of kingdom transfer, covenant faithfulness, and the identity of God's people across redemptive history. With careful attention to the text's original context and its implications for the church today, they examine how Christ presents himself as the rejected cornerstone—the one upon whom people either fall in repentance or are crushed in judgment. This episode offers rich insights into supersessionism, the remnant theology of Romans 11, and the practical call for Christians to examine whether they're submitting to Christ as the true cornerstone or attempting to usurp his rightful place. Key Takeaways The Self-Condemning Verdict: The chief priests and Pharisees unknowingly pronounce judgment upon themselves when they declare the wicked tenants deserve destruction, demonstrating how the natural conscience can discern God's justice even when blind to personal complicity. Kingdom Transfer as Covenant Transition: The "taking away" of the kingdom represents not the abandonment of God's elect remnant but the historical-redemptive transition from the typological Old Covenant administration to the New Covenant church gathered from all nations. The Cornerstone's Double Judgment: Christ as the cornerstone presents two modes of encounter—those who fall upon him in repentance are broken but healed; those upon whom he falls in final judgment are ground to powder with no remedy. Visible vs. Invisible Church Distinction: The visible identification of God's people shifted from the geopolitical nation of Israel to the universal church, while the invisible elect have always been saved by grace through faith in the coming Messiah. Fear of Man vs. Fear of God: The Pharisees' restraint from seizing Jesus due to fear of the crowds (rather than fear of God) exemplifies how the wicked are dominated by human opinion rather than divine accountability. Infant Baptism and Covenant Community: The joyful inclusion of children in the visible covenant community through baptism reflects God's gracious promise sealed to those who contribute nothing to their own covenant status. Fruit-Bearing as Evidence: The "new tenants" are characterized not by works-righteousness but by evidential fruit—the genuine works that flow from "true and lively faith" worked by the Holy Spirit. Key Concepts The Irony of Self-Condemnation The theological and pastoral power of this parable reaches its climax when the religious leaders, failing to perceive themselves as the wicked tenants in Jesus's story, pronounce harsh judgment upon the hypothetical villains: "He will bring those wretches to a wretched end." This moment mirrors Nathan's confrontation of David after the Bathsheba affair, yet with a tragic difference—these leaders never experience David's repentance. Calvin observes that the natural conscience, even when blind to personal guilt, retains an "hidden impulse to identify with justice." The Pharisees demonstrate total depravity in high definition: they possess enough moral clarity to recognize egregious covenant-breaking in the abstract, yet remain entirely blind to their own embodiment of that very wickedness. This irony serves as both judgment and warning—we all possess an uncanny ability to see sin clearly everywhere except in the mirror. Kingdom Transfer: Covenant Continuity and Discontinuity The phrase "the kingdom of God will be taken away from you and given to a nation producing its fruit" requires careful theological handling to avoid both replacement theology (in its pejorative sense) and dispensational fragmentation. The Reformed understanding maintains covenant continuity: there has always been one people of God, defined not ethnically but by faith in the Messiah. What changes is the visible administration of the covenant. Under the Old Covenant, the visible church was largely coterminous with ethnic Israel—a geopolitical reality with boundaries, a zip code, and national identity. Under the New Covenant, the visible church explodes these ethnic and geographic boundaries, fulfilling God's promise to Abraham that "in your seed all nations will be blessed." This is not Plan B; it's the eschatological unveiling of what was always intended. The "breaking off of natural branches" (Romans 11) refers to covenant unfaithfulness resulting in exclusion from visible covenant privileges, while the faithful Jewish remnant—the apostles, early believers, and the ongoing elect from Israel—remain fully incorporated into the church. The vineyard hasn't been abandoned; it's been opened to "other tenants" who will render the proper fruit: Gentiles grafted in alongside believing Jews into the one olive tree of God's redemptive purposes. The Cornerstone: Salvation or Destruction Christ's invocation of Psalm 118:22—"the stone which the builders rejected has become the chief cornerstone"—followed by his dual judgment ("whoever falls on this stone will be broken...on whomever it falls, it will scatter him like dust") presents two exhaustive options for relating to Jesus. The cornerstone in ancient construction was the foundational stone by which all other stones found their proper alignment and orientation. To fall upon this stone willingly—in repentance, faith, and self-abandonment—is painful. It shatters pride, self-righteousness, and autonomy. But this breaking leads to healing, to being properly "squared" and aligned with reality as God has constructed it. The alternative is catastrophic: to have the cornerstone fall upon you in final eschatological judgment is to experience irreversible, total destruction—being "ground to powder" with no possibility of remedy. The practical application is urgent: we must examine ourselves continually to ensure we're not attempting to be our own cornerstone, measuring righteousness by our own standards, aligning the universe to ourselves rather than submitting to Christ as the measure of all things. Memorable Quotes "There's never a time where that righteousness is removed or unapplied, but we are constantly faced with a choice as to whether we want to be the kind of people who render our fruit unto the Lord, as the faithful tenants when the unfaithful tenants are replaced. Or do we wanna be the people that reap wicked fruit and keep for ourselves?" — Tony Arsenal "The vineyard of God is still let out, the fruit is still demanded, the cornerstone is still laid. Blessed are they who receive him—and also get those babies into church." — Jesse Schwamb "This is not a wall you're gonna run through. Like you're gonna smash into this wall and it's gonna crush you. And if you are not properly assigning the cornerstone its place... the whole thing is gonna crush you." — Tony Arsenal Full Episode Transcript [00:01:05] Jesse Schwamb: Welcome to episode 492 of The Reformed Brotherhood. I'm Jesse.  [00:01:14] Tony Arsenal: And I'm Tony. And this is the podcast with ears to hear. Hey brother.  [00:01:18] Jesse Schwamb: Hey brother.  [00:01:19] Parable Recap [00:01:19] Jesse Schwamb: Well, the time has finally come for us to close out our discussion in Matthew 21. This is the Parable of the Vine growers, and everybody should just go back and list everything we said so far, but I think here's how we could sum it up. Jesus's authority gets challenged and he sets a trap so beautiful that we should put it into a museum. He tells basically the religious bigwigs, this whole story where tenants speed up servants, they kill the air. They generally behave like it's an HOA literally run by the devil. And then he asks them this question, so what should the owner of the vineyard do And the chief priest. Chest puffed up. Basically shout out the answers to their own indictment. Smoke 'em. Give the vineyard to somebody who isn't garbage. Listen fellas, you just preached your own funeral. So in this we get to see this total depravity in 4K. Sovereign grace skips the credential gatekeepers and it lands on the tax collectors and the gentiles. They elect the vineyard, the self-righteous, get the rock. And we're gonna close out what all of that means, including probably not a small amount of talk about the kingdom being transferred, whatever that means, and maybe a little engrafting. Aah, Romans 11 style. It's all there for us. And that is what is coming up. [00:02:34] Affirmations Setup [00:02:34] Jesse Schwamb: Of course before we can do any of that, we can't even get there. Tony, before we do affirmations, denials, you and I both know it's our contractual obligation. It's what the people want all over the world. If we skip this, there will be some kind of riot revolt. So we gotta start there. Let's not get too excited yet. So I'm curious as always, are you affirming with something or you not against something for this episode?  [00:02:58] Tony Arsenal: I am, I'm affirming, uh, this is gonna be like people are gonna grow and roll their eyes a little bit.  [00:03:04] Infant Baptism Joy [00:03:04] Tony Arsenal: I'm affirming infant baptism today. We had a lovely infant baptism at church, um, and a couple recently had a child. Um, there's been, this was a kind of a particularly, um, poignant baptism. Um, the, the mother was in the hospital for several weeks before the baby was born, um, with some medical challenges, so was in. In the hospital. In the hospital for like, I want to say probably four weeks, which is a long time. Um, they have several other children, which makes it even harder. Um, and then, uh, then the baby was in the hospital for quite some time. He came a little early and then had some other issues. Um, and so this family was out of church for quite some time dealing with these health issues, and we, we all miss them very much. So it was a very sweet moment. Um, and it's just a, a good reminder, right? And, and the way our church does it is, you know, the pastor, the family comes up, they do vows, they do the baptism, but he calls all the children forward and the children come and sit, uh, right in the front row and they watch this all happen. Um. Which is, is very sweet. And you know, I, I went up there with Augie, and Augie was sitting on my lap and he was very, he was like super locked into this, this whole thing, which is, uh, which was nice to see. So I'm affirming infant baptism. It's a beautiful, beautiful picture of the gospel. Um, it's, it's God's promise being sealed to someone who contributes nothing to, um, to that promise contributes nothing to, uh, their own, um, position in the church or status in the church. They contribute nothing. Um, in most cases they're not even aware of what's going on. So I know not all of our listeners are, uh, are covenant infant Baptists, uh, type people. Um, so yes, I get it. You disagree, but there is something just sweet and beautiful, uh, even I think even for people who aren't quite sold on infant baptism. Um, and I think even sometimes for people who are kind of opposed to infant baptism, I think we've commented in the PA past that there's kind of this impulse that I think all Christian parents have that their children should be. Treated in a certain way that's different than how a non-Christian family treats their children. Right. Um, so there is kind of this instinct that the, there's, whether it's a formal status or just sort of a, a way of thinking about things, there is this impulse that the children of believers are somehow set apart in different, and of course, the, the Presbyterian Covenant Baptist, um, position would, would formalize that through the rite of baptism, uh, at least in part. So I'm affirming infant baptism, both theologically, but also just experimentally today. Like it was just, it was just a balm to my soul to see this, um. And like I said, the congregation has been praying for a long time for the health, uh, and the, the welfare of this family, um, and been, you know, doing meal trains and all the stuff that churches do. But it was, it was a very sweet moment, um, to see the pastor scoop this little baby up in his arms and be able to sort of introduce him to the church as the newest covenant member of the congregation. Uh, it was just a very nice moment. [00:05:59] Baptism Dedication Common Ground [00:05:59] Jesse Schwamb: I think you're right. We can all agree that there's something really beautiful about God growing his church, at least the visible church, through just the multiplicative effect of. People having children, there's something beautiful about that, and then welcoming them in an official way into your congregation, into your midst. Interestingly, in my church, there was a baby dedication today and I was also equally moved though like I would say the promises that were invoked during that time, the equipment's made are very different than what you might hear during kind of pedo infant baptism. You're right in that the spirit of this that is like a representation kind of bringing forward of the child to say he or she is part of us and we're making a commitment to raise them in admonition of the Lord is a really lovely thing. It's like a public recognition that God is providing a manifest blessing in our midst, and that he is growing and working out his church and he's doing it by just bringing new people into it who are being, who are the subjects of procreation. Creation itself, but procreation and how can you not be like, just excited about that. And, and also a little bit like it's also, and I'm not trying to denigrate any practice here, but also just on the face also super adorable. Like when you, when you see a pastor scoop up, like you said, a little child, whether that's to pray with them and dedication or to baptize them. Either way, it's super just like lovely and just pulls in your heartstrings. Yeah. In like this very spiritual way, not just in kind of an emotional kind of way.  [00:07:26] Tony Arsenal: Yeah. Yeah. And I, you know, I don't, I think, um, when I think back, you know, Augie's, obviously you know this, but Augie was dedicated, um, Addie was not. Um, but when I think back to the vows we took, when we dedicated Augie, there are some differences, but there's also a lot that's not different like the sure close to like, raise up your child in the church and to like, pray for them and set a good example. And then, and then the sort of reciprocal vows that the congregation typically takes, that the congregation will do what they can to support the family as they, they raise this child and the Lord. Um, you know, even in, even in a lot of contexts, like in the Presbyterian church, I'm in like prayers that this, this child would come to know Jesus and would, would come to confess the faith for themselves and become a full, you know, full communicate member of the church. Like, those things are all present. So as much as I think, um. As much as I wanna acknowledge that infant baptism or, or covenant, I, I say covenant baptism versus, um, sort of like baptist theology writ, large credo Baptist theology, which is covenantal, but differently covenantal in most cases. Right. Um, even though that is a dividing line, and I think like it's a real dividing line. There's a real division that exists and that there's good theological historical reasons why those divisions exist. There still is so much that is the same. Um, in terms of how Baptists and, and Presbyterians or however formed, you know, PR Christians, um, re reflect on and think about their children. There's some differences, but in terms of like. We all want our children to come to know Jesus. We all want their first memory to be worshiping in the church and loving the Lord. We, we don't want them to ever remember a time where the name of Christ was not on their lips as their savior. Um, all those things are the same and even the, the way we promise before God and, and primarily before God, but before others, even the way we promise to nourish them in, in right doctrine and nourish them in good teaching and bring them into the church and, and set a faithful example. All of those things are the same. So I I I, I never want to diminish the fact that there are differences 'cause there are real differences and there are important differences. But I also think we often sort of like. I think because we've talked about this before, like Reformed Baptists and Presbyterians are so close that we have to bicker over the things that are different. It's like you're, it's like when you fight with your brother on whose side of the room it's on. Like you're so close that you have to find the little things to really bicker about and then you really, really bicker about them. And I think that kind of like describes the, the Presbyterian Baptist divide in a lot of ways. I know there's a lot of people that would say like, Lutherans are closer to Presbyterians and those people are just, I dunno, they're just wrong. Um, on, on, maybe on baptism, they're, they're not wrong. But in terms of general theological principles, like, you know, Westminster Confession, London Baptists, confession, like, it, it's 95% the same content. Sure. Um, and 95% like the same confession, not just the same like words, but the same meaning of the words. And, um, so yeah. Anyway, that's my affirmation. Infant baptism. It was a joy. I was happy to see it. Um, uh, we have a ton of little, little babies in the, the church. It's funny 'cause another, another, um. A couple announced today that they were expecting, and we've, we've had basically pregnant women in the church for, you know, obviously like at least nine months if someone is still pregnant. But like we've had, we've had this like rotation of, of women delivering babies for like, at least, probably, at least 16, 18 months of, of constantly having people who are, are expecting, which is really a great joy to see. So I, I love it. I love the church. I love the Presbyterian church. Um, and this was just another great example of, of the beauty of, uh, a robust confessionalism and a robust presbyterianism. [00:11:08] Jesse Schwamb: The way in which you said that made it sound like you're about to make like a grand historical statement. Like, we've had pregnant people in the church since the first century.  [00:11:18] Tony Arsenal: Well, I mean that's probably true, but  [00:11:19] Jesse Schwamb: yeah, it definitely  [00:11:20] Tony Arsenal: true. Not, not our church. Our church has only been around, our particular church has only been around for like 10 years, so I'm sure there have been times during that period where there were not pregnant people  [00:11:29] Jesse Schwamb: pregnant. It just sounded like we were going all the way back as if like to, again emphasize and maybe this isn't, this is as fair statement, like how faithful God has been like from the beginning. There's always been. Pregnant lady Church. Look, look at how faithful God is.  [00:11:42] Mic Grabbing Babies [00:11:42] Jesse Schwamb: And, and this is true, I like to play this game when there is a baby dedication. I'm not sure what the sound system is like in your church, but often our, our pastors wear like the tiny little like Backstreet Boys style. It's probably outdated reference, but microphone that comes over the ear and to the mouth and it's very discreet. But the game I like to play is like once, once he takes the child for a time of dedication or specifically prayer, the, the goal is to see like how long before that baby goes for the mic. Because as soon as like a baby sees a mic right there, it's like, oh yeah, this is the best thing that's happened to me in my tiny little life.  [00:12:20] Tony Arsenal: Yeah, it's like an angler fish is really what it is. Yes. It's like that glowing bulb that just sits in front of its face and it's, the baby's just gotta grab it. [00:12:27] Jesse Schwamb: It's just too tempting. It's just too tempting. And I, and I love, you can tell like our pastors are really adept at being able to keep the prayer going and like discreetly maneuver the child, keep the child happy. It's, it's really an amazing thing. So altogether, I'm totally with you on so many levels. It's so good to see that happen in the church. And I'm with you on that. We gotta take joy in that For sure.  [00:12:48] Tony Arsenal: Yeah. Jesse, what do you got for us tonight?  [00:12:50] Book Breath Pick [00:12:50] Jesse Schwamb: Yeah, something that's entirely unlike everything you just said. Certainly. Well, maybe, I guess there is a large spiritual component to this, but it's, I would say, for me, totally unexpected book recommendation and I came across this 'cause it was recommended to me and a while back, the keen or the listener who's been with us for a really long time, or a member that we talked about the book or why we sleep, this book became for me, like the equivalent of that in a totally different kind of topic or genre. It's called breath. The New Signs of a Lost Art by James Nestor and it explores how the way that humans breathe profoundly affects our health, our performance, our longevity. It's a book that is filled with both science and pseudoscience, which the author is really good at distinguishing and calling you to think about those things. But it's really totally changed how I understand like this little pattern in Habits of breathing. And it's a really interesting book of course. Like he draws from a lot of like religious influences, including of course the Judeo-Christian one. And I think that it even drew me back to understanding how God created us. And he did in a very specific way that text's giving some great description to the breadth that he gives us and how he gives us that breath. So if you're looking, I guess, for a little bit of a read, so that might surprise you about something that you might thought was automatic and simple in life and also that might. Be able to bring you some recommendations on how to better your health. Again, we're not doctors, but we are routinely considered among the top 50 healthcare podcasts. Then I would say this would be an interesting book for you to check out.  [00:14:19] Tony Arsenal: Yeah. Yeah. I haven't read it, but it's been recommended to me and one of the, one of the takeaways, actually, I think it might have been my doctor, my my PCP who mentioned this to me is like, if you wanna improve your health drastically, like just make it a practice of breathing through your nose. Yes. Like something that simple and straightforward has pretty significant health impacts of like. Like the way that your brain processes breath when it comes through your nose, the way that like, there's more filtering that happens with breath, so the air that gets to your lungs is cleaner. There's just a lot of, um, I haven't read it. I've, I think I actually have it somewhere, but I have not read it yet. Um, I, I should, I should take a look at it. I, I've heard good things about it.  [00:15:01] Jesse Schwamb: At the very least, if you're a Christian, it'll cause you to marvel again. That's how beautifully complex God has made the human body and how it seems entirely impossible that anyone could even logically reasonably conclude that somehow we are just time plus matter, plus chance, and that all these things got worked out. I don't wanna spoil some of the punchline. A part of the book is about this. Breathe through your nose, which you might think was just kind of an innocuous decision. Breathe through your nose, breathe your mouth. How, how different could it be? They actually do an experiment where they plug their noses, the author and somebody else for, uh, several, like 10 days straight. And do all these these things under medical supervision to see what the impact is. And I'll leave you to read it so you can hear that. There's also something fascinating, absolutely fascinating about carbon dioxide and a study that's done where they actually have people inhale a little bit of carbon dioxide and what it does to the body. In other words, like the system that God has put into play to ensure that the body gets the kind of right amount of oxygen that it needs and how it functions when it's given the warning side of carbon dioxide, even when. Your lung capacity and your oxygen, your blood doesn't change. There's a fascinating section on that. So I didn't expect to be this interested in the book and generally I take a little time before I recommend a book. I finished this a couple weeks ago and I'm still thinking about it. So, and I'm trying to put some things into practice, including I try to do some running and for the longest time I just thought, well, when you run, like even at any like moderate speed, like you have to breathe through your mouth, this book challenges some of that. So lo and behold, I went out and started to try just a little bit to see if I could just breathe through my nose. It turns out it's totally possible, like all this time I just thought that was impossible, like God didn't make us that way, and it's actually improving how I feel when I run and the running that I'm able to do. So I am surprised, I, I'm shocked by all this, and it's just as simple as understanding breath. Who would've guessed.  [00:16:56] Tony Arsenal: Yeah. I mean, I've heard it's a great book. I, I, I. It never ceases to amaze that the, the more we look at the human body, the more we look at God's creation, the more we see the fingerprints of our creators. So not, not  [00:17:07] Jesse Schwamb: right.  [00:17:07] Tony Arsenal: Sounds like a great book. I can't recommend it from personal experience, uh, although I've heard very good things.  [00:17:12] Reading Matthew 21 [00:17:12] Tony Arsenal: So, Jesse, I think we should probably just get into it because this is now week three of, uh, one week episode and, uh, we want to wanna dig in and we wanna wrap it up so we can move on to the next best thing out there, which is of course, the parables of Christ. [00:17:26] Jesse Schwamb: Let's get some. So I'm gonna read for us starting in verse 40 because if you've been tracking then you've already been with us through the first part of this parable, and it's notoriously or variously called parable the vine growers, or I kinda like the husband men, just because that's fun to say, and you don't get to drop husband men like very often. But vine dressers, vine growers, vine workers, it's all the same. But here's starting in verse 40. This is after Jesus has already explained the parable. He set it up for them and he's gonna bring for the indictment. So Jesus says, and therefore, when the owner of the vineyard comes, what will he do to these vine growers? They said to him, he will bring those wretches to a wretched end and he will rent out the vineyard to other vine growers who will pay him the proceeds at the proper seasons. Jesus said to them, did you never read in the scriptures the stone, which the builders rejected? This has become the chief cornerstone. This came about from the Lord in his, marvelous in our eyes. Therefore I say to you, the kingdom of God will be taken away from you and given to a nation producing the fruit of it. And he who falls on this stone will be broken to pieces, but on whomever it falls, it will scatter him like dust. And when the chief priests and the Pharisees heard his parables, they understood that he was speaking about them. And although they were seeking to seize him, they feared the crowds because they were guarding him to be a prophet.  [00:18:48] Irony Blind Leaders [00:18:48] Tony Arsenal: Yeah, that, that last little section here is just such, it's like dripping with such irony,  [00:18:53] Jesse Schwamb: so good  [00:18:54] Tony Arsenal: that like they, they are so blinded by their own, um, I dunno, ambition isn't, maybe isn't even the right word, but something in that, that neighborhood, they're so blinded by their desire to. Maintain their own status quo, their own uh, their own status. That they fear the crowds because the crowds hold them to be a prophet,  [00:19:15] Jesse Schwamb: right?  [00:19:16] Tony Arsenal: When in reality, like there is a prophet in their midst and much more than a prophet, uh, and they can't see it because of their own blindness. So I'm stoked to get into it. This is such, like we said, this is such a, like on the nose, paril, it's crazy. This is so much like, you know, Nathan's, you are the man kind of parable. Like yes, that's right, except there never is a, you are the man moment for them. They never get it, which is. Stunning. Like I, I, it just sort of is like, I don't even know what to make of that. [00:19:41] Jesse Schwamb: Yeah. There is like a wild blindness. I've been thinking about that a lot in our past conversations, but it culminates here. These chief priests and elders, I would say strangely, but I think that this is probably true of all of us, and maybe especially me, perhaps not yet, like perceiving themselves to be the vine growers here in view, they render this verdict of severe justice. It seems like you, you wanna say to them? Like, guys, guys, pull up, hold up a second. Yeah. Take a step back before you overreact here, because you're about to condemn yourselves and in the Greek here, this expression like, miserably destroy these wicked men. Or it gets like this double wretched in our translations. Mostly he will bring those wretches to a wretched end. It's this rhetorical intensification. It's incredible. And I, I think there's at least like two truths here. That come to my mind. One is, we've talked about before, but is in line with what you're saying, that the natural conscience, when not even aware of its own complicity, can still discern the justice of God's judgments. So here are these men who are so prone almost, I think what Calvin says elsewhere, like that we have this hidden impulse to identify with justice. Even when we can't see that we are the ones perpetrating something of injustice, still we can't help but cry out. We can't even help but identify it. And here they. Accurately identify it. And even though they're putting themselves exactly in the cross here, they cannot help but basically cry out that how egregious this behavior is of these vine growers that Jesus has basically, you know, created in this hypothetical environment, even still there, they're filled with rage and the rage gets turned on them. So the Pharisees here, of course, function as this unwitting witness to the righteousness of God's wrath against covenant breakers, even though they, they don't see it.  [00:21:29] Kingdom Transfer Talk [00:21:29] Jesse Schwamb: Uh, the second thing I think that comes to my mind, and maybe this is like more to the point, is that. The verse foreshadows this transfer of the kingdom from the Jewish nation to a new people that would bring forth its fruits, which I realize if I bring that up right now, that we've just committed to like six episodes just on that topic probably. But yeah, but like, we're gonna have to come to it because there's so much here. And the phrase of this, like, let out his vineyard unto other vine growers or husbandman, it does to me like anticipate this calling of the Gentiles and the formation of the Christian Church and in, in this way. It's not to me. The abandonment of the elect, remnant of Israel, but it is like the breaking off of the natural branches and then this engrafting of the wild olive shoots that come through like Allah, Romans 11. So it's, it's not like from one nation to another simply, but from like the carnal seed to a spiritual seed gathered out of all the nations, that that's wild. Right? I, I think that's all in view here. And it's like a kind of a crazy thing to say. It's certainly like a wild thing to say, no pun intended. And I imagine like, unexpected thing to say.  [00:22:38] Tony Arsenal: Yeah. Yeah.  [00:22:40] Supersessionism Clarified [00:22:40] Tony Arsenal: Let's think about that a little bit because I think too, there's, there's almost an element of, um. Man, I'm gonna get a lot of flack for saying this. You're, there's almost like a legitimate replacement theology here, right? Like replacement theology. I got covenant theology, you know, reformed, um, reformed theology often gets slandered as, you know, supersessionism or replacement theology, uh, with this idea that like, it's, it's interest. Uh, you have to have dispensational presuppositions for that phrase to even make sense because like the reformed paradigm is that there is one people of God full stop. And yes, like the identity of the one people of God seems to sort of like morph from the Jewish national people to now like Jews and Gentiles and actually predominantly Gentiles in the scope of like the whole history of the church. But what I mean by this is like, there's a visible church in the Old Testament, in the old, under the old Covenant, and the visible church under the old covenant is the national people of, of Israel. Right. By and large. Right. Um, and there are, there are sort of like Gentile, um, Clingons, not like the Star Trek people, but like gentile, like attachments to that throughout the history of, of Old Testament, um, theology. Um. That visible, that visible identification of this is the people of God being the Jewish people. Uh, these are the people that are the vineyard, the, they're the, the owner or the tenants of the vineyard or the, the visible Jewish people of the geopolitical nation of Israel under the old covenant that does sort of like get superseded by the church in the church age, in the new covenant,  right?  [00:24:24] Tony Arsenal: But where, where Supersessionism or the accusation of Supersessionism goes wrong is that there is this distinction between the visible and invisible church. And that distinction is what prevents us from being like, sort of like true replacement theologians in the way that the, the dispensationalist wanna paint us. So I, I think you're right that there is a lot to say here about the fact that, um, and, and this is where it gets, um. We have to be careful systematically. Right. God, God doesn't have to pivot. He doesn't have like a plan B. It's not like the Gentiles are the plan B, but there is a sense in almost in which the way that this is presented, the way that it appears in the scriptures is actually, yeah, there is almost like this plan B, like there is the geopolitical ethnic people of, of Israel, the Jewish people under the old covenant. And, and they don't do what they're supposed to do. They don't follow the terms of their covenant. They don't accept the kingdom that is bequeathed to them under the terms of the old covenant. And they, they reject that kingdom because of a disobedience. And, and I think what Christ here is narrowing in on is it's not just disobedience, right? It's not sort of like, um, accidental ancillary disobedience. It's not generalized disobedience. It is this sort of like usurpation of God's rightful status as the ruler and king of the nation. That's right. The the people, the, the Pharisees. And the chief priests and the scribes and the Sadducees, they want to be the rulers of the nation. They want to, they, they seem to wanna take the place of God, at least as far as Christ is presenting it. In this, they wanna usurp the kingdom. They want to take the heirs, uh, rightful inheritance, and they want to claim it for themselves. That is not a generalized disobedience, it's a special t type of covenant unfaithfulness that causes God to causes and kind of air quotes that causes God to hand over the kingdom to another people. Right. Partially, I think, uh, we don't need to get into Romans, the Romans 11 stuff, but partially I think because that's actually the way that he's going to ultimately save the Jewish people, right, is by sort of making, making them jealous of the Gentiles. Like there's a, there's a real element of that, that the salvation of the Gentiles is actually for, in some sense is for or unto the salvation of the Jewish people or the, the faithful Jewish remnant that's all here. And, and you can't really get past that in this parable. Um, this is why I think a, a lot of dispensationalist, um, uh, some of the classic dispensational sources would actually see like this, this is not for the Jewish church. This, this is for the Gentiles. This is actually part of the parentheses, um. You know, and, and again, dispensationalist divide all that stuff up differently, but this is a really interesting section for us to talk about that we can't, we can't just gloss over that. [00:27:11] Jesse Schwamb: I certainly don't mean to imply that it's wild because it's unexpected. I think it's wild because interestingly, the Pharisees, the teachers here, they challenge Jesus authority and his response to that is to challenge their covenant faithfulness.  [00:27:24] Tony Arsenal: Right?  [00:27:25] Jesse Schwamb: So it's not just if he turns it around, he uses this opportunity to explain what's going to happen to them as those who are, like you said, were supposed to be representative. And I think critically like the qualifying phrase. That that's using the text here, which shall render him the fruits in their seasons. That's like really important because these new vine growers are characterized by their fruitfulness. So this is not like a doctrine of works righteousness, but it's evidential fruit. And that's why, and I had to look this up and the Westminster Confession confession, chapter 16, good works are quote the fruits and evidences of true and lively faith, which I love. I was trying to find that language true and lively faith. So the visible church under that new administration is identified by the fruits of repentance, faith, and obedience worked out by the Holy Spirit. Again, I think that's all that is in view here, that that's a lot to say. But you know, famously, like you've kind of intimated, when we go back to the Old Testament, even we find when the Israelites leave triumphantly from Egypt, that they're accompanied by those outside of Israel. We find that other characters like Grh who continually want to identify with a Yahweh whom God is saving and drawing onto himself and here is kind. Him, Jesus, at least representing as the son of God. That kind of cli climactic view. Speaking from the prophet register again saying, this is what I was saying to Abraham. I said, like from your seed, all these nations in this spiritual sense will be gathered out. So there'll be a single nation as it were in Christ. And even now, I'm telling you, I'm breaking down those boundaries. But I think to your point, importantly Tony, in part because you have failed in the covenant promises and you who were to represent and to heed and to lead, have fallen down. And so now you're gonna trip over this stone and it's going to crush you. And as a result of that, the vine, the vine growers will be, or the vineyard itself will be turned over to those who bear this true and lively fruit.  [00:29:22] Tony Arsenal: Yeah. Yeah.  [00:29:23] Israel Failure Remnant [00:29:23] Tony Arsenal: There's an interesting, um. There's an interesting dynamic here that actually strikes me as kind of similar. It's a little bit more opaque, but similar to, uh, like Joseph in, uh, in Egypt, right when his brothers come and he says, you meant this for evil, but God meant it for good. Mm-hmm. There's a, there's an element of here, we've talked about the parables. That's sort of like systematic theology in story form. Um, there's a reality here that it's both true, that God always intended for the kingdom to be expansive and, and to expand beyond the nation of Israel. To be this universal, global lowercase c Catholic, universal church universal in the sense that it's not bound by any particular nation, by any particular geopolitical reality. Um. That's true, but it's also true that the reason, uh, on a sort of like horizontal level that that's true is that Israel failed. Right? It so God always intended for Israel to fail, yet Israel is responsible for the fact that they failed. Yes, that's right. Um, and, and, and again, we, we, we sort of commented on this before, like there are some in our broader reformed circles that turn this into a sort of antisemitism, like a sort of hatred for the Jewish people. And I don't think, I don't think that there's any warrant in scripture for that. In fact, I think scripture speaks strongly against that. Is that, um. Not necessarily because there's any particular unique special affection that God has for Israel, like, like the modern Jewish people, but, but that, like racism in general is prohibited by the Bible. But I think where we do need to be clear though, is that there is a real failure. It's a true, genuine failure on the part of the first century Jewish. Leaders and people, um, with a faithful remnant. Right? There was, um, we're, we're getting, you know, we're in the springtime and we've already had, uh, we've already had discussions about this. We've already done Easter, but like there is always conversations around Palm Sunday of like, are the crowds that are following Jesus into, into town screaming, you know, yelling, Hosanna? Is that the same crowds that are yelling crucify him a couple days later? Um, I tend to think like, no, like actually, like the people who are saying crucified, crucify Christ are probably like the Jews who live in Jerusalem or like the, primarily the religious leaders. There's a whole host of Jewish believers and kind of the hoy pallo, the, the people out in the country that absolutely follow Jesus. Like they follow him as the Messiah. They, they confess him in many cases. They convince him to be, um, they confess him to be God, to to be the savior, to be the, the figure from Daniel seven, the son of man. Um. There's a reality in which the Jewish remnant absolutely recognize Christ and they persist in the church, right? The earliest Christians were all Jews, and you know, there was a few Gentiles along the way, you know, and maybe not even Gentiles like Samaritans. I don't even know if you would call them gentiles. They're kind of this midway point, but in Jewish gentil. But there are people throughout Christ's ministry, right? Cornelius or not Cornelius, the Centurion recognizes that this is the son of God. Like there are people, the s Phoenician woman, there are people who are not part of Israel proper, who even in the, in the midst of Christ's ministry are recognizing him as God and as Messiah and as the savior of the world. But, but by and large, the earliest Christian movement was Jewish people. It was the faithful remnant of, of Israel who recognized that their Messiah had come. That is true. And at the same time. The, probably the majority, and especially the rulers and the leaders of the Israel, you know, the Jewish faith in the first century absolutely rejected him. And this is what I, this is what I think is wild, is I think sometimes we think that, um, the prophecies and the understanding of Christ and what the messiah, who the Messiah was to be and what to expect, we think of those as like super obscured and super hidden until Christ comes and then all of a sudden they're really obvious. Christ doesn't seem to treat them that way. Right? Right. He tells this parable and they rightly identify that, and this is a, this is such a thinly veiled parable. Like this is like, you killed the prophets. You're going to kill me. And there's going to be consequences. Like he practically says that outright. Um. He treats that as like they should obviously know this, right? The, have you never read in the scriptures, the stone, the builder rejected has become the cornerstone, right? This was the lord's doing. It is, and it is marvelous in their eyes that have you never read?  [00:34:06] Decree in Rejection [00:34:06] Tony Arsenal: That is a, that's a rhetorical question with the implied answer of, of course, you've read exactly like he's not, he's not teaching them something that he anticipated is new to them. He maybe is teaching them something that he anticipated they maybe you didn't recognize. But actually I think probably like, uh, there probably were many among them that were like, oh yeah, we are doing this. But then almost like we're powerless to stop themselves from moving forward in that.  [00:34:32] Jesse Schwamb: Right.  [00:34:32] Tony Arsenal: Sort of like wicked plan. [00:34:34] Jesse Schwamb: Right. Yeah. And I think we could extend that as well to say that this rejection of Christ by this Jewish leadership, which of course was a incredible failure, like you're saying, it wasn't an accident, it wasn't an unforeseen tragedy. So just like interestingly in Acts four in his sermon where Peter quotes from the same Old Testament passage about Christ being the cornerstone, you know, it was prophesied long before. And so the doctrine of God's eternal decree, I think finds v vivid illustration even here. This is all the Lord's doing. Yeah. And even the wicked rejection of the Messiah is serving this purpose, this sovereign purpose of God's great exaltation. And so it's fascinating, and we should marvel at the fact that, again, like God means what he says when he says like He uses what is weak to overcome that which is strong, or to embarrass the strong, he uses that which seems foolish. To make the wise themselves, the ones who are actually foolish in the same way.  [00:35:29] Cornerstone Unites Church [00:35:29] Jesse Schwamb: This very stone, which men in their malice cast aside on that day. God is in his wisdom setting as this chief cornerstone. And I love like that idea of this phrase, this head of the corner denoting that amazing preeminence of Christ, that Christ is not merely included in the building of the new Covenant church. He is its chief and constituent stone that joining together both like the Jew and the Gentile, finally into one structure. And that's really, I think to your point, that's the great mystery of the hidden ages from the past. That that's the thing which Christ is bringing to like this grand display, like out on the stage in the open, in front of everybody. He's drawing it up, he's calling it to account. And so in that way, the same Jesus that was rejected by men is in God's account of inestimable value. And that should be like, I think, familiar to most of us because like there a form tradition has always insisted that. The true theology always issues in doxology and the cross and exaltation of Christ are not merely these facts, which we give these intellectual ascent, but we, we confess them as mysteries which provoke us to adoration of who God is. It's the excellency of Christ expounding at length, like the wondrous conjunction of Christ's humiliation and his exaltation, which finds its pattern here, rejected by men, glorified by God.  [00:36:50] Tony Arsenal: Yeah. Yeah.  [00:36:52] Works Covenant Failures [00:36:52] Tony Arsenal: And, and this is, um, we, we commented in our first, uh, episode on this par ball. This is not isolated to just the rulers of Israel at the time of Christ, right? This is in reality, kind of like a reflection of every failure of the covenant of works. In some sense, every failure to hold the covenant of works boils down to an attempt to make oneself, God. Right. This was Adam's failure in the garden. Um, Eve, Eve was the first person to eat the fruit, but Adam, Adam was responsible for that and he, he also ate the fruit and they, they did so in part because they thought it was useful to make them like God and, and in an illegitimate fashion. And they knew it was an illegitimate fashion. It's not as though Adam and Eve suddenly were like, maybe we can eat the fruit. Maybe like we actually are fine to do it. Like they knew it was still forbidden. Right. They did it anyways. And the Pharisees here, um, are in a real attempt. Um, they are trying to take the role of Messiah for the people. They're trying to be the savior of the people in sort of shepherding and guiding them into this like. Ultra legalistic Puritan, like puritanical in the worst sense, um, kind of approach to the law. Um, this is the, the story of Old Testament Israel, right? What is the first thing that the Israelites do? Um, at Mount Sinai? The first thing they do is try to fashion gods so that they have a tame God that they can control and that they can actually be God's over. So I think this is really key and, and this is where it becomes practical for us, is that. I think we always are faced with a choice, right? There's, there's obviously those who are Christ, who the son is set free. He's set free indeed, and they will never not be his people. Like you never become not justified. If you were justified, you always forever more are justified. Justified is a final. It's, it's the future judgment of God's people dragged and dropped into the present and applied. It's the righteousness of Christ applied. So there, there's never a time where that righteousness is like removed or unapplied, but we are constantly faced with a choice as to whether we want to be the kind of people who render our fruit unto the Lord, uh, as the faithful, the sort of the implied faithful tenants that are going to be brought forward when the, the unfaithful tenants are replaced. Or do we wanna be the people that reap wicked fruit and keep for ourselves? And I think that's, that's really the thing. Like we're either gonna rep. Fruit of wickedness, or we're gonna reap fruit of righteousness. And the only thing to do with fruit of righteousness is surrender it to the Lord. But we often are faced with that choice, like, are we gonna reap our own wicked fruit and keep it all to ourselves right, uh, to our own detriment? Or are we gonna go ahead and be the faithful tenants that give the Lord what he deserves?  [00:39:46] Kingdom Transfer Explained [00:39:46] Jesse Schwamb: We're seeing so much of the simplicity of God here that like you and I have said so many times before that his loving kindness, his long suffering ness is his righteousness, is his justice, is his wrath. And so I think it's helpful, again, to remind ourselves that we're, we are talking, or he specifically is speaking of the kingdom of God here. And again referring to this visible administration of the covenant of grace, not to the inward and invisible kingdom of saving grace, which as you just said, can never be lost from those who possess it, which by the way is a really important distinctive of reform theology. There are many that would disagree with that statement, and I think really much to their harm in, in disagreement with the scriptures themselves, this one in particular, but it is this external administration, the privileges, the ordinances, the oracles of God. That is being transferred from the Jewish nation as a corporate body to a new and broader people of God. And because I know that sounds very extreme, I did look up Calvin and his commentary on this and let me read what he says because this is interesting. I think even this could possibly mis be misunderstood. But here's Calvin who can say it better than I. He says, quote by these words, he means that God would deprive the Jews of the honor and the privilege of being his peculiar people and would call the Gentiles that out of them he might form a church end quote. And going back to what you said earlier, I'm with you. I, I. I mean, this is not, I think as some have wrongly concluded, like replacement theology in like a wooden sense. I, I see this still as like this historical redemptive transition from the typological administration of the old covenant to the eschatological fulfillment of the new. And the elect remnant of Israel is not cast off, but the national like typological privileges are being transferred to the Catholic church, gathered from all nations. And in that, I really do see this wonderful confluence of God's loving kindness, his, his fidelity to the promises that he's made and his wrath being manifested all at once. And somehow Jesus, of course, in complete perfection, can bring that all to bear in this tiny little story.  [00:41:51] Tony Arsenal: Yeah. Yeah. And and isn't it just like the master teacher to like, put all of this baked into this? I mean, that's right. We think of this as like a long parable, like I think,  [00:42:02] Jesse Schwamb: right?  [00:42:02] Tony Arsenal: I think like it's, it's amazing how we think of parables as, you know, like this is a short one. A short one is a couple sentences, a long one is like a half a dozen sentences. Like, and of course like Christ is teaching broader than this. He's teaching more than this. Just, this is what's recorded by the inspiration of the Holy Spirit. This is what Matthews preserved for us.  [00:42:22] Stone Breaks or Crushes [00:42:22] Tony Arsenal: But you're right, there's so much baked into this little parable and I think, um, there's something to be said about this idea of like. Not only do those who smash against the, the rock, the, the cornerstone, those who smash against the rock, like those who who fall on the rock are broken to pieces, but also the rock falls on others and smashes them to pieces. Right? And, and there's something to be said about the fact that, and I'm not exactly sure how I wanna articulate this, but it's only those who like recognize the proper place of the rock and don't either let it fall on them or don't smash themselves against it. You know, we always joke about like running through a wall. Like this is not a wall you're gonna run through. Like you're gonna smash into this wall and it's gonna crush you. And if you are, if you're not properly assigning the cornerstone it's placed, right? The cornerstone is, is the stone that's placed in the foundation of a building that all the other stones find their orientation and their proper alignment based on. [00:43:26] Jesse Schwamb: Right.  [00:43:26] Tony Arsenal: You might think of this sometimes. I've heard this articulated as like the, the arch stone. I think it's a little bit different than that. Um, but it, the, the idea is the same, right? Like there's a stone in an arch. If you think of like a classic Roman arch, you have these piles of stones until you put the final arch stone in. That, in that stone is what makes the arch stable. Until that point, either side can fall, but if you don't properly set that arch stone where it's supposed to be, then the whole thing is gonna crush you. It's gonna fall down on top of you at some point. I think this is a little different. This is the cornerstone of a, this is more like the cornerstone of a building. This is the stone that the rest of the building, building is oriented against and is aligned with. If you get that wrong, then you have a, you have like a crooked wall, a wall that's not set, that's not straight. It's not stable. What this is saying and what this, this prophecy right from, from Psalm one 10, I think I should probably look it up, but I haven't yet. But this prophecy that Christ is referring to this, this prophetic statement in the Psalms that he's assuming the audience is familiar with, right? I think that's a really important point. Like he's not only assuming that they're familiar with it, there's rhetorical force of kind of like, of course you understand this principle that there is a cornerstone coming. There is something or someone who is coming that all other things will be measured against. And if you're either in alignment with this, with this person who is coming or you're out of alignment with reality, this thing is understood by them. It just is so critical and I think like the, the, a lot of the parables don't have explanations built into them. Some of them do. We've talked about some of them. A lot of them don't, this one does, but it's kind of like a really surprising way to explain it. And there's so much, um, the more that I look at this, the more we talk about it, this really is so similar to David and Nathan, right? Right. When with the, the affair with Bathsheba, he is saying to the Pharisees, look, you're the man. Like, you're the one here. You're the guy. You guys are the wicked tenants that are gonna, you've killed the prophets. Right? Um, I'm losing my, my timeline a little bit, but John the Baptist either had been executed or would be executed shortly at this point, right? So like the, the most recent prophet either was already killed or, or Christ knew of course he was going to be killed. Um, he's saying, look, you guys are the ones that are doing this and you're going to kill me. Right. And this is obviously what the prophecy is, that you think you're going to come against the cornerstone, but in reality you're going to shatter yourself upon me. You think you're gonna come against me, I'm going to crush you. And rather than say, you know, as ba, you know, as David does, where he repents, he, he fasts and he, he refuses to eat. He's, he's in mourning over both the loss of his infant, but, but more so over his own sin, I think is the picture the text gives us. Um, he's mourning trying to uh, sort of like reverse God's decision, but there's a genuine repentance to it, right? That's where we get Psalm 51, like creating, clean me a clean heart, oh God, renew a right spirit in me. There's none of that for the Pharisees, there's none of that for the sadist of the chief priests. They just continue to smash themselves against this rock, not recognizing that it's actually the rock that is crushing them. [00:47:05] Jesse Schwamb: Yeah, it's, it's a bit like, I'm gonna speak like a little maybe beyond my depth here, but there's a little bit of like that Nathan, like Strategem, and then this is where I'm outside my own experience. And then a little bit like maybe like WWE the rock in terms of like. If you want some come and get some, right? It's a little of both. And of course the passage ends very tragically, well ends humorously by them, you know, saying that at some point they were like, they understood in these parables, again, this is one of three of the same kind of topic of variety, but that Jesus was referring to them, which is funny. You wanna be like, yeah, it took a, took a long enough, I guess, guys, but you finally got it. But then that last sentence of like, they still sought to kill him. So to your point, even after all of this, there wasn't repentance. And we do get these, I think, two very distinct judgements that are depicted here, which you've already kinda led us into this first, like, whoever shall fall on the stone shall be broken. You know, to me, I think that's invoking this idea that in this life, there we are, we can be brought to brokenness through the gospel and to fall upon Christ. And repentance. And faith is to be broken in self, in pride and self-righteous. It's a breaking that does lead to healing. But this second judgment, you know the one, but on whomever it shall fall, it will grind him to powder, grind him to dust, I mean. Man, think about what a vivid image that is. I mean, that's like the more terrible of the two. That that's like the, yeah. Final Es logical judgment of those who persist in unbelief and it, it admits there's like no remedy. So there are only two ways to relate to Christ. You either fall upon him willingly in faith and repentance, which is painful, but it is saving, you know, to have him fall upon us in judgment is final in damning, and so that's what Christ presents here. [00:48:48] Psalm 118 in Context [00:48:48] Jesse Schwamb: It's, it's both of these things and you're right, it is brilliant that he goes to Psalm one 18 even that as a setup, because as you've kind of already said, I love to think, of course that's, can you manner the tone in which this was said to these scribes and Pharisees? Because of course the, the secondary indictment here is like, listen, you guys who like your great pride is that, you know, the scriptures really well. Have you read this part is familiar to you. Yeah. Can you tell me where that is? So like, we, we should go there just, just quickly. This is Psalm one 18 because I think that here again is, as I'm hearing it in context. There are some verses surrounding this that I think we might be surprised that they come right on the heels of this idea of the stone. So just a couple verses. In Psalm one 18 being in verse 22, the stone, which the builders rejected, has become the chief cornerstone. This is from Yahweh. It is marvelous in our eyes. Here's the verses that we might not recognize. Come right after it. This is the day which Yahweh has made. Let us rejoice and be glad in it. Oh, Yahweh, save. Oh, Yahweh, succeed. Blessed is the one who comes in the name of Yahweh. We have blessed you from the house of Yahweh. Yahweh is God, and he has given us light by the festival sacrifice with corns to the horns of the altar. You are my God, and I give thanks to you. You are my God, and I exalt you. Give thanks to Yahweh for his good, for his loving kindness endures forever. And so this idea that there's rejoicing in which day, I mean, usually we kinda say that it's like, well, it's a beautiful day out. It's the Lord's day. This is the day that Yahweh is like that. That's true. But also here in particular, it is this blessed day of Yahweh giving the stone, which the builders reject and which has become the chief cornerstone. And that stone is some will run headlong into and shipwreck their lives and others will be crushed underneath it. And guess what? This is the day which Yahweh has made and we're gonna rejoice and be glad in that.  [00:50:41] Tony Arsenal: Yeah. Yeah.  [00:50:43] Mark's Angle on Fear [00:50:43] Tony Arsenal: The other thing I think, you know, we. Should, um, maybe not spend any time on, 'cause we're at like, out, like minute 50 of a 60 minute podcast. But just going to, to Mark's version of this parable real quick. Um, starting in verse, uh, this is chapter 12, verse 12. It says, and they were seeking to arrest him, but feared the people for, they perceived that he had told the parable against them. So they left him and went away. And the, the main difference here, the reason I'm reading this is Mark chooses a d. Concerning them. The verb is, or the preposition is Perry. So it's kind of like this idea that he was, he was sort of speaking around them. He was talking about them. Mark uses the, the preposition, proce, which is not, um, not against, in like the same, uh, direct sense. We might use the word against. That would be something like Kada. Um, but he's, he's speaking this parable towards them or to them, um, against them. He's, he's directing the parable at them. And this is, this is, we, we commented on this a little bit in the, the first episode here. Um, he is speaking to the crowds. But he's telling the parable about or against or concerning the Pharisees and the scribes, and they perceive this, right. The, the gospels here don't say that the crowds perceive this. Right. And I think that's key. Like the Pharisees basically look at this and say, uh, we better get this under control because he's talking about us. Right, right. Like, I'm just picturing Paul Washer's. I'm not trying to say Paul Washer is a Pharisee, although some people would probably make that connection. But like I'm, I'm just hearing Paul Washer's voice saying like, I don't know why you're clapping. I'm talking about you. He's speaking to the Pharisees here. And it's interesting because Matthew associates the, the, uh, Pharisees. Cowardice in acting against Christ, uh, because they fear the crowds and because the crowds believe Christ is a parable or is a prophet Mark associates. And again, both of these things are true, right? This is holy scripture. This is inspired, these are not contradictory accounts. This is facets of the same diamond. Mark associates this with, they fear the crowds. Um, because they had taken him. They, they understood that the parable was being spoken against them, right? So there's this element that the Pharisees are not only understanding that the, the parable is about them, they feared them because the crowds believe that Christ is a prophet and that prophet is speaking this parable against them, right? So like they're, they're recognizing full on that it's only a matter of time before the, the general population, the general people that are listening to Christ recognize that he's overturning. Not only the Pharisees, the entire geopolitical nation of Israel, he's overturning the ethnic based reality, the geopolitical based reality, that God's people have a zip code and that zip code is Jerusalem. That zip code is this little si, this little tract of land the size of like Vermont and New Hampshire in the Mediterranean, like off the Mediterranean Sea. He's overturning that. And the, the Pharisees, the educated people, the, the Sadducees, the chief priests, the rulers, they recognize it's only a matter of time before the people understand what Christ is doing. They, they follow him as a prophet and this is what he's prophesying. And

✓ Kada će kompjuteri zameniti lekare? ✓ Ko može da vidi 150 pacijenata na dan? ✓ Kako je propao uptodate?

Kokie renginiai mūsų laukia Alytuje?

The daily lives of many Australians revolve around toilet access. But while public toilets are a vital part of urban infrastructure, they're often unsafe, unusable or hard to find. - Pïïr kɔɔc juëëc Australians ee rot gööt ke yiök tɛn lɔ rool. Mɛ̈n tɛ wën ye kuat eben lɔ rool ee abɛ̈ɛ̈ŋ kewën rilic gɛ̈ɛ̈th dit yiic, keek kaam dɛt yiic acïe piäth, aci leu bi keek luöi wala ril yiic bi yiök.

Cat - Robo - Bojack - Naveen have a very open and honest conversation about 2026 TN Election Results. The 'Vijay Wave' & what DMK missed seeing? -(0:10:00) - Where it went wrong and right?(00:15:28) - What was the change which Vijay promised?(00:26:49) - Problem with Anti-Incumbency with party in power(00:31:19) - Transparency and Accountability(00:43:00) - Where did DMK go wrong while fighting TVK?(00:53:00) - How to reach out and have a conversation with a TVK Core voter?(00:59:14) - What should we talk today during the modern times?(1:21:05) - Postal Votes Impact(1:23:53) - The oppotunity to politicize TVK Voters(1:24:15) - ADMKs Vote % all these years(1:27:28) - What happened in Kolathur?(1:35:37) - How social media users hopped on Vijay's bandwagon(1:37:44) - What did brand vijay reap in this election?(1:41:06) - What happened in Tuticorin constituency?(1:42:46) - Edappadi constituency(1:44:49) - How Whistle Logo reached people?(1:50:18) - Should Udhayanidhi be promoted as Deputy CM later?(1:58:12) - Was Vijay very relevant at the right place & right time?(2:00:00) - What happened to the 'Left' party?(2:07:18) - What should 'Left' do to address modern day problems?(2:16:56) - Populist and Welfare schemes(2:25:35) - The impact of Swing Voters(2:39:00) - What you are expecting from TVK these 5 years?-Binge Listen to all Tea Kada Benchu episodes with this

A young woman leaves work and vanishes into the night, leaving a trail of digital clues behind. What happened to Kada Scott? If you have any information about the case of Kada Scott, please contact the Philadelphia Police Department at 215-686-8477 or submit a tip online at phillypolice.com. If you or someone you know is experiencing domestic abuse, please contact the National Domestic Violence Hotline at 1-800-799-7233 or text START to 88788 for free and confidential help. Episode transcript, media, and sources available at ⁠bitesizedcrimepod.com⁠. Have a case you'd like me to cover? ⁠⁠Let me know!⁠⁠Follow the podcast on social media:Instagram⁠⁠ @bitesizedcrimepod⁠⁠TikTok⁠⁠ @bitesized_crime⁠⁠YouTube⁠⁠ @bitesizedcrimepod⁠⁠Facebook⁠⁠ @bitesizedcrimepod⁠⁠Support the podcast by leaving a 5-star rating and review on ⁠⁠Spotify⁠⁠ and ⁠⁠Apple Podcasts⁠⁠!Go to⁠⁠ https://betterhelp.com/bitesized⁠⁠ for 10% off your first month of therapy with BetterHelp and get matched with a therapist who will listen and help #sponsored Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Ako često stavljaš druge ispred sebe kako bi izbjegla konflikt, sačuvala mir ili bila “dobra”, ovaj video je za tebe.

U ovoj epizodi podkasta razgovaram sa prof. dr Marijom Srećkov Pavlović, sportskim psihologom, o tome ko zaista oblikuje mladog sportistu – roditelj, trener, psiholog ili okruženje – i kako izgleda mentalni razvoj na putu od deteta do šampiona. Govorimo o tome kada je pravi trenutak da sportista potraži psihološku podršku, šta razlikuje zdravu motivaciju od pritiska, kao i kako odnos trener–sportista utiče na samopouzdanje, strah od greške, tremu i sposobnost da se pritisak takmičenja iznese.Prof. dr Marija objašnjava šta zapravo znači i  kako se gradi mentalna snaga kroz različite faze karijere. Zašto je opasno vezivati identitet isključivo za rezultat i koje psihološke tehnike  pomažu sportistima da u ključnim momentima ostanu prisutni „u zoni“.Pričamo i o psihološkom aspektu povreda, oporavku i povratku bez straha, kao i o važnosti balansa sporta, obrazovanja i privatnog života, uz konkretne poruke za mlade sportiste, trenere i roditelje koji žele da budu prava podrška, a ne dodatni izvor pritiska.00:00:00 Uvod 00:03:30 Kakva je uloga sportskog psihologa?00:08:20 Zdrav odnos trenera i sportiste00:20:00 Prvi kontakt sa sportistima00:24:00 Faze u sportskoj karijeri00:30:30 Koncept mentalne snage00:37:10 Jasna komunikacija00:41:40 Tekvonda klub00:47:20 Kada trener izgubi svoju ulogu00:51:35 Strah od neuspeha i samopouzdanje01:03:20 Koncentracija01:10:30 Povrede01:19:10 Poziv sportistima na rad na sebiPratite nas na društvenim mrežama!Instagramhttps://www.instagram.com/jaomile_podcast/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/JAOMILEPODCASTTikTokhttps://www.tiktok.com/@jaomile_podcastTwitter https://twitter.com/mileilicGost: Marija Srećkov PavlovićDatum: 11. April  2026. Autor i domaćin: Tina KrajišnikLokacija: Studio Long MileProdukcija: Jao Mile#jaomilepodcast #marijapavlovic #tinakrajisnik  #crvenazvezda #kkpartizan #NikolaJovic #nba  #nikolajokic #abaliga #jokic #bogdanovic #euroleague #doncic #nikolatopic #mindset

U ovoj epizodi podkasta „Mindset“, gošća je Sanja Malagurski – proslavljena odbojkašica koja je svoj profesionalni put započela veoma rano, odlaskom u inostranstvo sa samo 16 godina.Govori o prvim velikim koracima u karijeri – pozivu za seniorsku reprezentaciju i odlasku na Olimpijske igre u Pekingu, ali i o izazovima koji dolaze uz rani profesionalizam i dugu inostranu karijeru .Otvoreno pričamo o periodima koji se ređe vide spolja – o oporavku nakon dve operacije prednjih ukrštenih ligamenata, o psihološkim izazovima i momentima kada je bilo najteže ostati na tom putu.Nakon 12 godina profesionalne karijere, Sanja se suočila sa burnout sindromom – temom koja je u sportu veoma prisutna, ali se o njoj i dalje nedovoljno govori. Iz današnje perspektive, sedam godina nakon završetka karijere, govori o važnosti prepoznavanja signala, otvorene komunikacije i traženja stručne pomoći.Ova epizoda donosi iskren uvid u to koliko sport oblikuje ličnost, ali i koliko je važno izgraditi identitet i van terena.  Ovo je takođe priča o snazi, trpljenju i onome o čemu se ćuti u sportu.Pratite nas na društvenim mrežama!Instagramhttps://www.instagram.com/jaomile_podcast/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/JAOMILEPODCASTTikTokhttps://www.tiktok.com/@jaomile_podcastTwitter https://twitter.com/mileilicGost: Sanja MalagurskiDatum: 18 April  2026. Autor i domaćin: Tina KrajišnikLokacija: Studio Long MileProdukcija: Jao Mile#jaomilepodcast #sanjamalagulski #tinakrajisnik #crvenazvezda #kkpartizan #NikolaJovic #nba  #nikolajokic #abaliga #jokic #bogdanovic #euroleague #doncic #nikolatopic #micic

Australia has welcomed over one million refugees. But changes to the economy, government policies, and the settlement process have made things more difficult for refugees settling today. - Australia acä kuëën juëëc tɛ̈n million tök kɔc kat bɛ̈ɛ̈i ken yic loor. Mɛ̈n ku ka ci root waar tɛn latuëŋ baai, lööŋ ci akuma looi ku luɔ̈i kääk rïïk ciökpïny aci käŋ cɔɔl aril yiic apɛi tɛ̈n kɔɔc ci rïïŋ bïk ke ciök riëëkpiny yakölë.

Dva i po psihijatra webshop

Kada učiš engleski, može ti se desiti da osećaš pritisak da stalno ideš dalje. To nije uvek dobro za tvoju sigurnost i preslušaj koje su moguće posledice. Preslušaj ovu epizodu. Ukoliko želiš da učiš engleski u English Lane školi sa Zoranom, pogledaj kako da se prijaviš ovde: https://englishlane.net/onlineskola/ Link ka ovoj epizodi podkasta na blogu: https://englishlane.net/onlineskola/209-pritisak-da-stalno-ides-napred-i-sta-su-posledice/

✓ Kako su kečeri izgubili kontakt sa stvarnošću? ✓ Zašto mlađe generacije ne menjaju izraz lica u javnosti? ✓ Kada će prestati igra muzičkih stolica?

Réécoutez l'Happy Hour DJ de Kada & Ba-Dri du mercredi 22 Avril 2026

Prema istraživanjima Instituta Wesley celijakija pogađa jednu od sedamdeset osoba u Australiji. Ali kada je hrana ključni dio kulturnog identiteta, posljedice ove autoimune bolesti - posebno za multikulturalne zajednice u Australiji - mogu ići dalje od fizičkog zdravlja, te uticati na mentalno blagostanje. Jude Soussan je mlada žena libanskog porijekla iz Pertha u Zapadnoj Australiji, koja je svoju dijagnozu iskoristila da kroz kreativnost educira druge o tome šta znači živjeti s celijakijom u dijaspori.

Tɛ ci käk piir yiic riɛl ku acïn tɛ yee raan ŋuɔɔth bi yen ye nhom wɛ̈lthin kaye kada leu bi raan ya thiëëc kuɔɔny tɛn kɔc kɔ̈k wën leu bi yen koony.

Ye ke ci kääk pïïr yiic riɛ̈l ku ŋɔ̈ɔ̈ŋ lëëu luɔi kada mënë ci käŋ riääk ku juëëŋ ke riëëc eben baai leeu kada.

Sve više ljudi kupuje na internetu razne preparate, kao npr. peptide i ubrizgava ih u svoje tijelo kao sredstvo za mršavljenje ili dugovječnost. Saznajmo zašto mnogi prihvataju rizik i umjesto tradicionalne medicine slušaju savjete različitih onlajn stručnjaka.

Laidoje „Prie aikštelės“ bendravome su sporto psichologe dr. Vilija Bičiūnaitė ir profesionaliu krepšininku, mentoriumi ir koučingo praktiku Gintautu Matuliu. Pašnekovai aptarė sporto psichologijos situaciją Lietuvoje, spaudimo kilmę, kaip jį kontroliuoti ir kas vyksta krepšininkų galvose prieš lemiamas atakas? Projektą finansuoja Medijų rėmimo fondas: https://www.medijufondas.lt Temos: Spaudimo kilmė ir kaip su juo tvarkosi G. Matulis? (0:00); Vidinis vs išorinis spaudimas: kodėl jo nereikia vengti? (6:44); Kada spaudimas žlugdo, o kada padeda? (10:10); G. Matulio susidūrimas su spaudimu rungtynių metu (13:48); Ar geriausi žaidėjai sulaukia mažiau spaudimo? (15:41); Kokia situacija su sporto psichologija Lietuvoje? (18:50); Praktiniai patarimai ir kaip greičiausiai susidraugauti su spaudimu? (25:33); Kiek yra svarbus pasiruošimas rungtynėms? (28:59); G. Matulio rutina ir kas vyksta prieš lemiamas atakas? (32:33); Olimpinės žaidynės: be spaudimo ir soc. tinklų (35:25); Ar galima spaudimą paversti geriausiu rezultatu? (39:20); Ar be spaudimo būtų geriau? (43:16); Kaip priversti spaudimą tarnauti mums? (45:06).

Réécoutez le FG mix avec Kada du Vendredi 3 avril 2026

Riɛlic käŋ piir ku tɛ bi yïn wëëu maac ku tɛ̈ɛ̈k keek thin.

U ovoj epizodi podkasta gošća je evropska ,svetska  i olimpijska šampionka u streljaštvu Zorana Arunović, jedna od najuspešnijih srpskih sportistkinja, koja nas vodi kroz iskren i duboko ličan osvrt na svoju karijeru.Govori o trenucima najvećih uspeha, ali i o onim najtežim – kada se javlja dilema da li nastaviti dalje ili odustati. Otkriva kako se nosila sa emocijama nakon poraza i šta ju je u tim trenucima zadržalo na putu vrhunskog sporta.Poseban akcenat stavlja na odnos i dugogodišnju saradnju sa sestrom, kao i na značaj sistema podrške – porodice, tima i rada sa sportskim psihologom. Kroz konkretne primere deli kako izgleda mentalna priprema pred nastup, koje tehnike koristi da bi postigla stanje smirenosti i vrhunske koncentracije, i koliko je fokus presudan u sportovima gde nijanse odlučuju.Otvoreno govori i o svom olimpijskom snu koji je jurila kroz četiri olimpijska ciklusa, kao i o lekcijama koje su je oblikovale tokom tog puta.Na iskren, duhovit i autentičan način deli priče o svojim najsrećnijim trenucima, ali i o onim koje je prolazila u tišini, daleko od očiju javnosti. Ova epizoda donosi i važnu poruku o izgradnji identiteta van sporta, kao i njenoj želji da u budućnosti doprinese stvaranju sigurnog i podsticajnog okruženja za nove generacije sportista.00:00:00 Uvod00:04:30 Sportisti za sportiste - OI u Milanu00:14:30 Druga stana OI00:19:00 Telefon samo za trenera00:26:10 Rad sa psihologom00:31:00 Psiholog - tabu tema00:36:40 Borba sa samim sobom00:41:40 Kad ne ide kako sam zamislila...00:44:40 Mentalne pripreme00:49:30 Sestra kao trener00:57:40 Emocije poraza01:04:00 Pucam za medalju na OI01:09:50 Kad ti se svet sruši01:18:05 Post OI depresija - Motivacija01:26:30 Komunikacija sa trenerom 01:30:00 Trema01:37:10 Da li medalje vrede?01:42:50 Ko je Zorana?01:44:30 SGO01:53:05 Šta ti je sport doneo?01:56:30 Poruka sportistimaPratite nas na društvenim mrežama!Instagramhttps://www.instagram.com/mindset_tina_krajisnik/https://www.instagram.com/jaomile_podcast/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/JAOMILEPODCASTTikTokhttps://www.tiktok.com/@jaomile_podcastTwitter https://twitter.com/mileilicGost: Zorana ArunovićDatum: 28. mart  2026. Autor i domaćin: Tina KrajišnikLokacija: Studio Long MileProdukcija: Jao Mile#tinakrajisnik #zoranaarunovic #mindset  #crvenazvezda #kkpartizan #NikolaJovic #nba  #nikolajokic #abaliga #jokic #bogdanovic #euroleague #doncic #nikolatopic #micic

Ɣɔ̈n looi yeen ee ku bi ya rööl tɛne' ɣok ku kɔc wën rɛɛl piny ke ŋic ke looikë.

Kada Scott ////// 891 Part 1 of 1  www.TrueCrimegrage.com23 year old Kada Scott was last seen in the parking lot of her workplace, The Terrace at Chestnut Hill senior living in Philadelphia late on the night of Saturday, October 4, 2025.  Kada received several texts and phone calls all from the same cellphone shortly before she was abducted. The Philadelphia Police department used, cellphone and vehicle information to lead them to multiple cars used in the abduction and subsequent crimes, Kada's body, and a single suspect who is a repeat violent offender. There is still a lot more for police to uncover. Multiple people were involved in these crimes and right now only one suspect has been arrested and charge with murder. Anyone with information can call or text Philadelphia Police at 215-686-TIPS (8477) or submit an anonymous tip online.Beer of the Week - Unity by Love City Brewing Garage Grade - 4 out of 5 bottle caps  More True Crime Garage can be found on Patreon and Apple subscriptions with our show - Off The Record.  Catch dozens of episodes of Off The Record plus a couple of Bonus episodes and our first 50 when you sign up today. True Crime Garage merchandise is available on our website's store page. Follow the show on X and Insta @TrueCrimeGarage / Follow Nic on X @TCGNIC / Follow The Captain on X @TCGCaptain  Thanks for listening and thanks for telling a friend.  Be good, be kind, and don't litter! Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.