Podcast appearances and mentions of bethany berger

House Committee on Natural Resources Subcommittee for Indigenous Peoples of the United States Date: Tuesday, September 20, 2022 Time: 11:00 AM Location: Longworth House Office Building 1324 Presiding: The Honorable Teresa Leger Fernández, Chair On Tuesday, September 20, 2022 at 11:00 a.m. ET, in room 1324 Longworth House Office Building and via Cisco WebEx, the Subcommittee for Indigenous Peoples of the United States (SCIP) will hold an oversight hearing entitled “Examining Oklahoma v. Castro-Huerta: The Implications of the Supreme Court's Ruling on Tribal Sovereignty.” Witness List Panel I: Administration Panel Hon. Bryan Newland Assistant Secretary – Indian Affairs U.S. Department of the Interior Washington, D.C. Panel II: Tribal Leader Panel Hon. Jonodev Chaudhuri Ambassador Muscogee Creek Nation Okmulgee, Oklahoma Hon. Kevin Killer President Oglala Sioux Tribe Pine Ridge, South Dakota Hon. Cheryl Andrews-Maltais Chairwoman Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head Aquinnah Aquinnah, Massachusetts Hon. Whitney Gravelle President Bay Mills Indian Community Brimley, Michigan Hon. Teri Gobin Chair Tulalip Tribes Tulalip, Washington Hon. Sara Hill Attorney General Cherokee Nation Tahlequah, Oklahoma Panel III: Legal Panel Ms. Mary Kathryn Nagle Counsel National Indigenous Women's Resource Center Washington, D.C. Ms. Bethany Berger Wallace Stevens Professor of Law University of Connecticut School of Law Hartford, Connecticut Ms. Carole Goldberg Jonathan D. Varat Distinguished Professor of Law Emerita University of California School of Law Los Angeles, California Hon. Matthew J. Ballard District Attorney Oklahoma District 12 Claremore, Oklahoma Mr. Mithun Mansinghani Partner Lehotsky Keller LLP Oklahoma City, Oklahoma Committee Notice: https://naturalresources.house.gov/hearings/hybrid-scip-oversight-hearing_september-20-2022

Indian property rights scholar Bethany Berger, a professor at the University of Connecticut School of Law, joins Infrastructure Junkies! to explain the intersection between Indian rights and right of way projects and infrastructure development in the United States.  She discusses the derivation of Indian property interests, how Indian reservations were established, the laws that govern Indian property rights, the source of those laws, and the effects of burial grounds and Indian artifacts on a project. For more information on this topic, the regulation on rights of way over trust and restricted lands on reservations can be found at 25 CFR 169 (there are some older statutes that apply to reservations generally), and the best resource to find out more about Indian property rights is Cohen's Handbook on Federal Indian Law, which is available on Lexis (but not Westlaw).  Ch.15, section 15.09[4] is all about rights of way, and Ch.20 section 20.02[3] is all about the National Historic Preservation Act.  Special thanks to our sponsor, Blackbird Right of Way, a full service, DBE certified right of way company, for making this episode possible.

Leon Fresco, a partner at Holland & Knight, discusses the Supreme Court ruling that certain immigrants awaiting a decision on whether they can stay in the U.S. because they fear torture at home, must be detained while their cases work their way through the system. Bethany Berger, a professor at the University of Connecticut Law School, discusses the Supreme Court ruling against unions on a decades-old regulation that gives union organizers access to agricultural company land for part of the year to talk to workers. June Grasso hosts. Learn more about your ad-choices at https://www.iheartpodcastnetwork.com

Leon Fresco, a partner at Holland & Knight, discusses the Supreme Court ruling that certain immigrants awaiting a decision on whether they can stay in the U.S. because they fear torture at home, must be detained while their cases work their way through the system. Bethany Berger, a professor at the University of Connecticut Law School, discusses the Supreme Court ruling against unions on a decades-old regulation that gives union organizers access to agricultural company land for part of the year to talk to workers. June Grasso hosts. Learn more about your ad-choices at https://www.iheartpodcastnetwork.com

Welcome to Feedback with EarBuds, the podcast recommendation podcast. Our newsletter brings you five podcast recommendations each week according to a theme, and curated by a different person. Our podcast is an audio version of the newsletter.Subscribe to the newsletter: eepurl.com/cIcBuHThis week's theme is Understanding Conscious Evolution. The curator is Robert Cobbold.On this podcast, you'll hear about our curator, the episodes they chose, our podcast spotlight of the week, an interview with someone in the podcast space, and more.Find this week's podcast recommendation list here: https://www.earbudspodcastcollective.org/podcasts-for-understanding-conscious-evolutionThis week's spotlight: She's All FatLink: https://shesallfatpod.com/Thank you to Bethany Berger for choosing this podcast!Apply to have your podcast spotlit: https://www.earbudspodcastcollective.org/podcast-spotlightsMya-Rose Craig info: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mya-Rose_CraigGet Birding Podcast: https://shows.acast.com/get-birdingEarBuds Blog: https://www.earbudspodcastcollective.org/blogThis week's sponsor is The Art of Manliness: https://www.artofmanliness.com/podcast/Curate a list here: https://www.earbudspodcastcollective.org/earbuds-podcast-curators-formFollow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/EarbudsPodColFollow us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/earbudspodcastcollectiveFollow us on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/earbudspodcastcollective/Learn more at our website: http://www.earbudspodcastcollective.orgTee Public: https://www.teepublic.com/user/earbuds-podcast-collective

Luke and Caleb bring news and updates on women's golf and their chances in the MAC championship. Women's basketball has had some off-season signings. Women's swimming and diving has garnered two individual championships from Bethany Berger. Let us know what you want to hear next! Tweet us @EchoPodcasts or emails us at sports@easternecho.com.Hosts: Caleb Burlingame, Luke GrembanProducer: Ronia Cabansag

Luke and Caleb bring news and updates on women's golf and their chances in the MAC championship. Women's basketball has had some off-season signings. Women's swimming and diving has garnered two individual championships from Bethany Berger. Let us know what you want to hear next! Tweet us @EchoPodcasts or emails us at sports@easternecho.com.Hosts: Caleb Burlingame, Luke GrembanProducer: Ronia Cabansag

Former federal prosecutor George Newhouse of Richards Carrington, discusses Supreme Court arguments over whether police can enter a home without a warrant in order to check on the safety or health of the residents. Bethany Berger, a professor at the University of Connecticut Law School, discusses Supreme Court arguments in a case that pits union rights against property rights. June Grasso hosts.

Former federal prosecutor George Newhouse of Richards Carrington, discusses Supreme Court arguments over whether police can enter a home without a warrant in order to check on the safety or health of the residents. Bethany Berger, a professor at the University of Connecticut Law School, discusses Supreme Court arguments in a case that pits union rights against property rights. June Grasso hosts. Learn more about your ad-choices at https://www.iheartpodcastnetwork.com

Hey, Counties!How's that isolation going? We hope you're healthy and safe.As always, each episode of Counter Programming will focus on a "counter" of some sort. Today, we learn about countertenors.Thank you to Bethany Berger for lending your voice for the intro section of the episode! You can do the same. Record a voice note saying, "Hi, i'm (your name), and you're listening to Counter Programming with Shira & Arielle." Then send it to us!You can reach us by email: counterprogrammingshiraarielle@gmail.com. You can also reach us on Instagram @counterprogrammingpod.Last week, Shira and Arielle covered counterfeit money. Check back in our feed to listen to our previous episodes.Countertenor Info:A countertenor (also contra tenor) is a type of classical male singing voice whose vocal range is equivalent to that of the female contralto or mezzo-soprano voice types, generally extending from around G3 to D5 or E5. Countertenors often are baritones or tenors at core, but on rare occasions use this vocal range in performance (via Wikipedia).As explained by Lestyn Davies, a Grammy award-winning countertenor, “It's a voice produced by not using one's ‘modal' or normal speaking voice, but the higher range that occurs when the combination of larynx muscles and vocal cord position are changed in such a way that the air passing through the cords vibrates a much thinner outer layer."Interview/Information about Aryeh Nussbaum Cohen:We talk about the Brooklyn Youth Chorus, Hannah Senesh Hebrew Day School, Elton John's 60th birthday party (at MSG), castration, the Church, Princeton theses, La Boheme, and so much more.Here's Aryeh's website (gorgeous, right?!)Here's the clip that we played of Aryeh singing. AMAZING!Aryeh dispels some rumors about opera, so listen in to have your perspective shifted.We talk about the practice of castration (long gone) and how it has affected the opera world to this day.Thanks for tuning in! Leave us a review on Apple or a comment on Castbox.Tweet at us. Here's Shira. Here's Arielle.At the top of the show, we told you about The Jordan Harbinger Show. Find it and listen here.Buzzsprout, y'all, the best podcast host in the game. Thank you to Daniel Tureck, our engineer.Thank you to Caio Slikta, our logo designer.Our music is called Tennessee Hayride and it's by Jason Shaw.

On May 8, 2019, the Ninth Circuit issued a 2-1 decision in Cedar Point Nursery v. Shiroma. In Cedar Point, California agricultural growers asked the court to invalidate an Agricultural Labor Relations Board regulation that allowed union organizers to come on to the growers’ property to solicit workers to join the union for 3 hours per day and 120 days per year. The growers contend that the regulation amounts to a physical taking under the Fifth Amendment. The Ninth Circuit majority rejected that argument, and held that the physical takings doctrine did not apply because the union organizers were not allowed around-the-clock access to the growers’ property.In this podcast, hear reactions from Wen Fa and Bethany Berger.Featuring:- Wen Fa, Attorney, Pacific Legal Foundation- Prof. Bethany Berger, Wallace Stevens Professor of Law, University of Connecticut School of LawVisit our website – RegProject.org – to learn more, view all of our content, and connect with us on social media.

On May 8, 2019, the Ninth Circuit issued a 2-1 decision in Cedar Point Nursery v. Shiroma. In Cedar Point, California agricultural growers asked the court to invalidate an Agricultural Labor Relations Board regulation that allowed union organizers to come on to the growers’ property to solicit workers to join the union for 3 hours per day and 120 days per year. The growers contend that the regulation amounts to a physical taking under the Fifth Amendment. The Ninth Circuit majority rejected that argument, and held that the physical takings doctrine did not apply because the union organizers were not allowed around-the-clock access to the growers’ property.In this podcast, hear reactions from Wen Fa and Bethany Berger.Featuring:- Wen Fa, Attorney, Pacific Legal Foundation- Prof. Bethany Berger, Wallace Stevens Professor of Law, University of Connecticut School of LawVisit our website – RegProject.org – to learn more, view all of our content, and connect with us on social media.

On May 8, 2019, the Ninth Circuit issued a 2-1 decision in Cedar Point Nursery v. Shiroma. In Cedar Point, California agricultural growers asked the court to invalidate an Agricultural Labor Relations Board regulation that allowed union organizers to come on to the growers’ property to solicit workers to join the union for 3 hours per day and 120 days per year. The growers contend that the regulation amounts to a physical taking under the Fifth Amendment. The Ninth Circuit majority rejected that argument, and held that the physical takings doctrine did not apply because the union organizers were not allowed around-the-clock access to the growers’ property. The dissent would have held for the growers, and reasoned that the Supreme Court has never endorsed a law that allowed non-employee labor organizers to enter a grower’s private property for substantial periods of time, when none of the employees live on the employer’s premises.Join the teleforum to hear reactions from Wen Fa and Bethany Berger. Wen Fa is an attorney with the Pacific Legal Foundation, a nonprofit dedicated to vindicating property rights and individual liberty. Mr. Fa was the primary drafter of the Growers’ Ninth Circuit brief and argued the case before the Ninth Circuit panel. Bethany Berger is a law professor at the University of Connecticut and an expert on property law.Featuring: Wen Fa, Attorney, Pacific Legal FoundationProf. Bethany Berger, Wallace Stevens Professor of Law, University of Connecticut School of Law Teleforum calls are open to all dues paying members of the Federalist Society. To become a member, sign up on our website. As a member, you should receive email announcements of upcoming Teleforum calls which contain the conference call phone number. If you are not receiving those email announcements, please contact us at 202-822-8138.

On May 8, 2019, the Ninth Circuit issued a 2-1 decision in Cedar Point Nursery v. Shiroma. In Cedar Point, California agricultural growers asked the court to invalidate an Agricultural Labor Relations Board regulation that allowed union organizers to come on to the growers’ property to solicit workers to join the union for 3 hours per day and 120 days per year. The growers contend that the regulation amounts to a physical taking under the Fifth Amendment. The Ninth Circuit majority rejected that argument, and held that the physical takings doctrine did not apply because the union organizers were not allowed around-the-clock access to the growers’ property. The dissent would have held for the growers, and reasoned that the Supreme Court has never endorsed a law that allowed non-employee labor organizers to enter a grower’s private property for substantial periods of time, when none of the employees live on the employer’s premises.Join the teleforum to hear reactions from Wen Fa and Bethany Berger. Wen Fa is an attorney with the Pacific Legal Foundation, a nonprofit dedicated to vindicating property rights and individual liberty. Mr. Fa was the primary drafter of the Growers’ Ninth Circuit brief and argued the case before the Ninth Circuit panel. Bethany Berger is a law professor at the University of Connecticut and an expert on property law.Featuring: Wen Fa, Attorney, Pacific Legal FoundationProf. Bethany Berger, Wallace Stevens Professor of Law, University of Connecticut School of Law Teleforum calls are open to all dues paying members of the Federalist Society. To become a member, sign up on our website. As a member, you should receive email announcements of upcoming Teleforum calls which contain the conference call phone number. If you are not receiving those email announcements, please contact us at 202-822-8138.

Festschrift in honor of Philip Frickey, Alexander F. and May T. Morrison Professor of Law, Berkeley Law Plenary Session 3 - Indian Law Moderator:  Nell Jessup Newton, Chancellor and Dean, William B. Lockhart Professor of Law, University of California, Hastings College of the Law Panelists: Robert Anderson, Director, Native American Law Center, Associate Professor of Law,  University of Washington School of Law Bethany Berger, Associate Professor of Law, University of Connecticut School of Law Sarah Krakoff, Associate Professor of Law, University of Colorado Law School

Festschrift in honor of Philip Frickey, Alexander F. and May T. Morrison Professor of Law, Berkeley Law Plenary Session 3 - Indian Law Moderator:  Nell Jessup Newton, Chancellor and Dean, William B. Lockhart Professor of Law, University of California, Hastings College of the Law Panelists: Robert Anderson, Director, Native American Law Center, Associate Professor of Law,  University of Washington School of Law Bethany Berger, Associate Professor of Law, University of Connecticut School of Law Sarah Krakoff, Associate Professor of Law, University of Colorado Law School