Podcasts about litigation

California's climate reporting is coming, but many questions remain. In this episode, we cover Assembly Bill (AB) 1305, Senate Bill (SB) 253, and SB 261—what's required now, what's still evolving, and how companies can prepare as the California Air Resources Board (CARB) works to finalize draft regulations.In this episode, we discuss:3:05 – Overview of AB 1305, SB 253, and SB 261, including scope and revenue thresholds6:46 – Litigation updates and why deadlines still apply despite challenges10:29 – Defining “doing business in California” and revenue thresholds under CARB proposals18:39 – CARB's role in enforcement, rulemaking, and timeline for draft regulationsFor more information, check out our In depth on California's climate laws and Chapter 22 of PwC's Sustainability reporting guide, Jurisdictional sustainability reporting – California.Be sure to follow this podcast on your favorite podcast app and subscribe to our weekly newsletter to stay in the loop for the latest thought leadership on sustainability standards.About our guestsLogan Redlin is a director in PwC's National Office who is focused on thought leadership strategy and content development related to accounting and financial reporting, sustainability reporting, and standard setting. Prior to this role, Logan spent 15 years in the audit practice, serving both public and private companies with a primary focus on asset management and real estate.Valerie Wieman is a PwC National Office partner with over 30 years of experience. She is one of the firm's technical experts on sustainability reporting and helps lead the creation, development, and publication of our brand-defining thought leadership, with a focus on domestic and international sustainability requirements.About our guest hostGuest host Diana Stoltzfus is a partner in the National Office who helps to shape PwC's perspectives on regulatory matters, responses to rulemakings and policy development, and implementation related to significant new rules and regulations. Prior to rejoining PwC, Diana was the Deputy Chief Accountant in the Office of the Chief Accountant (OCA) at the SEC where she led the activities of the OCA's Professional Practices Group.Transcripts available upon request for individuals who may need a disability-related accommodation. Please send requests to us_podcast@pwc.com Did you enjoy this episode? Text us your thoughts and be sure to include the episode name.

In this episode, hosts Brad and Michael welcome guest Brian Lauten, a triple board-certified business and commercial trial attorney and founding partner of Brian Lauten P.C., to unpack the realities of commercial litigation. Brian shares the often-overlooked consequences of filing a lawsuit, from hidden costs to litigation fatigue and unexpected counterclaims. Tune in to learn why the best litigation strategy may be never needing one, and the proactive legal steps you can take to avoid the courtroom.Watch full episodes of our podcast on our YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/@byrdadattoStay connected for the latest business and health care legal updates:WebsiteFacebookInstagramLinkedIn

In this episode of Status Check with Spivey, Mike Spivey hosts Trey Cox, co-chair of Gibson Dunn's global litigation practice group, on his legal career (4:18, 31:27), law school selection (9:20), hiring philosophies (16:42), and advice for aspiring law students and lawyers.Trey and Mike both recommend the book Brain Rules by John Medina, which you can learn more about here.You can listen and subscribe to Status Check with Spivey on ⁠⁠Apple Podcasts⁠⁠, ⁠⁠Spotify⁠⁠, and ⁠⁠YouTube⁠⁠. You can read a full transcript of this episode (with timestamps) here.

One year ago, U.S. District Court Judge Amit P. Mehta held that “Google is a monopolist and has acted as one to maintain its monopoly”, and, in doing so, violated Section 2 of the Sherman Act. On Tuesday, September 2, 2025, Judge Mehta’s remedy decision rejected the United States’ request for structural relief and indicated only limited conduct and behavioral requirements were appropriate to address any past effect of Google’s conduct and to protect competition going forward. Does either party have substantive grounds to expect an appellate court to reverse Judge Mehta’s liability and remedy decision? Is the remedy decision consistent with the liability decision (and vice-versa)? What are the next steps to implementing the remedy decision? What is the likely impact of Judge Mehta’s liability and remedy decisions on Google, monopolization law, and the Government’s anti-monopoly agenda. Please join our body of expert lawyers for a discussion of these and other related questions.Featuring:Alden F. Abbott, Senior Research Fellow, Mercatus Center, George Mason UniversityAshley Baker, Executive Director, The Committee for JusticeKathleen W. Bradish, Vice President and Director of Legal Advocacy, American Antitrust InstituteDerek W. Moore, Counsel, Rule Garza Howley LLP(Moderator) Bilal Sayyed, Counsel, Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

Bill Kanasky, Jr., Ph.D. and Steve Wood, Ph.D. discuss the most common mistakes attorneys make during litigation touching on jury research, voir dire, direct examination, openings, and closings. Bill and Steve stress that in jury research, confirmation bias is a major pitfall and attorneys often dismiss unfavorable results instead of using them to prepare for trial. They also highlight how waiting too long to conduct research is another mistake, as early testing reveals vulnerabilities before they become entrenched. In voir dire, many attorneys aren't vulnerable with jurors and also don't go deep enough with their questioning. Bill and Steve argue that opening up personally with jurors and going deeper on their responses helps identify problematic jurors and builds credibility. On direct examination, they caution against long, unfocused testimony, irrelevant background questions, and overly broad prompts that cause witnesses to ramble. Openings should avoid lengthy introductions and dense slide decks, instead focusing on clear, simple storytelling that doesn't overload jurors cognitively. Lastly, in closing arguments, they remind defense counsel that the goal is not to change minds but to equip favorable jurors with tools for deliberations.

In this edition of our banking litigation podcast, we consider some recent cases that will be most relevant to in-house lawyers at banks and financial institutions. This episode is hosted by John Corrie, a partner in our banking litigation team, who is joined by Ceri Morgan and special guest Nic Patmore. You can find links to our blog posts on the case covered in this podcast below: • Supreme Court decision in Hopcraft motor finance commission appeal – key implications for financial services firms https://www.hsfkramer.com/notes/bankinglitigation/2025-08/supreme-court-decision-in-hopcraft-motor-finance-commission-appeal • Banking Litigation Podcast Episode 54: Hopcraft Special Edition https://www.hsfkramer.com/notes/bankinglitigation/2025-08/banking-litigation-podcast-episode-54-hopcraft-special-edition • English High Court decides in favour of banks in EuroChem bond claim, confirming payment under on-demand bonds prohibited due to Russian sanctions https://www.hsfkramer.com/notes/bankinglitigation/2025-08/english-high-court-decides-in-favour-of-banks-in-eurochem-bond-claim • High Court grants bank stakeholder relief under CPR Part 86 in USD 11 million deposit dispute involving competing claims https://www.hsfkramer.com/notes/bankinglitigation/2025-08/high-court-grants-bank-stakeholder-relief-under-cpr-part-86 • High Court permits documents obtained via Norwich Pharmacal Order to be used against disclosing bank in related APP fraud claim https://www.hsfkramer.com/notes/bankinglitigation/2025-08/high-court-permits-documents-obtained-via-norwich-pharmacal-order • Financial List finds claim for declaratory relief brought by ultimate beneficial owners of loan notes against issuer is arguable https://www.hsfkramer.com/notes/bankinglitigation/2025-04/financial-list-finds-claim-for-declaratory-relief • Privy Council abrogates so-called "Shareholder Rule" under English law: companies can assert privilege against their shareholders https://www.hsfkramer.com/notes/bankinglitigation/2025-04/privy-council-abrogates-so-called-shareholder-rule-under-english-law-companies-can-assert-privilege-against-their-shareholders • Hague 2019 Judgments Convention comes into force in UK https://www.hsfkramer.com/notes/litigation/2025-07/hague-2019-judgments-convention-comes-into-force-in-uk • Civil Justice Council's final report on litigation funding recommends "light touch" statutory regulation https://www.hsfkramer.com/notes/bankinglitigation/2025-04/civil-justice-councils-final-report-on-litigation-funding-recommends-light-touch-statutory-regulation Don't forget to subscribe to the banking litigation blog https://hsfnotes.com/bankinglitigation/subscribe/

In this edition of our banking litigation podcast, we consider some recent cases that will be most relevant to in-house lawyers at banks and financial institutions. This episode is hosted by John Corrie, a partner in our banking litigation team, who is joined by Ceri Morgan and special guest Nic Patmore.You can find links to our blog posts on the case covered in this podcast below:Supreme Court decision in Hopcraft motor finance commission appeal – key implications for financial services firmsBanking Litigation Podcast Episode 54: Hopcraft Special EditionEnglish High Court decides in favour of banks in EuroChem bond claim, confirming payment under on-demand bonds prohibited due to Russian sanctionsHigh Court grants bank stakeholder relief under CPR Part 86 in USD 11 million deposit dispute involving competing claimsHigh Court permits documents obtained via Norwich Pharmacal Order to be used against disclosing bank in related APP fraud claimFinancial List finds claim for declaratory relief brought by ultimate beneficial owners of loan notes against issuer is arguablePrivy Council abrogates so-called "Shareholder Rule" under English law: companies can assert privilege against their shareholdersHague 2019 Judgments Convention comes into force in UKCivil Justice Council's final report on litigation funding recommends "light touch" statutory regulationDon't forget to subscribe to the banking litigation blog.

Workers Compensation is a very state specific thing, and recently, we have heard a lot of excited talk about work comp subrogation in Nevada.  That's because the Nevada Supreme Court changed the long-standing common law rules establishing the system for calculating the amount an insurer could recover on a workers compensation claim in a decision handed down in 2024.  Listen in as Rebecca and Steve walk through the rules as they developed in the common law over 38 years, then suddenly changed in 2024, and the legislature's response in 2025, to answer the question: where do Nevada work comp subrogation claims now?

In this insightful episode of RiskCellar, hosts Brandon and Nick delve deep into the evolving world of litigation finance with special guest Nick Rowles-Davies, CEO of Lexolent. Nick shares his extensive experience across the UK and international litigation finance landscape, highlighting the industry's foundational purpose: enabling access to justice for those who otherwise could not afford to pursue valid claims. The conversation covers the broad spectrum of litigation finance, from consumer funding and law firm lending to high-stakes commercial disputes, and the stringent underwriting processes that ensure careful risk management.The discussion compares the UK and US legal systems, exploring the impact of adverse cost rules in the UK versus juries and nuclear verdicts in the US. Recent regulatory developments, including Arizona's pioneering mandatory disclosure requirement for litigation funding, are considered. The episode also highlights how technology and AI are transforming case identification and underwriting. Listeners gain balanced perspectives on litigation finance's role as a driver of fairness and disruption within the legal and insurance landscapes.Key Takeaways:Litigation finance began as a vehicle for access to justice.Multiple types exist: consumer, law firm, and commercial funding.Rigorous due diligence leads to funding very few cases.UK's “loser pays” deters frivolous lawsuits, unlike US approach.Arizona's disclosure rule promotes funding transparency.Litigation finance in US is a small but growing industry.AI and tech play increasing roles in deal sourcing and assessment.Collaboration with insurers aligns interests.Litigation finance can facilitate fairer outcomes and longer negotiations.Transparency and regulation are essential for credibility.Social and legal differences affect litigation finance globally.Legal technology promises further evolution.Challenges remain regarding lawsuit inflation and insurance impacts.Episode Chapters:00:00 Intro & sponsor message05:00 Origins and purposes of litigation finance15:00 Types of funding and underwriting approach25:00 UK vs US legal system differences35:00 Arizona's funding disclosure and regulation trends45:00 Technology & AI in litigation finance55:00 Case examples and insurance ecosystem effects65:00 Social influences & nuclear verdict concerns75:00 Closing thoughts & outroConnect with RiskCellar:Website: https://www.riskcellar.com/Guest: Nick Rowles-DaviesLexolent Website: https://www.lexolent.com/nick-rowles-daviesNick Rowles-Davies LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/nick-rowles-davies/ Brandon Schuh:Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=61552710523314LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/brandon-stephen-schuh/Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/schuhpapa/Nick Hartmann:LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/nickjhartmann/ 

When does harassment become a crime — and what legal remedies exist if criminal courts refuse to act? In the final episode of this three-part UNCENSORED series, maritime lawyer and former U.S. Navy Reserve officer Adria Notari breaks down the critical differences between civil and criminal law for crew. From statutes of limitation and evidence collection to employer liability and the role of flag states, this conversation reveals why litigation is often the only driver of real change in yachting.

Few lawyers articulate the craft of advocacy with as much clarity and integrity as JP Sen, Senior Counsel, Bombay High Court. In this episode of The Daily Lawyer Legacy Series, he reflects on: Why he believes advocacy is an act of empathy The role of brevity, clarity and unimpeachable integrity in shaping a career His candid views on perjury, procedure and reforms India urgently needs How AI will transform legal practice but never replace the human advocate Lessons from a career defined by substance over spectacle This is more than a conversation about litigation; it's about empathy, ethics, and the future of the legal profession. Watch the full episode now on YouTube. Also streaming on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, Amazon Music & Google Podcasts. The Legacy Series is presented in collaboration with Solomon & Co., Advocates & Solicitors, one of India's oldest law firms with 115+ years of heritage. Together, we are preserving the voices and values of India's greatest legal minds. #JPSen #Advocacy #IndianLaw #Litigation #AIinLaw #LegacySeries #TheDailyLawyer #LegalIntegrity #IndianJudiciary #SolomonAndCo

Insurance. It's something we all pay for and hope we never need. But behind the scenes, it's a world of evolving risks, high-stakes litigation, and technology that's changing faster than the laws that govern it.In this episode of the Emerging Litigation Podcast, I interview Jeremy Moseley, partner at Spencer Fane in Denver, Colorado. Jeremy defends mass and class actions involving insurance regulations, healthcare, consumer products, and more. He's seen firsthand how automation, AI, and climate change are presenting new risks — and he's here to share what's coming next.We talk about how technology that makes claims handling faster and easier is now fueling lawsuits. How customized policies, while great for consumers, can leave dangerous gaps. And how juries today are awarding damages that would've seemed outrageous just a few years ago.Jeremy explains “social inflation” and the rise of thermonuclear verdicts—why $20 million doesn't sound like much anymore, and how insurers can push back with reality-based defense strategies. He also dives into climate change, shifting storm patterns, and how unprepared infrastructure are creating new underwriting challenges.And yes, we talk about Dr. Evil, and Ecclesiastes, and my horse Jefferson from a dude ranch vacation in Colorado.This episode is a warning, a guide, and a conversation about the future of insurance litigation. Jeremy's insights are sharp, timely, and grounded in real-world experience. If you work in insurance, law, or just want to understand how emerging risks are reshaping the world around us, this one's for you.Thanks to Jeremy Moseley for joining us.Tom HagyHost, The Emerging Litigation Podcast

Episode Info Cayce E. Lynch is the National Managing Partner and an Equity Partner at Tyson & Mendes. In this capacity, she leads the firm's strategic vision and execution across all offices, focusing on optimizing the firm's performance and addressing challenges in the evolving insurance defense industry. As part of the firm's executive leadership team, Ms. Lynch is passionate about fostering a culture centered on people while driving results, reflecting her belief that organizations thrive when they balance purpose with humanity. Under Ms. Lynch's leadership, the firm has more than quadrupled in size and strengthened its reputation as a leader in insurance defense. She is the founder of several transformative initiatives, including the Tyson & Mendes Women's Initiative, Young Professionals Group, and Diversity & Inclusion Committee, which provide mentorship and support for the firm's attorneys and staff as well as insurance professionals nationwide. She also established Tyson & Mendes University, the firm's premier internal education program that delivers unparalleled training for attorneys to ensure excellence in legal practice and client service. In her leadership, Ms. Lynch prioritizes work-life harmony over rigid concepts of “balance.” She is a vocal advocate for supporting working parents, empowering underrepresented groups, and encouraging individuals to fully embrace authenticity in their work. Her initiatives and approach aim to support employees in thriving personally and professionally. An industry-recognized speaker and educator, Ms. Lynch regularly presents CE and MCLE updates on topics such as preventing Nuclear Verdicts® and social inflation. She also serves as faculty for the Nuclear Verdicts Defense Institute, helping train defense professionals to combat Nuclear Verdict® trends. Ms. Lynch has been recognized with numerous awards, including San Diego Business Journal's “Business Women of the Year” Award (2017), “Top 40 Under 40” by both San Diego Metro and San Diego Business Journal (2018, 2019), and CLM's inaugural “Phenoms Under 40” (2022). She has also been listed as a “Woman of Influence in Law” (2021-2023)and a “Leader of Influence in Law” (2023) by San Diego Business Journal. Ms. Lynch earned her J.D., cum laude, in 2011 from the William S. Richardson School of Law, University of Hawaii at Manoa, where she served as the Outside Articles Editor for the University of Hawaii Law Review. After graduation, she clerked for Associate Justice James Duffy at the Hawaii Supreme Court. She is licensed to practice law in California and Colorado. Episode Highlights The Apex Method: Cayce Lynch introduces the "Apex" method, a holistic approach designed to prevent nuclear verdicts by diffusing juror anger from the onset of a case. This method emphasizes reasonableness and being a good human. Core Four Strategies: The Apex method includes four key strategies, referred to as the "Core Four," which are crucial in preventing juror anger and, consequently, nuclear verdicts. Research indicates that these strategies are often not utilized by the defense. Data-Driven Insights: The book is backed by extensive research, including the analysis of trial transcripts from 100 nuclear verdicts over the past decade. This research highlights the importance of understanding the psychological tactics used by the plaintiff's bar. Message of Hope: Despite the increasing challenge of nuclear verdicts, Cayce Lynch offers a message of hope. By changing defense strategies and presentations in court, there is potential to alter the trajectory of these verdicts and improve the viability of the insurance industry. Upcoming Book Release: "Nuclear Verdicts: The Apex" is set to launch on October 22nd, with pre-sales available from early September. These insights from Cayce Lynch's interview provide a comprehensive look at the challenges and solutions surrounding nuclear verdicts, offering valuable strategies for defense attorneys and claims professionals. This episode is brought to you by The Future of Insurance book series (future-of-insurance.com) from Bryan Falchuk. Follow the podcast at future-of-insurance.com/podcast for more details and other episodes. Music courtesy of Hyperbeat Music, available to stream or download on Spotify, Apple Music, and Amazon Music and more.

Welcome to 'AI Lawyer Talking Tech', the podcast where we explore the transformative impact of artificial intelligence on the legal world. In today's episode, we delve into how AI is rapidly reshaping legal practices, from enhancing operational efficiency and boosting profitability to redefining client acquisition and document management. We'll discuss the significant surge in AI adoption across the legal profession, with a majority of lawyers now embracing tools like generative AI to increase billable work and achieve a better work-life balance. This era is seeing the rise of "hybrid lawyers" who leverage AI to move beyond repetitive tasks, focusing instead on critical thinking and strategic legal analysis. While innovations like the Model Context Protocol (MCP) promise seamless interoperability between legal tech systems, we'll also address the crucial concerns around data accuracy, security, and the evolving role of human expertise in an increasingly AI-driven legal landscape. Join us as we examine how law firms are making strategic investments in AI to gain a decisive competitive edge and prepare for a future where technology is central to legal success.AI use gaining ground rapidly across legal profession2025-09-01 | Legal FuturesAI takeover: 50% of remote jobs to be replaced within 3 years as machines outperform humans in fairness and accuracy2025-09-01 | NaturalNews.comLaw firm staff awarded 5% bonus as it chalks up 9.2% rise in annual turnover2025-09-01 | TheBusinessDesk.comTrailblazing tech law firm opens first international office in London One of Europe's most active tech law firms has opened its first international office in London's...2025-09-01 | BusinessCloud.co.ukAI, innovation and life as a ‘hybrid lawyer'2025-09-01 | Legal CheekWhat Is MCP and Why You Need It2025-09-01 | Artificial LawyerNetDocuments Expands ndMAX Studio with Three New AI-Powered Apps for Litigation and Startup Financing2025-09-01 | Legal Technology News - Legal IT Professionals | Everything legal technologyInnovations in Legal Drafting: Modern Techniques for 20252025-09-01 | Legaltech on MediumProlog: The Forgotten Language That Powers Legal Tech and AI2025-09-01 | Legaltech on MediumAddressing the Fragmentation in Legal Client Acquisition: The Role of AI Agents and the Case of MagNet2025-09-01 | Legal Tech BlogArtificial Intelligence (AI): powering law firm profitability2025-09-01 | Legal Technology News - Legal IT Professionals | Everything legal technologyLawyer: Firefighter arrested by Border Patrol while fighting wildfire had been waiting 7 years for legal status2025-08-30 | 12News.comHow a Single Hashtag Led to a Zero Inheritance Payout2025-08-30 | Budget and the BeesInvestigation Launched on Data Breach Affecting TransUnion Clients2025-08-29 | InvestorsHangout.comLowenstein COO Michael R. Caplan Honored with NJBIZ Executive Excellence Award2025-08-28 | Lowenstein Sandler PC

In this episode, Bill Kanasky, Jr., Ph.D. is joined by attorneys Johan Flynn and Kevin Greene to discuss their recent nine-week asbestos trial in California that resulted in a major defense verdict. Johan and Kevin describe how they incorporated CSI's disruptive voir dire techniques into their jury selection strategy, using them to identify unfavorable jurors, plant seeds on critical defense themes, and introduce concepts such as anchoring early in the process. They also share insights on trial strategy, including coordinating with co-defendants, refining opening slides after judicial rulings, and carefully managing cross-examinations. Both emphasize the importance of adapting to surprises during trial and managing their mental and physical health during a lengthy trial. Johan and Kevin credit their success in this trial to the disruptive voir dire approach, which helped them connect with the jurors in a meaningful way, and highlighted how psychological techniques in voir dire can carry through to closing, reactivating juror commitments made during jury selection and directly influencing the final verdict.

If you've listened to this show for any length of time, and most likely even if you haven't, you know the US legal system all too often fails domestic abuse survivors, especially women, children, and adolescents. My guest, Professor Dale Margolin Cecka, knows it all too well. Professor Cecka is an advocate for women, children, and teens who have survived domestic abuse. Not only that, but she's also a law professor, former Superior Court senior staff attorney, former Assistant Attorney General of Georgia, and the Director of Albany Law School's Family Violence Litigation Clinic.For this episode, I talked with Professor Cecka about her experience and expertise, and many related topics. I think you'll enjoy this fascinating conversation as much as I did!Links related to this episode:Professor Cecka's recent article in The Imprint: https://imprintnews.org/opinion/new-york-gov-kathy-hochul-can-fix-anonymous-reporting-problem/264606“Inequity in Child Custody Legislation”: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/clr/vol20/iss1/8/ “Improper Delegation of Judicial Authority in Child Custody Cases: Finally Overturned”: https://scholarship.richmond.edu/law-faculty-publications/1425/ USA Today op-ed on the Diddy case: https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2025/06/02/diddy-trial-cassie-macron-slapped-wife-domestic-violence/83924410007/ Cover photo by charlesdeluvio on Unsplash.Photos related to today's episode can be viewed on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/sufferthelittlechildrenpod You can also follow the podcast on:Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/sufferthelittlechildrenpodTikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@STLCpodMy Linktree is available here: https://linktr.ee/stlcpod Visit the podcast's web page at https://www.sufferthelittlechildrenpod.com. By supporting me on Patreon, you'll also access rewards, including a shout-out by name on the podcast and exclusive rewards. Visit www.patreon.com/STLCpod. You can also support the podcast on www.Ko-Fi.com/STLCpod. **New! Become a member of my YouTube channel for perks, ranging from a shout-out, members-only chat emoji, and loyalty badges to other rewards. Click here: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCogRWoIzWMy7TX5PuX18smQ/join Join my Spreaker Supporters' Club: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/suffer-the-little-children--4232884/support This podcast is researched, written, hosted, edited, and produced by Laine.Music for this episode is licensed from https://audiojungle.net. Subscribe to Suffer the Little Children:Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/suffer-the-little-children/id1499010711Google Podcasts: https://playmusic.app.goo.gl/?ibi=com.google.PlayMusic&isi=691797987&ius=googleplaymusic&apn=com.google.android.music&link=https://play.google.com/music/m/I5mx3lacxpdkhssmk2n22csf32u?t%3DSuffer_the_Little_Children%26pcampaignid%3DMKT-na-all-co-pr-mu-pod-16Spreaker: https://www.spreaker.com/show/suffer-the-little-children Pandora: https://www.pandora.com/podcast/suffer-the-little-children/PC:61848?part=PC:61848&corr=podcast_organic_external_site&TID=Brand:POC:PC61848:podcast_organic_external_siteSpotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/0w98Tpd3710BZ0u036T1KEiHeartRadio: https://iheart.com/podcast/77891101/ ...or on your favorite podcast listening platform.If you see something, say something. https://childhelp.org

In this series, HRP's Brooke Casella is asking, what is PFAS? HRP's PFAS experts will each share their perspective on the question, answering not only, what is PFAS, but what does PFAS mean in the specific context and discipline where they operate.On the first episode, Tom Simmons, head of content for HRP Associates, and host of this podcast, share's his perspective. Listen to learn more and subscribe to The Pulse for all the details.

The past week has felt like history unfolding right in front of me, as courtrooms across the country have become the stage for a truly unprecedented legal drama with Donald Trump at the center. Let's get right into what's been happening, starting with the Northern District of California, where University of California researchers, led by Rahul Thakur, have taken President Trump and the Department of Government Efficiency to federal court. The heart of their lawsuit is over research funding and access, with University of California researchers claiming that new administrative policies under Trump's leadership are restricting crucial funding and threatening academic independence. Just a few days ago, on August 26, Judge Gonzalez Rogers presided over a hearing to decide whether the court should expand the scope of a preliminary injunction for a group of researchers who allege unfair targeting by Trump's administration. The Zoom link for the public portion of this hearing attracted thousands of virtual spectators, eager to see whether the judiciary would put more checks on the administration's reach. Judge Gonzalez Rogers has yet to issue a final decision, but the tension in the courtroom was palpable as government attorneys pushed back against claims of overreach and political motivation.Nationally, the legal landscape surrounding Trump is a tangled web. The Lawfare Litigation Tracker reports close to 300 active cases now challenging Trump administration policies across a wide array of issues. Some of the most high-profile litigation right now continues to focus on Trump's use of executive power, with opponents targeting everything from immigration enforcement to civil liberties. Litigation over the Alien Enemies Act, for instance, is ongoing, with several states and advocacy groups arguing in court that Trump's policies unlawfully target immigrants. Other cases are challenging how Trump's new executive orders interact with state laws, an issue that might well wind up before the Supreme Court in the coming months.Meanwhile, the White House itself is not sitting idle. Just this week, on August 25, President Trump issued a new executive order aimed at ending cashless bail in jurisdictions that, in his view, are failing to keep dangerous offenders locked up. In his executive order, Trump directed the Attorney General to create a list within 30 days, identifying cities and states where cash bail has been substantially eliminated for crimes Trump says pose a “clear threat” to public safety. This order has already prompted several lawsuits from civil rights groups and state attorneys general, who argue that Trump is overstepping federal authority by withholding resources from cities and states that disagree with his policies. Lawyers from both sides are preparing for a flurry of hearings throughout September, and this clash over criminal justice policy is likely to feature in the courtrooms and on campaign trails alike as we head into the fall.What ties this chaotic legal atmosphere together is the sheer pace at which developments are happening. Updates stream in almost daily, with each hearing, ruling, or presidential order setting off a chain reaction of new litigation, media scrutiny, and political debate. No matter how each case gets resolved, these trials are rewriting long-standing assumptions about presidential power and accountability. Thanks for tuning in to my recap of the latest from the Trump court cases. Be sure to come back next week for more. This has been a Quiet Please production, and for more, check out Quiet Please Dot A I.Some great Deals https://amzn.to/49SJ3QsFor more check out http://www.quietplease.ai

In this episode of Nurse Converse, Maggie Ortiz continues the Protect Your Nursing License Series by busting myths about malpractice insurance and explaining why every nurse — from new grads to NPs — needs to understand how coverage protects their license, career, and peace of mind. Drawing on real cases, legal insights, and her 25 years of nursing experience, Maggie breaks down misconceptions that leave nurses vulnerable and offers practical steps to stay protected.You'll learn:Why malpractice insurance does not make you a targetHow it ensures unbiased legal protection during litigationThe financial realities of lawsuits nurses often overlookProactive steps to safeguard your nursing license and career>>Malpractice Insurance Myths Debunked: Are You Putting Your Nursing License at Risk?Jump Ahead to Listen: [00:01:32] Malpractice insurance misconceptions.[00:05:59] Cost of nursing litigation.[00:10:06] Professional liability insurance importance.[00:12:35] Importance of nursing insurance.[00:19:06] Protecting your nursing license.[00:21:26] Protect your nursing license.[00:25:02] Protecting your nursing license.[00:28:47] Nurse professional practice protection.Connect with Maggie on LinkedIn and on social media:Instagram: @bolt_crnaTikTok: @advocates4nursesFacebook: Advocates4nursesYouTube: @Advocates4nursesDon't forget to explore her website, Advocates for NursesFor more information, full transcript and videos visit Nurse.org/podcastJoin our newsletter at nurse.org/joinInstagram: @nurse_orgTikTok: @nurse.orgFacebook: @nurse.orgYouTube: Nurse.org

I chat with Les Schlesinger, Owner at Auto Insurance Consulting, he has 35 years of experience in all aspects of the Auto Insurance space and is now offering that expertise to carriers, MGAs, etc who need help in Product, Marketing, Claims, Litigation, etc.Les Schlesinger: https://www.linkedin.com/in/les-schlesinger-039a3510/

The ongoing case of Etienne v. Ferguson raises profound questions about the interplay between religious liberty and state authority, particularly regarding Catholic confession, which centuries-old religious doctrine deems as absolutely confidential. The case challenges Washington's Senate Bill 5375, titled "Concering the duty of clergy to report child abuse and neglect." Does a state mandatory reporter law violate the First Amendment’s religion clauses if it encompasses information learned during the sacrament? Or can the state justify overriding the seal of confession as a necessary and justifiable measure to protect children?This webinar will examine the passage of Washington’s Senate Bill 5375, the historical and theological significance of confession, the constitutional protections afforded by the free exercise and establishment clauses, and the concerns of some that religious practices could be commandeered in service to the state’s police power. The discussion will also address whether the law unconstitutionally targets Catholic clergy and whether the state’s interest in child protection can supersede the religious obligation of priests to maintain absolute confidentiality, under penalty of excommunication.Our guests will consider the delicate relationship between religious liberty and state power in this high-stakes case.Featuring:Matthew Martens, Partner, WilmerHale LLP(Moderator) Hiram Sasser, Executive General Counsel, First Liberty Institute

In this episode of The Consumer Finance Podcast, Chris Willis, Heryka Knoespel, and Lori Sommerfield discuss overdraft and deposit account fees as they continue to dive into the CFPB's guidance withdrawal. They highlight the regulatory and litigation impacts of the rescinded guidance and its impact on banks and financial institutions, particularly in terms of compliance burdens and fee income, while also weighing potential reputational risks and operational challenges that may arise if policy changes follow the CFPB's withdrawn guidance. This episode also emphasizes the importance of financial institutions being prepared to defend against lawsuits, specifically those related to Regulation E and affirmative consent.

Adam Bronstein has been with Western Watersheds Project since 2020 and is the Oregon Director for the organization. Adam grew up exploring the Adirondack Mountains of upstate New York, and received a BS from SUNY ESF in Syracuse, NY in Environmental Studies and Geographic Information Technologies.He discussed the parameters of the Roadless Rule, explained specifics on protections for Inventoried Roadless Areas (IRAs), impacts logging, grazing and outdoor recreation takes on roadless areas, and the ways you can protect lands near you. Western Watersheds Press ReleaseUSDA Press Release on Roadless RuleRoadless Rule Maps & Litigation@westernwatersheds@thewolfconnectionpod

WBEN's Tom Puckett on possible litigation following Friday's fatal bus crash full 66 Wed, 27 Aug 2025 08:14:00 +0000 VLiNvr1ZtLOLpgVloOaw3j9lF4yuirFK news & politics,news WBEN Extras news & politics,news WBEN's Tom Puckett on possible litigation following Friday's fatal bus crash Archive of various reports and news events 2024 © 2021 Audacy, Inc. News & Politics News False https://player.a

Attorney Harry Forrest on possible civil suit litigation from Friday's deadly Thruway bus crash full 342 Wed, 27 Aug 2025 07:55:00 +0000 c8HqIIDtLY960OEgJPwkUfN708DGdfIs news & politics,news WBEN Extras news & politics,news Attorney Harry Forrest on possible civil suit litigation from Friday's deadly Thruway bus crash Archive of various reports and news events 2024 © 2021 Audacy, Inc. News & Politics News False

Attorney Steve Boyd is expecting wrongful death claims and more from victims and their families in last Friday's bus crash on I-90. He tells us about liability, the role of seat belts and more.

Summary In this episode of Armed American Radio, host Mark Walters discusses various legal challenges and victories related to gun rights with guests including Joseph Greenlee from the NRA and Dr. John Lott. The conversation covers recent court decisions, the impact of administration changes on crime rates, and personal stories highlighting the importance of self-defense. The episode emphasizes the need for continued support for the NRA and other organizations fighting for Second Amendment rights. In this episode, Mark Walters discusses the importance of self-defense stories, particularly those involving firearms, and how they relate to current crime rates in cities like Chicago and Washington, DC. The conversation highlights the deterrent effect of armed citizens, the impact of political leadership on crime, and the necessity of legal support for gun owners. The roundtable discussion also delves into cultural shifts and the role of education in shaping public perceptions of safety and crime prevention. Takeaways The NRA is actively involved in numerous legal challenges across the country. Recent court decisions have shown promise for gun rights advocates. Florida's young adult purchase ban is being challenged by the NRA. The importance of self-defense laws is highlighted through personal stories. Statistical analysis shows a significant drop in crime rates in DC under the current administration. The threat of prosecution is a key deterrent for criminals. The NRA's legal efforts are crucial in the fight against gun control measures. Public support for the NRA is essential for continued advocacy. The conversation emphasizes the need for vigilance in protecting Second Amendment rights. The impact of immigration on crime rates is a pressing issue. Self-defense stories highlight the importance of firearms in personal safety. Crime rates in cities like Chicago and DC are alarming and require attention. The Trump administration is making strides to ease gun carry laws. Community response is crucial in addressing ongoing violence in urban areas. Legal support for gun owners is essential in self-defense situations. Education plays a vital role in preventing crime and promoting safety. Government accountability is necessary for public safety and trust. Cultural shifts can lead to significant political changes. The actions of agencies like the ATF raise concerns about government overreach. Unity among gun owners and advocates is essential to protect rights. Keywords NRA, gun rights, litigation, court cases, self-defense, crime statistics, immigration, legal challenges, Second Amendment, Florida gun laws, self-defense, firearms, crime rates, Chicago, political dynamics, deterrent effect, gun ownership, public safety, legal support, cultural shifts  

In this podcast, Jeff talks about his trip to Italy and love of Italians — and notes the many similarities between Italians and Jews and one glaring difference. Italy was great but the constant content making of young people in Capri annoyed him. Only this dopey, lazy mentality could drive the success of Zorhan Mamdani, a Socialist Hamas supporter, in the NYC mayoral race.

(0:00) Intro(1:27) About the podcast sponsor: The American College of Governance Counsel(2:13) Start of interview(2:51) Jonathan's origin story(4:23) His Journey into Governance, initially via accounting with PwC and later with Lazard.(6:17) Types of Governance Structures(7:51) About his firm Current Capital Partners (M&A advisory, corporate management services, and PE investing).(8:31) The Inspiration Behind his book On Boards: The Modern Playbook for Corporate Governance.(10:44) Interviews that Shaped the Narrative. His standout: Admiral Michael Mullen.(13:04) Target Audience for the Book(14:48) The importance of "boards [with a roster of] best athletes, not experts in a narrow area."(17:04) His personal journey into boardrooms(19:56) Experience as an Expert Witness (21:41) Evolution of Delaware's Corporate Law. *Reference to Moelis case and Tesla's Elon Musk CEO compensation case. (24:40) AI's Impact on the Boardroom. "[I]t is critical to remember that directors oversee, but management runs the company day to day."(29:50) Navigating Geopolitical Challenges(32:01) The Rise of Shareholder Activism(34:29) Insights on Corporate Restructuring *Reference to E38 on the rise of bankruptcy directors with Jared Ellias (now at HLS)(38:33) Separation of Chair and CEO is preferable(39:00) "I think term-limits are a cop-out" there should be annual individual director evaluations.(39:43) The Need for Corporate Director Licenses.(41:36) Books that have greatly influenced his life:On a Clear Day You Can See General Motors, by Patrick J. Wright (1979)The Right Stuff, by Tom Wolfe (1979)The House of Morgan, by Ron Chernow (1990)(42:30) His mentors(43:18) Quotes that he thinks of often or lives his life by: "You can't get a hit if you don't swing the bat" "I'm dumb enough to make a decision" "It's all about tomorrow" "Have fun, life is too short"(44:24) An unusual habit or an absurd thing that he loves.(45:31) The living person he most admires: the Pope and Lebron James.Jonathan Foster is an experienced corporate director, investment banker, and expert witness in corporate litigation, and the author of the new book On Boards: The Modern Playbook for Corporate Governance. He has served on more than 50 boards, including Fortune 500 companies, private companies and companies involved in restructurings. You can follow Evan on social media at:X: @evanepsteinLinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/epsteinevan/ Substack: https://evanepstein.substack.com/__To support this podcast you can join as a subscriber of the Boardroom Governance Newsletter at https://evanepstein.substack.com/__Music/Soundtrack (found via Free Music Archive): Seeing The Future by Dexter Britain is licensed under a Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License

Litigation financing is a field that can seem a bit complex, but at its core, it's all about helping people and businesses manage the financial strain that comes with legal battles. In this episode with Eric Schuller, president of the Alliance for Responsible Consumer Legal Funding, we got a clear picture of what consumer legal funding is really about. Unlike commercial litigation financing, which involves large sums of money flowing to law firms or corporations to cover hefty legal fees, consumer legal funding reflects smaller, more direct support. This funding helps everyday people cover their living expenses, think rent, mortgage, groceries, while their legal cases move through the system. Eric emphasized that the money given in consumer legal funding cannot be used to pay for the litigation itself, which is a vital protection designed to keep things transparent and fair.On the flip side, commercial litigation financing is a much bigger beast, mostly involving companies funding lawsuits that can reach into the millions, like patent fights or other business-related disputes. The stakes and amounts are larger, and this sector is often criticized because it sometimes leads to complex conflicts of interest, especially when outside investors start putting money directly into law firms. Eric talked about how these big commercial deals have a vastly different risk profile and payment structure compared to consumer funding. The commercial side tends to have fewer but much larger investments, while consumer legal funding operates on a higher volume of smaller cases, supporting individuals who really need the financial bridge to get through tough times.One of the key challenges discussed is the confusion in legislation that lumps these two types of funding together, which can lead to unfair restrictions and misunderstandings. Eric pointed out that legislation works best when it clearly distinguishes consumer funding from commercial financing. The consumer side is focused on protection and aid, while the commercial side is more about risk investment and business strategy. This clear separation helps protect consumers who rely on these funds for basic needs without hampering the potential regulation and oversight of the commercial financing world. It's a constantly evolving space, with new laws and industry best practices emerging to ensure fairness, transparency, and responsible investment from both sides.Takeaway List:Distinction between consumer legal funding and commercial legal fundingConsumer legal funding supports household needs, not litigation costsCommercial litigation funding involves large sums for business lawsuitsConsumer funding payout comes after attorney and lien paymentsConsumer legal funding started in late 1990s; commercial in early 2000sChapters:00:00 Introduction to Litigation Financing02:00 Overview of Consumer Legal Funding10:00 Differences Between Consumer and Commercial Litigation Funding18:00 Eric Schuller's Insights on Consumer Legal Funding30:00 Legislative Landscape and Consumer Protections40:00 Commercial Litigation Financing Challenges50:00 Disclosure, Regulation, and Industry Future60:00 Role of Insurance and Risk Management70:00 Closing Thoughts on Litigation FinancingConnect with RiskCellar:Website: https://www.riskcellar.com/Brandon Schuh:Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=61552710523314LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/brandon-stephen-schuh/Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/schuhpapa/Nick Hartmann:LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/nickjhartmann/

Trucking defense attorney Doug Marcello joins Bill Kanasky, Jr., Ph.D. to discuss the latest in trucking litigation. Doug provides a “state of the union” update on where the industry has been, where it is now, and where it needs to go. They address recent tort reform efforts in states like Georgia, Louisiana, and South Carolina, and the importance of leveraging those reforms effectively. An important point that Doug and Bill highlight is the continued lack of collaboration among defense attorneys compared to the highly coordinated plaintiff's bar, which continues to share strategies nationwide. Doug and Bill emphasize the need for defense teams to be more proactive, from filing first to secure favorable jurisdictions, to preparing witnesses early, and by using focus groups early to test case themes, witness credibility, and damages strategies before mediation. They highlight the benefits of repeated testing and retesting to refine approaches, rather than relying on gut instincts or past case experience. The discussion also covers the importance of simple, compelling storytelling in openings and closings, counter-anchoring damages with reasonable and well-justified numbers, and making strategic concessions to build credibility with jurors. Doug and Bill stress that winning doesn't always mean a defense verdict — reasonable settlements and mitigation of liability and damages can be victories when approached the right way. Finally, they analyze the Texas Supreme Court's Warner decision, which reaffirmed the necessity of proximate cause in negligence cases and rejected the idea that simply being present at the scene is enough for liability. Both agree that the ruling provides clarity and is a positive outcome for the trucking industry.

Marc spricht mit Dr. Constantin Rehaag, Partner bei Dentons, über seinen vielfältigen Weg vom Reserveoffizier zum IP-Litigator mit strafrechtlichem Schwerpunkt. Es geht um die Bekämpfung von Marken- und Produktpiraterie, die internationale Zollpraxis, lebensgefährliche Medikamentenfälschungen und den Einsatz von KI in Großkanzleien, inklusive Einblicken in interne AI-Guidelines, Legal-Tech-Investitionen und veränderte Ausbildungsmodelle für junge Juristen. Wie erkennt man Fälschungen schon an der Paketflut? Welche Chancen eröffnet der europäische AI-Act für Anwälte? Weshalb bevorzugt Constantin Bewerber, deren zweites Examen stärker ausfällt? Warum sollten Partner in Kanzleien länger arbeiten? Antworten auf diese und viele weitere Fragen erhaltet Ihr in dieser Folge von IMR. Viel Spaß!

Jennifer Oliver is an experienced commercial litigator who has defended consumer class actions and multidistrict litigation, including those arising from data breaches and antitrust. She has worked in several high-profile jury trials, serving as lead counsel in complex mediations. She also counsels clients on matters related to privacy compliance and use of ad tech and similar technologies.Jennifer is a shareholder at Buchanan, Ingersoll & Rooney and has a long list of relevant affiliations and certifications including being an Executive Committee Member of the Privacy Section at the California Lawyers Association.With Jennifer we have dived deeper into AdTech or pixel-related litigation in California, both in court and through arbitration.References:* Jennifer Oliver on LinkedIn* Jennifer Oliver's profile at Buchanan* John Pavolotsky: How successful can US privacy laws be at regulating AI models and systems? (Masters of Privacy)* California SB 690 Passes California's Senate, Signaling a Major Step in Redefining Privacy Law and Limiting CIPA Litigation for Online Businesses This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.mastersofprivacy.com/subscribe

Stand Up is a daily podcast. I book,host,edit, post and promote new episodes with brilliant guests every day. This show is Ad free and fully supported by listeners like you! Please subscribe now for as little as 5$ and gain access to a community of over 750 awesome, curious, kind, funny, brilliant, generous souls Skye L. Perryman is a lawyer and the President and CEO of Democracy Forward, a non-partisan, national legal organization that promotes democracy and progress through litigation, regulatory engagement, policy education, and research. Over the course of Ms. Perryman's legal career, which has spanned nearly two decades, she has served in litigation roles at two global law firms, as a general counsel and chief legal officer, and in non-profit organizations. Ms. Perryman has represented clients across a broad range of industries, including in the healthcare, financial services, technology, education, consumer products, and non-profit sectors. Ms. Perryman's work has been recognized widely for its positive impact on people and communities. She has received numerous awards and recognitions for her commitment to public service and her professional work, including being named a Harry S. Truman Scholar (2002), a Baylor Line Foundation Outstanding Young Alumni (2018), a four-time Rising Star in Litigation in Washington, DC, one of the Most Influential People Shaping Policy in Washington, among other recognitions. Ms. Perryman is a frequent guest lecturer and keynote speaker on matters at the intersection of law and policy. Her legal briefs have been cited by the US Supreme Court as well as state supreme courts and her work is frequently covered in outlets such as The New York Times, National Public Radio, NBC News, The Washington Post, The Houston Chronicle, Teen Vogue, MSNBC, and CNN. As a founding member of the litigation team at Democracy Forward, Ms. Perryman developed and filed cases challenging unlawful activities pursued by the forty-fifth Presidential administration. All told, Democracy Forward brought more than 100 legal actions against the prior administration for abuses of power, stopping harmful policies and improving the lives of millions. Following the events of January 6, 2021, Democracy Forward expanded the scope and reach of its work to address anti-democratic activity across the nation, including countering the work of far-right legal organizations who are seeking to reverse our nation's progress. It has taken more than 700+ actions and works alongside more than 400+ clients and partners, filing cases across a range of issues, including those that advance reproductive health care, protect the freedom to read, defend civil rights, and preserve crucial checks and balances in our system of government. Under Ms. Perryman's leadership, Democracy Forward has emerged as a leader in unmasking Project 2025 - an effort backed by more than 100 far-right organizations to enable a future anti-democratic presidential administration to take swift action to roll back our rights and freedoms, and hurt the American people. Ms. Perryman grew up in Waco, Texas and is a proud product of K-12 public education. She holds a Bachelor of Arts in Economics and Philosophy magna cum laude from Baylor University where she was elected to Phi Beta Kappa and a Juris Doctor with honors from the Georgetown University Law Center where she served as an Editor for the American Criminal Law Review and was an Editor in Chief for the ACLR's Annual Survey on White Collar Crime. Perryman serves on the board of the Interfaith Alliance, the Baylor Line Foundation, and the Atlas Performing Arts Center, among other non-profit charitable organizations. Join us Thursday's at 8EST for our Weekly Happy Hour Hangout!  Pete on Blue Sky Pete on Threads Pete on Tik Tok Pete on YouTube  Pete on Twitter Pete On Instagram Pete Personal FB page Stand Up with Pete FB page All things Jon Carroll  Follow and Support Pete Coe Buy Ava's Art  Hire DJ Monzyk to build your website or help you with Marketing

 This week, join us as we revisit our episode on the Anti-Subrogation Rule for a refresher! Original Air Date: June 11, 2021. The idea that an insurance company cannot subrogate against its own insureds seems like common sense, but is this a hard-and-fast rule?  What happens when an insurance company tries to seek reimbursement for medical expenses paid to their insured when they also insure the tortfeasor who caused those injuries? What if that insured seeks her own recovery against the tortfeasor for the same medical expenses? What if an insured's intentional act was the cause of serious injuries or death? Does their insurance company have a right to subrogate to recover those amounts from their insured? In this installment in our series, follow Rebecca and Steve as they navigate the anti-subrogation rule and explain why insurance carriers cannot typically subrogate against their own insureds, and when such actions may be permitted. 

Lindsie is back from jury duty and she's STILL trying to get her life (and laundry) in order! This week, Kristen and Lindsie touch on everything from Jackson's new retainer tech to why the Amish might be allergy-free. Kristen's lists all her allergies (raspberries and ALL legumes?!) that has us questioning her quality of life. A listener writes in with some explanation on the litigation topic, shocking Spirit Airlines pilot charges, and the baffling concept of unintentional stalking. Plus, who's stealing $30k worth of Labubus??Thank you to our sponsors!Branch Basics: Get 15% off Branch Basics with the code southerntea at Branchbasics.com/Southerntea #branchbasicspodBuffy: Get 20% off your first Buffy order using code SOUTHERNTEA at Buffy.coIQBar: Text TEA to 64000 for 20% off all IQBar products, plus FREE shipping. By Texting 64000, you agree to receive recurring automated marketing messages from IQBAR. Message and data rates may apply. No purchase required. Terms apply, available at IQBAR.com. Reply "STOP" to stop, "HELP" for help.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

On July 23, the International Court of Justice issued an advisory opinion that many are regarding as a groundbreaking legal moment for the fight against climate change. But what was included in the actual opinion? What does this mean for the future of climate litigation? And most importantly, what will this mean for the future of climate action? To answer all these questions and more, we talk to Dr. Maria Antonia Tigre, the Director of Global Climate Change Litigation at the Sabin Center. She explains how this decision sets a new precedent in international law by recognizing the extensive legal obligations countries have in combating climate change. We explore how the opinion integrates customary international law, human rights, and environmental treaties, offering a robust framework for future climate cases. Dr. Maria Antonia Tigre also details the fascinating backstory of how a class project from the University of South Pacific in Vanuatu evolved into a global movement, culminating in this historic opinion. She shares insight into the legal community's reaction, the potential ripple effects on domestic and international cases, and the strengthened legal arguments that could emerge from this decision. We also explore the role science played in informing the court's decision, particularly the emphasis on the 1.5-degree threshold as a legal standard. Finally, we discuss the broader implications for fossil fuel regulation, climate reparations, and the responsibilities of both developed and developing nations. Dr. Maria Antonia Tigre is the Director of Global Climate Change Litigation at the Sabin Center. She manages the Sabin Center's Global Climate Change Litigation Database with the support of the Sabin Center's Peer Review Network of Climate Litigation. Maria Antonia is a leading expert in the field of climate change law and climate litigation, having published dozens of articles on the topic. She also co-heads the Sabin Center and GNHRE's project on Climate Litigation in the Global South.  Please consider becoming a paid subscriber to our newsletter/podcast, The Climate Weekly, to help support this show. Your contributions will make the continuation of this show possible.  Our music is "Gotta Get Up" by The Passion Hifi, check out his music at thepassionhifi.com. Rate, review and subscribe to this podcast on iTunes, Spotify, and more! Subscribe to our YouTube channel.

The Trade Guys welcome Rick Woldenberg, CEO of hand2mind and Learning Resources, whose companies are plaintiffs in a lawsuit challenging the Trump administration's use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. They explore the case, its broader implications, and how tariffs are affecting American businesses.

Dai Wei Chin Feman is Managing Director and Corporate Counsel at Parabellum Capital, a litigation funder. This conversation gets practical about career advancement though building a durable book with optionality, karma-as-a-system, and policy work. In this conversation, we discuss:How business development differentiates youHow parallel “optionality” compounds opportunityTurning affinity bars/CLEs into firmwide BD platformsWhy deliberate generosity is a diversification strategyFunding realities: policy, visibility, credibilityFrom “say yes” → strategic “no's” to protect your flywheelA 20-minute daily support habit + real-time alerts

Bill Kanasky, Jr., Ph.D. talks about the role of juror beliefs and attitudes in voir dire and why they must be treated as distinct concepts. Beliefs are what jurors think (cognitive), while attitudes are how they feel (emotional). Bill emphasizes that while many attorneys stop at/after belief-based questions, it's the follow-up attitude questions that reveal the real risk, since emotions ultimately drive juror decision-making. Bill gives an example of the sequence: start with belief questions such as “Do you think corporations put profits over safety?” and then follow up with attitude questions like “How do you feel about that?” Two jurors may share the same belief but have very different emotional reactions with one seeing it as a natural part of capitalism, while another may express deep distrust. That emotional distinction - the 'why' behind the belief - is where attorneys uncover risky jurors. Bill stresses that attorneys must not be afraid of uncovering negative emotions. In fact, identifying jurors with strong negative attitudes provides valuable opportunities to uncover additional risky jurors by asking who else feels the same way. Help make it easier for jurors to strike themselves. He advises attorneys to normalize negative responses, encourage openness, and use follow-ups, including multiple-choice options, to make it easier for jurors to express themselves. Ultimately, he argues that separating beliefs from attitudes and digging into emotional responses is the key to identifying and striking high-risk jurors.

It's easy to think legal dramas only happen to other people. You're busy juggling tenants, trades, inspections, owners and there's no time to worry about something like litigation. BUT the biggest legal risks in property management often don't come from dramatic incidents. They come from the quiet things, the vague termination letter, the maintenance request that gets lost in the shuffle, the call you meant to return but didn't.Legal issues in property management often come out of nowhere but they don't have to. If you've ever had that gut feeling that something's slipped through the cracks, or you're lying awake wondering if you've covered yourself properly, this episode is for you.In this episode, I share a few hard lessons I've learnt from situations I didn't see coming and how you can protect yourself before they become your reality too. These are the things no one tells you when you start a property management business, but they matter more than you think.“ I believe that transparency is the key. Transparency with your team, transparency with your tenants, transparency with your property owners. Make sure you're regularly checking in with everyone involved and keeping all parties informed of the status of issues. The more you communicate, the less room there is for misunderstandings and complaints.” -Kylie Walker We explore:What happened when I was too “nice” in a termination letter and how it cost me in courtThe maintenance issue that spiralled into a lawsuit even though we didn't engage the tradieWhy your agency can be held liable for things that feel out of your controlHow Office of Fair Trading complaints usually start and what you can do to avoid themThe insurance cover you need and what happens when it's not enoughThe systems I now rely on to reduce risk and catch things before they fall through the cracksWhy ongoing team training and crystal clear communication are non negotiablesKylie's Resources:Property Management Growth School: https://courses.thatpropertymum.com.au/TPM-BDMSchool Digital Marketing School: https://courses.thatpropertymum.com.au/digitalschool That Property Mum Courses: https://www.thatpropertymum.com.au/courses/ The PM Accelerate Membership: https://courses.thatpropertymum.com.au/accelerate Book a Strategy Call with Kylie: https://calendly.com/kylie-tpm/coaching-call Kolmeo: https://kolmeo.com/ Sensor Global: https://sensorinsure.com/ https://sensorglobal.com/ HD&U Sales Bundle: https://www.hdandu.com.au/that-property-mum-sales-readiness-bundle-0 Find out about our Done for You Lead Generation -...

In this episode, we sit down with Jesenia Orozco, a seasoned litigation paralegal in Florida whose career spans family law, immigration law, and beyond. With years of hands-on experience, Jesenia has guided attorneys and clients through some of life's most challenging legal battles — always bringing compassion, precision, and unwavering dedication to every case… Jesenia is the founder of Less4Legal, a legal service provider committed to delivering affordable, streamlined family law assistance to individuals and families who can't afford full legal representation. A former beauty queen turned legal advocate, she uses her platform to champion the most vulnerable, making high-quality legal support both accessible and dignified. Hit play to learn about: The complexities associated with family law. How paralegals help law firms free up time and resources. The ways that immigration law professionals can assist international clients. The role that ChatGDP is playing in the modern legal field. Want to find out more about Jesenia and Less4Legal's services? Get in touch here or follow @less4legalllc!

Today on our podcast, we're releasing a repurposed recording of our July 23, 2025 webinar titled “Student Lending Legislation and Litigation: 2025 Mid-Year Review.” The webinar features esteemed partners John Culhane and Tom Burke, who dive into the intricacies of student lending litigation and regulatory developments. As a senior partner in the Consumer Financial Services Group, John Culhane shares his extensive knowledge on higher education finance, focusing on state legislation and private student loan litigation. Tom Burke, also a partner in the same group, brings his expertise in private class actions and state enforcement actions, providing insights into the One Big Beautiful Bill Act and its significant impact on federal loan servicers and discussing federal student loan litigation. Consumer Finance Monitor is hosted by Alan Kaplinsky, Senior Counsel at Ballard Spahr, and the founder and former chair of the firm's Consumer Financial Services Group. We encourage listeners to subscribe to the podcast on their preferred platform for weekly insights into developments in the consumer finance industry.

In this episode of The Free Lawyer, host Gary Miles interviews Shari Belitz, a litigation consultant and forensic psychologist. Shari shares how she helps civil defense lawyers and insurance professionals use psychological principles to improve trial outcomes. They discuss effective case framing, jury selection, and witness preparation, highlighting common mistakes and practical strategies. Shari explains how storytelling, mock trials, and understanding juror biases can shape verdicts, and offers tips for countering plaintiff tactics like the “reptile theory.” The episode provides actionable insights for lawyers seeking to enhance their trial advocacy through psychology.Shari Belitz, Esq., is a Nationally Recognized Litigation Consultant, Keynote Speaker, Best Selling Author, Chief Executive Officer of Shari Belitz Communications LLC, Certified by the National Women's Business Enterprise National Counsel (WBENC). She is also the founder of the educational subscription course, EnPSYCHLAWpedia®.Shari Belitz Communications, LLC is a litigation consulting company which helps civil defense lawyers and insurance professionals achieve favorable litigation outcomes using psychology. Shari conducts mock trials, prepares witnesses for depositions and trials, writes theme development reports for mediation and trial, and performs jury selection and other customized trial services.Shari is an attorney with over twenty years of experience in the legal profession. Prior to her litigation consulting career, she was an accomplished insurance coverage attorney at a law firm and litigation manager in-house at an insurance company where she handled complex mass tort lawsuits for Fortune 500 insured clients. During her legal career, Shari studied forensic psychology, including advanced jury science and research at the graduate level.Intersection of Law and Psychology (00:02:20) Transition to Litigation Consulting (00:03:35) Jury Instructions and Psychology (00:04:25) Corporate Litigation Experience (00:05:55) Creating Compelling Jury Narratives (00:07:44) Common Mistakes in Openings and Voir Dire (00:11:36) Voir Dire Strategies and Juror Types (00:14:22) Deposition and Witness Preparation (00:17:51) Managing Jury Bias Against Defendants (00:22:58) Using Present Tense in Openings (00:26:19) Insights from Mock Trials (00:27:16) Overcoming Confirmation Bias (00:28:46) Psychological Techniques for Witnesses (00:30:16) SReptile Theory in Litigation (00:33:22)Responding to Reptile Tactics (00:36:19) Would you like to learn more about Breaking Free or order your copy? https://www.garymiles.net/break-free Would you like to schedule a complimentary discovery call? You can do so here: https://calendly.com/garymiles-successcoach/one-one-discovery-call

A status update on the JFK Records Act litigation between the Mary Ferrell Foundation and NARA.    Just a few days ago on August 6th, the  litigants filed a joint status report in the case involving the declassification of records related to historical assassinations.  The defendant's request for summary judgement was stayed as a result of President Trumps order regarding the release of records and this new  status report updates the public on the latest status of the suit. 

In Episode 397, host John Q. Khosravi, Esq. reunites with Kevin A. Gregg, host of the Immigration Review podcast, for their monthly dive into federal litigation. They explore trends, key case takeaways, strategic tips for navigating federal courts, and how litigation is shifting alongside USCIS practices. Key topics: Emerging patterns in federal litigation Key takeaways from recent cases Strategic considerations for attorneys navigating federal courts The evolving relationship between litigation and USCIS trends Show notes: Roman Zelichenko Tennis Retreat Tune in to the podcast here:  YouTube | Podcast | iTunes For Lawyers Only: Master the EB-1A petition—plus get a bonus O-1 visa workshop. JOIN NOW! - Get the Toolbox Magazine here! - Join our community (Lawyers Only):  - Get Started in Immigration Law! The Marriage/Family-Based Green Card course is for you 

John Quinn is joined by Mohammed Rashik, Founder and CEO of Rain Intelligence, a legal technology company that helps lawyers identify emerging legal needs and find potential clients—to make rain. Rain Intelligence provides AI-powered analysis of data from social media, government filings, e-commerce platforms, and other sources to detect patterns and events that could signal potential class action cases, regulatory issues, or other complex litigation opportunities. The goal is to make business development for lawyers more systematic and data-driven than more traditional, reactive methods.The idea for Rain Intelligence was born from Mohammed's frustration with the lack of tools to help generate clients when starting a solo practice. He began identifying legal issues proactively—such as discovering that a warehouse fire had likely been caused by a neighboring property's code violations—and found this approach led naturally to client engagement. The core insight was that legal needs often follow predictable patterns triggered by real-world events, and those patterns can be identified and scaled using data science.Rain Intelligence delivers daily personalized reports tailored to each attorney's practice areas, clients, and litigation history. These updates synthesize signals from a wide range of data pipelines—such as product labels, product recalls, consumer complaints, Substack articles, government announcements, and class action advertising—to identify high-potential legal opportunities. The opportunities are analyzed to assess the prospects for proving liability, the amount of damages, and the collectability of judgments. The service is subscription-based and is currently used by roughly half of the Am Law Top 10 firms and 20% of the top 200.Mohammed explains how Rain Intelligence pieces together disparate data sets to uncover legal risks that may not be obvious in isolation. For example, labeling a food item “preservative free” while including citric acid, which regulators consider a preservative, could be the basis for a lawsuit when combined with regulatory guidance and recent litigation trends. The technology is built to integrate seamlessly into legal workflows, helping lawyers generate business by doing what they do best—spotting legal issues and advising clients.Podcast Link: Law-disrupted.fmHost: John B. Quinn Producer: Alexis HydeMusic and Editing by: Alexander Rossi

This week, we have an update in the case of Milwaukee judge Hannah Dugan.Texas Governor Abbott is threatening to fine, arrest, and remove house Democrats who have fled the state to protest the new maps Republicans are trying to draw.Jeffrey Clark has been recommended for disbarment. An old law suit brought by Devin Nunes has been thrown out.And we are joined by the founder of Lawyers for Good Government to talk about their latest initiative.Pro Bono Litigation Corps — Lawyers for Good Governmenthttp://whistlebloweraid.org/beansThank you, Mint Mobile.Get this new customer offer and your 3-month Unlimited wireless plan for just $15 a month at  MINTMOBILE.com/CLEANUP  Allison Gillhttps://muellershewrote.substack.com/https://bsky.app/profile/muellershewrote.comHarry DunnHarry Dunn | Substack@libradunn1.bsky.social on BlueskyWant to support this podcast and get it ad-free and early?Go to: https://www.patreon.com/aisle45podTell us about yourself and what you like about the show - http://survey.podtrac.com/start-survey.aspx?pubid=BffJOlI7qQcF&ver=short

Today on Mea Culpa, I'm joined by Norm Eisen, a CNN Legal Analyst and the founder and executive chair of “States United Democracy Center”, a nonpartisan organization advancing free, fair, and secure elections. We break down the implosion at Trump's Department of Justice over his continued Epstein Files cover up, and look ahead to the midterm elections as the stakes are higher than ever. Shopify: Sign up for a $1 per month trial period at: https://shopify.com/COHEN Subscribe to Michael's YouTube Channel: ⁠https://www.youtube.com/@TheMichaelCohenShow⁠ Join us on Patreon: ⁠https://www.patreon.com/PoliticalBeatdown⁠ Add the Mea Culpa podcast feed: ⁠https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/mea-culpa-with-michael-cohen⁠ Add the Political Beatdown podcast feed: ⁠https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/political-beatdown Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

On this episode of Next Level CRE, Matt Faircloth interviews Patrick Grimes, founder of Passive Investing Mastery. Patrick shares his journey from a robotics engineer to a seasoned investor, detailing early missteps in pre-development deals during the 2008 crash and how he rebuilt by focusing on recession-resilient markets. He explains why he pivoted from single-family rentals to large-scale multifamily and ultimately to alternative, non-correlated investments like litigation finance. Patrick dives deep into how his firm funds late-stage mass tort legal cases—such as Camp Lejeune and LA Juvenile Detention settlements—for outsized, socially impactful returns. Patrick Grimes Current role: Founder & CEO, Passive Investing Mastery Based in: Honolulu, Hawaii Say hi to them at: investwithpatrick.com | passiveinvestingmastery.com Visit investwithsunrise.com to learn more about investment opportunities. Post your job for free at https://www.linkedin.com/BRE. Terms and conditions apply. Join the Best Ever Community  The Best Ever Community is live and growing - and we want serious commercial real estate investors like you inside. It's free to join, but you must apply and meet the criteria.  Connect with top operators, LPs, GPs, and more, get real insights, and be part of a curated network built to help you grow. Apply now at ⁠www.bestevercommunity.com⁠ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices