Podcast appearances and mentions of Courtney C Radsch

Caitlin Chin-Rothmann sits down with Dr. Courtney C. Radsch, director of the Center for Journalism and Liberty at the Open Markets Institute, to discuss the state of the news media in an evolving technological landscape. Caitlin and Courtney cover recent developments related to Canada's Online News Act, the California Journalism Preservation Act, and the U.S. Journalism and Competition Preservation Act, as well as responses from Meta and Google. In addition, they consider how the rapid adoption of generative AI could potentially affect journalists and the sustainability of news.

Over the past couple of episodes, we've been examining the relationship between public media and social media. In this episode – the final episode of this mini series – we're asking how can we regulate social media? How can we ensure a more balanced media ecosystem, where media organisations are financially viable, publicly visible and accessible, and where mis- and disinformation is controlled? Presenter: Harry Lock. Guests: Pascal Albrechtskirchinger (ZDF), Helen Jay (University of Westminster), Courtney C. Radsch, David Sutton (ABC). Reporter: Desilon Daniels (PMA).  Music: Lucas Thompson, Rachel Still and Tom Brazier.  Special effects: Studio Kolomna, Microsammy and pixabay. 

A very timely discussion with Dr. Sahar Khamis and her guests Dr. Nader Kabbani and Dr. Courtney Radsch in the program "The Bridge" on how AI is changing our world today, its different usages and applications, its economic, social, technological, and educational impacts, and all the opportunities it brings and the threats it poses. Dr. Nader Kabbani is Senior Fellow and Director of Research with the Middle East Council on Global Affairs and a Research Fellow with the Economic Research Forum. Previously, Kabbani was a Senior Fellow with the Brookings Institution and Director of Research with the Brookings Doha Center. A development researcher and practitioner with over 20 years' experience, Kabbani served in leadership positions the Silatech Foundation and the Syria Development Research Center at the Syria Trust for Development. He also served on the faculty of the American University of Beirut and the research staff of the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the California State Senate. Kabbani regularly consults for international organizations and serves on the advisory boards of several social enterprises and non-profit organizations. Kabbani holds a B.A. from Claremont McKenna College and a Ph.D. in Economics from the Johns Hopkins University. Dr. Courtney C. Radsch, PhD, is the Director of the Center for Journalism and Liberty at the Open Markets Institute. In this role, Dr. Radsch produces and oversees cutting-edge research into news media market structures and helps design smart policy solutions to protect and bolster journalism's financial and editorial independence. Dr. Radsch is journalist, scholar and advocate focused on the intersection of technology, media, and rights. Previously, she was a fellow at UCLA's Institute for Technology, Law & Policy where her research focuses on media sustainability and the platformatization of journalism; AI governance and information ecosystems; and the evolving socioeconomic and technopolitical effects of media and technology. She is the author of Cyberactivism and Citizen Journalism in Egypt: Digital Dissidence and Political Change (Palgrave-Macmillan, 2016)

Throughout the past two decades, social media networks have provided opportunities for public media to reach younger audiences and provide fresh content. It's been a necessary move, as younger audiences increasingly use these sites as a source of news. But recent headlines about two networks in particular – Twitter and TikTok – have shone a spotlight on public media's relationship with social media. What do these issues tell us about what it means for public service media to be on social media? And when the mission and values that govern social media are so different to that of public media, can public service media survive on these platforms? Presenter: Harry Lock. Guests: Jean-Paul Philippot (RTBF), Christian Gillinger (Swedish Radio), Courtney C. Radsch, and Philippe Edmond and Anne-Sophie Letellier (CBC/Radio-Canada). Music: Rachel Still, Lucas Thompson and Tom Brazier.

John Pollock & Wai Ting present a special live POST Show immediately following WWE Crown Jewel. Beyond discussing the results of this event, we conducting in-depth interviews about the various issues surrounding WWE's involvement with the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and the murder of journalist Jamal Khashoggi. For every minute of this broadcast, POST Wrestling will donate $5 towards the Committee to Protect Journalists (https://cpj.org/). Total revealed at the end of the show. TIMESTAMPS: 0:00 – Intro3:29 – Crown Jewel review34:12 – Dr. Courtney C. Radsch (CPJ)58:59 – Crown Jewel review (continued)1:16:24 – Brandon Howard Thurston (Wrestlenomics)1:32:30 – David Bixenspan (Deadspin)2:05:00 – Todd Martin (PWTorch)2:35:20 – Nate Milton (Kings of Sport)2:59:22 – David Meyers (former White House staff)3:28:26 – Lavie Margolin (author, TrumpMania) Plus, your feedback from the POST Wrestling Forum. You can WATCH video of our review by clicking here. [NOTE: Please excuse the technical issues in the live video. Some were cleaned up in the audio version. In particular, we urge you to LISTEN to our interview with Brandon Howard Thurston rather than watching due to technical issues within the video stream affecting its quality.]   Subscribe to POST WrestlingiTunes & iOS  | Android | Spotify | Google Play | Stitcher | TuneIn | Mac & PC | RSS Discuss this show at the POST Wrestling Forum
https://forum.postwrestling.com Support our Patreon - The POST Wrestling Café
http://www.patreon.com/POSTwrestling Follow us
Twitter | Facebook | Instagram | YouTube 

Net Neutrality Heats Up as President Obama has came out strongly for the concept of net neutrality, saying that an open Internet is essential to the American economy, and increasingly to our very way of life.Plus, we discuss Free Press in the Digital Age and the Battle over Whistleblowers as Bennet interviews Courtney C. Radsch, PhD, a journalist, researcher, and free expression advocate from the Committee to Protect Journalists.

El necio cree que todo lo que hace está bien, pero el sabio atiende los consejos. Proverbios 12: 15 No hay una lista de «Los diez refranes más populares de todos los tiempos», pero si la hubiera, hay uno que con toda seguridad estaría en el tope: «Dime con quién andas, y te diré quién eres». ¿Tenían razón nuestros abuelos y nuestros padres cuando nos repetían estas palabras? Una investigación realizada por la Universidad de Columbia, Estados Unidos, confirma que hay sabiduría en el viejo refrán. Entre los hallazgos más relevantes, el estudio encontró los siguientes: Es mucho más probable que un joven consuma marihuana si más de la mitad de sus amigos ya la está consumiendo. Las posibilidades de que un joven vea pornografía en Internet aumentan hasta tres veces si la mayoría de sus amigos ya lo hace. Si al menos la mitad de sus amigos son sexualmente activos, el riesgo de que el joven consuma alcohol aumenta treinta veces; el de consumir marihuana, veintidós veces; y el de fumar, cinco veces (Courtney C. Radsch, New York Times, edición electrónica, 20 de agosto de 2004). Los investigadores aclaran que el estudio no trata de establecer una relación de causa-efecto, sino más bien mostrar que hay una estrecha relación entre los amigos del joven y los hábitos que este adopta. Dicho de otra manera: las posibilidades de que un joven se involucre en conductas indeseables aumentan considerablemente si sus amigos participan de manera habitual de esas conductas. Estos resultados, por supuesto, no sorprenden a nadie. Todos queremos ser aceptados, no rechazados, por nuestros amigos. El problema se produce cuando, para lograr esa aceptación, nos vemos obligados a pagar un precio demasiado elevado. Y este es, en mi opinión, el punto central del estudio de la Universidad de Columbia. Ya sabíamos que los amigos influyen en nosotros. ¡Pero tanto! Alguien podrá alegar que se trata de solo un estudio. Sin embargo, ¿será necesario esperar que otros estudios confirmen lo que durante tantos años nos han dicho los abuelos? Ellos ya nos lo advirtieron: «Dime con quién andas, y te diré quién eres». Y hasta ahora nadie ha podido demostrar que estaban equivocados. ¿Escucharemos a los abuelos? ¿O pasaremos a formar parte de las estadísticas?  “Padre celestial,ayúdame a escuchar el consejo de las personas adultas que desean mi bienestar. Y dame sabiduría para escoger bien a mis amigos”.