Podcast appearances and mentions of megan stevenson

A celebration of independent horror and genre cinema... by the sea!This week Ben Errington and Andy Conduit-Turner attend Screams by the Sea at Pavilion Dance South West in Bournemouth. This episode includes interviews and reviews, plus catch-ups with previous guests and new friends.Screams By The Sea is a one-day event packed with thrills, chills and amazing opportunities. The main stage shows 5 feature films, a short film selection, script pitches and an awards ceremony. The event also includes a slew of industry talks, workshops and Q&As in the Industry Hub.00:00 Introduction05:45 Interview w/ Radi Nikolov (Festival Director)08:52 Interview w/ Aurélia Mengin (Director & Star of Scarlet Blue)19:11 Scarlet Blue Review26:37 Interview w/ Neil Fraser30:14 Suicide For Beginners Review35:14 Interview w/ Craig Thieman (Director of Suicide For Beginners)44:55 The Daemon Review54:35 Interview w/ Ruby Adams (Festival Event Manager)59:13 Interview w/ Katie Bonham (The Girl With The Haunted Vagina Producer)1:03:55 Umbra Review1:07:12 The Girl In Kelp Review1:08:47 The Girl With The Haunted Vagina Review1:12:29 Transylvanie Review1:14:34 Tasty Tongue Review1:18:15 Screenplay Competition1:24:43 Interview w/ Mark Walker1:29:50 Interview w/ Sam Carter1:33:53 Time Travel Is Dangerous Review1:40:42 Interview w/ Megan Stevenson, Ruth Syratt and Tom Lenk (Stars of Time Travel Is Dangerous)1:52:22 Final Thoughts / Festival Favourites2:08:53 Outro / Thanks (cont'd)http://www.horrorhangout.co.ukhttp://www.screamsbythesea.co.ukPodcast - https://fanlink.tv/horrorhangoutPatreon - http://www.patreon.com/horrorhangoutFacebook - http://www.facebook.com/horrorhangoutpodcastX - http:/x.com/horror_hangout_TikTok - http://www.tiktok.com/@horrorhangoutpodcastInstagram - http://www.instagram.com/horrorhangoutpodcastBen - https://x.com/ben_errington​​​Andy - https://www.instagram.com/andyctwrites/Audio credit - Taj Eastonhttp://tajeaston.comSupport this show http://supporter.acast.com/thehorrorhangout. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Do policies built around social and behavioral science research actually work? That's a big, and contentious, question. It's also almost an existential question for the disciplines involved. It's also a question that Megan Stevenson, a professor of law and of economics at the University of Virginia School of Law, grapples with as she explores how well randomized control trials can predict the real-world efficacy of interventions in criminal justice. What she's found so far in that particular niche has echoed across the research establishment. As she writes in the abstract of an article she saw published in the Boston University Law Review: "This Essay is built around a central empirical claim: that most reforms and interventions in the criminal legal space are shown to have little lasting effect when evaluated with gold standard methods. While this might be disappointing from the perspective of someone hoping to learn what levers to pull to achieve change, I argue that this teaches us something valuable about the structure of the social world. When it comes to the type of limited-scope interventions that lend themselves to high-quality evaluation, social change is hard to engineer. Stabilizing forces push people back towards the path they would have been on absent the intervention. Cascades—small interventions that lead to large and lasting changes—are rare. And causal processes are complex and context-dependent, meaning that a success achieved in one setting may not port well to another." In this Social Science Bites podcast, Stevenson tells interviewer David Edmonds that “the paper is not saying ‘nothing works ever.' It's saying nothing works among this subset of interventions, and interventions, as we talked about, are the type of interventions that get studied by randomized control trials tend to be pretty limited in scope. You can randomly allocate money, but you can't randomly allocate class or socioeconomic status.” Despite this cautionary finding in her research. Stevenson hasn't despaired about her career choice or that of other social and behavioral scientists. “Many of us are in this line of work because we care about the world,” she notes. “We want to make the world a better place. We want to think about the best way to do it. And this is valuable information along that path. It's valuable information in that it shuts some doors. … So keep trying other doors, keep experimenting.”

Aurelie Ouss talks about using insights from behavioral economics to reduce failures-to-appear in court. This episode was first posted in January 2020. "Nudging Crime Policy: Reducing Failures to Appear for Court" by Alissa Fishbane, Aurelie Ouss, and Anuj K. Shah. (Available from the authors upon request.) Related policy paper: "Using Behavioral Science to Improve Criminal Justice Outcomes: Preventing Failures to Appear in Court" by Brice Cook, Binta Zahra Diop, Alissa Fishbane, Jonathan Hayes, Aurelie Ouss, and Anuj Shah. OTHER RESEARCH WE DISCUSS IN THIS EPISODE: "Bail, Jail, and Pretrial Misconduct: The Influence of Prosecutors" by Aurelie Ouss and Megan T. Stevenson. “Distortion of Justice: How the Inability to Pay Bail Affects Case Outcomes” by Megan T. Stevenson. “The Effects of Pretrial Detention on Conviction, Future Crime, and Employment: Evidence from Randomly Assigned Judges” by Will Dobbie, Jacob Goldin, and Crystal S. Yang. “The Unintended Impact of Pretrial Detention on Case Outcomes: Evidence from New York City Arraignments” by Emily Leslie and Nolan G. Pope. “The Downstream Consequences of Misdemeanor Pretrial Detention” by Paul Heaton, Sandra Mayson, and Megan Stevenson. Episode 4 of Probable Causation: Megan Stevenson "Thinking, Fast and Slow? Some Field Experiments to Reduce Crime and Dropout in Chicago" by Sara B. Heller, Anuj K. Shah, Jonathan Guryan, Jens Ludwig, Sendhil Mullainathan, and Harold A. Pollack. “Behavioral Biases and Legal Compliance: A Field Experiment” by Natalia Emanuel and Helen Ho.

Would you rather spend a day in jail or be the victim of a burglary? UVA Law professor Megan Stevenson discusses why her research suggests almost no one should be detained pretrial.

Aurelie Ouss talks about using insights from behavioral economics to reduce failures-to-appear in court. This episode was first posted in January 2020. "Nudging Crime Policy: Reducing Failures to Appear for Court" by Alissa Fishbane, Aurelie Ouss, and Anuj K. Shah. (Available from the authors upon request.) Related policy paper: "Using Behavioral Science to Improve Criminal Justice Outcomes: Preventing Failures to Appear in Court" by Brice Cook, Binta Zahra Diop, Alissa Fishbane, Jonathan Hayes, Aurelie Ouss, and Anuj Shah. *** Probable Causation is part of Doleac Initiatives, a 501(c)(3) corporation. If you enjoy the show, please consider making a tax-deductible contribution. Thank you for supporting our work! *** OTHER RESEARCH WE DISCUSS IN THIS EPISODE: "Bail, Jail, and Pretrial Misconduct: The Influence of Prosecutors" by Aurelie Ouss and Megan T. Stevenson. “Distortion of Justice: How the Inability to Pay Bail Affects Case Outcomes” by Megan T. Stevenson. “The Effects of Pretrial Detention on Conviction, Future Crime, and Employment: Evidence from Randomly Assigned Judges” by Will Dobbie, Jacob Goldin, and Crystal S. Yang. “The Unintended Impact of Pretrial Detention on Case Outcomes: Evidence from New York City Arraignments” by Emily Leslie and Nolan G. Pope. “The Downstream Consequences of Misdemeanor Pretrial Detention” by Paul Heaton, Sandra Mayson, and Megan Stevenson. Episode 4 of Probable Causation: Megan Stevenson "Thinking, Fast and Slow? Some Field Experiments to Reduce Crime and Dropout in Chicago" by Sara B. Heller, Anuj K. Shah, Jonathan Guryan, Jens Ludwig, Sendhil Mullainathan, and Harold A. Pollack. “Behavioral Biases and Legal Compliance: A Field Experiment” by Natalia Emanuel and Helen Ho.

In this episode, Megan T. Stevenson, Assistant Professor of Law at George Mason University Antonin Scalia Law School, discusses her article "Algorithmic Risk Assessment in the Hands of Humans," which she co-authored with Jennifer L. Doleac. Stevenson begins by explaining how and why courts traditionally sentenced criminal defendants, focusing on the goal of incapacitation, which requires an assessment of the risk of recidivism. She observes that algorithmic risk assessment promises to make incapacitation more efficient, but notes many potential concern. She describes the empirical study of Virginia's program she conducted with Doleac, and observes that judges seem to depart from the algorithm's recommendations, especially for young defendants. She also observes that judges unexpectedly imposed lighter sentences on low-risk sex offenders. Stevenson is on Twitter at @MeganTStevenson.This episode was hosted by Brian L. Frye, Spears-Gilbert Associate Professor of Law at the University of Kentucky College of Law. Frye is on Twitter at @brianlfrye. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

The Bright Light: The mega-watt beauty @megsteves visited us before she went to shoot Season 3 of “Get Shorty” on Epix and Netflix. We talked about boys and her business. She’s such a pro. She brings the party with intelligence, humor and the perfect amount of silliness. Love the show? Subscribe, rate, review, and share! Here’s […]

The Bright Light: The mega-watt beauty @megsteves visited us before she went to shoot Season 3 of “Get Shorty” on Epix and Netflix. We talked about boys and her business. She’s such a pro. She brings the party with intelligence, humor and the perfect amount of silliness. Love the show? Subscribe, rate, review, and share! Here’s How » Join the Greatness Adjacent Community today: greatnessadjacentpodcast.com Greatness Adjacent Instagram

Megan Stevenson talks about the effects of cash bail and Philadelphia’s bail reform efforts.

This week on “Duke Energy Presents…Central Indiana Today”, the show will feature the town of Muncie as Shane's first guest will be Megan Stevenson of the Erskine Green Training Institute (located in Muncie). His second guest is Ali Tschuor, who says she is “…the new Miss Spirit of Indiana. Miss Spirit of Indiana is a preliminary competition to go on to compete for Miss Indiana in June, in Zionsville.” She is also from Muncie.

How many innocent people should we be allowed to arrest and jail in order to prevent a single dangerous person from being free? The Supreme Court has refused to answer this question, but algorithms have, and many courts across the country are going with the algorithm.  At different stages of the criminal justice system, computerized risk-assessment algorithms are slowly replacing bail hearings in determining who goes to jail and who goes free. This is widely seen as progressive reform, but may in fact be leading to more incarceration, not less. While many are warning that these algorithms are biased, racist, or based on bad data, the real problems are in fact much deeper, and even harder to solve. Guest voices include Megan Stevenson, John Ralphling, Renee Bolinger, Georgi Gardiner, and Seth Lazar. Please help the show by taking a listener survey to give us feedback. slate.com/podcastsurvey To sign up for Slate Plus to get bonus content for this and every episode, and every episode ad-free, go to slate.com/hiphiplus Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

How many innocent people should we be allowed to arrest and jail in order to prevent a single dangerous person from being free? The Supreme Court has refused to answer this question, but algorithms have, and many courts across the country are going with the algorithm.  At different stages of the criminal justice system, computerized risk-assessment algorithms are slowly replacing bail hearings in determining who goes to jail and who goes free. This is widely seen as progressive reform, but may in fact be leading to more incarceration, not less. While many are warning that these algorithms are biased, racist, or based on bad data, the real problems are in fact much deeper, and even harder to solve. Guest voices include Megan Stevenson, John Raphling, Renee Bolinger, Georgi Gardiner, and Seth Lazar. Please help the show by taking a listener survey to give us feedback. slate.com/podcastsurvey To sign up for Slate Plus to get bonus content for this and every episode, and every episode ad-free, go to slate.com/hiphiplus Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

 It’s the FINALE & we’re breaking it down with Megan Stevenson who play April Quinn. Rick heads to Guatemala to see Amara, Wilderness is a complete success and April is starting her shop. Join host - Thelma Mbaezue Daniel for the GET SHORTY After-Show! Working as muscle for a murderous Nevada crime ring can be hard, so lo and behold Miles Daly has decided to change professions and become a Hollywood movie producer. We're in hollywood too, so that means we're gonna talk about Get Shorty on the GET SHORTY AFTER SHOW! Stay tuned week to week for episode breakdowns, insider know-how straight for Hollywood, juicy news and gossip, and potential special guest interviews! --- This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app

In today's podcast episode, Mr. Skin will talk about the wonderful developments in TV nudity like the season premiere of Insecure which showed us Yvonne Orji. In Power Lela Loren and Naturi Naughton showed off their naturals while Megan Stevenson flashed her jugs in Get Shorty. Amara Zaragoza gets topless in the most recent episode of Strange Angel while Hannah Gross and Natalie Paul engages in skinful lesbian kisses in the most recent episode of The Sinner. In Netflix nudity news, Mr. Skin talks about Jana Perez's sex scenes. Plus Mr. Skin will talk about the news of Marilyn Monroe's missing nude scene in The Misfits.

The winners of our Young Legal Scholars Paper Competition will present their papers, and various other attendees will invite feedback on works they have in progress.Jud Campbell, University of Richmond School of Law: “The Invention of First Amendment Federalism”Jonathan Mitchell, Stanford Law School: “The Writ-of-Erasure Fallacy”Lochlan Shelfer, Gibson Dunn: “Intergovernmental Federalism Disputes”Megan Stevenson, George Mason University Antonin Scalia Law School: “Assessing Risk Assessment”Lael Weinberger, University of Chicago JD/PhD candidate: “Rebellion against International Law: Law, Ideology, and the Bricker Amendment”Commenter: Richard Epstein, NYU School of Law, University of Chicago Law SchoolModerator: Josh Teitelbaum, Georgetown University Law Center

The winners of our Young Legal Scholars Paper Competition will present their papers, and various other attendees will invite feedback on works they have in progress.Jud Campbell, University of Richmond School of Law: “The Invention of First Amendment Federalism”Jonathan Mitchell, Stanford Law School: “The Writ-of-Erasure Fallacy”Lochlan Shelfer, Gibson Dunn: “Intergovernmental Federalism Disputes”Megan Stevenson, George Mason University Antonin Scalia Law School: “Assessing Risk Assessment”Lael Weinberger, University of Chicago JD/PhD candidate: “Rebellion against International Law: Law, Ideology, and the Bricker Amendment”Commenter: Richard Epstein, NYU School of Law, University of Chicago Law SchoolModerator: Josh Teitelbaum, Georgetown University Law Center