Podcasts about pretrial

His attorney used the word “abandoned.” A fourteen-year-old girl's family packed up and left their Arkansas home after the man charged with harming her was arrested — a man who, according to court filings, owns six properties within five hundred feet of where they lived. Joseph Duggar's lawyer took that act of protection and reframed it as a business inconvenience. He filed a motion to let Joseph back on the land. The judge denied it in a hearing that lasted under five minutes.Tony Brueski walks through the Joseph Duggar case from the court filing that started this conversation to the generational pattern it uncovered. Joseph faces two felony counts of lewd and lascivious behavior involving a minor in Bay County, Florida, including a life felony. He has pleaded not guilty and demanded a jury trial. When investigators searched his Tontitown home after the arrest, they found children's bedroom doors with locks installed on the exterior. DCFS removed all four kids. Joseph and his wife Kendra each face four counts of endangering the welfare of a minor and four counts of false imprisonment.A generation earlier, Jim Bob and Michelle Duggar put the same locks on their daughters' doors after their son Josh confessed to harming his sisters. They called them safeguards. Jim Bob wrote Joseph in jail comparing him to King David. Five of Joseph's sisters have publicly condemned his actions. Pretrial hearing July 14. Trial in August.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#JosephDuggar #DuggarFamily #JosephDuggarUpdate #KendraDuggar #JimBobDuggar #19KidsAndCounting #DuggarArrest #DuggarTrial #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime

Joseph Duggar went to court and asked a judge to let him return to property near the home his accuser's family had to leave. His attorney's word for it: “abandoned.” The judge shut it down. But what the filing exposed is that Joseph owns six parcels of land within five hundred feet of where a fourteen-year-old girl and her family once lived — the same girl whose allegations led to his arrest on two felony counts in Bay County, Florida. He has pleaded not guilty. One of those counts is classified as a life felony.Tony Brueski traces the geography of this case from a 2020 Panama City Beach vacation back to the small Arkansas community where both families lived. The distance from Joseph's properties to the family's home: five hundred feet. The time between the alleged incidents and the arrest: six years. When the father confronted Joseph in March 2026, Joseph allegedly admitted to what happened on a recorded call with police. He was arrested the same day. The family left shortly after.After the arrest, investigators searched the Duggar home in Tontitown and found bedroom doors with locks on the outside — the same setup Jill Duggar described growing up with after her brother Josh confessed to harming his sisters. The state removed all four children. Both Joseph and Kendra Duggar face endangerment and false imprisonment charges. Jim Bob Duggar's jailhouse email told Joseph to make lemonade and compared him to King David. Pretrial hearing July 14. Trial in August.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#JosephDuggar #DuggarFamily #JosephDuggarCase #KendraDuggar #JimBobDuggar #19KidsAndCounting #DuggarArrest #DuggarTrial #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime

The federal trial in the Anna Kepner case was scheduled for June 1. Eighteen days before jury selection, the defense filed Document 74 — an Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial — requesting approximately ninety additional days of preparation. The court granted the motion. The new trial date is September 8.The procedural context makes the continuance notable. The defense previously moved at exceptional speed for a case carrying two potential life sentences. The defendant, Timothy Hudson — sixteen at the time of the alleged offense — signed a written waiver requesting adult prosecution. No contested transfer hearing was held. No prior continuances were filed. The defense operated on approximately three and a half months from initial discovery production to trial. That timeline is significantly compressed by federal standards.The continuance motion cited the government's voluminous discovery production, scheduling conflicts arising from lead counsel's involvement in two other federal trials, and family obligations. The prosecution filed no opposition. The absence of a government objection is procedurally significant — in a case where the prosecution has simultaneously sought pretrial detention, agreeing to a three-month delay represents a departure from the posture of urgency.The strategic implications extend in both directions. The defense's speed-to-trial approach had identifiable advantages: jury trial over bench trial, preservation of pretrial release, and forcing the government to proceed with the case as assembled. The reversal suggests the discovery production altered the defense's assessment of trial readiness.Unresolved proceedings remain before the September date. The autopsy report is sealed. The government's detention motion is pending — the defendant remains on GPS monitoring at a relative's home rather than in federal custody. Pretrial evidentiary motions have not yet been heard. Federal Rules of Evidence will substantially determine what reaches the jury.Anna Kepner was eighteen when she was found dead aboard the Carnival Horizon during a family cruise in November 2025. Her father has publicly stated the family is troubled by the defendant's current release conditions.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#AnnaKepner #CarnivalHorizon #TimothyHudson #FederalTrial #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #JusticeForAnna #FederalProcedure #MiamiFederalCourt #CruiseShipCase

The defense in the Anna Kepner case moved faster than virtually any federal team facing two life sentences. Waived the transfer hearing. Requested adult prosecution. Pushed toward a June 1 trial date with roughly three and a half months from first discovery to jury selection. Then eighteen days out, they asked for ninety more.Document 74 — an Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial — cited the government's voluminous discovery, scheduling conflicts with lead counsel's other federal cases, and family obligations. The prosecution had no objection. The new trial date is September 8. The strategic reversal raises a specific question: what did the defense encounter in the government's evidence production that changed the calculus?The original speed-to-trial approach had identifiable strategic logic: securing a jury rather than a single judge, preserving pretrial freedom while the government's detention motion remains unresolved, and forcing the prosecution to try the case it had assembled rather than giving it time to strengthen. That calculation appears to have shifted.The unresolved proceedings heading into September are significant. The autopsy report remains sealed. The government's motion for pretrial detention hasn't been ruled on — the defendant remains under GPS monitoring at a relative's home, not in federal custody. Pretrial motions are still pending. Federal rules of evidence could substantially narrow what reaches the jury compared to what the public has consumed through media coverage.Anna Kepner was eighteen when she was found dead aboard the Carnival Horizon during a family cruise in November 2025. Her stepbrother, Timothy Hudson, was charged as an adult with two federal felony counts. He signed a written waiver requesting adult court — no contested hearing, no delays. Anna's father has stated publicly the family is troubled by the defendant's release conditions.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#AnnaKepner #CarnivalHorizon #TimothyHudson #FederalTrial #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #JusticeForAnna #CruiseShipCase #MiamiFederalCourt #FederalDiscovery

The defense asked for the delay. The prosecution didn't object. That alignment is the detail worth examining in the Anna Kepner case — because both sides agreeing to slow down a trial eighteen days before jury selection tells you something about where the case actually stands.This defense team moved at unprecedented speed for a federal case carrying two life sentences. Waived the transfer hearing. Requested adult prosecution for a sixteen-year-old defendant. Pushed for a June 1 trial date with barely three and a half months of preparation. There were clear strategic reasons — a jury over a single judge, pretrial freedom preserved, and forcing the government to try the case as it existed rather than building a stronger one over time.Then Document 74 appeared. Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial. The defense cited voluminous discovery, lead counsel's conflicting federal trial schedule, and family obligations. The prosecution's silence — no objection — raises its own question. A government that wanted to maintain pressure would have fought the continuance. Instead they agreed to September 8.The behavioral read on the reversal: something in the discovery production changed the defense's assessment of what they were walking into. The speed-first strategy assumed the government's case was beatable as-is. The continuance suggests the evidence files contained something that required more time to address — whether that's volume, complexity, or substance.The unresolved proceedings between now and September matter enormously. The autopsy remains sealed. The detention question is still open — the defendant is on GPS monitoring, not in custody, and the government wants that changed. Pretrial motions haven't been heard. Federal evidentiary rules could filter out much of what the public believes it knows about this case.Anna Kepner was eighteen when she was found dead aboard the Carnival Horizon in November 2025. Her stepbrother Timothy Hudson faces two federal felony counts as an adult. Anna's father has publicly expressed concern about the defendant's release conditions.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#AnnaKepner #CarnivalHorizon #TimothyHudson #FederalTrial #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #JusticeForAnna #CruiseShipCase #FederalDiscovery #MiamiFederalCourt

YLR Hosts are joined by three rock-star attorneys: Esther Aguayo, Rose Mishaan and Marsanne Weese, who just fashioned a reset of California criminal law.

In this episode of Texas Talks, host Brad Swail sits down with Marc Levin, Chief Policy Counsel at the Council on Criminal Justice, for a wide-ranging conversation about where criminal justice reform stands in Texas today — and what lawmakers should be focused on next. Levin reflects on his long history in Texas criminal justice policy, from the 2007 reforms that helped the state avoid building thousands of new prison beds to the current push for a smarter, more data-driven justice system. He explains why public safety remains the core mission of government, but argues that Texas works best when policy is guided by proportionality, fairness, accountability, and evidence about what actually reduces crime and recidivism. The conversation explores recent reforms from the 89th Texas Legislature, including expanded pretrial funding, parole process changes through the Sunset review of TDCJ, and the constitutional amendment updating bail rules. Levin also discusses why plea bargaining deserves more scrutiny, how better data could help policymakers compare sentences and outcomes across counties, and why transparency matters if Texas wants to know whether its justice system is truly working. The discussion also covers: • The importance of pretrial services and front-loading treatment and support • Geriatric parole and streamlining release decisions for low-risk elderly inmates • Why Texas still needs better sentencing and recidivism data • The debate over prison air conditioning and what “smart justice” should mean • How AI can help solve crimes and inform decisions — without replacing human judgment • Why veterans need better identification and support within the justice system • Clean slate proposals for automatic record sealing of minor misdemeanors • Fentanyl testing strips as a harm-reduction tool to save lives • “Second look” sentencing for people who committed serious crimes as juveniles • Why trust in the justice system may be just as important as recidivism rates Levin makes the case that Texas has already shown it can lower both crime and incarceration at the same time — but only if lawmakers keep focusing on reforms that are practical, measurable, and rooted in outcomes rather than rhetoric. 00:00 — Introduction and Marc Levin joins the podcast 01:05 — Marc Levin's background and Texas criminal justice reform history 03:38 — What a smarter justice system actually looks like 05:16 — The biggest reforms from the 89th Texas Legislature 06:45 — Pretrial services, treatment, and front-loaded support 08:29 — Plea bargains, coercion, and the “trial penalty” 10:47 — Why Texas needs better sentencing and justice system data 12:45 — TDCJ Sunset review and parole process changes 16:18 — Prison air conditioning and the debate over humane conditions 19:17 — Why solving more crimes matters more than harsher conditions 21:36 — How AI is changing criminal justice policy 24:24 — Risk assessments, facial recognition, and guardrails for AI 29:00 — Priorities for the 90th Texas Legislature 29:45 — Veterans justice reform and better reentry support 34:08 — Clean slate policy and sealing minor misdemeanor records 35:54 — Fentanyl testing strips and harm reduction 38:06 — Second look sentencing for juveniles 40:18 — Is recidivism the best metric for justice reform? 43:26 — Long-term Texas trends in crime, incarceration, and reform 45:13 — Final thoughts: data, trust, and what Texas should do next Watch Full-Length Interviews: https://www.youtube.com/@TexasTalks

3-9-2026: Wake Up Missouri with Randy Tobler, Stephanie Bell, John Marsh, and Producer Drake

Today, we’re looking at the legal effort to get a former county official out of jail before trial — and what it could reveal about Arizona’s pretrial system.Support the show: https://www.myheraldreview.com/site/forms/subscription_services/See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The lead-up to Ghislaine Maxwell's trial was marked by years of delay, institutional reluctance, and a sudden scramble once Jeffrey Epstein was no longer alive to absorb the blame. After Epstein's death in federal custody in 2019, public pressure intensified over how a trafficking operation of that scale could exist without accomplices. Maxwell, long described by survivors as Epstein's right hand, recruiter, and enforcer, initially remained free, living quietly and largely untouched while outrage simmered. Federal authorities offered little reassurance that a meaningful investigation was underway, reinforcing the perception that Epstein had been treated as a convenient endpoint rather than the center of a network. When Maxwell was finally arrested in July 2020, nearly a year after Epstein's death, it felt less like proactive justice and more like a belated concession to public scrutiny. Prosecutors framed the case as overdue accountability, but critics noted that the government had years to act while Epstein was alive and chose not to.As the trial approached, the government's strategy became clearer and more controversial. Prosecutors narrowed the timeframe of the charges to the mid-1990s and early 2000s, limiting the scope of testimony and insulating many powerful figures from exposure. Pretrial battles focused on evidence access, witness credibility, and Maxwell's detention conditions, while survivors prepared to testify about recruitment, grooming, and abuse they said Maxwell directly facilitated. The defense attempted to recast Maxwell as a peripheral figure and leaned heavily on Epstein's 2008 non-prosecution agreement, despite its obvious moral and legal limitations. Meanwhile, the DOJ maintained a careful distance from broader questions about uncharged co-conspirators, reinforcing the impression that the trial was designed to close a chapter, not open new ones. By the time jury selection began, the case had come to symbolize not just Maxwell's alleged crimes, but the government's long-standing failure to confront Epstein's network honestly and in full view of the public.to  contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Navigating the Complexities of Criminal Procedure: Eyewitness IDs, Prosecutorial Discretion, and Double JeopardyThis conversation delves into the complexities of criminal procedure, focusing on key areas such as eyewitness identification, prosecutorial discretion, the Sixth Amendment right to counsel, and the Double Jeopardy Clause. It highlights the systemic issues within the legal framework, particularly the challenges posed by unreliable eyewitness testimony and the significant power wielded by prosecutors. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding these legal doctrines for effective legal practice and examination preparation.In the intricate world of criminal procedure, understanding the nuances of legal doctrines is crucial for anyone studying law. This post explores three pivotal areas: eyewitness identification, prosecutorial discretion, and double jeopardy, each presenting unique challenges and implications for justice.Eyewitness Identification: Eyewitness testimony is often seen as compelling evidence, yet it is fraught with potential for error. The case of Ronald Cotton highlights how suggestive police procedures can corrupt a witness's memory, leading to wrongful convictions. The Supreme Court's Manson v. Brathwaite decision attempts to address these issues with a two-part test, but critics argue that the reliability factors can be tainted by the very procedures meant to be scrutinized.Prosecutorial Discretion: Prosecutors wield immense power in the judicial system, deciding who to charge and what charges to bring. While this discretion is necessary, it is not without limits. The Constitution provides checks against selective and vindictive prosecution, though proving such claims is notoriously difficult. The balance between prosecutorial power and accountability remains a contentious issue.Double Jeopardy: The Fifth Amendment's Double Jeopardy Clause protects individuals from being tried or punished multiple times for the same offense. However, the Dual Sovereignty Doctrine allows separate sovereigns, like state and federal governments, to prosecute the same act independently. This doctrine raises questions about fairness and the potential for excessive punishment.Conclusion: The tension between finality and fairness is a recurring theme in criminal procedure. As legal systems evolve, the challenge remains to reconcile traditional practices with scientific insights and constitutional protections. Understanding these dynamics is essential for navigating the legal landscape and advocating for justice.Subscribe Now: Stay informed on the latest legal insights and analyses by subscribing.TakeawaysEyewitness identification is a leading cause of wrongful convictions.The systemic crisis of misidentification is acknowledged by judges and scholars.Prosecutorial discretion is vast but not unchecked.The Sixth Amendment right to counsel attaches after formal adversarial proceedings begin.Double Jeopardy protects against multiple prosecutions for the same offense.The Manson v. Brathwaite test assesses the reliability of eyewitness IDs.The dual sovereignty doctrine allows for multiple prosecutions by different sovereigns.Confidence in eyewitness testimony can be artificially inflated by suggestive procedures.The reliability factors in eyewitness identification can be tainted by police procedures.Understanding the balance between finality and accuracy is crucial in criminal law.criminal procedure, eyewitness identification, prosecutorial discretion, Sixth Amendment, double jeopardy, legal doctrines, constitutional law, wrongful convictions, due process, legal education

Watch the full coverage of the live stream on The Emily D. Baker YouTube channel: https://youtu.be/UNfVxmnKy0I  In this Case Brief about Kouri Richins, with jury selection approaching in February 2026, the court addresses multiple pretrial motions, including the admissibility of expert testimony regarding alleged forgeries and domestic violence. The court ruled to seal the entirety of the following day's hearing (January 8th) and its audio recording to protect the integrity of the jury pool and voir dire process, although the final rulings themselves will be public. RESOURCES Kouri Richins Playlist - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsbUyvZas7gJYyEMQDM_Cn4icqWBV20fW Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Ken Rosato fills in for Mark Simone. Zohran Mamdani wants to halt the clearing of homeless encampments when he takes office in January 2026. Ken also updates you on the latest developments in the United Healthcare CEO Luigi Mangione's case: Mangione was scheduled for a fourth day in court for an evidence suppression hearing, but proceedings were postponed due to his illness. Ken interviews Fox News Legal Analyst Gregg Jarrett. Together, they discuss concerns about United States circuit court judges stepping beyond their roles - making decisions based on politics rather than the law. Jarrett and Rosato analyze the implications of judicial activism and its impact on the legal system. Ken Rosato fills in for Mark Simone. Ken highlights a new survey from The New York Times detailing the caffeine content in various coffee and tea brands. He also discusses reports of mysterious flashes of light observed on the moon, sparking speculation and curiosity among scientists and the public alike. Ken interviews Healthy Living expert Paul Fulford. Paul explains the pros and cons of weight loss drugs, cautioning that while they can be effective, they may also undermine long-term health goals if not used properly. The conversation covers strategies for preserving muscle, burning fat during weight loss, and the importance of nutrition, highlighting the types of foods that support a healthy lifestyle.

Ken Rosato fills in for Mark Simone. Zohran Mamdani wants to halt the clearing of homeless encampments when he takes office in January 2026. Ken also updates you on the latest developments in the United Healthcare CEO Luigi Mangione's case: Mangione was scheduled for a fourth day in court for an evidence suppression hearing, but proceedings were postponed due to his illness. Ken interviews Fox News Legal Analyst Gregg Jarrett. Together, they discuss concerns about United States circuit court judges stepping beyond their roles - making decisions based on politics rather than the law. Jarrett and Rosato analyze the implications of judicial activism and its impact on the legal system. Ken Rosato fills in for Mark Simone. Ken highlights a new survey from The New York Times detailing the caffeine content in various coffee and tea brands. He also discusses reports of mysterious flashes of light observed on the moon, sparking speculation and curiosity among scientists and the public alike. Ken interviews Healthy Living expert Paul Fulford. Paul explains the pros and cons of weight loss drugs, cautioning that while they can be effective, they may also undermine long-term health goals if not used properly. The conversation covers strategies for preserving muscle, burning fat during weight loss, and the importance of nutrition, highlighting the types of foods that support a healthy lifestyle. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

“Banfield” takes you inside the courtroom on Day 2 of Luigi Mangione's pretrial hearing. Police bodycam footage shows officers surrounding Mangione in a Pennsylvania McDonald's. Plus, we break down the accused killer's fashion and fan club.Also, NewsNation's Brian Entin has the latest on all of the proceedings from the second day of Brian Walshe's murder trial.Then, "Banfield" has the latest on a “Louvre-style” heist in the middle of New York City, worth millions and caught on camera.

This Day in Legal History: Rosa Parks ArrestedOn December 1, 1955, Rosa Parks was arrested in Montgomery, Alabama, for refusing to surrender her seat to a white passenger on a segregated city bus. Parks, a 42-year-old Black seamstress and longtime activist, had been sitting in the “colored” section when the driver demanded she move. Her quiet but firm defiance violated local segregation laws, which mandated racial separation in public transportation and required Black passengers to yield seats to white passengers when buses became crowded. Parks' arrest became a catalyst for the Montgomery Bus Boycott, a coordinated campaign to end racial segregation on public transit.The boycott began four days later, organized by the Montgomery Improvement Association, with a then-unknown Martin Luther King Jr. as its president. It lasted over a year, during which thousands of Black residents refused to use the city's buses, severely impacting the transit system's finances. The protest was not only a powerful act of collective resistance but also a carefully structured legal challenge. Civil rights attorneys, including Fred Gray, filed a federal lawsuit—Browder v. Gayle—on behalf of several Black women who had experienced bus segregation.In November 1956, the federal district court ruled that Montgomery's segregated bus system was unconstitutional under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the decision, and on December 20, 1956, the boycott officially ended when the Court's ruling was implemented. Rosa Parks' arrest and the movement it sparked marked a turning point in the American civil rights struggle. Her individual act of resistance ignited a mass movement and set the stage for future legal and social change.The U.S. Supreme Court will hear a key copyright case today involving Cox Communications and several major record labels, including Sony, Warner, and Universal. The case centers on whether Cox can be held financially liable for allegedly enabling its users to illegally download music. A jury originally awarded the labels $1 billion in 2019 after finding Cox secondarily liable for over 10,000 copyright infringements, but the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals later reversed part of that decision, leading to a retrial on damages.Cox argues it shouldn't be held accountable for users' actions, warning that a ruling against it could force ISPs to terminate internet access for entire households or public institutions over alleged piracy. The company claims it reasonably handled piracy reports and criticized the notion that it failed to act. In contrast, the labels accuse Cox of ignoring thousands of infringement notices and protecting profitable repeat offenders while readily cutting off nonpaying customers.Big tech companies like Google, Amazon, and Microsoft have sided with Cox, suggesting that a ruling for the labels could harm the internet economy. Meanwhile, the Trump administration—represented by Solicitor General John Sauer—is supporting Cox's view that merely knowing about piracy isn't enough to establish liability. Industry groups in music, film, and publishing back the labels, arguing that Cox's stance threatens collaborative anti-piracy efforts. The Supreme Court's decision could reshape how ISPs respond to copyright violations.US Supreme Court to hear copyright dispute between Cox and record labels | ReutersFollowing a deadly shooting in Washington, D.C., involving an Afghan immigrant accused of killing a National Guard member, President Donald Trump has intensified efforts to restrict legal immigration. Within 48 hours of the attack, Trump paused Afghan immigration applications, launched a review of asylum approvals from the Biden era, and hinted at expanded vetting under his existing travel ban targeting 19 countries. These moves revive and build upon restrictive immigration policies from Trump's first term, now framed as necessary for national security.Critics argue the administration is exploiting a tragic but isolated incident to justify sweeping immigration rollbacks. Afghan advocacy groups stressed that Afghan immigrants undergo extensive vetting and should not be broadly blamed. While Trump and top officials suggested large-scale reforms—like ending federal benefits for non-citizens and denaturalizing those deemed a threat—federal agencies have so far announced more limited actions, such as case reviews for applicants from travel-ban countries.Legal experts warn that some of the proposed policies, including denying welfare to lawful residents and mass denaturalization, would likely be ruled unconstitutional. Nonetheless, the administration is signaling an aggressive stance, despite polls showing declining public approval of Trump's immigration policies. Meanwhile, Democrats accuse Trump of targeting law-abiding immigrants and using fear-based tactics for political gain.Trump sharpens focus on legal immigration after National Guard shooting | ReutersA federal judge's decision to ban generative AI from his chambers after an intern used it in a flawed court opinion has sparked debate over how technology should be used in the legal system. Judge Julien Neals of New Jersey attributed the error in a June ruling to a law student who used AI in violation of their school's policy, prompting Neals to prohibit AI use entirely among his staff. His response to Senator Chuck Grassley drew concern from legal academics and judges who argue that banning AI outright may be shortsighted.Proponents of AI in the judiciary say the technology, if used responsibly, could reduce case backlogs and improve efficiency amid staffing shortages. Judge Xavier Rodriguez of Texas ran an experiment comparing traditional opinion writing with AI-assisted drafting, showing significant time savings without sacrificing quality. He and others advocate for structured AI use, emphasizing vetting, fact-checking, and clear protocols to preserve judicial integrity.Magistrate Judge Allison Goddard and law professors like David Kemp suggest that instead of bans, institutions should focus on teaching students ethical and effective AI use. With many law students already accustomed to using generative AI, schools are scrambling to develop policies and training. Some institutions, like the University of Chicago Law School, have embraced AI integration, while others lag behind. The incident in Judge Neals' courtroom has become a wake-up call for courts and law schools to align on responsible AI use in legal education and practice.Judges' AI Blunders Spark Debate on Technology Use in CourtsLuigi Mangione, accused of killing UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson in a high-profile shooting outside a Manhattan hotel, appeared in court today for key pretrial hearings. The 27-year-old, arrested in December 2024, has pleaded not guilty to murder and multiple related charges in both state and federal cases. The hearings will determine whether crucial evidence—including a 3-D printed gun, silencer, and journal writings found in Mangione's backpack—can be used at trial. His defense argues that the items were obtained through an illegal search during his arrest in Pennsylvania and that statements he made to police should also be excluded.Prosecutors dispute those claims and are seeking to admit the materials, which they argue implicate Mangione in the killing. Mangione, who has gained a controversial following among critics of the U.S. healthcare system, faces life in prison if convicted of second-degree murder. In a separate federal case, prosecutors intend to seek the death penalty. Earlier in September, two terrorism charges were dismissed after a judge ruled there was insufficient evidence Mangione intended to intimidate healthcare workers or influence government policy.The hearings, overseen by Judge Gregory Carro, are expected to last through the week and include testimony from arresting officers. No trial date has yet been set, and Mangione remains in federal custody in Brooklyn.Luigi Mangione due in court for pretrial hearings over US healthcare executive's killing | Reuters This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

On New Year's Day 2023, mother and real estate executive Ana Walshe vanished, and her body has never been found. In the weeks following her disappearance, investigators zeroed in on her husband, and convicted fraudster, Brian Walshe, pointing to several troubling Google searches on his son's tablet. This episode of the Court TV Podcast features the final pretrial hearings from 11/17/2025 and 11/18/2025, including a last-minute guilty plea to two lesser charges before jury selection began. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

#BYU, #BYUCougars, #GoCougs, #ESPN, #BrighamYoung, #Brigham, #BrighamYoungUniversity, #BYUCougars, #Cougars, #ESPN, #ESPNTheFan, #BYUFootball, #KalaniSitake, #BYUHoops, #BYUBasketball, #BYUBasketball, #KevinYoung

In this episode of the Charity Charge Show we speak with, David Gaspar, CEO of The Bail Project, on how the organization posts bail at no cost for people who cannot afford it, then supports them with court reminders, transportation, and connections to services. He explains common misunderstandings about pretrial justice, highlights data from recent studies and The Bail Project's own publications, and reflects on leadership lessons as the organization approaches a milestone of 40,000 clients served.Episode HighlightsMission in one line: Help people fight their cases from a position of freedom and keep their lives stable while they wait for court.The problem: More than 500,000 people sit in jail on any given day because they cannot afford bail.What The Bail Project does: Posts bail for free, sends court reminders, provides transportation, and connects people to resources when and where needed.Why it matters: Pretrial jail time destabilizes jobs, housing, and family life. Supporting people to return to court protects stability and improves outcomes.Milestone ahead: Nearly 40,000 clients bailed out. About one third of those cases were dismissed, which points to significant unnecessary jail time.Practical proof: Simple tools such as reminders and rides reduce failures to appear and downstream warrants.About Charity ChargeCharity Charge is a financial technology company serving the nonprofit sector. From the Charity Charge Nonprofit Credit Card to bookkeeping, gift card disbursements, and state compliance, we help mission-driven organizations streamline operations and stay financially strong. Learn more at charitycharge.com.

Thanks to HellGate NYC for showing us how the Left thinks and exemplifies why Mamdani CANNOT BE ELECTED https://hellgatenyc.com/nyc-ju...

This conversation delves into the strategic intricacies of pre-trial adjudication in civil litigation, focusing on key rules such as Rule 12b (Motions to Dismiss), Rule 12c (Judgment on the Pleadings), Rule 55 (Default Judgments), and Rule 56 (Summary Judgment). The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding these procedural tools, their applications, and the strategic implications for legal practitioners. It highlights the evolution of pleading standards, the significance of evidence in summary judgment, and the broader context of the pre-trial process, including discovery and settlement negotiations.TakeawaysPre-trial adjudication is crucial in determining case outcomes.Rule 12b motions are often the first line of defense for defendants.Understanding the nuances of Rule 12b and 12c is essential for legal success.Default judgments can significantly impact litigation if a defendant fails to respond.Summary judgment shifts the focus from pleadings to actual evidence.The burden of proof and production are critical concepts in summary judgment motions.State courts may have different pleading standards than federal courts.The pre-trial process includes discovery, which is vital for gathering evidence.Settlement negotiations often occur during the pre-trial phase.Understanding procedural rules is key for effective legal strategy. pre-trial adjudication, civil procedure, Rule 12b, Rule 12c, Rule 55, Rule 56, motions to dismiss, summary judgment, legal strategy, litigation

A Lombard man was ordered held without pretrial release after authorities say he attacked multiple DuPage County sheriff's deputies during a court appearance, sending three to the hospital.

A Lombard man was ordered held without pretrial release after authorities say he attacked multiple DuPage County sheriff's deputies during a court appearance, sending three to the hospital.

A Lombard man was ordered held without pretrial release after authorities say he attacked multiple DuPage County sheriff's deputies during a court appearance, sending three to the hospital.

Going through the outstanding motions for Donna Adelson ahead of her final pre-trial hearing tomorrow. I will be live streaming, so come watch with us!ALL MERCH 10% off with code Sherlock10 at checkout Donate: (Thank you for your support! Couldn't do what I love without all y'all) PayPal - paypal.com/paypalme/prettyliesandalibisVenmo - @prettyliesalibisBuy Me A Coffee - https://www.buymeacoffee.com/prettyliesrCash App- PrettyliesandalibisAll links: https://linktr.ee/prettyliesandalibisMerch: prettyliesandalibis.myshopify.comPatreon: https://www.patreon.com/PrettyLiesAndAlibis(Weekly lives and private message board)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/pretty-lies-and-alibis--4447192/support.

Sean Combs, the appellant in United States v. Combs, case number 24-CR-542 (AS), has filed a motion for pretrial release from federal custody. The motion argues that Combs does not pose a flight risk, citing his deep ties to the community, longstanding residency in the United States, and significant business investments. Combs' defense emphasizes that he is fully prepared to comply with any conditions of release, including electronic monitoring or home confinement, to ensure his presence at trial.The motion also contends that Combs' continued detention negatively impacts his ability to prepare an adequate defense, citing limited access to legal counsel and case materials while in custody. The defense argues that pretrial release is essential to ensure a fair trial, noting that Combs has no history of failing to appear in court and that the charges against him, while serious, do not warrant indefinite pretrial incarceration. The decision on this motion remains pending before the appellate court.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.ca2.234342fd-2384-426f-a4a4-aeca250ee12d.16.1_2.pdfshow lessBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

A 37-year-old Woodford County man faces 21 counts of possessing child pornography following an extensive investigation and a search of his home. After the state's attorney requested to deny pre-trial release, a judge, citing the Pretrial Fairness Act, ruled the defendant could not be detained but imposed strict conditions, including no internet access and no contact with minors. On the House floor in Springfield, Representative Dennis Tipsword criticized the system, questioning who would enforce these restrictions. Tipsword argued that blame lies with lawmakers themselves, not with police, attorneys, or judges, pointing to legislative responsibility for the outcomes. Today on the House floor in Springfield, State Representative Dennis Tipsword (R-Metamora) asked “Who is going to enforce these ridiculous conditions?”  He went on to say that it is not the police officers' fault, it's not the state's attorney's fault, and it's not the judge's fault.  He said, “Look around this chamber…it is our fault.”

Katie and Kristi blind react to LVD's latest hearing. Lori continues to sassy and disrespectful with the judge and prosecutor.Join our squad! Kristi and Katie share true crime stories and give you actionable things you can do to help, all with a wicked sense of humor.Follow our True Crime Trials Channel: https://www.youtube.com/@TrueCrimeSquadTrialsFollow our True Crime Shorts Channel: https://www.youtube.com/@truecrimesquadshorts-t6iWant to Support our work and get extra perks?https://buymeacoffee.com/truecrimesquadLooking for extra content?https://www.patreon.com/truecrimesquad*Social Media Links*Facebook: www.facebook.com/truecrimesquadFacebook Discussion Group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/215774426330767Website: https://www.truecrimesquad.comTikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@truecrimesquadBlueSky- https://bsky.app/profile/truecrimesquad.bsky.social True Crime Squad on Spotifyhttps://open.spotify.com/show/5gIPqBHJLftbXdRgs1Bqm1

The latest chapter in the Doomsday Cult Mom saga unfolds in an Arizona courtroom. Convicted killer Lori Daybell prepares to stand trial on charges that she conspired to kill her fourth husband, Charles Vallow. This is not the first time she's faced a jury, but this time she is representing herself. In this episode of the Court TV Podcast you'll hear one of the final pretrial hearings from 3/31/2025 in the case against Lori Daybell. For more on the Cult Mom Conspiracy Trial, Click Here.Listen to Lori Daybell's Idaho Murder Trial Here.Watch 24/7 Court TV LIVE Stream Today https://www.courttv.com/Join the Investigation Newsletter https://www.courttv.com/email/Court TV Podcast https://www.courttv.com/podcast/FOLLOW THE CASE:Facebook https://www.facebook.com/courttvTwitter/X https://twitter.com/CourtTVInstagram https://www.instagram.com/courttvnetwork/TikTok https://www.tiktok.com/@courttvliveYouTube https://www.youtube.com/c/COURTTVWATCH +140 FREE TRIALS IN THE COURT TV ARCHIVE https://www.courttv.com/trials/ HOW TO FIND COURT TV https://www.courttv.com/where-to-watch/

Holy cow! This one might get lit! Aidan “Turtleboy” Kearney & Karen Read's phone communications are the subject of today's hearing.Thank you Patrons!Ellen Solari, Carol Cardella, Joan Mahon, Marcie Denton, Rosanne Aponte, Tammie, Hanna, Johnny Jay, Spaceydove, Jude Barnes, JenTheRN, Susan, Victoria Devenish, Jeri Falk, Kimberly Lovelace, Penni Miller, Jil, Janet Gardner, Jayne Wallace (JaynesWhirled), Pat Brooks, Jennifer Klearman, Judy Brown Linda Lazzaro, Suzanne Kniffin, Susan Hicks, Jeff Meadors, D Samlam, Pat Brooks, Kathy Chapin, Cythnia, Bonnie Schoeneman-Dilley, Diane Larsen, Mary, Kimberly Philipson, Stephanie Damilano, Cat Stewart, Cindy Pochesci, Kevin Crecy, Renee Chavez, Melba Pourteau, Julie K Thomas, Riverdale Pilates, Mia Wallace, Stark Stuff,Yvette Jocklin, Kayce Taylor, Alice, JenTile, Dean, GiGi5, Jennifer Crum, Dana Natale, Marie Patriagnnani, Bewildered Beauty, Pepper, Joan Chakonas, Blythe, Pat Dell, Lorraine Reid, Sandra Guse Van Zeeland, Isa, T.B., Kitties1993, Regan Johnson, Melissa, Victoria Gray Bross, Kay Be, Toni Woodland, Danbrit, Kenny Haines, Maureen P and Toni NatalieGet access to exclusive content & support the podcast by becoming a Patron today! https://patreon.com/robertaglasstruecrimereportThrow a tip in the tip jar! https://buymeacoffee.com/robertaglassSupport Roberta by sending a donation via Venmo. https://venmo.com/robertaglass

Karen Read prepares to face a jury once again after her first trial ended with a hung jury in the death of her boyfriend, Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe. Prosecutors allege she hit him with her car after a night of drinking and left him to die in the cold, while she maintains that she is being framed for murder and the real killer has close ties to the Boston Police department. This episode of the Court TV Podcast features the final pretrial hearing from 3/25/2025, just one week before jury selection begins in this contentious retrial. For more on the case against Karen Read, Click Here.Watch 24/7 Court TV LIVE Stream Today https://www.courttv.com/Join the Investigation Newsletter https://www.courttv.com/email/Court TV Podcast https://www.courttv.com/podcast/FOLLOW THE CASE:Facebook https://www.facebook.com/courttvTwitter/X https://twitter.com/CourtTVInstagram https://www.instagram.com/courttvnetwork/TikTok https://www.tiktok.com/@courttvliveYouTube https://www.youtube.com/c/COURTTVWATCH +140 FREE TRIALS IN THE COURT TV ARCHIVE https://www.courttv.com/trials/ HOW TO FIND COURT TV https://www.courttv.com/where-to-watch/

Karen Read is accused of the second degree murder of police officer John O'Keefe. Karen Read has amassed a herd of lawyers lead by David Yannetti and Alan Jackson. Elizabeth Little and Robert Alessi round out her team. Specially appointed prosecutor Hank Brennan represents the Commonwealth along side Adam Lally and Laura McLaughlin.Show Notes:Roberta Glass "Karen Read's Final Pretrial Hearing Before April 1st, 2025" -  Trial!https://www.youtube.com/live/jtDt3tHaBcY?si=Lo1oVFT8yV271vVFThank you Patrons! Ellen Solari, Carol Cardella, Joan Mahon, Marcie Denton, Rosanne Aponte, Tammie, Hanna, Johnny Jay, Spaceydove, Jude Barnes, JenTheRN, Susan, Victoria Devenish, Jeri Falk, Kimberly Lovelace, Penni Miller, Jil, Janet Gardner, Jayne Wallace (JaynesWhirled), Pat Brooks, Jennifer Klearman, Judy Brown Linda Lazzaro, Suzanne Kniffin, Susan Hicks, Jeff Meadors, D Samlam, Pat Brooks, Kathy Chapin, Cythnia, Bonnie Schoeneman-Dilley, Diane Larsen, Mary, Kimberly Philipson, Stephanie Damilano, Cat Stewart, Cindy Pochesci, Kevin Crecy, Renee Chavez, Melba Pourteau, Julie K Thomas, Riverdale Pilates, Mia Wallace, Stark Stuff,Yvette Jocklin, Kayce Taylor, Alice, JenTile, Dean, GiGi5, Jennifer Crum, Dana Natale, Marie Patriagnnani, Bewildered Beauty, Pepper, Joan Chakonas, Blythe, Pat Dell, Lorraine Reid, Sandra Guse Van Zeeland, Isa, T.B., Kitties1993, Regan Johnson, Melissa, Victoria Gray Bross, Kay Be, Toni Woodland, Danbrit, Kenny Haines, Maureen P and Toni NatalieGet access to exclusive content & support the podcast by becoming a Patron today! https://patreon.com/robertaglasstruecrimereport Throw a tip in the tip jar! https://buymeacoffee.com/robertaglassSupport Roberta by sending a donation via Venmo. https://venmo.com/robertaglassGet $10 credit towards your next livestream using this affiliate link! Want to create live streams like this? Check out StreamYard: https://streamyard.com/pal/d/6616403606241280

Karen Read's first trial in the death of John O'Keefe, her boyfriend and Boston Police officer, ended with a hung jury. Now, she prepares to face a jury once again not only maintaining her innocence but claiming that those close to O'Keefe and the Boston Police Department have framed her for murder. This episode of the Court TV Podcast takes you to Dedham Massachusetts for one of the final pretrial hearings in the controversial case against Karen Read from 3/18/2025.For more on the case against Karen Read, Click Here.Watch 24/7 Court TV LIVE Stream Today https://www.courttv.com/Join the Investigation Newsletter https://www.courttv.com/email/Court TV Podcast https://www.courttv.com/podcast/FOLLOW THE CASE:Facebook https://www.facebook.com/courttvTwitter/X https://twitter.com/CourtTVInstagram https://www.instagram.com/courttvnetwork/TikTok https://www.tiktok.com/@courttvliveYouTube https://www.youtube.com/c/COURTTVWATCH +140 FREE TRIALS IN THE COURT TV ARCHIVE https://www.courttv.com/trials/ HOW TO FIND COURT TV https://www.courttv.com/where-to-watch/

RAW COURT AUDIO-AZ v. Lori Daybell, Pretrial Hearing- Part 1 Pretrial Hearing - Phoenix, AZ – Convicted killer Lori Vallow Daybell, known as the “Doomsday Cult Mom,” has filed a handwritten motion requesting that Court TV be barred from covering her Arizona courtroom proceedings. She cited the network's coverage of her and her fifth husband, Chad Daybell's, murder cases in Idaho as the basis for her request. Representing herself at trial, Daybell faces charges for the murder of her fourth husband, Charles Vallow, and the attempted murder of her niece's ex-husband, Brandon Boudreaux. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

RAW COURT AUDIO-AZ v. Lori Daybell, Pretrial Hearing- Part 2 Pretrial Hearing - Phoenix, AZ – Convicted killer Lori Vallow Daybell, known as the “Doomsday Cult Mom,” has filed a handwritten motion requesting that Court TV be barred from covering her Arizona courtroom proceedings. She cited the network's coverage of her and her fifth husband, Chad Daybell's, murder cases in Idaho as the basis for her request. Representing herself at trial, Daybell faces charges for the murder of her fourth husband, Charles Vallow, and the attempted murder of her niece's ex-husband, Brandon Boudreaux. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

RAW COURT AUDIO-AZ v. Lori Daybell, Pretrial Hearing- Part 1 Pretrial Hearing - Phoenix, AZ – Convicted killer Lori Vallow Daybell, known as the “Doomsday Cult Mom,” has filed a handwritten motion requesting that Court TV be barred from covering her Arizona courtroom proceedings. She cited the network's coverage of her and her fifth husband, Chad Daybell's, murder cases in Idaho as the basis for her request. Representing herself at trial, Daybell faces charges for the murder of her fourth husband, Charles Vallow, and the attempted murder of her niece's ex-husband, Brandon Boudreaux. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

RAW COURT AUDIO-AZ v. Lori Daybell, Pretrial Hearing- Part 2 Pretrial Hearing - Phoenix, AZ – Convicted killer Lori Vallow Daybell, known as the “Doomsday Cult Mom,” has filed a handwritten motion requesting that Court TV be barred from covering her Arizona courtroom proceedings. She cited the network's coverage of her and her fifth husband, Chad Daybell's, murder cases in Idaho as the basis for her request. Representing herself at trial, Daybell faces charges for the murder of her fourth husband, Charles Vallow, and the attempted murder of her niece's ex-husband, Brandon Boudreaux. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Convicted killer Lori Vallow Daybell, known as the "Doomsday Cult Mom," has filed a handwritten motion requesting that Court TV be barred from covering her Arizona courtroom proceedings. She claims the network's past coverage of her and her fifth husband, Chad Daybell's, murder cases in Idaho have been prejudicial. Representing herself at trial, Daybell faces charges for the murder of her fourth husband, Charles Vallow, and the attempted murder of her niece's ex-husband, Brandon Boudreaux. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Convicted killer Lori Vallow Daybell, known as the "Doomsday Cult Mom," has filed a handwritten motion requesting that Court TV be barred from covering her Arizona courtroom proceedings. She claims the network's past coverage of her and her fifth husband, Chad Daybell's, murder cases in Idaho have been prejudicial. Representing herself at trial, Daybell faces charges for the murder of her fourth husband, Charles Vallow, and the attempted murder of her niece's ex-husband, Brandon Boudreaux. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Convicted killer Lori Vallow Daybell, known as the "Doomsday Cult Mom," has filed a handwritten motion requesting that Court TV be barred from covering her Arizona courtroom proceedings. She claims the network's past coverage of her and her fifth husband, Chad Daybell's, murder cases in Idaho have been prejudicial.  Representing herself at trial, Daybell faces charges for the murder of her fourth husband, Charles Vallow, and the attempted murder of her niece's ex-husband, Brandon Boudreaux.  Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

Convicted killer Lori Vallow Daybell, known as the "Doomsday Cult Mom," has filed a handwritten motion requesting that Court TV be barred from covering her Arizona courtroom proceedings. She claims the network's past coverage of her and her fifth husband, Chad Daybell's, murder cases in Idaho have been prejudicial.  Representing herself at trial, Daybell faces charges for the murder of her fourth husband, Charles Vallow, and the attempted murder of her niece's ex-husband, Brandon Boudreaux.  Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

Welcome to the "Week in Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.       This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.       Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.  Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime, or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week in Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Welcome to the "Week in Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.       This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.       Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.  Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime, or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week in Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Judge Halts Karen Read Pretrial Hearing After ‘Grave Concern' Over New Information A pretrial hearing in the Karen Read case took an unexpected turn when Judge Beverly Cannone abruptly ended proceedings, citing "grave concern" over newly disclosed information that could have "profound effects" on the defense. The dramatic moment unfolded after an open court discussion regarding federal involvement in the case, including expert witnesses from ARCCA, a forensic firm specializing in accident reconstruction. “The Commonwealth just provided the court with information that causes me grave concern,” Cannone announced after returning from an unplanned recess. “The implications of that information may have profound effects on the defense and defense counsel.” Cannone then suspended the hearing, stating that when proceedings resume, all affected parties should be "appropriately prepared" to address the issues at hand. The abrupt decision followed a statement by special prosecutor Hank Brennan, who disclosed in open court that Read's defense team had previously communicated with ARCCA experts before her first trial. Brennan referred to what appeared to be emails between the defense and ARCCA, along with a $23,000 invoice the firm allegedly sent to Read's legal team. Brennan, who recently filed a motion to bar ARCCA witnesses from testifying at Read's retrial, accused the defense of concealing critical information about the experts' involvement. “Both Dr. Wolfe and Dr. Rentschler admittedly did not review all pertinent and relevant evidence that exists in this case,” Brennan's motion stated, referring to ARCCA's accident reconstruction specialists who testified in Read's defense in June 2024. Tuesday's pretrial hearing was the first since the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court denied Read's appeal to dismiss two of the three charges against her. Read is accused of striking her boyfriend, Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe, with her Lexus SUV in January 2022 and leaving him to die outside in a snowstorm after a night of drinking. Her original trial ended in a hung jury, leading Cannone to declare a mistrial in July 2024. Read, who has consistently maintained her innocence, claims that she was framed and that O'Keefe was actually killed inside the home of Brian Albert before being dragged outside. In an exclusive interview with Boston 25's Ted Daniel on Super Bowl Sunday, Read reiterated her stance, stating, “I have nothing to hide. I've been framed.” Her retrial, originally scheduled for early 2025, has now been pushed to April. The latest developments raise new questions about the role of federal forensic experts in the case and how their testimony might impact the outcome of the upcoming trial. #KarenRead #JusticeForKarenRead #BostonPD #LegalNews #TrueCrime #CourtroomDrama #BreakingNews Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Judge Halts Karen Read Pretrial Hearing After ‘Grave Concern' Over New Information A pretrial hearing in the Karen Read case took an unexpected turn when Judge Beverly Cannone abruptly ended proceedings, citing "grave concern" over newly disclosed information that could have "profound effects" on the defense. The dramatic moment unfolded after an open court discussion regarding federal involvement in the case, including expert witnesses from ARCCA, a forensic firm specializing in accident reconstruction. “The Commonwealth just provided the court with information that causes me grave concern,” Cannone announced after returning from an unplanned recess. “The implications of that information may have profound effects on the defense and defense counsel.” Cannone then suspended the hearing, stating that when proceedings resume, all affected parties should be "appropriately prepared" to address the issues at hand. The abrupt decision followed a statement by special prosecutor Hank Brennan, who disclosed in open court that Read's defense team had previously communicated with ARCCA experts before her first trial. Brennan referred to what appeared to be emails between the defense and ARCCA, along with a $23,000 invoice the firm allegedly sent to Read's legal team. Brennan, who recently filed a motion to bar ARCCA witnesses from testifying at Read's retrial, accused the defense of concealing critical information about the experts' involvement. “Both Dr. Wolfe and Dr. Rentschler admittedly did not review all pertinent and relevant evidence that exists in this case,” Brennan's motion stated, referring to ARCCA's accident reconstruction specialists who testified in Read's defense in June 2024. Tuesday's pretrial hearing was the first since the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court denied Read's appeal to dismiss two of the three charges against her. Read is accused of striking her boyfriend, Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe, with her Lexus SUV in January 2022 and leaving him to die outside in a snowstorm after a night of drinking. Her original trial ended in a hung jury, leading Cannone to declare a mistrial in July 2024. Read, who has consistently maintained her innocence, claims that she was framed and that O'Keefe was actually killed inside the home of Brian Albert before being dragged outside. In an exclusive interview with Boston 25's Ted Daniel on Super Bowl Sunday, Read reiterated her stance, stating, “I have nothing to hide. I've been framed.” Her retrial, originally scheduled for early 2025, has now been pushed to April. The latest developments raise new questions about the role of federal forensic experts in the case and how their testimony might impact the outcome of the upcoming trial. #KarenRead #JusticeForKarenRead #BostonPD #LegalNews #TrueCrime #CourtroomDrama #BreakingNews Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

A pretrial hearing in the Karen Read case took an unexpected turn when Judge Beverly Cannone abruptly ended proceedings, citing "grave concern" over newly disclosed information that could have "profound effects" on the defense. The dramatic moment unfolded after an open court discussion regarding federal involvement in the case, including expert witnesses from ARCCA, a forensic firm specializing in accident reconstruction. “The Commonwealth just provided the court with information that causes me grave concern,” Cannone announced after returning from an unplanned recess. “The implications of that information may have profound effects on the defense and defense counsel.” Cannone then suspended the hearing, stating that when proceedings resume, all affected parties should be "appropriately prepared" to address the issues at hand. The abrupt decision followed a statement by special prosecutor Hank Brennan, who disclosed in open court that Read's defense team had previously communicated with ARCCA experts before her first trial. Brennan referred to what appeared to be emails between the defense and ARCCA, along with a $23,000 invoice the firm allegedly sent to Read's legal team. Brennan, who recently filed a motion to bar ARCCA witnesses from testifying at Read's retrial, accused the defense of concealing critical information about the experts' involvement. “Both Dr. Wolfe and Dr. Rentschler admittedly did not review all pertinent and relevant evidence that exists in this case,” Brennan's motion stated, referring to ARCCA's accident reconstruction specialists who testified in Read's defense in June 2024. Tuesday's pretrial hearing was the first since the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court denied Read's appeal to dismiss two of the three charges against her. Read is accused of striking her boyfriend, Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe, with her Lexus SUV in January 2022 and leaving him to die outside in a snowstorm after a night of drinking. Her original trial ended in a hung jury, leading Cannone to declare a mistrial in July 2024. Read, who has consistently maintained her innocence, claims that she was framed and that O'Keefe was actually killed inside the home of Brian Albert before being dragged outside. #KarenRead #JusticeForKarenRead #BostonPD #LegalNews #TrueCrime #CourtroomDrama #BreakingNews Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com  

A pretrial hearing in the Karen Read case took an unexpected turn when Judge Beverly Cannone abruptly ended proceedings, citing "grave concern" over newly disclosed information that could have "profound effects" on the defense. The dramatic moment unfolded after an open court discussion regarding federal involvement in the case, including expert witnesses from ARCCA, a forensic firm specializing in accident reconstruction. “The Commonwealth just provided the court with information that causes me grave concern,” Cannone announced after returning from an unplanned recess. “The implications of that information may have profound effects on the defense and defense counsel.” Cannone then suspended the hearing, stating that when proceedings resume, all affected parties should be "appropriately prepared" to address the issues at hand. The abrupt decision followed a statement by special prosecutor Hank Brennan, who disclosed in open court that Read's defense team had previously communicated with ARCCA experts before her first trial. Brennan referred to what appeared to be emails between the defense and ARCCA, along with a $23,000 invoice the firm allegedly sent to Read's legal team. Brennan, who recently filed a motion to bar ARCCA witnesses from testifying at Read's retrial, accused the defense of concealing critical information about the experts' involvement. “Both Dr. Wolfe and Dr. Rentschler admittedly did not review all pertinent and relevant evidence that exists in this case,” Brennan's motion stated, referring to ARCCA's accident reconstruction specialists who testified in Read's defense in June 2024. Tuesday's pretrial hearing was the first since the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court denied Read's appeal to dismiss two of the three charges against her. Read is accused of striking her boyfriend, Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe, with her Lexus SUV in January 2022 and leaving him to die outside in a snowstorm after a night of drinking. Her original trial ended in a hung jury, leading Cannone to declare a mistrial in July 2024. Read, who has consistently maintained her innocence, claims that she was framed and that O'Keefe was actually killed inside the home of Brian Albert before being dragged outside. #KarenRead #JusticeForKarenRead #BostonPD #LegalNews #TrueCrime #CourtroomDrama #BreakingNews Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com  

A pretrial hearing in the Karen Read case took an unexpected turn when Judge Beverly Cannone abruptly ended proceedings, citing "grave concern" over newly disclosed information that could have "profound effects" on the defense. The dramatic moment unfolded after an open court discussion regarding federal involvement in the case, including expert witnesses from ARCCA, a forensic firm specializing in accident reconstruction. “The Commonwealth just provided the court with information that causes me grave concern,” Cannone announced after returning from an unplanned recess. “The implications of that information may have profound effects on the defense and defense counsel.” Cannone then suspended the hearing, stating that when proceedings resume, all affected parties should be "appropriately prepared" to address the issues at hand. The abrupt decision followed a statement by special prosecutor Hank Brennan, who disclosed in open court that Read's defense team had previously communicated with ARCCA experts before her first trial. Brennan referred to what appeared to be emails between the defense and ARCCA, along with a $23,000 invoice the firm allegedly sent to Read's legal team. Brennan, who recently filed a motion to bar ARCCA witnesses from testifying at Read's retrial, accused the defense of concealing critical information about the experts' involvement. “Both Dr. Wolfe and Dr. Rentschler admittedly did not review all pertinent and relevant evidence that exists in this case,” Brennan's motion stated, referring to ARCCA's accident reconstruction specialists who testified in Read's defense in June 2024. Tuesday's pretrial hearing was the first since the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court denied Read's appeal to dismiss two of the three charges against her. Read is accused of striking her boyfriend, Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe, with her Lexus SUV in January 2022 and leaving him to die outside in a snowstorm after a night of drinking. Her original trial ended in a hung jury, leading Cannone to declare a mistrial in July 2024. Read, who has consistently maintained her innocence, claims that she was framed and that O'Keefe was actually killed inside the home of Brian Albert before being dragged outside. #KarenRead #JusticeForKarenRead #BostonPD #LegalNews #TrueCrime #CourtroomDrama #BreakingNews Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

A pretrial hearing in the Karen Read case took an unexpected turn when Judge Beverly Cannone abruptly ended proceedings, citing "grave concern" over newly disclosed information that could have "profound effects" on the defense. The dramatic moment unfolded after an open court discussion regarding federal involvement in the case, including expert witnesses from ARCCA, a forensic firm specializing in accident reconstruction. “The Commonwealth just provided the court with information that causes me grave concern,” Cannone announced after returning from an unplanned recess. “The implications of that information may have profound effects on the defense and defense counsel.” Cannone then suspended the hearing, stating that when proceedings resume, all affected parties should be "appropriately prepared" to address the issues at hand. The abrupt decision followed a statement by special prosecutor Hank Brennan, who disclosed in open court that Read's defense team had previously communicated with ARCCA experts before her first trial. Brennan referred to what appeared to be emails between the defense and ARCCA, along with a $23,000 invoice the firm allegedly sent to Read's legal team. Brennan, who recently filed a motion to bar ARCCA witnesses from testifying at Read's retrial, accused the defense of concealing critical information about the experts' involvement. “Both Dr. Wolfe and Dr. Rentschler admittedly did not review all pertinent and relevant evidence that exists in this case,” Brennan's motion stated, referring to ARCCA's accident reconstruction specialists who testified in Read's defense in June 2024. Tuesday's pretrial hearing was the first since the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court denied Read's appeal to dismiss two of the three charges against her. Read is accused of striking her boyfriend, Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe, with her Lexus SUV in January 2022 and leaving him to die outside in a snowstorm after a night of drinking. Her original trial ended in a hung jury, leading Cannone to declare a mistrial in July 2024. Read, who has consistently maintained her innocence, claims that she was framed and that O'Keefe was actually killed inside the home of Brian Albert before being dragged outside. #KarenRead #JusticeForKarenRead #BostonPD #LegalNews #TrueCrime #CourtroomDrama #BreakingNews Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Donald Trump is being prosecuted for (among other things) lying to his supporters about stolen votes and rigged elections. He whipped them up into a frenzy and then he told them to go to the US Capitol and stop the certification of a presidential election. Put another way, Trump intentionally lies to incite violence. And now he's at it again. Trump is telling disgusting, despicable, and reckless violence-inducing lies about the Haitian community - and violence is again happening. All the while, Trump is on pretrial release. The law provides that if a defendant on pretrial release poses a danger to the community, his release should be revoked and he should be detained pending trial. Yet judges, prosecutors, and all institutions of government seem determined to sacrifice the safety of all Americans to the clear, demonstrated danger of Trump's reckless, violence-inducing lies. The Question is . . . why?If you're interested in supporting our all-volunteer efforts, you can become a Team Justice patron at: / glennkirschner If you'd like to support us and buy Team Justice and Justice Matters merchandise visit:https://shop.spreadshirt.com/glennkir...Check out Glenn's website at https://glennkirschner.com/Follow Glenn on:Threads: https://www.threads.net/glennkirschner2Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/glennkirschner2Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/glennkirschner2Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/glennkirsch...See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.