Podcasts about prosecutors

Three hundred and seventy-six years. That's how long it would take Kouri Richins to pay off the $1.37 million a judge just ordered her to return — if she worked every available hour at the highest wage Utah's prisons offer. She was convicted of poisoning her husband Eric Richins for the insurance money. The forensic accountant at trial testified she burned through the entire payout in under ninety days.On August 28, the court signed off on the restitution and sent the debt to collectors. Her lawyer didn't dispute the figure. The request to hold off while she appeals went nowhere — the judge said the law gave him no choice. Before the murder trial even began, this same judge had ruled she was too poor to pay for her own defense. The county covered her attorneys and is covering her appeal.The restitution is only the financial reckoning she's facing right now. Another twenty-six felony charges sit in a separate Summit County filing. Prosecutors say she secretly borrowed against her husband's home, fabricated bank documents for lenders, and took $45,000 from her closest friend through a deal that left the friend's family without a home. A scheduling conference is set for October 9.This episode covers the restitution order, the trail of debt the money disappeared into, and the fraud case that's next on the docket.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodDisclaimer:This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.Hashtags:#KouriRichins #EricRichins #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #Restitution #MurderConviction #SummitCountyUtah #TrueCrimePodcast #JusticeForEric #LifeWithoutParole

Prosecutors believe if more evidence is presented, Diddy could face time behind bars for the murder of Tupac.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The State's rebuttal to defense expert Matthew Noedel focused on challenging the significance of his conclusions about the absence of victim blood or other victim-linked biological material in Bryan Kohberger's car and residence. Noedel had emphasized that investigators conducted an extensive search of Kohberger's vehicle and apartment and did not find blood tied to Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle or Ethan Chapin. Prosecutors responded that the absence of detectable victim blood did not establish that Kohberger had not been inside the King Road house, nor did it prove that biological material could not have been removed, degraded or simply never transferred in a recoverable quantity. The rebuttal also cautioned against treating a negative finding as affirmative proof of innocence, arguing that forensic testing can establish what was detected in a particular sample but cannot necessarily reconstruct every transfer event that did or did not occur.The State also pushed back on Noedel's interpretation of secondary transfer and contamination issues, arguing that his report went beyond what the laboratory results could reliably support. Prosecutors stressed that transfer of DNA or blood is highly dependent on variables such as the amount of biological material present, the surfaces involved, subsequent cleaning, time, environmental conditions and the way evidence was handled. In other words, they argued that Noedel was using the lack of victim DNA in Kohberger's vehicle and apartment to suggest a broader exculpatory conclusion that the science itself did not require. The rebuttal was therefore less about disputing the raw laboratory results and more about disputing the inference Noedel drew from them: everyone agreed that victim blood was not found in the car or apartment, but the State argued that this fact alone did not meaningfully exclude Kohberger from the murders or undermine the prosecution's larger evidentiary case.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:030326+REDACTED+Exhibits+S-1+through+S-13+to+States+Amended+Supp+Resp+to+Rqst+for+Disc+RE+Expert+Testimony.pdf

Tyler Robinson's case is officially headed to trial after Utah District Judge Tony Graf ruled that prosecutors presented enough evidence to move forward on the aggravated murder charge in the killing of Charlie Kirk. Prosecutors argued that Robinson fired a high-powered rifle from a rooftop more than 400 feet away as Kirk spoke before a crowd of more than 3,000 people at Utah Valley University, creating a risk not only to Kirk but to others nearby. That alleged danger to the surrounding crowd is critical because it supports the aggravating factor prosecutors are relying on to keep the death penalty in play. Robinson pleaded not guilty to all charges after the ruling, while his defense unsuccessfully argued that the state had failed to establish the level of risk necessary to sustain the capital charge. Graf could have sent the case forward on a lesser murder charge, but instead sided with prosecutors and allowed the aggravated murder count to stand.The ruling followed a five-day preliminary hearing in July in which prosecutors laid out what they described as a mountain of evidence against Robinson. That evidence included DNA and a handwritten note prosecutors allege Robinson left for his romantic partner in which he claimed responsibility for killing Kirk. Prosecutors also argued that the trajectory and location of the shot showed Robinson allegedly knew he was firing into a densely packed public event where a missed shot could have killed someone else. Kirk's family called the ruling an important step toward justice, while Robinson showed no visible reaction as the judge announced his decision. With the aggravated murder charge intact and the death penalty still on the table, the case now moves from the preliminary stage into the full trial process, where prosecutors will have to prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

The Bryan Kohberger case became consumed by repeated discovery disputes as the defense accused prosecutors of failing to turn over evidence quickly enough, completely enough, or in a form that could actually be used to prepare for trial. Anne Taylor and Kohberger's defense team filed multiple motions to compel, arguing that they were still waiting on materials tied to forensic testing, expert analysis, investigative records, digital evidence, DNA work, and other parts of the state's case even as prosecutors were pushing the case toward trial. The defense repeatedly framed the problem as more than ordinary delay, arguing that incomplete or late disclosure made it harder to investigate the evidence independently, prepare expert challenges, litigate suppression issues, and build a meaningful defense in a death penalty case. Prosecutors pushed back by insisting they had produced enormous amounts of discovery, were continuing to supplement disclosures as new material became available, and were not deliberately withholding evidence.That disagreement produced a steady back-and-forth in court, with each side accusing the other of overstating the problem. The defense argued that simply dumping huge volumes of material did not satisfy the state's obligations if important records were missing, difficult to identify, or produced too late to be meaningfully examined. Prosecutors countered that the investigation was massive, involved numerous agencies and experts, and that some requested material either did not exist, was not in the state's possession, or was still being gathered from outside entities. Judge John Judge was repeatedly asked to referee those disputes, ordering additional disclosures in some instances while declining to accept the defense's broader suggestion that prosecutors were systematically hiding evidence. The result was an ongoing discovery battle that became one of the defining procedural fights of the pretrial case, with Kohberger's lawyers arguing that the state's disclosure problems threatened the fairness of the proceedings and prosecutors maintaining that they were meeting their obligations in an extraordinarily complex prosecution.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

In this episode of AML Conversations, Brad Breslin, President and General Manager, Compliance Solutions at AML RightSource, sits down with Jeff Schlanger, former Manhattan prosecutor, institutional reformer, and author of "Doing Right: From Prosecutor to Reformer — A Journey Through Crime, Corruption, Complacency, and Change." Jeff's career spans four decades on the front lines of accountability. He prosecuted the Westies and helped build the case against John Gotti. He served as the federal monitor overseeing the LAPD consent decree after the Rampart scandal. He later became the NYPD's first Deputy Commissioner for Risk Management, and he founded IntegrAssure to bring collaborative oversight to police departments nationwide, including the Aurora, Colorado consent decree. The conversation explores what happens when institutions designed to do good drift off course, and what it takes to bring them back. Jeff shares the moment he discovered the FBI withheld knowledge of jury tampering during the Gotti trial, why he published his NYPD resignation letter, and how the Mickey Featherstone case taught him that doing right often means acting against your own interests. For financial crime compliance and risk professionals, the lessons translate directly. Jeff draws the line from police reform to the HSBC monitorship, where he and Brad worked together, showing that the methodology of oversight, accountability, and continuous improvement is the same whether the rulebook is an LAPD procedures manual or the FFIEC guidelines. Link to Jeff's book: https://doingright.integrassure.com/doing-right-homepage.html

In Episode 3 of Mother on Trial: Inside the Lindsay Clancy Case, Mystery and Murder: Analysis by Dr. Phil, the case enters its most consequential phase as closing arguments end and the jury begins deliberating. Prosecutors argue that Lindsay Clancy knew what she was doing, deliberately created an opportunity to be alone with her children, carried out the killings in sequence, and demonstrated purposeful behavior before attempting suicide. The defense counters that Clancy was suffering from severe psychiatric illness, had deteriorated dramatically after childbirth, and lacked criminal responsibility at the time of the killings. Sarah Carden joins Dr. Phil and breaks down the competing arguments, Massachusetts' legal standard for lack of criminal responsibility, and why the prosecution, not the defense, carries the burden of proving criminal responsibility beyond a reasonable doubt. Now jurors are scrutinizing two critical pieces of evidence: Clancy's prescription medication bottles and the knife used in her suicide attempt, evidence that sits directly at the intersection of the defense's psychiatric argument and the prosecution's theory of deliberate, organized behavior. The ultimate question remains: Was Lindsay Clancy severely mentally ill but still criminally responsible, or was her mental disease so severe that the Commonwealth cannot prove she was responsible for what she did?Sponsored by SleepCreme: The foundation of health begins with sleep. Claim your exclusive Dr. Phill offer here: https://sleepcreme.com/See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

The Lindsay Clancy jury just told the judge they are deadlocked. After nearly 18 hours, they still cannot agree on whether a Massachusetts mother murdered her three children. The judge sent them back in. Pat opened the phones and asked you what you think. Lindsay Clancy is charged with first-degree murder in the deaths of Cora, 5, Dawson, 3, and 8-month-old Callan. The defense says postpartum psychosis, a pile of psychiatric medications, and a command hallucination. Prosecutors say she planned it: She sent her husband out for a prescription and takeout, then used exercise bands. Supporters in pink shirts showed up arguing that she is sick, not guilty. A hung jury does not settle that fight. It just hands it to the rest of the country. That is why Pat took calls instead of reading another legal explainer. Regular people are not sitting in that Plymouth courtroom. They still have to decide what they believe about responsibility, mental illness, and what we owe three children who never got a vote. Pat also covered: After a 9-woman jury deadlock on Lindsay Clancy, is the 19th Amendment back on the table? A U.N. committee says countries are “legally obliged” to consider slavery reparations. “Baby canceled” posts are treating abortions like gender-reveal announcements. Did the jury stall because the facts are messy or because the culture no longer wants to call this murder? If you had to vote today — guilty, not guilty by reason of insanity, or mistrial — which way do you go, and why? If you want unfiltered truth and common-sense analysis that cuts through the noise, hit subscribe and turn on notifications. 00:00 Pat Gray UNLEASHED! 02:55 Updates on the Lindsay Clancy Trial 07:17 Women Presidential Voting Data 08:50 The Horrific Story of Constance Fisher 11:59 More on Lindsay Clancy 14:22 Caller Sam 15:17 Caller Jessica 21:23 Caller Cheryl #1 23:38 Caller Cheryl #2 30:13 Caller Cheryl #3 32:13 Caller Rob 34:50 Caller Marshall 37:32 Caller Sheryl (Cheryl #4) 42:04 Caller Julie (Florida) 49:02 Pat Wants to Repeal the 19th Amendment 51:15 Caller Mike 53:26 Mitch McConnell Sighting 54:30 Timothy Ray Jones Jr. & Double Standards 55:19 Caller Britney 59:24 Caller Mary 1:03:04 U.S. Hits Iran Once Again 1:04:23 Judges: Khalid Sheikh Mohammed & Tyler Robinson 1:06:22 Caller Kathy 1:08:06 Caller Amber 1:09:10 Caller Julie (Indiana) 1:12:19 Caller James 1:14:38 Caller Mel 1:16:12 Caller Leanne 1:18:03 Caller Pat 1:19:14 Caller Betty 1:28:48 U.N. Wants Reparations from the U.S.A. 1:30:02 Pat Doesn't Want Women to Vote 1:30:58 Tony Romo Pleads No Contest to Drug / Alcohol Problem 1:34:58 Results of Today's Calls on Lindsay Clancy Trial Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

56 year old Dawn Light stood before another Massachusetts judge this morning facing the serious charge of juror intimidation after being caught by police filming jurors in the Lindsay Clancy trial. Prosecutors claim the retired nurse and mother was in a restricted parking lot and adamantly denied taking photos of jurors, only for police to find a video of them in her deleted files. Her attorneys claim it was just a misunderstanding, and that Light was only trying to get a picture of Lindsay Clancy.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

56 year old Dawn Light stood before another Massachusetts judge this morning facing the serious charge of juror intimidation after being caught by police filming jurors in the Lindsay Clancy trial. Prosecutors claim the retired nurse and mother was in a restricted parking lot and adamantly denied taking photos of jurors, only for police to find a video of them in her deleted files. Her attorneys claim it was just a misunderstanding, and that Light was only trying to get a picture of Lindsay Clancy.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

56 year old Dawn Light stood before another Massachusetts judge this morning facing the serious charge of juror intimidation after being caught by police filming jurors in the Lindsay Clancy trial. Prosecutors claim the retired nurse and mother was in a restricted parking lot and adamantly denied taking photos of jurors, only for police to find a video of them in her deleted files. Her attorneys claim it was just a misunderstanding, and that Light was only trying to get a picture of Lindsay Clancy.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The prosecutor told the jury Lindsay Clancy left her children on the basement floor with exercise bands still around their necks and called them broken toys. The defense attorney held up a honeymoon wish jar and told the jury the prosecution ripped the soul out of a woman destroyed by thirteen psychiatric medications.Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer joins Tony Brueski for a three-part verdict-watch interview covering the prosecution, the defense, and what could happen next. They disagree on this case and every question is a place where their reads collide.The prosecution's own expert Kirk Heilbrun called the killings out of love — a serious suicide attempt where Clancy could not bear to leave the children behind. Defense expert Phillip Resnick called her a puppet. The voice she described appeared once, lasted eighteen minutes, and vanished the moment the children were dead.Nine women and three men are deliberating at Plymouth Superior Court. Five verdict options. First-degree carries life without parole. Not criminally responsible means a psychiatric facility with periodic reviews.Andrea Yates received that verdict twenty years ago. She is still in a state hospital.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #TrueCrimeToday #JenniferCoffindaffer #TrueCrime #PostpartumPsychosis #VerdictWatch #ClosingArguments #MurderTrial #MaternalMentalHealth

Send us Fan MailAttorney Chris Madel spoke with Liz Collin on her podcast about how Minnesota police officers have been prosecuted without a grand jury indictment — as required by Minnesota law.Madel raised this issue while defending Minnesota Trooper Ryan Londregan before Hennepin County Attorney Mary Moriarty dropped the charges in the case. However, the lack of a grand jury indictment —as required by Minnesota law — also affects the prosecutions of other Minnesota police officers, including Derek Chauvin, who raised this same issue in his latest petition.“I think with respect to Minnesota Statute 628.61 ... I think they're just ignoring it. There is no real other explanation for it," said Madel.Support the show

James Blunt, Hayden Panettiere, Candace Owes, Tyler Robinson - Ex Prosecutor Lionel!Watch all of our Hayden Panettiere videos here    • Hayden Panettiere  Watch all of our Lionel videos here:    • Lionel Nation  Candace Owens on Lionel:    • LIONEL Welcomes CANDACE OWENS LIVE: UNEDIT...  LIONEL on YT:    / @lionelnation    LIONEL on X https://x.com/LionelMedia  LYNN's WARRIORS on YT    / @lynnswarriors     We're joined by legal expert and former prosecutor Lionel, breaking down today's biggest headlines, legal controversies, and the questions everyone is asking. Expect sharp analysis, real talk, and insights you won't hear anywhere else.Shaun Attwood's social media:TikTok:   / shaunattwood1  Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/shaunattwoo...Twitter:   / shaunattwood  Facebook:   / shaunattwood1  Patreon:   / shaunattwood  Odysee: https://odysee.com/@ShaunAttwood:a#podcast #truecrime #news #youtubenews #podcast #livestream #youtube #news #usa #uk #jamesblunt #HaydenPanettiere #hollywood #hollywoodnews

Melesa Johnson, Jackson County Prosecutor, On Katie Garcia Mysterious Death | 9-2-26See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

A Utah judge is set to decide whether prosecutors have presented enough evidence to send Tyler Robinson to trial for the aggravated murder of Charlie Kirk, a charge that could make Robinson eligible for the death penalty. The decision follows an unusually lengthy preliminary hearing in which prosecutors spent five days laying out what they described as overwhelming evidence tying Robinson to the September 2025 shooting at Utah Valley University. Robinson, who turned himself in the day after the killing, has not yet entered a plea. His attorneys have largely avoided presenting an alternative theory of the shooting and have instead focused on challenging whether the state has enough evidence to support the aggravated murder charge and whether the death penalty should remain on the table. Judge Tony Graf could order Robinson to stand trial on aggravated murder, reduce the case to a lesser murder charge, or dismiss the charges, though prosecutors could potentially refile them.A major issue is whether the shooting endangered people other than Kirk, which is critical to the aggravated murder allegation. Prosecutors argue that numerous people were inside a "zone of danger" when the shot was fired from a rooftop more than 400 feet away, while the defense contends the shooter struck the intended target and did not place others in sufficient danger to justify the enhanced charge. Prosecutors have also pointed to DNA they say connected Robinson to the suspected murder weapon, an engraved cartridge they characterize as politically motivated, alleged writings and messages attributed to Robinson, and statements from his romantic partner, Lance Twiggs. Investigators also say Robinson posted in an online chat room shortly before surrendering that he was responsible for what happened at UVU. The defense has challenged the reliability of some of the DNA evidence and disputes whether prosecutors can establish the political motivation necessary for additional sentencing enhancements, leaving Graf's ruling as the next major turning point in determining whether the case proceeds toward a capital murder trial.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Judge to decide if Charlie Kirk murder case will go to trial | AP News

Bryan Kohberger's newest attorney, Jason Goldman, says the immediate focus of the defense is whether Kohberger's 2025 guilty plea was constitutionally valid and truly entered knowingly and voluntarily. Kohberger pleaded guilty to murdering Madison Mogen, Kaylee Goncalves, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin in exchange for avoiding the death penalty, but he is now seeking post-conviction relief and attempting to withdraw that plea. In a handwritten petition filed in July, Kohberger claimed his former attorneys provided ineffective assistance and that his plea was induced by promises that were not kept and threats allegedly made by members of his own defense team. Goldman says an amended petition and possible evidentiary hearing could finally expose what happened during the critical days leading up to the plea, including circumstances that have not yet been made public. Judge Steven Hippler has given Kohberger's attorneys until November 13 to file the more detailed amended petition, while prosecutors are pushing to have the challenge dismissed.The new defense team is also attacking the structure of the proceedings themselves. Idaho attorney Greg Rauch, who was appointed to represent Kohberger, has asked that Hippler be removed from the case and that the proceedings be transferred back to Moscow, arguing that questions surrounding the judge's impartiality must be resolved before Kohberger's constitutional claims are heard. The motion points to Hippler's earlier refusal to give Kohberger's trial attorneys additional preparation time and to unusually harsh comments the judge made about Kohberger at sentencing. Prosecutors, meanwhile, have requested the transcript of Kohberger's July 2025 plea hearing, apparently preparing to use Kohberger's own sworn statements in court to undermine his new assertion that the plea was involuntary. What had appeared to be a closed case after Kohberger admitted responsibility and received four consecutive life sentences has therefore reopened into a significant post-conviction battle, with his new attorneys signaling that the circumstances surrounding the plea, his former defense team and potentially previously undisclosed information could become central issues in court.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Bryan Kohberger's new lawyer targets guilty plea constitutionality | Fox News

The State's rebuttal to defense expert Matthew Noedel focused on challenging the significance of his conclusions about the absence of victim blood or other victim-linked biological material in Bryan Kohberger's car and residence. Noedel had emphasized that investigators conducted an extensive search of Kohberger's vehicle and apartment and did not find blood tied to Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle or Ethan Chapin. Prosecutors responded that the absence of detectable victim blood did not establish that Kohberger had not been inside the King Road house, nor did it prove that biological material could not have been removed, degraded or simply never transferred in a recoverable quantity. The rebuttal also cautioned against treating a negative finding as affirmative proof of innocence, arguing that forensic testing can establish what was detected in a particular sample but cannot necessarily reconstruct every transfer event that did or did not occur.The State also pushed back on Noedel's interpretation of secondary transfer and contamination issues, arguing that his report went beyond what the laboratory results could reliably support. Prosecutors stressed that transfer of DNA or blood is highly dependent on variables such as the amount of biological material present, the surfaces involved, subsequent cleaning, time, environmental conditions and the way evidence was handled. In other words, they argued that Noedel was using the lack of victim DNA in Kohberger's vehicle and apartment to suggest a broader exculpatory conclusion that the science itself did not require. The rebuttal was therefore less about disputing the raw laboratory results and more about disputing the inference Noedel drew from them: everyone agreed that victim blood was not found in the car or apartment, but the State argued that this fact alone did not meaningfully exclude Kohberger from the murders or undermine the prosecution's larger evidentiary case.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:030326+REDACTED+Exhibits+S-1+through+S-13+to+States+Amended+Supp+Resp+to+Rqst+for+Disc+RE+Expert+Testimony.pdf

U.S. President Donald Trump on Tuesday dismissed reports that he seeks to force Iran into negotiations following the latest strikes against Tehran, saying the United States is currently in a better position. Trump said in a post on Truth Social that the U.S. military has almost complete control of the Strait of Hormuz, the critical waterway for global oil and gas shipment that Iran has sought to control.Jurors in the Lindsay Clancy murder trial resumed deliberations Wednesday, a day after telling the judge they couldn't agree on whether the Massachusetts mother was criminally responsible for killing her three children.A former labor and delivery nurse, Clancy doesn't deny strangling her three young children at the family's home in 2023, but she says postpartum psychosis led to her actions. Prosecutors argue that she knew what she was doing. Clancy, 36, has pleaded not guilty by reason of lack of criminal responsibility.

Earlier today, U.S. forces began striking Iran's military targets after Iran launched attacks on shipping vessels in the Strait of Hormuz and U.S. forces in the region. The Treasury is working on more sanctions targeting the Iranian regime.Immigration and Customs Enforcement arrested more than 2,000 criminal illegal immigrants in New York in one month. Officials said those arrested include murderers, rapists, and drug traffickers.A Utah judge is set to decide whether Tyler Robinson will stand trial in the killing of Charlie Kirk. Prosecutors and the defense are making their final arguments before Judge Tony Graf decides whether the case will move forward.Apple's new CEO, John Ternus, is taking over on Tuesday as Tim Cook steps down. Ternus holds an engineering background and is expected to lead Apple with his technical expertise.More Breaking News, Special Reports, and Live Coverage on NTD: https://ept.ms/NTD_LIVE

Tyler Robinson's case is officially headed to trial after Utah District Judge Tony Graf ruled that prosecutors presented enough evidence to move forward on the aggravated murder charge in the killing of Charlie Kirk. Prosecutors argued that Robinson fired a high-powered rifle from a rooftop more than 400 feet away as Kirk spoke before a crowd of more than 3,000 people at Utah Valley University, creating a risk not only to Kirk but to others nearby. That alleged danger to the surrounding crowd is critical because it supports the aggravating factor prosecutors are relying on to keep the death penalty in play. Robinson pleaded not guilty to all charges after the ruling, while his defense unsuccessfully argued that the state had failed to establish the level of risk necessary to sustain the capital charge. Graf could have sent the case forward on a lesser murder charge, but instead sided with prosecutors and allowed the aggravated murder count to stand.The ruling followed a five-day preliminary hearing in July in which prosecutors laid out what they described as a mountain of evidence against Robinson. That evidence included DNA and a handwritten note prosecutors allege Robinson left for his romantic partner in which he claimed responsibility for killing Kirk. Prosecutors also argued that the trajectory and location of the shot showed Robinson allegedly knew he was firing into a densely packed public event where a missed shot could have killed someone else. Kirk's family called the ruling an important step toward justice, while Robinson showed no visible reaction as the judge announced his decision. With the aggravated murder charge intact and the death penalty still on the table, the case now moves from the preliminary stage into the full trial process, where prosecutors will have to prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Matthew Exton Trial: Attempted Murder Case & James Elmore Jr. Texas Killing Fields Trial“The James Elmore Jr. trial focuses on a manslaughter charge connected to the 1984 death of Laura Miller, as prosecutors present evidence in the Texas Killing Fields case.”#MatthewExton #JamesElmoreJr #TexasKillingFieldsMatthew Exton trial and James Elmore Jr. trial are the focus of this latest true crime and courtroom update. In this video, we break down the latest developments, court proceedings, evidence, and allegations surrounding both high-profile criminal cases.The Matthew Exton trial in Toledo, Ohio involves an attempted murder case and three counts of felonious assault stemming from a 2025 restaurant incident. Prosecutors allege Matthew Exton brought a firearm into a crowded restaurant and pointed it at his ex-wife, while the defense disputes the prosecution's interpretation of what happened.We examine the Matthew Exton court case, the restaurant incident, the prosecution's arguments, the defense position, and the latest courtroom developments.The video also covers the James Elmore Jr. trial connected to the Texas Killing Fields case. James Dolphs Elmore Jr. is facing a manslaughter charge related to the 1984 death of Laura Miller, along with evidence-tampering charges connected to the deaths of Laura Miller and Audrey Cook.The James Elmore Jr. trial has brought renewed attention to the Texas Killing Fields investigation, the Laura Miller case, and the decades-long search for answers surrounding the victims connected to the Calder Road area.In this video, we cover:• Matthew Exton trial latest update• Matthew Exton attempted murder case• Matthew Exton court proceedings• Matthew Exton restaurant incident• Toledo Ohio crime case• James Elmore Jr. trial• James Dolphs Elmore Jr. court case• Laura Miller case• Texas Killing Fields trial• Audrey Cook case• Texas Killing Fields investigation• Latest true crime news• Criminal trial updates• Courtroom news and analysisThis video is for news, commentary, analysis, and informational purposes. The allegations discussed are allegations and should not be considered a finding of guilt unless determined by a court.#MatthewExton #MatthewExtonTrial #JamesElmoreJr #JamesElmoreTrial #TexasKillingFields #LauraMiller #AudreyCook #TrueCrime #TrueCrimeNews #CrimeNews #CourtroomNews #TrialUpdate #CriminalTrial #OhioCrime #TexasCrime

Lily Fletcher, producer of Hulu's Welcome to the Family: The Murder of Dan Markel, joins Kate to discuss the shocking murder-for-hire case at the center of the four-part docuseries. Florida State University law professor Dan Markel was murdered in 2014 amid a bitter custody battle with his former wife, Wendi Adelson. Prosecutors ultimately connected the killing to members of the wealthy Adelson family and a chain involving an intermediary and two hired gunmen. Ryan and Katie Fears also share their firsthand memories of Wendi's brother Charlie Adelson years before he was convicted of arranging Dan's murder. Reality Life with Kate Casey Summer Reading List: https://katecasey.substack.com/p/books-i-cant-stop-talking-about-this Vanity Fair Article: https://www.vanityfair.com/culture/story/martha-moxleys-diary What to Watch List: https://katecasey.substack.com Patreon: http://www.patreon.com/katecasey Instagram: http://www.instagram.com/katecaseyca Tik Tok: https://www.tiktok.com/@itskatecasey?lang=en Facebook Group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/113157919338245 Amazon List: https://www.amazon.com/shop/katecasey Twitter: https://twitter.com/katecaseySee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

• Jurors in Lindsay Clancy's trial are continuing their deliberations after they informed the judge this morning they were unable to reach a unanimous decision. The judge sent them back to keep deliberating.• The Massachusetts mother is accused of murder after strangling her three young children. The jury could consider charges of first-degree murder, second-degree murder or manslaughter.• Prosecutors have argued Clancy acted “intentionally, rationally, and swiftly” to kill her children. The defense, however, has argued Clancy should not be held criminally responsible because she was suffering from postpartum psychosis. If the jury finds Clancy not criminally responsible for the killings of her children, she could spend the rest of her life in a hospital.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

The prosecutor in Minneapolis who is investigating the homicides of Renee Goode and Alex Pretti - Hennepin County District Attorney Mary Moriarty - has finally announced that she now believes she has enough evidence to make charging decisions in the ICE killings of Renee Good and Alex Pretti.Glenn discusses why tis is an enormously consequential announcement. Find Glenn on Substack: glennkirschner.substack.comSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Mental health conditions are now the leading killer of new mothers in the United States. The CDC puts the number at nearly twenty-three percent of all pregnancy-related deaths, ahead of hemorrhage, ahead of heart failure. Over eighty percent were preventable. One in five mothers gets screened for depression after delivery.Those numbers sit behind the murder trial of Lindsay Clancy at Plymouth Superior Court. Clancy, a former labor and delivery nurse, killed her three young children at their Duxbury, Massachusetts, home in January 2023, less than three weeks after being released from a psychiatric facility. Prosecutors and her defense team agree she was mentally ill. The jury is weighing whether she was too ill to understand her actions.Her defense rests on postpartum psychosis, a psychiatric emergency affecting roughly one to two mothers per thousand births. Despite the name, clinicians describe it as a mood disorder that arrives fast and disguises itself as ordinary postpartum fatigue. Bipolar history and prior episodes are the clearest warning signs, both screenable before delivery. With early treatment the acute crisis resolves in weeks.Forensic psychiatrist Phillip Resnick testified for Clancy's defense. He also testified for Andrea Yates, who drowned her five children in 2001 and was ultimately found not guilty by reason of insanity. Meghan Cliffel, a postpartum psychosis survivor from 2015, questions why the system waits for dead children before it pays attention.END_LINKS:Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodDISCLAIMER:This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS:#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #PostpartumPsychosis #HiddenKillers #MaternalMentalHealth #PostpartumDepression #TrueCrime #MentalHealthAwareness #LindsayClancyVerdict #PlymouthSuperiorCourt

Nearly 30 years after Tupac Shakur was gunned down near the Las Vegas Strip, a jury convicted Duane "Keffe D" Davis of first-degree murder. The verdict arrived after roughly three hours. Davis's defense attorney had argued for almost two hours that his client's 18 years of recorded confessions were fabricated for money and street credibility. The jury rejected that argument. The prosecution had no recovered weapon, no vehicle, and no cooperating eyewitness — Suge Knight refused to talk to either side. Prosecutors relied entirely on Davis's own words across a federal proffer, police interviews, a documentary, and a memoir. Tupac's sister Sekyiwa Shakur wept as the verdict was announced. Davis faces life in prison at sentencing on October 13 and has stated his intention to appeal. What he told the judge immediately after the conviction is something you need to hear.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KeffeD #TupacShakur #2Pac #TupacMurderTrial #GuiltyVerdict #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #LasVegas #OrlandoAnderson #Justice

Lindsay Clancy told evaluators a male voice appeared for the first time on the afternoon of January 24, 2023. The voice told her this was her last chance — kill the children and then herself. It lasted roughly eighteen minutes. It stopped the moment the children were dead. She has not reported hearing it since.The prosecution's own expert Gregory Saathoff called that pattern unusual. Command hallucinations do not typically appear once and vanish. Defense experts Paul Zeizel and Phillip Resnick both testified the voice was consistent with postpartum psychosis. Resnick called Clancy a puppet and categorized the killings as altruistic filicide — killing out of a belief she was protecting her children from suffering without her.Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer joins Tony Brueski as the jury deliberates in Plymouth Superior Court. They disagree on this case and dig into what the defense actually proved — and whether a jury of nine women and three men can convict after hearing it.Reddington blamed the medications and the doctors. Sprague blamed the woman who made a choice. The jury is deciding which version they believe.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #TrueCrimeToday #JenniferCoffindaffer #TrueCrime #PostpartumPsychosis #VerdictWatch #CommandHallucination #MurderTrial #JuryDeliberations

The J. M. Smucker Company notched a win in its trademark dilution case against Trader Joe's over the Uncrustable dupes. A judge in Ohio refused to dismiss the case or transfer it to California.    For the third time, Judge Alvin Hellerstein rejected Trump's attempt to remove his hush money conviction case to federal court from New York State court.   The Supreme Court allowed Trump to build his monstrous bunker ballroom.   DOOFUS OF THE DAY: George Santos managed to get himself banned for life by Kalshi after he got caught better on his own attendance at the State of the Union.   MAIN SHOW:   Judge Rita Lin granted summary judgment to Anthropic in its case against the Defense Department. After the company objected to the use of its product for autonomous lethal targeting and mass surveillance of Americans, Pete Hegseth set out to destroy its business. He failed.   Judge Indira Talwani refused to stay her own order blocking the Post Office from implementing Trump's demand to seize control of mail-in ballots.    Prosecutors in Minnesota hope to criminalize protest by claiming that an entire network of people engaging in First Amendment-protected protest are responsible if one of them eventually commits a crime. Pursuant to a Trump directive known as NSPM-7, the DOJ instructed operatives to infiltrate and surveil affinity groups espousing "extreme viewpoints on immigration, radical gender ideology, and anti-American sentiment." None of which is a crime! They've charged 15 protesters in Minnesota as part of a conspiracy that includes major unions and the DSA — all of which they've snooped on using administrative warrants from DHS.   SUBSCRIBER BONUS: A gestational surrogate from Alaska is trying to steal a sick baby. And Ken Paxton wants to help her do it!   J.M. Smucker Co v. Trader Joe's https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/71631587/jm-smucker-company-v-trader-joes-company/   People of The State of New York v. Trump https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67326478/people-of-the-state-of-new-york-v-trump/   Anthropic PBC v. U.S. Department of War https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/72379655/anthropic-pbc-v-us-department-of-war   US v. Sant [D. Minn. docket via CourtListener] https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/73489661/united-states-v-sant/   National Park Service v. National Trust for Historic Preservation [Supreme Court order] https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/26a203_2b8e.pdf   League of Women Voters v. Trump https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/73133197/league-of-women-voters-of-massachusetts-v-trump/?   NSPM-7 https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/09/countering-domestic-terrorism-and-organized-political-violence/   Show Links: https://www.lawandchaospod.com/ BlueSky: @LawAndChaosPod Threads: @LawAndChaosPod Twitter: @LawAndChaosPod  

• Jurors in Lindsay Clancy's trial are continuing their deliberations after they informed the judge this morning they were unable to reach a unanimous decision. The judge sent them back to keep deliberating.• The Massachusetts mother is accused of murder after strangling her three young children. The jury could consider charges of first-degree murder, second-degree murder or manslaughter.• Prosecutors have argued Clancy acted “intentionally, rationally, and swiftly” to kill her children. The defense, however, has argued Clancy should not be held criminally responsible because she was suffering from postpartum psychosis. If the jury finds Clancy not criminally responsible for the killings of her children, she could spend the rest of her life in a hospital.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

The prosecutor in Minneapolis who is investigating the homicides of Renee Goode and Alex Pretti - Hennepin County District Attorney Mary Moriarty - has finally announced that she now believes she has enough evidence to make charging decisions in the ICE killings of Renee Good and Alex Pretti.Glenn discusses why tis is an enormously consequential announcement. Find Glenn on Substack: glennkirschner.substack.comSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Bryan Kohberger's newest attorney, Jason Goldman, says the immediate focus of the defense is whether Kohberger's 2025 guilty plea was constitutionally valid and truly entered knowingly and voluntarily. Kohberger pleaded guilty to murdering Madison Mogen, Kaylee Goncalves, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin in exchange for avoiding the death penalty, but he is now seeking post-conviction relief and attempting to withdraw that plea. In a handwritten petition filed in July, Kohberger claimed his former attorneys provided ineffective assistance and that his plea was induced by promises that were not kept and threats allegedly made by members of his own defense team. Goldman says an amended petition and possible evidentiary hearing could finally expose what happened during the critical days leading up to the plea, including circumstances that have not yet been made public. Judge Steven Hippler has given Kohberger's attorneys until November 13 to file the more detailed amended petition, while prosecutors are pushing to have the challenge dismissed.The new defense team is also attacking the structure of the proceedings themselves. Idaho attorney Greg Rauch, who was appointed to represent Kohberger, has asked that Hippler be removed from the case and that the proceedings be transferred back to Moscow, arguing that questions surrounding the judge's impartiality must be resolved before Kohberger's constitutional claims are heard. The motion points to Hippler's earlier refusal to give Kohberger's trial attorneys additional preparation time and to unusually harsh comments the judge made about Kohberger at sentencing. Prosecutors, meanwhile, have requested the transcript of Kohberger's July 2025 plea hearing, apparently preparing to use Kohberger's own sworn statements in court to undermine his new assertion that the plea was involuntary. What had appeared to be a closed case after Kohberger admitted responsibility and received four consecutive life sentences has therefore reopened into a significant post-conviction battle, with his new attorneys signaling that the circumstances surrounding the plea, his former defense team and potentially previously undisclosed information could become central issues in court.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Bryan Kohberger's new lawyer targets guilty plea constitutionality | Fox NewsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell had extensive ties to France, yet the full scope of what happened there remains far less explored than their activities in New York, Florida or the U.S. Virgin Islands. Epstein owned a lavish apartment on Avenue Foch in Paris that functioned as both a social hub and, according to survivor accounts and later investigative findings, another location where young women and girls were brought into his orbit. His French connections ran deep through the modeling world, particularly through Jean-Luc Brunel, the powerful agent accused of using modeling agencies to gain access to vulnerable young women and minors. French investigators later gathered allegations that Epstein committed rape and sexual assault in Paris, while other accounts placed Epstein, Maxwell and Brunel in Saint-Tropez and other parts of France where similar patterns of recruitment and exploitation were alleged. French authorities searched Epstein's Paris residence after his 2019 arrest, but his death, Brunel's later death in custody, statutes of limitation and the international nature of the network left major portions of the French story unresolved.That unresolved history is now getting another look. In February 2026, Paris prosecutors opened fresh investigations into possible human trafficking and financial crimes after millions of newly released Epstein records produced new leads, and they also began a complete reanalysis of the earlier Brunel investigation. Prosecutors have acknowledged that the material could point to sexual offenses, trafficking, money laundering, tax fraud and other misconduct committed on French soil or involving French nationals, while urging additional survivors to come forward. The French dimension matters because Epstein's activities there appear to have intersected with fashion agencies, wealthy social circles, politicians, diplomats and international travel in ways that have never been fully mapped publicly. So while France has investigated parts of the Epstein network, the larger question remains open: how extensive was the operation there, who facilitated it, how many victims were involved, and whether crimes tied to Epstein and Maxwell extended far beyond the handful of French allegations that have already reached investigators.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

A Utah judge is set to decide whether prosecutors have presented enough evidence to send Tyler Robinson to trial for the aggravated murder of Charlie Kirk, a charge that could make Robinson eligible for the death penalty. The decision follows an unusually lengthy preliminary hearing in which prosecutors spent five days laying out what they described as overwhelming evidence tying Robinson to the September 2025 shooting at Utah Valley University. Robinson, who turned himself in the day after the killing, has not yet entered a plea. His attorneys have largely avoided presenting an alternative theory of the shooting and have instead focused on challenging whether the state has enough evidence to support the aggravated murder charge and whether the death penalty should remain on the table. Judge Tony Graf could order Robinson to stand trial on aggravated murder, reduce the case to a lesser murder charge, or dismiss the charges, though prosecutors could potentially refile them.A major issue is whether the shooting endangered people other than Kirk, which is critical to the aggravated murder allegation. Prosecutors argue that numerous people were inside a "zone of danger" when the shot was fired from a rooftop more than 400 feet away, while the defense contends the shooter struck the intended target and did not place others in sufficient danger to justify the enhanced charge. Prosecutors have also pointed to DNA they say connected Robinson to the suspected murder weapon, an engraved cartridge they characterize as politically motivated, alleged writings and messages attributed to Robinson, and statements from his romantic partner, Lance Twiggs. Investigators also say Robinson posted in an online chat room shortly before surrendering that he was responsible for what happened at UVU. The defense has challenged the reliability of some of the DNA evidence and disputes whether prosecutors can establish the political motivation necessary for additional sentencing enhancements, leaving Graf's ruling as the next major turning point in determining whether the case proceeds toward a capital murder trial.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Judge to decide if Charlie Kirk murder case will go to trial | AP NewsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The midterm elections are ramping up. We launch our candidate series with Dave Dawson, the Democrat running in Iowa's 4th District. Dawson is running against Siouxland Chamber of Commerce president Chris McGowan, a seat currently held by Rep. Randy Feenstra. We talk with him about running as a Democrat in a red district. But first, we revisit a conversation with an astrophysicist who discusses new research on white dwarf stars 200 light-years away and learn about scientists at the University of Iowa working on a virtual lunar landscape complete with low gravity and lunar dirt. (Portions of the episode were originally produced Feb. 3, 2026.)

Catie's Case: The Lindsay Clancy Trial Catie takes a deep dive into one of the most complicated and emotionally charged criminal trials in the country. Lindsay Clancy is charged in the January 2023 deaths of her three children—Cora, Dawson and Callan—at the family's home in Duxbury, Massachusetts. Clancy has pleaded not guilty by reason of insanity. The facts of what happened are largely undisputed. The trial instead centers on Clancy's mental state and whether she was legally responsible for her actions. Her defense argues that Clancy was experiencing severe postpartum psychosis, had undergone extensive psychiatric treatment and medication changes, and had lost touch with reality when she killed the children. Defense expert Dr. Phillip Resnick testified that she was psychotic at the time. Prosecutors argue that although Clancy suffered from significant mental-health problems, she still understood right from wrong. They point to evidence they say demonstrates organization and planning, including sending her husband Patrick out of the house on errands before the killings. Patrick Clancy's testimony became one of the trial's most emotional moments. He described Lindsay as a loving mother before her mental-health decline and said she had never previously expressed a desire to harm the children. The trial ultimately became a battle between competing psychiatric interpretations: was this a deliberate murder committed by someone suffering from depression and other mental-health problems, or the catastrophic result of postpartum psychosis severe enough to eliminate criminal responsibility? After testimony from more than 80 witnesses over roughly five weeks, jurors began deliberating on August 27. And they still haven't reached a verdict. As of August 31, the jury has deliberated for approximately 17 hours across three days. Jurors have requested to review physical evidence including prescription bottles and the knife Clancy used during her suicide attempt. The available verdicts are not simply “guilty” or “not guilty.” Depending on how jurors interpret Clancy's intent and mental state, they may consider first-degree murder, second-degree murder, manslaughter or a finding that she was not criminally responsible because of mental illness. If the jury ultimately finds her not guilty by reason of insanity, that would not necessarily mean Clancy simply goes free. She could instead be committed to a psychiatric hospital, potentially for an extended period. The case has also forced a much broader conversation about postpartum psychosis, how seriously severe postpartum psychiatric symptoms are treated, and whether the medical system failed to recognize just how sick Clancy had become. Also in this episode: The U.S.–Iran war heats up again as Trump declares Iran “dead,” threatens additional strikes and shares AI-generated footage depicting an attack that apparently never occurred. The Supreme Court, USPS and the Trump administration collide over mail voting while election officials warn that thousands of otherwise valid ballots are arriving too late to be counted. Texas Republicans begin asking uncomfortable questions about changes to the state's $3 billion-plus broadband program that benefited Elon Musk's Starlink. Meta reportedly discovers a flaw in its plan to replace huge portions of its workforce with artificial intelligence: humans still have to fix everything the AI screws up. Plus another food-recall roundup, the Pentagon gets government versions of ChatGPT and Grok, Howard Stern heads to HBO Max, AMC becomes a movie distributor, and plenty more from another completely normal week in America. LINKShttps://instagram.com/itsnewstoushttps://tiktok.com/@itsnewstous Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

After three decades, there is a conviction in one of the country's most infamous unsolved killings. A Nevada jury found Duane "Keffe D" Davis guilty of orchestrating the 1996 murder of hip-hop superstar Tupac Shakur. Prosecutors argued he ordered the killing and sought revenge after Shakur and members of his entourage attacked Davis's nephew. Amna Nawaz discussed more with Joel Anderson. PBS News is supported by - https://www.pbs.org/newshour/about/funders. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy

This Day in Legal History: Aaron Burr Acquitted of TreasonOn September 1, 1807, a jury in Richmond, Virginia acquitted Aaron Burr—the former Vice President of the United States—of treason, in what remains the only time such a high-ranking American official has ever been tried for that crime. The verdict was delivered in memorably grudging terms: the jury said Burr was “not proved to be guilty under this indictment by any evidence submitted to us.” Burr had allegedly conspired to carve an independent republic out of western territory, but he walked free.The reason he walked free is one of the most important principles in American criminal law. The framers of the Constitution, remembering how English kings had used vague, elastic treason charges to destroy their political enemies, deliberately wrote the narrowest possible definition into Article III: treason against the United States consists only of levying war against them, or adhering to their enemies, and—crucially—no one can be convicted except on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act, or on confession in open court. Presiding over the trial was Chief Justice John Marshall, and Marshall enforced that definition strictly. He held that mere conspiracy, mere intention, mere assemblage of men was not enough—the government had to prove an actual overt act of levying war, with two witnesses. It couldn't, and Burr was acquitted.The significance of September 1, 1807 is layered. It was a dramatic clash between the branches: President Thomas Jefferson desperately wanted Burr convicted and worked behind the scenes to make it happen, while Marshall's court insisted on rigorous proof and refused to bend to political pressure—even subpoenaing the president himself for documents. It cemented the idea that “treason” cannot be a catch-all for disloyalty, and that an independent judiciary must hold the line on proof even when a president demands a scalp. On a day featuring both a murder verdict and several tests of executive power, Burr's acquittal is a fitting reminder that the highest function of a court is sometimes to say no.A jury in Las Vegas has found Duane “Keffe D” Davis guilty of first-degree murder for orchestrating the 1996 killing of Tupac Shakur—closing, at last, one of the most notorious cold cases in American music history nearly thirty years after the fact. We've tracked this trial from jury selection through the defense's remarkable “don't believe my client” strategy, and now it's over: after a weeks-long trial, the jury deliberated for under three hours before convicting. Prosecutors never claimed Davis pulled the trigger. Their theory, as the deputy district attorney put it in closing, was that “this was a case about gang retaliation and revenge”—that Davis provided the gun and ordered the attack, making him criminally responsible for the murder even though someone else fired the shots. And the evidence that convicted him was, essentially, Davis himself: the interviews, the podcasts, and the 2019 memoir in which he described his role in the killing. His own lawyer's defense was to beg the jury not to credit those statements—to treat them as the lies of a braggart embellishing for money and street credibility. The jury didn't buy it. The significance is a striking answer to the evidentiary question I flagged when this trial opened: yes, a man's public boasts about a crime can be enough to convict him of it. Davis talked his way from “long-suspected” to “convicted murderer.” It's a cautionary tale as old as the law itself—that the words you say to burnish your legend can become the words that put you in prison—and it brought a measure of accountability to a killing that went unpunished for three decades. Jury convicts Duane “Keffe D” Davis in Tupac killing trial | ReutersNBC Los Angeles · CNNThe legal war over mail-in voting grinds on: the Trump administration has asked the First Circuit Court of Appeals to lift the order still blocking parts of the president's executive order overhauling how ballots are delivered. Recall the state of play. Last week, the Supreme Court, on its emergency docket, lifted one of two injunctions—letting some pieces of the order take effect—but pointedly did not rule on whether any of it is actually lawful, and the Postal Service's role remained blocked nationwide. Now the administration is going back to the appeals court to try to clear that remaining block. Its arguments are largely practical: it says the lower court's injunction was premature, issued before the Postal Service and other agencies had even finalized their plans, and that the injunction created an impossible situation—a “bifurcated” system where the order is blocked in the 23 states that sued but allowed everywhere else, which the government says is logistically unworkable. Meanwhile, there's a new wrinkle: a whistleblower has reportedly claimed the Postal Service's plan to implement the order could actually “derail” the midterms. The significance is that this is heading, almost inevitably, back to the Supreme Court—which still has not addressed the fundamental question of whether the president can restructure how Americans vote by mail. We are now roughly two months from the election, and the machinery of how ballots get delivered is being litigated in real time, court by court, on emergency timelines. The uncertainty itself is a problem: election administrators and voters need to know the rules, and right now the rules are moving. Trump administration asks US appeals court to lift order blocking mail-in voting | ReutersThe Hill · NPRAnd finally, a divided Supreme Court has cleared the way—for now—for construction of President Trump's new White House ballroom to continue. In a 5-4 emergency ruling, the Court granted the administration's request and blocked lower-court orders that would have paused the aboveground portion of the project. Some background: in 2025, the administration had the White House's East Wing demolished—without notifying Congress—to make room for a planned 90,000-square-foot ballroom projected to cost $400 million or more, including an extensive underground component the administration says houses secure facilities. The National Trust for Historic Preservation sued, arguing the president had no authority to demolish part of the White House and build this on his own. The legal hook the Court used is a familiar one: standing. The majority said the Trust likely doesn't have standing—the legal right to bring the suit in the first place—which is often how courts dispose of cases without confronting the underlying merits. And that's the key caveat: the unsigned order does not decide whether Trump actually has the authority to build a massive ballroom without congressional approval. That question stays open as the litigation continues. The significance is twofold. Substantively, a president reshaping the White House itself, demolishing a historic wing without telling Congress, raises real questions about the limits of executive authority over federal property. Procedurally, this is once again the emergency docket letting the executive proceed on a threshold technicality—standing—while leaving the hard constitutional question for another day, if it's ever answered at all. By the time the merits are sorted out, the ballroom may simply be built. Supreme Court lets Trump's White House ballroom construction continue for now | ReutersCNBC · NBC News This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

Bob Lee, the Cash App founder and prominent tech executive, was stabbed to death in San Francisco in April 2023. Investigators focused on Nima Momeni after surveillance showed Lee leaving his sister Khazar's apartment with him before the two stopped near the Bay Bridge, where Lee was fatally stabbed. Prosecutors argued Momeni killed Lee over anger surrounding his sister's alleged drugging and sexual assault, while Momeni claimed he acted in self-defense after Lee attacked him with a knife. Join Mike and Gibby as they discuss the murder of Bob Lee. DNA evidence linked both men to the weapon, and Momeni was convicted of second-degree murder in December 2024. However, questions surrounding the confrontation, the competing accounts of what happened, and the circumstances that led to Lee's death continue to fuel debate, leaving the full truth behind the killing a mystery.You can help support the show at patreon.com/truecrimeallthetimeVisit the show's website at truecrimeallthetime.com for contact, merchandise, and donation informationAn Emash Digital productionSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Lindsay Clancy is currently on trial for killing her three children.Prosecutors say the murders were intentional, but her defense team says she was suffering from severe postpartum psychosis -- a condition that does not have a distinct diagnosis in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders.That's the handbook used to identify mental health conditions, so patients often have a hard time getting proper care.The case has put a spotlight on maternal mental health and how its treated by the public and healthcare professionals. What does it reveal?WBUR's Deborah Becker contributed reporting to this episode.It was produced by Megan Lim and Karen Zamora, with audio engineering by Éowyn Fain, Hannah Gluvna and Ted Mebane. Our director is Jonas Adams.It was edited by Justine Kenin and Tinbete Ermyas.Our interim executive producer is Courtney Dorning.Support public media with NPR+ and enjoy perks for over 25 podcasts like this one. This show's perks include bonus episodes and sponsor-free listening. Learn more at plus.npr.org.See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for sponsorship and to manage your podcast sponsorship preferences.NPR Privacy Policy

Brian Burke got into corrections in his early twenties, spent four years working inside the New York state prison system, and then spent twenty-nine years as a New York court officer — experiencing the full spectrum of what the American justice system looks like from the person responsible for maintaining order in the room where it all happens. In this episode of Locked In with Ian Bick, he shares what four years in the New York state prison system taught him, what twenty-nine years as a court officer — the juries, the defendants, the prosecutors, the judges, and the heartbreaking and strangest moments the job produced — really looked like from the inside, and what his most significant professional experience actually involved: personally escorting Rex Heuermann — the Gilgo Beach serial killer — throughout his arrest, conviction, and sentencing, and what that specific proximity to one of the most disturbing criminal cases in recent New York history actually revealed about the person at the center of it. _____________________________________________ #officer #truecrimestories #court #newyork _____________________________________________ Thank you to CASH APP for sponsoring this episode: Download Cash App Today: https://click.cash.app/ui6m/6pao71et #CashAppPod Cash App is a financial services platform, not a bank. Banking services provided by Cash App's bank partner(s). Prepaid debit cards issued by Sutton Bank, Member FDIC. Cash App Visa® Debit Flex Cards issued by Sutton Bank, Member FDIC, and The Bancorp Bank, N.A., pursuant to a license from Visa U.S.A. Inc. See terms and conditions for the Sutton prepaid card, Sutton debit flex card, and Bancorp debit flex card. Cash App Green features, Savings, Direct deposit, Round ups, Overdraft coverage and Discounts provided by Cash App, a Block, Inc. brand. Visit cash.app/legal/podcast for full disclosures. _____________________________________________ Hosted, Executive Produced & Edited By Ian Bick: https://www.instagram.com/ian_bick/?hl=en https://ianbick.com/ _____________________________________________ Timestamps: 00:00 Arraignment Shock 00:19 Growing Up in the Bronx 01:28 Childhood and Early Career 02:53 Choosing Law Enforcement 04:48 Starting in Corrections 06:39 First Prison Assignment 09:14 First Prison Experience 10:27 Transfer to Fishkill 11:34 Life at Fishkill 13:05 Working the Shoe 15:50 Shoe Conditions 16:42 Protective Custody 17:45 Perspective from Solitary 18:49 Corrections Experience Helps 20:40 Respect from Other Officers 21:37 Career Plans in Corrections 23:56 Types of Crimes at Fishkill 25:00 Advice from Veteran Officers 25:43 Prison Food and Cooking 28:00 Sponsor: Cash App Green 30:12 Becoming a Court Officer 31:51 Pay and Academy Differences 32:58 Court Officer Academy 33:58 Swearing in Witnesses 34:33 First Court Assignment 35:25 Family Court Cases 37:45 Emotional Family Court 38:50 Typical Family Court Day 39:31 Family Court Volatility 41:11 Celebrities in Family Court 41:54 Opinions on Lawyers 42:49 Divorce Case Stories 43:34 Promotion to the Bronx 44:24 The Amadou Diallo Case 45:45 Bronx Court Duties 46:44 Handling Prisoners in the Bronx 47:24 Building Rapport with Defendants 48:54 A Mob Enforcer Trial 51:13 Jury System and Sequestration 52:24 Juror Conversations 53:51 Predicting Verdicts 55:21 Juries and Social Media 56:34 Officer Conversations and Bets 57:09 Transfer to Suffolk County 58:35 The Tankoff Case 01:01:39 Verdict Reactions 01:02:27 Taking Convicted Felons into Custody 01:03:17 The Samurai Sword Case 01:07:00 Release and Redemption 01:08:31 Weighing Justice 01:09:16 Showing Grace to Vicious Criminals 01:10:08 Vigilante Thoughts 01:10:48 Drunk Driving Cases 01:12:36 The Schwalli Case 01:13:20 Judges Off the Bench 01:14:11 Judges' Sentencing Decisions 01:15:29 Prison Tours with Judges 01:16:21 Prison Tours and Shows 01:17:22 Court Officers vs. Cops 01:18:03 Courtroom Violence 01:19:47 Prosecutors and Their Styles 01:21:03 Defendant Representing Himself 01:22:25 Strange Defendant Behavior 01:23:28 Shocking Case Outcomes 01:24:56 Disturbing Cases 01:25:15 Closed Hearings and Undercover Testimony 01:26:08 Faking Mental Illness 01:27:55 Grand Jury Testimony 01:28:42 Weapons and Contraband in Court 01:29:16 Inmate Fights in Pens 01:30:58 Refusing to Go to Court 01:31:57 Feeding Inmates 01:33:14 Court Day Logistics 01:34:00 System Designed to Plead Out? 01:35:28 Hypothetical: Sharing Information 01:36:01 Fair Judges 01:37:00 The Rex Case Begins 01:39:52 Rex's Initial Arraignment 01:40:26 Rex's Court Appearances 01:43:20 Rex's Personality and Humor 01:45:36 Rex's Family and Background 01:47:49 Rex's Guilty Plea 01:48:56 Fear of Rex 01:49:27 After Sentencing 01:50:20 Rex's Future in Prison 01:52:41 Family and Friends' Reactions 01:54:00 Why Rex Didn't Go to Trial 01:56:06 Retirement After 29 Years 01:57:07 Watching Court Shows 01:57:39 Jury System Critique 01:59:21 Jury Understanding 02:00:04 Fair Trial for Serial Killers 02:00:20 The Valvet Case 02:02:22 Most Important Lesson 02:02:56 Final Thoughts and Thanks _____________________________________________ To advertise on the show, contact sales@advertisecast.com or visit https://advertising.libsyn.com/LockedInWithIanBicka

Bryan Kohberger's post-conviction petition earned an evidentiary hearing — set for June 17, 2027 before Judge Steven Hippler. Prosecutors tried to get it dismissed without a hearing and failed. But the hearing is the system working as designed, not a signal that Kohberger's claims carry weight.The petition accuses his former defense team of coercing a false confession, withholding hair evidence from Ethan Chapin's hand, and making promises about prison conditions that never came true. All of this runs headfirst into a nine-page questionnaire Kohberger signed under oath confirming his plea was voluntary and that no outside promises influenced his decision.Criminal defense attorney David Gelman says post-sentencing plea reversals are extraordinarily rare. Northeastern law professor Daniel Medwed called it a monumental uphill battle. Even a successful withdrawal puts the death penalty back on the table and sends Kohberger to trial carrying his own sworn confession.Digital forensics expert Sy Ray — retained by Kohberger's own defense team before the plea — responded to the petition by going public with claims of additional incriminating cellphone data and calling for a new trial with the death penalty restored. Kohberger cited Ray's work in his petition. Ray's answer: put the former defense attorneys under oath and try this case again.LinksListen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodDisclaimerThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.Hashtags#BryanKohberger #SyRay #TrueCrimeToday #KohbergerHearing #IdahoMurders #UniversityOfIdaho #KohbergerPetition #AnneTaylor #JudgeHippler #TrueCrime

In the first forty-eight hours after Anna Kepner's body was found aboard the Carnival Horizon, custody filings allege Timothy Hudson's mother texted his biological father that she'd told their son she loved him. Within weeks, those same filings claim she said she couldn't jeopardize her marriage to help him. The filings allege the family wanted Timothy "buried." That's how fast the fracture happened.Timothy Hudson is sixteen, charged as an adult with first-degree murder in his stepsister's death. His defense team just told a federal judge they need more time because a "very unfortunate family dynamic" is preventing them from reaching family members essential to a Miller hearing — a constitutionally required proceeding examining a juvenile's childhood before a life sentence. The judge granted the continuance. Prosecutors didn't oppose it.The defense won't say who they can't reach. The custody record says it for them. Timothy's mother is married to Anna's father Christopher Kepner. She is both the accused killer's biological mother and the stepmother of the person who was killed. Court records from the custody case show she and Christopher expelled Timothy from their home. His biological father Thomas Hudson — who appears to be cooperating with the defense — put the text exchanges into the court record. Christopher Kepner told reporters he wants Timothy in "orange jumpsuit and handcuffs."The trial is set for November 2nd. The plea deadline is October 23rd. The Miller hearing happens regardless of which path the defense takes — and they can't prepare for it without the parent who raised Timothy day to day.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#AnnaKepner #TimothyHudson #CarnivalHorizon #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #CruiseShipMurder #MillerHearing #FederalTrial #TrueCrimePodcast #CriminalJustice

Bryan Kohberger's defense and the State of Idaho fought over whether prosecutors had complied with Idaho Criminal Rule 16(b)(7), which governed disclosure of expert witnesses and the substance of their expected testimony. In December 2024, Kohberger's attorneys asked Judge Steven Hippler to compel more complete disclosures and sanction the prosecution, arguing that the state had identified roughly 25 experts but had supplied actual reports for only a handful of them. The defense said major areas of the case, including DNA, digital forensics and other technical evidence, were represented by disclosures that were too vague to reveal the experts' actual opinions, methods and conclusions. Kohberger's lawyers argued that this left them trying to prepare their own expert case without knowing precisely what the prosecution intended to present, despite a looming deadline for defense expert disclosures. They asked Hippler to consider excluding inadequately disclosed state experts or, at minimum, order fuller disclosure and push back the defense's deadline.Prosecutors pushed back hard, arguing that they had been continuously producing discovery and expert-related material throughout the case and that the defense was overstating both the deficiencies and what Rule 16 actually required. The state maintained that expert discovery was an ongoing process, that it had complied with its obligations as information became available, and that the drastic remedy of excluding experts or imposing sanctions was unwarranted. The dispute therefore became about much more than paperwork: Kohberger's team framed it as a fair-trial problem in a capital case, saying it could not meaningfully prepare to confront expert testimony it had not fully seen, while prosecutors portrayed the motion as an attempt to punish the state despite an enormous and continuously developing discovery record. The fight illustrated just how technical the case had become, with both sides battling not only over what evidence existed, but over exactly when expert opinions had to be disclosed, how detailed those disclosures had to be and what consequences should follow if the court found that either side had fallen short.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Day one of Tyler Robinson's preliminary hearing on July 6, 2026, largely centered on prosecutors beginning to construct a timeline of Charlie Kirk's killing at Utah Valley University and establishing the authenticity of the surveillance footage and investigative records they intended to use against Robinson. Former UVU police officer Chris Bagley described the moment the gunshot rang out during Kirk's September 10, 2025 event and the chaos that followed, while Utah State Bureau of Investigation agent David Hull walked the court through the enormous video-review effort undertaken after the shooting. Hull testified that investigators examined hundreds of hours of surveillance footage and ultimately tracked a person they believed was Robinson moving around the UVU campus at several different points that day. Prosecutors introduced surveillance recordings from multiple locations as they attempted to connect the person seen approaching the campus, moving toward the area surrounding the Losee Center, and later leaving the area to Robinson. Three separate videos depicting Kirk being shot were admitted, although Judge Tony Graf determined that their graphic nature warranted restricting their display to the attorneys' and judge's monitors rather than broadcasting them throughout the courtroom. Kirk's widow, Erika, and his parents left the courtroom while the videos were reviewed. Prosecutors also introduced Kirk's autopsy report through Hull, which listed his cause of death as a gunshot wound to the neck and the manner of death as homicideThe defense spent much of the first day attacking the manner in which the prosecution was getting its evidence into the record rather than attempting to disprove the entire prosecution theory at that stage. Kathryn Nester and Robinson's attorneys repeatedly raised hearsay, foundation and authentication objections, arguing that investigators were being permitted to introduce reports, statements and records created by other people without those individuals appearing personally to testify. Judge Graf overruled most of those objections, reflecting the substantially lower evidentiary threshold governing a Utah preliminary hearing, whose purpose was only to determine whether probable cause existed to send Robinson to trial rather than whether prosecutors could prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. One significant exception involved an edited compilation of surveillance footage, which Graf declined to admit in that form and required prosecutors to replace with the underlying unedited material. Hull's testimony also revealed the scope of the prosecution's surveillance theory: investigators claimed Robinson had appeared on or around the UVU campus multiple times on September 10 and that they were attempting to stitch those appearances together into a continuous identification of the alleged shooter. By the end of day one, prosecutors had established the killing itself, the medical cause of Kirk's death, the existence and authenticity of substantial video evidence and the beginnings of their effort to identify Robinson as the person captured in that footage. They had not yet presented many of the pieces expected to become more consequential later in the hearing, including the rifle and DNA evidence, Robinson's alleged communications and admissions, and testimony concerning his roommate Lance Twiggs.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Jeff is back after a long absence, and he explains why: the bipartisan insanity in America left him too disgusted to record, even for the nation's 250th birthday. He remembers the 1976 bicentennial, when kids collected special quarters, flags flew everywhere, and Americans actually liked their country. Compare that to now. What changed? Muslim terror supporters are winning elections coast to coast: Mamdani's New York, where tax dollars fund Israel-bashing puppet shows for four-year-olds, and Michigan, where Abdul El-Sayed will cruise into the Senate after answering a synagogue terror attack with "hurt people, hurt people." Jew hate is now the one issue uniting the far left and the Nazi right — and it wins. And Jeff is officially done defending Trump. Iran "unconditionally surrendered"? They're still firing missiles, rebuilding nuclear sites, and executing protesters while Trump begs for a deal and dangles F-35s in front of Turkey's fanatical dictator Erdogan. Compromised by Qatari billions or just a moron — either way, America's last chance is gone. Next week: Jeff finally takes on the Lindsay Clancy case.

The fate of Duane "Keffe D" Davis is now in the hands of the jury in the Tupac Shakur killing trial. AP's Lisa Dwyer reports.

In Broomfield, Colorado, Kristil Krug began receiving disturbing messages from someone who seemed to know her every move. She went to the police, changed her routines, armed herself, and turned her home into a fortress. But as the threats grew more sinister, Kristil began to wonder if the person she feared was closer than anyone realized.How to support:For extra perks including exclusive content, early release, and ad-free episodes -Go to - PatreonHow to connect:WebsiteInstagramFacebookTwitterTheme and Closing Track:Original compositions created for The Minds of MadnessPlease check out our sponsors and help support the podcast:Shopify - Sign up for a one-dollar-per-month trial period at shopify.com/madnessQuince - Upgrade your wardrobe with pieces made to last with Quince. Go to Quince.com/madness for free shipping on your order and 365-day returns.Raycon - The Essential Open Earbuds are perfect for refreshing your routine this spring. Go to buyraycon.com/mindsofmadnessOPEN to get 20% off!HERS - Feel like your best self again, Visit forhers.com/MADNESS to get a personalized, affordable plan that gets you.Talkiatry - Head to Talkiatry.com/madness to complete the short assessment and get matched with an in‑network psychiatrist in just a few minutes.Granola - If meetings are eating up your day, Granola is a no-brainer. You can try it totally free for three months - just head to granola.ai/MADNESSRula - Rula patients typically pay $15 per session when using insurance. Connect with quality therapists and mental health experts who specialize in you at rula.com/madnessKeeper - Right now, Keeper's offering 60% off personal and family plans at Keepersecurity.com/MADNESS. This incredible offer is only for podcast listeners!Research & Writing:Ryan DeiningerSources:James Barron ObituaryFemale Georgia dentist from wealthy coastal enclave accused of killing boyfriendWealthy US Dentist Accused Of Murdering Her Boyfriend, Patients Express ShockDentist Accused of Shooting Her Partner to Death in Home in Upscale Georgia NeighborhoodSt. Simons Island dentist charged with murder after deadly shootingCivil lawsuit filed against Glynn County dentistDentist girlfriend accused of fatally shooting boyfriend through locked bedroom doorWealthy Georgia Dentist Gunned Down Husband Inside Bedroom of $1.6M Mansion, Cops SayJuror refuses to deliberate in Suzanne Mericle's murder trial‘He's in my nightmares': Suzanne Mericle accuses victim of abuseSt. Simons Island dentist convictedCourt TV RecapFamily of slain Gainesville man issues statement after Mericle found guiltyDentist found guilty of murdering her boyfriendDefense for St. Simons Island dentist rests'I didn't have to do that': Prosecutors play video of St. Simons Island dentist Defense says shooting was 'justified' in trialGlynn County PD takes standDentist says she texted another man night of shootingSt. Simons Island dentist on trial for murder of boyfriend takes witness standJustice Is A Process

Dr. Phillip Resnick examined two women who killed their own children in the exact same way, decades apart, and reached the same conclusion both times. He evaluated Andrea Yates before her 2001 case ended in a not guilty by reason of insanity verdict, and he told Lindsay Clancy's jury she was following a command voice too, the same finding, one expert, two mothers. That comparison sits at the center of a defense case that's now rested. The record shows Lindsay in session with her psychiatrist on January 23, 2023, one day before the killings, on top of two nurse practitioners, a therapist, two December calls to a suicide hotline, and a five-day inpatient stay at McLean Hospital that ended nineteen days before. The planning theory, built on errands and timing, runs into Resnick's testimony that the Commonwealth's own testing found no evidence of faking, and that Lindsay downplayed her symptoms rather than exaggerated them. The staged-jump theory runs into the fact that she's paralyzed for life and remains on suicide watch at Tewksbury Hospital. Prosecutors have their own expert. Dr. Avram Mack, who interviewed Lindsay in April 2026, testified she could tell right from wrong, and told the jury she said "go to God" to her children during the killings, a statement she reportedly framed very differently to a hospital chaplain a week later and to Resnick himself months after that. Closings are next. Lindsay's plea is not guilty on three counts of murder, on the ground that she lacked criminal responsibility, and a conviction would mean life without parole starting at age thirty-six for a woman already paralyzed and under suicide watch. Tony Brueski asks what it means when the same doctor who helped clear one mother says the same thing about another. Links & Legal Footer: Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. Hashtags: #LindsayClancy #AndreaYates #TrueCrimeToday #LindsayClancyTrial #PhillipResnick #InsanityDefense #PostpartumPsychosis #AvramMack #TrueCrime #MurderTrial 

Lindsay Clancy was sitting across from her psychiatrist on January 23, 2023, one day before she killed her three children. Jennifer Coffindaffer, 25 years in the FBI and no stranger to the guilty camp, joins Tony Brueski to hold every argument for Lindsay's guilt up against what actually made it into the record. The paper trail is the starting point. Beyond that psychiatrist visit, Lindsay had two nurse practitioners, a therapist, two December calls to a suicide hotline, and a five-day inpatient stay at McLean Hospital that ended nineteen days before the killings. The planning argument leans on errands, timing, and exercise bands as proof she knew what she was doing, but Dr. Phillip Resnick, who examined both Lindsay and Andrea Yates, told this jury she was following a command voice. The theory that a search about treating a sociopath proves she was faking runs into Resnick's own testimony that the Commonwealth's testing found no evidence of faking, and that she downplayed her symptoms rather than exaggerated them. The staged-jump theory doesn't hold up against a woman who cut her own wrists, cut her own neck, is paralyzed for life, and remains on suicide watch at Tewksbury Hospital. Prosecutors have countered with Dr. Avram Mack, who interviewed Lindsay in April 2026, testified she could tell right from wrong, and told the jury she said "go to God" to her children during the killings, a statement that sits uneasily next to what she told a hospital chaplain a week later and Dr. Resnick months after that. Closings are next. Lindsay's plea is not guilty on three counts of murder, on the ground that she lacked criminal responsibility. Coffindaffer and Brueski ask how sick someone has to be before a jury calls it not responsible. Links & Legal Footer: Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. Hashtags: #LindsayClancy #PhillipResnick #HiddenKillers #LindsayClancyTrial #PostpartumPsychosis #InsanityDefense #AndreaYates #AvramMack #TrueCrime #MurderTrial