Podcasts about prosecutors

At the dawn of the twentieth-century, major advances in science and technology brought incredible change to the field of medicine, enhancing and extending the lives of millions. Yet at the same time, a lax regulations and minimal oversight made it possible for countless medical grifters to get rich offering quack medical solutions to everything from whooping cough to cancer, sometimes at the expense of their patient's lives.When Linda Hazzard opened her sanitarium, the Institute of Natural Therapeutics at Wilderness Heights, in Olalla, Washington in the first decade of the 1900s, she claimed her rigid fasting and elimination approach to dieting was a miracle cure for a variety of illnesses, both trivial and serious. For years, Hazzard operated what amounted to a health retreat for the wealthy, without any oversight from the state or federal agencies. In the end, Hazzard's starvation cure resulted in the deaths of over a dozen people and her arrest and trial for manslaughter, but through all of it, she maintained it was a viable treatment—standing by her methods up until they ended her own life.Thank you to the Incredible Dave White of Bring Me the Axe Podcast for research and Writing support!ReferencesHines, Terrence. 1997. "Starvation Heights." Skeptical Inquirer. Lovejoy, Bess. 2014. "The doctor who starved her patients to death." Smithsonian Magazine, October 28.Olsen, Gregg. 2005. Starvation Heights: A True Story of Murder and Malice in the Woods of the Pacific Northwest. New York, NY: Crown Publishing Group.Seattle Daily Times. 1911. "Erdman diary tells method of treatment." Seattle Daily Times, August 14.Seattle Star. 1908. "Charged with starving eight-months-old baby." Seattle Star, January 30: 1.—. 1911. "Denies she 'fasted' 2 girls." Seattle Star, August 9: 3.—. 1911. "'Fast cure' woman is arrested." Seattle Star, August 7: 3.—. 1909. "Prosecutors think they can put a stop to starvation cure." Seattle Star, June 26: 1.—. 1908. "Sign doesn't make a doctor." Seattle Star, June 8: 6.—. 1909. "Woman starves to death under care of Dr. L.B. Hazzard." Seattle Star, June 24: 1.—. 1908. "WQeeden case leads to Dr. Hazzard's arrest." Seattle Star, January 31: 1.Tacoma Daily Ledger. 1912. "Dr. Hazzard has her first inning." Tacoma Daily Ledger, Janaury 28: 1.—. 1912. "Dr. Hazzard's trial begins." Tacoma Daily Ledger, January 16: 1.—. 1912. "Final arguments in Hazzard case." Tacoma Daily Ledger, February 3: 2.—. 1912. "Heiress testifies against Dr. Hazzard." Tacoma Daily Ledger, January 20: 1.—. 1912. "Mrs. Hazzard breaks down, and is attended by a dcevoted follower." Tacoma Daily Ledger, February 5: 1.—. 1904. "Samuel Hazzard sent to Minnesota prison." Tacoma Daily Ledger, March 16: 3.—. 1912. "Witnesses deny state's charges." Tacoma Daily Ledger, January 30: 1.—. 1912. "Woman bathed by young men." Tacoma Daily Ledger, January 23: 1.—. 1911. "Woman meet before judge." Tacoma Daily Ledger, October 22: 1. Stay in the know - wondery.fm/morbid-wondery.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Angel Studios https://Angel.com/ToddJoin the Angel Guild today and stream Testament, a powerful new series featuring the retelling of the book of Acts. Alan's Soaps https://www.AlansArtisanSoaps.comUse coupon code TODD to save an additional 10% off the bundle price.Bizable https://GoBizable.comUntie your business exposure from your personal exposure with BiZABLE.  Schedule your FREE consultation at GoBizAble.com today.  Bonefrog https://BonefrogCoffee.com/toddThe new GOLDEN AGE is here!  Use code TODD at checkout to receive 10% off your first purchase and 15% on subscriptions.Bulwark Capital https://KnowYourRiskPodcast.comBe confident in your portfolio with Bulwark! Schedule your free Know Your Risk Portfolio review. Go to KnowYourRiskPodcast.com today. Renue Healthcare https://Renue.Healthcare/ToddYour journey to a better life starts at Renue Healthcare. Visit https://Renue.Healthcare/ToddLISTEN and SUBSCRIBE at:The Todd Herman Show - Podcast - Apple PodcastsThe Todd Herman Show | Podcast on SpotifyWATCH and SUBSCRIBE at: Todd Herman - The Todd Herman Show - YouTubeHow Sydney Sweeny's Genes Has The Left Eating The Left. //  Is Being Healthy Anti-American? // Co-Exist but Do Not CooperateEpisode Links:CNN had on a marketing professor from the University of Michigan School of Business to discuss if/when American Eagle should apologize for the Sydney Sweeney ad.MUST-SEE: Woman says her childhood trauma as a "brown girl" came back after seeing the Sydney Sweeney ad for American Eagle. - "It is so difficult to grow up as a person of color, specifically a woman..."Libs are policing other libs for criticizing the Sydney Sweeney ad while not wearing COVID masks (this is real)Dr. Anthony Chaffee: "Goldman Sachs had a part of their meeting leaked, and they said: Is curing patients a sustainable business model?"Attempted Islamic honor killing: Two fundamentalist Muslim migrants from Iraq are on trial in Olympia, Wash. over a horrific attack on their teen daughter outside Timberline High School last year. Prosecutors say Ihsan Ali and Zahraa Ali strangled the girl to try to kill her as revenge for her rejecting their plan to marry her off to an older Muslim man in their home country. ISLAMIFICATION: Islamic center writes ‘community support letter' for Somali immigrant convicted of raping a 12-year-old.

Welcome to the "Week in Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.       This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.       Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.  Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime, or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week in Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle. Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Welcome to the "Week in Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.       This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.       Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.  Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime, or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week in Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle. Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

In this gripping episode we go behind the headlines of the shocking Utah murder case involving Kathryn Restelli, who has now pled guilty to conspiring in the murder of her husband, Matthew Restelli. Her mother, Tracy Grist, and brother, Kevin Ellis, remain behind bars awaiting trial. Prosecutors say the trio tracked Matthew from California using an AirTag and staged a deadly ambush with their children in the next room. And don't go anywhere. I'm going to show you actual footage of Kathryn Restelli pleading guilty in court. I've enhanced the audio and video to help you hear every word clearly—so you can better understand how this web of deceit unraveled.#KathrynRestelli #MatthewRestelli #TracyGrist #KevinEllis #UtahMurder #AmericanFork #RestelliMurderCase #FamilyConspiracy #AirTagTracking #ChrisStewart #LawAndCrime #DomesticViolence #CustodyBattle #TrueCrimeCommunity #ProfilingEvil #MikeKing #WolvesInSheepsClothing #TrueCrimeBooks #GuiltyPlea #MurderInUtah #CriminalProfiling #ManipulationAndControl #BehavioralAnalysis #CrimeSceneBreakdown=======================================Order Wolves in Sheep's Clothing now! https://www.profilingevil.com/wolvesOrder Deceived, An Investigative Memoir of the Zion Society Cult. (Signed and shipped FREE in USA) https://www.paypal.com/ncp/payment/DYVV8R6AQELKGOrder She Knew No Fear (Signed and Free USA Shipping) https://www.paypal.com/ncp/payment/9NKCKQ5EUHR6YDONATE to Profiling Evil: https://www.paypal.com/donate/?hosted_button_id=T54JX76RZ455SSUPPORT our Podcasts: https://www.buzzsprout.com/1213394/support

Former Trump Prosecutor Investigated; Trade Deals, Peace Negotiations, 3% Economic Growth

Traffic is really out of control … officially! Also, how will your representative in Congress change if the new Texas GOP maps get passed? Host Raheel Ramzanali is joined by executive producer Laura Isensee and Houstonia Magazine's Erica Cheng to break down these and other big stories from this week. You won't believe what game is taking over the city, and Raheel is PSYCHED that one of his favorite shows is returning to TV.  Stories we talked about on today's show:  Houston commute woes worsen—now among top 10 worst in America Texas Republicans unveil redistricting map to expand GOP foothold by 5 seats, including 1 in Houston Newsom will move to redraw California map if Texas redistricts, teeing up national fight 'The stress of it': Prosecutors leaving DA Teare's office as case loads remain high Houston's Mahjong Boom: Meet the Women Teaching the Game, One Tile at a Time Why ‘King of the Hill' Is the Most Significant Work of Texan Culture of the Past Thirty Years Learn more about the sponsors of this August 1st episode: Holocaust Museum Houston Visit Port Aransas Houston Restaurant Weeks Downtown Houston+ Get more from City Cast Houston when you become a City Cast Houston Neighbor. You'll enjoy perks like ad-free listening, invitations to members only events and more. Join now at membership.citycast.fm  Looking for more Houston news? Then sign up for our morning newsletter Hey Houston  Follow us on Instagram  @CityCastHouston Don't have social media? Then leave us a voicemail or text us at +1 713-489-6972 with your thoughts! Have feedback or a show idea? Let us know!  Interested in advertising with City Cast? Let's Talk! Photo: Mark Mulligan/Houston Chronicle via Getty Images Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

The Prosecutor is the remarkable true story of Fritz Bauer, a gay German Jew who survived the Nazis and sought to hold his countrymen to account. 

Aaron Spencer Case: Parental Instinct vs. Premeditated Force: A Defense Attorney's Playbook How far can a parent go to protect their child—and when does that line become a crime? In Part 2 of our Aaron Spencer deep dive, we flip the script and step into the defense's war room. Spencer's legal team says he acted out of necessity. Prosecutors say it was murder. But the jury? They're going to have to decide whether this was justifiable force… or personal revenge with deadly consequences. Defense attorney and former prosecutor Eric Faddis returns to explore how this case could—and likely will—play out at trial. What are Spencer's strongest defenses under Arkansas law? How does the presence of a no-contact order, a prior history of alleged sexual abuse, and the discovery of the victim in Fosler's truck shape the legal argument? And how dangerous is that reload moment—the one detail that could shift the entire perception of whether this was about protection… or punishment? We also dive into jury strategy: what kind of jurors are likely to sympathize with Spencer? What emotional arguments work—and which could backfire? And what role will the testimony of Spencer's daughter play in either exonerating him… or sealing his fate? This episode peels back the tactical side of the case. The courtroom chess. The human drama behind the legal filings. Because this isn't just a question of law—it's a test of how the justice system handles instinct, trauma, and the deep, terrifying fear that your child might not make it home unless you intervene. This case is far from over—but the battle lines are being drawn. #AaronSpencerCase #SelfDefenseOrMurder #TrueCrimeAnalysis #JusticeForVictims #ParentalInstinct #CriminalDefenseStrategy #ArkansasTrial #EricFaddis #HiddenKillersPodcast #LegalBreakdown Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Aaron Spencer Case: Parental Instinct vs. Premeditated Force: A Defense Attorney's Playbook How far can a parent go to protect their child—and when does that line become a crime? In Part 2 of our Aaron Spencer deep dive, we flip the script and step into the defense's war room. Spencer's legal team says he acted out of necessity. Prosecutors say it was murder. But the jury? They're going to have to decide whether this was justifiable force… or personal revenge with deadly consequences. Defense attorney and former prosecutor Eric Faddis returns to explore how this case could—and likely will—play out at trial. What are Spencer's strongest defenses under Arkansas law? How does the presence of a no-contact order, a prior history of alleged sexual abuse, and the discovery of the victim in Fosler's truck shape the legal argument? And how dangerous is that reload moment—the one detail that could shift the entire perception of whether this was about protection… or punishment? We also dive into jury strategy: what kind of jurors are likely to sympathize with Spencer? What emotional arguments work—and which could backfire? And what role will the testimony of Spencer's daughter play in either exonerating him… or sealing his fate? This episode peels back the tactical side of the case. The courtroom chess. The human drama behind the legal filings. Because this isn't just a question of law—it's a test of how the justice system handles instinct, trauma, and the deep, terrifying fear that your child might not make it home unless you intervene. This case is far from over—but the battle lines are being drawn. #AaronSpencerCase #SelfDefenseOrMurder #TrueCrimeAnalysis #JusticeForVictims #ParentalInstinct #CriminalDefenseStrategy #ArkansasTrial #EricFaddis #HiddenKillersPodcast #LegalBreakdown Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

WMAL GUEST: TIM CARNEY (Senior Columnist, The Washington Examiner) HIS LATEST COLUMN: Soros-Funded Prosecutor Steve Descano and Fairfax County’s Booming Brothel Industry SOCIAL MEDIA: X.com/TPCarney Where to find more about WMAL's morning show: Follow Podcasts on Apple, Audible and Spotify Follow WMAL's "O'Connor and Company" on X: @WMALDC, @LarryOConnor, @JGunlock, @PatricePinkfile, and @HeatherHunterDC Facebook: WMALDC and Larry O'Connor Instagram: WMALDC Website: WMAL.com/OConnor-Company Episode: Thursday, July 31, 2025 / 8 AM HourSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

What was it like to be the lead prosecutor in the Bryan Kohberger case, with the nation watching your every move? 48 Hours correspondent Peter Van Sant speaks with Latah County prosecutor Bill Thompson who opens up about the immense pressure of the Bryan Kohberger case, the emotional toll, and the controversy surrounding the plea deal. Why was there no requirement for Kohberger to reveal crucial information? And what really happened behind the scenes of the case that gripped the country? To learn more about listener data and our privacy practices visit: https://www.audacyinc.com/privacy-policy Learn more about your ad choices. Visit https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Aaron Spencer Case: The Father, the Firearm, and the Felony, A Prosecutor's Dilemma What happens when the justice system fails to protect—and a father takes justice into his own hands? In this gripping first episode, we dive deep into the explosive case of Aaron Spencer, the Arkansas father and decorated military veteran now facing second-degree murder charges for fatally shooting Michael Fosler—a man accused of sexually abusing Spencer's teenage daughter. Fosler, despite 43 felony charges, was out on bond and allegedly in violation of a no-contact order the night Spencer tracked down his truck and found his daughter inside. Spencer made a split-second choice. Now he's facing decades behind bars. But was this murder… or justified protection? Joining me is Eric Faddis, former prosecutor and current defense attorney, who breaks down the prosecution's side of this legal firestorm. We unpack why the State decided to file charges despite overwhelming public support for Spencer, what the second-degree murder charge actually means under Arkansas law, and how prosecutors navigate the high-wire act of pursuing a case that looks like vigilante justice to some—and heroic parenting to others. We also explore the Arkansas Supreme Court's unprecedented intervention, after a sweeping gag order attempted to seal this case from public view. Spoiler alert: it backfired, big time. This isn't just a legal breakdown. It's a wake-up call. Because when victims don't feel safe and predators walk free, it's not a question of if someone will take matters into their own hands—it's when. Don't miss this opening deep dive into one of the most emotionally charged, morally complex, and legally combustible cases in the country right now. #AaronSpencer #ArkansasJustice #MichaelFosler #TrueCrimePodcast #JusticeSystemFail #SelfDefenseLaw #SecondDegreeMurder #VigilanteJustice #HiddenKillers #EricFaddis Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Aaron Spencer Case: The Father, the Firearm, and the Felony, A Prosecutor's Dilemma What happens when the justice system fails to protect—and a father takes justice into his own hands? In this gripping first episode, we dive deep into the explosive case of Aaron Spencer, the Arkansas father and decorated military veteran now facing second-degree murder charges for fatally shooting Michael Fosler—a man accused of sexually abusing Spencer's teenage daughter. Fosler, despite 43 felony charges, was out on bond and allegedly in violation of a no-contact order the night Spencer tracked down his truck and found his daughter inside. Spencer made a split-second choice. Now he's facing decades behind bars. But was this murder… or justified protection? Joining me is Eric Faddis, former prosecutor and current defense attorney, who breaks down the prosecution's side of this legal firestorm. We unpack why the State decided to file charges despite overwhelming public support for Spencer, what the second-degree murder charge actually means under Arkansas law, and how prosecutors navigate the high-wire act of pursuing a case that looks like vigilante justice to some—and heroic parenting to others. We also explore the Arkansas Supreme Court's unprecedented intervention, after a sweeping gag order attempted to seal this case from public view. Spoiler alert: it backfired, big time. This isn't just a legal breakdown. It's a wake-up call. Because when victims don't feel safe and predators walk free, it's not a question of if someone will take matters into their own hands—it's when. Don't miss this opening deep dive into one of the most emotionally charged, morally complex, and legally combustible cases in the country right now. #AaronSpencer #ArkansasJustice #MichaelFosler #TrueCrimePodcast #JusticeSystemFail #SelfDefenseLaw #SecondDegreeMurder #VigilanteJustice #HiddenKillers #EricFaddis Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

A round-up of the main headlines in Sweden on July 30th, 2025. You can hear more reports on our homepage www.radiosweden.se, or in the app Sveriges Radio. Presenter and producer: Michael Walsh

Nearly three months before Bryan Kohberger murdered four University of Idaho students, a sheriff's deputy stopped him for speeding less than two miles from the house at 1122 King Rd. Prosecutors planned to use the traffic stop at Kohberger's trial and his defense team objected to it. Following Kohberger's sentencing, the traffic stop video is now public. Law&Crime's Angenette Levy breaks down why the video matters and details all of the lies Kohberger told following the murders and his strange behavior in this episode of Crime Fix — a daily show covering the biggest stories in crime.PLEASE SUPPORT THE SHOW:Get 15% off OneSkin with the code CRIMEFIX at https://www.oneskin.co #oneskinpodHost:Angenette Levy https://twitter.com/Angenette5Producer:Jordan ChaconCRIME FIX PRODUCTION:Head of Social Media, YouTube - Bobby SzokeSocial Media Management - Vanessa BeinVideo Editing - Daniel CamachoGuest Booking - Alyssa Fisher & Diane KayeSTAY UP-TO-DATE WITH THE LAW&CRIME NETWORK:Watch Law&Crime Network on YouTubeTV: https://bit.ly/3td2e3yWhere To Watch Law&Crime Network: https://bit.ly/3akxLK5Sign Up For Law&Crime's Daily Newsletter: https://bit.ly/LawandCrimeNewsletterRead Fascinating Articles From Law&Crime Network: https://bit.ly/3td2IqoLAW&CRIME NETWORK SOCIAL MEDIA:Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/lawandcrime/Twitter: https://twitter.com/LawCrimeNetworkFacebook: https://www.facebook.com/lawandcrimeTwitch: https://www.twitch.tv/lawandcrimenetworkTikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@lawandcrimeSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Top headlines for Wednesday, July 30, 2025In this episode, we begin by examining the increasing allegations against Michael Tait, as two more individuals come forward, raising the total number of accusers to eight. Next, we explore Pastor Derwin Gray's pointed critique of the Trump administration's actions, which he argues have hindered opportunities for minorities through its stance on diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives. Plus, we take a closer look at a new documentary that sheds light on the rising movement to reintroduce Bible-based education in public schools. 00:11 2 more men accuse Michael Tait of sexual assault01:07 Derwin Gray: Trump ‘damaging opportunities' with attacks on DEI02:02 Gunman who killed 4 then himself in NYC, blamed NFL, CTE02:57 Prosecutor in ACNA bishop abuse case alleges misconduct in trial03:56 Documentary looks at rise of Bible lessons in public schools04:51 Canadian church slapped with $2,500 fine for hosting Sean Feucht05:47 Church challenges members to initiate a 'culture of evangelism'Subscribe to this PodcastApple PodcastsSpotifyGoogle PodcastsOvercastFollow Us on Social Media@ChristianPost on TwitterChristian Post on Facebook@ChristianPostIntl on InstagramSubscribe on YouTubeGet the Edifi AppDownload for iPhoneDownload for AndroidSubscribe to Our NewsletterSubscribe to the Freedom Post, delivered every Monday and ThursdayClick here to get the top headlines delivered to your inbox every morning!Links to the News2 more men accuse Michael Tait of sexual assault | EntertainmentDerwin Gray: Trump ‘damaging opportunities' with attacks on DEI | PoliticsGunman who killed 4 then himself in NYC, blamed NFL, CTE | U.S.Prosecutor in ACNA bishop abuse case alleges misconduct in trial | Church & MinistriesDocumentary looks at rise of Bible lessons in public schools | EducationCanadian church slapped with $2,500 fine for hosting Sean Feucht | WorldChurch challenges members to initiate a 'culture of evangelism' | Church & Ministries

This Day in Legal History: Medicare and Medicaid Signed into BeingOn July 30, 1965, President Lyndon B. Johnson signed the Social Security Amendments of 1965 into law, creating the Medicare and Medicaid programs. The signing took place at the Truman Library in Independence, Missouri, with former President Harry S. Truman—an early advocate for national health insurance—present and symbolically receiving the first Medicare card. Medicare was designed to provide hospital and medical insurance to Americans aged 65 and older, regardless of income or medical history. Medicaid, created alongside Medicare, offered healthcare assistance to low-income individuals and families.At the time, nearly half of Americans over 65 had no health insurance. The passage of Medicare was a landmark achievement of Johnson's Great Society initiative and built on decades of political struggle over healthcare reform. The legislation amended Title XVIII of the Social Security Act and was strongly opposed by many in the medical establishment and conservative politicians who labeled it as “socialized medicine.” Nevertheless, the program gained rapid popularity and provided immediate relief to millions.Administered by the federal government, Medicare initially had two parts: Part A, covering hospital insurance, and Part B, covering outpatient and physician services. It has since evolved to include prescription drug coverage (Part D) and options for private plans (Medicare Advantage). The law reshaped the American healthcare landscape and established the principle that access to healthcare for seniors was a federal responsibility.The U.S. Senate confirmed Emil Bove, a former lawyer for Donald Trump and senior Justice Department official, to a lifetime seat on the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in a narrow 50-49 vote. Bove faced unified Democratic opposition and criticism from over 900 former DOJ employees, who claimed he undermined the department's integrity. His nomination prompted a Democratic walkout during the Senate Judiciary Committee's vote and drew sharp condemnation from Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer.Despite controversy, Republicans praised Bove's background as a federal terrorism prosecutor and his legal work defending Trump in several criminal cases. His confirmation shifts the appellate court's balance back in favor of Republican appointees. Critics cited Bove's alleged directives that defied judicial authority and political interference in a corruption case against New York Mayor Eric Adams. Bove denied wrongdoing in both instances. His confirmation is part of Trump's renewed effort in his second term to reshape the judiciary, following over 230 appointments in his first term. Trump has also nominated another close adviser, Jennifer Mascott, to the same court.Trump lawyer Bove confirmed to US appeals court, overcoming Democratic opposition | ReutersBove Confirmed to Appeals Court After Whistleblowers Emerge (1)A White House crypto task force established by President Trump is set to release a highly anticipated report outlining the administration's policy goals for the digital asset sector. The report, expected Wednesday, will address tokenization, market structure legislation, and a regulatory framework for blockchain-based financial products. Created by executive order shortly after Trump took office in January, the group is led by Bo Hines and includes top officials such as Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and SEC Chair Paul Atkins.The document is expected to support expanded use of tokenization, which converts traditional assets like stocks and real estate into blockchain-based tokens. The report may call on the SEC to create a framework enabling firms like Coinbase to offer tokenized securities, though specific language remains under wraps. It will also outline the White House's preferences for crypto legislation currently advancing in Congress, including follow-up to the recently passed stablecoin law.Trump has made pro-crypto policies a centerpiece of his administration, reversing many of the enforcement actions taken under President Biden, such as lawsuits against Coinbase and Binance. While the industry sees the report as a roadmap for mainstream integration, concerns remain about conflicts of interest, particularly given Trump's financial ties to crypto ventures and meme coins. The administration has denied any ethical violations.White House set to unveil closely watched crypto policy report | ReutersThe Trump administration has formally requested the release of grand jury transcripts related to Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, citing public interest and mounting pressure over the government's handling of the sex trafficking cases. Prosecutors filed late-night motions with U.S. District Judges Richard Berman and Paul Engelmayer, arguing that the sealed testimony should now be disclosed, though the judges had previously asked for stronger legal justification. Grand jury records are typically secret, with limited exceptions for disclosure.Trump said he directed Attorney General Pam Bondi to seek the unsealing after the Justice Department reaffirmed its conclusion that Epstein died by suicide and that there was no list of elite clients—a stance that frustrated some Trump supporters who suspect a cover-up. Epstein died in 2019 before his trial; Maxwell, convicted in 2021, is serving a 20-year sentence and has appealed to the Supreme Court to overturn her conviction.In a related effort, a Florida judge recently denied a separate request to release grand jury records from earlier state investigations into Epstein, ruling they did not meet legal exceptions. Even if the federal judges allow the current transcripts to be unsealed, the documents may not reveal new information, since much of the testimony was covered during Maxwell's trial. The transcripts also wouldn't encompass the full scope of investigative material held by the government.Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, a former Trump lawyer, recently met with Maxwell for two days, reportedly seeking any names or evidence she could provide about others potentially involved. Neither Blanche nor Maxwell's attorney has commented in detail on those meetings.Trump administration asks judges to release Epstein, Maxwell grand jury transcripts | ReutersA Massachusetts jury has ordered Johnson & Johnson to pay over $42 million to Paul Lovell, who developed mesothelioma after decades of using the company's talc products. Lovell and his wife sued in 2021, claiming the talc contained asbestos that he unknowingly inhaled, and accused J&J of failing to warn consumers despite knowing the risks. The jury awarded damages for pain, suffering, and medical costs.J&J denied any wrongdoing, calling the verdict “junk science” and saying its products are asbestos-free and safe, with plans to appeal the decision. The company ended U.S. sales of talc-based baby powder in 2020. This case adds to a string of multi-million-dollar verdicts against J&J in talc-related mesothelioma lawsuits, although some have been overturned on appeal.J&J is facing over 63,000 active lawsuits, and possibly up to 100,000 claims in total, most alleging ovarian cancer from talc use. The company's attempts to resolve the claims through bankruptcy have failed in court three times, including a $10 billion settlement proposal rejected in March. The Lovell case is part of ongoing litigation that continues to test J&J's legal strategy and product safety claims.Johnson & Johnson ordered to pay $42M after jury finds talc caused man's cancer | Reuters This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

Prosecutors have lost their appeal against the sentence given to former NSW police officer Kristian White, who tasered 95-year-old Clare Nowland in a nursing home.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Breaking down and picking out the best snippets from the interviews law enforcement and prosecutor Bill Thompson have given since the gag order has been lifted.ALL MERCH 10% off with code Sherlock10 at checkout Donate: (Thank you for your support! Couldn't do what I love without all y'all) PayPal - paypal.com/paypalme/prettyliesandalibisVenmo - @prettyliesalibisBuy Me A Coffee - https://www.buymeacoffee.com/prettyliesrCash App- PrettyliesandalibisAll links: https://linktr.ee/prettyliesandalibisMerch: prettyliesandalibis.myshopify.comPatreon: https://www.patreon.com/PrettyLiesAndAlibis(Weekly lives and private message board)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/pretty-lies-and-alibis--4447192/support.

LIONEL on X https://x.com/LionelMedia  LYNN's WARRIORS on YT    / @lynnswarriors      MY BOOK LINKS: Who Killed Epstein? Prince Andrew or Bill Clinton by Shaun Attwood UK: https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B093QK1GS1 USA: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B093QK1GS1 Worldwide: https://books2read.com/u/bQjGQD Shaun Attwood's social media: TikTok:   / shaunattwood1  Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/shaunattwoo... Twitter:   / shaunattwood  Facebook:   / shaunattwood1  Patreon:   / shaunattwood  Odysee: https://odysee.com/@ShaunAttwood:a #podcast #truecrime #news  #youtube  #people #uk #royal #fbi  #usa #musk #trump #epstein #maxwell

Robert Peters spent most of his life as a prosecutor and a Christian. Those two things came together when he took his position as the director of institutional response for GRACE, an organization that investigates sexual abuse in Protestant churches. Founded in 2003 after a reporter called the founder about a case of sexual abuse mishandled by a pastor, GRACE, which stands for Godly Response to Abuse in the Christian Environment, the group's leadership became convinced that Protestant institutions were not properly addressing incidents of sexual abuse that would eventually lead to the damage seen in the Catholic Church. In their view, authoritarian cultures of some organizations were particularly susceptible to spiritual abuse and silencing victims.Following in the footsteps of James Lutrell, a prosecutor in the case of the Delphi, Indiana murders of Abby Williams and Libby German, Robert puts a laser focus on victims, getting to the truth and promoting change. Robert joins me today to discuss stemming out abuse in the church.Contact me at silverliningshandbookpod@gmail.comCheck out the Silver Linings Handbook website at:https://silverliningshandbook.com/Check out our Patreon to support the show at:https://www.patreon.com/thesilverliningshandbookJoin our Facebook Group at:https://www.facebook.com/groups/1361159947820623Visit the Silver Linings Handbook store to support the podcast at:https://www.bonfire.com/store/the-silver-linings-handbook-podcast-storeVisit The True Crime Times Substack at:https://truecrimemessenger.substack.comThe Silver Linings Handbook podcast is a part of the ART19 network. ART19 is a subsidiary of Wondery and Amazon Music.See the Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and the California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

In its motion opposing Ghislaine Maxwell's appeal, the Department of Justice argued that the 2007 non-prosecution agreement (NPA) between Jeffrey Epstein and the U.S. Attorney's Office in the Southern District of Florida did not and could not shield Maxwell from prosecution in a different jurisdiction. The DOJ emphasized that Maxwell was not a signatory to the agreement and that the language of the NPA did not expressly bind federal prosecutors in the Southern District of New York. By reinforcing that the agreement applied only to Epstein and only within Florida's jurisdiction, the government maintained that Maxwell's prosecution was not only lawful but well within constitutional and statutory boundaries.The DOJ also dismantled several of Maxwell's other appellate claims, including challenges related to the statute of limitations, juror misconduct, and alleged flaws in jury instructions. Prosecutors argued that the indictment fell squarely within the allowed time frame under the applicable federal laws governing crimes against minors, and that the lower court acted within its discretion in denying Maxwell's request for a new trial. They also rejected the notion that the jury had been misled or that any aspect of the charges had been constructively amended. The motion concluded by urging the Second Circuit—and ultimately the Supreme Court—not to disturb the conviction or sentence, framing Maxwell's appeal as a meritless attempt to relitigate settled issues.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:US government urges appeals court to uphold Ghislaine Maxwell's sex trafficking conviction | Daily Mail Online

In June 2022, Maxwell's legal team submitted a 77-page sentencing memorandum to the U.S. District Court in Manhattan requesting a significant downward variance from both the Probation Department's recommendation and the federal Sentencing Guidelines. While the probation office had proposed a 20-year sentence (240 months), Maxwell's attorneys argued she should receive only 51 to 63 months in prison. They maintained that Maxwell should not be punished as a proxy for Jeffrey Epstein, emphasizing he was the principal orchestrator of the crimes and that Maxwell had never before been charged with wrongdoing until her association with him resurfaced. Her defense also cited her difficult and traumatic childhood, abusive father, and the death threats she continues to face as aggravating circumstances warranting leniency.Prosecutors forcefully opposed the request, urging the court instead to impose a prison term within the Guidelines range—between 30 to 55 years—based on Maxwell's “pivotal role” in grooming and recruiting vulnerable young girls for Epstein. They highlighted her lack of remorse, failure to accept responsibility, and the profound and enduring harm caused to numerous victims. The prosecutors made clear that Maxwell's privileged background offered no mitigation given the extreme gravity of her crimes.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/jun/15/ghislaine-maxwell-sex-trafficking-sentence

In its motion opposing Ghislaine Maxwell's appeal, the Department of Justice argued that the 2007 non-prosecution agreement (NPA) between Jeffrey Epstein and the U.S. Attorney's Office in the Southern District of Florida did not and could not shield Maxwell from prosecution in a different jurisdiction. The DOJ emphasized that Maxwell was not a signatory to the agreement and that the language of the NPA did not expressly bind federal prosecutors in the Southern District of New York. By reinforcing that the agreement applied only to Epstein and only within Florida's jurisdiction, the government maintained that Maxwell's prosecution was not only lawful but well within constitutional and statutory boundaries.The DOJ also dismantled several of Maxwell's other appellate claims, including challenges related to the statute of limitations, juror misconduct, and alleged flaws in jury instructions. Prosecutors argued that the indictment fell squarely within the allowed time frame under the applicable federal laws governing crimes against minors, and that the lower court acted within its discretion in denying Maxwell's request for a new trial. They also rejected the notion that the jury had been misled or that any aspect of the charges had been constructively amended. The motion concluded by urging the Second Circuit—and ultimately the Supreme Court—not to disturb the conviction or sentence, framing Maxwell's appeal as a meritless attempt to relitigate settled issues.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:US government urges appeals court to uphold Ghislaine Maxwell's sex trafficking conviction | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Justice Brad Hart earned his undergraduate degree from Baylor University in 1993 and his J.D. from South Texas College of Law in 1997. After law school, he was a trial prosecutor in the Harris County District Attorney's office for 16 years, even being honored as "Prosecutor of the Year" by the Texas Narcotics Officers' Association in 2011. He was appointed Judge of the 230th District Court in 2013 and was recognized as "Judge of the Year" by the Texas Gang Investigators' Association in 2018. Following, he served as the Chief of the General Felony Trial Division at the Fort Bend County District Attorney's office before being elected to the 14th Court of Appeals in 2024. Brad makes his home in Houston, Texas.

​Recent court documents have revealed that DNA from three different individuals was discovered under the fingernails of Madison Mogen, one of the four University of Idaho students tragically murdered in November 2022. This finding suggests that Mogen may have struggled with her assailant, potentially collecting crucial forensic evidence during the attack. However, defense attorneys for the primary suspect, Bryan Kohberger, contend that the DNA tests were inconclusive and have filed motions to exclude this evidence from the upcoming trial..Kohberger, a former criminology Ph.D. student, is accused of fatally stabbing Mogen and her three housemates. Prosecutors have presented additional evidence linking Kohberger to the crime, including DNA found on a knife sheath at the scene, surveillance footage of a vehicle resembling his, and cell phone records placing him near the victims' residence before and after the murders. The defense is challenging the admissibility of much of this evidence, arguing that certain investigative methods and the breadth of search warrants could mislead the jury or infringe upon Kohberger's rightsto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Idaho murders trial rocked by curveball DNA evidence found under victim's fingernails | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In a significant win for prosecutors, the presiding judge over the Brian Walshe murder case has almost entirely sided with the Commonwealth in the defense's bid to have key digital evidence thrown out. We're unpacking what this means for the upcoming trial.For updates to the case as they happen, visit nbcboston.com/tag/ana-walshe. And you can keep up with us on Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, X and BlueSky for updates on this case and all the biggest, most interesting news happening in Boston and beyond.

Wyandotte County Prosecutor Mark Dupree press conference HR 1 full 3851 Tue, 29 Jul 2025 14:58:14 +0000 xwkC2t6EGA0sWCQI3xYJqJy3UmzG589E news MIDDAY with JAYME & WIER news Wyandotte County Prosecutor Mark Dupree press conference HR 1 From local news & politics, to what's trending, sports & personal stories...MIDDAY with JAYME & WIER will get you through the middle of your day! © 2025 Audacy, Inc. News False https://player.amperwavepodcast

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

A dead officer, a girlfriend on trial, and a case that tore a town apart.When John O'Keefe was found lifeless in the snow in January 2022, Karen Read said she dropped him off. Prosecutors said she left him to die.As the high-stakes retrial begins, we recap the explosive first trial—tainted evidence, missing pieces, and a system under fire. Was it a drunken accident, a murder, or a cover-up buried beneath a blizzard of lies?Featuring interviews with: Alina Burroughs---Host: Kristin ThorneWriter & Producer: Cooper MollExecutive Producer: Jessica LowtherEditor: Anna McClainAssociate Producer: Tess Jagger-WellsBooking Producer: Lisa FeitLegal: Elizabeth VulajKey Art: Sean PanzeraSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Ghislaine Maxwell played a central role in Jeffrey Epstein's criminal enterprise by identifying, grooming, and trafficking underage girls—often under the guise of offering them legitimate work or educational opportunities. She was accused by multiple victims of facilitating their abuse by gaining their trust, normalizing inappropriate behavior, and ultimately delivering them to Epstein and his associates. Testimony during her trial and in civil litigation revealed that Maxwell was not only complicit in the abuse but also instrumental in introducing young girls to a network of wealthy, politically connected men. Victims stated that Maxwell instructed them on how to behave, what to wear, and how to sexually service Epstein's powerful guests, with some alleging that photos were taken or acts were observed by third parties.Beyond procuring the girls, Maxwell was accused of organizing travel, arranging accommodations, and helping maintain Epstein's complex web of properties where much of the abuse occurred. Flight logs, address books, and witness testimony placed high-profile individuals—including royalty, billionaires, and former presidents—at Epstein's residences or on his private jets. Although not all of these men were directly implicated in abuse, the structure Maxwell helped build blurred the line between social networking and sex trafficking. In some cases, it was alleged that girls were strategically made available to powerful men in what appeared to be attempts at influence, blackmail, or the cultivation of compromising material—though no formal charges on that front have been filed against her.source:https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10201625/Ghislaine-Maxwell-set-powerful-men-women-theyd-like-Prosecutors-case-reveal-emails.html

"Mind Over Murder" podcast hosts Bill Thomas and Kristin Dilley meet with retired prosecutor Matt Murphy to discuss the parole process for the 3 men convicted in mass kidnapping of 26 elementary school students and their bus driver in rural Chowchilla, California.  The crime, the largest mass kidnapping in United States history, shocked the nation in 1976. How does the California parole system work?   What impact did the kidnapping have on the 26 survivors? Why were the three kidnappers ultimately paroled?  This bonus episode of "Mind Over Murder" originally ran on March 31, 2025."Chowchilla" Documentary on Max (highly recommended)https://www.max.com/movies/chowchilla/35e6ffd5-2cb1-4bd4-b2f3-62064f73a7a2Matt Murphy The Book of Murder: A Prosecutor's Journey Through Love and Deathhttps://www.thebookofmurder.com/CrimeCon:  We're going to CrimeCon again, folks! Join us in Denver for new merch, some MOM listener hangouts, and a lot of fun! Use the code MINDOVERMURDER to get 10% off your tickets between now and September! See you there!WTKR News 3: One year after development in Colonial Parkway Murders, where do things stand?https://www.wtkr.com/news/in-the-community/historic-triangle/one-year-after-development-in-colonial-parkway-murders-where-do-things-standWon't you help the Mind Over Murder podcast increase our visibility and shine the spotlight on the "Colonial Parkway Murders" and other unsolved cases? Contribute any amount you can here:https://www.gofundme.com/f/mind-over-murder-podcast-expenses?utm_campaign=p_lico+share-sheet&utm_medium=copy_link&utm_source=customerWTVR CBS News:  Colonial Parkway murders victims' families keep hope cases will be solved:https://www.wtvr.com/news/local-news/colonial-parkway-murders-update-april-19-2024WAVY TV 10 News:  New questions raised in Colonial Parkway murders:https://www.wavy.com/news/local-news/new-questions-raised-in-colonial-parkway-murders/Alan Wade Wilmer, Sr. has been named as the killer of Robin Edwards and David Knobling in the Colonial Parkway Murders in September 1987, as well as the murderer of Teresa Howell in June 1989. He has also been linked to the April 1988 disappearance and likely murder of Keith Call and Cassandra Hailey, another pair in the Colonial Parkway Murders.13News Now investigates: A serial killer's DNA will not be entered into CODIS database:https://www.13newsnow.com/video/news/local/13news-now-investigates/291-e82a9e0b-38e3-4f95-982a-40e960a71e49WAVY TV 10 on the Colonial Parkway Murders Announcement with photos:https://www.wavy.com/news/crime/deceased-man-identified-as-suspect-in-decades-old-homicides/WTKR News 3https://www.wtkr.com/news/is-man-linked-to-one-of-the-colonial-parkway-murders-connected-to-the-other-casesVirginian Pilot: Who was Alan Wade Wilmer Sr.? Man suspected in two ‘Colonial Parkway' murders died alone in 2017https://www.pilotonline.com/2024/01/14/who-was-alan-wade-wilmer-sr-man-suspected-in-colonial-parkway-murders-died-alone-in-2017/Colonial Parkway Murders Facebook page with more than 18,000 followers: https://www.facebook.com/ColonialParkwayCaseYou can also participate in an in-depth discussion of the Colonial Parkway Murders here:https://earonsgsk.proboards.com/board/50/colonial-parkway-murdersMind Over Murder is proud to be a Spreaker Prime Podcaster:https://www.spreaker.comJoin the discussion on our Mind Over MurderColonial Parkway Murders website: https://colonialparkwaymurders.com Mind Over Murder Podcast website: https://mindovermurderpodcast.comPlease subscribe and rate us at your favorite podcast sites. Ratings and reviews are very important. Please share and tell your friends!We launch a new episode of "Mind Over Murder" every Monday morning, and a bonus episode every Thursday morning.Sponsors: Othram and DNAsolves.comContribute Your DNA to help solve cases: https://dnasolves.com/user/registerFollow "Mind Over Murder" on Twitter: https://twitter.com/MurderOverFollow Bill Thomas on Twitter: https://twitter.com/BillThomas56Follow "Colonial Parkway Murders" on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ColonialParkwayCase/Follow us on InstaGram:: https://www.instagram.com/colonialparkwaymurders/Check out the entire Crawlspace Media network at http://crawlspace-media.com/All rights reserved. Mind Over Murder, Copyright Bill Thomas and Kristin Dilley, Another Dog Productions/Absolute Zero ProductionsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/mind-over-murder--4847179/support.

After Ghislaine Maxwell's conviction in 2021 and her 20-year sentence in 2022, public speculation mounted that she might cooperate with federal authorities by naming the powerful men who allegedly participated in or enabled Jeffrey Epstein's abuse. Given her proximity to Epstein's inner circle and her direct involvement in organizing his social and logistical network, she was widely believed to possess critical information that could implicate some of the most prominent names in politics, finance, and royalty. Despite this potential leverage, Maxwell never cut a cooperation deal before or after her trial. Prosecutors confirmed that she neither sought nor was offered a plea bargain that would require her to testify or provide names in exchange for leniency.Maxwell's silence has frustrated victims, investigators, and the public alike, especially considering the extensive documentation—flight logs, photos, guest lists—that tie her to a web of powerful associates. While her legal team floated vague claims of innocence and wrongful prosecution, she never offered to trade information for a reduced sentence. Even after being imprisoned, she has refused to publicly identify any co-conspirators beyond Epstein himself. Her reluctance to cooperate has fueled theories that she was protecting individuals more powerful than herself—either out of loyalty, fear, or the hope of future influence behind bars. Whatever the motive, Maxwell had the opportunity to speak, potentially reduce her time, and shed light on the broader network—but she chose not to.source:https://www.newsweek.com/ghislaine-maxwell-should-start-naming-names-shave-years-off-sentence-1720162

After Ghislaine Maxwell's conviction in 2021 and her 20-year sentence in 2022, public speculation mounted that she might cooperate with federal authorities by naming the powerful men who allegedly participated in or enabled Jeffrey Epstein's abuse. Given her proximity to Epstein's inner circle and her direct involvement in organizing his social and logistical network, she was widely believed to possess critical information that could implicate some of the most prominent names in politics, finance, and royalty. Despite this potential leverage, Maxwell never cut a cooperation deal before or after her trial. Prosecutors confirmed that she neither sought nor was offered a plea bargain that would require her to testify or provide names in exchange for leniency.Maxwell's silence has frustrated victims, investigators, and the public alike, especially considering the extensive documentation—flight logs, photos, guest lists—that tie her to a web of powerful associates. While her legal team floated vague claims of innocence and wrongful prosecution, she never offered to trade information for a reduced sentence. Even after being imprisoned, she has refused to publicly identify any co-conspirators beyond Epstein himself. Her reluctance to cooperate has fueled theories that she was protecting individuals more powerful than herself—either out of loyalty, fear, or the hope of future influence behind bars. Whatever the motive, Maxwell had the opportunity to speak, potentially reduce her time, and shed light on the broader network—but she chose not to.source:https://www.newsweek.com/ghislaine-maxwell-should-start-naming-names-shave-years-off-sentence-1720162Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Ghislaine Maxwell played a central role in Jeffrey Epstein's criminal enterprise by identifying, grooming, and trafficking underage girls—often under the guise of offering them legitimate work or educational opportunities. She was accused by multiple victims of facilitating their abuse by gaining their trust, normalizing inappropriate behavior, and ultimately delivering them to Epstein and his associates. Testimony during her trial and in civil litigation revealed that Maxwell was not only complicit in the abuse but also instrumental in introducing young girls to a network of wealthy, politically connected men. Victims stated that Maxwell instructed them on how to behave, what to wear, and how to sexually service Epstein's powerful guests, with some alleging that photos were taken or acts were observed by third parties.Beyond procuring the girls, Maxwell was accused of organizing travel, arranging accommodations, and helping maintain Epstein's complex web of properties where much of the abuse occurred. Flight logs, address books, and witness testimony placed high-profile individuals—including royalty, billionaires, and former presidents—at Epstein's residences or on his private jets. Although not all of these men were directly implicated in abuse, the structure Maxwell helped build blurred the line between social networking and sex trafficking. In some cases, it was alleged that girls were strategically made available to powerful men in what appeared to be attempts at influence, blackmail, or the cultivation of compromising material—though no formal charges on that front have been filed against her.source:https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10201625/Ghislaine-Maxwell-set-powerful-men-women-theyd-like-Prosecutors-case-reveal-emails.htmlBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The Visine Killer: James Craig's Bizarre Plot to Mask Murder Revealed Episode Description: Prepare to unravel the meticulous, terrifying strategy behind a murder by milligram as we meticulously examine the alleged poisoning of Angela Craig. Prosecutors contend James Craig systematically administered deadly doses of cyanide and tetrahydrozoline, chillingly ordered using aliases and shipped directly to his dental office. This episode dissects the unique challenges and distinct advantages faced by prosecutors when building a case centered on poisoning, emphasizing how the slow, calculated, and insidious nature of such a crime significantly strengthens the argument for first-degree murder. We will meticulously analyze the damning digital breadcrumbs: a precise timeline of online searches for poisons, documented chemical purchases, and Angela's escalating medical symptoms directly correlating with her repeated hospital visits. A critical question arises: how does a defense attorney even begin to construct a plausible argument for a client who had such deadly substances delivered to their own place of business? We explore the chilling implications of James Craig's medical background, pondering whether his professional knowledge made the alleged act even more egregious in the eyes of potential jurors. Is there any conceivable legal pathway for the defense to argue "accidental poisoning" given the unequivocal toxicology reports? Furthermore, we investigate the perplexing use of seemingly innocuous Visine, questioning if it was a desperate act of improvisation or a calculated attempt to mask the poisoning as a natural, rapidly deteriorating illness, thereby deflecting suspicion. The psychological impact of a defendant appearing calm and smiling at a hospital while their spouse slowly succumbs to poison will be discussed, exploring how prosecutors can present such emotional details without appearing speculative, and whether juries are ultimately swayed more by these unsettling emotional cues or by the cold, hard science of forensic evidence. Hashtags: #JamesCraig #AngelaCraig #TrueCrime #Poisoning #Cyanide #Tetrahydrozoline #MurderByMilligram #ForensicScience #MedicalMisuse #FirstDegreeMurder #Premeditation #VisineKiller #OnlineSearches #ChemicalPurchases #Toxicology #LegalStrategy #Prosecution #DefenseChallenge #TrueCrimeAnalysis #ColdBlooded Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

The Visine Killer: James Craig's Bizarre Plot to Mask Murder Revealed Prepare to unravel the meticulous, terrifying strategy behind a murder by milligram as we meticulously examine the alleged poisoning of Angela Craig. Prosecutors contend James Craig systematically administered deadly doses of cyanide and tetrahydrozoline, chillingly ordered using aliases and shipped directly to his dental office. This episode dissects the unique challenges and distinct advantages faced by prosecutors when building a case centered on poisoning, emphasizing how the slow, calculated, and insidious nature of such a crime significantly strengthens the argument for first-degree murder. We will meticulously analyze the damning digital breadcrumbs: a precise timeline of online searches for poisons, documented chemical purchases, and Angela's escalating medical symptoms directly correlating with her repeated hospital visits. A critical question arises: how does a defense attorney even begin to construct a plausible argument for a client who had such deadly substances delivered to their own place of business? We explore the chilling implications of James Craig's medical background, pondering whether his professional knowledge made the alleged act even more egregious in the eyes of potential jurors. Is there any conceivable legal pathway for the defense to argue "accidental poisoning" given the unequivocal toxicology reports? Furthermore, we investigate the perplexing use of seemingly innocuous Visine, questioning if it was a desperate act of improvisation or a calculated attempt to mask the poisoning as a natural, rapidly deteriorating illness, thereby deflecting suspicion. The psychological impact of a defendant appearing calm and smiling at a hospital while their spouse slowly succumbs to poison will be discussed, exploring how prosecutors can present such emotional details without appearing speculative, and whether juries are ultimately swayed more by these unsettling emotional cues or by the cold, hard science of forensic evidence. Hashtags: #JamesCraig #AngelaCraig #TrueCrime #Poisoning #Cyanide #Tetrahydrozoline #MurderByMilligram #ForensicScience #MedicalMisuse #FirstDegreeMurder #Premeditation #VisineKiller #OnlineSearches #ChemicalPurchases #Toxicology #LegalStrategy #Prosecution #DefenseChallenge #TrueCrimeAnalysis #ColdBlooded Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

H1 - July 24 2025 - " Trump is removing criminals out of SC without McMaster's help " , " Let's put it all together shall we about Obama " , "the things you have to believe to be a Democrat today " , "The Idaho murders prosecutor who go the plea deal never did it before "

New York's prosecutors shockingly argued that Jeffrey Epstein—a man accused of sexually abusing multiple minors—should be deemed a Level One sex offender, the lowest-risk classification. Their justification? Epstein faced a single formal charge, and none of the underage victims had cooperated with authorities at that time. This defense blatantly ignored the overwhelming accounts of numerous survivors, and effectively treated Epstein not as a predator, but as a one-off offender whose broader abuses could be dismissed as unconfirmed rumors.Worse still, the argument undermines the integrity of the entire sex-offender system. By leveraging technicalities—such as lack of indictments rather than evidence—the DA's office appeared to prioritize legal loopholes over public safety and survivor voices. Labeling a man with multiple credible accusations as “low-risk” isn't negligence; it's willful minimizing of harm. New York's stance didn't just misclassify Epstein—it revealed a system more interested in protecting offenders than in confronting peril.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:https://nypost.com/2019/04/11/da-knew-jeffrey-epstein-was-a-dangerous-pedophile-when-arguing-for-leniency/

What kind of killer walks into a hospital wearing scrubs and allegedly delivers a final dose of poison to his dying wife? Let's explore the disturbing case of Dr. James Craig, a Colorado dentist accused of murdering his wife, Angela, by poisoning her with arsenic, cyanide, and tetrahydrozoline. Prosecutors say Craig orchestrated an elaborate murder plot driven by an affair, financial trouble, and a crumbling marriage. #JamesCraig #AngelaCraig #ColoradoMurderTrial #DentistMurderCase #PoisonMurder #Arsenic #Cyanide #Tetrahydrozoline #HospitalHomicide #CrimeSceneBehavior #OrganizedOffender #DisorganizedOffender #ProfilingEvil #FoxNation #PaulMauro #JoshuaRitter #TrueCrimeCommunity #WolvesInSheepsClothing #MikeKing #CriminalProfiling #AffairAndMurder #VisinePoisoning #ForensicPsychology #MurderByPoison #DeathInvestigation #MotiveAndMeans #CriminalMindset #TrueCrimeAnalysis=======================================Order Wolves in Sheep's Clothing now! https://www.profilingevil.com/wolvesOrder Deceived, An Investigative Memoir of the Zion Society Cult. (Signed and shipped FREE in USA) https://www.paypal.com/ncp/payment/DYVV8R6AQELKGOrder She Knew No Fear (Signed and Free USA Shipping) https://www.paypal.com/ncp/payment/9NKCKQ5EUHR6YDONATE to Profiling Evil: https://www.paypal.com/donate/?hosted_button_id=T54JX76RZ455SSUPPORT our Podcasts: https://www.buzzsprout.com/1213394/support

Bryan Kohberger pleaded guilty to murdering four University of Idaho student but there were always red flags. This is one of the reasons Bryan Kohberger was denied when he tried to be a part of the Pullman Police Dept. Former Pullman Police Chief joins STS about his interaction with Idaho Killer Bryan Kohberger. Welcome to Surviving the Survivor, the show that brings you the #BestGuests in all of #truecrime. In this episode STS Host, Joel Waldman, interviews Former Pullman Police Chief Gary Jenkins about what he noticed about Kohberger--and what happened as the breaking news unfolded. Bryan Kohberger, a former criminology Ph.D. student, pleaded guilty on July 2, 2025, to the November 13, 2022 home‑invasion stabbing murders of four University of Idaho students—Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin. Facing charges of four counts of first‑degree murder and one count of felony burglary, Kohberger accepted a plea deal that spares him the death penalty in exchange for four consecutive life sentences plus an extra 10 years, with no possibility of appeal. Prosecutors secured a conviction based on DNA evidence from a knife sheath and Q‑tip, along with cell‑tower data and surveillance footage, though the motive remains officially unknown. Now awaiting sentencing on July 23, the controversial plea—welcomed by some families seeking closure but strongly opposed by others—has ignited widespread debate and media coverage.More of STS:Links: Https://linktr.ee/stspodcastGet Joel's Book: Https://amzn.to/48GwbLxSTS Merch: Https://www.bonfire.com/store/sts-store/Support the show on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/SurvivingTheSurvivorCatch us live on YouTube: Surviving The Survivor: #BestGuests in True Crime - YouTubeVenmo Donations: @STSPodcast or Https://www.venmo.com/stspodcast

Live Courtroom Audio: Stephan Sterns Pleads Guilty (No Contest) To Maddie Soto's Murder & Abuse Stephan Sterns is officially going to die in prison. He pleaded no contest to the murder of 13-year-old Maddie Soto and guilty to a devastating series of sex crimes—eight counts of capital sexual battery, multiple counts of sexual abuse, and lewd molestation. It was a courtroom heavy with grief, rage, and unhealed wounds. But one person was conspicuously silent. In this episode, we take you inside the courtroom where Sterns faced the consequences of his horrific crimes—and where Jennifer Soto, Maddie's own mother, neither spoke nor was mentioned as a participant. While family after family member delivered gut-wrenching victim impact statements, Jennifer stayed out of sight. So now that Sterns has taken the plea deal, will Jennifer Soto finally be held accountable? Prosecutors no longer need her as a witness. There's no trial. No risk of her pleading the Fifth. Just a pile of deeply disturbing facts that paint a picture of a mother who ignored—or accepted—clear red flags. We walk through: The full breakdown of the plea agreement and sentencing Maddie's family confronting Sterns with heartbreak and fury The legal implications of Sterns' no contest plea And the question: Does this now open the door for charges against Jennifer Soto? We also highlight shocking court admissions—like the fact that Maddie's mom allowed her to sleep in the same bed as Sterns, and her previous police statement claiming the “sex stuff wasn't evil.” How does that not rise to criminal neglect? This episode is not just about one man's sentencing—it's about what happens next in the pursuit of full justice for Maddie Soto.

Live Courtroom Audio: Stephan Sterns Pleads Guilty (No Contest) To Maddie Soto's Murder & Abuse Stephan Sterns is officially going to die in prison. He pleaded no contest to the murder of 13-year-old Maddie Soto and guilty to a devastating series of sex crimes—eight counts of capital sexual battery, multiple counts of sexual abuse, and lewd molestation. It was a courtroom heavy with grief, rage, and unhealed wounds. But one person was conspicuously silent. In this episode, we take you inside the courtroom where Sterns faced the consequences of his horrific crimes—and where Jennifer Soto, Maddie's own mother, neither spoke nor was mentioned as a participant. While family after family member delivered gut-wrenching victim impact statements, Jennifer stayed out of sight. So now that Sterns has taken the plea deal, will Jennifer Soto finally be held accountable? Prosecutors no longer need her as a witness. There's no trial. No risk of her pleading the Fifth. Just a pile of deeply disturbing facts that paint a picture of a mother who ignored—or accepted—clear red flags. We walk through: The full breakdown of the plea agreement and sentencing Maddie's family confronting Sterns with heartbreak and fury The legal implications of Sterns' no contest plea And the question: Does this now open the door for charges against Jennifer Soto? We also highlight shocking court admissions—like the fact that Maddie's mom allowed her to sleep in the same bed as Sterns, and her previous police statement claiming the “sex stuff wasn't evil.” How does that not rise to criminal neglect? This episode is not just about one man's sentencing—it's about what happens next in the pursuit of full justice for Maddie Soto.

What do you do when your conscience won't stay quiet? In Genesis 42, Joseph's brothers finally face the guilt they buried years ago. They had sold Joseph into slavery and lied to their father—and for 25 years, they said nothing. But now, God begins to wake up their sleeping consciences. In this episode, Stephen Davey unpacks the story and reveals how God uses association, similar circumstances, and isolation to stir a guilty heart. Joseph—now prime minister of Egypt—confronts his brothers without revealing his identity. He mirrors their past actions, giving them a taste of their own betrayal. And for the first time, they confess their guilt out loud. Stephen explains how conscience works—how it can be conditioned, suppressed, or renewed. You'll learn that guilt is not your enemy. It's a gift from God that points you to repentance and healing. You'll also see how easily we defend ourselves, make excuses, or blame others—just like Joseph's brothers. If you've ever carried guilt, or if someone you love seems hardened by sin, this episode will give you hope. God's grace is patient. He awakens your heart not to shame you—but to restore you.

Former Prosecutor Explains What REALLY Happened To The Epstein ‘List' DESCRIPTION: What happened to the infamous Epstein list? Why did it vanish from the conversation—and who made that decision? In this revealing episode, former prosecutor Eric Faddis peels back the legal layers to expose how the justice system handled (or buried) the most explosive set of names tied to one of history's darkest sex trafficking rings. Was the list sealed by court order? Was it suppressed to protect high-profile individuals? Or was it never fully compiled at all? Faddis explains what prosecutors are allowed to do with sensitive evidence, how political influence and sealed agreements can keep names off the public record, and why the Epstein case continues to feel like a cover-up—because it just might be. If you've been waiting for someone to explain what actually happened to the Epstein list without spin, speculation, or online hysteria—this is it. A legal insider's account of the list that disappeared. #Hashtags: #EpsteinList #EricFaddis #JeffreyEpsteinCase #SealedFiles #HiddenKillers #WhatHappenedToTheList #TrueCrimePodcast #JusticeSuppressed #ProsecutorReveals #EliteProtection Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Tim, Phil, & Brett are joined by Steve Hilton to discuss Pam Bondi firing the prosecutor investigating Epstein, Trump calling his supporters weaklings, Alex Jones slamming Trump over Epstein files, and young Democrats continuing to embrace Zohran Mamdani & socialism.   Hosts:  Tim @Timcast (everywhere) Phil @PhilThatRemains (X) Brett  @PopCultureCrisis  (YouTube, Rumble) Serge @SergeDotCom (everywhere) Guest: Steve Hilton @SteveHiltonx (X)