Podcasts about prosecutors

Prosecutors in Sean "Diddy" Combs' federal sex trafficking trial have encountered a significant challenge: they are unable to locate a key witness, identified as "Victim-3." This witness was expected to provide crucial testimony regarding allegations that Combs coerced her into sexual acts. During court proceedings on May 7, 2025, Assistant U.S. Attorney Maurene Comey informed the judge that both the witness and her attorney have been unresponsive, and there's uncertainty about her appearance even if subpoenaed. This development raises concerns about the prosecution's ability to present a comprehensive case.Despite this setback, the prosecution plans to proceed with testimonies from other accusers, including Combs' ex-girlfriend Cassie Ventura. The absence of Victim-3's testimony could impact the prosecution's strategy, but they remain committed to presenting the available evidence. Combs faces serious charges, including sex trafficking and racketeering, and has pleaded not guilty. The trial continues as both sides prepare for opening statements scheduled for May 12.to  contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Sean 'Diddy' Combs' prosecutors admit they may go to trial without key witnessBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In the case of United States v. Sean Combs (24 Cr. 542), federal prosecutors have filed an opposition to the defense's motions requesting a hearing, a bill of particulars, and a gag order. The defense sought a hearing to investigate alleged government leaks of evidence, specifically a 2016 video purportedly showing Combs assaulting his ex-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura. Prosecutors refuted these claims, stating they did not possess the video prior to its public release and had no involvement in its dissemination. They argued that the defense's allegations are baseless and represent a strategic attempt to suppress critical evidence that is highly probative of Combs' alleged criminal conduct.Regarding the request for a bill of particulars, the defense sought detailed information about the charges to prepare for trial. Prosecutors contended that the indictment already provides sufficient detail, outlining the nature of the charges and the alleged criminal activities. They maintained that additional specifics are unnecessary and could compromise ongoing investigations or witness safety. Concerning the motion for a gag order to prevent public statements by potential witnesses and attorneys, prosecutors argued that existing court orders already address these concerns, rendering the defense's request redundant. They emphasized the importance of balancing the defendant's right to a fair trial with the public's right to information, asserting that current measures are adequate to maintain this balance.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:diddy.pdf

In the case of United States v. Sean Combs (24 Cr. 542), federal prosecutors have filed an opposition to the defense's motions requesting a hearing, a bill of particulars, and a gag order. The defense sought a hearing to investigate alleged government leaks of evidence, specifically a 2016 video purportedly showing Combs assaulting his ex-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura. Prosecutors refuted these claims, stating they did not possess the video prior to its public release and had no involvement in its dissemination. They argued that the defense's allegations are baseless and represent a strategic attempt to suppress critical evidence that is highly probative of Combs' alleged criminal conduct.Regarding the request for a bill of particulars, the defense sought detailed information about the charges to prepare for trial. Prosecutors contended that the indictment already provides sufficient detail, outlining the nature of the charges and the alleged criminal activities. They maintained that additional specifics are unnecessary and could compromise ongoing investigations or witness safety. Concerning the motion for a gag order to prevent public statements by potential witnesses and attorneys, prosecutors argued that existing court orders already address these concerns, rendering the defense's request redundant. They emphasized the importance of balancing the defendant's right to a fair trial with the public's right to information, asserting that current measures are adequate to maintain this balance.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:diddy.pdf

In the case of United States v. Sean Combs (24 Cr. 542), federal prosecutors have filed an opposition to the defense's motions requesting a hearing, a bill of particulars, and a gag order. The defense sought a hearing to investigate alleged government leaks of evidence, specifically a 2016 video purportedly showing Combs assaulting his ex-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura. Prosecutors refuted these claims, stating they did not possess the video prior to its public release and had no involvement in its dissemination. They argued that the defense's allegations are baseless and represent a strategic attempt to suppress critical evidence that is highly probative of Combs' alleged criminal conduct.Regarding the request for a bill of particulars, the defense sought detailed information about the charges to prepare for trial. Prosecutors contended that the indictment already provides sufficient detail, outlining the nature of the charges and the alleged criminal activities. They maintained that additional specifics are unnecessary and could compromise ongoing investigations or witness safety. Concerning the motion for a gag order to prevent public statements by potential witnesses and attorneys, prosecutors argued that existing court orders already address these concerns, rendering the defense's request redundant. They emphasized the importance of balancing the defendant's right to a fair trial with the public's right to information, asserting that current measures are adequate to maintain this balance.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:diddy.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In the case of United States v. Sean Combs (24 Cr. 542), federal prosecutors have filed an opposition to the defense's motions requesting a hearing, a bill of particulars, and a gag order. The defense sought a hearing to investigate alleged government leaks of evidence, specifically a 2016 video purportedly showing Combs assaulting his ex-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura. Prosecutors refuted these claims, stating they did not possess the video prior to its public release and had no involvement in its dissemination. They argued that the defense's allegations are baseless and represent a strategic attempt to suppress critical evidence that is highly probative of Combs' alleged criminal conduct.Regarding the request for a bill of particulars, the defense sought detailed information about the charges to prepare for trial. Prosecutors contended that the indictment already provides sufficient detail, outlining the nature of the charges and the alleged criminal activities. They maintained that additional specifics are unnecessary and could compromise ongoing investigations or witness safety. Concerning the motion for a gag order to prevent public statements by potential witnesses and attorneys, prosecutors argued that existing court orders already address these concerns, rendering the defense's request redundant. They emphasized the importance of balancing the defendant's right to a fair trial with the public's right to information, asserting that current measures are adequate to maintain this balance.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:diddy.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The Prosecution:   During the opening statements of Sean "Diddy" Combs's federal sex trafficking trial, prosecutors portrayed him as a powerful figure who led a criminal enterprise over two decades. Assistant U.S. Attorney Emily Johnson described Combs as having a "larger than life" public persona with a darker side that involved coercing women into drug-fueled sexual encounters and using violence to maintain control. The prosecution alleged that Combs's inner circle, including bodyguards and high-ranking employees, assisted in committing and concealing crimes such as kidnapping, arson, bribery, and obstruction of justice. Key evidence includes testimonies from three women—ex-girlfriend Cassie Ventura, a woman referred to as "Jane," and a former assistant named "Mia"—as well as surveillance footage from a 2016 incident showing Combs assaulting Ventura in a Los Angeles hotel hallway.Prosecutors detailed disturbing allegations, including Combs orchestrating events known as "freak-offs," where women were allegedly forced into degrading acts with male sex workers. One specific claim involved Combs instructing a sex worker to urinate in Ventura's mouth during such an event. The prosecution contends that these acts were part of a broader pattern of abuse and exploitation facilitated by Combs's entertainment empire. Combs has pleaded not guilty to all charges, which include racketeering conspiracy, sex trafficking, and transportation to engage in prostitution, and faces the possibility of life imprisonment if convicted.The  Defense:During the opening statements of Sean "Diddy" Combs's federal sex trafficking trial, his defense team, led by attorney Teny Geragos, acknowledged Combs's history of violence and temper but firmly denied that his actions constituted sex trafficking, racketeering, or prostitution. Geragos portrayed the case as one centered on "love, jealousy, infidelity, and money," arguing that the relationships in question were consensual adult interactions, including participation in a "swinger's lifestyle." She emphasized that while Combs may have exhibited abusive behavior, the prosecution's attempt to classify these personal relationships as criminal enterprises was a mischaracterization.The defense also sought to humanize Combs, reminding jurors that he is not on trial for being "mean" or a "jerk," but for specific criminal charges that they argue are unfounded. Geragos highlighted that the government's case intrudes into Combs's private life without sufficient legal basis, asserting that the alleged victims were capable individuals who made their own choices. She contended that the prosecution's narrative was an overreach, attempting to criminalize consensual activities and personal flawsto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:(4) Live updates: Sean ‘Diddy' Combs trial opening statements | CNNBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Sean “Diddy” Combs' legal team is facing an uphill battle as they prepare to defend him against explosive federal charges of sex trafficking, drug distribution, and running a criminal enterprise. Prosecutors are expected to call multiple cooperating witnesses—many of them alleged victims and former insiders—whose stories span decades and paint a picture of a carefully controlled web of abuse, coercion, and violence. That cumulative weight makes it difficult for the defense to dismiss the case as opportunistic or fabricated. This isn't just about one accuser—it's about an alleged pattern of criminal conduct, and the government only needs to prove that pattern, not each individual act.Diddy's attorneys are expected to focus heavily on undermining the credibility of the accusers, possibly pointing to inconsistencies or financial motives. But in a federal RICO case, that only gets them so far. The structure of the case allows the government to use broader racketeering evidence to show intent and criminal enterprise, even if some parts are disputed. The defense also faces the court of public opinion, especially after damaging surveillance footage surfaced showing Diddy allegedly assaulting Cassie Ventura—footage that may or may not be admissible, but will almost certainly be on jurors' minds. All of this sets the stage for a high-stakes legal showdown where reputation, freedom, and legacy hang in the balance.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Sean 'Diddy' Combs defense lawyers face uphill battle in bid to undermine accusers | ReutersBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Last fall, the Justice Department unveiled a series of shocking allegations against Sean Combs, the music mogul known as Diddy.Prosecutors charged Mr. Combs with sex trafficking and racketeering, and for the past seven weeks, they have argued their case in a Manhattan courtroom.Ben Sisario, who has been covering the trial, explains the ins and outs of the proceedings and discusses the media circus surrounding it.Guest: Ben Sisario, a reporter for The New York Times covering music and the music industry.Background reading: Read four takeaways from the closing argument at Mr. Combs's trial.Here's a timeline of Mr. Combs's career, including his rise in hip-hop, controversies and legal disputes.For more information on today's episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily. Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday. Photo: Paras Griffin/Getty Images Unlock full access to New York Times podcasts and explore everything from politics to pop culture. Subscribe today at nytimes.com/podcasts or on Apple Podcasts and Spotify.

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth blasts the media for downplaying the success of US strikes on Iranian nuclear sites, accusing reporters of anti-Trump bias and relying on misleading leaks. The Trump administration plans to restrict Congress's access to classified intel. Prosecutors in the Sean "Diddy" Combs trial tell jurors the rapper led a criminal enterprise, pointing to drug distribution, arson, and sex trafficking as predicate crimes. Republican consultant Ryan Girdusky gives an exclusive deep dive on 33-year-old Muslim democratic socialist Zohran Mamdani, Democrat nominee for NYC mayor. Cozy Earth: Luxury shouldn't be out of reach. Go to https://cozyearth.com/MEGYNfor up to 40% off Cozy Earth's best-selling temperature-regulating sheets, apparel, and more. FYSI: https://FYSI.com/Megyn or call 800-877-4000

New twisters rip across southern Minnesota; Prosecutors make closing arguments in Diddy trial; Pentagon reveals new details of U.S. airstrikes on Iran's nuclear program; and more on tonight's broadcast.

Today, I dive into the latest drama surrounding Justin Baldoni and Blake Lively, particularly the recent dismissal of Baldoni's $400 million counter-lawsuit against Lively, which has left many of his fans concerned. I also discuss Ryan Reynolds' comments that seem to take a jab at Baldoni while asserting his own integrity. Shifting gears, I cover TLC news, including the Pauly family's house for sale in Oregon and the ongoing speculation about their future on the show, as well as updates on the Plath family's home in Georgia, which hasn't sold yet. On a personal note, I share my own fertility journey following an egg donor transfer and my anxieties about potential pregnancy. Finally, I touch on the Diddy trial, where the prosecution has dropped several charges, raising questions about the case's future. Stay tuned for more updates and insights! Timestamps: 00:00:00 - Introduction and Overview 00:02:50 - Sister Wives Update: Salty Birches Podcast 00:09:00 - Justin Baldoni's Legal Troubles 00:10:05 - Personal Update: Pregnancy Test Anxiety 00:12:47 - Ryan Reynolds' Comments on the Lawsuit MY ⁠Go Big Podcasting⁠ Courses Are Here! Purchase Go Big Podcasting and learn to start, monetize, and grow your own podcast. Use code DAD15 for 15% OFF until 6/30/2025 **SHOP my Amazon Marketplace - especially if you're looking to get geared-up to start your own Podcast!!!** ⁠https://www.amazon.com/shop/thesarahfrasershow⁠ Show is sponsored by: ⁠ASPCA Pet Insurance⁠ to explore coverage, visit A-S-P-C-A pet insurance dot com slash TSFS. Download⁠ Cash App⁠ & sign up! Use our exclusive referral code TSFS in your profile, send $5 to a friend within 14 days, and you'll get $10 dropped right into your account. Terms apply ⁠Horizonfibroids.com⁠ get rid of those nasty fibroids ⁠Gopurebeauty.com⁠ science backed skincare from head to toe, use code TSFS at checkout for 25% OFF your order ⁠Nutrafol.com⁠ use code TSFS for FREE shipping and $10 off your subscription ⁠Quince.com/tsfs⁠ for FREE shipping on your order and 365 day returns ⁠Rula.com/tsfs⁠ to get started today. That's R-U-L-A dot com slash tsfs for convenient therapy that's covered by insurance. ⁠SkylightCal.com/tsfs⁠ for $30 OFF your 15 inch calendar  ⁠Thrivecosmetics.com/tsfs⁠ Brighten a mom's day—especially if you're that mom. Go to ⁠thrivecausemetics.com/TSFS⁠ for 20% OFF your order ⁠Warbyparker.com/tsfs⁠ make an appointment at one of their 270 store locations and head to the website to try on endless pairs of glasses virtually and buy your perfect pair Follow me on Instagram/Tiktok: @thesarahfrasershow   ***Visit our Sub-Reddit: ⁠reddit.com/r/thesarahfrasershow⁠ for ALL things The Sarah Fraser Show!!!*** Advertise on The Sarah Fraser Show: ⁠thesarahfrasershow@gmail.com⁠ Got a juicy gossip TIP from your favorite TLC or Bravo show? Email: ⁠thesarahfrasershow@gmail.com Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Intense and nerve energy fills courtroom as prosecutors paint a picture of power, fear and manipulation behind the scenes of the life of music mogul Sean Diddy Combs. The government alleged that Combs used his influence to orchestrate and conceal criminal activity, urging jurors to connect the dots from years of disturbing testimony from various witnesses who knew Diddy. Welcome to Surviving The Survivor, the show that brings you the #BestGuests in all of #truecrime. In this episode, Emmy award-wining host Joel Waldman breaks down the biggest moments in court and brings in analysis from our STS #BestGuests who are closely following the case. STS #BestGuests Lauren Conlin: Podcaster, Reporter & Host of POPCRIMETV, has been covering Diddy's Trial from inside the courtroom Stephen Cazares: a former Asst United States Attorney who has tried 17 federal jury trials, and argued 12 appeals before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit. Amy Shlosberg: Criminologist, Professor and Co-Host of Women & Crime and Direct Appeal Podcast “Sex trafficking, forced labor, kidnapping, arson, bribery and obstruction of justice" are how prosecutors describe the case. Prosecutors painted Combs as the mastermind of a long criminal enterprise fueled by fear, control, and violence. At stake: decades in prison if convicted, and this could forever reshape Diddy's legacy. Sean Diddy Combs face five counts of sex trafficking and racketeering.⸻ #Support the show:All Things STS: Https://linktr.ee/stspodcastGet Joel's Book: Https://amzn.to/48GwbLxSTS Merch: Https://www.bonfire.com/store/sts-store/Support the show on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/SurvivingTheSurvivorCatch us live on YouTube: Surviving The Survivor: #BestGuests in True Crime - YouTubeVenmo Donations: @STSPodcast or Https://www.venmo.com/stspodcast#truecrimecommunity #truestory #celebrity #diddytrial #diddy #stsnation

Linday Stanley, the prosecutor who ruined any chance at finding justice in a expeditious manner for Suzanne Morphew is once again in the spotlight as her day of reckoning draws near. Previously, we discussed her incoming troubles and now we are learning more about she is alleged to have done, including sharing information from the case with a podcast host and also posting about the case in public forums. This led to the Judge dismissing the charges against Barry Morphew and stunting any chance at justice the family of Suzanne Morphew might have had.In this episode, we dive into the new allegations and see whats what. (commercial at 7:39)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Suzanne Morphew murder case plagued with more issues months after missing mom's body found (foxnews.com)

Prosecutors reviewed evidence for more than six hours in court yesterday, will the defense keep things briefer? See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The Ochelli Effect 6-26-2025 NEWS againCuomo says he is still gonna run for Mayor.Who took a leak on Donny Darko?Trump sent troops on a Perfect Flight?&Ochelii 100% SUPPORTS THIS ACTION FROM THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATIONhttps://www.pbs.org/newshour/health/watch-live-cdc-vaccine-panel-holds-meeting-after-rfk-jr-ousts-and-replaces-expert-former-membershttps://www.npr.org/sections/shots-health-news/2025/06/26/nx-s1-5438485/cdc-acip-rfk-thimerosal-vaccines---Two I's WAR & OTHER BULLSHITPub Crawl Pete and General Dan RAISIN' Caine Hold a Press Conference!https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qa6xUNKlP7Yhttps://www.defense.gov/News/Transcripts/Transcript/Article/4227366/defense-secretary-pete-hegseth-and-joint-chiefs-of-staff-chairman-gen-dan-caine/Does anybody care if this actually could make the future much les stable? It won't because it was just theater, but imagine if you take the threats from Iran seriously?Epitaph for the puppet show.Iran : The Supreme Leader re-surfacedIran's Khamenei resurfaces to warn against future US attacks in first statement since ceasefirehttps://apnews.com/article/israel-iran-war-nuclear-06-26-2025-d09bf2282deea3b2edd63f29c867c058Thump Trump: On The Road To PerditionFools rush in, where wise men never go.Rohn KenyattaJun 26, 2025https://rohnkenyatta.substack.com/p/thump-trump-on-the-road-to-perdition?---Bill Moyers finally dies!So the guy who was likely making sure the media disinformation from Warren Commission to controlling the Opposition among Critics with Plants and creating the negative tag, "Conspiracy Theorist" has finally left the building?Bill Moyers, Lyndon Johnson press chief and celebrated broadcaster, dies at 91https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jun/26/bill-moyers-broadcaster-dies---LIFESTYLES OF THE BITCHEST INFAMOUSDiddy trial live updates: Prosecutors drop some kidnapping, arson, sex trafficking claimshttps://www.usatoday.com/story/entertainment/celebrities/2025/06/25/diddy-trial-live-updates-day-34/84338440007It's good to be the king of AMAZON DOT COM we guess...Jeff Bezos, Lauren Sánchez arrive for controversial luxury Italian weddinghttps://www.aol.com/jeff-bezos-lauren-sa-nchez-152507306.htmlhttps://www.gbnews.com/celebrity/jeff-bezos-wedding-protest-mannequin-amazon-founder-venice---OCHELLI Dot Com is Broke!Anything is a blessing if you have the meansTHANKS TO ALL who have kept us GoingWithout YOUR support we go silent.PayPalhttps://www.paypal.com/paypalme/ochelliEmail blindjfkresearcher@gmail.comBE THE EFFECTOchelli Link Treehttps://linktr.ee/chuckochelli---NOVEMBER IN DALLAS LANCER CONFERENCEDISCOUNT FOR YOU10 % OFF code = Ochelli10https://assassinationconference.com/Coming SOON Room Discount Details The Fairmont Dallas hotel 1717 N Akard Street, Dallas, Texas 75201.  access to Dealey Plaza

June 27, 2025 ~ Karen McDonald, Oakland County prosecutor, joins Lloyd and former Congressman Dave Trott to discuss her run for Michigan State Attorney General in 2026.

Trump officials push back on CNN and NYT claims downplaying the impact of U.S. strikes on Iranian nuclear sites, calling the mission a decisive success. President Trump secures a major win at the NATO summit as allies agree to raise defense spending to 5% of GDP, with a bromance on full display between Trump and Secretary General Rutte. Prosecutors drop three predicate acts from the racketeering case against Sean “Diddy” Combs. After Rep. Jasmine Crockett blasts Trump's Iran strikes as unconstitutional, Speaker Johnson says she helps the GOP every time she speaks.Riverbend Ranch: Visit https://riverbendranch.com/ | Use promo code MEGYN for $20 off your first order. Tax Network USA: Call 1-800-958-1000 or visit https://TNUSA.com/MEGYN to speak with a strategist for FREE today

Barry Morphew is behind bars again for the murder of his wife and now his ex-girlfriend is turning on him. Plus shocking new evidence reveals disturbing details in the murder of his wife, Suzanne Morphew. This episode uncovers the twisted timeline and chilling methods that could finally bring justice in one of America's most haunting true crime cases out of Colorado. Welcome to Surviving the Survivor, the show that brings you the #BestGuests in all of #truecrime. Emmy Award-winning Journalist and Host Joel Waldman is joined by our panel of #BestGuests to deep dive into the new details of what really happened to Suzanne Morphew and a closer look inside the sinister mind of the alleged killer. STS #BestGuests: Mike King: Criminal Profiler/Host of @ProfilingEvil & Author of Wolves in Sheep's Clothing: A Practical Guide for True Crime Enthusiasts Colin McCallin: Defense Attorney and Host of Is This Legal? Kris Calvert: Suspense Writer and Host of Hitched 2 Homicide Suzanne Morphew, a Colorado mother of two, vanished on Mother's Day 2020 during what was initially believed to be a bike ride gone wrong. Her husband, Barry Morphew, was later arrested and charged with her murder, despite her body not being found at the time. Prosecutors alleged Barry killed Suzanne after discovering she was having an affair and planning to leave him, pointing to a chilling pattern of control, deception, and disturbing forensic evidence. The Suzanne Morphew case quickly became a national true crime sensation, with twists, false leads, and shocking new developments now resurfacing after Barry's recent re-arrest.⸻ #Support the show:All Things STS: Https://linktr.ee/stspodcastGet Joel's Book: Https://amzn.to/48GwbLxSTS Merch: Https://www.bonfire.com/store/sts-store/Support the show on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/SurvivingTheSurvivorCatch us live on YouTube: Surviving The Survivor: #BestGuests in True Crime - YouTubeVenmo Donations: @STSPodcast or Https://www.venmo.com/stspodcast#SuzanneMorphew #BarryMorphew #TrueCrimeStory #MissingPersons #JusticeForSuzanne #TrueCrimeCommunity #CrimeDocumentary #ColdCaseUpdate #TrueCrimeInvestigation #murdermystery

The Diddy Trial From Start Up To Closing: What Happened & What's Next  Sean "Diddy" Combs—music mogul, entrepreneur, icon—now finds himself at the center of one of the most explosive federal trials in recent memory. After weeks of intense courtroom drama, graphic evidence, and disturbing testimonies, federal prosecutors have officially rested their case, accusing Combs of running a criminal empire involving racketeering, sex trafficking, and interstate prostitution. The allegations are as serious as they are shocking, painting a picture of Combs using his immense power and celebrity status to allegedly orchestrate what prosecutors describe as coercive and violent sexual activities disguised as lavish "freak off" parties. The trial unfolded dramatically, featuring testimonies from 34 witnesses including alleged victims, former employees, bodyguards, hotel managers, and male escorts. Prosecutors showcased explicit video recordings, detailed text exchanges, and financial records purportedly linking Combs directly to these activities. Notably absent from the defense were any witnesses—including Combs himself—raising questions about their bold strategy of resting without rebuttal. With closing arguments imminent, all eyes now shift to the jury. The defense maintains Combs' innocence, suggesting the activities were consensual adult encounters, while prosecutors insist they were violent, manipulative, and illegal. The trial's outcome will profoundly impact not only Combs' future—potentially facing life imprisonment if convicted—but also how celebrities' power dynamics and abuses are handled in federal court moving forward. In this deep dive, we break down exactly what happened today in the courtroom, what it means for the trial's outcome, and what comes next as the jury prepares to deliberate. Join us as we uncover the full scope of this case, discussing the broader implications for celebrity accountability, the power dynamics in the entertainment industry, and the line between private behavior and criminal misconduct. Stay tuned, subscribe, and comment your thoughts below. Was this criminal exploitation or misunderstood lifestyle choices? Justice hangs in the balance. #DiddyTrial #SeanCombs #TrueCrime #CelebrityTrial #FederalTrial #SexTrafficking #Racketeering #CourtroomDrama #CrimeNews #JusticeSystem    Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872 

The Diddy Trial From Start Up To Closing: What Happened & What's Next  Sean "Diddy" Combs—music mogul, entrepreneur, icon—now finds himself at the center of one of the most explosive federal trials in recent memory. After weeks of intense courtroom drama, graphic evidence, and disturbing testimonies, federal prosecutors have officially rested their case, accusing Combs of running a criminal empire involving racketeering, sex trafficking, and interstate prostitution. The allegations are as serious as they are shocking, painting a picture of Combs using his immense power and celebrity status to allegedly orchestrate what prosecutors describe as coercive and violent sexual activities disguised as lavish "freak off" parties. The trial unfolded dramatically, featuring testimonies from 34 witnesses including alleged victims, former employees, bodyguards, hotel managers, and male escorts. Prosecutors showcased explicit video recordings, detailed text exchanges, and financial records purportedly linking Combs directly to these activities. Notably absent from the defense were any witnesses—including Combs himself—raising questions about their bold strategy of resting without rebuttal. With closing arguments imminent, all eyes now shift to the jury. The defense maintains Combs' innocence, suggesting the activities were consensual adult encounters, while prosecutors insist they were violent, manipulative, and illegal. The trial's outcome will profoundly impact not only Combs' future—potentially facing life imprisonment if convicted—but also how celebrities' power dynamics and abuses are handled in federal court moving forward. In this deep dive, we break down exactly what happened today in the courtroom, what it means for the trial's outcome, and what comes next as the jury prepares to deliberate. Join us as we uncover the full scope of this case, discussing the broader implications for celebrity accountability, the power dynamics in the entertainment industry, and the line between private behavior and criminal misconduct. Stay tuned, subscribe, and comment your thoughts below. Was this criminal exploitation or misunderstood lifestyle choices? Justice hangs in the balance. #DiddyTrial #SeanCombs #TrueCrime #CelebrityTrial #FederalTrial #SexTrafficking #Racketeering #CourtroomDrama #CrimeNews #JusticeSystem    Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872 

Prosecutors are no longing pursuing certain charges after claiming they don't want to confuse the jury. Netflix released a documentary about a poop cruise in 2013. F1 is available to see in theaters tomorrow!See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Federal prosecutors handling Sean “Diddy” Combs' racketeering case informed Judge Arun Subramanian—on June 25, just before closing arguments—that they would no longer pursue three specific predicate charges: attempted kidnapping, attempted arson, and aiding and abetting sex trafficking. These predicates were part of the broader racketeering conspiracy charge. Prosecutors said the decision was aimed at simplifying jury instructions and helping jurors focus on the remaining core allegations.Despite dropping those predicates, the prosecution still pressed ahead with the central charges, including racketeering tied to forced labor, drug offenses, and bribery, as well as two counts of sex trafficking and one count of transportation for prostitution.   The timeline saw the prosecution rest after calling 34 witnesses over 29 days, and the defense surprisingly rested in just over 20 minutes—calling no witnesses and relying on text-message evidenceto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Prosecutors in Sean 'Diddy' Combs' trial backtrack on several allegations | Fox News

The Diddy Trial From Start Up To Closing: What Happened & What's Next  Sean "Diddy" Combs—music mogul, entrepreneur, icon—now finds himself at the center of one of the most explosive federal trials in recent memory. After weeks of intense courtroom drama, graphic evidence, and disturbing testimonies, federal prosecutors have officially rested their case, accusing Combs of running a criminal empire involving racketeering, sex trafficking, and interstate prostitution. The allegations are as serious as they are shocking, painting a picture of Combs using his immense power and celebrity status to allegedly orchestrate what prosecutors describe as coercive and violent sexual activities disguised as lavish "freak off" parties. The trial unfolded dramatically, featuring testimonies from 34 witnesses including alleged victims, former employees, bodyguards, hotel managers, and male escorts. Prosecutors showcased explicit video recordings, detailed text exchanges, and financial records purportedly linking Combs directly to these activities. Notably absent from the defense were any witnesses—including Combs himself—raising questions about their bold strategy of resting without rebuttal. With closing arguments imminent, all eyes now shift to the jury. The defense maintains Combs' innocence, suggesting the activities were consensual adult encounters, while prosecutors insist they were violent, manipulative, and illegal. The trial's outcome will profoundly impact not only Combs' future—potentially facing life imprisonment if convicted—but also how celebrities' power dynamics and abuses are handled in federal court moving forward. In this deep dive, we break down exactly what happened today in the courtroom, what it means for the trial's outcome, and what comes next as the jury prepares to deliberate. Join us as we uncover the full scope of this case, discussing the broader implications for celebrity accountability, the power dynamics in the entertainment industry, and the line between private behavior and criminal misconduct. Stay tuned, subscribe, and comment your thoughts below. Was this criminal exploitation or misunderstood lifestyle choices? Justice hangs in the balance. #DiddyTrial #SeanCombs #TrueCrime #CelebrityTrial #FederalTrial #SexTrafficking #Racketeering #CourtroomDrama #CrimeNews #JusticeSystem    Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872 

In a shocking 11th hour move before closing arguments begin, the prosecution in the Sean "Diddy" Combs sex trafficking trial backpedals on their RICO case. Will this 'dumbing down' of the charges before the final showdown mean a verdict by July 4th? In an unprecedented triumph against evil, Florida authorities, and their federal partners rescue 60 children from the clutches of sex traffickers...making it the largest recovery in U.S history. A 4yr old boy is severely burned in a horrific S'mores mishap at a children's museum. Plus, a date night ends with 'time' behind bars! Jennifer Gould reports. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Federal prosecutors handling Sean “Diddy” Combs' racketeering case informed Judge Arun Subramanian—on June 25, just before closing arguments—that they would no longer pursue three specific predicate charges: attempted kidnapping, attempted arson, and aiding and abetting sex trafficking. These predicates were part of the broader racketeering conspiracy charge. Prosecutors said the decision was aimed at simplifying jury instructions and helping jurors focus on the remaining core allegations.Despite dropping those predicates, the prosecution still pressed ahead with the central charges, including racketeering tied to forced labor, drug offenses, and bribery, as well as two counts of sex trafficking and one count of transportation for prostitution.   The timeline saw the prosecution rest after calling 34 witnesses over 29 days, and the defense surprisingly rested in just over 20 minutes—calling no witnesses and relying on text-message evidenceto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Prosecutors in Sean 'Diddy' Combs' trial backtrack on several allegations | Fox NewsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Joyce talks about Andrew Cuomo losing the Mayoral Primary and his brother declaring "The Democrat Party is Dead," prosecutors have decided to consolidate the charges against P. Diddy, Pete Hegseth defends President Trump to the media and gives more details on the bombing of nuclear sites in Iran, and the Supreme Court rules against the lower courts in Maryland to give more power back to President Trump on deportations. See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

AP correspondent Haya Panjwani reports on an update to Kilmar Abrego Garcia's case.

AP correspondent Julie Walker reports from court on the prosecutions closing arguments in the Sean 'Diddy' Combs case.

AP correspondent Julie Walker reports from court, federal prosecutors wrap up their closing arguments at the Sean 'Diddy' Combs trial.

The prosecution's nearly five-hour closing argument in the racketeering conspiracy and sex trafficking trial of Sean Combs ended with federal prosecutor Christy Slavik imploring the jury to convict the defendant as charged. “Up until today, the defendant was able to get away with his crimes because of his money, power and influence,” Slavik claimed. “It's time to hold him accountable. It's time for justice. It's time to find the defendant guilty.” Slavik told jurors that a lot of the evidence presented during the trial was difficult to witness but, she argued, that evidence “proves to you that the defendant is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.” She asserted that Combs “ran his criminal enterprise with total control” and with the support of an inner circle whose “one job was to say yes to the defendant.” The defense closing argument is scheduled to begin at 9 a.m. ET Friday morning. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Mike Marza and ABC News Legal Contributor Bernarda Villalona recap a big day in the trial of Sean 'Diddy' Combs. Federal prosecutors are no longer including attempted kidnapping and attempted arson as underlying crimes in the alleged racketeering conspiracy charge against Sean Combs. Prosecutors disclosed in a letter to Judge Arun Subramanian that they would “no longer proceed on these theories” when they deliberated closing arguments, which are scheduled to begin Thursday. Instead, prosecutors signaled that they would push sex trafficking and forced labor as primary predicate acts that the jury could find to convict Combs of racketeering conspiracy. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

After Choice's bombshell sunscreen testing revealed some of our fave products don't meet their SPF claims, we examine what this means for the bottle in your bathroom cabinet. Plus, more people are turning to ChatGPT for therapy sessions... but is AI actually equipped to handle our mental health? And in headlines today, Iran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei says Iran struck a US base in Qatar and warned of further attacks if provoked; Closing arguments are underway in the sex trafficking trial of Sean “Diddy” Combs; Prosecutors will appeal the sentence of former Senior Constable Kristian James Samuel White; Singer Jessie J has revealed that her breast cancer is “all gone” following surgery earlier this week. THE END BITSSupport independent women's media Check out The Quicky Instagram here Mamamia studios are styled with furniture from Fenton and Fenton visit www.fentonandfenton.com.au GET IN TOUCHShare your story, feedback, or dilemma! Send us a voice note or email us at thequicky@mamamia.com.au CREDITS Hosts: Taylah Strano & Tahli Blackman Guests: Annaliese Todd, Mamamia lifestyle writer Audio Producer: Lu Hill Become a Mamamia subscriber: https://www.mamamia.com.au/subscribeSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

‘Ghost Adventures' Star's Estranged Wife Gets Up to 7½ Years for Murder-for-Hire Plot A Las Vegas judge has sentenced Victoria Goodwin — the estranged wife of “Ghost Adventures” investigator Aaron Goodwin — to three to seven-and-a-half years in state prison for plotting to have the reality-TV star murdered. Judge Nadia Krall handed down the 36- to 90-month term on Thursday, June 5, after the 32-year-old tearfully admitted that she conspired with convicted family killer Grant Amato to arrange a contract hit on her husband. Goodwin pleaded guilty in April to a single count of conspiracy to commit murder, part of a deal that spared her the possibility of a longer sentence on additional solicitation charges. Prosecutors said she began exchanging letters, phone calls, and illicit text messages with Amato in early 2024, shortly after she saw him featured in the Paramount+ docuseries Ctrl + Alt + Desire. Amato is serving life in a Florida prison for the 2019 slayings of his parents and brother. According to police testimony, prison staff found a contraband cellphone in Amato's possession last winter. The device contained dozens of messages from Victoria that included the couple's Las Vegas address, Aaron Goodwin's daily routine, and a proposed “payment plan” for the killing. “Am I a bad person because I chose to end his existence, not divorce?” she wrote in one exchange, investigators told the court. Detectives informed Aaron Goodwin of the alleged plot only after his wife's arrest on March 6. The 49-year-old cinematographer — a regular on Discovery's long-running paranormal series — filed for divorce within days and began traveling with armed security. “For seven years I thought I was in the most loving marriage with my best friend,” he told the court, choking back tears. “Now I'll never feel safe again.” Addressing the bench, Aaron said Victoria had “spent almost all our savings” trying to keep the scheme secret while carrying on what prosecutors described as an “emotional and spiritual marriage” with Amato. “The fact that this person did all this to me with no care or love in her heart — I will never be the same,” he said, urging Krall to impose prison time. Victoria, shackled and wearing jail attire, offered an equally emotional apology moments before sentencing. “I recognize my stupidity and the terrible crime against Aaron,” she sobbed. “I pray you find joy and peace again, and I promise you'll never see or hear from me.” She also apologized to the court, calling the plot her “rock bottom.” Deputy District Attorney Jillian Strout countered that the apology rang hollow, noting that Victoria never tried to halt the plan until law enforcement intervened. “She provided location, timing, and payment details; the wheels were in motion,” Strout said, adding that an unidentified accomplice outside the prison was prepared to carry out the killing. Amato has not been charged in Nevada, though authorities say their investigation remains open. Defense attorney Brandon Albright asked for probation, pointing to Victoria's “severe mental-health struggles” and the fact that the murder was never actually attempted. Judge Krall rejected the request. “This was not a fantasy,” she said. “The steps taken moved this crime from thought to preparation.” Krall imposed the maximum term allowed under the plea agreement, ordering Victoria to serve at least three years before she is eligible for parole and to have no contact with Aaron. The couple married in August 2022 after dating for several years. Court filings show their relationship began to fracture in late 2023 amid allegations that Victoria was involved with “multiple men,” including Amato. Aaron told reporters outside the courthouse that he is undergoing therapy “to process the betrayal” and hopes to focus on new paranormal projects once the divorce is finalized. “I'm grateful to the fans who have reached out,” he said. “Their support reminds me that there are still good people out there.” Victoria Goodwin was led from the courtroom by marshals to begin her sentence at the Florence McClure Women's Correctional Center. With credit for the 92 days already served, she could leave prison as early as 2028 — a possibility her former husband still finds unnerving. “Whether she serves the minimum or the maximum, I'll be looking over my shoulder,” Aaron said. “But at least today the court affirmed that what happened to me deserves prison time.” Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Inside the Sandra Birchmore Cover-Up: Grooming, Power, and a Staged Suicide  Sandra Birchmore was 23, pregnant, and living alone when she was found dead in her Canton, Massachusetts apartment in 2021. The initial ruling? Suicide. But now—thanks to a federal indictment—that story is unraveling fast. In this episode, we break down the disturbing case of Sandra Birchmore, who prosecutors say was groomed and exploited for years by Stoughton Police Officer Matthew Farwell. Farwell met Sandra through a police youth mentorship program when she was just 13. By 15, he was in a sexual relationship with her. By 23, she was pregnant with a child she believed was his. Then she turned up dead. Prosecutors allege Farwell strangled her to keep her quiet, then staged the scene to look like a suicide. Years passed before the FBI stepped in—exposing what many believe to be a shocking abuse of power. And Farwell isn't the only name caught in the fallout. Other officers allegedly had ties to Sandra, yet walked away uncharged. Some resigned. Some let their police certifications quietly expire. And all the while, Sandra's family was left to fight for the truth. We unpack the federal case, the DNA twist that shattered everything Sandra believed, the silence of those around her, and the ugly reality of what happens when predators wear badges. This isn't just about one murder. It's about a system that let it happen—and almost let it disappear. Subscribe and listen as we ask the hard questions. Was this justice delayed—or justice nearly buried? #SandraBirchmore #TrueCrime #PoliceCorruption #Grooming #JusticeForSandra #FederalIndictment #CoverUp #SystemicFailure #VictimsVoices #TrueCrimePodcast    Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872 

 Inside the Sandra Birchmore Cover-Up: Grooming, Power, and a Staged Suicide  Sandra Birchmore was 23, pregnant, and living alone when she was found dead in her Canton, Massachusetts apartment in 2021. The initial ruling? Suicide. But now—thanks to a federal indictment—that story is unraveling fast. In this episode, we break down the disturbing case of Sandra Birchmore, who prosecutors say was groomed and exploited for years by Stoughton Police Officer Matthew Farwell. Farwell met Sandra through a police youth mentorship program when she was just 13. By 15, he was in a sexual relationship with her. By 23, she was pregnant with a child she believed was his. Then she turned up dead. Prosecutors allege Farwell strangled her to keep her quiet, then staged the scene to look like a suicide. Years passed before the FBI stepped in—exposing what many believe to be a shocking abuse of power. And Farwell isn't the only name caught in the fallout. Other officers allegedly had ties to Sandra, yet walked away uncharged. Some resigned. Some let their police certifications quietly expire. And all the while, Sandra's family was left to fight for the truth. We unpack the federal case, the DNA twist that shattered everything Sandra believed, the silence of those around her, and the ugly reality of what happens when predators wear badges. This isn't just about one murder. It's about a system that let it happen—and almost let it disappear. Subscribe and listen as we ask the hard questions. Was this justice delayed—or justice nearly buried? #SandraBirchmore #TrueCrime #PoliceCorruption #Grooming #JusticeForSandra #FederalIndictment #CoverUp #SystemicFailure #VictimsVoices #TrueCrimePodcast    Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872 

‘Ghost Adventures' Star's Estranged Wife Gets Up to 7½ Years for Murder-for-Hire Plot A Las Vegas judge has sentenced Victoria Goodwin — the estranged wife of “Ghost Adventures” investigator Aaron Goodwin — to three to seven-and-a-half years in state prison for plotting to have the reality-TV star murdered. Judge Nadia Krall handed down the 36- to 90-month term on Thursday, June 5, after the 32-year-old tearfully admitted that she conspired with convicted family killer Grant Amato to arrange a contract hit on her husband. Goodwin pleaded guilty in April to a single count of conspiracy to commit murder, part of a deal that spared her the possibility of a longer sentence on additional solicitation charges. Prosecutors said she began exchanging letters, phone calls, and illicit text messages with Amato in early 2024, shortly after she saw him featured in the Paramount+ docuseries Ctrl + Alt + Desire. Amato is serving life in a Florida prison for the 2019 slayings of his parents and brother. According to police testimony, prison staff found a contraband cellphone in Amato's possession last winter. The device contained dozens of messages from Victoria that included the couple's Las Vegas address, Aaron Goodwin's daily routine, and a proposed “payment plan” for the killing. “Am I a bad person because I chose to end his existence, not divorce?” she wrote in one exchange, investigators told the court. Detectives informed Aaron Goodwin of the alleged plot only after his wife's arrest on March 6. The 49-year-old cinematographer — a regular on Discovery's long-running paranormal series — filed for divorce within days and began traveling with armed security. “For seven years I thought I was in the most loving marriage with my best friend,” he told the court, choking back tears. “Now I'll never feel safe again.” Addressing the bench, Aaron said Victoria had “spent almost all our savings” trying to keep the scheme secret while carrying on what prosecutors described as an “emotional and spiritual marriage” with Amato. “The fact that this person did all this to me with no care or love in her heart — I will never be the same,” he said, urging Krall to impose prison time. Victoria, shackled and wearing jail attire, offered an equally emotional apology moments before sentencing. “I recognize my stupidity and the terrible crime against Aaron,” she sobbed. “I pray you find joy and peace again, and I promise you'll never see or hear from me.” She also apologized to the court, calling the plot her “rock bottom.” Deputy District Attorney Jillian Strout countered that the apology rang hollow, noting that Victoria never tried to halt the plan until law enforcement intervened. “She provided location, timing, and payment details; the wheels were in motion,” Strout said, adding that an unidentified accomplice outside the prison was prepared to carry out the killing. Amato has not been charged in Nevada, though authorities say their investigation remains open. Defense attorney Brandon Albright asked for probation, pointing to Victoria's “severe mental-health struggles” and the fact that the murder was never actually attempted. Judge Krall rejected the request. “This was not a fantasy,” she said. “The steps taken moved this crime from thought to preparation.” Krall imposed the maximum term allowed under the plea agreement, ordering Victoria to serve at least three years before she is eligible for parole and to have no contact with Aaron. The couple married in August 2022 after dating for several years. Court filings show their relationship began to fracture in late 2023 amid allegations that Victoria was involved with “multiple men,” including Amato. Aaron told reporters outside the courthouse that he is undergoing therapy “to process the betrayal” and hopes to focus on new paranormal projects once the divorce is finalized. “I'm grateful to the fans who have reached out,” he said. “Their support reminds me that there are still good people out there.” Victoria Goodwin was led from the courtroom by marshals to begin her sentence at the Florence McClure Women's Correctional Center. With credit for the 92 days already served, she could leave prison as early as 2028 — a possibility her former husband still finds unnerving. “Whether she serves the minimum or the maximum, I'll be looking over my shoulder,” Aaron said. “But at least today the court affirmed that what happened to me deserves prison time.” Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Send Kris and Rob a Text Message!In Part Two of The Scarsdale Diet Murder, we pick up where the gunshots left off. Dr. Herman Tarnower—the cardiologist behind The Scarsdale Diet—was dead, and his longtime lover Jean Harris was in handcuffs. But the real battle had just begun.What followed was a 14-week media-frenzied trial, filled with courtroom theatrics, handwritten, ten page love letters, prescription drugs, and a defense that teetered between suicide attempt and emotional collapse. Prosecutors painted Jean as a jealous, calculating killer. The defense claimed she was a broken woman, unraveling under years of psychological manipulation and amphetamines prescribed by the man she ultimately shot.The jury didn't buy it.Jean Harris was found guilty of second-degree murder and sentenced to 15 years to life. She would go on to serve 12 years behind bars before then-New York Governor Mario Cuomo commuted her sentence at age 69.In this episode, we break down the trial, the aftermath, and the transformation of Jean Harris—from prep school headmistress to convicted murderer to prison reform advocate.sources used for this podcastSupport the showJOIN THE HITCHED 2 HOMICIDE IN-LAWS AND OUTLAWSSTART KRIS CALVERT'S BOOKS TODAY FOR FREEH2H WEBSITEH2H on TWITTERH2H on INSTA

Count 4 of the federal indictment against Sean "Diddy" Combs charges him with transporting Victim 1, identified as Cassie Ventura, across state lines with the intent to engage her in prostitution. Prosecutors allege that between 2009 and 2018, Combs orchestrated and facilitated "freak-off" events—drug-fueled sexual encounters involving male escorts—which he directed, filmed, and used to exert control over Ventura. These events reportedly took place in various locations, including New York City, Los Angeles, and Miami. The prosecution argues that Combs used his influence and resources to transport Ventura and other women to these events, where they were coerced into participating in commercial sex acts. Evidence presented includes travel records and communications that suggest the transportation was part of a broader scheme to exploit women for prostitution.In response, Combs' defense team contends that the interactions were consensual and part of a private, non-criminal lifestyle. They argue that Ventura willingly participated in these events and that the transportation was not for the purpose of engaging her in prostitution. The defense also points to the absence of direct evidence linking the transportation to prostitution, suggesting that the charges are based on assumptions rather than concrete proof. The outcome of this count will depend on the jury's assessment of the credibility of the evidence and testimonies presented, including the context of the relationships and the nature of the events in question.to contact  me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Count 5 of the federal indictment against Sean "Diddy" Combs charges him with transporting Victim 2, referred to as "Jane," and male commercial sex workers across state lines with the intent to engage in prostitution between 2021 and 2024. Prosecutors allege that Combs orchestrated and facilitated "freak-off" events—drug-fueled sexual encounters involving male escorts—which he directed, filmed, and used to exert control over Jane. These events reportedly took place in various locations, including New York City, Los Angeles, and Miami. The prosecution's claim hinges on the idea that Jane was not participating in these acts voluntarily but was instead coerced or manipulated into doing so under duress, a key aspect of the trafficking charge under federal law. If the prosecution's evidence is found to be credible, it would prove that Combs played a central role in exploiting Jane, using his power and influence to subject her to coercive circumstancesIn response, Combs' defense team contends that the interactions were consensual and part of a private, non-criminal lifestyle. They argue that Jane willingly participated in these events and that the transportation was not for the purpose of engaging her in prostitution. The defense also points to the absence of direct evidence linking the transportation to prostitution, suggesting that the charges are based on assumptions rather than concrete proof. The outcome of this count will depend on the jury's assessment of the credibility of the evidence and testimonies presented, including the context of the relationships and the nature of the events in question.to  contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

This Day in Legal History: Alien ActOn June 25, 1798, the United States Congress passed the Alien Act, one of the four laws collectively known as the Alien and Sedition Acts. Signed into law by President John Adams, the Alien Act authorized the president to order the deportation of any non-citizen deemed "dangerous to the peace and safety of the United States." This law emerged during a time of heightened political tension and fear of foreign influence, particularly as hostilities with France escalated during the Quasi-War. The Federalist-controlled government promoted the act as a necessary measure to protect national security, but it quickly drew criticism from the rival Democratic-Republican Party.Critics argued the act violated fundamental principles of due process and civil liberties, granting the executive branch unchecked power over immigration and expulsion. The law did not require a criminal conviction or even a hearing, allowing deportation based solely on presidential discretion. Although the Alien Act had a two-year sunset clause and was never directly enforced through mass deportations, its passage contributed to a growing divide between Federalists and Jeffersonians.The broader set of Alien and Sedition Acts also targeted political dissent, with the Sedition Act criminalizing speech critical of the government. These laws played a central role in the 1800 presidential election, fueling opposition that ultimately helped Thomas Jefferson defeat John Adams. In the long run, the Alien Act became emblematic of federal overreach and was widely viewed as an overreaction to perceived threats. It underscored early challenges in balancing national security with individual rights and helped lay the groundwork for later debates on immigration and executive authority.A decade after the Supreme Court's landmark ruling in Obergefell v. Hodges, a Christian legal group is preparing to challenge the decision that legalized same-sex marriage nationwide. The move comes amid broader conservative momentum, including a Southern Baptist Convention resolution calling for the ruling's repeal and a recent Supreme Court decision upholding Tennessee's ban on gender-affirming care for minors. Despite these developments, legal experts, including conservatives, see little chance the Court will take up the challenge. John Bursch, a former Obergefell litigator, noted that overturning such a major precedent typically requires both time and significant public advocacy—Roe v. Wade, for instance, remained in force for nearly 50 years before being overturned in Dobbs.Nonetheless, Liberty Counsel is moving forward with a Supreme Court appeal on behalf of Kim Davis, the Kentucky clerk who refused to issue a marriage license to a same-sex couple just days after Obergefell. Davis was found liable for $100,000 in emotional distress damages, and the group will argue that her actions were protected by the First Amendment. The Sixth Circuit rejected that argument, stating that Davis acted as a public official and thus could not claim constitutional protection for her refusal. Liberty Counsel also intends to ask the Court to reconsider the core ruling in Obergefell, comparing their strategy to how Dobbs upended abortion rights.Legal observers remain skeptical. The Supreme Court already declined to hear Davis's earlier appeal, and while Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito expressed concerns about the scope of Obergefell, they said Davis had not properly raised the issue in lower courts. That procedural misstep could again doom her case. Meanwhile, political efforts are mounting in conservative states, with resolutions and bills promoting "covenant marriage" that excludes same-sex couples. Still, critics such as the ACLU see these moves as largely symbolic and lacking real legal traction.Same-Sex Marriage Challenge Seen as Long Shot at Supreme CourtA new ruling in the case Bartz et al v. Anthropic PBC has provided the first major legal decision on whether training generative AI models qualifies as fair use under U.S. copyright law. District Judge William Alsup concluded that using legitimately purchased books to train AI models like Anthropic's Claude counts as transformative fair use, as long as the books are bought for training and then destroyed afterward. This decision gives AI developers a tentative legal framework, or “roadmap,” for creating compliant large language models, though the ruling is not without limits. Alsup allowed separate claims involving pirated training materials to proceed to trial, drawing a sharp line between lawful acquisition and copyright infringement.The court's ruling highlights the four traditional fair use factors, placing significant weight on the transformative nature of AI training while minimizing the importance of its commercial impact on the original market. Alsup asserted that the use was transformative enough to outweigh concerns over licensing markets, suggesting that AI training doesn't necessarily harm authors' ability to profit from their work. This view diverges from recent interpretations emphasizing market harm, such as the Supreme Court's 2022 Warhol decision. While this reasoning favors developers, it also creates tension with copyright owners, who argue the ruling downplays existing licensing practices.The decision notably distances itself from claims involving pirated materials. Alsup treated the copying and use of pirated books as a separate issue that may still result in substantial liability, including statutory damages. This split decision—approving the use of lawfully acquired materials but scrutinizing pirated content—offers a compromise approach that courts in similar cases might adopt. With multiple lawsuits against OpenAI and Meta pending, Alsup's ruling could influence upcoming decisions, though judges in other districts may interpret the law differently. The opinion suggests that training can be transformative and lawful under certain conditions but reinforces that AI companies must source training data responsibly.Mixed Anthropic Ruling Builds Roadmap for Generative AI Fair UseAnthropic wins key US ruling on AI training in authors' copyright lawsuit | ReutersKilmar Abrego Garcia, a Salvadoran national previously deported under the Trump administration despite a court order barring his removal, is set to appear in a Nashville court to determine the terms of his release from jail. A U.S. magistrate judge ruled that Abrego could not be detained pending trial, citing insufficient evidence that he poses a danger. Abrego has pleaded not guilty to charges of conspiring to smuggle migrants into the U.S., accusations his legal team argues were intended to justify his unlawful deportation. His case has drawn attention as a symbol of the Trump administration's controversial immigration policies and has sparked civil rights concerns.The court noted that even if Abrego is released from criminal custody, immigration authorities may still detain him. The judge questioned the reliability of the government's witnesses, many of whom are convicted smugglers or deportees seeking leniency. Prosecutors allege Abrego transported migrants, including minors, on over 100 trips between Texas and Maryland, often accompanied by his own children to avoid suspicion. However, the court viewed these claims skeptically due to the witnesses' motivations and criminal backgrounds.U.S. officials initially labeled his deportation an “administrative error” and resisted calls to return him, raising further due process concerns. Another judge is investigating whether the administration violated court orders related to his removal. Ultimately, the Justice Department brought Abrego back to face charges, but the judge's recent ruling underscores the court's commitment to ensuring his constitutional rights are respected.Returned deportee Abrego due in US court over bail conditions | Reuters This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

Is Barry Morphew Guilty Or Innocent? Barry Morphew was first thrust into the national spotlight in May 2020, when his wife Suzanne Morphew vanished from their home in Salida, Colorado, on Mother's Day weekend. Barry told police she went for a bike ride and never returned. But almost immediately, investigators began to suspect foul play—and Barry became their primary focus. A year later, in 2021, Barry was arrested and charged with first-degree murder, even though Suzanne's body hadn't been found. Prosecutors laid out a circumstantial case built on digital data, suspicious behavior, and a crumbling marriage. But after major missteps by the prosecution—including withheld evidence and discovery violations—the case collapsed in 2022 and the charges were dropped. Then in 2023, Suzanne's remains were finally discovered in a remote area of Colorado. A forensic bombshell followed: BAM, a rare tranquilizer used on wildlife, was found in her bones. Barry, who had experience using BAM from his days as a deer farmer, was re-indicted in 2025. Prosecutors now say this evidence links him directly to Suzanne's death. Barry Morphew maintains his innocence, and his defense argues the case is still circumstantial, flawed, and built on faulty assumptions. The question facing the courts—and the public—is whether this time, the evidence will finally be enough to hold him accountable.  PROSECUTORS SAY HE DID IT • Suzanne's remains were found in 2023 with BAM (a rare wildlife tranquilizer) in her bones. • Barry was the ONLY private individual in the area known to have purchased BAM (from Indiana, during deer farming). • A plastic syringe cap from a dart was found in the family dryer with Barry's shorts. • Barry's phone went into airplane mode minutes after Suzanne's final message. He went “dark” for ~8 hours. • His truck telemetry system also failed to log during key early morning hours on May 10 — the exact time he claimed he was driving to a job site. • Surveillance showed Barry dumping unknown trash in 5+ commercial dumpsters on May 10 — and couldn't say what he threw away. • A cracked bedroom doorframe suggested a violent altercation. Barry denied knowing how it got there. • Suzanne had just told Barry (via text): “I'm done.” • She was having a secret 2-year affair and planned to leave him. • Barry told police their marriage was “great.” Suzanne's texts said she felt unsafe.  DEFENSE SAYS IT'S REASONABLE DOUBT • No BAM or tranquilizer vials were found during 2020 searches. • Dart gun was found disassembled. No proof it was recently used. • The “syringe cap” had no prints, no DNA, and couldn't be dated. • No murder weapon was recovered. • No blood. No trace evidence. No eyewitness. No confession. • Suzanne's cause of death is “homicide in the setting of BAM intoxication,” but there's no confirmed mechanism (e.g. suffocation, overdose, blunt trauma). • Unidentified male DNA was found on Suzanne's car and bike helmet — linked via CODIS to known sex offenders in other states. • Prosecutors say they ruled out these men by location. But the origin of the DNA? Still unexplained. • Barry's defense argues the entire case is circumstantial and built around prosecutorial bias. • The 2022 case collapsed due to major discovery violations. Judge barred 14 expert witnesses. Charges were dropped. THE QUESTION IS: Did Barry use a rare tranquilizer only he had access to, kill Suzanne, and cover it up? Or is this a story of a man wrongly accused, with sloppy investigation and missing forensic proof? What do YOU believe? Reply below. #BarryMorphew #SuzanneMorphew #TrueCrime #BAMEvidence #ReasonableDoubt #ColdCase #DigitalForensics #JusticeForSuzanne Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Is Barry Morphew Guilty Or Innocent? Barry Morphew was first thrust into the national spotlight in May 2020, when his wife Suzanne Morphew vanished from their home in Salida, Colorado, on Mother's Day weekend. Barry told police she went for a bike ride and never returned. But almost immediately, investigators began to suspect foul play—and Barry became their primary focus. A year later, in 2021, Barry was arrested and charged with first-degree murder, even though Suzanne's body hadn't been found. Prosecutors laid out a circumstantial case built on digital data, suspicious behavior, and a crumbling marriage. But after major missteps by the prosecution—including withheld evidence and discovery violations—the case collapsed in 2022 and the charges were dropped. Then in 2023, Suzanne's remains were finally discovered in a remote area of Colorado. A forensic bombshell followed: BAM, a rare tranquilizer used on wildlife, was found in her bones. Barry, who had experience using BAM from his days as a deer farmer, was re-indicted in 2025. Prosecutors now say this evidence links him directly to Suzanne's death. Barry Morphew maintains his innocence, and his defense argues the case is still circumstantial, flawed, and built on faulty assumptions. The question facing the courts—and the public—is whether this time, the evidence will finally be enough to hold him accountable.  PROSECUTORS SAY HE DID IT • Suzanne's remains were found in 2023 with BAM (a rare wildlife tranquilizer) in her bones. • Barry was the ONLY private individual in the area known to have purchased BAM (from Indiana, during deer farming). • A plastic syringe cap from a dart was found in the family dryer with Barry's shorts. • Barry's phone went into airplane mode minutes after Suzanne's final message. He went “dark” for ~8 hours. • His truck telemetry system also failed to log during key early morning hours on May 10 — the exact time he claimed he was driving to a job site. • Surveillance showed Barry dumping unknown trash in 5+ commercial dumpsters on May 10 — and couldn't say what he threw away. • A cracked bedroom doorframe suggested a violent altercation. Barry denied knowing how it got there. • Suzanne had just told Barry (via text): “I'm done.” • She was having a secret 2-year affair and planned to leave him. • Barry told police their marriage was “great.” Suzanne's texts said she felt unsafe.  DEFENSE SAYS IT'S REASONABLE DOUBT • No BAM or tranquilizer vials were found during 2020 searches. • Dart gun was found disassembled. No proof it was recently used. • The “syringe cap” had no prints, no DNA, and couldn't be dated. • No murder weapon was recovered. • No blood. No trace evidence. No eyewitness. No confession. • Suzanne's cause of death is “homicide in the setting of BAM intoxication,” but there's no confirmed mechanism (e.g. suffocation, overdose, blunt trauma). • Unidentified male DNA was found on Suzanne's car and bike helmet — linked via CODIS to known sex offenders in other states. • Prosecutors say they ruled out these men by location. But the origin of the DNA? Still unexplained. • Barry's defense argues the entire case is circumstantial and built around prosecutorial bias. • The 2022 case collapsed due to major discovery violations. Judge barred 14 expert witnesses. Charges were dropped. THE QUESTION IS: Did Barry use a rare tranquilizer only he had access to, kill Suzanne, and cover it up? Or is this a story of a man wrongly accused, with sloppy investigation and missing forensic proof? What do YOU believe? Reply below. #BarryMorphew #SuzanneMorphew #TrueCrime #BAMEvidence #ReasonableDoubt #ColdCase #DigitalForensics #JusticeForSuzanne Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Record breaking heat today. The heat emergence continues today. The Celtics traded Jrue Holiday to the Trailblazers. The Oklahoma City Thunder are NBA champs and will have their celebratory parade today. A state police lieutenant was hit with a stolen motorcycle on revere beach boulevard; he is in critical condition. Prosecutors in the Diddy trial may rest their case as early as today, the defense may not call a single witness. Jeff Bazos wedding will take place this weekend. The Cambridge taste food festival has been moved to tomorrow due to the heat.  

Melesa Johnson, Jackson County Prosecutor | 6-24-25See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Few figures in Latin American politics polarize opinion like Colombia's former president, Álvaro Uribe. Right now, Uribe, Colombia's president from 2002 to 2010, faces charges of bribery, procedural fraud, and bribery in a judicial proceeding. Prosecutors must determine whether he instigated others to manipulate witness testimony in an attempt to mislead the judiciary for his benefit.   So, along with Adriaan Alsema, director of Colombia Reports, we take a deep dive into the "early years" from Uribe's birth in Salgar, Antioquia and up until his campaign to become governor of the department, taking in his education, his role on the Medellin city council, director of Aerocivil, Mayor of Medellin and many family connections.    Allegations of ties to drug cartels and paramilitaries have dogged him since the early 1980s, when the civil aviation agency he then led was accused of giving air licenses to drug traffickers. Declassified State Department cables from a decade later show U.S. officials were told the up-and-coming politician had ties to cartels.   In future episodes we will look at further details surrounding Colombia's most powerful political force.    The Colombia Briefing is reported by Emily Hart. 

In March 2025, a professional photographer filed a lawsuit against Sean "Diddy" Combs in the New York State Supreme Court, alleging sexual battery. The plaintiff, identified as John Doe, claims that during a commercial shoot in late 2022 or early 2023, Combs invited him into his trailer under the pretense of discussing career opportunities. Once inside, Combs allegedly pressured Doe to engage in sexual acts, suggesting that compliance would advance his career. The lawsuit details that after Doe refused, Combs threatened him with physical violence and expelled him from the trailer. Doe asserts that he returned to work, grappling with the trauma of the encounter.Combs' legal team has denied the allegations, stating that he has "never sexually assaulted or sex trafficked anyone—man or woman, adult or minor." They assert confidence in the judicial process and anticipate prevailing in court. This lawsuit adds to a series of legal challenges Combs faces, including multiple allegations of sexual misconduct and assault spanning several decades. As of now, Combs remains incarcerated on unrelated charges, with a trial set for May 2025.On March 14, 2025, Sean "Diddy" Combs appeared in Manhattan federal court, pleading not guilty to a superseding indictment that expands previous charges to include allegations of forced labor. Prosecutors assert that between 2004 and 2024, Combs exploited his business empire to coerce employees into grueling work conditions and threatened those who resisted, as part of a broader sex trafficking and racketeering conspiracy.During the hearing, Combs, 55, appeared with noticeable physical changes, sporting gray hair and a beard. The court discussed the admissibility of a hotel surveillance video from 2016, allegedly showing Combs assaulting his former girlfriend, Cassie Ventura. His defense contends the footage is misleading and manipulated. Combs has been detained without bail since his September 2024 arrest, with his trial scheduled to commence on May 5, 2025.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

The prosecution has presented a detailed case against Sean "Diddy" Combs on Count Two of his federal indictment, which accuses him of sex trafficking by force, fraud, or coercion involving his former girlfriend, Casandra “Cassie” Ventura. Testimony from witnesses and evidence of digital communications between Diddy and Cassie have painted a troubling picture of manipulation and control. Prosecutors argue that Diddy used his power and influence to coerce Cassie into engaging in sex acts with other individuals under duress, maintaining control over her through a mix of threats, promises, and financial leverage. The prosecution also highlighted a pattern of emotional abuse and psychological pressure, underscoring the imbalance of power in their relationship and the ongoing exploitation Cassie faced during their time together. Additionally, the government introduced testimony suggesting that Diddy's management of Cassie's career was a tool to further his control over her, with career opportunities and personal favors tied to her compliance.Forensic evidence and witness statements have supported the allegations, with some individuals describing how Diddy would demand services from Cassie and other women under the guise of business or professional obligations. These claims of sex trafficking are bolstered by text messages and other forms of communication where Diddy's coercive tactics were allegedly evident. Despite the gravity of these accusations, the defense has denied the allegations, presenting their own version of events that disputes the characterization of Diddy's actions as coercive or criminal. The jury will now face the critical task of determining whether the prosecution's portrayal of exploitation is convincing enough to overcome the defense's argument, and if Diddy's actions truly amounted to trafficking by force, fraud, or coercion, or if the evidence is insufficient to support such a serious charge.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Is Barry Morphew Guilty Or Innocent? Barry Morphew was first thrust into the national spotlight in May 2020, when his wife Suzanne Morphew vanished from their home in Salida, Colorado, on Mother's Day weekend. Barry told police she went for a bike ride and never returned. But almost immediately, investigators began to suspect foul play—and Barry became their primary focus. A year later, in 2021, Barry was arrested and charged with first-degree murder, even though Suzanne's body hadn't been found. Prosecutors laid out a circumstantial case built on digital data, suspicious behavior, and a crumbling marriage. But after major missteps by the prosecution—including withheld evidence and discovery violations—the case collapsed in 2022 and the charges were dropped. Then in 2023, Suzanne's remains were finally discovered in a remote area of Colorado. A forensic bombshell followed: BAM, a rare tranquilizer used on wildlife, was found in her bones. Barry, who had experience using BAM from his days as a deer farmer, was re-indicted in 2025. Prosecutors now say this evidence links him directly to Suzanne's death. Barry Morphew maintains his innocence, and his defense argues the case is still circumstantial, flawed, and built on faulty assumptions. The question facing the courts—and the public—is whether this time, the evidence will finally be enough to hold him accountable.  PROSECUTORS SAY HE DID IT • Suzanne's remains were found in 2023 with BAM (a rare wildlife tranquilizer) in her bones. • Barry was the ONLY private individual in the area known to have purchased BAM (from Indiana, during deer farming). • A plastic syringe cap from a dart was found in the family dryer with Barry's shorts. • Barry's phone went into airplane mode minutes after Suzanne's final message. He went “dark” for ~8 hours. • His truck telemetry system also failed to log during key early morning hours on May 10 — the exact time he claimed he was driving to a job site. • Surveillance showed Barry dumping unknown trash in 5+ commercial dumpsters on May 10 — and couldn't say what he threw away. • A cracked bedroom doorframe suggested a violent altercation. Barry denied knowing how it got there. • Suzanne had just told Barry (via text): “I'm done.” • She was having a secret 2-year affair and planned to leave him. • Barry told police their marriage was “great.” Suzanne's texts said she felt unsafe.  DEFENSE SAYS IT'S REASONABLE DOUBT • No BAM or tranquilizer vials were found during 2020 searches. • Dart gun was found disassembled. No proof it was recently used. • The “syringe cap” had no prints, no DNA, and couldn't be dated. • No murder weapon was recovered. • No blood. No trace evidence. No eyewitness. No confession. • Suzanne's cause of death is “homicide in the setting of BAM intoxication,” but there's no confirmed mechanism (e.g. suffocation, overdose, blunt trauma). • Unidentified male DNA was found on Suzanne's car and bike helmet — linked via CODIS to known sex offenders in other states. • Prosecutors say they ruled out these men by location. But the origin of the DNA? Still unexplained. • Barry's defense argues the entire case is circumstantial and built around prosecutorial bias. • The 2022 case collapsed due to major discovery violations. Judge barred 14 expert witnesses. Charges were dropped. THE QUESTION IS: Did Barry use a rare tranquilizer only he had access to, kill Suzanne, and cover it up? Or is this a story of a man wrongly accused, with sloppy investigation and missing forensic proof? What do YOU believe? Reply below. #BarryMorphew #SuzanneMorphew #TrueCrime #BAMEvidence #ReasonableDoubt #ColdCase #DigitalForensics #JusticeForSuzanne Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

The White House is playing down President Donald Trump's comments about a regime change in Iran. GOP leaders are trying to push through Trump's domestic policy bill. Prosecutors are wrapping up their case against Sean “Diddy” Combs this week. Police say they stopped a mass shooting at a church in Michigan. Plus, we'll tell you which grocery chain is closing stores. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

In one of the most confounding true crime stories of the last decade, the Barry and Suzanne Morphew case spans five years of mystery, failed prosecution, and a stunning re-indictment. Suzanne disappeared on Mother's Day 2020. Her husband Barry said she went for a bike ride and never returned. But as investigators dug deeper, they uncovered a tangled timeline of GPS anomalies, suspicious dumpster runs, secret affairs, and an unsettling piece of plastic—a tranquilizer dart cap in the family dryer. Barry was charged with first-degree murder in 2021, only to have the case fall apart in court due to major discovery violations. Prosecutors failed to turn over DNA evidence that matched unknown males and lost 14 of their 16 expert witnesses after a judge sanctioned them for misconduct.  The trial was dropped days before it began, and Barry walked free—for a while. Then, in 2023, Suzanne's remains were discovered in a remote Colorado grave. What forensic toxicologists found in her bones shocked even seasoned investigators: traces of BAM, a wildlife tranquilizer mixture only one private citizen in the region had access to—Barry Morphew. This video unpacks every detail: from Suzanne's last known messages and Barry's “chipmunk” alibi, to the psychological profile of a man accused twice, and the forensic breakthroughs that changed everything. No speculation. No fluff. Just verified timelines, legal records, and the disturbing puzzle pieces that brought Barry Morphew back into custody in 2025. If you're into criminal psychology, prosecutorial failures, forensic science, and the haunting mystery of what happened to Suzanne Morphew, this is the breakdown you've been waiting for. #BarryMorphew #SuzanneMorphew #TrueCrime #Forensics #ColdCase #DNAEvidence #BAMTranquilizer #ProsecutorialMisconduct #HiddenKillers #TrueCrimeCommunity    Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872