Saiesha’s Political Hypothesis

Gender inequality is one of the most primitive and oldest forms of inequality. Sadly, it is still very much a reality in most parts of the world. In many countries women do not have equal access to education, healthcare, safety, work or political decision-making. Today we discuss whether gender quotas are a truly viable way to tackle such a deep rooted inequality.

Examining the significant similarities between the UK and US judiciaires

An episode after a LONG break, but we're back. In this one, we discuss a source, something that's very important when interpreting political data. The link to the source : https://classroom.google.com/u/0/c/MjQxMDg2MTQwOTZa/a/MjI1NDU0NDA1MTky/details

I found a really interesting article defending some arguments against the Electoral College that I previously had, it's from the National Affairs by Allen Guelzo, and in this episode, I discuss it. Let me know your views and thoughts!

Today we split the podcast up into 2 sections, before Trump made his Barret nomination and after. Sources I used : https://www.npr.org/2018/06/29/624467256/what-happened-with-merrick-garland-in-2016-and-why-it-matters-now https://www.google.ae/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2020/09/21/politics/amy-coney-barrett-supreme-court/index.html

I evaluate the extent to which social and economic factors influence the way we vote

Functions include : representation, legitimization, legislation, accountability, scrutiny. Let's explore how and if they're truly and genuinely effectively carried out in the UK.

I took inspirations from a few stories I've heard online and experiences to collate this episode, hope you enjoy! https://www.thenewequilibrium.co.uk/topstories/log-kya-kahenge-what-netflixs-indian-matchmaking-reveals-about-the-fight-for-feminism-in-south-asian-culture

Prayers going out to Reva's family for the horrible events that she must have gone through that night. ❤️ Sources I used: The mental element in murder : https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=1auYX3ijhDQ Introduction and forensics : https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=9wOhvqjOHwk Ballistics & forensics evidence : https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=8NrfoR9sMus

Sources I used and strongly urge you to read : 1) https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/india-35-million-deaths-britain-shashi-tharoor-british-empire-a7627041.html 2) https://www.varsity.co.uk/features/19559 3) https://www.varsity.co.uk/features/19559

After 18 years of Conservative rule, how did the Labour party manage it's 179-seat majority under Tony Blair? Was it down to the media? Bad Conservative reputation? Their commitments to improving protection of human rights? Find out more on today's episode.

Given Kanye's tweet on the 4th of July 2020, I wanted to do some research of my own regarding the legitimacy of him actually being able to run for president. Information influenced by Eve Cornwell.

Diving into something more legal than political this episode. Contract law has always been something that's intrigued me considering the different elements that go into making a contract legally enforceable. The sources and cases used: 1. Balfour v Balfour 1919, Carlil v Carbonic Smolkr Ball Company 1893, Chappel v Nestle 1960, Arrale v Constain Civil Engineering Ltd 1976, Roscorla v Thomas 1842, Pinnel's Case 1602, Williams v Roffey Bro's & Nicholls 1991, Collier v Wright 2008, Gay Choon Ing v Loh Sze Ti Terence Perer 2009, Wells v Devani 2019

I made a google document filled with resources - https://docs.google.com/document/d/1xQFIrUtRfXkPNO2aJ_wkYOiVWFBz7rTDgBjNnKh7Df0/edit?usp=sharing It is more important than anything to spread awareness and to actively challenge our legal system against racism and inequalities in all forms.

The advocacy for gender quotas in our society leads to people mischaracterizing the feminist movement as misandrist when in fact it was intended to be a means in achieving empowerment.

This case has been surrounded by ethical/ moral debate and was one of the cases that sparked my legal interest. I discuss some legislation that was used in her case, as well as my stance on how the court handled the topic of morality in her case.

I focus more on the legal side of this discussion as that's what interested me with this topic the most. The confusion over its legality makes the issue extremely controversial, however this does not make it any less disturbing than the symbols already are.

Constitutions organize, distribute and regulate state power. The unwritten or arguably ‘uncodified' constituion of Britain is largely due to its history with colonialism and it's international relations.

A philosophical approach on the ‘post-truth era' that we are dubbed to be living in. I look at the origins of ‘fake news' and how that has made an impact in history, a really interesting concept about intrinsic value and human nature. This links to politics as campaigns and manifestos are built on fiction, whether they will be carried out effectively or not.

The COVID-19 pandemic has affected billions globally and the economic recession it has caused is unprecedented in our society. In this episode we discuss (with our first guest) how detrimental it is to UK's economy.

The current electoral system is First Past The Post, where if you win even +1 vote than the next party, YOU TAKE ALL. (Therefore the "winner takes all" saying) Some constituants feel unheard under this system, and suggest a proportional system instead of a plurality one, where the number of votes = number of seats in the house of commons. I discuss the advantages and disadvantages of both system along with examples as fresh as the 2019 General Election to support my argument for there being no need to replace the current FPTP system.

With the AV referendum gaining 68% votes to keep the FPTP system of representative democracy and the Brexit EU referendum that caused political unrest, it is crucial to consider and provide an argument for both sides of the story.

Feminism being a concern of the private or public sphere is a pressing topic, and with movements such as #MeToo, and Harvey Weinstein's recent trial, I hope to expose compelling arguments for both sides of the store in the hope of widening your beliefs and challenging your ore-existing notions about this topic!

Widening the franchise to 16+ has been a conversation of great conflict in the UK for years. I hope to expose compelling arguments for both sides in the hope of widening your beliefs and challenging your pre-existing notions about this topic. All while learning more and enjoying yourself :)