CANCEL LINCOLN

CHECK OUT OUR STORE! https://www.etsy.com/shop/CancelLincoln?ref=shopNot long after General Robert E Lee's surrender at Appomattox in April 1865, the president of the Confederate States, Jefferson Davis, was captured and taken into the Union's custody. Davis was set to be put on trial and publicly made an example of in court in an epic way, as a consequence for the accusation of treason levied against him by the Federal Government. Additionally the North was counting on a verdict of guilty to put a seal of constitutional approval on its invasion of the South. But things wouldn't turn out as expected.Follow me on:Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCub_W83v0K8IAPdbKmElx1g Odyssee: https://odysee.com/@vice_signal:5?r=hMkwyZNi3fs2HJ6F96QhBHqF8MWnQqnFBitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/3SgJIq54ZZ0O/Rumble: https://rumble.com/account/content?type=allSpotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/7HhXaN4jdOWvBO3lSIIXQF?si=74CvbnAlT-GdMvlVN5NYSw Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/cancel-lincoln/id1611084856Twitter: https://twitter.com/cancellincoln Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/cancellincoln/Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/betrayalof1776/?ref=pages_you_manage

Just like the South's secession from the Union preceded the Civil War, the secession from the British Empire of the thirteen colonies that would become the United States in 1776, preceded the American Revolution. The only difference between these two secessions is that the Confederacy was prevented from acheiving its independence. But the principles behind each were the same: resistance to tyranny, Liberty, and self governance.Follow me on:Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCub_W83v0K8IAPdbKmElx1gOdyssee: https://odysee.com/@vice_signal:5?r=hMkwyZNi3fs2HJ6F96QhBHqF8MWnQqnFBitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/3SgJIq54ZZ0O/Rumble: https://rumble.com/account/content?type=allSpotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/7HhXaN4jdOWvBO3lSIIXQF?si=74CvbnAlT-GdMvlVN5NYSw Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/cancel-lincoln/id1611084856Twitter: https://twitter.com/cancellincolnInstagram: https://www.instagram.com/cancellincoln/Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/betrayalof1776/?ref=pages_you_manage

The court historian written public school textbooks tend to not mention that when Union soldiers learned that their new proclaimed mission in the Civil War was ending slavery , a preponderance of them were incensed with Lincoln, and a sentiment of betrayal was widespread within the ranks. One of Lincoln's commanders of the army, “Fighting Joe Hooker,” in reaction to the Emancipation Proclamation wrote, "a large element of the army had taken sides against it, declaring that they would never have embarked in the war had they anticipated this action of the government."Follow me on:Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCub_W83v0K8IAPdbKmElx1gOdyssee: https://odysee.com/@vice_signal:5?r=hMkwyZNi3fs2HJ6F96QhBHqF8MWnQqnFBitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/3SgJIq54ZZ0O/Rumble: https://rumble.com/account/content?type=allSpotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/7HhXaN4jdOWvBO3lSIIXQF?si=74CvbnAlT-GdMvlVN5NYSw Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/cancel-lincoln/id1611084856Twitter: https://twitter.com/cancellincolnInstagram: https://www.instagram.com/cancellincoln/Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/betrayalof1776/?ref=pages_you_manage

Ultimately it was the propagation of good political optics for Lincoln which was the intention behind issuing the Emancipation Proclamation, and not benevolence towards slaves. The Proclamation would serve three main purposes. The first, as discussed previously, was to inspire slave uprisings in the Confederacy, which would divert resources and manpower from its fighting force if successful. The second, as mentioned, was rebranding the North's cause in the war into a moral crusade palatable to the Yankee intelligentsia , rather than the real political one, which would mitigate resistance to it. The third, and far less known yet perhaps most significant reason, was a diplomatic one. Follow me on:Odyssee: https://odysee.com/@vice_signal:5?r=hMkwyZNi3fs2HJ6F96QhBHqF8MWnQqnFBitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/3SgJIq54ZZ0O/Rumble: https://rumble.com/account/content?type=allSpotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/7HhXaN4jdOWvBO3lSIIXQF?si=74CvbnAlT-GdMvlVN5NYSw Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/cancel-lincoln/id1611084856Twitter: https://twitter.com/cancellincolnInstagram: https://www.instagram.com/cancellincoln/ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/betrayalof1776/?ref=pages_you_manage

The Union as established by the Founding Fathers was a voluntary one, made up of thirteen sovereign states, and the Southern States no longer wanted to remain in it. However this didn't stop Lincoln from invading and forcing them to stay using violence, much like an abusive husband might brutalize his wife to prevent her from leaving him, and then rape her as punishment. Follow me on:Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/3SgJIq54ZZ0O/Odyssee: https://odysee.com/@vice_signal:5?r=hMkwyZNi3fs2HJ6F96QhBHqF8MWnQqnFRumble: https://rumble.com/account/content?type=allTwitter: https://twitter.com/cancellincolnFacebook: https://www.facebook.com/cancelproofideas/?ref=page_internal

After the war, most former slaves had no other way of making a living other than sharecropping or tenant farming, basically a system in which land owners would lend land to poor farmers in return for either regular rent payments, or half of their crop yield every season. As author and New York Times contributor Phillip Leigh writes, “Sharecropping was not a choice freely made by Southerners after the Civil War.…It was compelled by a regional capital shortage when the only alternative was starvation.” He also writes "If not chattel [legal] slavery, it was a peonage system that enslaved the cropper to a cycle of annual debts and perpetual backbreaking labor. Children as young as four regularly worked in the fields. Poor health was a consequence.”Follow me on:Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/3SgJIq54ZZ0O/Odyssee: https://odysee.com/@vice_signal:5?r=hMkwyZNi3fs2HJ6F96QhBHqF8MWnQqnFRumble: https://rumble.com/account/content?type=allTwitter: https://twitter.com/cancellincolnFacebook: https://www.facebook.com/cancelproofideas/?ref=page_internal

By the early 1800s, most of the Northern U.S. States either abolished slavery by statute or enacted laws to gradually end it, but mostly not out of concern for the well being of blacks, or a belief in racial equality. New Englanders widely believed that blacks were inferior beings, not worthy of sharing a society with, even as slaves; and that any intermingling with them would lead to contamination of their ideal white Christian society. Abraham Lincoln also believed this.Follow me on:Youtube: https://youtu.be/k02IgiBE3q4Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/3SgJIq54ZZ0O/Odyssee: https://odysee.com/@vice_signal:5?r=hMkwyZNi3fs2HJ6F96QhBHqF8MWnQqnFRumble: https://rumble.com/account/content?type=allTwitter: https://twitter.com/cancellincolnFacebook: https://www.facebook.com/cancelproofideas/?ref=page_internal

Massachusetts was the first British colony in America to legalize slavery in 1638. For more than 200 years African slavery existed in Boston, along with Newport, Rhode Island, where by the mid 18th century, 1/3 of its population were slaves. In 1750 there were three times as many slaves in Connecticut as there were in Georgia, and four times as many in Massachusetts. Nearly all New England aristocrats used slaves for farm and household labor. In 1703 more than 42% of New York City households owned slaves.

The Emancipation Proclamation is not what the general public is led to believe it is. This is because it did not actually free any slaves upon its issuance, stating, “all persons held as slaves within any State or designated part of a State, the people whereof shall then be in rebellion against the United States, shall be then, thenceforward, and forever free.” The dictate issued by President Lincoln during the Civil War freed slaves only in territories held by the Confederacy, which, as implied, the Union did not have even the slightest control over. Not only that, but it did not free the over 450,000 slaves in Union States which Lincoln did control, including those owned by his Generals Ulysses Grant snd Sherman.

Following the South initially seceding from the Union, there were two hundred resolutions, and fifty seven amendments proposed in Congress to permanently enshrine slavery into the highest document of the land. On February 28, 1861, with the support of Abraham Lincoln, the U.S. House of Representatives passed the Corwin Amendent, a bill that would make slavery permanent in the United States Constitution.Follow me on:Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/3SgJIq54ZZ0O/Odyssee: https://odysee.com/@vice_signal:5?r=hMkwyZNi3fs2HJ6F96QhBHqF8MWnQqnFRumble: https://rumble.com/account/content?type=allTwitter: https://twitter.com/cancellincolnFacebook: https://www.facebook.com/cancelproofideas/?ref=page_internal

So at this point you may be asking , “Wait, dude, are you saying that Lincoln didn't fight the Civil War to end slavery?” Yes that is correct. There is no historical evidence to indicate that he did, but there is ample evidence to the contrary. For starters Lincoln married into an affluent slave owning family from Kentucky, the Todds, strongly indicating that even on a personal level, he was not an abolitionist.

The egregious negrophobia in Northern states is not the only shameful thing the Yankee written history books tend to minimize about the pre-Civil War period, if not totally ignore. Three states on Lincoln's side of the Civil War initially rejected ratification of the Thirteenth Amendment of the Constitution, which is what ended slavery in the United States.

There's a common belief in the general public, that because Northern states legally ended slavery decades before the Civil War, their communities recognized the human rights of blacks. This is a wrong. As the number of free blacks in the North increased, laws were put in place designed to exclude them from white society, or Black Codes.

For Lincoln, the Plains Indians were not only an obstacle to the construction of railroads, but also an obstacle to his dream of making America a white ethno-state, which is why he fought for decades to deport all blacks from the United States to black colonies, or, reservations of a sort, which were in outside lands. To realize his racially pure utopia, Lincoln became a member and leader of the American Colonization Society, an organization created to publicly encourage and finance the removal of freed blacks in America to Africa, or the “back to Africa” movement as it's widely recognized today.

Racist quotes such as those in the previous episode are the last thing anyone familiar with the historical context in which they were given needs to be convinced that racial tolerance, let alone racial equality, were not exactly popular ideals at the time, especially amongst Lincoln and his allies. This was evidenced not only by their blatant racist statements regarding blacks, but, also, and especially by their genocide of Native Americans.

Many point to Lincoln's opposition to the expansion of slavery into new territories in the rapidly expanding United States of the Antebellum period, as incontrovertible proof that he wished to see the practice abolished. But, just like with everything else in politics, there were more interests behind his position than the general public today is made aware of. While it is inarguable that Lincoln did oppose the expansion of slavery into U.S. territories, he was not motivated by humanitarianism. He was motivated by political power.Watch the video of the episode here: https://youtu.be/aCcwTmZk0Bc

For those who live for the truth, I ask that you suppose that perhaps not all of the narratives of the History of this country that we've inherited are compatible with its facts. I ask you to wonder if maybe not all of our victories were achieved by choosing the “just” path at critical inflection points in our past, and if the politically dystopian world more and more of us witness materializing before our eyes presently is the once predictable consequence of those choices. I ask that you open your mind to the consideration, that perhaps you've been indoctrinated by your government and institutions no less than Mao Zedong, or Stalin, or the Japanese empire indoctrinated their own people for their own selfish ends. I ask that you consider, that the story we've been told about some of our treasured historical heroes are fables, and that the messianic story of President Abraham Lincoln is one such fable.Watch the show with visual graphics here: https://youtu.be/AA8PVb1CdPU