Podcasts about latah county

Bryan Kohberger: How We Got Here - Episode 8: "Change of Venue and New Strategies - 2024" Description: The most significant change to the Idaho murders case came in September 2024 when Judge John Judge granted a motion to move the trial 300 miles from tiny Latah County to Idaho's capital city of Boise. This episode explores how extensive pretrial publicity and the small population of Moscow made finding impartial jurors nearly impossible, with surveys showing 98% of residents were aware of the case and 67% had already formed opinions about guilt. We examine the defense's development of alternate perpetrator theories, including their argument that multiple attackers committed the murders rather than a single individual. The episode details the logistical challenges of relocating a death penalty trial, including the victims' families raising over $65,000 to attend proceedings in Boise. We explore new evidence about Kohberger's Amazon purchases eight months before the murders, including a Ka-Bar knife and sheath identical to items found at the crime scene, providing clear evidence of premeditation. The episode also examines how both prosecution and defense teams adapted their strategies for a new venue and jury pool while preparing for one of the most closely watched trials in American history. Hashtags: #VenueChange #BoiseIdaho #PretrialPublicity #AlternatePerpetratorTheory #AmazonPurchases #Premeditation #JurySelection #LogisticalChallenges #VictimsFamilies #Fundraising #DefenseStrategy #ProsecutionStrategy #DeathPenaltyTrial #LegalProceedings #TrialPreparation Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Bryan Kohberger: How We Got Here - Episode 8: "Change of Venue and New Strategies - 2024" Description: The most significant change to the Idaho murders case came in September 2024 when Judge John Judge granted a motion to move the trial 300 miles from tiny Latah County to Idaho's capital city of Boise. This episode explores how extensive pretrial publicity and the small population of Moscow made finding impartial jurors nearly impossible, with surveys showing 98% of residents were aware of the case and 67% had already formed opinions about guilt. We examine the defense's development of alternate perpetrator theories, including their argument that multiple attackers committed the murders rather than a single individual. The episode details the logistical challenges of relocating a death penalty trial, including the victims' families raising over $65,000 to attend proceedings in Boise. We explore new evidence about Kohberger's Amazon purchases eight months before the murders, including a Ka-Bar knife and sheath identical to items found at the crime scene, providing clear evidence of premeditation. The episode also examines how both prosecution and defense teams adapted their strategies for a new venue and jury pool while preparing for one of the most closely watched trials in American history. Hashtags: #VenueChange #BoiseIdaho #PretrialPublicity #AlternatePerpetratorTheory #AmazonPurchases #Premeditation #JurySelection #LogisticalChallenges #VictimsFamilies #Fundraising #DefenseStrategy #ProsecutionStrategy #DeathPenaltyTrial #LegalProceedings #TrialPreparation Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Bryan Kohberger: How We Got Here - Episode 8: "Change of Venue and New Strategies - 2024" Description: The most significant change to the Idaho murders case came in September 2024 when Judge John Judge granted a motion to move the trial 300 miles from tiny Latah County to Idaho's capital city of Boise. This episode explores how extensive pretrial publicity and the small population of Moscow made finding impartial jurors nearly impossible, with surveys showing 98% of residents were aware of the case and 67% had already formed opinions about guilt. We examine the defense's development of alternate perpetrator theories, including their argument that multiple attackers committed the murders rather than a single individual. The episode details the logistical challenges of relocating a death penalty trial, including the victims' families raising over $65,000 to attend proceedings in Boise. We explore new evidence about Kohberger's Amazon purchases eight months before the murders, including a Ka-Bar knife and sheath identical to items found at the crime scene, providing clear evidence of premeditation. The episode also examines how both prosecution and defense teams adapted their strategies for a new venue and jury pool while preparing for one of the most closely watched trials in American history. Hashtags: #VenueChange #BoiseIdaho #PretrialPublicity #AlternatePerpetratorTheory #AmazonPurchases #Premeditation #JurySelection #LogisticalChallenges #VictimsFamilies #Fundraising #DefenseStrategy #ProsecutionStrategy #DeathPenaltyTrial #LegalProceedings #TrialPreparation Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

From the archives: 6-28-23Judge John Judge warned the media during yesterdays hearing about zooming in on Bryan Kohberger during the proceedings. He pointed to the Lori Vallow trial for reference and noted that if the Media wants to keep the cameras in the courtroom, they are going to have to follow the rules as they are stated. Considering the interest surrounding this case, the Judge feels that it would be prejudicial to keep the camera locked on Kohberger.We also dive a littler deeper into the hearing from yesterday and discuss what went down in the courtroom in Latah County.(commercial at 8:53)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Bryan Kohberger judge refers to Lori Vallow case as suit-clad Idaho murders suspect appears in court | The IndependentBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

The scientific report on the effects of media coverage on prospective jurors in Latah County examined the impact of pretrial publicity on the jury pool for the Bryan Kohberger case. Kohberger, accused of murdering four University of Idaho students, has been the subject of extensive media coverage, which has raised concerns about the potential bias among jurors.Key points from the report include:Media Influence: The report highlighted how pervasive media coverage can shape public perception, often leading to preconceived notions of guilt or innocence. This is particularly problematic in high-profile cases like Kohberger's, where intense media scrutiny can taint the jury pool.Survey Findings: A survey conducted by a trial consultant on behalf of the defense indicated that the more someone knew about the case, the more likely they were to believe Kohberger was guilty. This survey included questions that incorporated both true and false information to gauge the extent of misinformation and its effect on potential jurors.Pretrial Publicity: The report underscores the difficulty of finding unbiased jurors in Latah County due to the saturation of media coverage. It suggests that prospective jurors exposed to extensive pretrial information are more likely to have formed opinions about the case.Defense Strategy: The defense team used the survey data to argue for a change of venue, claiming that an impartial trial would be difficult to achieve in Latah County. They contended that the media coverage had created a presumptive bias against Kohberger, necessitating the trial to be moved to a different location to ensure fairness.Judicial Response: The court acknowledged the potential impact of media coverage on jurors and temporarily halted the survey to review its methodology and ensure compliance with non-dissemination orders. The defense argued that continuing the survey in other counties was crucial for a comparative analysis to determine an appropriate venue for the trial.These findings reflect the complex interplay between media coverage and the judicial process, emphasizing the need for careful consideration to maintain the integrity of the legal proceedings​.(commercial at 7:41)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protomail.comsource:072224-Memorandum-Support-MCoV.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

The scientific report on the effects of media coverage on prospective jurors in Latah County examined the impact of pretrial publicity on the jury pool for the Bryan Kohberger case. Kohberger, accused of murdering four University of Idaho students, has been the subject of extensive media coverage, which has raised concerns about the potential bias among jurors.Key points from the report include:Media Influence: The report highlighted how pervasive media coverage can shape public perception, often leading to preconceived notions of guilt or innocence. This is particularly problematic in high-profile cases like Kohberger's, where intense media scrutiny can taint the jury pool.Survey Findings: A survey conducted by a trial consultant on behalf of the defense indicated that the more someone knew about the case, the more likely they were to believe Kohberger was guilty. This survey included questions that incorporated both true and false information to gauge the extent of misinformation and its effect on potential jurors.Pretrial Publicity: The report underscores the difficulty of finding unbiased jurors in Latah County due to the saturation of media coverage. It suggests that prospective jurors exposed to extensive pretrial information are more likely to have formed opinions about the case.Defense Strategy: The defense team used the survey data to argue for a change of venue, claiming that an impartial trial would be difficult to achieve in Latah County. They contended that the media coverage had created a presumptive bias against Kohberger, necessitating the trial to be moved to a different location to ensure fairness.Judicial Response: The court acknowledged the potential impact of media coverage on jurors and temporarily halted the survey to review its methodology and ensure compliance with non-dissemination orders. The defense argued that continuing the survey in other counties was crucial for a comparative analysis to determine an appropriate venue for the trial.These findings reflect the complex interplay between media coverage and the judicial process, emphasizing the need for careful consideration to maintain the integrity of the legal proceedings​.(commercial at 7:41)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protomail.comsource:072224-Memorandum-Support-MCoV.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

The scientific report on the effects of media coverage on prospective jurors in Latah County examined the impact of pretrial publicity on the jury pool for the Bryan Kohberger case. Kohberger, accused of murdering four University of Idaho students, has been the subject of extensive media coverage, which has raised concerns about the potential bias among jurors.Key points from the report include:Media Influence: The report highlighted how pervasive media coverage can shape public perception, often leading to preconceived notions of guilt or innocence. This is particularly problematic in high-profile cases like Kohberger's, where intense media scrutiny can taint the jury pool.Survey Findings: A survey conducted by a trial consultant on behalf of the defense indicated that the more someone knew about the case, the more likely they were to believe Kohberger was guilty. This survey included questions that incorporated both true and false information to gauge the extent of misinformation and its effect on potential jurors.Pretrial Publicity: The report underscores the difficulty of finding unbiased jurors in Latah County due to the saturation of media coverage. It suggests that prospective jurors exposed to extensive pretrial information are more likely to have formed opinions about the case.Defense Strategy: The defense team used the survey data to argue for a change of venue, claiming that an impartial trial would be difficult to achieve in Latah County. They contended that the media coverage had created a presumptive bias against Kohberger, necessitating the trial to be moved to a different location to ensure fairness.Judicial Response: The court acknowledged the potential impact of media coverage on jurors and temporarily halted the survey to review its methodology and ensure compliance with non-dissemination orders. The defense argued that continuing the survey in other counties was crucial for a comparative analysis to determine an appropriate venue for the trial.These findings reflect the complex interplay between media coverage and the judicial process, emphasizing the need for careful consideration to maintain the integrity of the legal proceedings​.(commercial at 7:41)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protomail.comsource:072224-Memorandum-Support-MCoV.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

The scientific report on the effects of media coverage on prospective jurors in Latah County examined the impact of pretrial publicity on the jury pool for the Bryan Kohberger case. Kohberger, accused of murdering four University of Idaho students, has been the subject of extensive media coverage, which has raised concerns about the potential bias among jurors.Key points from the report include:Media Influence: The report highlighted how pervasive media coverage can shape public perception, often leading to preconceived notions of guilt or innocence. This is particularly problematic in high-profile cases like Kohberger's, where intense media scrutiny can taint the jury pool.Survey Findings: A survey conducted by a trial consultant on behalf of the defense indicated that the more someone knew about the case, the more likely they were to believe Kohberger was guilty. This survey included questions that incorporated both true and false information to gauge the extent of misinformation and its effect on potential jurors.Pretrial Publicity: The report underscores the difficulty of finding unbiased jurors in Latah County due to the saturation of media coverage. It suggests that prospective jurors exposed to extensive pretrial information are more likely to have formed opinions about the case.Defense Strategy: The defense team used the survey data to argue for a change of venue, claiming that an impartial trial would be difficult to achieve in Latah County. They contended that the media coverage had created a presumptive bias against Kohberger, necessitating the trial to be moved to a different location to ensure fairness.Judicial Response: The court acknowledged the potential impact of media coverage on jurors and temporarily halted the survey to review its methodology and ensure compliance with non-dissemination orders. The defense argued that continuing the survey in other counties was crucial for a comparative analysis to determine an appropriate venue for the trial.These findings reflect the complex interplay between media coverage and the judicial process, emphasizing the need for careful consideration to maintain the integrity of the legal proceedings​.(commercial at 7:41)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protomail.comsource:072224-Memorandum-Support-MCoV.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

From the archives: 6-24-23Judge John Judge warned the media during yesterdays hearing about zooming in on Bryan Kohberger during the proceedings. He pointed to the Lori Vallow trial for reference and noted that if the Media wants to keep the cameras in the courtroom, they are going to have to follow the rules as they are stated. Considering the interest surrounding this case, the Judge feels that it would be prejudicial to keep the camera locked on Kohberger.We also dive a littler deeper into the hearing from yesterday and discuss what went down in the courtroom in Latah County.(commercial at 7:32)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Bryan Kohberger judge refers to Lori Vallow case as suit-clad Idaho murders suspect appears in court | The Independent

The Idaho Supreme Court has granted a change of venue for Bryan Kohberger's trial, moving it from Latah County to Ada County. This decision was made after Kohberger's defense raised concerns over finding an impartial jury in the original county due to the high-profile nature of the case. Kohberger is accused of the brutal murders of four University of Idaho students in November 2022, a crime that has garnered significant media attention and community impact.In addition to the venue change, the Idaho courts have assigned District Judge Steven Hippler from the Fourth Judicial District to oversee the case moving forward. Kohberger, who has been in custody since his arrest, will be transferred to the Ada County Jail as the trial preparations continue. This move aims to ensure a fair trial by reducing local bias that could influence the outcome. The upcoming proceedings are expected to be closely watched as the legal process advances in a new jurisdiction.(commercial at 8:45)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Bryan Kohberger judge announces new location for Idaho murders trial | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In a move that was not totally unexpected, prosecutors in Moscow have opted to go the Grand Jury route when dealing with Bryan Kohberger and his indictment by the state. With this superseded indictment, it helps the state bypass any sort of surprises at the preliminary hearing and it also keeps Bethany Funke from having to potentially take the stand.Kohberger will still make his appearance in Latah County court on the 22nd in regard to the Gag order and the challenge made to it by the media and Goncalves family.(commercial at 10:41)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Bryan Kohberger indicted by secret grand jury and will be arraigned for gruesome quadruple killing | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

From the archives: 6-24-23Judge John Judge warned the media during yesterdays hearing about zooming in on Bryan Kohberger during the proceedings. He pointed to the Lori Vallow trial for reference and noted that if the Media wants to keep the cameras in the courtroom, they are going to have to follow the rules as they are stated. Considering the interest surrounding this case, the Judge feels that it would be prejudicial to keep the camera locked on Kohberger.We also dive a littler deeper into the hearing from yesterday and discuss what went down in the courtroom in Latah County.(commercial at 7:32)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Bryan Kohberger judge refers to Lori Vallow case as suit-clad Idaho murders suspect appears in court | The IndependentBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

The scientific report on the effects of media coverage on prospective jurors in Latah County examined the impact of pretrial publicity on the jury pool for the Bryan Kohberger case. Kohberger, accused of murdering four University of Idaho students, has been the subject of extensive media coverage, which has raised concerns about the potential bias among jurors.Key points from the report include:Media Influence: The report highlighted how pervasive media coverage can shape public perception, often leading to preconceived notions of guilt or innocence. This is particularly problematic in high-profile cases like Kohberger's, where intense media scrutiny can taint the jury pool.Survey Findings: A survey conducted by a trial consultant on behalf of the defense indicated that the more someone knew about the case, the more likely they were to believe Kohberger was guilty. This survey included questions that incorporated both true and false information to gauge the extent of misinformation and its effect on potential jurors.Pretrial Publicity: The report underscores the difficulty of finding unbiased jurors in Latah County due to the saturation of media coverage. It suggests that prospective jurors exposed to extensive pretrial information are more likely to have formed opinions about the case.Defense Strategy: The defense team used the survey data to argue for a change of venue, claiming that an impartial trial would be difficult to achieve in Latah County. They contended that the media coverage had created a presumptive bias against Kohberger, necessitating the trial to be moved to a different location to ensure fairness.Judicial Response: The court acknowledged the potential impact of media coverage on jurors and temporarily halted the survey to review its methodology and ensure compliance with non-dissemination orders. The defense argued that continuing the survey in other counties was crucial for a comparative analysis to determine an appropriate venue for the trial.These findings reflect the complex interplay between media coverage and the judicial process, emphasizing the need for careful consideration to maintain the integrity of the legal proceedings​.(commercial at 7:41)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protomail.comsource:072224-Memorandum-Support-MCoV.pdf

The scientific report on the effects of media coverage on prospective jurors in Latah County examined the impact of pretrial publicity on the jury pool for the Bryan Kohberger case. Kohberger, accused of murdering four University of Idaho students, has been the subject of extensive media coverage, which has raised concerns about the potential bias among jurors.Key points from the report include:Media Influence: The report highlighted how pervasive media coverage can shape public perception, often leading to preconceived notions of guilt or innocence. This is particularly problematic in high-profile cases like Kohberger's, where intense media scrutiny can taint the jury pool.Survey Findings: A survey conducted by a trial consultant on behalf of the defense indicated that the more someone knew about the case, the more likely they were to believe Kohberger was guilty. This survey included questions that incorporated both true and false information to gauge the extent of misinformation and its effect on potential jurors.Pretrial Publicity: The report underscores the difficulty of finding unbiased jurors in Latah County due to the saturation of media coverage. It suggests that prospective jurors exposed to extensive pretrial information are more likely to have formed opinions about the case.Defense Strategy: The defense team used the survey data to argue for a change of venue, claiming that an impartial trial would be difficult to achieve in Latah County. They contended that the media coverage had created a presumptive bias against Kohberger, necessitating the trial to be moved to a different location to ensure fairness.Judicial Response: The court acknowledged the potential impact of media coverage on jurors and temporarily halted the survey to review its methodology and ensure compliance with non-dissemination orders. The defense argued that continuing the survey in other counties was crucial for a comparative analysis to determine an appropriate venue for the trial.These findings reflect the complex interplay between media coverage and the judicial process, emphasizing the need for careful consideration to maintain the integrity of the legal proceedings​.(commercial at 7:41)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protomail.comsource:072224-Memorandum-Support-MCoV.pdf

The scientific report on the effects of media coverage on prospective jurors in Latah County examined the impact of pretrial publicity on the jury pool for the Bryan Kohberger case. Kohberger, accused of murdering four University of Idaho students, has been the subject of extensive media coverage, which has raised concerns about the potential bias among jurors.Key points from the report include:Media Influence: The report highlighted how pervasive media coverage can shape public perception, often leading to preconceived notions of guilt or innocence. This is particularly problematic in high-profile cases like Kohberger's, where intense media scrutiny can taint the jury pool.Survey Findings: A survey conducted by a trial consultant on behalf of the defense indicated that the more someone knew about the case, the more likely they were to believe Kohberger was guilty. This survey included questions that incorporated both true and false information to gauge the extent of misinformation and its effect on potential jurors.Pretrial Publicity: The report underscores the difficulty of finding unbiased jurors in Latah County due to the saturation of media coverage. It suggests that prospective jurors exposed to extensive pretrial information are more likely to have formed opinions about the case.Defense Strategy: The defense team used the survey data to argue for a change of venue, claiming that an impartial trial would be difficult to achieve in Latah County. They contended that the media coverage had created a presumptive bias against Kohberger, necessitating the trial to be moved to a different location to ensure fairness.Judicial Response: The court acknowledged the potential impact of media coverage on jurors and temporarily halted the survey to review its methodology and ensure compliance with non-dissemination orders. The defense argued that continuing the survey in other counties was crucial for a comparative analysis to determine an appropriate venue for the trial.These findings reflect the complex interplay between media coverage and the judicial process, emphasizing the need for careful consideration to maintain the integrity of the legal proceedings​.(commercial at 7:41)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protomail.comsource:072224-Memorandum-Support-MCoV.pdf

The scientific report on the effects of media coverage on prospective jurors in Latah County examined the impact of pretrial publicity on the jury pool for the Bryan Kohberger case. Kohberger, accused of murdering four University of Idaho students, has been the subject of extensive media coverage, which has raised concerns about the potential bias among jurors.Key points from the report include:Media Influence: The report highlighted how pervasive media coverage can shape public perception, often leading to preconceived notions of guilt or innocence. This is particularly problematic in high-profile cases like Kohberger's, where intense media scrutiny can taint the jury pool.Survey Findings: A survey conducted by a trial consultant on behalf of the defense indicated that the more someone knew about the case, the more likely they were to believe Kohberger was guilty. This survey included questions that incorporated both true and false information to gauge the extent of misinformation and its effect on potential jurors.Pretrial Publicity: The report underscores the difficulty of finding unbiased jurors in Latah County due to the saturation of media coverage. It suggests that prospective jurors exposed to extensive pretrial information are more likely to have formed opinions about the case.Defense Strategy: The defense team used the survey data to argue for a change of venue, claiming that an impartial trial would be difficult to achieve in Latah County. They contended that the media coverage had created a presumptive bias against Kohberger, necessitating the trial to be moved to a different location to ensure fairness.Judicial Response: The court acknowledged the potential impact of media coverage on jurors and temporarily halted the survey to review its methodology and ensure compliance with non-dissemination orders. The defense argued that continuing the survey in other counties was crucial for a comparative analysis to determine an appropriate venue for the trial.These findings reflect the complex interplay between media coverage and the judicial process, emphasizing the need for careful consideration to maintain the integrity of the legal proceedings​.(commercial at 7:41)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protomail.comsource:072224-Memorandum-Support-MCoV.pdf

The State of Idaho has filed an objection to Bryan Kohberger's motion to change the venue of his trial from Latah County to Boise. The prosecution argues that Kohberger has not sufficiently demonstrated that a fair and impartial trial cannot be held in Latah County. They contend that while the case has received significant media coverage, this alone does not justify a venue change. The State asserts that through proper jury selection, a fair trial can be achieved in Latah County despite the publicity surrounding the case​.In their objection to Bryan Kohberger's motion to change the venue of his trial, Idaho prosecutors argue that Kohberger's defense has not proven that an impartial trial cannot occur in Latah County, despite the intense media coverage. The prosecution contends that widespread publicity does not inherently necessitate a venue change and that careful jury selection, including thorough questioning during voir dire, can ensure an unbiased jury. They emphasize that the defense has not met the legal standard required to justify moving the trial to Boise.This stance reflects the prosecution's confidence in the court's ability to manage potential biases within Latah County, reinforcing their desire to maintain the trial location.(commercial at 8:50)to contact me:bobbycapuci@protonmail.comsource:081224-States-Objection-Defendants-MCV.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

The State of Idaho has filed an objection to Bryan Kohberger's motion to change the venue of his trial from Latah County to Boise. The prosecution argues that Kohberger has not sufficiently demonstrated that a fair and impartial trial cannot be held in Latah County. They contend that while the case has received significant media coverage, this alone does not justify a venue change. The State asserts that through proper jury selection, a fair trial can be achieved in Latah County despite the publicity surrounding the case​.In their objection to Bryan Kohberger's motion to change the venue of his trial, Idaho prosecutors argue that Kohberger's defense has not proven that an impartial trial cannot occur in Latah County, despite the intense media coverage. The prosecution contends that widespread publicity does not inherently necessitate a venue change and that careful jury selection, including thorough questioning during voir dire, can ensure an unbiased jury. They emphasize that the defense has not met the legal standard required to justify moving the trial to Boise.This stance reflects the prosecution's confidence in the court's ability to manage potential biases within Latah County, reinforcing their desire to maintain the trial location.(commercial at 8:50)to contact me:bobbycapuci@protonmail.comsource:081224-States-Objection-Defendants-MCV.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

The State of Idaho has filed an objection to Bryan Kohberger's motion to change the venue of his trial from Latah County to Boise. The prosecution argues that Kohberger has not sufficiently demonstrated that a fair and impartial trial cannot be held in Latah County. They contend that while the case has received significant media coverage, this alone does not justify a venue change. The State asserts that through proper jury selection, a fair trial can be achieved in Latah County despite the publicity surrounding the case​.In their objection to Bryan Kohberger's motion to change the venue of his trial, Idaho prosecutors argue that Kohberger's defense has not proven that an impartial trial cannot occur in Latah County, despite the intense media coverage. The prosecution contends that widespread publicity does not inherently necessitate a venue change and that careful jury selection, including thorough questioning during voir dire, can ensure an unbiased jury. They emphasize that the defense has not met the legal standard required to justify moving the trial to Boise.This stance reflects the prosecution's confidence in the court's ability to manage potential biases within Latah County, reinforcing their desire to maintain the trial location.(commercial at 8:50)to contact me:bobbycapuci@protonmail.comsource:081224-States-Objection-Defendants-MCV.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

The order to change the venue of Bryan Kohberger's trial stems from concerns about ensuring a fair trial. Kohberger, accused of killing four University of Idaho students, had become the focus of intense media attention, particularly in Latah County, where the murders occurred. The defense argued that this level of public exposure could taint the jury pool and hinder the possibility of a fair and impartial trial.The court, considering these arguments, agreed that moving the trial to a different county would mitigate these concerns. The new location is expected to have less pre-trial publicity, allowing for a more neutral jury selection process. The order does not change the charges or the trial's timeline but focuses solely on ensuring that the judicial process remains unbiased and fair.(commercial at 8:56)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:090624-Order-Granting-Defendants-Motion-Change-Venue.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

The order to change the venue of Bryan Kohberger's trial stems from concerns about ensuring a fair trial. Kohberger, accused of killing four University of Idaho students, had become the focus of intense media attention, particularly in Latah County, where the murders occurred. The defense argued that this level of public exposure could taint the jury pool and hinder the possibility of a fair and impartial trial.The court, considering these arguments, agreed that moving the trial to a different county would mitigate these concerns. The new location is expected to have less pre-trial publicity, allowing for a more neutral jury selection process. The order does not change the charges or the trial's timeline but focuses solely on ensuring that the judicial process remains unbiased and fair.(commercial at 8:56)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:090624-Order-Granting-Defendants-Motion-Change-Venue.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

The order to change the venue of Bryan Kohberger's trial stems from concerns about ensuring a fair trial. Kohberger, accused of killing four University of Idaho students, had become the focus of intense media attention, particularly in Latah County, where the murders occurred. The defense argued that this level of public exposure could taint the jury pool and hinder the possibility of a fair and impartial trial.The court, considering these arguments, agreed that moving the trial to a different county would mitigate these concerns. The new location is expected to have less pre-trial publicity, allowing for a more neutral jury selection process. The order does not change the charges or the trial's timeline but focuses solely on ensuring that the judicial process remains unbiased and fair.(commercial at 8:56)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:090624-Order-Granting-Defendants-Motion-Change-Venue.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Dr. Bryan Edelman is a trial consultant and expert on pre-trial publicity who was involved in the Bryan Kohberger trial. Edelman was hired by Kohberger's defense team to conduct a phone survey of potential jurors in Latah County, Idaho. The purpose of the survey was to assess the impact of media coverage on public opinion about the case, which involves Kohberger being charged with the murder of four University of Idaho students.The survey, which contacted 400 residents, faced significant criticism from the prosecution. They argued that the questions were too specific and potentially spread false information, thereby contaminating the jury pool. Some questions included details not found in official affidavits, leading to concerns that the survey was prejudicing potential jurors against Kohberger.Edelman defended his work, stating that his aim was to measure the influence of media coverage on public opinion, regardless of whether the information was true or false. He emphasized that such surveys are standard practice in high-profile cases to determine whether a fair trial can be conducted in the current venue or if a change of venue is necessary.The controversy surrounding the survey led the judge to pause its continuation and to schedule further hearings to decide on the matter.In this episode we take a look at his declaration filed with the court.(commercial at 8:05)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:072224-Memorandum-Support-MCoV.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Dr. Bryan Edelman is a trial consultant and expert on pre-trial publicity who was involved in the Bryan Kohberger trial. Edelman was hired by Kohberger's defense team to conduct a phone survey of potential jurors in Latah County, Idaho. The purpose of the survey was to assess the impact of media coverage on public opinion about the case, which involves Kohberger being charged with the murder of four University of Idaho students.The survey, which contacted 400 residents, faced significant criticism from the prosecution. They argued that the questions were too specific and potentially spread false information, thereby contaminating the jury pool. Some questions included details not found in official affidavits, leading to concerns that the survey was prejudicing potential jurors against Kohberger.Edelman defended his work, stating that his aim was to measure the influence of media coverage on public opinion, regardless of whether the information was true or false. He emphasized that such surveys are standard practice in high-profile cases to determine whether a fair trial can be conducted in the current venue or if a change of venue is necessary.The controversy surrounding the survey led the judge to pause its continuation and to schedule further hearings to decide on the matter.In this episode we take a look at his declaration filed with the court.(commercial at 8:05)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:072224-Memorandum-Support-MCoV.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Dr. Bryan Edelman is a trial consultant and expert on pre-trial publicity who was involved in the Bryan Kohberger trial. Edelman was hired by Kohberger's defense team to conduct a phone survey of potential jurors in Latah County, Idaho. The purpose of the survey was to assess the impact of media coverage on public opinion about the case, which involves Kohberger being charged with the murder of four University of Idaho students.The survey, which contacted 400 residents, faced significant criticism from the prosecution. They argued that the questions were too specific and potentially spread false information, thereby contaminating the jury pool. Some questions included details not found in official affidavits, leading to concerns that the survey was prejudicing potential jurors against Kohberger.Edelman defended his work, stating that his aim was to measure the influence of media coverage on public opinion, regardless of whether the information was true or false. He emphasized that such surveys are standard practice in high-profile cases to determine whether a fair trial can be conducted in the current venue or if a change of venue is necessary.The controversy surrounding the survey led the judge to pause its continuation and to schedule further hearings to decide on the matter.In this episode we take a look at his declaration filed with the court.(commercial at 8:05)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:072224-Memorandum-Support-MCoV.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Dr. Bryan Edelman is a trial consultant and expert on pre-trial publicity who was involved in the Bryan Kohberger trial. Edelman was hired by Kohberger's defense team to conduct a phone survey of potential jurors in Latah County, Idaho. The purpose of the survey was to assess the impact of media coverage on public opinion about the case, which involves Kohberger being charged with the murder of four University of Idaho students.The survey, which contacted 400 residents, faced significant criticism from the prosecution. They argued that the questions were too specific and potentially spread false information, thereby contaminating the jury pool. Some questions included details not found in official affidavits, leading to concerns that the survey was prejudicing potential jurors against Kohberger.Edelman defended his work, stating that his aim was to measure the influence of media coverage on public opinion, regardless of whether the information was true or false. He emphasized that such surveys are standard practice in high-profile cases to determine whether a fair trial can be conducted in the current venue or if a change of venue is necessary.The controversy surrounding the survey led the judge to pause its continuation and to schedule further hearings to decide on the matter.In this episode we take a look at his declaration filed with the court.(commercial at 8:05)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:072224-Memorandum-Support-MCoV.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Dr. Bryan Edelman is a trial consultant and expert on pre-trial publicity who was involved in the Bryan Kohberger trial. Edelman was hired by Kohberger's defense team to conduct a phone survey of potential jurors in Latah County, Idaho. The purpose of the survey was to assess the impact of media coverage on public opinion about the case, which involves Kohberger being charged with the murder of four University of Idaho students.The survey, which contacted 400 residents, faced significant criticism from the prosecution. They argued that the questions were too specific and potentially spread false information, thereby contaminating the jury pool. Some questions included details not found in official affidavits, leading to concerns that the survey was prejudicing potential jurors against Kohberger.Edelman defended his work, stating that his aim was to measure the influence of media coverage on public opinion, regardless of whether the information was true or false. He emphasized that such surveys are standard practice in high-profile cases to determine whether a fair trial can be conducted in the current venue or if a change of venue is necessary.The controversy surrounding the survey led the judge to pause its continuation and to schedule further hearings to decide on the matter.In this episode we take a look at his declaration filed with the court.(commercial at 8:05)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:072224-Memorandum-Support-MCoV.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Dr. Bryan Edelman is a trial consultant and expert on pre-trial publicity who was involved in the Bryan Kohberger trial. Edelman was hired by Kohberger's defense team to conduct a phone survey of potential jurors in Latah County, Idaho. The purpose of the survey was to assess the impact of media coverage on public opinion about the case, which involves Kohberger being charged with the murder of four University of Idaho students.The survey, which contacted 400 residents, faced significant criticism from the prosecution. They argued that the questions were too specific and potentially spread false information, thereby contaminating the jury pool. Some questions included details not found in official affidavits, leading to concerns that the survey was prejudicing potential jurors against Kohberger.Edelman defended his work, stating that his aim was to measure the influence of media coverage on public opinion, regardless of whether the information was true or false. He emphasized that such surveys are standard practice in high-profile cases to determine whether a fair trial can be conducted in the current venue or if a change of venue is necessary.The controversy surrounding the survey led the judge to pause its continuation and to schedule further hearings to decide on the matter.In this episode we take a look at his declaration filed with the court.(commercial at 8:05)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:072224-Memorandum-Support-MCoV.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Dr. Bryan Edelman is a trial consultant and expert on pre-trial publicity who was involved in the Bryan Kohberger trial. Edelman was hired by Kohberger's defense team to conduct a phone survey of potential jurors in Latah County, Idaho. The purpose of the survey was to assess the impact of media coverage on public opinion about the case, which involves Kohberger being charged with the murder of four University of Idaho students.The survey, which contacted 400 residents, faced significant criticism from the prosecution. They argued that the questions were too specific and potentially spread false information, thereby contaminating the jury pool. Some questions included details not found in official affidavits, leading to concerns that the survey was prejudicing potential jurors against Kohberger.Edelman defended his work, stating that his aim was to measure the influence of media coverage on public opinion, regardless of whether the information was true or false. He emphasized that such surveys are standard practice in high-profile cases to determine whether a fair trial can be conducted in the current venue or if a change of venue is necessary.The controversy surrounding the survey led the judge to pause its continuation and to schedule further hearings to decide on the matter.In this episode we take a look at his declaration filed with the court.(commercial at 8:05)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:072224-Memorandum-Support-MCoV.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Dr. Bryan Edelman is a trial consultant and expert on pre-trial publicity who was involved in the Bryan Kohberger trial. Edelman was hired by Kohberger's defense team to conduct a phone survey of potential jurors in Latah County, Idaho. The purpose of the survey was to assess the impact of media coverage on public opinion about the case, which involves Kohberger being charged with the murder of four University of Idaho students.The survey, which contacted 400 residents, faced significant criticism from the prosecution. They argued that the questions were too specific and potentially spread false information, thereby contaminating the jury pool. Some questions included details not found in official affidavits, leading to concerns that the survey was prejudicing potential jurors against Kohberger.Edelman defended his work, stating that his aim was to measure the influence of media coverage on public opinion, regardless of whether the information was true or false. He emphasized that such surveys are standard practice in high-profile cases to determine whether a fair trial can be conducted in the current venue or if a change of venue is necessary.The controversy surrounding the survey led the judge to pause its continuation and to schedule further hearings to decide on the matter.In this episode we take a look at his declaration filed with the court.(commercial at 8:05)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:072224-Memorandum-Support-MCoV.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Dr. Bryan Edelman is a trial consultant and expert on pre-trial publicity who was involved in the Bryan Kohberger trial. Edelman was hired by Kohberger's defense team to conduct a phone survey of potential jurors in Latah County, Idaho. The purpose of the survey was to assess the impact of media coverage on public opinion about the case, which involves Kohberger being charged with the murder of four University of Idaho students.The survey, which contacted 400 residents, faced significant criticism from the prosecution. They argued that the questions were too specific and potentially spread false information, thereby contaminating the jury pool. Some questions included details not found in official affidavits, leading to concerns that the survey was prejudicing potential jurors against Kohberger.Edelman defended his work, stating that his aim was to measure the influence of media coverage on public opinion, regardless of whether the information was true or false. He emphasized that such surveys are standard practice in high-profile cases to determine whether a fair trial can be conducted in the current venue or if a change of venue is necessary.The controversy surrounding the survey led the judge to pause its continuation and to schedule further hearings to decide on the matter.In this episode we take a look at his declaration filed with the court.(commercial at 8:05)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:072224-Memorandum-Support-MCoV.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Dr. Bryan Edelman is a trial consultant and expert on pre-trial publicity who was involved in the Bryan Kohberger trial. Edelman was hired by Kohberger's defense team to conduct a phone survey of potential jurors in Latah County, Idaho. The purpose of the survey was to assess the impact of media coverage on public opinion about the case, which involves Kohberger being charged with the murder of four University of Idaho students.The survey, which contacted 400 residents, faced significant criticism from the prosecution. They argued that the questions were too specific and potentially spread false information, thereby contaminating the jury pool. Some questions included details not found in official affidavits, leading to concerns that the survey was prejudicing potential jurors against Kohberger.Edelman defended his work, stating that his aim was to measure the influence of media coverage on public opinion, regardless of whether the information was true or false. He emphasized that such surveys are standard practice in high-profile cases to determine whether a fair trial can be conducted in the current venue or if a change of venue is necessary.The controversy surrounding the survey led the judge to pause its continuation and to schedule further hearings to decide on the matter.In this episode we take a look at his declaration filed with the court.(commercial at 8:05)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:072224-Memorandum-Support-MCoV.pdf

Dr. Bryan Edelman is a trial consultant and expert on pre-trial publicity who was involved in the Bryan Kohberger trial. Edelman was hired by Kohberger's defense team to conduct a phone survey of potential jurors in Latah County, Idaho. The purpose of the survey was to assess the impact of media coverage on public opinion about the case, which involves Kohberger being charged with the murder of four University of Idaho students.The survey, which contacted 400 residents, faced significant criticism from the prosecution. They argued that the questions were too specific and potentially spread false information, thereby contaminating the jury pool. Some questions included details not found in official affidavits, leading to concerns that the survey was prejudicing potential jurors against Kohberger.Edelman defended his work, stating that his aim was to measure the influence of media coverage on public opinion, regardless of whether the information was true or false. He emphasized that such surveys are standard practice in high-profile cases to determine whether a fair trial can be conducted in the current venue or if a change of venue is necessary.The controversy surrounding the survey led the judge to pause its continuation and to schedule further hearings to decide on the matter.In this episode we take a look at his declaration filed with the court.(commercial at 8:05)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:072224-Memorandum-Support-MCoV.pdf

Dr. Bryan Edelman is a trial consultant and expert on pre-trial publicity who was involved in the Bryan Kohberger trial. Edelman was hired by Kohberger's defense team to conduct a phone survey of potential jurors in Latah County, Idaho. The purpose of the survey was to assess the impact of media coverage on public opinion about the case, which involves Kohberger being charged with the murder of four University of Idaho students.The survey, which contacted 400 residents, faced significant criticism from the prosecution. They argued that the questions were too specific and potentially spread false information, thereby contaminating the jury pool. Some questions included details not found in official affidavits, leading to concerns that the survey was prejudicing potential jurors against Kohberger.Edelman defended his work, stating that his aim was to measure the influence of media coverage on public opinion, regardless of whether the information was true or false. He emphasized that such surveys are standard practice in high-profile cases to determine whether a fair trial can be conducted in the current venue or if a change of venue is necessary.The controversy surrounding the survey led the judge to pause its continuation and to schedule further hearings to decide on the matter.In this episode we take a look at his declaration filed with the court.(commercial at 8:05)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:072224-Memorandum-Support-MCoV.pdf

Dr. Bryan Edelman is a trial consultant and expert on pre-trial publicity who was involved in the Bryan Kohberger trial. Edelman was hired by Kohberger's defense team to conduct a phone survey of potential jurors in Latah County, Idaho. The purpose of the survey was to assess the impact of media coverage on public opinion about the case, which involves Kohberger being charged with the murder of four University of Idaho students.The survey, which contacted 400 residents, faced significant criticism from the prosecution. They argued that the questions were too specific and potentially spread false information, thereby contaminating the jury pool. Some questions included details not found in official affidavits, leading to concerns that the survey was prejudicing potential jurors against Kohberger.Edelman defended his work, stating that his aim was to measure the influence of media coverage on public opinion, regardless of whether the information was true or false. He emphasized that such surveys are standard practice in high-profile cases to determine whether a fair trial can be conducted in the current venue or if a change of venue is necessary.The controversy surrounding the survey led the judge to pause its continuation and to schedule further hearings to decide on the matter.In this episode we take a look at his declaration filed with the court.(commercial at 8:05)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:072224-Memorandum-Support-MCoV.pdf

Dr. Bryan Edelman is a trial consultant and expert on pre-trial publicity who was involved in the Bryan Kohberger trial. Edelman was hired by Kohberger's defense team to conduct a phone survey of potential jurors in Latah County, Idaho. The purpose of the survey was to assess the impact of media coverage on public opinion about the case, which involves Kohberger being charged with the murder of four University of Idaho students.The survey, which contacted 400 residents, faced significant criticism from the prosecution. They argued that the questions were too specific and potentially spread false information, thereby contaminating the jury pool. Some questions included details not found in official affidavits, leading to concerns that the survey was prejudicing potential jurors against Kohberger.Edelman defended his work, stating that his aim was to measure the influence of media coverage on public opinion, regardless of whether the information was true or false. He emphasized that such surveys are standard practice in high-profile cases to determine whether a fair trial can be conducted in the current venue or if a change of venue is necessary.The controversy surrounding the survey led the judge to pause its continuation and to schedule further hearings to decide on the matter.In this episode we take a look at his declaration filed with the court.(commercial at 8:05)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:072224-Memorandum-Support-MCoV.pdf

Dr. Bryan Edelman is a trial consultant and expert on pre-trial publicity who was involved in the Bryan Kohberger trial. Edelman was hired by Kohberger's defense team to conduct a phone survey of potential jurors in Latah County, Idaho. The purpose of the survey was to assess the impact of media coverage on public opinion about the case, which involves Kohberger being charged with the murder of four University of Idaho students.The survey, which contacted 400 residents, faced significant criticism from the prosecution. They argued that the questions were too specific and potentially spread false information, thereby contaminating the jury pool. Some questions included details not found in official affidavits, leading to concerns that the survey was prejudicing potential jurors against Kohberger.Edelman defended his work, stating that his aim was to measure the influence of media coverage on public opinion, regardless of whether the information was true or false. He emphasized that such surveys are standard practice in high-profile cases to determine whether a fair trial can be conducted in the current venue or if a change of venue is necessary.The controversy surrounding the survey led the judge to pause its continuation and to schedule further hearings to decide on the matter.In this episode we take a look at his declaration filed with the court.(commercial at 8:05)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:072224-Memorandum-Support-MCoV.pdf

Dr. Bryan Edelman is a trial consultant and expert on pre-trial publicity who was involved in the Bryan Kohberger trial. Edelman was hired by Kohberger's defense team to conduct a phone survey of potential jurors in Latah County, Idaho. The purpose of the survey was to assess the impact of media coverage on public opinion about the case, which involves Kohberger being charged with the murder of four University of Idaho students.The survey, which contacted 400 residents, faced significant criticism from the prosecution. They argued that the questions were too specific and potentially spread false information, thereby contaminating the jury pool. Some questions included details not found in official affidavits, leading to concerns that the survey was prejudicing potential jurors against Kohberger.Edelman defended his work, stating that his aim was to measure the influence of media coverage on public opinion, regardless of whether the information was true or false. He emphasized that such surveys are standard practice in high-profile cases to determine whether a fair trial can be conducted in the current venue or if a change of venue is necessary.The controversy surrounding the survey led the judge to pause its continuation and to schedule further hearings to decide on the matter.In this episode we take a look at his declaration filed with the court.(commercial at 8:05)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:072224-Memorandum-Support-MCoV.pdf

Dr. Bryan Edelman is a trial consultant and expert on pre-trial publicity who was involved in the Bryan Kohberger trial. Edelman was hired by Kohberger's defense team to conduct a phone survey of potential jurors in Latah County, Idaho. The purpose of the survey was to assess the impact of media coverage on public opinion about the case, which involves Kohberger being charged with the murder of four University of Idaho students.The survey, which contacted 400 residents, faced significant criticism from the prosecution. They argued that the questions were too specific and potentially spread false information, thereby contaminating the jury pool. Some questions included details not found in official affidavits, leading to concerns that the survey was prejudicing potential jurors against Kohberger.Edelman defended his work, stating that his aim was to measure the influence of media coverage on public opinion, regardless of whether the information was true or false. He emphasized that such surveys are standard practice in high-profile cases to determine whether a fair trial can be conducted in the current venue or if a change of venue is necessary.The controversy surrounding the survey led the judge to pause its continuation and to schedule further hearings to decide on the matter.In this episode we take a look at his declaration filed with the court.(commercial at 8:05)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:072224-Memorandum-Support-MCoV.pdf

Dr. Bryan Edelman is a trial consultant and expert on pre-trial publicity who was involved in the Bryan Kohberger trial. Edelman was hired by Kohberger's defense team to conduct a phone survey of potential jurors in Latah County, Idaho. The purpose of the survey was to assess the impact of media coverage on public opinion about the case, which involves Kohberger being charged with the murder of four University of Idaho students.The survey, which contacted 400 residents, faced significant criticism from the prosecution. They argued that the questions were too specific and potentially spread false information, thereby contaminating the jury pool. Some questions included details not found in official affidavits, leading to concerns that the survey was prejudicing potential jurors against Kohberger.Edelman defended his work, stating that his aim was to measure the influence of media coverage on public opinion, regardless of whether the information was true or false. He emphasized that such surveys are standard practice in high-profile cases to determine whether a fair trial can be conducted in the current venue or if a change of venue is necessary.The controversy surrounding the survey led the judge to pause its continuation and to schedule further hearings to decide on the matter.In this episode we take a look at his declaration filed with the court.(commercial at 8:05)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:072224-Memorandum-Support-MCoV.pdf

Dr. Bryan Edelman is a trial consultant and expert on pre-trial publicity who was involved in the Bryan Kohberger trial. Edelman was hired by Kohberger's defense team to conduct a phone survey of potential jurors in Latah County, Idaho. The purpose of the survey was to assess the impact of media coverage on public opinion about the case, which involves Kohberger being charged with the murder of four University of Idaho students.The survey, which contacted 400 residents, faced significant criticism from the prosecution. They argued that the questions were too specific and potentially spread false information, thereby contaminating the jury pool. Some questions included details not found in official affidavits, leading to concerns that the survey was prejudicing potential jurors against Kohberger.Edelman defended his work, stating that his aim was to measure the influence of media coverage on public opinion, regardless of whether the information was true or false. He emphasized that such surveys are standard practice in high-profile cases to determine whether a fair trial can be conducted in the current venue or if a change of venue is necessary.The controversy surrounding the survey led the judge to pause its continuation and to schedule further hearings to decide on the matter.In this episode we take a look at his declaration filed with the court.(commercial at 8:05)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:072224-Memorandum-Support-MCoV.pdf

From the archives: 6-28-23Judge John Judge warned the media during yesterdays hearing about zooming in on Bryan Kohberger during the proceedings. He pointed to the Lori Vallow trial for reference and noted that if the Media wants to keep the cameras in the courtroom, they are going to have to follow the rules as they are stated. Considering the interest surrounding this case, the Judge feels that it would be prejudicial to keep the camera locked on Kohberger.We also dive a littler deeper into the hearing from yesterday and discuss what went down in the courtroom in Latah County.(commercial at 8:53)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Bryan Kohberger judge refers to Lori Vallow case as suit-clad Idaho murders suspect appears in court | The IndependentBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Bryan Kohberger, the man accused of murdering four University of Idaho students in 2022, recently had his request for a venue change granted by Judge John Judge of Idaho's 2nd Judicial District. The judge expressed concerns that Kohberger would not receive a fair trial in Latah County, where the crimes occurred, due to the overwhelming media coverage and the small size of the community. This decision was made after considering evidence that a large percentage of potential jurors in the area had already formed opinions about the case, with many believing Kohberger is guilty.Kohberger's defense argued that the intense pretrial publicity had tainted the local jury pool, making it impossible to find impartial jurors. While the defense has suggested moving the trial to Ada County, home to Boise, the exact new location will be determined by Idaho's Supreme Court. The trial, originally scheduled to start in June 2025, could see significant logistical challenges due to its high profile and the expected length of three months.The decision to move the trial has been met with mixed reactions. While legal experts agree that a fair trial would be difficult in Latah County, the family of one of the victims, Kaylee Goncalves, expressed disappointment, believing the trial should remain in the community most affected by the tragedy.In this episode, we keep the conversation going about the latest order by Judge Judge.  (commercial at 9:13)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

The ongoing legal battle between the state of Idaho and Bryan Kohberger, who is accused of killing four University of Idaho students in 2022, has been particularly intense regarding the venue for his upcoming trial. Kohberger's defense team has repeatedly requested a change of venue, arguing that he cannot receive a fair trial in Latah County due to the extensive media coverage and the small, potentially biased jury pool. They have specifically requested the trial be moved to Ada County, nearly 300 miles away, which they believe would provide a more impartial jury.The prosecution, however, has opposed this request, insisting that Latah County is a suitable venue and that moving the trial would not significantly improve the chances of a fair trial. They argue that media coverage and public opinion have been widespread and would likely follow the trial wherever it is held in Idaho.The legal back-and-forth has also been complicated by a series of other pre-trial motions and hearings, many of which have frustrated both the families of the victims and the judge overseeing the case. These include debates over evidence, such as the use of investigative genetic genealogy by the prosecution and the defense's requests for broader access to this evidence. Additionally, the defense's alibi strategy has been another point of contention, as they have claimed that Kohberger was "out driving" at the time of the murders, but have struggled to provide specific details to support this claim.A hearing is scheduled for August 29, 2024, to further address the change of venue request, and the trial itself is set to begin in June 2025. The extended pre-trial proceedings have drawn criticism for their slow pace, adding to the tension surrounding this high-profile case(commercial at 8:23)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

In the case CR29-22-2805, the defense filed a Reply to the State's Objection to the Defendant's Motion for Change of Venue. This motion is part of the ongoing legal proceedings against Bryan Kohberger, who is accused of the murder of four University of Idaho students. The defense argued that due to the extensive media coverage and the intense public interest in the case, finding an impartial jury within Latah County would be nearly impossible. They contend that moving the trial to another venue is necessary to ensure a fair trial.The State, however, objected to this motion, asserting that the pretrial publicity, while extensive, does not automatically disqualify the ability to empanel an impartial jury. The defense's reply emphasized that the local community's involvement and the saturation of the case in the media have created a prejudiced environment, making a fair trial in the current venue untenable.The reply also referenced surveys and expert opinions that support the argument for a change of venue. The defense further criticized the State's reliance on the voir dire process (jury selection) as an adequate safeguard against bias, arguing that the overwhelming public sentiment in the area would not be adequately addressed merely through questioning potential jurors.This back-and-forth on the motion reflects the high stakes and contentious nature of the pretrial proceedings, with both sides preparing for a legal battle that hinges on ensuring the trial's fairness amidst widespread public interest.(commercial at 7:43)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

In the lead-up to Bryan Kohberger's trial for the alleged murders of four University of Idaho students, his defense team has highlighted several rumors circulating within Latah County that could potentially bias the jury pool. These include unverified claims that Kohberger had used a fake name to meet women, that he had been terminated from a teaching assistant position due to behavioral issues, and that he had a history of drug use. Additionally, there were speculations about his alleged involvement in other unsolved crimes, purportedly odd behavior during his time as a graduate student, and supposed comments he made about his ability to commit a perfect crime. The defense argues that such pervasive rumors, lacking substantiated evidence, have created a prejudicial environment that could impede Kohberger's right to a fair trial. They contend that the widespread dissemination of these unverified claims has tainted the local jury pool, making it challenging to select impartial jurors who have not been influenced by pretrial publicity. This situation underscores the complexities of ensuring a fair judicial process in high-profile cases where public opinion may be swayed by uncorroborated information.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

As the Rex Heuermann spool continues to unroll, we are learning more and more information about the man who is alleged to be the Long Island Serial killer, and each bit of information we find out, is more disturbing then the next it would seem.   In this episode, we hear how Rex Heuermann was present at a gun club in Manorville the day before Jessica Taylor went missing.  In our second article, we head out to Moscow to get an update on the financial impact that the Kohberger case has had on Latah county and what the state and county plan on doing to mitigate the costs.   (commercial at 8:08)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Latah County budgets for Kohberger murder trial in Moscow | Idaho Statesmansource:Suspected Gilgo Beach killer Rex Heuermann allegedly visited LI gun club day before victim Jessica Taylor disappeared (nypost.com)

Bryan Kohberger's hearing on January 22, 2025, primarily focused on the ongoing legal proceedings related to his case. The judge excused Kohberger from attending the hearing in person, but his attorneys appeared to argue against the admissibility of DNA evidence linked to his family. This hearing was conducted with a degree of secrecy, with the courtroom closed to the public and under a gag order to ensure a fair trial, as the case has garnered significant public attention. The defense's request to dismiss certain DNA evidence seems to be a critical part of their strategy, aiming to challenge the prosecution's case by questioning the validity or relevance of the genetic material collected.The trial, initially set in Moscow, Idaho, was moved to Ada County due to concerns about the potential for an unbiased jury in Latah County, given the extensive media coverage and public sentiment. The relocation to Boise was decided after arguments that a fair trial would be impossible in the original venue due to the "mob mentality" and threats of unrest if Kohberger were acquitted. Today's proceedings also included discussions on managing the trial's logistics and expenses, with the county's budget for the trial being significantly increased to accommodate the costs associated with such a high-profile case.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Bryan Kohberger judge considers major decision days before key hearing in Idaho murder case | Daily Mail Online

The order to change the venue of Bryan Kohberger's trial stems from concerns about ensuring a fair trial. Kohberger, accused of killing four University of Idaho students, had become the focus of intense media attention, particularly in Latah County, where the murders occurred. The defense argued that this level of public exposure could taint the jury pool and hinder the possibility of a fair and impartial trial.The court, considering these arguments, agreed that moving the trial to a different county would mitigate these concerns. The new location is expected to have less pre-trial publicity, allowing for a more neutral jury selection process. The order does not change the charges or the trial's timeline but focuses solely on ensuring that the judicial process remains unbiased and fair.(commercial at 9:33)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:090624-Order-Granting-Defendants-Motion-Change-Venue.pdf

The courtroom drama surrounding Bryan Kohberger took a sharp turn this past week, as his defense team filed a motion that could reshape the trajectory of his trial. At the heart of the matter: allegations that the prosecution failed to provide full disclosure of expert opinions and reports, a requirement under Idaho's Rules of Evidence. This legal battle, unfolding in the shadows of one of the most chilling murder cases in recent memory, underscores just how high the stakes have become. Kohberger, accused of the brutal slayings of four University of Idaho students, has steadfastly maintained his innocence. He now faces not just the weight of public scrutiny but also the potential for life-altering consequences if convicted. This latest motion, filed by his attorneys on December 27, 2024, alleges significant breaches of legal protocol by the prosecution. In a case where every detail matters, these allegations add a layer of complexity that could ripple through the proceedings for months to come. The defense's motion calls out what they describe as the “bulk” of the state's expert disclosures as being incomplete. Of the 25 experts listed by the prosecution, reports have been received from only five, leaving the defense scrambling to prepare rebuttals by the looming January 23 deadline. “This is a capital murder case,” the defense argued in their motion. “Compliance with the rules of discovery is not optional.” The implication is clear: without these expert reports, Kohberger's team is operating at a significant disadvantage, unable to fully anticipate or counter the state's evidence. To understand the gravity of this issue, it's important to consider the role of expert testimony in a trial of this magnitude. Experts provide the scientific backbone for arguments about forensic evidence, behavioral analysis, and timelines of events. In a case as complex and emotionally charged as this one, their insights could tip the scales of justice. The defense's claim that the prosecution's disclosures are incomplete raises serious questions about fairness and due process. Prosecutors, meanwhile, have remained tight-lipped, neither confirming nor denying the defense's assertions. A request for comment from the Latah County prosecuting attorney's office has, as of now, gone unanswered. But the silence may soon give way to a heated exchange in court, as both sides prepare for a pivotal hearing on January 23. This latest legal maneuver comes against the backdrop of Kohberger's upcoming trial, set to begin on August 11, 2025. Jury selection is scheduled for late July, giving both sides a narrow window to resolve these procedural disputes. The stakes could not be higher. Kohberger's life hangs in the balance, with the prosecution pursuing the death penalty. The legal wrangling also underscores the intense scrutiny this case has attracted. From the initial shockwaves of the murders in November 2022 to the subsequent investigation and arrest of Kohberger, every development has been dissected in the court of public opinion. Now, with the defense raising questions about procedural compliance, the case enters yet another contentious phase. The allegations also bring into focus the two surviving roommates, Bethany Funke and Dylan Mortensen, whose statements to police provided chilling details of the night of the murders. Mortensen described hearing unusual noises and seeing a masked figure in the early hours of that November morning. Her account, though harrowing, will likely be a cornerstone of the state's case. The defense's ability to challenge such testimony may hinge, in part, on the expert analyses they claim are missing. As the legal teams prepare for their next court showdown, the psychological toll on all involved is undeniable. For the victims' families, each delay or procedural hiccup is a painful reminder of the justice they seek. For Kohberger's defense, every missing piece of evidence feels like an uphill battle in a case already weighted heavily against their client. The January hearing will not only address the motion to compel expert disclosures but could also set the tone for the trial to come. Will the court grant the defense's request for more time? Will certain expert testimonies be excluded altogether? These questions hang over the proceedings like a dark cloud, with no easy answers in sight. Meanwhile, the broader implications of this legal skirmish extend beyond the confines of the Moscow courtroom. They touch on the fundamental principles of justice: the right to a fair trial, the responsibility of the state to adhere to procedural rules, and the delicate balance of power between prosecution and defense. In the weeks to come, those principles will be tested, as both sides continue to battle for control of the narrative and, ultimately, the outcome of this high-stakes trial. For now, Kohberger remains in custody at the Ada County Jail in Boise, awaiting his day in court. The world will be watching as this case unfolds, each new development adding another piece to a puzzle that has gripped the nation's attention. The road to justice, it seems, is as fraught and complex as the case itself. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com