Podcasts about ada county

Bryan Kohberger: How We Got Here - Episode 10: "Setting the Stage for Trial - Current Status and What Lies Ahead" Description: In our final episode, we examine where the case stands as trial approaches and analyze what this case means for the future of criminal justice in America. With jury selection beginning July 30th, 2025, we explore the challenges of finding impartial jurors in one of the most publicized cases in recent memory, despite the large Ada County jury pool. This episode analyzes the strengths and weaknesses each side brings to trial, from the prosecution's seemingly overwhelming DNA and digital evidence to the defense's constitutional challenges and alternate theories. We examine the key factors that will likely determine the trial's outcome, including the genetic genealogy evidence facing its first major courtroom test and the interpretation of complex digital forensics. The episode explores the lasting impact this case has already had on criminal justice, from the use of emerging forensic technologies to the challenges of ensuring fair trials in the social media age. We also reflect on the permanent changes to the University of Idaho and Moscow community, and consider how this case will influence law enforcement, legal education, and criminal procedure for years to come. Finally, we remember the four young victims whose lives were cut short and whose memory deserves justice. Hashtags: #TrialOutlook #CriminalJustice #ForensicScience #LegalPrecedent #JurySelection #GeneticGenealogy #DigitalForensics #CommunityImpact #UniversityOfIdaho #LegacyCase #VictimsMemory #JusticeSystem #TrueGrime #CriminalLaw #ModernForensics Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Bryan Kohberger: How We Got Here - Episode 10: "Setting the Stage for Trial - Current Status and What Lies Ahead" Description: In our final episode, we examine where the case stands as trial approaches and analyze what this case means for the future of criminal justice in America. With jury selection beginning July 30th, 2025, we explore the challenges of finding impartial jurors in one of the most publicized cases in recent memory, despite the large Ada County jury pool. This episode analyzes the strengths and weaknesses each side brings to trial, from the prosecution's seemingly overwhelming DNA and digital evidence to the defense's constitutional challenges and alternate theories. We examine the key factors that will likely determine the trial's outcome, including the genetic genealogy evidence facing its first major courtroom test and the interpretation of complex digital forensics. The episode explores the lasting impact this case has already had on criminal justice, from the use of emerging forensic technologies to the challenges of ensuring fair trials in the social media age. We also reflect on the permanent changes to the University of Idaho and Moscow community, and consider how this case will influence law enforcement, legal education, and criminal procedure for years to come. Finally, we remember the four young victims whose lives were cut short and whose memory deserves justice. Hashtags: #TrialOutlook #CriminalJustice #ForensicScience #LegalPrecedent #JurySelection #GeneticGenealogy #DigitalForensics #CommunityImpact #UniversityOfIdaho #LegacyCase #VictimsMemory #JusticeSystem #TrueGrime #CriminalLaw #ModernForensics Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Bryan Kohberger: How We Got Here - Episode 10: "Setting the Stage for Trial - Current Status and What Lies Ahead" Description: In our final episode, we examine where the case stands as trial approaches and analyze what this case means for the future of criminal justice in America. With jury selection beginning July 30th, 2025, we explore the challenges of finding impartial jurors in one of the most publicized cases in recent memory, despite the large Ada County jury pool. This episode analyzes the strengths and weaknesses each side brings to trial, from the prosecution's seemingly overwhelming DNA and digital evidence to the defense's constitutional challenges and alternate theories. We examine the key factors that will likely determine the trial's outcome, including the genetic genealogy evidence facing its first major courtroom test and the interpretation of complex digital forensics. The episode explores the lasting impact this case has already had on criminal justice, from the use of emerging forensic technologies to the challenges of ensuring fair trials in the social media age. We also reflect on the permanent changes to the University of Idaho and Moscow community, and consider how this case will influence law enforcement, legal education, and criminal procedure for years to come. Finally, we remember the four young victims whose lives were cut short and whose memory deserves justice. Hashtags: #TrialOutlook #CriminalJustice #ForensicScience #LegalPrecedent #JurySelection #GeneticGenealogy #DigitalForensics #CommunityImpact #UniversityOfIdaho #LegacyCase #VictimsMemory #JusticeSystem #TrueGrime #CriminalLaw #ModernForensics Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Following the November 2022 murders of four University of Idaho students, suspect Bryan Kohberger's phone records revealed a series of unsettling activities. Investigators discovered that Kohberger, a criminology Ph.D. student at Washington State University, conducted online searches related to serial killer Ted Bundy and viewed pornography depicting nonconsensual acts, using keywords such as "forced," "passed out," "drugged," and "sleeping" . Additionally, surveillance footage showed a white Hyundai Elantra, matching Kohberger's vehicle, circling the victims' residence multiple times on the night of the murders . Cellphone tower data further indicated that Kohberger's phone connected near the victims' house 23 times in the four months leading up to the murders, often during nighttime hours .These findings, combined with DNA evidence linking Kohberger to the crime scene, have strengthened the prosecution's case against him. Despite this, Kohberger has pleaded not guilty and maintains his innocence, claiming he was out driving alone on the night of the murders . His trial is scheduled to begin on August 11, 2025, in Ada County, Idaho . If convicted, he could face the death penalty.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Explosive detail buried in Idaho murder suspect's phone records reveals who he called after the killings | Daily Mail Online

Following the November 2022 murders of four University of Idaho students, suspect Bryan Kohberger's phone records revealed a series of unsettling activities. Investigators discovered that Kohberger, a criminology Ph.D. student at Washington State University, conducted online searches related to serial killer Ted Bundy and viewed pornography depicting nonconsensual acts, using keywords such as "forced," "passed out," "drugged," and "sleeping" . Additionally, surveillance footage showed a white Hyundai Elantra, matching Kohberger's vehicle, circling the victims' residence multiple times on the night of the murders . Cellphone tower data further indicated that Kohberger's phone connected near the victims' house 23 times in the four months leading up to the murders, often during nighttime hours .These findings, combined with DNA evidence linking Kohberger to the crime scene, have strengthened the prosecution's case against him. Despite this, Kohberger has pleaded not guilty and maintains his innocence, claiming he was out driving alone on the night of the murders . His trial is scheduled to begin on August 11, 2025, in Ada County, Idaho . If convicted, he could face the death penalty.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Explosive detail buried in Idaho murder suspect's phone records reveals who he called after the killings | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Following the November 2022 murders of four University of Idaho students, suspect Bryan Kohberger's phone records revealed a series of unsettling activities. Investigators discovered that Kohberger, a criminology Ph.D. student at Washington State University, conducted online searches related to serial killer Ted Bundy and viewed pornography depicting nonconsensual acts, using keywords such as "forced," "passed out," "drugged," and "sleeping" . Additionally, surveillance footage showed a white Hyundai Elantra, matching Kohberger's vehicle, circling the victims' residence multiple times on the night of the murders . Cellphone tower data further indicated that Kohberger's phone connected near the victims' house 23 times in the four months leading up to the murders, often during nighttime hours .These findings, combined with DNA evidence linking Kohberger to the crime scene, have strengthened the prosecution's case against him. Despite this, Kohberger has pleaded not guilty and maintains his innocence, claiming he was out driving alone on the night of the murders . His trial is scheduled to begin on August 11, 2025, in Ada County, Idaho . If convicted, he could face the death penalty.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Explosive detail buried in Idaho murder suspect's phone records reveals who he called after the killings | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

On November 7, 2024, Bryan Kohberger appeared in an Ada County courtroom for a hearing to challenge the prosecution's intent to seek the death penalty in his upcoming trial. Kohberger faces charges for the November 2022 murders of four University of Idaho students. His defense team argued that the death penalty is arbitrary, inappropriate under modern standards, and unconstitutional. They also contended that methods of execution, such as lethal injection and firing squads, constitute cruel and unusual punishment. The prosecution countered by stating that both Idaho and U.S. Supreme Courts have upheld the constitutionality of the death penalty.During the four-hour hearing, Judge Steven Hippler engaged both sides with questions, expressing concerns about the timing of the decision on execution methods, given the lengthy appeals process in death penalty cases. He questioned why a ruling on execution methods should be made now, considering that it could be over a decade before any sentence is carried out, during which time methods may change. The defense emphasized the importance of addressing the death penalty issue before jury selection, citing the impact on jury composition and trial preparation. At the conclusion of the hearing, Judge Hippler stated he would take the matters under advisement and issue written opinions in due course.(commercial at 9:41)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Idaho murders suspect Bryan Kohberger gets no-nonsense warning from judge over potential death penalty | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

The Idaho Supreme Court has granted a change of venue for Bryan Kohberger's trial, moving it from Latah County to Ada County. This decision was made after Kohberger's defense raised concerns over finding an impartial jury in the original county due to the high-profile nature of the case. Kohberger is accused of the brutal murders of four University of Idaho students in November 2022, a crime that has garnered significant media attention and community impact.In addition to the venue change, the Idaho courts have assigned District Judge Steven Hippler from the Fourth Judicial District to oversee the case moving forward. Kohberger, who has been in custody since his arrest, will be transferred to the Ada County Jail as the trial preparations continue. This move aims to ensure a fair trial by reducing local bias that could influence the outcome. The upcoming proceedings are expected to be closely watched as the legal process advances in a new jurisdiction.(commercial at 8:45)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Bryan Kohberger judge announces new location for Idaho murders trial | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

On day five of jury selection in the Chad Daybell murder trial, the final panel of jurors was seated after a rigorous week-long vetting process in Ada County, Idaho. After questioning over 100 potential jurors, both the prosecution and defense settled on a panel consisting of 10 men and 8 women, which includes 12 jurors and 6 alternates. Much of the questioning on the final day centered around jurors' views on the death penalty, religious beliefs, and their ability to remain impartial in a high-profile, emotionally charged case. Some prospective jurors were excused after expressing strong opinions about capital punishment or sharing doubts about their ability to disregard media coverage surrounding the deaths of Tylee Ryan, J.J. Vallow, and Tammy Daybell.With the jury finalized, opening statements are scheduled to begin on Wednesday, April 10, marking the start of what is expected to be a lengthy and complex trial. Chad Daybell faces multiple counts, including first-degree murder, conspiracy to commit murder, and insurance fraud, all tied to the suspicious deaths of his wife Tammy Daybell and Lori Vallow's two children. The judge has already imposed a strict decorum order to prevent disruptions and manage the intense public interest in the case. The seating of the jury sets the stage for a deeply scrutinized legal battle that will delve into alleged religious extremism, apocalyptic prophecies, and a tangled web of lies and death that has haunted two families for years.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Bryan Kohberger, the man accused of murdering four University of Idaho students in 2022, recently had his request for a venue change granted by Judge John Judge of Idaho's 2nd Judicial District. The judge expressed concerns that Kohberger would not receive a fair trial in Latah County, where the crimes occurred, due to the overwhelming media coverage and the small size of the community. This decision was made after considering evidence that a large percentage of potential jurors in the area had already formed opinions about the case, with many believing Kohberger is guilty.Kohberger's defense argued that the intense pretrial publicity had tainted the local jury pool, making it impossible to find impartial jurors. While the defense has suggested moving the trial to Ada County, home to Boise, the exact new location will be determined by Idaho's Supreme Court. The trial, originally scheduled to start in June 2025, could see significant logistical challenges due to its high profile and the expected length of three months.The decision to move the trial has been met with mixed reactions. While legal experts agree that a fair trial would be difficult in Latah County, the family of one of the victims, Kaylee Goncalves, expressed disappointment, believing the trial should remain in the community most affected by the tragedy.In this episode, we keep the conversation going about the latest order by Judge Judge.  (commercial at 9:13)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

The ongoing legal battle between the state of Idaho and Bryan Kohberger, who is accused of killing four University of Idaho students in 2022, has been particularly intense regarding the venue for his upcoming trial. Kohberger's defense team has repeatedly requested a change of venue, arguing that he cannot receive a fair trial in Latah County due to the extensive media coverage and the small, potentially biased jury pool. They have specifically requested the trial be moved to Ada County, nearly 300 miles away, which they believe would provide a more impartial jury.The prosecution, however, has opposed this request, insisting that Latah County is a suitable venue and that moving the trial would not significantly improve the chances of a fair trial. They argue that media coverage and public opinion have been widespread and would likely follow the trial wherever it is held in Idaho.The legal back-and-forth has also been complicated by a series of other pre-trial motions and hearings, many of which have frustrated both the families of the victims and the judge overseeing the case. These include debates over evidence, such as the use of investigative genetic genealogy by the prosecution and the defense's requests for broader access to this evidence. Additionally, the defense's alibi strategy has been another point of contention, as they have claimed that Kohberger was "out driving" at the time of the murders, but have struggled to provide specific details to support this claim.A hearing is scheduled for August 29, 2024, to further address the change of venue request, and the trial itself is set to begin in June 2025. The extended pre-trial proceedings have drawn criticism for their slow pace, adding to the tension surrounding this high-profile case(commercial at 8:23)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

The Ada County Coroner's Office is home to the only forensic pathologists in the state.

Cell antennas emit invisible wireless "smoke" that penetrates the body and causes harm. There is nothing you can do to escape it unless your local government properly regulates where cell towers can be installed.  Most governments are ill-equipped to understand what they have the right to do.   In this episode, we educate what needs to be done. Currently, Idaho is pushing House Bill H180, which only allows local governments 10 days to review applications. If they are unable to respond, the application is deemed approved. The Idaho Association of Cities, the Association of Counties, and Ada County are against this bill.  Idaho is in the crosshairs of the wireless industry's push to put these antennas everywhere. But should we?  What are the health Ramifications?  What harm is brought to Idaho's crops when the pollinators needed for our crops are gone? We spent 60-plus years arguing the health ramifications of Smoking in public places.  We finally banned smoking long after we knew that smoking caused harm. At least by smoking cigarettes, one can escape the pollution that causes you harm.  With Wireless Radiation, THERE IS NO ESCAPING THE HARMFUL EFFECTS!!The Idaho Broadband Task Force has federal money that it is using to connect high-speed broadband wired fiber optics to every community in Idaho. We are grateful for that. It's good for all of us to have hardwired fiber optics connecting us. We need to go a step further. If we could wire every home in America with Electricity in the 1930s, we can do the same with fiberoptic cable today. Now, Big Wireless wants to get in on the free money. Cell towers and small cell antennas are inferior ways to distribute broadband data. They are power hogs, harm you and our pollinators, and have poor security.   Telecommunications vs BroadbandSome known health ramifications are as follows: Over 18,000 studies have shown the cause of harm. These were submitted to the court in the 2021 DC Court of Appeals Decision that found against the FCC. Proven Health RisksIncreases AfibIncreases TinititusLack of sleepingGlioblastoma Brain cancerHeadaches and Brain FogTirednessRelated Shows:Dr. Martin Paul  Support the show Ready for your healing journey?Visit our website: www.LivingWatersCleanse.com Or give us a call at: (208) 378-9911Stem Cell Activation Patches:www.StemCellPatch.netGet your Supplements and Natural Body Products Here:www.livingwaterscleanse.com/supplementsQI-Shield EMF Devices:Protect your whole home or office with a touric shield from EMF's. 1. QI Shield Covers 16'x16' 2. QI Home Covers 50' x 50' 3. QI Max Covers 250'x250'Click on link and enter Livingwaters in discount code section during checkout Magnesium Soaks:Follow us on our socials: Living Waters Wellness CenterBitChute: www.bitchute.com/livingwaterswellnessRumble: www.rumble.com/l...

The jury selection process for the Lori Vallow Daybell trial concluded in early April 2023, marking a significant step in the high-profile case surrounding the murders of her children, Tylee Ryan and JJ Vallow, and the conspiracy to kill Tammy Daybell. Given the extensive media coverage and the disturbing nature of the allegations, the court carefully screened hundreds of potential jurors over several days in Ada County, Idaho, where the trial had been moved to ensure a fair and impartial jury. The process involved extensive questioning to assess jurors' knowledge of the case, their ability to remain unbiased, and their views on topics such as religion, mental health, and extreme beliefs, which were central to the prosecution's case. The defense and prosecution used their challenges to strike jurors they believed might be prejudiced, ultimately selecting 12 jurors and six alternates to hear the case.News coverage of the jury selection highlighted the difficulty in finding individuals who had not been exposed to the intense media scrutiny surrounding the case. Many potential jurors had already formed opinions based on news reports and social media discussions, making it challenging to ensure an impartial panel. Some were dismissed due to personal connections to law enforcement or prior experiences with child abuse cases, which could affect their ability to remain neutral. With a jury now in place, legal analysts speculated on how the selected individuals' backgrounds and beliefs might influence their views on Lori Vallow's mental state and culpability. As the trial began, the prosecution was expected to argue that Vallow played an active role in planning and covering up the murders, while the defense sought to portray her as a manipulated victim of Chad Daybell's apocalyptic influence. The jury's composition and ability to weigh these arguments impartially became a focal point of discussions leading into the trial.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

The jury selection process in the Lori Vallow Daybell trial was a meticulous and time-consuming effort due to the high-profile nature of the case and the widespread media coverage surrounding it. The process began in March 2023 in Ada County, Idaho, where the trial was moved from Fremont County to ensure a more impartial jury pool. Over the course of several days, dozens of potential jurors were questioned about their knowledge of the case, personal biases, and ability to remain fair and impartial. Attorneys on both sides focused heavily on whether potential jurors had been exposed to extensive media coverage, as well as their views on issues like mental illness and religious beliefs—both of which played a central role in Vallow's defense. The court aimed to select a jury that could fairly weigh the evidence, considering the disturbing allegations against Vallow, who was accused of murdering her two children, Tylee Ryan and JJ Vallow, and conspiring to kill her husband's previous wife, Tammy Daybell.After careful screening, a jury of 12 members along with six alternates was finalized. The prosecution and defense used their allotted peremptory challenges to strike jurors they felt might be unfavorable to their side, while also navigating challenges for cause—such as individuals who admitted they had already formed opinions about the case. The selection process was critical, as the defense sought jurors who might be open to arguments regarding Vallow's mental state and alleged manipulation by her husband, Chad Daybell, while the prosecution sought individuals who could objectively analyze the evidence, including grisly forensic findings. Once seated, the jury was instructed to avoid outside influences, including media coverage, to ensure a fair trial.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

The jury selection process in the Lori Vallow Daybell trial was a meticulous and time-consuming effort due to the high-profile nature of the case and the widespread media coverage surrounding it. The process began in March 2023 in Ada County, Idaho, where the trial was moved from Fremont County to ensure a more impartial jury pool. Over the course of several days, dozens of potential jurors were questioned about their knowledge of the case, personal biases, and ability to remain fair and impartial. Attorneys on both sides focused heavily on whether potential jurors had been exposed to extensive media coverage, as well as their views on issues like mental illness and religious beliefs—both of which played a central role in Vallow's defense. The court aimed to select a jury that could fairly weigh the evidence, considering the disturbing allegations against Vallow, who was accused of murdering her two children, Tylee Ryan and JJ Vallow, and conspiring to kill her husband's previous wife, Tammy Daybell.After careful screening, a jury of 12 members along with six alternates was finalized. The prosecution and defense used their allotted peremptory challenges to strike jurors they felt might be unfavorable to their side, while also navigating challenges for cause—such as individuals who admitted they had already formed opinions about the case. The selection process was critical, as the defense sought jurors who might be open to arguments regarding Vallow's mental state and alleged manipulation by her husband, Chad Daybell, while the prosecution sought individuals who could objectively analyze the evidence, including grisly forensic findings. Once seated, the jury was instructed to avoid outside influences, including media coverage, to ensure a fair trial.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

The jury selection process for the Lori Vallow Daybell trial concluded in early April 2023, marking a significant step in the high-profile case surrounding the murders of her children, Tylee Ryan and JJ Vallow, and the conspiracy to kill Tammy Daybell. Given the extensive media coverage and the disturbing nature of the allegations, the court carefully screened hundreds of potential jurors over several days in Ada County, Idaho, where the trial had been moved to ensure a fair and impartial jury. The process involved extensive questioning to assess jurors' knowledge of the case, their ability to remain unbiased, and their views on topics such as religion, mental health, and extreme beliefs, which were central to the prosecution's case. The defense and prosecution used their challenges to strike jurors they believed might be prejudiced, ultimately selecting 12 jurors and six alternates to hear the case.News coverage of the jury selection highlighted the difficulty in finding individuals who had not been exposed to the intense media scrutiny surrounding the case. Many potential jurors had already formed opinions based on news reports and social media discussions, making it challenging to ensure an impartial panel. Some were dismissed due to personal connections to law enforcement or prior experiences with child abuse cases, which could affect their ability to remain neutral. With a jury now in place, legal analysts speculated on how the selected individuals' backgrounds and beliefs might influence their views on Lori Vallow's mental state and culpability. As the trial began, the prosecution was expected to argue that Vallow played an active role in planning and covering up the murders, while the defense sought to portray her as a manipulated victim of Chad Daybell's apocalyptic influence. The jury's composition and ability to weigh these arguments impartially became a focal point of discussions leading into the trial.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The jury selection process for the Lori Vallow Daybell trial concluded in early April 2023, marking a significant step in the high-profile case surrounding the murders of her children, Tylee Ryan and JJ Vallow, and the conspiracy to kill Tammy Daybell. Given the extensive media coverage and the disturbing nature of the allegations, the court carefully screened hundreds of potential jurors over several days in Ada County, Idaho, where the trial had been moved to ensure a fair and impartial jury. The process involved extensive questioning to assess jurors' knowledge of the case, their ability to remain unbiased, and their views on topics such as religion, mental health, and extreme beliefs, which were central to the prosecution's case. The defense and prosecution used their challenges to strike jurors they believed might be prejudiced, ultimately selecting 12 jurors and six alternates to hear the case.News coverage of the jury selection highlighted the difficulty in finding individuals who had not been exposed to the intense media scrutiny surrounding the case. Many potential jurors had already formed opinions based on news reports and social media discussions, making it challenging to ensure an impartial panel. Some were dismissed due to personal connections to law enforcement or prior experiences with child abuse cases, which could affect their ability to remain neutral. With a jury now in place, legal analysts speculated on how the selected individuals' backgrounds and beliefs might influence their views on Lori Vallow's mental state and culpability. As the trial began, the prosecution was expected to argue that Vallow played an active role in planning and covering up the murders, while the defense sought to portray her as a manipulated victim of Chad Daybell's apocalyptic influence. The jury's composition and ability to weigh these arguments impartially became a focal point of discussions leading into the trial.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

The jury selection process in the Lori Vallow Daybell trial was a meticulous and time-consuming effort due to the high-profile nature of the case and the widespread media coverage surrounding it. The process began in March 2023 in Ada County, Idaho, where the trial was moved from Fremont County to ensure a more impartial jury pool. Over the course of several days, dozens of potential jurors were questioned about their knowledge of the case, personal biases, and ability to remain fair and impartial. Attorneys on both sides focused heavily on whether potential jurors had been exposed to extensive media coverage, as well as their views on issues like mental illness and religious beliefs—both of which played a central role in Vallow's defense. The court aimed to select a jury that could fairly weigh the evidence, considering the disturbing allegations against Vallow, who was accused of murdering her two children, Tylee Ryan and JJ Vallow, and conspiring to kill her husband's previous wife, Tammy Daybell.After careful screening, a jury of 12 members along with six alternates was finalized. The prosecution and defense used their allotted peremptory challenges to strike jurors they felt might be unfavorable to their side, while also navigating challenges for cause—such as individuals who admitted they had already formed opinions about the case. The selection process was critical, as the defense sought jurors who might be open to arguments regarding Vallow's mental state and alleged manipulation by her husband, Chad Daybell, while the prosecution sought individuals who could objectively analyze the evidence, including grisly forensic findings. Once seated, the jury was instructed to avoid outside influences, including media coverage, to ensure a fair trial.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The jury selection process in the Lori Vallow Daybell trial was a meticulous and time-consuming effort due to the high-profile nature of the case and the widespread media coverage surrounding it. The process began in March 2023 in Ada County, Idaho, where the trial was moved from Fremont County to ensure a more impartial jury pool. Over the course of several days, dozens of potential jurors were questioned about their knowledge of the case, personal biases, and ability to remain fair and impartial. Attorneys on both sides focused heavily on whether potential jurors had been exposed to extensive media coverage, as well as their views on issues like mental illness and religious beliefs—both of which played a central role in Vallow's defense. The court aimed to select a jury that could fairly weigh the evidence, considering the disturbing allegations against Vallow, who was accused of murdering her two children, Tylee Ryan and JJ Vallow, and conspiring to kill her husband's previous wife, Tammy Daybell.After careful screening, a jury of 12 members along with six alternates was finalized. The prosecution and defense used their allotted peremptory challenges to strike jurors they felt might be unfavorable to their side, while also navigating challenges for cause—such as individuals who admitted they had already formed opinions about the case. The selection process was critical, as the defense sought jurors who might be open to arguments regarding Vallow's mental state and alleged manipulation by her husband, Chad Daybell, while the prosecution sought individuals who could objectively analyze the evidence, including grisly forensic findings. Once seated, the jury was instructed to avoid outside influences, including media coverage, to ensure a fair trial.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The jury selection process in the Lori Vallow Daybell trial was a meticulous and time-consuming effort due to the high-profile nature of the case and the widespread media coverage surrounding it. The process began in March 2023 in Ada County, Idaho, where the trial was moved from Fremont County to ensure a more impartial jury pool. Over the course of several days, dozens of potential jurors were questioned about their knowledge of the case, personal biases, and ability to remain fair and impartial. Attorneys on both sides focused heavily on whether potential jurors had been exposed to extensive media coverage, as well as their views on issues like mental illness and religious beliefs—both of which played a central role in Vallow's defense. The court aimed to select a jury that could fairly weigh the evidence, considering the disturbing allegations against Vallow, who was accused of murdering her two children, Tylee Ryan and JJ Vallow, and conspiring to kill her husband's previous wife, Tammy Daybell.After careful screening, a jury of 12 members along with six alternates was finalized. The prosecution and defense used their allotted peremptory challenges to strike jurors they felt might be unfavorable to their side, while also navigating challenges for cause—such as individuals who admitted they had already formed opinions about the case. The selection process was critical, as the defense sought jurors who might be open to arguments regarding Vallow's mental state and alleged manipulation by her husband, Chad Daybell, while the prosecution sought individuals who could objectively analyze the evidence, including grisly forensic findings. Once seated, the jury was instructed to avoid outside influences, including media coverage, to ensure a fair trial.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

The jury selection process in the Lori Vallow Daybell trial was a meticulous and time-consuming effort due to the high-profile nature of the case and the widespread media coverage surrounding it. The process began in March 2023 in Ada County, Idaho, where the trial was moved from Fremont County to ensure a more impartial jury pool. Over the course of several days, dozens of potential jurors were questioned about their knowledge of the case, personal biases, and ability to remain fair and impartial. Attorneys on both sides focused heavily on whether potential jurors had been exposed to extensive media coverage, as well as their views on issues like mental illness and religious beliefs—both of which played a central role in Vallow's defense. The court aimed to select a jury that could fairly weigh the evidence, considering the disturbing allegations against Vallow, who was accused of murdering her two children, Tylee Ryan and JJ Vallow, and conspiring to kill her husband's previous wife, Tammy Daybell.After careful screening, a jury of 12 members along with six alternates was finalized. The prosecution and defense used their allotted peremptory challenges to strike jurors they felt might be unfavorable to their side, while also navigating challenges for cause—such as individuals who admitted they had already formed opinions about the case. The selection process was critical, as the defense sought jurors who might be open to arguments regarding Vallow's mental state and alleged manipulation by her husband, Chad Daybell, while the prosecution sought individuals who could objectively analyze the evidence, including grisly forensic findings. Once seated, the jury was instructed to avoid outside influences, including media coverage, to ensure a fair trial.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

 https://www.fcaidaho.org/glusk@fca.org | Gabby was an FCA staff member in Iowa and just moved to Idaho and has joined our local team! We are so excited to have her and her previous FCA experience. More info on Gabby coming soon!The Fellowship of Christian Athletes' exciting local radio program, Heart of the Athlete, airs Saturdays at 9 am MST on KBXL 94.1 FM. The show is hosted by local FCA Director, Ken Lewis. This program is a great opportunity to listen to local athletes and coaches share their lives, combining sports with their faith in Jesus Christ each week!Our relationships will demonstrate steadfast commitment to Jesus Christ and His Word through Integrity, Serving, Teamwork and Excellence.NNU Box 3359 623 S University Blvd Nampa, ID 83686 United States (208) 697-1051 klewis@fca.orghttps://www.fcaidaho.org/Podcast Website: https://941thevoice.com/podcasts/heart-of-the-athlete/

In this episode, hosts Eric Fey and Brianna Lennon speak with Trent Tripple in Ada County, Idaho. Trent was integral in implementing the new Ballot Verifier system in Ada County that allows voters to view ballot images and cast vote records side-by-side. They spoke about how this ballot verifier came to be, how it's helped decrease distrust in elections in Idaho and how it's won his office back time that used to be spent fielding public records requests.

The Idaho Supreme Court has granted a change of venue for Bryan Kohberger's trial, moving it from Latah County to Ada County. This decision was made after Kohberger's defense raised concerns over finding an impartial jury in the original county due to the high-profile nature of the case. Kohberger is accused of the brutal murders of four University of Idaho students in November 2022, a crime that has garnered significant media attention and community impact.In addition to the venue change, the Idaho courts have assigned District Judge Steven Hippler from the Fourth Judicial District to oversee the case moving forward. Kohberger, who has been in custody since his arrest, will be transferred to the Ada County Jail as the trial preparations continue. This move aims to ensure a fair trial by reducing local bias that could influence the outcome. The upcoming proceedings are expected to be closely watched as the legal process advances in a new jurisdiction.(commercial at 8:45)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Bryan Kohberger judge announces new location for Idaho murders trial | Daily Mail Online

Bryan Kohberger's hearing on January 22, 2025, primarily focused on the ongoing legal proceedings related to his case. The judge excused Kohberger from attending the hearing in person, but his attorneys appeared to argue against the admissibility of DNA evidence linked to his family. This hearing was conducted with a degree of secrecy, with the courtroom closed to the public and under a gag order to ensure a fair trial, as the case has garnered significant public attention. The defense's request to dismiss certain DNA evidence seems to be a critical part of their strategy, aiming to challenge the prosecution's case by questioning the validity or relevance of the genetic material collected.The trial, initially set in Moscow, Idaho, was moved to Ada County due to concerns about the potential for an unbiased jury in Latah County, given the extensive media coverage and public sentiment. The relocation to Boise was decided after arguments that a fair trial would be impossible in the original venue due to the "mob mentality" and threats of unrest if Kohberger were acquitted. Today's proceedings also included discussions on managing the trial's logistics and expenses, with the county's budget for the trial being significantly increased to accommodate the costs associated with such a high-profile case.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Bryan Kohberger judge considers major decision days before key hearing in Idaho murder case | Daily Mail Online

Bryan Kohberger's hearing on January 22, 2025, primarily focused on the ongoing legal proceedings related to his case. The judge excused Kohberger from attending the hearing in person, but his attorneys appeared to argue against the admissibility of DNA evidence linked to his family. This hearing was conducted with a degree of secrecy, with the courtroom closed to the public and under a gag order to ensure a fair trial, as the case has garnered significant public attention. The defense's request to dismiss certain DNA evidence seems to be a critical part of their strategy, aiming to challenge the prosecution's case by questioning the validity or relevance of the genetic material collected.The trial, initially set in Moscow, Idaho, was moved to Ada County due to concerns about the potential for an unbiased jury in Latah County, given the extensive media coverage and public sentiment. The relocation to Boise was decided after arguments that a fair trial would be impossible in the original venue due to the "mob mentality" and threats of unrest if Kohberger were acquitted. Today's proceedings also included discussions on managing the trial's logistics and expenses, with the county's budget for the trial being significantly increased to accommodate the costs associated with such a high-profile case.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Bryan Kohberger judge considers major decision days before key hearing in Idaho murder case | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Bryan Kohberger's hearing on January 22, 2025, primarily focused on the ongoing legal proceedings related to his case. The judge excused Kohberger from attending the hearing in person, but his attorneys appeared to argue against the admissibility of DNA evidence linked to his family. This hearing was conducted with a degree of secrecy, with the courtroom closed to the public and under a gag order to ensure a fair trial, as the case has garnered significant public attention. The defense's request to dismiss certain DNA evidence seems to be a critical part of their strategy, aiming to challenge the prosecution's case by questioning the validity or relevance of the genetic material collected.The trial, initially set in Moscow, Idaho, was moved to Ada County due to concerns about the potential for an unbiased jury in Latah County, given the extensive media coverage and public sentiment. The relocation to Boise was decided after arguments that a fair trial would be impossible in the original venue due to the "mob mentality" and threats of unrest if Kohberger were acquitted. Today's proceedings also included discussions on managing the trial's logistics and expenses, with the county's budget for the trial being significantly increased to accommodate the costs associated with such a high-profile case.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Bryan Kohberger judge considers major decision days before key hearing in Idaho murder case | Daily Mail Online

On November 7, 2024, Bryan Kohberger appeared in an Ada County courtroom for a hearing to challenge the prosecution's intent to seek the death penalty in his upcoming trial. Kohberger faces charges for the November 2022 murders of four University of Idaho students. His defense team argued that the death penalty is arbitrary, inappropriate under modern standards, and unconstitutional. They also contended that methods of execution, such as lethal injection and firing squads, constitute cruel and unusual punishment. The prosecution countered by stating that both Idaho and U.S. Supreme Courts have upheld the constitutionality of the death penalty.During the four-hour hearing, Judge Steven Hippler engaged both sides with questions, expressing concerns about the timing of the decision on execution methods, given the lengthy appeals process in death penalty cases. He questioned why a ruling on execution methods should be made now, considering that it could be over a decade before any sentence is carried out, during which time methods may change. The defense emphasized the importance of addressing the death penalty issue before jury selection, citing the impact on jury composition and trial preparation. At the conclusion of the hearing, Judge Hippler stated he would take the matters under advisement and issue written opinions in due course.(commercial at 9:41)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Idaho murders suspect Bryan Kohberger gets no-nonsense warning from judge over potential death penalty | Daily Mail Online

The ongoing legal battle between the state of Idaho and Bryan Kohberger, who is accused of killing four University of Idaho students in 2022, has been particularly intense regarding the venue for his upcoming trial. Kohberger's defense team has repeatedly requested a change of venue, arguing that he cannot receive a fair trial in Latah County due to the extensive media coverage and the small, potentially biased jury pool. They have specifically requested the trial be moved to Ada County, nearly 300 miles away, which they believe would provide a more impartial jury.The prosecution, however, has opposed this request, insisting that Latah County is a suitable venue and that moving the trial would not significantly improve the chances of a fair trial. They argue that media coverage and public opinion have been widespread and would likely follow the trial wherever it is held in Idaho.The legal back-and-forth has also been complicated by a series of other pre-trial motions and hearings, many of which have frustrated both the families of the victims and the judge overseeing the case. These include debates over evidence, such as the use of investigative genetic genealogy by the prosecution and the defense's requests for broader access to this evidence. Additionally, the defense's alibi strategy has been another point of contention, as they have claimed that Kohberger was "out driving" at the time of the murders, but have struggled to provide specific details to support this claim.A hearing is scheduled for August 29, 2024, to further address the change of venue request, and the trial itself is set to begin in June 2025. The extended pre-trial proceedings have drawn criticism for their slow pace, adding to the tension surrounding this high-profile case(commercial at 8:23)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Attorneys for Bryan Kohberger have accused investigators of mishandling key evidence and using aggressive search tactics in the case linking him to the killings of four University of Idaho students in November 2022. In court filings, the defense is asking the court to exclude evidence it claims was improperly obtained, including DNA, digital accounts, and information from expert witnesses. In recently submitted documents, Kohberger's defense argues that investigative genetic genealogy—used to connect DNA collected at the crime scene to Kohberger's family home in Pennsylvania—is both "unreliable and controversial." According to the defense, “The investigators' methods show a disregard for protocols, effectively destroying the house to save the car, or some other evidence, from Mr. Kohberger's rubber gloves.” Kohberger was arrested on Dec. 30, 2022, in Pennsylvania, following a month-long investigation into the Nov. 13 stabbings of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin. The students were found dead in their rental home near the University of Idaho campus. Prosecutors have maintained that DNA collected from the crime scene matches Kohberger's DNA, which was obtained from his family residence. Despite this claim, the defense is challenging the admissibility of such evidence, citing concerns over the reliability of investigative genetic genealogy. The defense has also taken issue with how investigators collected evidence from Kohberger's digital accounts, including his Apple iCloud, Google, and Amazon profiles. These filings accuse the prosecution of failing to provide adequate disclosure regarding the experts expected to testify at trial, labeling the lack of transparency as a violation of due process. The defense team has requested that the court impose sanctions on prosecutors for their handling of discovery and pretrial evidence-sharing obligations. Kohberger, a former criminology student, was indicted last year on four counts of first-degree murder and one count of burglary. He chose to remain silent during his arraignment, prompting Latah County Judge John Judge to enter not guilty pleas on his behalf. The case, which was transferred to Ada County, is expected to move to trial in August. The parties are scheduled to return to court on Jan. 23 to address the defense's allegations of evidence mishandling and procedural misconduct. As the trial date approaches, both sides are preparing for an intense legal battle over the validity of the evidence. The defense's challenges, particularly regarding DNA and digital evidence, could significantly shape the outcome of this high-profile case. #BryanKohberger #IdahoMurders #CriminalDefense #DNAEvidence #LegalChallenges #UniversityOfIdaho #TrueCrime Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Attorneys for Bryan Kohberger have accused investigators of mishandling key evidence and using aggressive search tactics in the case linking him to the killings of four University of Idaho students in November 2022. In court filings, the defense is asking the court to exclude evidence it claims was improperly obtained, including DNA, digital accounts, and information from expert witnesses. In recently submitted documents, Kohberger's defense argues that investigative genetic genealogy—used to connect DNA collected at the crime scene to Kohberger's family home in Pennsylvania—is both "unreliable and controversial." According to the defense, “The investigators' methods show a disregard for protocols, effectively destroying the house to save the car, or some other evidence, from Mr. Kohberger's rubber gloves.” Kohberger was arrested on Dec. 30, 2022, in Pennsylvania, following a month-long investigation into the Nov. 13 stabbings of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin. The students were found dead in their rental home near the University of Idaho campus. Prosecutors have maintained that DNA collected from the crime scene matches Kohberger's DNA, which was obtained from his family residence. Despite this claim, the defense is challenging the admissibility of such evidence, citing concerns over the reliability of investigative genetic genealogy. The defense has also taken issue with how investigators collected evidence from Kohberger's digital accounts, including his Apple iCloud, Google, and Amazon profiles. These filings accuse the prosecution of failing to provide adequate disclosure regarding the experts expected to testify at trial, labeling the lack of transparency as a violation of due process. The defense team has requested that the court impose sanctions on prosecutors for their handling of discovery and pretrial evidence-sharing obligations. Kohberger, a former criminology student, was indicted last year on four counts of first-degree murder and one count of burglary. He chose to remain silent during his arraignment, prompting Latah County Judge John Judge to enter not guilty pleas on his behalf. The case, which was transferred to Ada County, is expected to move to trial in August. The parties are scheduled to return to court on Jan. 23 to address the defense's allegations of evidence mishandling and procedural misconduct. As the trial date approaches, both sides are preparing for an intense legal battle over the validity of the evidence. The defense's challenges, particularly regarding DNA and digital evidence, could significantly shape the outcome of this high-profile case. #BryanKohberger #IdahoMurders #CriminalDefense #DNAEvidence #LegalChallenges #UniversityOfIdaho #TrueCrime Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Attorneys for Bryan Kohberger have accused investigators of mishandling key evidence and using aggressive search tactics in the case linking him to the killings of four University of Idaho students in November 2022. In court filings, the defense is asking the court to exclude evidence it claims was improperly obtained, including DNA, digital accounts, and information from expert witnesses. In recently submitted documents, Kohberger's defense argues that investigative genetic genealogy—used to connect DNA collected at the crime scene to Kohberger's family home in Pennsylvania—is both "unreliable and controversial." According to the defense, “The investigators' methods show a disregard for protocols, effectively destroying the house to save the car, or some other evidence, from Mr. Kohberger's rubber gloves.” Kohberger was arrested on Dec. 30, 2022, in Pennsylvania, following a month-long investigation into the Nov. 13 stabbings of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin. The students were found dead in their rental home near the University of Idaho campus. Prosecutors have maintained that DNA collected from the crime scene matches Kohberger's DNA, which was obtained from his family residence. Despite this claim, the defense is challenging the admissibility of such evidence, citing concerns over the reliability of investigative genetic genealogy. The defense has also taken issue with how investigators collected evidence from Kohberger's digital accounts, including his Apple iCloud, Google, and Amazon profiles. These filings accuse the prosecution of failing to provide adequate disclosure regarding the experts expected to testify at trial, labeling the lack of transparency as a violation of due process. The defense team has requested that the court impose sanctions on prosecutors for their handling of discovery and pretrial evidence-sharing obligations. Kohberger, a former criminology student, was indicted last year on four counts of first-degree murder and one count of burglary. He chose to remain silent during his arraignment, prompting Latah County Judge John Judge to enter not guilty pleas on his behalf. The case, which was transferred to Ada County, is expected to move to trial in August. The parties are scheduled to return to court on Jan. 23 to address the defense's allegations of evidence mishandling and procedural misconduct. As the trial date approaches, both sides are preparing for an intense legal battle over the validity of the evidence. The defense's challenges, particularly regarding DNA and digital evidence, could significantly shape the outcome of this high-profile case. #BryanKohberger #IdahoMurders #CriminalDefense #DNAEvidence #LegalChallenges #UniversityOfIdaho #TrueCrime Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

Attorneys for Bryan Kohberger have accused investigators of mishandling key evidence and using aggressive search tactics in the case linking him to the killings of four University of Idaho students in November 2022. In court filings, the defense is asking the court to exclude evidence it claims was improperly obtained, including DNA, digital accounts, and information from expert witnesses. In recently submitted documents, Kohberger's defense argues that investigative genetic genealogy—used to connect DNA collected at the crime scene to Kohberger's family home in Pennsylvania—is both "unreliable and controversial." According to the defense, “The investigators' methods show a disregard for protocols, effectively destroying the house to save the car, or some other evidence, from Mr. Kohberger's rubber gloves.” Kohberger was arrested on Dec. 30, 2022, in Pennsylvania, following a month-long investigation into the Nov. 13 stabbings of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin. The students were found dead in their rental home near the University of Idaho campus. Prosecutors have maintained that DNA collected from the crime scene matches Kohberger's DNA, which was obtained from his family residence. Despite this claim, the defense is challenging the admissibility of such evidence, citing concerns over the reliability of investigative genetic genealogy. The defense has also taken issue with how investigators collected evidence from Kohberger's digital accounts, including his Apple iCloud, Google, and Amazon profiles. These filings accuse the prosecution of failing to provide adequate disclosure regarding the experts expected to testify at trial, labeling the lack of transparency as a violation of due process. The defense team has requested that the court impose sanctions on prosecutors for their handling of discovery and pretrial evidence-sharing obligations. Kohberger, a former criminology student, was indicted last year on four counts of first-degree murder and one count of burglary. He chose to remain silent during his arraignment, prompting Latah County Judge John Judge to enter not guilty pleas on his behalf. The case, which was transferred to Ada County, is expected to move to trial in August. The parties are scheduled to return to court on Jan. 23 to address the defense's allegations of evidence mishandling and procedural misconduct. As the trial date approaches, both sides are preparing for an intense legal battle over the validity of the evidence. The defense's challenges, particularly regarding DNA and digital evidence, could significantly shape the outcome of this high-profile case. #BryanKohberger #IdahoMurders #CriminalDefense #DNAEvidence #LegalChallenges #UniversityOfIdaho #TrueCrime Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Bryan Kohberger was investigated for a home invasion eerily similar to the horrific crime he now stands accused of committing—the brutal murders of four University of Idaho students. The revelation, which emerged this week, has sent shockwaves through both the legal community and the public, raising profound questions about the odds of such coincidences and the investigative gaps that may have allowed a predator to escalate unchecked. The first case unfolded in October 2021, barely a year before the University of Idaho slayings, and less than 10 miles from the Moscow, Idaho, crime scene. A woman in Pullman, Washington, reported being awakened in the early morning hours by the sound of her bedroom door opening. She was met with a masked intruder armed with a knife. The assailant said nothing, his silence amplifying the terror. Acting with remarkable courage, the woman fought back, delivering a kick that sent the man stumbling before he fled through her closet and out of the home. The parallels between the two cases are impossible to ignore. Both crimes occurred in the dead of night when the victims were at their most vulnerable. In each instance, the perpetrator wore a mask and wielded a knife. The silent, calculated manner in which the Pullman assailant moved through the home mirrors the modus operandi alleged in the Idaho murders. Yet, while the 2021 incident ended with the victim's escape and survival, the Moscow tragedy resulted in the deaths of Ethan Chapin, Xana Kernodle, Kaylee Goncalves, and Madison Mogen—a crime so heinous it has captivated the nation's attention. When Kohberger was arrested in December 2022, authorities began scrutinizing his past, seeking any signs of violent tendencies or precursors to the alleged killings. Their investigation led them to revisit the Pullman home invasion. Kohberger was named a person of interest, but law enforcement ultimately cleared him. According to police, his height did not match the victim's description of the intruder, and he had not yet enrolled at Washington State University at the time of the attack. “We have no reason or evidence to believe he was involved in this burglary at this time,” Pullman police told ABC News. Still, the lingering questions remain. How rare is it for someone to be linked, even tangentially, to two such similar crimes? Is it a coincidence, or does it suggest a pattern that went unnoticed? The odds, as some experts suggest, strain credulity. For Kohberger's defense team, the Pullman case represents both a challenge and an opportunity. On the one hand, the unresolved nature of the 2021 break-in could bolster their argument that another individual with a similar modus operandi may be responsible for the Idaho murders. On the other hand, the eerie similarities between the two incidents could make it harder for jurors to ignore the implication of a connection. Adding to the complexity is the timing of the revelations. The Pullman incident had largely faded from public memory until body camera footage from the 2021 investigation surfaced. In it, the victim recounts the chilling encounter with clarity: “I heard my door open and I looked over, and someone was wearing a ski mask and had a knife. I kicked the s--t out of their stomach and screamed super loud, and they like flew back into my closet and then ran out my door and up the stairs.” Her statement paints a picture of a terrifying but brief encounter, one that underscores her sheer will to survive. In Moscow, however, the outcome was tragically different. The four students, attacked in their sleep, never had the chance to defend themselves. The contrast between these outcomes—one victim escaping, four others losing their lives—raises critical questions about what changed in the intervening year. Did the perpetrator learn from the failed attempt in Pullman? Did the crime in 2021 represent an early, unsophisticated attempt that escalated into the meticulously planned massacre in 2022? These are questions that prosecutors and defense attorneys alike will likely explore as Kohberger's trial unfolds. The trial, set to begin in August 2025, is already shaping up to be one of the most closely watched in recent history. With a change of venue to Ada County due to concerns about pretrial publicity, the case will proceed in two phases: the first to determine guilt or innocence, the second to decide whether Kohberger, if convicted, will face the death penalty. In motions filed earlier this year, Kohberger's defense team sought to remove the death penalty as an option, citing procedural and evidentiary concerns. The judge denied these motions, leaving the ultimate fate of the accused in the hands of a jury. As the legal teams prepare for trial, the Pullman case looms in the background, a chilling reminder of the unresolved questions that haunt both the prosecution and the defense. For the families of the Idaho victims, the trial represents a step toward justice, but it also underscores the devastating reality of what might have been prevented. Could a deeper investigation into the 2021 incident have uncovered a pattern of behavior? Could it have led to interventions that saved four young lives? The answers may never fully emerge, but they will undoubtedly cast a long shadow over the proceedings. The community's reactions have been a mix of outrage, grief, and unease. In Moscow and Pullman alike, residents have grappled with the realization that their seemingly idyllic college towns were the backdrop for crimes of such magnitude. Candlelight vigils and community forums have sought to reclaim a sense of safety and solidarity, but the scars remain visible. For some, the question is not only what happened but how to prevent it from happening again. As the trial date approaches, the intersection of these two cases—one resolved in the minds of investigators, the other still unfolding—continues to captivate and confound. The odds of a man being questioned about a crime so similar to one he allegedly committed a year later are staggering. Whether coincidence or something more sinister, the eerie similarities serve as a stark reminder of the complexities that define the search for justice. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

Bryan Kohberger was investigated for a home invasion eerily similar to the horrific crime he now stands accused of committing—the brutal murders of four University of Idaho students. The revelation, which emerged this week, has sent shockwaves through both the legal community and the public, raising profound questions about the odds of such coincidences and the investigative gaps that may have allowed a predator to escalate unchecked. The first case unfolded in October 2021, barely a year before the University of Idaho slayings, and less than 10 miles from the Moscow, Idaho, crime scene. A woman in Pullman, Washington, reported being awakened in the early morning hours by the sound of her bedroom door opening. She was met with a masked intruder armed with a knife. The assailant said nothing, his silence amplifying the terror. Acting with remarkable courage, the woman fought back, delivering a kick that sent the man stumbling before he fled through her closet and out of the home. The parallels between the two cases are impossible to ignore. Both crimes occurred in the dead of night when the victims were at their most vulnerable. In each instance, the perpetrator wore a mask and wielded a knife. The silent, calculated manner in which the Pullman assailant moved through the home mirrors the modus operandi alleged in the Idaho murders. Yet, while the 2021 incident ended with the victim's escape and survival, the Moscow tragedy resulted in the deaths of Ethan Chapin, Xana Kernodle, Kaylee Goncalves, and Madison Mogen—a crime so heinous it has captivated the nation's attention. When Kohberger was arrested in December 2022, authorities began scrutinizing his past, seeking any signs of violent tendencies or precursors to the alleged killings. Their investigation led them to revisit the Pullman home invasion. Kohberger was named a person of interest, but law enforcement ultimately cleared him. According to police, his height did not match the victim's description of the intruder, and he had not yet enrolled at Washington State University at the time of the attack. “We have no reason or evidence to believe he was involved in this burglary at this time,” Pullman police told ABC News. Still, the lingering questions remain. How rare is it for someone to be linked, even tangentially, to two such similar crimes? Is it a coincidence, or does it suggest a pattern that went unnoticed? The odds, as some experts suggest, strain credulity. For Kohberger's defense team, the Pullman case represents both a challenge and an opportunity. On the one hand, the unresolved nature of the 2021 break-in could bolster their argument that another individual with a similar modus operandi may be responsible for the Idaho murders. On the other hand, the eerie similarities between the two incidents could make it harder for jurors to ignore the implication of a connection. Adding to the complexity is the timing of the revelations. The Pullman incident had largely faded from public memory until body camera footage from the 2021 investigation surfaced. In it, the victim recounts the chilling encounter with clarity: “I heard my door open and I looked over, and someone was wearing a ski mask and had a knife. I kicked the s--t out of their stomach and screamed super loud, and they like flew back into my closet and then ran out my door and up the stairs.” Her statement paints a picture of a terrifying but brief encounter, one that underscores her sheer will to survive. In Moscow, however, the outcome was tragically different. The four students, attacked in their sleep, never had the chance to defend themselves. The contrast between these outcomes—one victim escaping, four others losing their lives—raises critical questions about what changed in the intervening year. Did the perpetrator learn from the failed attempt in Pullman? Did the crime in 2021 represent an early, unsophisticated attempt that escalated into the meticulously planned massacre in 2022? These are questions that prosecutors and defense attorneys alike will likely explore as Kohberger's trial unfolds. The trial, set to begin in August 2025, is already shaping up to be one of the most closely watched in recent history. With a change of venue to Ada County due to concerns about pretrial publicity, the case will proceed in two phases: the first to determine guilt or innocence, the second to decide whether Kohberger, if convicted, will face the death penalty. In motions filed earlier this year, Kohberger's defense team sought to remove the death penalty as an option, citing procedural and evidentiary concerns. The judge denied these motions, leaving the ultimate fate of the accused in the hands of a jury. As the legal teams prepare for trial, the Pullman case looms in the background, a chilling reminder of the unresolved questions that haunt both the prosecution and the defense. For the families of the Idaho victims, the trial represents a step toward justice, but it also underscores the devastating reality of what might have been prevented. Could a deeper investigation into the 2021 incident have uncovered a pattern of behavior? Could it have led to interventions that saved four young lives? The answers may never fully emerge, but they will undoubtedly cast a long shadow over the proceedings. The community's reactions have been a mix of outrage, grief, and unease. In Moscow and Pullman alike, residents have grappled with the realization that their seemingly idyllic college towns were the backdrop for crimes of such magnitude. Candlelight vigils and community forums have sought to reclaim a sense of safety and solidarity, but the scars remain visible. For some, the question is not only what happened but how to prevent it from happening again. As the trial date approaches, the intersection of these two cases—one resolved in the minds of investigators, the other still unfolding—continues to captivate and confound. The odds of a man being questioned about a crime so similar to one he allegedly committed a year later are staggering. Whether coincidence or something more sinister, the eerie similarities serve as a stark reminder of the complexities that define the search for justice. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Bryan Kohberger was investigated for a home invasion eerily similar to the horrific crime he now stands accused of committing—the brutal murders of four University of Idaho students. The revelation, which emerged this week, has sent shockwaves through both the legal community and the public, raising profound questions about the odds of such coincidences and the investigative gaps that may have allowed a predator to escalate unchecked. The first case unfolded in October 2021, barely a year before the University of Idaho slayings, and less than 10 miles from the Moscow, Idaho, crime scene. A woman in Pullman, Washington, reported being awakened in the early morning hours by the sound of her bedroom door opening. She was met with a masked intruder armed with a knife. The assailant said nothing, his silence amplifying the terror. Acting with remarkable courage, the woman fought back, delivering a kick that sent the man stumbling before he fled through her closet and out of the home. The parallels between the two cases are impossible to ignore. Both crimes occurred in the dead of night when the victims were at their most vulnerable. In each instance, the perpetrator wore a mask and wielded a knife. The silent, calculated manner in which the Pullman assailant moved through the home mirrors the modus operandi alleged in the Idaho murders. Yet, while the 2021 incident ended with the victim's escape and survival, the Moscow tragedy resulted in the deaths of Ethan Chapin, Xana Kernodle, Kaylee Goncalves, and Madison Mogen—a crime so heinous it has captivated the nation's attention. When Kohberger was arrested in December 2022, authorities began scrutinizing his past, seeking any signs of violent tendencies or precursors to the alleged killings. Their investigation led them to revisit the Pullman home invasion. Kohberger was named a person of interest, but law enforcement ultimately cleared him. According to police, his height did not match the victim's description of the intruder, and he had not yet enrolled at Washington State University at the time of the attack. “We have no reason or evidence to believe he was involved in this burglary at this time,” Pullman police told ABC News. Still, the lingering questions remain. How rare is it for someone to be linked, even tangentially, to two such similar crimes? Is it a coincidence, or does it suggest a pattern that went unnoticed? The odds, as some experts suggest, strain credulity. For Kohberger's defense team, the Pullman case represents both a challenge and an opportunity. On the one hand, the unresolved nature of the 2021 break-in could bolster their argument that another individual with a similar modus operandi may be responsible for the Idaho murders. On the other hand, the eerie similarities between the two incidents could make it harder for jurors to ignore the implication of a connection. Adding to the complexity is the timing of the revelations. The Pullman incident had largely faded from public memory until body camera footage from the 2021 investigation surfaced. In it, the victim recounts the chilling encounter with clarity: “I heard my door open and I looked over, and someone was wearing a ski mask and had a knife. I kicked the s--t out of their stomach and screamed super loud, and they like flew back into my closet and then ran out my door and up the stairs.” Her statement paints a picture of a terrifying but brief encounter, one that underscores her sheer will to survive. In Moscow, however, the outcome was tragically different. The four students, attacked in their sleep, never had the chance to defend themselves. The contrast between these outcomes—one victim escaping, four others losing their lives—raises critical questions about what changed in the intervening year. Did the perpetrator learn from the failed attempt in Pullman? Did the crime in 2021 represent an early, unsophisticated attempt that escalated into the meticulously planned massacre in 2022? These are questions that prosecutors and defense attorneys alike will likely explore as Kohberger's trial unfolds. The trial, set to begin in August 2025, is already shaping up to be one of the most closely watched in recent history. With a change of venue to Ada County due to concerns about pretrial publicity, the case will proceed in two phases: the first to determine guilt or innocence, the second to decide whether Kohberger, if convicted, will face the death penalty. In motions filed earlier this year, Kohberger's defense team sought to remove the death penalty as an option, citing procedural and evidentiary concerns. The judge denied these motions, leaving the ultimate fate of the accused in the hands of a jury. As the legal teams prepare for trial, the Pullman case looms in the background, a chilling reminder of the unresolved questions that haunt both the prosecution and the defense. For the families of the Idaho victims, the trial represents a step toward justice, but it also underscores the devastating reality of what might have been prevented. Could a deeper investigation into the 2021 incident have uncovered a pattern of behavior? Could it have led to interventions that saved four young lives? The answers may never fully emerge, but they will undoubtedly cast a long shadow over the proceedings. The community's reactions have been a mix of outrage, grief, and unease. In Moscow and Pullman alike, residents have grappled with the realization that their seemingly idyllic college towns were the backdrop for crimes of such magnitude. Candlelight vigils and community forums have sought to reclaim a sense of safety and solidarity, but the scars remain visible. For some, the question is not only what happened but how to prevent it from happening again. As the trial date approaches, the intersection of these two cases—one resolved in the minds of investigators, the other still unfolding—continues to captivate and confound. The odds of a man being questioned about a crime so similar to one he allegedly committed a year later are staggering. Whether coincidence or something more sinister, the eerie similarities serve as a stark reminder of the complexities that define the search for justice. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Hosts: Greg Skordas and Rusty Cannon  In the coming days, Ada County in Idaho will publish more than 270,000 ballots cast in the November 5th election. The county clerk says doing so should help calm concerns and fears over election tampering, and strengthen trust in the electoral process. Could a similar thing happen here in Utah? We discuss the balance between security and privacy. 

Hosts: Greg Skordas and Rusty Cannon  Special counsel drops Jan. 6th, classified documents cases against Trump Special counsel Jack Smith is winding down his investigations and current cases, including two cases against President-elect Donald Trump. Today, Smith announced he was dropping the federal election subversion case and the mishandling of classified documents case against the incoming president. Inside Sources discusses both with KSL Legal Analyst Greg Skordas.  All nominees named in President-elect Trump’s Cabinet; legal standoff underway This weekend, President-elect Trump named his final choices for Cabinet members. But progress for those choices has stalled; not with confirmation, but with transitioning. The nominees haven’t been able to coordinate the transition with the agencies they’ll oversee due to a delay in background screenings and transparency agreements. We give listeners the latest updates on the upcoming Cabinet.  Enhanced monitoring announced for Great Salt Lake An enhanced monitoring system was announced today for the Great Salt Lake. The hope is that the new monitors will improve understanding of drought and climate change in the area. Tim Davis, Great Salt Lake Deputy Commissioner joins Inside Sources in the studio to discuss the program and share overall updates on the lake ahead of winter season.  Idaho county to post cast ballots online in the name of transparency In the coming days, Ada County in Idaho will publish more than 270,000 ballots cast in the November 5th election. The county clerk says doing so should help calm concerns and fears over election tampering, and strengthen trust in the electoral process. Could a similar thing happen here in Utah? We discuss the balance between security and privacy.  Taking a deeper look into Trump’s proposed energy plans Sources tell Reuters News that President-elect Trump’s energy plan includes many different sources but focuses heavily on boosting gas exports and oil drilling. The plan is similar to the one Trump campaigned on and will begin on Day 1 of his new presidency. The Inside Sources hosts explain other points of the plan.  Is Google’s advertising technology a monopoly? A judge will soon decide. A federal judge is currently hearing final argument regarding a Google advertising monopoly case. The results of that case could have large implications for the future of Google as a company. It comes as Google faces other legal challenges relating to its Chrome browser. Is this an example of government overreach or consumer protection? The hosts dig into the latest cases.  Potential pardons from President Biden With less than 2 months to go before he leaves office, could President Joe Biden change his mind and pardon his son Hunter? Inside Sources finishes up discussing a recent Politico piece that says it would be okay – and maybe even good – for President Biden to pardon his son before the new administration takes office. 

Cyclists and pedestrians take over Latah near the railroad crossing. (Murphy Woodhouse / Boise State Public Radio )Right around noon on a bluebird September Sunday in Boise, a pack of cyclists dozens strong turned south onto Latah Street, a chorus of bike bells sounding. A large group of cyclists cruises south on Latah around noon on Sunday, Sept 22, when Boise held its first Open Streets event.(Murphy Woodhouse / Boise State Public Radio )They cruised past a barricade, where police and volunteers were turning motorists away. Several hundred yards in, the Boise Good Times Street Band welcomed riders with a jaunty rendition of Give My Regards to Broadway. Wide, business-lined Latah is soon packed with bikers, walkers, roller skaters and at least one person on stilts.Food trucks and other stands line the one-mile segment of the street, and long lines stretch out of the cafes and restaurants on the route. Long lines stretched out of the cafes and restaurants on Latah during the event.(Murphy Woodhouse)Lindsey Lind and her family – husband Eric, their two young children, and two dogs – had walked from their nearby home. They're standing in line for some birria tacos.“It's kind of weird,” she said, standing in the middle of the road. “Like, I feel like I keep needing to move over to the side.”Eric described Latah on a normal day.“It's busy, and usually people aren't doing 30 miles an hour,” he said. “It's, you know, 35, 40.”“Or more,” Lindsey interjected.They loved the vibrant sense of community surrounding them, and the promotion of green alternatives to driving.“I think it helps people slow down a little bit and see kind of what's out here as far as businesses and, you know, it kind of puts maybe some of these businesses on the map,” Eric said. Austin Clark, owner of Primal Coffee on Latah, plays fiddle with his friend Matt Hopper's band The Roman Candles in front of his cafe during the Open Streets event. "I think I knew it would be a good coordinated event, so I was happy to be a part of it and see where it goes," he said.(Murphy Woodhouse / Boise State Public Radio )“I think it's really awesome for Latah's business, this kind of exposure,” said Austin Clark, owner of Primal Coffee, located on the street. “Maybe a lot of people don't come up onto Latah ever, you know, because there's no reason to. But now they've got a reason to come.”Sending a messageThese are exactly the sorts of sentiments organizers of Boise's first Open Streets event were hoping to inspire.“All the chips fell into place. It worked out really well. And here we are today with close to, I would say like 3000 people,” said Nina Pienaar, advocacy director at the Boise Bicycle Project (BBP). Several days after the event, organizers later provided an updated figure of over 6,000. Bike racks were packed tight on Latah Street during the event.(Murphy Woodhouse / Boise State Public Radio )BBP worked closely with Ada County, Boise, and other local officials to develop location criteria, then surveyed neighborhoods to find a spot with local buy-in. They ultimately landed on Latah.Pienaar said the strong turnout “sends the message loud and clear that like, ‘Hey, the Boise community, we're out biking, we're out walking. We want to see more infrastructure. We want to be able to choose to bike and to walk rather than choosing to get into our vehicles.'”The second Open Streets event is already planned for next year, according to an official with the City of Boise, which sponsored the event. But with thousands in the street for the first event, Pienaar said there's huge potential for a more regular schedule, perhaps even biweekly during the summer, adding: “The more the better.”Social animals“The concept is really, really simple. You open streets to people and you close them to cars. And the magic happens,” said Gil Penalosa. “You get young and old and rich and poor and fat and skinny, and you get everybody.”Penalosa is an urban planner who now lives in Toronto, where he was the runner-up in the 2022 mayoral election. But as an official in the Colombian capital of Bogotá in the late 1990s, he helped dramatically expand the city's weekly ciclovía program, credited as the seed of the global Open Streets movement. Every Sunday some 1.5 million Bogotanos cruise around 80 miles of car-free roads.“Why is it spreading?” he asked. “I think because humans are social animals, and we want to be with other people.”A winged stilt walker makes their way down Latah. (Murphy Woodhouse / Boise State Public Radio )The many benefits of Open Streets are best achieved with frequent repetition, especially the health benefits, Penalosa argued. But in a time of often ugly divisiveness, he said anything that brings a diverse swath of a community together is good.“The possibility of people meeting as equals is really, really, really important,” he said.He acknowledges that some officials and businesses can blanch at shutting down significant stretches of roadways to cars, but encourages cities that haven't tried it to be gutsy.“I've seen it [be] successful … in cities of 50,000 people or 500,000 or 5 million, 20 million. It works everywhere,” Penalosa said. “I've seen it in poor cities, in wealthy cities, and it makes everybody happier and healthier. And also to keep in mind that this is low-risk, this is low-cost and has very high benefits.”Terra Reed, an organizer of the Albuquerque Open Streets event Ciclovía – now in its 10th year – similarly encouraged other cities to give it a go, saying that it doesn't have to be huge to be a success. From their experience, she said “having strong ties” with local governments is especially important to start and maintain such efforts.“Try to build those relationships early,” she advised.Just keep pedalingIn a parking lot off Latah, young kids are buzzing around a bicycle skills course. 6-and-a-half-year-old Margot Mace makes her way around a bicycle skills course.(Murphy Woodhouse / Boise State Public Radio )Margot Mace, who's 6-and-a-half years old, is getting frustrated trying to ride her bike over a teeter-totter obstacle.“You can do it, keep pedaling,” her mom, Beth Edwards, encouraged.“It doesn't let me do it,” Margot shouted in frustration after another failed attempt.Beth said they had ridden to Latah with dozens of others – and got a taste of the danger cyclists face in the city.“We were trying to get across Orchard (Street) and a car almost ran us down,” she recounted. “We were a big group of bikers, so we weren't just one cycling family or one person. There was 40 of us and a car still almost ran us down.”Edwards had heard of Open Streets, but didn't really know much about the idea until that Sunday. She loved its emphasis on safety for all road users.“We are just kinda constantly living with that ‘Llook out! Look out!'” she said. “Coming here and being free and seeing her just riding safely and freely is a pretty awesome feeling.”After three failed attempts, Margot backed up to give it one more go. She rolled up and over to the applause of spectators.“I just love how she never gives up,” Beth said. “That's all it takes.”This story was produced by the Mountain West News Bureau, a collaboration between Wyoming Public Media, Nevada Public Radio, Boise State Public Radio in Idaho, KUNR in Nevada, KUNC in Colorado and KANW in New Mexico, with support from affiliate stations across the region. Funding for the Mountain West News Bureau is provided in part by the Corporation for Public Broadcasting.

On November 7, 2024, Bryan Kohberger appeared in an Ada County courtroom for a hearing to challenge the prosecution's intent to seek the death penalty in his upcoming trial. Kohberger faces charges for the November 2022 murders of four University of Idaho students. His defense team argued that the death penalty is arbitrary, inappropriate under modern standards, and unconstitutional. They also contended that methods of execution, such as lethal injection and firing squads, constitute cruel and unusual punishment. The prosecution countered by stating that both Idaho and U.S. Supreme Courts have upheld the constitutionality of the death penalty.During the four-hour hearing, Judge Steven Hippler engaged both sides with questions, expressing concerns about the timing of the decision on execution methods, given the lengthy appeals process in death penalty cases. He questioned why a ruling on execution methods should be made now, considering that it could be over a decade before any sentence is carried out, during which time methods may change. The defense emphasized the importance of addressing the death penalty issue before jury selection, citing the impact on jury composition and trial preparation. At the conclusion of the hearing, Judge Hippler stated he would take the matters under advisement and issue written opinions in due course.(commercial at 9:41)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Idaho murders suspect Bryan Kohberger gets no-nonsense warning from judge over potential death penalty | Daily Mail Online

On November 7, 2024, Bryan Kohberger appeared in an Ada County courtroom for a hearing to challenge the prosecution's intent to seek the death penalty in his upcoming trial. Kohberger faces charges for the November 2022 murders of four University of Idaho students. His defense team argued that the death penalty is arbitrary, inappropriate under modern standards, and unconstitutional. They also contended that methods of execution, such as lethal injection and firing squads, constitute cruel and unusual punishment. The prosecution countered by stating that both Idaho and U.S. Supreme Courts have upheld the constitutionality of the death penalty.During the four-hour hearing, Judge Steven Hippler engaged both sides with questions, expressing concerns about the timing of the decision on execution methods, given the lengthy appeals process in death penalty cases. He questioned why a ruling on execution methods should be made now, considering that it could be over a decade before any sentence is carried out, during which time methods may change. The defense emphasized the importance of addressing the death penalty issue before jury selection, citing the impact on jury composition and trial preparation. At the conclusion of the hearing, Judge Hippler stated he would take the matters under advisement and issue written opinions in due course.(commercial at 9:41)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Idaho murders suspect Bryan Kohberger gets no-nonsense warning from judge over potential death penalty | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Bryan Kohberger's lawyers are asking the new judge presiding over his quadruple homicide case in Ada County to strike the death penalty as a possible punishment. Kohberger is accused of murdering four University of Idaho students in a home near campus in Moscow in November 2022. His lawyers say the death penalty is cruel and unusual punishment which violates his Eighth Amendment rights. Law&Crime's Angenette Levy looks at a recent hearing where prosecutors and defense attorneys argued over the request in this episode of Crime Fix — a daily show covering the biggest stories in crime.PLEASE SUPPORT THE SHOW: Download the FREE Upside App at https://upside.app.link/lctakeover to get an extra 25 cents back for every gallon on your first tank of gas.Host:Angenette Levy https://twitter.com/Angenette5Guest:Michael LasherCRIME FIX PRODUCTION:Head of Social Media, YouTube - Bobby SzokeSocial Media Management - Vanessa BeinVideo Editing - Daniel CamachoGuest Booking - Alyssa Fisher & Diane KayeSTAY UP-TO-DATE WITH THE LAW&CRIME NETWORK:Watch Law&Crime Network on YouTubeTV: https://bit.ly/3td2e3yWhere To Watch Law&Crime Network: https://bit.ly/3akxLK5Sign Up For Law&Crime's Daily Newsletter: https://bit.ly/LawandCrimeNewsletterRead Fascinating Articles From Law&Crime Network: https://bit.ly/3td2IqoLAW&CRIME NETWORK SOCIAL MEDIA:Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/lawandcrime/Twitter: https://twitter.com/LawCrimeNetworkFacebook: https://www.facebook.com/lawandcrimeTwitch: https://www.twitch.tv/lawandcrimenetworkSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Kevin Miller speaks to Sheriff Clifford and Lars Larson previewing election day.

The trial of Bryan Kohberger, accused of murdering four University of Idaho students in 2022, has been delayed again and is now set to begin on August 11, 2025. Initially scheduled for June of the same year, this new date comes as the case continues to grapple with procedural complexities and the intense media scrutiny surrounding the high-profile murders. The change follows the defense's successful motion to move the trial to Ada County, Boise, in an effort to ensure a fair jury selection process. Kohberger's defense argued that the extensive pre-trial publicity in Latah County, where the murders took place, could prejudice potential jurors, prompting the change of venue.The trial is expected to run through November 2025, reflecting the time required to navigate the numerous pre-trial motions and the challenge of seating an impartial jury for such a heavily publicized case. Kohberger faces charges of first-degree murder for the fatal stabbings of the four students, a crime that shocked the nation and garnered widespread attention. His defense team continues to raise concerns about evidence and procedural matters, contributing to the trial's delayed timeline. With the trial now set for late summer 2025, the case will remain in the national spotlight as it progresses toward its resolution​.(commercial at 7:58)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Bryan Kohberger has trial delayed in slayings of Idaho college students - and proceedings set to last months | Daily Mail Online

Accused Idaho Killer Bryan Kohberger Appeared in New Court After Venue Change Bryan Kohberger, the suspect charged with the murders of four University of Idaho students, made his first court appearance in Boise after successfully obtaining a venue change. The hearing marked his first appearance before a new judge after the case was relocated. Kohberger, if convicted, faced the possibility of the death penalty. The session was brief, primarily focused on procedural updates. “It was just a check-in, since the case was moved, and probably just to let the parties know what he expects going forward,” Boise-based defense lawyer Edwina Elcox, who was not involved in the case, told Fox News Digital. The venue change signaled a new phase in the widely publicized case that had captured national attention since the killings nearly two years prior. Kohberger was charged with four counts of first-degree murder and one count of felony burglary. The victims, all students at the University of Idaho, were found in their off-campus home, leading to an extensive investigation that eventually led authorities to Kohberger. At his arraignment the previous year, Kohberger had pleaded not guilty to all charges. The former judge had entered those pleas on his behalf, setting the stage for the ongoing legal battle. A significant part of Kohberger's defense strategy was a motion to dismiss the death penalty as an option. A hearing to address this issue was scheduled for November 7 at the Ada County courthouse in Boise. The decision on whether capital punishment would remain on the table was a critical point in the case as it moved closer to trial. While the hearing did not result in major developments, legal experts observed that the new judge took the opportunity to establish his authority. “There weren't any surprises,” Elcox remarked, “but the judge made it clear how he planned to manage the proceedings moving forward.” As the legal process continued, the public and the families of the victims awaited further updates, particularly concerning the looming decision on the death penalty. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Accused Idaho Killer Bryan Kohberger Appeared in New Court After Venue Change Bryan Kohberger, the suspect charged with the murders of four University of Idaho students, made his first court appearance in Boise after successfully obtaining a venue change. The hearing marked his first appearance before a new judge after the case was relocated. Kohberger, if convicted, faced the possibility of the death penalty. The session was brief, primarily focused on procedural updates. “It was just a check-in, since the case was moved, and probably just to let the parties know what he expects going forward,” Boise-based defense lawyer Edwina Elcox, who was not involved in the case, told Fox News Digital. The venue change signaled a new phase in the widely publicized case that had captured national attention since the killings nearly two years prior. Kohberger was charged with four counts of first-degree murder and one count of felony burglary. The victims, all students at the University of Idaho, were found in their off-campus home, leading to an extensive investigation that eventually led authorities to Kohberger. At his arraignment the previous year, Kohberger had pleaded not guilty to all charges. The former judge had entered those pleas on his behalf, setting the stage for the ongoing legal battle. A significant part of Kohberger's defense strategy was a motion to dismiss the death penalty as an option. A hearing to address this issue was scheduled for November 7 at the Ada County courthouse in Boise. The decision on whether capital punishment would remain on the table was a critical point in the case as it moved closer to trial. While the hearing did not result in major developments, legal experts observed that the new judge took the opportunity to establish his authority. “There weren't any surprises,” Elcox remarked, “but the judge made it clear how he planned to manage the proceedings moving forward.” As the legal process continued, the public and the families of the victims awaited further updates, particularly concerning the looming decision on the death penalty. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Kohberger's Case: Ada County says 'We've Got This'

Use code EmilyBakerClass at https://www.GreenChef.com/EmilyBakerClass to get 50% off, plus 50 free ClassPass credits!Justin Timberlake pleaded guilty to a traffic infraction driving while ability impaired to resolve his DWI case in the Hamptons. The public safety announcement in front of the Sag Harbor Police Department was part of the plea deal that knocked down the misdemeanor charge he was facing to a non-criminal traffic violation.Karen Read filed an appeal to motion to dismiss counts one and three to the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts. The defense argues that the jury acquitted Karen of charges one and three even though they didn't mark it on the jury forms. They relitigate that retrying her for counts one and three violates double jeopardy. They are asking for oral arguments.On Thursday, September 12th, 2024, Harvey Weinstein was indicted again in New York. According to Law360 reporting, the indictment will remain sealed until Weinstein is arraigned, which has yet to happen due to his deteriorating health. According to Weinstein's representative he was rushed to the hospital on Sunday, September 8th, 2024, for emergency open heart surgery.In his status conference in Illinois, Girardi wasn't present and prosecutors asked to continue to the pre-trial conferences until December 18th, 2024. They indicated that they may drop the charges against Girardi after his sentencing on December 6th, 2024 in Los Angeles.The Bryan Kohberger trial moves to Ada County's Fourth District located in Boise and gets appointed a new judge, Judge Steven Hippler. This means that trial dates and other deadlines are now subject to change.In the infamous viral clip, Redden is accused of leaping over the bench and attacking a Las Vegas Judge Holthus. He was charged with Attempted Murder of a victim 60 years of age or older. On the second day, after hearing the testimony of Judge Holthus and her law clerk, Redden pleaded Guilty but Mentally Ill. He has a sentencing Hearing on November 7th.This podcast uses the following third-party services for analysis: Spotify Ad Analytics - https://www.spotify.com/us/legal/ad-analytics-privacy-policy/Podscribe - https://podscribe.com/privacyChartable - https://chartable.com/privacy

Bryan Kohberger Goes VIP - Booked in Ada County...