Podcasts about Judicial district

In May 2020, on Mother's Day, Suzanne Morphew disappeared after leaving for a bike ride near her Salida, Colorado home. Her husband, Barry Morphew, told investigators she never returned — but beneath the surface was a story of secrets, tangled relationships and a forensic trail that would span years. The first murder charges against Barry were filed in 2021 — then dismissed in 2022 amid prosecutorial misconduct and investigative errors. Many thought the case was over. But when Suzanne's remains were discovered in September 2023 in a remote shallow grave, new evidence emerged: a rare wildlife tranquilizer mixture known as BAM (butorphanol, azaperone, medetomidine) found in her bones, phone and truck telemetry gaps, and the claim that Barry was the only private citizen in the region with access to that drug. In June 2025, a grand jury in Colorado's 12th Judicial District indicted Barry for first-degree murder. The state says this is the break they've waited for; the defense says it's a recycled narrative built on speculation. In this video we walk through: the newly-released forensic findings and how they changed the case what the prosecution now says happened — from tranquilizer to grave to indictment the defense's counter-arguments: contamination, missing weapon, precedent of a failed case the emotional fallout: Suzanne's daughters, the community watching, the husband who insists he's innocent what's next: upcoming hearings, potential trial timing, and how this case reflects on the justice system Whether you're a longtime follower of true-crime or coming in fresh — this story is about more than who did it. It's about how evidence is built (and rebuilt), how time changes a case, and how truth sometimes hides in the crevices of data, memory and motive.  #BarryMorphew #SuzanneMorphew #TrueCrime #ColdCase #AnimalTranquilizer #BAMdrug #ColoradoCrime #JusticeDelayed #Podcast #HiddenKillersStyle Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

In May 2020, on Mother's Day, Suzanne Morphew disappeared after leaving for a bike ride near her Salida, Colorado home. Her husband, Barry Morphew, told investigators she never returned — but beneath the surface was a story of secrets, tangled relationships and a forensic trail that would span years. The first murder charges against Barry were filed in 2021 — then dismissed in 2022 amid prosecutorial misconduct and investigative errors. Many thought the case was over. But when Suzanne's remains were discovered in September 2023 in a remote shallow grave, new evidence emerged: a rare wildlife tranquilizer mixture known as BAM (butorphanol, azaperone, medetomidine) found in her bones, phone and truck telemetry gaps, and the claim that Barry was the only private citizen in the region with access to that drug. In June 2025, a grand jury in Colorado's 12th Judicial District indicted Barry for first-degree murder. The state says this is the break they've waited for; the defense says it's a recycled narrative built on speculation. In this video we walk through: the newly-released forensic findings and how they changed the case what the prosecution now says happened — from tranquilizer to grave to indictment the defense's counter-arguments: contamination, missing weapon, precedent of a failed case the emotional fallout: Suzanne's daughters, the community watching, the husband who insists he's innocent what's next: upcoming hearings, potential trial timing, and how this case reflects on the justice system Whether you're a longtime follower of true-crime or coming in fresh — this story is about more than who did it. It's about how evidence is built (and rebuilt), how time changes a case, and how truth sometimes hides in the crevices of data, memory and motive.  #BarryMorphew #SuzanneMorphew #TrueCrime #ColdCase #AnimalTranquilizer #BAMdrug #ColoradoCrime #JusticeDelayed #Podcast #HiddenKillersStyle Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Texas state Sen. Pete Flores (l-r) converses with David Bradley of Tegrity Contractors Inc., general contractor for the 81st Judicial District regional medical examiner facility to be located in Pleasanton, and Wilson County Pct. 4 Commissioner John “Scott” Akin Oct. 17, after the groundbreaking hosted by the company. Flores and Akin talked about the need for continued state funding for facility operations after the building's completion, projected for July 2026, contingent upon conclusion of the permit process by the city of Pleasanton.Article Link

WE PUT THE COPS ON THE HOOK And it is affecting how policing is done and not in a good way. DA Michael Allen of the 4th Judicial District was listening the other day when we talked about this study by the Common Sense Institute about how we've stopped putting criminals in jail and crime has gone up. He reached out to remind me that the changes made to qualified immunity for cops has also had negative pressure on policing, so we're going to check in with him about that today at 2:30.

In another episode of the Small Town Life podcast, host Dave welcomes Elizabeth Snyder Fortino, a lifelong Herkimer County native and seasoned attorney, as she discusses her candidacy for Supreme Court Judge in New York's 5th Judicial District.

In the next episode of the Small Town Life Podcast, hosted by Dave Warner, Judge Candace Randall opened up about her unique path to the bench, her experiences in law school, and the rigors of campaigning for the Supreme Court in New York's 5th Judicial District.The interview, part of the Studio 25 Podcast Network, offers listeners an intimate look at the life of a dedicated public servant who's balancing family, a legal practice, and a multi-county election bid.

According to documents filed in the 81st Judicial District, plaintiff HK Bella's Ranch (HKBR) has filed a lawsuit against Wilson County for writ of mandamus — which orders government officials to perform their public duty — in a suit seeking damages and “non-monetary relief, exclusive of attorneys' fees” related to a plat of Bella's Ranch Phase 1 from 2024. HKBR claims “the county had until Aug. 1, 2024, to either approve or disapprove the plat” and “the County did neither,” “choosing instead to wait more than 80 days to place the plat” on a commissioners court agenda. Moreover, the claim...Article Link

In this episode of “Louisiana Unfiltered” 21st Judicial District Attorney Scott Perrilloux  joins Kiran Chawla as they discuss the recent lawsuit brought against Roblox by the State of Louisiana, The rising success of the Attorney General's ICAC program and the lowering rate of Fentanyl related overdose deaths in Livingston Parish and surrounding parishes. Chapters01:59 Roblox Lawsuit09:44 Safeguards and Responsibilities19:14 Shifting to Internet Crimes21:59 Overdoses Declines28:08 Mental Health and Addiction IssuesLocal Sponsors for this episode include:Neighbors Federal Credit Union:Another Chance Bail Bonds:Dudley DeBosier Injury LawyersSound and Editing for this audio podcast by Envision Podcast Production:

A closer look at a federal judge's ruling Mississippi Supreme Court District lines must be redrawn.Then, we talk with Jackson Mayor John Horhn, who took office in July, about the challenges and his goals for the state's capital city.Plus, we hear how tourism changed in Mississippi after Hurricane Katrina. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In next installment of Texas Talks Presents: Hemp in Texas, host Brad Swail sits down with Sarah Stogner, the elected District Attorney for Texas' 143rd Judicial District. Known for her unfiltered honesty and fierce independence, Stogner makes the legal case against SB5—the controversial bill to ban hemp-derived THC. She argues that the real threat to Texans isn't hemp, but selective prosecution, government overreach, and bad lawmaking driven by special interests. From generational alcohol abuse to the collapse of prosecutorial credibility in THC cases, this episode is a wake-up call from inside the justice system. Stogner says what others won't: banning hemp won't protect children—it'll destroy businesses, waste resources, and push more Texans into the black market.

Listener calls on Russia Collusion/Tulsi Gabbard's recent comments, The Deep State, The Hollywood Madam Heidi Fleiss, and more! Then - District Attorney for Colorado's Judicial District 23 George Brauchler on the Dominion/Randy Corporon Case Settlement. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Today: A new law adding a judge to Colorado’s overburdened 7th Judicial District in 2026 aims to ease case backlogs, improve access to justice, and address long-standing staffing challenges. And later: The Montrose Recreation District is offering affordable, flexible swim lessons for all ages and abilities this summer to promote water safety, confidence, and fun.Support the show: https://www.montrosepress.com/site/forms/subscription_services/See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Bryan Kohberger, the man accused of murdering four University of Idaho students in 2022, recently had his request for a venue change granted by Judge John Judge of Idaho's 2nd Judicial District. The judge expressed concerns that Kohberger would not receive a fair trial in Latah County, where the crimes occurred, due to the overwhelming media coverage and the small size of the community. This decision was made after considering evidence that a large percentage of potential jurors in the area had already formed opinions about the case, with many believing Kohberger is guilty.Kohberger's defense argued that the intense pretrial publicity had tainted the local jury pool, making it impossible to find impartial jurors. While the defense has suggested moving the trial to Ada County, home to Boise, the exact new location will be determined by Idaho's Supreme Court. The trial, originally scheduled to start in June 2025, could see significant logistical challenges due to its high profile and the expected length of three months.The decision to move the trial has been met with mixed reactions. While legal experts agree that a fair trial would be difficult in Latah County, the family of one of the victims, Kaylee Goncalves, expressed disappointment, believing the trial should remain in the community most affected by the tragedy.In this episode, we keep the conversation going about the latest order by Judge Judge.  (commercial at 9:13)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Peter Boyles talks with District Attorney of Colorado's Judicial District 23 George Brauchler! Reaction to Kyle Clarke's clueless and moronic remarks about George, Is he actually this dumb or is it an Act? A trip down memory lane with a story on George's start in Radio, and more! See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Transcript: https://ww2.nycourts.gov/doc/15536

Transcript: https://ww2.nycourts.gov/admin/amici/Transcripts/VGraffeo10-27-16.pdf

Transcript: https://ww2.nycourts.gov/admin/amici/Transcripts/HHeath10-27-16.pdf

Transcript: https://ww2.nycourts.gov/admin/amici/Transcripts/MaeDAgostino10-21-16.pdf

Transcript: https://ww2.nycourts.gov/admin/amici/Transcripts/KDoyle12-05-16.pdf

Transcript: https://ww2.nycourts.gov/admin/amici/Transcripts/BTobin11-18-16.pdf

Transcript: https://ww2.nycourts.gov/admin/amici/Transcripts/MWork1-24-17.pdf

Transcript: https://ww2.nycourts.gov/admin/amici/Transcripts/DYoung12-5-16.pdf

Transcript: https://ww2.nycourts.gov/doc/15526

Transcript: https://ww2.nycourts.gov/doc/15531

Transcript: http://ww2.nycourts.gov/sites/default/files/document/files/2019-11/CynthiaLaFave6-27-19FINAL_0.pdf

A former fan favorite WWE wrestler Duke The Dumpster Dorese from the 1990s has been indicted in Tennessee for attempted aggravated sexual exploitation of children.Michael Droese, better known to wrestling fans as Duke “The Dumpster” Droese, was indicted by a Warren County grand jury in May, according to a release from District Attorney General Chris Stanford, 31st Judicial District.It was alleged that Droese used a Coinbase account in an attempt to purchase child sex abuse images on the dark web, the release reads. Coinbase, however, recognized what the transaction was and declined the payment. The company then sent a tip to the FBI.We have also included our 2018 interview with Duke as we talk about his arrest.#WWF #DukeTheDummpsterDorese #WWENews #WWEUiverse #WrestlingCommunity #WrestlingNews #PerchedOnTheTopRopeSupport this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/perchedonthetoprope/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Question of Ethics Conversation: January 23, 2025Artificial intelligence has the potential to reshape the judicial system. AI-powered tools, from legal research assistants to sentencing algorithms and customer service chatbots, offer efficiency but also introduce risks, particularly bias. Additionally, the confidentiality of court records and legal proceedings becomes a pressing concern, as AI systems require vast sums of data for training—potentially exposing sensitive information to breaches or misuse.While AI chatbots improve accessibility by guiding litigants through procedural questions, the possibility of providing incorrect information and the prohibition against providing legal advice highlights the need for careful human oversight.As courts integrate AI into their operations, how do we ensure transparency, accountability, and fairness? What ethical and legal questions arise?Today's Moderator Creadell Webb, Chief Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Officer for the 1st Judicial District in Philadelphia, PennsylvaniaToday's ModeratorCreadell Webb Chief Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Officer for the 1st Judicial District in Philadelphia, PennsylvaniaToday's PanelCourtney Whiteside Director, Municipal Court St. Louis, MissouriAlison Braaton Clerk of District Court, Grand Forks County, North DakotaAndrea Powers Human Resources Director, Idaho Court System, Boise, IdahoAmy Emig Business Development Manager, Enterprise Technology Services Division, Oregon Judicial Department, Salem, OregonKelly Hutton Court Administrator, North Dakota Court System, Grand Forks, North DakotaPeter Kiefer host of the Court Leader's Advantage Podcast SeriesNickolas Brackley Technology and Solutions Specialist, Enterprise Technology Services Division, Oregon Judicial Department, Salem, OregonNorman Meyer, Retired Clerk of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of New MexicoRoger Rand IT Manager, Multnomah Circuit Court, Portland, Oregon

Bryan Kohberger, the man accused of murdering four University of Idaho students in 2022, recently had his request for a venue change granted by Judge John Judge of Idaho's 2nd Judicial District. The judge expressed concerns that Kohberger would not receive a fair trial in Latah County, where the crimes occurred, due to the overwhelming media coverage and the small size of the community. This decision was made after considering evidence that a large percentage of potential jurors in the area had already formed opinions about the case, with many believing Kohberger is guilty.Kohberger's defense argued that the intense pretrial publicity had tainted the local jury pool, making it impossible to find impartial jurors. While the defense has suggested moving the trial to Ada County, home to Boise, the exact new location will be determined by Idaho's Supreme Court. The trial, originally scheduled to start in June 2025, could see significant logistical challenges due to its high profile and the expected length of three months.The decision to move the trial has been met with mixed reactions. While legal experts agree that a fair trial would be difficult in Latah County, the family of one of the victims, Kaylee Goncalves, expressed disappointment, believing the trial should remain in the community most affected by the tragedy.In this episode, we keep the conversation going about the latest order by Judge Judge.  (commercial at 9:13)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Question of Ethics Conversation January 23, 2025 EpisodeArtificial intelligence has the potential to reshape the judicial system. AI-powered tools, from legal research assistants to sentencing algorithms and customer service chatbots, offer efficiency but also introduce risks, particularly bias. Additionally, the confidentiality of court records and legal proceedings becomes a pressing concern, as AI systems require vast sums of data for training—potentially exposing sensitive information to breaches or misuse.While AI chatbots improve accessibility by guiding litigants through procedural questions, the possibility of providing incorrect information and the prohibition against providing legal advice highlights the need for careful human oversight.As courts integrate AI into their operations, how do we ensure transparency, accountability, and fairness? What ethical and legal questions arise?Today's Moderator Creadell Webb Chief Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Officer for the 1st Judicial District in Philadelphia, PennsylvaniaToday's PanelCourtney Whiteside Director of the Municipal Court in St. Louis, MissouriAlison Braaton Clerk of District Court in Grand Forks County, North DakotaAndrea Powers Human Resources Director of the Idaho Court System, BoiseAmy Emig Business Development Manager, Multnomah Circuit Court, Portland, OregonKelly Hutton Court Administrator, North Dakota Court System, Grand ForksPeter Kiefer Host, Court Leader's Advantage Podcast SeriesNickolas Brackley IT Specialist for the Oregon Judicial Department Circuit Court, SalemNorman Meyer Retired Clerk of the United States Bankruptcy Court, District of New Mexico andRoger Rand IT Manager for the Multnomah Circuit Court, in Portland, Oregon

The laws took effect before this school year, resulting in students across the state being arrested for statements that wouldn't even get them expelled. Today, we discuss the conflicting nature of school threat assessment laws and the unintended consequences they've created. And it's your turn to talk. We want to hear from you: Are threat assessment laws in Tennessee working? Call 615-760-2000 with your question or comment.Guests Aliyya Swaby, ProPublica, Reporter covering children, families and social inequality Paige Pfleger, WPLN, Criminal Justice Reporter Kevin Boyer, Father of 11-year-old arrested in Chattanooga Zoë Jamail, Policy Coordinator for Disability Rights Tennessee Matt Moore, Assistant Public Defender for the 26th Judicial District of Tennessee

February 18, 2025 , Court Leader's Advantage Podcast EpisodeUnderstanding trauma-informed engagement is increasingly essential for court employees and judges. Many—if not most—individuals who interact with the court system have experienced significant trauma. Whether they are litigants, witnesses, or defendants, they often carry the invisible weight of past or ongoing adversity.A trauma-informed approach helps court professionals recognize signs of trauma and respond in ways that foster trust, reduce stress, and minimize the risk of re-traumatization. Additionally, this approach supports the well-being of court employees by equipping them with strategies to navigate difficult interactions while mitigating the impact of secondary traumatic stress on themselves.This month, we are exploring the role of trauma-informed engagement in court interactions. How can courts further integrate this critical practice to enhance fairness, empathy, and effectiveness in the justice system?Today's Panel: Carrie Summer-Namura, Program Coordinator for the Clackamas County Circuit Court, in Oregon City, OregonJill Houck, Trial Court Administration for the Superior Court in Cape May and Atlantic Counties New JerseyTrent Baker, Program Coordinator for Early Childhood Court, Dependency Drug Court & Juvenile Drug Court, 17th Judicial District, Fort Lauderdale, FloridaLeave a question or comment about the episode at clapodcast@nacmnet.org

November 21st, 2024, Question of Ethics Conversation  Copilot describes data literacy as understanding, interpreting, and using data effectively. It involves knowing how to read charts and graphs, understanding statistics, and being able to critically evaluate data sources for their reliability and relevance. Just as how literacy with words helps you comprehend and communicate in language, data literacy empowers you to navigate and make sense of the vast amounts of data we encounter daily. Problem Analysis is an often-overlooked component of decision-making. In this episode we discuss data literacy and how it intersects with ethics in the courts. Episode Moderator: Roger Rand, IT Manager, Multnomah County Circuit Court, Portland, Oregon Episode Panel: Courtney Whiteside, Director, Municipal Court, St. Louis, Missouri. Courtney is also the chair of the NACM Ethics Subcommittee. Stacy Worby, State Jury Coordinator, Alaska State Court System, Anchorage. Ellen Haines, Supervisor, IT Training & Data Analysis Department, Multnomah Circuit Court, Portland, Oregon Peter Kiefer, Host, Court Leaders Advantage Podcast Series, Auburn, New York. Jeff Chappell, Court Administrator, Municipal Court, O'Fallon, Missouri. Creadell Webb, Chief Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion Officer, 1st Judicial District, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Leave a question or comment at ethics@nacmnet,org Join the Question of Ethics Conversation held after the Subcommittee meetings every fourth Thursday of the month at 2:00 pm ET.

   Slam the Gavel welcomes Hector Araujo from Staunton, Virginia to the podcast. Hector discussed his family court issues in dealing with a JDR Judge Susan B. Read, 25th Judicial District in Virginia. Hector's case  involves false accusations, Custodial Interference and jail time.     Judge Susan B. Read just gives his ex-wife a slap on the wrists for withholding the kids from him. The ex-wifes boyfriend had been physically abusing the children as well. Apparently, the grandmother who has involvement with CPS has influence in the court procedure. She persuaded the judge to put Hector in a bad light. However, the judge found mother's boyfriend GUILTY but ALLOWED him to STILL STAY IN THE HOME, BUT NOT ALLOWED TO HAVE CONTACT WITH THE CHILDREN. How does that work IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE CHILDREN??    Hector has spent 11 months incarcerated for non-support while his arrears mounted to $12,000.00. Due to the stress of family court, Hector has also suffered multiple strokes and has had a pacemaker placed in his chest. His children have been turned against him. There is no justice in Staunton Virginia, especially when dealing with a judge like this. Hector has an appeal sitting in the court and two Show Causes for the mother not giving him the kids on his visiting time. To Reach Hector Araujo: hectoraraujo35@gmail.com****** Supportshow(https://www.buymeacoffee.com/maryannpetri)Maryann Petri: dismantlingfamilycourtcorruption.comhttps://www.tiktok.com/@maryannpetriFacebook:  https://www.youtube.com/@slamthegavelpodcasthostmar5536Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/guitarpeace/Pinterest: Slam The Gavel Podcast/@guitarpeaceLinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/maryann-petri-62a46b1ab/  YouTube:  https://www.youtube.com/@slamthegavelpodcasthostmar5536  Twitter https://x.com/PetriMaryann*DISCLAIMER* The use of this information is at the viewer/user's own risk. Not financial, medical nor legal advice as the content on this podcast does not constitute legal, financial, medical or any other professional advice. Viewer/user's should consult with the relevant professionals. Reproduction, distribution, performing, publicly displaying and making a derivative of the work is explicitly prohibited without permission from content creator. Podcast is protected by owner. The content creator maintains the exclusive right and any unauthorized copyright infringement is subject to legal prosecution.Support the showSupportshow(https://www.buymeacoffee.com/maryannpetri)http://www.dismantlingfamilycourtcorruption.com/

GEORGE BRAUCHLER IS BACK TO PROSECUTING BAD GUYS And now he's doing it in the newly created 23rd Judicial District. He joins me at 1 to talk about what we can expect from the new office.

 Colorado is once again on the forefront of legalizing another federally-controlled substance: psilocybin, also known as magic mushrooms. CPR's Molly Cruse and Alejandro Alonso Galva talk about what's in store with "The Trip: CPR's Coverage of Colorado's Psychedelic Journey." Then, Colorado gets a new judicial district for the first time in 60 years. Plus, Purplish looks at how the legislative session is shaping up. Also, a new directory will be a health resource for Black Coloradans. And commemorating the MLK Holiday in Colorado. 

George Braucher is the newly elected DA of the newly created 23rd Judicial District. We'll talk about what criminals in the district should expect once George takes office next month. We'll also talk about how Laura Ingraham (or her producers putting words in her mouth) misled viewers about Brauchler.Creation of the 23rd Judicial District - Douglas CountyDA-elect to take tough-on-crime approach in new 23rd Judicial District

On this Salcedo Storm Podcast:KSEV Interview with Sarah Stogner, District Attorney-Elect, 143rd Judicial District.

For the first time since 1964, Colorado is getting a new judicial district. We'll talk about the impact it could have. Then, the remarkable story of Jeremiah Daniels, an Aurora boy who has Down syndrome who stars in the critically-acclaimed movie, "Color Book" which screens at the Denver Film Festival this weekend. 

In the first hour of "Connections with Evan Dawson" on Oct. 23, 2024, we talk with candidates running for New York State Supreme Court in the 7th Judicial District.

The judge overseeing the Bryan Kohberger case abruptly paused a hearing Thursday on the potential change of venue for the capital murder trial after a defense expert witness showed social media content in court. Kohberger, a former Washington State University graduate student, is accused of killing four University of Idaho students and faces a capital murder trial scheduled for June 2025. Judge John Judge, who presides over the case in Idaho's 2nd Judicial District, listened to arguments from both the prosecution and defense regarding whether the trial should remain in Latah County, where the crime occurred. The hearing saw testimony from three expert witnesses, including Brian Edelman, co-founder of the jury consultancy firm Trial Innovations, hired by the defense to survey prospective jurors' knowledge and opinions about the case in Latah County.  During his testimony, Edelman showed Facebook posts in the courtroom, searching “Moscow murders” on the platform and sharing a screen recording of the search results. “You can see the extent of content that's out there from groups that are just talking about this case and sharing information and discussing what they think happens, and videos and posts, which may include anything from influencers and podcasters to sharing traditional news stories through local newspapers or television stories,” Edelman explained. The presentation included various Facebook groups, posts, and videos, many of which used sensationalized language or speculated on case details. Concerned about the impact of displaying such content, Judge Judge stopped Edelman and paused the hearing, which was live-streamed to the public via YouTube.   Kohberger's lead public defender, Anne Taylor, requested a break to discuss the situation privately. After a 30-minute pause, the court resumed, and Judge announced a one-hour lunch break. He decided that the first 15 minutes following the recess would not be streamed to the public, allowing only the victims' family members who were watching online to view those first minutes through Zoom. “It's kind of a compromise,” Judge said. “We thought there were certain things that maybe we don't want to send out to the public. I don't necessarily know what it all is, but I need to look at it and see it.” Kohberger's defense team has argued that the trial must be moved out of Latah County to ensure his constitutional right to a fair and impartial jury. In court filings, the defense claimed that Latah County has been “utterly corrupted” by news exposure about the case, fostering a “mob mentality within the community.” Anne Taylor and her team seek to move the trial to Boise, Idaho's capital city, located about 300 miles south of Moscow. Boise, situated in the state's largest county, offers a potentially more unbiased jury pool, Taylor argued. The defense supported its request for a change of venue with results from a phone survey conducted by a hired trial consultant. However, the survey initially drew criticism from Judge Judge because it polled prospective jurors in the community, potentially tainting the local jury pool. Prosecutors also opposed the defense's motion, arguing that pretrial publicity is common in high-profile cases and does not justify a venue change under Idaho law. “A move to Boise is neither necessary nor convenient,” Latah County Prosecutor Bill Thompson stated in his filing, arguing that the defense's survey results are flawed. Thompson suggested alternative measures, such as an expanded jury pool, to ensure an impartial jury. Ultimately, the decision rests with Judge Judge. Should he grant the defense's request to relocate the trial, he could choose to remain with the case unless he opts to withdraw due to the venue change, according to Idaho criminal rules. Bryan Kohberger, 29, is charged with four counts of first-degree murder in the November 2022 stabbing deaths of University of Idaho students Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin. Prosecutors have indicated their intention to seek the death penalty if Kohberger is convicted. Any challenges to the death penalty will be addressed in a separate hearing scheduled for early November. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The judge overseeing the Bryan Kohberger case abruptly paused a hearing Thursday on the potential change of venue for the capital murder trial after a defense expert witness showed social media content in court. Kohberger, a former Washington State University graduate student, is accused of killing four University of Idaho students and faces a capital murder trial scheduled for June 2025. Judge John Judge, who presides over the case in Idaho's 2nd Judicial District, listened to arguments from both the prosecution and defense regarding whether the trial should remain in Latah County, where the crime occurred. The hearing saw testimony from three expert witnesses, including Brian Edelman, co-founder of the jury consultancy firm Trial Innovations, hired by the defense to survey prospective jurors' knowledge and opinions about the case in Latah County.  During his testimony, Edelman showed Facebook posts in the courtroom, searching “Moscow murders” on the platform and sharing a screen recording of the search results. “You can see the extent of content that's out there from groups that are just talking about this case and sharing information and discussing what they think happens, and videos and posts, which may include anything from influencers and podcasters to sharing traditional news stories through local newspapers or television stories,” Edelman explained. The presentation included various Facebook groups, posts, and videos, many of which used sensationalized language or speculated on case details. Concerned about the impact of displaying such content, Judge Judge stopped Edelman and paused the hearing, which was live-streamed to the public via YouTube.   Kohberger's lead public defender, Anne Taylor, requested a break to discuss the situation privately. After a 30-minute pause, the court resumed, and Judge announced a one-hour lunch break. He decided that the first 15 minutes following the recess would not be streamed to the public, allowing only the victims' family members who were watching online to view those first minutes through Zoom. “It's kind of a compromise,” Judge said. “We thought there were certain things that maybe we don't want to send out to the public. I don't necessarily know what it all is, but I need to look at it and see it.” Kohberger's defense team has argued that the trial must be moved out of Latah County to ensure his constitutional right to a fair and impartial jury. In court filings, the defense claimed that Latah County has been “utterly corrupted” by news exposure about the case, fostering a “mob mentality within the community.” Anne Taylor and her team seek to move the trial to Boise, Idaho's capital city, located about 300 miles south of Moscow. Boise, situated in the state's largest county, offers a potentially more unbiased jury pool, Taylor argued. The defense supported its request for a change of venue with results from a phone survey conducted by a hired trial consultant. However, the survey initially drew criticism from Judge Judge because it polled prospective jurors in the community, potentially tainting the local jury pool. Prosecutors also opposed the defense's motion, arguing that pretrial publicity is common in high-profile cases and does not justify a venue change under Idaho law. “A move to Boise is neither necessary nor convenient,” Latah County Prosecutor Bill Thompson stated in his filing, arguing that the defense's survey results are flawed. Thompson suggested alternative measures, such as an expanded jury pool, to ensure an impartial jury. Ultimately, the decision rests with Judge Judge. Should he grant the defense's request to relocate the trial, he could choose to remain with the case unless he opts to withdraw due to the venue change, according to Idaho criminal rules. Bryan Kohberger, 29, is charged with four counts of first-degree murder in the November 2022 stabbing deaths of University of Idaho students Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin. Prosecutors have indicated their intention to seek the death penalty if Kohberger is convicted. Any challenges to the death penalty will be addressed in a separate hearing scheduled for early November. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The judge in Bryan Kohberger's case paused a hearing on a potential change of venue for his capital murder trial after a defense expert presented social media content in court. Kohberger, a former Washington State University graduate student, is accused of killing four University of Idaho students and is set to go to trial in June 2025. Judge John Judge, overseeing the case in Idaho's 2nd Judicial District, heard arguments on whether the trial should remain in Latah County, where the crime occurred. Three expert witnesses testified, including Brian Edelman from Trial Innovations, a jury consultancy firm hired by the defense to survey the knowledge and opinions of potential jurors in Latah County. During his testimony, Edelman displayed a screen recording of Facebook posts discussing the case by searching “Moscow murders.” The content included groups, posts, and videos that often contained sensational language or speculative details. Concerned about the impact of these displays, Judge Judge halted the hearing, which was live-streamed on YouTube, saying, "I don't think we need to advertise all these, honestly. We've been trying to protect from this kind of stuff." Kohberger's lead public defender, Anne Taylor, requested a private discussion following the incident. After a brief pause, the court reconvened, and Judge Judge announced a one-hour lunch break. He decided that the first 15 minutes after the recess would not be streamed to the public, allowing only the victims' families to view via Zoom, citing a need to avoid broadcasting sensitive content. Kohberger's defense team is pushing for a venue change, arguing that extensive media coverage has created a "mob mentality" in Latah County, preventing a fair trial. They suggest moving the trial to Boise, Idaho's capital, to access a less biased jury pool. The defense's argument is supported by a survey conducted by a trial consultant, although it faced criticism for potentially influencing the local jury pool. Prosecutors oppose moving the trial, arguing that pretrial publicity is common in high-profile cases and does not justify a venue change under Idaho law. Latah County Prosecutor Bill Thompson proposed alternatives, such as an expanded jury pool, to maintain fairness. Judge Judge will decide whether to approve the venue change, and if granted, he may continue overseeing the case or withdraw due to the change, as allowed by Idaho law. Bryan Kohberger, 29, faces four counts of first-degree murder for the November 2022 stabbing deaths of University of Idaho students. Prosecutors plan to seek the death penalty if he is convicted, with a hearing on potential challenges scheduled for early November. The outcome of the venue debate will significantly impact the trial's proceedings. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The judge in Bryan Kohberger's case paused a hearing on a potential change of venue for his capital murder trial after a defense expert presented social media content in court. Kohberger, a former Washington State University graduate student, is accused of killing four University of Idaho students and is set to go to trial in June 2025.    Judge John Judge, overseeing the case in Idaho's 2nd Judicial District, heard arguments on whether the trial should remain in Latah County, where the crime occurred. Three expert witnesses testified, including Brian Edelman from Trial Innovations, a jury consultancy firm hired by the defense to survey the knowledge and opinions of potential jurors in Latah County.    During his testimony, Edelman displayed a screen recording of Facebook posts discussing the case by searching “Moscow murders.” The content included groups, posts, and videos that often contained sensational language or speculative details. Concerned about the impact of these displays, Judge Judge halted the hearing, which was live-streamed on YouTube, saying, "I don't think we need to advertise all these, honestly. We've been trying to protect from this kind of stuff."  Kohberger's lead public defender, Anne Taylor, requested a private discussion following the incident. After a brief pause, the court reconvened, and Judge Judge announced a one-hour lunch break. He decided that the first 15 minutes after the recess would not be streamed to the public, allowing only the victims' families to view via Zoom, citing a need to avoid broadcasting sensitive content.  Kohberger's defense team is pushing for a venue change, arguing that extensive media coverage has created a "mob mentality" in Latah County, preventing a fair trial. They suggest moving the trial to Boise, Idaho's capital, to access a less biased jury pool. The defense's argument is supported by a survey conducted by a trial consultant, although it faced criticism for potentially influencing the local jury pool.  Prosecutors oppose moving the trial, arguing that pretrial publicity is common in high-profile cases and does not justify a venue change under Idaho law. Latah County Prosecutor Bill Thompson proposed alternatives, such as an expanded jury pool, to maintain fairness.  Judge Judge will decide whether to approve the venue change, and if granted, he may continue overseeing the case or withdraw due to the change, as allowed by Idaho law.  Bryan Kohberger, 29, faces four counts of first-degree murder for the November 2022 stabbing deaths of University of Idaho students. Prosecutors plan to seek the death penalty if he is convicted, with a hearing on potential challenges scheduled for early November. The outcome of the venue debate will significantly impact the trial's proceedings.  Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The judge in Bryan Kohberger's case paused a hearing on a potential change of venue for his capital murder trial after a defense expert presented social media content in court. Kohberger, a former Washington State University graduate student, is accused of killing four University of Idaho students and is set to go to trial in June 2025.    Judge John Judge, overseeing the case in Idaho's 2nd Judicial District, heard arguments on whether the trial should remain in Latah County, where the crime occurred. Three expert witnesses testified, including Brian Edelman from Trial Innovations, a jury consultancy firm hired by the defense to survey the knowledge and opinions of potential jurors in Latah County.    During his testimony, Edelman displayed a screen recording of Facebook posts discussing the case by searching “Moscow murders.” The content included groups, posts, and videos that often contained sensational language or speculative details. Concerned about the impact of these displays, Judge Judge halted the hearing, which was live-streamed on YouTube, saying, "I don't think we need to advertise all these, honestly. We've been trying to protect from this kind of stuff."  Kohberger's lead public defender, Anne Taylor, requested a private discussion following the incident. After a brief pause, the court reconvened, and Judge Judge announced a one-hour lunch break. He decided that the first 15 minutes after the recess would not be streamed to the public, allowing only the victims' families to view via Zoom, citing a need to avoid broadcasting sensitive content.  Kohberger's defense team is pushing for a venue change, arguing that extensive media coverage has created a "mob mentality" in Latah County, preventing a fair trial. They suggest moving the trial to Boise, Idaho's capital, to access a less biased jury pool. The defense's argument is supported by a survey conducted by a trial consultant, although it faced criticism for potentially influencing the local jury pool.  Prosecutors oppose moving the trial, arguing that pretrial publicity is common in high-profile cases and does not justify a venue change under Idaho law. Latah County Prosecutor Bill Thompson proposed alternatives, such as an expanded jury pool, to maintain fairness.  Judge Judge will decide whether to approve the venue change, and if granted, he may continue overseeing the case or withdraw due to the change, as allowed by Idaho law.  Bryan Kohberger, 29, faces four counts of first-degree murder for the November 2022 stabbing deaths of University of Idaho students. Prosecutors plan to seek the death penalty if he is convicted, with a hearing on potential challenges scheduled for early November. The outcome of the venue debate will significantly impact the trial's proceedings.  Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The judge in Bryan Kohberger's case paused a hearing on a potential change of venue for his capital murder trial after a defense expert presented social media content in court. Kohberger, a former Washington State University graduate student, is accused of killing four University of Idaho students and is set to go to trial in June 2025.    Judge John Judge, overseeing the case in Idaho's 2nd Judicial District, heard arguments on whether the trial should remain in Latah County, where the crime occurred. Three expert witnesses testified, including Brian Edelman from Trial Innovations, a jury consultancy firm hired by the defense to survey the knowledge and opinions of potential jurors in Latah County.    During his testimony, Edelman displayed a screen recording of Facebook posts discussing the case by searching “Moscow murders.” The content included groups, posts, and videos that often contained sensational language or speculative details. Concerned about the impact of these displays, Judge Judge halted the hearing, which was live-streamed on YouTube, saying, "I don't think we need to advertise all these, honestly. We've been trying to protect from this kind of stuff."  Kohberger's lead public defender, Anne Taylor, requested a private discussion following the incident. After a brief pause, the court reconvened, and Judge Judge announced a one-hour lunch break. He decided that the first 15 minutes after the recess would not be streamed to the public, allowing only the victims' families to view via Zoom, citing a need to avoid broadcasting sensitive content.  Kohberger's defense team is pushing for a venue change, arguing that extensive media coverage has created a "mob mentality" in Latah County, preventing a fair trial. They suggest moving the trial to Boise, Idaho's capital, to access a less biased jury pool. The defense's argument is supported by a survey conducted by a trial consultant, although it faced criticism for potentially influencing the local jury pool.  Prosecutors oppose moving the trial, arguing that pretrial publicity is common in high-profile cases and does not justify a venue change under Idaho law. Latah County Prosecutor Bill Thompson proposed alternatives, such as an expanded jury pool, to maintain fairness.  Judge Judge will decide whether to approve the venue change, and if granted, he may continue overseeing the case or withdraw due to the change, as allowed by Idaho law.  Bryan Kohberger, 29, faces four counts of first-degree murder for the November 2022 stabbing deaths of University of Idaho students. Prosecutors plan to seek the death penalty if he is convicted, with a hearing on potential challenges scheduled for early November. The outcome of the venue debate will significantly impact the trial's proceedings.  Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The judge in Bryan Kohberger's case paused a hearing on a potential change of venue for his capital murder trial after a defense expert presented social media content in court. Kohberger, a former Washington State University graduate student, is accused of killing four University of Idaho students and is set to go to trial in June 2025.    Judge John Judge, overseeing the case in Idaho's 2nd Judicial District, heard arguments on whether the trial should remain in Latah County, where the crime occurred. Three expert witnesses testified, including Brian Edelman from Trial Innovations, a jury consultancy firm hired by the defense to survey the knowledge and opinions of potential jurors in Latah County.    During his testimony, Edelman displayed a screen recording of Facebook posts discussing the case by searching “Moscow murders.” The content included groups, posts, and videos that often contained sensational language or speculative details. Concerned about the impact of these displays, Judge Judge halted the hearing, which was live-streamed on YouTube, saying, "I don't think we need to advertise all these, honestly. We've been trying to protect from this kind of stuff."  Kohberger's lead public defender, Anne Taylor, requested a private discussion following the incident. After a brief pause, the court reconvened, and Judge Judge announced a one-hour lunch break. He decided that the first 15 minutes after the recess would not be streamed to the public, allowing only the victims' families to view via Zoom, citing a need to avoid broadcasting sensitive content.  Kohberger's defense team is pushing for a venue change, arguing that extensive media coverage has created a "mob mentality" in Latah County, preventing a fair trial. They suggest moving the trial to Boise, Idaho's capital, to access a less biased jury pool. The defense's argument is supported by a survey conducted by a trial consultant, although it faced criticism for potentially influencing the local jury pool.  Prosecutors oppose moving the trial, arguing that pretrial publicity is common in high-profile cases and does not justify a venue change under Idaho law. Latah County Prosecutor Bill Thompson proposed alternatives, such as an expanded jury pool, to maintain fairness.  Judge Judge will decide whether to approve the venue change, and if granted, he may continue overseeing the case or withdraw due to the change, as allowed by Idaho law.  Bryan Kohberger, 29, faces four counts of first-degree murder for the November 2022 stabbing deaths of University of Idaho students. Prosecutors plan to seek the death penalty if he is convicted, with a hearing on potential challenges scheduled for early November. The outcome of the venue debate will significantly impact the trial's proceedings.  Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The judge in Bryan Kohberger's case paused a hearing on a potential change of venue for his capital murder trial after a defense expert presented social media content in court. Kohberger, a former Washington State University graduate student, is accused of killing four University of Idaho students and is set to go to trial in June 2025.    Judge John Judge, overseeing the case in Idaho's 2nd Judicial District, heard arguments on whether the trial should remain in Latah County, where the crime occurred. Three expert witnesses testified, including Brian Edelman from Trial Innovations, a jury consultancy firm hired by the defense to survey the knowledge and opinions of potential jurors in Latah County.    During his testimony, Edelman displayed a screen recording of Facebook posts discussing the case by searching “Moscow murders.” The content included groups, posts, and videos that often contained sensational language or speculative details. Concerned about the impact of these displays, Judge Judge halted the hearing, which was live-streamed on YouTube, saying, "I don't think we need to advertise all these, honestly. We've been trying to protect from this kind of stuff."  Kohberger's lead public defender, Anne Taylor, requested a private discussion following the incident. After a brief pause, the court reconvened, and Judge Judge announced a one-hour lunch break. He decided that the first 15 minutes after the recess would not be streamed to the public, allowing only the victims' families to view via Zoom, citing a need to avoid broadcasting sensitive content.  Kohberger's defense team is pushing for a venue change, arguing that extensive media coverage has created a "mob mentality" in Latah County, preventing a fair trial. They suggest moving the trial to Boise, Idaho's capital, to access a less biased jury pool. The defense's argument is supported by a survey conducted by a trial consultant, although it faced criticism for potentially influencing the local jury pool.  Prosecutors oppose moving the trial, arguing that pretrial publicity is common in high-profile cases and does not justify a venue change under Idaho law. Latah County Prosecutor Bill Thompson proposed alternatives, such as an expanded jury pool, to maintain fairness.  Judge Judge will decide whether to approve the venue change, and if granted, he may continue overseeing the case or withdraw due to the change, as allowed by Idaho law.  Bryan Kohberger, 29, faces four counts of first-degree murder for the November 2022 stabbing deaths of University of Idaho students. Prosecutors plan to seek the death penalty if he is convicted, with a hearing on potential challenges scheduled for early November. The outcome of the venue debate will significantly impact the trial's proceedings.  Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The judge in Bryan Kohberger's case paused a hearing on a potential change of venue for his capital murder trial after a defense expert presented social media content in court. Kohberger, a former Washington State University graduate student, is accused of killing four University of Idaho students and is set to go to trial in June 2025.    Judge John Judge, overseeing the case in Idaho's 2nd Judicial District, heard arguments on whether the trial should remain in Latah County, where the crime occurred. Three expert witnesses testified, including Brian Edelman from Trial Innovations, a jury consultancy firm hired by the defense to survey the knowledge and opinions of potential jurors in Latah County.    During his testimony, Edelman displayed a screen recording of Facebook posts discussing the case by searching “Moscow murders.” The content included groups, posts, and videos that often contained sensational language or speculative details. Concerned about the impact of these displays, Judge Judge halted the hearing, which was live-streamed on YouTube, saying, "I don't think we need to advertise all these, honestly. We've been trying to protect from this kind of stuff."  Kohberger's lead public defender, Anne Taylor, requested a private discussion following the incident. After a brief pause, the court reconvened, and Judge Judge announced a one-hour lunch break. He decided that the first 15 minutes after the recess would not be streamed to the public, allowing only the victims' families to view via Zoom, citing a need to avoid broadcasting sensitive content.  Kohberger's defense team is pushing for a venue change, arguing that extensive media coverage has created a "mob mentality" in Latah County, preventing a fair trial. They suggest moving the trial to Boise, Idaho's capital, to access a less biased jury pool. The defense's argument is supported by a survey conducted by a trial consultant, although it faced criticism for potentially influencing the local jury pool.  Prosecutors oppose moving the trial, arguing that pretrial publicity is common in high-profile cases and does not justify a venue change under Idaho law. Latah County Prosecutor Bill Thompson proposed alternatives, such as an expanded jury pool, to maintain fairness.  Judge Judge will decide whether to approve the venue change, and if granted, he may continue overseeing the case or withdraw due to the change, as allowed by Idaho law.  Bryan Kohberger, 29, faces four counts of first-degree murder for the November 2022 stabbing deaths of University of Idaho students. Prosecutors plan to seek the death penalty if he is convicted, with a hearing on potential challenges scheduled for early November. The outcome of the venue debate will significantly impact the trial's proceedings.  Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The judge in Bryan Kohberger's case paused a hearing on a potential change of venue for his capital murder trial after a defense expert presented social media content in court. Kohberger, a former Washington State University graduate student, is accused of killing four University of Idaho students and is set to go to trial in June 2025. Judge John Judge, overseeing the case in Idaho's 2nd Judicial District, heard arguments on whether the trial should remain in Latah County, where the crime occurred. Three expert witnesses testified, including Brian Edelman from Trial Innovations, a jury consultancy firm hired by the defense to survey the knowledge and opinions of potential jurors in Latah County. During his testimony, Edelman displayed a screen recording of Facebook posts discussing the case by searching “Moscow murders.” The content included groups, posts, and videos that often contained sensational language or speculative details. Concerned about the impact of these displays, Judge Judge halted the hearing, which was live-streamed on YouTube, saying, "I don't think we need to advertise all these, honestly. We've been trying to protect from this kind of stuff." Kohberger's lead public defender, Anne Taylor, requested a private discussion following the incident. After a brief pause, the court reconvened, and Judge Judge announced a one-hour lunch break. He decided that the first 15 minutes after the recess would not be streamed to the public, allowing only the victims' families to view via Zoom, citing a need to avoid broadcasting sensitive content. Kohberger's defense team is pushing for a venue change, arguing that extensive media coverage has created a "mob mentality" in Latah County, preventing a fair trial. They suggest moving the trial to Boise, Idaho's capital, to access a less biased jury pool. The defense's argument is supported by a survey conducted by a trial consultant, although it faced criticism for potentially influencing the local jury pool. Prosecutors oppose moving the trial, arguing that pretrial publicity is common in high-profile cases and does not justify a venue change under Idaho law. Latah County Prosecutor Bill Thompson proposed alternatives, such as an expanded jury pool, to maintain fairness. Judge Judge will decide whether to approve the venue change, and if granted, he may continue overseeing the case or withdraw due to the change, as allowed by Idaho law. Bryan Kohberger, 29, faces four counts of first-degree murder for the November 2022 stabbing deaths of University of Idaho students. Prosecutors plan to seek the death penalty if he is convicted, with a hearing on potential challenges scheduled for early November. The outcome of the venue debate will significantly impact the trial's proceedings. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Jeff Stanfield & Andy Shaver are joined by duck hunting buddies, Hunter Brooks & Nick Wiles. Hunter and Nick grew up across the street from each other in a small West Texas town. Hunter is the District Attorney for the 50th Judicial District in Texas and Nick is an air conditioner mechanic working for his familiy's HVAC company. The guys discuss some of Hunter's high profiles cases, climbing Mount Kilimanjaro, silly laws, duck hunting in West Texas, the new wrinkle the duo are hoping to add this coming duck season, and how each duck hunter varies in their tactics.