Podcasts about Delphi

In a startling revelation, the ongoing Delphi murder case involving Richard Allen has taken a turn, exposing the intense behind-the-scenes interactions between Judge Gull and the defense attorneys Rozzi and Baldwin. Recently, a detailed account of what transpired in Judge Gull's chambers was brought to light, raising serious concerns about the judicial process in this high-profile case. Jennifer Coffindaffer, a retired FBI special agent, shared her insights on the "Hidden Killers" podcast with Tony Brueski, delving into the implications of these revelations.    The 20-page document detailing the conversation in chambers revealed what Coffindaffer described as a "strong arm maneuver" by Judge Gull. The judge's alleged threats to publicly accuse the attorneys of "gross negligence" and "gross incompetence" in open court have sent shockwaves through the legal community. These words carry significant weight, especially considering the distinguished reputations of Rozzi and Baldwin in Indiana's legal circles.    Coffindaffer, reflecting on the transcript, observed, "You can see throughout reading this transcript how they just cower... It just doesn't seem like that's how our justice system should work." This situation raises fundamental questions about the balance of power in the courtroom and the role of a judge in ensuring a fair trial.    When asked about the commonality of such strong-arming tactics, Coffindaffer noted that while judges often exert influence in chambers, the degree of coercion alleged in this case is unprecedented. "Never seeing somebody told, if you don't get off, I'm going to kick you off and embarrass you," she remarked, highlighting the atypical nature of Judge Gull's approach.    The decision to handle this matter behind closed doors, without an evidentiary hearing, adds another layer of controversy to the case. Coffindaffer suggests that a more transparent and procedural approach would have been to conduct a hearing, allowing the attorneys to defend their actions and the judge to make an informed decision. The absence of this process not only undermines the defense's position but also casts a shadow over the judge's impartiality.    This development in the Delphi murder case has opened a Pandora's box of potential judicial misconduct and ethical dilemmas. Coffindaffer's commentary raises the possibility of uncovering similar instances involving Judge Gull, suggesting that this incident might be "only the tip of the iceberg."    As the case continues to unfold, the focus remains on ensuring justice for the victims. However, these recent revelations have shifted some attention to the judicial process itself. The question now is not only about Richard Allen's fate but also about the integrity of the legal proceedings in this highly scrutinized case. Can the justice system rectify these alleged missteps, or will they lead to further complications and delays in finding the truth behind the Delphi murders?    The answers to these questions are eagerly awaited, not just by those directly involved in the case, but by a public increasingly concerned about the fairness and transparency of the legal system. As the spotlight remains on Judge Gull and her handling of the defense attorneys, the broader implications for judicial conduct and ethics in high-profile cases come sharply into focus. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In a startling revelation, the ongoing Delphi murder case involving Richard Allen has taken a turn, exposing the intense behind-the-scenes interactions between Judge Gull and the defense attorneys Rozzi and Baldwin. Recently, a detailed account of what transpired in Judge Gull's chambers was brought to light, raising serious concerns about the judicial process in this high-profile case. Jennifer Coffindaffer, a retired FBI special agent, shared her insights on the "Hidden Killers" podcast with Tony Brueski, delving into the implications of these revelations.    The 20-page document detailing the conversation in chambers revealed what Coffindaffer described as a "strong arm maneuver" by Judge Gull. The judge's alleged threats to publicly accuse the attorneys of "gross negligence" and "gross incompetence" in open court have sent shockwaves through the legal community. These words carry significant weight, especially considering the distinguished reputations of Rozzi and Baldwin in Indiana's legal circles.    Coffindaffer, reflecting on the transcript, observed, "You can see throughout reading this transcript how they just cower... It just doesn't seem like that's how our justice system should work." This situation raises fundamental questions about the balance of power in the courtroom and the role of a judge in ensuring a fair trial.    When asked about the commonality of such strong-arming tactics, Coffindaffer noted that while judges often exert influence in chambers, the degree of coercion alleged in this case is unprecedented. "Never seeing somebody told, if you don't get off, I'm going to kick you off and embarrass you," she remarked, highlighting the atypical nature of Judge Gull's approach.    The decision to handle this matter behind closed doors, without an evidentiary hearing, adds another layer of controversy to the case. Coffindaffer suggests that a more transparent and procedural approach would have been to conduct a hearing, allowing the attorneys to defend their actions and the judge to make an informed decision. The absence of this process not only undermines the defense's position but also casts a shadow over the judge's impartiality.    This development in the Delphi murder case has opened a Pandora's box of potential judicial misconduct and ethical dilemmas. Coffindaffer's commentary raises the possibility of uncovering similar instances involving Judge Gull, suggesting that this incident might be "only the tip of the iceberg."    As the case continues to unfold, the focus remains on ensuring justice for the victims. However, these recent revelations have shifted some attention to the judicial process itself. The question now is not only about Richard Allen's fate but also about the integrity of the legal proceedings in this highly scrutinized case. Can the justice system rectify these alleged missteps, or will they lead to further complications and delays in finding the truth behind the Delphi murders?    The answers to these questions are eagerly awaited, not just by those directly involved in the case, but by a public increasingly concerned about the fairness and transparency of the legal system. As the spotlight remains on Judge Gull and her handling of the defense attorneys, the broader implications for judicial conduct and ethics in high-profile cases come sharply into focus. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In the intricate Delphi murder case involving Richard Allen, the debate intensifies around Judge Gull's controversial decisions and the legal future of the accused. Bob Motta, a seasoned defense attorney and podcast host, shared his insights with Tony Brueski on the "Hidden Killers" podcast, shedding light on recent developments and potential implications for the case.    Motta delved into the complexities of Judge Gull's response to the dismissal of Allen's attorneys, Rozzi and Baldwin. "It's the case that never sleeps," Motta said, reflecting on the ongoing legal battle and the constant updates in court filings. He expressed concerns about the procedural arguments raised by Judge Gull, emphasizing their potential impact on the trial's outcome.    Motta's analysis suggests that if the Supreme Court of Indiana overlooks the procedural defects highlighted by Judge Gull and addresses the merits of the case, the outcome could drastically affect Allen's future. However, if the Supreme Court sides with Judge Gull on procedural grounds, it could close a critical path for Allen to challenge the loss of his chosen attorneys.    One striking aspect of Motta's commentary is the emphasis on the strategic implications of the trial's timeline. He speculated that Judge Gull might have used the document leak as a pretext to remove Allen's attorneys and delay the trial, thereby avoiding a speedy trial deadline that would have put immense pressure on both the court and the prosecution.    Motta also raised the possibility of a new attorney stepping in pro bono to represent Allen, highlighting the case's high-profile nature and the determination of Allen's original attorneys, who firmly believe in his innocence. "This isn't the typical lawyer defense thing," Motta noted, pointing to the exceptional commitment shown by Rozzi and Baldwin.    The discussion also touched on the broader context of the justice system, examining how judicial power dynamics and procedural nuances can significantly influence a trial's trajectory. Motta's perspective suggests a legal system where strategic maneuvering and interpretation of rules can overshadow the pursuit of justice.    As the Delphi murder case continues to unfold, the central question remains: Will the legal system uphold the fundamental rights of the accused while ensuring a fair and timely trial? The answer lies not only in the hands of the Supreme Court of Indiana but also in the potential actions of new attorneys who may come forward to take on Allen's defense.    With the case teetering on a procedural tightrope, the fate of Richard Allen hangs in the balance, underscoring the crucial role of judicial discretion and the interpretation of legal procedures in high-stakes criminal trials. As the public eagerly awaits the next chapter in this legal saga, the question lingers: Will justice prevail in the Delphi murder case, or will procedural complexities overshadow the quest for truth? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In the intricate Delphi murder case involving Richard Allen, the debate intensifies around Judge Gull's controversial decisions and the legal future of the accused. Bob Motta, a seasoned defense attorney and podcast host, shared his insights with Tony Brueski on the "Hidden Killers" podcast, shedding light on recent developments and potential implications for the case.    Motta delved into the complexities of Judge Gull's response to the dismissal of Allen's attorneys, Rozzi and Baldwin. "It's the case that never sleeps," Motta said, reflecting on the ongoing legal battle and the constant updates in court filings. He expressed concerns about the procedural arguments raised by Judge Gull, emphasizing their potential impact on the trial's outcome.    Motta's analysis suggests that if the Supreme Court of Indiana overlooks the procedural defects highlighted by Judge Gull and addresses the merits of the case, the outcome could drastically affect Allen's future. However, if the Supreme Court sides with Judge Gull on procedural grounds, it could close a critical path for Allen to challenge the loss of his chosen attorneys.    One striking aspect of Motta's commentary is the emphasis on the strategic implications of the trial's timeline. He speculated that Judge Gull might have used the document leak as a pretext to remove Allen's attorneys and delay the trial, thereby avoiding a speedy trial deadline that would have put immense pressure on both the court and the prosecution.    Motta also raised the possibility of a new attorney stepping in pro bono to represent Allen, highlighting the case's high-profile nature and the determination of Allen's original attorneys, who firmly believe in his innocence. "This isn't the typical lawyer defense thing," Motta noted, pointing to the exceptional commitment shown by Rozzi and Baldwin.    The discussion also touched on the broader context of the justice system, examining how judicial power dynamics and procedural nuances can significantly influence a trial's trajectory. Motta's perspective suggests a legal system where strategic maneuvering and interpretation of rules can overshadow the pursuit of justice.    As the Delphi murder case continues to unfold, the central question remains: Will the legal system uphold the fundamental rights of the accused while ensuring a fair and timely trial? The answer lies not only in the hands of the Supreme Court of Indiana but also in the potential actions of new attorneys who may come forward to take on Allen's defense.    With the case teetering on a procedural tightrope, the fate of Richard Allen hangs in the balance, underscoring the crucial role of judicial discretion and the interpretation of legal procedures in high-stakes criminal trials. As the public eagerly awaits the next chapter in this legal saga, the question lingers: Will justice prevail in the Delphi murder case, or will procedural complexities overshadow the quest for truth? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The transcript of the in-chambers meeting between the prosecution, defense, and Judge Gull in the Delphi case has been released. What have we learned? And what does it mean for the future of the case?

Katie and Kristi update cases they are following. Watch for Rex Heuermann, Brianna Ghey Murder Trial, a racial injustice case that's going to the Virginia Supreme court, Alex Murdaugh sentencing, Troy Driver, Delphi, Vallow/Daybell, and Franke.

The unfolding narrative around Richard Allen, the primary suspect in the infamous Delphi murders, has taken a disturbing turn. Recent allegations suggest a harrowing reality within the walls of the Westville Correctional Facility, where Allen is being held. These claims, voiced by fellow inmate Robert Baston, paint a bleak picture of abuse and mistreatment by the staff and guards.    In an illuminating discussion on the "Hidden Killers" podcast, hosted by Tony Brueski, former FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer sheds light on these troubling accusations and the complexities of prison life. Baston, who had initially intended to testify about the alleged abuse, withdrew his statement citing fears for his safety. This development raises crucial questions about the oversight and conduct in correctional facilities, especially in high-profile cases like Allen's.    Coffindaffer explains the challenging dynamics within prisons, where guards often work under stressful conditions with low pay, creating a 'perfect storm' for potential conflicts and abuse. She underscores the dire need for more comprehensive monitoring, such as body-worn cameras, to protect both inmates and guards from false allegations and abuse. "This is the worst case scenario," Coffindaffer notes, emphasizing the need for effective measures to ensure safety and fairness in the penal system.    The situation in Westville Correctional Facility, as described by Baston, calls for immediate and thorough investigation. The absence of adequate surveillance and protective measures not only endangers the welfare of inmates like Allen but also casts a shadow over the integrity of the justice system. It's a stark reminder of the often-overlooked human rights issues within the penal system, especially for those awaiting trial and presumed innocent until proven guilty.    Brueski and Coffindaffer's conversation gravitates towards the broader implications of such allegations. If true, they not only reflect a failure in the prison system but also potentially jeopardize the due process for Allen. Coffindaffer raises a valid concern that if Allen is convicted, these issues could lead to an overturning of the verdict, further delaying justice for the victims.    The deterioration observed in Allen's physical and mental state, as pointed out by Coffindaffer, adds another layer of complexity to the case. The transition from a normal life to the harsh realities of prison life, especially under the alleged conditions, could have a profound impact on any individual. "It's just it would be so negatively impactful on a person," Coffindaffer remarks, highlighting the drastic change in Allen's condition.    As the case continues to unfold, the spotlight is not only on Allen's guilt or innocence but also on the conditions of his incarceration. It's a situation that begs for transparency, accountability, and reform in the prison system. The allegations, if verified, not only call for immediate action to safeguard the rights and well-being of inmates but also raise significant questions about the efficacy of the justice system in handling high-profile cases.    The Delphi murder case, with its twists and turns, underscores the urgent need for a fair and just legal process, not just for the accused but also for the victims seeking closure. As Coffindaffer aptly puts it, the ultimate goal is to see the justice system work correctly, ensuring that such administrative and procedural lapses do not hinder the path to justice for Abby and Libby, the young victims of this tragic case.    In the shadow of these grave allegations, one cannot help but ponder: Can the justice system rise to the challenge and ensure a fair trial for Richard Allen while also addressing the deeply rooted issues within the prison system? Or will these allegations be another chapter in the long history of systemic failures in the treatment of inmates, especially those yet to be proven guilty? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The Delphi murder case, involving the prime suspect Richard Allen, has taken a distressing turn with emerging allegations of abuse and mistreatment within the walls of Westville Correctional Facility. These revelations, brought to light by inmate Robert Baston, add another layer of complexity to an already convoluted case. Neama Rahmani, a former federal prosecutor, joined Tony Brueski on the podcast "Hidden Killers" to dissect these claims and their potential impact on the case.    Baston's reluctance to testify, citing concerns for his own safety, raises significant questions about the conditions in the correctional facility. As Rahmani points out, his statements could be a critical indicator of underlying issues. "Prisoners lie sometimes, especially convicted sex offenders. But, physical abuse does happen in correctional facilities," Rahmani acknowledged, suggesting the possibility of validity behind Baston's claims.    The conversation delved into the nature of oversight in such institutions. Rahmani highlighted the roles of independent watchdogs, like an inspector general, and the Department of Justice's Civil Rights Division, in investigating and potentially rectifying such issues. He also noted the possibility of civil litigation as a recourse for inmates facing abuse. "There's a few ways to hold bad actors on the law enforcement side accountable if there is indeed some sort of abuse going on," Rahmani explained.    However, the path to justice is fraught with challenges. Rahmani pointed out the inherent risks faced by inmates like Baston, who consider speaking out against their alleged abusers. The fear of retaliation is a palpable threat that can dissuade inmates from coming forward, a concern that Baston himself seems to share.    This situation in Westville Correctional Facility, where Richard Allen is detained, complicates the already tumultuous Delphi murder case. The allegations, if true, not only cast a shadow over the integrity of the facility but also raise concerns about the treatment of inmates, including those awaiting trial, like Allen.    Rahmani's insights underscore a crucial aspect of the American criminal justice system – the need for transparent and accountable correctional facilities. As the Delphi case continues to unfold, these allegations of abuse within Westville Correctional Facility demand attention and action.    In the quest for justice in the Delphi murders, the treatment of suspects and inmates remains a critical component. As Rahmani aptly put it, "I'm not in prison. I'm not dealing with these types of abusive guards, at least allegedly. So, it's a question of, are they willing to, just like any other testimony, right? If you're testifying against someone in court, it could be a co-defendant, it could be a guard. You know, there is always that fear of retaliation and that's real."    The Delphi murder case has evolved beyond a mere criminal investigation, touching upon broader issues of human rights and the administration of justice within correctional facilities. As new details emerge, one can't help but wonder: How will these allegations influence the ongoing legal battle for Richard Allen, and what steps will be taken to ensure that justice prevails not just in the courtroom but within the walls of correctional institutions? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The Delphi murder case, involving the prime suspect Richard Allen, has taken a distressing turn with emerging allegations of abuse and mistreatment within the walls of Westville Correctional Facility. These revelations, brought to light by inmate Robert Baston, add another layer of complexity to an already convoluted case. Neama Rahmani, a former federal prosecutor, joined Tony Brueski on the podcast "Hidden Killers" to dissect these claims and their potential impact on the case.    Baston's reluctance to testify, citing concerns for his own safety, raises significant questions about the conditions in the correctional facility. As Rahmani points out, his statements could be a critical indicator of underlying issues. "Prisoners lie sometimes, especially convicted sex offenders. But, physical abuse does happen in correctional facilities," Rahmani acknowledged, suggesting the possibility of validity behind Baston's claims.    The conversation delved into the nature of oversight in such institutions. Rahmani highlighted the roles of independent watchdogs, like an inspector general, and the Department of Justice's Civil Rights Division, in investigating and potentially rectifying such issues. He also noted the possibility of civil litigation as a recourse for inmates facing abuse. "There's a few ways to hold bad actors on the law enforcement side accountable if there is indeed some sort of abuse going on," Rahmani explained.    However, the path to justice is fraught with challenges. Rahmani pointed out the inherent risks faced by inmates like Baston, who consider speaking out against their alleged abusers. The fear of retaliation is a palpable threat that can dissuade inmates from coming forward, a concern that Baston himself seems to share.    This situation in Westville Correctional Facility, where Richard Allen is detained, complicates the already tumultuous Delphi murder case. The allegations, if true, not only cast a shadow over the integrity of the facility but also raise concerns about the treatment of inmates, including those awaiting trial, like Allen.    Rahmani's insights underscore a crucial aspect of the American criminal justice system – the need for transparent and accountable correctional facilities. As the Delphi case continues to unfold, these allegations of abuse within Westville Correctional Facility demand attention and action.    In the quest for justice in the Delphi murders, the treatment of suspects and inmates remains a critical component. As Rahmani aptly put it, "I'm not in prison. I'm not dealing with these types of abusive guards, at least allegedly. So, it's a question of, are they willing to, just like any other testimony, right? If you're testifying against someone in court, it could be a co-defendant, it could be a guard. You know, there is always that fear of retaliation and that's real."    The Delphi murder case has evolved beyond a mere criminal investigation, touching upon broader issues of human rights and the administration of justice within correctional facilities. As new details emerge, one can't help but wonder: How will these allegations influence the ongoing legal battle for Richard Allen, and what steps will be taken to ensure that justice prevails not just in the courtroom but within the walls of correctional institutions? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Adam John Walsh was an American child who was abducted from a Sears department store at the Hollywood Mall in Hollywood, Florida, on July 27, 1981. In this episode of Zone 7, Crime Scene Investigator, Sheryl McCollum, talks with Callahan Walsh about his work at the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC). They discuss several high-profile missing and exploited children cases, including Adam Walsh, Amber Hagerman, and the Delphi murders. Callahan also talks about prevention tips for parents, the NCMEC's services, and how to stay safe online. Show Notes: [0:00] Welcome back to Zone 7 with Crime Scene Investigator, Sheryl McCollum.   [3:10] Sheryl introduces guest, Callahan Walsh to the listeners [6:00] Callahan shares a brief background of how he got to be a part of NCMEC [7:00] National Center for Missing & Exploited Children [10:00] Educating the public on how to help find missing children  [15:30] “32 million reports of suspected child sexual exploitation online came into the National Center through our cyber tip line in 2022 alone.” [16:30] Question: Adam's case changed the way not only law enforcement but the way the public looks and investigates and deals with missing children's cases. Can you tell us how?  [17:20] Operation Cross Country  [18:25] Team Adam  [20:40] The Delphi Murders: The Quest for Justice with Barbara MacDonald [25:00] Preventions and safety tips for parents [25:40] KidSmartz [29:00] Predators collaborating online during pandemic [31:55] Sextortion  [35:10] Facial Reconstruction Demonstration [43:25] Public donations allow NCMEC to continue work. If you would like to help DONATE HERE [45:06] “Not knowing where your child is at bedtime is a pretty hard thing to accept.” -R.W Thanks for listening to another episode! If you're loving the show and want to help grow the show, please head over to Itunes and leave a rating and review! How to Leave an Apple Podcast Review: First, Open the podcast app on your iPhone, Mac, or iPad. Then, hit the “Search” tab at the bottom right-hand corner of the page and search for Zone 7. Select the podcast, scroll down to find the subheading “Ratings & Reviews”. and select “Write a Review.” Next, select the number of stars you'd like to leave. Please choose 5 stars! Using the text box which says “Title,” write a title for your review. Then in the text box, write the review itself. The review can be up to 300 words long, but doesn't need to be much more than: “Love the show! Thanks!” or Once you're done select “Send” in the upper right-hand corner. --- Sheryl “Mac” McCollum is an Emmy Award winning CSI, a writer for CrimeOnLine, Forensic and Crime Scene Expert for Crime Stories with Nancy Grace, and a CSI for a metro Atlanta Police Department. She is the co-author of the textbook., Cold Case: Pathways to Justice. Sheryl is also the founder and director of the Cold Case Investigative Research Institute, a collaboration between universities and colleges that brings researchers, practitioners, students and the criminal justice community together to advance techniques in solving cold cases and assist families and law enforcement with solvability factors for unsolved homicides, missing persons, and kidnapping cases.   You can connect and learn more about Sheryl's work by visiting the CCIRI website https://coldcasecrimes.org Social Links: Email: coldcase2004@gmail.com Twitter: @ColdCaseTips Facebook: @sheryl.mccollum See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In this episode we are going to take a look at the probable cause affidavit filed with the court in Delphi in relation to the arrest of the suspect Richard Allen. We will be taking a much closer look at this trial as it continues to face obstacle after obstacle on its way to the courtroom. (commercial at 13:49)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Probable-Cause-Affidavit-Richard-Allen.pdf (fox59.com)This show is part of the Spreaker Prime Network, if you are interested in advertising on this podcast, contact us at https://www.spreaker.com/show/5080327/advertisement

In the ongoing Delphi murder case, the spotlight has shifted from the suspect, Richard Allen, to the courtroom dynamics, particularly the actions of Judge Gull. Bob Motta, a defense attorney and host of the podcast "Defense Diaries," recently delved into the latest developments in this complex case with Tony Brueski on the "Hidden Killers" podcast.    Motta's analysis focused on Judge Gull's recent responses to the dismissal of Allen's attorneys, Rozzi and Baldwin, revealing a tangled web of legal maneuvering. "It's like the case that never sleeps," Motta remarked, highlighting the constant stream of filings and the intricate legal procedures that have come to define the case.    According to Motta, Judge Gull's response primarily hinges on procedural arguments. She contends that Allen's defense should have sought an interlocutory appeal at the appellate court level before escalating the matter to the Supreme Court of Indiana. This procedural oversight could potentially lead the Supreme Court to dismiss the case without addressing the core issues at stake, such as the alleged mistreatment of Allen and the conduct of his defense attorneys.    Motta's interpretation of the unfolding events paints a picture of a judicial system grappling with complex procedural rules and the balancing of a defendant's rights. The case has raised significant questions about the fairness of judicial processes, particularly in high-profile cases like the Delphi murders. "You know, it's about his Sixth Amendment rights, his constitutional rights that are at stake," Motta emphasized, pointing out the fundamental legal principles involved.    The podcast discussion also touched on the broader implications of the case for the justice system. With allegations of abuse within the prison system where Allen is being held, coupled with the controversial actions of Judge Gull, the case underscores the need for transparency and accountability at every level of the legal process.    As the Delphi murder case continues to unfold, the focus remains not only on the quest for justice for the victims but also on the integrity of the legal system itself. With the Supreme Court of Indiana's decision pending, the outcome could have far-reaching consequences for how similar cases are handled in the future.    As Motta concluded, "I hope it doesn't play out that way because I really think that it's important that these two guys finish this case out for a lot of different reasons." His statement encapsulates the complexity of the situation, where the pursuit of justice for the victims is intertwined with the preservation of the legal rights of the accused.    The Delphi murder case, thus, stands at a critical juncture. Will the legal system rise to the challenge of ensuring a fair trial amidst procedural controversies and allegations of abuse? The answer to this question will not only impact Richard Allen's fate but also shape public trust in the judicial process. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In the ongoing Delphi murder case, the spotlight has shifted from the suspect, Richard Allen, to the courtroom dynamics, particularly the actions of Judge Gull. Bob Motta, a defense attorney and host of the podcast "Defense Diaries," recently delved into the latest developments in this complex case with Tony Brueski on the "Hidden Killers" podcast.    Motta's analysis focused on Judge Gull's recent responses to the dismissal of Allen's attorneys, Rozzi and Baldwin, revealing a tangled web of legal maneuvering. "It's like the case that never sleeps," Motta remarked, highlighting the constant stream of filings and the intricate legal procedures that have come to define the case.    According to Motta, Judge Gull's response primarily hinges on procedural arguments. She contends that Allen's defense should have sought an interlocutory appeal at the appellate court level before escalating the matter to the Supreme Court of Indiana. This procedural oversight could potentially lead the Supreme Court to dismiss the case without addressing the core issues at stake, such as the alleged mistreatment of Allen and the conduct of his defense attorneys.    Motta's interpretation of the unfolding events paints a picture of a judicial system grappling with complex procedural rules and the balancing of a defendant's rights. The case has raised significant questions about the fairness of judicial processes, particularly in high-profile cases like the Delphi murders. "You know, it's about his Sixth Amendment rights, his constitutional rights that are at stake," Motta emphasized, pointing out the fundamental legal principles involved.    The podcast discussion also touched on the broader implications of the case for the justice system. With allegations of abuse within the prison system where Allen is being held, coupled with the controversial actions of Judge Gull, the case underscores the need for transparency and accountability at every level of the legal process.    As the Delphi murder case continues to unfold, the focus remains not only on the quest for justice for the victims but also on the integrity of the legal system itself. With the Supreme Court of Indiana's decision pending, the outcome could have far-reaching consequences for how similar cases are handled in the future.    As Motta concluded, "I hope it doesn't play out that way because I really think that it's important that these two guys finish this case out for a lot of different reasons." His statement encapsulates the complexity of the situation, where the pursuit of justice for the victims is intertwined with the preservation of the legal rights of the accused.    The Delphi murder case, thus, stands at a critical juncture. Will the legal system rise to the challenge of ensuring a fair trial amidst procedural controversies and allegations of abuse? The answer to this question will not only impact Richard Allen's fate but also shape public trust in the judicial process. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The Delphi murder case, involving the prime suspect Richard Allen, has taken a distressing turn with emerging allegations of abuse and mistreatment within the walls of Westville Correctional Facility. These revelations, brought to light by inmate Robert Baston, add another layer of complexity to an already convoluted case. Neama Rahmani, a former federal prosecutor, joined Tony Brueski on the podcast "Hidden Killers" to dissect these claims and their potential impact on the case.    Baston's reluctance to testify, citing concerns for his own safety, raises significant questions about the conditions in the correctional facility. As Rahmani points out, his statements could be a critical indicator of underlying issues. "Prisoners lie sometimes, especially convicted sex offenders. But, physical abuse does happen in correctional facilities," Rahmani acknowledged, suggesting the possibility of validity behind Baston's claims.    The conversation delved into the nature of oversight in such institutions. Rahmani highlighted the roles of independent watchdogs, like an inspector general, and the Department of Justice's Civil Rights Division, in investigating and potentially rectifying such issues. He also noted the possibility of civil litigation as a recourse for inmates facing abuse. "There's a few ways to hold bad actors on the law enforcement side accountable if there is indeed some sort of abuse going on," Rahmani explained.    However, the path to justice is fraught with challenges. Rahmani pointed out the inherent risks faced by inmates like Baston, who consider speaking out against their alleged abusers. The fear of retaliation is a palpable threat that can dissuade inmates from coming forward, a concern that Baston himself seems to share.    This situation in Westville Correctional Facility, where Richard Allen is detained, complicates the already tumultuous Delphi murder case. The allegations, if true, not only cast a shadow over the integrity of the facility but also raise concerns about the treatment of inmates, including those awaiting trial, like Allen.    Rahmani's insights underscore a crucial aspect of the American criminal justice system – the need for transparent and accountable correctional facilities. As the Delphi case continues to unfold, these allegations of abuse within Westville Correctional Facility demand attention and action.    In the quest for justice in the Delphi murders, the treatment of suspects and inmates remains a critical component. As Rahmani aptly put it, "I'm not in prison. I'm not dealing with these types of abusive guards, at least allegedly. So, it's a question of, are they willing to, just like any other testimony, right? If you're testifying against someone in court, it could be a co-defendant, it could be a guard. You know, there is always that fear of retaliation and that's real."    The Delphi murder case has evolved beyond a mere criminal investigation, touching upon broader issues of human rights and the administration of justice within correctional facilities. As new details emerge, one can't help but wonder: How will these allegations influence the ongoing legal battle for Richard Allen, and what steps will be taken to ensure that justice prevails not just in the courtroom but within the walls of correctional institutions? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The unfolding narrative around Richard Allen, the primary suspect in the infamous Delphi murders, has taken a disturbing turn. Recent allegations suggest a harrowing reality within the walls of the Westville Correctional Facility, where Allen is being held. These claims, voiced by fellow inmate Robert Baston, paint a bleak picture of abuse and mistreatment by the staff and guards.    In an illuminating discussion on the "Hidden Killers" podcast, hosted by Tony Brueski, former FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer sheds light on these troubling accusations and the complexities of prison life. Baston, who had initially intended to testify about the alleged abuse, withdrew his statement citing fears for his safety. This development raises crucial questions about the oversight and conduct in correctional facilities, especially in high-profile cases like Allen's.    Coffindaffer explains the challenging dynamics within prisons, where guards often work under stressful conditions with low pay, creating a 'perfect storm' for potential conflicts and abuse. She underscores the dire need for more comprehensive monitoring, such as body-worn cameras, to protect both inmates and guards from false allegations and abuse. "This is the worst case scenario," Coffindaffer notes, emphasizing the need for effective measures to ensure safety and fairness in the penal system.    The situation in Westville Correctional Facility, as described by Baston, calls for immediate and thorough investigation. The absence of adequate surveillance and protective measures not only endangers the welfare of inmates like Allen but also casts a shadow over the integrity of the justice system. It's a stark reminder of the often-overlooked human rights issues within the penal system, especially for those awaiting trial and presumed innocent until proven guilty.    Brueski and Coffindaffer's conversation gravitates towards the broader implications of such allegations. If true, they not only reflect a failure in the prison system but also potentially jeopardize the due process for Allen. Coffindaffer raises a valid concern that if Allen is convicted, these issues could lead to an overturning of the verdict, further delaying justice for the victims.    The deterioration observed in Allen's physical and mental state, as pointed out by Coffindaffer, adds another layer of complexity to the case. The transition from a normal life to the harsh realities of prison life, especially under the alleged conditions, could have a profound impact on any individual. "It's just it would be so negatively impactful on a person," Coffindaffer remarks, highlighting the drastic change in Allen's condition.    As the case continues to unfold, the spotlight is not only on Allen's guilt or innocence but also on the conditions of his incarceration. It's a situation that begs for transparency, accountability, and reform in the prison system. The allegations, if verified, not only call for immediate action to safeguard the rights and well-being of inmates but also raise significant questions about the efficacy of the justice system in handling high-profile cases.    The Delphi murder case, with its twists and turns, underscores the urgent need for a fair and just legal process, not just for the accused but also for the victims seeking closure. As Coffindaffer aptly puts it, the ultimate goal is to see the justice system work correctly, ensuring that such administrative and procedural lapses do not hinder the path to justice for Abby and Libby, the young victims of this tragic case.    In the shadow of these grave allegations, one cannot help but ponder: Can the justice system rise to the challenge and ensure a fair trial for Richard Allen while also addressing the deeply rooted issues within the prison system? Or will these allegations be another chapter in the long history of systemic failures in the treatment of inmates, especially those yet to be proven guilty? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The unfolding narrative around Richard Allen, the primary suspect in the infamous Delphi murders, has taken a disturbing turn. Recent allegations suggest a harrowing reality within the walls of the Westville Correctional Facility, where Allen is being held. These claims, voiced by fellow inmate Robert Baston, paint a bleak picture of abuse and mistreatment by the staff and guards.    In an illuminating discussion on the "Hidden Killers" podcast, hosted by Tony Brueski, former FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer sheds light on these troubling accusations and the complexities of prison life. Baston, who had initially intended to testify about the alleged abuse, withdrew his statement citing fears for his safety. This development raises crucial questions about the oversight and conduct in correctional facilities, especially in high-profile cases like Allen's.    Coffindaffer explains the challenging dynamics within prisons, where guards often work under stressful conditions with low pay, creating a 'perfect storm' for potential conflicts and abuse. She underscores the dire need for more comprehensive monitoring, such as body-worn cameras, to protect both inmates and guards from false allegations and abuse. "This is the worst case scenario," Coffindaffer notes, emphasizing the need for effective measures to ensure safety and fairness in the penal system.    The situation in Westville Correctional Facility, as described by Baston, calls for immediate and thorough investigation. The absence of adequate surveillance and protective measures not only endangers the welfare of inmates like Allen but also casts a shadow over the integrity of the justice system. It's a stark reminder of the often-overlooked human rights issues within the penal system, especially for those awaiting trial and presumed innocent until proven guilty.    Brueski and Coffindaffer's conversation gravitates towards the broader implications of such allegations. If true, they not only reflect a failure in the prison system but also potentially jeopardize the due process for Allen. Coffindaffer raises a valid concern that if Allen is convicted, these issues could lead to an overturning of the verdict, further delaying justice for the victims.    The deterioration observed in Allen's physical and mental state, as pointed out by Coffindaffer, adds another layer of complexity to the case. The transition from a normal life to the harsh realities of prison life, especially under the alleged conditions, could have a profound impact on any individual. "It's just it would be so negatively impactful on a person," Coffindaffer remarks, highlighting the drastic change in Allen's condition.    As the case continues to unfold, the spotlight is not only on Allen's guilt or innocence but also on the conditions of his incarceration. It's a situation that begs for transparency, accountability, and reform in the prison system. The allegations, if verified, not only call for immediate action to safeguard the rights and well-being of inmates but also raise significant questions about the efficacy of the justice system in handling high-profile cases.    The Delphi murder case, with its twists and turns, underscores the urgent need for a fair and just legal process, not just for the accused but also for the victims seeking closure. As Coffindaffer aptly puts it, the ultimate goal is to see the justice system work correctly, ensuring that such administrative and procedural lapses do not hinder the path to justice for Abby and Libby, the young victims of this tragic case.    In the shadow of these grave allegations, one cannot help but ponder: Can the justice system rise to the challenge and ensure a fair trial for Richard Allen while also addressing the deeply rooted issues within the prison system? Or will these allegations be another chapter in the long history of systemic failures in the treatment of inmates, especially those yet to be proven guilty? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In the ongoing Delphi murder case, the spotlight has shifted from the suspect, Richard Allen, to the courtroom dynamics, particularly the actions of Judge Gull. Bob Motta, a defense attorney and host of the podcast "Defense Diaries," recently delved into the latest developments in this complex case with Tony Brueski on the "Hidden Killers" podcast.    Motta's analysis focused on Judge Gull's recent responses to the dismissal of Allen's attorneys, Rozzi and Baldwin, revealing a tangled web of legal maneuvering. "It's like the case that never sleeps," Motta remarked, highlighting the constant stream of filings and the intricate legal procedures that have come to define the case.    According to Motta, Judge Gull's response primarily hinges on procedural arguments. She contends that Allen's defense should have sought an interlocutory appeal at the appellate court level before escalating the matter to the Supreme Court of Indiana. This procedural oversight could potentially lead the Supreme Court to dismiss the case without addressing the core issues at stake, such as the alleged mistreatment of Allen and the conduct of his defense attorneys.    Motta's interpretation of the unfolding events paints a picture of a judicial system grappling with complex procedural rules and the balancing of a defendant's rights. The case has raised significant questions about the fairness of judicial processes, particularly in high-profile cases like the Delphi murders. "You know, it's about his Sixth Amendment rights, his constitutional rights that are at stake," Motta emphasized, pointing out the fundamental legal principles involved.    The podcast discussion also touched on the broader implications of the case for the justice system. With allegations of abuse within the prison system where Allen is being held, coupled with the controversial actions of Judge Gull, the case underscores the need for transparency and accountability at every level of the legal process.    As the Delphi murder case continues to unfold, the focus remains not only on the quest for justice for the victims but also on the integrity of the legal system itself. With the Supreme Court of Indiana's decision pending, the outcome could have far-reaching consequences for how similar cases are handled in the future.    As Motta concluded, "I hope it doesn't play out that way because I really think that it's important that these two guys finish this case out for a lot of different reasons." His statement encapsulates the complexity of the situation, where the pursuit of justice for the victims is intertwined with the preservation of the legal rights of the accused.    The Delphi murder case, thus, stands at a critical juncture. Will the legal system rise to the challenge of ensuring a fair trial amidst procedural controversies and allegations of abuse? The answer to this question will not only impact Richard Allen's fate but also shape public trust in the judicial process. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In this episode we are going to take a look at the probable cause affidavit filed with the court in Delphi in relation to the arrest of the suspect Richard Allen. We will be taking a much closer look at this trial as it continues to face obstacle after obstacle on its way to the courtroom. (commercial at 13:49)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Probable-Cause-Affidavit-Richard-Allen.pdf (fox59.com)This show is part of the Spreaker Prime Network, if you are interested in advertising on this podcast, contact us at https://www.spreaker.com/show/5003294/advertisement

As the Delphi murder case continues to grip the nation, the question on everyone's mind is, "What's next for Richard Allen and Judge Gull?" Former FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer joined Tony Brueski on the "Hidden Killers" podcast to dissect the current state of the case, which remains shrouded in uncertainty and legal complexities.    The situation hinges on the Indiana Supreme Court's impending review of Judge Gull's conduct and the controversial removal of Richard Allen's attorneys. Coffindaffer points out, “Part of it will come down to what was actually said behind closed doors. But I see a problem with not releasing that transcript because it doesn't fall into the typical reasons for sealing.”    As the clock ticks towards the 27th, the deadline for Judge Gull to either unveil the transcript of the in-camera meeting or justify its concealment, speculation mounts. “I'm dying to see it,” admits Coffindaffer. “Why so long?” Brueski wonders, echoing the thoughts of many who follow the case. Coffindaffer explains that Gull is likely scrambling to find case law to support her stance, a task that seems increasingly challenging given the circumstances.    The Supreme Court's decision could potentially lead to a dramatic shift in the case, including the reinstatement of Allen's original attorneys or even a change in judges. Coffindaffer believes that the critical issue is whether leaving crime scene photos on a conference table constitutes gross negligence, as Judge Gull asserted.    While the act was undoubtedly negligent, Coffindaffer raises a crucial point: “Does gross negligence in one instance, with these facts, equal removing your lawyers and extending your time in a top-security prison facility? Does that equate to the punishment that this person couldn't have the lawyers they want?” These are the questions that the Indiana Supreme Court must grapple with.    The ramifications of this decision extend far beyond the immediate players in the case. For Richard Allen, it could mean the difference between a speedy trial with his chosen attorneys or prolonged uncertainty in a maximum-security prison. For the families of the Delphi murder victims, it's yet another agonizing delay in their quest for justice.    As Coffindaffer optimistically notes, “I fully believe we can trust the Indiana Supreme Court. They've made it very clear they're not messing around.” This sentiment offers a glimmer of hope that the court will bring clarity and direction to a case that has been plagued by controversy and ambiguity.    As we await the Supreme Court's decision, the question that remains is whether the scales of justice will tip towards transparency and fairness, or if the shadows of doubt and secrecy will continue to cloud the Delphi murder case. The eyes of the nation are on Indiana, waiting to see if the legal system can untangle this complex web and pave the way for a fair trial. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

As the Delphi murder case continues to grip the nation, the question on everyone's mind is, "What's next for Richard Allen and Judge Gull?" Former FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer joined Tony Brueski on the "Hidden Killers" podcast to dissect the current state of the case, which remains shrouded in uncertainty and legal complexities.    The situation hinges on the Indiana Supreme Court's impending review of Judge Gull's conduct and the controversial removal of Richard Allen's attorneys. Coffindaffer points out, “Part of it will come down to what was actually said behind closed doors. But I see a problem with not releasing that transcript because it doesn't fall into the typical reasons for sealing.”    As the clock ticks towards the 27th, the deadline for Judge Gull to either unveil the transcript of the in-camera meeting or justify its concealment, speculation mounts. “I'm dying to see it,” admits Coffindaffer. “Why so long?” Brueski wonders, echoing the thoughts of many who follow the case. Coffindaffer explains that Gull is likely scrambling to find case law to support her stance, a task that seems increasingly challenging given the circumstances.    The Supreme Court's decision could potentially lead to a dramatic shift in the case, including the reinstatement of Allen's original attorneys or even a change in judges. Coffindaffer believes that the critical issue is whether leaving crime scene photos on a conference table constitutes gross negligence, as Judge Gull asserted.    While the act was undoubtedly negligent, Coffindaffer raises a crucial point: “Does gross negligence in one instance, with these facts, equal removing your lawyers and extending your time in a top-security prison facility? Does that equate to the punishment that this person couldn't have the lawyers they want?” These are the questions that the Indiana Supreme Court must grapple with.    The ramifications of this decision extend far beyond the immediate players in the case. For Richard Allen, it could mean the difference between a speedy trial with his chosen attorneys or prolonged uncertainty in a maximum-security prison. For the families of the Delphi murder victims, it's yet another agonizing delay in their quest for justice.    As Coffindaffer optimistically notes, “I fully believe we can trust the Indiana Supreme Court. They've made it very clear they're not messing around.” This sentiment offers a glimmer of hope that the court will bring clarity and direction to a case that has been plagued by controversy and ambiguity.    As we await the Supreme Court's decision, the question that remains is whether the scales of justice will tip towards transparency and fairness, or if the shadows of doubt and secrecy will continue to cloud the Delphi murder case. The eyes of the nation are on Indiana, waiting to see if the legal system can untangle this complex web and pave the way for a fair trial. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In the labyrinth of the Delphi murder case, a new revelation has emerged, shedding light on the controversial actions of Judge Gull in the dismissal of Richard Allen's attorneys, Bradley Rozzi and Andrew Baldwin. Former federal prosecutor and attorney Neama Rahmani weighed in on this development during a recent episode of the podcast "Hidden Killers" with Tony Brueski, offering a critical perspective on the judicial decisions that have marred the case. The podcast unveiled a document outlining the conversation between Judge Gull and Allen's attorneys, which Rahmani scrutinized closely. His conclusion? Disagreement with Judge Gull's approach. "When the court of appeal asks for it, you better turn it over. That's a higher judge," Rahmani emphasized, questioning the rationale behind keeping such proceedings a secret. Rahmani dissected the issue at the core of Judge Gull's decision – the alleged gross negligence of Allen's attorneys. Without an evidentiary hearing or clear-cut proof, the former prosecutor found the judge's declaration of gross negligence inappropriate. "She's not the finder of fact here," Rahmani asserted, suggesting that the issue in the case should have been the potential conflict of interest, not negligence. The conversation took a turn towards Allen's perspective, contemplating his best course of action. Rahmani offered a strategic approach: "If I'm Richard Allen and I really want these two lawyers, this is what I say." He advocated for Allen to make a knowing and voluntary waiver of any potential conflict in open court, effectively choosing the attorney he trusts despite any alleged conflicts. Rahmani's insight didn't stop there. He addressed the elephant in the room – whether Judge Gull should recuse herself given the convoluted nature of the case. His view? Judges make mistakes, and reversals on appeal are part of the judicial process. "I don't think a judge necessarily needs to get off the case just because they made a wrong ruling," he said, implying that the appellate courts' role is to correct such errors. As the Delphi murder case continues to unravel, the question of justice for Richard Allen remains in the balance. The conversation with Rahmani highlights the complexities of the legal system, where judicial decisions can have far-reaching implications on the rights of the accused and the pursuit of justice. As the case progresses, one can't help but wonder: Will Richard Allen's right to a fair trial be upheld in the face of judicial discrepancies? And how will the decisions made today shape the future of justice in high-profile cases like the Delphi murders? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The trial of Richard Allen has been brought to a complete stop due to allegations that are flying from the Judge and from the former legal team that was representing Allen until there was an egregious leak of evidence from the office of one of the lawyers on the team. That leak initiated the chain of events that has now led us here. Will the Supreme court side with the AG and Judge Gull? Or will they see things the same way as Baldwin and Rozzi?Let's dive in and see what's up!(commercial at 7:31)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Delphi judge, Indiana AG argue against supreme court involvement | wthr.comThis show is part of the Spreaker Prime Network, if you are interested in advertising on this podcast, contact us at https://www.spreaker.com/show/5003294/advertisement

Essex gives the latest in the Delphi case. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

As the Delphi murder case continues to grip the nation, the question on everyone's mind is, "What's next for Richard Allen and Judge Gull?" Former FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer joined Tony Brueski on the "Hidden Killers" podcast to dissect the current state of the case, which remains shrouded in uncertainty and legal complexities.    The situation hinges on the Indiana Supreme Court's impending review of Judge Gull's conduct and the controversial removal of Richard Allen's attorneys. Coffindaffer points out, “Part of it will come down to what was actually said behind closed doors. But I see a problem with not releasing that transcript because it doesn't fall into the typical reasons for sealing.”    As the clock ticks towards the 27th, the deadline for Judge Gull to either unveil the transcript of the in-camera meeting or justify its concealment, speculation mounts. “I'm dying to see it,” admits Coffindaffer. “Why so long?” Brueski wonders, echoing the thoughts of many who follow the case. Coffindaffer explains that Gull is likely scrambling to find case law to support her stance, a task that seems increasingly challenging given the circumstances.    The Supreme Court's decision could potentially lead to a dramatic shift in the case, including the reinstatement of Allen's original attorneys or even a change in judges. Coffindaffer believes that the critical issue is whether leaving crime scene photos on a conference table constitutes gross negligence, as Judge Gull asserted.    While the act was undoubtedly negligent, Coffindaffer raises a crucial point: “Does gross negligence in one instance, with these facts, equal removing your lawyers and extending your time in a top-security prison facility? Does that equate to the punishment that this person couldn't have the lawyers they want?” These are the questions that the Indiana Supreme Court must grapple with.    The ramifications of this decision extend far beyond the immediate players in the case. For Richard Allen, it could mean the difference between a speedy trial with his chosen attorneys or prolonged uncertainty in a maximum-security prison. For the families of the Delphi murder victims, it's yet another agonizing delay in their quest for justice.    As Coffindaffer optimistically notes, “I fully believe we can trust the Indiana Supreme Court. They've made it very clear they're not messing around.” This sentiment offers a glimmer of hope that the court will bring clarity and direction to a case that has been plagued by controversy and ambiguity.    As we await the Supreme Court's decision, the question that remains is whether the scales of justice will tip towards transparency and fairness, or if the shadows of doubt and secrecy will continue to cloud the Delphi murder case. The eyes of the nation are on Indiana, waiting to see if the legal system can untangle this complex web and pave the way for a fair trial. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The trial of Richard Allen has been brought to a complete stop due to allegations that are flying from the Judge and from the former legal team that was representing Allen until there was an egregious leak of evidence from the office of one of the lawyers on the team. That leak initiated the chain of events that has now led us here. Will the Supreme court side with the AG and Judge Gull? Or will they see things the same way as Baldwin and Rozzi?Let's dive in and see what's up!(commercial at 7:31)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Delphi judge, Indiana AG argue against supreme court involvement | wthr.comThis show is part of the Spreaker Prime Network, if you are interested in advertising on this podcast, contact us at https://www.spreaker.com/show/5080327/advertisement

On November 27, 2023 , Judge Frances Gull and Indiana Attorney General Todd Rokita both filed response briefs with the Indiana Supreme Court. Richard Allen's former defense team hope that the Court will return them to the case, that it will remove Judge Gull from the face and that it will set a speedy trial date. What responses did Rokita and Gull make to those requests?Send tips to murdersheet@gmail.com.The Murder Sheet is a production of Mystery Sheet LLC .See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

The indiana supreme court slapped Judge Gull with a November 27th deadline to turn over documents to them in relation to the Richard Allen trial and the side show that it has now become. Judge Gull has been out sick for the past week or so, but according to sources, she was able to meet her deadlines and handle her case load while out of the office. The supreme court in Indiana will now be tasked with deciding what happens from here and if Judge Gull will be involved moving forward.(commercial at 7:22)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Delphi judge faces deadline with Indiana Supreme Court (fox59.com)This show is part of the Spreaker Prime Network, if you are interested in advertising on this podcast, contact us at https://www.spreaker.com/show/5080327/advertisement

In the labyrinth of the Delphi murder case, a new revelation has emerged, shedding light on the controversial actions of Judge Gull in the dismissal of Richard Allen's attorneys, Bradley Rozzi and Andrew Baldwin. Former federal prosecutor and attorney Neama Rahmani weighed in on this development during a recent episode of the podcast "Hidden Killers" with Tony Brueski, offering a critical perspective on the judicial decisions that have marred the case.    The podcast unveiled a document outlining the conversation between Judge Gull and Allen's attorneys, which Rahmani scrutinized closely. His conclusion? Disagreement with Judge Gull's approach. "When the court of appeal asks for it, you better turn it over. That's a higher judge," Rahmani emphasized, questioning the rationale behind keeping such proceedings a secret.    Rahmani dissected the issue at the core of Judge Gull's decision – the alleged gross negligence of Allen's attorneys. Without an evidentiary hearing or clear-cut proof, the former prosecutor found the judge's declaration of gross negligence inappropriate. "She's not the finder of fact here," Rahmani asserted, suggesting that the issue in the case should have been the potential conflict of interest, not negligence.    The conversation took a turn towards Allen's perspective, contemplating his best course of action. Rahmani offered a strategic approach: "If I'm Richard Allen and I really want these two lawyers, this is what I say." He advocated for Allen to make a knowing and voluntary waiver of any potential conflict in open court, effectively choosing the attorney he trusts despite any alleged conflicts.    Rahmani's insight didn't stop there. He addressed the elephant in the room – whether Judge Gull should recuse herself given the convoluted nature of the case. His view? Judges make mistakes, and reversals on appeal are part of the judicial process. "I don't think a judge necessarily needs to get off the case just because they made a wrong ruling," he said, implying that the appellate courts' role is to correct such errors.    As the Delphi murder case continues to unravel, the question of justice for Richard Allen remains in the balance. The conversation with Rahmani highlights the complexities of the legal system, where judicial decisions can have far-reaching implications on the rights of the accused and the pursuit of justice.    As the case progresses, one can't help but wonder: Will Richard Allen's right to a fair trial be upheld in the face of judicial discrepancies? And how will the decisions made today shape the future of justice in high-profile cases like the Delphi murders? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The Judge in The Delphi Case Responds... Let's Talk About It!  

In the labyrinth of the Delphi murder case, a new revelation has emerged, shedding light on the controversial actions of Judge Gull in the dismissal of Richard Allen's attorneys, Bradley Rozzi and Andrew Baldwin. Former federal prosecutor and attorney Neama Rahmani weighed in on this development during a recent episode of the podcast "Hidden Killers" with Tony Brueski, offering a critical perspective on the judicial decisions that have marred the case.    The podcast unveiled a document outlining the conversation between Judge Gull and Allen's attorneys, which Rahmani scrutinized closely. His conclusion? Disagreement with Judge Gull's approach. "When the court of appeal asks for it, you better turn it over. That's a higher judge," Rahmani emphasized, questioning the rationale behind keeping such proceedings a secret.    Rahmani dissected the issue at the core of Judge Gull's decision – the alleged gross negligence of Allen's attorneys. Without an evidentiary hearing or clear-cut proof, the former prosecutor found the judge's declaration of gross negligence inappropriate. "She's not the finder of fact here," Rahmani asserted, suggesting that the issue in the case should have been the potential conflict of interest, not negligence.    The conversation took a turn towards Allen's perspective, contemplating his best course of action. Rahmani offered a strategic approach: "If I'm Richard Allen and I really want these two lawyers, this is what I say." He advocated for Allen to make a knowing and voluntary waiver of any potential conflict in open court, effectively choosing the attorney he trusts despite any alleged conflicts.    Rahmani's insight didn't stop there. He addressed the elephant in the room – whether Judge Gull should recuse herself given the convoluted nature of the case. His view? Judges make mistakes, and reversals on appeal are part of the judicial process. "I don't think a judge necessarily needs to get off the case just because they made a wrong ruling," he said, implying that the appellate courts' role is to correct such errors.    As the Delphi murder case continues to unravel, the question of justice for Richard Allen remains in the balance. The conversation with Rahmani highlights the complexities of the legal system, where judicial decisions can have far-reaching implications on the rights of the accused and the pursuit of justice.    As the case progresses, one can't help but wonder: Will Richard Allen's right to a fair trial be upheld in the face of judicial discrepancies? And how will the decisions made today shape the future of justice in high-profile cases like the Delphi murders? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In the labyrinthine saga of the Delphi murder case, the latest developments raise more questions than answers. Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer recently discussed the complexities surrounding the case on the "Hidden Killers" podcast with host Tony Brueski. As the investigation into the murder of two young girls in Delphi, Indiana, continues to unfold, critical issues concerning judicial decisions and the fate of defendant Richard Allen remain unresolved.    But what does the future hold for Judge Gull, the embattled figure at the heart of the case? The Indiana Supreme Court has demanded explanations for her refusal to release the transcript of a pivotal closed-door meeting. Coffindaffer reflects, “The 27th is when Judge Gull has to turn over her reasons for not wanting the transcript...released. It's going to be really interesting to see what the upper court decides on that.”    The stakes are high as October 20, 2024, looms as the new trial date. Yet, if Allen's original attorneys are reinstated, they are ready to proceed to trial within 70 days. “I think Richard Allen, and really most defendants, deserve that,” Coffindaffer asserts, emphasizing the importance of a swift and fair trial.    The recent unsealing of information by Judge Gull, dating back to June, adds another layer of intrigue. Is it an attempt at backtracking, a bid to correct past wrongs under the scrutiny of higher authorities? Coffindaffer ponders, “Is she trying to correct these wrongs now that there's a microscope on her?”    One of the more striking revelations in the case involves the potential existence of other suspects. Coffindaffer notes, “The prosecutor said, well, listen, there's somebody else, we believe there was somebody else… was that true?”    As for the evidential bullet linked to Allen's weapon, found near the crime scene, its significance in the case is monumental. “He puts himself at the crime scene, of course. So does Ron Logan,” Coffindaffer points out. However, the debate around the ballistic evidence could be contentious. “It's really going to come down to probably two different ballistic experts arguing whether that's truly the exact same tool marks that are on that casing,” she explains.    Coffindaffer's insights illuminate the labyrinth of the Delphi murder case, where every twist and turn in the judicial process impacts the lives of those most affected – the families of the victims and the accused, Richard Allen. As the legal wrangling continues, the quest for truth and justice in the haunting shadows of Delphi remains fraught with uncertainty and turmoil.    As we await the unfolding events, one crucial question lingers: In the tangled web of the Delphi murder case, can justice prevail for all involved, and can a fair trial emerge from the chaos? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

As the Delphi murder case continues to unravel, the spotlight intensifies on Judge Gull's decisions and the fate of suspect Richard Allen. In a recent episode of the "Hidden Killers" podcast, defense attorney and podcast host Bob Motta joined Tony Brueski to dissect the ongoing legal drama surrounding one of Indiana's most high-profile cases.    The conversation pivoted around Judge Gull's latest actions, including her order correcting previous errors related to defense filings. Despite this, Richard Allen's original attorneys have not been reinstated, casting a shadow of uncertainty over the trial. Motta, critically eyeing the developments, said, "It's the case that never sleeps. Every time I think I'm out, they pull me back in."    With the Indiana Supreme Court's intervention, the case has taken a significant turn. Gull's reluctance to release the transcript from the closed-door meeting that led to the dismissal of Allen's attorneys raises serious questions. Motta pointed out, "She's trying to come up with case law, but the clock is ticking. The 27th is her deadline to explain her actions."    Discussing the potential implications of the Supreme Court's decision, Motta explained, "Part of it will come down to what was actually said behind closed doors. But the problem is, with any kind of prisons and jails, it's such a closed universe to the rest of the world."    The podcast delved deeper into the prison conditions faced by Allen, with Motta describing them as potentially abusive. He highlighted the challenges in addressing such issues, "You can get an ombudsman to complain of conditions in prisons and jails. Lawsuits can be filed, sparking investigations. But the problem is the closed nature of these institutions."    Motta also addressed the public's perception dilemma when it comes to allegations from prison inmates. "It's a situation where you have people assumed to have zero credibility because they're convicted felons. Who do you believe, the felon or the prison staff?" he questioned.    On the matter of Allen's confession and the controversy surrounding it, Motta expressed skepticism. "Whether it was because they're Odin guys or not, I have no idea. But it's not crazy to suggest that the guards could be trying to get this guy to confess because they know that's what they need to close the case," he stated.    Looking ahead, Motta speculated on the possible outcomes if Allen is found innocent. "If he's found innocent, does he have a massive lawsuit against the state, against these prison systems?" he pondered, indicating a legal battle beyond the murder trial itself.    The "Hidden Killers" discussion with Bob Motta shed light on the complex layers of the Delphi murder case, revealing a tangled web of legal, ethical, and human rights issues. As the case progresses, the question remains: Will the pursuit of justice for the Delphi murder victims be hindered by the controversies surrounding the judicial process and prison conditions? Or will the Indiana Supreme Court's decisions pave the way for a fair and transparent resolution? The answers to these questions will not only impact Richard Allen's fate but also reflect on the integrity of the legal system itself. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In the labyrinthine saga of the Delphi murder case, the latest developments raise more questions than answers. Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer recently discussed the complexities surrounding the case on the "Hidden Killers" podcast with host Tony Brueski. As the investigation into the murder of two young girls in Delphi, Indiana, continues to unfold, critical issues concerning judicial decisions and the fate of defendant Richard Allen remain unresolved.    But what does the future hold for Judge Gull, the embattled figure at the heart of the case? The Indiana Supreme Court has demanded explanations for her refusal to release the transcript of a pivotal closed-door meeting. Coffindaffer reflects, “The 27th is when Judge Gull has to turn over her reasons for not wanting the transcript...released. It's going to be really interesting to see what the upper court decides on that.”    The stakes are high as October 20, 2024, looms as the new trial date. Yet, if Allen's original attorneys are reinstated, they are ready to proceed to trial within 70 days. “I think Richard Allen, and really most defendants, deserve that,” Coffindaffer asserts, emphasizing the importance of a swift and fair trial.    The recent unsealing of information by Judge Gull, dating back to June, adds another layer of intrigue. Is it an attempt at backtracking, a bid to correct past wrongs under the scrutiny of higher authorities? Coffindaffer ponders, “Is she trying to correct these wrongs now that there's a microscope on her?”    One of the more striking revelations in the case involves the potential existence of other suspects. Coffindaffer notes, “The prosecutor said, well, listen, there's somebody else, we believe there was somebody else… was that true?”    As for the evidential bullet linked to Allen's weapon, found near the crime scene, its significance in the case is monumental. “He puts himself at the crime scene, of course. So does Ron Logan,” Coffindaffer points out. However, the debate around the ballistic evidence could be contentious. “It's really going to come down to probably two different ballistic experts arguing whether that's truly the exact same tool marks that are on that casing,” she explains.    Coffindaffer's insights illuminate the labyrinth of the Delphi murder case, where every twist and turn in the judicial process impacts the lives of those most affected – the families of the victims and the accused, Richard Allen. As the legal wrangling continues, the quest for truth and justice in the haunting shadows of Delphi remains fraught with uncertainty and turmoil.    As we await the unfolding events, one crucial question lingers: In the tangled web of the Delphi murder case, can justice prevail for all involved, and can a fair trial emerge from the chaos? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

As the Delphi murder case continues to unravel, the spotlight intensifies on Judge Gull's decisions and the fate of suspect Richard Allen. In a recent episode of the "Hidden Killers" podcast, defense attorney and podcast host Bob Motta joined Tony Brueski to dissect the ongoing legal drama surrounding one of Indiana's most high-profile cases.    The conversation pivoted around Judge Gull's latest actions, including her order correcting previous errors related to defense filings. Despite this, Richard Allen's original attorneys have not been reinstated, casting a shadow of uncertainty over the trial. Motta, critically eyeing the developments, said, "It's the case that never sleeps. Every time I think I'm out, they pull me back in."    With the Indiana Supreme Court's intervention, the case has taken a significant turn. Gull's reluctance to release the transcript from the closed-door meeting that led to the dismissal of Allen's attorneys raises serious questions. Motta pointed out, "She's trying to come up with case law, but the clock is ticking. The 27th is her deadline to explain her actions."    Discussing the potential implications of the Supreme Court's decision, Motta explained, "Part of it will come down to what was actually said behind closed doors. But the problem is, with any kind of prisons and jails, it's such a closed universe to the rest of the world."    The podcast delved deeper into the prison conditions faced by Allen, with Motta describing them as potentially abusive. He highlighted the challenges in addressing such issues, "You can get an ombudsman to complain of conditions in prisons and jails. Lawsuits can be filed, sparking investigations. But the problem is the closed nature of these institutions."    Motta also addressed the public's perception dilemma when it comes to allegations from prison inmates. "It's a situation where you have people assumed to have zero credibility because they're convicted felons. Who do you believe, the felon or the prison staff?" he questioned.    On the matter of Allen's confession and the controversy surrounding it, Motta expressed skepticism. "Whether it was because they're Odin guys or not, I have no idea. But it's not crazy to suggest that the guards could be trying to get this guy to confess because they know that's what they need to close the case," he stated.    Looking ahead, Motta speculated on the possible outcomes if Allen is found innocent. "If he's found innocent, does he have a massive lawsuit against the state, against these prison systems?" he pondered, indicating a legal battle beyond the murder trial itself.    The "Hidden Killers" discussion with Bob Motta shed light on the complex layers of the Delphi murder case, revealing a tangled web of legal, ethical, and human rights issues. As the case progresses, the question remains: Will the pursuit of justice for the Delphi murder victims be hindered by the controversies surrounding the judicial process and prison conditions? Or will the Indiana Supreme Court's decisions pave the way for a fair and transparent resolution? The answers to these questions will not only impact Richard Allen's fate but also reflect on the integrity of the legal system itself. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

As the Delphi murder case continues to unravel, the spotlight intensifies on Judge Gull's decisions and the fate of suspect Richard Allen. In a recent episode of the "Hidden Killers" podcast, defense attorney and podcast host Bob Motta joined Tony Brueski to dissect the ongoing legal drama surrounding one of Indiana's most high-profile cases.    The conversation pivoted around Judge Gull's latest actions, including her order correcting previous errors related to defense filings. Despite this, Richard Allen's original attorneys have not been reinstated, casting a shadow of uncertainty over the trial. Motta, critically eyeing the developments, said, "It's the case that never sleeps. Every time I think I'm out, they pull me back in."    With the Indiana Supreme Court's intervention, the case has taken a significant turn. Gull's reluctance to release the transcript from the closed-door meeting that led to the dismissal of Allen's attorneys raises serious questions. Motta pointed out, "She's trying to come up with case law, but the clock is ticking. The 27th is her deadline to explain her actions."    Discussing the potential implications of the Supreme Court's decision, Motta explained, "Part of it will come down to what was actually said behind closed doors. But the problem is, with any kind of prisons and jails, it's such a closed universe to the rest of the world."    The podcast delved deeper into the prison conditions faced by Allen, with Motta describing them as potentially abusive. He highlighted the challenges in addressing such issues, "You can get an ombudsman to complain of conditions in prisons and jails. Lawsuits can be filed, sparking investigations. But the problem is the closed nature of these institutions."    Motta also addressed the public's perception dilemma when it comes to allegations from prison inmates. "It's a situation where you have people assumed to have zero credibility because they're convicted felons. Who do you believe, the felon or the prison staff?" he questioned.    On the matter of Allen's confession and the controversy surrounding it, Motta expressed skepticism. "Whether it was because they're Odin guys or not, I have no idea. But it's not crazy to suggest that the guards could be trying to get this guy to confess because they know that's what they need to close the case," he stated.    Looking ahead, Motta speculated on the possible outcomes if Allen is found innocent. "If he's found innocent, does he have a massive lawsuit against the state, against these prison systems?" he pondered, indicating a legal battle beyond the murder trial itself.    The "Hidden Killers" discussion with Bob Motta shed light on the complex layers of the Delphi murder case, revealing a tangled web of legal, ethical, and human rights issues. As the case progresses, the question remains: Will the pursuit of justice for the Delphi murder victims be hindered by the controversies surrounding the judicial process and prison conditions? Or will the Indiana Supreme Court's decisions pave the way for a fair and transparent resolution? The answers to these questions will not only impact Richard Allen's fate but also reflect on the integrity of the legal system itself. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In the labyrinthine saga of the Delphi murder case, the latest developments raise more questions than answers. Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer recently discussed the complexities surrounding the case on the "Hidden Killers" podcast with host Tony Brueski. As the investigation into the murder of two young girls in Delphi, Indiana, continues to unfold, critical issues concerning judicial decisions and the fate of defendant Richard Allen remain unresolved.    But what does the future hold for Judge Gull, the embattled figure at the heart of the case? The Indiana Supreme Court has demanded explanations for her refusal to release the transcript of a pivotal closed-door meeting. Coffindaffer reflects, “The 27th is when Judge Gull has to turn over her reasons for not wanting the transcript...released. It's going to be really interesting to see what the upper court decides on that.”    The stakes are high as October 20, 2024, looms as the new trial date. Yet, if Allen's original attorneys are reinstated, they are ready to proceed to trial within 70 days. “I think Richard Allen, and really most defendants, deserve that,” Coffindaffer asserts, emphasizing the importance of a swift and fair trial.    The recent unsealing of information by Judge Gull, dating back to June, adds another layer of intrigue. Is it an attempt at backtracking, a bid to correct past wrongs under the scrutiny of higher authorities? Coffindaffer ponders, “Is she trying to correct these wrongs now that there's a microscope on her?”    One of the more striking revelations in the case involves the potential existence of other suspects. Coffindaffer notes, “The prosecutor said, well, listen, there's somebody else, we believe there was somebody else… was that true?”    As for the evidential bullet linked to Allen's weapon, found near the crime scene, its significance in the case is monumental. “He puts himself at the crime scene, of course. So does Ron Logan,” Coffindaffer points out. However, the debate around the ballistic evidence could be contentious. “It's really going to come down to probably two different ballistic experts arguing whether that's truly the exact same tool marks that are on that casing,” she explains.    Coffindaffer's insights illuminate the labyrinth of the Delphi murder case, where every twist and turn in the judicial process impacts the lives of those most affected – the families of the victims and the accused, Richard Allen. As the legal wrangling continues, the quest for truth and justice in the haunting shadows of Delphi remains fraught with uncertainty and turmoil.    As we await the unfolding events, one crucial question lingers: In the tangled web of the Delphi murder case, can justice prevail for all involved, and can a fair trial emerge from the chaos? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The indiana supreme court slapped Judge Gull with a November 27th deadline to turn over documents to them in relation to the Richard Allen trial and the side show that it has now become. Judge Gull has been out sick for the past week or so, but according to sources, she was able to meet her deadlines and handle her case load while out of the office. The supreme court in Indiana will now be tasked with deciding what happens from here and if Judge Gull will be involved moving forward.(commercial at 7:22)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Delphi judge faces deadline with Indiana Supreme Court (fox59.com)This show is part of the Spreaker Prime Network, if you are interested in advertising on this podcast, contact us at https://www.spreaker.com/show/5003294/advertisement

An Indiana man named Mitchell Westerman has been arrested as the source of the Delphi Leaks. These leaks have caused a huge amount of fallout. We've seen one man kill himself over the leaks and we have also seen justice now delayed for at least an extra 10 months. Westerman says that Baldwin had no idea that he was taking the pictures and that Baldwin was not in the room when it happened.The Indiana Supreme court will now decide where things will go from here.(commercial at 6:33)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Indiana man Mitchell Westerman is charged over leaking gruesome Delphi murder crime scene photos | Daily Mail OnlineThis show is part of the Spreaker Prime Network, if you are interested in advertising on this podcast, contact us at https://www.spreaker.com/show/5080327/advertisement

Rex Heuermann's wife is reportedly making $1M filming a documentaryRex has a new pen pal who is a notorious serial killer.Video of Ruby Franke being pulled over for speeding at 4AM with kids in the car just days before her arrest on child abuse chargesDelphi - arrest in the crime scene photo leaksThe transcript from the in chambers meeting is made publicLet's go through some Chad Daybell filings! All links: https://linktr.ee/prettyliesandalibisMerch: prettyliesandalibis.myshopify.comPatreon: https://www.patreon.com/PrettyLiesAndAlibisDonate: PayPal - prettyliesandalibis@gmail.com Venmo - @prettyliesalibisBuy Me A Coffee - https://www.buymeacoffee.com/prettyliesrCash App- PrettyliesandalibisThis show is part of the Spreaker Prime Network, if you are interested in advertising on this podcast, contact us at https://www.spreaker.com/show/4447192/advertisement

Kegan Kline, the man allegedly behind the screen name that was talking to the girls before they were murdered and who is also accused of over 25 crimes against children will need a new lawyer after he asked for his current lawyer Andrew Achey to be removed saying that Achey was not being honest with him. Kline has denied any involvement with the murder of Liberty and Abigail, but says that he approached the prosecutors with information but was ignored.(commercial at 10:14)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:'Pedophile' Kegan Kline denies connection to Delphi murder suspect Richard Allen, just as his defense attorney backs out | The US Sun (the-sun.com)This show is part of the Spreaker Prime Network, if you are interested in advertising on this podcast, contact us at https://www.spreaker.com/show/5003294/advertisement

An Indiana man named Mitchell Westerman has been arrested as the source of the Delphi Leaks. These leaks have caused a huge amount of fallout. We've seen one man kill himself over the leaks and we have also seen justice now delayed for at least an extra 10 months. Westerman says that Baldwin had no idea that he was taking the pictures and that Baldwin was not in the room when it happened.The Indiana Supreme court will now decide where things will go from here.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Indiana man Mitchell Westerman is charged over leaking gruesome Delphi murder crime scene photos | Daily Mail OnlineThis show is part of the Spreaker Prime Network, if you are interested in advertising on this podcast, contact us at https://www.spreaker.com/show/5003294/advertisement

Kegan Kline, the man allegedly behind the screen name that was talking to the girls before they were murdered and who is also accused of over 25 crimes against children will need a new lawyer after he asked for his current lawyer Andrew Achey to be removed saying that Achey was not being honest with him. Kline has denied any involvement with the murder of Liberty and Abigail, but says that he approached the prosecutors with information but was ignored.(commercial at 10:14)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:'Pedophile' Kegan Kline denies connection to Delphi murder suspect Richard Allen, just as his defense attorney backs out | The US Sun (the-sun.com)This show is part of the Spreaker Prime Network, if you are interested in advertising on this podcast, contact us at https://www.spreaker.com/show/5080327/advertisement

The situation in Delphi is about as messed up as it could be, with lawyers, judges and justice itself in limbo. Trying to sort some of that out is the Indiana State supreme court who is now tasked with making sense of the madness and fixing the mess that the lower court finds itself in. In this episode, we get some more context on the transcripts and what their release could mean for the trial of Richard Allen as we move forward. (commercial at 8:11)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Delphi murders trial transcript released on attorneys withdrawal | wthr.comThis show is part of the Spreaker Prime Network, if you are interested in advertising on this podcast, contact us at https://www.spreaker.com/show/5003294/advertisement

The Tall Girls need to find a way forward, but they are faced with an electrifying obstacle! Delphi knocks on the door. Morgan harnesses lightning. Raina uncovers confusing machinery. Toz flexes through the muscle burn.Cover art by Eiriol Evans.Original Soundtrack by Chloe Elliott.A New World Dawns (Main Theme)Roll For InitiativeJolted AwakeSupport us by becoming a patron on Patreon.Check out the full original soundtrack here. Music from the main campaign can be found on Spotify, Apple Music, Amazon Music, YouTube Music and Deezer.Say hi to Chloe and Am at Dragonmeet on December 2nd! Chloe will be playing Mork Borg live in Theatre Macabre: The 3 Nightmares of the Cthulu Who Stole Christmas.Watch Chloe in Bowies in Spelljammer on The Role Play Factory.Listen to Am and Chloe on A Rendezvous with Destiny. You can find them on Twitter and Instagram @RWD_Pod.Listen to Am on The Date Night Drive In. You can find them on Twitter @D8NightDrivein.Watch Chloe live on Twitch at twitch.tv/clo_withtheflow. VODs can be found here as well or on YouTube.Asexuality and Aromantic Resources:The Asexual Visibility and Education NetworkThe Aromantic-spectrum Union for Recognition, Education, and AdvocacyDemisexuality Resource CentreDeck of Many Aces is unofficial Fan Content permitted under the Fan Content Policy. Not approved/endorsed by Wizards. Portions of the materials used are property of Wizards of the Coast. ©Wizards of the Coast LLC All the characters in this podcast are fictitious, and any resemblance to actual persons, living or dead, is purely coincidental. Get bonus content on PatreonSupport this show http://supporter.acast.com/deck-of-many-aces. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

The situation in Delphi is about as messed up as it could be, with lawyers, judges and justice itself in limbo. Trying to sort some of that out is the Indiana State supreme court who is now tasked with making sense of the madness and fixing the mess that the lower court finds itself in. In this episode, we get some more context on the transcripts and what their release could mean for the trial of Richard Allen as we move forward. (commercial at 8:11)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Delphi murders trial transcript released on attorneys withdrawal | wthr.comThis show is part of the Spreaker Prime Network, if you are interested in advertising on this podcast, contact us at https://www.spreaker.com/show/5080327/advertisement

The Cheat Sheet is The Murder Sheet's segment breaking down weekly news and updates in some of the murder cases we cover.This episode covers the Delphi murders, the case of alleged online predator Benjamin Rollo and its parallels to the case of Kegan Kline, the murder of Kaylah Farmer, a recent spate of suicides involving the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department, the mass shooting in Lewiston, Maine, the murder of Dan Markel, and the murder of Jared Bridegan.Fox 59's report on Judge Frances Gull's recent health issues: https://fox59.com/indiana-news/judge-overseeing-delphi-murders-case-against-richard-allen-suffers-urgent-medical-condition/Check out Justice Served Daily's Youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCU2tWfT9J9O2Lj0qdCKtCxQOur interview with Beth Jackson of the National Children's Advocacy Center about how parents and guardians can speak to their children about online predators: https://art19.com/shows/murder-sheet/episodes/664a8897-d71d-47b8-9f64-275d1b1b6a62Our interview with the Catfish Cops about online predators: https://art19.com/shows/murder-sheet/episodes/73895383-d4f0-4647-839b-fe288dead118The Federal Bureau of Investigation's Crime Data Explorer: https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/LATEST/webapp/#/pages/le/lesdcfrom the site of Danielle Rousseau, an assistant professor of criminal justice at Boston University: https://sites.bu.edu/daniellerousseau/2023/02/28/police-officer-suicide-and-suicide-prevention/#:~:text=In%202020%2C%20116%20police%20officers,population%20(McAward%2C%202022USA Today on a recent study of law enforcement suicides: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2022/06/10/high-suicide-rate-police-firefighters-mental-health/7470846001/Send tips to murdersheet@gmail.com.The Murder Sheet is a production of Mystery Sheet LLC.----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------This show is sponsored by BetterHelp. We're proud to have this company as our sponsor — they're dedicated to revolutionizing mental healthcare. We all struggle sometimes. We have a lot of trouble settling down our racing thoughts at night. Poor sleep hygiene also makes us less motivated and more downbeat come daytime. But the good news is that therapy can help us combat the issue, and secure better coping mechanisms. Therapy can really unlock what's going on in your mind. Armed with that information and the tools to better deal with life's problems, you can work on becoming the best version of yourself. And if you're like us, you'll be significantly better rested as well! Therapy can be expensive and time-consuming, which is often the drawback for many people. That's why we're so excited about BetterHelp, an online therapy service that matches you with a licensed therapist. BetterHelp allows you to pursue therapy on your time. Even those of us with busy schedules can make this work, and you can switch therapists until you find the perfect fit. Get a break from your thoughts, with BetterHelp.Visit BetterHelp dot com slash murdersheet today to get 10% off your first month.That's better HELP—H - E - L - P—dot com slash murdersheet.https://betterhelp.com/murdersheetSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

As the circus continues to slide into the place of justice in Delphi, we are getting a look at the transcripts from the latest faceplant in the case that saw both of Richard Allen's attorneys removed. In this episode, we dive into the transcripts in their entirety. (commercial at 22:27)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comThis show is part of the Spreaker Prime Network, if you are interested in advertising on this podcast, contact us at https://www.spreaker.com/show/5080327/advertisement

What happens when the legal process itself becomes as mysterious and contentious as the case it's supposed to adjudicate? This is the unfolding scenario in the Delphi murder case, where Judge Gull's actions and the fate of Richard Allen's defense team are under intense scrutiny. Bob Motta, a seasoned defense attorney and host of the podcast Defense Diaries, shared his insights with Tony Brueski on the "Hidden Killers" podcast, painting a picture of a judicial system in turmoil.    Motta elucidates the latest developments: "Gull, in a somewhat surprising move, finally drafts an order instructing the clerk to address issues raised in the writ for mandamus." This action, taken in anticipation of a looming deadline from the Indiana Supreme Court, seems to correct some previous oversights concerning defense filings. Yet, as of now, Richard Allen's original attorneys remain off the case.    The crux of the controversy hinges on a pivotal in-camera meeting, where Judge Gull allegedly decided to remove Allen's attorneys, citing gross negligence. This decision, shrouded in secrecy, has become the center of a legal maelstrom, with the Supreme Court demanding transparency. Motta notes, "She's trying to come up with case law to justify why an in-camera meeting should not be made public. It's her attempt to navigate through a complex legal maze, but the obstacles are formidable."    Motta further explains the complications arising from the docket management, pointing out that “while the technical responsibility for the docket lies with the clerk, the judge cannot absolve herself from the gaps and inconsistencies.” He argues that significant procedural lapses cannot be simply brushed under the clerical rug.    The Indiana Supreme Court's upcoming decision on whether to reinstate Allen's attorneys or potentially replace Judge Gull could have far-reaching implications. "If Gull's actions in the closed meeting are deemed inappropriate or unjustified, it could mean a dramatic shift in the case," Motta asserts.    Amidst these legal entanglements, the core of the case — the tragic murder of two young girls in Delphi — remains in the backdrop, overshadowed by procedural chaos and judicial controversy. Motta emphasizes the need for a fair trial, stating, “The integrity of our judicial system and the pursuit of justice for the victims demand a resolution to these issues. The public's trust in the process is at stake.”    The Delphi murder case, once a straightforward investigation, has evolved into a labyrinth of legal debates, challenging the very foundations of judicial fairness and due process. As Motta aptly puts it, “Every twist in this case draws us back in, searching for clarity in a situation mired in ambiguity and legal maneuvering.”    The question remains: Will the pursuit of justice for Richard Allen and the victims' families find its path amid the judicial upheaval, or will the case remain ensnared in a tangle of legal technicalities and controversial decisions? The answer lies in the impending rulings of the Indiana Supreme Court, and all eyes are watching. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

What happens when the legal process itself becomes as mysterious and contentious as the case it's supposed to adjudicate? This is the unfolding scenario in the Delphi murder case, where Judge Gull's actions and the fate of Richard Allen's defense team are under intense scrutiny. Bob Motta, a seasoned defense attorney and host of the podcast Defense Diaries, shared his insights with Tony Brueski on the "Hidden Killers" podcast, painting a picture of a judicial system in turmoil.    Motta elucidates the latest developments: "Gull, in a somewhat surprising move, finally drafts an order instructing the clerk to address issues raised in the writ for mandamus." This action, taken in anticipation of a looming deadline from the Indiana Supreme Court, seems to correct some previous oversights concerning defense filings. Yet, as of now, Richard Allen's original attorneys remain off the case.    The crux of the controversy hinges on a pivotal in-camera meeting, where Judge Gull allegedly decided to remove Allen's attorneys, citing gross negligence. This decision, shrouded in secrecy, has become the center of a legal maelstrom, with the Supreme Court demanding transparency. Motta notes, "She's trying to come up with case law to justify why an in-camera meeting should not be made public. It's her attempt to navigate through a complex legal maze, but the obstacles are formidable."    Motta further explains the complications arising from the docket management, pointing out that “while the technical responsibility for the docket lies with the clerk, the judge cannot absolve herself from the gaps and inconsistencies.” He argues that significant procedural lapses cannot be simply brushed under the clerical rug.    The Indiana Supreme Court's upcoming decision on whether to reinstate Allen's attorneys or potentially replace Judge Gull could have far-reaching implications. "If Gull's actions in the closed meeting are deemed inappropriate or unjustified, it could mean a dramatic shift in the case," Motta asserts.    Amidst these legal entanglements, the core of the case — the tragic murder of two young girls in Delphi — remains in the backdrop, overshadowed by procedural chaos and judicial controversy. Motta emphasizes the need for a fair trial, stating, “The integrity of our judicial system and the pursuit of justice for the victims demand a resolution to these issues. The public's trust in the process is at stake.”    The Delphi murder case, once a straightforward investigation, has evolved into a labyrinth of legal debates, challenging the very foundations of judicial fairness and due process. As Motta aptly puts it, “Every twist in this case draws us back in, searching for clarity in a situation mired in ambiguity and legal maneuvering.”    The question remains: Will the pursuit of justice for Richard Allen and the victims' families find its path amid the judicial upheaval, or will the case remain ensnared in a tangle of legal technicalities and controversial decisions? The answer lies in the impending rulings of the Indiana Supreme Court, and all eyes are watching. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Hosts of the "Murder Sheet" podcast join the show to talk about the Delphi case. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.