POPULARITY
36 episodes with virginia giuffre
27 episodes with virginia giuffre
12 episodes with virginia giuffre
7 episodes with virginia giuffre
3 episodes with virginia giuffre
6 episodes with virginia giuffre
4 episodes with virginia giuffre
2 episodes with virginia giuffre
4 episodes with virginia giuffre
5 episodes with virginia giuffre
5 episodes with virginia giuffre
4 episodes with virginia giuffre
2 episodes with virginia giuffre
2 episodes with virginia giuffre
2 episodes with virginia giuffre
5 episodes with virginia giuffre
2 episodes with virginia giuffre
4 episodes with virginia giuffre
The infamous Prince Andrew BBC Newsnight interview—widely seen as a catastrophic PR disaster—came about through months of behind-the-scenes maneuvering. Emily Maitlis and producer Sam McAlister had been pursuing Andrew's team for an interview for years, sensing that his ties to Jeffrey Epstein would eventually demand answers. McAlister, known for her persistence, managed to gain the trust of Buckingham Palace courtiers and convinced them that a sit-down would provide Andrew with the chance to clear his name and demonstrate transparency. The Prince and his advisors, astonishingly confident in his ability to explain away damning allegations, ultimately agreed, believing this would be the definitive rebuttal to growing scrutiny over his relationship with Epstein and Virginia Giuffre.What followed, of course, was the exact opposite: a masterclass in self-destruction. Andrew infamously claimed he couldn't sweat, insisted a Pizza Express outing proved his innocence, and showed more sympathy for Epstein than for survivors. The decision to grant the interview—conceived as a reputational rescue mission—was the result of staggering arrogance and tone-deafness within the royal circle. Palace aides, who expected a controlled narrative, failed to recognize that Andrew's own words would expose him as evasive, entitled, and profoundly out of touch. Far from salvaging his image, the interview sealed his disgrace, forcing him to withdraw from royal duties and leaving the monarchy scrambling to contain the fallout.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10974711/New-excruciating-details-Andrews-car-crash-Newsnight-interview-revealed.html
The infamous Prince Andrew BBC Newsnight interview—widely seen as a catastrophic PR disaster—came about through months of behind-the-scenes maneuvering. Emily Maitlis and producer Sam McAlister had been pursuing Andrew's team for an interview for years, sensing that his ties to Jeffrey Epstein would eventually demand answers. McAlister, known for her persistence, managed to gain the trust of Buckingham Palace courtiers and convinced them that a sit-down would provide Andrew with the chance to clear his name and demonstrate transparency. The Prince and his advisors, astonishingly confident in his ability to explain away damning allegations, ultimately agreed, believing this would be the definitive rebuttal to growing scrutiny over his relationship with Epstein and Virginia Giuffre.What followed, of course, was the exact opposite: a masterclass in self-destruction. Andrew infamously claimed he couldn't sweat, insisted a Pizza Express outing proved his innocence, and showed more sympathy for Epstein than for survivors. The decision to grant the interview—conceived as a reputational rescue mission—was the result of staggering arrogance and tone-deafness within the royal circle. Palace aides, who expected a controlled narrative, failed to recognize that Andrew's own words would expose him as evasive, entitled, and profoundly out of touch. Far from salvaging his image, the interview sealed his disgrace, forcing him to withdraw from royal duties and leaving the monarchy scrambling to contain the fallout.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10974711/New-excruciating-details-Andrews-car-crash-Newsnight-interview-revealed.htmlBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
Metropolitan Police—commonly known as Scotland Yard—announced in 2019 that it would not reopen its investigation into Virginia Giuffre's claims that she had been trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein and coerced into sex with Prince Andrew in London when she was 17. Senior officials argued that the case was largely centered overseas and therefore outside their jurisdiction, effectively closing the door on UK law enforcement scrutiny. When the matter resurfaced in 2021, Scotland Yard once again dropped the investigation, sparking criticism that the decision looked less like jurisdictional caution and more like deliberate avoidance. These refusals coincided with repeated reports that Prince Andrew had not cooperated with U.S. prosecutors, raising suspicions that British institutions were ensuring the royal remained insulated from serious investigation.Critics argue that this institutional reluctance effectively shielded Prince Andrew from the consequences of his Epstein ties. Former U.S. Attorney Geoffrey Berman recounted that his team was stonewalled when they tried to reach the Duke of York, further fueling the belief that UK authorities deliberately protected him from accountability. While no charges were ever brought, the optics were damning: Scotland Yard's stance, combined with Andrew's legal evasions, created the appearance of a protective bubble that prioritized the monarchy's image over justice for Epstein's victims.To contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:https://knewz.com/lust-lies-spies-part-2-how-the-enormous-power-of-the-british-police-force-provided-a-protection-racket-for-prince-andrew-and-covered-up-epstein-maxwells-criminal-ente/
With each batch of Jeffrey Epstein documents that surfaces—from court filings to unsealed transcripts and FBI files—Prince Andrew's name is once again thrust into the spotlight. These releases often contain references to him, such as listings among associates or detailed accounts of his time at Epstein's properties. For instance, newly unsealed documents highlighted Andrew's extended stays at Epstein's Palm Beach home; hearings and filings regularly cite his presence alongside Epstein, ensuring he remains intertwined in evolving narratives. Even when he isn't the focus, his proximity to Epstein continues to resurface in the broader revelations.Furthermore, recent DOJ transcripts featuring Ghislaine Maxwell's remarks have revived scrutiny of Andrew's role in the affair. Maxwell directly addressed—and dismissed—allegations against him, including claims involving Virginia Giuffre, and even contested the authenticity of widely circulated photos. Her denials, despite their disputed nature, reignite public and media debate and keep Andrew at the center of each new chapter in the Epstein saga.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
A memoir titled Nobody's Girl: A Memoir of Surviving Abuse and Fighting for Justice, written by Virginia Roberts Giuffre with journalist Amy Wallace, is scheduled for posthumous release on October 21, 2025, from Alfred A. Knopf (with Penguin Random House involved in audio and ebook editions). The 400‑page manuscript was completed prior to Giuffre's death by suicide in April 2025, and she had conveyed—via an email to Wallace dated April 1—that it was her “heartfelt wish” for the book to be published regardless of the outcome. Publishers describe the memoir as an unsparing and powerful narrative of trafficking, abuse, and survival, rigorously fact-checked and legally vetted, aimed at spotlighting systemic failures in human trafficking enforcement and championing justice and awareness.Of particular note, Nobody's Girl includes “intimate, disturbing, and heartbreaking new details” about Giuffre's experiences with Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, and other high-profile individuals—including Britain's Prince Andrew. This marks her first public discussion of Andrew since their 2022 out-of-court settlement, which reportedly involved a multi-million‑dollar payment. In doing so, the memoir is expected to reignite scrutiny and media attention on the allegations Andrew has long denied, resurrecting his central role in a scandal many believed had faded from the headlines.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Prince Andrew struggling as Virginia Giuffre memoir set for release: expert | Fox News
Donna Adelson murder for hire trial day 6 recap. Jeffrey Epstein accuser Virginia Giuffre's tell-all memoir. New York fashion model's face permanently disfigured after Germany train stabbing. Drew Nelson reports.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
A memoir titled Nobody's Girl: A Memoir of Surviving Abuse and Fighting for Justice, written by Virginia Roberts Giuffre with journalist Amy Wallace, is scheduled for posthumous release on October 21, 2025, from Alfred A. Knopf (with Penguin Random House involved in audio and ebook editions). The 400‑page manuscript was completed prior to Giuffre's death by suicide in April 2025, and she had conveyed—via an email to Wallace dated April 1—that it was her “heartfelt wish” for the book to be published regardless of the outcome. Publishers describe the memoir as an unsparing and powerful narrative of trafficking, abuse, and survival, rigorously fact-checked and legally vetted, aimed at spotlighting systemic failures in human trafficking enforcement and championing justice and awareness.Of particular note, Nobody's Girl includes “intimate, disturbing, and heartbreaking new details” about Giuffre's experiences with Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, and other high-profile individuals—including Britain's Prince Andrew. This marks her first public discussion of Andrew since their 2022 out-of-court settlement, which reportedly involved a multi-million‑dollar payment. In doing so, the memoir is expected to reignite scrutiny and media attention on the allegations Andrew has long denied, resurrecting his central role in a scandal many believed had faded from the headlines.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Prince Andrew struggling as Virginia Giuffre memoir set for release: expert | Fox NewsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
Tuesday, August 26th, 2025Today, Donald Trump has signed an executive order making flag burning illegal with a mandatory minimum of one year in prison; the general who led the assessment that Trump's bombing of Iran didn't destroy anything has been fired; Epstein survivor Virginia Giuffre wrote a memoir before she died and it will be posthumously released; Trump and Netanyahu are moving forward with an all out assault on Gaza; Judge Xinis has blocked the government from moving Kilmar Abrego for now; Nancy Mace canceled a speech after just 8 people showed up; and Allison and Dana deliver your Good News.Thank You, Helix27% Off Sitewide, when you go to HelixSleep.com/dailybeansThank You, Naked Winesnakedwines.com/DAILYBEANS and use code DAILYBEANS for both the code and password. IRS asks for public input on free tax filing options to inform congressional report | Internal Revenue Service - Deadline September 5Help ensure safety of public servants. Hold RFK Jr accountable by signing the letter: savehhs.org, @firedbutfighting.bsky.social on BlueskyStoriesJudge temporarily bars Kilmar Abrego García's deportation to Uganda | The Washington PostEpstein accuser Virginia Giuffre wrote a memoir. Months after her death, it's coming out | AP NewsFollowing Trump's lead, Netanyahu shifts strategy on ceasefire even after Hamas accepts | CNNGeneral who led assessment of US bombing raid in Iran and 2 admirals fired | Stars and StripesTrump wants to punish people for flag burning. Is burning the American flag illegal? | CBS NewsNancy Mace scraps South Carolina campaign stop after nobody showed up to see the ‘proud transphobe | The AdvocateGood Trouble Trump's VA Rule Would Ban Abortion Care for Veterans—Your Voice Can Stop It | On Offense with Kris GoldsmithThe most effective comments include your personal or professional perspective, identify how this rule would affect you or your community, and offer a specific recommendation or concern. Write a Public Comment - Reproductive Health Services - Deadline September 3From The Good NewsIRS asks for public input on free tax filing options to inform congressional report | Internal Revenue Service - Deadline September 5Mayor: No plans to remove Lexington's rainbow crosswalk - WUKYNational Park Service Birthday - NPS Commemorations and Celebrations (U.S. National Park Service)Auditory processing disorder (APD) - Symptoms and causes - Mayo ClinicReminder - you can see the pod pics if you become a Patron. The good news pics are at the bottom of the show notes of each Patreon episode! That's just one of the perks of subscribing! patreon.com/muellershewrote Our Donation LinksNational Security Counselors - DonateMSW Media, Blue Wave California Victory Fund | ActBlueWhistleblowerAid.org/beansFederal workers - feel free to email AG at fedoath@pm.me and let me know what you're going to do, or just vent. I'm always here to listen. Find Upcoming Actions 50501 Movement, No Kings.org, Indivisible.orgDr. Allison Gill - Substack, BlueSky , TikTok, IG, TwitterDana Goldberg - BlueSky, Twitter, IG, facebook, danagoldberg.comCheck out more from MSW Media - Shows - MSW Media, Cleanup On Aisle 45 pod, The Breakdown | SubstackShare your Good News or Good TroubleMSW Good News and Good TroubleHave some good news; a confession; or a correction to share?Good News & Confessions - The Daily Beanshttps://www.dailybeanspod.com/confessional/ Listener Survey:http://survey.podtrac.com/start-survey.aspx?pubid=BffJOlI7qQcF&ver=shortFollow the Podcast on Apple:The Daily Beans on Apple PodcastsWant to support the show and get it ad-free and early?The Daily Beans | SupercastThe Daily Beans & Mueller, She Wrote | PatreonThe Daily Beans | Apple Podcasts
Hamamoto on YouTube: / @professorhamamoto Watch part 6 here: https://youtube.com/live/DViShfvP9yE Watch part 5 here: https://youtube.com/live/TaF8EMyS4V4 Watch Prof Hamamoto Part 4 https://youtube.com/live/TkUr4CanA_k Watch Prof Hamamoto Part 3 https://youtube.com/live/qUHdKtabgNo Prof. Darrell Hamamoto, who is an American writer, academic, and specialist in U.S. media and ethnic studies. Professors Facebook : https://www.facebook.com/share/hZajgC... Follow P Diddys latest: • P Diddy #jayz #beyonce #hollywood #countrymusic #nashville #pdiddy #puffdaddy #truecrime #news #youtubenews #podcast #livestream #youtube #thepope #vatican #church Here are Hamamoto's recommended books: Can't Stop Won't Stop: A History of the Hip-Hop Generation ——- The Psychological Covert War on Hip-Hop ——- The Covert War Against Rock: What You Don't Know About The Deaths of; (Jim Morrison, Tupac Shakur, Michael Hutchence, Brian Jones, Jimi Hendrix, Phil Ochs, Bob Marley, Peter Tosh, John Lennon & The Notorious B.I.G) ——- Hit Men: Power Brokers and Fast Money Inside the Music Business ——- Me, the Mob, and the Music: One Helluva Ride Tommy James and the Shondells ——- Godfather of the Music Business: Morris Levy (American Made Music Series) ——- LAbyrinth: A Detective Investigates the Murders of Tupac Shakur and Notorious B.I.G., the Implication of Death Row Records, Suge Knight, and the Origins of the Los Angeles ——- The FBI war on Tupac Shakur: State repression of Black Leaders from the Civil Rights Error to the 1990s (real world) ——- The FBI war on Tupac Shakur and Black Leaders: US Intelligence's: Murderous Targeting of Tupac, MLK, Malcol, Panthers, Hendrix, Marley rappers and Linked Ethic Leftists ——- Have Gun Will Travel: The Spectacular Rise and Violent Fall of Death Row Records ——- The Big Payback: The History of the Business of Hip-Hop ——- Ruthless: A Memoir ——- Hip-Hop Decoded ——- Q: The Autobiography of Quincy Jones ——- How to Wreck a Nice Beach: The Vocoder from WW II to Hip-Hop, The Machine Speaks ——- Dancing with the Devil: How Puff burned the bad boys of Hip-Hop ——- Hiding in Hip-Hop: On the Down Low in the Entertainment industry—from Music to Hollywood
Ghislaine Maxwell's two‑day interview with Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, spanning over 300 pages, offers a key insight: she never saw Donald Trump behave inappropriately. Maxwell described their relationship as strictly cordial, noting she had not witnessed him in any compromising situations—particularly massages or other intimate settings—and referred to him as “a gentleman in all respects.” She also asserted that there was no “client list” implicating powerful figures in Epstein's network—debunking widespread speculation of a Black Book or secret registry—while expressing uncertainty over whether she attended any gatherings that could corroborate such claimsMaxwell similarly defended Bill Clinton, saying he was her friend—not Epstein's—and that she never observed any misbehavior between them. She rejected claims involving Prince Andrew, going so far as to label allegations connecting him to Virginia Giuffre as “bullshit,” and suggested the infamous photograph depicting him with Giuffre may have been doctored. Regarding Epstein's death, Maxwell dismissed theories of foul play as “ludicrous,” suggesting instead that a prison incident—such as a violent confrontation over commissary—was a more plausible explanation.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:5 takeaways from Ghislaine Maxwell transcripts and audio files
Houston, Texas: two men in ski masks posing as police officers are dead after a homeowner opens fire during a late-night home invasion. Jeffrey Epstein accuser Virginia Giuffre has a posthumous memoir coming out this fall that promises to share disturbing new details of her abuse. Drew Nelson reports.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Metropolitan Police—commonly known as Scotland Yard—announced in 2019 that it would not reopen its investigation into Virginia Giuffre's claims that she had been trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein and coerced into sex with Prince Andrew in London when she was 17. Senior officials argued that the case was largely centered overseas and therefore outside their jurisdiction, effectively closing the door on UK law enforcement scrutiny. When the matter resurfaced in 2021, Scotland Yard once again dropped the investigation, sparking criticism that the decision looked less like jurisdictional caution and more like deliberate avoidance. These refusals coincided with repeated reports that Prince Andrew had not cooperated with U.S. prosecutors, raising suspicions that British institutions were ensuring the royal remained insulated from serious investigation.Critics argue that this institutional reluctance effectively shielded Prince Andrew from the consequences of his Epstein ties. Former U.S. Attorney Geoffrey Berman recounted that his team was stonewalled when they tried to reach the Duke of York, further fueling the belief that UK authorities deliberately protected him from accountability. While no charges were ever brought, the optics were damning: Scotland Yard's stance, combined with Andrew's legal evasions, created the appearance of a protective bubble that prioritized the monarchy's image over justice for Epstein's victims.To contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:https://knewz.com/lust-lies-spies-part-2-how-the-enormous-power-of-the-british-police-force-provided-a-protection-racket-for-prince-andrew-and-covered-up-epstein-maxwells-criminal-ente/Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
At Balmoral, the headlines weren't about speeches or scandals—it was Kate's dramatically lighter hair that stole the spotlight. Meanwhile, Prince Andrew was quietly sidelined from the family church outing, and King Charles looked weary ahead of Trump's visit. The Sussexes tried to crash the news cycle with a Harry-surfing Instagram clip set to Salt-N-Pepa's “Whatta Man.” In America, Harry's visa is under review again—more than 1,000 documents are now with a judge. Virginia Giuffre's memoir Nobody's Girl will be released this October, promising new details and renewed scrutiny of Prince Andrew. And in the most absurd royal-adjacent news: Meghan Markle and Pamela Anderson are locked in a pickle war. Yes, really.
Morse code transcription: vvv vvv Women in gaming Twitch streamer Alyska and the female gamers defying stereotypes Virginia Giuffre memoir to be published months after death Get ready for fracking, Reform UK tells energy firms Holidays with grandparents on the up amid summer childcare cost Half of UK job losses in hospitality, say bosses Ecuador Victims of violent cartels tell BBC they now hide from US authorities Half alive Mushroom lunch survivor tells court of murders impact Inside Donetsk as residents flee attacks on Ukrainian region Putin wants to control Helicopter crashes in Isle of Wight field near Shanklin Lives torn apart by fatal crashes on the A9, Scotlands longest road
CannCon and Zak “RedPill78” Paine dive into a packed Monday news cycle, kicking off with reactions to the world premiere of Brad Zerbo's documentary CODEX 9/11 and its explosive revelations. From John Bolton's FBI raid and its deep state implications, to Rick Wilson's meltdown and the Lincoln Project's scandals, the hosts break down the hypocrisy of political elites. They cover Tulsi Gabbard's alleged Five Eyes directive, new Nord Stream pipeline revelations, and Justice Gorsuch slamming rogue lower courts. The discussion heats up with Florida's immigration battles, Trump's nationwide National Guard mobilizations, and fresh Epstein-related disclosures including Maxwell transcripts, DOJ document handovers, and Virginia Giuffre's upcoming memoir. With fiery commentary, sharp analysis, and plenty of humor, this episode pulls no punches on corruption, cover-ups, and the fight for accountability.
DNC Chair wants Democrats to fight back against Trump's GOP-backed authoritarianism. An obviously hobbled Shitler could barely walk during his latest golf outing. Governor Pritzker ripped man-baby a new one for illegally deploying the National Guard in a historic righteous tongue lashing. In the new authoritarian led economy, the government could take stakes in even more companies. Even conservatives didn't like sickly Trump's plan to jail folks who burn the flag. Lil Nas got in trouble in Los Angeles and of course the cops were up to no good. A memoir of the late Epstein victim, Virginia Giuffre chronicled horrors involving predator Prince Andrew. A gaggle of New York suits gave the famously bland restaurant Cracker Barrell a marketing makeover and scored a zero with the MAGATs. The Crabs discussed how the New York Times and other outlets ruthlessly covered Biden's health issues and wondered why those same outlets barely touch on the Felon-in-chief's alleged congestive heart failure.
Newly unsealed court filings from Virginia Giuffre's civil case have raised questions about whether Jeffrey Epstein may have leveraged incriminating material to exert influence over Prince Andrew. During Epstein's deposition under oath, he refused to answer whether he intended to obtain blackmail-worthy information on the Duke of York after Giuffre's alleged encounter with him—choosing instead to invoke his Fifth Amendment right. Giuffre herself testified that Epstein required her to report in detail about the encounter, including whether Prince Andrew had “thanked” Epstein for arranging it—a line of questioning that suggests Epstein might have been cultivating compromising content.Despite these indications, a recent exhaustive review by the FBI and Department of Justice concluded that they found no credible evidence of a “client list” or a blackmail scheme involving Epstein and prominent individuals—including Prince Andrew. A memo released last month reaffirmed that the investigation found nothing actionable that would warrant further scrutiny or charges against third parties such as Prince Andrew.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comSource:https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/12404386/jeffrey-epstein-something-on-prince-andrew-documentary/Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
Ghislaine Maxwell's two‑day interview with Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, spanning over 300 pages, offers a key insight: she never saw Donald Trump behave inappropriately. Maxwell described their relationship as strictly cordial, noting she had not witnessed him in any compromising situations—particularly massages or other intimate settings—and referred to him as “a gentleman in all respects.” She also asserted that there was no “client list” implicating powerful figures in Epstein's network—debunking widespread speculation of a Black Book or secret registry—while expressing uncertainty over whether she attended any gatherings that could corroborate such claimsMaxwell similarly defended Bill Clinton, saying he was her friend—not Epstein's—and that she never observed any misbehavior between them. She rejected claims involving Prince Andrew, going so far as to label allegations connecting him to Virginia Giuffre as “bullshit,” and suggested the infamous photograph depicting him with Giuffre may have been doctored. Regarding Epstein's death, Maxwell dismissed theories of foul play as “ludicrous,” suggesting instead that a prison incident—such as a violent confrontation over commissary—was a more plausible explanation.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:5 takeaways from Ghislaine Maxwell transcripts and audio filesBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
According to court documents unsealed in early 2024, Virginia Giuffre (formerly Roberts) testified in a 2016 deposition that Jeffrey Epstein paid her $15,000 after she was trafficked to have sex with Britain's Prince Andrew in 2001, when she was 17. Giuffre stated the money was given directly following the encounter in London, and it was presented as compensation for her involvement. Prince Andrew has consistently denied the allegations, saying he has no recollection of ever meeting Giuffre, despite the existence of the well-known photograph showing the two together.The revelation reinforced the transactional nature of Epstein's network—money being used both as bait and as a tool of control. It also underlined the extent to which high-profile figures were entwined in his operations, whether knowingly or not. Giuffre's testimony and the financial trail she described remain crucial in piecing together how Epstein financed and facilitated abuse, and why so many powerful individuals have fought to distance themselves from his name.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Jeffrey Epstein 'paid Virginia Giuffre $15K to have sex with Prince Andrew at 17,' latest bombshell docs claim | The Sun
A federal judge calls out the Justice Department for requesting the release of a few dozen pages of Jeffrey Epstein material when it has 100,000 pages of files but won't release them. Anderson speaks with Sky and Amanda Roberts, the brother and sister-in-law of the late Epstein accuser Virginia Giuffre. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
In early 2016, Virginia Giuffre, through her counsel, filed a motion seeking to compel Ghislaine Maxwell to produce documents that had been withheld based on objections and privilege claims deemed improper by the plaintiff. Giuffre's motion challenged Maxwell's broad assertions of attorney‑client privilege, work‑product doctrine, vagueness, overbreadth, and undue burden. The motion was accompanied by detailed declarations—most notably by attorney Sigrid S. McCawley—which laid out why many of Maxwell's objections appeared unjustified and why the requested materials were relevant and necessary for Giuffre's case.The court reviewed both the motion and Maxwell's opposition, which included memoranda of law and declarations defending her objections and maintaining that providing certain documents would violate privacy rights or exceed the scope of discovery. Ultimately, in a partially favorable ruling for Giuffre, the court granted the motion in part and denied it in part, indicating that while some objections were valid, Maxwell was required to produce additional documents where privilege claims were not properly supported.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Giuffre v. Maxwell | MOTION to Compel Ghislaine Maxwell to Produce Documents Subject To Improper Objections . Document | Casetext
In early 2016, Virginia Giuffre, through her counsel, filed a motion seeking to compel Ghislaine Maxwell to produce documents that had been withheld based on objections and privilege claims deemed improper by the plaintiff. Giuffre's motion challenged Maxwell's broad assertions of attorney‑client privilege, work‑product doctrine, vagueness, overbreadth, and undue burden. The motion was accompanied by detailed declarations—most notably by attorney Sigrid S. McCawley—which laid out why many of Maxwell's objections appeared unjustified and why the requested materials were relevant and necessary for Giuffre's case.The court reviewed both the motion and Maxwell's opposition, which included memoranda of law and declarations defending her objections and maintaining that providing certain documents would violate privacy rights or exceed the scope of discovery. Ultimately, in a partially favorable ruling for Giuffre, the court granted the motion in part and denied it in part, indicating that while some objections were valid, Maxwell was required to produce additional documents where privilege claims were not properly supported.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Giuffre v. Maxwell | MOTION to Compel Ghislaine Maxwell to Produce Documents Subject To Improper Objections . Document | Casetext
In her Second Amended Response to Maxwell's discovery demands, Virginia Giuffre pushed back aggressively, refusing to yield to Maxwell's attempts to broaden discovery into intrusive and irrelevant personal and psychological domains. She objected to Maxwell's sprawling requests as overly burdensome, unduly invasive, and aimed at discrediting her through unnecessary exposure rather than legitimate legal pursuit. Giuffre instead reinforced her focus on evidence directly tied to the defamation claims and trafficking allegations, contesting any effort by Maxwell to turn the process into a fishing expedition or reputation‑smearing exercise under the guise of legal procedure.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:epstein-documents-943-pages - DocumentCloud
In her Second Amended Response to Maxwell's discovery demands, Virginia Giuffre pushed back aggressively, refusing to yield to Maxwell's attempts to broaden discovery into intrusive and irrelevant personal and psychological domains. She objected to Maxwell's sprawling requests as overly burdensome, unduly invasive, and aimed at discrediting her through unnecessary exposure rather than legitimate legal pursuit. Giuffre instead reinforced her focus on evidence directly tied to the defamation claims and trafficking allegations, contesting any effort by Maxwell to turn the process into a fishing expedition or reputation‑smearing exercise under the guise of legal procedure.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:epstein-documents-943-pages - DocumentCloud
In her Second Amended Response to Maxwell's discovery demands, Virginia Giuffre pushed back aggressively, refusing to yield to Maxwell's attempts to broaden discovery into intrusive and irrelevant personal and psychological domains. She objected to Maxwell's sprawling requests as overly burdensome, unduly invasive, and aimed at discrediting her through unnecessary exposure rather than legitimate legal pursuit. Giuffre instead reinforced her focus on evidence directly tied to the defamation claims and trafficking allegations, contesting any effort by Maxwell to turn the process into a fishing expedition or reputation‑smearing exercise under the guise of legal procedure.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:epstein-documents-943-pages - DocumentCloud
In a long-overdue act of transparency, a federal judge ordered the names of roughly 170 individuals—once shaded behind the label “John Doe” or “Jane Doe”—to be unsealed in court filings stemming from Virginia Giuffre's defamation lawsuit against Ghislaine Maxwell. The documents revealed luminaries like Bill Clinton (previously “Doe 36”), Prince Andrew (“actually Jane Doe 162” in context of testimony), hedge fund titan Glenn Dubin, modeling mogul Jean-Luc Brunel, and others represented alongside Epstein's victims, employees, and passersby.Rather than simple exposure of identities, this unmasking lifted the curtain on how deeply entrenched Epstein's network was, reaching into the upper echelons of finance, royalty, and politics.But make no mistake: public exposure doesn't mean public accountability. Unsealing the names confirmed countless high‑profile connections, yet it stops short of revealing misconduct or initiating investigations. In many cases, the inclusion in these documents wasn't tied to wrongdoing—people merely appeared in correspondence or witness lists. Still, the moral stain lingers. If Epstein's proximity wasn't disqualifying, what is? That these names remained cloaked so long—until a lawsuit ended in 2024—speaks volumes about the protection privilege continues to afford the powerful.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Over 170 of Jeffrey Epstein's high-profile associates will be NAMED in court documents set to be unsealed in the first days of 2024 | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
Prince Andrew's ties to Jeffrey Epstein run far deeper than most people realise — and bestselling royal biographer Andrew Lownie joins me to reveal new evidence, shocking witness testimony, and disturbing details the Palace would rather you never heard. From claims Andrew visited Epstein's private island, to reports of 40 prostitutes sent to him on one trip, to the bizarre alleged rivalry with Epstein over women, this interview exposes the murky world of royalty, sex, and power. Sponsor: Make your AI video here: https://invideo.io/i/andrewgold Follow Andrew Lownie: https://andrewlownie.me/media UK: Buy Entitled!: https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/0008775451 Other countries: Link at bottom We discuss: Did Prince Andrew order Virginia Giuffre “from a catalogue”? Why Bill Clinton's name keeps coming up in Epstein investigations The surprising celebrities linked to Epstein — from Donald Trump to Stephen Hawking Whether the Royal Family protected Andrew from justice How Ghislaine Maxwell fits into the picture The mysterious deaths and threats surrounding this story And what really happened the night Jeffrey Epstein died Andrew Lownie, author of Traitor King and The Duke of York: The Turbulent Life of Prince Andrew, has spent years digging into the Prince's scandals — and in this no-holds-barred conversation, he pulls no punches. This is Heretics — where we ask the questions others won't. #epstein #trump #hereticspodcast Chapters: 0:00 Prince Andrew & Epstein Highlights 1:20 Entitled: Andrew, Sarah & Jeffrey Epstein 2:35 Andrew's Sex Rivalry With Epstein 4:50 The Evidence That Andrew Was On The Island 5:35 Bill Clinton's Name Came Up A Lot 8:20 Have The Royals Protected Andrew? 11:50 40 Prostitutes Sent To Andrew On His Trip! 12:50 Fight With Prince Harry 15:05 Is Andrew Lownie Scared For His Life? 17:20 Andrew & Epstein ‘Shared' Women 19:20 Andrew Ordered Virginia FROM A CATALOGUE 21:35 Ghislaine Maxwell & Trump Will Be Let Off 24:50 Was Andrew Involved in the Logistics 27:05 The Most Damning Thing About Andrew - Epstein 28:35 Trump & Andrew 31:20 Stephen Hawking Was On the List 32:20 What Really Happened to Epstein? 35:10 How the Palace Suppress Epstein - Andrew Ties 37:20 Jacob Rees-Mogg's FIGHT With Andrew Lownie 40:45 How Emily Maitlis STOLE The Andrew Interview 42:20 Clinton, Andrew & Epstein 45:20 Jimmy Savile, & Andrew's Harvey Weinstein Friendship 47:05 Sarah Ferguson Even CLOSER With Epstein 48:50 Why Doesn't Andrew Volunteer Information? 53:05 A Heretic Andrew Lownie Admires Buy the book: US: https://www.amazon.com/Entitled-Rise-... Australia: https://www.amazon.com.au/dp/B0F49YZ9QD Canada: https://www.amazon.ca/dp/B0FHKYTWF2 Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Ghislaine Maxwell filed a formal motion in January 2024 seeking sanctions under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 37(b) and 37(c), arguing that Virginia Giuffre had failed to comply with both a court-ordered discovery directive and Rule 26(a) disclosure requirements. Maxwell's team, led by attorney Laura Menninger, detailed repeated instances in which Giuffre withheld or failed to fully disclose critical medical records and the identities of treating health providers—information essential to assessing her claims for emotional and physical distress. They characterized these omissions as intentional and willful, highlighting Giuffre's failure to identify providers like Dr. Lightfoot in Australia, among others, despite clear court orders and confirmations made during an April 21, 2016 hearing.Maxwell contended these violations had prejudiced her defense and undermined the integrity of the discovery process—arguing that lesser sanctions would be insufficient. Her motion sought a range of potential consequences under Rule 37(b), such as preclusion of Giuffre's damages claims or striking portions of her case, as well as cost-shifting remedies available under Rule 37(c), including attorney's fees and possibly an adverse inference against Giuffre. The motion emphasized that Giuffre and her counsel were well aware of the consequences of non-compliance and that her continued delays and omissions should trigger serious sanctions.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:epstein-documents-943-pages - DocumentCloud
In a long-overdue act of transparency, a federal judge ordered the names of roughly 170 individuals—once shaded behind the label “John Doe” or “Jane Doe”—to be unsealed in court filings stemming from Virginia Giuffre's defamation lawsuit against Ghislaine Maxwell. The documents revealed luminaries like Bill Clinton (previously “Doe 36”), Prince Andrew (“actually Jane Doe 162” in context of testimony), hedge fund titan Glenn Dubin, modeling mogul Jean-Luc Brunel, and others represented alongside Epstein's victims, employees, and passersby.Rather than simple exposure of identities, this unmasking lifted the curtain on how deeply entrenched Epstein's network was, reaching into the upper echelons of finance, royalty, and politics.But make no mistake: public exposure doesn't mean public accountability. Unsealing the names confirmed countless high‑profile connections, yet it stops short of revealing misconduct or initiating investigations. In many cases, the inclusion in these documents wasn't tied to wrongdoing—people merely appeared in correspondence or witness lists. Still, the moral stain lingers. If Epstein's proximity wasn't disqualifying, what is? That these names remained cloaked so long—until a lawsuit ended in 2024—speaks volumes about the protection privilege continues to afford the powerful.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Over 170 of Jeffrey Epstein's high-profile associates will be NAMED in court documents set to be unsealed in the first days of 2024 | Daily Mail Online
Virginia Roberts Giuffre forcefully praised Judge Loretta Preska's decision to unseal hundreds of documents from her 2015 defamation suit against Ghislaine Maxwell, emphasizing that the public's right to know was far more important than the shield of secrecy favored by the elite. Giuffre—whose suit formed the backbone of the Epstein revelations—welcomed the court's move to begin releasing names and redacted filings, saying that letting these documents remain buried was exactly the kind of suppression that protected predators and damaged survivors who dared to speak out.She made clear that the disclosures were far overdue, and that the people who sought to keep these documents sealed were the ones with something to lose. Giuffre argued that while pseudonymous third parties and powerful individuals lurked behind most sealing motions, transparency should never be sacrificed at the altar of privacy—especially when the crimes involved minors and high‑level enablers. By characterizing Preska's unsealing order as a minor yet vital victory, Giuffre signaled that sunlight remains the most powerful disinfectant in the Epstein saga.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Jeffrey Epstein victim Virginia Giuffre taunts those to be named in unsealed docs (nypost.com)
In early 2016, Virginia Giuffre, through her counsel, filed a motion seeking to compel Ghislaine Maxwell to produce documents that had been withheld based on objections and privilege claims deemed improper by the plaintiff. Giuffre's motion challenged Maxwell's broad assertions of attorney‑client privilege, work‑product doctrine, vagueness, overbreadth, and undue burden. The motion was accompanied by detailed declarations—most notably by attorney Sigrid S. McCawley—which laid out why many of Maxwell's objections appeared unjustified and why the requested materials were relevant and necessary for Giuffre's case.The court reviewed both the motion and Maxwell's opposition, which included memoranda of law and declarations defending her objections and maintaining that providing certain documents would violate privacy rights or exceed the scope of discovery. Ultimately, in a partially favorable ruling for Giuffre, the court granted the motion in part and denied it in part, indicating that while some objections were valid, Maxwell was required to produce additional documents where privilege claims were not properly supported.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Giuffre v. Maxwell | MOTION to Compel Ghislaine Maxwell to Produce Documents Subject To Improper Objections . Document | CasetextBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
In early 2016, Virginia Giuffre, through her counsel, filed a motion seeking to compel Ghislaine Maxwell to produce documents that had been withheld based on objections and privilege claims deemed improper by the plaintiff. Giuffre's motion challenged Maxwell's broad assertions of attorney‑client privilege, work‑product doctrine, vagueness, overbreadth, and undue burden. The motion was accompanied by detailed declarations—most notably by attorney Sigrid S. McCawley—which laid out why many of Maxwell's objections appeared unjustified and why the requested materials were relevant and necessary for Giuffre's case.The court reviewed both the motion and Maxwell's opposition, which included memoranda of law and declarations defending her objections and maintaining that providing certain documents would violate privacy rights or exceed the scope of discovery. Ultimately, in a partially favorable ruling for Giuffre, the court granted the motion in part and denied it in part, indicating that while some objections were valid, Maxwell was required to produce additional documents where privilege claims were not properly supported.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Giuffre v. Maxwell | MOTION to Compel Ghislaine Maxwell to Produce Documents Subject To Improper Objections . Document | CasetextBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
Ghislaine Maxwell filed a formal motion in January 2024 seeking sanctions under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 37(b) and 37(c), arguing that Virginia Giuffre had failed to comply with both a court-ordered discovery directive and Rule 26(a) disclosure requirements. Maxwell's team, led by attorney Laura Menninger, detailed repeated instances in which Giuffre withheld or failed to fully disclose critical medical records and the identities of treating health providers—information essential to assessing her claims for emotional and physical distress. They characterized these omissions as intentional and willful, highlighting Giuffre's failure to identify providers like Dr. Lightfoot in Australia, among others, despite clear court orders and confirmations made during an April 21, 2016 hearing.Maxwell contended these violations had prejudiced her defense and undermined the integrity of the discovery process—arguing that lesser sanctions would be insufficient. Her motion sought a range of potential consequences under Rule 37(b), such as preclusion of Giuffre's damages claims or striking portions of her case, as well as cost-shifting remedies available under Rule 37(c), including attorney's fees and possibly an adverse inference against Giuffre. The motion emphasized that Giuffre and her counsel were well aware of the consequences of non-compliance and that her continued delays and omissions should trigger serious sanctions.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:epstein-documents-943-pages - DocumentCloudBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
When Scotland Yard announced it was closing its investigation into Jeffrey Epstein in 2021, it sparked widespread criticism and renewed allegations of institutional cowardice. The Metropolitan Police had previously reviewed several allegations involving Epstein and his associates—including claims made by Virginia Giuffre that she was trafficked to Prince Andrew in London—but ultimately concluded there was “no further action” to be taken. Despite international pressure and mounting evidence, the decision signaled that UK authorities were unwilling to pursue meaningful accountability, especially when it involved proximity to the royal family. Critics saw the move as a transparent effort to shield powerful figures from exposure rather than a genuine conclusion based on lack of evidence.The announcement reinforced a pattern familiar to Epstein's victims: doors closing, institutions retreating, and justice slipping further out of reach. Scotland Yard's explanation leaned heavily on jurisdictional limitations and a vague assertion that the case had already been “reviewed twice,” but it did little to explain why the London portion of Giuffre's allegations—where she claimed she was trafficked and abused at Ghislaine Maxwell's residence—wasn't pursued with greater urgency. For many, the decision served as yet another reminder that Epstein's network didn't just corrupt individuals—it hollowed out the very systems that were supposed to stand against him.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11138849/Met-Police-drop-investigation-disgraced-Jeffrey-Epstein-absence-information.html
The Prince Andrew interview on BBC Newsnight came about after Buckingham Palace sought to clear his name amid growing scrutiny over his ties to Jeffrey Epstein. The idea was first pitched when Prince Andrew's then-private secretary, Amanda Thirsk, was in discussions with BBC journalist Emily Maitlis and Newsnight editor Esme Wren about a possible interview. Initially, the palace wanted to use the interview to refute allegations that Prince Andrew had sexually abused Virginia Giuffre, who alleged she was trafficked to him by Epstein when she was 17. Thirsk and Andrew saw it as an opportunity to publicly address the controversy, believing it would help him regain credibility. The interview was arranged through direct negotiations between Thirsk and the Newsnight team, with Prince Andrew ultimately agreeing to the sit-down, which was filmed inside Buckingham Palace in November 2019.However, the interview turned into a public relations disaster for Prince Andrew. Instead of clearing his name, his lack of remorse, bizarre explanations, and contradictions only fueled greater criticism. He infamously claimed he could not have been with Giuffre on the alleged night because he was at Pizza Express in Woking and insisted he could not sweat due to a medical condition. The broadcast led to intense backlash, forcing Andrew to step back from royal duties days later. BBC journalist Sam McAlister, who negotiated the interview, later revealed that Andrew and his team failed to anticipate how damning his answers would sound, leading to what is now regarded as one of the most disastrous royal interviews in history.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
Glenn Dubin is an American billionaire financier and investor. His relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, a financier and convicted sex offender, has attracted significant attention and scrutiny.Dubin's connection with Epstein primarily revolved around philanthropic and social circles. Dubin and his former wife, Eva Andersson-Dubin, had a personal and professional relationship with Epstein for several years.They reportedly met Epstein in the early 2000s through a mutual friend, and Dubin invested money with Epstein's hedge fund.Their friendship became more prominent as Dubin and his wife became involved in Epstein's charitable foundation, the Jeffrey Epstein VI Foundation, and supported various causes together.The Dubins' relationship with Epstein came under intense scrutiny following Epstein's arrest in 2019 on federal charges of sex trafficking of minors. Epstein died in jail by apparent suicide a month later. During the subsequent investigations and legal proceedings, Glenn Dubin was mentioned in court documents related to Epstein, with allegations made by one of Epstein's accusers, Virginia Giuffre, who claimed that she was forced into a sexual encounter with Dubin, which he denied.Meanwhile, Vivek Ramaswamy, the man who claims he will out those who were involved with Jeffrey Epstein if he becomes President is also taking 100K from Glenn Dubin, a man who has been credibilty accused in not only the enabling of Jeffrey Epstein, but also taking part in the abuse himself. to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Friends of Jeffrey Epstein have given more than $100,000 to Vivek Ramaswamy's 2024 run even as he demands full transparency of disgraced financier's clients | Daily Mail Online
In her Second Amended Response to Maxwell's discovery demands, Virginia Giuffre pushed back aggressively, refusing to yield to Maxwell's attempts to broaden discovery into intrusive and irrelevant personal and psychological domains. She objected to Maxwell's sprawling requests as overly burdensome, unduly invasive, and aimed at discrediting her through unnecessary exposure rather than legitimate legal pursuit. Giuffre instead reinforced her focus on evidence directly tied to the defamation claims and trafficking allegations, contesting any effort by Maxwell to turn the process into a fishing expedition or reputation‑smearing exercise under the guise of legal procedure.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:epstein-documents-943-pages - DocumentCloudBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
In her Second Amended Response to Maxwell's discovery demands, Virginia Giuffre pushed back aggressively, refusing to yield to Maxwell's attempts to broaden discovery into intrusive and irrelevant personal and psychological domains. She objected to Maxwell's sprawling requests as overly burdensome, unduly invasive, and aimed at discrediting her through unnecessary exposure rather than legitimate legal pursuit. Giuffre instead reinforced her focus on evidence directly tied to the defamation claims and trafficking allegations, contesting any effort by Maxwell to turn the process into a fishing expedition or reputation‑smearing exercise under the guise of legal procedure.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:epstein-documents-943-pages - DocumentCloudBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
In her Second Amended Response to Maxwell's discovery demands, Virginia Giuffre pushed back aggressively, refusing to yield to Maxwell's attempts to broaden discovery into intrusive and irrelevant personal and psychological domains. She objected to Maxwell's sprawling requests as overly burdensome, unduly invasive, and aimed at discrediting her through unnecessary exposure rather than legitimate legal pursuit. Giuffre instead reinforced her focus on evidence directly tied to the defamation claims and trafficking allegations, contesting any effort by Maxwell to turn the process into a fishing expedition or reputation‑smearing exercise under the guise of legal procedure.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:epstein-documents-943-pages - DocumentCloudBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
Virginia Roberts Giuffre forcefully praised Judge Loretta Preska's decision to unseal hundreds of documents from her 2015 defamation suit against Ghislaine Maxwell, emphasizing that the public's right to know was far more important than the shield of secrecy favored by the elite. Giuffre—whose suit formed the backbone of the Epstein revelations—welcomed the court's move to begin releasing names and redacted filings, saying that letting these documents remain buried was exactly the kind of suppression that protected predators and damaged survivors who dared to speak out.She made clear that the disclosures were far overdue, and that the people who sought to keep these documents sealed were the ones with something to lose. Giuffre argued that while pseudonymous third parties and powerful individuals lurked behind most sealing motions, transparency should never be sacrificed at the altar of privacy—especially when the crimes involved minors and high‑level enablers. By characterizing Preska's unsealing order as a minor yet vital victory, Giuffre signaled that sunlight remains the most powerful disinfectant in the Epstein saga.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Jeffrey Epstein victim Virginia Giuffre taunts those to be named in unsealed docs (nypost.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
Virginia Giuffre's response to Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for summary judgment was a direct challenge to Maxwell's attempt to dismiss the case without a trial. In her filing, Giuffre argued that Maxwell's statements denying any wrongdoing were not only defamatory, but made with actual malice—because Maxwell knew they were false when she made them. Giuffre's legal team submitted sworn testimony, supporting documentation, and detailed timelines to establish that Maxwell had played a central role in Epstein's trafficking operation and that her denials were part of a broader effort to discredit and silence victims.Virginia Giuffre's response to Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for summary judgment was a direct challenge to Maxwell's attempt to dismiss the case without a trial. In her filing, Giuffre argued that Maxwell's statements denying any wrongdoing were not only defamatory, but made with actual malice—because Maxwell knew they were false when she made them. Giuffre's legal team submitted sworn testimony, supporting documentation, and detailed timelines to establish that Maxwell had played a central role in Epstein's trafficking operation and that her denials were part of a broader effort to discredit and silence victims.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Giuffre-unseal.pdf (courthousenews.com)
Virginia Giuffre's response to Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for summary judgment was a direct challenge to Maxwell's attempt to dismiss the case without a trial. In her filing, Giuffre argued that Maxwell's statements denying any wrongdoing were not only defamatory, but made with actual malice—because Maxwell knew they were false when she made them. Giuffre's legal team submitted sworn testimony, supporting documentation, and detailed timelines to establish that Maxwell had played a central role in Epstein's trafficking operation and that her denials were part of a broader effort to discredit and silence victims.Virginia Giuffre's response to Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for summary judgment was a direct challenge to Maxwell's attempt to dismiss the case without a trial. In her filing, Giuffre argued that Maxwell's statements denying any wrongdoing were not only defamatory, but made with actual malice—because Maxwell knew they were false when she made them. Giuffre's legal team submitted sworn testimony, supporting documentation, and detailed timelines to establish that Maxwell had played a central role in Epstein's trafficking operation and that her denials were part of a broader effort to discredit and silence victims.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Giuffre-unseal.pdf (courthousenews.com)
Send us a textIn today's explosive episode, I'm diving deep into the Jeffrey Epstein scandal with a focus on Bill Clinton given he was just subpoenaed by Congress and as usual there are shocking revelations. I will remind you of all of the women who made allegations against Bill Clinton especially around the time he was supposedly hanging out with Epstein. We will discuss the congressional subpoena that was issued to him and Hillary Clinton. I'll tell you about a transgender woman named Ava Cordero who filed a police report against Epstein back in 2007 but was completely ignored because of being trans and other factors, plus I'm covering Alicia Arden's story from Gloria Allred's recent press conference about her encounter with Epstein at the Shutters Hotel in Santa Monica that also got buried. I'm breaking down everything Ghislaine Maxwell likely told the DOJ about Bill Clinton's extensive travels with Epstein and the evidence surrounding it. I'll walk you through Virginia Giuffre's unpublished memoir "Billionaire's Playboy Club" where she details seeing Clinton on Epstein's island with two young girls, and I'm giving you my take on whether her claims are credible or not. Then we're switching gears to some major Real Housewives of Beverly Hills tea - Denise Richards is allegedly back for the new season and it's pissing off Rachel Zoe by stealing her thunder, plus I've got insider details about their Montauk filming and a shocking murder that happened that same week. People have big concerns about Dorit telling the truth in her announced memoir, and I'll tell you about it. Since we are talking Epstein, I'm also sharing Sami Sheen's terrifying TikTok about almost getting trafficked, and wait until you hear the explosive rant from Project Runway designer Kenley Collins absolutely destroying Andy Cohen and calling him a predator and the Gay Weinstein. Trust me, you don't want to miss a single minute of this one because the dot connecting is mind-blowing.For the Full epsodes go here for only $6.00 per month plus more show! https://www.patreon.com/c/DishingDramaWithDanaWilkeySupport the showDana is on Cameo!Follow Dana: @Wilkey_Dana$25,000 Song - Apple Music$25,000 Song - SpotifyTo support the show and listen to full episodes, become a member on PatreonTo learn more about sponsorships, email DDDWpodcast@gmail.comDana's YouTube Channel
The family of prominent Epstein survivor Virginia Giuffre is speaking out about the administration's handling of the Epstein case. Plus, CNN takes you on the dangerous mission to get aid to the Palestinians struggling to survive in Gaza. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Monday, August 4th, 2025Today, party preference in the US has shifted back to the Democrats for the first time since 2023; Virginia Giuffre's family responds to Trump's admission that she was trafficked from Mar a Lago; trump always chickens out - he pauses Mexico tariffs for another 90 days; the DC Bar's Board of Professional Responsibility has recommended Jeffrey Clark be disbarred; the Navy reverses its decision to stop sharing weather data at the last minute; the Florida attorney general issued a subpoena to a bar to get the names of people who participated in a drag show; we have more details on California's plan to redraw voting maps in response to Texas; and Allison and Dana deliver the good news.Thank You, DeleteMeGet 20% off your DeleteMe plan when you go to joindeleteme.com/DAILYBEANS and use promo code DAILYBEANS at checkout.Stories'Alligator Alcatraz' detainees on hunger strike for 10th day, protesting conditions | NBC NewsLeaked memo from Hegseth's brother calls for US army to help with deportations nationwide ‘for years to come': report | The IndependentSupreme Court signals it may rule on law protecting power of minority voters - The Washington PostEXCLUSIVE: Someone Waived Ghislaine Maxwell's Sex Offender Status to Move Her to a Minimum Security Camp in TexasI Am Suing the Department of Justice for the Epstein Files Training Videos | Allison Gill — National Security Counselors - DonateTrump fires labor statistics boss hours after the release of weak jobs report | NBC NewsGavin Newsom may call special election to redraw California congressional maps | The GuardianSmithsonian says Trump impeachments will be restored to exhibit | CBS NewsSenate confirms Jeanine Pirro as U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia | CBS NewsTesla hit with $243 million in damages after jury finds its Autopilot feature contributed to fatal crash | NBC News Good Trouble The white house wants to know what topics you'd like to hear more about, so they've sent out a survey: What topics would you like to hear more about from the White House?From The Good NewsBaltimore protesters show support for Maryland pastor detained by ICE agents - cbs newsDemonstrators gather in Colorado Springs for nationwide ‘Rage Against the Regime' protest - KKTV11American Community Survey (ACS) Reminder - you can see the pod pics if you become a Patron. The good news pics are at the bottom of the show notes of each Patreon episode! That's just one of the perks of subscribing! patreon.com/muellershewrote Our Donation LinksNational Security Counselors - DonateMSW Media, Blue Wave California Victory Fund | ActBlueWhistleblowerAid.org/beans Federal workers - feel free to email AG at fedoath@pm.me and let me know what you're going to do, or just vent. I'm always here to listen. Find Upcoming Actions 50501 Movement, No Kings.org, Indivisible.orgDr. Allison Gill - Substack, BlueSky , TikTok, IG, TwitterDana Goldberg - BlueSky, Twitter, IG, facebook, danagoldberg.comCheck out more from MSW Media - Shows - MSW Media, Cleanup On Aisle 45 pod, The Breakdown | SubstackShare your Good News or Good TroubleMSW Good News and Good TroubleHave some good news; a confession; or a correction to share?Good News & Confessions - The Daily Beanshttps://www.dailybeanspod.com/confessional/ Listener Survey:http://survey.podtrac.com/start-survey.aspx?pubid=BffJOlI7qQcF&ver=shortFollow the Podcast on Apple:The Daily Beans on Apple PodcastsWant to support the show and get it ad-free and early?The Daily Beans | SupercastThe Daily Beans & Mueller, She Wrote | PatreonThe Daily Beans | Apple Podcasts
Barb McQuade hosts #SistersInLaw to dissect Pam Bondi's judicial complaints targeting Judge Boasberg and if they are legitimate, before linking them to the growing number of violent threats being faced by members of the judiciary trying to uphold the law. Then, the #Sisters dive deeper into the danger ethical judges face in the current political climate, and emphasize why their independence is so important. They also further explore the latest developments in the Epstein and Maxwell saga, with a focus on the comments President Trump recently made about his former employee Virginia Giuffre. Get the brand new ReSIStance T-Shirt & Mini Tote at politicon.com/merch #SistersInLaw Spin-off Shows Are Here! Check out Jill's New Politicon YouTube Show: Just The Facts Check out Kim's New Politicon Podcast: Justice By Design Add the #Sisters & your other favorite Politicon podcast hosts on Bluesky Get Barb's book, Attack From Within, coming out in paperback! Joyce's new book, Giving Up Is Unforgivable, is now available for pre-order! Get your #SistersInLaw MERCH at politicon.com/merch WEBSITE & TRANSCRIPT Email: SISTERSINLAW@POLITICON.COM or Thread to @sistersInLaw.podcast Get text updates from #SistersInLaw and Politicon. Support This Week's Sponsors Wild Alaskan Company: Get $35 off your first box of wild-caught, sustainable seafood—delivered right to your door. Go to: wildalaskan.com/SISTERS Thrive Causemetics: Maximize your look with minimal effort. Go to thrivecausemetics.com/sisters for an exclusive offer of 20% off your first order. Pacagen: For an extra 15% off your order and a special gift, head to Pacagen.com/SISTERS and use the code: SISTERS OneSkin: Get 15% off OneSkin with the code SISTERS at https://www.oneskin.co/ #oneskinpod Get More From The #SistersInLaw Joyce Vance: Bluesky | Twitter | University of Alabama Law | MSNBC | Civil Discourse Substack | Author of “Giving Up Is Unforgiveable” Jill Wine-Banks: Bluesky | Twitter | Facebook | Website | Author of The Watergate Girl: My Fight For Truth & Justice Against A Criminal President | Just The Facts YouTube Kimberly Atkins Stohr: Bluesky | Twitter | Boston Globe | WBUR | The Gavel Newsletter | Justice By Design Podcast Barb McQuade: Bluesky | Twitter | University of Michigan Law | Just Security | MSNBC | Attack From Within: How Disinformation Is Sabotaging America
It's Liberation Day…again. After two missed deadlines and only a few trade deals done, Trump's global tariffs officially go into effect today. To mark the occasion, White House trade advisor Peter Navarro says the president not only deserves a Nobel Peace Prize—but also a Nobel Prize in economics. Meanwhile, Trump can't stop talking about Jeffrey Epstein, telling reporters on Air Force One that Virginia Giuffre was "stolen" by Jeffrey Epstein from the Mar-a-Largo spa. Trump pressures Senate Republicans to kill a ban on congressional (and presidential) stock trading. Jon and Dan discuss the latest, including Democrats' shifting views on Gaza, Kamala Harris's decision not to run for California governor, and Texas Republicans' attempts to steal the 2026 midterm elections by redrawing their congressional map. Then, Congressman Jason Crow joins Tommy in the studio to talk about recruiting Democrats to run for office, and why he's suing ICE after being denied entry to a detention facility in his district.
Megyn Kelly is joined by Walter Kirn, editor of Editor-at-Large, "County Highway," to discuss how the Sydney Sweeney American Eagle ad shows that culture can be honest and anti-woke about beauty again, the left's absurd attacks calling it a white supremacist dog whistle, how the era of woke ended after Trump won again in November, how the Sweeney American Eagle moment shows our culture is returning to normal, how the media spun Trump's answer about Epstein and Virginia Giuffre into complete nonsense, the media trying to accuse Trump of knowing Epstein was trafficking girls, Trump reportedly considering a pardon Diddy, why she says Diddy doesn't deserve any mercy from the President after abusing women, and more. Then Alexis Wilkins, country singer, commentator, and girlfriend of FBI Director Kash Patel, joins to talk about her response to the internet trolls who say she's an Israeli spy and part of Mossad, how the media has tried to smear her relationship with FBI Director Kash Patel and past association with PragerU, the need to speak out about what's true, refusing to compromise her conservative values in college or her music career, her relationship with FBI Director Kash Patel, and more.Kirn- https://countyhighway.com/Wilkins- https://x.com/alexiswilkinsBirch Gold: Text MK to 989898 and get your free info kit on goldByrna: Go to https://Byrna.com or your local Sportsman's Warehouse today.Lean: Visit https://TakeLean.com & use code MK20 for 20% offGrand Canyon University: https://GCU.edu Follow The Megyn Kelly Show on all social platforms:YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/MegynKellyTwitter: http://Twitter.com/MegynKellyShowInstagram: http://Instagram.com/MegynKellyShowFacebook: http://Facebook.com/MegynKellyShow Find out more information at:https://www.devilmaycaremedia.com/megynkellyshow
© 2020-2025 Ivy Podcast Discovery LLC
