Podcast appearances and mentions of virginia giuffre

E24 - Today on Vapid Response Wednesday: the story of a wealthy family that lost everything and the one son who had no choice but to try to defend his sister after she was convicted of abusing and trafficking minors with (and for) Jeffrey Epstein. For this special episode we read through Ian Maxwell's entire body of published work for The Spectator and unseriously consider some of the many questions the tabloid heir raises about the arrest and conviction of his sister Ghislaine, the evils of the First Amendment, and of course a lengthy digression about some people named Todd.  Watch this episode on YouTube! Nobody's Girl, Virginia Roberts Giuffre (2025) Virginia Giuffre's full 2019 interview on 60 Minutes Australia Ian Maxwell's video interview with The Telegraph, Feb. 20, 2026 Ian Maxwell's author page at The Spectator “The truth about my sister, Ghislaine Maxwell,” Ian Maxwell, The Spectator, 12/16/2021 “My sister Ghislaine was denied justice,” Ian Maxwell, The Spectator (UK edition), 7/1/2022 “Don't take Virginia Giuffre's memoir at face value,” Ian Maxwell, The Spectator, 11/5/2025 “How my sister Ghislaine beat the Epstein conspiracy theories,” Ian Maxwell, The Spectator, 9/9/2025 “My sister Ghislaine became a prop in the theater of global online outrage,” Ian Maxwell, The Spectator, 2/25/26 Full Department of Trade and Industry report regarding the investigation into Robert Maxwell's pension fund embezzlement and corporate fraud (2001) Check out the OA Linktree for all the places to go and things to do!

The Atlantic's Sarah Fitzpatrick, who has spent over a decade reporting on Jeffrey Epstein, published a detailed timeline of how the Epstein Files Transparency Act came to exist. Hawk walks through that article, adding context and commentary throughout. At the center of the story is an unlikely political partnership between Representative Ro Khanna, a progressive Democrat from Silicon Valley, and Representative Thomas Massie, a conservative Republican from Kentucky. Together, with support from Marjorie Taylor Greene, Nancy Mace, and Lauren Boebert, they pushed through legislation forcing the release of the Epstein files after the DOJ and FBI sent an unsigned letter in July 2025 declaring the files closed and Epstein's death a suicide. Pam Bondi handed out binders of previously released and heavily redacted documents to right-wing media figures at the White House a year ago, then told Fox News she had truckloads of evidence and the Epstein client list on her desk. Meanwhile, the FBI assigned 1,000 personnel to catalog every mention of Donald Trump's name in the files. Trump's name appears tens of thousands of times. He is the first person listed on a DOJ slide titled "Prominent Names" and is linked to an accusation involving a minor, documents that were withheld or deleted from the DOJ website. The fallout outside the U.S. has included arrests of prominent figures in Norway, scrutiny of Prince Andrew and Peter Mandelson in Britain, and resignations across Europe. Thirteen Trump administration officials, including six cabinet members, are implicated. Back in Congress, only one member, Clay Higgins of Louisiana, voted against the bill. Thomas Massie told the author he believes he may have shortened his own life by pursuing this. Virginia Roberts Giuffre, Epstein's most prominent accuser and Prince Andrew's accuser, died by suicide last year. At a recent congressional hearing, eight Epstein survivors stood directly behind Pam Bondi. Every one raised their hand confirming their offers to testify had been ignored. Bondi never turned around. SUPPORT & CONNECT WITH HAWK- Support on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/mdg650hawk - Hawk's Merch Store: https://hawkmerchstore.com - Connect on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@mdg650hawk7thacct - Connect on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@hawkeyewhackamole - Connect on BlueSky: https://bsky.app/profile/mdg650hawk.bsky.social - Connect on Substack: https://mdg650hawk.substack.com - Connect on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/hawkpodcasts - Connect on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/mdg650hawk - Connect on Twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/mdg650hawk ALL HAWK PODCASTS INFO- Additional Content Available Here: https://www.hawkpodcasts.comhttps://www.youtube.com/@hawkpodcasts- Listen to Hawk Podcasts On Your Favorite Platform:Spotify: https://spoti.fi/3RWeJfyApple Podcasts: https://apple.co/422GDuLYouTube: https://youtube.com/@hawkpodcastsiHeartRadio: https://ihr.fm/47vVBdPPandora: https://bit.ly/48COaTB

Ian Maxwell — brother of convicted Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell — publicly commented that Prince Andrew essentially had no real option but to settle his sexual assault lawsuit with Virginia Giuffre rather than fight it in court. Maxwell suggested the combination of intense public scrutiny, the strength of Giuffre's allegations, and the political and reputational risk to the British monarchy made a contested trial untenable for the prince. He said that the allegations — which claimed Giuffre was trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein and forced into sexual encounters with Andrew when she was a minor — had created “immense pain” for the royal family and that Andrew, feeling cornered by both legal pressure and the broader cultural climate around believing victims, chose to resolve the matter quietly to minimize further damage.Maxwell also implied that timing and public perception — including the heightened sensitivity around sexual abuse and the impact on the royal family, particularly during Queen Elizabeth II's Platinum Jubilee — played into the decision to settle. He framed the settlement as a strategic retreat rather than an admission of guilt, arguing that Andrew's priority was to protect the Crown's reputation and “do the best he could” for his family in extraordinarily difficult circumstances. Despite settling the case, Andrew continued to deny the underlying allegations, and the commentary highlighted how the fallout from his association with Epstein and the civil claims profoundly affected his public standing and royal role.to contact  me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

El favorito de la reina terminó convertido en el mayor escándalo de la realeza. El príncipe Andrés pasó de héroe militar y figura carismática a protagonista de una crisis internacional tras su cercanía con Jeffrey Epstein y las acusaciones que nunca logró borrar de su imagen pública. Una historia sobre poder, silencios incómodos y decisiones que tuvieron consecuencias irreversibles. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See https://pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Prince Andrew's long-running entanglement with Jeffrey Epstein has become one of the most destabilizing liabilities facing the British monarchy in decades, and it has landed squarely at King Charles's feet. Andrew's disastrous BBC Newsnight interview, his civil lawsuit settlement with Virginia Giuffre, and the steady drip of new allegations and disclosures have kept the scandal alive long after the palace hoped it would fade. Each new headline reopens questions about judgment, privilege, and accountability at the highest levels of royal life. Instead of quietly stepping back, Andrew repeatedly misread the public mood—clinging to Royal Lodge, resisting pressure to downsize, and appearing more focused on personal grievance than institutional damage control. For King Charles, who has worked to streamline the monarchy and restore public trust, Andrew's refusal to fully disappear from public life has been a strategic nightmare. The scandal has forced Charles into the uncomfortable position of distancing himself from his own brother in order to protect the crown.Critically, Andrew's conduct has not just embarrassed the family—it has undermined the monarchy's credibility at a time when its relevance is under scrutiny. His association with Epstein, his tone-deaf attempts at rehabilitation, and the perception that he expected preferential treatment reinforced a narrative of entitlement that clashes sharply with Charles's message of duty and modernization. Every legal development, every resurfaced photograph, every renewed call for inquiry drags the institution back into a controversy it cannot control. Andrew's actions have effectively compelled King Charles to spend political capital managing fallout rather than advancing his own agenda. In a monarchy that depends heavily on public confidence, Andrew has become less a private liability and more a constitutional headache—one that continues to test Charles's authority, judgment, and willingness to draw hard lines within his own family.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In her deposition in the defamation lawsuit filed by Virginia Giuffre against Ghislaine Maxwell, Johanna Sjoberg described being recruited to work for Jeffrey Epstein under the impression that it was a legitimate job opportunity. According to her testimony, she was initially hired to help with office work but was soon asked to give massages to Epstein—something she testified quickly evolved into inappropriate and unwanted conduct. Sjoberg stated that Ghislaine Maxwell played a central role in managing the household and was often present during these encounters, contributing to the atmosphere of control and pressure. Her deposition supported claims made by Giuffre and other women who alleged they were misled into situations where they were exploited.Sjoberg also testified about interactions with well-known individuals while in Epstein's company, including an allegation involving Prince Andrew, which she said took place at Epstein's residence. She described an incident in which Maxwell, Epstein, and others were present during a moment she considered inappropriate and unsettling. While the full extent of those interactions remains the subject of legal scrutiny and public interest, Sjoberg's deposition contributed to the broader pattern of allegations suggesting a tightly controlled environment where young women were manipulated under false pretenses. Her account was one of several that added weight to the claims being investigated in both civil and criminal proceedings surrounding Epstein and Maxwell.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

www.patreon.com/theconspiracypodcastWhat are the facts involved with Trump and Epstein. How much did he know him? we break down the documented connections between President Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein — from the first social overlap in the late 1980s to the flight logs, depositions, lawsuits, and DOJ file releases that followed.We start at the beginning:The Palm Beach party circuit.The 1992 Mar-a-Lago footage. The 2002 “terrific guy” quote. The 1990s flights on Epstein's plane. The Mar-a-Lago recruitment overlap involving Virginia Giuffre. The mid-2000s falling out.The 2016 civil lawsuit naming both Trump and Epstein. The Maxwell trial. The prosecutor email about eight flights.And what actually appears in the so-called “Epstein files.”No clickbait. No partisan spin. No dramatic music pretending we uncovered something that isn't in the record.We separate:What's documented What's alleged What's denied What's unproven And what's never been chargedBecause in a story this big, proximity gets confused with proof — and rumors spread faster than facts.

In a Telegraph interview highlighted by the New York Post, Ian Maxwell — brother of convicted sex trafficker Ghislaine Maxwell — launched a forceful defense of his sister and an attack on Virginia Giuffre, one of Jeffrey Epstein's most prominent accusers. Ian labeled Giuffre a “monster,” insisting her accusations had “devastating ramifications” for Ghislaine and framing his sister as a “scapegoat” for Epstein's crimes. He argued that Ghislaine's 20-year sentence was unfair and politically motivated, suggested the trial was flawed, and claimed that if Epstein were still alive he would be imprisoned while Ghislaine would be free. He attempted to compare her punishment to what he regarded as lighter sentences in other federal cases and lamented what he described as harsh treatment by the justice system and media.Maxwell also responded to Giuffre's death by saying he “didn't shed a tear” when she died by suicide in April, and portrayed his sister as the true victim in the broader scandal. He asserted that the government and media chose Ghislaine to pay the price for Epstein's actions, defended her treatment in prison, and reiterated his family's support for her. His remarks sparked controversy because they recast a widely recognized victim of trafficking as the antagonist and echoed broader debates over accountability and narrative control in the Epstein case.to  contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Ian Maxwell calls Virginia Giuffre a ‘monster' in defense of Ghislaine

In her deposition in the defamation lawsuit filed by Virginia Giuffre against Ghislaine Maxwell, Johanna Sjoberg described being recruited to work for Jeffrey Epstein under the impression that it was a legitimate job opportunity. According to her testimony, she was initially hired to help with office work but was soon asked to give massages to Epstein—something she testified quickly evolved into inappropriate and unwanted conduct. Sjoberg stated that Ghislaine Maxwell played a central role in managing the household and was often present during these encounters, contributing to the atmosphere of control and pressure. Her deposition supported claims made by Giuffre and other women who alleged they were misled into situations where they were exploited.Sjoberg also testified about interactions with well-known individuals while in Epstein's company, including an allegation involving Prince Andrew, which she said took place at Epstein's residence. She described an incident in which Maxwell, Epstein, and others were present during a moment she considered inappropriate and unsettling. While the full extent of those interactions remains the subject of legal scrutiny and public interest, Sjoberg's deposition contributed to the broader pattern of allegations suggesting a tightly controlled environment where young women were manipulated under false pretenses. Her account was one of several that added weight to the claims being investigated in both civil and criminal proceedings surrounding Epstein and Maxwell.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Prince Andrew's downfall has accelerated sharply in the wake of fresh allegations tied to Jeffrey Epstein and the explosive release of Virginia Giuffre's memoir, Nobody's Girl. The book recounts new details about Andrew's alleged sexual encounters with Giuffre while she was being trafficked as a minor by Epstein. These revelations reignited public outrage and renewed scrutiny over Andrew's long-denied relationship with both Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. Buckingham Palace has reportedly been forced into damage control, with King Charles III supporting Andrew's decision to give up his “Duke of York” title and remaining royal honors. The palace has publicly stated that the new allegations must be fully investigated, signaling growing institutional distance from Andrew as pressure mounts for full transparency and accountability.Adding to his disgrace, newly surfaced claims allege that Andrew attempted to orchestrate an online smear campaign against Giuffre to salvage his reputation. According to The Guardian's coverage of the memoir, the prince and his aides tried to hire internet trolls to harass Giuffre online and even sought access to her private information, including her Social Security number. Reports indicate that the Metropolitan Police have opened an inquiry into whether Andrew misused his royal security detail or other public resources during this smear campaign. Parliamentarians are also reportedly pushing to strip him of any remaining titles and privileges, as his reputation continues to collapse under the weight of new evidence and public disgust over his conduct.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsources:Prince Andrew tried to hire 'internet trolls' to 'hassle' his sex accuser Virginia Giuffre, her posthumous memoir reveals | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In her deposition in the defamation lawsuit filed by Virginia Giuffre against Ghislaine Maxwell, Johanna Sjoberg described being recruited to work for Jeffrey Epstein under the impression that it was a legitimate job opportunity. According to her testimony, she was initially hired to help with office work but was soon asked to give massages to Epstein—something she testified quickly evolved into inappropriate and unwanted conduct. Sjoberg stated that Ghislaine Maxwell played a central role in managing the household and was often present during these encounters, contributing to the atmosphere of control and pressure. Her deposition supported claims made by Giuffre and other women who alleged they were misled into situations where they were exploited.Sjoberg also testified about interactions with well-known individuals while in Epstein's company, including an allegation involving Prince Andrew, which she said took place at Epstein's residence. She described an incident in which Maxwell, Epstein, and others were present during a moment she considered inappropriate and unsettling. While the full extent of those interactions remains the subject of legal scrutiny and public interest, Sjoberg's deposition contributed to the broader pattern of allegations suggesting a tightly controlled environment where young women were manipulated under false pretenses. Her account was one of several that added weight to the claims being investigated in both civil and criminal proceedings surrounding Epstein and Maxwell.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Tom Bilyeu and co-host DREW dive headfirst into some of the most pressing and controversial news stories shaking the globe. They kick things off by unpacking the arrest of Prince Andrew—highlighting the unprecedented legal scrutiny on the British royal family and its deep connections to the infamous Epstein saga. The conversation peels back the layers of power, secrecy, and the changing nature of accountability in the age of hyper-velocity information, asking whether true justice can ever be achieved when the world's elites are involved. But the episode doesn't stop there. Tom Bilyeu and DREW pivot to the bizarre timing of President Trump's announcement to “give us the aliens,” raising questions about whether disclosures about extraterrestrial life are just next-level distractions from more uncomfortable truths. From Nobel Prize-winning physics experiments that challenge our understanding of reality itself, to politicians and military personnel testifying under oath about UFOs, this discussion is a whirlwind journey through the places where science fiction meets political theater. As always, expect sharp analysis, biting humor, and a fearless willingness to address the issues others avoid. Whether it's the unraveling of global conspiracies, the fate of democracy in an era of fractured narratives, or the economic chess game of international tariffs, this episode promises to make you think deeper and question everything. Buckle up—this is Impact Theory at its thought-provoking best. Huel: High-Protein Starter Kit 20% off for new customers at https://huel.com/impact code impactKetone IQ: Visit https://ketone.com/IMPACT for 30% OFF your subscription orderQuince: Free shipping and 365-day returns at https://quince.com/impactpodShopify: Sign up for your one-dollar-per-month trial period at https://shopify.com/impactPique: 20% off at https://piquelife.com/impact Cape: 33% off your first 6 months with code IMPACT at https://cape.co/impact Plaud: Get 10% off with code TOM10 at https://plaud.ai/tomDuck.Ai: Protect your privacy at https://duck.ai/impactRaycon: 15% off at https://buyraycon.com/impact What's up, everybody? It's Tom Bilyeu here: If you want my help... STARTING a business: join me here at ZERO TO FOUNDER:  https://tombilyeu.com/zero-to-founder?utm_campaign=Podcast%20Offer&utm_source=podca[%E2%80%A6]d%20end%20of%20show&utm_content=podcast%20ad%20end%20of%20show SCALING a business: see if you qualify here.:  https://tombilyeu.com/call Get my battle-tested strategies and insights delivered weekly to your inbox: sign up here.: https://tombilyeu.com/ ********************************************************************** If you're serious about leveling up your life, I urge you to check out my new podcast, Tom Bilyeu's Mindset Playbook —a goldmine of my most impactful episodes on mindset, business, and health. Trust me, your future self will thank you. ********************************************************************** FOLLOW TOM: Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/tombilyeu/ Tik Tok: https://www.tiktok.com/@tombilyeu?lang=en Twitter: https://twitter.com/tombilyeu YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@TomBilyeu Prince Andrew arrest, Epstein files, Jeffrey Epstein, misconduct in public office, British royal family, information censorship, aliens, extraterrestrial disclosure, Trump administration, political distraction, royal scandal, government secrets, Virginia Giuffre, sexual abuse allegations, whistleblower testimony, House Oversight Committee, UAP (Unidentified Aerial Phenomena), alien technology, Nobel Prize physics, quantum entanglement, Obama alien remarks, Trump tariffs, Supreme Court ruling, International Emergency Economic Power Act (IEPA), tariff lawsuits, government shutdown, GDP numbers, deregulation, energy prices, U.S. manufacturing jobs Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In her deposition in the defamation lawsuit filed by Virginia Giuffre against Ghislaine Maxwell, Johanna Sjoberg described being recruited to work for Jeffrey Epstein under the impression that it was a legitimate job opportunity. According to her testimony, she was initially hired to help with office work but was soon asked to give massages to Epstein—something she testified quickly evolved into inappropriate and unwanted conduct. Sjoberg stated that Ghislaine Maxwell played a central role in managing the household and was often present during these encounters, contributing to the atmosphere of control and pressure. Her deposition supported claims made by Giuffre and other women who alleged they were misled into situations where they were exploited.Sjoberg also testified about interactions with well-known individuals while in Epstein's company, including an allegation involving Prince Andrew, which she said took place at Epstein's residence. She described an incident in which Maxwell, Epstein, and others were present during a moment she considered inappropriate and unsettling. While the full extent of those interactions remains the subject of legal scrutiny and public interest, Sjoberg's deposition contributed to the broader pattern of allegations suggesting a tightly controlled environment where young women were manipulated under false pretenses. Her account was one of several that added weight to the claims being investigated in both civil and criminal proceedings surrounding Epstein and Maxwell.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

The newly released U.S. Department of Justice files on Jeffrey Epstein have laid bare not just the scale of his abuse network but the years of inaction and institutional negligence that preceded his 2019 arrest. Documents show that detailed victim testimony was provided to federal authorities long before Epstein was finally held — including an extensive 2011 interview with an accuser that echoed the later claims made by Virginia Giuffre — yet the FBI and DOJ failed to aggressively pursue meaningful investigation or prosecution based on that information. Other early reports, such as a 1996 complaint about Epstein stealing intimate photographs from a victim, were likewise ignored by federal agents. The significance of these missed opportunities is staggering: authorities had the evidence and detailed accounts of trafficking and abuse but repeatedly failed to act, allowing Epstein's predatory activities to continue unchecked for years.The files also reveal how the FBI's handling of victims' disclosures was not just passive but alarming. The accuser interviewed in 2011 reported attempts to intimidate her after she spoke with agents, including phone calls purportedly from law enforcement figures, yet investigators still did not follow up with urgency. Epstein's long history of abuse and trafficking — documented in these newly revealed internal materials — underscores systemic lapses at the highest levels of federal enforcement. Rather than treating victims' testimony as actionable leads, the DOJ and FBI sat on crucial information, failed to connect the dots between early reports and patterns of abuse, and let Epstein's network flourish for decades. The release of these files therefore doesn't just illuminate Epstein's crimes — it highlights a profound institutional failure by the agencies charged with bringing him and his enablers to justice.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Epstein files place renewed attention on US authorities' failure to stop him | Jeffrey Epstein | The Guardian

In her deposition in the defamation lawsuit filed by Virginia Giuffre against Ghislaine Maxwell, Johanna Sjoberg described being recruited to work for Jeffrey Epstein under the impression that it was a legitimate job opportunity. According to her testimony, she was initially hired to help with office work but was soon asked to give massages to Epstein—something she testified quickly evolved into inappropriate and unwanted conduct. Sjoberg stated that Ghislaine Maxwell played a central role in managing the household and was often present during these encounters, contributing to the atmosphere of control and pressure. Her deposition supported claims made by Giuffre and other women who alleged they were misled into situations where they were exploited.Sjoberg also testified about interactions with well-known individuals while in Epstein's company, including an allegation involving Prince Andrew, which she said took place at Epstein's residence. She described an incident in which Maxwell, Epstein, and others were present during a moment she considered inappropriate and unsettling. While the full extent of those interactions remains the subject of legal scrutiny and public interest, Sjoberg's deposition contributed to the broader pattern of allegations suggesting a tightly controlled environment where young women were manipulated under false pretenses. Her account was one of several that added weight to the claims being investigated in both civil and criminal proceedings surrounding Epstein and Maxwell.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

In her deposition in the defamation lawsuit filed by Virginia Giuffre against Ghislaine Maxwell, Johanna Sjoberg described being recruited to work for Jeffrey Epstein under the impression that it was a legitimate job opportunity. According to her testimony, she was initially hired to help with office work but was soon asked to give massages to Epstein—something she testified quickly evolved into inappropriate and unwanted conduct. Sjoberg stated that Ghislaine Maxwell played a central role in managing the household and was often present during these encounters, contributing to the atmosphere of control and pressure. Her deposition supported claims made by Giuffre and other women who alleged they were misled into situations where they were exploited.Sjoberg also testified about interactions with well-known individuals while in Epstein's company, including an allegation involving Prince Andrew, which she said took place at Epstein's residence. She described an incident in which Maxwell, Epstein, and others were present during a moment she considered inappropriate and unsettling. While the full extent of those interactions remains the subject of legal scrutiny and public interest, Sjoberg's deposition contributed to the broader pattern of allegations suggesting a tightly controlled environment where young women were manipulated under false pretenses. Her account was one of several that added weight to the claims being investigated in both civil and criminal proceedings surrounding Epstein and Maxwell.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

In her deposition in the defamation lawsuit filed by Virginia Giuffre against Ghislaine Maxwell, Johanna Sjoberg described being recruited to work for Jeffrey Epstein under the impression that it was a legitimate job opportunity. According to her testimony, she was initially hired to help with office work but was soon asked to give massages to Epstein—something she testified quickly evolved into inappropriate and unwanted conduct. Sjoberg stated that Ghislaine Maxwell played a central role in managing the household and was often present during these encounters, contributing to the atmosphere of control and pressure. Her deposition supported claims made by Giuffre and other women who alleged they were misled into situations where they were exploited.Sjoberg also testified about interactions with well-known individuals while in Epstein's company, including an allegation involving Prince Andrew, which she said took place at Epstein's residence. She described an incident in which Maxwell, Epstein, and others were present during a moment she considered inappropriate and unsettling. While the full extent of those interactions remains the subject of legal scrutiny and public interest, Sjoberg's deposition contributed to the broader pattern of allegations suggesting a tightly controlled environment where young women were manipulated under false pretenses. Her account was one of several that added weight to the claims being investigated in both civil and criminal proceedings surrounding Epstein and Maxwell.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Survivor testimonies and legal documents confirm that Jeffrey Epstein meticulously installed hidden cameras throughout his properties, especially at his Manhattan mansion, Palm Beach home, and New Mexico ranch. Maria Farmer—one of the first women to report Epstein to authorities—described walking into a “media room” where monitors replayed footage from pinhole cameras placed in bathrooms, bedrooms, and common areas. She recalled seeing repeated images of beds and toilets, and witnessing technicians actively monitoring these spaces—suggesting Epstein spied on his guests during intimate or private moments to gather leverage or blackmail material.Further evidence supports that Epstein stored binders of CD‑ROMs, hard drives, and labeled video files containing recordings of underage survivors and powerful individuals. One document reportedly includes “young [name] + [name]” written on discs locked in his New York safe. Virginia Giuffre's posthumously released diary claims she was filmed being assaulted and that footage was used to extort influential figures—directly contradicting an FBI memo that stated no credible blackmail existed.to  contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In a Telegraph interview highlighted by the New York Post, Ian Maxwell — brother of convicted sex trafficker Ghislaine Maxwell — launched a forceful defense of his sister and an attack on Virginia Giuffre, one of Jeffrey Epstein's most prominent accusers. Ian labeled Giuffre a “monster,” insisting her accusations had “devastating ramifications” for Ghislaine and framing his sister as a “scapegoat” for Epstein's crimes. He argued that Ghislaine's 20-year sentence was unfair and politically motivated, suggested the trial was flawed, and claimed that if Epstein were still alive he would be imprisoned while Ghislaine would be free. He attempted to compare her punishment to what he regarded as lighter sentences in other federal cases and lamented what he described as harsh treatment by the justice system and media.Maxwell also responded to Giuffre's death by saying he “didn't shed a tear” when she died by suicide in April, and portrayed his sister as the true victim in the broader scandal. He asserted that the government and media chose Ghislaine to pay the price for Epstein's actions, defended her treatment in prison, and reiterated his family's support for her. His remarks sparked controversy because they recast a widely recognized victim of trafficking as the antagonist and echoed broader debates over accountability and narrative control in the Epstein case.to  contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Ian Maxwell calls Virginia Giuffre a ‘monster' in defense of GhislaineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In her deposition in the defamation lawsuit filed by Virginia Giuffre against Ghislaine Maxwell, Johanna Sjoberg described being recruited to work for Jeffrey Epstein under the impression that it was a legitimate job opportunity. According to her testimony, she was initially hired to help with office work but was soon asked to give massages to Epstein—something she testified quickly evolved into inappropriate and unwanted conduct. Sjoberg stated that Ghislaine Maxwell played a central role in managing the household and was often present during these encounters, contributing to the atmosphere of control and pressure. Her deposition supported claims made by Giuffre and other women who alleged they were misled into situations where they were exploited.Sjoberg also testified about interactions with well-known individuals while in Epstein's company, including an allegation involving Prince Andrew, which she said took place at Epstein's residence. She described an incident in which Maxwell, Epstein, and others were present during a moment she considered inappropriate and unsettling. While the full extent of those interactions remains the subject of legal scrutiny and public interest, Sjoberg's deposition contributed to the broader pattern of allegations suggesting a tightly controlled environment where young women were manipulated under false pretenses. Her account was one of several that added weight to the claims being investigated in both civil and criminal proceedings surrounding Epstein and Maxwell.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In her deposition in the defamation lawsuit filed by Virginia Giuffre against Ghislaine Maxwell, Johanna Sjoberg described being recruited to work for Jeffrey Epstein under the impression that it was a legitimate job opportunity. According to her testimony, she was initially hired to help with office work but was soon asked to give massages to Epstein—something she testified quickly evolved into inappropriate and unwanted conduct. Sjoberg stated that Ghislaine Maxwell played a central role in managing the household and was often present during these encounters, contributing to the atmosphere of control and pressure. Her deposition supported claims made by Giuffre and other women who alleged they were misled into situations where they were exploited.Sjoberg also testified about interactions with well-known individuals while in Epstein's company, including an allegation involving Prince Andrew, which she said took place at Epstein's residence. She described an incident in which Maxwell, Epstein, and others were present during a moment she considered inappropriate and unsettling. While the full extent of those interactions remains the subject of legal scrutiny and public interest, Sjoberg's deposition contributed to the broader pattern of allegations suggesting a tightly controlled environment where young women were manipulated under false pretenses. Her account was one of several that added weight to the claims being investigated in both civil and criminal proceedings surrounding Epstein and Maxwell.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In her deposition in the defamation lawsuit filed by Virginia Giuffre against Ghislaine Maxwell, Johanna Sjoberg described being recruited to work for Jeffrey Epstein under the impression that it was a legitimate job opportunity. According to her testimony, she was initially hired to help with office work but was soon asked to give massages to Epstein—something she testified quickly evolved into inappropriate and unwanted conduct. Sjoberg stated that Ghislaine Maxwell played a central role in managing the household and was often present during these encounters, contributing to the atmosphere of control and pressure. Her deposition supported claims made by Giuffre and other women who alleged they were misled into situations where they were exploited.Sjoberg also testified about interactions with well-known individuals while in Epstein's company, including an allegation involving Prince Andrew, which she said took place at Epstein's residence. She described an incident in which Maxwell, Epstein, and others were present during a moment she considered inappropriate and unsettling. While the full extent of those interactions remains the subject of legal scrutiny and public interest, Sjoberg's deposition contributed to the broader pattern of allegations suggesting a tightly controlled environment where young women were manipulated under false pretenses. Her account was one of several that added weight to the claims being investigated in both civil and criminal proceedings surrounding Epstein and Maxwell.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

The newly released U.S. Department of Justice files on Jeffrey Epstein have laid bare not just the scale of his abuse network but the years of inaction and institutional negligence that preceded his 2019 arrest. Documents show that detailed victim testimony was provided to federal authorities long before Epstein was finally held — including an extensive 2011 interview with an accuser that echoed the later claims made by Virginia Giuffre — yet the FBI and DOJ failed to aggressively pursue meaningful investigation or prosecution based on that information. Other early reports, such as a 1996 complaint about Epstein stealing intimate photographs from a victim, were likewise ignored by federal agents. The significance of these missed opportunities is staggering: authorities had the evidence and detailed accounts of trafficking and abuse but repeatedly failed to act, allowing Epstein's predatory activities to continue unchecked for years.The files also reveal how the FBI's handling of victims' disclosures was not just passive but alarming. The accuser interviewed in 2011 reported attempts to intimidate her after she spoke with agents, including phone calls purportedly from law enforcement figures, yet investigators still did not follow up with urgency. Epstein's long history of abuse and trafficking — documented in these newly revealed internal materials — underscores systemic lapses at the highest levels of federal enforcement. Rather than treating victims' testimony as actionable leads, the DOJ and FBI sat on crucial information, failed to connect the dots between early reports and patterns of abuse, and let Epstein's network flourish for decades. The release of these files therefore doesn't just illuminate Epstein's crimes — it highlights a profound institutional failure by the agencies charged with bringing him and his enablers to justice.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Epstein files place renewed attention on US authorities' failure to stop him | Jeffrey Epstein | The GuardianBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In a Telegraph interview highlighted by the New York Post, Ian Maxwell — brother of convicted sex trafficker Ghislaine Maxwell — launched a forceful defense of his sister and an attack on Virginia Giuffre, one of Jeffrey Epstein's most prominent accusers. Ian labeled Giuffre a “monster,” insisting her accusations had “devastating ramifications” for Ghislaine and framing his sister as a “scapegoat” for Epstein's crimes. He argued that Ghislaine's 20-year sentence was unfair and politically motivated, suggested the trial was flawed, and claimed that if Epstein were still alive he would be imprisoned while Ghislaine would be free. He attempted to compare her punishment to what he regarded as lighter sentences in other federal cases and lamented what he described as harsh treatment by the justice system and media.Maxwell also responded to Giuffre's death by saying he “didn't shed a tear” when she died by suicide in April, and portrayed his sister as the true victim in the broader scandal. He asserted that the government and media chose Ghislaine to pay the price for Epstein's actions, defended her treatment in prison, and reiterated his family's support for her. His remarks sparked controversy because they recast a widely recognized victim of trafficking as the antagonist and echoed broader debates over accountability and narrative control in the Epstein case.to  contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Ian Maxwell calls Virginia Giuffre a ‘monster' in defense of GhislaineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

February, 22 2026, 7AM; Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton will meet with committee members on Thursday, and former President Bill Clinton will testify a day later. The depositions will take place behind closed doors, but they will be filmed and transcribed. Both have denied any wrongdoing, and Hillary Clinton has said that neither of them has links to the late sex offender. Rep. James Walkinshaw, who will be in the room for both depositions, joins The Weekend to discuss the depositions and his decision to bring Jeffrey Epstein survivor Jess Michaels as his guest to President Trump's State of the Union address on Tuesday. For more, follow us on social media: Bluesky: @theweekendmsnow.bsky.social Instagram: @theweekendmsnow TikTok: @theweekendmsnow To listen to this show and other MS podcasts without ads, sign up for MS NOW Premium on Apple Podcasts. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

In her deposition in the defamation lawsuit filed by Virginia Giuffre against Ghislaine Maxwell, Johanna Sjoberg described being recruited to work for Jeffrey Epstein under the impression that it was a legitimate job opportunity. According to her testimony, she was initially hired to help with office work but was soon asked to give massages to Epstein—something she testified quickly evolved into inappropriate and unwanted conduct. Sjoberg stated that Ghislaine Maxwell played a central role in managing the household and was often present during these encounters, contributing to the atmosphere of control and pressure. Her deposition supported claims made by Giuffre and other women who alleged they were misled into situations where they were exploited.Sjoberg also testified about interactions with well-known individuals while in Epstein's company, including an allegation involving Prince Andrew, which she said took place at Epstein's residence. She described an incident in which Maxwell, Epstein, and others were present during a moment she considered inappropriate and unsettling. While the full extent of those interactions remains the subject of legal scrutiny and public interest, Sjoberg's deposition contributed to the broader pattern of allegations suggesting a tightly controlled environment where young women were manipulated under false pretenses. Her account was one of several that added weight to the claims being investigated in both civil and criminal proceedings surrounding Epstein and Maxwell.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

In her deposition in the defamation lawsuit filed by Virginia Giuffre against Ghislaine Maxwell, Johanna Sjoberg described being recruited to work for Jeffrey Epstein under the impression that it was a legitimate job opportunity. According to her testimony, she was initially hired to help with office work but was soon asked to give massages to Epstein—something she testified quickly evolved into inappropriate and unwanted conduct. Sjoberg stated that Ghislaine Maxwell played a central role in managing the household and was often present during these encounters, contributing to the atmosphere of control and pressure. Her deposition supported claims made by Giuffre and other women who alleged they were misled into situations where they were exploited.Sjoberg also testified about interactions with well-known individuals while in Epstein's company, including an allegation involving Prince Andrew, which she said took place at Epstein's residence. She described an incident in which Maxwell, Epstein, and others were present during a moment she considered inappropriate and unsettling. While the full extent of those interactions remains the subject of legal scrutiny and public interest, Sjoberg's deposition contributed to the broader pattern of allegations suggesting a tightly controlled environment where young women were manipulated under false pretenses. Her account was one of several that added weight to the claims being investigated in both civil and criminal proceedings surrounding Epstein and Maxwell.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

In her deposition in the defamation lawsuit filed by Virginia Giuffre against Ghislaine Maxwell, Johanna Sjoberg described being recruited to work for Jeffrey Epstein under the impression that it was a legitimate job opportunity. According to her testimony, she was initially hired to help with office work but was soon asked to give massages to Epstein—something she testified quickly evolved into inappropriate and unwanted conduct. Sjoberg stated that Ghislaine Maxwell played a central role in managing the household and was often present during these encounters, contributing to the atmosphere of control and pressure. Her deposition supported claims made by Giuffre and other women who alleged they were misled into situations where they were exploited.Sjoberg also testified about interactions with well-known individuals while in Epstein's company, including an allegation involving Prince Andrew, which she said took place at Epstein's residence. She described an incident in which Maxwell, Epstein, and others were present during a moment she considered inappropriate and unsettling. While the full extent of those interactions remains the subject of legal scrutiny and public interest, Sjoberg's deposition contributed to the broader pattern of allegations suggesting a tightly controlled environment where young women were manipulated under false pretenses. Her account was one of several that added weight to the claims being investigated in both civil and criminal proceedings surrounding Epstein and Maxwell.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

In her deposition in the defamation lawsuit filed by Virginia Giuffre against Ghislaine Maxwell, Johanna Sjoberg described being recruited to work for Jeffrey Epstein under the impression that it was a legitimate job opportunity. According to her testimony, she was initially hired to help with office work but was soon asked to give massages to Epstein—something she testified quickly evolved into inappropriate and unwanted conduct. Sjoberg stated that Ghislaine Maxwell played a central role in managing the household and was often present during these encounters, contributing to the atmosphere of control and pressure. Her deposition supported claims made by Giuffre and other women who alleged they were misled into situations where they were exploited.Sjoberg also testified about interactions with well-known individuals while in Epstein's company, including an allegation involving Prince Andrew, which she said took place at Epstein's residence. She described an incident in which Maxwell, Epstein, and others were present during a moment she considered inappropriate and unsettling. While the full extent of those interactions remains the subject of legal scrutiny and public interest, Sjoberg's deposition contributed to the broader pattern of allegations suggesting a tightly controlled environment where young women were manipulated under false pretenses. Her account was one of several that added weight to the claims being investigated in both civil and criminal proceedings surrounding Epstein and Maxwell.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

In a now-publicized email from 2015, Prince Andrew wrote to Ghislaine Maxwell inquiring specifically about Virginia Roberts (now Virginia Giuffre), the woman who had publicly accused him of sexual abuse tied to Jeffrey Epstein's trafficking operation. The email, sent shortly after Roberts' allegations were made public, read: “Let me know when we can talk. Got some specific questions to ask you about Virginia Roberts.” The tone was casual, but the implication was clear—he was seeking information or clarification from Maxwell, who had long served as Epstein's close associate and alleged co-conspirator in grooming underage girls.This email undermined Prince Andrew's later claims of having no meaningful recollection of Virginia Roberts or the events she described. It showed that he not only knew of her existence, but was actively discussing her with Maxwell behind the scenes as legal scrutiny mounted. The correspondence was used to highlight inconsistencies in his public denials and cast further doubt on his defense, suggesting a coordinated effort to manage damage and control the narrative around Roberts' accusations.To contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comSource:https://www.tatler.com/article/prince-andrew-asked-ghislaine-maxwell-for-information-about-virginia-roberts-giuffre-newly-released-depositionBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The newly released U.S. Department of Justice files on Jeffrey Epstein have laid bare not just the scale of his abuse network but the years of inaction and institutional negligence that preceded his 2019 arrest. Documents show that detailed victim testimony was provided to federal authorities long before Epstein was finally held — including an extensive 2011 interview with an accuser that echoed the later claims made by Virginia Giuffre — yet the FBI and DOJ failed to aggressively pursue meaningful investigation or prosecution based on that information. Other early reports, such as a 1996 complaint about Epstein stealing intimate photographs from a victim, were likewise ignored by federal agents. The significance of these missed opportunities is staggering: authorities had the evidence and detailed accounts of trafficking and abuse but repeatedly failed to act, allowing Epstein's predatory activities to continue unchecked for years.The files also reveal how the FBI's handling of victims' disclosures was not just passive but alarming. The accuser interviewed in 2011 reported attempts to intimidate her after she spoke with agents, including phone calls purportedly from law enforcement figures, yet investigators still did not follow up with urgency. Epstein's long history of abuse and trafficking — documented in these newly revealed internal materials — underscores systemic lapses at the highest levels of federal enforcement. Rather than treating victims' testimony as actionable leads, the DOJ and FBI sat on crucial information, failed to connect the dots between early reports and patterns of abuse, and let Epstein's network flourish for decades. The release of these files therefore doesn't just illuminate Epstein's crimes — it highlights a profound institutional failure by the agencies charged with bringing him and his enablers to justice.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Epstein files place renewed attention on US authorities' failure to stop him | Jeffrey Epstein | The GuardianBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In a historic and unprecedented development, Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor (formerly Prince Andrew) was arrested and held by British police on suspicion of misconduct in public office. This episode breaks down the shocking details of the arrest at the Sandringham estate, the release of the "Epstein Files," and what this means for the future of the British Monarchy.In this episode, we cover:The Arrest: A timeline of the Thames Valley Police raid on February 19, 2026, and the former Prince's 11 hours in custody.The Allegations: Why investigators are focusing on his role as a UK Trade Envoy and claims that he shared confidential government information with Jeffrey Epstein.The King's Response: Analyzing King Charles III's stunning statement that "the law must take its course."The Legal Fallout: What is "Misconduct in Public Office," and could it lead to a life sentence?The Victims' Voice: The reaction from the family of Virginia Giuffre and other survivors following the news.Disclaimer: Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor has consistently denied all wrongdoing. He has been "released under investigation" and has not been formally charged at this time.+1

February, 21 2026, 7AM: The court struck down his far reaching global tariffs in a 6-3 decision Friday, ruling that he did not have authority under a 1977 emergency economic powers law.  Tim O'Brien and Courtenay Brown join The Weekend to discuss the latest in the SCOTUS decision and how the ruling may impact President trump's economic agenda, as well as the bottom line for U.S. For more, follow us on social media: Bluesky: @theweekendmsnow.bsky.social Instagram: @theweekendmsnow TikTok: @theweekendmsnow To listen to this show and other MS podcasts without ads, sign up for MS NOW Premium on Apple Podcasts. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

In her deposition in the defamation lawsuit filed by Virginia Giuffre against Ghislaine Maxwell, Johanna Sjoberg described being recruited to work for Jeffrey Epstein under the impression that it was a legitimate job opportunity. According to her testimony, she was initially hired to help with office work but was soon asked to give massages to Epstein—something she testified quickly evolved into inappropriate and unwanted conduct. Sjoberg stated that Ghislaine Maxwell played a central role in managing the household and was often present during these encounters, contributing to the atmosphere of control and pressure. Her deposition supported claims made by Giuffre and other women who alleged they were misled into situations where they were exploited.Sjoberg also testified about interactions with well-known individuals while in Epstein's company, including an allegation involving Prince Andrew, which she said took place at Epstein's residence. She described an incident in which Maxwell, Epstein, and others were present during a moment she considered inappropriate and unsettling. While the full extent of those interactions remains the subject of legal scrutiny and public interest, Sjoberg's deposition contributed to the broader pattern of allegations suggesting a tightly controlled environment where young women were manipulated under false pretenses. Her account was one of several that added weight to the claims being investigated in both civil and criminal proceedings surrounding Epstein and Maxwell.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Ian Maxwell — brother of convicted Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell — publicly commented that Prince Andrew essentially had no real option but to settle his sexual assault lawsuit with Virginia Giuffre rather than fight it in court. Maxwell suggested the combination of intense public scrutiny, the strength of Giuffre's allegations, and the political and reputational risk to the British monarchy made a contested trial untenable for the prince. He said that the allegations — which claimed Giuffre was trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein and forced into sexual encounters with Andrew when she was a minor — had created “immense pain” for the royal family and that Andrew, feeling cornered by both legal pressure and the broader cultural climate around believing victims, chose to resolve the matter quietly to minimize further damage.Maxwell also implied that timing and public perception — including the heightened sensitivity around sexual abuse and the impact on the royal family, particularly during Queen Elizabeth II's Platinum Jubilee — played into the decision to settle. He framed the settlement as a strategic retreat rather than an admission of guilt, arguing that Andrew's priority was to protect the Crown's reputation and “do the best he could” for his family in extraordinarily difficult circumstances. Despite settling the case, Andrew continued to deny the underlying allegations, and the commentary highlighted how the fallout from his association with Epstein and the civil claims profoundly affected his public standing and royal role.to contact  me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In his much-criticized 2019 BBC Newsnight interview about his friendship with Jeffrey Epstein, Prince Andrew made a series of remarks and excuses that were broadly seen as implausible or tone-deaf, deepening public distrust and damaging his reputation. He denied ever having sex with Virginia Giuffre, claiming he was at a PizzaExpress in Woking with his daughter on the date she alleged, and insisted he couldn't sweat due to an “adrenaline overdose” from the Falklands War — assertions that were widely mocked and widely reported as undermining his credibility. At the time, Andrew also tried to downplay his closeness to Epstein, saying they met only occasionally and that he had ended contact in 2010; subsequent releases of emails and documents suggested continued contact beyond that date, adding to the perception that his interview responses were evasive or misleading.Behind the scenes, those involved in arranging and producing the interview later described it as a “car crash” or PR disaster that was disastrously misjudged by palace advisers and by Andrew himself. According to accounts around the broadcast, Andrew and his team initially believed the interview would help clear the air but were unprepared for the level of probing about Epstein and Giuffre. The aftermath saw a swift public backlash, damage to the monarchy's image, and Andrew stepping back from royal duties; his remarks became focal points for ridicule, and subsequent analyses and dramatizations (including in documentaries and dramatized films) have highlighted how poorly his explanations landed and how badly they aligned with available evidence.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In his much-criticized 2019 BBC Newsnight interview about his friendship with Jeffrey Epstein, Prince Andrew made a series of remarks and excuses that were broadly seen as implausible or tone-deaf, deepening public distrust and damaging his reputation. He denied ever having sex with Virginia Giuffre, claiming he was at a PizzaExpress in Woking with his daughter on the date she alleged, and insisted he couldn't sweat due to an “adrenaline overdose” from the Falklands War — assertions that were widely mocked and widely reported as undermining his credibility. At the time, Andrew also tried to downplay his closeness to Epstein, saying they met only occasionally and that he had ended contact in 2010; subsequent releases of emails and documents suggested continued contact beyond that date, adding to the perception that his interview responses were evasive or misleading.Behind the scenes, those involved in arranging and producing the interview later described it as a “car crash” or PR disaster that was disastrously misjudged by palace advisers and by Andrew himself. According to accounts around the broadcast, Andrew and his team initially believed the interview would help clear the air but were unprepared for the level of probing about Epstein and Giuffre. The aftermath saw a swift public backlash, damage to the monarchy's image, and Andrew stepping back from royal duties; his remarks became focal points for ridicule, and subsequent analyses and dramatizations (including in documentaries and dramatized films) have highlighted how poorly his explanations landed and how badly they aligned with available evidence.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Sky and Amanda Roberts, brother and sister-in-law of Virginia Roberts Giuffre, react to the news of the arrest of former Prince Andrew. Virginia Roberts Giuffre's photo with Andrew, the man she accused of participating in her abuse at the hands of Jeffrey Epstein, became one of the most recognizable pieces of evidence in her advocacy for justice for her fellow survivors of Epstein's abuse. Rep. Ro Khanna joins to discuss a new deposition given by Les Wexner, a close associate of Jeffrey Epstein, and why Donald Trump's Justice Department hasn't taken any action on Epstein's associates the way other countries have since the release of millions of Epstein files. Susan Rice, former national security advisor and former U.S. ambassador to the U.N., talks with Jen Psaki about Donald Trump's latest pseudo-governmental vanity project, the "Board of Peace," and Trump's dubious appropriation of $10 billion from U.S. taxpayers for the project. House Democratic Leader Rep. Hakeem Jeffries talks with Jen Psaki about the upcoming midterm elections. To listen to this show and other MS podcasts without ads, sign up for MS NOW Premium on Apple Podcasts. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

It's Friday, February 20th, A.D. 2026. This is The Worldview in 5 Minutes heard on 140 radio stations and at www.TheWorldview.com.  I'm Adam McManus. (Adam@TheWorldview.com) By Adam McManus 100 U.S. troops on the ground in Northeast Nigeria U.S. officials confirmed that roughly 100 U.S. troops arrived in Nigeria on Monday, tasked with a mission to train and equip Nigerian anti-terror forces in their ongoing struggle against the country's rising Islamic terrorist threat, reports International Christian Concern. About 200 troops are expected to be deployed in the coming weeks. Nigeria has witnessed an uptick in religious-based violence in the central and north by the Islamic Boko Haram terrorist group against Christians. The U.S. soldiers were sent to Bauchi State located in northeastern Nigeria at the invitation of the Nigerian government. British police arrested Prince Andrew Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, the man formerly known as Prince Andrew before his royal title was stripped from him, was arrested on suspicion of misconduct in a public office at around 8:00am on his 66th birthday yesterday, reports The U.S. Sun. Andrew allegedly shared sensitive information with his pedophile pal Jeffrey Epstein while serving as the United Kingdom's trade envoy. He spent time in Vietnam, Singapore, China, and Hong Kong in October 2010 on taxpayer-funded official business and high-level trade talks. An email to Epstein on November 30, 2010, sent by Andrew's “Special Adviser” Amit Patel, contained four documents reporting on what had been discussed on his trip. The email and its four attachments were sent to Andrew at 4.57pm, and forwarded to multi- millionaire Jeffrey Epstein five minutes later, at 5.02pm. Cops also confirmed at the time that they were separately probing allegations that a woman was trafficked to the UK by Epstein to have a sexual encounter with Prince Andrew. Yesterday, police raided royal residences in Windsor and Norfolk. Andrew's brother, King Charles III, age 77, said, “I have learned with the deepest concern the news about Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor and suspicion of misconduct in public office. What now follows is the full, fair, and proper process by which this issue is investigated in the appropriate manner and by the appropriate authorities. They have our full and wholehearted support and co-operation.” Andrew's arrest comes almost a year after Virginia Giuffre, a woman who accused him of sexually assaulting her while she was a minor, committed suicide last April. Virginia's emotional brothers Sky and Daniel said: “At last, today, our broken hearts have been lifted at the news that no one is above the law, not even royalty. On behalf of our sister, Virginia Giuffre, we extend our gratitude to the UK's Thames Valley Police for their investigation, and the arrest of Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor. For survivors everywhere, Virginia did this for you.” Galatians 6:7 says, “Do not be deceived: God cannot be mocked. A man reaps what he sows.” Black D.C. grandma about Trump:  “I love him!” Back in 2017, Forlesia Cook's grandson was murdered in cold blood in Washington D.C.  Yesterday, at the Black History Month Reception at the White House, she spoke glowingly about President Donald Trump's concern about her family and his willingness to send in the National Guard to D.C. to put the criminals behind bars, reports FoxNews.com. Listen. COOK: “One thing I like about him, he keeps it real, just like Grandma. I appreciate that because I can trust Him, because he tells exactly how he feel and what he think. Thank God for this President. (applause) “I am filled. My cup runneth over because he allowed his people to come to my house to interview me, to talk about the murder of my grandson. It seemed like nobody cared. I marched. I rallied. I pulled out other families in the District of Columbia that had murders and did not have answers. Ooh! We marched and we rallied. And nobody heard me, Democrats, until this Republican sent his people out there to interview me in my home. Have you ever heard of a thing? “Then they invited me twice before Congress to testify for the Beautiful Bill that's going to change crime in the District.  (applause)  If you kill somebody, okay, you take a life, you do life. Just that simple. (applause)  If you do a harsh crime, you do harsh time. Just that simple. “And then we need National Guard, and which we did years ago, he brought it on. “I love him. I don't want to hear nothing you got to say about that racist stuff. And don't be looking at me on the news hatin' on me because I'm standing up for somebody that deserves to be standin' up for. Get off the man's back. Let him do his job. He's doing the right thing. Back up off of me. And Grandma said it.” (applause) Cook cited Psalm 23:5 in her remarks.  The full verse says, “Thou preparest a table before me in the presence of mine enemies; Thou anointest my head with oil; my cup runneth over.” President Trump was clearly touched by Forlesia Cook's passion and gratitude. TRUMP: “Thank you, darling. That's great, and it's from the heart. Your little baby was just so horribly taken from you. “Under the Trump administration, we believe that no community should be abandoned to the scourge of violent crime. We're saving 1000s and 1000s of lives in many cities. And frankly, if these radical left lunatic Democrats would come and say, ‘Please help us. Please,' we'd stop crimes all over the place. “Every town that we go in, every city that we go in, like Washington, Felicia, you feel much safer now, totally safe. You can walk to a restaurant. The restaurants were all closing. Now, the bad news is you can't get into a restaurant. It's a great thing to see what's happening in Washington.” American abolitionist and former slave Frederick Douglass remembered And finally, 131 years ago today, on February 20, 1895, American abolitionist Frederick Douglass met his maker. He was the most important leader of the American movement for black civil rights in the 19th century. After escaping from slavery in Maryland in 1838, Douglass became a national leader of the abolitionist movement in Massachusetts and New York. He gained fame for his oratory and incisive antislavery writings. Accordingly, he was described by abolitionists, in his time, as a living counterexample to claims by supporters of slavery that enslaved people lacked the intellectual capacity to function as independent American citizens. Indeed, Northerners, at the time, found it hard to believe that such a great orator had once been enslaved. It was in response to this disbelief that Douglass wrote Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglas: An American Slave in 1845.  It was influential in promoting the cause of abolition, as was his second book, written in 1855, entitled My Bondage and My Freedom. Following the Civil War, Douglass was an active campaigner for the rights of freed slaves and wrote his last autobiography entitled Life and Times of Frederick Douglass. Close And that's The Worldview on this Friday, February 20th, in the year of our Lord 2026. Follow us on X or subscribe for free by Spotify, Amazon Music, or by iTunes or email to our unique Christian newscast at www.TheWorldview.com.  Plus, you can get the Generations app through Google Play or The App Store. I'm Adam McManus (Adam@TheWorldview.com). Seize the day for Jesus Christ.

Welcome to "The Other Side of Midnight," your ultimate destination for unfiltered rants, deep-state takedowns, and midnight mysteries. Hosted by Lionel, this episode embraces "Ventilation Friday" to unleash a furious, freewheeling purge of pain against the global elite. We are diving headfirst into the "Epstein enema"—the explosive, system-unclogging scandal exposing the darkest, most depraved secrets of the world's most powerful people. Expect jaw-dropping rants on the British Royal Family's bizarre behavior, from Prince Andrew's manic teddy bear fetishes and room-temperature hotel hookers to King Charles demanding his shoelaces be ironed. Plus, we're tackling the vindication of Pizzagate, the shady disappearance of key witnesses like Virginia Giuffre, and a massive thank-you to President Trump for finally validating the existence of UFOs. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Former Prince Andrew, now Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, was arrested on February 19, 2026 — his 66th birthday — by British police on suspicion of misconduct in public office after authorities began investigating allegations linked to his conduct during his time as a UK trade envoy. Thames Valley Police confirmed they arrested a man in his sixties in Norfolk on those suspicions and were carrying out searches at properties in both Norfolk and Berkshire; under UK procedure the arrested person was not immediately named but the reporting makes clear it was Mountbatten-Windsor. The inquiry stems from documents in the recently released Epstein files suggesting he may have shared confidential government information with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, and he remains in custody while the investigation continues.The arrest represents a historic moment as the first senior British royal to be taken into custody in modern times and follows years of public scrutiny over his association with Epstein and prior civil litigation, including a high-profile settlement with accuser Virginia Giuffre. King Charles III responded to the news by affirming that “the law must take its course,” emphasizing cooperation with police, while Giuffre's family welcomed the development as a sign that no one is above the law. The exact legal outcome — whether formal charges will be filed — remains to be seen as the investigation unfolds.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:UK police arrest Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor for misconduct in public office | AP News

Hawk breaks down the newly released Justice Department files revealing that Jean-Luc Brunel, the French modeling scout and one of Jeffrey Epstein's closest associates, was secretly negotiating with federal prosecutors in 2016 and was prepared to hand over incriminating photographs and testify about Epstein's sex trafficking operation. Brunel's lawyer told prosecutors his client had recruited girls for Epstein and was willing to walk into the US Attorney's Office in New York in exchange for immunity. Then Epstein found out. Emails now part of the document dump show Epstein immediately contacted Katherine Rummler, then a prominent attorney and later Goldman Sachs general counsel, who has since resigned. Epstein's outreach effectively shut down Brunel's cooperation, and prosecutors never pursued him further. More than 50 additional girls were trafficked in the three years that followed. The files also expose how Epstein used Brunel's modeling agency MC2, which Epstein helped bankroll with up to $1 million, as a vehicle to recruit foreign women, secure their work visas, and keep them financially dependent. A recruiter named Daniel Sead supplied girls from Sweden, Slovakia, France, and Russia. Virginia Giuffre had alleged Brunel trafficked girls as young as 12. Brunel was arrested in France in 2020 on rape charges and was found hanged in his cell in 2022. Epstein's nonprosecution deal in 2008, negotiated by then-US Attorney Alex Acosta, allowed the trafficking to continue for years. Julie K. Brown's Miami Herald investigation and her book Perversion of Justice ultimately forced federal action in 2019. SUPPORT & CONNECT WITH HAWK- Support on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/mdg650hawk - Hawk's Merch Store: https://hawkmerchstore.com - Connect on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@mdg650hawk7thacct - Connect on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@hawkeyewhackamole - Connect on BlueSky: https://bsky.app/profile/mdg650hawk.bsky.social - Connect on Substack: https://mdg650hawk.substack.com - Connect on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/hawkpodcasts - Connect on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/mdg650hawk - Connect on Twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/mdg650hawk ALL HAWK PODCASTS INFO- Additional Content Available Here: https://www.hawkpodcasts.comhttps://www.youtube.com/@hawkpodcasts- Listen to Hawk Podcasts On Your Favorite Platform:Spotify: https://spoti.fi/3RWeJfyApple Podcasts: https://apple.co/422GDuLYouTube: https://youtube.com/@hawkpodcastsiHeartRadio: https://ihr.fm/47vVBdPPandora: https://bit.ly/48COaTB

UnHerd's Freddie Sayers talks to journalist Michael Tracey about the arrest of Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor and what Tracey describes as a "moral panic" surrounding the Epstein scandal. Tracey challenges the mainstream narrative, arguing that the case against the former Prince relies on fictionalised accounts and inconsistent testimony from the late Virginia Giuffre, and by examining recently surfaced FBI memos and the charges of misconduct in public office, suggests that the current constitutional crisis is driven more by mass hysteria and media credulity than by unassailable legal evidence. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Even from behind bars, Ghislaine Maxwell continues to staunchly defend Prince Andrew, displaying a brazen disregard for the gravity of her own convictions and the overwhelming evidence against her. In a 2022 interview from prison, Maxwell audaciously claimed that the infamous photograph showing Prince Andrew with his arm around Virginia Giuffre, one of Epstein's most prominent accusers, is "fake," despite its widespread acceptance as genuine. This blatant attempt to discredit a victim not only undermines the experiences of countless survivors but also highlights Maxwell's unrepentant nature and her willingness to perpetuate falsehoods to protect her powerful associates.Furthermore, Maxwell's expressed sympathy for Prince Andrew, referring to him as a "dear friend" and stating she "feels so bad" for him, is a glaring example of her continued manipulation and deflection. By portraying Andrew as a victim suffering due to his association with her, Maxwell attempts to elicit public sympathy for a man who has been credibly accused of sexual misconduct, thereby minimizing the severity of the allegations against him. This tactic not only insults the intelligence of the public but also serves to retraumatize survivors by elevating the concerns of the accused over the suffering of the victims. Maxwell's unwavering defense of Prince Andrew from her prison cell is a stark reminder of her persistent allegiance to the powerful, even at the expense of justice and truth.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

C dans l'air du 20 février 2026 - Epstein/ Andrew : panique à Buckingham C'est la photo à la Une des médias britanniques ce vendredi. L'ex-prince Andrew, à l'arrière d'une voiture, hagard et le regard fixe, quittant le poste de police hier soir. Libéré sous caution après 12 heures d'interrogatoire avant les suites de l'enquête, le frère de Charles III avait été arrêté et placé en garde à vue jeudi matin, le jour de son 66e anniversaire. Des perquisitions ont été menées dans les résidences de la Couronne. Le prince déchu est soupçonné d'avoir transmis des documents sensibles à Jeffrey Epstein, après la publication de millions de nouveaux documents par la justice américaine. Dans ces derniers, il est cité plus de 4 700 fois. Les enquêteurs s'intéressent particulièrement à des mails datant de 2010, suggérant qu'il aurait transmis au financier américain des rapports potentiellement confidentiels du temps où il était émissaire du Royaume-Uni pour le commerce international. Ces courriels sont venus s'ajouter aux soupçons qui planaient déjà sur Andrew à la suite des accusations de viol proférées par Virginia Giuffre, principale témoin à charge du dossier Epstein, qui s'est suicidée en 2025.Dans la tourmente depuis plusieurs mois, le fils préféré de la reine a été déchu de ses titres royaux en octobre dernier pour ses liens avec le pédocriminel américain. Son interpellation est un coup de tonnerre pour la famille royale britannique et une véritable déflagration dans tout le Royaume-Uni. C'est la première fois, dans l'histoire récente de la monarchie, que l'un de ses membres est formellement arrêté. Nos journalistes ont recueilli le témoignage d'une ancienne mannequin qui a rencontré Jeffrey Epstein en 2004. À l'époque âgée de 21 ans, elle est abordée dans la rue à Paris par Daniel Siad, qui lui propose d'aller travailler pour des agences à New York. Quelques semaines plus tard, après s'être renseignée auprès de son agence sur l'individu et avoir été rassurée, elle s'envole pour les États-Unis. Mais les choses ne se sont pas passées comme prévu. Au lieu de rencontrer des agences, elle va avoir un entretien « étrange » avec Jeffrey Epstein à son domicile. Elle a été entendue en 2019 par la PJ de Nanterre. Elle revient sur cet épisode ce soir dans #cdanslair.Aux États-Unis, où le scandale a débuté, l'affaire Epstein continue également de provoquer des remous, et une résidence alimente les interrogations : le ranch « Zorro », une vaste propriété détenue par le criminel sexuel américain au Nouveau-Mexique. Il s'agit de la seule propriété d'Epstein à ne pas avoir été perquisitionnée ; pourtant, elle apparaît à de multiples reprises dans les fichiers et les témoignages de victimes. Elle a été rachetée en 2023 par un élu texan républicain, trumpiste. Lundi, la Chambre des représentants du Nouveau-Mexique a décidé la création d'une commission spéciale bipartite chargée d'enquêter sur le domaine et les crimes qui ont pu s'y dérouler.Nos experts :- Anthony BELLANGER - Éditorialiste à France Info TV, spécialiste des questions internationales- François DE LABARRE - grand reporter à Paris Match- Valérie CANTIÉ - journaliste à l'agence de vérification de Radio-France- Thomas PERNETTE - Chef du service royautés à Point de vue - Cécile DUCOURTIEUX (en duplex) - correspondante à Londres du journal Le Monde

Renue Healthcare https://Renue.Healthcare/ToddYour journey to a better life starts at Renue Healthcare. Visit https://Renue.Healthcare/Todd Bulwark Capital https://KnowYourRiskPodcast.comBe confident in your portfolio with Bulwark! Schedule your free Know Your Risk Portfolio review. Go to KnowYourRiskPodcast.com today. Alan's Soaps https://www.AlansArtisanSoaps.comUse coupon code TODD to save an additional 10% off the bundle price.Bonefrog https://BonefrogCoffee.com/ToddGet the new limited release, The Sisterhood, created to honor the extraordinary women behind the heroes.   Use code TODD at checkout to receive 10% off your first purchase and 15% on subscriptions.LISTEN and SUBSCRIBE at:The Todd Herman Show - Podcast - Apple PodcastsThe Todd Herman Show | Podcast on SpotifyWATCH and SUBSCRIBE at: Todd Herman - The Todd Herman Show - YouTubePrince Andrew was NOT arrested for ANYTHING to do with the Epstein files… OK… Far more interesting to me are the layers of denial that exist among elitists. You can also see this in the separate country of Washington StateEpisode Links:Pulp Fiction co-writer Roger Avary told Rogan that Hollywood normalized Moloch worship to Americans through predictive programming.BREAKING: UK police have arrested Prince Andrew in relation to the Epstein files.Independent journalist Kim Iversen names the Epstein clients that Virginia Giuffre could not name. The following are the clients: 1) Ehud Barak 2) Glenn Dubin 3) Thomas Pritzker 4) Leon Black 5) Bill Richardson 6)George MitchellEXCLUSIVE: Transgender Pro-Pedophile ‘MAP' Activists Publicly Campaigning in SeattleHaley Robson recruited at least 24 underage girls for a predator. She collected $200 a head. She sat poolside while minors were assaulted behind closed doors. The detective told her to her face that she'd committed a second-degree felony. Those are her own words on camera. There are legitimate questions about how someone with that level of involvement gets rebranded as purely a "survivor."Mirjam Heine, German Doctor: It is our responsibility to accept pedophiles. We should respect their feelings — because if we do not, we make them feel isolated, and will ultimately lead them to sexually abuse more childrenPulp Fiction co-writer Roger Avary told Rogan that Hollywood normalized Moloch worship to Americans through predictive programming.

Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor has been arrested on suspicion of misconduct in public office by police investigating his dealings with Jeffrey Epstein. Six unmarked police cars carrying plainclothes officers arrived at the Sandringham estate while the former prince was celebrating his 66th birthday on Thursday. Officers searched the Norfolk property as well as Mountbatten-Windsor's former home at the Royal Lodge in Great Windsor Park. Lucy Hough speaks to the Guardian journalist David Pegg – watch on YouTube – Read extract from Virginia Giuffre's posthumous memoir here. Help support our independent journalism at theguardian.com/infocus

From global tech scandals to local politics, this episode dives into: Bill Gates & Epstein Fallout: Gates cancels India AI Summit appearance amid backlash over past associations. Prince Andrew & Royal Scandals: How the Epstein files continue to shake high-profile figures. Colbert Controversy & Election Law: FCC equal-time rules, censorship claims, and media bias. NYC Dog Debate: Pro-Palestinian activist sparks outrage over “Islamization” and banning indoor pets. Trump & Soleimani: Revisiting U.S. military revenge, Iran tensions, and historical context. AI & Surveillance: Ring's new Search Party feature, Skynet-style networks, and the risks of connected cameras. Retirement Planning: Tips from Common Sense Retirement Planning to secure your future against market swings. From politics to tech, censorship to security, this episode covers the stories everyone is talking about — and the ones you might be missing.

From tech scandals to political drama, this episode covers the biggest stories shaking the U.S. and the world: Bill Gates & Epstein Fallout: Gates cancels India AI Summit amid controversy over past associations. Prince Andrew Arrested: Epstein scandal reverberates through the royal family. Colbert & FCC Equal-Time Law: Media censorship, election fairness, and liberal hypocrisy. NYC Dog Controversy: Activist sparks outrage over “Islamization” and indoor pets. Trump & Soleimani: Revisiting U.S. revenge, Iran tensions, and military history. AI & Ring Surveillance: Ring's Search Party, Flock Safety controversy, and Skynet-style networks. Retirement Planning Tips: Strategies from Common Sense Retirement Planning to protect income. Politics, culture, tech, and security collide — this episode covers the stories everyone is talking about.

Tom Sykes, The Daily Beast's unmissable Royals columnist, joins Executive Editor Hugh Dougherty to examine how the fallout from Jeffrey Epstein has reignited a crisis around Prince Andrew that now threatens to engulf the wider monarchy. As new scrutiny revisits Andrew's relationship with Virginia Giuffre and raises questions about what the Palace knew, Sykes argues that King Charles III is confronting a scandal no longer containable by tradition or silence—one already straining relations with heir Prince William and forcing a reckoning over accountability, reputation, and whether the royal family can still rely on deference in an era demanding transparency. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices