Podcast appearances and mentions of virginia giuffre

On today's episode, CORINNE FISHER and KRYSTYNA HUTCHINSON put their gaydar to the test to let one listener know the sexual status of her crush. Krystyna spills the Epstein tea after reading Virginia Giuffre's book, “Nobody's Girl.” C&K then welcome stand-up comedian, KATIE BOYLE, back to the studio. The trio discuss reuniting with your high school crush, the consequences of talking about your abortion on Irish radio, her feud with Conor McGregor, and “pro-lifers” threatening death. Follow KATIE on IG @KatieBoyleComic Follow CORINNE on IG @PhilanthropyGal Follow KRYSTYNA on IG @KrystynaHutch Follow ERIC on IG @EricFretty Want to write into the show? Send us an email SorryAboutLastNightShow@gmail.com Music credit for today's episode:Ellisa SunWho Knew⁠https://open.spotify.com/track/1DJJeHLV2xtPVSEh4aWBdF?si=398f38ad74b74846⁠ Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

The funeral for 87 year old Bondi victim Alex Kleytman held today, the youngest and oldest victims of the Bondi terror attack farewelled on the same day; The government will look to strengthen migration laws to ensure people with anti-Semitic views cannot visit or emigrate to Australia after the Bondi massacre; There are calls for the federal govt to bolster hate speech laws; A man who allegedly threatened a member of the Jewish community during a flight from Bali has been arrested; Virginia Giuffre’s posthumous memoir Nobody's Girl has officially sold 1 million copies, her family saying the milestone is a bitter sweet moment; The Oscars will look very different in 2029, ending their partnership with broadcast partner ABC and moving to YouTube END BITS Bondi Beach condolence book Support independent women's media CREDITS Host/Producer: Claire MurphyBecome a Mamamia subscriber: https://www.mamamia.com.au/subscribeSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Virginia Giuffre's response to Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for summary judgment was a direct challenge to Maxwell's attempt to dismiss the case without a trial. In her filing, Giuffre argued that Maxwell's statements denying any wrongdoing were not only defamatory, but made with actual malice—because Maxwell knew they were false when she made them. Giuffre's legal team submitted sworn testimony, supporting documentation, and detailed timelines to establish that Maxwell had played a central role in Epstein's trafficking operation and that her denials were part of a broader effort to discredit and silence victims.Virginia Giuffre's response to Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for summary judgment was a direct challenge to Maxwell's attempt to dismiss the case without a trial. In her filing, Giuffre argued that Maxwell's statements denying any wrongdoing were not only defamatory, but made with actual malice—because Maxwell knew they were false when she made them. Giuffre's legal team submitted sworn testimony, supporting documentation, and detailed timelines to establish that Maxwell had played a central role in Epstein's trafficking operation and that her denials were part of a broader effort to discredit and silence victims.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Giuffre-unseal.pdf (courthousenews.com)

Virginia Giuffre's response to Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for summary judgment was a direct challenge to Maxwell's attempt to dismiss the case without a trial. In her filing, Giuffre argued that Maxwell's statements denying any wrongdoing were not only defamatory, but made with actual malice—because Maxwell knew they were false when she made them. Giuffre's legal team submitted sworn testimony, supporting documentation, and detailed timelines to establish that Maxwell had played a central role in Epstein's trafficking operation and that her denials were part of a broader effort to discredit and silence victims.Virginia Giuffre's response to Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for summary judgment was a direct challenge to Maxwell's attempt to dismiss the case without a trial. In her filing, Giuffre argued that Maxwell's statements denying any wrongdoing were not only defamatory, but made with actual malice—because Maxwell knew they were false when she made them. Giuffre's legal team submitted sworn testimony, supporting documentation, and detailed timelines to establish that Maxwell had played a central role in Epstein's trafficking operation and that her denials were part of a broader effort to discredit and silence victims.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Giuffre-unseal.pdf (courthousenews.com)

In the defamation case Virginia Giuffre brought against Ghislaine Maxwell beginning in 2015, Maxwell responded with a motion for summary judgment—arguing that Giuffre's allegations were not legally defamatory and that Maxwell was entitled to judgment as a matter of law. That motion aimed to avoid a trial by asserting that even if all of Giuffre's allegations were true, they did not meet the legal threshold for defamation. The motion, along with supporting documents, was filed under seal during pre-trial proceedings. Ultimately, the district court did not grant the motion, and the case was later settled out of court under confidentiality terms in 2017.When third parties later moved to unseal portions of the sealed record, particularly filings related to the summary judgment motion, the courts determined that these materials were judicial documents subject to a strong presumption of public access. A federal appeals court ordered their partial release because Maxwell had not shown sufficient reasons to overcome the public's right of access. In other words, although Maxwell sought to dispose of the case quietly and legally via summary judgment—and shield that process from public view—those efforts were rejected, and important portions of the case were ultimately made part of the public record.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Epstein Docs - DocumentCloud

In the defamation case Virginia Giuffre brought against Ghislaine Maxwell beginning in 2015, Maxwell responded with a motion for summary judgment—arguing that Giuffre's allegations were not legally defamatory and that Maxwell was entitled to judgment as a matter of law. That motion aimed to avoid a trial by asserting that even if all of Giuffre's allegations were true, they did not meet the legal threshold for defamation. The motion, along with supporting documents, was filed under seal during pre-trial proceedings. Ultimately, the district court did not grant the motion, and the case was later settled out of court under confidentiality terms in 2017.When third parties later moved to unseal portions of the sealed record, particularly filings related to the summary judgment motion, the courts determined that these materials were judicial documents subject to a strong presumption of public access. A federal appeals court ordered their partial release because Maxwell had not shown sufficient reasons to overcome the public's right of access. In other words, although Maxwell sought to dispose of the case quietly and legally via summary judgment—and shield that process from public view—those efforts were rejected, and important portions of the case were ultimately made part of the public record.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Epstein Docs - DocumentCloud

Virginia Giuffre's response to Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for summary judgment was a direct challenge to Maxwell's attempt to dismiss the case without a trial. In her filing, Giuffre argued that Maxwell's statements denying any wrongdoing were not only defamatory, but made with actual malice—because Maxwell knew they were false when she made them. Giuffre's legal team submitted sworn testimony, supporting documentation, and detailed timelines to establish that Maxwell had played a central role in Epstein's trafficking operation and that her denials were part of a broader effort to discredit and silence victims.Virginia Giuffre's response to Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for summary judgment was a direct challenge to Maxwell's attempt to dismiss the case without a trial. In her filing, Giuffre argued that Maxwell's statements denying any wrongdoing were not only defamatory, but made with actual malice—because Maxwell knew they were false when she made them. Giuffre's legal team submitted sworn testimony, supporting documentation, and detailed timelines to establish that Maxwell had played a central role in Epstein's trafficking operation and that her denials were part of a broader effort to discredit and silence victims.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Giuffre-unseal.pdf (courthousenews.com)

Virginia Giuffre's response to Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for summary judgment was a direct challenge to Maxwell's attempt to dismiss the case without a trial. In her filing, Giuffre argued that Maxwell's statements denying any wrongdoing were not only defamatory, but made with actual malice—because Maxwell knew they were false when she made them. Giuffre's legal team submitted sworn testimony, supporting documentation, and detailed timelines to establish that Maxwell had played a central role in Epstein's trafficking operation and that her denials were part of a broader effort to discredit and silence victims.Virginia Giuffre's response to Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for summary judgment was a direct challenge to Maxwell's attempt to dismiss the case without a trial. In her filing, Giuffre argued that Maxwell's statements denying any wrongdoing were not only defamatory, but made with actual malice—because Maxwell knew they were false when she made them. Giuffre's legal team submitted sworn testimony, supporting documentation, and detailed timelines to establish that Maxwell had played a central role in Epstein's trafficking operation and that her denials were part of a broader effort to discredit and silence victims.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Giuffre-unseal.pdf (courthousenews.com)

Multiple accusers have alleged that Prince Andrew was present at Jeffrey Epstein's residences during periods when sexual abuse of minors was actively occurring, placing him not on the margins of Epstein's world, but squarely inside it. These accusations stem most prominently from Virginia Giuffre, who stated under oath that Andrew abused her when she was a teenager and that these encounters occurred in locations directly controlled by Epstein, including his Manhattan mansion. Her account was not vague or secondhand; she described specific settings, timelines, and circumstances, asserting that Andrew was not an unwitting guest but an active participant in Epstein's environment of exploitation. The now-infamous photograph of Andrew with his arm around Giuffre inside Epstein's London residence further undercuts claims of distance or ignorance, placing him physically and socially within Epstein's inner circle at a time when abuse was widespread and well-documented.What makes Andrew's position especially damning is not just the allegation itself, but his pattern of denial, evasion, and privilege-driven insulation from scrutiny. Rather than submit to questioning or cooperate meaningfully with investigators, Andrew retreated behind royal status, legal maneuvering, and ultimately a multimillion-dollar civil settlement that allowed him to avoid sworn testimony without ever addressing the substance of the claims in court. His insistence that he has “no recollection” of events at Epstein's properties strains credibility given the volume of corroborating evidence showing he was repeatedly present in Epstein's orbit after Epstein's criminal conduct was already known. Taken together, the accusations portray not a naïve bystander, but a man who benefited from proximity to power, wealth, and protection—one who has never been forced to reconcile his public denials with the serious, specific, and consistent allegations that place him at the scene while abuse was taking place.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Meghan Markle is reported to have deleted Thomas Markle's phone number and has no plans to visit him as he recovers in a Philippine hospital following a leg amputation, despite a letter said to have been hand delivered to him this week. Sources question why she will not call, while Page Six claims she has no trip planned, as the Sussexes prepare for a Montecito Christmas and an overseas New Year's getaway. Meanwhile, Prince Andrew is stripped of his final remaining military rank, formally demoted by the Defence Council, as renewed Epstein scrutiny swirls again. The Metropolitan Police also says it will take no further action over allegations Andrew sought information about accuser Virginia Giuffre. Add in fresh reporting on Andrew's looming exit from Royal Lodge, including a temporary “shoebox-sized” stop at Sandringham and claims of a slow, room-by-room clear-out, and it is another messy chapter for the York story.Hear our new show "Crown and Controversy: Prince Andrew" here.Check out "Palace Intrigue Presents: King WIlliam" here.

On today's episode: Rob Reiner and his wife found dead in Los Angeles home. Authorities say they will release person of interest detained in Brown University shooting. A visiting NFL team lodged nearby the Brown University shooting before Sunday’s game at New England. Landslide win for Kast gives Chile its most right-wing president in decades. Crowd gathers at site of deadly shooting at Bondi beach to pay respect to victims. Attacker who killed US troops in Syria was a recent recruit to security forces, official says. Affable comedy acting legend Dick Van Dyke turns 100 years old. King Charles III says his cancer treatment is being reduced as he promotes benefits of screening. Washington flooding forces an entire city to temporarily evacuate as rivers top historic highs. Tumbling tech stocks drag Wall Street to its worst day in 3 weeks. A three-time Super Bowl MVP and a two-time All-Pro suffers ACL tears, Denver and Los Angeles clinch NFL playoff berths and an eight-time Pro Bowl QB returns, Indiana’s star quarterback wins college football’s top honor and an American skiing star misses the podium in Switzerland. A visiting NFL team lodged nearby the Brown University shooting before Sunday’s game at New England. Former Hong Kong pro-democracy media mogul Jimmy Lai convicted in landmark national security trial. Zelenskyy offers to drop NATO bid for security guarantees but rejects US push to cede territory. Nobel laureate Ales Bialiatski tells AP of Belarus prison ordeal in first interview after release. Hamas confirms the death of a top commander in Gaza after Israeli strike. Pope criticizes prison overcrowding during special Mass for inmates, guards and families. Myanmar military claims armed opposition groups used hospital hit by airstrike as base. Fighting rages on Thai-Cambodian border despite Trump's ceasefire claim. UK police won't probe claim former prince asked bodyguard to investigate Virginia Giuffre. —The Associated Press About this program Host Terry Lipshetz is managing editor of the national newsroom for Lee Enterprises. Besides producing the daily Hot off the Wire news podcast, Terry conducts periodic interviews for this Behind the Headlines program, co-hosts the Streamed & Screened movies and television program and is the former producer of Across the Sky, a podcast dedicated to weather and climate. Theme music The News Tonight, used under license from Soundstripe. YouTube clearance: ZR2MOTROGI4XAHRX

Investigative biographer Andrew Lownie joins the show to unpack the rise and fall of Prince Andrew, from his troubled childhood and war-hero image to financial corruption, Epstein, and royal protection at the highest levels. We explore Andrew's marriage to Sarah Ferguson, the Trade Envoy scandals, intelligence entanglements, the Virginia Giuffre case, the infamous Newsnight interview, Andrew's and Fergie's relationship to Epstein, and why Lownie believes the monarchy enabled Andrew for decades.  Guest bio: Andrew Lownie is an award-winning investigative biographer, journalist, and publisher, widely regarded as one of Britain's most relentless royal historians. He is the author of Traitor King, The Mountbattens, and his latest book Entitled, which examines Prince Andrew and Sarah Ferguson. Known for deep archival research and award-winning writing, Lownie has built a reputation for exposing power, corruption, and institutional cover-ups at the highest levels of the British establishment. Subscribe to The Zach Show 2.0 to gain early access to all future episodes, exclusive AMAs, the ability to suggest guest questions, bonus content, and more: https://thezachshow.supercast.com/ ANDREW LOWNIE LINKSEntitled: https://bit.ly/3YpacFTWebsite: https://andrewlownie.me/Substack: https://andrewlownie.substack.com/All Books: https://andrewlownie.me/books THE ZACH SHOW LINKS: The Zach Show 2.0: https://thezachshow.supercast.com/Spotify: https://spoti.fi/3zaS6sPYouTube: https://bit.ly/3lTpJdjWebsite: https://www.auxoro.com/Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/auxoroTikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@thezachshowpod If you're not ready to subscribe to The Zach Show 2.0, rating the show on Spotify or Apple Podcasts is free and massively helpful. It boosts visibility, helps new listeners discover the show, and keeps this chaos alive. Thank you: Rate The Zach Show on Spotify: https://bit.ly/43ZLrAtRate The Zach Show on Apple Podcasts: https://bit.ly/458nbha

In the defamation case Virginia Giuffre brought against Ghislaine Maxwell beginning in 2015, Maxwell responded with a motion for summary judgment—arguing that Giuffre's allegations were not legally defamatory and that Maxwell was entitled to judgment as a matter of law. That motion aimed to avoid a trial by asserting that even if all of Giuffre's allegations were true, they did not meet the legal threshold for defamation. The motion, along with supporting documents, was filed under seal during pre-trial proceedings. Ultimately, the district court did not grant the motion, and the case was later settled out of court under confidentiality terms in 2017.When third parties later moved to unseal portions of the sealed record, particularly filings related to the summary judgment motion, the courts determined that these materials were judicial documents subject to a strong presumption of public access. A federal appeals court ordered their partial release because Maxwell had not shown sufficient reasons to overcome the public's right of access. In other words, although Maxwell sought to dispose of the case quietly and legally via summary judgment—and shield that process from public view—those efforts were rejected, and important portions of the case were ultimately made part of the public record.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Epstein Docs - DocumentCloudBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In the defamation case Virginia Giuffre brought against Ghislaine Maxwell beginning in 2015, Maxwell responded with a motion for summary judgment—arguing that Giuffre's allegations were not legally defamatory and that Maxwell was entitled to judgment as a matter of law. That motion aimed to avoid a trial by asserting that even if all of Giuffre's allegations were true, they did not meet the legal threshold for defamation. The motion, along with supporting documents, was filed under seal during pre-trial proceedings. Ultimately, the district court did not grant the motion, and the case was later settled out of court under confidentiality terms in 2017.When third parties later moved to unseal portions of the sealed record, particularly filings related to the summary judgment motion, the courts determined that these materials were judicial documents subject to a strong presumption of public access. A federal appeals court ordered their partial release because Maxwell had not shown sufficient reasons to overcome the public's right of access. In other words, although Maxwell sought to dispose of the case quietly and legally via summary judgment—and shield that process from public view—those efforts were rejected, and important portions of the case were ultimately made part of the public record.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Epstein Docs - DocumentCloudBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Virginia Giuffre's response to Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for summary judgment was a direct challenge to Maxwell's attempt to dismiss the case without a trial. In her filing, Giuffre argued that Maxwell's statements denying any wrongdoing were not only defamatory, but made with actual malice—because Maxwell knew they were false when she made them. Giuffre's legal team submitted sworn testimony, supporting documentation, and detailed timelines to establish that Maxwell had played a central role in Epstein's trafficking operation and that her denials were part of a broader effort to discredit and silence victims.Virginia Giuffre's response to Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for summary judgment was a direct challenge to Maxwell's attempt to dismiss the case without a trial. In her filing, Giuffre argued that Maxwell's statements denying any wrongdoing were not only defamatory, but made with actual malice—because Maxwell knew they were false when she made them. Giuffre's legal team submitted sworn testimony, supporting documentation, and detailed timelines to establish that Maxwell had played a central role in Epstein's trafficking operation and that her denials were part of a broader effort to discredit and silence victims.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Giuffre-unseal.pdf (courthousenews.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Virginia Giuffre's response to Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for summary judgment was a direct challenge to Maxwell's attempt to dismiss the case without a trial. In her filing, Giuffre argued that Maxwell's statements denying any wrongdoing were not only defamatory, but made with actual malice—because Maxwell knew they were false when she made them. Giuffre's legal team submitted sworn testimony, supporting documentation, and detailed timelines to establish that Maxwell had played a central role in Epstein's trafficking operation and that her denials were part of a broader effort to discredit and silence victims.Virginia Giuffre's response to Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for summary judgment was a direct challenge to Maxwell's attempt to dismiss the case without a trial. In her filing, Giuffre argued that Maxwell's statements denying any wrongdoing were not only defamatory, but made with actual malice—because Maxwell knew they were false when she made them. Giuffre's legal team submitted sworn testimony, supporting documentation, and detailed timelines to establish that Maxwell had played a central role in Epstein's trafficking operation and that her denials were part of a broader effort to discredit and silence victims.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Giuffre-unseal.pdf (courthousenews.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Virginia Giuffre's response to Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for summary judgment was a direct challenge to Maxwell's attempt to dismiss the case without a trial. In her filing, Giuffre argued that Maxwell's statements denying any wrongdoing were not only defamatory, but made with actual malice—because Maxwell knew they were false when she made them. Giuffre's legal team submitted sworn testimony, supporting documentation, and detailed timelines to establish that Maxwell had played a central role in Epstein's trafficking operation and that her denials were part of a broader effort to discredit and silence victims.Virginia Giuffre's response to Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for summary judgment was a direct challenge to Maxwell's attempt to dismiss the case without a trial. In her filing, Giuffre argued that Maxwell's statements denying any wrongdoing were not only defamatory, but made with actual malice—because Maxwell knew they were false when she made them. Giuffre's legal team submitted sworn testimony, supporting documentation, and detailed timelines to establish that Maxwell had played a central role in Epstein's trafficking operation and that her denials were part of a broader effort to discredit and silence victims.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Giuffre-unseal.pdf (courthousenews.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Virginia Giuffre's response to Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for summary judgment was a direct challenge to Maxwell's attempt to dismiss the case without a trial. In her filing, Giuffre argued that Maxwell's statements denying any wrongdoing were not only defamatory, but made with actual malice—because Maxwell knew they were false when she made them. Giuffre's legal team submitted sworn testimony, supporting documentation, and detailed timelines to establish that Maxwell had played a central role in Epstein's trafficking operation and that her denials were part of a broader effort to discredit and silence victims.Virginia Giuffre's response to Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for summary judgment was a direct challenge to Maxwell's attempt to dismiss the case without a trial. In her filing, Giuffre argued that Maxwell's statements denying any wrongdoing were not only defamatory, but made with actual malice—because Maxwell knew they were false when she made them. Giuffre's legal team submitted sworn testimony, supporting documentation, and detailed timelines to establish that Maxwell had played a central role in Epstein's trafficking operation and that her denials were part of a broader effort to discredit and silence victims.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Giuffre-unseal.pdf (courthousenews.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The Metropolitan Police says it has decided not to investigate newspaper reports that Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor asked his close protection officer to gather information fourteen years ago about Virginia Giuffre, who accused him of sexual assault. He has not commented on the reports, but has consistently denied all the allegations against him. Also: Buckingham Palace says the King's delighted with the worldwide reaction to his call for more people to be screened for cancer, and: it's believed that more than 600 migrants have crossed the channel today in small boats.

C dans l'air du 13 décembre 2025 - Dossier Epstein : le compte à rebours est lancé pour TrumpDonald Trump ne parvient pas à se sortir de l'affaire Epstein. Suite à une loi signée par le président américain, un juge fédéral a ordonné mercredi, et pour la troisième fois en quelques jours, la levée du secret sur des documents judiciaires relatifs à l'affaire du criminel sexuel Jeffrey Epstein. Les révélations pourraient avoir lieu d'ici au 19 décembre, date butoir fixée par la loi.Après avoir dévoilé il y a peu les photos de la résidence de Jeffrey Epstein à Little Saint James, l'île privée des Caraïbes où il aurait organisé son trafic sexuel, des élus démocrates ont rendu publiques cette nuit de nouvelles photos. Donald Trump apparaît sur plusieurs d'entre-elles. La pression est maximale sur le locataire de la Maison-Blanche. D'autant que son comportement interroge. Alors qu'il avait estimé durant sa campagne qu'il fallait faire toute la lumière sur ce dossier, il a semblé vouloir tout faire pour étouffer l'affaire une fois revenu au pouvoir.L'affaire Epstein n'est pas la seule à agiter l'actualité américaine. La bataille entre Netflix et la Paramount pour racheter le géant du divertissement Warner Bros Discovery fait elle aussi les gros titres outre-Atlantique.Entre Netflix, le champion mondial du streaming, et la Warner, l'affaire semblait entendue. Mais la Paramount a contre-attaqué, avec une offre à 108 milliards de dollars. L'entreprise est dirigée par David Ellison, le fils du milliardaire Larry Ellison, proche de Donald Trump. L'affaire prend donc un tour politique. D'autant que l'offre comprend le rachat de la branche média de la Warner, propriétaire de la chaine de télévision CNN. Donald Trump accuse depuis longtemps cette chaine de servir ses opposants démocrates et d'être un « ennemi du peuple ». Un changement de propriétaire et de ligne éditoriale ne serait pas pour lui déplaire. S'il se défend de toute ingérence dans ce dossier, il argue que Netflix, pour des raisons juridiques anti-trust, ne pourrait peut-être pas racheter la Warner.Le président américain n'est pas la seule personnalité au cœur du scandale Epstein. Andrew, le frère de l'actuel roi Charles III, était également très proche du criminel sexuel. Virginia Giuffre, principale plaignante de l'affaire Jeffrey Epstein, avait pris la parole pour expliquer qu'Andrew l'avait violé. Andrew a depuis été déchu de son titre de prince et s'est vu retirer toutes les distinctions honorifiques liées à celui-ci.Que savait Donald Trump des crimes de Jeffrey Epstein ?Comment le président américain compte-t-il peser dans le rachat de la Warner ?Combien de personnalités ont-elles été impliquées dans les crimes de Jeffrey Epstein ?Nos experts :- Laurence HAIM - Journaliste, ancienne correspondante aux États-Unis - Auteure de « Ghislaine Maxwell, une femme amoureuse »- Lucas MENGET - Grand reporter- Jean-Bernard CADIER - Journaliste, ancien correspondant aux Etats-Unis - Auteur de « Néron à la Maison Blanche »- Anne TOULOUSE - Journaliste franco-américaine - Auteure de « L'art de trumper »

C dans l'air du 13 décembre 2025 - Dossier Epstein : le compte à rebours est lancé pour TrumpDonald Trump ne parvient pas à se sortir de l'affaire Epstein. Suite à une loi signée par le président américain, un juge fédéral a ordonné mercredi, et pour la troisième fois en quelques jours, la levée du secret sur des documents judiciaires relatifs à l'affaire du criminel sexuel Jeffrey Epstein. Les révélations pourraient avoir lieu d'ici au 19 décembre, date butoir fixée par la loi.Après avoir dévoilé il y a peu les photos de la résidence de Jeffrey Epstein à Little Saint James, l'île privée des Caraïbes où il aurait organisé son trafic sexuel, des élus démocrates ont rendu publiques cette nuit de nouvelles photos. Donald Trump apparaît sur plusieurs d'entre-elles. La pression est maximale sur le locataire de la Maison-Blanche. D'autant que son comportement interroge. Alors qu'il avait estimé durant sa campagne qu'il fallait faire toute la lumière sur ce dossier, il a semblé vouloir tout faire pour étouffer l'affaire une fois revenu au pouvoir.L'affaire Epstein n'est pas la seule à agiter l'actualité américaine. La bataille entre Netflix et la Paramount pour racheter le géant du divertissement Warner Bros Discovery fait elle aussi les gros titres outre-Atlantique.Entre Netflix, le champion mondial du streaming, et la Warner, l'affaire semblait entendue. Mais la Paramount a contre-attaqué, avec une offre à 108 milliards de dollars. L'entreprise est dirigée par David Ellison, le fils du milliardaire Larry Ellison, proche de Donald Trump. L'affaire prend donc un tour politique. D'autant que l'offre comprend le rachat de la branche média de la Warner, propriétaire de la chaine de télévision CNN. Donald Trump accuse depuis longtemps cette chaine de servir ses opposants démocrates et d'être un « ennemi du peuple ». Un changement de propriétaire et de ligne éditoriale ne serait pas pour lui déplaire. S'il se défend de toute ingérence dans ce dossier, il argue que Netflix, pour des raisons juridiques anti-trust, ne pourrait peut-être pas racheter la Warner.Le président américain n'est pas la seule personnalité au cœur du scandale Epstein. Andrew, le frère de l'actuel roi Charles III, était également très proche du criminel sexuel. Virginia Giuffre, principale plaignante de l'affaire Jeffrey Epstein, avait pris la parole pour expliquer qu'Andrew l'avait violé. Andrew a depuis été déchu de son titre de prince et s'est vu retirer toutes les distinctions honorifiques liées à celui-ci.Que savait Donald Trump des crimes de Jeffrey Epstein ?Comment le président américain compte-t-il peser dans le rachat de la Warner ?Combien de personnalités ont-elles été impliquées dans les crimes de Jeffrey Epstein ?Nos experts :- Laurence HAIM - Journaliste, ancienne correspondante aux États-Unis - Auteure de « Ghislaine Maxwell, une femme amoureuse »- Lucas MENGET - Grand reporter- Jean-Bernard CADIER - Journaliste, ancien correspondant aux Etats-Unis - Auteur de « Néron à la Maison Blanche »- Anne TOULOUSE - Journaliste franco-américaine - Auteure de « L'art de trumper »

In her Second Amended Response to Maxwell's discovery demands, Virginia Giuffre pushed back aggressively, refusing to yield to Maxwell's attempts to broaden discovery into intrusive and irrelevant personal and psychological domains. She objected to Maxwell's sprawling requests as overly burdensome, unduly invasive, and aimed at discrediting her through unnecessary exposure rather than legitimate legal pursuit. Giuffre instead reinforced her focus on evidence directly tied to the defamation claims and trafficking allegations, contesting any effort by Maxwell to turn the process into a fishing expedition or reputation‑smearing exercise under the guise of legal procedure.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:epstein-documents-943-pages - DocumentCloudBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In her Second Amended Response to Maxwell's discovery demands, Virginia Giuffre pushed back aggressively, refusing to yield to Maxwell's attempts to broaden discovery into intrusive and irrelevant personal and psychological domains. She objected to Maxwell's sprawling requests as overly burdensome, unduly invasive, and aimed at discrediting her through unnecessary exposure rather than legitimate legal pursuit. Giuffre instead reinforced her focus on evidence directly tied to the defamation claims and trafficking allegations, contesting any effort by Maxwell to turn the process into a fishing expedition or reputation‑smearing exercise under the guise of legal procedure.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:epstein-documents-943-pages - DocumentCloudBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In her Second Amended Response to Maxwell's discovery demands, Virginia Giuffre pushed back aggressively, refusing to yield to Maxwell's attempts to broaden discovery into intrusive and irrelevant personal and psychological domains. She objected to Maxwell's sprawling requests as overly burdensome, unduly invasive, and aimed at discrediting her through unnecessary exposure rather than legitimate legal pursuit. Giuffre instead reinforced her focus on evidence directly tied to the defamation claims and trafficking allegations, contesting any effort by Maxwell to turn the process into a fishing expedition or reputation‑smearing exercise under the guise of legal procedure.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:epstein-documents-943-pages - DocumentCloudBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Even from behind bars, Ghislaine Maxwell has remained a steadfast and vocal defender of Prince Andrew, clinging to a narrative of innocence that defies the mountain of public scrutiny and survivor testimony. In interviews and through intermediaries, Maxwell has repeatedly insisted that the infamous photo of Prince Andrew with Virginia Giuffre—his arm around her bare waist, Maxwell herself grinning in the background—is either doctored or misrepresented. This denial comes despite the fact that the image has been widely authenticated and corroborated by multiple individuals, including Giuffre. Maxwell's unwavering defense appears less about truth and more about protecting a shared past—one steeped in elite privilege, mutual secrets, and potentially incriminating knowledge. Her loyalty to Andrew reads not as moral conviction, but as a desperate act of preservation for a world that once protected them both.What stands out about Maxwell's continued defense of Prince Andrew is how consistent it has remained, even after her own conviction. Rather than expressing any accountability or reflecting on the damage caused by the trafficking ring she was convicted of helping to run, Maxwell has chosen to double down on denying Andrew's involvement. She's made repeated claims that the photo of Andrew with Virginia Giuffre is fake, despite no credible evidence to support that. Her stance seems rooted less in legal strategy and more in loyalty to past allies. It suggests that, even in prison, Maxwell is still protecting the network of high-profile individuals connected to Epstein, perhaps in the hope that continued silence or allegiance might one day benefit her.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Ghislaine Maxwell offers no apology to Epstein victims | Daily Mail Online

Even from behind bars, Ghislaine Maxwell has remained a steadfast and vocal defender of Prince Andrew, clinging to a narrative of innocence that defies the mountain of public scrutiny and survivor testimony. In interviews and through intermediaries, Maxwell has repeatedly insisted that the infamous photo of Prince Andrew with Virginia Giuffre—his arm around her bare waist, Maxwell herself grinning in the background—is either doctored or misrepresented. This denial comes despite the fact that the image has been widely authenticated and corroborated by multiple individuals, including Giuffre. Maxwell's unwavering defense appears less about truth and more about protecting a shared past—one steeped in elite privilege, mutual secrets, and potentially incriminating knowledge. Her loyalty to Andrew reads not as moral conviction, but as a desperate act of preservation for a world that once protected them both.What stands out about Maxwell's continued defense of Prince Andrew is how consistent it has remained, even after her own conviction. Rather than expressing any accountability or reflecting on the damage caused by the trafficking ring she was convicted of helping to run, Maxwell has chosen to double down on denying Andrew's involvement. She's made repeated claims that the photo of Andrew with Virginia Giuffre is fake, despite no credible evidence to support that. Her stance seems rooted less in legal strategy and more in loyalty to past allies. It suggests that, even in prison, Maxwell is still protecting the network of high-profile individuals connected to Epstein, perhaps in the hope that continued silence or allegiance might one day benefit her.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Ghislaine Maxwell offers no apology to Epstein victims | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Sky Roberts described how he personally drove his pickup truck to the house of Jeffrey Epstein to meet him and Ghislaine Maxwell after his then-teenage daughter Virginia Giuffre was offered a job as a masseuse. He said Epstein seemed like “a regular guy” and Maxwell appeared friendly — nothing that suggested to him the abuse that would later come to light. Roberts said he believed at the time he was simply doing his parental duty by checking out the job offer his daughter accepted, and insisted he had no clue Epstein was a pedophile or that his daughter would be exploited. According to him, Virginia “never came home from trips and said, ‘I've been sexually abused'” — and because she never described it to him, he remained completely unaware of what was really happening.In later public remarks, Roberts reaffirmed that he believed his daughter's allegations were real. He backed the authenticity of a widely circulated photograph showing Giuffre with Epstein's associates, saying she had shown him the original years before she went public — meaning it wasn't doctored. He called Epstein and Maxwell “despicable,” condemning how they abused wealth and power to prey on vulnerable young women. He also criticized those — including powerful men — whom he feels escaped real accountability.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Prince Andrew's relationship with Jeffrey Epstein was not a mistake—it was a calculated choice sustained over years, even after Epstein's conviction for sex crimes. The Duke of York didn't distance himself from Epstein—he doubled down, staying at his Manhattan mansion and walking through Central Park with him while the world watched. When accused by Virginia Giuffre of raping her while she was a trafficked teenager, Andrew responded not with cooperation or humility, but with denials, absurd alibis, and a multi-million dollar settlement to avoid testifying under oath. The infamous Newsnight interview only cemented his arrogance, exposing a man more concerned with salvaging his reputation than acknowledging the suffering of Epstein's victims.What followed was a carefully managed retreat from public life. The monarchy, under increasing pressure, stripped Prince Andrew of his titles and public duties—not out of moral reckoning, but as a necessary step to contain the fallout. The legal system never pursued criminal charges, and media coverage often focused more on the royal family's image than the underlying allegations. Virginia Giuffre, through her persistence, brought global attention to a case that might otherwise have remained buried. In the end, Prince Andrew's reputation remains permanently damaged, but the broader questions about accountability, privilege, and institutional protection remain unresolved.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Prince Andrew's relationship with Jeffrey Epstein was not a mistake—it was a calculated choice sustained over years, even after Epstein's conviction for sex crimes. The Duke of York didn't distance himself from Epstein—he doubled down, staying at his Manhattan mansion and walking through Central Park with him while the world watched. When accused by Virginia Giuffre of raping her while she was a trafficked teenager, Andrew responded not with cooperation or humility, but with denials, absurd alibis, and a multi-million dollar settlement to avoid testifying under oath. The infamous Newsnight interview only cemented his arrogance, exposing a man more concerned with salvaging his reputation than acknowledging the suffering of Epstein's victims.What followed was a carefully managed retreat from public life. The monarchy, under increasing pressure, stripped Prince Andrew of his titles and public duties—not out of moral reckoning, but as a necessary step to contain the fallout. The legal system never pursued criminal charges, and media coverage often focused more on the royal family's image than the underlying allegations. Virginia Giuffre, through her persistence, brought global attention to a case that might otherwise have remained buried. In the end, Prince Andrew's reputation remains permanently damaged, but the broader questions about accountability, privilege, and institutional protection remain unresolved.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

After Epstein's 2008 non-prosecution deal — which Dershowitz helped negotiate — Dershowitz found himself accused by one of Epstein's alleged victims, Virginia Giuffre, of having been trafficked by Epstein. Dershowitz vehemently denied the allegation and counter-sued, claiming Giuffre and her lawyers were engaged in an extortion scheme aimed not only at him but at Wexner, whom Dershowitz said Giuffre and her team threatened privately. In connection with that countersuit, Dershowitz deposed Wexner in early 2022, pointing to Wexner as a potential target of alleged extortion and arguing that any civil-suit payout should ultimately come from him rather than from Dershowitz.But Wexner's camp pushed back hard. Attorneys for Wexner flatly denied that any extortion demand had ever been made, denied that any settlement had been entered into, and said no money or other consideration was ever paid. They asserted Wexner “had no involvement” and lacked “any personal knowledge relating to” Dershowitz's “extortion claim.” That denial undermined a central plank of Dershowitz's countersuit. Meanwhile, Wexner had previously publicly stated that he “regretted” his association with Epstein — noting that Epstein had misappropriated substantial sums from him.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

After Epstein's 2008 non-prosecution deal — which Dershowitz helped negotiate — Dershowitz found himself accused by one of Epstein's alleged victims, Virginia Giuffre, of having been trafficked by Epstein. Dershowitz vehemently denied the allegation and counter-sued, claiming Giuffre and her lawyers were engaged in an extortion scheme aimed not only at him but at Wexner, whom Dershowitz said Giuffre and her team threatened privately. In connection with that countersuit, Dershowitz deposed Wexner in early 2022, pointing to Wexner as a potential target of alleged extortion and arguing that any civil-suit payout should ultimately come from him rather than from Dershowitz.But Wexner's camp pushed back hard. Attorneys for Wexner flatly denied that any extortion demand had ever been made, denied that any settlement had been entered into, and said no money or other consideration was ever paid. They asserted Wexner “had no involvement” and lacked “any personal knowledge relating to” Dershowitz's “extortion claim.” That denial undermined a central plank of Dershowitz's countersuit. Meanwhile, Wexner had previously publicly stated that he “regretted” his association with Epstein — noting that Epstein had misappropriated substantial sums from him.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

New reporting has intensified scrutiny around Prince Andrew following allegations that he sent a young woman to Jeffrey Epstein, who subsequently reported being sexually abused by Epstein. According to accounts now under renewed examination, Andrew allegedly facilitated the introduction under the guise of networking and opportunity, despite the well-known concerns already circulating within elite circles about Epstein's predatory behavior. If accurate, the allegation positions Andrew not as a peripheral figure who exercised poor judgment, but as an active participant who enabled access to a victim who later suffered harm. It also raises profound questions about what Andrew knew, when he knew it, and whether he deliberately ignored the warning signs attached to Epstein's reputation.The allegation further undermines Andrew's long-standing public defense that he was simply “unaware” of Epstein's criminal behavior and maintained only a surface-level association. Instead, it depicts a scenario in which he may have used his status to funnel women into Epstein's social orbit while simultaneously portraying himself as detached and uninvolved. Legal analysts and victim-advocacy groups argue that this development demands formal investigation rather than public relations statements or royal damage control. If corroborated, this would represent a grave escalation in Andrew's alleged misconduct — shifting the narrative from questionable association to potential facilitation of abuse, with implications that extend far beyond personal embarrassment or reputational decline.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Andrew told Epstein victim: I know he's been 'inappropriate' with another woman... a YEAR before ex-prince met his accuser Virginia Giuffre, lawyers for abused actress claim | Daily Mail Online

Prince Andrew's relationship with Jeffrey Epstein was not a mistake—it was a calculated choice sustained over years, even after Epstein's conviction for sex crimes. The Duke of York didn't distance himself from Epstein—he doubled down, staying at his Manhattan mansion and walking through Central Park with him while the world watched. When accused by Virginia Giuffre of raping her while she was a trafficked teenager, Andrew responded not with cooperation or humility, but with denials, absurd alibis, and a multi-million dollar settlement to avoid testifying under oath. The infamous Newsnight interview only cemented his arrogance, exposing a man more concerned with salvaging his reputation than acknowledging the suffering of Epstein's victims.What followed was a carefully managed retreat from public life. The monarchy, under increasing pressure, stripped Prince Andrew of his titles and public duties—not out of moral reckoning, but as a necessary step to contain the fallout. The legal system never pursued criminal charges, and media coverage often focused more on the royal family's image than the underlying allegations. Virginia Giuffre, through her persistence, brought global attention to a case that might otherwise have remained buried. In the end, Prince Andrew's reputation remains permanently damaged, but the broader questions about accountability, privilege, and institutional protection remain unresolved.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

According to public autopsy records, many people regarded as whistleblowers have died by s*icide.  Virginia Giuffre is one of Epstein's most outspoken victims who has spent her life fighting to bring Epstein and Ghislaine to justice.  At 17 years old she is photographed with “Prince” Andrew whose hand is wrapped around her waist.  By her late 20s she's best known for exposing that picture to the public and testifying to the trafficking she was subjected to by some of the world's elite.  Yet now, as of April 25th, 2025, Virginia Giuffre is dead. Leaving behind a manuscript titled “Nobody's Girl” detailing the 2 years she was trafficking by Epstein to limitlessly powerful people. Before her death she emails two confidants:  “In the event of my passing, I would like to ensure that “Nobody's Girl” is still released...” Sent April 1, 2025. April 25, 2025, Virginia Giuffre will be found dead. Her death ruled as a s*icide less than a month after her email and a few years after she made the following tweet on X:  “I am making it publicly known that in no way, shape, or form am I s*icidal. I have made this known to my therapist and GP– if something happens to me– in the sake of my family do not let this go away and help me protect them. Too many evil people want to see me quieted.”  Now, a lot can change in a few years, including someone's mental state. But with the Epstein case and files...  Everyone feels like a suspect.Everyone has money. Everyone has power. And everyone has a lot to lose.   Full show notes available at RottenMangoPodcast.com Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Vincent F Amen - Rina Oh Vs Virginia GiuffreNovember 5Vincent F Amen brings his research into the current state and background of the legal case for Diversity-Libel, Assault, and Slander brought against Virginia Giuffre. With Giuffre's passing earlier this year, it's a particularly complicated case.But there's much which isn't in the public domain, and Vincent has the goods.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-opperman-report--1198501/support.

Virginia Giuffre publicly declared that she intended to push forward with her abuse case against Prince Andrew — not for a quiet settlement, but with the aim of full legal exposure. She said she was prepared to “destroy” the former royal's defenses in civil court, seeking accountability, damages, and a judgment that could leave him “penniless” should she prevail. Her stance was that powerful status and privilege would not shield him from the consequences of the alleged abuse and trafficking tied to the broader network of Jeffrey Epstein.The announcement sent shockwaves through Buckingham Palace and across the public arena, as many saw it as a long-overdue confrontation with a man who had repeatedly tried to hide behind privilege, denial, and carefully manufactured PR. Critics argued that Andrew had spent years dodging responsibility — giving disastrous interviews, hiding behind his titles, and attempting to paint himself as a victim rather than addressing serious allegations with honesty or transparency. The prospect of Giuffre dragging him into open court threatened to strip away every layer of protection he enjoyed, exposing not only his personal conduct but the institution that propped him up.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

New reporting has intensified scrutiny around Prince Andrew following allegations that he sent a young woman to Jeffrey Epstein, who subsequently reported being sexually abused by Epstein. According to accounts now under renewed examination, Andrew allegedly facilitated the introduction under the guise of networking and opportunity, despite the well-known concerns already circulating within elite circles about Epstein's predatory behavior. If accurate, the allegation positions Andrew not as a peripheral figure who exercised poor judgment, but as an active participant who enabled access to a victim who later suffered harm. It also raises profound questions about what Andrew knew, when he knew it, and whether he deliberately ignored the warning signs attached to Epstein's reputation.The allegation further undermines Andrew's long-standing public defense that he was simply “unaware” of Epstein's criminal behavior and maintained only a surface-level association. Instead, it depicts a scenario in which he may have used his status to funnel women into Epstein's social orbit while simultaneously portraying himself as detached and uninvolved. Legal analysts and victim-advocacy groups argue that this development demands formal investigation rather than public relations statements or royal damage control. If corroborated, this would represent a grave escalation in Andrew's alleged misconduct — shifting the narrative from questionable association to potential facilitation of abuse, with implications that extend far beyond personal embarrassment or reputational decline.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Andrew told Epstein victim: I know he's been 'inappropriate' with another woman... a YEAR before ex-prince met his accuser Virginia Giuffre, lawyers for abused actress claim | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

According to public autopsy records, many people regarded as whistleblowers have died by s*icide.  Virginia Giuffre is one of Epstein's most outspoken victims who has spent her life fighting to bring Epstein and Ghislaine to justice.  At 17 years old she is photographed with “Prince” Andrew whose hand is wrapped around her waist.  By her late 20s she's best known for exposing that picture to the public and testifying to the trafficking she was subjected to by some of the world's elite.  Yet now, as of April 25th, 2025, Virginia Giuffre is dead. Leaving behind a manuscript titled “Nobody's Girl” detailing the 2 years she was trafficking by Epstein to limitlessly powerful people. Before her death she emails two confidants:  “In the event of my passing, I would like to ensure that “Nobody's Girl” is still released...” Sent April 1, 2025. April 25, 2025, Virginia Giuffre will be found dead. Her death ruled as a s*icide less than a month after her email and a few years after she made the following tweet on X:  “I am making it publicly known that in no way, shape, or form am I s*icidal. I have made this known to my therapist and GP– if something happens to me– in the sake of my family do not let this go away and help me protect them. Too many evil people want to see me quieted.”  Now, a lot can change in a few years, including someone's mental state. But with the Epstein case and files...  Everyone feels like a suspect.Everyone has money. Everyone has power. And everyone has a lot to lose.   Full show notes available at RottenMangoPodcast.com Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

When Queen Elizabeth II removed Prince Andrew's military titles, royal patronages, and the style of “His Royal Highness” in an official capacity, the atmosphere in the United Kingdom and across the Commonwealth was one of shock mixed with a sense of inevitability. Public pressure had been building for months as scrutiny intensified surrounding his involvement with Jeffrey Epstein and the lawsuit brought against him by Virginia Giuffre. The announcement marked an unprecedented moment in modern royal history: a reigning monarch publicly distancing the institution from her own son. To many, it signaled that the monarchy was feeling the weight of public opinion and was forced to prioritize its survival and credibility over internal loyalty. The tone was somber, historic, and heavy — a stark break from the tradition of quiet internal discipline.The fallout was immediate. Military organizations expressed relief that affiliation with Andrew had been removed, as members had been openly demanding his separation from regimental roles to protect their integrity. Charities and institutions withdrew or declined his patronage, concerned that association would damage their reputations. Inside the royal family, the move reinforced the perception of Andrew as isolated and diminished, stripped of official duties and effectively exiled from frontline public life. It also intensified the broader conversation about accountability, privilege, and the future of the monarchy amid escalating scandals. For supporters of the crown, the decision was seen as necessary triage; for critics, it was viewed as a long-overdue acknowledgment of the gravity surrounding the allegations and his relationship with Epstein. The event permanently altered Andrew's standing and foreshadowed the deeper crises the royal family would continue to face.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Epstein survivor Anouska De Georgiou says Ghislaine Maxwell introduced her to Donald Trump with a clear intention of trafficking her to the billionaire. But Anouska says Trump refused: “at no time did President Trump behave with any impropriety with me.” De Georgiou – a friend of the lated Virginia Giuffre – joins with other Epstein survivors including model Lisa Phillips, who are urging Trump to release the full Epstein files to the public. Comedian Ryan Sickler discusses his battle with Factor V Leiden, a rare blood clotting condition, and Chef Gruel joins with pro turkey tips for Thanksgiving. Anouska De Georgiou founded the Kintsugi Foundation to support women in recovery. She grew up between London and the south of France and is a survivor of abuse and trafficking by Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. She has been in recovery since age 26 and now supports women healing from trauma. More at https://instagram.com/anouskadegeorgiou Lisa Phillips is an Epstein survivor who has advocated for the full release of Epstein's case files. She suffered abuse at 21 and continues to speak publicly about accountability and transparency surrounding the case. She is a model who has appeared on multiple magazine covers. Learn more at https://instagram.com/iamLisaPhillips⠀Ryan Sickler is a comedian and host of The HoneyDew. His special Live & Alive is available on YouTube and Patreon, and his 2018 album Get a Hold of Yourself reached #1 on Billboard and iTunes. Follow at https://x.com/ryansickler Chef Andrew Gruel is a food entrepreneur, Huntington Beach City Councilor, and founder of American Gravy Restaurant Group. He hosts American Gravy on Rumble and is active in small business advocacy. Follow at https://x.com/ChefGruel 「 SUPPORT OUR SPONSORS 」 • AUGUSTA PRECIOUS METALS – Thousands of Americans are moving portions of their retirement into physical gold & silver. Learn more in this 3-minute report from our friends at Augusta Precious Metals: ⁠⁠⁠https://drdrew.com/gold⁠⁠⁠ or text DREW to 35052 ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠• FATTY15 – The future of essential fatty acids is here! Strengthen your cells against age-related breakdown with Fatty15. Get 15% off a 90-day Starter Kit Subscription at ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://drdrew.com/fatty15⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ • PALEOVALLEY - "Paleovalley has a wide variety of extraordinary products that are both healthful and delicious,” says Dr. Drew. "I am a huge fan of this brand and know you'll love it too!” Get 15% off your first order at ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://drdrew.com/paleovalley⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ • VSHREDMD – Formulated by Dr. Drew: The Science of Cellular Health + World-Class Training Programs, Premium Content, and 1-1 Training with Certified V Shred Coaches! More at https://drdrew.com/vshredmd • THE WELLNESS COMPANY - Counteract harmful spike proteins with TWC's Signature Series Spike Support Formula containing nattokinase and selenium. Learn more about TWC's supplements at ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://twc.health/drew⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ 「 ABOUT THE SHOW 」 Ask Dr. Drew is produced by Kaleb Nation (⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://kalebnation.com⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠) and Susan Pinsky (⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://twitter.com/firstladyoflov⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠e⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠). This show is for entertainment and/or informational purposes only, and is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Executive Producers • Kaleb Nation - ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://kalebnation.com⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ • Susan Pinsky - ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://x.com/firstladyoflove⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Content Producer & Booking • Emily Barsh - ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://x.com/emilytvproducer⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Hosted By • Dr. Drew Pinsky - ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://x.com/drdrew⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Vincent F Amen brings his research into the current state and background of the legal case for Diversity-Libel, Assault, and Slander brought against Virginia Giuffre. With Giuffre's passing earlier this year, it's a particularly complicated case.But there's much which isn't in the public domain, and Vincent has the goods.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-opperman-report--1198501/support.

The latest circus around Virginia Roberts' estate is exactly the kind of revolting greed-fest that makes people lose faith in humanity. Instead of honoring the memory of a woman who survived hell and spent years fighting for justice, we now have her former lawyer and her housekeeper crawling out of the woodwork, demanding pieces of her estate like vultures circling a fresh body. Virginia's sons—the people who should unquestionably be first in line to inherit—are now forced to battle against outsiders who had no blood or lifelong bond to her, only financial interest. It's hard to stomach the audacity: to watch people who claim to have cared for her now scrambling over money before the ground is even settled on her grave.It's beyond disgraceful. These aren't distant corporations or opportunistic strangers—these are people who supposedly stood beside Virginia during her fight, now positioning themselves against her own children for a share of the estate. They're actually arguing that they somehow “deserve” it, as if proximity to tragedy gives you title to the spoils. The sheer gall of trying to pry money away from her sons—kids who have endured more pain and public trauma than most families could ever imagine—is nauseating. It's an ugly reminder that greed doesn't sleep, grief doesn't protect anyone, and when money is on the table, masks come off and the knives come out.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Sons of Virginia Giuffre, who accused Andrew and Epstein, seek control of her estate - ABC News

The 2009 settlement between Virginia Roberts (now Virginia Giuffre) and Jeffrey Epstein was a confidential agreement reached in the aftermath of her filing a civil lawsuit in federal court in Florida, accusing Epstein of sexual abuse and trafficking her to his powerful associates while she was a minor. Rather than proceed to trial, Epstein opted to settle the case privately, paying Roberts $500,000 in exchange for the dismissal of the lawsuit. The settlement was drafted to include a broad release clause shielding Epstein and a long list of unnamed “potential defendants,” which was widely interpreted as an attempt to protect influential individuals within Epstein's network who might have faced future litigation. The agreement included standard nondisclosure provisions that barred Roberts from publicly discussing details of what she endured.For years, the terms of the settlement remained sealed, fueling public speculation and legal battles about who exactly benefited from the release language. It re-entered the spotlight in later years, especially during litigation involving Prince Andrew, whose legal team argued that the 2009 settlement insulated him from Roberts' 2021 lawsuit alleging sexual assault. When the agreement was unsealed in 2021, the $500,000 payout and the sweeping protections it appeared to offer were confirmed, sparking public outrage and intensified scrutiny of how Epstein used financial leverage to suppress accusations and protect himself and others within his orbit. The unsealing demonstrated how carefully orchestrated legal settlements were used as part of a long-term strategy to silence survivors and prevent broader accountability.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The latest circus around Virginia Roberts' estate is exactly the kind of revolting greed-fest that makes people lose faith in humanity. Instead of honoring the memory of a woman who survived hell and spent years fighting for justice, we now have her former lawyer and her housekeeper crawling out of the woodwork, demanding pieces of her estate like vultures circling a fresh body. Virginia's sons—the people who should unquestionably be first in line to inherit—are now forced to battle against outsiders who had no blood or lifelong bond to her, only financial interest. It's hard to stomach the audacity: to watch people who claim to have cared for her now scrambling over money before the ground is even settled on her grave.It's beyond disgraceful. These aren't distant corporations or opportunistic strangers—these are people who supposedly stood beside Virginia during her fight, now positioning themselves against her own children for a share of the estate. They're actually arguing that they somehow “deserve” it, as if proximity to tragedy gives you title to the spoils. The sheer gall of trying to pry money away from her sons—kids who have endured more pain and public trauma than most families could ever imagine—is nauseating. It's an ugly reminder that greed doesn't sleep, grief doesn't protect anyone, and when money is on the table, masks come off and the knives come out.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Sons of Virginia Giuffre, who accused Andrew and Epstein, seek control of her estate - ABC NewsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

A fierce legal battle is now erupting over Virginia Roberts' estate after it was revealed she died without a will, leaving the distribution of her assets open to contention. Under Australian inheritance law, her estranged husband, Robert Giuffre, would normally receive a lump sum and roughly one-third of the estate by default. However, that expectation has been shaken by the existence of a letter Virginia allegedly sent to her lawyer, explicitly stating that she did not want her husband to receive anything in the event of her death. That letter, while not a formal will, may now become a critical piece of evidence in court as her children and siblings argue that her true wishes should override the standard legal formula. Instead of clarity, the lack of a legally binding will has opened the door to conflict, emotion, and potential litigation among those closest to her.The situation is further complicated by the unresolved lawsuit involving Rina Oh, which must be factored into the estate's value before any division can occur. With substantial money at stake and multiple parties claiming rightful authority, the probate process is set to become a long, messy fight that could drag on for months or even years. What should have been a time of collective mourning has instead become a battlefield, with each side preparing to weaponize legal arguments, personal history, and Virginia's final communications to support their claims. For someone whose life was defined by survival, struggle, and fighting systems of power, the tragedy now lies in watching her legacy become entangled in a war over control, money, and interpretation.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Virginia Giuffre's family is at war over who gets Andrew's multi-million payout after she died without leaving a will | Daily Mail Online

In this episode of the Uploft Interior Design Podcast, I share my personal reflections on Thanksgiving, discussing my small family dynamics and the various ways I've celebrated the holiday over the years. I then dive into a listener question from Theresa in Harrisburg, who is looking to modernize her entertainment center. I provide design advice on wall-mounted TVs and alternative storage solutions to enhance her space. In the second half, I discuss Virginia Giuffre's memoir, "Nobody's Girl," sharing my thoughts on the important themes of sexual abuse and the need for ongoing awareness beyond the Me Too movement. I encourage listeners to consider adding this impactful book to their holiday wish list and remind everyone to tune in next week for more design insights and pop culture discussions. Timestamps: 00:00:00 - Thanksgiving Reflections00:04:04 - Design Advice Introduction00:04:37 - Listener Question from Theresa00:10:39 - Design Solutions for Theresa's Entertainment Center00:16:18 - Virginia Giuffre Book Recommendation00:24:39 - Closing Thoughts and Next Week's Preview Links: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Uploft.com⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠AffordableInteriorDesign.com⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Submit your design questions⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ to be featured on the show ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Become a Premium Member⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ and access the bonus episodes Click ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠here⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ to become an interior designer with Uploft's Interior Design Academy. Get Betsy's book: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠betsyhelmuth.com/book⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠For more about our residential interior design services, visit ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ModernInteriorDesign.com⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ For our commercial interior design services, visit ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠OfficeInteriorDesign.com⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Follow Us: Instagram: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠@uploftinteriordesign⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Facebook: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠facebook.com/UploftIntDes⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ TikTok: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠tiktok.com/@uploftinteriordesign⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ LinkedIn: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠linkedin.com/company/uploft-interior-design⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ If you enjoy the show, please spread the word and leave a review on iTunes! Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

This week we bring you an episode from Question Everything, another KCRW podcast. Host Brian Reed brings together the reporters who know the Jeffrey Epstein case best – along with one of their Trump-supporting producers – for drinks and a candid, no-holds-barred conversation. They compare notes, challenge each other's assumptions, and reveal what it really takes to separate fact from rumor in a story that has tested the limits of journalism.It's one of the most provocative and confronting discussions Brian's ever hosted about power, accountability and what's at stake when the media goes up against billionaires and their networks.Check out the Question Everything Substack, by the way, where we get into juicy behind the scenes details and other good stuff from our episodes. “Question Everything” is a production of KCRW and Placement Theory.Drinking and fact-checking don't always go hand in hand, so clarifying and correcting a few statements from the conversation here – which honestly in themselves give a sense of just how many crannies of global power the tendrils of the Epstein story reach into. We reached out to Anouska De Georgiou to see if she wanted to comment, but we didn't hear back. Leslie Wexner is not the founder of Victoria's Secret – he bought the company in 1982, and he said Jeffrey Epstein had stolen $46 million from him, not $60 million. Meanwhile investor Leon Black paid Epstein $170 million for supposed tax advice – not $160 million. Virginia Giuffre sued Prince Andrew as an individual, not the Crown itself. Tara Palmeri's reporting that Elon Musk dm'd Virgina Giuffre saying Trump would release the files is based on Virginia telling her this – Tara didn't see the DM. At one point, Eric says that in 2015, Roger Stone called Epstein's island a “democrat orgy island.” Really, Stone wrote a book excoriating the Clintons called The Clinton's War on Women, and there's a chapter in there called Orgy Island, which highlights Bill Clinton's friendship with Epstein. So Roger Stone didn't call Epstein's island a democrat orgy island. Just “orgy island.” And last, but not least: the pope who was in a picture with Jeffrey Epstein, which was displayed on Epstein's credenza, was John Paul II.

Monday, November 17th, 2025Today, Epstein survivors confirm that Trump killed a Biden-era investigation into the Epstein files; the Comey case is on thin ice as a judge demands missing grand jury tapes; Mike Flynn is in talks with Trump's DOJ for a $50M settlement as the regime continues to loot the Treasury; the Trump administration is killing Biden's cash payments for delayed and canceled flights; Ghislaine Maxwell emailed her lawyer from prison about a commutation; Indiana ignores pressure from Trump and refuses to redraw their maps; the Trump administration is lifting some tariffs because of high prices; a Judge indefinitely bars Trump from fining University of California over alleged discrimination; and Allison and Dana Deliver your Good News.Thank You, DeleteMeGet 20% off your DeleteMe plan when you go to joindeleteme.com/DAILYBEANS and use promo code DAILYBEANS at checkout. Thank You, Naked WinesTo get 6 bottles of wine for $39.99, head to nakedwines.com/DAILYBEANS and use code DAILYBEANS for both the code and password.Guest: Adam KlasfeldAll Rise NewsAll Rise News - Bluesky, @klasfeldreports.com - BlueSky, @KlasfeldReports - Twitter, @senecaprojectus - InstagramRising This Week: Bolton's road to trial beginsThe E. Jean Carroll Experience: She **Is** Our Type! With E. Jean Carroll | Feminist Buzzkills!LIVE: WOW! Trump PULLS PLUG on KEY INVESTIGATION Into THE FILESComey prosecutor issues Day 2 denial on grand jury records (Klasfeld Live with Allison Gill)StoriesMichael Flynn, DOJ in Settlement Talks Over $50 Million Claim | BloombergIndiana won't redraw congressional maps due to lack of votes in Senate | WISHTV  Indianapolis NewsTrump Administration Scraps Cash Payments for Delayed or Canceled Flights | The New York TimesHouse Democrats press DOJ for details on Epstein co-conspirators probe that was "inexplicably killed" | CBS NewsPrison employees have been terminated after Ghislaine Maxwell's email messages were shared, her lawyer says | CNN PoliticsTrump Administration Lifts Some Food Tariffs in Effort to Ease Prices | The New York TimesJudge indefinitely bars Trump from fining University of California over alleged discrimination | AP News Good TroubleIf you're hearing right-wing media insist that the redacted name in the Epstein email is Virginia Giuffre, here's the simplest response: prove it.If Republicans claim the redacted Epstein email name is Virginia Giuffre, tell your House rep: “Prove it. Lift the redaction. If it's her, show it. If you can't, say so.”And if your rep is a Democrat — especially on House Oversight — ask them to demand transparency on that redaction. Find Your Representative | house.gov→Contacting U.S. Senators Find Your Representative | house.gov**Mutual Aid Relief Fund, Mutual Aid Hub, GiveDirectly.org/snap**Group Directory - The Visibility Brigade: Resistance is Possible**Vote Yes 836 - Oklahoma is gathering signatures**How to Organize a Bearing Witness Standout**Indiana teacher snitch portal - Eyes on Education**Find Your Representative | house.gov, Contacting U.S. Senators Our Donation LinksNational Security Counselors - Donate, MSW Media, Blue Wave CA Victory Fund | ActBlue, WhistleblowerAid.org/beansFederal workers - email AG at fedoath@pm.me and let me know what you're going to do, or just vent. I'm always here to listen. Find Upcoming Actions 50501 Movement, No Kings.org, Indivisible.orgDr. Allison Gill - Substack, BlueSky , TikTok, IG, TwitterDana Goldberg - The 2025 Out100, BlueSky, Twitter, IG, facebook, danagoldberg.comMore from MSW Media - Shows - MSW Media, Cleanup On Aisle 45 pod, The Breakdown | SubstackReminder - you can see the pod pics if you become a Patron. The good news pics are at the bottom of the show notes of each Patreon episode! That's just one of the perks of subscribing! patreon.com/muellershewrote Our Donation LinksNational Security Counselors - DonateMSW Media, Blue Wave California Victory Fund | ActBlueWhistleblowerAid.org/beansFederal workers - feel free to email AG at fedoath@pm.me and let me know what you're going to do, or just vent. I'm always here to listen. Find Upcoming Actions 50501 Movement, No Kings.org, Indivisible.orgDr. Allison Gill - Substack, BlueSky , TikTok, IG, TwitterDana Goldberg - BlueSky, Twitter, IG, facebook, danagoldberg.comCheck out more from MSW Media - Shows - MSW Media, Cleanup On Aisle 45 pod, The Breakdown | SubstackShare your Good News or Good TroubleMSW Good News and Good TroubleHave some good news; a confession; or a correction to share?Good News & Confessions - The Daily Beanshttps://www.dailybeanspod.com/confessional/ Listener Survey:http://survey.podtrac.com/start-survey.aspx?pubid=BffJOlI7qQcF&ver=shortFollow the Podcast on Apple:The Daily Beans on Apple PodcastsWant to support the show and get it ad-free and early?The Daily Beans | SupercastThe Daily Beans & Mueller, She Wrote | PatreonThe Daily Beans | Apple Podcasts Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

On Wednesday's Mark Levin Show, in chapter two of "American Marxism," titled "Breeding Mobs," it explains how mass movements devour individual identity and uniqueness, rendering people indistinguishable while assigning group identities based on race, age, or income to foster class distinctions and divisions.  These movements attract disenchanted, disaffected, and maladjusted individuals who blame external factors like the system or others for their conditions, lured by utopian promises and criticisms of society, where improving their lot ties to the cause and disparaging the successful becomes a tactic to instill meaning and self-worth.  Ultimately, these movements rely on deceit, propaganda, intimidation, and force, leading to scapegoating, violence, and totalitarianism.  Just think of figures like Bernie Sanders, AOC, Nick Fuentes, Steve Bannon, Alex Jones, Tucker Carlson, and their supporters. Also, Democrats are trying to insinuate that Trump spent significant time with Virginia Giuffre and possibly engaged in untoward behavior. However, Giuffre herself stated in 2016 that Trump was never involved in any improper conduct with her and that she witnessed nothing inappropriate. Democrats redacting Giuffre's name in leaked emails was intentional to fabricate a scandal, similar to the Russia hoax. Later, Gov Greg Abbott calls in and explains that he shut down the proposed EPIC center in the Dallas area, an Islamic-only development, through a new law that bans no-go zones, prohibits discriminatory land sales or rentals based on Islam, mandates disputes be resolved under Texas laws and courts rather than Sharia law, and empowers the Attorney General to close such projects. He also outlined a multi-point plan to make housing more affordable by reducing property taxes. Finally, Professor Emeritus John Ellis calls in and argues that to save universities from radical political zealots who have replaced knowledge promotion with fringe ideology indoctrination, urgent reform is essential, as evidenced by radicalized graduates influencing society, such as New York's communist mayor. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Dave Rubin of "The Rubin Report" talks about White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt listing the damage done by Democrats' pointless government shutdown to a stunned press; Donald Trump announcing the official end of the government shutdown and his plan to to make health insurance more affordable for Americans by giving healthcare subsidies directly to them instead of to health insurance companies; Bill O'Reilly getting Stephen A. Smith to go quiet with his simple advice to Democrats on their political strategy while on Chris Cuomo's NewsNation show; Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez making it clear that she is not just focused on taking on Chuck Schumer, but the entire old guard of the Democratic Party establishment to push the party in the direction of the Democratic Socialists; Karoline Leavitt directly answering a reporter's question about the just released email concerning an interaction between Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein victim Virginia Giuffre; John Fetterman shocking CNN's Dana Bash with his warning about the dangers of the far-left and why Bluesky is filled with death threats against centrist Democrats like himself; Marco Rubio issuing a chilling warning to the European Union if it gets in the way of America's attacks on Venezuelan drug boats trafficking illegal drugs into the country; and much more. Dave also does a special "ask me anything" question-and-answer session on a wide-ranging host of topics, answering questions from the Rubin Report Locals community. WATCH the MEMBER-EXCLUSIVE segment of the show here: https://rubinreport.locals.com/ Check out the NEW RUBIN REPORT MERCH here: https://daverubin.store/ ----------  Today's Sponsors: Noble Gold Investments - Whether you're looking to roll over an old 401(k) into a Gold IRA… or you want physical coins and bars delivered right to your home Noble Gold makes the process simple, safe, and stress-free. Download the free wealth protection kit and open a new qualified account and get a FREE 10-ounce Silver Flag Bar plus a Silver American Eagle Proof Coin. Go to http://DaveRubinGold.com Tax Network USA - If you owe back taxes or have unfiled returns, don't let the government take advantage of you. Whether you owe a few thousand or a few million, they can help you. Call 1(800)-958-1000 for a private, free consultation or Go to: https://tnusa.com/dave Balance of Nature - Make sure you are getting all the positive effects from a wide variety of fruits and vegetables. Rubin Report viewers get 35% off their first order plus a FREE Fiber & Spice supplement when you use Code RUBIN. Go to: http://balanceofnature.com/