Podcast appearances and mentions of virginia giuffre

In her deposition in the defamation lawsuit filed by Virginia Giuffre against Ghislaine Maxwell, Johanna Sjoberg described being recruited to work for Jeffrey Epstein under the impression that it was a legitimate job opportunity. According to her testimony, she was initially hired to help with office work but was soon asked to give massages to Epstein—something she testified quickly evolved into inappropriate and unwanted conduct. Sjoberg stated that Ghislaine Maxwell played a central role in managing the household and was often present during these encounters, contributing to the atmosphere of control and pressure. Her deposition supported claims made by Giuffre and other women who alleged they were misled into situations where they were exploited.Sjoberg also testified about interactions with well-known individuals while in Epstein's company, including an allegation involving Prince Andrew, which she said took place at Epstein's residence. She described an incident in which Maxwell, Epstein, and others were present during a moment she considered inappropriate and unsettling. While the full extent of those interactions remains the subject of legal scrutiny and public interest, Sjoberg's deposition contributed to the broader pattern of allegations suggesting a tightly controlled environment where young women were manipulated under false pretenses. Her account was one of several that added weight to the claims being investigated in both civil and criminal proceedings surrounding Epstein and Maxwell.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

In her deposition in the defamation lawsuit filed by Virginia Giuffre against Ghislaine Maxwell, Johanna Sjoberg described being recruited to work for Jeffrey Epstein under the impression that it was a legitimate job opportunity. According to her testimony, she was initially hired to help with office work but was soon asked to give massages to Epstein—something she testified quickly evolved into inappropriate and unwanted conduct. Sjoberg stated that Ghislaine Maxwell played a central role in managing the household and was often present during these encounters, contributing to the atmosphere of control and pressure. Her deposition supported claims made by Giuffre and other women who alleged they were misled into situations where they were exploited.Sjoberg also testified about interactions with well-known individuals while in Epstein's company, including an allegation involving Prince Andrew, which she said took place at Epstein's residence. She described an incident in which Maxwell, Epstein, and others were present during a moment she considered inappropriate and unsettling. While the full extent of those interactions remains the subject of legal scrutiny and public interest, Sjoberg's deposition contributed to the broader pattern of allegations suggesting a tightly controlled environment where young women were manipulated under false pretenses. Her account was one of several that added weight to the claims being investigated in both civil and criminal proceedings surrounding Epstein and Maxwell.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

In her deposition in the defamation lawsuit filed by Virginia Giuffre against Ghislaine Maxwell, Johanna Sjoberg described being recruited to work for Jeffrey Epstein under the impression that it was a legitimate job opportunity. According to her testimony, she was initially hired to help with office work but was soon asked to give massages to Epstein—something she testified quickly evolved into inappropriate and unwanted conduct. Sjoberg stated that Ghislaine Maxwell played a central role in managing the household and was often present during these encounters, contributing to the atmosphere of control and pressure. Her deposition supported claims made by Giuffre and other women who alleged they were misled into situations where they were exploited.Sjoberg also testified about interactions with well-known individuals while in Epstein's company, including an allegation involving Prince Andrew, which she said took place at Epstein's residence. She described an incident in which Maxwell, Epstein, and others were present during a moment she considered inappropriate and unsettling. While the full extent of those interactions remains the subject of legal scrutiny and public interest, Sjoberg's deposition contributed to the broader pattern of allegations suggesting a tightly controlled environment where young women were manipulated under false pretenses. Her account was one of several that added weight to the claims being investigated in both civil and criminal proceedings surrounding Epstein and Maxwell.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

In her deposition in the defamation lawsuit filed by Virginia Giuffre against Ghislaine Maxwell, Johanna Sjoberg described being recruited to work for Jeffrey Epstein under the impression that it was a legitimate job opportunity. According to her testimony, she was initially hired to help with office work but was soon asked to give massages to Epstein—something she testified quickly evolved into inappropriate and unwanted conduct. Sjoberg stated that Ghislaine Maxwell played a central role in managing the household and was often present during these encounters, contributing to the atmosphere of control and pressure. Her deposition supported claims made by Giuffre and other women who alleged they were misled into situations where they were exploited.Sjoberg also testified about interactions with well-known individuals while in Epstein's company, including an allegation involving Prince Andrew, which she said took place at Epstein's residence. She described an incident in which Maxwell, Epstein, and others were present during a moment she considered inappropriate and unsettling. While the full extent of those interactions remains the subject of legal scrutiny and public interest, Sjoberg's deposition contributed to the broader pattern of allegations suggesting a tightly controlled environment where young women were manipulated under false pretenses. Her account was one of several that added weight to the claims being investigated in both civil and criminal proceedings surrounding Epstein and Maxwell.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

In her deposition in the defamation lawsuit filed by Virginia Giuffre against Ghislaine Maxwell, Johanna Sjoberg described being recruited to work for Jeffrey Epstein under the impression that it was a legitimate job opportunity. According to her testimony, she was initially hired to help with office work but was soon asked to give massages to Epstein—something she testified quickly evolved into inappropriate and unwanted conduct. Sjoberg stated that Ghislaine Maxwell played a central role in managing the household and was often present during these encounters, contributing to the atmosphere of control and pressure. Her deposition supported claims made by Giuffre and other women who alleged they were misled into situations where they were exploited.Sjoberg also testified about interactions with well-known individuals while in Epstein's company, including an allegation involving Prince Andrew, which she said took place at Epstein's residence. She described an incident in which Maxwell, Epstein, and others were present during a moment she considered inappropriate and unsettling. While the full extent of those interactions remains the subject of legal scrutiny and public interest, Sjoberg's deposition contributed to the broader pattern of allegations suggesting a tightly controlled environment where young women were manipulated under false pretenses. Her account was one of several that added weight to the claims being investigated in both civil and criminal proceedings surrounding Epstein and Maxwell.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

In her deposition in the defamation lawsuit filed by Virginia Giuffre against Ghislaine Maxwell, Johanna Sjoberg described being recruited to work for Jeffrey Epstein under the impression that it was a legitimate job opportunity. According to her testimony, she was initially hired to help with office work but was soon asked to give massages to Epstein—something she testified quickly evolved into inappropriate and unwanted conduct. Sjoberg stated that Ghislaine Maxwell played a central role in managing the household and was often present during these encounters, contributing to the atmosphere of control and pressure. Her deposition supported claims made by Giuffre and other women who alleged they were misled into situations where they were exploited.Sjoberg also testified about interactions with well-known individuals while in Epstein's company, including an allegation involving Prince Andrew, which she said took place at Epstein's residence. She described an incident in which Maxwell, Epstein, and others were present during a moment she considered inappropriate and unsettling. While the full extent of those interactions remains the subject of legal scrutiny and public interest, Sjoberg's deposition contributed to the broader pattern of allegations suggesting a tightly controlled environment where young women were manipulated under false pretenses. Her account was one of several that added weight to the claims being investigated in both civil and criminal proceedings surrounding Epstein and Maxwell.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In her deposition in the defamation lawsuit filed by Virginia Giuffre against Ghislaine Maxwell, Johanna Sjoberg described being recruited to work for Jeffrey Epstein under the impression that it was a legitimate job opportunity. According to her testimony, she was initially hired to help with office work but was soon asked to give massages to Epstein—something she testified quickly evolved into inappropriate and unwanted conduct. Sjoberg stated that Ghislaine Maxwell played a central role in managing the household and was often present during these encounters, contributing to the atmosphere of control and pressure. Her deposition supported claims made by Giuffre and other women who alleged they were misled into situations where they were exploited.Sjoberg also testified about interactions with well-known individuals while in Epstein's company, including an allegation involving Prince Andrew, which she said took place at Epstein's residence. She described an incident in which Maxwell, Epstein, and others were present during a moment she considered inappropriate and unsettling. While the full extent of those interactions remains the subject of legal scrutiny and public interest, Sjoberg's deposition contributed to the broader pattern of allegations suggesting a tightly controlled environment where young women were manipulated under false pretenses. Her account was one of several that added weight to the claims being investigated in both civil and criminal proceedings surrounding Epstein and Maxwell.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In her deposition in the defamation lawsuit filed by Virginia Giuffre against Ghislaine Maxwell, Johanna Sjoberg described being recruited to work for Jeffrey Epstein under the impression that it was a legitimate job opportunity. According to her testimony, she was initially hired to help with office work but was soon asked to give massages to Epstein—something she testified quickly evolved into inappropriate and unwanted conduct. Sjoberg stated that Ghislaine Maxwell played a central role in managing the household and was often present during these encounters, contributing to the atmosphere of control and pressure. Her deposition supported claims made by Giuffre and other women who alleged they were misled into situations where they were exploited.Sjoberg also testified about interactions with well-known individuals while in Epstein's company, including an allegation involving Prince Andrew, which she said took place at Epstein's residence. She described an incident in which Maxwell, Epstein, and others were present during a moment she considered inappropriate and unsettling. While the full extent of those interactions remains the subject of legal scrutiny and public interest, Sjoberg's deposition contributed to the broader pattern of allegations suggesting a tightly controlled environment where young women were manipulated under false pretenses. Her account was one of several that added weight to the claims being investigated in both civil and criminal proceedings surrounding Epstein and Maxwell.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In her deposition in the defamation lawsuit filed by Virginia Giuffre against Ghislaine Maxwell, Johanna Sjoberg described being recruited to work for Jeffrey Epstein under the impression that it was a legitimate job opportunity. According to her testimony, she was initially hired to help with office work but was soon asked to give massages to Epstein—something she testified quickly evolved into inappropriate and unwanted conduct. Sjoberg stated that Ghislaine Maxwell played a central role in managing the household and was often present during these encounters, contributing to the atmosphere of control and pressure. Her deposition supported claims made by Giuffre and other women who alleged they were misled into situations where they were exploited.Sjoberg also testified about interactions with well-known individuals while in Epstein's company, including an allegation involving Prince Andrew, which she said took place at Epstein's residence. She described an incident in which Maxwell, Epstein, and others were present during a moment she considered inappropriate and unsettling. While the full extent of those interactions remains the subject of legal scrutiny and public interest, Sjoberg's deposition contributed to the broader pattern of allegations suggesting a tightly controlled environment where young women were manipulated under false pretenses. Her account was one of several that added weight to the claims being investigated in both civil and criminal proceedings surrounding Epstein and Maxwell.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In her deposition in the defamation lawsuit filed by Virginia Giuffre against Ghislaine Maxwell, Johanna Sjoberg described being recruited to work for Jeffrey Epstein under the impression that it was a legitimate job opportunity. According to her testimony, she was initially hired to help with office work but was soon asked to give massages to Epstein—something she testified quickly evolved into inappropriate and unwanted conduct. Sjoberg stated that Ghislaine Maxwell played a central role in managing the household and was often present during these encounters, contributing to the atmosphere of control and pressure. Her deposition supported claims made by Giuffre and other women who alleged they were misled into situations where they were exploited.Sjoberg also testified about interactions with well-known individuals while in Epstein's company, including an allegation involving Prince Andrew, which she said took place at Epstein's residence. She described an incident in which Maxwell, Epstein, and others were present during a moment she considered inappropriate and unsettling. While the full extent of those interactions remains the subject of legal scrutiny and public interest, Sjoberg's deposition contributed to the broader pattern of allegations suggesting a tightly controlled environment where young women were manipulated under false pretenses. Her account was one of several that added weight to the claims being investigated in both civil and criminal proceedings surrounding Epstein and Maxwell.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Prince Andrew's continued evasion of accountability has transformed him into a central figure in the fallout surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's criminal empire. Born into one of the most privileged positions on earth, he repeatedly placed himself in Epstein's inner circle even after Epstein's conviction, including reportedly staying at his home in New York after the scandal was public. A widely criticized BBC interview intended to clear his name instead became a defining moment of public collapse, in which Andrew offered implausible explanations involving a Pizza Express alibi and a medical claim that he could not sweat—responses that significantly damaged his credibility. The now-iconic photograph of Andrew with Virginia Giuffre and Epstein's documented pattern of exploiting underage girls further intensified scrutiny, raising serious questions about the prince's judgment, integrity, and transparency.Andrew has repeatedly declined opportunities to speak with U.S. authorities and has now let multiple congressional deadlines pass without cooperation, retreating into royal seclusion as public pressure mounts. The royal family has since removed many of his public roles and military honors in an effort to contain the damage, but the strategy has only highlighted the seriousness of the allegations and the depth of Andrew's involvement with Epstein. His silence has become its own indictment, signaling fear rather than innocence, and reinforcing the perception that accountability is being avoided rather than confronted.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Prince Andrew's continued evasion of accountability has transformed him into a central figure in the fallout surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's criminal empire. Born into one of the most privileged positions on earth, he repeatedly placed himself in Epstein's inner circle even after Epstein's conviction, including reportedly staying at his home in New York after the scandal was public. A widely criticized BBC interview intended to clear his name instead became a defining moment of public collapse, in which Andrew offered implausible explanations involving a Pizza Express alibi and a medical claim that he could not sweat—responses that significantly damaged his credibility. The now-iconic photograph of Andrew with Virginia Giuffre and Epstein's documented pattern of exploiting underage girls further intensified scrutiny, raising serious questions about the prince's judgment, integrity, and transparency.Andrew has repeatedly declined opportunities to speak with U.S. authorities and has now let multiple congressional deadlines pass without cooperation, retreating into royal seclusion as public pressure mounts. The royal family has since removed many of his public roles and military honors in an effort to contain the damage, but the strategy has only highlighted the seriousness of the allegations and the depth of Andrew's involvement with Epstein. His silence has become its own indictment, signaling fear rather than innocence, and reinforcing the perception that accountability is being avoided rather than confronted.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

This week we are discussing American Sheroes - Virginia Giuffre, a well known Epstein victim who has recently died and Aileen Wuornos, a famous serial killer of men. These women both have harrowing tales and experienced many cycles of abuse but never stood down and continued to fight for other women and justice, until both of their deaths. TW!! Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Prince Andrew's continued evasion of accountability has transformed him into a central figure in the fallout surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's criminal empire. Born into one of the most privileged positions on earth, he repeatedly placed himself in Epstein's inner circle even after Epstein's conviction, including reportedly staying at his home in New York after the scandal was public. A widely criticized BBC interview intended to clear his name instead became a defining moment of public collapse, in which Andrew offered implausible explanations involving a Pizza Express alibi and a medical claim that he could not sweat—responses that significantly damaged his credibility. The now-iconic photograph of Andrew with Virginia Giuffre and Epstein's documented pattern of exploiting underage girls further intensified scrutiny, raising serious questions about the prince's judgment, integrity, and transparency.Andrew has repeatedly declined opportunities to speak with U.S. authorities and has now let multiple congressional deadlines pass without cooperation, retreating into royal seclusion as public pressure mounts. The royal family has since removed many of his public roles and military honors in an effort to contain the damage, but the strategy has only highlighted the seriousness of the allegations and the depth of Andrew's involvement with Epstein. His silence has become its own indictment, signaling fear rather than innocence, and reinforcing the perception that accountability is being avoided rather than confronted.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Late victim advocate Virginia Giuffre shared more disturbing truths about the abuse she endured at the hands of predator Jeffrey Epstein and his co-conspirator Ghislaine Maxwell in her posthumously released memoir, Nobody's Girl: A Memoir of Surviving Abuse and Fighting for Justice. Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

I came back from the UK expecting to ease into the week, and instead I walked straight into one of the wildest legislative twists I have seen in years. The Epstein files bill (HR 4405) cleared the House by way of a discharge petition and did so with only a single vote against it. I'll admit — did not take this seriously when it first appeared. I assumed it would stall in committee or die somewhere between the House and Senate. And now that I'm holding the text of the bill in my hands, it is obvious that this is very real and very close to becoming law. Donald Trump has already said he will sign it, and with a nearly unanimous House vote, it's hard to imagine the Senate blocking it.This portion of our story really begins last Tuesday when House Democrats released a new batch of Epstein related emails. The headline was an email in which Epstein told an associate that Donald Trump knew about his behavior and had spent time at his house with a girl later identified as Virginia Giuffre, though crucially, this email did not accuse Trump of participating in abuse. However, with the House reopened and Adelita Grijalva finally sworn in as its newest member, the discharge petition managed to mass on the exact same day — despite reports that Trump immediately called people like Lauren Boebert and Nancy Mace urging them to pull their signatures.Politics Politics Politics is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.Trump's reaction also says a lot here. On Thursday, Trump was furious, calling allies to warn them that he would rescind endorsements if they voted for the petition. The White House framed the anger as frustration that Republicans had given Democrats a politically useful victory. But by Friday, Trump reversed himself and said everyone should support the release since there was nothing to hide. Late Sunday, he doubled down again, telling reporters the files were long overdue and that Pam Bondi should open new investigations into Bill Clinton, Larry Summers, and Reid Hoffman. It was at that point that it became obvious that the bill was going to sail through. Even Speaker Mike Johnson voted for it — an unusual action considering discharge petitions are mechanisms designed to bypass the Speaker.The bill itself is sweeping. It orders the Attorney General to turn over internal DOJ communications related to charging decisions, investigations, destruction of records, detention details, and Epstein's death. It blocks the government from withholding records due to embarrassment, reputational harm, or political sensitivity. Only material that qualifies as child sexual abuse imagery or details an active investigation can be withheld.The winners in all of this are obvious. Thomas Massie and Ro Khanna get enormous credit for pushing the discharge petition from the beginning. They stared down the White House and they won. The losers are just as clear. Trump took the biggest political hit because this never needed to become a fight in the first place. If he wanted the files released he could have released them. The notion that people like Kash Patel and Pam Bondi were acting on their own is nonsense. They do not freelance on something this sensitive. Trump might be trying to rewrite the narrative, but the timeline speaks for itself.Personally, I think the files have never been released because the conclusion reached is messy rather than clean. We know Epstein abused underage girls. We know Ghislaine Maxwell helped facilitate it. The open question is whether other powerful people committed crimes that can be clearly proved. If the files contain only partial hints or ambiguous associations, releasing them will satisfy no one. People will assume something is missing, especially considering just how conspiratorial this entire story feels. People build their own conclusions in the absence of official clarity, as we've seen since the death of Epstein himself.Still, the fact remains that this administration took an enormous and unnecessary political loss by fighting transparency that it had promised during the campaign. They went from inviting influencers to the White House for binders labeled Phase One to issuing a one page memo suggesting there was nothing further to see. We do not know what will emerge when the full set of records is released. We do know that the political consequences of this episode are locked in place. Everyone who pushed for transparency won. Everyone who resisted it lost. And once the documents are public nobody will be able to put the lid back on whatever comes next.Chapters00:00:00 - Intro00:03:38 - Epstein Files00:20:44 - Update00:22:36 - Saudi Crown Prince00:26:51 - Texas Maps Blocked00:28:09 - Tariff Checks00:31:10 - UK Politics, AI, and More with Tom Merritt01:09:36 - Wrap-up This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.politicspoliticspolitics.com/subscribe

Scotland Yard has come under intense scrutiny for repeatedly opening and then quietly closing inquiries into Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. When allegations involving Virginia Giuffre and potential UK-based trafficking surfaced years ago, the Metropolitan Police declined to pursue a full investigation, claiming it was outside their jurisdiction and not the “appropriate authority” to handle the matter. Even as mounting media coverage, survivor testimony, and public pressure demanded action, the force appeared determined to distance itself rather than confront the implications of a high-profile trafficking network operating on British soil. Critics argue that closing the case so quickly—despite the gravity and credibility of the accusations—looked less like a procedural decision and more like an intentional effort to avoid political and institutional fallout.Years later, when Scotland Yard announced it was reviewing new allegations against Maxwell related to grooming and trafficking in the UK, there was a brief sense of hope that justice might finally be taken seriously. But the review ultimately stalled without becoming a full investigation, igniting outrage from advocates who accused the force of protecting the powerful rather than defending victims. The pattern is unmistakable: initiate interest only under pressure, then retreat the moment attention shifts. To many, it feels like a choreographed performance meant to pacify public outrage rather than uncover the truth—a police institution more concerned with shielding reputations than exposing the depth of a criminal enterprise tied to elite circles.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

GET YOUR WAV WATCH HERE: https://buy.wavwatch.com/WAM Use Code WAM to save $100 and purchase amazing healing frequency technology! GET HEIRLOOM SEEDS & NON GMO SURVIVAL FOOD HERE: https://heavensharvest.com/ USE Code WAM to save 5% plus free shipping! BUY GOLD HERE: https://firstnationalbullion.com/schedule-consult/ Avoid CBDCs! Get Your SUPER-SUPPLIMENTS HERE: https://vni.life/wam Use Code WAM15 & Save 15%! Life changing formulas you can't find anywhere else! HELP SUPPORT US AS WE DOCUMENT HISTORY HERE: https://gogetfunding.com/help-keep-wam-alive/# Josh Sigurdson reports on the news that the Senate has voted unanimously to release ALL of the Epstein Files which President Trump says he will sign off on. The reality is a little bit more complicated. For years, Democrats laughed at claims about Jeffrey Epstein's trafficking network. Republicans called for transparency. Now, many Republicans call it a hoax while Democrats push for the files to be released. Now that it has gone to the Senate, we've seen a unanimous vote from both sides of the paradigm to release the files. All except one suspicious Republican representative from Louisiana named Clay Higgins. The issue is, the US government doesn't have actual access to the Epstein Files or videos. The Israeli government does. They just feed SOME of the files to the Democrats and the Republicans if it can cause divide and keep people sitting on their hands for a little while longer. Epstein bragged about being Mossad to his exes and took a plea deal over being a blackmail agent. Now, new revelations are coming out that are both ground breaking and (if you have been watching our content the past 15 years) not shocking. Jeffrey Epstein enlisted a Rothschild-run bank to fund Israel's cyberweapons development and worked directly with former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak, someone who victim Virginia Giuffre exposed as one of the men who violently assaulted her. This is massive news which was released with all the sources by Drop Site. It backs what we've been saying for more than a decade! How can anyone claim Epstein isn't an Israeli agent at this point? Meanwhile, banker Larry Summers has resigned from OpenAI and Harvard over their Epstein investigation due to being exposed in recent papers. Democrat Stacey Plaskett has lost her chair on committees after it was exposed that in 2019 during a hearing with Michael Cohen, she was being given orders by text by Jeffrey Epstein which she followed. If you care more about the politics of those involved with Epstein than the reality that this massive trafficking network has victimized thousands of children, then you don't care about the children at all and all of this was just about confirmation bias. Clinton was clearly heavily involved with Epstein. And if you don't find Trump's attacks on those who gave questions related to Epstein suspicious, your BS guage is way off. Trump plans to sign these papers but remember, the real consequential documents or files (or videos) are in the hands of the Israeli government and they have no plans to expose themselves and give up all their blackmail any time soon. Stay tuned for more from WAM! Get local, healthy, pasture raised meat delivered to your door here: https://wildpastures.com/promos/save-20-for-life/bonus15?oid=6&affid=321 USE THE LINK & get 20% off for life and $15 off your first box! DITCH YOUR DOCTOR! https://www.livelongerformula.com/wam Get a natural health practitioner and work with Christian Yordanov! Mention WAM and get a FREE masterclass! You will ALSO get a FREE metabolic function assessment! GET YOUR APRICOT SEEDS at the life-saving Richardson Nutritional Center HERE: https://rncstore.com/r?id=bg8qc1 Use code JOSH to save money! SIGN UP FOR HOMESTEADING COURSES NOW: https://freedomfarmers.com/link/17150/ Get Prepared & Start The Move Towards Real Independence With Curtis Stone's Courses! GET YOUR FREEDOM KELLY KETTLE KIT HERE: https://patriotprepared.com/shop/freedom-kettle/ Use Code WAM and enjoy many solutions for the outdoors in the face of the impending reset! PayPal: ancientwonderstelevision@gmail.com FIND OUR CoinTree page here: https://cointr.ee/joshsigurdson PURCHASE MERECHANDISE HERE: https://world-alternative-media.creator-spring.com/ JOIN US on SubscribeStar here: https://www.subscribestar.com/world-alternative-media For subscriber only content! Pledge here! Just a dollar a month can help us alive! https://www.patreon.com/user?u=2652072&ty=h&u=2652072 BITCOIN ADDRESS: 18d1WEnYYhBRgZVbeyLr6UfiJhrQygcgNU World Alternative Media 2025

Jeffrey Epstein's name is back in the headlines as Congress releases tens of thousands of pages of “Epstein files.” But what's actually in these documents, what's missing, and how much is being twisted for political gain? Today Todd walks through the new records from the House Oversight Committee, the DOJ, and Epstein's estate, explains the now-viral email mentioning Donald Trump, and clarifies what Virginia Giuffre really testified under oath. We separate justice from retribution, evidence from speculation, and truth from conspiracy-as-entertainment while asking who, if anyone, is serious about the victims and accountability. If you're tired of weaponized narratives and just want an honest look at the Epstein case, this episode is for you.

Scotland Yard has come under intense scrutiny for repeatedly opening and then quietly closing inquiries into Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. When allegations involving Virginia Giuffre and potential UK-based trafficking surfaced years ago, the Metropolitan Police declined to pursue a full investigation, claiming it was outside their jurisdiction and not the “appropriate authority” to handle the matter. Even as mounting media coverage, survivor testimony, and public pressure demanded action, the force appeared determined to distance itself rather than confront the implications of a high-profile trafficking network operating on British soil. Critics argue that closing the case so quickly—despite the gravity and credibility of the accusations—looked less like a procedural decision and more like an intentional effort to avoid political and institutional fallout.Years later, when Scotland Yard announced it was reviewing new allegations against Maxwell related to grooming and trafficking in the UK, there was a brief sense of hope that justice might finally be taken seriously. But the review ultimately stalled without becoming a full investigation, igniting outrage from advocates who accused the force of protecting the powerful rather than defending victims. The pattern is unmistakable: initiate interest only under pressure, then retreat the moment attention shifts. To many, it feels like a choreographed performance meant to pacify public outrage rather than uncover the truth—a police institution more concerned with shielding reputations than exposing the depth of a criminal enterprise tied to elite circles.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Jeffrey Epstein's name is back in the headlines as Congress releases tens of thousands of pages of “Epstein files.” But what's actually in these documents, what's missing, and how much is being twisted for political gain? Today Todd walks through the new records from the House Oversight Committee, the DOJ, and Epstein's estate, explains the now-viral email mentioning Donald Trump, and clarifies what Virginia Giuffre really testified under oath. We separate justice from retribution, evidence from speculation, and truth from conspiracy-as-entertainment while asking who, if anyone, is serious about the victims and accountability. If you're tired of weaponized narratives and just want an honest look at the Epstein case, this episode is for you.

In the early 2000s, former U.S. Senate Majority Leader and diplomat George J. Mitchell was publicly associated with Jeffrey Epstein and was identified in media reports as part of Epstein's influential social circle. Epstein referred to Mitchell as a close acquaintance and supporter, while Mitchell acknowledged that Epstein had donated to charitable causes he was involved with. Correspondence later found among Epstein's personal files — including a handwritten letter believed to be from Mitchell — further highlighted the degree of familiarity between the two men. Mitchell has consistently emphasized that his interactions with Epstein were limited to fundraising and political or philanthropic contexts, and that he was unaware of Epstein's criminal conduct until it became public.The controversy escalated in 2019 when unsealed court documents revealed that Virginia Giuffre, one of Epstein's accusers, alleged that Epstein trafficked her to several prominent men — naming Mitchell among them. Giuffre claimed she was forced to perform sexual acts with Mitchell while under Epstein's control. Mitchell vehemently denied the accusations, stating he had never met Giuffre and had no involvement in any trafficking or abuse, calling the allegations “false.” He has not been charged with any crime, and no legal case has been brought forward against him, but the allegation and association with Epstein have generated sustained scrutiny and reputational damage. Mitchell maintains he has “never observed anything improper” and has condemned Epstein's crimes.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Monday, November 17th, 2025Today, Epstein survivors confirm that Trump killed a Biden-era investigation into the Epstein files; the Comey case is on thin ice as a judge demands missing grand jury tapes; Mike Flynn is in talks with Trump's DOJ for a $50M settlement as the regime continues to loot the Treasury; the Trump administration is killing Biden's cash payments for delayed and canceled flights; Ghislaine Maxwell emailed her lawyer from prison about a commutation; Indiana ignores pressure from Trump and refuses to redraw their maps; the Trump administration is lifting some tariffs because of high prices; a Judge indefinitely bars Trump from fining University of California over alleged discrimination; and Allison and Dana Deliver your Good News.Thank You, DeleteMeGet 20% off your DeleteMe plan when you go to joindeleteme.com/DAILYBEANS and use promo code DAILYBEANS at checkout. Thank You, Naked WinesTo get 6 bottles of wine for $39.99, head to nakedwines.com/DAILYBEANS and use code DAILYBEANS for both the code and password.Guest: Adam KlasfeldAll Rise NewsAll Rise News - Bluesky, @klasfeldreports.com - BlueSky, @KlasfeldReports - Twitter, @senecaprojectus - InstagramRising This Week: Bolton's road to trial beginsThe E. Jean Carroll Experience: She **Is** Our Type! With E. Jean Carroll | Feminist Buzzkills!LIVE: WOW! Trump PULLS PLUG on KEY INVESTIGATION Into THE FILESComey prosecutor issues Day 2 denial on grand jury records (Klasfeld Live with Allison Gill)StoriesMichael Flynn, DOJ in Settlement Talks Over $50 Million Claim | BloombergIndiana won't redraw congressional maps due to lack of votes in Senate | WISHTV  Indianapolis NewsTrump Administration Scraps Cash Payments for Delayed or Canceled Flights | The New York TimesHouse Democrats press DOJ for details on Epstein co-conspirators probe that was "inexplicably killed" | CBS NewsPrison employees have been terminated after Ghislaine Maxwell's email messages were shared, her lawyer says | CNN PoliticsTrump Administration Lifts Some Food Tariffs in Effort to Ease Prices | The New York TimesJudge indefinitely bars Trump from fining University of California over alleged discrimination | AP News Good TroubleIf you're hearing right-wing media insist that the redacted name in the Epstein email is Virginia Giuffre, here's the simplest response: prove it.If Republicans claim the redacted Epstein email name is Virginia Giuffre, tell your House rep: “Prove it. Lift the redaction. If it's her, show it. If you can't, say so.”And if your rep is a Democrat — especially on House Oversight — ask them to demand transparency on that redaction. Find Your Representative | house.gov→Contacting U.S. Senators Find Your Representative | house.gov**Mutual Aid Relief Fund, Mutual Aid Hub, GiveDirectly.org/snap**Group Directory - The Visibility Brigade: Resistance is Possible**Vote Yes 836 - Oklahoma is gathering signatures**How to Organize a Bearing Witness Standout**Indiana teacher snitch portal - Eyes on Education**Find Your Representative | house.gov, Contacting U.S. Senators Our Donation LinksNational Security Counselors - Donate, MSW Media, Blue Wave CA Victory Fund | ActBlue, WhistleblowerAid.org/beansFederal workers - email AG at fedoath@pm.me and let me know what you're going to do, or just vent. I'm always here to listen. Find Upcoming Actions 50501 Movement, No Kings.org, Indivisible.orgDr. Allison Gill - Substack, BlueSky , TikTok, IG, TwitterDana Goldberg - The 2025 Out100, BlueSky, Twitter, IG, facebook, danagoldberg.comMore from MSW Media - Shows - MSW Media, Cleanup On Aisle 45 pod, The Breakdown | SubstackReminder - you can see the pod pics if you become a Patron. The good news pics are at the bottom of the show notes of each Patreon episode! That's just one of the perks of subscribing! patreon.com/muellershewrote Our Donation LinksNational Security Counselors - DonateMSW Media, Blue Wave California Victory Fund | ActBlueWhistleblowerAid.org/beansFederal workers - feel free to email AG at fedoath@pm.me and let me know what you're going to do, or just vent. I'm always here to listen. Find Upcoming Actions 50501 Movement, No Kings.org, Indivisible.orgDr. Allison Gill - Substack, BlueSky , TikTok, IG, TwitterDana Goldberg - BlueSky, Twitter, IG, facebook, danagoldberg.comCheck out more from MSW Media - Shows - MSW Media, Cleanup On Aisle 45 pod, The Breakdown | SubstackShare your Good News or Good TroubleMSW Good News and Good TroubleHave some good news; a confession; or a correction to share?Good News & Confessions - The Daily Beanshttps://www.dailybeanspod.com/confessional/ Listener Survey:http://survey.podtrac.com/start-survey.aspx?pubid=BffJOlI7qQcF&ver=shortFollow the Podcast on Apple:The Daily Beans on Apple PodcastsWant to support the show and get it ad-free and early?The Daily Beans | SupercastThe Daily Beans & Mueller, She Wrote | PatreonThe Daily Beans | Apple Podcasts Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

In this appeal from a now-settled defamation case brought by Virginia Giuffre against Ghislaine Maxwell, the Second Circuit held that many of the documents under seal were properly treated as “judicial documents” to which a strong presumption of public access attached. The court reaffirmed that the status of a document as a judicial document is “fixed at filing” — meaning that if the filing was relevant to the court's exercise of its Article III functions when filed, later events (e.g., the case being settled or the motion becoming moot) do not nullify the presumption of access. The court also clarified that a document does not lose the presumption of access simply because the court did not explicitly rely on it in rendering a decision, and that filings in connection with motions to seal or unseal are themselves judicial documents since they invoke the court's supervisory power.At the same time, the Second Circuit affirmed in part and vacated in part the district court's orders. It agreed that the lower court did not err in declining to unseal certain documents — for example, segments of Maxwell's deposition involving her adult sexual relationships and redacted identifying information of pseudonymized third-parties — because in those instances countervailing privacy interests outweighed the access presumption. But the appellate court vacated the district court's categorical refusal to treat certain undecided motions as judicial documents subject to access, and remanded for further individual review of those materials (including a Florida deposition transcript and filings by non-parties) consistent with the correct standard.to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

In the early 2000s, former U.S. Senate Majority Leader and diplomat George J. Mitchell was publicly associated with Jeffrey Epstein and was identified in media reports as part of Epstein's influential social circle. Epstein referred to Mitchell as a close acquaintance and supporter, while Mitchell acknowledged that Epstein had donated to charitable causes he was involved with. Correspondence later found among Epstein's personal files — including a handwritten letter believed to be from Mitchell — further highlighted the degree of familiarity between the two men. Mitchell has consistently emphasized that his interactions with Epstein were limited to fundraising and political or philanthropic contexts, and that he was unaware of Epstein's criminal conduct until it became public.The controversy escalated in 2019 when unsealed court documents revealed that Virginia Giuffre, one of Epstein's accusers, alleged that Epstein trafficked her to several prominent men — naming Mitchell among them. Giuffre claimed she was forced to perform sexual acts with Mitchell while under Epstein's control. Mitchell vehemently denied the accusations, stating he had never met Giuffre and had no involvement in any trafficking or abuse, calling the allegations “false.” He has not been charged with any crime, and no legal case has been brought forward against him, but the allegation and association with Epstein have generated sustained scrutiny and reputational damage. Mitchell maintains he has “never observed anything improper” and has condemned Epstein's crimes.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Dr. Jerome Corsi uncovers today's biggest stories — from the Democrat-driven Epstein email hoax, to the white British exodus from London, to the staggering reality that Generation Z is missing millions due to decades of abortion and anti-family propaganda.In this episode, Dr. Corsi exposes how:Democrats knowingly pushed a false Epstein–Trump connection, hiding that Virginia Giuffre herself exonerated Trump CN 11 17London's white British population collapsed from 98% to 37%, revealing a huge demographic shiftGen Z is missing nearly 20 million people, and Gen Alpha & Gen Beta may followIllegal alien crime rings are spreading into American towns, including a Wisconsin community under advisoryThe global Left advances policies designed to destabilize families, economies, and national identityGold surges past $4,000/oz as the world approaches a 2026 global financial crisisTrump now demands a full release of all Epstein documents, forcing transparency the media fearsAnd why the global realignment—from Russia and Ukraine to Israel to Venezuela—will reshape 2025 and beyond.

The Epstein Files are back in the news... but what's new? From emails allegedly linking President Trump to Jeffrey Epstein's activities, to Bill Clinton's name being brought up again and even more division in camp MAGA, what do the latest document dumps tell us? Plus, in unrelated Trump news, he's suing the BBC... we'll explain. And in headlines today, Opposition leader Sussan Ley says she can guarantee that she will lead the coalition to the next federal election; Victorian Liberals could appoint their first female leader with a leadership spill predicted today; Confessed murderer Lachlan Young will learn his fate today after killing his former girlfriend Hannah McGuire; 7 time world champion Layne Beachley has been honoured for her efforts to improve women’s surfing with the Dawn Award THE END BITS Support independent women's media Check out The Quicky Instagram here GET IN TOUCHShare your story, feedback, or dilemma! Send us a voice note or email us at thequicky@mamamia.com.au CREDITS Hosts: Taylah Strano & Claire Murphy Guest: Amelia Lester, Mamamia US Correspondent Audio Producer: Lu Hill Become a Mamamia subscriber: https://www.mamamia.com.au/subscribeSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

This week on The Necessary Conversation, Haley is back from vacation, Bob chickened out, and things get heated fast as we dive into the most explosive week of Trump's second term yet — from the release of the Epstein emails to Ghislaine Maxwell's special treatment to Democrats folding under Republican pressure.

Lawyer Alan Dershowitz joins Freddy Gray to react to the 20,000 newly released Epstein emails — and why he believes far more remains hidden. He discusses Trump's appearance in the documents, the contradictions in Virginia Giuffre's testimony, the FBI's real “client list”, and why judges are still sealing major depositions. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Tesla changing the world, especially healthcare. And lots more...~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Politics, Dilbert New Artist, Hemp Loopholes, Trump's BBC Options, Trump's Healthcare Plan, Confusopoly, Illustrating Healthcare Solution, Robot Medical Healthcare, Elon Musk, Tesla American Parts, Tesla AI5 Chip, US Overspending Doom, Bill Maher's Truth Search, Mayor Mamdani, Trump's MTG Endorsement Retraction, MAHA Calley Means, Bad-Bureaucrat Instruction Manual, Epstein Files Release, Virginia Giuffre, Reid Hoffman, Jaime Raskin, Scott Adams

Prince Andrew's past just caught up with him — again. The U.S. House Oversight Committee has officially requested that Andrew Mountbatten Windsor, formerly known as Prince Andrew, sit for a transcribed interview under oath about his involvement with convicted sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein. This unprecedented move marks the first time a U.S. congressional body has formally sought testimony from a member of the British royal family in connection with Epstein's network. In this powerful episode, Tony Brueski breaks down the explosive details of the congressional letter, signed by sixteen House Democrats, which cites flight logs, financial ledgers labeled “massage for Andrew,” and emails showing a disturbingly close relationship between Andrew and Epstein long after Epstein's conviction. The committee's request goes far beyond curiosity — they're following the money, the documents, and the survivors' testimony to uncover just how deep Andrew's involvement really went. Congressman Suhas Subramanyam says multiple survivors have come forward alleging that Virginia Giuffre was not the only woman trafficked to Andrew — and that new leads could expose a broader pattern of abuse and complicity. With Epstein's estate handing over more than 17,000 documents and financial records, investigators now believe they may be closing in on the truth. As the walls close in, Andrew's refusal to cooperate could have devastating consequences — not just legally, but for the already fragile reputation of the monarchy. From the 2011 email where Andrew wrote to Epstein “We're in this together,” to the alleged effort to smear Giuffre through his royal protection officer, this episode pulls no punches in exposing the arrogance, privilege, and denial that kept Epstein's network alive. Subscribe and listen as Tony Brueski unpacks the congressional strategy, the survivor testimony, and what may finally be Prince Andrew's reckoning. #PrinceAndrew #JeffreyEpstein #EpsteinFiles #HiddenKillers #TonyBrueski #RoyalScandal #Congress #SexTrafficking #HouseOversight #VirginiaGiuffre Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Prince Andrew's past just caught up with him — again. The U.S. House Oversight Committee has officially requested that Andrew Mountbatten Windsor, formerly known as Prince Andrew, sit for a transcribed interview under oath about his involvement with convicted sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein. This unprecedented move marks the first time a U.S. congressional body has formally sought testimony from a member of the British royal family in connection with Epstein's network. In this powerful episode, Tony Brueski breaks down the explosive details of the congressional letter, signed by sixteen House Democrats, which cites flight logs, financial ledgers labeled “massage for Andrew,” and emails showing a disturbingly close relationship between Andrew and Epstein long after Epstein's conviction. The committee's request goes far beyond curiosity — they're following the money, the documents, and the survivors' testimony to uncover just how deep Andrew's involvement really went. Congressman Suhas Subramanyam says multiple survivors have come forward alleging that Virginia Giuffre was not the only woman trafficked to Andrew — and that new leads could expose a broader pattern of abuse and complicity. With Epstein's estate handing over more than 17,000 documents and financial records, investigators now believe they may be closing in on the truth. As the walls close in, Andrew's refusal to cooperate could have devastating consequences — not just legally, but for the already fragile reputation of the monarchy. From the 2011 email where Andrew wrote to Epstein “We're in this together,” to the alleged effort to smear Giuffre through his royal protection officer, this episode pulls no punches in exposing the arrogance, privilege, and denial that kept Epstein's network alive. Subscribe and listen as Tony Brueski unpacks the congressional strategy, the survivor testimony, and what may finally be Prince Andrew's reckoning. #PrinceAndrew #JeffreyEpstein #EpsteinFiles #HiddenKillers #TonyBrueski #RoyalScandal #Congress #SexTrafficking #HouseOversight #VirginiaGiuffre Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Watch all our Kirby videos here https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLPT_cCpNMvT7_mLeI1VIlNk3uHWSICLAU  Kirby ON YouTube:  https://www.youtube.com/kirbysommers   Kirby's links: Website:  https://kirbysommers.com   X: https://twitter.com/LandlordLinks   Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/kirbysommers   KIRBYS Substack: https://kirbysommers.substack.com/  Welcome author, journalist, and historian Kirby Sommers back for an exciting follow up show. Ms Sommers is an activist and a survivor. Published works include investigations into Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, the Franklin scandal, crime, and espionage. Author of the memoir Billionaire's Woman. Watch another podcast with Kirby: https://youtube.com/live/LiKvBKq54Mc  Watch Kirby's latest 1+ hour update https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q5wodh_fKBw&t=1047s  Watch the new info video on Kirby's channel: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5RJNvCmVpmM&t=5s UNTOUCHABLE - Jimmy Savile documentary https://youtu.be/6zCOix1iTvg ADOPTED KID'S CA HORROR STORY & BOYS TOWN! PASTOR Eddie https://youtube.com/live/vD3SGWpnfyM Watch Used By ELITES From Age 6 - Survivor Kelly Patterson https://youtube.com/live/nkKkIfLkRx0  KELLY'S 2 HOUR VIDEO ON VIRGINIA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SdIWUZIkxEU&t=3535s BOOK LINKS: Who Killed Epstein? Prince Andrew or Bill Clinton by Shaun Attwood   UK: https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B093QK1GS1   USA: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B093QK1GS1   Worldwide: https://books2read.com/u/bQjGQD  All of Shaun's books on Amazon UK: https://www.amazon.co.uk/stores/Shaun-Attwood/author/B0042NT0CU? All of Shaun's books on Amazon USA: https://www.amazon.com/stores/Shaun-Attwood/author/B0042NT0CU?ccs_id=601ed49b-a7d2-4682-8c04-f7b40a2217ef —————————— Shaun Attwood's social media:  TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@shaunattwood1?  Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/shaunattwood/?hl=en  Twitter: https://twitter.com/shaunattwood  Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/shaunattwood1/  Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/shaunattwood  Odysee: https://odysee.com/@ShaunAttwood:a #podcast #truecrime #news  #usa #youtube  #people #uk #princeandrew #royal #royalfamily

Send us a textJoin me for part of this massive two-part show starting with Real Housewives of Salt Lake City gossip and ending with the shocking finale of Virginia Giuffre's book Nobody's Girl. First, I'm exposing a fan page on X who's been getting fed play-by-play gossip from housewives while they're shooting - I share my research on who is behind it. I mean we are talking about entire storylines eight months in advance including Meredith Marks' suspension and Amy Steele quitting. There's also tea about Heather Gay potentially having a drinking problem being planted by anti-Heather cast members, plus I'm recapping episode 9 where Meredith allegedly freaks out on the plane pulling Brittani Bateman's hair and hitting her seat. Then I'm covering Dolores Catania and Paulie Connell's engagement with the 11-carat ring at the Apple Store, and there's tension with Teresa Giudice over timing at BravoCon. The second hour covers the final chapters of Virginia Giuffre's book with absolutely shocking revelations including how she implies Elizabeth Hurley was the model who procured girls for Epstein and Bill Gates may have abused her, the credible death threats from the FBI, Ghislaine Maxwell settlement money she used to buy a $1.4 million house in Australia, Jean-Luc Brunel's deposition, her two suicide attempts with 240 pills after breaking her neck, and the Disney character code words between Jess Staley and Epstein. Full episode only available at Dishing Drama Dana Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/cw/DishingDramaWithDanaWilkey

Prince Andrew's entanglement with Jeffrey Epstein reached a point where there was no off-ramp, no graceful escape route left for him to take. From the moment photos surfaced of him walking with Epstein in Central Park after Epstein's 2008 conviction, his public credibility began to erode. Every attempt to distance himself only made things worse—his disastrous 2019 BBC interview cemented his reputation as arrogant, evasive, and tone-deaf. Instead of expressing remorse or empathy for Epstein's victims, he portrayed himself as the victim, insisting he'd done nothing wrong while offering implausible excuses about medical conditions and faulty memories. The public and the press weren't buying it. With Epstein's death reigniting global outrage, Andrew found himself cornered by mounting evidence of his closeness to the financier—flight logs, photos, and testimony from Virginia Giuffre made denial untenable.By the time Andrew settled Giuffre's civil lawsuit in 2022, reportedly for millions, his royal career was finished. The Queen stripped him of his military titles and public duties, while King Charles quietly ensured his permanent exile from frontline royal life. Every possible exit strategy—silence, denial, legal settlements, staged contrition—had failed. Epstein's shadow had consumed Andrew's reputation, leaving him radioactive even within his own family. What began as an elite friendship turned into a life sentence of disgrace; there was no PR fix, no royal favor, no public forgiveness that could undo the damage. Epstein's name became an anchor Andrew could never cut loose from—dragging him deeper every time he tried to escape.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

In her December 2023 ruling, Loretta Preska, the U.S. District Judge overseeing the case stemming from the civil suit by Virginia Giuffre against Ghislaine Maxwell, determined that more than 150 names that had been redacted from court filings would be unsealed as of January 1, 2024. She explained that the public interest in transparency outweighed the privacy interests of many involved, particularly because a significant portion of the information—such as names of associates and witnesses—was already in the public domain via media reporting, depositions, or previous filings. She granted anyone named in the documents a deadline to request a further redaction before the release.However, Judge Preska also made clear that not all records would become public: she insisted that names of minors or individuals whose involvement stemmed solely from victim-status would remain shielded, because their privacy interests outweighed any public benefit in disclosure. She cautioned that many of the names being released may lack context as to how they relate to the litigation or alleged misconduct — meaning a name in the filings does not automatically imply innocence or guilt.We also hear from Tartaglione's lawyer about the missing video.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Jeffrey Epstein's relationship with transhumanism was never some passing curiosity—it was one of the central obsessions that animated the final decade of his life. He fancied himself a benefactor of “the future of humanity,” throwing money and influence at scientists who were willing to indulge his fantasies about genetic engineering, human enhancement, brain-mapping, and even selective breeding. Epstein hosted salons with top-tier researchers, funded fringe-adjacent longevity experiments, and pushed for projects that blurred the line between visionary science and eugenic delusion. Behind the PR gloss of “advancing human potential,” there was always the darker subtext: Epstein wanted to shape evolution in his own image, to create a world where elite men—just like him—could extend their lineage, their power, and their biological footprint.His relationship with Marvin Minsky fit neatly into that same paradigm. Minsky, an MIT legend and one of the founding fathers of artificial intelligence, became one of Epstein's most publicly controversial scientific associates. Epstein courted Minsky aggressively—donations to MIT, invitations to his private gatherings, a seat at the table for any cutting-edge conversation Epstein thought he could buy his way into. Minsky, known for his brilliance but also for a certain intellectual detachment from moral scrutiny, was drawn into Epstein's orbit at the same time Epstein was shaping his network of scientists into something between an advisory board and a trophy case. After Epstein's arrest, Minsky's name became part of the fallout, including allegations from Virginia Giuffre placing him at Epstein's island—allegations Minsky was never able to respond to before his death. Their connection underscores a larger truth:to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

In this appeal from a now-settled defamation case brought by Virginia Giuffre against Ghislaine Maxwell, the Second Circuit held that many of the documents under seal were properly treated as “judicial documents” to which a strong presumption of public access attached. The court reaffirmed that the status of a document as a judicial document is “fixed at filing” — meaning that if the filing was relevant to the court's exercise of its Article III functions when filed, later events (e.g., the case being settled or the motion becoming moot) do not nullify the presumption of access. The court also clarified that a document does not lose the presumption of access simply because the court did not explicitly rely on it in rendering a decision, and that filings in connection with motions to seal or unseal are themselves judicial documents since they invoke the court's supervisory power.At the same time, the Second Circuit affirmed in part and vacated in part the district court's orders. It agreed that the lower court did not err in declining to unseal certain documents — for example, segments of Maxwell's deposition involving her adult sexual relationships and redacted identifying information of pseudonymized third-parties — because in those instances countervailing privacy interests outweighed the access presumption. But the appellate court vacated the district court's categorical refusal to treat certain undecided motions as judicial documents subject to access, and remanded for further individual review of those materials (including a Florida deposition transcript and filings by non-parties) consistent with the correct standard.to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In 2015 the Met began what was known as an evidentiary review into claims that Prince Andrew had sexual contact with Virginia Giuffre when she was 17, while she was trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein and his associate Ghislaine Maxwell. The review concluded in 2021 with the Met announcing it would take no further action.In October 2025 new allegations emerged that Andrew may have sought to use a Met-assigned bodyguard (a close protection officer) to dig up information on Giuffre—including her date of birth and U.S. Social Security number—to find a supposed criminal record. The Met stated it was “aware of media reporting and actively looking into the claims made.”To contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Friday, November 14th, 2025Today, new details emerge about the young girl Matt Gaetz exploited that led to the criminal investigation into him for sex trafficking a minor; a judge in the Comey case says a chunk of the grand jury transcripts is missing; Catholic bishops condemn US immigration operations in a rare public statement; a judge in Chicago has ordered the release of hundreds of non high-risk immigration detainees in Chicago; after that apartment building raid where they rappelled from Blackhawk helicopters - Propublica found no actual arrests were made; Trump withdraws his Supreme Court appeal over SNAP benefits; Bill Pulte has referred Eric Swalwell to the DOJ for mortgage fraud; the Oklahoma governor has stayed the execution of Tremane Wood; and Allison and Dana Deliver your Good News.Thank You, CBDistilleryUse promo code DAILYBEANS at CBDistillery.com for 25% off your purchase. Thank You, Fast Growing TreesGet 15% off your first purchase.  FastGrowingTrees.com/dailybeansGuest: John FugelsangTell Me Everything - John Fugelsang, The John Fugelsang Podcast, John Fugelsang - Substack, @johnfugelsang.bsky.social - Bluesky, @JohnFugelsang -TwitterSeparation of Church and Hate by John Fugelsang - OUT NOW!JOHN FUGELSANG BOOK TOUR PPV SPECIALStoriesAmerica's bishops express opposition to indiscriminate mass deportations | Catholic News AgencyTrump official refers Rep. Eric Swalwell for a federal criminal probe over alleged mortgage fraud | NBC NewsOklahoma governor spares the life of death row inmate just before scheduled lethal injection | PBS NewsHow a 17-Year-Old Girl Became Enmeshed in the Matt Gaetz Scandal | The New York Times“I Lost Everything”: Venezuelans Were Rounded Up in a Dramatic Midnight Raid but Never Charged With a Crime | ProPublicaGood TroubleIf you're hearing right-wing media insist that the redacted name in the Epstein email is Virginia Giuffre, here's the simplest response: prove it.If Republicans claim the redacted Epstein email name is Virginia Giuffre, tell your House rep: “Prove it. Lift the redaction. If it's her, show it. If you can't, say so.”And if your rep is a Democrat — especially on House Oversight — ask them to demand transparency on that redaction. Find Your Representative | house.govContacting U.S. Senators Find Your Representative | house.gov**Mutual Aid Relief Fund, Mutual Aid Hub, GiveDirectly.org/snap**​​Saturday, November 15. TeslaTakedown.com**Group Directory - The Visibility Brigade: Resistance is Possible**Vote Yes 836 - Oklahoma is gathering signatures**How to Organize a Bearing Witness Standout**Indiana teacher snitch portal - Eyes on Education**Find Your Representative | house.gov, Contacting U.S. SenatorsFrom The Good Newsadoptapet.com/pet/45311295-stockton-californiaSleepy Cat KnitsDana Goldberg Outrageous Tour - TONIGHT November 14th ChicagoOur Donation LinksNational Security Counselors - Donate, MSW Media, Blue Wave CA Victory Fund | ActBlue, WhistleblowerAid.org/beansFederal workers - email AG at fedoath@pm.me and let me know what you're going to do, or just vent. I'm always here to listen. Find Upcoming Actions 50501 Movement, No Kings.org, Indivisible.orgDr. Allison Gill - Substack, BlueSky , TikTok, IG, TwitterDana Goldberg - The 2025 Out100, BlueSky, Twitter, IG, facebook, danagoldberg.comMore from MSW Media - Shows - MSW Media, Cleanup On Aisle 45 pod, The Breakdown | SubstackReminder - you can see the pod pics if you become a Patron. The good news pics are at the bottom of the show notes of each Patreon episode! That's just one of the perks of subscribing! patreon.com/muellershewrote Our Donation LinksNational Security Counselors - DonateMSW Media, Blue Wave California Victory Fund | ActBlueWhistleblowerAid.org/beansFederal workers - feel free to email AG at fedoath@pm.me and let me know what you're going to do, or just vent. I'm always here to listen. Find Upcoming Actions 50501 Movement, No Kings.org, Indivisible.orgDr. Allison Gill - Substack, BlueSky , TikTok, IG, TwitterDana Goldberg - BlueSky, Twitter, IG, facebook, danagoldberg.comCheck out more from MSW Media - Shows - MSW Media, Cleanup On Aisle 45 pod, The Breakdown | SubstackShare your Good News or Good TroubleMSW Good News and Good TroubleHave some good news; a confession; or a correction to share?Good News & Confessions - The Daily Beanshttps://www.dailybeanspod.com/confessional/ Listener Survey:http://survey.podtrac.com/start-survey.aspx?pubid=BffJOlI7qQcF&ver=shortFollow the Podcast on Apple:The Daily Beans on Apple PodcastsWant to support the show and get it ad-free and early?The Daily Beans | SupercastThe Daily Beans & Mueller, She Wrote | PatreonThe Daily Beans | Apple Podcasts Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Jeffrey Epstein's own words have now obliterated the last surviving excuse of the people who spent years swearing the photo of Prince Andrew with Virginia Roberts was fake. In his newly revealed emails, Epstein makes it clear—flat-out, unequivocally—that the photo is real. No hedging, no “maybe,” no conspiratorial tap-dancing. The man at the center of the entire operation confirmed its authenticity himself. And with that single admission, he torpedoed every hack, every opportunist, every palace-adjacent clown who built their entire reputations around insisting that the image was doctored, fabricated, or some kind of elaborate smear.Epstein's admission doesn't just undercut the “fake picture” crowd—it vaporizes their entire narrative. Every pundit, PR lackey, and self-styled “expert” who pushed that nonsense wasn't just wrong; they were pushing a lie that the trafficker himself never believed for a second. For years, these people tried to gaslight the public and smear a trafficking survivor to protect a disgraced royal. Now, with Epstein's own confirmation standing in black and white, their talking points have collapsed. There's no Photoshop mystery, no deepfake theory, no palace spin-cycle left. The picture is real. It always was. And the truth just came from the one man they never expected to hear it from.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comto contact me:source:Epstein said Andrew did have photo taken with Virginia Giuffre, emails show | US News | Sky News

On Wednesday's Mark Levin Show, in chapter two of "American Marxism," titled "Breeding Mobs," it explains how mass movements devour individual identity and uniqueness, rendering people indistinguishable while assigning group identities based on race, age, or income to foster class distinctions and divisions.  These movements attract disenchanted, disaffected, and maladjusted individuals who blame external factors like the system or others for their conditions, lured by utopian promises and criticisms of society, where improving their lot ties to the cause and disparaging the successful becomes a tactic to instill meaning and self-worth.  Ultimately, these movements rely on deceit, propaganda, intimidation, and force, leading to scapegoating, violence, and totalitarianism.  Just think of figures like Bernie Sanders, AOC, Nick Fuentes, Steve Bannon, Alex Jones, Tucker Carlson, and their supporters. Also, Democrats are trying to insinuate that Trump spent significant time with Virginia Giuffre and possibly engaged in untoward behavior. However, Giuffre herself stated in 2016 that Trump was never involved in any improper conduct with her and that she witnessed nothing inappropriate. Democrats redacting Giuffre's name in leaked emails was intentional to fabricate a scandal, similar to the Russia hoax. Later, Gov Greg Abbott calls in and explains that he shut down the proposed EPIC center in the Dallas area, an Islamic-only development, through a new law that bans no-go zones, prohibits discriminatory land sales or rentals based on Islam, mandates disputes be resolved under Texas laws and courts rather than Sharia law, and empowers the Attorney General to close such projects. He also outlined a multi-point plan to make housing more affordable by reducing property taxes. Finally, Professor Emeritus John Ellis calls in and argues that to save universities from radical political zealots who have replaced knowledge promotion with fringe ideology indoctrination, urgent reform is essential, as evidenced by radicalized graduates influencing society, such as New York's communist mayor. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Dave Rubin of "The Rubin Report" talks about White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt listing the damage done by Democrats' pointless government shutdown to a stunned press; Donald Trump announcing the official end of the government shutdown and his plan to to make health insurance more affordable for Americans by giving healthcare subsidies directly to them instead of to health insurance companies; Bill O'Reilly getting Stephen A. Smith to go quiet with his simple advice to Democrats on their political strategy while on Chris Cuomo's NewsNation show; Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez making it clear that she is not just focused on taking on Chuck Schumer, but the entire old guard of the Democratic Party establishment to push the party in the direction of the Democratic Socialists; Karoline Leavitt directly answering a reporter's question about the just released email concerning an interaction between Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein victim Virginia Giuffre; John Fetterman shocking CNN's Dana Bash with his warning about the dangers of the far-left and why Bluesky is filled with death threats against centrist Democrats like himself; Marco Rubio issuing a chilling warning to the European Union if it gets in the way of America's attacks on Venezuelan drug boats trafficking illegal drugs into the country; and much more. Dave also does a special "ask me anything" question-and-answer session on a wide-ranging host of topics, answering questions from the Rubin Report Locals community. WATCH the MEMBER-EXCLUSIVE segment of the show here: https://rubinreport.locals.com/ Check out the NEW RUBIN REPORT MERCH here: https://daverubin.store/ ----------  Today's Sponsors: Noble Gold Investments - Whether you're looking to roll over an old 401(k) into a Gold IRA… or you want physical coins and bars delivered right to your home Noble Gold makes the process simple, safe, and stress-free. Download the free wealth protection kit and open a new qualified account and get a FREE 10-ounce Silver Flag Bar plus a Silver American Eagle Proof Coin. Go to http://DaveRubinGold.com Tax Network USA - If you owe back taxes or have unfiled returns, don't let the government take advantage of you. Whether you owe a few thousand or a few million, they can help you. Call 1(800)-958-1000 for a private, free consultation or Go to: https://tnusa.com/dave Balance of Nature - Make sure you are getting all the positive effects from a wide variety of fruits and vegetables. Rubin Report viewers get 35% off their first order plus a FREE Fiber & Spice supplement when you use Code RUBIN. Go to: http://balanceofnature.com/

The Rich Zeoli Show- Hour 4: 6:05pm- The Trump administration is set to hit Italian pasta with a 107% importation tariff. Aren't the tariffs supposed to address national security concerns? 6:15pm- On Wednesday, House Democrats released emails showing convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein discussing President Donald Trump. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt noted that the victim referenced in the email is Virginia Giuffre—who repeatedly stated Trump was never involved in any wrongdoing. In response, the Republican controlled House Oversight Committee released an additional 20,000 pages of documents related to the Epstein case. 6:30pm- Excessive Regulation: President Donald Trump has pardoned Michelino Sunseri—a record-setting trail runner who briefly used a restricted path while running the Grand Teton in Wyoming. Federal prosecutors had argued Sunseri violated National Park Service regulations.

The Rich Zeoli Show- Hour 1: 3:05pm- Excessive Regulation: President Donald Trump has pardoned Michelino Sunseri—a record-setting trail runner who briefly used a restricted path while running the Grand Teton in Wyoming. Federal prosecutors had argued Sunseri violated National Park Service regulations. 3:20pm- The Trump administration is set to hit Italian pasta with a 107% importation tariff. 3:30pm- On Wednesday, House Democrats released emails showing convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein discussing President Donald Trump. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt noted that the victim referenced in the email is Virginia Giuffre—who repeatedly stated Trump was never involved in any wrongdoing. In response, the Republican controlled House Oversight Committee released an additional 20,000 pages of documents related to the Epstein case.

The Rich Zeoli Show- Hour 3: 5:05pm- On Wednesday, House Democrats released emails showing convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein discussing President Donald Trump. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt noted that the victim referenced in the email is Virginia Giuffre—who repeatedly stated Trump was never involved in any wrongdoing. In response, the Republican controlled House Oversight Committee released an additional 20,000 pages of documents related to the Epstein case. 5:20pm- While appearing on CNN with Dana Bash, Sen. John Fetterman (D-PA) said that while the far-right has mocked him and called him names, the far-left has openly called for him to die. 5:30pm- During a discussion with Bill Maher, Cheryl Hines revealed: “The Republicans have been very kind to me from the beginning.” 5:40pm- Rep. Mikie Sherrill delivered a 90-second speech from the House floor supposedly opposing the government funding bill—however, she primarily used the opportunity to brag about her gubernatorial election win and announce that it will be her final speech as a member of Congress: “This will be my last speech in this chamber.” She plans to submit her resignation next week—triggering a special election to fill her seat. Democrats will have another House vacancy after only just filling a previous vacancy Wednesday afternoon.

The Rich Zeoli Show- Full Episode (11/12/2025): 3:05pm- Excessive Regulation: President Donald Trump has pardoned Michelino Sunseri—a record-setting trail runner who briefly used a restricted path while running the Grand Teton in Wyoming. Federal prosecutors had argued Sunseri violated National Park Service regulations. 3:20pm- The Trump administration is set to hit Italian pasta with a 107% importation tariff. 3:30pm- On Wednesday, House Democrats released emails showing convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein discussing President Donald Trump. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt noted that the victim referenced in the email is Virginia Giuffre—who repeatedly stated Trump was never involved in any wrongdoing. In response, the Republican controlled House Oversight Committee released an additional 20,000 pages of documents related to the Epstein case. 4:05pm- On Monday night, eight Senators who caucus with Democrats—Angus King, Tim Kaine, Dick Durbin, John Fetterman, Maggie Hassan, Jeanne Shaheen, and Catherine Cortez Masto—joined Republicans to pass a spending package to end the government shutdown. The final vote in the Senate was 60-40. The House of Representatives is expected to vote on—and pass—the bill later today. 4:15pm- When asked if Chuck Schumer should remain Senate Minority Leader after several Democrats broke ranks and joined Republicans to vote in favor of reopening the government, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio Cortez said, “this problem is bigger than one person.” 4:30pm- Hooters is making the move to become a “family friendly” restaurant + Coca-Cola is releasing a limited-edition holiday soda—smooth, creamy vanilla flavored Coke! Is there a marketing campaign that Matt won't fall for? 5:05pm- On Wednesday, House Democrats released emails showing convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein discussing President Donald Trump. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt noted that the victim referenced in the email is Virginia Giuffre—who repeatedly stated Trump was never involved in any wrongdoing. In response, the Republican controlled House Oversight Committee released an additional 20,000 pages of documents related to the Epstein case. 5:20pm- While appearing on CNN with Dana Bash, Sen. John Fetterman (D-PA) said that while the far-right has mocked him and called him names, the far-left has openly called for him to die. 5:30pm- During a discussion with Bill Maher, Cheryl Hines revealed: “The Republicans have been very kind to me from the beginning.” 5:40pm- Rep. Mikie Sherrill delivered a 90-second speech from the House floor supposedly opposing the government funding bill—however, she primarily used the opportunity to brag about her gubernatorial election win and announce that it will be her final speech as a member of Congress: “This will be my last speech in this chamber.” She plans to submit her resignation next week—triggering a special election to fill her seat. Democrats will have another House vacancy after only just filling a previous vacancy Wednesday afternoon. 6:05pm- The Trump administration is set to hit Italian pasta with a 107% importation tariff. Aren't the tariffs supposed to address national security concerns? 6:15pm- On Wednesday, House Democrats released emails showing convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein discussing President Donald Trump. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt noted that the victim referenced in the email is Virginia Giuffre—who repeatedly stated Trump was never involved in any wrongdoing. In response, the Republican controlled House Oversight Committee released an additional 20,000 pages of documents related to the Epstein case. 6:30pm- Excessive Regulation: President Donald Trump has pardoned Michelino Sunseri—a record-setting trail runner who briefly used a restricted path while running the Grand Teton in Wyoming. Federal prosecutors had argued Sunseri violated National Park Service regulations.

Prince Andrew's past just caught up with him — again. The U.S. House Oversight Committee has officially requested that Andrew Mountbatten Windsor, formerly known as Prince Andrew, sit for a transcribed interview under oath about his involvement with convicted sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein. This unprecedented move marks the first time a U.S. congressional body has formally sought testimony from a member of the British royal family in connection with Epstein's network. In this powerful episode, Tony Brueski breaks down the explosive details of the congressional letter, signed by sixteen House Democrats, which cites flight logs, financial ledgers labeled “massage for Andrew,” and emails showing a disturbingly close relationship between Andrew and Epstein long after Epstein's conviction. The committee's request goes far beyond curiosity — they're following the money, the documents, and the survivors' testimony to uncover just how deep Andrew's involvement really went. Congressman Suhas Subramanyam says multiple survivors have come forward alleging that Virginia Giuffre was not the only woman trafficked to Andrew — and that new leads could expose a broader pattern of abuse and complicity. With Epstein's estate handing over more than 17,000 documents and financial records, investigators now believe they may be closing in on the truth. As the walls close in, Andrew's refusal to cooperate could have devastating consequences — not just legally, but for the already fragile reputation of the monarchy. From the 2011 email where Andrew wrote to Epstein “We're in this together,” to the alleged effort to smear Giuffre through his royal protection officer, this episode pulls no punches in exposing the arrogance, privilege, and denial that kept Epstein's network alive. Subscribe and listen as Tony Brueski unpacks the congressional strategy, the survivor testimony, and what may finally be Prince Andrew's reckoning. #PrinceAndrew #JeffreyEpstein #EpsteinFiles #HiddenKillers #TonyBrueski #RoyalScandal #Congress #SexTrafficking #HouseOversight #VirginiaGiuffre Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Prince Andrew's past just caught up with him — again. The U.S. House Oversight Committee has officially requested that Andrew Mountbatten Windsor, formerly known as Prince Andrew, sit for a transcribed interview under oath about his involvement with convicted sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein. This unprecedented move marks the first time a U.S. congressional body has formally sought testimony from a member of the British royal family in connection with Epstein's network. In this powerful episode, Tony Brueski breaks down the explosive details of the congressional letter, signed by sixteen House Democrats, which cites flight logs, financial ledgers labeled “massage for Andrew,” and emails showing a disturbingly close relationship between Andrew and Epstein long after Epstein's conviction. The committee's request goes far beyond curiosity — they're following the money, the documents, and the survivors' testimony to uncover just how deep Andrew's involvement really went. Congressman Suhas Subramanyam says multiple survivors have come forward alleging that Virginia Giuffre was not the only woman trafficked to Andrew — and that new leads could expose a broader pattern of abuse and complicity. With Epstein's estate handing over more than 17,000 documents and financial records, investigators now believe they may be closing in on the truth. As the walls close in, Andrew's refusal to cooperate could have devastating consequences — not just legally, but for the already fragile reputation of the monarchy. From the 2011 email where Andrew wrote to Epstein “We're in this together,” to the alleged effort to smear Giuffre through his royal protection officer, this episode pulls no punches in exposing the arrogance, privilege, and denial that kept Epstein's network alive. Subscribe and listen as Tony Brueski unpacks the congressional strategy, the survivor testimony, and what may finally be Prince Andrew's reckoning. #PrinceAndrew #JeffreyEpstein #EpsteinFiles #HiddenKillers #TonyBrueski #RoyalScandal #Congress #SexTrafficking #HouseOversight #VirginiaGiuffre Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

In this episode, Michael unpacks the stunning release of thousands of Jeffrey Epstein emails that have Washington on edge. What began as a selective Democratic leak of three explosive emails suggesting Donald Trump knew more about Epstein's abuse than he admitted soon became a political firestorm — with Republicans countering by releasing over 20,000 documents. Michael walks listeners through what the emails actually say — and what's pure speculation. Epstein's cryptic phrase “the dog that didn't bark,” his mention of Trump spending hours with Virginia Giuffre, and references to Trump “knowing about the girls” are now public. But the real question, Michael argues, is why the White House is scrambling — with reports of Lauren Boebert being summoned to the Situation Room and Trump playing phone tag with Nancy Mace. Is there more we haven't seen? Or is this another example of political theater in overdrive? Original air date 13 November 2025. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See https://pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.