Podcasts about Objection

Your intake call isn't just a casual chat. It's your power move. In this episode, Jennifer and Robin share why this second step in your client experience journey can make or break your ability to close the sale. They explain how to lead with confidence, ask thoughtful questions that uncover what your clients really want, and position yourself as the expert from the very first conversation. You'll also learn how to use tech tools like AI to stay fully present while capturing key details without missing a beat. Plus, hear how creating a clear structure for your call helps set expectations, build trust, and make it easier to introduce your planning fee with ease. If you're ready to turn more inquiries into booked clients, this episode is a must-listen! Download the free Intake Call Guide: https://www.tiquehq.com/sales-call?utm_source=Podcast+Episode+135&utm_medium=Podcast+Shownotes&utm_campaign=Sales+Call Today we will cover: (01:40) Why the intake call matters is the key to closing the sale (09:30) How to prepare with confidence and establish your authority (11:30) Objection handling tips (18:20) Using AI for client interactions and digital note-taking (26:20) Building strong client relationships from the first call (28:45) How to structure an effective intake call and lead with confidence (36:40) How to introduce your planning fee without awkwardness (40:05) Collaborating with suppliers to enhance your destination knowledge Also mentioned in the episode: Seven Figure Sales Episode 123: How To Get A Client To Commit To A Budget with Courtney Gardner JOIN THE NICHE COMMUNITY An interactive membership for travel advisors wanting the community, education, & support to grow their business. VISIT THE TEMPLATE SHOP Create an enjoyable booking experience for every one of your travel clients. EXPLORE THE PROGRAMS Self-paced style courses for the modern travel advisor. FOLLOW ALONG ON INSTAGRAM @TiqueHQ

What if the best sales training didn't come from a textbook — but from a Miami bar?In this episode, Jessey chats with Jen Way, a real estate investor turned sales coach, who's helped countless land investors close more deals by simply learning how to talk again. From her days behind the bar to flipping houses and buying land, Jen shares how conversation — not persuasion — is the foundation of great sales.You'll hear Jen's journey from marine science grad to multi-faceted investor, and why she believes anyone can become good at sales with the right mindset and structure. No gimmicks. No pressure tactics. Just real rapport, real listening, and a whole lot of curiosity.In this episode:How Jen went from wholesaling houses to coaching investors on salesWhy “likability” isn't about personality — and what to lean on insteadJen's repeat-relate-resume method to unlock better conversationsHow to front-load objections before they kill your deal

“Cindy” is up against a jealous friend, an upcoming wedding, and some potential drama that could go down that she now knows about. Well the wedding was this past weekend and we have an UPDATE!

In Group Therapy, "Rebecca" is reeling after what her husband said to her after the birth of their second child. How does she get past it? Plus we get an update from "Cindy Clutching Her Pearls" about if her friend "Kelsey" objected at a weekend wedding of mutual friends! Plus we investigate what another segment would sound like if we were NOT sober!

We had some special guests, Bryson Bloom and Dalton Ponce from The Party Animals to help out with TBT this morning! So fun! Plus some potential wedding drama "Cindy" brought to us with knowledge that someone may or may not object to a wedding this weekend! Then Sammi needed ASAP help when she broke her BF's prized possession he asked her not to touch while he was out of town!

“Cindy” is up against a jealous friend, an upcoming wedding, and some potential drama that could go down that she now knows about.

Send us a textIn Season 10, we're tackling the most basic question of them all: Does God exist?While there may not be a single, knock-down argument for the existence of God, the cumulative case is very strong. Over the course of this season, we will consider 8 or 9 arguments that, when you put them together, make an utterly compelling case for God's existence — and specifically for the existence of the God of the Bible.We hope you join us on our journey through this season!We always love to hear from you. Get in touch via:Instagram: @theequipprojectEmail: theequipproject@gmail.com

In State of Idaho v. Bryan C. Kohberger, Case No. CR01-24-31665, the defense submitted a reply challenging the State's opposition to its motion to continue the trial. Kohberger's legal team argues that the prosecution's objection ignores the complex and voluminous nature of discovery materials still being reviewed, which include thousands of pages of documents, hours of surveillance footage, and extensive forensic data. The defense emphasizes that proceeding without adequate time to evaluate this evidence would compromise Kohberger's constitutional right to a fair trial and effective assistance of counsel.Additionally, the reply underscores that this is a capital case with unique legal and investigative demands, requiring more preparation time than the prosecution acknowledges. The defense contends that rushing the proceedings would not serve justice and that the need for a continuance is both reasonable and necessary given the gravity of the charges and the scope of the case. They urge the court to grant the motion and reject the State's assertion that further delay is unwarranted.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:061625+Defendants+Reply+to+the+States+Opposition+to+Defendants+Motion+to+Continue.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In State of Idaho v. Bryan C. Kohberger, Case No. CR01-24-31665, the defense submitted a reply challenging the State's opposition to its motion to continue the trial. Kohberger's legal team argues that the prosecution's objection ignores the complex and voluminous nature of discovery materials still being reviewed, which include thousands of pages of documents, hours of surveillance footage, and extensive forensic data. The defense emphasizes that proceeding without adequate time to evaluate this evidence would compromise Kohberger's constitutional right to a fair trial and effective assistance of counsel.Additionally, the reply underscores that this is a capital case with unique legal and investigative demands, requiring more preparation time than the prosecution acknowledges. The defense contends that rushing the proceedings would not serve justice and that the need for a continuance is both reasonable and necessary given the gravity of the charges and the scope of the case. They urge the court to grant the motion and reject the State's assertion that further delay is unwarranted.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:061625+Defendants+Reply+to+the+States+Opposition+to+Defendants+Motion+to+Continue.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

How To Handle ANY Objection Like A Master!

​In Case Number CR01-24-31665, the State of Idaho has submitted a reply to defendant Bryan C. Kohberger's objection concerning the self-authentication of certain records intended for use at trial. The State aims to admit various pieces of evidence—including surveillance footage, financial records, and communication data—by relying on the Idaho Rules of Evidence (I.R.E.) 803(6) and (8) for hearsay exceptions, and I.R.E. 902(4) and (11) for self-authentication, thereby eliminating the need for foundational witnesses. They assert that each item will be accompanied by the necessary Certificates of Authenticity to establish proper foundation and relevance.In response to the defense's objections, the State details specific items of evidence, such as surveillance footage from properties on Linda Lane and video from Albertson's in Clarkston, Washington, outlining their relevance and the steps taken to authenticate them. Additionally, the State addresses records from Amazon, AT&T, and various financial institutions, emphasizing that Certificates of Authenticity have been obtained or are in the process of being secured. The State maintains that utilizing these evidentiary rules does not infringe upon the defendant's due process rights and is a standard procedure to ensure efficiency and reliability in the admission of evidence.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:032425-States+Reply+to+Defendants+Objection+to+MIL+RE+Self+Authentication+of+Records.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

​In Case Number CR01-24-31665, the State of Idaho has submitted a reply to defendant Bryan C. Kohberger's objection concerning the self-authentication of certain records intended for use at trial. The State aims to admit various pieces of evidence—including surveillance footage, financial records, and communication data—by relying on the Idaho Rules of Evidence (I.R.E.) 803(6) and (8) for hearsay exceptions, and I.R.E. 902(4) and (11) for self-authentication, thereby eliminating the need for foundational witnesses. They assert that each item will be accompanied by the necessary Certificates of Authenticity to establish proper foundation and relevance.In response to the defense's objections, the State details specific items of evidence, such as surveillance footage from properties on Linda Lane and video from Albertson's in Clarkston, Washington, outlining their relevance and the steps taken to authenticate them. Additionally, the State addresses records from Amazon, AT&T, and various financial institutions, emphasizing that Certificates of Authenticity have been obtained or are in the process of being secured. The State maintains that utilizing these evidentiary rules does not infringe upon the defendant's due process rights and is a standard procedure to ensure efficiency and reliability in the admission of evidence.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:032425-States+Reply+to+Defendants+Objection+to+MIL+RE+Self+Authentication+of+Records.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In the case of United States v. Combs, S3 24 Cr. 542 (AS), the Government filed a letter opposing the defendant's objections to certain exhibits intended to be introduced during the testimony of the witness identified as “Jane.” Despite ongoing discussions between the parties, two main areas of dispute remain. First, the defense argues that selected text message exchanges should be excluded under the rule of completeness, suggesting that the Government is presenting messages out of context. Second, the defense raises hearsay objections to specific exhibits, including a text message exchange, a screenshot of a media headline, and several personal notes written by Jane in her phone's Notes app.The Government maintains that these objections lack merit. Regarding the completeness argument, the prosecution contends that the messages they seek to introduce are independently admissible and not misleading or taken out of context. As for the hearsay objections, the Government argues that the exhibits in question either do not constitute hearsay, fall within recognized exceptions, or are not offered for the truth of the matter asserted. Ultimately, the Government urges the Court to overrule the objections and allow the contested materials to be admitted into evidence during Jane's testimony.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.411.0_1.pdf

In the case of United States v. Combs, S3 24 Cr. 542 (AS), the Government filed a letter opposing the defendant's objections to certain exhibits intended to be introduced during the testimony of the witness identified as “Jane.” Despite ongoing discussions between the parties, two main areas of dispute remain. First, the defense argues that selected text message exchanges should be excluded under the rule of completeness, suggesting that the Government is presenting messages out of context. Second, the defense raises hearsay objections to specific exhibits, including a text message exchange, a screenshot of a media headline, and several personal notes written by Jane in her phone's Notes app.The Government maintains that these objections lack merit. Regarding the completeness argument, the prosecution contends that the messages they seek to introduce are independently admissible and not misleading or taken out of context. As for the hearsay objections, the Government argues that the exhibits in question either do not constitute hearsay, fall within recognized exceptions, or are not offered for the truth of the matter asserted. Ultimately, the Government urges the Court to overrule the objections and allow the contested materials to be admitted into evidence during Jane's testimony.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.411.0_1.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

​In Case Number CR01-24-31665, defendant Bryan C. Kohberger has filed a reply to the State's objection concerning his Motion in Limine #6, which seeks to exclude specific opinions of forensic analyst Rylene Nowlin and the use of the terms "touch DNA" and "contact DNA" during trial. Kohberger's defense argues that these terms are misleading and could confuse the jury by implying a certainty about the method of DNA transfer that is not scientifically substantiated. They emphasize that Nowlin's own disclosures acknowledge the complexity of DNA transfer mechanisms and the current inability of DNA technology to conclusively determine how or when DNA was deposited on an item. Therefore, the defense contends that allowing such terminology and speculative testimony would prejudice the jury and should be excluded to ensure a fair trial.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:032425-Defendants-Reply-States-Objection-Defendants-MIL6-RE-Nowlin-Touch-Contact-DNA.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In the case of United States v. Combs, S3 24 Cr. 542 (AS), the Government filed a letter opposing the defendant's objections to certain exhibits intended to be introduced during the testimony of the witness identified as “Jane.” Despite ongoing discussions between the parties, two main areas of dispute remain. First, the defense argues that selected text message exchanges should be excluded under the rule of completeness, suggesting that the Government is presenting messages out of context. Second, the defense raises hearsay objections to specific exhibits, including a text message exchange, a screenshot of a media headline, and several personal notes written by Jane in her phone's Notes app.The Government maintains that these objections lack merit. Regarding the completeness argument, the prosecution contends that the messages they seek to introduce are independently admissible and not misleading or taken out of context. As for the hearsay objections, the Government argues that the exhibits in question either do not constitute hearsay, fall within recognized exceptions, or are not offered for the truth of the matter asserted. Ultimately, the Government urges the Court to overrule the objections and allow the contested materials to be admitted into evidence during Jane's testimony.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.411.0_1.pdf

In State of Idaho v. Bryan C. Kohberger, Case No. CR01-24-31665, the defense submitted a reply challenging the State's opposition to its motion to continue the trial. Kohberger's legal team argues that the prosecution's objection ignores the complex and voluminous nature of discovery materials still being reviewed, which include thousands of pages of documents, hours of surveillance footage, and extensive forensic data. The defense emphasizes that proceeding without adequate time to evaluate this evidence would compromise Kohberger's constitutional right to a fair trial and effective assistance of counsel.Additionally, the reply underscores that this is a capital case with unique legal and investigative demands, requiring more preparation time than the prosecution acknowledges. The defense contends that rushing the proceedings would not serve justice and that the need for a continuance is both reasonable and necessary given the gravity of the charges and the scope of the case. They urge the court to grant the motion and reject the State's assertion that further delay is unwarranted.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:061625+Defendants+Reply+to+the+States+Opposition+to+Defendants+Motion+to+Continue.pdf

In State of Idaho v. Bryan C. Kohberger, Case No. CR01-24-31665, the defense submitted a reply challenging the State's opposition to its motion to continue the trial. Kohberger's legal team argues that the prosecution's objection ignores the complex and voluminous nature of discovery materials still being reviewed, which include thousands of pages of documents, hours of surveillance footage, and extensive forensic data. The defense emphasizes that proceeding without adequate time to evaluate this evidence would compromise Kohberger's constitutional right to a fair trial and effective assistance of counsel.Additionally, the reply underscores that this is a capital case with unique legal and investigative demands, requiring more preparation time than the prosecution acknowledges. The defense contends that rushing the proceedings would not serve justice and that the need for a continuance is both reasonable and necessary given the gravity of the charges and the scope of the case. They urge the court to grant the motion and reject the State's assertion that further delay is unwarranted.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:061625+Defendants+Reply+to+the+States+Opposition+to+Defendants+Motion+to+Continue.pdf

In the case of United States v. Combs, S3 24 Cr. 542 (AS), the Government filed a letter opposing the defendant's objections to certain exhibits intended to be introduced during the testimony of the witness identified as “Jane.” Despite ongoing discussions between the parties, two main areas of dispute remain. First, the defense argues that selected text message exchanges should be excluded under the rule of completeness, suggesting that the Government is presenting messages out of context. Second, the defense raises hearsay objections to specific exhibits, including a text message exchange, a screenshot of a media headline, and several personal notes written by Jane in her phone's Notes app.The Government maintains that these objections lack merit. Regarding the completeness argument, the prosecution contends that the messages they seek to introduce are independently admissible and not misleading or taken out of context. As for the hearsay objections, the Government argues that the exhibits in question either do not constitute hearsay, fall within recognized exceptions, or are not offered for the truth of the matter asserted. Ultimately, the Government urges the Court to overrule the objections and allow the contested materials to be admitted into evidence during Jane's testimony.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.411.0_1.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In State of Idaho v. Bryan C. Kohberger, Case No. CR01-24-31665, the defense submitted a reply challenging the State's opposition to its motion to continue the trial. Kohberger's legal team argues that the prosecution's objection ignores the complex and voluminous nature of discovery materials still being reviewed, which include thousands of pages of documents, hours of surveillance footage, and extensive forensic data. The defense emphasizes that proceeding without adequate time to evaluate this evidence would compromise Kohberger's constitutional right to a fair trial and effective assistance of counsel.Additionally, the reply underscores that this is a capital case with unique legal and investigative demands, requiring more preparation time than the prosecution acknowledges. The defense contends that rushing the proceedings would not serve justice and that the need for a continuance is both reasonable and necessary given the gravity of the charges and the scope of the case. They urge the court to grant the motion and reject the State's assertion that further delay is unwarranted.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:061625+Defendants+Reply+to+the+States+Opposition+to+Defendants+Motion+to+Continue.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In State of Idaho v. Bryan C. Kohberger, Case No. CR01-24-31665, the defense submitted a reply challenging the State's opposition to its motion to continue the trial. Kohberger's legal team argues that the prosecution's objection ignores the complex and voluminous nature of discovery materials still being reviewed, which include thousands of pages of documents, hours of surveillance footage, and extensive forensic data. The defense emphasizes that proceeding without adequate time to evaluate this evidence would compromise Kohberger's constitutional right to a fair trial and effective assistance of counsel.Additionally, the reply underscores that this is a capital case with unique legal and investigative demands, requiring more preparation time than the prosecution acknowledges. The defense contends that rushing the proceedings would not serve justice and that the need for a continuance is both reasonable and necessary given the gravity of the charges and the scope of the case. They urge the court to grant the motion and reject the State's assertion that further delay is unwarranted.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:061625+Defendants+Reply+to+the+States+Opposition+to+Defendants+Motion+to+Continue.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

The Trump administration orders about 700 Marines to Los Angeles to support National Guard troops in the wake of protests this weekend over immigration. California Attorney General Rob Bonta (D) says he is suing the Trump administration over the deployment of those National Guard troops. Senate Republican leaders are continuing to focus their energy on their budget reconciliation package, while the divisions over Medicaid changes and debt and deficit reduction remain. Meanwhile, House Republicans are starting their efforts this week to lock in as much as $9 billion in spending cuts. We are less than a week away from a military parade marking the 250th birthday of the US Army. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

​In his affidavit, defense expert Sy Ray challenges the State's motion regarding AT&T Timing Advance records in the case against Bryan Kohberger. Ray asserts that AT&T's Timing Advance data, which can accurately determine a mobile device's location, was available and utilized by law enforcement during their 2022 investigation. He provides evidence that the FBI obtained such data from AT&T for over 3,800 devices, excluding Kohberger's, and contends that the prosecution's claim—that AT&T did not produce Timing Advance records in 2022—is misleading. Ray suggests that the absence of Kohberger's Timing Advance data is either a significant deviation from standard investigative procedures or indicative of intentional withholding of exculpatory evidence. He concludes that the prosecution's motion misrepresents the facts and aims to conceal potentially exonerating information.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:032625+Defendants+Notice+of+Filing+Affidavit+iso+Obj+to+the+States+MIL+RE+ATT+Timing+Advance+Records.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

The Hidden Objection Killing 99% of Your Sales What if fear—not price or timing—is the real reason you're losing deals?

Most salespeople struggle with objections because they've been taught to fight them head-on. But what if there was a smarter way to handle them—one that feels natural and actually works better? In this video you'll learn a counterintuitive approach to sales objections that might change the way you sell forever. Backed by real sales experience […] The post Answering Objection Questions Is Shockingly Uncomplicated appeared first on Salesman.com.

In this episode of Running with Wolves, Savannah Jordan is calling out the thing most business owners avoid: objections. Spoiler—they're not rejections. They're just feedback. And if you know how to actually listen to what your lead is saying, you can turn “I'm not ready” into “Where do I pay?” with a few smart messaging shifts. Savannah's breaking down why most people handle objections all wrong, the real reason you keep getting hit with financial and urgency pushback, and how to lead the conversation with confidence instead of falling into convince-mode. You'll learn how to read the room, shift your strategy based on buyer type, and walk into every sales convo knowing you can close—even if the lead comes in ice cold. If your sales calls feel more like awkward Hinge messages you have to get a second opinion on, this one's your fix.   Got questions? MESSAGE Savannah on Instagram. Want Savannah in your corner for your next launch or sales sprint? Apply to work with her HERE.

Bryan Kohberger and his legal team have asked the court multiple times to stay proceedings. Judge Judge has so far denied their request and now the prosecution is objecting to the second request to stay the proceedings. In this episode we dive into that objection in full. (commercial at 9:47)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:081123-Objection-to-Defendants-Second-Motion-to-Stay-Proceedings.pdf (amazonaws.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

CULTIVATING SAINTS, SAGES, AND STATESMEN THROUGH THE GREAT TRADITION OF CHRISTENDOMIn today's episode, we dive into St. Thomas Aquinas's "brief" case for the papacy. He makes four arguments, and responds to two objections (both of which are often made by protestants and other non-Catholics to this day!). These arguments come from his apologetic work, Summa Contra Gentiles (Book 4, Ch. 76).If you aren't Catholic, learn why the papacy makes sense from Scripture and reason. If you are Catholic, learn how to defend the papacy with these great arguments from St. Thomas.VISIT OUR WEBSITEhttps://eternalchristendom.com/BECOME A PATRON OF THE GREAT TRADITIONHelp us continue to dig into the Great Tradition; produce beautiful, substantive content; and gift these treasures to cultural orphans around the world for free:https://eternalchristendom.com/become-a-patron/EXCLUSIVE DISCOUNTS AT ETERNAL CHRISTENDOM BOOKSTOREhttps://eternalchristendom.com/bookstore/CONNECT ON SOCIAL MEDIAX: https://twitter.com/JoshuaTCharlesFacebook: https://www.facebook.com/joshuatcharles/Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/joshuatcharles/DIVE DEEPERCheck out Eternal Christendom's "Becoming Catholic," where you'll find hundreds of thousands of words of free content (as big as the Bible!) in the form of Articles, Quote Archives, and Study Banks to help you become, remain, and deepen your life as a Catholic:https://eternalchristendom.com/becoming-catholic/EPISODE CHAPTERS00:00 - Intro01:23 - Roadmap04:03 - Argument 1: Societies Have Heads06:28 - Argument 2: Resolving Disputes11:25 - Argument 3: Rule by One18:36 - Argument 4: Imitation of Heaven23:36 - Objection 1: Christ is the Shepherd27:35 - Objection 2: Peter Has No Successors29:56 - ConclusionLISTEN ON APPLEhttps://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/eternal-christendom-podcast/id1725000526LISTEN ON SPOTIFYhttps://open.spotify.com/show/3HoTTco6oJtApc21ggVevu

This episode is the audio from our webinar on objection handling. We were joined by Will Aitken, Founder of WillAitken.com, Jack Wauson, GTM Team Lead at Mixmax, and Abdulla Casino, Manager of Sales Development at ZoomInfo. Check out more free content and get coaching at ⁠⁠⁠⁠https://outboundsquad.com

Let's talk about it.You're ambitious. You're multi-passionate. You've got vision for days.And because of that, you might be sabotaging your success without even knowing it.In this episode, I'm breaking down what shiny object syndrome really looks like for high-achieving women, and why it's killing your confidence, confusing your audience, and slowing down your business growth.If you've ever said “I want to do it all,”If you've launched 10 things and mastered none,If you're building but feel scattered, stretched, and stuck…This episode is your permission slip to stop doing the most and start doing what matters.You'll hear the truth about focus, discipline, mastery, and how to build your business (and legacy) one solid step at a time.Because all those sexy future visions?They don't come from doing more.They come from going deeper.

In this episode we get back to the court documents and check out the states objection to Bryan Kohbergers motion to dismiss the charges against him. (commercial at 21:50)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - Objection to MTD on GJ Instructions.docx (amazonaws.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In this episode, Colin Nolan shares the importance of transforming objections into opportunities by mastering the art of uncovering customer pain. Discover why the most successful objection handling happens during discovery, not at the end of the sales process, and learn practical techniques to leverage emotional buying motives when facing resistance. If you're struggling with closing deals, this conversation reveals why the solution lies in how you open them.

Fianna Fáil councillor Anne O’Sullivan said at yesterday’s meeting of Kerry County Council that a constituent’s name and address was submitted in a planning objection. However, the man knew nothing about this – his identity was used to make a bogus objection, Cllr O’Sullivan said.

What if our biggest obstacle to faith isn't intellectual—but personal? This week, we tackle the deeper reason so many resist Jesus: not because He hasn't proven Himself, but because if He is who He says He is, it means we're no longer in charge. It's not just about answering our questions—it's about surrendering our autonomy. Whether you're a skeptic, a seeker, or a longtime believer, it's crucial to confront the deeper issue behind unbelief and consider what it really means to trust Jesus with your whole life.

David is an art history professor. For the last year, he has been researching an early 20th-century American impressionist named Agnes Millen Richmond. He's started buying her paintings… and they're expensive. Susan says they have too many already! She says her husband is obsessed! Who's right? Who's wrong?We are on TikTok and YouTube! Follow us on both @judgejohnhodgmanpod! Follow us on Instagram @judgejohnhodgman!Thanks to reddit user u/OldTechNewSpecs for naming this week's case! To suggest a title for a future episode, keep an eye on the Maximum Fun subreddit at reddit.com/r/maximumfun! Judge John Hodgman is member-supported! Join at $5 a month at maximumfun.org/join!

Fr. Michael Copenhagen is a Melkite (Eastern Catholic) priest, husband, and father, at St. Nicholas the Wonderworker Melkite Catholic Church in Gates, New York. He holds a Bachelors of Sacred Theology from the Pontifical University of St. Thomas Aquinas in Rome. In Today's Show:  Can you explain the difference between blessing yourself from left to right, versus right to left as some Orthodox do? How do you justify the Filioque to the Orthodoxy? Is there any heresy in the Byzantine/Eastern rite in contrast to the western Roman Catholic rite? Is it coincidence that the Great Schism and Protestant reformation both happened under a pope named Leo? ​​What is the Eastern rite view on toll house? Pope Honorius I: A valid objection to the papacy? Should a damaged scapular be burned or buried? ​​Who purchases the ring for a newly elected Pope, and why is it so expensive? Visit the show page at thestationofthecross.com/askapriest to listen live, check out the weekly lineup, listen to podcasts of past episodes, watch live video, find show resources, sign up for our mailing list of upcoming shows, and submit your question for Father!

In this final exploration of Cicero's "On Ends," Michael and Caleb break down Book V, where Cicero reveals his own philosophical sweet spot – an Aristotelian-Platonic approach that challenges both Stoicism and Epicureanism.Against a backdrop of ancient Athens, Cicero's characters debate the core question: What makes a truly good human life? They navigate the middle path between Stoic rigidity (where virtue alone brings happiness) and Aristotle's elitism (where external goods are required).(01:53) Awesome Beginning(07:10) What's Our Purpose?(26:09) Supreme Happiness(31:55) Cicero's Objection(40:39) Summary***Subscribe to The Stoa Letter for weekly meditations, actions, and links to the best Stoic resources: www.stoaletter.com/subscribeDownload the Stoa app (it's a free download): https://stoameditation.com/podIf you try the Stoa app and find it useful, but truly cannot afford it, email us and we'll set you up with a free account.Listen to more episodes and learn more here: https://stoameditation.com/blog/stoa-conversations/Check out our Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/@stoaphilosophyThanks to Michael Levy for graciously letting us use his music in the conversations: https://ancientlyre.com/

You've done all the work to bring a potential client to the table and you are now at the part of the conversation where many inexperienced coaches fumble the bag. If you want to sit on the same side of the table as the prospect and actually help them, listen to this episode. I'll break down a way you can have a clear and honest conversation about finances and do what's best for the prospect but also your business.   Time Stamps:   (0:24) The Money Conversation Problem (1:14) Is This Really About Money? (2:55) If The Money Were There, Are You In? (5:00) Final Step and Custom Payment Plan ---------- Whenever You're Ready, Here Are 4 Ways We Can Help You (For Free)   (Community) Join the Fitness Business Secrets FB  Community to Unlock Your Free 5 Clients in 5 Days Mini-Course   (Content) Grab our exact post templates that are responsible for more than 3,500 online clients in our business Automated Post Planner   (Instagram) 3-5x Your Engagement, Grow an Audience and Generate Dream Clients from Instagram IG Playbook For Health & Fitness Coaches   (Get Clarity) Schedule a FREE No-Obligation 15-minute Call to Explore How To Add 10,000/Mo to Your Business–Guaranteed

CULTIVATING SAINTS, SAGES, AND STATESMEN THROUGH THE GREAT TRADITION OF CHRISTENDOMIn this episode, Joshua Charles unveils how he concluded—even while he was still a protestant—that "sola scriptura" (or "Scripture alone") was a false doctrine.He explains how he reached this conclusion in two primary ways: he recognized "sola scriptura" was both logically incoherent, and inconsistent with the sacred history recounted in the Bible itself.To his shock and amazement, his intuitions were ultimately confirmed by a famous and well-respected protestant teacher and theologian who advocated "sola scriptura."VISIT OUR WEBSITEhttps://eternalchristendom.com/BECOME A PATRON OF THE GREAT TRADITIONHelp us continue to dig into the Great Tradition; produce beautiful, substantive content; and gift these treasures to cultural orphans around the world for free:https://eternalchristendom.com/become-a-patron/Have your patronage DOUBLED thanks to a generous $50,000 matching gift from a patron:https://donorbox.org/eternal-christendom-double-your-impactEXCLUSIVE DISCOUNTS AT ETERNAL CHRISTENDOM BOOKSTOREhttps://eternalchristendom.com/bookstore/CONNECT ON SOCIAL MEDIAX: https://twitter.com/JoshuaTCharlesFacebook: https://www.facebook.com/joshuatcharles/Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/joshuatcharles/DIVE DEEPERCheck out Eternal Christendom's "Becoming Catholic," where you'll find hundreds of thousands of words of free content (as big as the Bible!) in the form of Articles, Quote Archives, and Study Banks to help you become, remain, and deepen your life as a Catholic:https://eternalchristendom.com/becoming-catholic/EPISODE CHAPTERS00:00 - Introduction03:45 - The Right Definition of "Sola Scriptura"07:59 - Objection 1: Logically Incoherent12:01 - Objection 2: Inconsistent with Sacred History20:25 - My Intuitions Confirmed by a Protestant (RC Sproul)40:17 - ConclusionLISTEN ON APPLEhttps://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/eternal-christendom-podcast/id1725000526LISTEN ON SPOTIFYhttps://open.spotify.com/show/3HoTTco6oJtApc21ggVevu

If you're doing any kind of cold calling or prospecting, you'll eventually hear this objection: "I'm in a meeting right now." Paul Wise, a heavy cold caller from Normandy, France targets product managers at software companies and says that nine times out of ten when he gets a decision-maker on the phone, they claim to be "in a meeting." Three Ways to Handle the "I'm in a Meeting" Prospecting Objection As I explained to Paul, how you respond in that moment can make or break your opportunity to move forward. First, let's acknowledge something important: If someone is genuinely in the middle of an important meeting, they typically don't answer calls from unknown numbers. The fact that they picked up your call suggests they may not be as unavailable as they claim. That said, they might be between meetings, heading into a meeting, or simply using this as a brush-off technique. Regardless of their true situation, you need an objection handling strategy. Based on my conversation with Paul, here are three effective approaches to handle this common situation: Approach #1: The Quick Pitch Strategy This is what Paul had been doing—when he gets someone on the phone who says they're in a meeting, he delivers his DMX (Decision Maker Express) pitch as quickly as possible, then tries to secure a meeting. Paul mentioned this sometimes works for him. He gets the meeting scheduled, then works hard to ensure they show up by engaging with them on LinkedIn, sending follow-up emails, and basically "surrounding" them with touch points. The upside: You've got them on the line, so why not take your shot? The downside: Rushing through your pitch can make you sound desperate and reduce your effectiveness. When to use it: If you have a high-energy personality and can deliver a compelling, concise pitch without sounding rushed, this approach can work. It's especially effective if you have a solid follow-up strategy to ensure they show up to the meeting. Approach #2: The Acknowledge and Pivot Strategy Instead of trying to pitch someone who's claimed to be busy, simply acknowledge their situation and pivot directly to scheduling: "I totally expected you to be in a meeting and not able to talk. That's exactly why I called—to find a time that's more convenient for you. Why don't I send you a meeting invite for Thursday at 2:00, and then we can get together when you do have time to talk?" This approach demonstrates respect for their time while simultaneously accomplishing your objective of setting an appointment. What happens next reveals a lot: If they agree to the meeting, you've accomplished your goal without the rushed pitch. If they ask, "Who are you again?" they're actually signaling they have more time than they initially let on. If they say they're not available Thursday, they're engaging in a scheduling conversation—which means they're interested enough to find an alternative time. When to use it: This works particularly well when you sense the prospect is genuinely busy but might be interested with the right approach. It's respectful, professional, and surprisingly effective. Approach #3: The Non-Complementary Behavior Strategy This is my personal favorite because it uses psychology to your advantage. When the prospect answers with high energy, saying they're busy or in a meeting, don't match their energy. Instead, deliberately slow down and use a calm, relaxed tone: "Totally get that. I figured you would be busy. Look, I only have two questions." Then—and this is critical—be quiet. Let the silence do the work. If they truly have no time, they'll hang up. But most won't. Instead, they'll likely say something like, "Okay, but go fast." Now you need to ask a question that gets them engaged—something they can easily answer that reveals qualification information: "How many data points are you connected to in your current configuration?" The magic happens in what follows:

In this episode of Create Like The Greats, Ross dives into the evolving landscape of digital marketing in the era of artificial intelligence and large language models (LLMs). He challenges brands to rethink their approach by understanding that today's most influential "audiences" aren't just humans—they're machines. Ross outlines how AI tools like ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google's AI Overviews, and others scrape public content to generate recommendations and answers for users, and how brands can strategically position their content to become part of this intelligence loop. Whether it's SEO, Reddit commentary, or owning bottom-of-funnel content, Ross shares powerful frameworks and tactics to help your brand stay relevant, present, and impactful in the age of AI-driven search results. Key Takeaways and Insights: ​​

Cale answers objections to Jesus’ Resurrection: the “Stolen Body Theory”, the “Swoon Theory”, the “Hallucination Theory”, and more!

If you are looking for the BEST SALES TRAINING on YOUTUBE you've found it!Andy Elliott teaches sales people to make more money and close more deals. TEXT ANDY at +1 (918) 210 - 0254 and he will help you make more money and change your life fast!You can also book a 15 minute strategy call with Andy by CLICKING HERE: https://elliott247.com/andy-calendar?...Follow Andy Elliott on other socials HERE:  / officialandyelliott    / theandyelliott  ABOUT ME:The Elliott Group is the fastest growing sales training company in the world.Andy Elliott owns a 9 figure business and helps business owners, leaders, sales people, and sales teams scale in revenue fast! If you're looking to level up, Andy Elliott is the right coach to push you & change your life!Andy Elliott lives in Scottsdale, Arizona, with his beautiful wife of 20 years and his 3 amazing kids.Want to STOP snoring and fix your breathing!? Buy Hostage Tape by CLICKING HERE: https://hostagetape.com/?srsltid=AfmB...General Disclaimer:https://elliott247.com/general-8652

Money objections are tough, especially when you hear “I can't afford it.” In this episode of Windshield Time, Chris Elmore and James Walker dive into one of the most emotional objections techs face in the field. You'll learn why affordability objections feel so awkward, how to overcome your own money biases, and how to turn a vulnerable moment into a confident path forward.

How many times have you heard this on a sales call?People playing the family card when you tell them the investment.The thing is, people are using their motive to mask their fear. It's nonsensical.This episode applies to you and your sales calls, but also in your own life. Are you making this mistake?---

Real estate objection handling doesn't have to feel like pressure or guesswork. In this live roleplay, We walk through exactly how to respond when sellers challenge your value — including the dreaded commission objection.Throughout this session, We break down multiple high-pressure listing objections with confidence and clarity. From expired listings to skeptical homeowners, you'll see real-time examples of how to lead with empathy and control the conversation without sounding scripted.If you've ever lost a listing because a seller said, “What's your commission?” or “I don't want to sign a long-term contract,” this breakdown is for you. You'll get real estate objection scripts for expireds, learn the psychology behind listing presentation objection handling, and see why confidence in your delivery matters more than any canned line.What You'll Learn:- How to handle real estate commission objections without flinching- Why most agents lose control in tough listing appointments- A repeatable objection-handling framework you can start practicing today- Real estate roleplay objection handling examples you can model- Scripts and mindset shifts that move sellers toward yesThis isn't theory. It's practical, pressure-tested strategy from real roleplays designed to help you perform when it counts.

Welcome to a new episode of Next Level Pros! In this episode, sales expert Chris Lee breaks down the critical sales technique of transforming the common objection "I need to think about it" into a successful close. Through a detailed role-play demonstration, Chris reveals psychological strategies to help potential clients make decisive decisions while building trust and understanding.Highlights:"Maybes don't make the world go round.""Being decisive has really served me well.""There is not a concern in the world that can't be overcome."Timestamps:00:00 - Introduction: The Phrase That Kills Deals01:45 - Exploring Client's Fear and Hesitation04:06 - Understanding Decision-Making Motivations05:32 - The Value of Being Decisive07:34 - Authenticity in Sales ConversationsWant me to teach you how to grow your business? Text me! 509-374-7554Want access to more of my content? Click the link below for all of our latest updates and events!https://linktr.ee/nextlevelprosWant to be a guest on our show? Apply here!https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1YlkVBSluEKMTg4gehyUOHYvBratcxHV5rt3kiWTXNC4/viewform?edit_requested=trueWatch my latest PodcastApple - https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/next-level-pros/id1687030281Spotify- https://open.spotify.com/show/1e0cL2vI1JAtQrojSOA7D2?si=95980cd4e55a437aYouTube- https://www.youtube.com/@NextLevelPros