Podcasts about kohberger

In a dramatic pretrial maneuver, Bryan Kohberger's defense team has introduced an "alternate perpetrator" theory in the 2022 University of Idaho student murders case. During a recent court hearing, Judge Steven Hippler acknowledged the defense's proposal but emphasized the need for concrete evidence to support such a claim. The defense has been given until May 23 to present admissible evidence identifying the alleged alternate suspect. Currently, the details of this theory remain sealed pending the judge's decision on its admissibility .Legal experts view this strategy as a high-risk attempt to introduce reasonable doubt, especially given the substantial evidence against Kohberger, including DNA found on a knife sheath at the crime scene and surveillance footage of his vehicle near the victims' residence. A hearing to assess the validity of the alternate suspect theory is scheduled for June 18, with the trial set to commence on August 11, 2025 .to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Idaho murders BOMBSHELL as Bryan Kohberger names another suspect | Daily Mail Online

Bryan Kohberger's family has released a statement about his arrest and the murder of Xana, Ethan, Madison and Kaylee. The Kohberger family expressed empathy for the families of the murdered college students while at the same time saying that they support Bryan and urge people to let the legal process play out before rushing to judgement.Let's dive in and see what they had to say.(commercial at 10:11)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Idaho Murders Suspect Bryan Kohberger's Family Make Statement (newsweek.com)

Genealogy is used in solving crimes by tracing the lineage of DNA found at crime scenes to identify possible suspects and then confirming or excluding them through further DNA testing. This method, called genetic genealogy, involves comparing the crime scene DNA profile to publicly available genetic genealogy databases, and then using traditional genealogical research to identify potential relatives of the person whose DNA was found at the crime scene. The goal is to find a close relative of the person whose DNA was found, and then work backwards to identify the person responsible for the crime. This approach has been successfully used to solve a number of cold cases, particularly in the United States.In this episode, we see how this applies to the Bryan Kohberger arrest and how a new trend using genealogy to solve current cases is beginning to emerge.(commercial at 8:23)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:How a suspect was identified in the Bryan Kohberger case (wpbf.com)

In this episode, we get right back to the court documents and this time we are taking a look at the 37 day stay ordered by Judge John Judge and several other new filings.(commercial at 8:00)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:070723 Order Staying Time for Speedy Trial.pdf (idaho.gov)source:070623 Amended Stipulation for Prepartion and Release of Transcript and Record of Grand Jury Proceedings Wi.pdf (idaho.gov)source:070723 Order for County to Pay Expense of Transcribing Grand Jury Transcript.pdf (idaho.gov)

In November 2022, four University of Idaho students—Ethan Chapin, Xana Kernodle, Madison Mogen, and Kaylee Goncalves—were found brutally murdered in an off-campus house in Moscow, Idaho. The suspect, Bryan Kohberger, was arrested in late December 2022.Key evidence in the case includes DNA found on a knife sheath left at the crime scene, which matched DNA from Kohberger's family's trash in Pennsylvania. Surveillance footage traced a white Hyundai Elantra, owned by Kohberger, near the crime scene around the time of the murders. Additionally, cell phone records showed Kohberger's phone was near the victims' residence on multiple occasions prior to the murders, though it was turned off during the time the murders occurred​.Kohberger, a criminology Ph.D. student at Washington State University, exhibited an interest in criminal psychology and crime scene analysis. He has pleaded not guilty and his defense suggests he was out driving at the time of the murders.Now, after the relase of a book detailing the murders by author Howard Blum, the Gocalves family is bashing that book and saying it's a work of fiction.In our second article, we get an update on what we might expect today at Bryan Kohberger's hearing.(commercial at 8:07)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Bryan Kohberger Book Slammed By Victim's Family - Newsweek

A new development has emerged in the case against Bryan Kohberger, the suspect in the 2022 murders of four University of Idaho students. A woman, identified only as "MM" in court documents, claims she was the DoorDash driver who delivered food to victim Xana Kernodle shortly before the killings occurred. In bodycam footage from a September 2024 DUI stop in Pullman, Washington, she states, "I'm the DoorDash driver. I saw Bryan there. I parked right next to him." This statement suggests she may have witnessed Kohberger near the crime scene on the night of the murders. The authenticity of this claim is supported by DoorDash delivery records and surveillance footage placing Kohberger's vehicle in the vicinity around the time of the crime.However, the woman's credibility could be challenged due to her arrest for driving under the influence of prescription medication during the same incident. Despite this, her statement has garnered attention as a potentially significant piece of evidence in the case. Prosecutors may seek to introduce her testimony to establish a timeline of events leading up to the murders, while the defense may attempt to discredit her account. The trial is scheduled to begin in August 2025, with jury selection starting in late July. As the proceedings unfold, this new witness could play a pivotal role in the case against Kohberger.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Bryan Kohberger murder case: Potential witness appears to say she saw him at the scene, police video shows | CNN

Why Is The Koberger Trial Taking So Long? #kohberger #annTaylor #judgehippler The Idaho 4 case is slated to go on trial on 8/14/25 and Judge Hipplet told both prosecution and defense to be ready. Lead defense attorney ann Taylor has requested a continuance for several reasons. Judge Stephen Hippler is weighing his decions to move forward or grant a stay.

Bryan Kohberger's defense team filed a motion to continue his trial, citing the immense complexity of the case and the need for more time to prepare a constitutionally sound defense in a potential death penalty proceeding. Central to their argument was the overwhelming volume of discovery—spanning thousands of documents, extensive digital forensics, and controversial investigative techniques like investigative genetic genealogy (IGG)—that still required analysis. The defense stressed that critical forensic testing, alternative suspect leads, and expert witness coordination were all in progress but incomplete, and that proceeding without adequate preparation time would severely undermine Kohberger's Sixth Amendment rights.Additionally, the motion addressed a new and pressing concern: recent unauthorized leaks of sensitive case information to the media, which the defense claims have irreparably tainted the jury pool and complicated trial readiness. The leaked material included confidential investigative details and potential evidentiary matters that had not yet been addressed in court, prompting fears that media exposure could bias potential jurors and violate Kohberger's right to a fair trial. The defense argued that the leaks not only compromised the integrity of the case but also necessitated further investigation into their source and impact, requiring additional time to file proper motions and possibly request venue changes. Together, these issues formed the basis of their request for a delay, asserting that justice demands a careful, deliberate approach—especially when a man's life hangs in the balance.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:052025+Defendants+Motion+to+Continue.pdf

Bryan Kohberger's defense team filed a motion to continue his trial, citing the immense complexity of the case and the need for more time to prepare a constitutionally sound defense in a potential death penalty proceeding. Central to their argument was the overwhelming volume of discovery—spanning thousands of documents, extensive digital forensics, and controversial investigative techniques like investigative genetic genealogy (IGG)—that still required analysis. The defense stressed that critical forensic testing, alternative suspect leads, and expert witness coordination were all in progress but incomplete, and that proceeding without adequate preparation time would severely undermine Kohberger's Sixth Amendment rights.Additionally, the motion addressed a new and pressing concern: recent unauthorized leaks of sensitive case information to the media, which the defense claims have irreparably tainted the jury pool and complicated trial readiness. The leaked material included confidential investigative details and potential evidentiary matters that had not yet been addressed in court, prompting fears that media exposure could bias potential jurors and violate Kohberger's right to a fair trial. The defense argued that the leaks not only compromised the integrity of the case but also necessitated further investigation into their source and impact, requiring additional time to file proper motions and possibly request venue changes. Together, these issues formed the basis of their request for a delay, asserting that justice demands a careful, deliberate approach—especially when a man's life hangs in the balance.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:052025+Defendants+Motion+to+Continue.pdf

Bryan Kohberger's defense team filed a motion to continue his trial, citing the immense complexity of the case and the need for more time to prepare a constitutionally sound defense in a potential death penalty proceeding. Central to their argument was the overwhelming volume of discovery—spanning thousands of documents, extensive digital forensics, and controversial investigative techniques like investigative genetic genealogy (IGG)—that still required analysis. The defense stressed that critical forensic testing, alternative suspect leads, and expert witness coordination were all in progress but incomplete, and that proceeding without adequate preparation time would severely undermine Kohberger's Sixth Amendment rights.Additionally, the motion addressed a new and pressing concern: recent unauthorized leaks of sensitive case information to the media, which the defense claims have irreparably tainted the jury pool and complicated trial readiness. The leaked material included confidential investigative details and potential evidentiary matters that had not yet been addressed in court, prompting fears that media exposure could bias potential jurors and violate Kohberger's right to a fair trial. The defense argued that the leaks not only compromised the integrity of the case but also necessitated further investigation into their source and impact, requiring additional time to file proper motions and possibly request venue changes. Together, these issues formed the basis of their request for a delay, asserting that justice demands a careful, deliberate approach—especially when a man's life hangs in the balance.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:052025+Defendants+Motion+to+Continue.pdf

Bryan Kohberger's defense team filed a motion to continue his trial, citing the immense complexity of the case and the need for more time to prepare a constitutionally sound defense in a potential death penalty proceeding. Central to their argument was the overwhelming volume of discovery—spanning thousands of documents, extensive digital forensics, and controversial investigative techniques like investigative genetic genealogy (IGG)—that still required analysis. The defense stressed that critical forensic testing, alternative suspect leads, and expert witness coordination were all in progress but incomplete, and that proceeding without adequate preparation time would severely undermine Kohberger's Sixth Amendment rights.Additionally, the motion addressed a new and pressing concern: recent unauthorized leaks of sensitive case information to the media, which the defense claims have irreparably tainted the jury pool and complicated trial readiness. The leaked material included confidential investigative details and potential evidentiary matters that had not yet been addressed in court, prompting fears that media exposure could bias potential jurors and violate Kohberger's right to a fair trial. The defense argued that the leaks not only compromised the integrity of the case but also necessitated further investigation into their source and impact, requiring additional time to file proper motions and possibly request venue changes. Together, these issues formed the basis of their request for a delay, asserting that justice demands a careful, deliberate approach—especially when a man's life hangs in the balance.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:052025+Defendants+Motion+to+Continue.pdf

Bryan Kohberger's defense team filed a motion to continue his trial, citing the immense complexity of the case and the need for more time to prepare a constitutionally sound defense in a potential death penalty proceeding. Central to their argument was the overwhelming volume of discovery—spanning thousands of documents, extensive digital forensics, and controversial investigative techniques like investigative genetic genealogy (IGG)—that still required analysis. The defense stressed that critical forensic testing, alternative suspect leads, and expert witness coordination were all in progress but incomplete, and that proceeding without adequate preparation time would severely undermine Kohberger's Sixth Amendment rights.Additionally, the motion addressed a new and pressing concern: recent unauthorized leaks of sensitive case information to the media, which the defense claims have irreparably tainted the jury pool and complicated trial readiness. The leaked material included confidential investigative details and potential evidentiary matters that had not yet been addressed in court, prompting fears that media exposure could bias potential jurors and violate Kohberger's right to a fair trial. The defense argued that the leaks not only compromised the integrity of the case but also necessitated further investigation into their source and impact, requiring additional time to file proper motions and possibly request venue changes. Together, these issues formed the basis of their request for a delay, asserting that justice demands a careful, deliberate approach—especially when a man's life hangs in the balance.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:052025+Defendants+Motion+to+Continue.pdf

Bryan Kohberger's defense team filed a motion to continue his trial, citing the immense complexity of the case and the need for more time to prepare a constitutionally sound defense in a potential death penalty proceeding. Central to their argument was the overwhelming volume of discovery—spanning thousands of documents, extensive digital forensics, and controversial investigative techniques like investigative genetic genealogy (IGG)—that still required analysis. The defense stressed that critical forensic testing, alternative suspect leads, and expert witness coordination were all in progress but incomplete, and that proceeding without adequate preparation time would severely undermine Kohberger's Sixth Amendment rights.Additionally, the motion addressed a new and pressing concern: recent unauthorized leaks of sensitive case information to the media, which the defense claims have irreparably tainted the jury pool and complicated trial readiness. The leaked material included confidential investigative details and potential evidentiary matters that had not yet been addressed in court, prompting fears that media exposure could bias potential jurors and violate Kohberger's right to a fair trial. The defense argued that the leaks not only compromised the integrity of the case but also necessitated further investigation into their source and impact, requiring additional time to file proper motions and possibly request venue changes. Together, these issues formed the basis of their request for a delay, asserting that justice demands a careful, deliberate approach—especially when a man's life hangs in the balance.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:052025+Defendants+Motion+to+Continue.pdf

Sean "Diddy" Combs trial jury sees shocking photos of drugs, baby oil, lube, and guns, at Combs LA Mansion as his former assistant, who has immunity to testify against Combs, talks about cleaning up after "Wild King Night" and getting drugs for Diddy. In Idaho, a woman caught on police body cam saying she saw Bryan Kohberger at the Moscow, Idaho, home minutes before the murders as she delivered food to Xana Kernodle. Dave Mack ReportsSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

​In Case Number CR01-24-31665, the State of Idaho has submitted a reply to defendant Bryan C. Kohberger's objection concerning the self-authentication of certain records intended for use at trial. The State aims to admit various pieces of evidence—including surveillance footage, financial records, and communication data—by relying on the Idaho Rules of Evidence (I.R.E.) 803(6) and (8) for hearsay exceptions, and I.R.E. 902(4) and (11) for self-authentication, thereby eliminating the need for foundational witnesses. They assert that each item will be accompanied by the necessary Certificates of Authenticity to establish proper foundation and relevance.In response to the defense's objections, the State details specific items of evidence, such as surveillance footage from properties on Linda Lane and video from Albertson's in Clarkston, Washington, outlining their relevance and the steps taken to authenticate them. Additionally, the State addresses records from Amazon, AT&T, and various financial institutions, emphasizing that Certificates of Authenticity have been obtained or are in the process of being secured. The State maintains that utilizing these evidentiary rules does not infringe upon the defendant's due process rights and is a standard procedure to ensure efficiency and reliability in the admission of evidence.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:032425-States+Reply+to+Defendants+Objection+to+MIL+RE+Self+Authentication+of+Records.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

​In Case Number CR01-24-31665, the State of Idaho has submitted a reply to defendant Bryan C. Kohberger's objection concerning the self-authentication of certain records intended for use at trial. The State aims to admit various pieces of evidence—including surveillance footage, financial records, and communication data—by relying on the Idaho Rules of Evidence (I.R.E.) 803(6) and (8) for hearsay exceptions, and I.R.E. 902(4) and (11) for self-authentication, thereby eliminating the need for foundational witnesses. They assert that each item will be accompanied by the necessary Certificates of Authenticity to establish proper foundation and relevance.In response to the defense's objections, the State details specific items of evidence, such as surveillance footage from properties on Linda Lane and video from Albertson's in Clarkston, Washington, outlining their relevance and the steps taken to authenticate them. Additionally, the State addresses records from Amazon, AT&T, and various financial institutions, emphasizing that Certificates of Authenticity have been obtained or are in the process of being secured. The State maintains that utilizing these evidentiary rules does not infringe upon the defendant's due process rights and is a standard procedure to ensure efficiency and reliability in the admission of evidence.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:032425-States+Reply+to+Defendants+Objection+to+MIL+RE+Self+Authentication+of+Records.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Judge John Judge of Idaho firmly rejected Bryan Kohberger's latest legal maneuver to challenge the death penalty, dismissing his claim that Idaho's execution methods—specifically the firing squad—are unconstitutional. Kohberger's defense argued that the state's reintroduction of the firing squad as a backup method for executions constituted cruel and unusual punishment, thus violating the Eighth Amendment. However, Judge Judge ruled that since the firing squad hasn't actually been used in Idaho yet, and lethal injection remains the primary method, the argument was premature and speculative. He emphasized that Kohberger's execution method isn't an active issue at this stage of the proceedings.The ruling marks another significant setback for Kohberger's legal team, which has made several unsuccessful attempts to derail the state's pursuit of the death penalty. Kohberger faces four counts of first-degree murder in the brutal November 2022 stabbing deaths of four University of Idaho students. Prosecutors have made clear their intent to seek capital punishment, citing the heinous and calculated nature of the crime.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Idaho murders trial judge's damning one-word response to Bryan Kohberger's bid to dodge the firing squad | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Judge to Kohberger: "YOU'RE GOING TO TRIAL" | Defense Team's Desperate Moves FAIL in Court The Bryan Kohberger case took a dramatic turn on June 18, 2025, when Judge Steven Hippler delivered a crushing blow to the defense team's delay tactics. In this deep dive, we analyze the pivotal pretrial hearing that locked in the August 11 trial date for the man accused of murdering four University of Idaho students: Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin. We break down prosecutor Joshua Hurwit's explosive "scorched earth" accusation against defense attorney Anne Taylor, who desperately sought to postpone the trial citing contaminated jury pools from NBC Dateline's leaked coverage. The leaked episode revealed sealed evidence including 23 connections to the victims' home, internet searches, and Amazon purchase histories that should never have gone public. Most shocking: the emergence of a DoorDash driver who claims she saw Kohberger at the murder scene at 3:59 AM - just minutes before the killings. This witness, struggling with PTSD from witnessing her husband's 2013 murder, could provide the prosecution's smoking gun or become the defense's greatest gift. We examine the sealed alternate perpetrator theory, Judge Hippler's demand for "actual evidence rather than just allegations," and why the defense's inability to propose alternative trial dates sealed their fate. Plus: what the 68 terabytes of digital evidence means for both sides. With jury selection beginning July 30 in Boise and livestreaming approved, this case is barreling toward a conclusion. Will the DoorDash witness's 13-minute window prove Kohberger's guilt or create reasonable doubt? #BryanKohberger #IdahoMurders #MoscowMurders #TrueCrime #CourtTV #JudgeHippler #DoorDashWitness #UniversityOfIdaho #CriminologyStudent #BreakingNews Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872  

Kohberger Case: Mysterious DNA Creates Doubt? Let's Talk About It! #BryanKohberger #TrueCrime #KohbergerCase #DNAEvidence #CrimeTalk #Idaho4

Judge to Kohberger: "YOU'RE GOING TO TRIAL" | Defense Team's Desperate Moves FAIL in Court The Bryan Kohberger case took a dramatic turn on June 18, 2025, when Judge Steven Hippler delivered a crushing blow to the defense team's delay tactics. In this deep dive, we analyze the pivotal pretrial hearing that locked in the August 11 trial date for the man accused of murdering four University of Idaho students: Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin. We break down prosecutor Joshua Hurwit's explosive "scorched earth" accusation against defense attorney Anne Taylor, who desperately sought to postpone the trial citing contaminated jury pools from NBC Dateline's leaked coverage. The leaked episode revealed sealed evidence including 23 connections to the victims' home, internet searches, and Amazon purchase histories that should never have gone public. Most shocking: the emergence of a DoorDash driver who claims she saw Kohberger at the murder scene at 3:59 AM - just minutes before the killings. This witness, struggling with PTSD from witnessing her husband's 2013 murder, could provide the prosecution's smoking gun or become the defense's greatest gift. We examine the sealed alternate perpetrator theory, Judge Hippler's demand for "actual evidence rather than just allegations," and why the defense's inability to propose alternative trial dates sealed their fate. Plus: what the 68 terabytes of digital evidence means for both sides. With jury selection beginning July 30 in Boise and livestreaming approved, this case is barreling toward a conclusion. Will the DoorDash witness's 13-minute window prove Kohberger's guilt or create reasonable doubt? #BryanKohberger #IdahoMurders #MoscowMurders #TrueCrime #CourtTV #JudgeHippler #DoorDashWitness #UniversityOfIdaho #CriminologyStudent #BreakingNews Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Judge to Kohberger: "YOU'RE GOING TO TRIAL" | Defense Team's Desperate Moves FAIL in Court The Bryan Kohberger case took a dramatic turn on June 18, 2025, when Judge Steven Hippler delivered a crushing blow to the defense team's delay tactics. In this deep dive, we analyze the pivotal pretrial hearing that locked in the August 11 trial date for the man accused of murdering four University of Idaho students: Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin. We break down prosecutor Joshua Hurwit's explosive "scorched earth" accusation against defense attorney Anne Taylor, who desperately sought to postpone the trial citing contaminated jury pools from NBC Dateline's leaked coverage. The leaked episode revealed sealed evidence including 23 connections to the victims' home, internet searches, and Amazon purchase histories that should never have gone public. Most shocking: the emergence of a DoorDash driver who claims she saw Kohberger at the murder scene at 3:59 AM - just minutes before the killings. This witness, struggling with PTSD from witnessing her husband's 2013 murder, could provide the prosecution's smoking gun or become the defense's greatest gift. We examine the sealed alternate perpetrator theory, Judge Hippler's demand for "actual evidence rather than just allegations," and why the defense's inability to propose alternative trial dates sealed their fate. Plus: what the 68 terabytes of digital evidence means for both sides. With jury selection beginning July 30 in Boise and livestreaming approved, this case is barreling toward a conclusion. Will the DoorDash witness's 13-minute window prove Kohberger's guilt or create reasonable doubt? #BryanKohberger #IdahoMurders #MoscowMurders #TrueCrime #CourtTV #JudgeHippler #DoorDashWitness #UniversityOfIdaho #CriminologyStudent #BreakingNews Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872  

Judge to Kohberger: "YOU'RE GOING TO TRIAL" | Defense Team's Desperate Moves FAIL in Court The Bryan Kohberger case took a dramatic turn on June 18, 2025, when Judge Steven Hippler delivered a crushing blow to the defense team's delay tactics. In this deep dive, we analyze the pivotal pretrial hearing that locked in the August 11 trial date for the man accused of murdering four University of Idaho students: Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin. We break down prosecutor Joshua Hurwit's explosive "scorched earth" accusation against defense attorney Anne Taylor, who desperately sought to postpone the trial citing contaminated jury pools from NBC Dateline's leaked coverage. The leaked episode revealed sealed evidence including 23 connections to the victims' home, internet searches, and Amazon purchase histories that should never have gone public. Most shocking: the emergence of a DoorDash driver who claims she saw Kohberger at the murder scene at 3:59 AM - just minutes before the killings. This witness, struggling with PTSD from witnessing her husband's 2013 murder, could provide the prosecution's smoking gun or become the defense's greatest gift. We examine the sealed alternate perpetrator theory, Judge Hippler's demand for "actual evidence rather than just allegations," and why the defense's inability to propose alternative trial dates sealed their fate. Plus: what the 68 terabytes of digital evidence means for both sides. With jury selection beginning July 30 in Boise and livestreaming approved, this case is barreling toward a conclusion. Will the DoorDash witness's 13-minute window prove Kohberger's guilt or create reasonable doubt? #BryanKohberger #IdahoMurders #MoscowMurders #TrueCrime #CourtTV #JudgeHippler #DoorDashWitness #UniversityOfIdaho #CriminologyStudent #BreakingNews Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Newly released court documents reveal that surveillance cameras played a crucial role in tracking Bryan Kohberger's movements — as well as those of the victims — in the hours leading up to the University of Idaho murders. Investigators pieced together video footage from a network of cameras across Moscow, Idaho, to map out the victims' final evening and Kohberger's alleged path both before and after the killings. This surveillance helped authorities narrow the timeframe of the crime and identify Kohberger's white Hyundai Elantra, which was seen repeatedly driving near the crime scene around the time of the murders.According to the documents, camera footage showed Kohberger's vehicle leaving his Pullman apartment late at night, circling the victims' neighborhood multiple times, and then quickly departing the area after the estimated time of the murders. Additional video captured the victims at various locations on the night of November 12 into the early hours of November 13, including stops at a bar and a food truck. This comprehensive surveillance trail was key evidence that eventually led authorities to focus on Kohberger as a suspect.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Map: Alleged paths of Kohberger, Idaho victims via cameras | Idaho StatesmanBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

​In Case Number CR01-24-31665, defendant Bryan C. Kohberger has filed a reply to the State's objection concerning his Motion in Limine #6, which seeks to exclude specific opinions of forensic analyst Rylene Nowlin and the use of the terms "touch DNA" and "contact DNA" during trial. Kohberger's defense argues that these terms are misleading and could confuse the jury by implying a certainty about the method of DNA transfer that is not scientifically substantiated. They emphasize that Nowlin's own disclosures acknowledge the complexity of DNA transfer mechanisms and the current inability of DNA technology to conclusively determine how or when DNA was deposited on an item. Therefore, the defense contends that allowing such terminology and speculative testimony would prejudice the jury and should be excluded to ensure a fair trial.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:032425-Defendants-Reply-States-Objection-Defendants-MIL6-RE-Nowlin-Touch-Contact-DNA.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Bryan Kohberger and his defense team are setting themselves up for an epic battle in the courtroom with the prosecutors over the DNA evidence and whether or not that DNA belongs to Bryan Kohberger. According to a new documentary, the fact that the house on King Road was a "Party House" and that there was other DNA of unknown males found at the house, Kohberger's team could sink their teeth into that and try to harness it in their favor. In this epiosde, we take a look at that as a strategy and how Kohberger might atempt to harness it and what the proseuction might do to shoot it down. (commercial at 8:18)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Idaho murders suspect Bryan Kohberger could claim in his trial that home where four students were murdered was 'party house' which would explain why his DNA was found there | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

One of the biggest concerns whenever a grand jury is empaneled is the secrecy in which it operates. With the defense not being able to be present during the presentation of evidence, things are tilted from the very start. However, in some cases, the state feels that a Grand Jury is the proper path to travel.In this episode, we take a look at the decision to use a grand jury to indict Bryan Kohberger and what that might mean for transparency as we move forward.(commercial at 7:45)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Community kept in the dark with secret Kohberger grand jury | Idaho StatesmanBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Shocking New Witness in Kohberger Case! #kohberger #eyewitness #Idaho 4 case A DoorDash driver claims she saw Bryan Kohberger at the Idaho murder scene just minutes before the horrific events unfolded. This startling new testimony, emerging from recently surfaced bodycam footage, threatens to completely alter the trajectory of the Kohberger trial. Listen to this episode to get the latest up to date info.

Judge in Kohberger Case Warns: Be Prepared! #BryanKohberger #KohbergerCase #CourtroomUpdate #TrueCrime #JudgeWarning #CrimeTalk  

In State of Idaho v. Bryan C. Kohberger, Case No. CR01-24-31665, the defense submitted a reply challenging the State's opposition to its motion to continue the trial. Kohberger's legal team argues that the prosecution's objection ignores the complex and voluminous nature of discovery materials still being reviewed, which include thousands of pages of documents, hours of surveillance footage, and extensive forensic data. The defense emphasizes that proceeding without adequate time to evaluate this evidence would compromise Kohberger's constitutional right to a fair trial and effective assistance of counsel.Additionally, the reply underscores that this is a capital case with unique legal and investigative demands, requiring more preparation time than the prosecution acknowledges. The defense contends that rushing the proceedings would not serve justice and that the need for a continuance is both reasonable and necessary given the gravity of the charges and the scope of the case. They urge the court to grant the motion and reject the State's assertion that further delay is unwarranted.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:061625+Defendants+Reply+to+the+States+Opposition+to+Defendants+Motion+to+Continue.pdf

In State of Idaho v. Bryan C. Kohberger, Case No. CR01-24-31665, the defense submitted a reply challenging the State's opposition to its motion to continue the trial. Kohberger's legal team argues that the prosecution's objection ignores the complex and voluminous nature of discovery materials still being reviewed, which include thousands of pages of documents, hours of surveillance footage, and extensive forensic data. The defense emphasizes that proceeding without adequate time to evaluate this evidence would compromise Kohberger's constitutional right to a fair trial and effective assistance of counsel.Additionally, the reply underscores that this is a capital case with unique legal and investigative demands, requiring more preparation time than the prosecution acknowledges. The defense contends that rushing the proceedings would not serve justice and that the need for a continuance is both reasonable and necessary given the gravity of the charges and the scope of the case. They urge the court to grant the motion and reject the State's assertion that further delay is unwarranted.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:061625+Defendants+Reply+to+the+States+Opposition+to+Defendants+Motion+to+Continue.pdf

Lori Vallow Daybell did not receive the death penalty due to a combination of factors primarily related to the management and timing of evidence disclosures by the prosecution. The defense argued that the prosecution's late submission of thousands of documents and pieces of evidence impeded their ability to adequately prepare for trial. Judge Steven Boyce ruled to remove the death penalty to ensure that Vallow Daybell's constitutional rights were protected, allowing her defense team sufficient time to review the evidence. The judge emphasized that his decision was not to penalize the state but to avoid potential reversible errors that could arise from discovery issues if a death sentence were imposed​.  The implications of this decision might influence Bryan Kohberger's case, as his defense team could leverage similar arguments regarding evidence handling and procedural fairness. Kohberger, charged with the murders of four University of Idaho students, is facing the death penalty. His defense has been actively challenging the prosecution on various procedural grounds, including the handling and disclosure of DNA evidence and other investigative materials​.In this episode, we dive in and take a look at the possibility of Bryan Kohberger avoiding the death penalty due to prosecutorial misconduct.(commercial at 9:31)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Idaho suspect Bryan Kohberger's team could use same tactic as cult mom Lori Vallow to avoid death penalty if convicted | The US Sun (the-sun.com)

The fate of Bryan Kohberger's murder trial hangs in the balance as an Idaho judge considers whether to delay the August proceedings over explosive allegations of evidence leaks in a Dateline NBC episode. In a heated hearing, Kohberger's defense argued the Dateline special (featuring unreleased cell data, surveillance footage, and search history) violated a gag order and tainted the jury pool. But prosecutors fired back, calling it a stall tactic in the high-profile case of the four University of Idaho students stabbed to death in 2022. Will the trial proceed as scheduled? Or will leaks, media frenzy, and witness drama force a delay? Law&Crime's Jesse Weber breaks down the details from the latest hearing.PLEASE SUPPORT THE SHOW:IF YOU OR A LOVED ONE HAVE SUFFERED PHYSICAL OR MENTAL HEALTH ISSUES DUE TO VIDEO GAMES, VISIT VGCLAIMS.COM/SIDEBAR TO ANSWER LESS THAN 10 QUESTIONS AND CHECK YOUR ELIGIBILITY TO FILE A CLAIMHOST:Jesse Weber: https://twitter.com/jessecordweberLAW&CRIME SIDEBAR PRODUCTION:YouTube Management - Bobby SzokeVideo Editing - Michael Deininger, Christina O'Shea & Jay CruzScript Writing & Producing - Savannah Williamson & Juliana BattagliaGuest Booking - Alyssa Fisher & Diane KayeSocial Media Management - Vanessa BeinSTAY UP-TO-DATE WITH THE LAW&CRIME NETWORK:Watch Law&Crime Network on YouTubeTV: https://bit.ly/3td2e3yWhere To Watch Law&Crime Network: https://bit.ly/3akxLK5Sign Up For Law&Crime's Daily Newsletter: https://bit.ly/LawandCrimeNewsletterRead Fascinating Articles From Law&Crime Network: https://bit.ly/3td2IqoLAW&CRIME NETWORK SOCIAL MEDIA:Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/lawandcrime/Twitter: https://twitter.com/LawCrimeNetworkFacebook: https://www.facebook.com/lawandcrimeTwitch: https://www.twitch.tv/lawandcrimenetworkTikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@lawandcrimeSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Watch for Karen Read, Shannon Overstreet, Matthew Farwell, Kohberger, Donna Adelson, the murder of Ralph Brian, Kouri Richins, and Cowboy Cody.Join our squad! Kristi and Katie share true crime stories and give you actionable things you can do to help, all with a wicked sense of humor.Merch Store: https://truecrimesquad-shop.fourthwall.com/Follow our True Crime Trials Channel: https://www.youtube.com/@TrueCrimeSquadTrialsFollow our True Crime Shorts Channel: https://www.youtube.com/@truecrimesquadshorts-t6iWant to Support our work and get extra perks?https://buymeacoffee.com/truecrimesquadLooking for extra content?https://www.patreon.com/truecrimesquad*Social Media Links*Facebook: www.facebook.com/truecrimesquadFacebook Discussion Group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/215774426330767Website: https://www.truecrimesquad.comTikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@truecrimesquadBlueSky- https://bsky.app/profile/truecrimesquad.bsky.social True Crime Squad on Spotifyhttps://open.spotify.com/show/5gIPqBHJLftbXdRgs1Bqm1

A DoorDash driver says she saw Bryan Kohberger near the scene just minutes before the four students were murdered at the University of Idaho in Moscow. This new eyewitness could dramatically shift the case ahead of Kohberger's death penalty trial. #STSNation, Welcome to Surviving the Survivor — the podcast bringing you the #BestGuests in all of #TrueCrime… A potential bombshell ahead of Bryan Kohberger's capital murder trial: A DoorDash driver caught on police bodycam says she saw Kohberger near the King Road home moments before the murders. Her testimony, if admitted, could reshape the prosecution's timeline and undermine the defense's claim that Kohberger had no connection to the victims. PLUS: A private investigator is organizing a 35-mile search for the missing murder weapon — the Ka-Bar knife — and the families of the four slain University of Idaho students speak out in a raw new Prime Video docuseries, One Night in Idaho, premiering July 11. The pressure is mounting. The clock is ticking. And we're breaking it all down with the sharpest legal minds and criminal experts. #BestGuests: Greg Skordas Tara Malek Roger Rhoades⸻ #Support the show:All Things STS: Https://linktr.ee/stspodcastGet Joel's Book: Https://amzn.to/48GwbLxSTS Merch: Https://www.bonfire.com/store/sts-store/Support the show on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/SurvivingTheSurvivorCatch us live on YouTube: Surviving The Survivor: #BestGuests in True Crime - YouTubeVenmo Donations: @STSPodcast#BryanKohberger #Idaho4 #UniversityOfIdaho #TrueCrime #MoscowMurders #KayleeGoncalves #MadisonMogen #XanaKernodle #EthanChapin #DoorDashWitness #KaBarKnife #OneNightInIdaho #PrimeVideo #SurvivingTheSurvivor

DoorDash Driver's BOMBSHELL 'I Parked Next to Bryan Kohberger' - Idaho Murder Timeline Exposed In this explosive true crime deep dive, we uncover the shocking testimony of a DoorDash driver who may hold the key to Bryan Kohberger's fate in the University of Idaho murder trial. Known only as "M.M.," this 44-year-old food delivery driver made a routine Jack in the Box delivery to victim Xana Kernodle at 3:59 AM on November 13, 2022 - just minutes before four college students were brutally murdered at 1122 King Road in Moscow, Idaho. What makes this testimony absolutely crucial? The DoorDash driver claims she parked RIGHT NEXT TO Bryan Kohberger's white Hyundai Elantra at the murder scene. This places the accused killer at the location during the critical timeline prosecutors say the murders occurred - between 4:07 and 4:20 AM. We analyze the bombshell body camera footage from a September 2024 traffic stop in Pullman, Washington, where M.M. casually revealed to police: "Now I have to testify in the big murder case... I'm the DoorDash driver. I saw Bryan." This previously unknown witness could be the prosecution's smoking gun in their death penalty case against Kohberger. Join us as we break down: The minute-by-minute timeline of that fatal night How a routine food delivery became crucial murder evidence Why the defense is scrambling to discredit this testimony Court documents revealing DoorDash's cooperation with investigators The impact on Kohberger's upcoming July 2025 trial in Boise This video examines how one woman's late-night delivery job inadvertently made her a star witness in one of America's most closely-watched murder trials. We'll explore the legal implications, the forensic timeline, and what this means for Bryan Kohberger's defense team as they attempt to create reasonable doubt. For Madison Mogen, Kaylee Goncalves, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin - four bright University of Idaho students whose lives were cut tragically short - this testimony could be the key to justice. #BryanKohberger #IdahoMurders #UniversityofIdaho #TrueCrime #DoorDashDriver #MoscowIdaho #KayleeGoncalves #MadisonMogen #XanaKernodle #EthanChapin 

Kohberger Hearing-RAW AUDIO Part 2: Defense Makes Last Stand Before August Trial Bryan Kohberger's murder trial for the Idaho student killings is set to proceed in August 2024 despite his defense team's desperate attempts to delay. Ada County Judge Steven Hippler heard arguments from defense attorney Anne Taylor, who claims Kohberger's constitutional rights are being violated due to insufficient time to review 68 terabytes of evidence. The case involves the November 2022 stabbing deaths of University of Idaho students Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin. Taylor's team has identified 56 penalty phase witnesses and is investigating Kohberger's family history for potential red flags. The defense cited upcoming media coverage including a James Patterson book and Amazon Prime docuseries as obstacles to fair jury selection. Prosecutor Josh Hurwit argued against perpetual delays, noting that specialists have already completed their investigations without finding red flags. The closed-door portion of the hearing addressed Kohberger's alternate suspect evidence. This death penalty case continues to generate national attention as the August 11 trial date approaches. Stay updated on all developments in the Moscow murders case and Kohberger's legal proceedings. #BryanKohberger #IdahoMurders #MoscowMurders #KayleeGoncalves #MadisonMogen #XanaKernodle #EthanChapin #DeathPenalty #TrueCrime #CourtUpdate Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872  

Kohberger Hearing-RAW AUDIO Part 1: Defense Makes Last Stand Before August Trial Bryan Kohberger's murder trial for the Idaho student killings is set to proceed in August 2024 despite his defense team's desperate attempts to delay. Ada County Judge Steven Hippler heard arguments from defense attorney Anne Taylor, who claims Kohberger's constitutional rights are being violated due to insufficient time to review 68 terabytes of evidence. The case involves the November 2022 stabbing deaths of University of Idaho students Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin. Taylor's team has identified 56 penalty phase witnesses and is investigating Kohberger's family history for potential red flags. The defense cited upcoming media coverage including a James Patterson book and Amazon Prime docuseries as obstacles to fair jury selection. Prosecutor Josh Hurwit argued against perpetual delays, noting that specialists have already completed their investigations without finding red flags. The closed-door portion of the hearing addressed Kohberger's alternate suspect evidence. This death penalty case continues to generate national attention as the August 11 trial date approaches. Stay updated on all developments in the Moscow murders case and Kohberger's legal proceedings. #BryanKohberger #IdahoMurders #MoscowMurders #KayleeGoncalves #MadisonMogen #XanaKernodle #EthanChapin #DeathPenalty #TrueCrime #CourtUpdate Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872  

Kohberger Hearing-RAW AUDIO Part 2: Defense Makes Last Stand Before August Trial Bryan Kohberger's murder trial for the Idaho student killings is set to proceed in August 2024 despite his defense team's desperate attempts to delay. Ada County Judge Steven Hippler heard arguments from defense attorney Anne Taylor, who claims Kohberger's constitutional rights are being violated due to insufficient time to review 68 terabytes of evidence. The case involves the November 2022 stabbing deaths of University of Idaho students Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin. Taylor's team has identified 56 penalty phase witnesses and is investigating Kohberger's family history for potential red flags. The defense cited upcoming media coverage including a James Patterson book and Amazon Prime docuseries as obstacles to fair jury selection. Prosecutor Josh Hurwit argued against perpetual delays, noting that specialists have already completed their investigations without finding red flags. The closed-door portion of the hearing addressed Kohberger's alternate suspect evidence. This death penalty case continues to generate national attention as the August 11 trial date approaches. Stay updated on all developments in the Moscow murders case and Kohberger's legal proceedings. #BryanKohberger #IdahoMurders #MoscowMurders #KayleeGoncalves #MadisonMogen #XanaKernodle #EthanChapin #DeathPenalty #TrueCrime #CourtUpdate Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Kohberger Hearing-RAW AUDIO Part 1: Defense Makes Last Stand Before August Trial Bryan Kohberger's murder trial for the Idaho student killings is set to proceed in August 2024 despite his defense team's desperate attempts to delay. Ada County Judge Steven Hippler heard arguments from defense attorney Anne Taylor, who claims Kohberger's constitutional rights are being violated due to insufficient time to review 68 terabytes of evidence. The case involves the November 2022 stabbing deaths of University of Idaho students Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin. Taylor's team has identified 56 penalty phase witnesses and is investigating Kohberger's family history for potential red flags. The defense cited upcoming media coverage including a James Patterson book and Amazon Prime docuseries as obstacles to fair jury selection. Prosecutor Josh Hurwit argued against perpetual delays, noting that specialists have already completed their investigations without finding red flags. The closed-door portion of the hearing addressed Kohberger's alternate suspect evidence. This death penalty case continues to generate national attention as the August 11 trial date approaches. Stay updated on all developments in the Moscow murders case and Kohberger's legal proceedings. #BryanKohberger #IdahoMurders #MoscowMurders #KayleeGoncalves #MadisonMogen #XanaKernodle #EthanChapin #DeathPenalty #TrueCrime #CourtUpdate Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

DoorDash Driver's BOMBSHELL 'I Parked Next to Bryan Kohberger' - Idaho Murder Timeline Exposed In this explosive true crime deep dive, we uncover the shocking testimony of a DoorDash driver who may hold the key to Bryan Kohberger's fate in the University of Idaho murder trial. Known only as "M.M.," this 44-year-old food delivery driver made a routine Jack in the Box delivery to victim Xana Kernodle at 3:59 AM on November 13, 2022 - just minutes before four college students were brutally murdered at 1122 King Road in Moscow, Idaho. What makes this testimony absolutely crucial? The DoorDash driver claims she parked RIGHT NEXT TO Bryan Kohberger's white Hyundai Elantra at the murder scene. This places the accused killer at the location during the critical timeline prosecutors say the murders occurred - between 4:07 and 4:20 AM. We analyze the bombshell body camera footage from a September 2024 traffic stop in Pullman, Washington, where M.M. casually revealed to police: "Now I have to testify in the big murder case... I'm the DoorDash driver. I saw Bryan." This previously unknown witness could be the prosecution's smoking gun in their death penalty case against Kohberger. Join us as we break down: The minute-by-minute timeline of that fatal night How a routine food delivery became crucial murder evidence Why the defense is scrambling to discredit this testimony Court documents revealing DoorDash's cooperation with investigators The impact on Kohberger's upcoming July 2025 trial in Boise This video examines how one woman's late-night delivery job inadvertently made her a star witness in one of America's most closely-watched murder trials. We'll explore the legal implications, the forensic timeline, and what this means for Bryan Kohberger's defense team as they attempt to create reasonable doubt. For Madison Mogen, Kaylee Goncalves, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin - four bright University of Idaho students whose lives were cut tragically short - this testimony could be the key to justice. #BryanKohberger #IdahoMurders #UniversityofIdaho #TrueCrime #DoorDashDriver #MoscowIdaho #KayleeGoncalves #MadisonMogen #XanaKernodle #EthanChapin

DoorDash Driver's BOMBSHELL 'I Parked Next to Bryan Kohberger' - Idaho Murder Timeline Exposed In this explosive true crime deep dive, we uncover the shocking testimony of a DoorDash driver who may hold the key to Bryan Kohberger's fate in the University of Idaho murder trial. Known only as "M.M.," this 44-year-old food delivery driver made a routine Jack in the Box delivery to victim Xana Kernodle at 3:59 AM on November 13, 2022 - just minutes before four college students were brutally murdered at 1122 King Road in Moscow, Idaho. What makes this testimony absolutely crucial? The DoorDash driver claims she parked RIGHT NEXT TO Bryan Kohberger's white Hyundai Elantra at the murder scene. This places the accused killer at the location during the critical timeline prosecutors say the murders occurred - between 4:07 and 4:20 AM. We analyze the bombshell body camera footage from a September 2024 traffic stop in Pullman, Washington, where M.M. casually revealed to police: "Now I have to testify in the big murder case... I'm the DoorDash driver. I saw Bryan." This previously unknown witness could be the prosecution's smoking gun in their death penalty case against Kohberger. Join us as we break down: The minute-by-minute timeline of that fatal night How a routine food delivery became crucial murder evidence Why the defense is scrambling to discredit this testimony Court documents revealing DoorDash's cooperation with investigators The impact on Kohberger's upcoming July 2025 trial in Boise This video examines how one woman's late-night delivery job inadvertently made her a star witness in one of America's most closely-watched murder trials. We'll explore the legal implications, the forensic timeline, and what this means for Bryan Kohberger's defense team as they attempt to create reasonable doubt. For Madison Mogen, Kaylee Goncalves, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin - four bright University of Idaho students whose lives were cut tragically short - this testimony could be the key to justice. #BryanKohberger #IdahoMurders #UniversityofIdaho #TrueCrime #DoorDashDriver #MoscowIdaho #KayleeGoncalves #MadisonMogen #XanaKernodle #EthanChapin

DoorDash Driver's BOMBSHELL 'I Parked Next to Bryan Kohberger' - Idaho Murder Timeline Exposed In this explosive true crime deep dive, we uncover the shocking testimony of a DoorDash driver who may hold the key to Bryan Kohberger's fate in the University of Idaho murder trial. Known only as "M.M.," this 44-year-old food delivery driver made a routine Jack in the Box delivery to victim Xana Kernodle at 3:59 AM on November 13, 2022 - just minutes before four college students were brutally murdered at 1122 King Road in Moscow, Idaho. What makes this testimony absolutely crucial? The DoorDash driver claims she parked RIGHT NEXT TO Bryan Kohberger's white Hyundai Elantra at the murder scene. This places the accused killer at the location during the critical timeline prosecutors say the murders occurred - between 4:07 and 4:20 AM. We analyze the bombshell body camera footage from a September 2024 traffic stop in Pullman, Washington, where M.M. casually revealed to police: "Now I have to testify in the big murder case... I'm the DoorDash driver. I saw Bryan." This previously unknown witness could be the prosecution's smoking gun in their death penalty case against Kohberger. Join us as we break down: The minute-by-minute timeline of that fatal night How a routine food delivery became crucial murder evidence Why the defense is scrambling to discredit this testimony Court documents revealing DoorDash's cooperation with investigators The impact on Kohberger's upcoming July 2025 trial in Boise This video examines how one woman's late-night delivery job inadvertently made her a star witness in one of America's most closely-watched murder trials. We'll explore the legal implications, the forensic timeline, and what this means for Bryan Kohberger's defense team as they attempt to create reasonable doubt. For Madison Mogen, Kaylee Goncalves, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin - four bright University of Idaho students whose lives were cut tragically short - this testimony could be the key to justice. #BryanKohberger #IdahoMurders #UniversityofIdaho #TrueCrime #DoorDashDriver #MoscowIdaho #KayleeGoncalves #MadisonMogen #XanaKernodle #EthanChapin

Kohberger Hearing-RAW AUDIO Part 1: Defense Makes Last Stand Before August Trial Bryan Kohberger's murder trial for the Idaho student killings is set to proceed in August 2024 despite his defense team's desperate attempts to delay. Ada County Judge Steven Hippler heard arguments from defense attorney Anne Taylor, who claims Kohberger's constitutional rights are being violated due to insufficient time to review 68 terabytes of evidence. The case involves the November 2022 stabbing deaths of University of Idaho students Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin. Taylor's team has identified 56 penalty phase witnesses and is investigating Kohberger's family history for potential red flags. The defense cited upcoming media coverage including a James Patterson book and Amazon Prime docuseries as obstacles to fair jury selection. Prosecutor Josh Hurwit argued against perpetual delays, noting that specialists have already completed their investigations without finding red flags. The closed-door portion of the hearing addressed Kohberger's alternate suspect evidence. This death penalty case continues to generate national attention as the August 11 trial date approaches. Stay updated on all developments in the Moscow murders case and Kohberger's legal proceedings. #BryanKohberger #IdahoMurders #MoscowMurders #KayleeGoncalves #MadisonMogen #XanaKernodle #EthanChapin #DeathPenalty #TrueCrime #CourtUpdate Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Is The Koberger Trial Ever Going To Happen? #kohberger #annTaylor #judgehippler The defense for Bryan Kohberger is trying to delay the trial because of numerous reasons, alternate suspect, the dateline NBC documentary, and a poential alternate suspect. Judge Hippler mus decide if this case moves forward as scheduled. The deth penalty nature of this case makes it that much more difficult.

Bryan Kohberger: How We Got Here - Episode 9: "Final Preparations - Early 2025" Description: As 2025 began, both prosecution and defense teams entered the final phase of preparation for what promised to be one of the most closely watched criminal trials in American history. This episode explores the aggressive timeline set by Judge Steven Hippler, with jury selection scheduled for July 30th and trial beginning August 11th, 2025. We examine the prosecution's "convergence theory" strategy and their preparation of sophisticated 3D crime scene models that would allow jurors to virtually walk through the house at 1122 King Road. The episode details Judge Hippler's crucial April rulings on remaining evidentiary disputes, including genetic genealogy evidence, cell phone tower data, and Kohberger's post-murder behavior at WSU. We explore the defense team's challenges in creating reasonable doubt against overwhelming forensic evidence, including their autism spectrum disorder strategy and extensive expert witness preparation. The episode also examines the massive logistical preparations for a high-profile death penalty trial, including security protocols, media management, and the emotional preparation of victims' families for what would be a devastating trial experience that could last several months. Hashtags: #TrialPreparation #JudgeHippler #ConvergenceTheory #3DCrimeScene #EvidentiaryRulings #AutismDefense #ExpertWitnesses #LogisticalChallenges #SecurityProtocols #MediaManagement #VictimsFamilies #JurySelection #DeathPenaltyTrial #Boise #TrialTimeline Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

The Bryan Kohberger DoorDash Driver Mystery: Did She REALLY See Him Night? A shocking development in the Bryan Kohberger Idaho murders case has true crime followers divided. During a 2024 DUI arrest, a woman claimed she was THE DoorDash driver who delivered food to victim Xana Kernodle at 4 AM on November 13, 2022 - and says she saw Bryan Kohberger at the scene. She claims she parked "side-by-side" with his white Hyundai Elantra. But here's where it gets complicated: prosecutors won't confirm her identity, she's not on any witness lists, and the original police investigation interviewed the DoorDash driver right after the murders with NO mention of seeing anyone. Is she really the driver? Why wait two years to come forward? And why reveal this during a drunk driving arrest? This video breaks down the credibility concerns, legal implications, and how this could either strengthen or completely derail the death penalty case against Kohberger. We examine the timeline, the evidence, what legal experts are saying, and why the defense team might be secretly celebrating this development. With the trial set for August 2025, this witness controversy adds another layer of complexity to an already complicated case. Could this be the eyewitness testimony prosecutors desperately need, or a credibility disaster waiting to happen? #BryanKohberger #IdahoMurders #DoorDashDriver #TrueCrime #IdahoStudentMurders #UniversityOfIdaho #MoscowIdaho #KohbergerTrial #EyewitnessTestimony #BreakingNews Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872  

Bryan Kohberger: How We Got Here - Episode 9: "Final Preparations - Early 2025" Description: As 2025 began, both prosecution and defense teams entered the final phase of preparation for what promised to be one of the most closely watched criminal trials in American history. This episode explores the aggressive timeline set by Judge Steven Hippler, with jury selection scheduled for July 30th and trial beginning August 11th, 2025. We examine the prosecution's "convergence theory" strategy and their preparation of sophisticated 3D crime scene models that would allow jurors to virtually walk through the house at 1122 King Road. The episode details Judge Hippler's crucial April rulings on remaining evidentiary disputes, including genetic genealogy evidence, cell phone tower data, and Kohberger's post-murder behavior at WSU. We explore the defense team's challenges in creating reasonable doubt against overwhelming forensic evidence, including their autism spectrum disorder strategy and extensive expert witness preparation. The episode also examines the massive logistical preparations for a high-profile death penalty trial, including security protocols, media management, and the emotional preparation of victims' families for what would be a devastating trial experience that could last several months. Hashtags: #TrialPreparation #JudgeHippler #ConvergenceTheory #3DCrimeScene #EvidentiaryRulings #AutismDefense #ExpertWitnesses #LogisticalChallenges #SecurityProtocols #MediaManagement #VictimsFamilies #JurySelection #DeathPenaltyTrial #Boise #TrialTimeline Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

The Bryan Kohberger DoorDash Driver Mystery: Did She REALLY See Him Night? A shocking development in the Bryan Kohberger Idaho murders case has true crime followers divided. During a 2024 DUI arrest, a woman claimed she was THE DoorDash driver who delivered food to victim Xana Kernodle at 4 AM on November 13, 2022 - and says she saw Bryan Kohberger at the scene. She claims she parked "side-by-side" with his white Hyundai Elantra. But here's where it gets complicated: prosecutors won't confirm her identity, she's not on any witness lists, and the original police investigation interviewed the DoorDash driver right after the murders with NO mention of seeing anyone. Is she really the driver? Why wait two years to come forward? And why reveal this during a drunk driving arrest? This video breaks down the credibility concerns, legal implications, and how this could either strengthen or completely derail the death penalty case against Kohberger. We examine the timeline, the evidence, what legal experts are saying, and why the defense team might be secretly celebrating this development. With the trial set for August 2025, this witness controversy adds another layer of complexity to an already complicated case. Could this be the eyewitness testimony prosecutors desperately need, or a credibility disaster waiting to happen? #BryanKohberger #IdahoMurders #DoorDashDriver #TrueCrime #IdahoStudentMurders #UniversityOfIdaho #MoscowIdaho #KohbergerTrial #EyewitnessTestimony #BreakingNews Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872  

Bryan Kohberger: How We Got Here - Episode 8: "Change of Venue and New Strategies - 2024" Description: The most significant change to the Idaho murders case came in September 2024 when Judge John Judge granted a motion to move the trial 300 miles from tiny Latah County to Idaho's capital city of Boise. This episode explores how extensive pretrial publicity and the small population of Moscow made finding impartial jurors nearly impossible, with surveys showing 98% of residents were aware of the case and 67% had already formed opinions about guilt. We examine the defense's development of alternate perpetrator theories, including their argument that multiple attackers committed the murders rather than a single individual. The episode details the logistical challenges of relocating a death penalty trial, including the victims' families raising over $65,000 to attend proceedings in Boise. We explore new evidence about Kohberger's Amazon purchases eight months before the murders, including a Ka-Bar knife and sheath identical to items found at the crime scene, providing clear evidence of premeditation. The episode also examines how both prosecution and defense teams adapted their strategies for a new venue and jury pool while preparing for one of the most closely watched trials in American history. Hashtags: #VenueChange #BoiseIdaho #PretrialPublicity #AlternatePerpetratorTheory #AmazonPurchases #Premeditation #JurySelection #LogisticalChallenges #VictimsFamilies #Fundraising #DefenseStrategy #ProsecutionStrategy #DeathPenaltyTrial #LegalProceedings #TrialPreparation Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Kohberger Defense Moves in Secret… What Are They Hiding? #Kohberger #TrueCrime #LegalDrama #CrimeTalk #CourtUpdate #Justice