POPULARITY
Two conspiracy theories have trailed the University of Idaho murders since before Bryan Kohberger was ever arrested, and Tony Brueski tackles both in this combined look at the case for True Crime Today. The first theory ruined an innocent man's life before Kohberger was ever named a suspect in this case. The internet decided a grieving young man who'd just lost the woman he loved was responsible, largely because he called her phone repeatedly that morning, something with a completely innocent explanation once you know the full timeline. We break down why the roommates waiting hours to call 911 isn't the smoking gun people think, what their private writings do and don't show, the theory that they were spared for being involved, and why a judge called the internet's alternate suspects rank speculation. The second theory says Kohberger's DNA was planted on the knife sheath left behind at the scene. The lab that tested it says the amount recovered wasn't a faint trace, it was hundreds of times more genetic material than investigators typically find in a case like this one. We go through the unidentified blood inside the house, the mismatched DNA under a victim's fingernails, the hair people insist was staged, the claim that genetic genealogy was concealed from the court, and the Amazon order for that same knife. No clean motive isn't proof of innocence, and a guilty plea stacked on top of DNA, phone records, car evidence, and scanner data isn't how wrongful conviction cases usually look. We separate the real open questions from the ones the internet invented, and explain why a missing motive never actually pointed at the wrong man here. Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. Hashtags #BryanKohberger #IdahoMurders #TrueCrimeToday #KayleeGoncalves #TrueCrime #KnifeSheath #DNAEvidence #GuiltyPlea #TrueCrimePodcast #IdahoFour
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
Two very different conspiracy theories have followed the University of Idaho murders, and Tony Brueski takes both apart in this combined breakdown of the Kohberger case. One theory destroyed an innocent man's reputation before an arrest was ever made. The other tries to undo a guilty plea years later. Before Bryan Kohberger was ever a suspect, the internet had already decided who did it, a young man grieving the woman he loved. He was blamed for calling her repeatedly that morning, a fact with a heartbreaking, entirely innocent explanation once the timeline is laid out in full. We go through why the roommates' hours-long delay in calling 911 isn't what people think it proves, what their private writings actually show, and why a judge looked at the alternate suspects online sleuths pushed and called the theory rank speculation. Then there's the sheath. Kohberger's DNA turned up on the snap of a leather knife sheath left in a victim's bed, and the lab says it wasn't a trace amount, it was hundreds of times more genetic material than investigators usually see in a case like this. We break down the unidentified blood in the house, the mismatched DNA under a victim's fingernails, the hair theory, the claim that genetic genealogy was hidden from the court, and the Amazon order for the murder weapon's exact make. A guilty plea doesn't erase every question people have, but stacked next to the DNA, the phone data, the car, and the scanner activity, it isn't the kind of confession that matches wrongful conviction cases. This episode separates what's actually unresolved from what the internet just won't let go of, and looks at why an absent motive kept fueling doubt long after the plea was entered. Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. Hashtags #BryanKohberger #IdahoMurders #HiddenKillers #KayleeGoncalves #TrueCrime #KnifeSheath #DNAEvidence #GuiltyPlea #TrueCrimePodcast #IdahoFour
This episode is about two theories the University of Idaho murders never seem to shake, and Tony Brueski walks through both, live, on the Kohberger case. The first cost an innocent man his reputation before anyone had a name for the killer. The second is still circulating despite a guilty plea. Before Bryan Kohberger's arrest, the internet had already picked a suspect, a young man who'd just lost someone he loved and made the mistake of calling her phone too many times that morning, for reasons that turn out to be completely innocent once investigators laid them out. We cover why the surviving roommates' delayed 911 call doesn't mean what people assume, what their private writings actually reveal, the theory that they were spared because they were involved, and why a judge dismissed the internet's alternate suspects as rank speculation. Then we turn to the sheath conspiracy. Kohberger's DNA on that knife sheath wasn't a faint trace, according to the lab, it was hundreds of times more genetic material than a typical case involves, which the lab itself has stated on the record. We go through the unidentified blood found in the house, the DNA mixture under a victim's fingernails that didn't match him, the buried hair claims, the accusation that genetic genealogy was hidden from the court, and the Amazon order for the exact knife style used. No clear motive doesn't mean wrong man, and a guilty plea layered on top of DNA, phone data, car evidence, and scanner activity looks nothing like the wrongful plea cases people compare it to. We break down why fixated strangers remain dangerous even without a motive anyone can neatly explain. Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. Hashtags #BryanKohberger #IdahoMurders #HKLive #KayleeGoncalves #TrueCrime #KnifeSheath #DNAEvidence #GuiltyPlea #TrueCrimePodcast #IdahoFour
The Tyler Robinson defense is following a familiar capital-case strategy: challenge the evidence, contest deadlines, file repeated motions, preserve every possible appellate issue, and force the prosecution to defend each stage of its case. That approach closely resembles the strategy used by Bryan Kohberger's attorneys before he ultimately pleaded guilty in exchange for the removal of the death penalty. Although the constant delays and procedural battles are understandably frustrating, particularly for Charlie Kirk's family and supporters, they are part of the reality of a case in which the government is seeking the ultimate punishment.The Robinson case is unlikely to move quickly or in a straight line. His attorneys are attempting to weaken the prosecution's evidence, protect his constitutional rights, create leverage for a possible resolution, and save him from execution. Meanwhile, prosecutors must answer each challenge carefully because a major mistake could jeopardize a conviction or sentence years later. Eventually the motions and delays will end, but until then, the slow and repetitive legal grind should not be viewed as separate from the case. In a capital murder prosecution, that grind is the case.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
The Tyler Robinson defense is following a familiar capital-case strategy: challenge the evidence, contest deadlines, file repeated motions, preserve every possible appellate issue, and force the prosecution to defend each stage of its case. That approach closely resembles the strategy used by Bryan Kohberger's attorneys before he ultimately pleaded guilty in exchange for the removal of the death penalty. Although the constant delays and procedural battles are understandably frustrating, particularly for Charlie Kirk's family and supporters, they are part of the reality of a case in which the government is seeking the ultimate punishment.The Robinson case is unlikely to move quickly or in a straight line. His attorneys are attempting to weaken the prosecution's evidence, protect his constitutional rights, create leverage for a possible resolution, and save him from execution. Meanwhile, prosecutors must answer each challenge carefully because a major mistake could jeopardize a conviction or sentence years later. Eventually the motions and delays will end, but until then, the slow and repetitive legal grind should not be viewed as separate from the case. In a capital murder prosecution, that grind is the case.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
The Tyler Robinson defense is following a familiar capital-case strategy: challenge the evidence, contest deadlines, file repeated motions, preserve every possible appellate issue, and force the prosecution to defend each stage of its case. That approach closely resembles the strategy used by Bryan Kohberger's attorneys before he ultimately pleaded guilty in exchange for the removal of the death penalty. Although the constant delays and procedural battles are understandably frustrating, particularly for Charlie Kirk's family and supporters, they are part of the reality of a case in which the government is seeking the ultimate punishment.The Robinson case is unlikely to move quickly or in a straight line. His attorneys are attempting to weaken the prosecution's evidence, protect his constitutional rights, create leverage for a possible resolution, and save him from execution. Meanwhile, prosecutors must answer each challenge carefully because a major mistake could jeopardize a conviction or sentence years later. Eventually the motions and delays will end, but until then, the slow and repetitive legal grind should not be viewed as separate from the case. In a capital murder prosecution, that grind is the case.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
The Tyler Robinson defense is following a familiar capital-case strategy: challenge the evidence, contest deadlines, file repeated motions, preserve every possible appellate issue, and force the prosecution to defend each stage of its case. That approach closely resembles the strategy used by Bryan Kohberger's attorneys before he ultimately pleaded guilty in exchange for the removal of the death penalty. Although the constant delays and procedural battles are understandably frustrating, particularly for Charlie Kirk's family and supporters, they are part of the reality of a case in which the government is seeking the ultimate punishment.The Robinson case is unlikely to move quickly or in a straight line. His attorneys are attempting to weaken the prosecution's evidence, protect his constitutional rights, create leverage for a possible resolution, and save him from execution. Meanwhile, prosecutors must answer each challenge carefully because a major mistake could jeopardize a conviction or sentence years later. Eventually the motions and delays will end, but until then, the slow and repetitive legal grind should not be viewed as separate from the case. In a capital murder prosecution, that grind is the case.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
The Idaho murders case ended with a guilty plea, and it still won't sit quietly — because a loud corner of the internet is certain Bryan Kohberger was framed. In this one, we go straight at the forensic theories and pull them apart. The center of it all is a knife sheath left in a young woman's bed and the male DNA found on its snap. Theorists need that DNA to be a tiny, plantable speck. The lab says the opposite — there was so much of it that the amount itself is the problem for the defense, not the prosecution. We unpack what touch DNA actually is and why a single-source profile on that snap is so hard to explain away. Then the harder cards: an unidentified man's blood on a stairway, a DNA mixture under a victim's fingernails with no match to Kohberger, the untested debris, and the accusation that the FBI built a false trail and misled a judge. We take each one seriously, then show why none of it outweighs a man's own skin on the weapon — the weapon his own account ordered online. This isn't a recap. It's a point-by-point answer to the questions that keep this case alive, told in plain language for the people who actually want them answered. Was he set up, or is the truth just simpler than anyone wants it to be?END_LINKS:Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDISCLAIMER:This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS: #IdahoMurders #BryanKohberger #HiddenKillers #UniversityOfIdaho #MoscowIdaho #DNAEvidence #TouchDNA #GeneticGenealogy #TrueCrimePodcast #IdahoFour
The Tyler Robinson defense is following a familiar capital-case strategy: challenge the evidence, contest deadlines, file repeated motions, preserve every possible appellate issue, and force the prosecution to defend each stage of its case. That approach closely resembles the strategy used by Bryan Kohberger's attorneys before he ultimately pleaded guilty in exchange for the removal of the death penalty. Although the constant delays and procedural battles are understandably frustrating, particularly for Charlie Kirk's family and supporters, they are part of the reality of a case in which the government is seeking the ultimate punishment.The Robinson case is unlikely to move quickly or in a straight line. His attorneys are attempting to weaken the prosecution's evidence, protect his constitutional rights, create leverage for a possible resolution, and save him from execution. Meanwhile, prosecutors must answer each challenge carefully because a major mistake could jeopardize a conviction or sentence years later. Eventually the motions and delays will end, but until then, the slow and repetitive legal grind should not be viewed as separate from the case. In a capital murder prosecution, that grind is the case.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
The Tyler Robinson defense is following a familiar capital-case strategy: challenge the evidence, contest deadlines, file repeated motions, preserve every possible appellate issue, and force the prosecution to defend each stage of its case. That approach closely resembles the strategy used by Bryan Kohberger's attorneys before he ultimately pleaded guilty in exchange for the removal of the death penalty. Although the constant delays and procedural battles are understandably frustrating, particularly for Charlie Kirk's family and supporters, they are part of the reality of a case in which the government is seeking the ultimate punishment.The Robinson case is unlikely to move quickly or in a straight line. His attorneys are attempting to weaken the prosecution's evidence, protect his constitutional rights, create leverage for a possible resolution, and save him from execution. Meanwhile, prosecutors must answer each challenge carefully because a major mistake could jeopardize a conviction or sentence years later. Eventually the motions and delays will end, but until then, the slow and repetitive legal grind should not be viewed as separate from the case. In a capital murder prosecution, that grind is the case.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
Alex Murdaugh's retrial is officially on the calendar — April 5, 2027 — and the first hearing made one thing immediately clear: the defense is not running the same playbook. Harpootlian walked into a Lexington County courtroom with first-responder transcripts and told the judge the accounts from people who arrived at Moselle the night of the killings don't match. He said there were other individuals present that night whose presence has never been fully accounted for.The prosecution faces a retrial with significantly less room to maneuver. The South Carolina Supreme Court's ruling limited how much financial crimes evidence the state can present — after prosecutors spent 12.5 hours over ten days on that testimony in the original trial. Attorney General Alan Wilson has put the death penalty on the table, a move the defense calls vindictive prosecution and a campaign sound bite. Wilson, the Republican candidate for governor, says the legal landscape around capital punishment has changed since 2022. The defense fired back: “What does he know today he didn't know five years ago?”Meanwhile, DNA from an unknown male recovered from under Maggie Murdaugh's fingernails sits waiting for a test the defense says didn't exist when the killings happened. The defense wants it sent to Othram, the forensic genealogy lab behind the Kohberger case. The judge will rule on that motion at the next hearing, August 14. Murdaugh himself appeared in double shackles and an orange jumpsuit. His lawyer told the court he is “not Ted Bundy.” The prosecution's response: he “thinks he is special. He is not.”End Links:Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel.https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagramhttps://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebookhttps://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tokhttps://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitterhttps://x.com/TrueCrimePodDisclaimer:This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.Hashtags:#AlexMurdaugh #MaggieMurdaugh #TrueCrimeToday #MurdaughRetrial #Moselle #MurdaughHearing #DeathPenalty #DickHarpootlian #CreightonWaters #TrueCrime
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
The defense asked for a laptop so Alex Murdaugh could review discovery from prison. The judge denied it after the warden said no inmate gets one. The compromise leaves Murdaugh dependent on his attorneys to bring their own devices to a conference room. With a trial date set for April 2027 and the defense claiming they need six months just to get eight new expert witnesses up to speed, the logistics of preparing a capital-eligible murder defense without digital access to evidence becomes a strategic problem in itself.Bob Motta examines what the defense showed the court at the first retrial hearing: transcripts from first responders suggesting other people were present at Moselle, a DNA motion targeting the same forensic lab used in the Kohberger case, and Harpootlian's public statement that the defense has a strategy for the kennel video. The question for a second jury: does the defense now have enough tools to dismantle the circumstantial case that convicted Murdaugh in three hours the first time? Tony Brueski and Bob Motta.End Links:Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel.https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagramhttps://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebookhttps://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tokhttps://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitterhttps://x.com/TrueCrimePodDisclaimer:This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.Hashtags:#AlexMurdaugh #MaggieMurdaugh #HiddenKillers #BobMotta #DefenseDiaries #MurdaughRetrial #Moselle #KennelVideo #DickHarpootlian #TrueCrime
The first retrial hearing in the Murdaugh case produced a moment that deserves more attention than it received. Dick Harpootlian presented the court with transcripts from interviews conducted with the first people to arrive at the Moselle property after Maggie and Paul were found dead. He told Judge McCaslin the accounts contain conflicting information about who was present at the property that night — and that the defense has received tips from people claiming to have case information that were forwarded to SLED with no confirmation they were ever investigated.That revelation came alongside a barrage of defense moves at the June 29 hearing. The team has eight new expert witnesses who need six months to prepare. They want Othram — the forensic genetic genealogy lab that worked the Kohberger case — to analyze the unknown male DNA recovered from under Maggie's left-hand fingernails, designated as Item No. 70. Jim Griffin told the judge the DNA was catalogued by SLED and never further analyzed. He cited the David Camm case from Indiana, where untested crime scene DNA ultimately identified the actual killer and led to the defendant's acquittal at a third trial.Judge McCaslin set the retrial for April 5, 2027. She denied Murdaugh a laptop in prison but arranged a conference room compromise. She deferred the DNA ruling to the next hearing on August 14 after ordering both sides' experts to confer. The venue motion is unresolved. And the death penalty — never sought in the first trial — is now allegedly on the table. Everything about this retrial is different from the first.End Links:Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel.https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagramhttps://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebookhttps://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tokhttps://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitterhttps://x.com/TrueCrimePodDisclaimer:This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.Hashtags:#AlexMurdaugh #MaggieMurdaugh #MurdaughRetrial #Moselle #MurdaughHearing #ItemNo70 #OthramDNA #DavidCamm #DickHarpootlian #TrueCrime
Five and a half million dollars to defend a man who admitted he did it. Eight million in total public costs. No trial. And a sealed file keeping the full breakdown from the people who paid for it. This is the real price tag of the Bryan Kohberger case — and why taxpayers in Idaho still can't see it.Kohberger pleaded guilty in July of 2025 to killing four University of Idaho students. He took four consecutive life sentences, no parole. The death penalty had been on the table for years before prosecutors dropped it in a deal. His entire defense was publicly funded after a court ruled he couldn't afford his own attorney.The defense team's invoices and expenses remain sealed. When a request was made to unseal them, the defense objected. A judge ruled for opening at least some of it. The defense appealed that order to the Idaho Supreme Court — and the appeal is being paid for with public money. Taxpayers foot the bill to spend it, then foot the bill again to be told they can't see how it was spent.The operational side tells the same story in smaller numbers. A donated crime-scene house turned into a three-hundred-forty-six-thousand-dollar line item before it was demolished. Sixteen thousand in wasted lodging because somebody didn't book the refundable rate. Nearly a hundred fifty thousand dollars in jail costs across two facilities. All explainable. None of it spent like it was real.The victims' families raise scholarship money in their children's names, treating every dollar like it matters. Eight million dollars passed through a system that treated none of it that way — and locked the proof in a drawer.LinksJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDisclaimerThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.Hashtags (10)#BryanKohberger #IdahoStudentMurders #TrueCrimeToday #TrueCrime #Kohberger #UniversityOfIdaho #TaxpayerMoney #KohbergerCase #MoscowIdaho #KohbergerDefense
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
The Bryan Kohberger case cost more than eight million dollars in public money. He confessed. There was no trial. And the people who paid for it have never been shown the full bill. This is the story of what happens when real money gets treated like it belongs to nobody.Nearly five and a half million went to his defense — attorneys, experts, investigators — all on the public dime after he was ruled indigent. Prosecutors spent years pursuing the death penalty before it got dropped in a plea deal. A massive war machine built for a capital trial that never happened.The defense spending sits in a sealed court file. A judge ordered parts of it unsealed. Kohberger's lawyers objected to releasing any of it, lost, and appealed to the Idaho Supreme Court — billing the public for the effort. The case is over. The man confessed. There are no appeals on the conviction. And the receipts are behind a wall.The smaller numbers are just as telling. A free house ran up three hundred forty-six thousand dollars in security and upkeep before they bulldozed it. One agency lost sixteen thousand in non-refundable hotel rooms while another agency, facing the identical situation, booked refundable and lost about thirteen hundred. Nobody stole anything. Nobody's money was on the line, and so nobody protected it.Convert the waste into what it could have been — scholarships, classrooms, resources at the same university those four students attended — and it gets hard to swallow. The victims' families know exactly what a dollar is worth. They raise scholarship money by hand, in the names of the children they lost.LinksJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDisclaimerThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.Hashtags (10)#BryanKohberger #IdahoStudentMurders #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #Kohberger #UniversityOfIdaho #TaxpayerMoney #KohbergerCase #MoscowIdaho #KohbergerDefense
The defense is building Alex Murdaugh's retrial around evidence SLED collected and never fully analyzed: DNA from an unknown male found under Maggie Murdaugh's left-hand fingernails. They want Othram — the lab behind the Kohberger identification — to run an independent analysis on a rush order.Tony Brueski and Robin Dreeke take the audience's hardest questions head on. Is a proven liar's denial worth anything? Does his voice on Paul's phone at the kennels prove he's the killer, or just that he was concealing something? The first trial stayed in his home county, and he was convicted. Now his lawyers want out. What went wrong with his read on that room?From prison, he's filed a federal suit against Becky Hill. Listeners smell a fishing trip through discovery to drag others down. Tony and Robin work through whether that's desperation or instinct — and whether a clean jury can even exist after three years of wall-to-wall coverage. A Hidden Killers investigation.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#AlexMurdaugh #MurdaughRetrial #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #RobinDreeke #MaggieMurdaugh #PaulMurdaugh #SLED #SouthCarolina #DNA
Alex Murdaugh's defense team has asked a judge to send untested DNA evidence to Othram, the forensic lab that worked the Kohberger case. The sample was found under Maggie Murdaugh's left-hand fingernails. SLED identified it as belonging to an unknown, unrelated male and stopped testing. The defense wants to know who it belongs to.Tony Brueski and Robin Dreeke take on the audience's most heated questions about the retrial. Can a man who stole twelve million and lied to everyone for years be believed about anything? Does the kennel video — his voice at the scene, minutes before the shots — end the conversation, or does it only prove he was hiding something? And does unknown DNA under the fingernails of his murdered wife change the behavioral read, or is it a distraction the defense is dressing up as a bombshell?The jury question looms over everything. After three years of documentaries and a global media trial, is a neutral jury even possible? The comments are sure they already know the answer — on both sides. Tony and Robin push past the certainty. A Hidden Killers investigation.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#AlexMurdaugh #MurdaughRetrial #HiddenKillersLive #TrueCrime #RobinDreeke #MaggieMurdaugh #PaulMurdaugh #SLED #SouthCarolina #DNA
Kaylee Goncalves' parents still have one question for Bryan Kohberger: why? After the plea deal, four life sentences, and no trial, the motive remains the missing piece. Scott breaks down what Kohberger's silence means legally, why plea deals often leave families without answers, and what comes next. The Goncalves family is also turning grief into action through advanced DNA testing for cold cases. Watch, comment, and stay to the end. #BryanKohberger, #KayleeGoncalves, #IdahoMurders, #CrimeTalk, #TrueCrime, #LegalAnalysis Crime Talk Store: https://crime-talk-network.myshopify.com/collections/all
Bryan Kohberger: Crime Scene Photos Released—Then Pulled Nearly 3,000 Kohberger crime scene photos were released—then pulled back. Idaho State Police says the release followed records laws, but complaints came fast. Some images reportedly raised serious privacy and redaction concerns. Scott breaks down what this means legally, ethically, and procedurally. Watch, comment, and stay to the end. Crime Talk Store: https://crime-talk-network.myshopify.com/collections/all #BryanKohberger, #IdahoMurders, #CrimeTalk, #TrueCrime, #LegalAnalysis, #UniversityOfIdaho
Criminologist Brent Turvey is the primary source behind "Broken Plea," the new book on the Idaho murders case. He has now been publicly disavowed by the defense team that hired him. Attorneys Ann Taylor, Elisa Massoth, and Bicka Barlow stated they are "appalled" by his media appearances and that he is violating his confidentiality agreement. They specified he was hired solely for crime scene analysis and is speaking on topics outside his scope. The book's own author told NewsNation there is "no smoking gun" and "no secret evidence." This Hidden Killers Week in Review combines two episodes examining the book's claims against the evidentiary record and the psychological portrait of Bryan Kohberger emerging from newly surfaced jail writings.Tony Brueski systematically checked every major allegation. The chain of custody claim that Turvey characterizes as "fabricated"? Moscow's police chief responded that the department uses electronic barcodes, not handwritten logs. The Othram DNA laboratory allegation? Forensic professionals confirmed it as a standard step in genetic genealogy investigation, not evidence of a cover-up. The second-attacker theory? Directly contradicted by Kohberger's own guilty plea as a sole actor — entered with no incentive to shield an accomplice and with a trial date weeks away. The prosecution's case, the defense's internal conflict over its own expert, and Kohberger's decision to plead guilty despite having every argument in this book available to him all point to the same unresolved question.The episodes also examine Kohberger's never-before-published jail letters. He wrote to his dog about alleged telepathic communication. He described "triumphantly ascending" and experiencing "clarity and serenity" from custody. He wrote his sister a letter so clinically detached it resembles academic correspondence. Across all writings, there is no reference to Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle, or Ethan Chapin. Psychotherapist Shavaun Scott analyzes these writings alongside documented jail behaviors — obsessive handwashing until his skin bled, prolonged showers, and the consistent pattern of watching his own case coverage but switching channels whenever his family appeared.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#BryanKohberger #IdahoMurders #BrokenPlea #KayleeGoncalves #MadisonMogen #XanaKernodle #EthanChapin #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #CriminalPsychology
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
The criminologist behind the biggest new book on the Idaho murders has been publicly disavowed by the defense team that hired him. Ann Taylor, Elisa Massoth, and Bicka Barlow said they are "appalled" by Brent Turvey's media appearances and that he is violating his confidentiality agreement. They said he was hired solely for crime scene analysis and is now speaking on topics outside his expertise. Meanwhile, the book's author told NewsNation there is "no smoking gun" and "no secret evidence" in the Kohberger case. This Hidden Killers Week in Review brings together two episodes pulling apart both the book's claims and the psychological portrait of Bryan Kohberger emerging from his own writings.Tony Brueski fact-checked every major claim in "Broken Plea" against on-the-record responses from Idaho prosecutors, defense attorneys, and forensic professionals. The chain of custody allegation that Turvey calls "fabricated"? Moscow's police chief says the department uses electronic barcodes, not handwritten logs. The Othram DNA lab story? A standard step in genetic genealogy, not a cover-up. The second-attacker theory? Contradicted by Kohberger himself, who pled guilty as a sole actor with zero incentive to protect an accomplice. The overriding question: Kohberger had every argument in this book and a trial date weeks away. He still said guilty.Then there are the jail letters — never before published, now surfaced in the book itself. Kohberger wrote to his dog claiming they communicated telepathically. He wrote his family about "triumphantly ascending" and "clarity and serenity." He wrote his sister a letter so clinical it reads like a dissertation. Across all of it, not a single mention of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle, or Ethan Chapin. Psychotherapist Shavaun Scott analyzes the writings alongside inmate reports of obsessive handwashing until his skin bled and a man who watched his own coverage on every channel but changed it the moment his family appeared onscreen.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#BryanKohberger #IdahoMurders #BrokenPlea #KayleeGoncalves #MadisonMogen #XanaKernodle #EthanChapin #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #CriminalPsychology
Christopher Whitcomb's book on the Idaho student murders presents itself as an investigation into unresolved evidence questions. When each major claim is checked against on-the-record responses from law enforcement, prosecutors, and the defense team itself, the foundation doesn't hold.This week's True Crime Today review examines the most consequential Kohberger case developments — a point-by-point analysis of the book's claims, the public disavowal of its primary source, and the civil litigation that represents the actual unresolved accountability in this case.Brent Turvey's chain of custody allegation regarding the Ka-Bar knife sheath centers on a claim about documentation irregularities. Moscow's police chief has stated publicly that the department employs electronic barcodes — not the handwritten log system Turvey's allegation requires. The Othram DNA laboratory involvement that the book characterizes as irregular is a standard component of genetic genealogy investigations. The second-attacker theory is contradicted by Kohberger's own guilty plea as a sole actor — entered with a trial date weeks away and with full awareness that identifying a co-conspirator would have been his most significant leverage for a reduced sentence.Kohberger's defense attorneys — Ann Taylor, Elisa Massoth, and Bicka Barlow — issued a public statement calling Turvey's media conduct "appalling" and stating he was retained exclusively for crime scene analysis. They accuse him of violating his confidentiality agreement and speaking on matters outside his retained expertise. Whitcomb himself told NewsNation the book contains no smoking gun and no secret evidence.Bryan Kohberger had access to every argument this book contains. He had a trial date. He had a defense team prepared to litigate. He entered a guilty plea to four counts of first-degree murder. The families of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin have filed suit against Washington State University alleging the institution failed to act on formal stalking complaints. That civil action addresses the systemic failure the criminal case could not — and represents the substantive legal question still outstanding.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#BryanKohberger #IdahoMurders #BrokenPlea #BrentTurvey #AnnTaylor #ChainOfCustody #KnifeSheath #DNAEvidence #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
The man behind the biggest claims in the new Idaho murders book has been publicly disavowed by the people who hired him. Criminologist Brent Turvey — the primary source for Christopher Whitcomb's book — was called out by Ann Taylor, Elisa Massoth, and Bicka Barlow in a statement saying they are "appalled" by his media appearances. They said he was retained solely for crime scene analysis and is now speaking on subjects beyond his scope. They accused him of violating his confidentiality agreement. His own defense team is telling the public not to take him seriously.This week's Hidden Killers review brings together the most critical Kohberger case conversations — focused on what the book actually contains versus what holds up when you check it against the record.We went through every major claim. The chain of custody allegation Turvey calls "fabricated"? Moscow PD has stated they use electronic barcodes, not the handwritten logs Turvey's claim depends on. The Othram DNA lab story? Standard genetic genealogy procedure, not evidence of anything improper. The second-attacker theory? Bryan Kohberger pled guilty as a sole actor. He had every reason to name an accomplice if one existed — it would have been his single strongest bargaining chip. He didn't, because there's nothing to name. Even Whitcomb himself told NewsNation there's no smoking gun and no secret evidence. That's the author of the book saying his own book doesn't contain what the marketing implies.Kohberger had a trial date weeks away. He had every argument this book is selling. He had a defense team that could have pursued every one of Turvey's concerns in court. He pled guilty anyway. That fact answers every question the book is trying to raise.The families of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin have filed suit against Washington State University alleging the school ignored formal stalking complaints against Kohberger. That's the story that matters — institutional failure, not a book tour.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#BryanKohberger #IdahoMurders #BrokenPlea #BrentTurvey #AnnTaylor #KnifeSheath #ChainOfCustody #UniversityOfIdaho #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers
The book's author says there's no smoking gun. The book's primary source has been disavowed by his own defense team clients. And the defendant the book is about already confessed. So what exactly is left?This week's review brings together the most pointed Kohberger case conversations — and we did something the book apparently didn't count on anyone doing. We checked every major claim against the record.Robin Dreeke — retired FBI Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program Chief — joins to answer the listener questions that have flooded in since the book dropped and since Brent Turvey started making media rounds. But the answers don't go where the book wants them to go.Turvey's central allegation — that the knife sheath chain of custody was "fabricated" — depends on a claim about handwritten logs. Moscow's police chief has publicly stated the department uses electronic barcodes. The Othram DNA lab involvement that the book frames as suspicious? Standard procedure in genetic genealogy investigations. The second-attacker theory? Bryan Kohberger pled guilty as a sole actor with a trial date weeks away. If an accomplice existed, naming one would have been the most powerful tool his defense had. He didn't use it because it doesn't exist.Ann Taylor, Elisa Massoth, and Bicka Barlow — Kohberger's own defense attorneys — have publicly stated they are "appalled" by Turvey's appearances. They said he was hired for crime scene analysis only and is speaking outside his expertise. When your own clients are telling the public to disregard you, the credibility question answers itself.The families have filed a lawsuit against Washington State University alleging the school ignored formal complaints about Kohberger's behavior from women who reported stalking and intimidation. That lawsuit — not this book — is where the unresolved accountability lives. Kohberger confessed. The question isn't whether he did it. The question is who failed to stop him before he did.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#BryanKohberger #IdahoMurders #BrokenPlea #RobinDreeke #BrentTurvey #AnnTaylor #KnifeSheath #ListenerQA #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers
Bryan Kohberger entered guilty pleas to four counts of first-degree murder. He waived appellate rights. He is serving four consecutive life sentences without parole. The criminal case is resolved. The public conversation that has erupted since is not — and the substance of it doesn't hold up the way its authors want it to.This week's True Crime Today review examines the most significant Idaho murders developments — specifically, why the forensic claims circulating after the plea don't carry the weight being assigned to them.Brent Turvey, a forensic scientist retained by the defense, has publicly alleged chain of custody irregularities with the Ka-Bar knife sheath — the item carrying Kohberger's touch DNA. He contends documentation was completed retroactively rather than signed contemporaneously by each handler. The defense team publicly condemned his disclosures as a breach of confidentiality. What neither side has addressed is the most revealing fact: the defense did not file a suppression motion based on Turvey's findings before entering the plea. In a case carrying four murder charges where the defendant faced the possibility of death, an actionable evidentiary defect would have been litigated aggressively. It wasn't.Christopher Whitcomb's book packages questions about a case that already produced a confession. That's not forensic analysis — it's publishing.Eric Faddis provides the legal framework — prosecutorial evidence strategy, the calculus behind defense plea decisions, what chain of custody objections actually require to succeed, and why post-conviction forensic disputes almost never alter the outcome they claim to challenge. The families of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin received a confession. What's circulating now serves other interests.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#BryanKohberger #IdahoMurders #KnifeSheath #ChainOfCustody #BrentTurvey #BrokenPlea #EricFaddis #ForensicEvidence #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
Bryan Kohberger admitted to killing four people. He took the deal. He waived his appeals. And now the people who were supposed to defend him are publicly fighting each other over evidence claims that didn't matter enough to pursue when the case was still active.This week's Hidden Killers review pulls together the most pointed conversations from the Idaho murders — focused on why the post-plea noise doesn't hold up under scrutiny.Brent Turvey went public alleging chain of custody problems with the Ka-Bar knife sheath. The defense team responded by calling his conduct appalling — not because he's wrong about forensics, but because he's talking at all. And that tension tells you something important: if Turvey's findings were strong enough to suppress the sheath, a competent defense team fighting four murder charges would have used them. They didn't. Either the claims weren't as solid as Turvey now suggests, or the defense calculated that even without the sheath, the rest of the evidence was enough to convict. Either way, the idea that this plea was somehow premature doesn't survive basic scrutiny.Christopher Whitcomb wrote a book. Kohberger confessed. Those two facts tell you everything about the value of the book. Packaging questions after a guilty plea isn't journalism — it's commerce.Eric Faddis has prosecuted and defended murder cases built on physical evidence. He breaks down why post-plea forensic claims almost never hold the weight their authors suggest, what the defense team's decision to take the deal actually tells you about the strength of the prosecution's case, and what four families are left to feel while watching people profit off the margins of their grief.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#BryanKohberger #IdahoMurders #KnifeSheath #AnneTaylor #BrentTurvey #ChainOfCustody #BrokenPlea #UniversityOfIdaho #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers
At Washington State University, Bryan Kohberger's classmates kept a tally board tracking his disturbing behavior. A faculty member told a student to email "911" if she needed help around him. Women were afraid to walk home alone because of him. He was described as a narcissist who never displayed empathy toward another person. In the courtroom, he sat expressionless through everything — victim impact statements, a surviving roommate confronting him, families breaking down — and said nothing. Then from prison, he picked up a pen, and a different person appeared on the page entirely.Kohberger's jail letters have surfaced, and they read like they were written by someone who's never been inside a courtroom, let alone convicted of four murders. He writes about telepathy with his dog. He uses language like "entropic" and "intuitive capacities." He tells his family about ascending to new peaks and finding "clarity and serenity." He signs letters to his sister "Bernnzz" and calls his dog "Brother." Same man at every stage — WSU, the courtroom, the letters — wearing a completely different mask each time.This episode tracks that pattern across every context Kohberger has existed in and uses his own words to map how this mind actually works. The dominance, the performance, the retreat into language nobody can challenge. And at the center of it all — a void where accountability should be. He writes about hearts and green pastures. He doesn't write about Kaylee, Maddie, Xana, or Ethan. Not once. That absence is the loudest thing in every letter.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#BryanKohberger #KohbergerPrison #IdahoMurders #TrueCrimeToday #KohbergerPsychology #KingRoad #KayleeGoncalves #EthanChapin #CriminalPsychology #TrueCrime
A comprehensive procedural legal analysis of three major criminal cases by former felony prosecutor and defense attorney Eric Faddis.Nancy Guthrie has been missing from her Tucson-area home for over three months. No arrest has been made. No suspect has been publicly identified. FBI Director Kash Patel stated his agency was excluded from the investigation for four days. The Pima County Sheriff disputes this timeline. Faddis analyzes the legal framework for civil claims the family may pursue — including defamation actions against content creators who allegedly targeted cleared family members, potential county liability for alleged investigative failures including the reported early crime scene release and the assignment of a sergeant with no homicide experience, petitioning for alternative investigative oversight, Arizona's statutory victim rights framework, and the legal exposure of media outlets that published unverified ransom material.David Burke, the artist known as D4VD, faces charges of first-degree murder with special circumstances, continuous sexual abuse of a child under fourteen, and unlawful mutilation of human remains. He has pleaded not guilty. The People's Brief, which the court declined to seal, alleges sexual abuse beginning when the victim was thirteen, an alleged motive rooted in the victim's reported threats to expose the relationship, an alleged stabbing, and months of alleged concealment. Alleged child sexual abuse material has reportedly been found on his phone. Faddis examines the defense's strategic reversal and the preliminary hearing set for May 26.Bryan Kohberger pleaded guilty and is serving four consecutive life sentences. The book "Broken Plea" alleges chain of custody problems with the knife sheath. Defense expert Brent Turvey, who made the claim, is accused by his former legal team of violating his confidentiality agreement. Faddis assesses the claim's legal weight and the ethical dimensions of the public dispute.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NancyGuthrie #D4VD #BryanKohberger #CelesteRivasHernandez #IdahoMurders #EricFaddis #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #LegalAnalysis #JusticeMatters
Bryan Kohberger pleaded guilty on July 2, 2025, to the stabbing deaths of four University of Idaho students. He received four consecutive life sentences with no possibility of parole and waived his right to appeal. The legal proceedings are concluded.A book titled "Broken Plea" by Christopher Whitcomb has introduced claims from former defense expert Brent Turvey regarding alleged chain of custody irregularities with the Ka-Bar knife sheath recovered at the crime scene — the prosecution's primary physical evidence linking Kohberger through DNA found under the snap. The evidence bag was reportedly documented inconsistently, with entries on a label appearing in similar handwriting with the same pen across multiple dates spanning November 2022.Kohberger's defense team, led by attorney Anne Taylor, issued their first public statement outside court proceedings since his December 2022 arrest. The statement accuses Turvey of violating a confidentiality agreement that they say has not been rescinded, and of speaking outside his areas of expertise on material that remains confidential. Turvey has characterized the statement as a deflection, stating he disclosed nothing confidential and alleging that Taylor's office had been investigated over a separate leak.The chain of custody allegation was not included in Turvey's filed expert report. He claims the discovery came after his filing deadline. Retired NYPD Inspector Paul Mauro has characterized the claim as a procedural attack rather than a substantive evidentiary challenge. Whitcomb has acknowledged there is no wrongful conviction claim and had no investigative role in the case.Former felony prosecutor and defense attorney Eric Faddis provides a procedural analysis of the confidentiality dispute, the evidentiary weight of post-plea forensic claims, and the ethical framework governing expert conduct in concluded criminal cases.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#BryanKohberger #IdahoMurders #BrokenPlea #BrentTurvey #AnneTaylor #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #EricFaddis #ChainOfCustody #LegalAnalysis
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
Every case covered here has an investigation that's failing somebody. The question is who — and what the law says can be done about it.In the Nancy Guthrie case, the FBI and local law enforcement are publicly fighting over how the investigation was handled. Content creators have allegedly built platforms off defaming the cleared family. Media outlets ran hoax ransom demands. An 84-year-old woman has been missing for over three months with no arrest and no publicly identified suspect. Former felony prosecutor Eric Faddis lays out the legal options the Guthrie family reportedly has — against every party that may have failed them.The D4VD case shifted dramatically when prosecutors unsealed the People's Brief alleging David Burke sexually abused Celeste Rivas Hernandez beginning when she was thirteen, murdered her when she allegedly threatened to expose the relationship, and concealed her remains for months while reportedly launching a world tour. The defense reversed its timeline strategy. Alleged child sexual abuse material was reportedly found on Burke's phone. The preliminary hearing is set for May 26. Faddis dissects the prosecution's strategy and the defense's reversal.Bryan Kohberger pleaded guilty and is serving four consecutive life sentences. A book titled "Broken Plea" alleges chain of custody problems with the knife sheath — but the expert making the claim didn't include it in his own filed report, his former defense team publicly called him "appalling," and the author acknowledges there is no wrongful conviction. Faddis examines who's credible and what's left. Three cases. Every legal angle. Every accountability question answered.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NancyGuthrie #D4VD #BryanKohberger #CelesteRivasHernandez #IdahoMurders #EricFaddis #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #LegalAnalysis #JusticeMatters
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
For years, Bryan Kohberger gave the world nothing. He sat silent through court hearings. He showed zero emotion while the families of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin confronted him at sentencing. When the judge asked if he wanted to speak, he said three words — "I respectfully decline." Then, from a maximum security cell, he finally opened up. Not to a reporter. Not to a judge. To his dog.Kohberger's prison letters have now surfaced, and for the first time since his arrest, we can see what's going on behind that blank stare. He tells his dog Scout they communicated telepathically. He writes to his sister Amanda about "Hearts promise unto the green pastures ahead" and signs it "Bernnzz." He writes to his family about ascending and finding serenity through a "Singular Heart." After years of calculated silence, his own handwriting cracked the mask wide open.This episode is a psychological deep dive into those writings and what they tell us about the mind behind the King Road murders. We connect the patterns in these letters to the behavior his WSU classmates reported — the dominance, the inability to connect, the need to perform intellectual superiority in every room. The same engine that drove a PhD student to terrify the women around him is now driving a convicted killer to write pseudo-spiritual philosophy from a cell he'll never leave. And the most telling detail of all? Across every letter — not one victim's name. Not one acknowledgment. The silence didn't break. It just changed form.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#BryanKohberger #KohbergerMind #IdahoMurders #KohbergerLetters #KingRoad #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #KayleeGoncalves #MadisonMogen #KillerPsychology
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
The central allegation in "Broken Plea" is that the Ka-Bar knife sheath — the prosecution's key piece of physical evidence linking Bryan Kohberger to the murders through DNA — allegedly had chain of custody problems serious enough to be challenged at trial. It's the kind of claim that sounds explosive on a book jacket. There's one problem: the expert making it didn't include it in his own filed report.Brent Turvey, a criminologist and forensic scientist hired by Kohberger's defense, says he discovered the alleged issue after he submitted his expert analysis to meet a court deadline. The evidence bag was reportedly filled out twice — once on the bag itself and again on a sticker affixed to the front — with entries that appeared to be written in similar handwriting with what appeared to be the same pen across dates spanning November 13 through November 16, 2022.Retired NYPD Inspector Paul Mauro reviewed the same material and characterized it as a procedural challenge — the kind of technical attack you raise when there's no substantive defense available. The book's author, Christopher Whitcomb, is a former FBI Hostage Rescue Team member whose post-bureau career includes novel writing and screenwriting for Netflix and HBO. He had no investigative role in this case and acknowledges there is no wrongful conviction claim.Kohberger pleaded guilty, received four consecutive life sentences, and waived his right to appeal. His former defense team, led by Anne Taylor, has publicly called Turvey's conduct "appalling" and accused him of violating a confidentiality agreement.Former felony prosecutor and defense attorney Eric Faddis examines every claim in this book — its factual basis, its legal relevance, and whether any of it changes a single thing about where this case stands.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#BryanKohberger #IdahoMurders #BrokenPlea #BrentTurvey #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #EricFaddis #ChainOfCustody #KnifeSheath #JusticeForTheIdahoFour
Bryan Kohberger pleaded guilty to four counts of first-degree murder and received four consecutive life sentences with no possibility of parole for the stabbing deaths of University of Idaho students Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin. He waived all appellate rights. The criminal case is closed. But newly published letters from his time in the Latah County Jail have opened an entirely different line of inquiry.Three letters written in October 2023 — to his dog, his sister, and his family — contain no acknowledgment of the charges, the victims, or his legal situation. His dog letter claims telepathic communication and is signed with his full legal name. His sister letter uses invented terminology and reads as a detached philosophical exercise. His family letter references "clarity and serenity" from jail and includes the phrase "A four" — while facing four murder charges.A new book on the case has also published the FBI's interview with Kohberger's mother conducted the night of his arrest — before she had legal counsel — in which she described her son as having virtually no friends, minimal romantic history, and near-exclusive communication with his parents. Psychotherapist Shavaun Scott examines what these materials, combined with inmate-reported behavioral patterns, reveal about the psychological dimensions of a case where the legal resolution left more questions than it answered.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#BryanKohberger #IdahoMurders #BrokenPlea #KayleeGoncalves #MadisonMogen #XanaKernodle #EthanChapin #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #CriminalPsychology
Bryan Kohberger pled guilty to four counts of first-degree murder in the Idaho student killings. He waived his right to appeal. He received four consecutive life sentences. And now a former FBI agent is selling a book that says the evidence was fabricated. “Broken Plea” by Christopher Whitcomb makes extraordinary claims about the Kohberger case — that the knife sheath chain of custody was falsified, that a private DNA lab found a different match before being shut down, and that two attackers were responsible for the crimes at 1122 King Road. We examined each claim against the public record and on-the-record responses from legal professionals. Moscow Police Chief Anthony Dahlinger disputed the chain of custody allegations directly. Twin Falls County Prosecutor Grant Loebs confirmed chain of custody can be established through live testimony. The Othram Laboratories story is not a conspiracy — it is a normal step in forensic genetic genealogy that the book fundamentally misrepresents. And the second-attacker theory is contradicted by Kohberger himself, who admitted sole responsibility with nothing to gain from protecting an accomplice. Whitcomb told NewsNation there is no smoking gun. Kohberger's defense team has publicly condemned their own expert's media tour. And Kohberger — who had every argument this book contains — chose guilty over trial. That is the fact this book cannot explain away.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#Kohberger #BryanKohberger #BrokenPlea #IdahoMurders #TrueCrimeToday #KohbergerEvidence #GuiltyPlea #EthanChapin #XanaKernodle #JusticeForIdaho4
Two landmark cases examined through the lens of criminal psychology by psychotherapist Shavaun Scott — one resolved by guilty plea, one in early proceedings.Bryan Kohberger pleaded guilty to four counts of first-degree murder for the November 2022 stabbing deaths of University of Idaho students Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin. He received four consecutive life sentences with no possibility of parole and waived all appellate rights. Newly published letters from his time in the Latah County Jail — written in October 2023 to his dog, his sister, and his family — contain no reference to the victims, the charges, or his legal situation, raising significant questions about psychological detachment.David Anthony Burke, known as D4vd, faces first-degree murder charges with special circumstances of lying in wait, financial gain, and witness elimination, along with continuous sexual abuse of a child under fourteen and mutilation of human remains. He has pleaded not guilty. Prosecutors allege a pattern of conduct beginning with reported contact when Celeste Rivas Hernandez was eleven, an alleged sexual relationship beginning at thirteen, and an alleged killing to prevent disclosure. Three grand juries heard testimony from the defendant's friends, management, and family members. Scott provides clinical analysis of the alleged behavioral patterns, psychological detachment, and bystander dynamics across both cases.Burke maintains his innocence through counsel.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#BryanKohberger #D4vd #CelesteRivasHernandez #IdahoMurders #DavidAnthonyBurke #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #CriminalPsychology #JusticeForCeleste #KayleeGoncalves
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
Bryan Kohberger is serving four consecutive life sentences for the Idaho murders. He pled guilty to all counts. And now a book called “Broken Plea” is asking you to question everything about his case. We read the entire book. We traced every claim about Kohberger back to its source. And we found something the book does not want you to notice: nearly every explosive revelation comes from defense experts who were hired and paid by Kohberger's own legal team — experts whose client chose to plead guilty despite having access to every argument they are now selling to publishers. The chain of custody claim? Multiple Idaho legal professionals disputed it on the record. Boise defense attorney Edwina Elcox confirmed the evidence would still have been admitted at trial. The genetic genealogy story about four brothers? That is how the science works — it identifies relatives as an intermediate step, not a final answer. Kohberger's DNA was independently confirmed through a completely separate process. The second-attacker theory? Three years of investigation produced zero corroborating evidence, and Kohberger himself admitted sole responsibility. The author acknowledges there is no smoking gun. Kohberger's defense team has disavowed their own expert. And the man at the center of it all had every one of these arguments before he stood up and said guilty. The families of Kaylee, Maddie, Xana, and Ethan deserve better than monetized doubt.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#Kohberger #BryanKohberger #BrokenPlea #IdahoMurders #ChainOfCustody #KohbergerDNA #GuiltyPlea #KayleeGoncalves #TrueCrime #HiddenKillersPod
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
Bryan Kohberger's guilty plea closed the criminal case. It did not close the questions about who he is. A new book on the Idaho murders has published, for the first time, three letters Kohberger wrote from the Latah County Jail in October 2023 — to his dog, his sister, and his family. The content is striking not for what it says, but for what is entirely absent: any connection to reality.He claimed telepathic communication with his dog. He addressed his sister in the plural and invented a capitalized philosophical term. He wrote his family about "triumphantly ascending to new peaks" while awaiting a potential death sentence. And in that family letter, two words sit in the middle of the text: "A four." He was charged with killing four people — Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin.Combined with his mother's FBI interview the night of his arrest — where she repeatedly called him her angel, described a man with virtually no social connections, and turned to comfort the family dog mid-interrogation — and inmate observations of obsessive compulsive rituals, the psychological picture is far more complex than a simple guilty plea suggests. Psychotherapist Shavaun Scott, author of "The Minds of Mass Killers," breaks down what this body of evidence reveals about the mind behind the Moscow murders.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#BryanKohberger #IdahoMurders #BrokenPlea #KayleeGoncalves #MadisonMogen #XanaKernodle #EthanChapin #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #CriminalPsychology
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
Two of the most psychologically complex cases in recent true crime converge in a single episode — with a psychotherapist who studies the minds behind extreme violence analyzing both.Bryan Kohberger's guilty plea closed the Idaho murders case. But three never-before-published letters from jail have opened a window into his psychological state that the trial process never did. Written to his dog, his sister, and his family — with no mention of victims Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle, or Ethan Chapin — the letters reveal a mind apparently disconnected from reality. Combined with his mother's FBI interview, inmate observations of severe compulsive behavior, and his emotionless plea, the portrait is deeply unsettling and demands clinical examination.Then: the case prosecutors are building against David Anthony Burke, known as D4vd. Alleged first contact with Celeste Rivas Hernandez when she was eleven. An alleged sexual relationship beginning at thirteen. A fourteen-year-old allegedly killed to protect a music career. And an entire circle of friends, managers, and family members — three grand juries' worth — who prosecutors allege were close enough to be questioned under oath yet reportedly never acted on what was in front of them. A psychotherapist examines the alleged psychology of the accused and the bystander dynamics that prosecutors allege allowed a child to allegedly remain hidden in plain sight.Burke has pleaded not guilty. His attorneys state the evidence will show his innocence.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#BryanKohberger #D4vd #CelesteRivasHernandez #IdahoMurders #DavidAnthonyBurke #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #CriminalPsychology #JusticeForCeleste #KayleeGoncalves
Three cases at distinct stages of the legal process raise overlapping questions about evidentiary standards, investigative procedure, and institutional accountability.In Los Angeles, David Anthony Burke faces first-degree murder charges with special circumstance allegations of lying in wait, financial gain, and murder of a witness in connection with the death of fourteen-year-old Celeste Rivas Hernandez. The charges carry the possibility of the death penalty, though the DA's office has not yet made that determination. Burke has pleaded not guilty, and his defense team maintains he did not cause Celeste's death. The People's Brief filed by prosecutors outlines allegations of a sexual relationship beginning when she was thirteen, a killing allegedly motivated by career preservation, and months of alleged evidence destruction.In Idaho, Bryan Kohberger's guilty plea to four counts of first-degree murder foreclosed any judicial evaluation of the chain of custody dispute now raised publicly by a former defense expert. The Ka-Bar knife sheath carrying Kohberger's DNA allegedly had documentation that was retroactive and legally insufficient. The victims' families have filed a civil lawsuit against Washington State University.In Indiana, Richard Allen's defense team filed a reply brief and requested oral arguments before the Court of Appeals, arguing the trial court committed constitutional error by excluding alternative suspect evidence, admitting involuntary confessions, and blocking the defense from presenting a complete case.Robin Dreeke and Tony Brueski take listener questions on the legal standards at stake in each case, the procedural distinctions between pre-trial, post-plea, and appellate proceedings, and what these cases collectively reveal about the American criminal justice system.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#D4VD #BryanKohberger #DelphiMurders #TrueCrimeToday #RichardAllen #CelesteRivasHernandez #LegalAnalysis #ListenerQA #TrueCrime #CriminalJustice
The procedural and forensic dispute over the Ka-Bar knife sheath in the Bryan Kohberger case raises evidentiary questions that his guilty plea ensured no judge or jury would ever evaluate. Defense forensic scientist Brent Turvey alleges the chain of custody documentation was retroactive, potentially constituting evidence tampering, false reporting, and professional misconduct. Moscow Police Chief Anthony Dahlinger maintains the department's electronic barcode system met all legal requirements. Idaho State Police released a photo of the evidence bag showing an unbroken seal.Kohberger pleaded guilty to four counts of first-degree murder in July 2025, accepting four consecutive life sentences with no possibility of parole in exchange for avoiding the death penalty. He waived all appeal rights. The plea foreclosed any evidentiary challenge.The dispute has generated a rare public conflict between Kohberger's defense team and their former expert. Attorneys Anne Taylor, Elisa Massoth, and Bicka Barlow issued a statement saying they are “appalled” by Turvey's comments and alleging he violated his confidentiality agreement. Turvey maintains the topics he discussed are part of mass public disclosures.Separately, the families of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin have filed a lawsuit against Washington State University alleging the institution received formal complaints about Kohberger's conduct and failed to act.Robin Dreeke and Tony Brueski address listener questions on the evidentiary standards governing chain of custody disputes, the procedural implications of the defense-expert conflict, the civil liability landscape facing WSU, and what the unidentified hair — confirmed by the FBI as not Kohberger's and reportedly never fully processed — means for the completeness of this investigation.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#BryanKohberger #ChainOfCustody #IdahoMurders #TrueCrimeToday #KnifeSheath #ForensicEvidence #WSULawsuit #LegalAnalysis #ListenerQA #TrueCrime
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
The physical evidence tying Bryan Kohberger to the King Road crime scene came down to one item: a Ka-Bar knife sheath carrying a single source of male DNA matched to Kohberger. It was the prosecution's anchor. And according to a defense forensic scientist who reviewed the chain of custody documentation, it may have been vulnerable to a challenge that could have kept it out of trial entirely.Brent Turvey, a criminologist with a Ph.D. and testimony in over seventy trials, alleges the evidence bag was documented retroactively. The bag appears to have been filled in twice, with the earliest visible date and initials of lead detective Brett Payne written over the evidence tape sealing the bag. Turvey told reporters the chain of custody was legally insufficient and that the sheath should have been ruled inadmissible.Moscow Police Chief Anthony Dahlinger pushed back. He stated the department uses electronic barcodes and numbered stickers rather than handwritten logs and that the process met legal requirements. Idaho State Police released a photo of the evidence bag showing an unbroken seal.The dispute never reached a courtroom. Kohberger pleaded guilty in July 2025 to four counts of first-degree murder and received four consecutive life sentences with no parole. He waived all appeal rights. The victims — Kaylee Goncalves, twenty-one; Madison Mogen, twenty-one; Xana Kernodle, twenty; and Ethan Chapin, twenty — never received the trial their families expected.Robin Dreeke and I take your questions on the chain of custody dispute, the unidentified hair the FBI says isn't Kohberger's, the families' lawsuit against WSU, and what Kohberger's letters from jail reveal about the man behind the plea.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#IdahoMurders #BryanKohberger #KnifeSheath #ChainOfCustody #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #BrokenPlea #KingRoad #ListenerQA #ForensicEvidence
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
The evidentiary landscape across these three cases reveals patterns that your questions have been tracking with precision. From forensic trace analysis in the D4VD case to chain of custody disputes in Idaho to excluded alternative suspect evidence in Delphi, the investigative details expose alleged systemic gaps at every level.In the D4VD case, prosecutors say LAPD's Trace Analysis Unit found plastic from an inflatable pool lodged in wounds on Celeste Rivas Hernandez's remains. Amazon and Postmates records allegedly tie the purchase of that pool, along with chainsaws, a body bag, and a burn cage, to David Anthony Burke under the alias Victoria Mendez. Burke has pleaded not guilty and maintains he did not cause Celeste's death.In Idaho, the defense forensic scientist who reviewed the Ka-Bar knife sheath alleges the evidence bag was documented retroactively and that the chain of custody was legally insufficient. The FBI confirmed that a hair found near one of the victims does not belong to Bryan Kohberger. It has reportedly never been fully processed.In Delphi, Richard Allen's reply brief details what the defense says the jury was denied: the composite sketch, testimony challenging bullet-matching evidence, audio from Allen's solitary confinement, the Kegan Kline catfish connection, and evidence pointing to alternative suspects whose interviews were allegedly recorded over and whose weapons were never collected.Robin Dreeke and Tony Brueski take listener questions across all three cases, connecting the forensic, investigative, and procedural threads your messages keep pulling.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#D4VD #BryanKohberger #DelphiMurders #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #ForensicEvidence #ChainOfCustody #ListenerQA #CelesteRivasHernandez #RichardAllen
Bryan Kohberger admitted he killed four University of Idaho students. He's serving four consecutive life sentences. He gave up his right to appeal. And yet somehow, the fight over what happened in this case is more intense now than it was before the plea.At the center of it: Brent Turvey, a forensic scientist the defense team hired and now wishes would disappear. Turvey was retained to analyze the crime scene. He reportedly found what he describes as serious chain of custody failures with the Ka-Bar knife sheath — the prosecution's most critical piece of physical evidence — and says those failures would have been enough to challenge the admissibility of Kohberger's DNA at trial. He says he brought these concerns to lead attorney Anne Taylor before the plea. He says no one acted on them.The defense team's response came in the form of their first public statement since sentencing — not about the evidence, but about Turvey. They called his conduct appalling. They accused him of violating his confidentiality agreement. They said he's speaking on topics outside his expertise. Turvey responded by calling the statement deflection and challenging Taylor to name a single specific violation.This conflict exploded alongside the release of "Broken Plea," a book by former FBI agent Christopher Whitcomb that draws on thousands of pages of undisclosed case files. The book raises additional questions — about untested hair found at the scene that was reportedly excluded as Kohberger's by the FBI lab, about competing expert conclusions on the number of perpetrators, and about a crime scene timeline that doesn't hold together the way the prosecution described it.For the families of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin, this was supposed to be finished. Instead, the very people who were supposed to fight for the defense are now fighting each other — publicly, bitterly, and with no end in sight. The case may be closed. The questions are wide open.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#BryanKohberger #IdahoMurders #BrentTurvey #DefenseExpert #BrokenPlea #ChainOfCustody #KnifeSheath #AnneTaylor #TrueCrime #TrueCrimeToday
Bryan Kohberger's defense team has issued its first public statement since his guilty plea, and this time, they are taking aim at one of their own experts. Attorneys Anne Taylor, Elisa Massoth, and Bicka Barlow accused forensic scientist Brent Turvey of violating a confidentiality agreement after his recent public comments about the Ka-Bar knife sheath, chain-of-custody concerns, and case-related materials. Turvey denies wrongdoing, saying the information he discussed was already public or included in discovery. The controversy centers on one of the most important pieces of evidence in the University of Idaho murders case: the knife sheath recovered from the crime scene, which later became central to the DNA evidence tied to Kohberger. In this video, we break down what the defense said, how Turvey responded, why the knife sheath evidence still matters, and whether these chain-of-custody claims would likely have changed anything in court. Rest in peace Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin. #BryanKohberger #IdahoMurders #ExpertWitness
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
The people who hired Brent Turvey to help defend Bryan Kohberger are now publicly condemning him. Not because he did bad work. Because he's talking about what the work revealed.Turvey is a forensic scientist — PhD in Criminology, three decades of casework, more than 70 trials as a qualified expert. Kohberger's defense team brought him in to analyze the crime scene at the King Road house where Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin were fatally stabbed in November 2022. He signed a confidentiality agreement. And according to him, he found something that could have upended the prosecution's entire physical case: alleged chain of custody failures on the Ka-Bar knife sheath — the evidence that carried Kohberger's touch DNA and served as the strongest physical link between him and the crime scene.Turvey says he told the defense about this before the plea deal. He says they didn't pursue it. He says he never got a straight answer about why. Then Kohberger pleaded guilty, and the door to every unresolved evidence question closed.Now Turvey is speaking to reporters. He's collaborated with former FBI agent Christopher Whitcomb, whose new book "Broken Plea" documents thousands of pages of previously undisclosed case files — including evidence photos, untested hair found at the scene, and expert conclusions that contradict each other on fundamental questions about how these crimes were committed.Anne Taylor's defense team broke their silence to call Turvey appalling and accuse him of breaching his agreement. Turvey says everything he's shared was already in the public record. He calls their statement deflection. And while they publicly condemn him for talking, Taylor and co-counsel Elisa Massoth are reportedly scheduled to give their own paid, closed-door presentation about the case at a defense lawyers conference — under confidentiality rules they control.The families deserve answers. They're getting a fight instead.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#BryanKohberger #IdahoMurders #BrentTurvey #AnneTaylor #BrokenPlea #KaBarSheath #ForensicScience #KayLeeGoncalves #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers
Bryan Kohberger pled guilty on July 2, 2025, to four counts of first-degree murder and one count of felony burglary in the November 2022 stabbing deaths of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin at their off-campus residence near the University of Idaho. He received four consecutive life sentences without possibility of parole, plus an additional ten years for burglary, and waived all rights to appeal. The plea agreement removed the death penalty from consideration. No trial was held. Now, defense-retained forensic scientist Brent Turvey is publicly alleging that the Ka-Bar knife sheath recovered from the crime scene — the sole piece of physical evidence carrying Kohberger's DNA — had chain of custody deficiencies he says could have provided grounds for a challenge to its admissibility. Turvey alleges the evidence bag documentation was completed retroactively by a single individual, lacking the required dual signatures for each transfer between law enforcement personnel. Kohberger's defense team, led by public defender Anne Taylor, has responded by accusing Turvey of violating a confidentiality agreement signed in October 2024. Former FBI agent Christopher Whitcomb's book "Broken Plea" raises additional questions — including untested hair recovered from the crime scene that the FBI lab reportedly determined did not belong to Kohberger, and conflicting expert assessments regarding whether a single perpetrator could have carried out the attack. Eric Faddis, criminal defense attorney and former felony prosecutor, examines the legal implications of the chain of custody allegations, the defense team's public dispute with their own expert, and the procedural reality that Kohberger's waiver of appeal rights forecloses any judicial review of the evidence.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#Kohberger #BryanKohberger #IdahoMurders #ChainOfCustody #KnifeSheath #BrentTurvey #BrokenPlea #EricFaddis #UniversityOfIdaho #TrueCrime
Three cases. Three families. None of them have the answers they were promised. Bryan Kohberger pled guilty to murdering four University of Idaho students and is serving life without parole — but his own defense expert is now publicly alleging the key physical evidence had serious chain of custody problems, and a new book by a former FBI agent reveals untested crime scene evidence that wasn't Kohberger's. The plea buried everything. Nick Reiner sits in a Los Angeles jail facing two counts of first-degree murder with death penalty eligibility for the stabbing deaths of his parents, Rob and Michele Reiner. The autopsy reports still aren't finished. The preliminary hearing just got pushed to September. His public defender hasn't tipped her hand on whether a mental health defense is coming. And the family is enduring every delay in a case where the accused is their own blood. Tupac Shakur's family just filed a wrongful death lawsuit naming Keffe D and one hundred unnamed co-conspirators — nearly three decades after the rapper was gunned down in Las Vegas. The lawsuit is designed to force testimony from people who have never faced a subpoena. Keffe D's criminal trial is set for August. The witnesses are vanishing. And the family has already lost nearly everyone. Eric Faddis — criminal defense attorney and former felony prosecutor — joins Hidden Killers to break down all three cases in one extended conversation covering the evidence, the legal strategies, the failures, and the families still fighting for something the system keeps deferring.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#Kohberger #NickReiner #TupacShakur #RobReiner #KeffeD #EricFaddis #IdahoMurders #BrentwoodMurder #WrongfulDeath #TrueCrime
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
Eric Faddis — criminal defense attorney and former felony prosecutor — joins Hidden Killers for an extended session covering three major cases demanding attention. In the Kohberger case, defense-retained forensic scientist Brent Turvey is publicly alleging chain of custody deficiencies with the knife sheath — the sole piece of physical evidence carrying Kohberger's DNA — that he says could have been challenged at trial. A new book by former FBI agent Christopher Whitcomb surfaces untested crime scene evidence the FBI lab confirmed wasn't Kohberger's. The defense team has responded by attacking Turvey for speaking while simultaneously preparing a paid conference presentation about the case. Kohberger pled guilty on July 2, 2025, to four counts of first-degree murder and waived all appeal rights. None of the evidence questions can be relitigated. In the Reiner case, Nick Reiner's preliminary hearing was pushed to September 15 after the court confirmed autopsy reports on Rob and Michele Reiner remain incomplete over four months after their deaths. Nick faces two counts of first-degree murder with death penalty eligibility. His public defender Kimberly Greene has entered a not guilty plea but has not addressed whether a mental health defense is forthcoming despite Nick's documented history of schizoaffective disorder and a prior conservatorship. And in the Tupac Shakur case, Mopreme Shakur filed a wrongful death lawsuit naming Keffe D and John Does 1 through 100, alleging a conspiracy that goes beyond the individuals in the white Cadillac. The lawsuit is built around civil discovery — the power to compel testimony and documents from individuals who have never been subpoenaed. Keffe D's criminal trial is set for August 10, 2026. The complaint cites grand jury transcripts and the Netflix documentary "Sean Combs: The Reckoning." Faddis analyzes the legal implications, the strategic decisions, and the family impact across all three cases.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#Kohberger #NickReiner #TupacShakur #RobReiner #KeffeD #EricFaddis #IdahoMurders #BrentwoodMurder #WrongfulDeath #TrueCrime
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
Bryan Kohberger pled guilty and is serving four consecutive life sentences for the murders of four University of Idaho students. No trial. No cross-examination. No jury verdict. And now, the forensic expert his own defense hired is alleging that the knife sheath — the only physical evidence tying Kohberger to the crime scene through DNA — had a chain of custody so flawed it could have been challenged and potentially excluded at trial. Brent Turvey, a forensic scientist with over seventy trials to his name, says the evidence bag's documentation was filled out after the fact by a single person and lacked the required signatures for each transfer between law enforcement. The defense team led by Anne Taylor never acted on his findings before Kohberger took the deal. Now that same defense team is publicly attacking Turvey for speaking — while simultaneously preparing a paid, closed-door presentation at a defense lawyers' conference titled "Lessons Learned from Kohberger," where attendees must sign confidentiality pledges. Former FBI agent Christopher Whitcomb's new book "Broken Plea" adds another layer — untested hair found at the scene that the FBI lab confirmed wasn't Kohberger's, and expert disagreement on whether one person could have carried out the attack. Eric Faddis, criminal defense attorney and former felony prosecutor, dissects the chain of custody allegations, the defense's contradictory behavior, and what it means that the evidence underneath a quadruple homicide plea deal was never subjected to adversarial testing in a courtroom.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#Kohberger #BryanKohberger #IdahoMurders #KnifeSheath #ChainOfCustody #BrentTurvey #BrokenPlea #KayleeGoncalves #MadisonMogen #TrueCrime
Megyn Kelly investigates the Idaho college murders, including a deep dive into Bryan Kohberger's past, the circumstances and evidence of the crime, how Kohberger was caught, and unanswered questions to this day. Follow The Megyn Kelly Show on all social platforms: YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/MegynKelly Twitter: http://Twitter.com/MegynKellyShow Instagram: http://Instagram.com/MegynKellyShow Facebook: http://Facebook.com/MegynKellyShow Find out more information at:https://www.devilmaycaremedia.com/megynkellyshow Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.