Podcasts about Motion

Le gouvernement de François Bayrou a survécu à une motion de censure déposée à l'Assemblée nationale suite à l'adoption du budget 2025.Traduction :François Bayrou's government survived a no-confidence motion filed in the National Assembly following the adoption of the 2025 budget. Hébergé par Acast. Visitez acast.com/privacy pour plus d'informations.

Today, we're delving into a groundbreaking study that examines the impact of spinal adjustments on scoliosis, focusing on movement mechanics and overall stability. Scoliosis affects a significant number of adolescents, and while traditional treatments include bracing and surgery, this episode shines a spotlight on the effectiveness of conservative approaches like spinal adjustment.Episode Notes: Analysis of kinematic and kinetic changes in scoliosis following spinal manipulationThe Best Objective Assessment of the Cervical Spine- Provide reliable assessments and exercises for Neuromuscular Control, Proprioception, Range of Motion, and Sensorimotor-Integration. Learn more at NeckCare.comTurncloud EHR- Minimalist design, without being sparse. Practical, yet elegant. Turncloud's design was to find the most efficient path in a day in the life of a chiropractic office. Connect with their team at www.turncloud.com Patient Pilot by The Smart Chiropractor is the fastest, easiest to generate weekly patient reactivations on autopilot…without spending any money on advertising. Click here to schedule a call with our team.Our members use research to GROW their practice. Are you interested in increasing your referrals? Discover the best chiropractic marketing you aren't currently using right here!

In this episode of Bible Reading and Coffee Drinking, we journey through Matthew 8, where Jesus' ministry bursts into action through miraculous healings and demonstrations of divine power. From cleansing a man with leprosy and healing the servant of a Roman centurion, to calming a fierce storm and confronting demonic forces, this chapter reveals Jesus' compassionate heart and His authority over sickness, nature, and evil. Join us as we explore how these miracles call us to a deeper trust in God's power and invite us to experience His healing touch in our lives. Grab your Bible and coffee, and let's dive into a chapter where faith meets action!Also, use the code "Podcast20" to get 20% off our entire store. This is a special code specifically for our podcast listeners! See all our our hoodies, t-shirts, caps and more at ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.livingchristian.org/store.html⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠.Check out this podcast and all previous episodes on Spotify, iTunes, YouTube and more! - https://www.livingchristian.org/podcast.htmlNEW DEVOTIONAL: 30 Days With The Lord, A Living Christian Devotional: https://amzn.to/4eXAO7sMY BIBLE: Every Man's Bible: New Living Translation - Find it here: https://amzn.to/3MuDAUSCHECK OUT OUR WEBSITE BELOW FOR CHRISTIAN APPAREL, PRODUCTS, BLOGS, BIBLE VERSES AND MORE:Website | https://www.livingchristian.orgStore | https://www.livingchristian.org/store.htmlPodcast | https://www.livingchristian.org/podcast.htmlFOLLOW ME ON SOCIAL:Instagram | https://www.instagram.com/living_christian/Facebook | https://www.facebook.com/livechristian1 Twitter | https://twitter.com/livechristian1Pinterest | https://www.pinterest.com/living_christian/TikTok | https://www.tiktok.com/@livingchristianABOUT US:Living Christian believes that our Christian faith isn't just for Sunday mornings in Church. Our faith impacts every aspect of our lives and the challenges we face every day of the week. We want to connect to people who are seeking to determine what Living Christian means in their own day-to-day lives. We are focused on providing resources and products to a community of believers. We provide daily biblical inspiration, motivation and guidance through social posts, blogs and Christian apparel and products.This work contains Music Track The 126ers - Winds of Spring that is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution license. Source: https://directory.audio/free-music/pop/5092-the-126ers-winds-of-springAuthor: The 126ers#christ #christian #christianity #christianblog #christianblogger #verses #bible #bibleinspiration #bibletime #jesusistheway #biblestudy #dailybible #newtestament #oldtestament #thebible #christ #jesuschrist #holybible #lukewarm #christians #christianpodcast #christmas

The dive into the court documents continues as we begin our look at the declaration fo Wendy Olson to vacate the gag order. (commercial at 9:59)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - Media Coalition - Declaration of Olson in Support of Motion to Vacate or Amend the Amended No(119421395.1) (amazonaws.com)

The dive into the court documents continues as we begin our look at the declaration fo Wendy Olson to vacate the gag order. (commercial at 9:59)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - Media Coalition - Declaration of Olson in Support of Motion to Vacate or Amend the Amended No(119421395.1) (amazonaws.com)

Stacey Plaskett, Democrat and Delegate to Congress from the U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI), has been actively seeking the dismissal of a lawsuit filed by survivors of Jeffrey Epstein. The lawsuit, which targets various officials from the USVI, accuses them of enabling Epstein's sex trafficking activities. Plaskett has described the suit as "legally and factually frivolous" and argues that the claims against her lack any substantial basis, suggesting that her inclusion is an attempt to unfairly malign her reputation due to her high profile​.Plaskett's legal team contends that the lawsuit does not meet the necessary pleading standards and that there is no evidence connecting her to Epstein's criminal activities. They argue that her interactions with Epstein, including accepting campaign donations from him, do not imply any knowledge or involvement in his illegal actions​. Plaskett asserts that the lawsuit is a scattershot attempt at monetary gain, aiming to exploit her public status to increase the case's visibility and pressure for a settlement​.(commercial at 8:39)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - 15154228_7.docx (courtlistener.com)

Stacey Plaskett, Democrat and Delegate to Congress from the U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI), has been actively seeking the dismissal of a lawsuit filed by survivors of Jeffrey Epstein. The lawsuit, which targets various officials from the USVI, accuses them of enabling Epstein's sex trafficking activities. Plaskett has described the suit as "legally and factually frivolous" and argues that the claims against her lack any substantial basis, suggesting that her inclusion is an attempt to unfairly malign her reputation due to her high profile​.Plaskett's legal team contends that the lawsuit does not meet the necessary pleading standards and that there is no evidence connecting her to Epstein's criminal activities. They argue that her interactions with Epstein, including accepting campaign donations from him, do not imply any knowledge or involvement in his illegal actions​. Plaskett asserts that the lawsuit is a scattershot attempt at monetary gain, aiming to exploit her public status to increase the case's visibility and pressure for a settlement​.(commercial at 8:39)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - 15154228_7.docx (courtlistener.com)

Is your marriage just going through the motions, or is it growing through the motions? That is the conversation Scott Salisbury, Director of Marriage Programs at Relate Well Live Well, will have iwth Eric and Brigitte as they discuss three steps to a growing marriage on a Valentines Day Mornings with Eric and Brigitte. Relate Well Live WellDonate to Moody Radio: http://moodyradio.org/donateto/morningshow/wrmbSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In Case No. 2:24-cv-12647 before Hon. Judith Levy, the defendant, Sean Combs, has filed a motion for sanctions against the plaintiff, alleging misconduct in the litigation process. The motion argues that the plaintiff has engaged in actions that are frivolous, abusive, or otherwise in bad faith, including making baseless allegations and improperly using the legal system to damage the defendant's reputation. Combs' legal team asserts that such behavior has caused significant harm, including unnecessary legal expenses and damage to his professional and personal standing.The motion requests that the court impose appropriate sanctions to deter further misuse of the judicial process. Potential remedies sought include the dismissal of certain claims, reimbursement of legal fees incurred by the defendant, and other punitive measures deemed fit by the court. Combs' legal team emphasizes the importance of maintaining the integrity of the legal system and argues that allowing such alleged misconduct to continue unaddressed would set a dangerous precedent for future cases.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.mied.380235.70.0.pdf

In response to the government's declarations submitted on January 17, 2025 (Dkt. 131), Sean Combs' legal team reiterates their arguments in favor of his Motion for a Hearing, Suppression, and Other Relief (Dkt. 97). The defense asserts that the government's submission fails to address critical procedural and substantive issues related to the evidence in question. Specifically, they highlight inconsistencies and potential constitutional violations in the methods used to obtain evidence against Mr. Combs, calling into question its admissibility. The defense maintains that these deficiencies warrant a full evidentiary hearing to safeguard Mr. Combs' rights under due process.Additionally, the defense emphasizes that suppression of certain evidence is not only appropriate but necessary to ensure a fair trial. They argue that the government's declarations lack sufficient justification to refute claims of improper conduct and overreach by law enforcement. By filing this response, Mr. Combs' counsel seeks to underscore the importance of addressing these legal flaws promptly and thoroughly, urging the court to grant the requested relief to uphold the integrity of the judicial process.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.135.0.pdf

The judge in the TikTok Psychic Defamation Case denied her Motion to Alter or Amend Judgement. The judge said that the Summary Judgement against her was fair and will move forward with a hearing to asses damages.Another option is to come to an agreed settlement with the professor. I'll continue to monitor movements on this case. The judge has been incredibly patient and the plaintiff deserves to be remedied for the false accusations that caused an online campaign of hate against them. Watch the full coverage: https://www.youtube.com/live/-AAmjQbR2RM?t=870sRESOURCESTikTok Psychic Defamation Playlist - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsbUyvZas7gJhnNYbw7Go9agKxL9poNLvThis podcast uses the following third-party services for analysis: Spotify Ad Analytics - https://www.spotify.com/us/legal/ad-analytics-privacy-policy/Podscribe - https://podscribe.com/privacy

Ducks Unlimited Podcast: Season Wrap-Up Live StreamHosts: Dr. Mike Brasher, Katie Burke, Matt HarrisonLocation: Ducks Unlimited HQ, Memphis, TNPresented by: Purina ProPlan & Bird Dog Whiskey

In Case No. 1:23-cv-06418, defendant Leon Black filed a memorandum supporting his motion for sanctions against Wigdor LLP and attorney Jeanne Christensen. Black contends that the plaintiff's legal team pursued baseless claims, lacking factual and legal merit, with the intent to damage his reputation and coerce a settlement. He argues that their actions constitute an abuse of the judicial process, warranting sanctions to deter such conduct and uphold the integrity of the court.Black's memorandum details instances where he believes Wigdor LLP and Christensen failed to conduct adequate investigations before filing the lawsuit, resulting in frivolous and defamatory allegations. He asserts that their behavior violates professional conduct standards and has caused him significant harm. Consequently, Black requests that the court impose appropriate sanctions, including financial penalties and disciplinary measures, to prevent similar misconduct in the future.(commercial at 7:42)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.602764.54.0.pdf

In Case No. 1:23-cv-06418, defendant Leon Black filed a memorandum supporting his motion for sanctions against Wigdor LLP and attorney Jeanne Christensen. Black contends that the plaintiff's legal team pursued baseless claims, lacking factual and legal merit, with the intent to damage his reputation and coerce a settlement. He argues that their actions constitute an abuse of the judicial process, warranting sanctions to deter such conduct and uphold the integrity of the court.Black's memorandum details instances where he believes Wigdor LLP and Christensen failed to conduct adequate investigations before filing the lawsuit, resulting in frivolous and defamatory allegations. He asserts that their behavior violates professional conduct standards and has caused him significant harm. Consequently, Black requests that the court impose appropriate sanctions, including financial penalties and disciplinary measures, to prevent similar misconduct in the future.(commercial at 7:42)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.602764.54.0.pdf

In Case No. 24-CV-07778-JLR, presided over by Hon. Jennifer L. Rochon, the defendant has filed a memorandum opposing the plaintiff's motion to proceed anonymously. The defendant argues that the plaintiff has not demonstrated sufficient justification to override the presumption of open judicial proceedings, emphasizing the importance of transparency and the public's right to access court records. The memorandum contends that allowing the plaintiff to remain anonymous could prejudice the defendant's ability to mount an effective defense and may set a concerning precedent for future cases.The defendant further asserts that the plaintiff's concerns about potential harm or harassment are speculative and do not meet the legal standards required to proceed under a pseudonym. They argue that the court should require the plaintiff to disclose their identity to uphold the principles of fairness and openness in the judicial process. The memorandum requests that the court deny the plaintiff's motion and mandate that all parties be identified by their real names in the proceedings.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.629911.50.0.pdf

In Case No. 24-CV-07778-JLR, presided over by Hon. Jennifer L. Rochon, the defendant has filed a memorandum opposing the plaintiff's motion to proceed anonymously. The defendant argues that the plaintiff has not demonstrated sufficient justification to override the presumption of open judicial proceedings, emphasizing the importance of transparency and the public's right to access court records. The memorandum contends that allowing the plaintiff to remain anonymous could prejudice the defendant's ability to mount an effective defense and may set a concerning precedent for future cases.The defendant further asserts that the plaintiff's concerns about potential harm or harassment are speculative and do not meet the legal standards required to proceed under a pseudonym. They argue that the court should require the plaintiff to disclose their identity to uphold the principles of fairness and openness in the judicial process. The memorandum requests that the court deny the plaintiff's motion and mandate that all parties be identified by their real names in the proceedings.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.629911.50.0.pdf

Podcast interview with dancer/actress Tyne Stecklein about balancing motherhood and career in the entertainment industry.Tyne's ArtKey Takeaways - Tyne recently had her third child (first daughter) and is balancing life with 3 kids under 6 - She has continued working in dance/acting throughout pregnancies and postpartum periods - Creativity and artistic outlets are crucial for her mental health and sense of self as a mom - Flexibility and adaptability are key for managing an entertainment career with young kidsRecent Birth and Family Update - Had daughter Essence on December 13th, joining sons Brecken (6) and Ocean (3.5) - Was surprised to have a girl after assuming it would be another boy - Found not knowing the gender added an exciting element of surprise - Named baby about an hour before leaving hospital after getting to know herBalancing Career and Motherhood - Continued working on dance/acting jobs during pregnancies, sometimes not disclosing pregnancy - Grateful for understanding from female choreographers who are also moms - Teaches dance conventions as steady work between acting/dancing gigs - Husband also works in entertainment (dance, music, home remodeling) - Challenging to have two self-employed parents, but allows flexibilityPostpartum Experience and Self-Care - Third pregnancy/delivery was physically easiest but early weeks were chaotic due to wildfires - Evacuated with newborn and family, stayed in 8 different places over 2.5 weeks - Trying to incorporate older kids with baby, realizing importance of one-on-one time - Meditation and creative outlets like painting help with mental health - Savoring newborn snuggles as form of self-care currentlyCareer Impact of Motherhood - Initially wanted to reach certain acting milestones before starting family - Chose starting family over Broadway opportunity, felt it was right timing - Kids have expanded emotional range/life experience to draw from as performer - Auditioning for family commercials together during pandemic - Exposing kids to parents' work, but not pushing them into entertainmentAdvice for Artist Parents - Make time for creative pursuits to stay connected to self - Having kids adds depth to art rather than limiting it - Be adaptable with schedules/routines, especially with multiple kids - Zip-up swaddles and two-way zip onesies are lifesavers for baby care

In response to the government's declarations submitted on January 17, 2025 (Dkt. 131), Sean Combs' legal team reiterates their arguments in favor of his Motion for a Hearing, Suppression, and Other Relief (Dkt. 97). The defense asserts that the government's submission fails to address critical procedural and substantive issues related to the evidence in question. Specifically, they highlight inconsistencies and potential constitutional violations in the methods used to obtain evidence against Mr. Combs, calling into question its admissibility. The defense maintains that these deficiencies warrant a full evidentiary hearing to safeguard Mr. Combs' rights under due process.Additionally, the defense emphasizes that suppression of certain evidence is not only appropriate but necessary to ensure a fair trial. They argue that the government's declarations lack sufficient justification to refute claims of improper conduct and overreach by law enforcement. By filing this response, Mr. Combs' counsel seeks to underscore the importance of addressing these legal flaws promptly and thoroughly, urging the court to grant the requested relief to uphold the integrity of the judicial process.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.135.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Stacey Plaskett, Democrat and Delegate to Congress from the U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI), has been actively seeking the dismissal of a lawsuit filed by survivors of Jeffrey Epstein. The lawsuit, which targets various officials from the USVI, accuses them of enabling Epstein's sex trafficking activities. Plaskett has described the suit as "legally and factually frivolous" and argues that the claims against her lack any substantial basis, suggesting that her inclusion is an attempt to unfairly malign her reputation due to her high profile​.Plaskett's legal team contends that the lawsuit does not meet the necessary pleading standards and that there is no evidence connecting her to Epstein's criminal activities. They argue that her interactions with Epstein, including accepting campaign donations from him, do not imply any knowledge or involvement in his illegal actions​. Plaskett asserts that the lawsuit is a scattershot attempt at monetary gain, aiming to exploit her public status to increase the case's visibility and pressure for a settlement​.(commercial at 8:39)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - 15154228_7.docx (courtlistener.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In Case No. 24-CV-07778-JLR, presided over by Hon. Jennifer L. Rochon, the defendant has filed a memorandum opposing the plaintiff's motion to proceed anonymously. The defendant argues that the plaintiff has not demonstrated sufficient justification to override the presumption of open judicial proceedings, emphasizing the importance of transparency and the public's right to access court records. The memorandum contends that allowing the plaintiff to remain anonymous could prejudice the defendant's ability to mount an effective defense and may set a concerning precedent for future cases.The defendant further asserts that the plaintiff's concerns about potential harm or harassment are speculative and do not meet the legal standards required to proceed under a pseudonym. They argue that the court should require the plaintiff to disclose their identity to uphold the principles of fairness and openness in the judicial process. The memorandum requests that the court deny the plaintiff's motion and mandate that all parties be identified by their real names in the proceedings.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.629911.50.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In Case No. 2:24-cv-12647 before Hon. Judith Levy, the defendant, Sean Combs, has filed a motion for sanctions against the plaintiff, alleging misconduct in the litigation process. The motion argues that the plaintiff has engaged in actions that are frivolous, abusive, or otherwise in bad faith, including making baseless allegations and improperly using the legal system to damage the defendant's reputation. Combs' legal team asserts that such behavior has caused significant harm, including unnecessary legal expenses and damage to his professional and personal standing.The motion requests that the court impose appropriate sanctions to deter further misuse of the judicial process. Potential remedies sought include the dismissal of certain claims, reimbursement of legal fees incurred by the defendant, and other punitive measures deemed fit by the court. Combs' legal team emphasizes the importance of maintaining the integrity of the legal system and argues that allowing such alleged misconduct to continue unaddressed would set a dangerous precedent for future cases.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.mied.380235.70.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In Case No. 24-CV-07778-JLR, presided over by Hon. Jennifer L. Rochon, the defendant has filed a memorandum opposing the plaintiff's motion to proceed anonymously. The defendant argues that the plaintiff has not demonstrated sufficient justification to override the presumption of open judicial proceedings, emphasizing the importance of transparency and the public's right to access court records. The memorandum contends that allowing the plaintiff to remain anonymous could prejudice the defendant's ability to mount an effective defense and may set a concerning precedent for future cases.The defendant further asserts that the plaintiff's concerns about potential harm or harassment are speculative and do not meet the legal standards required to proceed under a pseudonym. They argue that the court should require the plaintiff to disclose their identity to uphold the principles of fairness and openness in the judicial process. The memorandum requests that the court deny the plaintiff's motion and mandate that all parties be identified by their real names in the proceedings.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.629911.50.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Ep 16 Founder Series Pt 1: A Lifetime of Spine Surgery, Motion Advocacy & Giving Back, Craig Humphreys, MD   In this first episode of our two-part Founder Series, co-hosts Courtney Schutze and Brady Riesgraf sit down with Dr. Craig Humphreys, a board-certified orthopedic spine surgeon, innovator, and pioneer in spine surgery, to discuss the evolution of motion preservation and the rewarding journey behind MOTUS—the first lumbar total joint replacement for the low back. From his early career in Chattanooga, Tennessee, to building a transformative spine practice in Soldotna, Alaska, Dr. Humphreys shares the journey of how he co-developed MOTUS (formerly the Kenai Device) with Dr. Scott Hodges. Their story began as a mission to offer patients a motion-preserving alternative to spinal fusion and culminated in the creation of a novel device aimed at restoring natural balance, maintaining motion, and preserving adjacent spinal levels.    For this episode, we had the opportunity to travel to Soldotna, Alaska and sit down with Dr. Humphreys in his home, situated on the Kenai River—the very place that inspired the original Kenai implant (now known as MOTUS). During our visit, Dr. Humphreys shares how a 3 a.m. epiphany and a hand-drawn sketch led to a breakthrough medical device, his struggles and triumphs in navigating the medical device industry, and why he believes motion preservation is the future of spine surgery.   Although Dr. Humphreys is native to Alaska, he started his medical education journey in the Midwest - graduating from the University of Notre Dame, receiving his medical degree at Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, and completing his spine fellowship at The Medical College of Wisconsin. With over 25 years of experience, he has treated thousands of patients, contributed to major clinical advancements, and played a pivotal role in bringing motion preservation to the forefront of spine surgery. He has been instrumental in shaping the future of motion-preserving spine surgery, advocating for better long-term patient outcomes, and partaking in groundbreaking clinical trials.   In this episode, you'll learn: The reality of developing a medical device: Why bringing new technology to market takes decades. The evolution of spine care: Why the shift to motion preservation matters and is gaining momentum. The origins of MOTUS - the first lumbar total joint replacement: How a simple idea turned into a breakthrough device. The fight to change the standard of care: Why motion preservation is facing the same uphill battle as total hip and knee replacements once did. The availability of new technology: How new advancements are providing alternatives to spinal fusion for patients struggling with leg and/or back pain. A lifetime of impact: His philanthropic work through the Carolyn Jane Foundation, bringing critical pediatric spine care to Africa.   Beyond his contributions to spine care in Alaska, Dr. Humphreys and his wife, Julie Humphreys, RN, are deeply committed to philanthropy and global healthcare access. Through the Carolyn Jane Foundation, they provide life-changing scoliosis surgeries to children in underserved regions of Africa, ensuring that spine care is accessible to those who need it most. Their work has helped countless families, and their commitment to service is just as impactful as their innovations in spine surgery.   This episode is Part 1 of a 2-Part Founder Series. Check out Part 2 with Dr. Scott Hodges, where we go even deeper into the promise of motion preservation and patient outcomes! https://youtu.be/F8mdFKVf_2I     Note: The MOTUS device is currently in the data collection phase of a US IDE FDA Trial and is not available for commercial use at the time of recording. To keep up with the progress of the trial, you can visit www.3Spine.com.   Learn more about Dr. Humphreys and The Carolyn Jane Foundation: LinkedIn: ⁠https://www.linkedin.com/in/craig-humphreys-md-87a8b234/  Dr. Humphreys Practice: https://spine.cpgh.org/ Carolyn Jane Foundation: https://carolynjane.org/ Cure Kenya Website: https://kenya.cure.org/    You can find The Spine Pod on all Podcast Streaming Platforms, including: YouTube:    / @thespinepod   Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/0DBzWfV... Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast... Amazon Music: https://music.amazon.com/podcasts/98f... iHeart Radio: https://www.iheart.com/podcast/269-th... Follow The Spine Pod on Facebook to learn more about the latest episodes and happenings in the world of motion preservation: ⁠https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?..⁠. The information in this podcast is for educational and informational purposes only and is not intended as medical advice. It does not replace consultation with a qualified healthcare professional. Always seek the advice of your physician or another qualified healthcare provider regarding any medical condition or treatment.  

In this episode of Women in Motion, Lee Kantor talks with Sharon Shaheed, founder of Piano Play Music Systems. Sharon discusses her background in music education and the unique approach of her program, which starts teaching children as young as 19 months and involves parents in the learning process. She highlights the importance of patience, […]

In the newest episode of the Blue Ribbon College Basketball Podcast, hosts Chris Dortch—editor and publisher of Blue Ribbon College Basketball Yearbook—and Kevin Ingram—the radio voice of Vanderbilt men's basketball—discuss a variety of college basketball (and other) topics:• Analyzing Saturday's monster Southeastern Conference supremacy game between No. 1 Auburn and No. 2 Alabama.• Mike Woodson is out at Indiana. The school has to make the right decision when it hires his replacement. Who will it be?• Rick Pitino's St. John's team is atop the Big East. Son Richard's New Mexico Lobos lead the Mountain West. The apple didn't fall far from this tree.• What we're listening to this week includes more Wilco from Chris, and with Valentine's Day coming up, Kevin picks his top five romantic power ballads.All Blue Ribbon college basketball podcasts are available on Apple Podcasts and Spotify.You can also listen in your email client or click on the “Listen In Podcast App” link above to listen in your podcast player of choice. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit blueribbon.substack.com

CLNS Media's Taylor Kyles and SI's Mike Kadlick take a look at what the Patriots could look like under a new coaching staff in 2025. With the return of Josh McDaniels as offensive coordinator, the discussion centers on how the Patriots can revitalize their offense. Plus, we analyze the defensive shifts under new coordinator Terrell Williams. 0:00 - Intro 2:01 - Josh McDaniels Offense 6:07 - Return of fullback 9:15 - More shotgun formations 10:56 - Motion with purpose 12:34 - Empowering the quarterback 15:00 - Quarterback mobility emphasized 17:00 - Run game concepts analyzed 19:56 - Drake's running usage 22:24 - QB design runs 25:02 - Trick plays discussed 26:39 - Josh's unpredictability 29:06 - Terrell Williams' defense 32:27 - Edge defenders' size 34:00 - Defensive formations overview 36:44 - Simulated pressures explained 39:48 - Simulated pressures discussed 42:06 - Patriots' defensive schemes 44:04 - Future expectations outlined Patriots Daily is Powered by:

In Case No. 1:23-cv-06418, defendant Leon Black filed a memorandum supporting his motion for sanctions against Wigdor LLP and attorney Jeanne Christensen. Black contends that the plaintiff's legal team pursued baseless claims, lacking factual and legal merit, with the intent to damage his reputation and coerce a settlement. He argues that their actions constitute an abuse of the judicial process, warranting sanctions to deter such conduct and uphold the integrity of the court.Black's memorandum details instances where he believes Wigdor LLP and Christensen failed to conduct adequate investigations before filing the lawsuit, resulting in frivolous and defamatory allegations. He asserts that their behavior violates professional conduct standards and has caused him significant harm. Consequently, Black requests that the court impose appropriate sanctions, including financial penalties and disciplinary measures, to prevent similar misconduct in the future.(commercial at 7:42)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.602764.54.0.pdf

In Case No. 1:23-cv-06418, defendant Leon Black filed a memorandum supporting his motion for sanctions against Wigdor LLP and attorney Jeanne Christensen. Black contends that the plaintiff's legal team pursued baseless claims, lacking factual and legal merit, with the intent to damage his reputation and coerce a settlement. He argues that their actions constitute an abuse of the judicial process, warranting sanctions to deter such conduct and uphold the integrity of the court.Black's memorandum details instances where he believes Wigdor LLP and Christensen failed to conduct adequate investigations before filing the lawsuit, resulting in frivolous and defamatory allegations. He asserts that their behavior violates professional conduct standards and has caused him significant harm. Consequently, Black requests that the court impose appropriate sanctions, including financial penalties and disciplinary measures, to prevent similar misconduct in the future.(commercial at 7:42)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.602764.54.0.pdf

In the case 24 CV 07774 (JPO)(BJM), Macy's has filed a Reply Memorandum of Law to bolster its Motion to Dismiss the plaintiff's complaint. In this reply, Macy's reiterates its position that the plaintiff's allegations are legally insufficient, failing to meet the necessary pleading standards. The company contends that the complaint does not establish a plausible claim for relief, lacks specific factual support, and relies on conclusory statements. Macy's argues that even if the alleged facts are accepted as true, they do not constitute a violation of applicable laws. The memorandum emphasizes that the plaintiff has not demonstrated a direct causal link between Macy's actions and any purported harm suffered. Consequently, Macy's urges the court to grant its motion and dismiss the complaint in its entirety, asserting that allowing the case to proceed would be unwarranted based on the presented arguments.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:TO:

In the case 24 CV 07774 (JPO)(BJM), Macy's has filed a Reply Memorandum of Law to bolster its Motion to Dismiss the plaintiff's complaint. In this reply, Macy's reiterates its position that the plaintiff's allegations are legally insufficient, failing to meet the necessary pleading standards. The company contends that the complaint does not establish a plausible claim for relief, lacks specific factual support, and relies on conclusory statements. Macy's argues that even if the alleged facts are accepted as true, they do not constitute a violation of applicable laws. The memorandum emphasizes that the plaintiff has not demonstrated a direct causal link between Macy's actions and any purported harm suffered. Consequently, Macy's urges the court to grant its motion and dismiss the complaint in its entirety, asserting that allowing the case to proceed would be unwarranted based on the presented arguments.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:TO:

In Case No. 24-CV-07778-JLR, presided over by Hon. Jennifer L. Rochon, the defendant has filed a memorandum opposing the plaintiff's motion to proceed anonymously. The defendant argues that the plaintiff has not demonstrated sufficient justification to override the presumption of open judicial proceedings, emphasizing the importance of transparency and the public's right to access court records. The memorandum contends that allowing the plaintiff to remain anonymous could prejudice the defendant's ability to mount an effective defense and may set a concerning precedent for future cases.The defendant further asserts that the plaintiff's concerns about potential harm or harassment are speculative and do not meet the legal standards required to proceed under a pseudonym. They argue that the court should require the plaintiff to disclose their identity to uphold the principles of fairness and openness in the judicial process. The memorandum requests that the court deny the plaintiff's motion and mandate that all parties be identified by their real names in the proceedings.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.629911.50.0.pdf

In Case No. 24-CV-07778-JLR, presided over by Hon. Jennifer L. Rochon, the defendant has filed a memorandum opposing the plaintiff's motion to proceed anonymously. The defendant argues that the plaintiff has not demonstrated sufficient justification to override the presumption of open judicial proceedings, emphasizing the importance of transparency and the public's right to access court records. The memorandum contends that allowing the plaintiff to remain anonymous could prejudice the defendant's ability to mount an effective defense and may set a concerning precedent for future cases.The defendant further asserts that the plaintiff's concerns about potential harm or harassment are speculative and do not meet the legal standards required to proceed under a pseudonym. They argue that the court should require the plaintiff to disclose their identity to uphold the principles of fairness and openness in the judicial process. The memorandum requests that the court deny the plaintiff's motion and mandate that all parties be identified by their real names in the proceedings.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.629911.50.0.pdf

A federal judge has ruled that the Trump administration is violating a restraining order the judge issued previously requiring the administration to lift the freeze on billions of dollars in federal grants.Attorneys General from 22 states brought suit against the Trump administration asking the court to order Trump to lift the freeze on federal funds that had been allocated to the states. Judge John J. McConnell, Jr., found in favor of the states, ruling that the "sweeping freeze of federal funds is . . . likely unconstitutional and has caused and continues to case irreparable harm to a vast portion of this country."However, the Trump administration failed to comply with the original court order. So the states filed a Motion for Enforcement of the Temporary Restraining Order. In granting the states' motion, Judge Jackson wrote:"It is a basic proposition that all orders and judgments of courts must be complied with promptly . . . Persons who make private determinations of the law and refuse to obey an order generally risk criminal contempt even if the order is ultimately ruled incorrect."However, the judge stopped short of holding the Trump administration in contempt, rather ordering them to comply.Trump seems determined to plunge our nation into a constitutional crisis. Glenn exposes what might happen next it Trump continues to defy lawful court orders.If you're interested in supporting our all-volunteer efforts, you can become a Team Justice patron at: / glennkirschner If you'd like to support us and buy Team Justice and Justice Matters merchandise visit:https://shop.spreadshirt.com/glennkir...Check out Glenn's website at https://glennkirschner.com/Follow Glenn on:Threads: https://www.threads.net/glennkirschner2X aka Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/glennkirschner2Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/glennkirschner2Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/glennkirsch...Bluesky: https://bsky.app/profile/glennkirschn...TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/glennkirschner2See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

The Supreme Judicial Court denied Karen Read's motion regarding dismissing counts 1 and 3. Trooper Michael Proctor, the lead investigator, is undergoing disciplinary hearings. These hearings are currently ongoing and Day 3 will continue in March.The Re-trial is scheduled for April 1st. The defense is requesting the court to order the prosecution to produce all video evidence and associated metadata in a forensically sound manner. We are still waiting for the defense to file their Motion to Dismiss and the deadline is Feb 20th.Watch the full coverage: https://youtube.com/live/rbYylRyjISkThis podcast uses the following third-party services for analysis: Spotify Ad Analytics - https://www.spotify.com/us/legal/ad-analytics-privacy-policy/Podscribe - https://podscribe.com/privacy

For the first time since the 2017 Delphi murders, the state of Indiana has released crime scene photos, shedding new light on the evidence used to convict Richard Allen in the deaths of 13-year-old Abby Williams and 14-year-old Libby German. The photos, included in a legal response by Carroll County Prosecutor Nicholas McLeland, show different angles of Libby German's cellphone before it was collected as evidence. The same phone recorded the infamous "bridge guy" video, which played a crucial role in the case. Prosecutors argue the images reinforce their claim that environmental factors, such as water or dirt, could have impacted the phone's functionality. However, Allen's defense team disputes this, insisting the phone was manually activated even after it had reportedly stopped moving. Allen, 52, was convicted in November and sentenced to 130 years in prison for the killings. His attorneys have since filed a Motion to Correct Errors, arguing that multiple issues— including forensic concerns, Allen's treatment while in custody, allegedly false evidence, and an alleged confession from another man— warrant a new trial or the overturning of his conviction. Defense attorney claims safekeeping order was illegal Allen's lawyers have long argued that his pretrial detention at the Westville Correctional Facility, where he spent significant time in solitary confinement, severely impacted his mental health and ultimately influenced the trial's outcome. They describe the safekeeping order that placed him in the facility as “plainly illegal from start to finish.” In response, McLeland dismissed these concerns, stating, “The motion for safekeeping does not touch on matters of guilt or impact the ability to have a fair trial, it is a mechanism for housing the Defendant in a penal facility pending trial that will keep him and others safe.” Surveillance footage and allegations of false evidence The defense has also pointed to newly surfaced surveillance footage from near the crime scene that they claim contradicts the prosecution's timeline of events. According to Allen's attorneys, jurors were presented with false evidence during the trial. McLeland, however, has pushed back, stating that the video is “unverified by legitimate means” and lacks an Indiana State Police identification number. As a result, he argues, it is “an improper submission for consideration by the Court.” Alleged 2017 confession by another suspect Another major argument in the defense's motion revolves around an alleged confession by Ron Logan, the late owner of the property where Abby and Libby were found. According to Indiana State Police records from 2017, Logan allegedly gave a detailed account of how he killed the girls. Allen's attorneys argue that excluding Logan as a third-party suspect was a critical mistake by the court. However, McLeland downplayed the confession, stating that the person who reported it to police “failed the polygraph miserably” and that “many of those details are directly contradicted by the evidence.” Prosecutors push back against new trial request McLeland has urged the judge to deny the defense's motion outright, arguing, “The Defense is not permitted to request a new trial to change strategy when their chosen path fails.” Former prosecutor and current defense attorney Brad Banks echoed this sentiment, predicting that Allen's request will be swiftly denied. “I won't be surprised if this was denied pretty readily,” Banks said. “I think there's somewhere close to 0% chance any of this gets granted.” NBCUniversal fights for public access to evidence In a separate legal development, NBCUniversal has filed a motion requesting that all trial evidence and exhibits be made public. The media company had previously submitted a public records request seeking access to materials in the case, but the state denied that request. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

For the first time since the 2017 Delphi murders, the state of Indiana has released crime scene photos, shedding new light on the evidence used to convict Richard Allen in the deaths of 13-year-old Abby Williams and 14-year-old Libby German. The photos, included in a legal response by Carroll County Prosecutor Nicholas McLeland, show different angles of Libby German's cellphone before it was collected as evidence. The same phone recorded the infamous "bridge guy" video, which played a crucial role in the case. Prosecutors argue the images reinforce their claim that environmental factors, such as water or dirt, could have impacted the phone's functionality. However, Allen's defense team disputes this, insisting the phone was manually activated even after it had reportedly stopped moving. Allen, 52, was convicted in November and sentenced to 130 years in prison for the killings. His attorneys have since filed a Motion to Correct Errors, arguing that multiple issues— including forensic concerns, Allen's treatment while in custody, allegedly false evidence, and an alleged confession from another man— warrant a new trial or the overturning of his conviction. Defense attorney claims safekeeping order was illegal Allen's lawyers have long argued that his pretrial detention at the Westville Correctional Facility, where he spent significant time in solitary confinement, severely impacted his mental health and ultimately influenced the trial's outcome. They describe the safekeeping order that placed him in the facility as “plainly illegal from start to finish.” In response, McLeland dismissed these concerns, stating, “The motion for safekeeping does not touch on matters of guilt or impact the ability to have a fair trial, it is a mechanism for housing the Defendant in a penal facility pending trial that will keep him and others safe.” Surveillance footage and allegations of false evidence The defense has also pointed to newly surfaced surveillance footage from near the crime scene that they claim contradicts the prosecution's timeline of events. According to Allen's attorneys, jurors were presented with false evidence during the trial. McLeland, however, has pushed back, stating that the video is “unverified by legitimate means” and lacks an Indiana State Police identification number. As a result, he argues, it is “an improper submission for consideration by the Court.” Alleged 2017 confession by another suspect Another major argument in the defense's motion revolves around an alleged confession by Ron Logan, the late owner of the property where Abby and Libby were found. According to Indiana State Police records from 2017, Logan allegedly gave a detailed account of how he killed the girls. Allen's attorneys argue that excluding Logan as a third-party suspect was a critical mistake by the court. However, McLeland downplayed the confession, stating that the person who reported it to police “failed the polygraph miserably” and that “many of those details are directly contradicted by the evidence.” Prosecutors push back against new trial request McLeland has urged the judge to deny the defense's motion outright, arguing, “The Defense is not permitted to request a new trial to change strategy when their chosen path fails.” Former prosecutor and current defense attorney Brad Banks echoed this sentiment, predicting that Allen's request will be swiftly denied. “I won't be surprised if this was denied pretty readily,” Banks said. “I think there's somewhere close to 0% chance any of this gets granted.” NBCUniversal fights for public access to evidence In a separate legal development, NBCUniversal has filed a motion requesting that all trial evidence and exhibits be made public. The media company had previously submitted a public records request seeking access to materials in the case, but the state denied that request. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In the case 24 CV 07774 (JPO)(BJM), Macy's has filed a Reply Memorandum of Law to bolster its Motion to Dismiss the plaintiff's complaint. In this reply, Macy's reiterates its position that the plaintiff's allegations are legally insufficient, failing to meet the necessary pleading standards. The company contends that the complaint does not establish a plausible claim for relief, lacks specific factual support, and relies on conclusory statements. Macy's argues that even if the alleged facts are accepted as true, they do not constitute a violation of applicable laws. The memorandum emphasizes that the plaintiff has not demonstrated a direct causal link between Macy's actions and any purported harm suffered. Consequently, Macy's urges the court to grant its motion and dismiss the complaint in its entirety, asserting that allowing the case to proceed would be unwarranted based on the presented arguments.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:TO:

In the case 24 CV 07774 (JPO)(BJM), Macy's has filed a Reply Memorandum of Law to bolster its Motion to Dismiss the plaintiff's complaint. In this reply, Macy's reiterates its position that the plaintiff's allegations are legally insufficient, failing to meet the necessary pleading standards. The company contends that the complaint does not establish a plausible claim for relief, lacks specific factual support, and relies on conclusory statements. Macy's argues that even if the alleged facts are accepted as true, they do not constitute a violation of applicable laws. The memorandum emphasizes that the plaintiff has not demonstrated a direct causal link between Macy's actions and any purported harm suffered. Consequently, Macy's urges the court to grant its motion and dismiss the complaint in its entirety, asserting that allowing the case to proceed would be unwarranted based on the presented arguments.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:TO:

Isabelle and David continue to talk with David's brother's friend, Aaron, and contemplate why folks with ADHD can be so enthusiastic and excited about interests, people, etc. Is it because we are like puppies who are starved for reinforcement (dopamine)? Or does it come from living a life on the outside and the joy of connection when it has been missed for so long. With callbacks to Greatest American Hero (See Ep095) as well as the real story behind the theme song to St. Elmo's Fire.—-David describes how borrowing from LeDerick Horne and his brilliant theory around leadership, that folks in leadership can have a number of qualities, including being promoters. Folks with ADHD can be natural promoters, and being a promoter is actually a form of leading others. With the caveat that we must be into what we promote. And how excited we are about people and how we talk people up. David names that perhaps this has something to do with how we are starving (for dopamine) and intimacy and connection and relatedness can help us fill that void, we reach for the connection and get excited. Isabelle wonders if this relates to an autism(ASD)-style special interest, how she perpetually is excited and has a working principle that everyone could find common ground if we just found a shared hobby or special interest. David likes to tell people on airplanes that he's a car salesman so he can talk and listen to his heart's content but he doesn't have to focus on what he does. Isabelle names that even though David is not very savvy about cars, he could sell a car because he's such a natural salesperson. Isabelle names that anxiety around overselling things, she might encourage people to try new things, take new risks, explore and play—but her working memory is so poor that she doesn't know if she oversold, she has to refer to notes or something as reference. David loved serving as fun because there was a high degree of risk and failing so it helped me remember things. David names that we are not starving puppies with watery eyes, but we are highly susceptible to be reinforced, so when we see someone else's tail wagging, it shoots up our levels of dopamine, we are highly reinforced. The establishing operation—social connection and social mastery is water for us, like the water-deprived rats being reinforced in Skinner boxes. The environment makes Isabelle's puppy quality feel safe or good or not; and can lead to her feeling starved of that connection and reinforcement. The feeling when you have no one wagging their tail back at you—how many mistakes we do make, how many social gaffs and miscues, and big ones. It's almost like we find ourselves so marginalized, its like finding a prison gang when we find people who get us. What does it do to your sense of self when you can't do what you want with your morning—how that deflates your sense of self. Isabelle feels like she shares a bond with the other parents and caregivers that are always running late—it flares up imposter syndrome and “if you only saw me five minutes ago." David reframes this as "if only you saw what it took me to get here and I made it!" Aaron is a master of social engineering, even though he's almost always good at it and social interaction, he remains scared the whole time. The anxiety hits because if it doesn't work out, he takes the hits hard: he can take a lot of them, but they hit hard. David shares one of his hits—he was spending a lot of money for grad school, wanting to read all the books for all his classes, he was going to learn it all...but he didn't do any of the readings for one of his classes. The class was talking about this person out loud, “Ed Nafoah” — he was like "what is this Nafoah guy talking about ?” and everyone in class is like “Edna? Her name is Edna Foa.” It took five to ten minutes for David to feel the cabin pressure returning and the lights to come up and to return to his body. Aaron points out that his impulsivity could carry him through it—David had a ballast and in grad school and they were talking about different psychosocial backgrounds, step or two based on privilege. The professor holds up a dollar and says "the first person to…can have this dollar?” He's never seen someone authorized like that. Aaron sings the theme song from “The Greatest American Hero” which we all know, and the superhero suit is David's impulsivity. Who is Edna Foa?Greatest American Hero trailer (he is LITERALLY "walking on air")Story behind St. Elmo's Fire theme song, "Man in Motion" here's the music video and the song A quick synopsis of the backstory behind the song (Source: Wikipedia)And an interview with the songwriter/singer, John Parr, discussing how he came up with the idea and how he snuck it in to be the theme song for this 1980's Brat Pack Extravaganza. For more about our guest:Aaron Michael Ullrey (he/him)Writing and Editing Specialist, Editor in ChiefResearch Associate, Transcendence and TransformationCenter for the Study of World Religion (CSWR) at Harvard Divinity SchoolInstructor of Religious StudiesThe University of HoustonInstructor of Sanskrit LanguageUniversity of Naropa -----Cover Art by: Sol VázquezTechnical Support by: Bobby Richards

 For the first time since the 2017 Delphi murders, the state of Indiana has released crime scene photos, shedding new light on the evidence used to convict Richard Allen in the deaths of 13-year-old Abby Williams and 14-year-old Libby German. The photos, included in a legal response by Carroll County Prosecutor Nicholas McLeland, show different angles of Libby German's cellphone before it was collected as evidence. The same phone recorded the infamous "bridge guy" video, which played a crucial role in the case. Prosecutors argue the images reinforce their claim that environmental factors, such as water or dirt, could have impacted the phone's functionality. However, Allen's defense team disputes this, insisting the phone was manually activated even after it had reportedly stopped moving. Allen, 52, was convicted in November and sentenced to 130 years in prison for the killings. His attorneys have since filed a Motion to Correct Errors, arguing that multiple issues— including forensic concerns, Allen's treatment while in custody, allegedly false evidence, and an alleged confession from another man— warrant a new trial or the overturning of his conviction. Defense attorney claims safekeeping order was illegal Allen's lawyers have long argued that his pretrial detention at the Westville Correctional Facility, where he spent significant time in solitary confinement, severely impacted his mental health and ultimately influenced the trial's outcome. They describe the safekeeping order that placed him in the facility as “plainly illegal from start to finish.” In response, McLeland dismissed these concerns, stating, “The motion for safekeeping does not touch on matters of guilt or impact the ability to have a fair trial, it is a mechanism for housing the Defendant in a penal facility pending trial that will keep him and others safe.” Surveillance footage and allegations of false evidence The defense has also pointed to newly surfaced surveillance footage from near the crime scene that they claim contradicts the prosecution's timeline of events. According to Allen's attorneys, jurors were presented with false evidence during the trial. McLeland, however, has pushed back, stating that the video is “unverified by legitimate means” and lacks an Indiana State Police identification number. As a result, he argues, it is “an improper submission for consideration by the Court.” Alleged 2017 confession by another suspect Another major argument in the defense's motion revolves around an alleged confession by Ron Logan, the late owner of the property where Abby and Libby were found. According to Indiana State Police records from 2017, Logan allegedly gave a detailed account of how he killed the girls. Allen's attorneys argue that excluding Logan as a third-party suspect was a critical mistake by the court. However, McLeland downplayed the confession, stating that the person who reported it to police “failed the polygraph miserably” and that “many of those details are directly contradicted by the evidence.” Prosecutors push back against new trial request McLeland has urged the judge to deny the defense's motion outright, arguing, “The Defense is not permitted to request a new trial to change strategy when their chosen path fails.” Former prosecutor and current defense attorney Brad Banks echoed this sentiment, predicting that Allen's request will be swiftly denied. “I won't be surprised if this was denied pretty readily,” Banks said. “I think there's somewhere close to 0% chance any of this gets granted.” NBCUniversal fights for public access to evidence In a separate legal development, NBCUniversal has filed a motion requesting that all trial evidence and exhibits be made public. The media company had previously submitted a public records request seeking access to materials in the case, but the state denied that request. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

Cortney Bishop's entrepreneurial spirit has driven her to create a one-of-a-kind business, complete with an in-house receiving operation and a creative approach to experiential e-commerce. She explains how each venture has helped her level up not just her firm, but also her own creativity.This episode was sponsored by Ethan Allen and The Shade Store. LINKSCortney BishopKaitlin PetersenBusiness of Home

A federal judge has ruled that the Trump administration is violating a restraining order the judge issued previously requiring the administration to lift the freeze on billions of dollars in federal grants.Attorneys General from 22 states brought suit against the Trump administration asking the court to order Trump to lift the freeze on federal funds that had been allocated to the states. Judge John J. McConnell, Jr., found in favor of the states, ruling that the "sweeping freeze of federal funds is . . . likely unconstitutional and has caused and continues to case irreparable harm to a vast portion of this country."However, the Trump administration failed to comply with the original court order. So the states filed a Motion for Enforcement of the Temporary Restraining Order. In granting the states' motion, Judge Jackson wrote:"It is a basic proposition that all orders and judgments of courts must be complied with promptly . . . Persons who make private determinations of the law and refuse to obey an order generally risk criminal contempt even if the order is ultimately ruled incorrect."However, the judge stopped short of holding the Trump administration in contempt, rather ordering them to comply.Trump seems determined to plunge our nation into a constitutional crisis. Glenn exposes what might happen next it Trump continues to defy lawful court orders.If you're interested in supporting our all-volunteer efforts, you can become a Team Justice patron at: / glennkirschner If you'd like to support us and buy Team Justice and Justice Matters merchandise visit:https://shop.spreadshirt.com/glennkir...Check out Glenn's website at https://glennkirschner.com/Follow Glenn on:Threads: https://www.threads.net/glennkirschner2X aka Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/glennkirschner2Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/glennkirschner2Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/glennkirsch...Bluesky: https://bsky.app/profile/glennkirschn...TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/glennkirschner2See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.