Podcasts about Motion

Robach and Holmes cover the latest news headlines and entertainment updates and give perspective on current events in their daily “Morning Run.”See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Robach and Holmes cover the latest news headlines and entertainment updates and give perspective on current events in their daily “Morning Run.”See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Gypsy Rose Blanchard's partner Ken has been found dead and she's speaking out! Plus, Jane Doe's identity has been revealed, along with some shocking new text messages in the Cornell 7 case. And Lindsay Clancy's motion claiming lack of evidence has been SHOT DOWN by Judge Sullivan. Let's eat real. Head to https://www.factormeals.com/nofilter50off and use code nofilter50off to get 50% off & 1 free breakfast item per box for 1 year, while supplies last until 10/31/2026. See website for more details. Become a Member of No Filter: ALL ACCESS: https://allaccess.supercast.com/ Shop New Merch now: https://merchlabs.com/collections/zack-peter?srsltid=AfmBOoqqnV3kfsOYPubFFxCQdpCuGjVgssGIXZRXHcLPH9t4GjiKoaio Watch Disaster Daters: https://open.spotify.com/show/3L4GLnKwz9Uy5dT8Ey1VPiBook a personalized message on Cameo: https://v.cameo.com/e/QxWQhpd1TIbDisclaimer: The views expressed in this video, on this YouTube Channel, and on No Filter with Zack Peter are for entertainment purposes only. All content is protected under Fair Use Rights.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Robach and Holmes cover the latest news headlines and entertainment updates and give perspective on current events in their daily “Morning Run.”See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Episode Summary In this episode of Business Coaching Secrets, Karl Bryan and co-host Road Dog deliver an energetic, honest deep-dive into core principles for coaching business success—from the real meaning of the 80/20 rule, the power (and pitfalls) of focus, and the truth about scaling and client retention, to addressing anxiety as the price of ambition. With playful banter and actionable wisdom, Karl busts common myths, unpacks the signal-to-noise concept with lessons from Steve Jobs and Elon Musk, and shares unique rules for coaches to build stronger, longer client relationships and higher-performing businesses. Key Topics Covered The Real 80/20 Principle in Business Karl Bryan explores how Steve Jobs' return to Apple and Nike's turnaround show 80/20 thinking in action—cutting unproductive offerings to amplify the best. Examples span from Google, McDonald's, and clothing companies to coaching: focus on the assets and relationships that drive the bulk of your results (03:14–08:00). Contrarian Takes on Coaching Advice Why "do what you love and money will follow" is overrated—do what you're good at, fall in love with sales, marketing, and solving problems (09:03). Challenging the E-Myth idea of leaving a business for six months: rare in reality, context matters. The myth of "multiple streams of income": not wise until your primary business is reliably selling at high volume for an extended period (13:09). Signal vs. Noise: Working Smarter, Not Harder Inspired by Steve Jobs and Elon Musk, Karl Bryan discusses eliminating "busywork" and prioritizing the vital few actions that make the boat go faster (19:31). How to apply signal-to-noise thinking in project planning, debates, and even national economic policy. Unique, Underdiscussed Coaching Rules Nothing in life (or business) is a straight line—it's all about adapting to unpredictable curves. The formula for failure: too much time and too many distractions. The formula for success: tight deadlines and single focus. Networking and environment: strategically positioning yourself in high-value places accelerates opportunities (29:53). Client Retention, Relationship Building, and Mindset Clients stay because they like you—make business relationships more personal and long-term. Life needs to break you to wake you—how overcoming adversity can be a launching pad for bigger breakthroughs. Addressing anxiety: the hidden currency of ambition, and why planning and taking action melts anxiety (41:14). Notable Quotes "Starve the trivial many so the vital few can do their magic and compound." "Do what you're good at—that's how you make lots of money. Fall in love with selling, marketing, content creation, problem-solving… that's how you crush it." "Put all your eggs in one basket, and watch that basket really, really, really carefully." "Motion is noise; signal is the results. The ultimate measure of working smarter is a low signal-to-noise ratio." "Your greatest successes will come through other people." "Anxiety is the price of ambition… Successful people are worrying, anxious addicts." "Remember: progress equals happiness." Actionable Takeaways 1. Ruthlessly Identify & Double Down on Your 80/20 Map out what drives the majority of your revenues, client results, and business growth. Focus there; cut or minimize the distracting rest. 2. Stop Chasing Every Trend—Master Your One Main Thing Until you have a $5M+ business (or stable, strong revenue), don't split your focus into multiple streams. Place all eggs in one basket, watch it obsessively. 3. Build Relationships for the Long Term Move beyond transactional coaching—clients stay (and refer) when they genuinely like you. Invest in those relationships (even outside the boardroom). 4. Remove "Busywork"—Prioritize Like Jobs/Musk Before acting, ask: will this move me measurably closer to my goal? If not, drop it. Efficient action beats constant activity. 5. Create Momentum by Changing Your Environment Network in higher-end venues, luxury lobbies, or wherever your ideal clients are. Uplevel conversations and connections. 6. Face Anxiety by Doing the Planning and the Work Document best/worst/probable scenarios. The act of planning, not the plan itself, reduces anxiety and increases confidence. 7. Serve and Connect—Fight the Epidemic of Loneliness Facilitate connection and belonging (like Swifties and Taylor Swift); people stay for how you make them feel. Resources Mentioned - Profit Acceleration Software™: Developed by Karl Bryan, a tool for demonstrating and delivering breakthrough client value. - Focused.com: Daily coaching strategies and insights, plus Profit Acceleration Software™ demos. - Networking and Environments: Visit high-end hotel lobbies, luxury car dealerships—be where your ideal clients are found. - Tony Robbins' Planning Frameworks: Step-by-step, action-driven problem-solving (Dickens Process, business planning). - Cody Sanchez's content on buying boring businesses: (Referenced as a case-in-point for scrutinizing "guru" numbers and context.) - Daily email subscription: Get tactical coaching insights at Focused.com. Like this episode? Please subscribe and share with another coach. Leave a review to help us impact more business coaches worldwide. For more resources on attracting small business owners and closing more high-end clients, visit Focused.com and get your demo of the Profit Acceleration Software™.

Jane Doe 3 asked the federal court to allow her to continue using a pseudonym in her lawsuits against Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn, including the related action in which they are sued as co-executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate. She argued that publicly revealing her identity would expose her to additional trauma, unwanted attention and possible retaliation after coming forward with allegations that Epstein sexually abused her. The court initially granted her request to proceed anonymously, while making clear that the protection could be revisited as the litigation developed. Indyke and Kahn later challenged that arrangement and asked Judge Arun Subramanian to require Doe to disclose her name publicly.Judge Subramanian rejected that effort at the time, finding that the balance of interests still favored protecting Jane Doe 3's identity. He noted the highly sensitive nature of the allegations, the potential harm that disclosure could cause and the fact that Indyke and Kahn already knew who she was, limiting any prejudice to their ability to defend the case. At the same time, the judge warned that anonymity was not necessarily permanent and could be reconsidered if Doe became the representative of a certified class or if the case survived summary judgment and moved closer to trial. The ruling therefore allowed her to remain Jane Doe 3 while the litigation continued, but left open the possibility that the court could require public identification later in the case.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

One of the richest gifts God has given us is healthy relationships.A marriage in balance, friends who mutually respect each other, and most of all, a strong “God connection” can be the ticket to a healthy, whole life. The full life Jesus spoke about!Hebrews 10:24–25 says, “And let us consider how to spur one another to love and to good works. Let us not forsake the assembling of ourselves together, as is the manner of some, but let us exhort one another, especially as you see the Day approaching.”With the fast pace of life, sometimes we forget to squeeze all the gratitude we can out of a great relationship. Remember to regularly tell the people in your life how much they mean to you, and to give thanks to God for sending these loved ones your way. Write them a note, even a text, to tell them what they mean to you.Let's pray.Lord, it's not about the number of relationships we have, but the quality. Thank you for giving people who are loyal and love us in return. Encourage us to love others in word and in deed. In Jesus' name, amen. Change your shirt, and you can change the world! Save 15% Off your entire purchase of faith-based apparel + gifts at Kerusso.com with code KDD15.

Robach and Holmes cover the latest news headlines and entertainment updates and give perspective on current events in their daily “Morning Run.”See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Lindsay Clancy's Motion For Finding Of Not Guilty Denied Let's Read The FilingBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/pretty-lies-and-alibis--4447192/support.ALL MERCH 10% off with code Sherlock10 at checkout  - NEW STYLES Donate: (Thank you for your support! Couldn't do what I love without all y'all) PayPal - paypal.com/paypalme/prettyliesandalibisVenmo - @prettyliesalibisBuy Me A Coffee - https://www.buymeacoffee.com/prettyliesrCash App- PrettyliesandalibisAll links: https://linktr.ee/prettyliesandalibisMerch: prettyliesandalibis.myshopify.comPatreon: https://www.patreon.com/PrettyLiesAndAlibis(Weekly lives and private message board)

Jane Doe 3 asked the federal court to allow her to continue using a pseudonym in her lawsuits against Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn, including the related action in which they are sued as co-executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate. She argued that publicly revealing her identity would expose her to additional trauma, unwanted attention and possible retaliation after coming forward with allegations that Epstein sexually abused her. The court initially granted her request to proceed anonymously, while making clear that the protection could be revisited as the litigation developed. Indyke and Kahn later challenged that arrangement and asked Judge Arun Subramanian to require Doe to disclose her name publicly.Judge Subramanian rejected that effort at the time, finding that the balance of interests still favored protecting Jane Doe 3's identity. He noted the highly sensitive nature of the allegations, the potential harm that disclosure could cause and the fact that Indyke and Kahn already knew who she was, limiting any prejudice to their ability to defend the case. At the same time, the judge warned that anonymity was not necessarily permanent and could be reconsidered if Doe became the representative of a certified class or if the case survived summary judgment and moved closer to trial. The ruling therefore allowed her to remain Jane Doe 3 while the litigation continued, but left open the possibility that the court could require public identification later in the case.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

They can't harm you if they can't find you! Use code emily and get 60% off annual plans: https://incogni.com/emily  Thanks to Incogni for sponsoring this video. Watch the full coverage of the live stream on The Emily D. Baker YouTube channel: https://youtu.be/TztbAKcRHkI  In this Case Brief, attorney Adam Lally concludes his testimony in a hearing regarding a motion to dismiss the case against Myles King, primarily addressing key discovery issues and missing evidence. RESOURCES Adam Lally August 2026 Hearing - https://youtu.be/MgpPkl4Cb48 Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Part 18 - The September 29, 2026 Hearing: Lindsay Clancy, a labor and delivery nurse, is accused of murdering her three young children on January, 24th, 2023. In this episode Nurse Erica covers the much anticipated September 29, 2026  hearing. This episode covers the latest developments in the Lindsay Clancy trial, including court motions, legal strategies, courtroom analysis and the implications of the proceedings. Nurse Erica also discusses The Boston Globe's motion for public access to trial information. The episode includes Judge Sullivan's upcoming retirement and trial scheduling. The defense's case focused on Lindsay Clancy's post partum depression, psychosis, and psychiatric medication history. The prosecution contended Clancy deliberately and meticulously planned it. This true crime trial series explores systemic issues in maternal mental health. Nurse Erica offers insights from a nurse's perspective to help listeners understand the complexities of the medical evidence and legal case.   Advertise on the show! Email with the subject NURSES UNCORKED SPONSOR to: nursesuncorked@gmail.com   Become a Patron! Gain early access to episodes, ad-free episodes, exclusive bonus content, giveaways, Zoom parties, shout-outs, and much more. https://patron.podbean.com/nursesuncorkedpodcast   ETSY Shop:  Stop Healthcare Worker Violence! https://www.etsy.com/shop/TheNurseErica   Chapters: 00:00 Intro to Lindsay Clancy Series and Hearing 02:45 Overview of Court Motions and New Attorneys 04:46 Rule 25 Motion for Acquittal and Arguments 13:14 Video from Hearing 19:54 Prosecutor's Response and Motion to Dismiss 22:00 Juror Notes and Privacy Concerns 23:48 Holdout Juror's Attorney  27:20 Motion from Boston Globe 30:02 Trial Scheduling and Judge Sullivan's Retirement 32:47 Conclusion  Help the podcast grow by giving episodes a like, download, follow and a 5 ️ star rating! Please follow Nurses Uncorked at: tiktok.com/nurses-uncorked https://youtube.com/@NursesUncorkedL   You can listen to the podcast at: podcasts.apple/nursesuncorked spotify.com/nursesuncorked podbean.com/nursesuncorked iheart.com/nurses-uncorked   Follow Nurse Erica:  @TheNurseErica on TikTok, Instagram, Facebook and YouTube! https://www.youtube.com/@thenurseerica9094 https://www.instagram.com/the.nurse.erica/   DISCLAIMER: This Podcast and all related content published or distributed by or on behalf of Nurse Erica or Nurses Uncorked Podcast is for informational, educational and entertainment purposes only and may include information that is general in nature and that is not specific to you. Any information or opinions expressed or contained herein are not intended to serve as legal advice, or replace medical advice, nor to diagnose, prescribe or treat any disease, condition, illness or injury, and you should consult your health care professional regarding all matters concerning your health, including before beginning any exercise, weight loss, or health care program. If you have, or suspect you may have, a health-care emergency, please contact a qualified health care professional for treatment. If you have pending legal issues, please consult an attorney. Episodes may contain speculation, theories, opinions, and unverified claims that have not been established as fact. Listeners are encouraged to conduct their own research. Nothing should be construed as guilt and no conclusions regarding criminal liability should be drawn solely from this podcast alone. The views and opinions expressed on Nurses Uncorked do not reflect the views of our employers, professional organizations or affiliates. Any information or opinions provided by guests, experts or hosts featured within website or on Nurses Uncorked Podcast are their own; not those of Nurse Erica or Nurses Uncorked LLC. Accordingly, Nurse Erica and Nurses Uncorked cannot be responsible for any results or consequences or actions you may take based on such information or opinions. All content is the sole property of Nurses Uncorked, LLC. All copyrights are reserved and the exclusive property of Nurses Uncorked, LLC.

How do you get more MSP clients without burning your market? You stop counting outbound touches and start counting the conversations where you knew something true about the buyer.One marketing company in our space is now promising MSPs 4,000 automated outbound touches a week. No SDR required. On paper, that sounds like the answer to everything. Most MSP owners I talk to would be thrilled with 40 touches a week done consistently.So I did the math. 4,000 touches a week is 208,000 touches a year. If your real target market is 2,000 businesses in your region, every one of them hears from you twice a week, all year, sounding exactly like the last 40 vendors who bought the same tool. And your market is finite. Once a business owner marks you as spam in March, they still remember your name in October.In this episode of Get More MSP Leads, I walk through why high-volume AI outbound can hurt MSPs more than it helps:

The Lindsay Clancy defense wants access to material from inside the jury process—and attorney Martin Weinberg made clear why those records could matter to what comes next.Weinberg argued a defense motion asking Judge William Sullivan to order that juror notes and sidebar discussions not remain subject to impoundment. The defense wants to use some of those documents to support its motion seeking dismissal of the case on double jeopardy grounds. Sullivan took the request under advisement, leaving the question of whether those materials will be released unresolved.It is a procedural fight, but not an insignificant one. The defense is trying to build its argument about whether Clancy can legally be tried again, and it believes portions of the trial record currently shielded from disclosure belong in that argument.Clancy, 34, of Duxbury, Massachusetts, has pleaded not guilty to three counts of murder and three counts of strangulation. Prosecutors allege that on January 24, 2023, she strangled her children—Cora, 5, Dawson, 3, and Callan, 7 months—with exercise resistance bands at the family's Summer Street home. Prosecutors allege Clancy then attempted suicide by jumping from a second-story window. She survived and is now paralyzed from the waist down.Patrick Clancy was out running errands at the time. He later relocated to Manhattan and spoke with The New Yorker about his wife's mental health.Kevin Reddington's defense has maintained that Lindsay Clancy suffered from severe postpartum psychosis and psychiatric overmedication and pursued an insanity defense when jury selection began July 20, 2026, in Plymouth Superior Court.Now Weinberg is focused on what happened within the jury process itself. The defense wants those records available for its double-jeopardy motion. Judge Sullivan will decide whether they get them.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #MartinWeinberg #TrueCrimeToday #ClancyCase #DoubleJeopardy #JurorNotes #KevinReddington #MassachusettsCourt #CourtroomNews #TrueCrime

The Lindsay Clancy Rule 25 fight took a sharp turn on September 29 when defense attorney Kevin Reddington challenged both the proof that she committed the charged acts and the Commonwealth's case on criminal responsibility.Reddington told the court his required-finding argument has two tracks. The first reaches back to his unsuccessful request for a bifurcated trial. He wanted the jury to decide whether Clancy committed the acts separately from whether she could be held criminally responsible, arguing that the combined trial forced the defense into a position that risked incriminating Clancy while pursuing an insanity defense.That distinction matters because Reddington is now attacking the underlying investigation. He pointed to what he described as inconsistencies and investigative shortcomings in the deaths of Clancy's children — Cora, 5, Dawson, 3, and Callan, 7 months — and in the investigation of Clancy's alleged attempt to harm herself afterward. He also challenged one of the most consequential pieces of the Commonwealth's case: her alleged confession. Reddington claimed the statement reflected a planted memory rather than a reliable recollection of the January 24, 2023 events.His second argument focuses on mental disease or defect. The defense has maintained that Clancy was suffering from severe postpartum psychosis. Reddington argued that the Commonwealth did not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that she was not psychotic at the time of the children's deaths, which goes directly to Massachusetts law on criminal responsibility.Clancy has pleaded not guilty to three murder charges and three strangulation charges. Her first trial ended with Judge William Sullivan declaring a mistrial after jurors could not reach unanimity. The Rule 25 motion asks Sullivan to decide whether the Commonwealth's evidence was legally sufficient, rather than simply sending the same unresolved questions to another jury.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel.https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #KevinReddington #TrueCrimeToday #Rule25 #ClancyCase #CriminalResponsibility #PostpartumPsychosis #InsanityDefense #MassachusettsCourt #TrueCrime

Winter is coming, rules of shows, AI, college football, movies, music, and more! Music: Star and Micey - #1 B.B. Palmer - D.I.P. Subscribe, rate, and review the show!Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Live recording of the fortnightly podcast Design Systems WTF (back for season two!), where Luke Murphy and Michelle Chin attempt to combat all the amazing wtf in design systems. In each episode, they answer a single question around design system troubles with a Q&A from the live audience.With the release of Figma Motion, we finally have a tool that talks to our design systems that do motion. So now it's time to ask the question - are we covering motion within our design systems in the right way?Show notesIntroducing Figma Motion — the Config 2026 launch (24 June) that kicked this topic off: timeline on the canvas, animated components, and motion variables with modesAtlassian Design System — Motion — the foundations page Luke screen-shares, with the four principles and the semantic token bundles like motion.popup.enter; the Applying motion page covers composing custom motion, and the motion primitive component is the componentised bitUber Base — Motion — Michelle's pick, with the accessibility-first guidelines, timing and easing, transitions, the atomic animation patterns, and the motion office hoursCarbon — Motion and Material — Motion — the other tokenised examplesThe Animator's Survival Kit — book by Richard Williams Designing Interface Animation — book by Val HeadVal Head at Converge US 2023 — "Animation, Your Design System, and You!" GSAP (now owned by Webflow) and Lottie — the dev-side enablersCassie Evans' live-coded GSAP game talk — (SmashingConf Freiburg 2025, and State of the Browser 2026 has a recording with transcript)Bonnie Kate Wolf — the illustration systems workBlush — Pablo Stanley's composable illustration toolKano model — the "emotional connection has been proved" referenceLuke on BlueskyMichelle on BlueskyEmail: community@zeroheight.com — and send your design system's motion docs, we want to see them!

Tous les jours, actualité, débats et bonne humeur rythment L'Heure des pros. Ce mardi, Pascal Praud revient sur la visite du Pape en France et l'émotion qu'elle a suscitée chez les Français. Vous voulez réagir ? Appelez-le 01.80.20.39.21 (numéro non surtaxé) ou rendez-vous sur les réseaux sociaux d'Europe 1 pour livrer votre opinion et débattre sur grandes thématiques développées dans l'émission du jour.Hébergé par Audiomeans. Visitez audiomeans.fr/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

Eleanor Choi, AIA, LEED AP BD-C, is a Principal, architect, project manager, and staff manager at SmithGroup, with more than 25 years of experience leading cultural, civic, academic, and historic preservation projects across the country. Based in Washington, DC, she has worked on nationally significant institutions including the Smithsonian National Museum of African American History and Culture, the Jimmy Carter Presidential Library and Museum, and museum planning and feasibility studies for emerging cultural organizations. Through her work on DC DGS and DPR projects and participation on the Arts and Humanities Council of Montgomery County, Eleanor also champions public art as an integral part of architecture and community building. Beyond project work, Eleanor is passionate about mentorship, leadership development, and expanding opportunities for future generations of architects. An alum of the AIA|DC Christopher Kelley Leadership Development Program, she currently serves as Treasurer of AIA|DC and is dedicated to fostering inclusive and supportive pathways into the profession. We talk about:- How being an “advanced generalist” across project types prepared Eleanor to specialize in museums and cultural architecture, where storytelling, representation, and community engagement shape design.- The four types of luck and how Luck of Motion and Luck of Awareness can create career opportunities through curiosity, volunteering, mentorship, and putting yourself out there.- Changing the architecture profession, from burnout and workplace culture to AI, evolving project delivery, and reinforcing the value architects bring to design.>>>Connect with Eleanor: LinkedIn PageSmithGroup (https://www.smithgroup.com/)AIA|DC (https://dcarchcenter.org/)AHCMC (https://www.creativemoco.com/)>>>Thank you to our sponsor:The American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC) is a not-for-profit technical institute for structural steel. The Architecture Center is an initiative of AISC, and was created for architects by architects. It provides resources to help architects save time and money, reduce risk, and achieve their project goals.Website: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠www.aisc.org/architecture-center⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠LinkedIn: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠www.linkedin.com/company/american-institute-of-steel-construction⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Instagram: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠www.instagram.com/aisc⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠>>>Connect with Architectette:- Website: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ www.architectette.com⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ (Learn more)- Instagram:⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ @architectette⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ (See more)- Newsletter:⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ www.architectette.com/newsletter⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ (Behind the Scenes Content)- LinkedIn: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠The Architectette Podcast⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Page and/or⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Caitlin Brady⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠>>>Music by⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ AlexGrohl⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ from ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Pixabay⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠.

On this third and final episode of our student series, we are joined by Tabitha Franceschini, an occupational therapist who just a year ago transitioned from being an OT student to a clinician practicing in a hand therapy clinic. Tabitha shares with us how the classroom prepared her to be a student in a hand therapy clinic, how her clinical instructor facilitated her learning and supported her critical thinking skills and how she then made the transition to full-time clinician in a specialty field.Guest Bio: Tabitha Franceschini is an occupational therapist specializing in hand and upper extremity rehabilitation at Tufts Medical Center. She graduated from Tufts University with her Doctor of Occupational Therapy in 2025 and completed the Tufts Hand & Upper Extremity Rehabilitation Certificate. Tabitha is also involved with the American Society of Hand Therapists through the Student Outreach Committee. She is passionate about hand therapy, clinical reasoning, and continuing to grow as a clinician, while sharing what she learns with other students and new graduates navigating the transition into practice.-The views and opinions expressed in the Hands in Motion podcast are those of the guests and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of ASHT. Appearance on the podcast does not imply endorsement of any products, services or viewpoints discussed.

Welcome to Mysteries to Die For.I am TG Wolff and am here with Jack, my piano player and producer. This is a podcast where we combine storytelling with original music to put you in the heart of a mystery. All stories are structured to challenge you to beat the detective to the solution. Jack and I perform these live, front to back, no breaks, no fakes, no retakes.In the world's most dangerous working environments it can seem like everything is out to kill you. The equipment you use. The materials you work with. The very air you breathe. Stored energy is a coiled viper waiting for the right moment to lash out. Owners, manufacturers, contractors, and beyond have developed safety protocols to combat STCKY, that is, Stuff That Can Kill You. Gravity, Motion, Mechanical, Electrical, Pressure, Sound, Radiation, Biological, Chemical, Temperature. This season is all about the means of murder as authors put our STCKY detective skills to the test. This is Season 9, Stuff That Can Kill You.This is Episode 19, where drowning is our STCKY means of death. This is Ping by Robert J. BinneyDELIBERATIONIt's another conundrum and Henri suspects everyone. Let's see if we can help him bring this case to a close and get him that macchiato he's been Jonesing for. Here's Henri's “do not trust” list, in the order we met them:• Mayor Tom Vaughn, Politian, ‘nuff said• Assistant Chief Rorschach, the man uses spit to fix his hair• Janet from IT, crushing on the ink stain• Judith the Comptroller, the money lady• John Smith, almost forgot himMembershipsAlright, before we dive back into the Henri's craziness, we gotta talk memberships. We've got three tiers now — the Grave Digger's Union, which is free because apparently we're philanthropists… or bad at business.Then there's the Cadaver Collective — four bucks a month. That's literally the price of a gas station coffee that tastes like sadness and burnt hopes.And if you're feeling fancy, we've got the Preservationist Society at eight bucks. That's the tier for people who want to say, ‘Yes, I support delusion storytellers who got their hands on a pair of microphone.Your membership keeps our real human authors fed, our software from becoming self aware, and the ads from clawing their way into the show.If you're not ready for commitment, you can still drop us a tip and leave a pun so bad it legally counts as a haunting. It's all on our website www.m2d4podcast.comAnthologyHey, before we answer the real question bothering Henri … who ruined Maxine's dye job with chlorine?— quick save the date. Our Season 9 companion anthology drops this October 13. Yes, an actual book. Words. Pages. Deliberation.So mark your calendars, carve it into a pumpkin, tattoo it on your soul — October 13. Season 9 anthology – Stuff That Can Kill You.WRAP UPThat wraps this episode of Mysteries to Die For. Support our show by subscribing, telling a mystery lover about us, and signing up for a membership. Check out our website m2d4podcast.com for links to this season's authors.Mysteries to Die For is hosted by TG Wolff and Jack Wolff. Ping was written by Robert J. Binney. Music and production are by Jack Wolff. Episode art is by TG Wolff. Join us next week for a Toe Tag, which is the first chapter from a fresh release in the mystery, crime, or thriller genre. Then come back in two weeks. Instead of an original story, we are going to do something a little different – we are going to play one minute mysteries where Jack and I will go up again H. A. Ripley and his 1932 DetectogramsWRAP UPThat wraps this episode of Mysteries to Die For. Support our show by subscribing, telling a mystery lover about us, and signing up for a membership. Check out our website m2d4podcast.com for links to this season's authors.Mysteries to Die For is hosted by TG Wolff and Jack Wolff. Ping was written by Robert J. Binney. Music and production are by Jack Wolff. Episode art is by TG Wolff. Join us next week for a Toe Tag, which is the first chapter from a fresh release in the mystery, crime, or thriller genre. Then come back in two weeks. Instead of an original story, we are going to do something a little different – we are going to play one minute mysteries where Jack and I will go up again H. A. Ripley and his 1932 Detectograms

All the pleadings have been drafted and filed relating to John Dehlin’s Motion to Dismiss the Church’s trademark infringement case against him. RFM is joined by esteemed co-counsel Kolby Reddish to explain what is going on and who is likely to prevail in the motion to dismiss. As an added bonus, Church lawyer David Jordan… Read More »Will The Church’s Lawsuit Be Dismissed? RFM: 480

Jane Doe #1 is seeking permission to pursue her claim against Jeffrey Epstein anonymously, asking the court to let her use a pseudonym instead of placing her real name in the public record. A motion to proceed anonymously requests an exception to the usual requirement that parties identify themselves in a lawsuit. In cases involving alleged sexual abuse, such requests commonly seek to protect a plaintiff's privacy and prevent additional emotional harm, unwanted exposure, or harassment as sensitive allegations become public.The court weighs those privacy concerns against the public's interest in open judicial proceedings and the defendant's ability to respond fairly to the allegations. Proceeding anonymously does not necessarily mean withholding the plaintiff's identity from the defendant or the court, and it does not establish that the underlying allegations are proven. Jane Doe #1's request concerns how she is identified publicly while pursuing her claim, with the judge deciding whether protection of her identity is warranted.to contat me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

JP Morgan has responded to the U.S. Virgin Islands' (USVI) motion to strike several of its affirmative defenses in the ongoing lawsuit related to Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking operations. The bank argues that these defenses are crucial to demonstrate the alleged complicity of the USVI government in enabling Epstein's activities.JP Morgan contends that high-ranking USVI officials, including former First Lady Cecile de Jongh, played a role in facilitating Epstein's operations by managing his local companies and helping spread his influence throughout the government. The bank alleges that Epstein's ties with local political figures allowed him to receive favorable treatment, such as tax benefits and reduced oversight, despite his known criminal background/The USVI's motion to strike these defenses is viewed by JP Morgan as an attempt to avoid exposing the government's own culpability. Conversely, the USVI argues that the bank's defenses are baseless and are intended to deflect from its failure to act on clear signs of Epstein's criminal behavior​.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.94.5.pdf (courtlistener.com)

JP Morgan has responded to the U.S. Virgin Islands' (USVI) motion to strike several of its affirmative defenses in the ongoing lawsuit related to Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking operations. The bank argues that these defenses are crucial to demonstrate the alleged complicity of the USVI government in enabling Epstein's activities.JP Morgan contends that high-ranking USVI officials, including former First Lady Cecile de Jongh, played a role in facilitating Epstein's operations by managing his local companies and helping spread his influence throughout the government. The bank alleges that Epstein's ties with local political figures allowed him to receive favorable treatment, such as tax benefits and reduced oversight, despite his known criminal background/The USVI's motion to strike these defenses is viewed by JP Morgan as an attempt to avoid exposing the government's own culpability. Conversely, the USVI argues that the bank's defenses are baseless and are intended to deflect from its failure to act on clear signs of Epstein's criminal behavior​.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.94.5.pdf (courtlistener.com)

JP Morgan has responded to the U.S. Virgin Islands' (USVI) motion to strike several of its affirmative defenses in the ongoing lawsuit related to Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking operations. The bank argues that these defenses are crucial to demonstrate the alleged complicity of the USVI government in enabling Epstein's activities.JP Morgan contends that high-ranking USVI officials, including former First Lady Cecile de Jongh, played a role in facilitating Epstein's operations by managing his local companies and helping spread his influence throughout the government. The bank alleges that Epstein's ties with local political figures allowed him to receive favorable treatment, such as tax benefits and reduced oversight, despite his known criminal background/The USVI's motion to strike these defenses is viewed by JP Morgan as an attempt to avoid exposing the government's own culpability. Conversely, the USVI argues that the bank's defenses are baseless and are intended to deflect from its failure to act on clear signs of Epstein's criminal behavior​.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.94.5.pdf (courtlistener.com)

JP Morgan has responded to the U.S. Virgin Islands' (USVI) motion to strike several of its affirmative defenses in the ongoing lawsuit related to Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking operations. The bank argues that these defenses are crucial to demonstrate the alleged complicity of the USVI government in enabling Epstein's activities.JP Morgan contends that high-ranking USVI officials, including former First Lady Cecile de Jongh, played a role in facilitating Epstein's operations by managing his local companies and helping spread his influence throughout the government. The bank alleges that Epstein's ties with local political figures allowed him to receive favorable treatment, such as tax benefits and reduced oversight, despite his known criminal background/The USVI's motion to strike these defenses is viewed by JP Morgan as an attempt to avoid exposing the government's own culpability. Conversely, the USVI argues that the bank's defenses are baseless and are intended to deflect from its failure to act on clear signs of Epstein's criminal behavior​.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.94.5.pdf (courtlistener.com)

JP Morgan has responded to the U.S. Virgin Islands' (USVI) motion to strike several of its affirmative defenses in the ongoing lawsuit related to Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking operations. The bank argues that these defenses are crucial to demonstrate the alleged complicity of the USVI government in enabling Epstein's activities.JP Morgan contends that high-ranking USVI officials, including former First Lady Cecile de Jongh, played a role in facilitating Epstein's operations by managing his local companies and helping spread his influence throughout the government. The bank alleges that Epstein's ties with local political figures allowed him to receive favorable treatment, such as tax benefits and reduced oversight, despite his known criminal background/The USVI's motion to strike these defenses is viewed by JP Morgan as an attempt to avoid exposing the government's own culpability. Conversely, the USVI argues that the bank's defenses are baseless and are intended to deflect from its failure to act on clear signs of Epstein's criminal behavior​.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.94.5.pdf (courtlistener.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

JP Morgan has responded to the U.S. Virgin Islands' (USVI) motion to strike several of its affirmative defenses in the ongoing lawsuit related to Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking operations. The bank argues that these defenses are crucial to demonstrate the alleged complicity of the USVI government in enabling Epstein's activities.JP Morgan contends that high-ranking USVI officials, including former First Lady Cecile de Jongh, played a role in facilitating Epstein's operations by managing his local companies and helping spread his influence throughout the government. The bank alleges that Epstein's ties with local political figures allowed him to receive favorable treatment, such as tax benefits and reduced oversight, despite his known criminal background/The USVI's motion to strike these defenses is viewed by JP Morgan as an attempt to avoid exposing the government's own culpability. Conversely, the USVI argues that the bank's defenses are baseless and are intended to deflect from its failure to act on clear signs of Epstein's criminal behavior​.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.94.5.pdf (courtlistener.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

JP Morgan has responded to the U.S. Virgin Islands' (USVI) motion to strike several of its affirmative defenses in the ongoing lawsuit related to Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking operations. The bank argues that these defenses are crucial to demonstrate the alleged complicity of the USVI government in enabling Epstein's activities.JP Morgan contends that high-ranking USVI officials, including former First Lady Cecile de Jongh, played a role in facilitating Epstein's operations by managing his local companies and helping spread his influence throughout the government. The bank alleges that Epstein's ties with local political figures allowed him to receive favorable treatment, such as tax benefits and reduced oversight, despite his known criminal background/The USVI's motion to strike these defenses is viewed by JP Morgan as an attempt to avoid exposing the government's own culpability. Conversely, the USVI argues that the bank's defenses are baseless and are intended to deflect from its failure to act on clear signs of Epstein's criminal behavior​.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.94.5.pdf (courtlistener.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

The Government of the United States Virgin Islands asks the court to strike four affirmative defenses asserted by JPMorgan in the lawsuit accusing the bank of knowingly participating in and benefiting from Jeffrey Epstein's sex-trafficking operation. The USVI alleges that JPMorgan provided the financial infrastructure through which Epstein paid victims and recruiters while concealing suspicious transactions from law enforcement. JPMorgan argues that the government's claims should be barred or reduced under the doctrines of in pari delicto, unclean hands, laches, and comparative or contributory fault, effectively contending that the USVI's own conduct or failure to act contributed to the alleged harm.The USVI responds that these defenses are legally unavailable because it is acting as a sovereign enforcing the Trafficking Victims Protection Act on behalf of the public, not as a private litigant seeking compensation for an ordinary injury. Citing decisions holding that equitable and fault-shifting defenses generally cannot be used against governments enforcing public rights, the USVI argues that JPMorgan cannot evade scrutiny of its own conduct by blaming territorial officials for allegedly failing to uncover or stop Epstein sooner. The government maintains that allowing the defenses to remain would produce unnecessary discovery into its policy and enforcement decisions, increase the cost and length of the litigation, and distract from the central question of whether JPMorgan violated federal trafficking law.to contat me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

The Government of the United States Virgin Islands asks the court to strike four affirmative defenses asserted by JPMorgan in the lawsuit accusing the bank of knowingly participating in and benefiting from Jeffrey Epstein's sex-trafficking operation. The USVI alleges that JPMorgan provided the financial infrastructure through which Epstein paid victims and recruiters while concealing suspicious transactions from law enforcement. JPMorgan argues that the government's claims should be barred or reduced under the doctrines of in pari delicto, unclean hands, laches, and comparative or contributory fault, effectively contending that the USVI's own conduct or failure to act contributed to the alleged harm.The USVI responds that these defenses are legally unavailable because it is acting as a sovereign enforcing the Trafficking Victims Protection Act on behalf of the public, not as a private litigant seeking compensation for an ordinary injury. Citing decisions holding that equitable and fault-shifting defenses generally cannot be used against governments enforcing public rights, the USVI argues that JPMorgan cannot evade scrutiny of its own conduct by blaming territorial officials for allegedly failing to uncover or stop Epstein sooner. The government maintains that allowing the defenses to remain would produce unnecessary discovery into its policy and enforcement decisions, increase the cost and length of the litigation, and distract from the central question of whether JPMorgan violated federal trafficking law.to contat me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Jes Staley's lawyers used the May 2023 filing to argue that JPMorgan Chase's third-party claims against him should be dismissed outright. The bank had sought contribution and indemnification from Staley in the lawsuits brought by a Jane Doe plaintiff and the U.S. Virgin Islands over JPMorgan's relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, but Staley argued those claims were legally defective. His attorneys said the Trafficking Victims Protection Act did not create a right to contribution or indemnification and that JPMorgan could not use New York state law to manufacture one. They also argued that JPMorgan was being sued for its own alleged conduct, not merely for Staley's actions, which undercut the bank's attempt to shift liability onto him. Staley's side further pointed to JPMorgan's own pleadings, which said his alleged misconduct fell outside the scope of his employment, and argued that the bank had failed to show that Staley caused the same injuries for which JPMorgan itself was being sued.Staley also attacked JPMorgan's separate employment-related claims for breach of fiduciary duty and faithless servant, arguing they were time-barred and inadequately pleaded. His attorneys said JPMorgan had been on notice for years that Staley's relationship with Epstein warranted scrutiny, particularly after Epstein's 2019 arrest and after the bank produced more than 1,200 Staley-Epstein emails to U.K. authorities. They argued that JPMorgan could not claim it only recently discovered the alleged misconduct when it possessed decades of records and had ample reason to investigate sooner. The filing also said the bank failed to plead with the required specificity who Staley allegedly deceived, when the deception occurred, or how it caused JPMorgan's later litigation costs and reputational damage. Staley's lawyers ultimately asked the court to dismiss all of JPMorgan's claims against him with prejudice.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - MTD Reply - Doe an(11210113.11).docx

Jes Staley's lawyers used the May 2023 filing to argue that JPMorgan Chase's third-party claims against him should be dismissed outright. The bank had sought contribution and indemnification from Staley in the lawsuits brought by a Jane Doe plaintiff and the U.S. Virgin Islands over JPMorgan's relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, but Staley argued those claims were legally defective. His attorneys said the Trafficking Victims Protection Act did not create a right to contribution or indemnification and that JPMorgan could not use New York state law to manufacture one. They also argued that JPMorgan was being sued for its own alleged conduct, not merely for Staley's actions, which undercut the bank's attempt to shift liability onto him. Staley's side further pointed to JPMorgan's own pleadings, which said his alleged misconduct fell outside the scope of his employment, and argued that the bank had failed to show that Staley caused the same injuries for which JPMorgan itself was being sued.Staley also attacked JPMorgan's separate employment-related claims for breach of fiduciary duty and faithless servant, arguing they were time-barred and inadequately pleaded. His attorneys said JPMorgan had been on notice for years that Staley's relationship with Epstein warranted scrutiny, particularly after Epstein's 2019 arrest and after the bank produced more than 1,200 Staley-Epstein emails to U.K. authorities. They argued that JPMorgan could not claim it only recently discovered the alleged misconduct when it possessed decades of records and had ample reason to investigate sooner. The filing also said the bank failed to plead with the required specificity who Staley allegedly deceived, when the deception occurred, or how it caused JPMorgan's later litigation costs and reputational damage. Staley's lawyers ultimately asked the court to dismiss all of JPMorgan's claims against him with prejudice.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - MTD Reply - Doe an(11210113.11).docx

JP Morgan has responded to the U.S. Virgin Islands' (USVI) motion to strike several of its affirmative defenses in the ongoing lawsuit related to Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking operations. The bank argues that these defenses are crucial to demonstrate the alleged complicity of the USVI government in enabling Epstein's activities.JP Morgan contends that high-ranking USVI officials, including former First Lady Cecile de Jongh, played a role in facilitating Epstein's operations by managing his local companies and helping spread his influence throughout the government. The bank alleges that Epstein's ties with local political figures allowed him to receive favorable treatment, such as tax benefits and reduced oversight, despite his known criminal background/The USVI's motion to strike these defenses is viewed by JP Morgan as an attempt to avoid exposing the government's own culpability. Conversely, the USVI argues that the bank's defenses are baseless and are intended to deflect from its failure to act on clear signs of Epstein's criminal behavior​.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.94.5.pdf (courtlistener.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

JP Morgan has responded to the U.S. Virgin Islands' (USVI) motion to strike several of its affirmative defenses in the ongoing lawsuit related to Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking operations. The bank argues that these defenses are crucial to demonstrate the alleged complicity of the USVI government in enabling Epstein's activities.JP Morgan contends that high-ranking USVI officials, including former First Lady Cecile de Jongh, played a role in facilitating Epstein's operations by managing his local companies and helping spread his influence throughout the government. The bank alleges that Epstein's ties with local political figures allowed him to receive favorable treatment, such as tax benefits and reduced oversight, despite his known criminal background/The USVI's motion to strike these defenses is viewed by JP Morgan as an attempt to avoid exposing the government's own culpability. Conversely, the USVI argues that the bank's defenses are baseless and are intended to deflect from its failure to act on clear signs of Epstein's criminal behavior​.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.94.5.pdf (courtlistener.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

JP Morgan has responded to the U.S. Virgin Islands' (USVI) motion to strike several of its affirmative defenses in the ongoing lawsuit related to Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking operations. The bank argues that these defenses are crucial to demonstrate the alleged complicity of the USVI government in enabling Epstein's activities.JP Morgan contends that high-ranking USVI officials, including former First Lady Cecile de Jongh, played a role in facilitating Epstein's operations by managing his local companies and helping spread his influence throughout the government. The bank alleges that Epstein's ties with local political figures allowed him to receive favorable treatment, such as tax benefits and reduced oversight, despite his known criminal background/The USVI's motion to strike these defenses is viewed by JP Morgan as an attempt to avoid exposing the government's own culpability. Conversely, the USVI argues that the bank's defenses are baseless and are intended to deflect from its failure to act on clear signs of Epstein's criminal behavior​.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.94.5.pdf (courtlistener.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

JP Morgan has responded to the U.S. Virgin Islands' (USVI) motion to strike several of its affirmative defenses in the ongoing lawsuit related to Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking operations. The bank argues that these defenses are crucial to demonstrate the alleged complicity of the USVI government in enabling Epstein's activities.JP Morgan contends that high-ranking USVI officials, including former First Lady Cecile de Jongh, played a role in facilitating Epstein's operations by managing his local companies and helping spread his influence throughout the government. The bank alleges that Epstein's ties with local political figures allowed him to receive favorable treatment, such as tax benefits and reduced oversight, despite his known criminal background/The USVI's motion to strike these defenses is viewed by JP Morgan as an attempt to avoid exposing the government's own culpability. Conversely, the USVI argues that the bank's defenses are baseless and are intended to deflect from its failure to act on clear signs of Epstein's criminal behavior​.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.94.5.pdf (courtlistener.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Jes Staley's lawyers used the May 2023 filing to argue that JPMorgan Chase's third-party claims against him should be dismissed outright. The bank had sought contribution and indemnification from Staley in the lawsuits brought by a Jane Doe plaintiff and the U.S. Virgin Islands over JPMorgan's relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, but Staley argued those claims were legally defective. His attorneys said the Trafficking Victims Protection Act did not create a right to contribution or indemnification and that JPMorgan could not use New York state law to manufacture one. They also argued that JPMorgan was being sued for its own alleged conduct, not merely for Staley's actions, which undercut the bank's attempt to shift liability onto him. Staley's side further pointed to JPMorgan's own pleadings, which said his alleged misconduct fell outside the scope of his employment, and argued that the bank had failed to show that Staley caused the same injuries for which JPMorgan itself was being sued.Staley also attacked JPMorgan's separate employment-related claims for breach of fiduciary duty and faithless servant, arguing they were time-barred and inadequately pleaded. His attorneys said JPMorgan had been on notice for years that Staley's relationship with Epstein warranted scrutiny, particularly after Epstein's 2019 arrest and after the bank produced more than 1,200 Staley-Epstein emails to U.K. authorities. They argued that JPMorgan could not claim it only recently discovered the alleged misconduct when it possessed decades of records and had ample reason to investigate sooner. The filing also said the bank failed to plead with the required specificity who Staley allegedly deceived, when the deception occurred, or how it caused JPMorgan's later litigation costs and reputational damage. Staley's lawyers ultimately asked the court to dismiss all of JPMorgan's claims against him with prejudice.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - MTD Reply - Doe an(11210113.11).docxBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

The Government of the United States Virgin Islands asks the court to strike four affirmative defenses asserted by JPMorgan in the lawsuit accusing the bank of knowingly participating in and benefiting from Jeffrey Epstein's sex-trafficking operation. The USVI alleges that JPMorgan provided the financial infrastructure through which Epstein paid victims and recruiters while concealing suspicious transactions from law enforcement. JPMorgan argues that the government's claims should be barred or reduced under the doctrines of in pari delicto, unclean hands, laches, and comparative or contributory fault, effectively contending that the USVI's own conduct or failure to act contributed to the alleged harm.The USVI responds that these defenses are legally unavailable because it is acting as a sovereign enforcing the Trafficking Victims Protection Act on behalf of the public, not as a private litigant seeking compensation for an ordinary injury. Citing decisions holding that equitable and fault-shifting defenses generally cannot be used against governments enforcing public rights, the USVI argues that JPMorgan cannot evade scrutiny of its own conduct by blaming territorial officials for allegedly failing to uncover or stop Epstein sooner. The government maintains that allowing the defenses to remain would produce unnecessary discovery into its policy and enforcement decisions, increase the cost and length of the litigation, and distract from the central question of whether JPMorgan violated federal trafficking law.to contat me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

A study in efficiency, with a great soundtrack. Donations, Merchandise, Newsletter, more: https://www.podrunner.com Steve Boyett - Groovelectric: Downloadable Soul https://www.groovelectric.com PLAYLIST 01. Eddie Makabi - Hallucinations (Maywave Remix ) 02. A2 Ray Okpara feat. Nikki - Brainows (Muan Remix) 03. Chain Selector - Wild Ivy 04. Make Free - This is My Life 05. Jason Parker - Techno Cat (Extended Mix) 06. Eleu - Shoulders Up 07. Bubba Brothers - Mad 08. A-Mase - Nothing Matter 09. Sander Wilder - Distant Horizon (Extended Mix) 10. Vodu - Berlin (XTD Version) 11. Markus Swarz - Thing 12. Lost Kraft - Goa 13. Leonety - Osaka City Lights (Nipika Remix) == Please support these artists == Podrunner is a registered trademark of Podrunner LLC. Music copyright © or CC the respective artists. All other material ©2006, 2026 by Podrunner LLC. For personal use only. Any unauthorized reproduction, editing, exhibition, sale, rental, exchange, public performance, or broadcast of this audio is prohibited. No part of Podrunner or its website and associated content may be used or reproduced in any manner for the purpose of training artificial intelligence technologies or systems.

On this week's show we take a look at the consumer reports ratings for 70 inch and larger TVs. We also read your email and take a look at the week's news. News: Your Google Home can now take orders from Claude and other AI agents Roku Adds 30 New Bundles To Premium Subscriptions Element Launches New TiVo-Powered Smart TVs in the U.S. Paramount Settles States' Antitrust Suit, Clearing Way for Warner Megadeal Consumer Reports Ratings for 70-inch and larger TVs: On this week's show we take a look at the consumer reports rating for 70 inch and larger TVs. This list was sent to us by Dermot who thought it may make a nice topic. We took the list and only updated pricing. So how does Consumer Reports determine a score for their TV ratings? Consumer Reports builds each TV's Overall Score from three buckets: lab performance, member surveys, and (for smart TVs) privacy/security. They do not accept manufacturer samples. Secret shoppers buy the sets at retail so they test the same units you would buy. They run 200+ TVs a year. Each set goes through 20+ tests and more than 500 data points in their Yonkers labs. Picture settings are optimized with the on-screen user controls only—not a full professional calibration. If a set needs a calibrator to look good, that hurts it. What the lab actually measures HD and UHD picture quality — test patterns plus real movie/TV clips for detail, black level, contrast, and color accuracy after the set is optimized. HDR — peak brightness (measured with a Photo Research PR-740 spectroradiometer), plus how well highlights and shadows hold up in dark and bright scenes. Viewing angle — color and contrast from both horizontal and vertical off-axis positions. Motion blur — how clean moving text and action stay. Sound quality — built-in speakers: clarity, bass, volume range, and distortion, compared against reference sets in the lab. Features / versatility — inputs, smart-TV functions, ease of use, etc. Data privacy and data security — whether the TV collects extra data, how easy it is to control that, encryption, known vulnerabilities, update practices. These scores are folded into the Overall Score. A viewing panel then watches real content side-by-side after the meter work is done. Survey piece  Predicted reliability and owner satisfaction come from CR member surveys, not from the lab unit they bought. Reliability is brand-level, not model-level. A statistical model estimates the chance a new set from that brand will have a problem in the first five years. They control for age, how often it's used, and whether it has an extended warranty. Owner satisfaction is how likely members are to recommend that brand. It is weighted at 5% of the Overall Score for every product category. Reliability's weight varies by category (typically 10–20%). For TVs it sits toward the lower end of that range because members rate reliability about even with picture performance. If a brand scores Poor or Fair on predicted reliability, that model cannot get a CR "Recommended" badge, no matter how well it tested. When they don't have enough survey data for a brand (like  on some Roku sets), they plug in category-average survey scores. How it becomes one number Overall Score is a weighted mix of the lab scores plus those two survey scores (and privacy/security). Models are then ranked against others in the same size group. That's why two 91-point sets can sit at very different prices: one won on lab performance plus surveys at a lower street price; the other is a more expensive flagship that still maxed the same scoring formula.  Brand            Model                  Overall     Score Price LG                  OLED77C5PUA   91              $1,800 Samsung      QN77S95F           91              $3,000 Samsung      QN77S90F           90              $2,500 Samsung     QN77S90H           89              $2,600 LG                OLED77G6WUA   89              $3,800 LG                OLED77G5WUA   88              $3,150 LG               OLED77C6HUP     88              $2,700 LG               OLED77M5PUA     87              $3,870 Samsung    QN77S84FA          85              $1,600 LG               OLED77B5PUA      84              $3,000 Sony           K-77XR80               83              $3,000 Sony          K-75XR90                83             $3,500 Samsung   QN75QN90F          82              $2,000 Sony          K-77XR8B               78              $2,500 Sony          K-75XR70                78             $1,500 Hisense    75U8QG                   75             $1,700 (65") LG              75QNED92AUA      75             $1,680 TCL           75QM8K                   74             Mostly Unavailable Sony          K-75XR50                73             $2,000 Roku          75R8B5                    73            $1,250 Roku          75R8C5                    72            $1,200 Hisense     75U75QG                 72            $1,700 (65") TV COMPARISON SUMMARY TOP TIER (Score 88-91) LG       OLED77C5PUA     91    $1,800    Best score-to-price Samsung  QN77S95F        91    $3,000    Same score as C5, $1,200 more Samsung  QN77S90F        90    $2,500 Samsung  QN77S90H        89    $2,600 LG       OLED77G6WUA     89    $3,800    Highest-priced LG LG       OLED77G5WUA     88    $3,150 LG       OLED77C6HUP     88    $2,700 Our takeaway is that the only score that actually matters here is not "91 vs 89." It is that the LG C5 is tied with Samsung's flagship S95F at 91, and it is $1,200 cheaper.  If we were going to spend money for a 75–77" set, we would treat the list like this: Buy the C5 if the room is normal-to-dim and you want the best picture per dollar. Buy the S95F only if the room is bright, you want a matte screen, and you specifically want a bright picture. Do not buy it just because it is tied at 91. The Samsung S84F at $1,600 / 85 is the value model if you don't want to go OLED. Anything at 75 or below is fine for a secondary room. Especially when you consider models from Samsung and LG providing higher quality for barely more in cost.  Does Consumer Reports still matter? Yes, but not as the only vote, and not the way it did 15 years ago. There are other sources out there and each weighs aspects of TVs differently. With that said, they all agree that the LG C5 is a really nice TV.

Hosts Fran Chismar and Tom Knezick reside over a panel of experts including Nathan Shampine (Natural Lands Manager, Mt. Cuba Center), Sam Hoadley (Manager of Horticultural Research, Mt. Cuba Center) and Jenna Webster (Senior Associate, LWLA) live at Mt. Cuba Center to discuss warm season grasses. Topics include the role warm season grasses play in restoration and meadows, what people should know before starting a meadow, which warm season grasses have the most untapped potential, wild type of cultivars, and seed vs. plugs vs. gallons.  The session ends with some wonderful audience questions. Music by Egocentric Plastic Men, Outro music by Dave Bennett. Follow Mt. Cuba Center Here. Learn about the Mt. Cuba Center Trail Garden Here. Follow LWLA Here. Have a question or a comment?  Call (215) 346-6189. Follow Native Plants Healthy Planet – Website / Instagram / Facebook / YouTube Follow Fran Chismar Here. Buy a T-shirt, spread the message, and do some good. Visit our store Here! Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

In the Bryan Kohberger case (CR29-22-2805), Kohberger's defense team has filed a motion to strike the state's intent to seek the death penalty. The defense argues that the prosecution failed to present the aggravating factors to a neutral fact-finder, a critical step in capital punishment cases. Additionally, the defense raised multiple challenges, including claims that Idaho's death penalty laws are unconstitutionally vague and do not align with contemporary standards of decency. They are contesting each aggravating factor cited by the prosecution, aiming to remove the death penalty from the table before the trial begins. A hearing for this motion has been scheduled for November 7, 2024, while the trial itself is set for June 2025. The prosecution initially filed their intent to pursue the death penalty in June 2023, and they are expected to respond to the defense's challenges by October 2024.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:OFFICE OF THE KOOTENAI COUNTY

Jes Staley's lawyers used the May 2023 filing to argue that JPMorgan Chase's third-party claims against him should be dismissed outright. The bank had sought contribution and indemnification from Staley in the lawsuits brought by a Jane Doe plaintiff and the U.S. Virgin Islands over JPMorgan's relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, but Staley argued those claims were legally defective. His attorneys said the Trafficking Victims Protection Act did not create a right to contribution or indemnification and that JPMorgan could not use New York state law to manufacture one. They also argued that JPMorgan was being sued for its own alleged conduct, not merely for Staley's actions, which undercut the bank's attempt to shift liability onto him. Staley's side further pointed to JPMorgan's own pleadings, which said his alleged misconduct fell outside the scope of his employment, and argued that the bank had failed to show that Staley caused the same injuries for which JPMorgan itself was being sued.Staley also attacked JPMorgan's separate employment-related claims for breach of fiduciary duty and faithless servant, arguing they were time-barred and inadequately pleaded. His attorneys said JPMorgan had been on notice for years that Staley's relationship with Epstein warranted scrutiny, particularly after Epstein's 2019 arrest and after the bank produced more than 1,200 Staley-Epstein emails to U.K. authorities. They argued that JPMorgan could not claim it only recently discovered the alleged misconduct when it possessed decades of records and had ample reason to investigate sooner. The filing also said the bank failed to plead with the required specificity who Staley allegedly deceived, when the deception occurred, or how it caused JPMorgan's later litigation costs and reputational damage. Staley's lawyers ultimately asked the court to dismiss all of JPMorgan's claims against him with prejudice.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - MTD Reply - Doe an(11210113.11).docxBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Jes Staley's lawyers used the May 2023 filing to argue that JPMorgan Chase's third-party claims against him should be dismissed outright. The bank had sought contribution and indemnification from Staley in the lawsuits brought by a Jane Doe plaintiff and the U.S. Virgin Islands over JPMorgan's relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, but Staley argued those claims were legally defective. His attorneys said the Trafficking Victims Protection Act did not create a right to contribution or indemnification and that JPMorgan could not use New York state law to manufacture one. They also argued that JPMorgan was being sued for its own alleged conduct, not merely for Staley's actions, which undercut the bank's attempt to shift liability onto him. Staley's side further pointed to JPMorgan's own pleadings, which said his alleged misconduct fell outside the scope of his employment, and argued that the bank had failed to show that Staley caused the same injuries for which JPMorgan itself was being sued.Staley also attacked JPMorgan's separate employment-related claims for breach of fiduciary duty and faithless servant, arguing they were time-barred and inadequately pleaded. His attorneys said JPMorgan had been on notice for years that Staley's relationship with Epstein warranted scrutiny, particularly after Epstein's 2019 arrest and after the bank produced more than 1,200 Staley-Epstein emails to U.K. authorities. They argued that JPMorgan could not claim it only recently discovered the alleged misconduct when it possessed decades of records and had ample reason to investigate sooner. The filing also said the bank failed to plead with the required specificity who Staley allegedly deceived, when the deception occurred, or how it caused JPMorgan's later litigation costs and reputational damage. Staley's lawyers ultimately asked the court to dismiss all of JPMorgan's claims against him with prejudice.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - MTD Reply - Doe an(11210113.11).docxBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

On this episode of Vitality Radio, Jared continues his series on the intelligence of symptoms with a look at nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and heartburn. These uncomfortable digestive symptoms may feel like the body is malfunctioning, but in many cases they are part of the body's natural protective response. Jared explains why nausea can act as an early warning, how vomiting and diarrhea help the body remove unwanted substances, and why simply shutting these responses down may not always be the best approach. He also discusses activated charcoal, ginger, probiotics, digestive enzymes, and supportive strategies for digestive distress. Finally, Jared explores acid reflux, the important role of stomach acid, concerns surrounding long-term PPI use, and why supporting healthy digestive function may offer a better long-term strategy.Additional Information:***Watch for all 4 parts of this series on Symptoms!Visit the podcast website here: VitalityRadio.comYou can follow @vitalitynutritionbountiful and @vitalityradio on Instagram, or Vitality Radio and Vitality Nutrition on Facebook. Join us also in the Vitality Radio Podcast Listener Community on Facebook. Shop the products that Jared mentions at vitalitynutrition.com. Let us know your thoughts about this episode using the hashtag #vitalityradio and please rate and review us on Apple Podcasts. Thank you!Just a reminder that this podcast is for educational purposes only. The FDA has not evaluated the podcast. The information is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease. The advice given is not intended to replace the advice of your medical professional.

Kevin Reddington, Lindsay Clancy's attorney, wants a limited inquiry into the holdout juror - let's go through the gfilingBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/pretty-lies-and-alibis--4447192/support.ALL MERCH 10% off with code Sherlock10 at checkout  - NEW STYLES Donate: (Thank you for your support! Couldn't do what I love without all y'all) PayPal - paypal.com/paypalme/prettyliesandalibisVenmo - @prettyliesalibisBuy Me A Coffee - https://www.buymeacoffee.com/prettyliesrCash App- PrettyliesandalibisAll links: https://linktr.ee/prettyliesandalibisMerch: prettyliesandalibis.myshopify.comPatreon: https://www.patreon.com/PrettyLiesAndAlibis(Weekly lives and private message board)