POPULARITY
101 episodes with Gag order
83 episodes with Gag order
28 episodes with Gag order
68 episodes with Gag order
20 episodes with Gag order
36 episodes with Gag order
13 episodes with Gag order
13 episodes with Gag order
13 episodes with Gag order
8 episodes with Gag order
8 episodes with Gag order
8 episodes with Gag order
8 episodes with Gag order
9 episodes with Gag order
18 episodes with Gag order
31 episodes with Gag order
6 episodes with Gag order
5 episodes with Gag order
11 episodes with Gag order
4 episodes with Gag order
5 episodes with Gag order
8 episodes with Gag order
6 episodes with Gag order
6 episodes with Gag order
10 episodes with Gag order
4 episodes with Gag order
5 episodes with Gag order
3 episodes with Gag order
4 episodes with Gag order
4 episodes with Gag order
8 episodes with Gag order
6 episodes with Gag order
5 episodes with Gag order
4 episodes with Gag order
6 episodes with Gag order
7 episodes with Gag order
6 episodes with Gag order
4 episodes with Gag order
6 episodes with Gag order
10 episodes with Gag order
6 episodes with Gag order
3 episodes with Gag order
8 episodes with Gag order
3 episodes with Gag order
6 episodes with Gag order
2 episodes with Gag order
5 episodes with Gag order
2 episodes with Gag order
4 episodes with Gag order
3 episodes with Gag order
3 episodes with Gag order
4 episodes with Gag order
3 episodes with Gag order
4 episodes with Gag order
Breaking down and picking out the best snippets from the interviews law enforcement and prosecutor Bill Thompson have given since the gag order has been lifted.ALL MERCH 10% off with code Sherlock10 at checkout Donate: (Thank you for your support! Couldn't do what I love without all y'all) PayPal - paypal.com/paypalme/prettyliesandalibisVenmo - @prettyliesalibisBuy Me A Coffee - https://www.buymeacoffee.com/prettyliesrCash App- PrettyliesandalibisAll links: https://linktr.ee/prettyliesandalibisMerch: prettyliesandalibis.myshopify.comPatreon: https://www.patreon.com/PrettyLiesAndAlibis(Weekly lives and private message board)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/pretty-lies-and-alibis--4447192/support.
The Verdict Is In, the Gag Order's Gone — What Happens Next? #Bryan Kohberger #idahomurders #idaho #formerdetectiveNYPD Sgt. Bill Cannon shares his perspective on the recent sentencing of Kohberger in the Idaho court. The true crime story continues to be updated as new details emerge. Join us as we continue to follow the idaho murders case.
Watch the full coverage of the live stream on The Emily D. Baker YouTube channel: https://youtube.com/live/CiCMWBvk-AM In a July 17th hearing, Judge Hippler lifted the non-dissemination (gag) order in the Bryan Kohberger case, emphasizing the public's right to information, especially since a plea has been entered. However, he clarified that the court's prior preservation order remains in place, and sealed documents are still sealed. The media's petition to unseal all documents was denied as premature. The judge stated that after sentencing, scheduled for July 23rd, the court will begin reviewing sealed materials to determine what can be unsealed, starting with the newest documents first. This process will allow counsel to object to unsealing specific documents or request redactions. He warned that this unsealing process will take a considerable amount of time, and public records requests for sealed documents will be denied until they are officially unsealed. The judge also addressed the right to appeal, noting that while Kohberger's plea agreement includes a waiver of appeal rights, the US Supreme Court's ruling in Garza v. Idaho indicates that a defendant's right to file the appeal. Therefore, the appellate process is expected to play out. The investigation into document leaks is ongoing. RESOURCES Bryan Kohberger Case Playlist - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsbUyvZas7gKASBczV3CsUx-t5oRAK0ca Leaked Kohberger Information The Emily Show - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UHSMQMdNDKE Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Get 20% OFF @honeylove by going to https://honeylove.com/LAWNERD ! #honeylovepod #ad In the Alex Murdaugh case, his defense attorney, Dick Harpootlian, is claiming new, exculpatory evidence was not turned over to the defense during the trial. They are text messages between Murdaugh and Eddie Smith. This is in addition to the ongoing appeal of the murder conviction based on allegations that the clerk of court, Becky Hill, influenced the jury. This could mean that a new murder trial can occur. However, Murdaugh will remain in prison for decades due to his multiple financial crime convictions. The gag order has been lifted in the Bryan Kohberger case and his sentencing is scheduled for Wednesday, July 23rd. While he waived his right to appeal, he can still file one, though it is unlikely to change his predetermined four consecutive life sentences. Tom Girardi has reported to prison as of July 17th, 2025, despite his attempts to delay. Court documents indicate that his motion for bond pending appeal will be heard in September, but the attorneys agreed he would go into custody in the interim. Denise Richards and Aaron Phypers are divorcing. Denise has filed for and received a temporary restraining order, alleging physical violence. The LA County court system is currently down online and I will cover this more in-depth once all court documents are available RESOURCES Bryan Kohberger Stream July 10 - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yy9rHg9m4xk Alex Murdaugh Appeal - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0HKNZBInEso First Girardi Stream - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qn16T4ySkec The Emily Show July 14 - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ysy5bvjKuac Alex Murdaugh Playlist - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsbUyvZas7gJUHo2XsVhGNBhaMdx9B_cq Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Criminal defense lawyer Damon Cheronis joins Karen Conti to discuss John Elway being cleared in the golf cart accident that killed his agent and when an accident becomes a crime. Damon also talks about lawyers leaving the DOJ and the release of the gag order in the Idaho murder case.
Will the victim's family and the public get access to all the evidence in the Idaho4 murder case? This critical gag order hearing today could determine whether chilling details about Bryan Kohberger and the brutal murder of four young Idaho students are unsealed for the world to see. Welcome to Surviving the Survivor, the show that brings you the #BestGuests in all of #truecrime. As families and media await more insight into Bryan Kohberger's motive, a critical gag order hearing is set for July 17, 2025 to determine if pre-sentencing restrictions on discussing court details will be lifted. This hearing could unlock new revelations about his alleged online alias and shed light on digital evidence tied to the case. STS Host Joel Waldman will be watching it live along with #BestGuests who will provide analysis. Bryan Kohberger confessed to the horrific November 13, 2022 stabbings of four University of Idaho students and plead guilty on July 2, 2025, to avoid the death penalty. He will now face four consecutive life sentences plus ten years and has given up his right to appeal. Evidence against him included DNA on a recovered knife sheath, phone data, and surveillance footage. We remember the lives of the four victims senselessly murdered in Moscow, Idaho: Ethan Chapin: A 20- year-old from Conway, Washington who was staying with his girlfriend, Xana Kernodle, the night of the murder. Ethan was a triplet. Kaylee Goncalves: A 21-year-old from Rathdrum, Idaho who was murdered in her home next to her best friend, Maddie. Xana Kernodle: A 20-year-old from Avondale, Arizona, who later lived in Post Falls, Idaho. She was murdered at her home with her close friends and boyfriend. Madison Mogen: A 21-year-old from Coeur d'Alene, Idaho who many believe was the intended target. Maddie was murdered next to her childhood best friend, Kaylee.More of STS:Links: Https://linktr.ee/stspodcastGet Joel's Book: Https://amzn.to/48GwbLxSTS Merch: Https://www.bonfire.com/store/sts-store/Support the show on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/SurvivingTheSurvivorCatch us live on YouTube: Surviving The Survivor: #BestGuests in True Crime - YouTubeVenmo Donations: @STSPodcast or Https://www.venmo.com/stspodcast#bryankohberger #trial #courtroomdrama #hearing #murdermystery #gagorder #stsnation #newsupdate #moscowidaho #idaho4update #truecrimecommunity #truecrimepodcast #truestory
Judge Steven Hippler issued an order lifting the gag order in the Bryan Kohberger case, stating that its original purpose—to protect Kohberger's right to a fair trial—was no longer valid following his guilty plea. With no jury trial forthcoming, the judge determined that the restrictions on speech could no longer be justified. He emphasized that lifting the gag order did not force any party to speak but simply restored their First Amendment right to do so if they chose. The order acknowledged the public's strong interest in transparency and access to information now that the criminal case had effectively moved past the trial phase.Despite objections from Kohberger's defense, who argued that media attention could influence the sentencing phase, the judge made clear that such publicity was inevitable regardless of the gag order's status. He dismissed the notion that continuing to silence participants would shield the process from public scrutiny. However, the judge declined to immediately unseal the more than 240 court filings that remain sealed in the case, saying he would review them individually after the upcoming sentencing hearing. The decision marks a shift toward greater openness in one of the most closely watched murder cases in recent memory.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Prosecutors reverse position on gag order after Kohberger murder confession | Fox News
Judge Steven Hippler issued an order lifting the gag order in the Bryan Kohberger case, stating that its original purpose—to protect Kohberger's right to a fair trial—was no longer valid following his guilty plea. With no jury trial forthcoming, the judge determined that the restrictions on speech could no longer be justified. He emphasized that lifting the gag order did not force any party to speak but simply restored their First Amendment right to do so if they chose. The order acknowledged the public's strong interest in transparency and access to information now that the criminal case had effectively moved past the trial phase.Despite objections from Kohberger's defense, who argued that media attention could influence the sentencing phase, the judge made clear that such publicity was inevitable regardless of the gag order's status. He dismissed the notion that continuing to silence participants would shield the process from public scrutiny. However, the judge declined to immediately unseal the more than 240 court filings that remain sealed in the case, saying he would review them individually after the upcoming sentencing hearing. The decision marks a shift toward greater openness in one of the most closely watched murder cases in recent memory.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Prosecutors reverse position on gag order after Kohberger murder confession | Fox NewsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
Judge Steven Hippler issued an order lifting the gag order in the Bryan Kohberger case, stating that its original purpose—to protect Kohberger's right to a fair trial—was no longer valid following his guilty plea. With no jury trial forthcoming, the judge determined that the restrictions on speech could no longer be justified. He emphasized that lifting the gag order did not force any party to speak but simply restored their First Amendment right to do so if they chose. The order acknowledged the public's strong interest in transparency and access to information now that the criminal case had effectively moved past the trial phase.Despite objections from Kohberger's defense, who argued that media attention could influence the sentencing phase, the judge made clear that such publicity was inevitable regardless of the gag order's status. He dismissed the notion that continuing to silence participants would shield the process from public scrutiny. However, the judge declined to immediately unseal the more than 240 court filings that remain sealed in the case, saying he would review them individually after the upcoming sentencing hearing. The decision marks a shift toward greater openness in one of the most closely watched murder cases in recent memory.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Prosecutors reverse position on gag order after Kohberger murder confession | Fox NewsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
Recap of the Bryan Kohberger hearing where the judge lifted the gag order. When will we start to see sealed documents?ALL MERCH 10% off with code Sherlock10 at checkout Donate: (Thank you for your support! Couldn't do what I love without all y'all) PayPal - paypal.com/paypalme/prettyliesandalibisVenmo - @prettyliesalibisBuy Me A Coffee - https://www.buymeacoffee.com/prettyliesrCash App- PrettyliesandalibisAll links: https://linktr.ee/prettyliesandalibisMerch: prettyliesandalibis.myshopify.comPatreon: https://www.patreon.com/PrettyLiesAndAlibis(Weekly lives and private message board)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/pretty-lies-and-alibis--4447192/support.
Judge Drops Gag Order in Kohberger Case… What Now? #Kohberger #TrueCrime #CrimeTalk #GagOrder #FreeSpeech #IdahoMurders
A media coalition has asked the judge presiding over Bryan Kohberger's case to vacate the non-dissemination order that has prevented the parties from granting interviews and releasing records. Prosecutor Bill Thompson had asked that the gag order remain in place until Kohberger is sentenced but then changed course. Meanwhile, Kohberger's lawyers has asked that the order remain in place citing threats to her client and an ongoing investigation into a leak of evidence. Law&Crime's Angenette Levy goes through the hearing in this episode of Crime Fix — a daily show covering the biggest stories in crime.PLEASE SUPPORT THE SHOW:Take your personal data back with Incogni! Use code CRIMEFIX at the link below and get 60% off an annual plan: http://incogni.com/crimefixHost:Angenette Levy https://twitter.com/Angenette5Guest:Guest: Jack Greiner https://x.com/jackcgreinerProducer:Jordan ChaconCRIME FIX PRODUCTION:Head of Social Media, YouTube - Bobby SzokeSocial Media Management - Vanessa BeinVideo Editing - Daniel CamachoGuest Booking - Alyssa Fisher & Diane KayeSTAY UP-TO-DATE WITH THE LAW&CRIME NETWORK:Watch Law&Crime Network on YouTubeTV: https://bit.ly/3td2e3yWhere To Watch Law&Crime Network: https://bit.ly/3akxLK5Sign Up For Law&Crime's Daily Newsletter: https://bit.ly/LawandCrimeNewsletterRead Fascinating Articles From Law&Crime Network: https://bit.ly/3td2IqoLAW&CRIME NETWORK SOCIAL MEDIA:Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/lawandcrime/Twitter: https://twitter.com/LawCrimeNetworkFacebook: https://www.facebook.com/lawandcrimeTwitch: https://www.twitch.tv/lawandcrimenetworkTikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@lawandcrimeSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
AP's Lisa Dwyer reports that a gag order was lifted in the Idaho students killed case.
Watch the full coverage of the live stream on The Emily D. Baker YouTube channel: https://youtube.com/live/Yy9rHg9m4xkBryan Kohberger has signed a factual basis admitting to the burglary and four murders, and a plea agreement for a fixed life sentence without parole or opportunity for reconsideration. This means a life sentence with no possibility of release. He has also waived his right to a fair trial, including the right to confront and cross-examine witnesses. Consequently, the media argues that the non-dissemination order should be lifted, as there is no longer a jury pool to taint or concerns about his right to a fair trial.The prosecution, however, objected to lifting the order. The court initially made a preliminary decision, stating it could be revisited if a reason emerged. The court also noted that no bond was set for the defendant. Bill Thompson emphasized the need for time to provide a full statement, which he claimed was difficult while preparing for sentencing. However, this was deemed not a legal justification, and the media has highlighted that "more time" is insufficient legal grounds to maintain a restrictive non-dissemination or gag order.As of July 10th, more docket entries haven't appeared since the order was filed on July 2nd. There's a possibility the court is backlogged and won't address it until July 23rd, at which point it would become moot and withdrawn.RESOURCESBryan Kohberger Playlist - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsbUyvZas7gKASBczV3CsUx-t5oRAK0caBryan Kohberger Change of Plea Hearing - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TdOt4zAWjp8This podcast uses the following third-party services for analysis: Spotify Ad Analytics - https://www.spotify.com/us/legal/ad-analytics-privacy-policy/Podscribe - https://podscribe.com/privacy
In Case No. CR01-24-31665, a coalition of major news organizations—including ABC News, CNN, CBS News, the Associated Press, Fox News, and others—have filed a memorandum seeking to be heard as interested parties in the criminal proceedings against Bryan C. Kohberger, the defendant charged in connection with the Idaho student murders. The media companies are requesting that the court vacate the existing nondissemination (gag) order, arguing that it violates constitutional protections under the First Amendment and impedes the public's right to access court proceedings and related information. They assert that the order is overly broad, lacks sufficient justification, and unjustifiably restricts press freedom and transparency in a case of significant public interest.The media coalition contends that the gag order infringes upon their ability to report on the case and gather news, including statements from attorneys, law enforcement, and other official sources. They argue that the public has a compelling interest in understanding the judicial process, particularly in a high-profile case involving allegations of multiple homicides. The memorandum emphasizes that any restrictions on speech must be narrowly tailored and based on specific findings, which the current order allegedly lacks. As such, the organizations urge the court to lift the nondissemination order entirely or, at a minimum, modify it to comply with constitutional standards.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - Media Coalition_Kohberger Sealed Records - Ada County - Memo ISO Motion to Vacate Gag Order_July 3(129532455.3)
In Case No. CR01-24-31665, a coalition of major news organizations—including ABC News, CNN, CBS News, the Associated Press, Fox News, and others—have filed a memorandum seeking to be heard as interested parties in the criminal proceedings against Bryan C. Kohberger, the defendant charged in connection with the Idaho student murders. The media companies are requesting that the court vacate the existing nondissemination (gag) order, arguing that it violates constitutional protections under the First Amendment and impedes the public's right to access court proceedings and related information. They assert that the order is overly broad, lacks sufficient justification, and unjustifiably restricts press freedom and transparency in a case of significant public interest.The media coalition contends that the gag order infringes upon their ability to report on the case and gather news, including statements from attorneys, law enforcement, and other official sources. They argue that the public has a compelling interest in understanding the judicial process, particularly in a high-profile case involving allegations of multiple homicides. The memorandum emphasizes that any restrictions on speech must be narrowly tailored and based on specific findings, which the current order allegedly lacks. As such, the organizations urge the court to lift the nondissemination order entirely or, at a minimum, modify it to comply with constitutional standards.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - Media Coalition_Kohberger Sealed Records - Ada County - Memo ISO Motion to Vacate Gag Order_July 3(129532455.3)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
From the archives: 3-5-23Bryan Kohberger's legal team ripped into the attempt by the media to get the gag order removed in new court filings and they made it clear how they felt about any attempt to alter it.In this episode, we take a look at the filing and what, if any, strategy might be in play for the long run by Bryan Kohberger's legal team.(commercial at 7:05)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Bryan Kohberger lawyer blasts 'grotesquely twisted' media coverage of stabbing that killed 4 Idaho students | Fox NewsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
In Case No. CR01-24-31665, a coalition of major news organizations—including ABC News, CNN, CBS News, the Associated Press, Fox News, and others—have filed a memorandum seeking to be heard as interested parties in the criminal proceedings against Bryan C. Kohberger, the defendant charged in connection with the Idaho student murders. The media companies are requesting that the court vacate the existing nondissemination (gag) order, arguing that it violates constitutional protections under the First Amendment and impedes the public's right to access court proceedings and related information. They assert that the order is overly broad, lacks sufficient justification, and unjustifiably restricts press freedom and transparency in a case of significant public interest.The media coalition contends that the gag order infringes upon their ability to report on the case and gather news, including statements from attorneys, law enforcement, and other official sources. They argue that the public has a compelling interest in understanding the judicial process, particularly in a high-profile case involving allegations of multiple homicides. The memorandum emphasizes that any restrictions on speech must be narrowly tailored and based on specific findings, which the current order allegedly lacks. As such, the organizations urge the court to lift the nondissemination order entirely or, at a minimum, modify it to comply with constitutional standards.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - Media Coalition_Kohberger Sealed Records - Ada County - Memo ISO Motion to Vacate Gag Order_July 3(129532455.3)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
Join the Kyle Seraphin Show LIVE 9:30a ET on Rumble, orfind me on Spotify for video replay: https://KyleSeraphinShow.com__________________________________________________Our Sponsors make this program possible:http://patriot-protect.com/KYLE (15% off Protecting yourself from scams/Identity theft)https://PatriotCoolers.com/collections/kyle-seraphin (PROMO KYLE for 10%)
CBC Busted Trying to GAG Media—Judge UNLEASHES Truth About Director's Scandal!Send a one-time contribution to the show - https://www.paypal.com/donate/?hosted_button_id=XARF5X38AMZULListen to our Podcast on the go: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/elev8podcastTikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@elev8podcast X: https://twitter.com/TheElev8Podcast0:00 - Intro1:30 - Judge Slaps CBC and Leaves them Exposed7:05 - Conservative Calls Carney and CBC LIARS
Gag orders, also known as prior restraint orders, are restrictions on speech or the press that are imposed by the government or the courts. The constitutionality of gag orders depends on the specific circumstances of each case and the specific restrictions imposed.In general, the First Amendment of the US Constitution protects freedom of speech and of the press, and restrictions on speech are subject to strict scrutiny by the courts.However, under certain circumstances, the government may impose restrictions on speech in order to protect important interests, such as national security, the integrity of the judicial process, or the privacy rights of individuals.In such cases, the courts will balance the government's interests against the First Amendment rights of the speaker or the press. If the restrictions are deemed to be narrowly tailored and the least restrictive means of achieving the government's interest, they may be upheld as constitutional. However, if the restrictions are overly broad or unnecessarily restrictive, they may be struck down as unconstitutional.In this episode we get the decision from the supreme court who has ruled that the gag order will stay in place.(commercial at 7:22)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Idaho murders: Court denies request to lift gag order in case of Bryan Kohberger, man accused of killing 4 college students - CBS NewsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
In the case of United States v. Sean Combs (24 Cr. 542), federal prosecutors have filed an opposition to the defense's motions requesting a hearing, a bill of particulars, and a gag order. The defense sought a hearing to investigate alleged government leaks of evidence, specifically a 2016 video purportedly showing Combs assaulting his ex-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura. Prosecutors refuted these claims, stating they did not possess the video prior to its public release and had no involvement in its dissemination. They argued that the defense's allegations are baseless and represent a strategic attempt to suppress critical evidence that is highly probative of Combs' alleged criminal conduct.Regarding the request for a bill of particulars, the defense sought detailed information about the charges to prepare for trial. Prosecutors contended that the indictment already provides sufficient detail, outlining the nature of the charges and the alleged criminal activities. They maintained that additional specifics are unnecessary and could compromise ongoing investigations or witness safety. Concerning the motion for a gag order to prevent public statements by potential witnesses and attorneys, prosecutors argued that existing court orders already address these concerns, rendering the defense's request redundant. They emphasized the importance of balancing the defendant's right to a fair trial with the public's right to information, asserting that current measures are adequate to maintain this balance.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:diddy.pdf
In the case of United States v. Sean Combs (24 Cr. 542), federal prosecutors have filed an opposition to the defense's motions requesting a hearing, a bill of particulars, and a gag order. The defense sought a hearing to investigate alleged government leaks of evidence, specifically a 2016 video purportedly showing Combs assaulting his ex-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura. Prosecutors refuted these claims, stating they did not possess the video prior to its public release and had no involvement in its dissemination. They argued that the defense's allegations are baseless and represent a strategic attempt to suppress critical evidence that is highly probative of Combs' alleged criminal conduct.Regarding the request for a bill of particulars, the defense sought detailed information about the charges to prepare for trial. Prosecutors contended that the indictment already provides sufficient detail, outlining the nature of the charges and the alleged criminal activities. They maintained that additional specifics are unnecessary and could compromise ongoing investigations or witness safety. Concerning the motion for a gag order to prevent public statements by potential witnesses and attorneys, prosecutors argued that existing court orders already address these concerns, rendering the defense's request redundant. They emphasized the importance of balancing the defendant's right to a fair trial with the public's right to information, asserting that current measures are adequate to maintain this balance.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:diddy.pdf
In the case of United States v. Sean Combs (24 Cr. 542), federal prosecutors have filed an opposition to the defense's motions requesting a hearing, a bill of particulars, and a gag order. The defense sought a hearing to investigate alleged government leaks of evidence, specifically a 2016 video purportedly showing Combs assaulting his ex-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura. Prosecutors refuted these claims, stating they did not possess the video prior to its public release and had no involvement in its dissemination. They argued that the defense's allegations are baseless and represent a strategic attempt to suppress critical evidence that is highly probative of Combs' alleged criminal conduct.Regarding the request for a bill of particulars, the defense sought detailed information about the charges to prepare for trial. Prosecutors contended that the indictment already provides sufficient detail, outlining the nature of the charges and the alleged criminal activities. They maintained that additional specifics are unnecessary and could compromise ongoing investigations or witness safety. Concerning the motion for a gag order to prevent public statements by potential witnesses and attorneys, prosecutors argued that existing court orders already address these concerns, rendering the defense's request redundant. They emphasized the importance of balancing the defendant's right to a fair trial with the public's right to information, asserting that current measures are adequate to maintain this balance.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:diddy.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
In the case of United States v. Sean Combs (24 Cr. 542), federal prosecutors have filed an opposition to the defense's motions requesting a hearing, a bill of particulars, and a gag order. The defense sought a hearing to investigate alleged government leaks of evidence, specifically a 2016 video purportedly showing Combs assaulting his ex-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura. Prosecutors refuted these claims, stating they did not possess the video prior to its public release and had no involvement in its dissemination. They argued that the defense's allegations are baseless and represent a strategic attempt to suppress critical evidence that is highly probative of Combs' alleged criminal conduct.Regarding the request for a bill of particulars, the defense sought detailed information about the charges to prepare for trial. Prosecutors contended that the indictment already provides sufficient detail, outlining the nature of the charges and the alleged criminal activities. They maintained that additional specifics are unnecessary and could compromise ongoing investigations or witness safety. Concerning the motion for a gag order to prevent public statements by potential witnesses and attorneys, prosecutors argued that existing court orders already address these concerns, rendering the defense's request redundant. They emphasized the importance of balancing the defendant's right to a fair trial with the public's right to information, asserting that current measures are adequate to maintain this balance.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:diddy.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
In the case of United States v. Sean Combs (24 Cr. 542), federal prosecutors have filed an opposition to the defense's motions requesting a hearing, a bill of particulars, and a gag order. The defense sought a hearing to investigate alleged government leaks of evidence, specifically a 2016 video purportedly showing Combs assaulting his ex-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura. Prosecutors refuted these claims, stating they did not possess the video prior to its public release and had no involvement in its dissemination. They argued that the defense's allegations are baseless and represent a strategic attempt to suppress critical evidence that is highly probative of Combs' alleged criminal conduct.Regarding the request for a bill of particulars, the defense sought detailed information about the charges to prepare for trial. Prosecutors contended that the indictment already provides sufficient detail, outlining the nature of the charges and the alleged criminal activities. They maintained that additional specifics are unnecessary and could compromise ongoing investigations or witness safety. Concerning the motion for a gag order to prevent public statements by potential witnesses and attorneys, prosecutors argued that existing court orders already address these concerns, rendering the defense's request redundant. They emphasized the importance of balancing the defendant's right to a fair trial with the public's right to information, asserting that current measures are adequate to maintain this balance.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:diddy.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
In the case of United States v. Sean Combs (24 Cr. 542), federal prosecutors have filed an opposition to the defense's motions requesting a hearing, a bill of particulars, and a gag order. The defense sought a hearing to investigate alleged government leaks of evidence, specifically a 2016 video purportedly showing Combs assaulting his ex-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura. Prosecutors refuted these claims, stating they did not possess the video prior to its public release and had no involvement in its dissemination. They argued that the defense's allegations are baseless and represent a strategic attempt to suppress critical evidence that is highly probative of Combs' alleged criminal conduct.Regarding the request for a bill of particulars, the defense sought detailed information about the charges to prepare for trial. Prosecutors contended that the indictment already provides sufficient detail, outlining the nature of the charges and the alleged criminal activities. They maintained that additional specifics are unnecessary and could compromise ongoing investigations or witness safety. Concerning the motion for a gag order to prevent public statements by potential witnesses and attorneys, prosecutors argued that existing court orders already address these concerns, rendering the defense's request redundant. They emphasized the importance of balancing the defendant's right to a fair trial with the public's right to information, asserting that current measures are adequate to maintain this balance.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:diddy.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
On November 3, 2024, Sean "Diddy" Combs' legal team submitted a letter to the federal judge overseeing his case, urgently requesting the implementation of a gag order. This plea was prompted by recent public statements from Courtney Burgess, a grand jury witness, who claimed to possess videos allegedly depicting Combs in compromising situations. Combs' attorneys argue that such statements have led to a "deluge of improper pretrial publicity," jeopardizing his right to a fair trial and undermining the integrity of the grand jury proceedings.In this episode, we dive into the latest developments and see where things stand.(commercial at 8:15)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Diddy makes shock attempt to silence grand jury witness who made bombshell claims about rapper's 'freak-off' parties | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
The lawyer representing the Goncalves family, Shannon Gray, filed an appeal that challenges the large scope of the gag ordered that was slapped on the Bryan Kohberger trial.Let's dive in and see what's up!(commercial at 6:34)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Idaho murders update: Kaylee Goncalves' family lawyer appeals gag order in Bryan Kohberger case | Fox NewsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
On November 3, 2024, Sean "Diddy" Combs' legal team submitted a letter to the federal judge overseeing his case, urgently requesting the implementation of a gag order. This plea was prompted by recent public statements from Courtney Burgess, a grand jury witness, who claimed to possess videos allegedly depicting Combs in compromising situations. Combs' attorneys argue that such statements have led to a "deluge of improper pretrial publicity," jeopardizing his right to a fair trial and undermining the integrity of the grand jury proceedings.In this episode, we dive into the latest developments and see where things stand.(commercial at 8:15)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Diddy makes shock attempt to silence grand jury witness who made bombshell claims about rapper's 'freak-off' parties | Daily Mail Online
In case 24-cr-542 (AS), Judge Arun Subramanian issued an order addressing pretrial matters in the prosecution of Sean Combs. The order reaffirms the need to maintain the integrity of the trial process, particularly in light of media coverage and the high-profile nature of the case. Judge Subramanian emphasized that both parties must adhere strictly to court rules, ensuring that public statements and information sharing do not jeopardize the fairness of the proceedings.The order also outlines the implementation of specific measures, such as restricted access to certain documents and a potential gag order to limit public comments from attorneys and witnesses. Judge Subramanian notes that these measures are necessary to prevent undue influence on potential jurors and to maintain a balanced judicial process. Further hearings and motions related to this order are expected to be scheduled as the case progresses.(commercial at 8:10)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.50.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
In United States v. Combs, case number 24-cr-542 (AS), Sean Combs has submitted a letter to Judge Arun Subramanian proposing specific language for a gag order in response to alleged leaks by the government. Combs argues that these leaks have involved confidential, damaging, and false information released to the media, which could prejudice his right to a fair trial. The defense believes a gag order is necessary to mitigate the impact of this information on the jury pool and to preserve the integrity of the judicial process.The proposed gag order, outlined in the attached Exhibit A, seeks to restrict public statements by both parties and limit the release of information related to the case. Combs' legal team contends that this measure is crucial to ensure a fair and unbiased trial, citing previous court discussions on October 10, 2024, regarding the need for such relief. They maintain that without these protections, the continued flow of leaked information could compromise the defendant's ability to receive a fair hearing.(commercial at 11:35)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.50.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
Sean “Diddy” Combs is pushing for a gag order against the attorneys representing his accusers, alleging that their public statements are threatening his right to a fair trial. On the eve of his criminal proceedings, Combs' legal team filed a motion requesting the court to restrict what the opposing counsel can say to the media, citing a “media circus” and arguing that the consistent leaks and inflammatory commentary are prejudicing the potential jury pool. Diddy's lawyers claim the plaintiffs' attorneys, particularly those handling the civil suits tied to sex trafficking and assault allegations, are engaging in a coordinated PR campaign designed to sway public opinion before any evidence is formally presented in court.The request for a gag order comes amid mounting legal trouble for Combs, who faces multiple lawsuits and a federal criminal investigation that includes the possibility of RICO charges. His legal team is framing the issue as a matter of constitutional fairness, asserting that the relentless media attention—much of it fed by the accusers' attorneys—violates due process and could derail any hope of impartial proceedings. The court has not yet ruled on the motion, but if granted, it could significantly limit public discourse from key voices in the case, setting up a major legal battle not just over the facts, but over who gets to shape the narrative.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Diddy's legal team asks judge to place gag orders on victims' attorneys on eve of trial | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
Gag orders, also known as prior restraint orders, are restrictions on speech or the press that are imposed by the government or the courts. The constitutionality of gag orders depends on the specific circumstances of each case and the specific restrictions imposed.In general, the First Amendment of the US Constitution protects freedom of speech and of the press, and restrictions on speech are subject to strict scrutiny by the courts.However, under certain circumstances, the government may impose restrictions on speech in order to protect important interests, such as national security, the integrity of the judicial process, or the privacy rights of individuals.In such cases, the courts will balance the government's interests against the First Amendment rights of the speaker or the press. If the restrictions are deemed to be narrowly tailored and the least restrictive means of achieving the government's interest, they may be upheld as constitutional. However, if the restrictions are overly broad or unnecessarily restrictive, they may be struck down as unconstitutional.In this episode we get the decision from the supreme court who has ruled that the gag order will stay in place.(commercial at 7:22)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Idaho murders: Court denies request to lift gag order in case of Bryan Kohberger, man accused of killing 4 college students - CBS NewsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
Dateline just leaked explosive evidence in the Bryan Kohberger case—and now the defense claims someone else did it. With the trial coming up late summer... is justice unraveling before it even begins? #STSNation, Welcome to Surviving the Survivor — the podcast that brings you the #BestGuests in all of #TrueCrime, covering the cases that matter most. Tonight, we dive into the Bryan Kohberger legal earthquake. First, the Dateline NBC special aired surveillance footage, phone pings, and graphic search histories—all evidence that may have been under court seal. Now, Judge Steven Hippler says the court's gag order was “likely” violated, a special prosecutor may be appointed, and the entire case could be jeopardized. Then came another curveball: At a May 15 hearing, Kohberger's defense dropped a sealed motion suggesting “alternate perpetrators” may be to blame. The judge wasn't buying it—at least not yet. He's demanding actual evidence before deciding whether the theory will be admissible. Meanwhile, victim families are speaking out. Angela Navejas, mother of Madison Mogen's best friend, says the defense is weaponizing distraction while ignoring the pain of the victims' loved ones. The Goncalves family posted: “One step forward, two steps back.” Is this trial about to implode?⸻ #Support the show:All Things STS: Https://linktr.ee/stspodcastGet Joel's Book: Https://amzn.to/48GwbLxSupport the show on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/SurvivingTheSurvivorCatch us live on YouTube: Surviving The Survivor: #BestGuests in True Crime - YouTubeVenmo Donations: @STSPodcast
Previously we were discussing the gag order that was initiated by the judge overseeing the case and now we are hearing that Bryan Kohberger's legal team, led by Ann Taylor were behind the request.In this episode, we take a look at that request and the gag order that was implemented in it's aftermath.(commercial at 6:07)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Bryan Kohberger defense behind gag order request in Idaho murders, new batch of court docs reveal | Fox NewsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
From the archives: 1-23-23Legal scholars are weighing in on the validity and need of a gag order as broad in scope as the one that has now been issued by Judge Marshall. While there certainly is a need to control information leaking from the trial, there is also a need for transparency from the government.In this episode, we take a look at the fine line that has to be walked by Judge Marshall and the court in Idaho when it comes to respecting the first amendment and safeguarding Bryan Kohberger's right to a fair trial.(commercial at 8:23)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Gag Order in Idaho Murders Case Effectively Silences Victims' Families (insider.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
Douglas Wigdor, representing accuser Cassandra Ventura, submitted a letter to Judge Arun Subramanian opposing Sean "Diddy" Combs' request for a gag order in his federal case. Wigdor argued that while Combs seeks to restrict public statements from accusers and their attorneys, his own family and legal team have been vocal in the media. He highlighted public comments from Combs' son, Quincy, and his mother, Janice Combs, as well as statements from Combs' attorney, Marc Agnifilo, who labeled the prosecution as racially motivated. Wigdor contended that if Combs' representatives are permitted to speak publicly, accusers and their legal counsel should have the same right, suggesting that Combs' request for a gag order is both hypocritical and unjust.We also get a look at a letter sent by the prosecutors....In a letter to Judge Subramanian regarding United States v. Sean Combs, the prosecution references a recent decision by Judge Ho in United States v. Adams, 24 Cr. 556 (DEH), as additional support for denying the defendant's motion concerning alleged leaks. The attached decision, labeled as Exhibit 1, is presented to bolster the government's position against the defendant's Leak Motion.(commercial at 10:26)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.55.0.pdfsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.56.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
Slam the Gavel welcomes Heather Bendl to the podcast. Heather is originally from Round Lake, Illinois but now resides in the Daytona, Florida area. She has four children ages 18, 17, 13, and 8. She was married to their father Justin Serlick from 2003 to 2013. Upon her divorce she was awarded sole custody of the oldest three. Justin Serlick refused to move out of Heather's home with her children after the divorce and he continued to emotionally and physically abuse the children and Heather. In 2017 Heather had her fourth child with Justin, this was not a planned pregnancy. In fact, she was in school full-time working on her Bachelor's of Science Degree at UW-Parkside in Kenosha, Wisconsin. Justin was taking advantage of Heather after she would take her Ambien to sleep. Heather had tried over the years to get Justin to move out of her home but his mother had threatened Heather over the years that if she removed Justin from the home she would make sure Heather never saw her children again......Non-Profit Email Address:JusticefortheSerlickChildren@gmail.comNon-Profit YouTube Channel:https://www.youtube.com/@JusticefortheSerlickChildrenNon-Profit FB Page:https://www.facebook.com/JusticefortheSerlickChildrenSupportshow(https://www.buymeacoffee.com/maryannpetri)Maryann Petri: dismantlingfamilycourtcorruption.comhttps://www.tiktok.com/@maryannpetriFacebook: https://www.youtube.com/@slamthegavelpodcasthostmar5536Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/guitarpeace/Pinterest: Slam The Gavel Podcast/@guitarpeaceLinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/maryann-petri-62a46b1ab/ YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@slamthegavelpodcasthostmar5536 Twitter https://x.com/PetriMaryannEzlegalsuit.comhttps://ko-fi.com/maryannpetri*DISCLAIMER* The use of this information is at the viewer/user's own risk. Not financial, medical nor legal advice as the content on this podcast does not constitute legal, financial, medical or any other professional advice. Viewer/user's should consult with the relevant professionals. Reproduction, distribution, performing, publicly displaying and making a derivative of the work is explicitly prohibited without permission from content creator. Podcast is protected by owner. The content creator maintains the exclusive right and any unauthorized copyright infringement is subject to legal prosecution. Support the showSupportshow(https://www.buymeacoffee.com/maryannpetri)http://www.dismantlingfamilycourtcorruption.com/
In a recent letter to Judge Subramanian, Sean Combs' legal team expressed concern over extensive pretrial publicity that they believe is compromising his right to a fair trial and the integrity of grand jury proceedings. They referenced a pending motion to limit extrajudicial statements by potential witnesses and their counsel, which the government has opposed, with Combs' reply due on November 8, 2024. Citing the immediate risk posed by ongoing public statements related to the grand jury, they requested the court to promptly restrict such extrajudicial comments during the motion's consideration.In this episode, we take a look at that motion.(commercial at 7:30)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Draft Combs 23.1 Letter 110124 [trg]Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
From the archives: 6-24-23Judge John Judge warned the media during yesterdays hearing about zooming in on Bryan Kohberger during the proceedings. He pointed to the Lori Vallow trial for reference and noted that if the Media wants to keep the cameras in the courtroom, they are going to have to follow the rules as they are stated. Considering the interest surrounding this case, the Judge feels that it would be prejudicial to keep the camera locked on Kohberger.We also dive a littler deeper into the hearing from yesterday and discuss what went down in the courtroom in Latah County.(commercial at 7:32)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Bryan Kohberger judge refers to Lori Vallow case as suit-clad Idaho murders suspect appears in court | The Independent
Sean “Diddy” Combs is pushing for a gag order against the attorneys representing his accusers, alleging that their public statements are threatening his right to a fair trial. On the eve of his criminal proceedings, Combs' legal team filed a motion requesting the court to restrict what the opposing counsel can say to the media, citing a “media circus” and arguing that the consistent leaks and inflammatory commentary are prejudicing the potential jury pool. Diddy's lawyers claim the plaintiffs' attorneys, particularly those handling the civil suits tied to sex trafficking and assault allegations, are engaging in a coordinated PR campaign designed to sway public opinion before any evidence is formally presented in court.The request for a gag order comes amid mounting legal trouble for Combs, who faces multiple lawsuits and a federal criminal investigation that includes the possibility of RICO charges. His legal team is framing the issue as a matter of constitutional fairness, asserting that the relentless media attention—much of it fed by the accusers' attorneys—violates due process and could derail any hope of impartial proceedings. The court has not yet ruled on the motion, but if granted, it could significantly limit public discourse from key voices in the case, setting up a major legal battle not just over the facts, but over who gets to shape the narrative.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Diddy's legal team asks judge to place gag orders on victims' attorneys on eve of trial | Daily Mail Online
Sean “Diddy” Combs is pushing for a gag order against the attorneys representing his accusers, alleging that their public statements are threatening his right to a fair trial. On the eve of his criminal proceedings, Combs' legal team filed a motion requesting the court to restrict what the opposing counsel can say to the media, citing a “media circus” and arguing that the consistent leaks and inflammatory commentary are prejudicing the potential jury pool. Diddy's lawyers claim the plaintiffs' attorneys, particularly those handling the civil suits tied to sex trafficking and assault allegations, are engaging in a coordinated PR campaign designed to sway public opinion before any evidence is formally presented in court.The request for a gag order comes amid mounting legal trouble for Combs, who faces multiple lawsuits and a federal criminal investigation that includes the possibility of RICO charges. His legal team is framing the issue as a matter of constitutional fairness, asserting that the relentless media attention—much of it fed by the accusers' attorneys—violates due process and could derail any hope of impartial proceedings. The court has not yet ruled on the motion, but if granted, it could significantly limit public discourse from key voices in the case, setting up a major legal battle not just over the facts, but over who gets to shape the narrative.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Diddy's legal team asks judge to place gag orders on victims' attorneys on eve of trial | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
VLOG April 30 Harvey Weinstein retrial https://matthewrussellleeicp.substack.com/p/courtroom-extra-harvey-weinstein-2c5Luigi Mangione eavesdrop reply https://www.patreon.com/posts/filing-after-for-127772047 Sean Combs seeks gag order https://www.patreon.com/posts/gag-order-in-run-127741988 TdA case SDNY https://www.innercitypress.com/sdny104bvyskociltdaicp042825.html UNRWA scam https://www.innercitypress.com/ungate1elinorhammarskjoldicp042825.html UN Indo-Pak failure
In a letter to Judge Subramanian, Sean Combs' legal team expressed concern over extensive pretrial publicity that they believe is compromising his right to a fair trial and the integrity of grand jury proceedings. They referenced a pending motion to limit extrajudicial statements by potential witnesses and their counsel, which the government has opposed, with Combs' reply due on November 8, 2024. Citing the immediate risk posed by ongoing public statements related to the grand jury, they requested the court to promptly restrict such extrajudicial comments during the motion's consideration.Sean "Diddy" Combs has collaborated with many influential figures in the music industry over the years. Here's an update on some of his closest music industry associates:L.A. Reid: The music executive and co-founder of LaFace Records has been accused of sexual assault by former music executive Drew Dixon. Despite denying the allegations, Reid's motion to dismiss the lawsuit was denied in 2024, allowing the case to move forward.Russell Simmons: The Def Jam co-founder has faced multiple allegations of sexual misconduct, including a lawsuit filed in late 2022. Simmons has denied these claims and has been living in Bali, Indonesia, amid ongoing legal battles.Suge Knight: Co-founder of Death Row Records, Knight has been imprisoned since 2018 after a fatal hit-and-run. While serving his sentence, he continues to speak out about the music industry, often criticizing other executives and artists.Jay-Z: A prominent figure in the music and business worlds, Jay-Z has faced criticism for remaining silent about Combs' legal troubles. He has not commented publicly on the allegations.In this episode, we take a look at what some of the other moguls in the music indsutry who acted as mentors to Diddy are up to these days and how they are all facing their own legal issues.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
Tomorrow their will be yet another voire dire in the Karen Read case due to discovery violations. Why are Karen Read's lawyers Alan Jackson & David Yannetti choosing to delete their text messages with their star witnesses from ARCCA ? Why won't they comply with their discovery obligations? What are the hiding?Join this channel to get access to perks: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCasCmfciTFDhUKGfylFG43A/joinGet access to exclusive content & support the podcast by becoming a Patron today! https://patreon.com/robertaglasstruecrimereportThrow a tip in the tip jar! https://buymeacoffee.com/robertaglassSupport Roberta by sending a donation via Venmo. https://venmo.com/robertaglassShow Notes:Innocence Fraud Watch "Killer Karen Read Retrial: UPDATED: Why Did Murderer Choose To Ghost Alleged “Best Friend” Ingrid Curtis (AKA Ingrid Miller Curtis) & Bill Curtis From Her Public Relations Innocence Fraud Propaganda Campaign?" -https://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2025/04/25/killer-karen-read-retrial-why-did-murderer-choose-to-ghost-ingrid-curtis-bill-curtis-from-her-public-relations-innocence-fraud-spin-campaign/Innocence Fraud Watch "Killer Karen Read Retrial: (UPDATED) ARCCA & Federal Investigation TIMELINE Incl. Innocence Fraudsters Daniel Wolfe & Andrew Rentschler, Witness Intimidation, Arrests, Extrajudicial Statements, Violations, Sanctions, “Gag Order” & Transcripts" - https://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2025/03/03/killer-karen-read-retrial-arcca-timeline-of-innocence-fraudsters-daniel-wolfe-andrew-rentschler-incl-some-billing-details/Masshole Mafia "The Truth About Sofagate" - Masshole Mafia "The Truth About Sofagate" - https://massholemafia.com/2025/04/27/the-truth-about-sofagate/Thank you Patrons!Hannna, Christy, Jen Buell, Elle Solari, Carol Cardella, Jennifer Harmon, DoxieMama65, Carol Holderman, Joan Mahon, Marcie Denton, Rosanne Aponte, Johnny Jay, Jude Barnes, JenTheRN, Victoria Devenish, Jeri Falk, Kimberly Lovelace, Penni Miller, Jil, Janet Gardner, Jayne Wallace (JaynesWhirled), Pat Brooks, Jennifer Klearman, Judy Brown, Linda Lazzaro, Suzanne Kniffin, Susan Hicks, Jeff Meadors, D Samlam, Pat Brooks, Cythnia, Bonnie Schoeneman-Dilley, Diane Larsen, Mary, Kimberly Philipson, Cat Stewart, Cindy Pochesci, Kevin Crecy, Renee Chavez, Melba Pourteau, Julie K Thomas, Mia Wallace, Stark Stuff, Kayce Taylor, Alice, Dean, GiGi5, Jennifer Crum, Dana Natale, Bewildered Beauty, Pepper, Joan Chakonas, Blythe, Pat Dell, Lorraine Reid, T.B., Melissa, Victoria Gray Bross, Toni Woodland, Danbrit, Kenny Haines and Toni Natalie
Slam the Gavel podcast welcomes Esther Deutsch to the podcast. Esther told her story of the money courts ignoring child abuse, disregarding evidence and withholding her children from her. They don't care about her children's well-being and they disregard exculpatory evidence if it doesn't fit their false narrative. A child suffers. Esther hasn't seen her children in FIVE years. We discussed the Thomas Valva case that involved Judge H. Zimmerman and other issues that went wrong in Esther's case that NEVER should have happened. Under a Gag Order, Esther speaks with bravery and heart as the First Amendment MUST be acknowledged. HELLO DOGE.To Reach Esther Deutsch: estherdeutsch2024@gmail.com***** Supportshow(https://www.buymeacoffee.com/maryannpetri)Maryann Petri: dismantlingfamilycourtcorruption.comhttps://www.tiktok.com/@maryannpetriFacebook: https://www.youtube.com/@slamthegavelpodcasthostmar5536Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/guitarpeace/Pinterest: Slam The Gavel Podcast/@guitarpeaceLinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/maryann-petri-62a46b1ab/ YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@slamthegavelpodcasthostmar5536 Twitter https://x.com/PetriMaryannEzlegalsuit.comhttps://ko-fi.com/maryannpetri*DISCLAIMER* The use of this information is at the viewer/user's own risk. Not financial, medical nor legal advice as the content on this podcast does not constitute legal, financial, medical or any other professional advice. Viewer/user's should consult with the relevant professionals. Reproduction, distribution, performing, publicly displaying and making a derivative of the work is explicitly prohibited without permission from content creator. Podcast is protected by owner. The content creator maintains the exclusive right and any unauthorized copyright infringement is subject to legal prosecution. Support the showSupportshow(https://www.buymeacoffee.com/maryannpetri)http://www.dismantlingfamilycourtcorruption.com/
In a letter to Judge Subramanian, Sean Combs' legal team expressed concern over extensive pretrial publicity that they believe is compromising his right to a fair trial and the integrity of grand jury proceedings. They referenced a pending motion to limit extrajudicial statements by potential witnesses and their counsel, which the government has opposed, with Combs' reply due on November 8, 2024. Citing the immediate risk posed by ongoing public statements related to the grand jury, they requested the court to promptly restrict such extrajudicial comments during the motion's consideration.Sean "Diddy" Combs has collaborated with many influential figures in the music industry over the years. Here's an update on some of his closest music industry associates:L.A. Reid: The music executive and co-founder of LaFace Records has been accused of sexual assault by former music executive Drew Dixon. Despite denying the allegations, Reid's motion to dismiss the lawsuit was denied in 2024, allowing the case to move forward.Russell Simmons: The Def Jam co-founder has faced multiple allegations of sexual misconduct, including a lawsuit filed in late 2022. Simmons has denied these claims and has been living in Bali, Indonesia, amid ongoing legal battles.Suge Knight: Co-founder of Death Row Records, Knight has been imprisoned since 2018 after a fatal hit-and-run. While serving his sentence, he continues to speak out about the music industry, often criticizing other executives and artists.Jay-Z: A prominent figure in the music and business worlds, Jay-Z has faced criticism for remaining silent about Combs' legal troubles. He has not commented publicly on the allegations.In this episode, we take a look at what some of the other moguls in the music indsutry who acted as mentors to Diddy are up to these days and how they are all facing their own legal issues.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
In this conversation, Carl Jackson discusses the implications of Trump's tariffs on the economy, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive tax package and deregulation to spur growth. He reflects on the current state of unity in America, expressing concerns about the divisive political climate and the challenges of bringing the country together. Jackson also critiques the recent elections, highlighting the importance of voter turnout and the need for accountability in governance, particularly regarding the rule of law and the handling of the Hunter Biden laptop controversy. Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/carljacksonradio Twitter: https://twitter.com/carljacksonshow Parler: https://parler.com/carljacksonshow Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/thecarljacksonshow http://www.TheCarlJacksonShow.comSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
In this conversation, Carl Jackson discusses the implications of Trump's tariffs on the economy, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive tax package and deregulation to spur growth. He reflects on the current state of unity in America, expressing concerns about the divisive political climate and the challenges of bringing the country together. Jackson also critiques the recent elections, highlighting the importance of voter turnout and the need for accountability in governance, particularly regarding the rule of law and the handling of the Hunter Biden laptop controversy. Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/carljacksonradio Twitter: https://twitter.com/carljacksonshow Parler: https://parler.com/carljacksonshow Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/thecarljacksonshow http://www.TheCarlJacksonShow.comSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
© 2020-2025 Ivy Podcast Discovery LLC
