Podcasts about Gag order

idaho true crime denying exempt gag order bryan kohberger order part

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 20, 2025 15:28

The dive into the court documents continues in this episode as we begin taking a look at Judge John Judge's order denying Shannon Gray's request to be exempt from the gag order.(commercial at 10:41)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:06232023+Ordr+Denying+Shanon+Grays+Req+to+be+Exempt+from+the+Amnd+Nondiss+Ordr+Grant+Req+the+Ordr+be+Clarif.pdf (amazonaws.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

The Order Denying Shannon Gray Request To Be Exempt From The Gag Order (Part 2)

idaho true crime denying exempt gag order bryan kohberger order part

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 20, 2025 14:10

The dive into the court documents continues in this episode as we begin taking a look at Judge John Judge's order denying Shannon Gray's request to be exempt from the gag order.(commercial at 10:41)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:06232023+Ordr+Denying+Shanon+Grays+Req+to+be+Exempt+from+the+Amnd+Nondiss+Ordr+Grant+Req+the+Ordr+be+Clarif.pdf (amazonaws.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

The Order Denying Shannon Gray Request To Be Exempt From The Gag Order (Part 3)

idaho true crime denying exempt gag order bryan kohberger order part

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 20, 2025 15:07

The dive into the court documents continues in this episode as we begin taking a look at Judge John Judge's order denying Shannon Gray's request to be exempt from the gag order.(commercial at 10:41)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:06232023+Ordr+Denying+Shanon+Grays+Req+to+be+Exempt+from+the+Amnd+Nondiss+Ordr+Grant+Req+the+Ordr+be+Clarif.pdf (amazonaws.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

The Order Denying Shannon Gray Request To Be Exempt From The Gag Order (Part 1)

idaho true crime denying exempt gag order bryan kohberger order part

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 19, 2025 15:44

The dive into the court documents continues in this episode as we begin taking a look at Judge John Judge's order denying Shannon Gray's request to be exempt from the gag order.(commercial at 10:41)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:06232023+Ordr+Denying+Shanon+Grays+Req+to+be+Exempt+from+the+Amnd+Nondiss+Ordr+Grant+Req+the+Ordr+be+Clarif.pdf (amazonaws.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Hearing: Bryan Kohberger's Gag Order is Reviewed by Judge; Will More Evidence Be Released?

Surviving the Survivor

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 18, 2025 73:36

Will the victim's family and the public get access to all the evidence in the Idaho4 murder case? This critical gag order hearing today could determine whether chilling details about Bryan Kohberger and the brutal murder of four young Idaho students are unsealed for the world to see. Welcome to Surviving the Survivor, the show that brings you the #BestGuests in all of #truecrime. As families and media await more insight into Bryan Kohberger's motive, a critical gag order hearing is set for July 17, 2025 to determine if pre-sentencing restrictions on discussing court details will be lifted. This hearing could unlock new revelations about his alleged online alias and shed light on digital evidence tied to the case. STS Host Joel Waldman will be watching it live along with #BestGuests who will provide analysis. Bryan Kohberger confessed to the horrific November 13, 2022 stabbings of four University of Idaho students and plead guilty on July 2, 2025, to avoid the death penalty. He will now face four consecutive life sentences plus ten years and has given up his right to appeal. Evidence against him included DNA on a recovered knife sheath, phone data, and surveillance footage. We remember the lives of the four victims senselessly murdered in Moscow, Idaho: Ethan Chapin: A 20- year-old from Conway, Washington who was staying with his girlfriend, Xana Kernodle, the night of the murder. Ethan was a triplet. Kaylee Goncalves: A 21-year-old from Rathdrum, Idaho who was murdered in her home next to her best friend, Maddie. Xana Kernodle: A 20-year-old from Avondale, Arizona, who later lived in Post Falls, Idaho. She was murdered at her home with her close friends and boyfriend. Madison Mogen: A 21-year-old from Coeur d'Alene, Idaho who many believe was the intended target. Maddie was murdered next to her childhood best friend, Kaylee.More of STS:Links: Https://linktr.ee/stspodcastGet Joel's Book: Https://amzn.to/48GwbLxSTS Merch: Https://www.bonfire.com/store/sts-store/Support the show on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/SurvivingTheSurvivorCatch us live on YouTube: Surviving The Survivor: #BestGuests in True Crime - YouTubeVenmo Donations: @STSPodcast or Https://www.venmo.com/stspodcast#bryankohberger #trial #courtroomdrama #hearing #murdermystery #gagorder #stsnation #newsupdate #moscowidaho #idaho4update #truecrimecommunity #truecrimepodcast #truestory

university washington arizona dna judge surviving survivors hearing idaho released moscow conway coeur gag order bryan kohberger avondale xana kernodle post falls

Murder In Moscow: Judge Hippler Has Lifted The Gag Order (7/18/25)

news murder judge fox news corruption moscow breaking news jeffrey epstein first amendment prosecutors ghislaine maxwell lifted prince andrew new story gag order bryan kohberger kohberger

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 18, 2025 11:21

Judge Steven Hippler issued an order lifting the gag order in the Bryan Kohberger case, stating that its original purpose—to protect Kohberger's right to a fair trial—was no longer valid following his guilty plea. With no jury trial forthcoming, the judge determined that the restrictions on speech could no longer be justified. He emphasized that lifting the gag order did not force any party to speak but simply restored their First Amendment right to do so if they chose. The order acknowledged the public's strong interest in transparency and access to information now that the criminal case had effectively moved past the trial phase.Despite objections from Kohberger's defense, who argued that media attention could influence the sentencing phase, the judge made clear that such publicity was inevitable regardless of the gag order's status. He dismissed the notion that continuing to silence participants would shield the process from public scrutiny. However, the judge declined to immediately unseal the more than 240 court filings that remain sealed in the case, saying he would review them individually after the upcoming sentencing hearing. The decision marks a shift toward greater openness in one of the most closely watched murder cases in recent memory.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Prosecutors reverse position on gag order after Kohberger murder confession | Fox News

Murder In Moscow: Judge Hippler Has Lifted The Gag Order (7/18/25)

news murder judge corruption moscow breaking news jeffrey epstein first amendment prosecutors ghislaine maxwell lifted prince andrew new story gag order bryan kohberger kohberger

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 18, 2025 11:21

Judge Steven Hippler issued an order lifting the gag order in the Bryan Kohberger case, stating that its original purpose—to protect Kohberger's right to a fair trial—was no longer valid following his guilty plea. With no jury trial forthcoming, the judge determined that the restrictions on speech could no longer be justified. He emphasized that lifting the gag order did not force any party to speak but simply restored their First Amendment right to do so if they chose. The order acknowledged the public's strong interest in transparency and access to information now that the criminal case had effectively moved past the trial phase.Despite objections from Kohberger's defense, who argued that media attention could influence the sentencing phase, the judge made clear that such publicity was inevitable regardless of the gag order's status. He dismissed the notion that continuing to silence participants would shield the process from public scrutiny. However, the judge declined to immediately unseal the more than 240 court filings that remain sealed in the case, saying he would review them individually after the upcoming sentencing hearing. The decision marks a shift toward greater openness in one of the most closely watched murder cases in recent memory.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Prosecutors reverse position on gag order after Kohberger murder confession | Fox NewsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Murder In Moscow: Judge Hippler Has Lifted The Gag Order (7/18/25)

murder judge idaho true crime moscow first amendment prosecutors lifted gag order bryan kohberger kohberger

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 18, 2025 11:21

Judge Steven Hippler issued an order lifting the gag order in the Bryan Kohberger case, stating that its original purpose—to protect Kohberger's right to a fair trial—was no longer valid following his guilty plea. With no jury trial forthcoming, the judge determined that the restrictions on speech could no longer be justified. He emphasized that lifting the gag order did not force any party to speak but simply restored their First Amendment right to do so if they chose. The order acknowledged the public's strong interest in transparency and access to information now that the criminal case had effectively moved past the trial phase.Despite objections from Kohberger's defense, who argued that media attention could influence the sentencing phase, the judge made clear that such publicity was inevitable regardless of the gag order's status. He dismissed the notion that continuing to silence participants would shield the process from public scrutiny. However, the judge declined to immediately unseal the more than 240 court filings that remain sealed in the case, saying he would review them individually after the upcoming sentencing hearing. The decision marks a shift toward greater openness in one of the most closely watched murder cases in recent memory.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Prosecutors reverse position on gag order after Kohberger murder confession | Fox NewsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Recap: Bryan Kohberger Hearing -Judge Lifts Gag Order- Sealed Documents Won't Be Out Soon

Lori Vallow & Chad Daybell Case

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 17, 2025 6:18

Recap of the Bryan Kohberger hearing where the judge lifted the gag order. When will we start to see sealed documents?ALL MERCH 10% off with code Sherlock10 at checkout Donate: (Thank you for your support! Couldn't do what I love without all y'all) PayPal - paypal.com/paypalme/prettyliesandalibisVenmo - @prettyliesalibisBuy Me A Coffee - https://www.buymeacoffee.com/prettyliesrCash App- PrettyliesandalibisAll links: https://linktr.ee/prettyliesandalibisMerch: prettyliesandalibis.myshopify.comPatreon: https://www.patreon.com/PrettyLiesAndAlibis(Weekly lives and private message board)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/pretty-lies-and-alibis--4447192/support.

judge court hearing paypal true crime documents sealed lifts gag order bryan kohberger all merch

Judge Drops Gag Order in Kohberger Case… What Now?

Crime Talk with Scott Reisch

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 17, 2025 16:19

Judge Drops Gag Order in Kohberger Case… What Now? #Kohberger #TrueCrime #CrimeTalk #GagOrder #FreeSpeech #IdahoMurders

judge drops gag order kohberger

Bryan Kohberger Judge Lifts Gag Order Amid Threats to Admitted Killer

Crime Fix with Angenette Levy

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 17, 2025 22:14

A media coalition has asked the judge presiding over Bryan Kohberger's case to vacate the non-dissemination order that has prevented the parties from granting interviews and releasing records. Prosecutor Bill Thompson had asked that the gag order remain in place until Kohberger is sentenced but then changed course. Meanwhile, Kohberger's lawyers has asked that the order remain in place citing threats to her client and an ongoing investigation into a leak of evidence. Law&Crime's Angenette Levy goes through the hearing in this episode of Crime Fix — a daily show covering the biggest stories in crime.PLEASE SUPPORT THE SHOW:Take your personal data back with Incogni! Use code CRIMEFIX at the link below and get 60% off an annual plan: http://incogni.com/crimefixHost:Angenette Levy https://twitter.com/Angenette5Guest:Guest: Jack Greiner https://x.com/jackcgreinerProducer:Jordan ChaconCRIME FIX PRODUCTION:Head of Social Media, YouTube - Bobby SzokeSocial Media Management - Vanessa BeinVideo Editing - Daniel CamachoGuest Booking - Alyssa Fisher & Diane KayeSTAY UP-TO-DATE WITH THE LAW&CRIME NETWORK:Watch Law&Crime Network on YouTubeTV: https://bit.ly/3td2e3yWhere To Watch Law&Crime Network: https://bit.ly/3akxLK5Sign Up For Law&Crime's Daily Newsletter: https://bit.ly/LawandCrimeNewsletterRead Fascinating Articles From Law&Crime Network: https://bit.ly/3td2IqoLAW&CRIME NETWORK SOCIAL MEDIA:Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/lawandcrime/Twitter: https://twitter.com/LawCrimeNetworkFacebook: https://www.facebook.com/lawandcrimeTwitch: https://www.twitch.tv/lawandcrimenetworkTikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@lawandcrimeSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

social media law news killers judge crime threats true crime amid lifts admitted gag order bryan kohberger kohberger incogni

An Idaho judge has lifted a sweeping gag order in Bryan Kohberger's quadruple murder case

AP Audio Stories

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 17, 2025 0:43

AP's Lisa Dwyer reports that a gag order was lifted in the Idaho students killed case.

judge idaho lifted sweeping quadruple murder case gag order bryan kohberger

Brian Kohberger's Signed Confession & Plea | Media Wants The Gag Order Lifted NOW | Case Brief

Get Legit Law & Sh!t

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 14, 2025 15:38

Watch the full coverage of the live stream on The Emily D. Baker YouTube channel: https://youtube.com/live/Yy9rHg9m4xkBryan Kohberger has signed a factual basis admitting to the burglary and four murders, and a plea agreement for a fixed life sentence without parole or opportunity for reconsideration. This means a life sentence with no possibility of release. He has also waived his right to a fair trial, including the right to confront and cross-examine witnesses. Consequently, the media argues that the non-dissemination order should be lifted, as there is no longer a jury pool to taint or concerns about his right to a fair trial.The prosecution, however, objected to lifting the order. The court initially made a preliminary decision, stating it could be revisited if a reason emerged. The court also noted that no bond was set for the defendant. Bill Thompson emphasized the need for time to provide a full statement, which he claimed was difficult while preparing for sentencing. However, this was deemed not a legal justification, and the media has highlighted that "more time" is insufficient legal grounds to maintain a restrictive non-dissemination or gag order.As of July 10th, more docket entries haven't appeared since the order was filed on July 2nd. There's a possibility the court is backlogged and won't address it until July 23rd, at which point it would become moot and withdrawn.RESOURCESBryan Kohberger Playlist - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsbUyvZas7gKASBczV3CsUx-t5oRAK0caBryan Kohberger Change of Plea Hearing - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TdOt4zAWjp8This podcast uses the following third-party services for analysis: Spotify Ad Analytics - https://www.spotify.com/us/legal/ad-analytics-privacy-policy/Podscribe - https://podscribe.com/privacy

media confessions signed plea lifted gag order bill thompson brian kohberger podscribe

Murder In Moscow: The Media Coalition Requests That The Gag Order Be Lifted Before Sentencing (7/13/25)

media murder cnn idaho fox news true crime moscow coalition abc news first amendment associated press requests cbs news lifted sentencing gag order bryan kohberger

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 14, 2025 9:05

In Case No. CR01-24-31665, a coalition of major news organizations—including ABC News, CNN, CBS News, the Associated Press, Fox News, and others—have filed a memorandum seeking to be heard as interested parties in the criminal proceedings against Bryan C. Kohberger, the defendant charged in connection with the Idaho student murders. The media companies are requesting that the court vacate the existing nondissemination (gag) order, arguing that it violates constitutional protections under the First Amendment and impedes the public's right to access court proceedings and related information. They assert that the order is overly broad, lacks sufficient justification, and unjustifiably restricts press freedom and transparency in a case of significant public interest.The media coalition contends that the gag order infringes upon their ability to report on the case and gather news, including statements from attorneys, law enforcement, and other official sources. They argue that the public has a compelling interest in understanding the judicial process, particularly in a high-profile case involving allegations of multiple homicides. The memorandum emphasizes that any restrictions on speech must be narrowly tailored and based on specific findings, which the current order allegedly lacks. As such, the organizations urge the court to lift the nondissemination order entirely or, at a minimum, modify it to comply with constitutional standards.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - Media Coalition_Kohberger Sealed Records - Ada County - Memo ISO Motion to Vacate Gag Order_July 3(129532455.3)

Murder In Moscow: The Media Coalition Requests That The Gag Order Be Lifted Before Sentencing (7/13/25)

media murder cnn idaho fox news true crime moscow coalition abc news first amendment associated press requests cbs news lifted sentencing gag order bryan kohberger

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 13, 2025 9:05

In Case No. CR01-24-31665, a coalition of major news organizations—including ABC News, CNN, CBS News, the Associated Press, Fox News, and others—have filed a memorandum seeking to be heard as interested parties in the criminal proceedings against Bryan C. Kohberger, the defendant charged in connection with the Idaho student murders. The media companies are requesting that the court vacate the existing nondissemination (gag) order, arguing that it violates constitutional protections under the First Amendment and impedes the public's right to access court proceedings and related information. They assert that the order is overly broad, lacks sufficient justification, and unjustifiably restricts press freedom and transparency in a case of significant public interest.The media coalition contends that the gag order infringes upon their ability to report on the case and gather news, including statements from attorneys, law enforcement, and other official sources. They argue that the public has a compelling interest in understanding the judicial process, particularly in a high-profile case involving allegations of multiple homicides. The memorandum emphasizes that any restrictions on speech must be narrowly tailored and based on specific findings, which the current order allegedly lacks. As such, the organizations urge the court to lift the nondissemination order entirely or, at a minimum, modify it to comply with constitutional standards.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - Media Coalition_Kohberger Sealed Records - Ada County - Memo ISO Motion to Vacate Gag Order_July 3(129532455.3)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Murder In Moscow: The Media Coalition Requests That The Gag Order Be Lifted Before Sentencing (7/13/25)

media murder cnn idaho fox news true crime moscow coalition abc news first amendment associated press requests cbs news lifted sentencing gag order bryan kohberger

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 13, 2025 9:05

In Case No. CR01-24-31665, a coalition of major news organizations—including ABC News, CNN, CBS News, the Associated Press, Fox News, and others—have filed a memorandum seeking to be heard as interested parties in the criminal proceedings against Bryan C. Kohberger, the defendant charged in connection with the Idaho student murders. The media companies are requesting that the court vacate the existing nondissemination (gag) order, arguing that it violates constitutional protections under the First Amendment and impedes the public's right to access court proceedings and related information. They assert that the order is overly broad, lacks sufficient justification, and unjustifiably restricts press freedom and transparency in a case of significant public interest.The media coalition contends that the gag order infringes upon their ability to report on the case and gather news, including statements from attorneys, law enforcement, and other official sources. They argue that the public has a compelling interest in understanding the judicial process, particularly in a high-profile case involving allegations of multiple homicides. The memorandum emphasizes that any restrictions on speech must be narrowly tailored and based on specific findings, which the current order allegedly lacks. As such, the organizations urge the court to lift the nondissemination order entirely or, at a minimum, modify it to comply with constitutional standards.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - Media Coalition_Kohberger Sealed Records - Ada County - Memo ISO Motion to Vacate Gag Order_July 3(129532455.3)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Anne Taylor Blasts The Attempt To Remove The Gag Order

idaho true crime remove blasts gag order bryan kohberger anne taylor

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 13, 2025 10:49

From the archives: 3-5-23Bryan Kohberger's legal team ripped into the attempt by the media to get the gag order removed in new court filings and they made it clear how they felt about any attempt to alter it.In this episode, we take a look at the filing and what, if any, strategy might be in play for the long run by Bryan Kohberger's legal team.(commercial at 7:05)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Bryan Kohberger lawyer blasts 'grotesquely twisted' media coverage of stabbing that killed 4 Idaho students | Fox NewsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

GAG ORDER! "I can't believe you are still talking about that creep." | Ep 606

The Kyle Seraphin Show

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 9, 2025 75:01

Join the Kyle Seraphin Show LIVE 9:30a ET on Rumble, orfind me on Spotify for video replay: https://KyleSeraphinShow.com__________________________________________________Our Sponsors make this program possible:http://patriot-protect.com/KYLE (15% off Protecting yourself from scams/Identity theft)https://PatriotCoolers.com/collections/kyle-seraphin (PROMO KYLE for 10%)

spotify identity protecting rumble creep gag order

The Supreme Court In Idaho Upholds The Bryan Kohberger Gag Order

court supreme court idaho true crime freedom of speech first amendment us constitution gag upholds gag order bryan kohberger

Play Episode Listen Later Jun 30, 2025 10:14

Gag orders, also known as prior restraint orders, are restrictions on speech or the press that are imposed by the government or the courts. The constitutionality of gag orders depends on the specific circumstances of each case and the specific restrictions imposed.In general, the First Amendment of the US Constitution protects freedom of speech and of the press, and restrictions on speech are subject to strict scrutiny by the courts.However, under certain circumstances, the government may impose restrictions on speech in order to protect important interests, such as national security, the integrity of the judicial process, or the privacy rights of individuals.In such cases, the courts will balance the government's interests against the First Amendment rights of the speaker or the press. If the restrictions are deemed to be narrowly tailored and the least restrictive means of achieving the government's interest, they may be upheld as constitutional. However, if the restrictions are overly broad or unnecessarily restrictive, they may be struck down as unconstitutional.In this episode we get the decision from the supreme court who has ruled that the gag order will stay in place.(commercial at 7:22)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Idaho murders: Court denies request to lift gag order in case of Bryan Kohberger, man accused of killing 4 college students - CBS NewsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Mega Edition: The Feds Opposition To Diddy's Motion For List Of Particulars, Gag Order Etc (Part 1-2) (6/28/25)

united states news mega true crime motion opposition sean combs breaking news feds prosecutors combs gag order particulars

Play Episode Listen Later Jun 28, 2025 23:53

In the case of United States v. Sean Combs (24 Cr. 542), federal prosecutors have filed an opposition to the defense's motions requesting a hearing, a bill of particulars, and a gag order. The defense sought a hearing to investigate alleged government leaks of evidence, specifically a 2016 video purportedly showing Combs assaulting his ex-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura. Prosecutors refuted these claims, stating they did not possess the video prior to its public release and had no involvement in its dissemination. They argued that the defense's allegations are baseless and represent a strategic attempt to suppress critical evidence that is highly probative of Combs' alleged criminal conduct.Regarding the request for a bill of particulars, the defense sought detailed information about the charges to prepare for trial. Prosecutors contended that the indictment already provides sufficient detail, outlining the nature of the charges and the alleged criminal activities. They maintained that additional specifics are unnecessary and could compromise ongoing investigations or witness safety. Concerning the motion for a gag order to prevent public statements by potential witnesses and attorneys, prosecutors argued that existing court orders already address these concerns, rendering the defense's request redundant. They emphasized the importance of balancing the defendant's right to a fair trial with the public's right to information, asserting that current measures are adequate to maintain this balance.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:diddy.pdf

Mega Edition: The Feds Opposition To Diddy's Motion For List Of Particulars, Gag Order Etc (Part 3-4) (6/28/25)

united states news mega true crime motion opposition sean combs breaking news feds prosecutors combs gag order particulars

Play Episode Listen Later Jun 28, 2025 40:03

In the case of United States v. Sean Combs (24 Cr. 542), federal prosecutors have filed an opposition to the defense's motions requesting a hearing, a bill of particulars, and a gag order. The defense sought a hearing to investigate alleged government leaks of evidence, specifically a 2016 video purportedly showing Combs assaulting his ex-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura. Prosecutors refuted these claims, stating they did not possess the video prior to its public release and had no involvement in its dissemination. They argued that the defense's allegations are baseless and represent a strategic attempt to suppress critical evidence that is highly probative of Combs' alleged criminal conduct.Regarding the request for a bill of particulars, the defense sought detailed information about the charges to prepare for trial. Prosecutors contended that the indictment already provides sufficient detail, outlining the nature of the charges and the alleged criminal activities. They maintained that additional specifics are unnecessary and could compromise ongoing investigations or witness safety. Concerning the motion for a gag order to prevent public statements by potential witnesses and attorneys, prosecutors argued that existing court orders already address these concerns, rendering the defense's request redundant. They emphasized the importance of balancing the defendant's right to a fair trial with the public's right to information, asserting that current measures are adequate to maintain this balance.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:diddy.pdf

Mega Edition: The Feds Opposition To Diddy's Motion For List Of Particulars, Gag Order Etc (Part 3-5) (6/28/25)

united states news mega true crime motion opposition sean combs breaking news feds prosecutors combs gag order particulars

Play Episode Listen Later Jun 28, 2025 40:03

In the case of United States v. Sean Combs (24 Cr. 542), federal prosecutors have filed an opposition to the defense's motions requesting a hearing, a bill of particulars, and a gag order. The defense sought a hearing to investigate alleged government leaks of evidence, specifically a 2016 video purportedly showing Combs assaulting his ex-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura. Prosecutors refuted these claims, stating they did not possess the video prior to its public release and had no involvement in its dissemination. They argued that the defense's allegations are baseless and represent a strategic attempt to suppress critical evidence that is highly probative of Combs' alleged criminal conduct.Regarding the request for a bill of particulars, the defense sought detailed information about the charges to prepare for trial. Prosecutors contended that the indictment already provides sufficient detail, outlining the nature of the charges and the alleged criminal activities. They maintained that additional specifics are unnecessary and could compromise ongoing investigations or witness safety. Concerning the motion for a gag order to prevent public statements by potential witnesses and attorneys, prosecutors argued that existing court orders already address these concerns, rendering the defense's request redundant. They emphasized the importance of balancing the defendant's right to a fair trial with the public's right to information, asserting that current measures are adequate to maintain this balance.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:diddy.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Mega Edition: The Feds Opposition To Diddy's Motion For List Of Particulars, Gag Order Etc (Part 1-2) (6/27/25)

united states news mega true crime motion opposition sean combs breaking news feds prosecutors combs gag order particulars

Play Episode Listen Later Jun 28, 2025 23:53

In the case of United States v. Sean Combs (24 Cr. 542), federal prosecutors have filed an opposition to the defense's motions requesting a hearing, a bill of particulars, and a gag order. The defense sought a hearing to investigate alleged government leaks of evidence, specifically a 2016 video purportedly showing Combs assaulting his ex-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura. Prosecutors refuted these claims, stating they did not possess the video prior to its public release and had no involvement in its dissemination. They argued that the defense's allegations are baseless and represent a strategic attempt to suppress critical evidence that is highly probative of Combs' alleged criminal conduct.Regarding the request for a bill of particulars, the defense sought detailed information about the charges to prepare for trial. Prosecutors contended that the indictment already provides sufficient detail, outlining the nature of the charges and the alleged criminal activities. They maintained that additional specifics are unnecessary and could compromise ongoing investigations or witness safety. Concerning the motion for a gag order to prevent public statements by potential witnesses and attorneys, prosecutors argued that existing court orders already address these concerns, rendering the defense's request redundant. They emphasized the importance of balancing the defendant's right to a fair trial with the public's right to information, asserting that current measures are adequate to maintain this balance.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:diddy.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Mega Edition: The Feds Opposition To Diddy's Motion For List Of Particulars, Gag Order Etc (Part 3-5) (6/28/25)

united states news mega true crime motion opposition sean combs breaking news feds prosecutors combs gag order particulars

Play Episode Listen Later Jun 28, 2025 40:03

In the case of United States v. Sean Combs (24 Cr. 542), federal prosecutors have filed an opposition to the defense's motions requesting a hearing, a bill of particulars, and a gag order. The defense sought a hearing to investigate alleged government leaks of evidence, specifically a 2016 video purportedly showing Combs assaulting his ex-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura. Prosecutors refuted these claims, stating they did not possess the video prior to its public release and had no involvement in its dissemination. They argued that the defense's allegations are baseless and represent a strategic attempt to suppress critical evidence that is highly probative of Combs' alleged criminal conduct.Regarding the request for a bill of particulars, the defense sought detailed information about the charges to prepare for trial. Prosecutors contended that the indictment already provides sufficient detail, outlining the nature of the charges and the alleged criminal activities. They maintained that additional specifics are unnecessary and could compromise ongoing investigations or witness safety. Concerning the motion for a gag order to prevent public statements by potential witnesses and attorneys, prosecutors argued that existing court orders already address these concerns, rendering the defense's request redundant. They emphasized the importance of balancing the defendant's right to a fair trial with the public's right to information, asserting that current measures are adequate to maintain this balance.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:diddy.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Mega Edition: The Feds Opposition To Diddy's Motion For List Of Particulars, Gag Order Etc (Part 1-2) (6/28/25)

united states news mega true crime motion opposition sean combs breaking news feds prosecutors combs gag order particulars

Play Episode Listen Later Jun 28, 2025 23:53

In the case of United States v. Sean Combs (24 Cr. 542), federal prosecutors have filed an opposition to the defense's motions requesting a hearing, a bill of particulars, and a gag order. The defense sought a hearing to investigate alleged government leaks of evidence, specifically a 2016 video purportedly showing Combs assaulting his ex-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura. Prosecutors refuted these claims, stating they did not possess the video prior to its public release and had no involvement in its dissemination. They argued that the defense's allegations are baseless and represent a strategic attempt to suppress critical evidence that is highly probative of Combs' alleged criminal conduct.Regarding the request for a bill of particulars, the defense sought detailed information about the charges to prepare for trial. Prosecutors contended that the indictment already provides sufficient detail, outlining the nature of the charges and the alleged criminal activities. They maintained that additional specifics are unnecessary and could compromise ongoing investigations or witness safety. Concerning the motion for a gag order to prevent public statements by potential witnesses and attorneys, prosecutors argued that existing court orders already address these concerns, rendering the defense's request redundant. They emphasized the importance of balancing the defendant's right to a fair trial with the public's right to information, asserting that current measures are adequate to maintain this balance.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:diddy.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Diddy's Legal Team And The Full Court Press For A Gag Order

news true crime sean combs breaking news combs sean diddy combs gag order legal team full court press

Play Episode Listen Later Jun 21, 2025 12:19

On November 3, 2024, Sean "Diddy" Combs' legal team submitted a letter to the federal judge overseeing his case, urgently requesting the implementation of a gag order. This plea was prompted by recent public statements from Courtney Burgess, a grand jury witness, who claimed to possess videos allegedly depicting Combs in compromising situations. Combs' attorneys argue that such statements have led to a "deluge of improper pretrial publicity," jeopardizing his right to a fair trial and undermining the integrity of the grand jury proceedings.In this episode, we dive into the latest developments and see where things stand.(commercial at 8:15)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Diddy makes shock attempt to silence grand jury witness who made bombshell claims about rapper's 'freak-off' parties | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Diddy's Legal Team And The Full Court Press For A Gag Order

news true crime sean combs breaking news combs sean diddy combs gag order legal team full court press daily mail online

Play Episode Listen Later Jun 20, 2025 12:19

On November 3, 2024, Sean "Diddy" Combs' legal team submitted a letter to the federal judge overseeing his case, urgently requesting the implementation of a gag order. This plea was prompted by recent public statements from Courtney Burgess, a grand jury witness, who claimed to possess videos allegedly depicting Combs in compromising situations. Combs' attorneys argue that such statements have led to a "deluge of improper pretrial publicity," jeopardizing his right to a fair trial and undermining the integrity of the grand jury proceedings.In this episode, we dive into the latest developments and see where things stand.(commercial at 8:15)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Diddy makes shock attempt to silence grand jury witness who made bombshell claims about rapper's 'freak-off' parties | Daily Mail Online

Judge Subramanian Makes A Ruling On First The Gag Order Request

news judge true crime sean combs breaking news ruling gag order subramanian

Play Episode Listen Later Jun 11, 2025 12:29

In case 24-cr-542 (AS), Judge Arun Subramanian issued an order addressing pretrial matters in the prosecution of Sean Combs. The order reaffirms the need to maintain the integrity of the trial process, particularly in light of media coverage and the high-profile nature of the case. Judge Subramanian emphasized that both parties must adhere strictly to court rules, ensuring that public statements and information sharing do not jeopardize the fairness of the proceedings.The order also outlines the implementation of specific measures, such as restricted access to certain documents and a potential gag order to limit public comments from attorneys and witnesses. Judge Subramanian notes that these measures are necessary to prevent undue influence on potential jurors and to maintain a balanced judicial process. Further hearings and motions related to this order are expected to be scheduled as the case progresses.(commercial at 8:10)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.50.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Prosecutors And Diddy Plead Their Case For A Gag Order