My Crazy Family | A Podcast of Crazy Family Stories

The full conversation with psychotherapist Shavaun Scott on the Mica Miller case. JP Miller met Mica when she was a child and allegedly built a world around her where her marriage, her income, her friendships, and her faith all ran through one man. When she tried to call for help, he allegedly told police she was mentally ill. When she tried to leave, she was dead in 48 hours.Scott names the clinical mechanisms at every stage: calculated targeting, spiritual enmeshment, pathologizing, ambient terror, narcissistic injury, and the concept of psychological homicide. She also addresses JP's rapid remarriage to a parishioner whose wheelchair-bound husband had drowned — and what that pattern tells a clinician.JP has pleaded not guilty to federal cyberstalking. Trial is October 2026. He has not been charged in Mica's death.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#MicaMiller #JPMiller #DeathOfThePastorsWife #ShavaunScott #SolidRockChurch #CoerciveControl #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #Netflix #PsychologicalHomicide

Mica Miller died two days after serving JP Miller with divorce papers. Clinical research identifies that window as the single most dangerous period in any coercive relationship. Psychotherapist Shavaun Scott explains the mechanism — what happens inside an abuser when control is taken away — and walks the audience through a concept most people have never heard: psychological homicide.A year after Mica's death, JP married Suzie Skinner, a woman from his church whose wheelchair-bound husband had drowned in a community pool in 2021. Scott addresses the pattern: what a rapid replacement reveals about personality traits the audience is watching play out in real time.Mica's death was ruled a suicide. JP has not been charged in connection with it. He has pleaded not guilty to federal cyberstalking. Trial is October 2026.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#MicaMiller #JPMiller #DeathOfThePastorsWife #ShavaunScott #SuzieSkinner #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #Netflix #PsychologicalHomicide #CoerciveControl

In February 2024, Mica walked out of a hospital she says JP had her committed to against her will. Her purse was gone. Her car keys were gone. Her car was gone. JP had collected them while she was admitted and told officers he was preventing overspending. When she reported the car stolen, an officer contacted JP, who said Mica suffered from mental disorders.Psychotherapist Shavaun Scott identifies the mechanism at work: a coercive controller creates the crisis, then presents himself as the reasonable party managing it. Scott walks through how that tactic turns law enforcement into an unwitting extension of the control — and what it does to a woman's capacity to trust her own perception of reality when the people she calls for help believe the person she's calling about.JP has pleaded not guilty to federal cyberstalking. Trial is October 2026.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#MicaMiller #JPMiller #DeathOfThePastorsWife #ShavaunScott #CoerciveControl #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #Netflix #MicasLaw #CyberstalkerPastor

Why did JP Miller officiate Mica's first wedding when she was 18? The documentary Death of the Pastor's Wife puts that detail into a timeline that stretches from Mica's childhood through her death: pastor, officiant, employer, affair partner, husband. Every milestone of her adult life was allegedly orchestrated by the same man who held spiritual authority over her family's church.Psychotherapist Shavaun Scott, author of Nightbird, sits down to walk through what that pattern clinically represents — how a figure in religious authority can use faith itself as a tool of control, and why women who grew up inside that dynamic often don't recognize what's happening until it's too late.JP has pleaded not guilty to federal cyberstalking. He has not been charged in Mica's death. Trial is October 2026.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#MicaMiller #JPMiller #DeathOfThePastorsWife #ShavaunScott #SolidRockChurch #CoerciveControl #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #Netflix #SpiritualAbuse

Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta sat inside Plymouth Superior Court for every day of Lindsay Clancy's five-week murder trial. He joins Tony Brueski for the full three-part conversation — the courtroom experience the cameras could not show, the prosecution's premeditation evidence versus the defense's medication argument, and what Lindsay's future holds regardless of the verdict.Bob describes what the room felt like during the worst testimony — the jury's nine mothers watching the prosecution describe how each child died, the families splitting the gallery, and the moment the energy shifted. He walks through ADA Jennifer Sprague's argument that the CVS run proves planning and Kevin Reddington's response that organized behavior and psychosis coexist every day.Lindsay was prescribed over a dozen psychiatric medications in months by providers who were not coordinating her care. She documented her symptoms. She sought help. The prosecution called it a cover story. The defense called it a system that destroyed a mother. Bob examines which argument landed in the room.He closes with the Andrea Yates precedent — twenty years committed — and what Lindsay's life inside Tewksbury Hospital looks like now. Paralyzed, medicated, locked in since 2023. The five verdict options the jury had for each child all lead to the same place: a locked building.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #BobMotta #TrueCrime #PostpartumPsychosis #InsanityDefense #HiddenKillers #PatrickClancy #MurderTrial #DefenseDiaries

Lindsay Clancy has been inside Tewksbury Hospital since 2023. She is paralyzed from the waist down. She takes psychotropic medications daily. A not-guilty verdict in her case does not open a door. It locks a different one. Massachusetts allows the state to petition for commitment to a secure psychiatric facility — six months initially, renewable every year, no cap.Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta was in the courtroom for the full five-week trial. He joins Tony Brueski to explain what commitment looks like compared to prison, what the annual evaluation process involves, and whether any realistic path exists for Lindsay to be deemed restored and released. He walks through the five verdict options the jury had for each of Lindsay's three children and what each outcome means for the rest of her life.Andrea Yates was found not guilty by reason of insanity in 2006. She has been committed for over twenty years. She has never been released. Bob addresses whether that precedent tells us anything about Lindsay's trajectory.He also addresses what the jurors as parents had to set aside to reach a verdict. The photographs. The autopsy evidence. The 911 call. Whether regular people can separate grief from legal analysis when three children are dead. Both sides agreed Lindsay was mentally ill. The fight was over whether that illness made her unable to control her actions.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #InsanityDefense #LindsayClancyTrial #TrueCrime #BobMotta #AndreaYates #HiddenKillers #CriminalJustice #MurderTrial #JuryDeliberation

Lindsay Clancy sent Patrick to pick up dinner and a prescription from CVS. The prosecution called the timing deliberate — she created a twenty-minute window and used every second of it. She brought each of her three children to the basement and strangled them with exercise bands. The state argued that level of organized behavior is incompatible with psychosis.The defense argued the opposite. Kevin Reddington told the jury that mothers in psychiatric crisis manage routines every day. They order food, pick up prescriptions, care for children, and hold conversations — all while their brains are in freefall. Organized behavior does not rule out psychosis. Hospitals see it constantly.Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta was inside Plymouth Superior Court for the full trial. He joins Tony Brueski to evaluate the prosecution's strongest evidence of premeditation — the CVS run, the phone call Lindsay made after the killings, and the state's three rebuttal experts who testified she was not psychotic. Bob also examines the defense's medication cascade: over a dozen prescriptions in months from providers who were not coordinating her care.Lindsay documented her symptoms. She sought help repeatedly. She told her doctors she was having intrusive thoughts about harming her children. The prosecution used that treatment history against her. Bob explains how both arguments played in the room.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodCheck out Robin Dreeke's Master Class https://www.masterclass.com/classes/become-the-person-everyone-trustsThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #PostpartumPsychosis #LindsayClancyTrial #TrueCrime #BobMotta #MaternalMentalHealth #HiddenKillers #MurderTrial #KevinReddington #CriminalJustice

Headlines and courtroom photos built one version of Lindsay Clancy. Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta sat feet from her for the full five-week trial at Plymouth Superior Court and saw another. The distance between the media image and the woman in the courtroom is the subject of this conversation.Bob joins Tony Brueski to describe what Lindsay looked like in person — her physical condition, her demeanor during different phases of testimony, and the moments when her composure broke. Lindsay is paralyzed from the waist down after her suicide attempt on January 24, 2023. She has been at Tewksbury Hospital since then. Seeing her in person, in a courtroom, feet from the families of her three dead children, was a different experience than watching the broadcast.Bob also describes what the jury's nine mothers looked like during the worst testimony — the autopsy evidence, the 911 call, and the prosecution's closing argument about how each child died. He walks through the gallery's response, the family tensions visible only from inside the room, and the specific moment when the entire courtroom's energy shifted.What the camera showed was testimony. What the room held was grief, tension, and the weight of three children who are never coming home.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #BobMotta #TrueCrime #PlymouthCourt #PostpartumPsychosis #HiddenKillers #MurderTrial #DefenseDiaries #Courtroom

Broken toys. That is what the prosecutor called the three children Lindsay Clancy left on the basement floor. Defense attorney Kevin Reddington held up a honeymoon wish jar and thirteen medications and called this prosecution the thing that ripped the soul out of a woman who never did anything wrong.Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer joins Tony Brueski live for a three-part interview as the jury deliberates. They see this case very differently and cover how the prosecution landed, how the defense landed, and what could happen next.The prosecution's own expert called the killings out of love. The defense's expert called Clancy a puppet controlled by command hallucinations. The voice she described appeared once, lasted eighteen minutes, and stopped the moment the children were dead.Nine women and three men have five verdict options at Plymouth Superior Court. Three and a half hours of deliberation on day one produced no verdict. The judge added manslaughter at the defense's request — up to twenty years instead of life.Patrick Clancy's wrongful death lawsuit against Lindsay's providers is already filed.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #HiddenKillers #JenniferCoffindaffer #TrueCrime #PostpartumPsychosis #VerdictWatch #ClosingArguments #HKLive #MaternalMentalHealth

Nine women and three men walked into the deliberation room at Plymouth Superior Court. Three and a half hours on day one. No verdict. Five options on those slips — first-degree murder, second-degree, manslaughter, not criminally responsible, or not guilty.Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer joins Tony Brueski live as the jury deliberates. They disagree on this case and dig into what could happen next. Can nine women convict a mother in a postpartum psychosis case? Is manslaughter the jury's way out? What happens if they cannot reach a unanimous verdict?First-degree murder means life without parole. Not criminally responsible means commitment to a psychiatric facility with periodic reviews. The judge explained that even an NCR finding does not mean Clancy goes free — prosecutors can petition for commitment, and the person is evaluated periodically.Patrick Clancy's wrongful death lawsuit against Lindsay's providers is already filed. Thirteen medications from providers who never compared notes.Andrea Yates received the NCR verdict twenty years ago. She is still in a state hospital. Every mother watching this case is watching those nine women right now.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #HiddenKillers #JenniferCoffindaffer #TrueCrime #PostpartumPsychosis #VerdictWatch #JuryDeliberations #HKLive #MaternalMentalHealth

Lindsay Clancy described a male voice that appeared for the first time on the afternoon of January 24, 2023. The voice commanded her to kill her children and then kill herself. It lasted roughly eighteen minutes. It stopped the moment the children were dead. She has never reported hearing it again.The prosecution's forensic psychiatrist Gregory Saathoff called that onset-and-vanish pattern clinically unusual. Defense experts Paul Zeizel and Phillip Resnick both testified the voice was consistent with postpartum psychosis. Resnick said Clancy was a puppet controlled by an external force and that she genuinely believed killing the children was protecting them.Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer joins Tony Brueski live as the jury deliberates. They disagree on this case and dig into the defense's evidence — the voice, the thirteen medications, the journal entries, the chaplain who testified Clancy said she was glad her children were safe.Reddington's closing attacked the medications, the providers who never coordinated care, and the prosecution for building a case against a woman whose brain was under chemical siege.Nine women and three men are deliberating. Five verdict options sit on those slips.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #HiddenKillers #JenniferCoffindaffer #TrueCrime #PostpartumPsychosis #VerdictWatch #CommandHallucination #HKLive #JuryDeliberations

The prosecution's own forensic psychologist Kirk Heilbrun told the jury Lindsay Clancy killed her children out of love — a serious suicide attempt where she could not bear to leave them behind. Heilbrun said she was criminally responsible, but his characterization of the motive cut against the prosecution's theory of premeditated cruelty.Forensic psychiatrist Gregory Saathoff, also testifying for the prosecution, agreed under questioning that the state's opening statement minimized what Clancy had been going through. Saathoff found what he called significant inconsistencies in Clancy's account of the voice she says commanded the killings.Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer joins Tony Brueski live as the jury deliberates. They disagree on this case and dig into whether the prosecution can convict when its own experts softened the case on the stand.Assistant District Attorney Jennifer Sprague told the jury Clancy planned it — mapped the distance to the restaurant, added the CVS stop, calculated the window. Sprague called the children protective factors Clancy removed so she could end her own life.Nine women and three men have five verdict options. They deliberated three and a half hours on day one.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #HiddenKillers #JenniferCoffindaffer #TrueCrime #PostpartumPsychosis #VerdictWatch #ClosingArguments #HKLive #MaternalMentalHealth

Criminal defense trial attorney Bob Motta sat inside Plymouth Superior Court for every day of Lindsay Clancy's murder trial. He watched the prosecution argue choice, the defense argue psychosis, and the jury receive five verdict options for each of three children.Bob joins Tony Brueski for the full three-part conversation: how the closing arguments landed, whether the jury was moved, and what happens next — including the conspiracy blaming Patrick and the malpractice lawsuits filed by both sides.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #TrueCrime #PostpartumPsychosis #BobMotta #PatrickClancy #InsanityDefense #HiddenKillers #CriminalJustice #MurderTrial

Thousands of people online are accusing Patrick Clancy of murdering his own children. Surveillance footage places him outside the home. Lindsay admitted she did it. The defense's entire case depends on her having done it during a psychotic break.Criminal defense trial attorney Bob Motta was inside Plymouth Superior Court. He watched Patrick testify. He joins Tony Brueski to address the conspiracy directly, explain whether Patrick has legal recourse, and break down what happens to Lindsay regardless of the verdict.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #PatrickClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #TrueCrime #ConspiracyTheory #PostpartumPsychosis #BobMotta #HiddenKillers #MedicalMalpractice #TrueCrimeCommunity

The defense in Lindsay Clancy's murder trial argued that her medical providers prescribed medication after medication without talking to each other. Kevin Reddington showed the jury her journal entries from December 2022 — the handwriting falling apart, the mind deteriorating a month before the killings.Criminal defense trial attorney Bob Motta was in the courtroom. He joins Tony Brueski to evaluate whether the defense proved overmedication caused a psychotic break — and whether the Resnick testimony carried the weight Reddington needed.END LINKSListen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #KevinReddington #InsanityDefense #TrueCrime #PostpartumPsychosis #LindsayClancyTrial #BobMotta #HiddenKillers #CriminalDefense #MurderTrial

The prosecution in Lindsay Clancy's murder trial told a jury of nine women and three men that Lindsay knew exactly what she was doing when she killed her three children. ADA Jennifer Sprague argued Lindsay sent Patrick away, chose the basement, and repeated the same method three times.Criminal defense trial attorney Bob Motta was inside Plymouth Superior Court. He joins Tony Brueski to assess whether the prosecution met its burden and how the jury responded to the state's case.END LINKSListen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #ClosingArguments #TrueCrime #PostpartumPsychosis #PlymouthCourt #BobMotta #HiddenKillers #MurderTrial #CriminalJustice

Shanna Gardner's trial was supposed to start this week. Then Mario Fernandez's conviction blew a hole in the timeline. Fernandez was found guilty of first-degree murder and solicitation for killing Jared Bridegan — a plot prosecutors say Gardner set in motion. The jury deliberated less than four hours and Fernandez is facing life without parole. But one day after that verdict, prosecutors filed two new felony charges against him, both involving children and both unrelated to Bridegan's death. That's what pushed Judge London Kite to grant Gardner's defense a continuance, moving jury selection to May 2027. Her attorneys say they need time to investigate whether the new allegations point to a motive of Fernandez's own — something that could reshape the entire narrative around who wanted Bridegan dead and why. Fernandez had already told police the twins were "better off" with Bridegan "out of the picture," a line that predates the new charges considerably. The delay doesn't touch the evidence prosecutors already have against Gardner directly: her own text messages. One exchange has a friend describing a search for someone who "performs permanent disappearing acts on certain people." A detective testified the plan traces to 2015. Gardner faces murder, conspiracy, solicitation, and a fourth charge tied to her children. Her attorney is Jose Baez — the lawyer who got Casey Anthony acquitted — and he's already fighting the state over how it's characterizing the evidence. The jury pool has been doubled to 500 people. May 2027 is the new date. Whether it holds is another question entirely. LINKS Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/  Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/  Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod  X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod DISCLAIMER This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. HASHTAGS #JaredBridegan #ShannaGardner #MarioFernandez #HiddenKillersLive #TrueCrime #JoseBaez #BrideganTrial #JacksonvilleBeach #MurderForHire #HenryTenon 

Two verdicts. Neither one lets Lindsay Clancy go home — and defense attorney Eric Faddis is here to explain why, with the case law laid out in full. If this jury goes with not guilty by reason of lack of criminal responsibility, Massachusetts still holds her: up to forty days of observation first, then a civil commitment petition with no expiration date attached. Faddis points to Andrea Yates as the template — found not guilty by reason of insanity in Texas back in 2006, and still inside a state hospital today, turning down her release hearing year after year. If the jury convicts on first-degree murder instead, there's no sentencing debate to watch. The penalty is automatic — life without parole — and the verdict triggers a mandatory appeal straight to the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, one that has to reckon with every psychiatric expert both sides put on the stand. Faddis breaks down the option jurors have that most people watching don't know exists: second-degree murder, the only verdict on that slip that comes with eventual parole eligibility. He also gets into what a successful appeal would even need to argue, and how rarely a life-without-parole sentence actually gets undone. None of this happens in the abstract. Clancy has been paralyzed from the waist down and on suicide watch since January 2023, currently held at Tewksbury Hospital under court order. A guilty verdict means moving that care and that body into the corrections system — one Faddis says isn't built for what her situation requires. Two verdict slips. Two entirely different rest-of-her-life sentences. Faddis breaks down both. Links: Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod Legal Disclaimer: This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. Hashtags: #LindsayClancy #EricFaddis #HiddenKillersLive #LindsayClancyTrial #PostpartumPsychosis #CriminalResponsibility #MassachusettsMurder #TrueCrime #TrueCrimePodcast #AndreaYates 

Twenty-five witnesses. Eight days. And the prosecution's last move in the Keffe D murder trial was letting the jury hear Duane Davis talk in his own voice — from jail. This recap combines Wednesday's and Thursday's testimony into the full picture of where the case against Davis stands heading into its final stretch. Testimony opened with retired Compton gang detective Robert Ladd, who worked the department's gang unit for years and tracked the South Side Compton Crips closely enough to tell the jury the exact rank Davis held inside the organization — and what that rank meant for who called the shots. The defense has argued Davis invented his role in the shooting entirely, for money. Then Tupac's childhood friend Malcolm Greenidge took the stand, describing where the gunfire came from that night and what Tupac was building in his final weeks: a label, a new album, a meeting already set with Quincy Jones. Crime scene analysts followed with an inventory of what a 2023 search of Davis's Henderson home produced, including his own book and newspaper clippings about the murder that had reportedly been kept for decades. Then prosecutors closed the door with the jail calls. Davis on a recorded line, frustrated that his own words were being turned into evidence. Davis on YouTube, calling his book "the real truth." And a separate call where the way Davis talked about Tupac lines up with the motive prosecutors have been building toward the whole trial. Next up: the defense calls its own witnesses, starting with a detective and two police officers. Closing arguments are set for Monday, and Davis has an overnight decision to make about whether he takes the stand in his own defense. Links & Legal: Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. Hashtags: #TupacShakur #KeffeD #HiddenKillers #TupacTrial #DuaneDavis #2Pac #TrueCrime #LasVegas #DeathRowRecords #JusticeForTupac 

If this jury convicts Lindsay Clancy, her life sentence starts at age thirty-six, with no parole, ever. Psychotherapist Shavaun Scott joins Tony Brueski to explain exactly what that number means for a woman who is paralyzed from the chest down and has been under constant watch since January 2023. For three and a half years, everyone around Lindsay has existed to keep her alive and treat her illness. Conviction flips that mission entirely. Shavaun breaks down what it means to go from patient to inmate, and why that transition hits harder for someone in her physical condition than for almost anyone else facing sentencing this year. The Department of Justice has already investigated Massachusetts prisons for isolating suicidal inmates in bare cells for months at a time, and a paralyzed woman with a documented history of self-harm would enter that system with no way to physically defend herself. None of it happens in a vacuum. The defense has rested on a record that includes a psychiatrist visit the day before the killings, a five-day inpatient stay at McLean that ended nineteen days before, and testimony from Dr. Phillip Resnick, who also examined Andrea Yates, that Lindsay was following a command voice. Prosecutors counter with Dr. Avram Mack, who says she could tell right from wrong, and Lindsay's own words to her children during the killings, which the defense argues sit alongside very different words she gave a chaplain and a second doctor in the months that followed. Shavaun and Tony take on the argument splitting the audience in half: does she pay with her life, or does a cell become just another kind of sentence for an illness nobody in this courtroom actually disputes she has. Links & Legal Footer: Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. Hashtags: #LindsayClancy #ShavaunScott #HiddenKillersLive #LindsayClancyTrial #PostpartumPsychosis #PrisonSystem #InsanityDefense #Massachusetts #TrueCrime #MurderTrial 

The theory floating around Lindsay Clancy's trial says she invented the voice she heard for a malpractice lawsuit filed in January 2026. Hospital chaplain Sheila Cavanaugh testified Clancy told her about that same voice in the first week of her hospitalization, in January 2023, three years before any lawsuit existed. Cavanaugh has visited her roughly two hundred times since. The timeline matters because of who else heard the same story. The prosecution's own psychiatrist, Dr. Avram Mack, called by the Commonwealth to argue Clancy was responsible for her actions, testified she described a male, laughing voice telling her it was her last chance. Mack's first interview with her didn't happen until April 2026, more than three years after the killings, well after Dr. Phillip Resnick's three-hour evaluation four months out and Dr. Paul Zeizel's roughly sixty sessions with her. Both Resnick and Zeizel diagnosed bipolar disorder with postpartum psychosis. Mack says there's no evidence of mania, and that Clancy isn't convinced she's bipolar at all. None of this started in a courtroom. Lindsay told her family in December 2022 that she'd had thoughts of harming the kids. They got her admitted to McLean Hospital, which sent her home as low risk nineteen days before the deaths, and her outpatient providers already knew about those thoughts too. She's pleaded not guilty on three counts of murder on the ground that she wasn't criminally responsible, and prosecutors allege planning and a faked suicide attempt. She's admitted she did it. What she was when she did it is the only question left for the jury. Tony Brueski and a guest lay the lawsuit theory next to the actual dates, and let the timeline speak for itself. Links & Legal Footer: Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. Hashtags: #LindsayClancy #SheilaCavanaugh #HiddenKillersLive #LindsayClancyTrial #PostpartumPsychosis #InsanityDefense #AvramMack #MentalHealth #TrueCrime #Duxbury 

Some of the loudest voices analyzing Patrick Clancy online describe themselves as former FBI profilers. They aren't. That's just one of five claims circulating in the comments of this trial that don't survive contact with the actual record, and this segment checks every one against sworn testimony. Start with the line everyone's arguing about. Nurse practitioner Rebecca Jollotta testified she raised bipolar disorder with the couple weeks before the killings, and Patrick answered her in five words. What he said next has been read as denial by some commenters and as an uneducated husband by others, and the experts who examined Lindsay afterward landed somewhere neither side expected. Then there's the timeline commenters cite as proof Patrick moved on too fast: Manhattan four months after the funerals, a new job at Microsoft, a divorce filed in February 2024, a relationship with Dr. Rachel Danis that same month, and a wedding in Central Park this April, three years and three months after his children died. He was never a suspect. He was never charged. He testified for the prosecution across two days with his movements documented on video. Andrea Yates' husband Rusty reached out to Patrick during this trial, one of the only people alive who understands what he's living through, and warned him about a kind of public scrutiny his own case, twenty-five years ago, never had to survive. Patrick's new wife has already received death threats over claims his attorneys call defamatory, aimed at a man both sides of the courtroom agree did nothing but come home to catastrophe. Five comments, five answers pulled straight from testimony, not speculation, and a reminder of what's actually at stake for a man who isn't even on trial. Links & Legal Footer: Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. Hashtags: #PatrickClancy #RustyYates #HiddenKillersLive #LindsayClancyTrial #LindsayClancy #PostpartumPsychosis #Duxbury #TrueCrime #MentalHealth #TrueCrimeCommunity 

Duane "Keffe D" Davis has told this story to cops, to cameras, and now to a jury — and depending on the day, the target changes. This is the combined recap of Monday's and Tuesday's testimony, Day 5 and Day 6, in the Tupac Shakur murder trial in Las Vegas. Monday's exhibit was a 2009 police interview: Davis describing a hunt for Tupac that started outside Club 662, a .40 Glock pulled from a hidden compartment in the car, and his nephew Orlando Anderson firing the shots — while Davis insists, on tape, that Suge Knight was the actual target that night. Jurors also heard from the photographer who took Tupac's last photo alive, and from a BET director who testified Davis got paid for interviews where he called himself the only man left who could tell the real story — interviews built partly on a sealed police recording that reached production through consultants tied to the original investigation. Tuesday's tape moves the story forward: a 2017 recording where Davis claims Sean "Puffy" Combs wanted Suge Knight "taken care of," and says he tried reaching Combs after the shooting with no response. The defense pushed back hard on letting the jury hear it. The judge let it in. And when the moment came for Davis to say something to Tupac's family, he didn't take it. Combs has denied any role in Tupac's death and has never faced charges. Davis remains the only person charged in the 1996 killing. Two days of tape, one story that keeps shifting. Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. Hashtags #TupacShakur #KeffeD #HiddenKillersLive #TupacMurderTrial #DuaneDavis #SugeKnight #OrlandoAnderson #TrueCrime #LasVegas #SeanCombs 

One commenter on this channel insisted a labor and delivery nurse would never search for the carotid artery, treating it as proof Lindsay Clancy was researching how to hurt her children. That search is real. It's on her phone. Defense attorney Kevin Reddington showed it to the jury himself, to prove the opposite: that she was researching how to end her own life. This trial has generated its own parallel record online, and this segment checks it line by line against sworn testimony. The rope-on-the-door theory doesn't exist in the trial record at all. What does exist: Patrick came home to a silent house, found the bedroom door locked, and testified that's when he knew something was wrong. The prosecution's rebuttal psychiatrist, Dr. Avram Mack, testified Lindsay told him she never locked that door. The exercise bands investigators collected were in the basement with a laptop, nowhere near the bedroom. The blood found outside her window came from her own fall, and the bloodstain analyst called those marks transfer stains, with the only real dispute between attorneys being whether she jumped or slid. Patrick's own timeline that night is documented on two surveillance cameras and a phone log, and Lindsay's defense has never once challenged it. On the 911 call itself, Lindsay told Patrick she'd tried to end her own life and that the kids were in the basement. Her own lawyer isn't blaming Patrick for anything, and the theories that keep circulating about him don't hold up against a timeline nobody in that courtroom disputes. Five popular theories, checked against the actual record, one at a time. Decide what you want about Lindsay Clancy, but decide it on the record. Links & Legal Footer: Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. Hashtags: #LindsayClancy #KevinReddington #HiddenKillersLive #LindsayClancyTrial #PostpartumPsychosis #PatrickClancy #InsanityDefense #TrueCrime #Duxbury #MurderTrial 

Every six months, for as long as the state wants, prosecutors could ask a judge to keep Lindsay Clancy locked inside a hospital instead of a prison. That's the mechanism waiting behind whatever verdict comes out of Plymouth Superior Court, and it's the part almost nobody watching this trial has actually thought through. Massachusetts law follows an insanity acquittal with a forty-day observation window, then commitment petitions that renew in six-month blocks with no ceiling on how many times the state can file. Getting released means convincing a judge Lindsay is no longer mentally ill or dangerous, while carrying a diagnosis her own defense told the jury she'll be managing for the rest of her life. Andrea Yates, acquitted by reason of insanity back in 2006, is still inside a Texas state facility today. That's the closest precedent this case has. It matters more given what jurors have already sat through. The prosecution opened by calling Lindsay "controlling, meticulous, and manipulative" and claiming she faked a suicide attempt, despite the fact that she's paralyzed from the waist down after cutting her own wrists and neck and jumping from a second-story window. During autopsy testimony for eight-month-old Callan, she sobbed hard enough that the judge called a recess. The next morning brought accusations of a hot mic catching someone on the prosecution's side saying "shut her up," which the DA's office disputes. Dueling experts have already left this jury with two incompatible diagnoses, and whichever one wins the verdict will control her treatment, her medication, and her odds of ever walking out of that facility. Psychotherapist Shavaun Scott joins Tony Brueski to lay out exactly how long "not guilty" can actually keep someone confined, and why the number most people assume is nowhere close to the one the law actually allows. Links & Legal Footer: Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. Hashtags: #LindsayClancy #AndreaYates #HiddenKillersLive #LindsayClancyTrial #InsanityDefense #Massachusetts #MentalHealth #CivilCommitment #TrueCrime #PlymouthSuperiorCourt 

Nolan Wells' family says they've offered the district attorney four different dates, on twelve hours' notice, to forensically examine his phone. Seven weeks after Nolan died on Horn Island, Mississippi, no exam has happened. The phone came off the island with Nolan's friends and has been with his family since the first days after his death. Before any official protocol existed, his mother and her sister opened it themselves and went through both of his Snapchat accounts. They were completely empty. On July 15, the family's legal team and District Attorney Angel Myers McIlrath agreed on paper to a joint exam at the Digital Forensics Lab at Mississippi Gulf Coast Community College, both sides' experts included, possibly the FBI too. No date got set. Then the DA's office sent a letter demanding the phone within 48 hours, while Nolan's parents were nowhere near Mississippi. Five days later, the family came back with four separate dates and twelve hours' notice each. Still nothing. Compare that to the three friends who were with Nolan that weekend: they handed their own phones straight to the FBI, no subpoena, no ultimatum, no back-and-forth. The family is asking for one thing before they do the same, a written chain-of-custody protocol that protects what's actually on that device. Forensic examiners say deleted messages can often be pulled from a phone like Nolan's, but the apps themselves purge data from their servers over time, and every week this drags on shrinks that window a little more. No one has been charged. The friends deny touching anything. The family has already subpoenaed Snapchat, Meta, TikTok, WhatsApp, and Life360 for the server-side records the phone alone can't provide. Tony Brueski walks through the paper trail, who offered what, who ignored it, and why a family that's tried this hard to cooperate is still holding a phone nobody official has opened. Links & Legal Footer: Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. Hashtags: #NolanWells #AngelMyersMcIlrath #HiddenKillersLive #HornIsland #Mississippi #ChainOfCustody #DigitalForensics #JusticeForNolan #TrueCrime #NolanWellsPhone 

Three verdicts. Three completely different futures. Lindsay Clancy's jury begins deliberations after closing arguments Thursday, and the outcome determines whether she spends the rest of her life in a prison, a psychiatric hospital, or back in a courtroom for a second trial.Eric Faddis sits down to walk through every scenario. He covers the jury room first — the Massachusetts legal standard that puts the burden on the prosecution, the two-prong test for criminal responsibility, and why the prosecution's own expert acknowledging severe mental illness matters under a standard that says mental disease or defect without requiring a specific diagnosis.If the jury acquits, Clancy enters a commitment process with no end date. Under Massachusetts law, the state can petition for involuntary commitment after 40 days of observation. Andrea Yates has been in a state hospital for twenty years after a similar verdict. Periodic review hearings require the state to prove Clancy remains mentally ill and dangerous. Reddington continues to represent her through those hearings.If the jury convicts on first-degree murder, the sentence is mandatory life without parole. Clancy transfers from Tewksbury Hospital to the corrections system — a paralyzed woman on 24-hour suicide watch moving from a treatment facility to a prison. The conviction goes to the SJC on automatic appeal with the full trial record, including the rejected mental health evidence.If the jury deadlocks, a mistrial is declared. The Karen Read jury deliberated 23 hours across five days and could not reach agreement even after Tuey-Rodriguez instructions.Faddis covers the mechanics of each outcome and what the legal fight looks like for Reddington after every possible verdict.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #HiddenKillers #JuryDeliberation #NotGuiltyInsanity #LifeWithoutParole #PostpartumPsychosis #CriminalAppeal #TrueCrimePodcast #TrueCrime

A first-degree murder conviction does not end the case for Lindsay Clancy or for Kevin Reddington. It changes the fight. The sentence is automatic — life without parole — but the legal work that follows could take years.Eric Faddis sits down to explain the roads available after a guilty verdict. Massachusetts automatically sends every first-degree murder conviction to the Supreme Judicial Court for review. The SJC examines the trial record for legal errors — evidentiary rulings, jury instructions, constitutional issues. That record contains everything the jury heard, including the competing psychiatric testimony and the medical records that formed the basis of the insanity defense. Faddis explains whether that evidence, rejected by the jury, can become the foundation of an appellate argument.The physical reality of Clancy's situation adds another layer. She has been at Tewksbury Hospital since May 2023, paralyzed and on 24-hour suicide watch. A conviction means she transfers from a medical setting to a corrections facility. That handoff involves moving a paraplegic patient on continuous suicide watch into a system built for a different purpose. Faddis covers how that process works and what an attorney can push for on behalf of a client inside the prison system.The jury also has the option of finding Clancy guilty of second-degree murder, which carries life with eventual parole eligibility. Faddis breaks down how a jury lands on second degree when the defense never argued she did not kill her children.Outside of a successful appeal, the only other path out of a first-degree sentence is executive commutation. Massachusetts governors have granted commutations for first-degree murder a handful of times in decades.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #HiddenKillers #FirstDegreeMurder #LifeSentence #CriminalAppeal #PostpartumPsychosis #PrisonSystem #TrueCrimePodcast #TrueCrime

A not-guilty verdict in Lindsay Clancy's trial does not result in her walking out of a courthouse. It results in a commitment hearing — and possibly a lifetime inside a psychiatric facility with no statutory release date.Eric Faddis sits down to explain what that path actually looks like. Under Massachusetts law, the court can order 40 days of hospitalization and observation after a finding of not criminally responsible. The district attorney then petitions for civil commitment. The commitment has no time limit. At periodic review hearings, the state must prove Clancy is still mentally ill and dangerous. If the state meets that burden, she stays. If it does not, a judge could order her release.Clancy is already at Tewksbury Hospital. She has been there since May 2023 for court-ordered mental health treatment. She is paralyzed from the waist down and under 24-hour suicide watch. Whether she goes to a psychiatric commitment facility or a prison, her medical and mental health needs remain significant. Faddis explains what the actual difference in care looks like between the two settings.Andrea Yates killed five of her children in Texas in 2001 and was found not guilty by reason of insanity in 2006. She has remained in a psychiatric hospital for two decades, declining an annual hearing that could lead to release. Her attorney has said she will likely never leave.Faddis covers whether the prosecution can continue fighting to keep Clancy committed after a jury rejected their case, what daily life inside a commitment facility looks like, and whether Reddington's legal role continues after the verdict.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #HiddenKillers #NGRI #PsychiatricCommitment #MentalHealthCourt #PostpartumPsychosis #TrueCrimePodcast #TrueCrime #MassachusettsMurderTrial

Closing arguments in the Lindsay Clancy murder trial begin Thursday after 21 days of testimony and 84 witnesses. What happens next is the part of the trial most people never see — twelve jurors behind a closed door, trying to agree on whether a mother who admits killing her three children was criminally responsible when she did it.Defense attorney and former prosecutor Eric Faddis sits down to explain the mechanics of that room. Massachusetts law requires the prosecution to prove criminal responsibility beyond a reasonable doubt. The defense does not carry that burden. The legal test — rooted in the McHoul standard — asks two questions: could Clancy appreciate the wrongfulness of what she did, and could she conform her conduct to the law. Prosecutors must prove both. If the jury has reasonable doubt on either, the verdict is not guilty by reason of lack of criminal responsibility.The prosecution's own rebuttal expert conceded Clancy suffered from severe mental illness. He called it depression, not psychosis. The legal standard does not specify a diagnosis — it says mental disease or defect.Faddis covers how jurors organize deliberations, how unanimous-verdict requirements shape the dynamics when holdouts emerge, and what tools the judge has when a jury reports it cannot reach agreement. He explains the Tuey-Rodriguez instruction — Massachusetts' last-resort charge to a deadlocked jury — and what happened when it was used in the Karen Read case.The jury in this case includes twelve women and six men. They begin their work after closing arguments end.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #HiddenKillers #JuryDeliberation #CriminalResponsibility #InsanityDefense #PostpartumPsychosis #TrueCrimePodcast #TrueCrime #MassachusettsMurderTrial

Her best-case scenario is the insanity verdict — the one where the jury agrees her mind was broken and she isn't criminally responsible. Live with Tony Brueski, psychotherapist Shavaun Scott spends three full segments showing why even that outcome keeps Lindsay Clancy behind locked doors, possibly forever — and why the alternative is darker still.The full interview runs the board. Segment one: the conviction path, where life without parole meets a paralyzed body and a psychiatric history inside a prison system federal investigators already flagged for how it treats inmates in crisis. Segment two: the commitment path, where six-month renewals stack into decades, release means disproving a lifelong illness, and Andrea Yates — twenty years confined after her own acquittal — stands as the cautionary tale. Segment three: Patrick Clancy's parallel ordeal, from the accusations his attorneys call patently false to the death threats against his new wife to the guidance of the one man who's survived this before him.Shavaun brings decades of clinical and forensic experience; Tony brings the questions the audience shouts at their screens. The chat gets the final segment, and the debate is already raging: if no door ever opens for Lindsay Clancy, did this trial ever really have stakes?Come argue. This one runs deep.END LINKS:Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodDISCLAIMER:This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS:#LindsayClancy #PatrickClancy #TrueCrime #LindsayClancyTrial #TrueCrimePodcast #TrueCrimeCommunity #PostpartumPsychosis #HiddenKillers #Massachusetts #MentalHealth

Patrick Clancy did what every grief counselor would tell him to do: he rebuilt. New city, new marriage, new routines to structure the days. And the public punished him for every piece of it. Live with Tony Brueski, psychotherapist Shavaun Scott examines why moving forward made a grieving father a target.The pattern is brutal in its logic. He relocated to Manhattan — cold, they said. He remarried in April — too fast, they said. He runs marathons and holds a job — too functional for a man who lost three children, they said. Shavaun breaks down the psychology behind the public's grief-policing: why observers appoint themselves judges of another person's timeline, and what they're actually protecting when they do it. She also explains why a survivor who looks okay draws more suspicion than one who falls apart.She also addresses what the audience can't see — the gap between a rebuilt exterior and whatever remains underneath, and whether the appearance of recovery after a loss this size can ever be trusted as the whole story.The chat takes over from there, on the question that has divided this audience since the wedding news broke: is there a right way to grieve three children — and who gets to decide?END LINKS:Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodDISCLAIMER:This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS:#LindsayClancy #PatrickClancy #TrueCrime #LindsayClancyTrial #RustyYates #TrueCrimePodcast #TrueCrimeCommunity #HiddenKillers #Massachusetts #GriefSupport

The insanity defense is pitched as the outcome where Lindsay Clancy gets help instead of punishment. Live with Tony Brueski, psychotherapist Shavaun Scott examines the fine print — and the fine print runs long.Here's the structure the coverage skips. An acquittal by reason of insanity doesn't release anyone in Massachusetts. It triggers observation, then commitment hearings the state can renew twice a year, indefinitely. The burden then reverses onto her: prove to a judge that the illness her lawyers spent a trial establishing no longer makes her dangerous. Shavaun explains why that reversal is nearly impossible to satisfy when the underlying condition never fully leaves.The live conversation covers what daily existence inside a long commitment looks like — the locked units, the medication decisions made by strangers, the years measured in review hearings. She also digs into what that life does to a person when "stable" is never quite stable enough. Shavaun has watched this cycle from the clinical side for decades, and her account of it is unlike anything the trial coverage has offered.The chat drives the second half, and the question on the table is the one dividing every comment section: if she never leaves, did she really win anything at all?END LINKS:Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodDISCLAIMER:This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS:#LindsayClancy #PatrickClancy #TrueCrime #LindsayClancyTrial #AndreaYates #TrueCrimePodcast #TrueCrimeCommunity #MentalHealth #HiddenKillers #Massachusetts

Every prison in Massachusetts was designed around an assumption: the inmate can stand up. Lindsay Clancy can't. Psychotherapist Shavaun Scott joins Tony Brueski live to talk through the collision between a mandatory life sentence and a defendant the system was never constructed to hold.Clancy needs two people to lift her from bed to wheelchair. Her psychiatric medications require careful daily balancing. She has been under unbroken supervision since January 2023 because of the risk she poses to herself. Every one of those needs is met by a hospital — and a first-degree murder conviction takes the hospital away.Shavaun spent decades in forensic and crisis settings, and she lays out the gap between what Clancy requires and what a correctional facility delivers. The conversation moves from the physical reality — bathing, transfers, medical care handled by corrections staff instead of nurses — to the psychological one: what happens inside a person when the people surrounding her stop being caregivers and become guards.This is the conversation the verdict coverage isn't having. Tony and Shavaun take it live, with the chat weighing in on the question that has no comfortable answer: when the defendant is this broken, what is prison actually for?END LINKS:Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodDISCLAIMER:This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS:#LindsayClancy #PatrickClancy #TrueCrime #LindsayClancyTrial #TrueCrimePodcast #TrueCrimeCommunity #PostpartumPsychosis #HiddenKillers #Massachusetts #PrisonSystem

The Patrick Clancy theories got big enough that CNN and Yahoo covered them. Patrick's attorneys at Todd & Weld put out a statement calling the accusations patently false and defamatory, and said they've caused real consequences for his family's safety. This episode does what those articles didn't have room for. It takes fifteen actual comments from this channel and reads the testimony back to each one.The accusations: a rope on the bedroom door, blood outside the window from an escape, a knife set down by a left-handed man, a mistress, a flight to Europe, an investigation that never happened. The record: Patrick testified the door was locked; the bands found on a door were in the basement; State Police called the window stains transfer stains; no witness addressed handedness; nothing in the trial mentions a mistress; Det. Sgt. Andrew Chiachio testified he mapped Patrick's route and pulled both surveillance videos.The other side has its own confidence. Lindsay acted rationally and intentionally, one comment says, which is the prosecution's argument stated as a verdict. The diagnoses in the record are bipolar disorder, from experts on both sides, and major depression. The OCPD, sociopath, and psychopath labels come from the comments.The detail this episode is built around: "Where is the carotid artery" is in Lindsay's phone extraction, and it was Kevin Reddington, her own lawyer, who put it on a poster board for the jury. Why the defense wanted that search seen, and why prosecutors framed the same history differently, is the first thing you'll hear.Also in here: what Lindsay said the first time a coworker told her about Andrea Yates, the five words Patrick said when a nurse raised bipolar, and what each verdict does to Lindsay Clancy.END LINKSListen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS#LindsayClancy #PatrickClancy #TrueCrimeToday #TrueCrime #LindsayClancyTrial #PostpartumPsychosis #AndreaYates #Duxbury #TrueCrimePodcast #ClancyTrial

The top comment on the Patrick Clancy video says the caregivers made Lindsay Clancy sick with thirteen drugs in four months, no one tested her hormones, and Patrick was in the basement or in New York. Most of that comment holds up.The New Yorker reported thirteen psychiatric drugs over four months. Patrick's own wrongful-death lawsuit says eight of them were prescribed inside a three-week window between Nov. 16 and Dec. 5, 2022. Both Patrick and Lindsay are suing her providers for failing to coordinate her care. Defense attorney Kevin Reddington asked the prosecution's rebuttal psychiatrist, Dr. Avram Mack, whether her thyroid should have been checked before stacking psychiatric medications, and Mack agreed in general terms. Lindsay's own journal, read in court, says she felt less connected to Callan after she stopped breastfeeding. Her coworker Margaret Hamp testified they worked night shifts together.Patrick did work from the basement. The New York trip was two nights in November 2022, followed by four days in San Francisco with Cora. The weekly guys' night the comment mentions doesn't appear in any testimony I can find.What that comment describes is the defense's case. It's a fair reading of the record. It's not evidence Patrick did anything wrong on Jan. 24.The segment is built around a different Patrick fact. Nurse practitioner Rebecca Jollotta testified she raised bipolar disorder with the couple weeks before the killings, and Patrick told her his wife was not bipolar. Every expert who examined Lindsay afterward, both sides, put her somewhere on that spectrum.Five comments checked: Patrick's help, Patrick's move, the profiler who wasn't FBI, the medication count, and what a verdict does. Blaming the system is a legitimate argument. So is asking what Patrick heard and didn't want to hear.END LINKSListen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS#LindsayClancy #PatrickClancy #TrueCrimeToday #TrueCrime #LindsayClancyTrial #PostpartumPsychosis #Duxbury #TrueCrimePodcast #ClancyTrial #MassachusettsTrial

Lindsay Clancy acted timely, intentionally, rationally, and swiftly to accomplish a very specific goal. That's a comment on this channel, and it's also the prosecution's case in one sentence. The problem is treating it as a finding.Massachusetts puts the burden on the Commonwealth. Prosecutors have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Lindsay was criminally responsible. Judge William Sullivan read the jury the test: whether a mental disease left her without substantial capacity to appreciate the wrongfulness of her conduct, or to conform her conduct to the law. Two prongs. A defendant who knew it was wrong can still fail the second one.On that question, the experts split down the middle. Dr. Phillip Resnick, for the defense, testified Lindsay was under a command hallucination and did not feel any sense of control. Dr. Avram Mack, for the prosecution, testified she always had the capacity to control her behavior. The jury picks.The same commenter cites her lying to medical staff, refusing treatment, and skipping meds. Dr. Shah, a prosecution witness, called her an honest patient. Nurse practitioner Rebecca Jollotta testified Lindsay asked to change her medications nearly every day and once wanted to stop them, and that Women & Infants Hospital itself recommended tapering Seroquel. On Dec. 15, 2022, Lindsay went to the Mass General ER and chose to stay outpatient. On Jan. 1 she checked herself into McLean. Refusing treatment and seeking treatment are both in the record, sometimes in the same week.This segment takes five comments on the psychosis question and checks each one, including the Andrea Yates conversation a coworker described under oath and the diagnoses experts on both sides actually made. Stating the verdict before the jury does is the same mistake from either direction.END LINKSListen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS#LindsayClancy #AndreaYates #TrueCrimeToday #PostpartumPsychosis #InsanityDefense #LindsayClancyTrial #TrueCrime #Duxbury #TrueCrimePodcast #ClancyTrial

Did anyone actually investigate Patrick Clancy? That question runs under half the comments on this channel, and the Lindsay Clancy trial already answered it under oath.State Police Det. Sgt. Andrew Chiachio testified that he mapped the route Patrick drove the night of Jan. 24, 2023, pulled surveillance from the Kingston CVS and the ThreeV restaurant, and interviewed witnesses including Lindsay's mother. The CVS footage shows Patrick walking in at 5:32 p.m. The restaurant footage shows him picking up the order at 5:54. A Cellebrite expert testified Lindsay's phone placed a 14-second call to Patrick between those two clips. He was two miles away with a receipt.Then there's the New Yorker theory: that Patrick left the country in February 2023 and that proves something. The magazine did report solo trips to Latin America and Europe before he sold the Duxbury house. No February date appears in that reporting that I can find. He wasn't a suspect, he wasn't charged, and he came back to Massachusetts to testify for the prosecution for two days.Another commenter asks a fair question: if Lindsay was psychotic, can her admission even be trusted? Her admission isn't one statement. It's the 911 call, her lawyer's opening, a hospital phone call to Patrick that Patrick testified about, dozens of evaluations, and a formal stipulation in court to the DNA on the bands.This segment works through five comments and puts the testimony next to each one. Some claims are missing from the record. One is in the record and backwards. All of them get an answer you can check.END LINKSListen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS#LindsayClancy #PatrickClancy #TrueCrimeToday #TrueCrime #LindsayClancyTrial #ClancyTrial #Duxbury #PostpartumPsychosis #TrueCrimePodcast #PlymouthSuperiorCourt

On Hidden Killers Live, ex-FBI agent Jennifer Coffindaffer takes on two cases in one sitting with Tony Brueski. First the Lindsay Clancy trial, where the prosecution's rebuttal psychiatrist carried her description of the voice into the record. Then the Nolan Wells investigation, where the DA's grand jury promise doesn't cover the one device the case turns on.Clancy's defense rested August 21, 2026, on Dr. Phillip Resnick, the psychiatrist from the Andrea Yates acquittal. He told jurors she was psychotic and following a command voice. Dr. Avram Mack, called by prosecutors, said she knew her actions were wrong and also said she described a laughing male voice to him and told him she doesn't want to be alive.Coffindaffer argues guilt and Tony argues the record. The psychiatrist session on January 23, 2023. Testing for the Commonwealth that showed no faking. The paralysis and the suicide watch. A chaplain who heard about the voice in January 2023, three years ahead of the lawsuit. A McLean discharge nineteen days before the deaths. Mack at three years versus Resnick at four months.Then Mississippi. Nolan Wells' phone has been with his family since the first days after he died on Horn Island, and seven weeks later nobody has examined it. Both sides agreed to a joint exam on July 15 and never booked it. The DA's 48-hour demand came next; the family's four-day offer came after. The sheriff said no foul play before the autopsy and never asked for the phone. The friends deny tampering.Clancy has entered a not guilty plea claiming no criminal responsibility; no one is charged in Nolan's death. The chat votes on both: is this strategy, or is the state afraid of what its own evidence says?Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #NolanWells #HiddenKillersLive #TrueCrime #ClancyTrial #HornIsland #PostpartumPsychosis #NolanWellsPhone #Mississippi #TrueCrimeLive

Not in the first week. Two days after Nolan Wells vanished on Horn Island, and before any autopsy, the Jackson County sheriff's office declared there was no foul play. Nolan's phone was with his family by then, and no agency had requested it. On Hidden Killers Live, ex-FBI agent Jennifer Coffindaffer and Tony Brueski take on seven weeks of an unexamined phone.The claim driving this case is that somebody wiped it. Nolan's mother got the device back from his friends within days and says the Snapchat accounts were empty and texts had vanished. The friends maintain they never touched it. A single extraction settles that. Nobody has performed one.Prosecutors and the family shook hands on a joint exam July 15, at a community college lab, with the FBI as a maybe. No date ever followed. The DA's 48-hour demand landed August 12 with the parents traveling. The family's answer on August 17 was any day through the 21st, with 12 hours' notice. The DA's public statements since haven't mentioned the phone.Six questions for the chat. How does a test that ends the argument go unrun for seven weeks? If the DA never took custody of the phone, does her grand jury promise even include it? Did Congress, the NAACP, and Al Sharpton get ahead of the evidence? Could the family's subpoenas to five tech companies answer it first? The friends volunteered their own devices, so does anyone in power want this one opened?Nobody is charged and the friends reject the tampering claim. The state's autopsy and toxicology reports are complete. The live chat gets the floor on every one.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NolanWells #HornIsland #HiddenKillersLive #TrueCrime #Mississippi #NolanWellsPhone #BenCrump #JusticeForNolan #JacksonCounty #TrueCrimeLive

She did. Dr. Avram Mack, the Commonwealth's rebuttal psychiatrist in the Lindsay Clancy trial, testified that Clancy told him about a male, laughing voice that said it was her last chance. On Hidden Killers Live, ex-FBI agent Jennifer Coffindaffer argues the guilt side while Tony Brueski runs every credibility attack against the testimony.The doctor's too old: Resnick is 88 and evaluated her four months out. Mack's evaluation came in April 2026. The chaplain isn't ordained: Cavanaugh also testified Clancy brought up the voice in their first conversations, and her visits number around two hundred.The voice was invented for the lawsuit: the malpractice case was filed in January 2026, and the chaplain's account puts the voice in January 2023. Her face is evidence: Mack himself said she cried in front of him. She denies being bipolar: Dr. Paul Zeizel and Resnick both diagnosed it, and denial runs with the illness.The family failed her: after she told them in December 2022 she'd had thoughts of harming the children, they got her into McLean Hospital. The hospital cleared her and discharged her; nineteen days after that, the children were dead. Her providers knew about the harm thoughts. She wasn't hiding it.Clancy denies three murder counts on a claim of no criminal responsibility, and prosecutors allege she planned the killings and staged the jump. Two versions of her are on trial at once: a mastermind who fooled everyone and an obvious danger nobody acted on. The chat picks one live.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #ClancyTrial #HiddenKillersLive #TrueCrime #AvramMack #PostpartumPsychosis #InsanityDefense #Duxbury #MurderTrial #TrueCrimeLive

Yes. Lindsay Clancy had a telehealth session with her psychiatrist on January 23, 2023, and killed her three children on January 24. On Hidden Killers Live, retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer brings the guilt argument in the Lindsay Clancy trial, and Tony Brueski brings the record.The defense rested August 21, 2026, on Dr. Phillip Resnick, the forensic psychiatrist from the Andrea Yates acquittal. He testified Clancy was psychotic and obeying a command voice. Prosecutors answered the same day with Dr. Avram Mack, who interviewed her in April 2026 and said she knew her actions were wrong.Six questions, six arguments for guilt, each one run against a fact. Everyone agrees she was sick, so how sick is sick enough? Yates planned and was acquitted, so why does planning convict Clancy? A sociopath faking insanity exaggerates, and the Commonwealth's testing showed Clancy minimized, so where's the faker? The paper trail runs through four providers and a McLean Hospital admission, so how is that no paper trail?The staged-jump theory meets a nurse in a house full of medication who chose a neck wound, cut wrists, and a second-story window, and is now paralyzed and still on suicide watch at Tewksbury. The consciousness-of-guilt theory meets three people who heard the same thing from her. "Go to God" during the killings, according to Mack. "Glad they're safe" to a chaplain a week later. Months after that, she told Resnick dying would've left the kids worse off without her.Clancy's plea is not guilty, built on lack of criminal responsibility, while prosecutors allege a planned killing and a faked suicide attempt. The live chat gets a say on every question.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #ClancyTrial #HiddenKillersLive #TrueCrime #PostpartumPsychosis #Duxbury #InsanityDefense #AndreaYates #MurderTrial #TrueCrimeLive

Two different states. Two different cases. The same pattern: prosecutors making decisions that may cost them the outcome.In Mississippi, the DA agreed to examine Nolan Wells' phone, then sent a 48-hour ultimatum that blew up the deal. The phone remains unexamined after six weeks. In Massachusetts, the prosecution spent fourteen days on a case the defense had already conceded — then alienated the jury by asking a mother-in-law about mortal sin, challenging a mother for not committing her daughter, and calling a paralyzed woman's injuries faked.Eric Faddis, defense attorney and former prosecutor, evaluates the prosecution's missteps in both cases and whether either side can recover.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NolanWells #LindsayClancy #HiddenKillersLive #EricFaddis #ProsecutionBlunders #PostpartumPsychosis #HornIsland #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #TrueCrime #InsanityDefense

Fourteen days. More than seventy witnesses. The prosecution rested its case — and the defense may have been building theirs the entire time. Every prosecution witness who personally knew Lindsay testified under cross that she was a wonderful mother. The defense psychologist has met with Lindsay sixty times and told the jury she was psychotic. Lindsay's hospital records say “critically ill, postpartum psychosis” while a hospital psychiatrist said she was “calm and cooperative.”The defense admitted Lindsay killed her children before trial. The only question is criminal responsibility. Eric Faddis, defense attorney and former prosecutor, evaluates what the prosecution proved and where this goes.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #HiddenKillersLive #PostpartumPsychosis #InsanityDefense #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #KevinReddington #TrueCrime #Duxbury #DrPaulZeizel

Three weeks of prosecution testimony in the Lindsay Clancy murder trial ended with more questions about the DA's courtroom conduct than about the defendant's guilt. A prosecutor asked Lindsay's former mother-in-law about mortal sin. The judge struck it. A prosecutor asked Lindsay's mother why she didn't have her daughter committed. A State Police investigator acknowledged the prosecution floated a theory that the defense psychologist coached Lindsay to claim she heard voices.The prosecution told this jury Lindsay faked a suicide attempt. She's paralyzed from the waist down. Their own psychiatrist saw her fourteen times by telehealth and never met her in person.Eric Faddis, defense attorney and former prosecutor, evaluates the prosecution's conduct and where this case goes next.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #HiddenKillersLive #PostpartumPsychosis #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #KevinReddington #InsanityDefense #TrueCrime #Duxbury #MortalSin

Nolan Wells' phone left Horn Island with his friends. His body was found two days later. Six weeks after his death, not a single forensic expert has examined that device. The DA and the family had a deal — a joint examination at the state digital forensics lab. Then the DA sent a 48-hour ultimatum and the deal collapsed.The phone has been in the family's possession since they retrieved it. Nolan's mother went through it herself before any protocol was established. Both Snapchat accounts were empty. The friends gave their phones to the FBI voluntarily. The family is demanding chain of custody protections that haven't been written yet.A grand jury is reportedly waiting to review this case. The state autopsy is sealed. The phone is sitting in a drawer. Eric Faddis, defense attorney and former prosecutor, evaluates whether a grand jury can move forward without the data that device was carrying.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NolanWells #HornIsland #HiddenKillersLive #Snapchat #PhoneEvidence #Mississippi #GrandJury #DigitalForensics #TrueCrime #JusticeForNolan

Fourteen telehealth sessions. Two hundred hospital visits. Neither person who spent the most time with Lindsay Clancy before or after her three children died in their Duxbury home ever documented the thing her defense now says explains everything. Her psychiatrist testified Clancy never looked psychotic across all fourteen sessions. Her hospital chaplain, who has sat with her roughly two hundred times over three years at Tewksbury Hospital, testified that Clancy described a male voice ordering her to kill her children and then herself. Then the prosecutor asked for the chaplain's notes — and that voice wasn't in a single one of them. This is where the Lindsay Clancy trial actually turns. Massachusetts law puts the burden on prosecutors once an insanity defense is on the table: they have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Clancy was criminally responsible when she killed her children with exercise bands. That means the state needs the jury to believe the chaplain missed the most consequential disclosure of her career, or that Clancy constructed the voice sometime after she survived her own fall. Phone records don't help settle it — Clancy had searched "symptoms of postpartum psychosis," mapped her husband's errand, and ordered the takeout that got him out of the house before it happened. The defense argues a medical system kept switching her medications without ever really listening. The prosecution argues the searches and the timing tell you everything you need to know about intent. Tony Brueski walks through what twelve jurors now have to decide, with closing arguments expected the week of August 24 — and no clean answer waiting on the other side of it. LINKS Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod DISCLAIMER This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. HASHTAGS #LindsayClancy #ClancyTrial #HiddenKillers #PostpartumPsychosis #InsanityDefense #DuxburyMom #MurderTrial #TrueCrime #TrueCrimePodcast #PlymouthSuperiorCourt 

Fourteen days. Seventy-plus witnesses. And the moment everyone in the Lindsay Clancy trial is still talking about came from the prosecution's own doctor. Dr. Jennifer Tufts, who prescribed twelve of Lindsay's thirty medications over four months of telehealth-only appointments, never met her patient in person and never pulled records from another clinic treating Lindsay simultaneously. Defense attorney Kevin Reddington asked her directly whether she had. She said no. "Seriously?" he said back. He then read her own chart notes to her — documentation of pressured speech, a possible sign of mania — and she told the courtroom she didn't stand behind them. Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta and retired FBI behavioral analyst Robin Dreeke both watched it happen live, and Tony Brueski brings their two takes together in one conversation. Psychiatric nurse practitioners added more to the pile, testifying that Lindsay begged to change medications that were making her feel worse — while one nurse told prosecutors she personally saw no signs of postpartum psychosis. Patrick Clancy, the Commonwealth's first witness, described his wife's supposed "best day" hours before three children died, then walked the jury through months of intrusive thoughts and a growing prescription list. This episode breaks down whether the prosecution spent two weeks building its own case — or the defense's. Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. #LindsayClancy #BobMotta #RobinDreeke #HiddenKillersLive #LindsayClancyTrial #TrueCrime #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #PostpartumPsychosis #Duxbury #TrialWatch 

Alex Murdaugh's retrial jury may hear him lie to them before they even meet him. Judge Debra McCaslin ruled at an August 14 pretrial hearing that the state can replay Murdaugh's own 2023 sworn testimony for the new jury — including his admission that he wasn't telling the truth about being at the kennels the night his wife and son were killed. Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer joins Tony Brueski to cover the full hearing. McCaslin also pulled the retrial entirely outside the 14th Judicial Circuit, citing the near impossibility of an unbiased jury in a county where the Murdaugh family ran the prosecutor's office for three generations. Where the case actually lands is still undecided, with the defense pushing for Charleston. The defense also dropped a bombshell claim: weapons from a recent Allendale County homicide may be ballistically connected to the Moselle murder weapons — news that prosecutor Creighton Waters said caught him completely off guard despite his daily contact with SLED. McCaslin cleared independent DNA testing on unidentified male genetic material found under Maggie Murdaugh's fingernails, and she's now personally overseeing jury selection after questions emerged about when Becky Hill's interference in the first trial actually began. A separate defense motion asks the judge to void the murder charges outright over allegations that a SLED agent fabricated grand jury evidence. Next court date: November 14. Retrial: April 5, 2027. Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. #AlexMurdaugh #MaggieMurdaugh #JenniferCoffindaffer #HiddenKillersLive #MurdaughRetrial #SLED #TrueCrime #SouthCarolina #CreightonWaters #CriminalJustice 

The Lindsay Clancy trial has one detail almost nobody talks about: both the prosecution and Lindsay's own defense attorney agree on what happened. She killed her three children. That's not contested by anyone in the courtroom. Online, it's contested by nearly everyone. Psychotherapist Shavaun Scott, author of Nightbird, sits down with Tony Brueski for a two-part conversation on the psychology of an audience that has rejected a fact pattern both sides accept. She explains why correcting a conspiracy theory in real time — walking through the Apple Watch data, the body temperature readings, the actual testimony — tends to make believers dig in harder instead of reconsidering. It's not a bug in how people think. It's exactly how the mechanism is supposed to work. Scott then turns to the posters themselves, describing real, physical symptoms in people who've never met the Clancy family: shaking hands, lost sleep, a level of fury usually reserved for something personal. She explains what the case is actually standing in for, and what it costs the people on the other end of it. Patrick Clancy, who testified for the prosecution and buried three children, is now getting death threats over a theory neither legal team has ever put forward. Scott ends by describing what it would take — and whether it's even possible — to bring someone back from a conclusion they've already built their identity around. Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. #LindsayClancy #PatrickClancy #ShavaunScott #HiddenKillersLive #LindsayClancyTrial #TrueCrime #ConspiracyTheories #DeathThreats #TrueCrimeFans #TrueCrimePsychology 

Henry Tenon admitted he killed Jared Bridegan. He took the deal that came with that admission — second-degree murder, fifteen years minimum, and a promise to testify against the two people accused of hiring him. In February 2026, he walked that away. He told the judge he wants a trial. The confession that was supposed to close this case now has to be proven all over again, without him helping. Mario Fernandez is the one in the courtroom now, on trial for first-degree murder and solicitation, accused of hiring his former tenant to kill a man he'd never met. An FBI agent testified that Tenon's phone made a run eighteen days before the murder — out of Fernandez's rental, past Bridegan's neighborhood and his children's gymnastics facility, and on to Jacksonville Beach, while Fernandez's own phone never left the property. Prosecutors call that a dry run. The defense calls it a workday, backed by video of Fernandez with contractors at the same address. Still, no DNA, no fingerprints, and no surveillance put Fernandez anywhere near the truck used in the ambush, and investigators never even searched the property where that truck was later found. Then there's the money — three checks, ten thousand dollars, written to Tenon roughly six weeks after Bridegan died, marked "landscaping" and "Kickstarter Good Luck!!" And a prosecutor's aside that a second, unnamed person was at the scene that night. Bridegan was a thirty-three-year-old father of four, shot after stopping to move a tire on a dark road with his toddler in the car. Robin Dreeke and Tony Brueski dig into what Tenon's reversal really costs the state, with Gardner's trial next and Tenon's own trial still two years out. LINKS Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod DISCLAIMER This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. HASHTAGS #JaredBridegan #MarioFernandez #HenryTenon #ShannaGardner #MurderForHire #JacksonvilleBeach #BrideganTrial #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #TrueCrimePodcast