My Crazy Family | A Podcast of Crazy Family Stories

Type "another Lindsay Clancy" into a search bar and watch how fast it autocompletes. That phrase now follows every headline about a mother and dead children — and it might be doing more damage than the case that inspired it.  Clancy, 34, of Duxbury, Massachusetts, was on trial for the January 24, 2023 killings of Cora, 5, Dawson, 3, and Callan, 7 months, allegedly strangled with exercise resistance bands inside the family's home. She's charged with three counts of murder and three counts of strangulation, and has pleaded not guilty. Her attorney's insanity defense leaned on documented postpartum psychosis and, reportedly, psychiatric overmedication — a hospital that allegedly saw the warning signs and didn't act. Clancy survived a suicide attempt after the killings and has been paralyzed from the waist down since. Her husband, Patrick Clancy, was out running errands when it happened.  After five weeks, eighty-plus witnesses, and three hundred exhibits, the jury told the judge three times they couldn't agree. Her attorney tried to remove a holdout juror; the state's highest court said no. The judge declared a mistrial.  Here's where it gets bigger than one case. Andrea Yates was the shorthand before Clancy — convicted, then found not guilty by reason of insanity on retrial. Roughly two-thirds of mothers who kill their children had a documented mental health history, and researchers say a large share were symptomatic at the time. More than twenty countries legally separate postpartum psychiatric crisis from premeditated murder. The United States doesn't. Tony breaks down what "another Lindsay Clancy" actually costs the next family standing where Clancy's stood, and why the comparison itself might be part of the failure. Links Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod Legal Disclaimer This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. Hashtags #LindsayClancy #KevinReddington #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #Mistrial #PostpartumPsychosis #DuxburyMassachusetts #PlymouthCounty #AndreaYates #AnotherLindsayClancy 

A jury that's already split on whether a mother is criminally responsible for killing her three children just found out someone was filming them on their way out of the courthouse. That's where the Lindsay Clancy trial stands right now. The panel spent five weeks hearing eighty witnesses and reviewing more than three hundred exhibits, all circling one unresolved question — was Lindsay Clancy psychotic on January 24, 2023, or wasn't she. The defense doesn't dispute what happened; Kevin Reddington has already told the court his client killed her kids with the exercise bands, and the DNA backs that up. The entire case now rests on criminal responsibility, and Massachusetts puts the burden of proving sanity on the prosecution once the defense raises it. When the jury told Judge Sullivan they couldn't reach a verdict, he read them the Tuey-Rodriguez charge — essentially telling them no future jury will have better evidence, so go back and keep trying. They did. They're still stuck. And somewhere in the middle of that impasse, a woman was arrested outside the courthouse accused of secretly filming jurors, with deleted footage of the panel recovered from her phone. Sullivan had to individually question every juror before letting deliberations continue. If this jury ultimately hangs, nothing about Lindsay Clancy's status changes. No acquittal, no conviction. She stays charged with three counts of murder, held at Tewksbury State Hospital, paralyzed from the waist down, while Plymouth County DA Timothy Cruz weighs what comes next. Defense attorney and former prosecutor Eric Faddis breaks down how close this case is to a mistrial, what the secret filming does to either side's appeal options, and why a jury this deadlocked was always going to be a coin flip.  Links & Footer Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod Check out Robin Dreeke's Master Class http://masterclass.com/robindreeke  This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. 

Six weeks. That's how long Nolan Wells' phone has sat with his family, untouched by a single forensic examiner, while two of the loudest voices in this case kept talking instead of waiting for evidence. The family agreed with the Jackson County DA back on July 15 to a joint exam at a community college lab — their experts, the DA's experts, maybe the FBI. Nobody locked in a date. Then the friends' attorney went on national radio and accused the family of refusing to cooperate. The DA's office answered with a 44-hour deadline to hand the phone over to her office instead, timed while Nolan's parents were out of state. The family called it bad faith and countered with any day between August 18 and 21. Meanwhile, Al Sharpton had already told the country this was suspicious — four days after Nolan's body was found, before the sheriff had ruled anything out, before an independent autopsy came back with no fractures, no lacerations, no deep-tissue injuries. He asked on camera if the friends were racist. He announced a six-figure reward at the funeral before cause of death was known. His attorneys now say he never accused the friends of anything. Go back and read what he actually said, in order, and see if you agree. Three strangers in three different states are now facing federal charges for threatening those friends over words that were never actually proven. And the phone that could end the guessing is still sitting in Ocean Springs, waiting on paperwork instead of a forensic lab. Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. Hashtags #NolanWells #AlSharpton #HornIsland #BenCrump #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #Mississippi #JacksonCounty #Investigation #JusticeForNolan 

FITSNews published two of Mica Miller's 911 calls from February 2024, and together they show a household spiraling out of control. In the first, Mica tells a dispatcher that her husband's adult son made an unwanted advance toward her in her own kitchen while John-Paul Miller wasn't home. In the second, she says that same son — Logan Ryan Hardee, JP's oldest — has been following her across town in his work truck, that he's armed, and that he's living in the house she fled to escape JP. Logan was already facing a felony domestic violence charge after a different woman was hospitalized with a head injury; he's never been charged with anything involving Mica. Psychotherapist Shavaun Scott joins to explain the pattern underneath all of it — how every time Mica called police reporting harassment, tire slashing, or surveillance, JP had already told officers she was bipolar, schizophrenic, having an episode, then confiscated her phone, laptop, purse, and car. Federal prosecutors allege he tracked her car and posted an intimate photo of her online without consent. Two 2025 civil lawsuits allege JP and his father used their churches and a school to gain access to underage girls for two decades; his father never answered and lost by default. JP has pleaded not guilty to federal cyberstalking charges, with trial set for October 2026. Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Check out Robin Dreeke's Master Class http://masterclass.com/robindreeke This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. Hashtags #MicaMiller #JPMiller #LoganHardee #ShavaunScott #DeathOfThePastorsWife #SolidRockChurch #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #Netflix #CoerciveControl 

Eighteen minutes of a voice nobody else ever heard. Twenty minutes alone with three children. Those two windows of time are the entire case against — and for — Lindsay Clancy, and a Plymouth County jury is now deciding which one actually explains what happened in that Duxbury basement.  Patrick Clancy left for CVS and Thai food. When he came back, Cora, Dawson, and Callan were gone. Prosecutors say Lindsay used exercise bands, used the basement, and did it three separate times — once for each child — before missing a phone call, calling back, and having a completely ordinary conversation. ADA Jennifer Sprague argues that isn't consistent with a woman who wasn't in control of herself, and told the jury exactly that in closing.  Lindsay told forensic evaluators otherwise. A male voice she'd never heard before appeared that January afternoon and told her this was her last chance. It lasted about eighteen minutes and disappeared the moment the children were dead. She says it hasn't come back. Defense psychiatrists Paul Zeizel and Phillip Resnick both testified to postpartum psychosis and zero appreciation of wrongdoing — Resnick, notably, testified for Andrea Yates using nearly identical language decades ago. The state's own psychiatrist, Gregory Saathoff, told jurors that hallucinations don't usually clock out the second the act is finished.  Defense attorney Reddington's closing pointed somewhere else entirely: thirteen psychiatric medications, stacked on top of each other by providers who never once compared notes or coordinated Lindsay's care.  Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer and defense attorney Bob Motta sit down with Tony Brueski to argue out both sides of a case where the forensic experts can't agree — and neither, this time, can the hosts. Links & Disclaimer Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod Check out Robin Dreeke's Master Class http://masterclass.com/robindreeke This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. Hashtags #LindsayClancy #BobMotta #HiddenKillers #JenniferCoffindaffer #LindsayClancyTrial #PostpartumPsychosis #DuxburyMurders #TrueCrime #VerdictWatch #CommandHallucination 

Five drugs, one chart, zero coordination. That's how defense attorney Kevin Reddington framed Lindsay Clancy's psychiatric care for a Plymouth County jury — lorazepam, sertraline, hydroxyzine, buspirone, trazodone, stacked on a new mother by providers who never once talked to each other. He paired it with her handwritten journal from December 2022, a month before the killings, pages he said had collapsed into chicken scratches because her mind was already gone.  The defense closed with forensic psychiatrist Phillip Resnick, who evaluated Andrea Yates decades earlier and told this jury Clancy was clearly psychotic when she killed Cora, Dawson, and Callan.  Then there's what the prosecution's own witnesses said. Forensic psychologist Kirk Heilbrun told jurors this was a serious suicide attempt accompanied by killing her children out of love, because she couldn't bear to leave them behind. Forensic psychiatrist Gregory Saathoff, pressed by the defense, agreed the state's own opening statement had minimized what Clancy was going through, while also flagging inconsistencies in her account of the voice she says ordered the killings.  ADA Jennifer Sprague's closing pushed back hard: Clancy made a rational choice, her children were the only thing keeping her from taking her own life, and she left them in the basement and went upstairs to finish what she'd planned for herself.  Nine women and three men deliberated three and a half hours on their first day and went home without a verdict. Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer and defense attorney Bob Motta join Tony Brueski to argue over whether the state's own witnesses ended up handing the defense its case. Links & Disclaimer Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod Check out Robin Dreeke's Master Class http://masterclass.com/robindreeke This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. Hashtags #LindsayClancy #KevinReddington #HiddenKillers #JenniferCoffindaffer #LindsayClancyTrial #PostpartumPsychosis #InsanityDefense #TrueCrime #VerdictWatch #ClosingArguments 

Tupac Shakur's murder just got a verdict, and it's not the one Duane “Keffe D” Davis's own defense team was hoping for. A Las Vegas jury took roughly three hours to convict Davis of first-degree murder — after his lawyers spent almost two of those hours in closing arguments trying to undo eighteen years of Davis talking. A 2008 federal proffer. A 2009 police interview. A 2017 documentary. A 2019 memoir sold as the unfiltered truth. Prosecutors never recovered a weapon, never found the Cadillac, never pulled phone records or surveillance. They didn't need to. Davis had already told the story himself, repeatedly, on the record. The jury believed him enough to convict. His own attorneys argued he'd been lying the entire time. Both can't be fully true, and that's the mess this verdict leaves behind — because Davis is also the source of the biggest name attached to this case outside his own: Sean “Diddy” Combs, who Davis has accused since 2008 of offering a million dollars for the hit. Combs has denied it. Police have said he's never been named a suspect. And the people who could independently back up or shoot down Davis's version are dead — his alleged Harlem contact, the other men said to be in that Cadillac, all gone. Davis faces life in prison at sentencing and says he'll appeal. He's also asked for his phone and laptop back. What he does with either one, and what it means for the Diddy allegation he's spent eighteen years repeating, is where this story goes next. Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Check out Robin Dreeke's Master Class http://masterclass.com/robindreeke This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. Hashtags #TupacShakur #KeffeD #Diddy #SeanCombs #TupacMurderTrial #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #GuiltyVerdict #LasVegas #Justice 

Psychotherapist Shavaun Scott joins Tony Brueski to explain what clinicians call the deadliest window — the period right after a victim tries to leave, when an abuser facing what's known as a narcissistic injury becomes most dangerous. Mica Miller served her husband, pastor John-Paul Miller, divorce papers on April 25, 2024. She was found dead forty-eight hours later at a North Carolina state park, in a death ruled a suicide. She had told a friend JP threatened to put a bullet in her head and make it look self-inflicted. He was verified to be in Charleston at the time and has not been charged. The next morning, JP delivered a full Sunday sermon to his congregation before saying a word about his wife's death, and later claimed he'd tried to raise her from the dead. Four days after that, he was seen drinking at a bar with congregant Suzie Skinner — whose wheelchair-bound Army veteran husband drowned in a community pool in September 2021 after confronting JP about an alleged affair. He married Suzie thirteen months later, with armed guards and no children present. Scott also addresses psychological homicide — the theory that a person can be driven to death without a hand ever being raised. Mica had told police JP controlled her since she was a child, filed at least eight police reports, and was still under his healthcare power of attorney when a December 2025 federal indictment detailed seventeen months of alleged cyberstalking. JP's trial is set for October 2026. Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Check out Robin Dreeke's Master Class http://masterclass.com/robindreeke This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. Hashtags #MicaMiller #JPMiller #ShavaunScott #PsychologicalHomicide #SuzieSkinner #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #Netflix #DeathOfThePastorsWife #CoerciveControl 

Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta of Defense Diaries spent five weeks and more than eighty witnesses inside the gallery at Lindsay Clancy's murder trial — close enough to watch her face change in real time, close enough to see what nine mothers sitting on that jury did when prosecutors described how each of her three children died. He joins Tony Brueski to describe what the broadcast cameras never captured: Patrick Clancy's family and Lindsay's own parents sitting feet apart in the same gallery for five straight weeks, the tension in the hallways during recess, and one specific moment when the entire room shifted at once. From there, Bob breaks down the prosecution's central argument — that Lindsay used a twenty-minute window, while Patrick was out for CVS and Thai takeout, to kill Cora, Dawson, and Callan with calculation, not confusion. The defense answered that organized behavior and psychosis coexist constantly in hospitals nationwide, pointing to Lindsay's documented history: more than a dozen psychiatric medications in the months before, a journal tracking her symptoms, and repeated warnings to her doctors that she was having intrusive thoughts about harming her children. Bob explains which version the jury seemed to believe, based on what he watched play out in real time from the seat next to her. Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Check out Robin Dreeke's Master Class http://masterclass.com/robindreeke This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. Hashtags #LindsayClancy #BobMotta #LindsayClancyTrial #PostpartumPsychosis #PlymouthCourt #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #MurderTrial #DefenseDiaries #Courtroom 

There's a woman who already lived through the exact legal question hanging over the Lindsay Clancy case — she killed her five children, was found not guilty by reason of insanity, and has stayed locked up for more than two decades since. Her name is Andrea Yates, and defense trial attorney Bob Motta says her outcome is the closest thing to a preview of what happens to Lindsay Clancy next. Motta sat through all five weeks of the Clancy trial and breaks down the five verdicts this jury was choosing between — not guilty, not guilty by reason of lack of criminal responsibility, first-degree murder, second-degree murder, manslaughter — and what each one actually means day to day. Some paths lead to prison with no parole. Others lead to a psychiatric commitment with no maximum sentence, annual evaluations, and a locked ward that looks a lot like the one Lindsay Clancy has been living in since her children — Cora, Dawson, and Callan — died and she tried to take her own life on January 24, 2023. Motta also unpacks the malpractice lawsuits she and her husband Patrick filed against her medical providers, and what a criminal verdict could mean for those cases. Defense attorney and former prosecutor Eric Faddis covers what happens if the jury can't get there at all. A retrial is the obvious move — Massachusetts just retried Karen Read within minutes of her own deadlock — but Lindsay Clancy also has the option to waive a jury completely and let a single judge decide. Faddis explains why that changes everything, and why Kevin Reddington's already-denied bifurcation motion might get a second look. Two guests, one case, and a defendant who may already know how this ends. Links & Footer Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod Check out Robin Dreeke's Master Class http://masterclass.com/robindreeke   This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. Hashtags #LindsayClancy #BobMotta #HiddenKillersPodcast #EricFaddis #AndreaYates #InsanityDefense #BenchTrial #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #TrueCrime #TrueCrimePodcast 

Nine women and three men walked into a Plymouth Superior Court deliberation room on August 27 to decide Lindsay Clancy's fate. Three and a half hours later, they walked out with no verdict. Lindsay has admitted to killing her three children — the only question left is whether postpartum psychosis erases her criminal responsibility for it. Five options sit on the verdict slips: first-degree murder, second-degree murder, manslaughter, not criminally responsible, or not guilty, each carrying a completely different outcome, from life without parole down to indefinite psychiatric commitment. Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer joins Tony Brueski live as the jury deliberates, and the two of them don't agree on where this lands. Can nine mothers sentence another mother suffering a documented mental health crisis to life in prison? Is manslaughter the middle ground this jury reaches for? What does a hung jury even mean after four weeks of testimony? Meanwhile, criminal defense attorney Bob Motta — who watched Patrick Clancy testify in person — addresses the surveillance footage placing Patrick outside the home and whether it gives any real oxygen to the online conspiracy theories accusing him instead of Lindsay. Patrick's wrongful death lawsuit against her medical providers is already filed, and if a civil jury finds those providers liable for the same three deaths this criminal jury is weighing, the two verdicts could end up telling completely different stories about what happened. Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Check out Robin Dreeke's Master Class http://masterclass.com/robindreeke This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. Hashtags #LindsayClancy #JenniferCoffindaffer #LindsayClancyTrial #JuryDeliberations #PostpartumPsychosis #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #NineWomen #BobMotta #MaternalMentalHealth 

A man who confessed to four murders and gave up his right to appeal is going back in front of a judge — and it's not for the reason you'd expect. Bryan Kohberger filed a handwritten petition from jail in July 2026 claiming his own defense attorneys, Anne Taylor, Elisa Massoth, and Bicka Barlow, coerced him into confessing. He says they promised prison conditions that never happened and hid evidence he considers exculpatory, including hair found in Ethan Chapin's hand that was excluded through physical analysis but never actually DNA tested. Prosecutors wanted the whole thing dismissed without a hearing. Judge Steven Hippler — the same judge who accepted Kohberger's guilty plea back in July 2025 — said no. A status conference is set for June 3, 2027, with a full evidentiary hearing on June 17. Here's where it gets stranger: Sy Ray, the digital forensics expert Kohberger's own defense team hired, told reporters investigators missed even more incriminating cellphone geolocation data placing Kohberger near the house before the murders — and said flat out he believes Kohberger would be convicted again. Ray wants the death penalty back in play. Kohberger's new attorney, Greg Rauch, was appointed in August 2026 and hadn't read the case file or even spoken to his client yet. He has ten months to prepare for a hearing where Kohberger's former lawyers could be put under oath and forced to say, on the record, exactly what they told their client and when. Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Check out Robin Dreeke's Master Class http://masterclass.com/robindreeke This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. Hashtags #BryanKohberger #KohbergerHearing #SyRay #IdahoMurders #EvidentiaryHearing #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #UniversityOfIdaho #MoscowIdaho #PostConvictionRelief 

Psychotherapist Shavaun Scott, author of Nightbird, joins Tony to walk through a timeline most people watching “Death of the Pastor's Wife” can see but may not fully understand. According to a police report Mica Miller filed in February 2024, pastor John-Paul Miller had been pursuing her since she was ten years old — fourteen years her senior, already married, already her pastor. His attorney has denied the allegation. What the Netflix documentary lays out next is its own kind of evidence: JP officiated Mica's first wedding at eighteen, brought her on as his personal assistant, started an affair with her while she was babysitting his own children, and married her himself in 2017. Every role in her life — wife, employee, worship leader at Solid Rock Church — ran through the same man. Friends allege he demanded compliance from her multiple times a day and withheld sleep when she refused. They allege he pushed her onto testosterone that damaged her singing voice. Family attorney Regina Ward alleges he later put her on his own lithium without her knowledge. Siblings allege an involuntary hospitalization followed, and that her car, phone, and laptop were seized while she was locked inside. Federal prosecutors allege an intimate photo from that laptop surfaced online without her consent. JP has pleaded not guilty to federal cyberstalking charges, with trial set for October 2026. Scott breaks down what that full timeline clinically represents — and why a pattern like this so often goes unrecognized until it's too late. Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Check out Robin Dreeke's Master Class http://masterclass.com/robindreeke This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. Hashtags #MicaMiller #JPMiller #ShavaunScott #DeathOfThePastorsWife #SolidRockChurch #SpiritualAbuse #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #Netflix #CoerciveControl 

Defense attorney and former prosecutor Eric Faddis covers the full scope of what is happening in and around the Lindsay Clancy murder trial at Plymouth Superior Court.The jury has been stuck for days. They sent deadlock notes. The judge gave them the Tuey-Rodriguez instruction. They went back in and still could not agree. The impasse appears rooted in a medical dispute—dueling psychiatric experts who examined the same woman and reached opposite conclusions—that twelve people with no medical training cannot resolve.Outside the courthouse, a woman was arrested for filming the jurors as they left. She told reporters she came to see Lindsay. Police found deleted videos on her phone. The judge questioned each juror one by one before letting them continue. The arrest creates potential grounds for appeal if a verdict is reached and complicates any future proceeding if it is not.If a mistrial is declared, the defense has options the public has not heard about. A bench trial would let a judge decide instead of a jury. A renewed bifurcation motion could narrow a retrial to the single question this jury could not answer. Massachusetts precedent points toward a retry, but the combination of the deadlock's depth, the outside interference, and the defense's available moves makes this a more complex calculation.Faddis breaks down all three developments—the deadlock, the arrest, and what comes next.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #HiddenKillers #EricFaddis #HungJury #JuryFilming #BenchTrial #PostpartumPsychosis #TrueCrime #TrueCrimePodcast

The assumption after a hung jury in the Lindsay Clancy case is a retrial. Massachusetts has a history of retrying its cases, and Plymouth County DA Timothy Cruz has shown no interest in reducing the first-degree murder charges. But the defense has moves that could change the trajectory entirely.The first: a bench trial. Massachusetts allows defendants to waive the right to a jury and be tried by a judge. If the problem with this trial is that twelve lay people cannot sort through competing psychiatric testimony, a bench trial puts the question before someone trained to evaluate exactly that kind of evidence.The second: a renewed bifurcation motion. Reddington asked Judge Sullivan to split the trial into a guilt phase and a responsibility phase before this trial began. Sullivan denied it. After a hung jury, that motion carries different weight. If granted, a retrial could bypass the physical evidence Clancy has already conceded and go directly to the psychiatric question.The retrial timeline is another factor. A second trial means months of preparation, the same eighty-plus witnesses returning, and Clancy—paralyzed, held at Tewksbury—sitting through it all again. Her lawyer was asked if she could handle another trial and gave a one-word answer.Defense attorney and former prosecutor Eric Faddis examines the bench trial option, the bifurcation strategy, the retrial math, and what mothers watching this case should think about if they ever find themselves on a jury summons for the next round.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #HiddenKillers #EricFaddis #Retrial #BenchTrial #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #MassachusettsLaw #TrueCrime #TrueCrimePodcast

The Lindsay Clancy jury was already signaling deep divisions when a new problem arrived from outside the courtroom. A 56-year-old woman was arrested at Plymouth Superior Court for allegedly filming jurors as they left the building. She told reporters she wanted to see Lindsay. Police recovered deleted videos of the jury from her phone.Judge Sullivan questioned each juror individually before allowing deliberations to continue. The jury had already spent days in the deliberation room and had sent multiple deadlock notes. The arrest added a layer of disruption to a panel that was already under extraordinary strain.The legal implications depend on the outcome. A guilty verdict gives the defense grounds to argue that the jury was compromised. A mistrial leaves the incident in the record for any future proceedings. Either way, the arrest forces the court to address whether the jury's deliberations were affected by the knowledge that someone outside was recording them.The incident also raises a broader question about the true-crime spectator culture and its impact on the legal process. Jurors in high-profile cases are increasingly exposed to public attention they never signed up for. A woman with no connection to the case showed up at a courthouse where three children's deaths are being litigated and treated the jurors like subjects in a documentary.Defense attorney and former prosecutor Eric Faddis examines the fallout, the appeal risk, and what courts must do to keep jurors safe from a public that cannot tell the difference between following a case and interfering with one.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #HiddenKillers #EricFaddis #JuryTampering #TrueCrimeTourist #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #MurderTrial #TrueCrime #TrueCrimePodcast

The Lindsay Clancy jury has been deliberating for days at Plymouth Superior Court after hearing more than eighty witnesses across five weeks. They sent notes to Judge Sullivan indicating they could not reach a unanimous decision. Sullivan read them the Tuey-Rodriguez instruction—a charge that tells jurors to keep working and that no future jury will hear better evidence. They went back in and remained stuck.The impasse centers on criminal responsibility. The prosecution's psychiatric experts said Clancy was not psychotic on January 24, 2023. The defense's experts said she was. Both used the same records. Both had comparable credentials. Both testified under oath. The jury is asked to resolve a medical dispute without medical training.Kevin Reddington conceded the physical evidence. Clancy killed her children. The defense has never contested that. The trial was always about one question—whether she was criminally responsible—and in Massachusetts, the prosecution carries the burden of proving sanity beyond a reasonable doubt.If the jury cannot agree and a mistrial is declared, Clancy is neither acquitted nor convicted. She remains charged with three counts of first-degree murder. She remains at Tewksbury State Hospital, paralyzed from the waist down. The DA's office decides whether to try her again.Defense attorney and former prosecutor Eric Faddis breaks down what a hung jury means for Clancy, whether a retrial is likely, and what mothers watching this case should understand about what happens when the system fails to deliver a verdict.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #HiddenKillers #EricFaddis #HungJury #PostpartumPsychosis #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #MurderTrial #TrueCrime #TrueCrimePodcast

The full conversation with psychotherapist Shavaun Scott on the Mica Miller case. JP Miller met Mica when she was a child and allegedly built a world around her where her marriage, her income, her friendships, and her faith all ran through one man. When she tried to call for help, he allegedly told police she was mentally ill. When she tried to leave, she was dead in 48 hours.Scott names the clinical mechanisms at every stage: calculated targeting, spiritual enmeshment, pathologizing, ambient terror, narcissistic injury, and the concept of psychological homicide. She also addresses JP's rapid remarriage to a parishioner whose wheelchair-bound husband had drowned — and what that pattern tells a clinician.JP has pleaded not guilty to federal cyberstalking. Trial is October 2026. He has not been charged in Mica's death.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#MicaMiller #JPMiller #DeathOfThePastorsWife #ShavaunScott #SolidRockChurch #CoerciveControl #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #Netflix #PsychologicalHomicide

Mica Miller died two days after serving JP Miller with divorce papers. Clinical research identifies that window as the single most dangerous period in any coercive relationship. Psychotherapist Shavaun Scott explains the mechanism — what happens inside an abuser when control is taken away — and walks the audience through a concept most people have never heard: psychological homicide.A year after Mica's death, JP married Suzie Skinner, a woman from his church whose wheelchair-bound husband had drowned in a community pool in 2021. Scott addresses the pattern: what a rapid replacement reveals about personality traits the audience is watching play out in real time.Mica's death was ruled a suicide. JP has not been charged in connection with it. He has pleaded not guilty to federal cyberstalking. Trial is October 2026.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#MicaMiller #JPMiller #DeathOfThePastorsWife #ShavaunScott #SuzieSkinner #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #Netflix #PsychologicalHomicide #CoerciveControl

In February 2024, Mica walked out of a hospital she says JP had her committed to against her will. Her purse was gone. Her car keys were gone. Her car was gone. JP had collected them while she was admitted and told officers he was preventing overspending. When she reported the car stolen, an officer contacted JP, who said Mica suffered from mental disorders.Psychotherapist Shavaun Scott identifies the mechanism at work: a coercive controller creates the crisis, then presents himself as the reasonable party managing it. Scott walks through how that tactic turns law enforcement into an unwitting extension of the control — and what it does to a woman's capacity to trust her own perception of reality when the people she calls for help believe the person she's calling about.JP has pleaded not guilty to federal cyberstalking. Trial is October 2026.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#MicaMiller #JPMiller #DeathOfThePastorsWife #ShavaunScott #CoerciveControl #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #Netflix #MicasLaw #CyberstalkerPastor

Why did JP Miller officiate Mica's first wedding when she was 18? The documentary Death of the Pastor's Wife puts that detail into a timeline that stretches from Mica's childhood through her death: pastor, officiant, employer, affair partner, husband. Every milestone of her adult life was allegedly orchestrated by the same man who held spiritual authority over her family's church.Psychotherapist Shavaun Scott, author of Nightbird, sits down to walk through what that pattern clinically represents — how a figure in religious authority can use faith itself as a tool of control, and why women who grew up inside that dynamic often don't recognize what's happening until it's too late.JP has pleaded not guilty to federal cyberstalking. He has not been charged in Mica's death. Trial is October 2026.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#MicaMiller #JPMiller #DeathOfThePastorsWife #ShavaunScott #SolidRockChurch #CoerciveControl #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #Netflix #SpiritualAbuse

Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta sat inside Plymouth Superior Court for every day of Lindsay Clancy's five-week murder trial. He joins Tony Brueski for the full three-part conversation — the courtroom experience the cameras could not show, the prosecution's premeditation evidence versus the defense's medication argument, and what Lindsay's future holds regardless of the verdict.Bob describes what the room felt like during the worst testimony — the jury's nine mothers watching the prosecution describe how each child died, the families splitting the gallery, and the moment the energy shifted. He walks through ADA Jennifer Sprague's argument that the CVS run proves planning and Kevin Reddington's response that organized behavior and psychosis coexist every day.Lindsay was prescribed over a dozen psychiatric medications in months by providers who were not coordinating her care. She documented her symptoms. She sought help. The prosecution called it a cover story. The defense called it a system that destroyed a mother. Bob examines which argument landed in the room.He closes with the Andrea Yates precedent — twenty years committed — and what Lindsay's life inside Tewksbury Hospital looks like now. Paralyzed, medicated, locked in since 2023. The five verdict options the jury had for each child all lead to the same place: a locked building.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #BobMotta #TrueCrime #PostpartumPsychosis #InsanityDefense #HiddenKillers #PatrickClancy #MurderTrial #DefenseDiaries

Lindsay Clancy has been inside Tewksbury Hospital since 2023. She is paralyzed from the waist down. She takes psychotropic medications daily. A not-guilty verdict in her case does not open a door. It locks a different one. Massachusetts allows the state to petition for commitment to a secure psychiatric facility — six months initially, renewable every year, no cap.Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta was in the courtroom for the full five-week trial. He joins Tony Brueski to explain what commitment looks like compared to prison, what the annual evaluation process involves, and whether any realistic path exists for Lindsay to be deemed restored and released. He walks through the five verdict options the jury had for each of Lindsay's three children and what each outcome means for the rest of her life.Andrea Yates was found not guilty by reason of insanity in 2006. She has been committed for over twenty years. She has never been released. Bob addresses whether that precedent tells us anything about Lindsay's trajectory.He also addresses what the jurors as parents had to set aside to reach a verdict. The photographs. The autopsy evidence. The 911 call. Whether regular people can separate grief from legal analysis when three children are dead. Both sides agreed Lindsay was mentally ill. The fight was over whether that illness made her unable to control her actions.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #InsanityDefense #LindsayClancyTrial #TrueCrime #BobMotta #AndreaYates #HiddenKillers #CriminalJustice #MurderTrial #JuryDeliberation

Lindsay Clancy sent Patrick to pick up dinner and a prescription from CVS. The prosecution called the timing deliberate — she created a twenty-minute window and used every second of it. She brought each of her three children to the basement and strangled them with exercise bands. The state argued that level of organized behavior is incompatible with psychosis.The defense argued the opposite. Kevin Reddington told the jury that mothers in psychiatric crisis manage routines every day. They order food, pick up prescriptions, care for children, and hold conversations — all while their brains are in freefall. Organized behavior does not rule out psychosis. Hospitals see it constantly.Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta was inside Plymouth Superior Court for the full trial. He joins Tony Brueski to evaluate the prosecution's strongest evidence of premeditation — the CVS run, the phone call Lindsay made after the killings, and the state's three rebuttal experts who testified she was not psychotic. Bob also examines the defense's medication cascade: over a dozen prescriptions in months from providers who were not coordinating her care.Lindsay documented her symptoms. She sought help repeatedly. She told her doctors she was having intrusive thoughts about harming her children. The prosecution used that treatment history against her. Bob explains how both arguments played in the room.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodCheck out Robin Dreeke's Master Class https://www.masterclass.com/classes/become-the-person-everyone-trustsThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #PostpartumPsychosis #LindsayClancyTrial #TrueCrime #BobMotta #MaternalMentalHealth #HiddenKillers #MurderTrial #KevinReddington #CriminalJustice

Headlines and courtroom photos built one version of Lindsay Clancy. Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta sat feet from her for the full five-week trial at Plymouth Superior Court and saw another. The distance between the media image and the woman in the courtroom is the subject of this conversation.Bob joins Tony Brueski to describe what Lindsay looked like in person — her physical condition, her demeanor during different phases of testimony, and the moments when her composure broke. Lindsay is paralyzed from the waist down after her suicide attempt on January 24, 2023. She has been at Tewksbury Hospital since then. Seeing her in person, in a courtroom, feet from the families of her three dead children, was a different experience than watching the broadcast.Bob also describes what the jury's nine mothers looked like during the worst testimony — the autopsy evidence, the 911 call, and the prosecution's closing argument about how each child died. He walks through the gallery's response, the family tensions visible only from inside the room, and the specific moment when the entire courtroom's energy shifted.What the camera showed was testimony. What the room held was grief, tension, and the weight of three children who are never coming home.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #BobMotta #TrueCrime #PlymouthCourt #PostpartumPsychosis #HiddenKillers #MurderTrial #DefenseDiaries #Courtroom

Broken toys. That is what the prosecutor called the three children Lindsay Clancy left on the basement floor. Defense attorney Kevin Reddington held up a honeymoon wish jar and thirteen medications and called this prosecution the thing that ripped the soul out of a woman who never did anything wrong.Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer joins Tony Brueski live for a three-part interview as the jury deliberates. They see this case very differently and cover how the prosecution landed, how the defense landed, and what could happen next.The prosecution's own expert called the killings out of love. The defense's expert called Clancy a puppet controlled by command hallucinations. The voice she described appeared once, lasted eighteen minutes, and stopped the moment the children were dead.Nine women and three men have five verdict options at Plymouth Superior Court. Three and a half hours of deliberation on day one produced no verdict. The judge added manslaughter at the defense's request — up to twenty years instead of life.Patrick Clancy's wrongful death lawsuit against Lindsay's providers is already filed.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #HiddenKillers #JenniferCoffindaffer #TrueCrime #PostpartumPsychosis #VerdictWatch #ClosingArguments #HKLive #MaternalMentalHealth

Nine women and three men walked into the deliberation room at Plymouth Superior Court. Three and a half hours on day one. No verdict. Five options on those slips — first-degree murder, second-degree, manslaughter, not criminally responsible, or not guilty.Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer joins Tony Brueski live as the jury deliberates. They disagree on this case and dig into what could happen next. Can nine women convict a mother in a postpartum psychosis case? Is manslaughter the jury's way out? What happens if they cannot reach a unanimous verdict?First-degree murder means life without parole. Not criminally responsible means commitment to a psychiatric facility with periodic reviews. The judge explained that even an NCR finding does not mean Clancy goes free — prosecutors can petition for commitment, and the person is evaluated periodically.Patrick Clancy's wrongful death lawsuit against Lindsay's providers is already filed. Thirteen medications from providers who never compared notes.Andrea Yates received the NCR verdict twenty years ago. She is still in a state hospital. Every mother watching this case is watching those nine women right now.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #HiddenKillers #JenniferCoffindaffer #TrueCrime #PostpartumPsychosis #VerdictWatch #JuryDeliberations #HKLive #MaternalMentalHealth

Lindsay Clancy described a male voice that appeared for the first time on the afternoon of January 24, 2023. The voice commanded her to kill her children and then kill herself. It lasted roughly eighteen minutes. It stopped the moment the children were dead. She has never reported hearing it again.The prosecution's forensic psychiatrist Gregory Saathoff called that onset-and-vanish pattern clinically unusual. Defense experts Paul Zeizel and Phillip Resnick both testified the voice was consistent with postpartum psychosis. Resnick said Clancy was a puppet controlled by an external force and that she genuinely believed killing the children was protecting them.Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer joins Tony Brueski live as the jury deliberates. They disagree on this case and dig into the defense's evidence — the voice, the thirteen medications, the journal entries, the chaplain who testified Clancy said she was glad her children were safe.Reddington's closing attacked the medications, the providers who never coordinated care, and the prosecution for building a case against a woman whose brain was under chemical siege.Nine women and three men are deliberating. Five verdict options sit on those slips.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #HiddenKillers #JenniferCoffindaffer #TrueCrime #PostpartumPsychosis #VerdictWatch #CommandHallucination #HKLive #JuryDeliberations

The prosecution's own forensic psychologist Kirk Heilbrun told the jury Lindsay Clancy killed her children out of love — a serious suicide attempt where she could not bear to leave them behind. Heilbrun said she was criminally responsible, but his characterization of the motive cut against the prosecution's theory of premeditated cruelty.Forensic psychiatrist Gregory Saathoff, also testifying for the prosecution, agreed under questioning that the state's opening statement minimized what Clancy had been going through. Saathoff found what he called significant inconsistencies in Clancy's account of the voice she says commanded the killings.Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer joins Tony Brueski live as the jury deliberates. They disagree on this case and dig into whether the prosecution can convict when its own experts softened the case on the stand.Assistant District Attorney Jennifer Sprague told the jury Clancy planned it — mapped the distance to the restaurant, added the CVS stop, calculated the window. Sprague called the children protective factors Clancy removed so she could end her own life.Nine women and three men have five verdict options. They deliberated three and a half hours on day one.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #HiddenKillers #JenniferCoffindaffer #TrueCrime #PostpartumPsychosis #VerdictWatch #ClosingArguments #HKLive #MaternalMentalHealth

Criminal defense trial attorney Bob Motta sat inside Plymouth Superior Court for every day of Lindsay Clancy's murder trial. He watched the prosecution argue choice, the defense argue psychosis, and the jury receive five verdict options for each of three children.Bob joins Tony Brueski for the full three-part conversation: how the closing arguments landed, whether the jury was moved, and what happens next — including the conspiracy blaming Patrick and the malpractice lawsuits filed by both sides.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #TrueCrime #PostpartumPsychosis #BobMotta #PatrickClancy #InsanityDefense #HiddenKillers #CriminalJustice #MurderTrial

Thousands of people online are accusing Patrick Clancy of murdering his own children. Surveillance footage places him outside the home. Lindsay admitted she did it. The defense's entire case depends on her having done it during a psychotic break.Criminal defense trial attorney Bob Motta was inside Plymouth Superior Court. He watched Patrick testify. He joins Tony Brueski to address the conspiracy directly, explain whether Patrick has legal recourse, and break down what happens to Lindsay regardless of the verdict.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #PatrickClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #TrueCrime #ConspiracyTheory #PostpartumPsychosis #BobMotta #HiddenKillers #MedicalMalpractice #TrueCrimeCommunity

The defense in Lindsay Clancy's murder trial argued that her medical providers prescribed medication after medication without talking to each other. Kevin Reddington showed the jury her journal entries from December 2022 — the handwriting falling apart, the mind deteriorating a month before the killings.Criminal defense trial attorney Bob Motta was in the courtroom. He joins Tony Brueski to evaluate whether the defense proved overmedication caused a psychotic break — and whether the Resnick testimony carried the weight Reddington needed.END LINKSListen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #KevinReddington #InsanityDefense #TrueCrime #PostpartumPsychosis #LindsayClancyTrial #BobMotta #HiddenKillers #CriminalDefense #MurderTrial

The prosecution in Lindsay Clancy's murder trial told a jury of nine women and three men that Lindsay knew exactly what she was doing when she killed her three children. ADA Jennifer Sprague argued Lindsay sent Patrick away, chose the basement, and repeated the same method three times.Criminal defense trial attorney Bob Motta was inside Plymouth Superior Court. He joins Tony Brueski to assess whether the prosecution met its burden and how the jury responded to the state's case.END LINKSListen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #ClosingArguments #TrueCrime #PostpartumPsychosis #PlymouthCourt #BobMotta #HiddenKillers #MurderTrial #CriminalJustice

Shanna Gardner's trial was supposed to start this week. Then Mario Fernandez's conviction blew a hole in the timeline. Fernandez was found guilty of first-degree murder and solicitation for killing Jared Bridegan — a plot prosecutors say Gardner set in motion. The jury deliberated less than four hours and Fernandez is facing life without parole. But one day after that verdict, prosecutors filed two new felony charges against him, both involving children and both unrelated to Bridegan's death. That's what pushed Judge London Kite to grant Gardner's defense a continuance, moving jury selection to May 2027. Her attorneys say they need time to investigate whether the new allegations point to a motive of Fernandez's own — something that could reshape the entire narrative around who wanted Bridegan dead and why. Fernandez had already told police the twins were "better off" with Bridegan "out of the picture," a line that predates the new charges considerably. The delay doesn't touch the evidence prosecutors already have against Gardner directly: her own text messages. One exchange has a friend describing a search for someone who "performs permanent disappearing acts on certain people." A detective testified the plan traces to 2015. Gardner faces murder, conspiracy, solicitation, and a fourth charge tied to her children. Her attorney is Jose Baez — the lawyer who got Casey Anthony acquitted — and he's already fighting the state over how it's characterizing the evidence. The jury pool has been doubled to 500 people. May 2027 is the new date. Whether it holds is another question entirely. LINKS Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/  Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/  Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod  X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod DISCLAIMER This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. HASHTAGS #JaredBridegan #ShannaGardner #MarioFernandez #HiddenKillersLive #TrueCrime #JoseBaez #BrideganTrial #JacksonvilleBeach #MurderForHire #HenryTenon 

Two verdicts. Neither one lets Lindsay Clancy go home — and defense attorney Eric Faddis is here to explain why, with the case law laid out in full. If this jury goes with not guilty by reason of lack of criminal responsibility, Massachusetts still holds her: up to forty days of observation first, then a civil commitment petition with no expiration date attached. Faddis points to Andrea Yates as the template — found not guilty by reason of insanity in Texas back in 2006, and still inside a state hospital today, turning down her release hearing year after year. If the jury convicts on first-degree murder instead, there's no sentencing debate to watch. The penalty is automatic — life without parole — and the verdict triggers a mandatory appeal straight to the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, one that has to reckon with every psychiatric expert both sides put on the stand. Faddis breaks down the option jurors have that most people watching don't know exists: second-degree murder, the only verdict on that slip that comes with eventual parole eligibility. He also gets into what a successful appeal would even need to argue, and how rarely a life-without-parole sentence actually gets undone. None of this happens in the abstract. Clancy has been paralyzed from the waist down and on suicide watch since January 2023, currently held at Tewksbury Hospital under court order. A guilty verdict means moving that care and that body into the corrections system — one Faddis says isn't built for what her situation requires. Two verdict slips. Two entirely different rest-of-her-life sentences. Faddis breaks down both. Links: Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod Legal Disclaimer: This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. Hashtags: #LindsayClancy #EricFaddis #HiddenKillersLive #LindsayClancyTrial #PostpartumPsychosis #CriminalResponsibility #MassachusettsMurder #TrueCrime #TrueCrimePodcast #AndreaYates 

Twenty-five witnesses. Eight days. And the prosecution's last move in the Keffe D murder trial was letting the jury hear Duane Davis talk in his own voice — from jail. This recap combines Wednesday's and Thursday's testimony into the full picture of where the case against Davis stands heading into its final stretch. Testimony opened with retired Compton gang detective Robert Ladd, who worked the department's gang unit for years and tracked the South Side Compton Crips closely enough to tell the jury the exact rank Davis held inside the organization — and what that rank meant for who called the shots. The defense has argued Davis invented his role in the shooting entirely, for money. Then Tupac's childhood friend Malcolm Greenidge took the stand, describing where the gunfire came from that night and what Tupac was building in his final weeks: a label, a new album, a meeting already set with Quincy Jones. Crime scene analysts followed with an inventory of what a 2023 search of Davis's Henderson home produced, including his own book and newspaper clippings about the murder that had reportedly been kept for decades. Then prosecutors closed the door with the jail calls. Davis on a recorded line, frustrated that his own words were being turned into evidence. Davis on YouTube, calling his book "the real truth." And a separate call where the way Davis talked about Tupac lines up with the motive prosecutors have been building toward the whole trial. Next up: the defense calls its own witnesses, starting with a detective and two police officers. Closing arguments are set for Monday, and Davis has an overnight decision to make about whether he takes the stand in his own defense. Links & Legal: Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. Hashtags: #TupacShakur #KeffeD #HiddenKillers #TupacTrial #DuaneDavis #2Pac #TrueCrime #LasVegas #DeathRowRecords #JusticeForTupac 

If this jury convicts Lindsay Clancy, her life sentence starts at age thirty-six, with no parole, ever. Psychotherapist Shavaun Scott joins Tony Brueski to explain exactly what that number means for a woman who is paralyzed from the chest down and has been under constant watch since January 2023. For three and a half years, everyone around Lindsay has existed to keep her alive and treat her illness. Conviction flips that mission entirely. Shavaun breaks down what it means to go from patient to inmate, and why that transition hits harder for someone in her physical condition than for almost anyone else facing sentencing this year. The Department of Justice has already investigated Massachusetts prisons for isolating suicidal inmates in bare cells for months at a time, and a paralyzed woman with a documented history of self-harm would enter that system with no way to physically defend herself. None of it happens in a vacuum. The defense has rested on a record that includes a psychiatrist visit the day before the killings, a five-day inpatient stay at McLean that ended nineteen days before, and testimony from Dr. Phillip Resnick, who also examined Andrea Yates, that Lindsay was following a command voice. Prosecutors counter with Dr. Avram Mack, who says she could tell right from wrong, and Lindsay's own words to her children during the killings, which the defense argues sit alongside very different words she gave a chaplain and a second doctor in the months that followed. Shavaun and Tony take on the argument splitting the audience in half: does she pay with her life, or does a cell become just another kind of sentence for an illness nobody in this courtroom actually disputes she has. Links & Legal Footer: Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. Hashtags: #LindsayClancy #ShavaunScott #HiddenKillersLive #LindsayClancyTrial #PostpartumPsychosis #PrisonSystem #InsanityDefense #Massachusetts #TrueCrime #MurderTrial 

The theory floating around Lindsay Clancy's trial says she invented the voice she heard for a malpractice lawsuit filed in January 2026. Hospital chaplain Sheila Cavanaugh testified Clancy told her about that same voice in the first week of her hospitalization, in January 2023, three years before any lawsuit existed. Cavanaugh has visited her roughly two hundred times since. The timeline matters because of who else heard the same story. The prosecution's own psychiatrist, Dr. Avram Mack, called by the Commonwealth to argue Clancy was responsible for her actions, testified she described a male, laughing voice telling her it was her last chance. Mack's first interview with her didn't happen until April 2026, more than three years after the killings, well after Dr. Phillip Resnick's three-hour evaluation four months out and Dr. Paul Zeizel's roughly sixty sessions with her. Both Resnick and Zeizel diagnosed bipolar disorder with postpartum psychosis. Mack says there's no evidence of mania, and that Clancy isn't convinced she's bipolar at all. None of this started in a courtroom. Lindsay told her family in December 2022 that she'd had thoughts of harming the kids. They got her admitted to McLean Hospital, which sent her home as low risk nineteen days before the deaths, and her outpatient providers already knew about those thoughts too. She's pleaded not guilty on three counts of murder on the ground that she wasn't criminally responsible, and prosecutors allege planning and a faked suicide attempt. She's admitted she did it. What she was when she did it is the only question left for the jury. Tony Brueski and a guest lay the lawsuit theory next to the actual dates, and let the timeline speak for itself. Links & Legal Footer: Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. Hashtags: #LindsayClancy #SheilaCavanaugh #HiddenKillersLive #LindsayClancyTrial #PostpartumPsychosis #InsanityDefense #AvramMack #MentalHealth #TrueCrime #Duxbury 

Some of the loudest voices analyzing Patrick Clancy online describe themselves as former FBI profilers. They aren't. That's just one of five claims circulating in the comments of this trial that don't survive contact with the actual record, and this segment checks every one against sworn testimony. Start with the line everyone's arguing about. Nurse practitioner Rebecca Jollotta testified she raised bipolar disorder with the couple weeks before the killings, and Patrick answered her in five words. What he said next has been read as denial by some commenters and as an uneducated husband by others, and the experts who examined Lindsay afterward landed somewhere neither side expected. Then there's the timeline commenters cite as proof Patrick moved on too fast: Manhattan four months after the funerals, a new job at Microsoft, a divorce filed in February 2024, a relationship with Dr. Rachel Danis that same month, and a wedding in Central Park this April, three years and three months after his children died. He was never a suspect. He was never charged. He testified for the prosecution across two days with his movements documented on video. Andrea Yates' husband Rusty reached out to Patrick during this trial, one of the only people alive who understands what he's living through, and warned him about a kind of public scrutiny his own case, twenty-five years ago, never had to survive. Patrick's new wife has already received death threats over claims his attorneys call defamatory, aimed at a man both sides of the courtroom agree did nothing but come home to catastrophe. Five comments, five answers pulled straight from testimony, not speculation, and a reminder of what's actually at stake for a man who isn't even on trial. Links & Legal Footer: Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. Hashtags: #PatrickClancy #RustyYates #HiddenKillersLive #LindsayClancyTrial #LindsayClancy #PostpartumPsychosis #Duxbury #TrueCrime #MentalHealth #TrueCrimeCommunity 

Duane "Keffe D" Davis has told this story to cops, to cameras, and now to a jury — and depending on the day, the target changes. This is the combined recap of Monday's and Tuesday's testimony, Day 5 and Day 6, in the Tupac Shakur murder trial in Las Vegas. Monday's exhibit was a 2009 police interview: Davis describing a hunt for Tupac that started outside Club 662, a .40 Glock pulled from a hidden compartment in the car, and his nephew Orlando Anderson firing the shots — while Davis insists, on tape, that Suge Knight was the actual target that night. Jurors also heard from the photographer who took Tupac's last photo alive, and from a BET director who testified Davis got paid for interviews where he called himself the only man left who could tell the real story — interviews built partly on a sealed police recording that reached production through consultants tied to the original investigation. Tuesday's tape moves the story forward: a 2017 recording where Davis claims Sean "Puffy" Combs wanted Suge Knight "taken care of," and says he tried reaching Combs after the shooting with no response. The defense pushed back hard on letting the jury hear it. The judge let it in. And when the moment came for Davis to say something to Tupac's family, he didn't take it. Combs has denied any role in Tupac's death and has never faced charges. Davis remains the only person charged in the 1996 killing. Two days of tape, one story that keeps shifting. Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. Hashtags #TupacShakur #KeffeD #HiddenKillersLive #TupacMurderTrial #DuaneDavis #SugeKnight #OrlandoAnderson #TrueCrime #LasVegas #SeanCombs 

One commenter on this channel insisted a labor and delivery nurse would never search for the carotid artery, treating it as proof Lindsay Clancy was researching how to hurt her children. That search is real. It's on her phone. Defense attorney Kevin Reddington showed it to the jury himself, to prove the opposite: that she was researching how to end her own life. This trial has generated its own parallel record online, and this segment checks it line by line against sworn testimony. The rope-on-the-door theory doesn't exist in the trial record at all. What does exist: Patrick came home to a silent house, found the bedroom door locked, and testified that's when he knew something was wrong. The prosecution's rebuttal psychiatrist, Dr. Avram Mack, testified Lindsay told him she never locked that door. The exercise bands investigators collected were in the basement with a laptop, nowhere near the bedroom. The blood found outside her window came from her own fall, and the bloodstain analyst called those marks transfer stains, with the only real dispute between attorneys being whether she jumped or slid. Patrick's own timeline that night is documented on two surveillance cameras and a phone log, and Lindsay's defense has never once challenged it. On the 911 call itself, Lindsay told Patrick she'd tried to end her own life and that the kids were in the basement. Her own lawyer isn't blaming Patrick for anything, and the theories that keep circulating about him don't hold up against a timeline nobody in that courtroom disputes. Five popular theories, checked against the actual record, one at a time. Decide what you want about Lindsay Clancy, but decide it on the record. Links & Legal Footer: Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. Hashtags: #LindsayClancy #KevinReddington #HiddenKillersLive #LindsayClancyTrial #PostpartumPsychosis #PatrickClancy #InsanityDefense #TrueCrime #Duxbury #MurderTrial 

Every six months, for as long as the state wants, prosecutors could ask a judge to keep Lindsay Clancy locked inside a hospital instead of a prison. That's the mechanism waiting behind whatever verdict comes out of Plymouth Superior Court, and it's the part almost nobody watching this trial has actually thought through. Massachusetts law follows an insanity acquittal with a forty-day observation window, then commitment petitions that renew in six-month blocks with no ceiling on how many times the state can file. Getting released means convincing a judge Lindsay is no longer mentally ill or dangerous, while carrying a diagnosis her own defense told the jury she'll be managing for the rest of her life. Andrea Yates, acquitted by reason of insanity back in 2006, is still inside a Texas state facility today. That's the closest precedent this case has. It matters more given what jurors have already sat through. The prosecution opened by calling Lindsay "controlling, meticulous, and manipulative" and claiming she faked a suicide attempt, despite the fact that she's paralyzed from the waist down after cutting her own wrists and neck and jumping from a second-story window. During autopsy testimony for eight-month-old Callan, she sobbed hard enough that the judge called a recess. The next morning brought accusations of a hot mic catching someone on the prosecution's side saying "shut her up," which the DA's office disputes. Dueling experts have already left this jury with two incompatible diagnoses, and whichever one wins the verdict will control her treatment, her medication, and her odds of ever walking out of that facility. Psychotherapist Shavaun Scott joins Tony Brueski to lay out exactly how long "not guilty" can actually keep someone confined, and why the number most people assume is nowhere close to the one the law actually allows. Links & Legal Footer: Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. Hashtags: #LindsayClancy #AndreaYates #HiddenKillersLive #LindsayClancyTrial #InsanityDefense #Massachusetts #MentalHealth #CivilCommitment #TrueCrime #PlymouthSuperiorCourt 

Nolan Wells' family says they've offered the district attorney four different dates, on twelve hours' notice, to forensically examine his phone. Seven weeks after Nolan died on Horn Island, Mississippi, no exam has happened. The phone came off the island with Nolan's friends and has been with his family since the first days after his death. Before any official protocol existed, his mother and her sister opened it themselves and went through both of his Snapchat accounts. They were completely empty. On July 15, the family's legal team and District Attorney Angel Myers McIlrath agreed on paper to a joint exam at the Digital Forensics Lab at Mississippi Gulf Coast Community College, both sides' experts included, possibly the FBI too. No date got set. Then the DA's office sent a letter demanding the phone within 48 hours, while Nolan's parents were nowhere near Mississippi. Five days later, the family came back with four separate dates and twelve hours' notice each. Still nothing. Compare that to the three friends who were with Nolan that weekend: they handed their own phones straight to the FBI, no subpoena, no ultimatum, no back-and-forth. The family is asking for one thing before they do the same, a written chain-of-custody protocol that protects what's actually on that device. Forensic examiners say deleted messages can often be pulled from a phone like Nolan's, but the apps themselves purge data from their servers over time, and every week this drags on shrinks that window a little more. No one has been charged. The friends deny touching anything. The family has already subpoenaed Snapchat, Meta, TikTok, WhatsApp, and Life360 for the server-side records the phone alone can't provide. Tony Brueski walks through the paper trail, who offered what, who ignored it, and why a family that's tried this hard to cooperate is still holding a phone nobody official has opened. Links & Legal Footer: Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. Hashtags: #NolanWells #AngelMyersMcIlrath #HiddenKillersLive #HornIsland #Mississippi #ChainOfCustody #DigitalForensics #JusticeForNolan #TrueCrime #NolanWellsPhone 

Three verdicts. Three completely different futures. Lindsay Clancy's jury begins deliberations after closing arguments Thursday, and the outcome determines whether she spends the rest of her life in a prison, a psychiatric hospital, or back in a courtroom for a second trial.Eric Faddis sits down to walk through every scenario. He covers the jury room first — the Massachusetts legal standard that puts the burden on the prosecution, the two-prong test for criminal responsibility, and why the prosecution's own expert acknowledging severe mental illness matters under a standard that says mental disease or defect without requiring a specific diagnosis.If the jury acquits, Clancy enters a commitment process with no end date. Under Massachusetts law, the state can petition for involuntary commitment after 40 days of observation. Andrea Yates has been in a state hospital for twenty years after a similar verdict. Periodic review hearings require the state to prove Clancy remains mentally ill and dangerous. Reddington continues to represent her through those hearings.If the jury convicts on first-degree murder, the sentence is mandatory life without parole. Clancy transfers from Tewksbury Hospital to the corrections system — a paralyzed woman on 24-hour suicide watch moving from a treatment facility to a prison. The conviction goes to the SJC on automatic appeal with the full trial record, including the rejected mental health evidence.If the jury deadlocks, a mistrial is declared. The Karen Read jury deliberated 23 hours across five days and could not reach agreement even after Tuey-Rodriguez instructions.Faddis covers the mechanics of each outcome and what the legal fight looks like for Reddington after every possible verdict.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #HiddenKillers #JuryDeliberation #NotGuiltyInsanity #LifeWithoutParole #PostpartumPsychosis #CriminalAppeal #TrueCrimePodcast #TrueCrime

A first-degree murder conviction does not end the case for Lindsay Clancy or for Kevin Reddington. It changes the fight. The sentence is automatic — life without parole — but the legal work that follows could take years.Eric Faddis sits down to explain the roads available after a guilty verdict. Massachusetts automatically sends every first-degree murder conviction to the Supreme Judicial Court for review. The SJC examines the trial record for legal errors — evidentiary rulings, jury instructions, constitutional issues. That record contains everything the jury heard, including the competing psychiatric testimony and the medical records that formed the basis of the insanity defense. Faddis explains whether that evidence, rejected by the jury, can become the foundation of an appellate argument.The physical reality of Clancy's situation adds another layer. She has been at Tewksbury Hospital since May 2023, paralyzed and on 24-hour suicide watch. A conviction means she transfers from a medical setting to a corrections facility. That handoff involves moving a paraplegic patient on continuous suicide watch into a system built for a different purpose. Faddis covers how that process works and what an attorney can push for on behalf of a client inside the prison system.The jury also has the option of finding Clancy guilty of second-degree murder, which carries life with eventual parole eligibility. Faddis breaks down how a jury lands on second degree when the defense never argued she did not kill her children.Outside of a successful appeal, the only other path out of a first-degree sentence is executive commutation. Massachusetts governors have granted commutations for first-degree murder a handful of times in decades.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #HiddenKillers #FirstDegreeMurder #LifeSentence #CriminalAppeal #PostpartumPsychosis #PrisonSystem #TrueCrimePodcast #TrueCrime

A not-guilty verdict in Lindsay Clancy's trial does not result in her walking out of a courthouse. It results in a commitment hearing — and possibly a lifetime inside a psychiatric facility with no statutory release date.Eric Faddis sits down to explain what that path actually looks like. Under Massachusetts law, the court can order 40 days of hospitalization and observation after a finding of not criminally responsible. The district attorney then petitions for civil commitment. The commitment has no time limit. At periodic review hearings, the state must prove Clancy is still mentally ill and dangerous. If the state meets that burden, she stays. If it does not, a judge could order her release.Clancy is already at Tewksbury Hospital. She has been there since May 2023 for court-ordered mental health treatment. She is paralyzed from the waist down and under 24-hour suicide watch. Whether she goes to a psychiatric commitment facility or a prison, her medical and mental health needs remain significant. Faddis explains what the actual difference in care looks like between the two settings.Andrea Yates killed five of her children in Texas in 2001 and was found not guilty by reason of insanity in 2006. She has remained in a psychiatric hospital for two decades, declining an annual hearing that could lead to release. Her attorney has said she will likely never leave.Faddis covers whether the prosecution can continue fighting to keep Clancy committed after a jury rejected their case, what daily life inside a commitment facility looks like, and whether Reddington's legal role continues after the verdict.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #HiddenKillers #NGRI #PsychiatricCommitment #MentalHealthCourt #PostpartumPsychosis #TrueCrimePodcast #TrueCrime #MassachusettsMurderTrial

Closing arguments in the Lindsay Clancy murder trial begin Thursday after 21 days of testimony and 84 witnesses. What happens next is the part of the trial most people never see — twelve jurors behind a closed door, trying to agree on whether a mother who admits killing her three children was criminally responsible when she did it.Defense attorney and former prosecutor Eric Faddis sits down to explain the mechanics of that room. Massachusetts law requires the prosecution to prove criminal responsibility beyond a reasonable doubt. The defense does not carry that burden. The legal test — rooted in the McHoul standard — asks two questions: could Clancy appreciate the wrongfulness of what she did, and could she conform her conduct to the law. Prosecutors must prove both. If the jury has reasonable doubt on either, the verdict is not guilty by reason of lack of criminal responsibility.The prosecution's own rebuttal expert conceded Clancy suffered from severe mental illness. He called it depression, not psychosis. The legal standard does not specify a diagnosis — it says mental disease or defect.Faddis covers how jurors organize deliberations, how unanimous-verdict requirements shape the dynamics when holdouts emerge, and what tools the judge has when a jury reports it cannot reach agreement. He explains the Tuey-Rodriguez instruction — Massachusetts' last-resort charge to a deadlocked jury — and what happened when it was used in the Karen Read case.The jury in this case includes twelve women and six men. They begin their work after closing arguments end.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #HiddenKillers #JuryDeliberation #CriminalResponsibility #InsanityDefense #PostpartumPsychosis #TrueCrimePodcast #TrueCrime #MassachusettsMurderTrial

Her best-case scenario is the insanity verdict — the one where the jury agrees her mind was broken and she isn't criminally responsible. Live with Tony Brueski, psychotherapist Shavaun Scott spends three full segments showing why even that outcome keeps Lindsay Clancy behind locked doors, possibly forever — and why the alternative is darker still.The full interview runs the board. Segment one: the conviction path, where life without parole meets a paralyzed body and a psychiatric history inside a prison system federal investigators already flagged for how it treats inmates in crisis. Segment two: the commitment path, where six-month renewals stack into decades, release means disproving a lifelong illness, and Andrea Yates — twenty years confined after her own acquittal — stands as the cautionary tale. Segment three: Patrick Clancy's parallel ordeal, from the accusations his attorneys call patently false to the death threats against his new wife to the guidance of the one man who's survived this before him.Shavaun brings decades of clinical and forensic experience; Tony brings the questions the audience shouts at their screens. The chat gets the final segment, and the debate is already raging: if no door ever opens for Lindsay Clancy, did this trial ever really have stakes?Come argue. This one runs deep.END LINKS:Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodDISCLAIMER:This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS:#LindsayClancy #PatrickClancy #TrueCrime #LindsayClancyTrial #TrueCrimePodcast #TrueCrimeCommunity #PostpartumPsychosis #HiddenKillers #Massachusetts #MentalHealth

Patrick Clancy did what every grief counselor would tell him to do: he rebuilt. New city, new marriage, new routines to structure the days. And the public punished him for every piece of it. Live with Tony Brueski, psychotherapist Shavaun Scott examines why moving forward made a grieving father a target.The pattern is brutal in its logic. He relocated to Manhattan — cold, they said. He remarried in April — too fast, they said. He runs marathons and holds a job — too functional for a man who lost three children, they said. Shavaun breaks down the psychology behind the public's grief-policing: why observers appoint themselves judges of another person's timeline, and what they're actually protecting when they do it. She also explains why a survivor who looks okay draws more suspicion than one who falls apart.She also addresses what the audience can't see — the gap between a rebuilt exterior and whatever remains underneath, and whether the appearance of recovery after a loss this size can ever be trusted as the whole story.The chat takes over from there, on the question that has divided this audience since the wedding news broke: is there a right way to grieve three children — and who gets to decide?END LINKS:Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodDISCLAIMER:This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS:#LindsayClancy #PatrickClancy #TrueCrime #LindsayClancyTrial #RustyYates #TrueCrimePodcast #TrueCrimeCommunity #HiddenKillers #Massachusetts #GriefSupport

The insanity defense is pitched as the outcome where Lindsay Clancy gets help instead of punishment. Live with Tony Brueski, psychotherapist Shavaun Scott examines the fine print — and the fine print runs long.Here's the structure the coverage skips. An acquittal by reason of insanity doesn't release anyone in Massachusetts. It triggers observation, then commitment hearings the state can renew twice a year, indefinitely. The burden then reverses onto her: prove to a judge that the illness her lawyers spent a trial establishing no longer makes her dangerous. Shavaun explains why that reversal is nearly impossible to satisfy when the underlying condition never fully leaves.The live conversation covers what daily existence inside a long commitment looks like — the locked units, the medication decisions made by strangers, the years measured in review hearings. She also digs into what that life does to a person when "stable" is never quite stable enough. Shavaun has watched this cycle from the clinical side for decades, and her account of it is unlike anything the trial coverage has offered.The chat drives the second half, and the question on the table is the one dividing every comment section: if she never leaves, did she really win anything at all?END LINKS:Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodDISCLAIMER:This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS:#LindsayClancy #PatrickClancy #TrueCrime #LindsayClancyTrial #AndreaYates #TrueCrimePodcast #TrueCrimeCommunity #MentalHealth #HiddenKillers #Massachusetts

Every prison in Massachusetts was designed around an assumption: the inmate can stand up. Lindsay Clancy can't. Psychotherapist Shavaun Scott joins Tony Brueski live to talk through the collision between a mandatory life sentence and a defendant the system was never constructed to hold.Clancy needs two people to lift her from bed to wheelchair. Her psychiatric medications require careful daily balancing. She has been under unbroken supervision since January 2023 because of the risk she poses to herself. Every one of those needs is met by a hospital — and a first-degree murder conviction takes the hospital away.Shavaun spent decades in forensic and crisis settings, and she lays out the gap between what Clancy requires and what a correctional facility delivers. The conversation moves from the physical reality — bathing, transfers, medical care handled by corrections staff instead of nurses — to the psychological one: what happens inside a person when the people surrounding her stop being caregivers and become guards.This is the conversation the verdict coverage isn't having. Tony and Shavaun take it live, with the chat weighing in on the question that has no comfortable answer: when the defendant is this broken, what is prison actually for?END LINKS:Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodDISCLAIMER:This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS:#LindsayClancy #PatrickClancy #TrueCrime #LindsayClancyTrial #TrueCrimePodcast #TrueCrimeCommunity #PostpartumPsychosis #HiddenKillers #Massachusetts #PrisonSystem