My Crazy Family | A Podcast of Crazy Family Stories

The questions listeners are asking about the Nancy Guthrie investigation aren't about politics. They're operational. And they deserve operational answers.Retired FBI Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program Chief Robin Dreeke has worked within multi-agency investigations, understands how institutional pressure cascades down to active casework, and has spent his career reading how officials in authority communicate — including when an investigation isn't producing the results they're publicly claiming it is. That expertise is precisely what this conversation draws on.The Guthrie investigation is now approaching two months without an arrest, a named suspect, or confirmed motive. The FBI and the Pima County Sheriff's Department have been co-leading the case from early on. DNA recovered from the scene has produced no CODIS matches. Physical searches have wound down. Tip volume has decreased. Investigators have been specifically requesting footage from January 11, weeks prior to the abduction, though the significance of that date has not been publicly confirmed. And the sheriff co-leading the investigation is simultaneously navigating a unanimous no-confidence vote, a Board of Supervisors compliance directive, and an active recall effort.Robin Dreeke addresses the structural and behavioral dimensions of these conditions: what they mean for the investigators actually working the case, whether FBI involvement provides insulation from disruption at the command level, how officials in crisis communicate about stalling investigations, and what conditions — realistically — could break this case open now versus later.These are not abstract questions. They come from people who have been following Nancy Guthrie's case closely, who understand that her family's ability to ever get answers may depend on what is happening right now.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NancyGuthrie #RobinDreeke #FBI #PimaCounty #ChrisNanos #HiddenKillersLive #MissingPersons #TrueCrime #InvestigativeAnalysis #SavannahGuthrie

When the man running the most high-profile missing persons case in the country is simultaneously fighting for his professional survival, you need more than commentary. You need a framework.Robin Dreeke is the former Chief of the FBI's Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program. He spent his career studying how people in authority behave when their constructed identities come under pressure — how they manage selective disclosure, how they process public rejection, how they sustain a false professional version of themselves inside the same institution for decades.Chris Nanos has been at the center of the Nancy Guthrie investigation since early February. He has also been at the center of a credibility crisis nearly as long. The documented record from his El Paso PD tenure — suspensions, insubordination — was never disclosed to Pima County across 42 years. Under oath, he denied it. When records surfaced, the explanation shifted. His own deputies voted unanimously against him. The Board of Supervisors has moved to compel sworn reporting. A recall effort is underway.Robin Dreeke doesn't speculate. He applies the frameworks developed through a career reading people inside national security operations to the publicly documented record of Nanos' behavior. The denial under oath. The rapid compliance the moment removal became legally possible, which legal observers note effectively closes the procedural door on that removal. The repeated reassurances that the investigation is progressing. The silence after the most public professional rejection of his career.This isn't a hit piece. It's an analysis. And it's the kind of analysis that doesn't get offered at a county supervisor meeting. Your questions, answered by someone who has spent a career in exactly this territory.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#RobinDreeke #ChrisNanos #NancyGuthrie #FBI #BehavioralAnalysis #PimaCounty #HiddenKillersLive #MissingPersons #TrueCrime #CriminalPsychology

Join Hidden Killers hosts Tony Brueski and Robin Dreeke for all three parts of their live conversation with psychotherapist Shavaun Scott — the most in-depth psychological examination of the Duggar story you're going to find anywhere.Two brothers facing criminal charges. One in federal prison. A father who has faced no legal consequences. An organization still operating. A 14-year-old girl in the middle of an active investigation. Four young children whose world just collapsed.Scott is a thirty-year licensed clinician who has worked in forensic mental health, domestic violence, trauma recovery, and criminal psychology — and who grew up inside a fundamentalist religious system herself. She brings the clinical framework and the lived experience to every part of this conversation.Part 1 — The system. What IBLP actually taught and what it was built to produce. Part 2 — The men. What a forensic clinician actually sees when she looks at Josh, Joseph, and Jim Bob Duggar. Part 3 — The survivors. What recovery takes and what the people at the center of this story need right now.Call in. Be part of the conversation. This is the full series.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#DuggarFamily #IBLP #ShavaunScott #TrueCrime #HiddenKillersLive #ReligiousAbuse #DuggarFamilySecrets #ForensicPsychology #TraumaRecovery #19KidsAndCounting

Join Hidden Killers hosts Tony Brueski and Robin Dreeke live for the final part of their three-part conversation with psychotherapist Shavaun Scott — and this one is about the people who matter most.Jill Duggar spent years in therapy before she could describe what her childhood actually looked like. This week she released a statement condemning abuse and supporting the victim. There's a 14-year-old girl in the middle of an active criminal investigation who carried what allegedly happened to her for nearly five years before she said anything. There are four children ages 3 to 7 whose parents are both now facing criminal charges. And there are hundreds of thousands of former IBLP members watching this story become national news — people who have been saying this for years.Scott has spent thirty years helping people recover from trauma, closed systems, and the kind of harm that doesn't have a name until someone finally gives you one. She's going to talk about what recovery actually takes — and what the people at the center of this story need right now.Call in. This is Part 3 of 3.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#JillDuggar #DuggarFamily #IBLP #TrueCrime #HiddenKillersLive #TraumaRecovery #ReligiousAbuse #DuggarFamilySecrets #19KidsAndCounting #ShavaunScott

Join Hidden Killers hosts Tony Brueski and Robin Dreeke live for Part 2 of their three-part conversation with psychotherapist Shavaun Scott — and this one goes straight at the men.Josh Duggar is in federal prison. Joseph Duggar was arrested this week on charges he allegedly admitted to twice. Their father Jim Bob has known about abuse inside his family since 2002, chose church elders over police every time, and testified under oath that he couldn't remember any of it. A federal judge called that testimony not credible in writing.Scott has spent thirty years sitting across from perpetrators of violence in forensic settings. She's going to tell you what she actually sees when she looks at these three men — their patterns, their psychology, and what the complete absence of real accountability produces over time.Call in. This is the conversation the headlines aren't having. This is Part 2 of 3.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#JoshDuggar #JosephDuggar #JimBobDuggar #DuggarFamily #TrueCrime #HiddenKillersLive #ForensicPsychology #DuggarFamilySecrets #19KidsAndCounting #ShavaunScott

Join Hidden Killers hosts Tony Brueski and Robin Dreeke live as they sit down with psychotherapist Shavaun Scott for Part 1 of a three-part conversation on the Duggar family and the organization that built them.Before the arrests. Before the convictions. Before any of it — there was IBLP. The Institute in Basic Life Principles told millions of American families that fathers held absolute authority, that female submission was God's design, and that leaving that authority was, in their own published words, witchcraft. They kept sex education out of their homeschool curriculum. They said fear of dying in pregnancy was satanic. They described rock music as more addictive than crack cocaine.Scott is a thirty-year licensed psychotherapist who specializes in trauma recovery and the psychology of violent behavior — and who grew up inside a fundamentalist religious system herself. She brings the clinical framework and the lived experience to one of the most important questions in this story: how does a system like IBLP get that level of control — and what does it produce in the families who live inside it?Call in. Join the conversation. This is Part 1 of 3.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#DuggarFamily #IBLP #BillGothard #TrueCrime #HiddenKillersLive #ReligiousAbuse #CultExposed #DuggarFamilySecrets #19KidsAndCounting #ShavaunScott

A recorded confession. A gun pointed — but at who? A man on trial for killing a predator the courts let go. Three active cases, and not one fits neatly into a headline.Joseph Duggar's defense starts at a massive disadvantage — two alleged confessions before counsel, one reportedly caught on tape. He's facing felony sex abuse charges in Florida while he and his wife face child endangerment counts in Arkansas — charges tied to the same investigation but legally split in two.In Massachusetts, Kelsey Fitzsimmons stands trial before a single judge. One charge: assault with a dangerous weapon. The case hinges entirely on where her weapon was aimed — her own head or another officer's. The defense, led by former AG Martha Coakley, argues meaning can turn on a single phrase.And in Arkansas, Aaron Spencer is just weeks from trial for killing a man who'd faced 40 counts of child sexual abuse and walked free. Those charges won't follow into Spencer's courtroom — legally, they never existed.On Hidden Killers, criminal defense attorney Bob Motta, retired FBI behavioral analyst Robin Dreeke, and host Tony Brueski examine all three cases with the depth they demand. They explore the legal strategies, psychological dynamics, and public narratives shaping three cases the system wasn't built to make simple.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#JosephDuggar #KelseyFitzsimmons #AaronSpencer #DuggarCase #FitzsimmonsTrial #SpencerTrial #HiddenKillers #CriminalDefense #BobMotta #RobinDreeke

Michael Fosler faced 40 counts of child sexual abuse — until a judge let him out on bond. He never made it to trial. Aaron Spencer is accused of making sure he didn't — and now Spencer's the one walking into court on June 22nd.The case has shaken Arkansas: a judge removed, an election swayed, and prosecutors insisting the public has the story wrong. On Hidden Killers, criminal defense attorney Bob Motta, retired FBI behavioral analyst Robin Dreeke, and host Tony Brueski examine where the Spencer case actually stands and what the next 90 days mean for the outcome. They break down the prosecution's media strategy, the risks of Spencer's own public statements, and the behavioral fallout when the justice system itself becomes the story. The charges against Fosler are gone — but the system that failed him will still be standing in that courtroom.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#AaronSpencer #MichaelFosler #SpencerTrial #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #CriminalDefense #ArkansasCase #SelfDefense #BobMotta #RobinDreeke

Everyone agrees on one thing: Kelsey Fitzsimmons drew her gun, and another officer pulled the trigger. What no one agrees on is where that gun was aimed. At Officer Noonan? Or at herself?Now, one judge — no jury — will decide what really happened in those split seconds. On Hidden Killers, criminal defense attorney Bob Motta, retired FBI behavioral analyst Robin Dreeke, and host Tony Brueski dig into how the defense is building its case when the shooting itself isn't in dispute. They break down the bench trial strategy, the surprising choice of a former Massachusetts Attorney General for the defense, and how mental health, police testimony, and perception collide in one of the most complex law-enforcement trials in recent memory.This is a case decided on the edge of one perceived moment. Hidden Killers examines what the legal record actually shows.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KelseyFitzsimmons #PoliceTrial #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #BenchTrial #CriminalDefense #BobMotta #RobinDreeke #WeaponsAssault #MassachusettsCrime

Joseph Duggar is accused of sexually abusing a child — and reportedly confessed – twice. Once to the victim's father, and again to detectives during a recorded call. Now, he's facing charges in two states: molestation and lewd conduct in Florida, and child endangerment and false imprisonment in Arkansas — matching the number of children in his home.On Hidden Killers, criminal defense attorney Bob Motta, retired FBI behavioral analyst Robin Dreeke, and host Tony Brueski break down how a recorded confession changes everything for the defense, what happens when two state cases collide, and how a family's long history of “handling things internally” becomes evidence in open court.This isn't just another criminal case — it's a fight to rebuild a defense from a confession that's already on tape.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#JosephDuggar #KendraDuggar #DuggarCase #ChildSexAbuse #HiddenKillers #CriminalDefense #BobMotta #RobinDreeke #ArkansasCrime #TrueCrime

The Hidden Killers team delivers an urgent, extended analytical session with retired FBI behavioral analyst Robin Dreeke, connecting three high-stakes investigations through behavioral science, institutional power, and the hard evidence now surfacing.In the Duggar case:Joseph and Kendra Duggar face active criminal charges while Josh Duggar remains in federal prison, his appeal denied. Robin dissects the behavioral and psychological signatures running through this family's history — the repeated use of silence and internal “accountability” to manage alleged abuse — and what happens when prosecutors re-enter a system built to keep outsiders out. The alleged victim's five-year delay in disclosure becomes a focal point as Robin unpacks what that gap reveals psychologically and evidentially.Inside IBLP:The Institute in Basic Life Principles shaped the Duggar framework from the start. Robin exposes how the Umbrella of Authority doctrine, coupled with deliberate suppression of sex education and boundary awareness, created generations unable to name harm when it occurred. Founder Bill Gothard, accused by more than 34 women, remains uncharged at age 91 — while his organization continues. Robin breaks down how structures like IBLP protect leadership, sanitize abuse, and sustain power long after exposure.In the Nancy Guthrie investigation:Federal agents are now canvassing individuals who left the area before Nancy disappeared — an uncommon move seven weeks into a missing person case, signaling a sharpened investigative theory. The case sheriff stands accused of false testimony under oath, shaking law enforcement credibility mid-investigation. The Guthrie family continues to highlight January 11th, a date law enforcement has conspicuously ignored — a silence that may speak volumes. Robin analyzes what each of these details signals about focus, pressure, and fracture points inside the investigation.Three cases. One pattern: a collision of closed systems, compromised authority, and the slow-breaking silence that follows.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#JosephDuggar #NancyGuthrie #IBLP #BillGothard #RobinDreeke #DuggarFamily #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #FBIInvestigation #TrueCrimePodcast

Seven weeks into the Nancy Guthrie disappearance, the investigation has reached a critical pivot point — and the Hidden Killers team is examining the developments shaking the case from inside and out. The FBI is reportedly conducting a targeted canvass aimed at individuals who left the area before Nancy vanished, while questions of sheriff misconduct and the still-unaddressed January 11th timeline gap raise escalating concerns about how this case is being handled.According to local reporting, FBI agents have been quietly revisiting Guthrie's former neighborhood, asking pointed questions about those who moved away in the weeks leading up to her disappearance. At day 49, this kind of specific, backward-looking inquiry is no routine sweep — it suggests an active theory and a narrowed focus. Retired FBI behavioral analyst Robin Dreeke dissects what this shift signals about investigators' timeline and priorities — and what it may reveal about who they now believe holds the key to Nancy's disappearance.Meanwhile, the Guthrie family has taken matters further, directly urging the Tucson community to search their memories and share any relevant details. Robin breaks down what such parallel public outreach suggests about their confidence in official progress — and the delicate balance between aiding an investigation and pressuring one.Complicating the case further, the sheriff overseeing key elements of the investigation has now been accused of false testimony under oath about his past record. Robin examines the behavioral red flags tied to deception by authority figures — and how compromised leadership at this stage can ripple through an entire investigation.The family continues to emphasize January 11th — roughly three weeks before Nancy vanished — as a date of significance. Law enforcement has yet to publicize its relevance or connection. That silence isn't neutral — it's data. Robin explains what investigators' unwillingness to address that date may really indicate, and why it could be central to understanding what happened to Nancy Guthrie.Each unanswered question now feels heavier. Every delay matters. The clock on this case isn't just ticking — it's running out on clarity.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NancyGuthrie #MissingPersons #Tucson #RobinDreeke #HiddenKillers #FBIInvestigation #JusticeForNancy #TrueCrime #MissingWoman #TrueCrimePodcast

The Duggar story didn't begin with Josh's crimes or Joseph's allegations. It began decades earlier — with Bill Gothard and the Institute in Basic Life Principles (IBLP) — a movement engineered to control families from the top down. It's time to confront what this system was built to do, how it operates behind closed doors, and why the Duggars aren't an anomaly. They're the blueprint.At the core of IBLP lies the Umbrella of Authority: fathers hold absolute power over wives, wives over children — and questioning that hierarchy is equated with defying God. That belief isn't just doctrine. It's a mechanism of silence. Robin Dreeke and I break down what happens inside households built on unquestioned control — and why, when harm occurs, the response is almost always to hide it.These children weren't merely sheltered. They were systematically denied sex education, vocabulary for consent, or even the language to name abuse. According to former members, that ignorance wasn't accidental — it was intentional. Robin exposes what happens psychologically to a child raised without those tools, and how that developmental void shapes disclosure years, or even decades, later.Bill Gothard, founder and longtime leader of IBLP, has been accused by more than 34 women of harassment and sexual assault. He's 91, never criminally charged, and his organization still operates — largely untouched. Robin and I examine how institutions like this survive exposure, recycle power, and evade accountability.Jill Duggar walked away and publicly condemned the system. Jinger Duggar followed. But former members don't describe leaving as walking out of a church — they describe deprogramming, rebuilding identity from the ground up. Robin explains what that means clinically, and why society still avoids calling such systems what they truly are.The deeper question is no longer how this happened — it's how many more families this system is still quietly shaping right now.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#IBLP #BillGothard #DuggarFamily #JosephDuggar #ReligiousAbuse #TrueCrime #RobinDreeke #HiddenKillers #Cult #TrueCrimePodcast

The Hidden Killers team launches a gripping, high-stakes analysis with retired FBI behavioral analyst Robin Dreeke, exposing the escalating psychological and behavioral patterns inside the Duggar household — and what the evidence reveals about how this insular family system continues to process alleged harm behind closed doors.Joseph Duggar grew up in the same tightly controlled environment that shielded Josh Duggar's alleged conduct for years before law enforcement intervened. Now, prosecutors allege Joseph has perpetrated his own offense within that same structure. Robin dissects what the family's documented history tells investigators and prosecutors confronting new allegations in a household that has long managed harm internally and away from scrutiny.Kendra Duggar entered this world at age 19, raised under the same doctrines of submission, male dominance, and enforced silence — and now faces charges of her own. Robin digs into the psychological research on individuals conditioned in high-control religious systems and what that conditioning means when accountability finally comes knocking.The alleged victim in this case reportedly carried her trauma for five years before disclosing, from age nine to fourteen. Robin breaks down what sustained silence like this usually signifies, how investigators interpret delayed disclosures, and how these patterns align with known abuse dynamics inside strictly hierarchical family systems.Meanwhile, Josh Duggar remains incarcerated on federal child sexual abuse material charges after his appeal was denied — still issuing statements of alleged innocence from prison. Robin probes the behavioral traits of those who never develop functional accountability and what that persistent denial exposes about how cycles of abuse can perpetuate over generations.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#JosephDuggar #DuggarFamily #JoshDuggar #KendraDuggar #RobinDreeke #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #BehavioralAnalysis #DuggarCase #TrueCrimePodcast

Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer spent her career inside one of the most powerful investigative institutions in the country. In this conversation, she applies the analytical frameworks developed across that career to three active cases — each one a different kind of institutional breakdown.The Kelsey Fitzsimmons case is, at its core, a question of how law enforcement handles mentally vulnerable subjects during high-stakes domestic interventions. Coffindaffer examines what protocol should exist, where it failed, and what the evidentiary record looks like when two people in a doorway give directly competing accounts of where a gun was pointed. The bench trial format, the role of a sworn affidavit from an interested party in triggering the legal chain of events, the DA's decision not to pursue the break-in — each of these is a system-level decision with analytical weight.The Nancy Guthrie investigation requires a different framework: what happens to an active investigation when its lead agency has an institutional credibility problem? Coffindaffer understands how a culture of fear inside an agency affects evidence decisions, information flow, and FBI cooperation. She also understands forensic genetic genealogy — what it requires, where it's vulnerable, and what early crime scene release and private lab processing mean for whether biological evidence can survive a legal challenge. With the ransom motive now being publicly questioned, she assesses what a credible investigative pivot looks like at this stage.The Kouri Richins conviction offers a third framework: how juries process circumstantial cases when the documentary evidence tells a story the defendant can't rebut. Coffindaffer examines what actually drove the conviction, what the appeal record legitimately holds, and what the road ahead looks like for a defendant who maintained innocence through every phase of this case.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KelseyFitzsimmons #NancyGuthrie #KouriRichins #HiddenKillersLive #FBIAnalysis #BenchTrial #MissingPersons #FentanylMurder #CriminalJustice #TrueCrime

Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer examines the Kouri Richins conviction with a specific analytical lens: not just what the jury decided, but what the evidentiary record required them to navigate — and what, if anything, in that record supports a viable appeal.The prosecution won this case without a recovered murder weapon. Its star witness — central to establishing Kouri Richins' access to fentanyl — faced significant credibility challenges during cross-examination that were visible and documented. The defense called no witnesses, a strategic choice Coffindaffer addresses directly. Despite that combination — which in many cases would be sufficient to generate reasonable doubt — the jury returned a conviction.What Coffindaffer brings to this analysis is a behavioral and investigative framework for understanding how a jury processes a case built largely on circumstantial evidence. Eric Richins' documented estate restructuring 18 months before his death, with a stated purpose of protecting his children from their mother, is the kind of pre-mortem evidence that carries unusual weight — it frames the entire relationship without requiring forensics. The financial pattern prosecutors established alongside it constructed a motive structure the defense never systematically dismantled.On appeal, the record carries legitimate material. The coaching video involving the prosecution's star witness raised procedural questions. That witness sustained credibility damage in front of the jury. The lead detective's own sworn testimony acknowledged the physical absence of fentanyl at the crime scene. Whether those issues rise to reversible error — or represent challenges that fall below the appellate threshold — is the core question addressed here.Sentencing is the immediate next phase. What Kouri Richins does at that proceeding will shape the early stages of any appeal strategy.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #EricRichins #GuiltyVerdict #FentanylMurder #AppealAnalysis #HiddenKillersLive #MurderVerdict #CircumstantialEvidence #TrueCrime #JenniferCoffindaffer

Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer has spent her career inside federal law enforcement. She knows what a functioning investigation looks like, and she knows what institutional dysfunction does to one. The Nancy Guthrie case — now 47 days in with no arrest — is raising questions that go directly to the structural integrity of the lead agency.The sheriff running this investigation was reportedly pushed out of a prior law enforcement position with a documented disciplinary history including excessive force, insubordination, and off-duty gambling violations. He subsequently misstated that history in a sworn deposition. His own agency personnel reportedly considered driving a recall effort and stayed quiet out of fear. That culture — inside the agency coordinating evidence, directing FBI access, and controlling the public narrative on this case — is the analytical starting point.Coffindaffer understands how an agency head with a complicated relationship to the truth affects the decisions that get made in the field. What gets documented. What gets routed upstream. What doesn't. She also understands forensic genetic genealogy — its prosecutorial potential and its legal vulnerabilities — including what early crime scene release and private lab processing mean for whether biological evidence remains viable at trial.January 24th has been added to the list of dates of interest alongside January 11th. FBI veterans are publicly questioning the ransom motive. Camera coverage of Nancy's property has been expanded and yielded nothing beyond a single doorbell image. The suspect profile may need to be rebuilt from the ground up.What should be happening right now, at day 47, that isn't — Coffindaffer doesn't pull that punch.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NancyGuthrie #MissingPersons #SheriffRecall #InvestigationIntegrity #ForensicGenealogy #HiddenKillersLive #FBIAnalysis #CompromisedInvestigation #TrueCrime #JenniferCoffindaffer

Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer brings a framework to the Kelsey Fitzsimmons case that goes beyond the courtroom question of guilt or innocence — she examines the institutional layers that converted a woman in documented mental health crisis into a criminal defendant.Coffindaffer spent decades inside federal law enforcement. She understands what protocols exist, what should exist, and where the gap between them becomes dangerous. In this case: what is the actual standard for how responding officers handle a mentally vulnerable mother at a custody execution? What weight does a sworn affidavit from an ex-partner carry legally when its author has an obvious interest in the outcome? And when a DA declines to pursue an alleged home entry, account access, and removal of defense-favorable material during a 53-day hospitalization — what does that decision signal about which party the system is oriented toward?The factual record is not in dispute on several points. Fitzsimmons was on documented medical leave for postpartum depression. A restraining order was executed at her home on June 30, 2025. She was shot. She spent 53 days hospitalized with a collapsed lung. She is now charged with assault with a dangerous weapon, facing a bench trial with a single judge as the finder of fact.The dispute is narrow and consequential: was she trying to die, or trying to kill? That question — settled in an instant, at a threshold, between a woman in crisis and a law enforcement officer — is now in front of one person in a courtroom.Coffindaffer's analysis here isn't about sympathy. It's about documented institutional patterns, where they fail, and what the record in this case actually reflects.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KelseyFitzsimmons #PostpartumDepression #FelonyAssault #BenchTrial #HiddenKillersLive #InstitutionalFailure #CriminalJustice #AssaultWithADangerousWeapon #TrueCrime #JenniferCoffindaffer

This week in Hidden Killers' Week in Review, the behavioral and psychological framework underneath the Murdaugh case gets its most complete examination. The Name is a five-part series — and Parts 1 and 2 together form the foundation that every other piece of this story sits on.Part 1 starts where the case actually starts: 1920. For eighty-six years, three generations of Murdaughs held prosecutorial power in South Carolina's lowcountry. They built institutional control over who faced consequences and who didn't. They raised Alex inside a system where problems were handled, not faced — where the family name functioned as both identity and immunity. The behavioral analysis at the center of Part 1 examines what that environment produces psychologically over a lifetime: a person who does not experience accountability as real, who cannot genuinely process consequences, and who therefore cannot be deterred by them. The dynasty didn't just enable Alex Murdaugh. It built him.Part 2 examines what he built inside that protection. While everyone saw the charming attorney, the real operating system was running in parallel: millions stolen from clients, a serious opioid addiction sustained over years, a financial fraud architecture that required constant new crimes to prevent collapse. Maggie was meeting with divorce attorneys. The Mallory Beach boat crash — a young woman dead and a family cover-up that followed — was the first significant test of whether the machine still worked. The covert narcissist's behavioral signature is the performance — the warmth, the charm, the devoted family man — maintained precisely because the exposure beneath it requires constant management. Part 2 examines that signature: how it hides, what sustains it, and what happens behaviorally when the control starts to fracture.This is the series the Murdaugh case has always needed.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#AlexMurdaugh #MurdaughDynasty #MurdaughFamily #CovertNarcissist #MurdaughFraud #MalloryBeach #MaggieAndPaul #HiddenKillersLive #BehavioralAnalysis #TrueCrime

This week in Hidden Killers' Week in Review, the expert analysis on the Nancy Guthrie investigation addresses what the public posture of this case is actually communicating — and what forty days of evidence buildup is quietly saying underneath it.Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer and behavioral analyst Robin Dreeke join Tony Brueski to break down where the investigation stands and what its current direction reveals. Sheriff Nanos went on national television stating investigators believe they know why Nancy's home was targeted, then immediately hedged that statement. He also told the public not to assume they are safe. Coffindaffer and Dreeke examine both statements — what each communicates about the investigation's actual position, and why the hedge matters as much as the assertion.The shift in investigative posture — cadaver dogs paused, ground searches scaled back, everything redirected to digital forensics and detective work — gets Coffindaffer's full professional assessment of what it signals versus how it's being interpreted publicly. The detail that's been significantly underreported anchors her analysis: in early March, more than a month into the investigation, agents were still going door-to-door asking neighbors about internet disruptions from the specific night Nancy disappeared, alongside a damaged utility box near her home. Coffindaffer explains what that investigative focus reveals about how this crime was allegedly planned and what it tells us about where the case is actually headed.Dreeke addresses the silence. Forty thousand tips. One point two million dollars in reward money. Six weeks of national coverage. And not one person close to the alleged perpetrator has made that call. The Ring camera vehicle 2.5 miles from Nancy's home at 2:36 a.m. remains unidentified. The DNA is too complex for a clean profile. CODIS returned nothing twice. Dreeke examines when that combination of silence and evidentiary dead ends becomes something investigators have to treat as a signal in itself.Nanos says they're closer. Coffindaffer and Dreeke break down what that looks like before it breaks.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NancyGuthrie #NancyGuthrieMissing #TucsonKidnapping #HiddenKillersLive #JenniferCoffindaffer #RobinDreeke #SheriffNanos #FBIInvestigation #MissingPersons #TrueCrime

This week in Hidden Killers' Week in Review, the behavioral analysis that matters most on the Kouri Richins case goes beyond the trial record and into the psychological architecture underneath it — the compulsion to perform grief publicly, and the documented history of victims who recognized what was being done to them and couldn't escape it anyway.After prosecutors say Kouri Richins killed her husband, she wrote a children's book. "Are You With Me?" A father who dies and becomes a firefly. She appeared on morning shows. She performed. Tony Brueski examines that behavior through the case that documents the narcissist's narrative compulsion at its most explicit — Nancy Crampton-Brophy, who published an essay in 2011 titled "How to Murder Your Husband," discussing methods and motivations under her real name, then shot her husband Daniel twice in the chest seven years later. The essay was excluded from her trial. The jury convicted her anyway. She bought the gun with traceable purchases. She drove herself to the crime scene. The need to be recognized as clever — to be seen — overrides the operational instinct to disappear. Kouri wrote herself as the bereaved mother. Nancy wrote herself as the expert. Both stepped into public light that ultimately exposed them.The victims' side of that dynamic is equally documented. Eric Richins told people after Valentine's Day 2022 that he believed Kouri was poisoning him. He had been violently ill. Prosecutors say she killed him with five times the lethal dose of fentanyl approximately a month later. Bobby Curley, in a hospital on September 22, 1991, physically grabbed a nurse and said clearly: "Please help me. My wife is trying to kill me. She is not as she seems." He died the next morning. Joann had been poisoning his iced tea with thallium for nearly a year — eleven months confirmed by hair analysis, nine hundred times the lethal dose — while collecting a $1.7 million settlement two days before he died.Both men named it. The behavioral framework that explains why naming it wasn't enough is the work this week's coverage does.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #KouriRichinsGuilty #NancyCramptonBrophy #JoannCurley #BobbyCurley #HiddenKillersLive #PerfectWife #NarcissistKiller #BehavioralAnalysis #TrueCrime

This week in Hidden Killers' Week in Review, the expert analysis on the Kouri Richins case shifts to what happens after a conviction — and what the behavioral record underneath it reveals when examined alongside one of the most documented cases of spousal premeditation in American true crime.Defense attorney Bob Motta and retired FBI Behavioral Analysis Chief Robin Dreeke join Tony Brueski to break down the appellate record the defense preserved across three weeks of trial. The coaching video — investigators on tape directing Carmen Lauber to provide details that would ensure Kouri's murder conviction — was played for a jury that convicted anyway. Motta addresses what that means for an appeal and where a competent appellate attorney actually focuses their energy. The hearsay ruling that kept out testimony about Eric allegedly asking someone about obtaining fentanyl — a ruling the defense ultimately abandoned themselves — factors into that assessment. So does the denied spoliation instruction over a missing pill bottle, and the informant instruction given for Lauber, the only witness connecting Kouri directly to the fentanyl. Dreeke examines what the jury communicated about their processing of the coaching video by returning a guilty verdict in three hours.The premeditated behavioral profile that prosecutors argued defined Kouri's conduct inside the marriage gets its sharpest comparative examination through Melanie McGuire — a case that documents exactly what the same pattern looks like when it reaches its conclusion. McGuire sat across from her husband at a closing, signed mortgage papers with him, and allegedly killed and dismembered him that night. Filed a restraining order against him two days later while allegedly still disposing of his remains. Her Google searches — "undetectable poisons," "how to commit murder," "fatal insulin doses" — became the evidentiary spine of her conviction. Kouri Richins allegedly ran fentanyl searches while Eric was alive, texted a boyfriend about marriage, and maintained a secret $250,000 HELOC he never knew existed.Dreeke's framework for reading the premeditated mind applies to both cases. The calculation doesn't announce itself.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #KouriRichinsGuilty #MelanieMcGuire #BobMotta #RobinDreeke #CriminalAppeal #HiddenKillersLive #PremeditatedMurder #SuitcaseKiller #UtahMurderTrial

This week in Hidden Killers' Week in Review, the expert voices best positioned to explain the Kouri Richins guilty verdict break down both dimensions of the trial that defined it — the defense strategy that collapsed under a three-hour deliberation, and the financial pattern that gave the prosecution its most durable argument.Defense attorney Bob Motta and retired FBI Behavioral Analysis Chief Robin Dreeke join Tony Brueski to examine the defense's zero-witness approach with the honesty the verdict now demands. The jury watched video of investigators directing Carmen Lauber to supply details that would ensure Kouri's murder conviction — before she changed her account. The lead detective confirmed four years of investigation produced no fentanyl connected to Eric Richins' death. Lauber's credibility was attacked on cross-examination and took additional damage when her drug court violations surfaced during trial. Motta identifies the specific decision he believes may have cost the defense this verdict. Dreeke breaks down the behavioral dimension — how a jury processes three weeks of watching a defendant sit silent while witness after witness testifies against her, and what that silence accumulates into by the time deliberations begin.Tony then takes on the portrait the defense worked to paint of Kouri Richins and measures it against the documented financial record. A secretly obtained HELOC draining Eric's accounts. Falsified documents used to secure fraudulent loans. $45,000 taken from a personal friend for a deal that never materialized and left that friend evicted. A home sold with alleged concealed mold problems. A business roughly $7.5 million in debt. Eric's quiet response: an estate attorney told specifically about recently discovered and ongoing financial abuse, and a restructured estate designed to protect his children. He stayed. He said nothing publicly. According to prosecutors, he was dead a year and a half later.That pattern has a name. Two experts. One verdict. This is the breakdown.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #KouriRichinsGuilty #KouriRichinsTrial #HiddenKillersLive #BobMotta #RobinDreeke #DefenseStrategy #EricRichins #FinancialFraud #MurderVerdict

This week in Hidden Killers' Week in Review, the expert voices who analyzed the Kouri Richins trial before the verdict provide the clearest framework for understanding what the guilty verdict actually means. Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer, behavioral analyst Robin Dreeke, and defense attorney Bob Motta each bring a distinct professional lens — and together they form the most complete picture of how this case was built, where it was vulnerable, and why eight jurors came back in three hours.Coffindaffer and Dreeke's pre-verdict breakdown now serves as a precise preview of the jury's reasoning. The defense's zero-witness decision — genuine strategic confidence or the absence of anyone worth calling. The behavioral record Dreeke examined: texts to a new boyfriend one month after Eric's death, memes documented on Kouri's phone the morning his body was found, and what that timeline reveals when mapped against a framework for reading behavior in the aftermath of loss. The recording that prosecutors had no good answer for — their own detectives captured on audio telling Carmen Lauber she needed to provide details that would ensure a murder conviction. Coffindaffer's assessment of how much damage that could do now has a verdict to measure against.Motta and Dreeke then work through how the state won anyway. Eric Richins warned multiple people he believed his wife was trying to poison him eighteen days before he died. The insurance policy timeline. The forged signature. The financial collapse prosecutors documented across three weeks of testimony. Motta examines what a defense attorney sees in a verdict like this — what moved the jury, and what it tells us about the power of accumulated circumstantial evidence when the physical evidence never materializes.Guilty on all counts. Three hours.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #KouriRichinsGuilty #KouriRichinsTrial #HiddenKillersLive #JenniferCoffindaffer #RobinDreeke #BobMotta #EricRichins #MurderVerdict #FentanylMurder

This week in Hidden Killers' Week in Review, the expert analysis that matters most on the Kouri Richins verdict comes from two people who read the defense's position clearly before the jury ever left the room. Defense attorney Bob Motta and retired FBI Behavioral Analysis Chief Robin Dreeke join Tony Brueski to break down what the defense accomplished, what it didn't, and what the guilty verdict on all counts reflects about the choices made on both sides.The prosecution's case gets its full accounting first. Tony walks through the circumstantial record prosecutors called death by a thousand cuts — the alleged $4.5 million in debt, four fentanyl runs allegedly made by the housekeeper at Kouri's request, the Valentine's Day poisoning attempt, deleted text messages, pre-arrest searches for "fentanyl poisoning," a jailhouse letter coaching family testimony, and a conversation with her boyfriend two weeks after Eric died in which she allegedly asked what it feels like to kill someone. No murder weapon. No confession. No eyewitness. No counter-narrative from the defense.Motta examines the three pillars the defense constructed across three weeks of cross-examination: Carmen Lauber's credibility, the absence of physical drug evidence, and the unsolved mystery theory around Eric's death. He addresses the call to rest without testimony — what a defense attorney weighs in that moment and what it signals about how the team assessed their own position.Dreeke brings the behavioral lens: what three weeks of watching Kouri sit silent at the defense table told the jury before closing arguments began, and whether silence ever functions as strategy or simply as absence. The jury took three hours. Guilty on all counts.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #KouriRichinsGuilty #BobMotta #RobinDreeke #KouriRichinsTrial #HiddenKillersLive #DefenseRests #EricRichins #FentanylMurder #MurderVerdict

This week in Hidden Killers' Week in Review, the expert analysis on the Laken Snelling case goes where standard coverage won't. Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer and behavioral analyst Robin Dreeke join Tony Brueski to break down a case that sits at the intersection of behavior, law, and accountability in ways most prosecutions don't.The foundation: University of Kentucky cheerleader Laken Snelling gave birth alone at 4 a.m. on August 27, 2025. Her newborn son was found dead hours later by her roommates — wrapped in a towel, inside a trash bag, in her closet. Born alive. Cause of death: asphyxia by undetermined means. A grand jury indicted her on first-degree manslaughter. She's facing up to 31 years.What makes this case analytically significant is the phone record. Deleted labor photos. Week-by-week pregnancy tracking maintained in private. Months of active concealment running alongside a public life that included nationals competition and a TikTok listing "be a mom" as a life goal. Dreeke treats that record as a behavioral document — examining what sustained parallel concealment reveals about intent, how it differs categorically from denial, and why the distinction matters in a prosecution built on conscious disregard. Coffindaffer works the legal side: whether this evidence holds a first-degree manslaughter charge through trial, what the word "guessed" is going to do in court, and how prosecutors need to handle the roommates' 4 a.m. acceptance of "I fainted" before the defense gets to it first.Then there's the jury question neither of them sidesteps. She's 22. No record. A competitive athlete. Juries carry assumptions about who commits these crimes. The only victim in that room had no voice. What does accountability actually look like in a case like this? Laken Snelling has pleaded not guilty and is presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LakenSnelling #LakenSnellingCase #JenniferCoffindaffer #RobinDreeke #HiddenKillersLive #NeonaticideKentucky #FirstDegreeManslaughter #PregnancyConcealment #KentuckyTrueCrime #TrueCrime2026

This week in Hidden Killers' Week in Review, the most useful expert analysis of the Kouri Richins trial comes into sharper focus now that the verdict is in. Eric Faddis — defense attorney and former felony prosecutor — sat down with Tony Brueski before the jury returned and worked through exactly where this case would be decided. Three hours of deliberation and a guilty verdict on all counts later, his breakdown holds up as a precise map of what the jury was weighing.Faddis examined the defense's drug use theory — the foundation of their case — and assessed what the judicial ruling against it, testimony from Eric's inner circle, and the forensic toxicology record had done to it. He addressed the immunity witnesses directly: both changed their stories, both had something to gain, and a detective's recorded words were turned against the state mid-trial. He didn't minimize any of it.But he also laid out what no defense attorney wants facing them at closing: a client whose deception record spans phone searches, a jailhouse tampering letter, a forged insurance document, and text messages requesting fentanyl three days after her husband died. That analysis is paired with Tony's Day 13 breakdown — the denied directed verdict motion, Detective O'Driscoll's final cross, and the one-hour recess that ended with three available witnesses and a defense that chose silence.The jury answered the question Faddis raised. Guilty on all counts.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #KouriRichinsGuilty #EricFaddis #KouriRichinsTrial #HiddenKillersLive #DefenseRests #FentanylMurder #EricRichins #MurderVerdict #LegalAnalysis

This week in Hidden Killers' Week in Review, the conversations that matter most on the Kouri Richins case aren't happening on the news. Former FBI Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Chief Robin Dreeke and psychotherapist Shavaun Scott join Tony Brueski to examine what the documented record of Kouri Richins' background actually suggests about the pattern of alleged behavior prosecutors are now presenting to a jury.Dreeke brings the behavioral lens: what it looks like when deception becomes a survival mechanism early in life, how that pattern manifests in adult relationships and high-stakes situations, and what the allegedly scripted, carefully layered jailhouse letter tells an expert about the person who wrote it. Scott brings the psychological framework: generational trauma, coercive relational dynamics, and the documented research on children suddenly forced to process a parent's alleged criminal conduct under a national spotlight.That expert analysis is grounded in a detailed breakdown of the Walk the Dog letter itself — six pages read as a complete document, not a collection of out-of-context lines. The Ronney scheme. The airport narrative. The GMA coordination. The Lotto and Katie requests. The Crest whitening strips passage that, once you understand what to look for, lands differently than it reads on first pass.This is the analytical work this case requires. Kouri Richins has pleaded not guilty and is presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #RobinDreeke #ShavaunScott #FBIBehavioralAnalysis #KouriRichinsTrial #TrueCrimePsychology #JailhouseLetter #WalkTheDog #BehavioralAnalysis #HiddenKillersLive

Tonight Tony Brueski and retired FBI Behavioral Analysis Chief Robin Dreeke go live with listener questions across three cases — and nothing is off limits. Kouri Richins is convicted. Does the immunity deal for Carmen Lauber sit right? Does Robin think Kouri believes she did anything wrong? Nancy Guthrie has been missing 46 days with no arrest — investigators just pulled new footage from her property and got nothing. What does Robin's experience say about where this is actually heading? And Kelsey Fitzsimmons waived her right to a jury today. Her trial starts March 23. One judge. A cop who was shot by a cop. A mental health crisis. A disputed moment nobody caught on camera. Listeners have been sitting on these questions all week. Tonight we answer them live.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #NancyGuthrie #KelseyFitzsimmons #RobinDreeke #HiddenKillersLive #TrueCrime #LivePodcast #TrueCrimePodcast #FentanylMurder #TucsonKidnapping

The trial of North Andover police officer Kelsey Fitzsimmons starts March 23. She's charged with assault with a dangerous weapon. And today she waived her right to a jury — putting her entire fate in the hands of a single judge. The case is one of the most contested and emotionally complicated ones we've covered. A new mother. A documented mental health crisis. Her own colleagues arriving at her door. A shooting that both sides describe completely differently. Allegations from her legal team that her ex-fiancé allegedly broke into her home and allegedly stole from her while she was hospitalized — and a DA's office that reportedly won't charge him. Tonight Tony Brueski and Robin Dreeke take your questions live and don't soften any of it. What does it mean to go judge-only five days before trial? How does a woman in a documented postpartum crisis end up as the defendant? And what does Robin's behavioral expertise say about everything that happened in that house before the shot was ever fired?Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KelseyFitzsimmons #HiddenKillersLive #RobinDreeke #NorthAndoverPolice #LivePodcast #TrueCrime #PostpartumDepression #PoliceShootingTrial #TrueCrimePodcast #CriminalTrial

Six weeks since Nancy Guthrie was abducted from her home in Tucson. No suspect. No arrest. And this week's news — more camera footage, nothing useful — isn't making it easier to stay hopeful. Tonight Tony Brueski and retired FBI Behavioral Analysis Chief Robin Dreeke take listener questions live and don't dodge the hard ones. Why are investigators suddenly focused on specific dates weeks before the abduction? What do missed ransom deadlines tell you about the person behind this? Is the sheriff's public messaging helping or hurting the investigation? And with Nancy being 84, needing daily medication, and now 46 days missing — what do Robin's experience and the research actually say about where things stand? Listeners have been carrying these questions. Tonight we work through them.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NancyGuthrie #HiddenKillersLive #RobinDreeke #SavannahGuthrie #TucsonKidnapping #LivePodcast #MissingPerson #TrueCrime #FBIInvestigation #TrueCrimePodcast

The verdict is in. Kouri Richins is going to prison for the fentanyl murder of her husband Eric — and listeners have been sitting on questions ever since the jury came back. Tonight, Tony Brueski and retired FBI Behavioral Analysis Chief Robin Dreeke take them live. What really happens the moment a verdict like this hits someone like Kouri? Does the behavioral mask hold, or does it finally crack? Did the immunity deals for Carmen Lauber and Robert Crozier serve justice — or just serve the prosecution? Is closure actually real for a family that's been living this for four years? And what does Robin — someone who spent a career reading dangerous people — actually think is going on inside Kouri Richins right now? No scripts, no filters. Just the questions listeners couldn't stop asking, and two people who won't dodge them.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #HiddenKillersLive #RobinDreeke #TrueCrime #EricRichins #FentanylMurder #LivePodcast #MurderVerdict #UtahMurder #TrueCrimePodcast

Live on Hidden Killers — psychotherapist Shavaun Scott joins Tony Brueski and Robin Dreeke for the most comprehensive psychological examination of the Kouri Richins case yet. Not the evidence. Not the verdict. The relationship — from the very first moment to the very last one.How someone like Eric Richins gets pulled in before he ever sees the trap. What the years of sustained control do to a person's identity, their judgment, their ability to reach for help. Why leaving is the most dangerous moment — and what doing it safely actually looks like.We're live, we're taking your questions, and we're having the conversation the courtroom couldn't.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #HiddenKillersLive #ShavaunScott #NarcissisticAbuse #LivePodcast #TrueCrimeLive #TraumaBonding #EricRichins #LeavingAbuse #CoerciveControl

Live on Hidden Killers — psychotherapist Shavaun Scott joins Tony Brueski and Robin Dreeke for the final conversation in this series on the psychology behind the Kouri Richins case: how these relationships end, and what it costs.Why is the exit the most dangerous moment? What does a narcissist's rage look like when it's quiet and controlled rather than explosive? How do you actually leave safely — not just emotionally, but physically and logistically? And what does the road back to yourself honestly look like once you're out?We're live and taking your questions. If you need this conversation, or you know someone who does — this is the one.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #HiddenKillersLive #ShavaunScott #LeavingAbuse #NarcissisticAbuse #LivePodcast #TrueCrimeLive #EricRichins #DomesticViolence #SafeExit

Live on Hidden Killers — psychotherapist Shavaun Scott joins Tony Brueski and Robin Dreeke to examine the part of the Kouri Richins story that gets the least attention: what was happening inside that marriage, day to day, long before prosecutors say things turned deadly.The emotional exhaustion. The gaslighting. The affair. The way someone can know something is deeply wrong and still not leave. Scott explains the psychological mechanisms behind all of it in plain language — no clinical jargon, no academic framing — just a direct conversation about what this phase does to a human being.We're live and taking your questions tonight. If you've lived this, are living this, or love someone who is — this is the conversation that names what you couldn't.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #HiddenKillersLive #TraumaBonding #ShavaunScott #NarcissisticAbuse #LivePodcast #Gaslighting #TrueCrimeLive #EricRichins #IntimatePartnerViolence

Live on Hidden Killers — psychotherapist Shavaun Scott joins Tony Brueski and Robin Dreeke to break down what the Kouri Richins case puts in sharp focus: how someone with narcissistic or borderline patterns pulls their partner in before the target ever sees it coming.This isn't about the crime. It's about what came before it — the relationship architecture that prosecutors say was built around control from day one. The love bombing. The mirroring. The children. The pace of it all. And why someone like Eric Richins — capable, grounded, and by all accounts nobody's fool — didn't see the trap until he was already inside it.Shavaun Scott brings over 30 years of clinical experience working with intimate partner violence — as both a therapist and a survivor — and she doesn't speak in clinical terms. She speaks like someone who has sat across from the people living this and the people who caused it.We're taking your questions live tonight as we explore the opening phase of a narcissistic relationship and what the warning signs look like before you can see them clearly.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #HiddenKillersLive #ShavaunScott #NarcissisticAbuse #LivePodcast #TrueCrimeLive #LoveBombing #IntimatePartnerViolence #NarcissistRelationship #EricRichins

Before the arrest. Before the conviction. Kouri Richins sat on camera and sold the world a grief book she didn't write about a husband a jury says she killed.Tony Brueski is going live with psychotherapist Shavaun Scott and retired FBI Behavioral Analysis Chief Robin Dreeke to break down that interview now that we know the full story. What was she doing psychologically? What does Robin Dreeke see in her delivery, her language, her behavior that the average viewer wouldn't catch? What does Shavaun Scott recognize in the performance of grief from someone who, according to a jury, had just committed murder?Watch it with us. Call in. Let's go.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #KouriRichinsGuilty #EricRichins #TrueCrime #BehavioralAnalysis #DeceptionDetection #TrueCrimePodcast #HiddenKillers #RobinDreeke #ShavaunScott

Kouri Richins has been convicted of aggravated murder. Tony Brueski is joined live by defense attorney Bob Motta and retired FBI Behavioral Analysis Chief Robin Dreeke to go through the whole case — prosecution, defense, and the appellate record underneath all of it.What did the state actually prove? What did the defense accomplish without calling a single witness — and why wasn't it enough? Where does the legal fight go from here? Bob Motta and Robin Dreeke break it down live. Call in and join the conversation.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #KouriRichinsGuilty #EricRichins #TrueCrime #MurderTrial #FentanylMurder #TrueCrimePodcast #HiddenKillers #UtahMurder #CriminalAppeal

Kouri Richins has been convicted of aggravated murder. The defense built a record throughout this trial specifically for this moment. Tony Brueski is joined live by defense attorney Bob Motta and retired FBI Behavioral Analysis Chief Robin Dreeke to break it down.The coaching video. The hearsay ruling. The missing pill bottle instruction. The Carmen Lauber informant instruction. Bob Motta tells us where the real appellate arguments are and where they aren't. Robin Dreeke examines the broader picture. Call in and weigh in.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #KouriRichinsGuilty #EricRichins #TrueCrime #CriminalAppeal #MurderTrial #TrueCrimePodcast #HiddenKillers #DueProcess #UtahMurder

Kouri Richins has been convicted. The defense called zero witnesses, landed real hits on the prosecution's case, and still lost. Tony Brueski is joined live by defense attorney Bob Motta and retired FBI Behavioral Analysis Chief Robin Dreeke to ask where it fell apart.The coaching video. The no-fentanyl admission. The Carmen Lauber credibility attack. Zero witnesses. Bob Motta breaks down the defense strategy and where it came up short. Robin Dreeke examines how the jury read all of it. Did any of it come close — or was this verdict inevitable? Call in. Let's get into it.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #KouriRichinsGuilty #EricRichins #TrueCrime #DefenseStrategy #ReasonableDoubt #TrueCrimePodcast #HiddenKillers #MurderTrial #UtahMurder

Kouri Richins has been convicted of aggravated murder. Tony Brueski is joined live by defense attorney Bob Motta and retired FBI Behavioral Analysis Chief Robin Dreeke to break down how the prosecution got a conviction without a murder weapon, a confirmed drug chain, or a death certificate that says anything other than undetermined.What landed with the jury? What does this conviction tell us about circumstantial cases? And what comes next? Call in. We're going live.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #KouriRichinsGuilty #EricRichins #TrueCrime #MurderTrial #FentanylMurder #ProsecutionCase #TrueCrimePodcast #HiddenKillers #UtahMurder

Three active criminal cases. Two former FBI agents. One extended live conversation that goes deeper than the headlines on all of them.Robin Dreeke — former Chief of the FBI's Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program — and retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer join Hidden Killers Live for a multi-part panel session covering the Kouri Richins murder trial, the Nancy Guthrie disappearance, and the Laken Snelling manslaughter case.Dreeke leads the behavioral analysis across all three. In the Richins case, he examines what the behavioral record — texts sent one month after Eric's death, memes pulled up the morning his body was found, and a defendant who chose not to testify — communicates about state of mind and awareness when read as a complete pattern rather than isolated incidents. In the Guthrie case, he examines the behavioral architecture of premeditation embedded in the alleged internet disruption, the specific targeting of a single home, and what forty-one days of silence from the people closest to the alleged perpetrator represents behaviorally. In the Snelling case, he examines what months of documented active concealment — tracked week by week, deleted afterward, running alongside a public life — reveals about awareness and intent, and where it sits on the recognized behavioral spectrum for neonaticide cases.Coffindaffer provides the investigative and procedural grounding for each. In Richins: the detective recording that played for the jury, the evidentiary gaps, and what the prosecution must accomplish in closing arguments. In Guthrie: the investigative pivot to digital forensics, what the internet disruption thread reveals, and what the case typically looks like from the inside when it's about to break. In Snelling: whether the first-degree manslaughter charge is legally durable, how the word "guessed" functions in a case with a born-alive determination, and what the prosecution's specific path to conviction requires.Three cases. The full picture. No shortcuts.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #NancyGuthrie #LakenSnelling #RobinDreeke #JenniferCoffindaffer #HiddenKillersLive #BehavioralAnalysis #TrueCrime #FBIAnalysis #TrueCrimePodcast

Laken Snelling didn't deny the pregnancy. She managed it. Tracked it week by week on her phone. Deleted the labor photos. Competed at nationals. Took what looked like maternity photos with her boyfriend. Posted a TikTok listing "be a mom" as a life goal. And gave birth alone at 4 in the morning without telling a single person.That is not denial. And Robin Dreeke — former Chief of the FBI's Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program — is precisely positioned to explain what it is.Dreeke joins Hidden Killers Live alongside retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer to apply a rigorous behavioral analysis to the Laken Snelling case — a case where the most important evidence isn't what happened at 4 in the morning, but what the months leading up to it reveal about the behavioral architecture of the person who made those choices.Dreeke walks through the behavioral distinction between denial, dissociation, and active parallel construction — and where the documented record in this case places Snelling on that spectrum. He examines what the TikTok evidence means in a behavioral context, how sustained concealment of this kind is maintained psychologically, and what the phone record as a whole communicates about awareness and intent.He also addresses the jury challenge — the specific behavioral and perceptual problem that emerges when a 22-year-old competitive athlete with no record sits at that defense table. Juries build internal models of what a defendant in a case like this is supposed to look like. When the person doesn't match, Dreeke explains what that mismatch costs the prosecution — and how it's addressed.Coffindaffer grounds the analysis in the procedural record: the charge, the evidence threshold, and what the grand jury's specific finding of conscious disregard means as this case moves toward trial.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LakenSnelling #RobinDreeke #BehavioralAnalysis #NeonaticideKentucky #FirstDegreeManslaughter #HiddenKillersLive #JenniferCoffindaffer #TrueCrime #KentuckyTrueCrime #PregnancyConcealment

Sheriff Nanos believes he knows the motive. He says this person could strike again. He says they're definitely closer. And after forty-one days, forty thousand tips, and one of the largest FBI task forces deployed on a kidnapping in recent memory — there is still no arrest.Robin Dreeke — former Chief of the FBI's Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program — joins Hidden Killers Live alongside retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer to examine the Nancy Guthrie case through a behavioral lens.Nanos' public statements are themselves strategic and behavioral signals. The decision to confirm a motive theory without disclosing it. The choice to warn the public they are not safe. The hedge on certainty at day forty-one. Dreeke breaks down what each of those choices communicates — about what investigators know, what they are trying to accomplish, and how those words are designed to move specific people.Then there is the silence. Forty thousand strangers called in tips. The people closest to the alleged perpetrator have not. Dreeke examines when that kind of silence transitions from fear to something investigators have to treat as a behavioral data point of its own — and what it implies about the social environment this person operates in.The behavioral architecture of premeditation is the central thread of this conversation. The alleged disruption of internet infrastructure before the abduction. The specific targeting of a single home. The timing and operational planning that a crime of this nature requires. Dreeke walks through what kind of behavioral pattern is consistent with this level of premeditation — and what it tells us about the profile investigators are working from.Coffindaffer provides the procedural layer: what this investigation looks like from the inside at day forty-one, and what typically precedes a break in a case built on this much accumulated forensic and digital work.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NancyGuthrie #RobinDreeke #BehavioralAnalysis #NancyGuthrieMissing #TucsonKidnapping #HiddenKillersLive #JenniferCoffindaffer #TrueCrime #MissingPersons #FBIBehavioralAnalysis

Kouri Richins didn't testify. The defense didn't call a single witness. And the behavioral record accumulated over three weeks of prosecution testimony is now headed to the jury with no counter-narrative on record.Robin Dreeke — former Chief of the FBI's Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program — joins Hidden Killers Live alongside retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer to break down what the behavioral signals in this case actually mean before closing arguments begin.Dreeke's analysis starts where most coverage stops: not with what Kouri said in court, but with what she did in the weeks following Eric's death. One month after his body was found, she allegedly texted a boyfriend that she wanted him to be her husband someday. On the morning Eric was discovered, her phone showed a string of memes — one celebrating wealth, another of a woman wiping her eyes with money. These aren't isolated data points. Dreeke walks through the behavioral framework for reading them — what patterns of conduct following loss reveal when mapped against expected grief response, and what the absence of those expected responses signals to someone trained in this work.Then there's the decision not to testify. Dreeke explains why, from a behavioral standpoint, that choice communicates something distinct from legal strategy — and what a jury is likely to process from it regardless of what they're instructed.Coffindaffer addresses the investigative record: the detective recording that may define the prosecution's legacy in this case, the evidentiary gaps that survive into deliberations, and what it means for a victim's family to have to hire their own investigator to move a case forward.Before the jury gets this — Dreeke and Coffindaffer give it the behavioral autopsy it deserves.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #RobinDreeke #BehavioralAnalysis #KouriRichinsTrial #EricRichins #HiddenKillersLive #JenniferCoffindaffer #TrueCrime #FBIAnalysis #UtahTrueCrime

Three weeks of trial. Both sides rested. Closing arguments coming. And our listeners have not stopped asking questions.Tonight we're going live with the full three-part listener Q&A breakdown — defense attorney Bob Motta and retired FBI Behavioral Analysis Chief Robin Dreeke answering everything the Hidden Killers audience has been asking about the Kouri Richins murder trial since day one.The behavioral evidence. The evidentiary holes. The defense strategy. The immunity deal. The forged signature. The statement that it would be better if Eric were dead. The silence of a defendant who never took the stand. We're going through all of it — live, with two of the sharpest minds we bring to this coverage — and your questions are welcome in real time.The verdict is coming. Join us before it does.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #KouriRichinsTrial #EricRichins #FentanylMurder #UtahMurderTrial #RobinDreeke #BobMotta #CarmenLauber #WalkTheDogLetter #TrueCrime

It's happening live. The Kouri Richins defense has rested and we're breaking it all down in real time with defense attorney Bob Motta and retired FBI Behavioral Analysis Chief Robin Dreeke.Kouri Richins did not take the stand. The defense closed without calling her. After three weeks of a murder trial that has captivated the true crime community — an affair, a forged insurance signature, a housekeeper buying fentanyl at a gas station, a ghostwritten children's grief book, and a letter found in a jail cell — the defense decided their best argument was already made.Tonight we're breaking down what that decision means, what the defense actually built over three weeks of cross-examination, and whether reasonable doubt is sitting in that jury room right now. Bob Motta gives us the inside view of the strategic calculus. Robin Dreeke breaks down what three weeks of watching Kouri at that defense table has communicated to the jury whether she testified or not.Bring your questions. Closing arguments are next. The verdict is coming. Join us live.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #KouriRichinsTrial #DefenseRests #EricRichins #UtahMurderTrial #FentanylMurder #BobMotta #RobinDreeke #TrueCrime #SummitCounty

Twelve people are about to deliberate a circumstantial murder case assembled over three weeks of testimony. Robin Dreeke — former FBI behavioral analyst and former Chief of the FBI's Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program — has spent a career understanding how people build conclusions under pressure, resist them, and defend them in groups. He joins Tony Brueski for Part 2 of the Kouri Richins listener Q&A.Dreeke's focus here is the behavioral architecture of deliberation itself. What do jurors actually do with three weeks of accumulated testimony when they're finally alone? How do group dynamics shape individual judgments? And in a case built entirely on circumstantial evidence, how do twelve people find and hold consensus?He examines what closing arguments are actually designed to accomplish — and the behavioral reality of why final framing sticks in ways that defy the assumption that jurors simply weigh facts objectively. Closing arguments are narrative tools. Dreeke explains how each side needs to deploy them.The deliberation timeline question gets behavioral treatment. Short deliberations versus long ones. What each typically signals — and what the specific composition of this case suggests about which direction the Richins jury is likely to move and how quickly.He also maps the realistic not-guilty scenario in detail. It's not an impossibility: coached witness testimony with documented complications, uninvestigated alternate-source leads, missing forensic tests on key evidence. Dreeke walks through the version of events where those gaps accumulate into reasonable doubt — and explains what external signals would indicate deliberations are moving that direction.And he examines jury instructions — the document most trial observers ignore — and the behavioral gap between what legal standards require and what happens when twelve people try to apply them to feelings built over three weeks.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#RobinDreeke #KouriRichins #HiddenKillersLive #BehavioralAnalysis #JuryDeliberations #TrueCrime #EricRichins #KouriRichinsTrial #DeceptionDetection #MurderVerdict

The defense rested without calling a single witness. To most observers, that's a legal strategy. To Robin Dreeke — former FBI behavioral analyst and former Chief of the FBI's Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program — it's a behavioral data point worth examining on its own terms.Dreeke joins Tony Brueski for a listener Q&A on the Kouri Richins murder trial, dissecting three weeks of accumulated behavioral evidence and what it tells us about the person at the center of this case.He starts with the "Walk the Dog" letter — Richins' alleged jail correspondence directing family members on what lies to tell investigators — examined through a behavioral lens. What does coordinated deception, executed from behind bars, signal about someone's internal decision-making architecture? What does it say about how that person thinks about others, about risk, and about consequence?Carmen Lauber's testimony gets the same treatment. Eric Richins' obituary was reportedly pinned to her mirror. A detective allegedly told her she needed to provide "details that ensure Kouri gets convicted." Dreeke maps how those two facts interact in a jury room — and what they do to the behavioral picture Lauber's testimony was supposed to construct.He also addresses a detail that drew less attention than it deserved: Richins appeared on national television promoting a children's grief book she allegedly did not write — she had a ghost writer. What does that behavior — crafting and publicly projecting a narrative about grief — reveal about someone whose husband had just died under suspicious circumstances?And what does it mean, behaviorally, that she sat through three weeks of testimony against her, watched the jury absorb every word, and her team's response was silence?Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #RobinDreeke #BehavioralAnalysis #KouriRichinsTrial #TrueCrime #HiddenKillersLive #DeceptionDetection #EricRichins #MurderTrial #FBIBehavioralAnalysis

Tonight we're going deep on the Kouri Richins murder trial with someone who's sat in both chairs — defense attorney and former felony prosecutor Eric Faddis joins Tony Brueski live for the conversation that covers all of it.The defense said the fentanyl might not have come from Kouri. The judge blocked their evidence. The forensics disagreed with their theory. Does anything they've argued actually land with a jury?The prosecution's two most important witnesses both have immunity deals. Both changed their stories. A detective's own recorded words were played against the state in open court. Can a murder conviction survive that?And the record Kouri left behind — phone searches for fentanyl poisoning, a jailhouse letter coaching her family, a forged signature, deleted memes accessed while her husband's body was still in the house. Does she take the stand and face all of it — or stay silent and hope?Eric Faddis has real answers. Not cable news answers — real ones. And tonight he's giving them live.Get in the chat. Your questions are part of the show.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#HiddenKillersLive #KouriRichins #EricFaddis #KouriRichinsTrial #TrueCrimeLive #MurderTrial #EricRichins #FentanylMurder #LivePodcast #TrueCrime

Kouri Richins has a deception problem — and it's documented, on tape, and already in front of the jury. Phone searches for fentanyl poisoning. Memes accessed minutes after first responders left. A letter from jail telling family members what to say. A forged signature on a life insurance policy.The question tonight is the one every trial watcher is asking: does she take the stand and try to explain it — or does she stay silent and hope the jury gives her the benefit of the doubt anyway?Eric Faddis joins Tony Brueski live to break it down. He's defended clients in situations like this. He knows what a jury does when someone stays silent after a record like Kouri's has been laid out for them. And he's not going to give you a sanitized answer.What do you think — should Kouri testify? Drop it in the chat. This is a live conversation and your questions matter.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#HiddenKillersLive #KouriRichins #KouriRichinsTrial #TrueCrimeLive #MurderTrial #EricRichins #WillSheTestify #LivePodcast #TrueCrime #FentanylMurder