Podcast appearances and mentions of bryan kohberger

In Massachusetts, a jury is deliberating the fate of Lindsay Clancy, a mother who says she was suffering from postpartum psychosis when she killed her three children. After California fire captain Rebecca Marodi was stabbed to death by her wife, Yolanda, investigators uncovered Yolanda's troubling past. In Dateline Round Up, there's a verdict in the murder trial of Duane "Keefe D" Davis, accused of orchestrating the 1996 Las Vegas shooting that killed rap legend Tupac Shakur. Courtroom surprise in the case of singer D4vd, accused of murdering 14-year-old Celeste Rivas Hernandez. And updates in the case of Bryan Kohberger, the man convicted of killing four University of Idaho students. Plus, expert breaks down the extradition process.This episode discusses suicide. If you or someone you know is in crisis, call the Suicide & Crisis Lifeline at 988 or visit 988lifeline.org for more resources.Listen to season 5 of the Dateline: Missing in America podcast: https://swap.fm/l/miafdlw. Find out more about the cases covered each week here: www.datelinetruecrimeweekly.com. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

The State's rebuttal to defense expert Matthew Noedel focused on challenging the significance of his conclusions about the absence of victim blood or other victim-linked biological material in Bryan Kohberger's car and residence. Noedel had emphasized that investigators conducted an extensive search of Kohberger's vehicle and apartment and did not find blood tied to Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle or Ethan Chapin. Prosecutors responded that the absence of detectable victim blood did not establish that Kohberger had not been inside the King Road house, nor did it prove that biological material could not have been removed, degraded or simply never transferred in a recoverable quantity. The rebuttal also cautioned against treating a negative finding as affirmative proof of innocence, arguing that forensic testing can establish what was detected in a particular sample but cannot necessarily reconstruct every transfer event that did or did not occur.The State also pushed back on Noedel's interpretation of secondary transfer and contamination issues, arguing that his report went beyond what the laboratory results could reliably support. Prosecutors stressed that transfer of DNA or blood is highly dependent on variables such as the amount of biological material present, the surfaces involved, subsequent cleaning, time, environmental conditions and the way evidence was handled. In other words, they argued that Noedel was using the lack of victim DNA in Kohberger's vehicle and apartment to suggest a broader exculpatory conclusion that the science itself did not require. The rebuttal was therefore less about disputing the raw laboratory results and more about disputing the inference Noedel drew from them: everyone agreed that victim blood was not found in the car or apartment, but the State argued that this fact alone did not meaningfully exclude Kohberger from the murders or undermine the prosecution's larger evidentiary case.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:030326+REDACTED+Exhibits+S-1+through+S-13+to+States+Amended+Supp+Resp+to+Rqst+for+Disc+RE+Expert+Testimony.pdf

The Bryan Kohberger case became consumed by repeated discovery disputes as the defense accused prosecutors of failing to turn over evidence quickly enough, completely enough, or in a form that could actually be used to prepare for trial. Anne Taylor and Kohberger's defense team filed multiple motions to compel, arguing that they were still waiting on materials tied to forensic testing, expert analysis, investigative records, digital evidence, DNA work, and other parts of the state's case even as prosecutors were pushing the case toward trial. The defense repeatedly framed the problem as more than ordinary delay, arguing that incomplete or late disclosure made it harder to investigate the evidence independently, prepare expert challenges, litigate suppression issues, and build a meaningful defense in a death penalty case. Prosecutors pushed back by insisting they had produced enormous amounts of discovery, were continuing to supplement disclosures as new material became available, and were not deliberately withholding evidence.That disagreement produced a steady back-and-forth in court, with each side accusing the other of overstating the problem. The defense argued that simply dumping huge volumes of material did not satisfy the state's obligations if important records were missing, difficult to identify, or produced too late to be meaningfully examined. Prosecutors countered that the investigation was massive, involved numerous agencies and experts, and that some requested material either did not exist, was not in the state's possession, or was still being gathered from outside entities. Judge John Judge was repeatedly asked to referee those disputes, ordering additional disclosures in some instances while declining to accept the defense's broader suggestion that prosecutors were systematically hiding evidence. The result was an ongoing discovery battle that became one of the defining procedural fights of the pretrial case, with Kohberger's lawyers arguing that the state's disclosure problems threatened the fairness of the proceedings and prosecutors maintaining that they were meeting their obligations in an extraordinarily complex prosecution.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

The murders of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin did more than trigger one of the most intensive homicide investigations in Idaho history; they also exposed the financial strain a case of that scale could place on state law enforcement. Idaho State Police committed investigators, forensic personnel and other resources to the Moscow investigation while continuing to handle its normal responsibilities across the state. The case required sustained manpower, extensive evidence processing, travel, overtime and coordination with Moscow Police and the FBI, underscoring how quickly a major murder investigation could consume resources far beyond what a small local department could absorb on its own.That pressure carried into the state budget process, where the Moscow murders became part of the justification for increasing funding available to Idaho State Police. Lawmakers were forced to confront the reality that a sprawling homicide investigation could require months of intensive work and substantial forensic and investigative support, all while the agency remained responsible for cases elsewhere in Idaho. The increased funding reflected a broader effort to strengthen the state's ability to respond to major crimes without forcing other investigations or services to absorb the cost. In that sense, the Moscow murders had consequences well beyond the criminal case itself, helping reshape the conversation in Boise about how much money and manpower Idaho needed to devote to complex, high-profile investigations.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Judge John Judge repeatedly warned members of the media covering Bryan Kohberger's case that their courtroom access came with rules and that he was prepared to restrict or eliminate cameras if those rules continued to be tested. During a June 2023 hearing, Judge specifically called out photographers and camera operators for “pushing the envelope,” particularly by focusing too closely on Kohberger, the defense table, attorneys' notes and computer screens instead of maintaining the wider courtroom shots the court had authorized. He made clear that the proceedings were supposed to take place in the courtroom, not become a spectacle conducted through television coverage, and warned that continued violations could result in cameras being removed altogether. Kohberger's defense later cited those incidents as evidence that the media had failed to follow the court's restrictions and argued that cameras threatened his ability to receive a fair trial.When the fight over cameras intensified later that year, Judge stopped short of banning them but delivered another pointed warning about how reporters, photographers and spectators were expected to behave. He urged everyone covering the case to exercise “dignity” and “restraint,” emphasizing that the extraordinary public interest surrounding Kohberger did not give the media license to turn every movement, facial expression or document on counsel's table into content. Judge attempted to balance the public's right to observe one of the country's most closely watched criminal cases against Kohberger's right to a fair proceeding, but his message to the press was unmistakable: courtroom access was a privilege governed by the court, and if the media could not respect the boundaries he imposed, he was willing to tighten those restrictions.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

One month after Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin were murdered in Moscow, Idaho, investigators still had not announced a suspect, made an arrest or recovered the murder weapon, fueling fears that the case could eventually go cold. Public confidence in the investigation had already been shaken by mixed messaging from Moscow Police, including the department's early assertion that there was no continuing threat to the community, a position authorities later softened as they urged residents to remain vigilant. Families of the victims also grew increasingly frustrated by the lack of information, with Steve Goncalves publicly criticizing investigators and considering hiring a private investigator. Moscow Police Chief James Fry pushed back against the idea that the investigation was stalling, insisting detectives were still receiving tips, conducting interviews and reviewing evidence every day.The larger concern was that the Idaho murders were unfolding against a grim national backdrop in which homicide clearance rates had fallen dramatically and unsolved killings could linger for decades. The discussion drew comparisons to older cold cases, including the Lewis Clark Valley murders, the Burger Chef murders and the then-still-developing Delphi investigation, all of which demonstrated the emotional damage prolonged uncertainty could inflict on families and entire communities. The absence of an arrest in Moscow also created a vacuum that internet sleuths quickly filled with rumors, accusations and speculation about people police had already ruled out, including surviving roommates, an ex-boyfriend and the so-called “hoodie guy.” At that point in December 2022, the fear was not simply that the killer might escape justice, but that every passing day without answers could deepen mistrust, paranoia and grief in a community already traumatized by the murders.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Forensic psychologist Katherine Ramsland said Bryan Kohberger may have been pursuing what she described as a “thrill kill” when the four University of Idaho students were murdered in Moscow. Ramsland, who had taught Kohberger at DeSales University, discussed the possibility in the context of offenders who commit murder for the excitement, power or psychological gratification of the act itself rather than for a more conventional motive such as money, revenge or personal conflict. She emphasized that such offenders can become highly focused on the experience of killing and may fantasize about it beforehand, though she did not claim to know Kohberger's actual motive or state of mind. At the time, the case was still developing and prosecutors had not publicly established a definitive motive.Ramsland's comments drew additional attention because of her prior academic connection to Kohberger and her extensive work studying violent offenders and serial killers. Her analysis suggested that, if the murders were indeed driven by thrill-seeking, the attack could have been less about the individual victims and more about the offender's desire to experience domination, fear and the act of killing itself. Still, she cautioned against treating that theory as fact without more evidence, particularly because many details about Kohberger's behavior, planning and relationship to the victims had not yet been fully established. The “thrill kill” theory therefore remained one possible psychological explanation rather than a proven motive in the Idaho murders.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

In Massachusetts, a jury is deliberating the fate of Lindsay Clancy, a mother who says she was suffering from postpartum psychosis when she killed her three children. After California fire captain Rebecca Marodi was stabbed to death by her wife, Yolanda, investigators uncovered Yolanda's troubling past. In Dateline Round Up, there's a verdict in the murder trial of Duane "Keefe D" Davis, accused of orchestrating the 1996 Las Vegas shooting that killed rap legend Tupac Shakur. Courtroom surprise in the case of singer D4vd, accused of murdering 14-year-old Celeste Rivas Hernandez. And updates in the case of Bryan Kohberger, the man convicted of killing four University of Idaho students. Plus, expert breaks down the extradition process. This episode discusses suicide. If you or someone you know is in crisis, call the Suicide & Crisis Lifeline at 988 or visit 988lifeline.org for more resources. Listen to season 5 of the Dateline: Missing in America podcast: https://swap.fm/l/miafdlw. Find out more about the cases covered each week here: www.datelinetruecrimeweekly.com. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

On July 2nd, 2025, Bryan Kohberger stood in the Ada County Courthouse and pleaded guilty to four counts of first-degree murder for killing University of Idaho students Madison Mogen, Kaylee Goncalves, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin. The judge asked if he was guilty. He said yes. Asked if anyone coerced him. No. Asked if he was promised anything. No. Three weeks later, he declined to explain why he did it.One year after that, Kohberger filed a handwritten petition from prison claiming he was "convinced to falsely confess" by his own defense attorneys. He offered no new evidence. He didn't establish that any threats or promises were made. A judge granted him an evidentiary hearing anyway — June 17th, 2027.Now his court-appointed legal team has added a New York attorney, Jason Goldman, who told PEOPLE magazine that the public should "caution against assuming" it knows the complete story. The public record includes phone data showing Kohberger near the victims' home twenty-three times before the killings, his DNA on a knife sheath left at the scene, a car cleaned spotless after the murders, and a thumbs-up selfie taken the morning after four people were stabbed to death in their beds. The Goncalves family called Kohberger a "narcissist" who got a deal that spared his life and now hates that life.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#BryanKohberger #Kohberger #TrueCrimeToday #IdahoMurders #TrueCrime #KohbergerCase #UniversityOfIdaho #MoscowIdaho #KohbergerPlea #CrimePodcast

A coalition of roughly 20 news organizations banded together in the spring of 2023 and asked to formally intervene in the Bryan Kohberger case so they could challenge the sweeping nondissemination order restricting what attorneys, law enforcement officers, investigators and others connected to the prosecution could say publicly. The coalition included the Associated Press, The New York Times, The Washington Post, ABC, the Seattle Times, the Spokesman-Review, the Idaho Press Club, EastIdahoNews.com and numerous television and journalism organizations. Their argument was straightforward: the gag order directly affected the media's ability to gather and report information about one of the most closely watched criminal cases in the country, yet the press had not been given an opportunity to object when prosecutors and Kohberger's defense agreed to the restrictions. The media initially took the dispute to the Idaho Supreme Court, which declined to immediately invalidate the order on procedural grounds but recognized that an overbroad or insufficiently tailored gag order could unconstitutionally interfere with news gathering. The coalition then returned to the trial court and formally moved to intervene so it could challenge the order there.Judge John Judge ultimately granted the media coalition permission to intervene, but only for the limited purpose of litigating the nondissemination order rather than becoming a full-fledged party to Kohberger's criminal prosecution. That distinction mattered: the news organizations were not being allowed to litigate guilt, evidence or other substantive issues between the State and Kohberger, but they were given standing to argue that court restrictions affecting public access and press freedom were unconstitutional or unnecessarily broad. The intervention became part of a much larger struggle over transparency in the case, eventually extending into disputes over cameras, courtroom photography and access to court records. In practical terms, the media organizations recognized that their interests were not always going to be represented by either prosecutors or the defense, so competitors that normally fought each other for stories joined forces to defend a common principle: if a court order restricted the public's ability to learn about the prosecution, the press wanted a seat at the table when that restriction was challenged.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Bryan Kohberger's newest attorney, Jason Goldman, says the immediate focus of the defense is whether Kohberger's 2025 guilty plea was constitutionally valid and truly entered knowingly and voluntarily. Kohberger pleaded guilty to murdering Madison Mogen, Kaylee Goncalves, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin in exchange for avoiding the death penalty, but he is now seeking post-conviction relief and attempting to withdraw that plea. In a handwritten petition filed in July, Kohberger claimed his former attorneys provided ineffective assistance and that his plea was induced by promises that were not kept and threats allegedly made by members of his own defense team. Goldman says an amended petition and possible evidentiary hearing could finally expose what happened during the critical days leading up to the plea, including circumstances that have not yet been made public. Judge Steven Hippler has given Kohberger's attorneys until November 13 to file the more detailed amended petition, while prosecutors are pushing to have the challenge dismissed.The new defense team is also attacking the structure of the proceedings themselves. Idaho attorney Greg Rauch, who was appointed to represent Kohberger, has asked that Hippler be removed from the case and that the proceedings be transferred back to Moscow, arguing that questions surrounding the judge's impartiality must be resolved before Kohberger's constitutional claims are heard. The motion points to Hippler's earlier refusal to give Kohberger's trial attorneys additional preparation time and to unusually harsh comments the judge made about Kohberger at sentencing. Prosecutors, meanwhile, have requested the transcript of Kohberger's July 2025 plea hearing, apparently preparing to use Kohberger's own sworn statements in court to undermine his new assertion that the plea was involuntary. What had appeared to be a closed case after Kohberger admitted responsibility and received four consecutive life sentences has therefore reopened into a significant post-conviction battle, with his new attorneys signaling that the circumstances surrounding the plea, his former defense team and potentially previously undisclosed information could become central issues in court.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Bryan Kohberger's new lawyer targets guilty plea constitutionality | Fox News

Pam Bondi effectively placed responsibility for the Justice Department's troubled handling of the Epstein files on Todd Blanche when she testified before House investigators in May 2026. Bondi said she did not personally conduct the document review and repeatedly emphasized that Blanche had been “in charge of the process and the entire release of the Epstein files.” She acknowledged that redaction errors occurred, including failures involving sensitive survivor information, while distancing herself from the mechanics of how the review and release were carried out. Democratic lawmakers came away from the questioning saying Bondi was clearly pointing to Blanche as the official responsible for the mistakes, although Bondi later pushed back publicly and insisted she was not trying to blame him. Even so, the transcript showed her drawing a clear line between her own role and Blanche's, praising him personally while simultaneously identifying him as the person who managed the process that produced the botched redactions, incomplete disclosures and broader controversy surrounding the release.Epstein survivors have been even more direct in blaming Blanche. After meeting with him in July 2026, more than two dozen accusers urged senators not to confirm him as attorney general, describing the meeting as an exercise in deflection and saying he showed no remorse for a release process that exposed survivors' names, identifying information and deeply personal material while other names remained redacted. Annie Farmer called Blanche abrasive, condescending and intentionally noncommittal, while other survivors said the meeting felt like a box-checking exercise arranged only because his confirmation was in jeopardy. They also criticized his handling of Ghislaine Maxwell, his apparent reluctance to pursue additional investigative leads and what they saw as a broader failure to center survivors in decisions about the Epstein records. Taken together, Bondi's testimony and the survivors' statements put Blanche at the center of the Epstein-files fiasco from two very different directions: his former boss identified him as the official overseeing the release, while the people most directly harmed by Epstein accused him of mishandling that responsibility and then failing to meaningfully answer for it.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

The FBI pushed back against reports that agents had briefly lost track of Bryan Kohberger while surveilling him during his cross-country drive from Washington to Pennsylvania in December 2022. According to the bureau, the claim was inaccurate and there had been no lapse in surveillance before Kohberger was arrested at his parents' home on December 30. The denial came amid continuing scrutiny of how investigators tracked Kohberger after identifying him as a person of interest in the murders of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin. At the same time, more details were emerging about Kohberger's behavior before the murders, including accounts from University of Idaho students who said they had seen him on the Moscow campus and remembered him staring at people in ways they found unsettling.The report also highlighted how the investigation was expanding beyond the evidence already disclosed in the probable-cause affidavit. Students and acquaintances described Kohberger as socially awkward and, in some cases, intense in his interactions, while investigators continued reviewing his movements, digital activity and possible connections to the victims or their surroundings. None of those campus sightings established that Kohberger had anything to do with the murders, but they added another layer to the growing effort to reconstruct where he had been, whom he had encountered and how familiar he may have been with Moscow before November 13, 2022. The FBI's denial about losing him during surveillance was significant because it directly challenged one of the more dramatic claims circulating about the manhunt and reinforced the broader message from authorities that many details being reported publicly were either incomplete or incorrect.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Ten days after the murders of Ethan Chapin, Xana Kernodle, Kaylee Goncalves and Madison Mogen, former FBI officials Chris Swecker and Danny Coulson said Moscow police appeared to need more help from the public to break the case open. Swecker said investigators had already conducted more than 100 interviews and collected substantial forensic evidence, but he believed the November 23 press conference showed that authorities were still searching for the lead that would connect the evidence to a suspect. He questioned whether the theory that one or more of the victims had been specifically targeted was actually being supported by what investigators were finding, arguing that a highly personal attack would normally have some kind of lead-up that friends, relatives or acquaintances might recognize. His broader point was that law enforcement had accumulated information, but still seemed to need the right tip or witness to turn that material into a clear investigative direction.Coulson agreed that the case could ultimately be solved through either a strong public tip or forensic evidence recovered from the King Road crime scene, and he emphasized the importance of the FBI's evidence-response team in sorting through what he described as an extremely difficult scene. He noted that the killer may have injured himself during the attack, which could have left behind blood or DNA capable of identifying him. Unlike investigators at the time, however, Coulson said he did not see the murders as obviously targeted, while also acknowledging that police might have been deliberately withholding important details to protect the investigation. At that stage, no suspect had been publicly identified, the murder weapon had not been found, and authorities were still trying to determine what the physical evidence, interviews and growing number of tips were actually telling them about who killed the four students.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

The State's rebuttal to defense expert Matthew Noedel focused on challenging the significance of his conclusions about the absence of victim blood or other victim-linked biological material in Bryan Kohberger's car and residence. Noedel had emphasized that investigators conducted an extensive search of Kohberger's vehicle and apartment and did not find blood tied to Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle or Ethan Chapin. Prosecutors responded that the absence of detectable victim blood did not establish that Kohberger had not been inside the King Road house, nor did it prove that biological material could not have been removed, degraded or simply never transferred in a recoverable quantity. The rebuttal also cautioned against treating a negative finding as affirmative proof of innocence, arguing that forensic testing can establish what was detected in a particular sample but cannot necessarily reconstruct every transfer event that did or did not occur.The State also pushed back on Noedel's interpretation of secondary transfer and contamination issues, arguing that his report went beyond what the laboratory results could reliably support. Prosecutors stressed that transfer of DNA or blood is highly dependent on variables such as the amount of biological material present, the surfaces involved, subsequent cleaning, time, environmental conditions and the way evidence was handled. In other words, they argued that Noedel was using the lack of victim DNA in Kohberger's vehicle and apartment to suggest a broader exculpatory conclusion that the science itself did not require. The rebuttal was therefore less about disputing the raw laboratory results and more about disputing the inference Noedel drew from them: everyone agreed that victim blood was not found in the car or apartment, but the State argued that this fact alone did not meaningfully exclude Kohberger from the murders or undermine the prosecution's larger evidentiary case.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:030326+REDACTED+Exhibits+S-1+through+S-13+to+States+Amended+Supp+Resp+to+Rqst+for+Disc+RE+Expert+Testimony.pdf

Investigators in Moscow cast an unusually wide net for surveillance footage as they tried to reconstruct the movements surrounding the murders of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin. Police canvassed neighborhoods, businesses and roadways well beyond the immediate King Road area, collecting video from homes, commercial properties and traffic routes miles away from the crime scene. That broader search was critical to the vehicle investigation, because detectives were not just looking for what happened directly outside the house; they were trying to trace a white Hyundai Elantra as it moved through Moscow and surrounding areas before and after the killings. The surveillance effort eventually became part of a much larger timeline that investigators used to compare vehicle movements with cellphone data, witness accounts and other evidence, turning scattered camera footage from across the area into a reconstruction of where the suspected vehicle traveled that night.At the same time, authorities processed the King Road residence as an enormous forensic scene and collected a vast amount of physical evidence. Investigators took thousands of photographs, created 3D scans of the house, collected more than a hundred pieces of physical evidence early in the investigation and submitted biological material for laboratory testing. That evidence included blood, DNA, fingerprints, trace material and items taken from multiple rooms, along with the knife sheath later tied to Kohberger through DNA testing. Search warrants also produced additional evidence from Kohberger's Washington apartment, office, vehicle and Pennsylvania family home. The scale of the collection showed how investigators were building the case from multiple directions at once: surveillance footage established movement, digital evidence helped establish timing, and DNA and physical evidence were used to connect people and objects to the crime scene.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Paulette Sutton was one of the prosecution's forensic experts in the case against Bryan Kohberger, and her specialty was crime-scene reconstruction and bloodstain-pattern analysis. Sutton reviewed the blood evidence documented inside 1122 King Road, including the location, distribution and characteristics of stains throughout the house, in an effort to help reconstruct what happened during the murders of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin. Her analysis dealt with issues such as transfer stains, drip patterns, the movement of blood through the scene and what the absence of certain expected patterns might mean. Sutton originally issued her report in August 2024 and later revised it in February 2025 after receiving additional materials, including reports prepared by defense experts.Sutton's role became especially important because the defense retained its own crime-scene reconstruction experts, including Matthew Noedel and Dr. Brent Turvey, who challenged portions of the prosecution's interpretation of the physical evidence. Her revised report therefore did more than simply describe the blood evidence; it also responded to those competing defense theories and explained why she believed certain features of the scene supported her conclusions. Had Kohberger's case gone to trial, Sutton was expected to help prosecutors walk jurors through the bloodstain evidence and explain what it suggested about movement, contact and activity inside the house during and after the attacks. In that sense, she would have been one of the State's key witnesses for translating the chaotic physical scene into a forensic reconstruction of how prosecutors believed the murders unfolded.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource: 030326+REDACTED+Exhibits+S-1+through+S-13+to+States+Amended+Supp+Resp+to+Rqst+for+Disc+RE+Expert+Testimony.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Megyn Kelly is joined by Mark Eiglarsh and Jonna Spilbor, hosts of “Positively Legal” on MK True Crime, to discuss the Lindsay Clancy jury saying they are deadlocked and not able to reach a verdict, the judge directing them to continue deliberating, what happens if they can't reach a verdict, whether Lindsay Clancy's defense wants a mistrial and what a win would look like for her, the performance of Kevin Reddington during the entire trial, the women who blame drugs and doctors for Lindsay Clancy's actions, whether these arguments from the defense will work with the jury, what happens in a potential child custody battle between Meghan Markle and Prince Harry, why Harry has the upper hand now, one Jerry Sandusky accuser recanting his testimony, what it means for the many other allegations against Sandusky, why the court is allowing Bryan Kohberger to get a new hearing despite his plea deal, the fake San Francisco 49ers player who allegedly defrauded women out of more than $1 million, the shocking scheme he and his hoax "financial advisor" ran, and more. Subscribe to MK True Crime to find Positively Legal: Apple: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/mk-true-crime/id1829831499 Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/4o80I2RSC2NvY51TIaKkJW YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@MKTrueCrime?sub_confirmation=1 Spilbor- https://www.instagram.com/jonna_spilbor Eiglarsh- https://speaktomark.com/ Lean: Discover why LEAN is becoming the choice for real weight‑loss results—shop now at https://TAKELEAN.com use code MK. Herald Group: Learn more at https://GuardYourCard.com Cozy Earth: Visit https://www.CozyEarth.com & Use code MEGYN for up to 20% off Birch Gold: Text MK to 989898 and get your free info kit on gold Follow The Megyn Kelly Show on all social platforms: YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/MegynKelly Twitter: http://Twitter.com/MegynKellyShow Instagram: http://Instagram.com/MegynKellyShow Facebook: http://Facebook.com/MegynKellyShow Find out more information at:https://www.devilmaycaremedia.com/megynkellyshow Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

#LindsayClancy #CrimeTalk #LindsayClancyTrial #VerdictWatch #TrueCrime #TrueCrimeNews #BryanKohberger #TylerRobinson #CharlieKirk #TupacShakur #KeffeD  The Lindsay Clancy jury says it cannot reach a unanimous verdict. After more than 17 hours of deliberations, jurors informed Judge William Sullivan that they were deadlocked — but the judge sent them back to continue deliberating. What happens if they still cannot agree? Could we be heading toward a hung jury and mistrial? Scott breaks down the possible scenarios. Also on today's Crime Talk: Tyler Robinson returns to court in the Charlie Kirk murder case, Duane "Keffe D" Davis is found guilty in the murder of Tupac Shakur, Bryan Kohberger escalates his attempt to withdraw his guilty plea, plus Other Cases, Legal History, the Legal Quote of the Day, and our Dumb Criminal of the Day. Join Scott Reisch for today's Crime Talk.

Bryan Kohberger is escalating his effort to undo his guilty plea by asking for Judge Steven Hippler to be removed from his post-conviction case and for the proceedings to be moved out of Ada County. Kohberger's new court-appointed attorney, Gregory Rauch, argues that Hippler can no longer be viewed as impartial because of the combination of his prior rulings, his rejection of defense claims that Kohberger's trial team was unprepared, and comments he made at sentencing questioning Kohberger's honesty and character. The motion points specifically to Hippler calling Kohberger a “faceless coward” and “the worst of the worst,” while also questioning whether Kohberger was capable of telling the truth. The defense argues those statements matter now because Kohberger's credibility could become central to whether his guilty plea was coerced or involuntary. Kohberger is claiming that his former lawyers pushed him into falsely confessing by overwhelming him with death-row fears, failing to adequately review the massive discovery record and withholding or minimizing evidence he now says could have helped establish his innocence.At the same time, Kohberger's defense is asking for the post-conviction proceedings to be transferred back to Latah County, where the murders occurred. The original criminal case was moved to Ada County because of concerns about seating an impartial jury and handling the enormous logistical demands of a capital trial, but Rauch argues those reasons no longer apply because the current proceeding will be decided by a judge rather than a jury. The defense says moving the case back to Latah County would better serve the convenience of witnesses and the interests of justice. Together, the two motions show that Kohberger's challenge is expanding beyond the validity of the plea itself and into the structure of the proceeding that will decide it. If he ultimately succeeds in withdrawing his guilty plea, the case could return to trial posture and potentially reopen the death-penalty exposure that disappeared when he accepted the 2025 plea agreement.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Bryan Kohberger seeks judge's removal in escalating bid to undo guilty plea

Nearly six weeks after the murders of Xana Kernodle, Ethan Chapin, Madison Mogen and Kaylee Goncalves, Kernodle's family took matters into its own hands by mailing 5,000 flyers to homes in and around Moscow, Idaho, asking residents to come forward with any information, photographs or video that might help investigators. It was the family's second flyer campaign; the first had begun just one week after the killings, when posters were distributed door to door and placed around the community. The new mailers included photographs of all four victims along with information about how to submit tips and digital evidence to law enforcement. At that point, dozens of FBI agents and analysts were assisting Moscow police and Idaho State Police, but no suspect had been publicly identified.Investigators said the family's effort was valuable because they were still trying to piece together the victims' final hours and determine whether seemingly insignificant photos, videos or social-media posts might contain useful context. By then, police had received nearly 15,000 tips and were reviewing thousands of pieces of video and other evidence, while also working through registrations for roughly 22,000 white Hyundai Elantras from model years 2011 to 2013. Despite growing public concern that the case was going cold, Chief James Fry and other officials rejected that characterization and insisted detectives were still actively developing leads. The flyer campaign captured the desperation of the moment: the families were grieving, the community was on edge, and investigators were still searching for the break that would finally identify the person responsible.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:https://lawandcrime.com/crime/family-of-slain-university-of-idaho-student-mails-out-flyers-pleading-for-tips-in-quadruple-homicide/

Gabby Petito's father, Joe Petito, offered a deeply personal message to the families of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin as they navigated the aftermath of the University of Idaho murders. Speaking with NewsNation's Brian Entin, Petito said one of the most important things grieving families could do was surround themselves with a strong support system and avoid trying to carry the pain alone. He pointed to the way he, his wife Tara, Gabby's mother Nichole Schmidt and her husband Jim Schmidt leaned on one another after Gabby's murder, saying that having people around who could hold each other up made an enormous difference when trying to survive an unimaginable loss. His advice to the Idaho families was not that the pain would disappear, but that having trusted people beside them could help them navigate something no family should ever have to endure.Petito also spoke about the way his family tried to turn Gabby's death into advocacy, particularly around domestic violence and law-enforcement reform. At the time, he was supporting Utah legislation that would require officers responding to domestic violence calls to conduct a lethality assessment designed to identify warning signs that a victim might be in immediate danger. Petito said he believed a system like that could potentially have changed what happened to Gabby after police encountered her and Brian Laundrie during their trip through Utah. His message to the Idaho families therefore came from someone who understood both the public scrutiny surrounding a nationally followed homicide and the long, painful process of trying to build something meaningful out of tragedy.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Chief James Fry and Idaho State Police spokesman Aaron Snell became two of the main law-enforcement voices explaining what investigators knew, and just as importantly, what they were not prepared to say publicly, after the murders of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin. Fry repeatedly described the killings as a targeted attack based on the evidence investigators were seeing, but he also acknowledged that police could not guarantee there was no continuing threat to the Moscow community and urged residents to remain vigilant. As public pressure mounted, Fry defended the investigation and stressed that Moscow Police remained in command, even with extensive help from the Idaho State Police and FBI. He said his department was deliberately withholding details that could compromise the case, arguing that investigators had to protect evidence, witness information and the eventual prosecution rather than satisfy the enormous demand for immediate answers.Snell largely reinforced that message from the state-police side, emphasizing that ISP and the FBI were supporting Moscow rather than taking over the investigation. He repeatedly urged the public to distinguish confirmed information from speculation and explained that investigators were examining enormous amounts of tips, video, digital evidence and physical evidence while refusing to publicly validate theories simply because they were gaining traction online. Both men pushed back against the idea that a lack of public information meant police lacked information internally. Their consistent position was that rumors about suspects, motives, victim behavior and investigative techniques could damage innocent people and interfere with the case, while verified information would be released only when investigators believed doing so would not jeopardize the investigation or prosecution.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Bryan Kohberger's newest attorney, Jason Goldman, says the immediate focus of the defense is whether Kohberger's 2025 guilty plea was constitutionally valid and truly entered knowingly and voluntarily. Kohberger pleaded guilty to murdering Madison Mogen, Kaylee Goncalves, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin in exchange for avoiding the death penalty, but he is now seeking post-conviction relief and attempting to withdraw that plea. In a handwritten petition filed in July, Kohberger claimed his former attorneys provided ineffective assistance and that his plea was induced by promises that were not kept and threats allegedly made by members of his own defense team. Goldman says an amended petition and possible evidentiary hearing could finally expose what happened during the critical days leading up to the plea, including circumstances that have not yet been made public. Judge Steven Hippler has given Kohberger's attorneys until November 13 to file the more detailed amended petition, while prosecutors are pushing to have the challenge dismissed.The new defense team is also attacking the structure of the proceedings themselves. Idaho attorney Greg Rauch, who was appointed to represent Kohberger, has asked that Hippler be removed from the case and that the proceedings be transferred back to Moscow, arguing that questions surrounding the judge's impartiality must be resolved before Kohberger's constitutional claims are heard. The motion points to Hippler's earlier refusal to give Kohberger's trial attorneys additional preparation time and to unusually harsh comments the judge made about Kohberger at sentencing. Prosecutors, meanwhile, have requested the transcript of Kohberger's July 2025 plea hearing, apparently preparing to use Kohberger's own sworn statements in court to undermine his new assertion that the plea was involuntary. What had appeared to be a closed case after Kohberger admitted responsibility and received four consecutive life sentences has therefore reopened into a significant post-conviction battle, with his new attorneys signaling that the circumstances surrounding the plea, his former defense team and potentially previously undisclosed information could become central issues in court.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Bryan Kohberger's new lawyer targets guilty plea constitutionality | Fox NewsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Our listeners get the Flamingo Starter Set for just $7 at https://www.shopflamingo.com/LAWNERD  #ad Get up to $200 off Square hardware when you sign up at https://square.com/go/lawnerd ! #squarepod #ad This episode of The Emily Show details the grand jury indictment of Nick Reiner for the murder of his parents, alongside ongoing probate court disputes regarding his access to a pre-funded trust to hire criminal defense counsel. Additionally, it explores the post-conviction relief efforts of Bryan Kohberger, whose defense is seeking a change of venue, more time to review an extraordinary volume of discovery data, and the disqualification of Judge Hippler based on past sentencing remarks questioning Kohberger's credibility. Finally, the episode highlights the ongoing Tupac Shakur murder trial involving Keffe D, noting that closing arguments are set to begin as the case moves toward a jury verdict. RESOURCES Keffe D Jury Charging Conference - https://youtu.be/E9560lA271A  d4vd case - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLPhpZZtIObJ4  Kouri Richins Case - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLXwccC5Kf7pE  Nick Reiner Probate - https://youtu.be/zhRDOfulLs0  Bryan Kohberger Wants to Withdraw His Plea - https://youtu.be/NeIWJ-0EeTk Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

In this episode, author and former FBI agent/journalist Christopher Whitcomb explains why he wrote his book “Broken Plea,” which examines primary source case documents and evidence photos/videos from the Moscow Idaho murder case involving Bryan Kohberger. He says recent document releases raised questions that didn't surface because there was no trial and the case was under a gag order, even though Kohberger pled guilty and received four life sentences plus 10 years for brutally ending the lives of four University of Idaho students Madison Mogen, Kaylee Goncalves, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin. Whitcomb discusses claims in prosecution reports that blood stains in common areas were “diluted with an unknown substance,” questions about timelines and how one person could commit the murders, and details from body camera footage and the initial 911 call. He also describes untested hair evidence found in Ethan's hand/bed area that remained in storage for years, and challenges common assumptions, especially given recent findings. Tune in now to get the facts and hear new perspectives! Get the book, Broken Plea: https://links.being-caroline.com/amazon/books-broken-plea-christopher-whitcomb Follow Caroline:IG: https://www.instagram.com/shop.with.caroline/TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@shop.with.carolineFacebook: https://www.facebook.com/beingcarolineSearch Looks: https://www.shop-with-caroline.com/Shop Merch: https://shop.dearmedia.com/collections/coming-in-hot

Bryan Kohberger's post-conviction petition earned an evidentiary hearing — set for June 17, 2027 before Judge Steven Hippler. Prosecutors tried to get it dismissed without a hearing and failed. But the hearing is the system working as designed, not a signal that Kohberger's claims carry weight.The petition accuses his former defense team of coercing a false confession, withholding hair evidence from Ethan Chapin's hand, and making promises about prison conditions that never came true. All of this runs headfirst into a nine-page questionnaire Kohberger signed under oath confirming his plea was voluntary and that no outside promises influenced his decision.Criminal defense attorney David Gelman says post-sentencing plea reversals are extraordinarily rare. Northeastern law professor Daniel Medwed called it a monumental uphill battle. Even a successful withdrawal puts the death penalty back on the table and sends Kohberger to trial carrying his own sworn confession.Digital forensics expert Sy Ray — retained by Kohberger's own defense team before the plea — responded to the petition by going public with claims of additional incriminating cellphone data and calling for a new trial with the death penalty restored. Kohberger cited Ray's work in his petition. Ray's answer: put the former defense attorneys under oath and try this case again.LinksListen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodDisclaimerThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.Hashtags#BryanKohberger #SyRay #TrueCrimeToday #KohbergerHearing #IdahoMurders #UniversityOfIdaho #KohbergerPetition #AnneTaylor #JudgeHippler #TrueCrime

Judge Hippler scheduled Bryan Kohberger's evidentiary hearing for June 17, 2027 after prosecutors asked for the post-conviction petition to be dismissed outright. The hearing is a procedural step — not a ruling, not a signal of merit — but the timeline it creates puts a new attorney ten months from a hearing where Kohberger's former lawyers could be forced to testify.Kohberger claims Taylor, Massoth, and Barlow coerced him into confessing, hid evidence, and lied about what prison and death row would look like. He signed a nine-page questionnaire under oath saying none of that happened. The legal standard he has to clear — manifest injustice — is designed to make post-sentencing plea withdrawals nearly impossible.His new attorney Greg Rauch hadn't read the petition, the case file, or spoken to Kohberger as of his August 2026 appointment. He needs to drive 300 miles south to Kuna just to visit his client at the Idaho Maximum Security Institution.And the expert his defense team hired to build his case is now working against him. Sy Ray told reporters that additional cellphone geolocation data places Kohberger near the house repeatedly before the murders. Ray's position is clear: bring back the death penalty and try this case again.LinksListen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodDisclaimerThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.Hashtags#BryanKohberger #SyRay #HiddenKillers #KohbergerPlea #IdahoMurders #UniversityOfIdaho #EvidentiaryHearing #GregRauch #KohbergerCase #TrueCrime

At roughly the seven-month mark after the murders of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin, the case had moved from an unexplained quadruple homicide into a formal prosecution against Bryan Kohberger. By then, investigators had alleged that the murders occurred around 4 a.m. on November 13, 2022, that a knife sheath bearing Kohberger's DNA was found beside Mogen's body, and that surviving roommate Dylan Mortensen had seen a masked man dressed in black walking through the house before leaving through the sliding glass door. Police had also tied a white Hyundai Elantra to the area around King Road, examined Kohberger's cellphone activity and built a circumstantial timeline around his movements before and after the killings. Kohberger, a Washington State University criminology graduate student at the time of his arrest, had been taken into custody at his family's Pennsylvania home in late December 2022 and extradited back to Idaho, where he faced four counts of first-degree murder and one count of burglary.By May 2023, the case was entering another major phase. A grand jury had indicted Kohberger, eliminating the preliminary hearing that had originally been scheduled and sending the case directly toward arraignment and trial. Yet even with a suspect in custody and considerably more evidence public than during the chaotic first weeks of the investigation, major questions remained unanswered. The murder weapon had not been recovered, prosecutors had not publicly established a motive, there was still no clear explanation for why these four victims or the King Road house had allegedly been targeted, and the full significance of the DNA, cellphone and vehicle evidence remained to be tested in court. Seven months after the murders, the mystery had therefore narrowed dramatically, but it had not disappeared: the central question was no longer simply who police believed committed the killings, but whether the evidence they had assembled could prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Bryan Kohberger was the man responsible.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Paulette Sutton was one of the prosecution's forensic experts in the case against Bryan Kohberger, and her specialty was crime-scene reconstruction and bloodstain-pattern analysis. Sutton reviewed the blood evidence documented inside 1122 King Road, including the location, distribution and characteristics of stains throughout the house, in an effort to help reconstruct what happened during the murders of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin. Her analysis dealt with issues such as transfer stains, drip patterns, the movement of blood through the scene and what the absence of certain expected patterns might mean. Sutton originally issued her report in August 2024 and later revised it in February 2025 after receiving additional materials, including reports prepared by defense experts.Sutton's role became especially important because the defense retained its own crime-scene reconstruction experts, including Matthew Noedel and Dr. Brent Turvey, who challenged portions of the prosecution's interpretation of the physical evidence. Her revised report therefore did more than simply describe the blood evidence; it also responded to those competing defense theories and explained why she believed certain features of the scene supported her conclusions. Had Kohberger's case gone to trial, Sutton was expected to help prosecutors walk jurors through the bloodstain evidence and explain what it suggested about movement, contact and activity inside the house during and after the attacks. In that sense, she would have been one of the State's key witnesses for translating the chaotic physical scene into a forensic reconstruction of how prosecutors believed the murders unfolded.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource: 030326+REDACTED+Exhibits+S-1+through+S-13+to+States+Amended+Supp+Resp+to+Rqst+for+Disc+RE+Expert+Testimony.pdf

Long before the murders of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin, Bryan Kohberger had accumulated a number of troubling complaints involving women and his behavior around them. One woman who met him through Tinder years earlier said their date became so uncomfortable that she pretended to vomit in order to get him to leave her apartment; she claimed Kohberger repeatedly touched her despite her objections and later texted her that she had “good birthing hips.” Other accounts surfaced from his time at Washington State University, where female students and staff reportedly complained that Kohberger lingered in offices, blocked doorways, followed women to their cars and made them feel unsafe. Some women were reportedly given security escorts after dark, and faculty members told investigators that multiple complaints had been made about Kohberger's treatment of women. One instructor said the concerns became serious enough that his conduct was repeatedly discussed in disciplinary meetings and that the program eventually held behavioral training for graduate students.Those incidents were not limited to graduate school. A former administrator at a Pennsylvania technical school said Kohberger had been removed from a high-school law-enforcement program after female students complained about him, forcing him to transfer into another vocational track. At WSU, meanwhile, reports described professors intervening when female students appeared trapped or uncomfortable around him, and some students reportedly kept office doors closed to prevent him from entering. Investigators later received additional accounts from women who said Kohberger had followed or persistently approached them despite their attempts to disengage. None of those earlier incidents proved that Kohberger would go on to commit murder, and they were not themselves evidence of what happened inside the King Road house, but after his arrest they took on much greater significance because they revealed a documented pattern of interpersonal problems, particularly involving women, that stretched across different periods of his life and existed well before November 13, 2022

Bryan Kohberger's defense and the State of Idaho fought over whether prosecutors had complied with Idaho Criminal Rule 16(b)(7), which governed disclosure of expert witnesses and the substance of their expected testimony. In December 2024, Kohberger's attorneys asked Judge Steven Hippler to compel more complete disclosures and sanction the prosecution, arguing that the state had identified roughly 25 experts but had supplied actual reports for only a handful of them. The defense said major areas of the case, including DNA, digital forensics and other technical evidence, were represented by disclosures that were too vague to reveal the experts' actual opinions, methods and conclusions. Kohberger's lawyers argued that this left them trying to prepare their own expert case without knowing precisely what the prosecution intended to present, despite a looming deadline for defense expert disclosures. They asked Hippler to consider excluding inadequately disclosed state experts or, at minimum, order fuller disclosure and push back the defense's deadline.Prosecutors pushed back hard, arguing that they had been continuously producing discovery and expert-related material throughout the case and that the defense was overstating both the deficiencies and what Rule 16 actually required. The state maintained that expert discovery was an ongoing process, that it had complied with its obligations as information became available, and that the drastic remedy of excluding experts or imposing sanctions was unwarranted. The dispute therefore became about much more than paperwork: Kohberger's team framed it as a fair-trial problem in a capital case, saying it could not meaningfully prepare to confront expert testimony it had not fully seen, while prosecutors portrayed the motion as an attempt to punish the state despite an enormous and continuously developing discovery record. The fight illustrated just how technical the case had become, with both sides battling not only over what evidence existed, but over exactly when expert opinions had to be disclosed, how detailed those disclosures had to be and what consequences should follow if the court found that either side had fallen short.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Recent court documents have unveiled text messages exchanged between the two surviving roommates, Dylan Mortensen and Bethany Funke, during the tragic events of November 13, 2022, in Moscow, Idaho. These messages provide a harrowing glimpse into their experiences that night. At approximately 4:22 a.m., Mortensen texted Funke, expressing confusion over the lack of response from their roommates, stating, "No one is answering." Funke replied with concern, noting that Xana Kernodle had been dressed in all black that evening. Mortensen then described encountering a man wearing a ski mask inside their home, to which Funke urgently responded, advising her to "run."Despite their immediate alarm, the roommates did not contact emergency services until later that morning. Mortensen continued her attempts to reach their roommates, sending a text to Kaylee Goncalves at 10:23 a.m., asking, "Ru up??" When there was no reply, a 911 call was placed over an hour later. The transcript of this call reveals a scene of chaos and confusion, with Mortensen and Funke, along with an unidentified friend, initially reporting Kernodle as unconscious, mentioning her alcohol consumption the previous night. They struggled to provide their address, and the dispatcher concluded the call upon the arrival of emergency responders, without obtaining a complete account of the night's events.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Bryan Kohberger case: Idaho court releases surviving housemates' text messages | Fox News

A standoff in Nashville ends in a fatal police shooting after a sword-wielding man holds a woman hostage inside a car. Bryan Kohberger’s new attorney files motions to disqualify the judge and move his post-conviction proceedings back to Latah County. A South Carolina judge denies bond for a woman accused of stabbing her Lyft driver eleven times during an alleged mental health crisis. Sydney Silvagni reports. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Bryan Kohberger is escalating his effort to undo his guilty plea by asking for Judge Steven Hippler to be removed from his post-conviction case and for the proceedings to be moved out of Ada County. Kohberger's new court-appointed attorney, Gregory Rauch, argues that Hippler can no longer be viewed as impartial because of the combination of his prior rulings, his rejection of defense claims that Kohberger's trial team was unprepared, and comments he made at sentencing questioning Kohberger's honesty and character. The motion points specifically to Hippler calling Kohberger a “faceless coward” and “the worst of the worst,” while also questioning whether Kohberger was capable of telling the truth. The defense argues those statements matter now because Kohberger's credibility could become central to whether his guilty plea was coerced or involuntary. Kohberger is claiming that his former lawyers pushed him into falsely confessing by overwhelming him with death-row fears, failing to adequately review the massive discovery record and withholding or minimizing evidence he now says could have helped establish his innocence.At the same time, Kohberger's defense is asking for the post-conviction proceedings to be transferred back to Latah County, where the murders occurred. The original criminal case was moved to Ada County because of concerns about seating an impartial jury and handling the enormous logistical demands of a capital trial, but Rauch argues those reasons no longer apply because the current proceeding will be decided by a judge rather than a jury. The defense says moving the case back to Latah County would better serve the convenience of witnesses and the interests of justice. Together, the two motions show that Kohberger's challenge is expanding beyond the validity of the plea itself and into the structure of the proceeding that will decide it. If he ultimately succeeds in withdrawing his guilty plea, the case could return to trial posture and potentially reopen the death-penalty exposure that disappeared when he accepted the 2025 plea agreement.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Bryan Kohberger seeks judge's removal in escalating bid to undo guilty pleaBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Judge Steven J. Hippler is an Idaho district judge who has served on the Fourth Judicial District bench since 2013. A Boise native, Hippler earned his undergraduate degree from Boise State University before graduating from the University of Utah College of Law in 1991, where he finished near the top of his class and was inducted into the Order of the Coif. Before becoming a judge, he spent more than two decades in private practice, eventually becoming a partner at Givens Pursley after previously working at Hall Farley Oberrecht & Blanton. His practice focused heavily on civil litigation, particularly medical malpractice, health care law, regulatory disputes and business litigation, representing doctors, hospitals and other medical providers. Then-Gov. Butch Otter appointed him to a newly created Fourth Judicial District judgeship in 2013, describing him at the time as an experienced and highly capable litigator. Hippler later handled both civil and felony criminal dockets, presided over Ada County's Mental Health Court and rose into an administrative leadership role within the Fourth Judicial District.Hippler became nationally known when the Bryan Kohberger case was transferred from Latah County to Ada County in 2024 and he took over from Judge John Judge. From the beginning, Hippler developed a reputation for running a tightly controlled courtroom, setting firm deadlines and making clear that he expected lawyers on both sides to be prepared and professional. He presided over the enormous volume of pretrial litigation involving the death penalty, expert witnesses, evidentiary disputes, discovery, media access and trial scheduling before Kohberger ultimately pleaded guilty in 2025. Hippler then accepted the plea and sentenced Kohberger to four consecutive life sentences without parole, plus additional punishment for burglary. He remains involved in Kohberger's subsequent attempt to undo those pleas, including establishing the procedural framework for the post-conviction challenge and a possible evidentiary hearing in 2027. His role in the case has made him one of the most visible judges in Idaho, but his background is notable because he did not come to the bench as a career prosecutor or criminal-defense attorney; much of his pre-judicial experience came from complex civil litigation, and colleagues have described his approach on the bench as methodical, demanding and decidedly resistant to surprises.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Paulette Sutton was one of the prosecution's forensic experts in the case against Bryan Kohberger, and her specialty was crime-scene reconstruction and bloodstain-pattern analysis. Sutton reviewed the blood evidence documented inside 1122 King Road, including the location, distribution and characteristics of stains throughout the house, in an effort to help reconstruct what happened during the murders of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin. Her analysis dealt with issues such as transfer stains, drip patterns, the movement of blood through the scene and what the absence of certain expected patterns might mean. Sutton originally issued her report in August 2024 and later revised it in February 2025 after receiving additional materials, including reports prepared by defense experts.Sutton's role became especially important because the defense retained its own crime-scene reconstruction experts, including Matthew Noedel and Dr. Brent Turvey, who challenged portions of the prosecution's interpretation of the physical evidence. Her revised report therefore did more than simply describe the blood evidence; it also responded to those competing defense theories and explained why she believed certain features of the scene supported her conclusions. Had Kohberger's case gone to trial, Sutton was expected to help prosecutors walk jurors through the bloodstain evidence and explain what it suggested about movement, contact and activity inside the house during and after the attacks. In that sense, she would have been one of the State's key witnesses for translating the chaotic physical scene into a forensic reconstruction of how prosecutors believed the murders unfolded.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource: 030326+REDACTED+Exhibits+S-1+through+S-13+to+States+Amended+Supp+Resp+to+Rqst+for+Disc+RE+Expert+Testimony.pdf

Judge Steven Hippler's April 24, 2025 order addressed whether the jury would be allowed to hear the 911 call made from the King Road house and see related communications between surviving roommates D.M. and B.F. Prosecutors wanted to introduce the call, the roommates' text messages and testimony about their conversations, while Kohberger's defense challenged portions of that material as inadmissible hearsay and objected to allowing jurors to use a transcript while listening to the audio. Hippler largely sided with the prosecution, finding that most of the 911 call and the roommates' communications were likely admissible if prosecutors laid the proper foundation at trial. He did, however, order several portions of the 911 call redacted because certain statements did not qualify for the hearsay exceptions the state relied upon. Hippler also permitted the prosecution to use a transcript as a demonstrative aid while the jury listened to the approved portions of the recording.The order was significant because the 911 call captured the chaotic discovery of the crime scene nearly eight hours after D.M. said she had seen a masked intruder inside the house. Among the portions ordered removed was a statement referencing someone having seen a man in the house the night before, while the remaining portions could still be presented to jurors subject to the court's evidentiary requirements. Hippler's ruling therefore rejected the defense's broader effort to keep the call out while still trimming material he believed crossed the hearsay line. The decision also revealed additional detail about the surviving roommates' actions that morning and showed how the prosecution intended to use the 911 call and contemporaneous messages to reconstruct what happened before police arrived. In practical terms, Hippler allowed the jury to hear most of one of the most anticipated pieces of evidence in the case, but not without carefully controlling which statements could come in.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Judge Steven Hippler lifted the gag order in the Bryan Kohberger case after Kohberger pleaded guilty and was sentenced, concluding that the circumstances that originally justified the sweeping restrictions on public statements had fundamentally changed. The order had been imposed during the pretrial phase to protect Kohberger's right to a fair trial and reduce the risk that lawyers, investigators, law enforcement officers, witnesses and others connected to the case could influence the jury pool through public commentary. Once there was no longer going to be a trial, Hippler found that the strongest constitutional justification for keeping those restrictions in place had largely disappeared. His ruling therefore removed the broad limits that had governed public discussion of the case for years and allowed attorneys, investigators and others previously bound by the order to speak publicly again, subject to the ordinary ethical and legal rules that still applied.The decision marked the end of one of the most contentious transparency battles in the Kohberger case. News organizations, victims' families and other interested parties had repeatedly challenged the gag order or argued that it restricted too much information from reaching the public, while the defense had consistently emphasized the need to protect Kohberger from prejudicial publicity. Hippler's order reflected the reality that those competing concerns looked very different after a guilty plea eliminated the need to seat an impartial jury. Lifting the gag order did not automatically unseal every document or make every piece of evidence public, because separate sealing orders and privacy protections could still remain in effect, but it removed the extraordinary speech restrictions that had surrounded the prosecution since its earliest stages. In practical terms, the ruling opened the door for many of the people directly involved in the case to finally discuss their experiences and the investigation without violating the court's pretrial publicity order.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Judge John Judge of Idaho firmly rejected Bryan Kohberger's latest legal maneuver to challenge the death penalty, dismissing his claim that Idaho's execution methods—specifically the firing squad—are unconstitutional. Kohberger's defense argued that the state's reintroduction of the firing squad as a backup method for executions constituted cruel and unusual punishment, thus violating the Eighth Amendment. However, Judge Judge ruled that since the firing squad hasn't actually been used in Idaho yet, and lethal injection remains the primary method, the argument was premature and speculative. He emphasized that Kohberger's execution method isn't an active issue at this stage of the proceedings.The ruling marks another significant setback for Kohberger's legal team, which has made several unsuccessful attempts to derail the state's pursuit of the death penalty. Kohberger faces four counts of first-degree murder in the brutal November 2022 stabbing deaths of four University of Idaho students. Prosecutors have made clear their intent to seek capital punishment, citing the heinous and calculated nature of the crime.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Idaho murders trial judge's damning one-word response to Bryan Kohberger's bid to dodge the firing squad | Daily Mail Online

Paulette Sutton was one of the prosecution's forensic experts in the case against Bryan Kohberger, and her specialty was crime-scene reconstruction and bloodstain-pattern analysis. Sutton reviewed the blood evidence documented inside 1122 King Road, including the location, distribution and characteristics of stains throughout the house, in an effort to help reconstruct what happened during the murders of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin. Her analysis dealt with issues such as transfer stains, drip patterns, the movement of blood through the scene and what the absence of certain expected patterns might mean. Sutton originally issued her report in August 2024 and later revised it in February 2025 after receiving additional materials, including reports prepared by defense experts.Sutton's role became especially important because the defense retained its own crime-scene reconstruction experts, including Matthew Noedel and Dr. Brent Turvey, who challenged portions of the prosecution's interpretation of the physical evidence. Her revised report therefore did more than simply describe the blood evidence; it also responded to those competing defense theories and explained why she believed certain features of the scene supported her conclusions. Had Kohberger's case gone to trial, Sutton was expected to help prosecutors walk jurors through the bloodstain evidence and explain what it suggested about movement, contact and activity inside the house during and after the attacks. In that sense, she would have been one of the State's key witnesses for translating the chaotic physical scene into a forensic reconstruction of how prosecutors believed the murders unfolded.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource: 030326+REDACTED+Exhibits+S-1+through+S-13+to+States+Amended+Supp+Resp+to+Rqst+for+Disc+RE+Expert+Testimony.pdf

Judge John Judge said he would not ban cameras from Bryan Kohberger's courtroom proceedings, but he made clear that he intended to impose tighter controls over how they were used. Both the prosecution and defense had raised concerns about media coverage, with Kohberger's attorneys arguing that cameras repeatedly focused on him in ways that could prejudice potential jurors, while prosecutors also supported restrictions in certain circumstances. Judge said he was trying to balance the public's right to observe the proceedings with Kohberger's constitutional right to a fair trial, and he warned photographers and media organizations that the courtroom was not a place for spectacle. He specifically objected to cameras focusing excessively on Kohberger, capturing attorneys' notes or recording during times when the court was not officially on the record.The ruling reflected the broader tension that surrounded one of the country's most closely watched murder cases. Judge emphasized that he wanted the case tried in the courtroom rather than in the media, while also recognizing the enormous public interest in the prosecution. Instead of removing cameras entirely, he chose to retain greater control over where they were positioned and what they were permitted to record. That left media access intact for the time being, but under stricter judicial supervision and with a warning that continued misuse could result in further restrictions. The dispute over cameras became another major pretrial battle in the Kohberger case, alongside the gag order, discovery fights and arguments over how much information should reach the public before a jury was ever seated.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Early in the investigation into the murders of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin, Moscow police were still trying to account for a significant gap in the victims' movements on the night of November 12 and early morning of November 13, 2022. Investigators had established a relatively clear timeline for Goncalves and Mogen, who had spent part of the night at a downtown bar before stopping at a food truck and returning to the King Road house. The movements of Kernodle and Chapin were far less certain. Police knew the couple had attended a party at the Sigma Chi fraternity house, but there was an approximately four-hour stretch between when they were believed to have arrived there and when they returned home that investigators were still working to reconstruct. Authorities appealed to the public for photographs, videos, witness accounts or other information that could help determine exactly where Kernodle and Chapin had been and whom they had encountered during those missing hours.At that stage, the unexplained period was one of several major holes investigators were attempting to fill as they built a minute-by-minute picture of the victims' final night. Police had not publicly identified a suspect, the murder weapon had not been recovered, and investigators were still collecting surveillance footage, digital evidence and tips from people who had been in the area. The four-hour gap did not mean police believed Kernodle or Chapin had necessarily encountered the killer during that period; rather, investigators were trying to eliminate uncertainty and determine whether anything that happened earlier in the evening could have been connected to what occurred later at the King Road residence. The unanswered timeline became another example of how incomplete the public picture remained during the first weeks of the investigation, when authorities were still assembling basic facts that would later be viewed very differently once Bryan Kohberger was arrested and the probable-cause evidence became public.to ocntact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/idaho-police-puzzled-by-four-hour-gap-in-timeline-of-murder-victims/ar-AA14XYAG?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=26522fcce5e548dda528f0a0f2b2df0b

Bryan Kohberger's defense team assembled a wide-ranging group of experts as it prepared for trial, signaling that it intended to challenge the prosecution on virtually every major category of evidence. The defense brought in specialists in DNA, genetic genealogy, digital forensics, cellular data, crime-scene analysis, bloodstain interpretation, pathology and other technical fields that could bear on the state's case. DNA experts were particularly important because prosecutors had relied heavily on genetic evidence connected to the knife sheath recovered at the King Road house, while specialists in investigative genetic genealogy were positioned to scrutinize how authorities identified Kohberger through family-tree research. Digital-evidence experts were also expected to examine cellphone records, location data, computer evidence, online activity and other electronic material that prosecutors intended to use to reconstruct Kohberger's movements and behavior before and after the murders.The unusually large expert roster reflected the defense strategy of attacking the case piece by piece rather than allowing the prosecution's evidence to be presented as a seamless narrative. Cell-site and geolocation specialists could challenge claims about where Kohberger's phone had been, forensic experts could question how physical evidence was collected and interpreted, and DNA specialists could probe the reliability, handling and statistical significance of the genetic evidence. The defense also retained experts capable of reviewing surveillance footage, vehicle identification and other digital or visual evidence tied to the white Hyundai Elantra that investigators associated with the crime. Taken together, the expert disclosures showed that Kohberger's attorneys were preparing for a highly technical trial in which they planned to contest not only what the evidence appeared to show, but also the scientific methods, assumptions and investigative procedures used to produce those conclusions.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Bryan Kohberger's defense said that during the early morning hours of November 13, 2022, when Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin were killed, Kohberger had been alone in his car driving through the countryside south and west of Moscow rather than inside the King Road house. His attorneys described nighttime driving as something Kohberger regularly did and said he often traveled to remote areas to hike, run or look at the moon and stars. The supplemental alibi filing identified cell-site expert Sy Ray as a witness who could partially corroborate that account by analyzing Kohberger's phone data and attempting to show that he had been traveling away from Moscow during portions of the night. The defense did not claim that another person had been physically with Kohberger and could verify his whereabouts, instead relying largely on his driving habits and anticipated expert analysis of digital location evidence.Prosecutors reacted by arguing that the so-called alibi was not really an alibi at all because it failed to establish where Kohberger had been during the critical window when the murders occurred. The state emphasized that Kohberger's phone had stopped reporting to the cellular network before the homicides and did not reconnect until afterward, meaning the very period in which he most needed location data was the period for which the phone provided none. Prosecutors also argued that saying Kohberger had been somewhere south and west of Moscow looking at the night sky was too vague to satisfy Idaho's alibi requirements, which called for specific locations and information identifying witnesses who could verify the defendant was somewhere else when the crime occurred. The state therefore asked the court to restrict or exclude the proposed alibi evidence, arguing that Ray's anticipated testimony might describe Kohberger's movements before or after the murders but could not establish that he had been somewhere else at the precise time the four students were killed.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Idaho's death penalty had a long history stretching back to the territorial era, with capital punishment established there in 1864, decades before statehood. Executions were originally carried out at the county level and were sometimes public, before the state centralized them at the penitentiary in 1901; Idaho's final hanging took place in 1957. Like the rest of the country, Idaho's capital punishment system was disrupted after the U.S. Supreme Court's 1972 decision in Furman v. Georgia, but lawmakers reinstated the death penalty under a revised statute the following year. In the modern era, Idaho has used lethal injection and has carried out only a small number of executions since capital punishment resumed nationally in the 1970s. More recently, the state moved aggressively to preserve its ability to execute prisoners when lethal-injection drugs became difficult to obtain, authorizing the firing squad as an alternative in 2023 and later making it the primary method of execution effective July 1, 2026. That history made Idaho one of the states that not only retained the death penalty but continued expanding the mechanisms available to carry it out.Bryan Kohberger became part of that history when prosecutors announced they would seek the death penalty for the murders of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin. For more than two years, the possibility of execution shaped nearly every major strategic battle in the case, including fights over aggravating factors, expert testimony, discovery, mitigation evidence and repeated defense efforts to have the death penalty removed. Kohberger's case also unfolded while Idaho was strengthening its execution laws, making the firing squad a particularly striking backdrop to a prosecution already carrying enormous public attention. Ultimately, however, Kohberger never reached a capital trial. In June 2025, prosecutors agreed to take the death penalty off the table in exchange for guilty pleas to four counts of first-degree murder and one count of burglary, and he was sentenced the following month to four consecutive life terms without parole. That resolution placed Kohberger in an unusual position within Idaho's death-penalty story: he spent years facing the possibility of becoming one of the state's most notorious condemned prisoners, only for the capital case to disappear through a plea agreement just before trial.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

When we first began covering the University of Idaho murders in November 2022, the case was still almost completely undefined. Four students — Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin — had been found dead inside an off-campus home on King Road in Moscow after police responded to a report of an unconscious person. Authorities were treating the deaths as homicides, but there was no suspect in custody and virtually every major question remained unanswered. Moscow Mayor Art Bettge said investigators had not settled on a motive and suggested possibilities ranging from a crime of passion to a burglary or robbery gone wrong. At that point, even the basic narrative of what had happened inside the house was still taking shape, while police searched the property, collected evidence and tried to reassure a shaken university community that there did not appear to be an ongoing threat.That was the environment in which our coverage of the case began: before Bryan Kohberger's name entered the public conversation, before the white Hyundai Elantra became a centerpiece of the investigation, before the DNA evidence, cellphone records, surviving-roommate accounts and enormous volume of court litigation that would eventually define the case. In those first reports, the story was simply an inexplicable quadruple homicide involving four young people who had been together with friends only hours before their deaths. The early speculation about a burglary gone wrong or a crime of passion demonstrated just how little was actually known and how dramatically the understanding of the case would evolve in the weeks and years that followed. Looking back at that initial reporting now provides a useful snapshot of where this investigation started: four victims, a house full of unanswered questions, an unknown killer and a community trying to understand how something so violent could have happened in the middle of a quiet college town.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11430199/Four-University-Idaho-students-killed-burglary-gone-wrong-mayor-says.html

Bryan Kohberger's defense had sought to have the indictment against him thrown out by arguing that the grand jury process was fundamentally flawed. In a filing made in August 2023, defense attorney Jay Logsdon disclosed that Kohberger's team had identified 24 separate issues supporting dismissal, although the memorandum detailing those arguments was filed under seal. The publicly available filing indicated that the defense was challenging the indictment on several fronts, including alleged grand jury bias, the use of inadmissible evidence, insufficient evidence to support the charges and prosecutorial misconduct. Kohberger's attorneys also accused prosecutors of withholding potentially exculpatory material, arguing that the grand jury process had not provided the kind of fair and reliable basis necessary to sustain the indictment.The motion represented one of the defense's earliest major attempts to attack the prosecution before trial by targeting the integrity of the grand jury proceedings themselves. Because those proceedings were secret, the public could not see the specific 24 alleged defects, leaving only the broader categories of the defense challenge available for scrutiny. Prosecutors were given time to respond, and a hearing was scheduled to address the motion. At that point, Kohberger was facing four counts of first-degree murder and one count of felony burglary in connection with the deaths of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin, while the defense was simultaneously mounting separate challenges to the DNA evidence and other parts of the state's case.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Paulette Sutton was one of the prosecution's forensic experts in the case against Bryan Kohberger, and her specialty was crime-scene reconstruction and bloodstain-pattern analysis. Sutton reviewed the blood evidence documented inside 1122 King Road, including the location, distribution and characteristics of stains throughout the house, in an effort to help reconstruct what happened during the murders of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin. Her analysis dealt with issues such as transfer stains, drip patterns, the movement of blood through the scene and what the absence of certain expected patterns might mean. Sutton originally issued her report in August 2024 and later revised it in February 2025 after receiving additional materials, including reports prepared by defense experts.Sutton's role became especially important because the defense retained its own crime-scene reconstruction experts, including Matthew Noedel and Dr. Brent Turvey, who challenged portions of the prosecution's interpretation of the physical evidence. Her revised report therefore did more than simply describe the blood evidence; it also responded to those competing defense theories and explained why she believed certain features of the scene supported her conclusions. Had Kohberger's case gone to trial, Sutton was expected to help prosecutors walk jurors through the bloodstain evidence and explain what it suggested about movement, contact and activity inside the house during and after the attacks. In that sense, she would have been one of the State's key witnesses for translating the chaotic physical scene into a forensic reconstruction of how prosecutors believed the murders unfolded.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource: 030326+REDACTED+Exhibits+S-1+through+S-13+to+States+Amended+Supp+Resp+to+Rqst+for+Disc+RE+Expert+Testimony.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Prosecutors pushed back against Bryan Kohberger's scientific report supporting a change of venue by arguing that the defense had overstated what its survey data actually proved about potential juror bias in Latah County. The defense had relied on polling and expert analysis to argue that pretrial publicity had poisoned the local jury pool and made it impossible for Kohberger to receive a fair trial in Moscow. The State countered that widespread familiarity with the case was not the same thing as fixed prejudice and emphasized that jurors could know about the murders without having already decided Kohberger was guilty. Prosecutors also challenged the methodology and interpretation behind the defense study, arguing that some of the questions were leading, that attitudes measured in a survey did not necessarily predict how prospective jurors would behave under oath, and that voir dire remained the proper mechanism for identifying and removing biased jurors.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com