Podcast appearances and mentions of bob motta

Nine women and three men had to decide whether Lindsay Clancy chose to kill her children or whether her doctors broke her brain with medications. The prosecution held up a CVS receipt as proof of planning. The defense rattled off prescriptions one by one until the chart ran off the page. Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta sat in the gallery for every day of it.Bob joins Tony Brueski for the full conversation covering all three parts of the interview. He starts with what the cameras missed — the grief in the gallery, the jury's reactions during the worst testimony, Lindsay's in-person appearance, and the moment the room shifted. He moves to the prosecution's strongest evidence: the twenty-minute window, the takeout timing, and ADA Jennifer Sprague's argument that Lindsay resented her life. He examines the defense's medication cascade and Kevin Reddington's closing.Bob closes with the question everyone is asking: what happens to Lindsay Clancy? She has been inside Tewksbury Hospital since 2023, paralyzed from the waist down. Andrea Yates has been committed for twenty years. Whether the verdict is guilty or not criminally responsible, Lindsay's life is inside a locked building. Bob explains the commitment process, the annual evaluations, and whether any realistic scenario involves her walking out.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #BobMotta #TrueCrime #PostpartumPsychosis #InsanityDefense #HiddenKillers #PatrickClancy #MurderTrial #DefenseDiaries

Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta sat inside Plymouth Superior Court for every day of Lindsay Clancy's five-week murder trial. He joins Tony Brueski for the full three-part conversation — the courtroom experience the cameras could not show, the prosecution's premeditation evidence versus the defense's medication argument, and what Lindsay's future holds regardless of the verdict.Bob describes what the room felt like during the worst testimony — the jury's nine mothers watching the prosecution describe how each child died, the families splitting the gallery, and the moment the energy shifted. He walks through ADA Jennifer Sprague's argument that the CVS run proves planning and Kevin Reddington's response that organized behavior and psychosis coexist every day.Lindsay was prescribed over a dozen psychiatric medications in months by providers who were not coordinating her care. She documented her symptoms. She sought help. The prosecution called it a cover story. The defense called it a system that destroyed a mother. Bob examines which argument landed in the room.He closes with the Andrea Yates precedent — twenty years committed — and what Lindsay's life inside Tewksbury Hospital looks like now. Paralyzed, medicated, locked in since 2023. The five verdict options the jury had for each child all lead to the same place: a locked building.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #BobMotta #TrueCrime #PostpartumPsychosis #InsanityDefense #HiddenKillers #PatrickClancy #MurderTrial #DefenseDiaries

The families sat in the same gallery for five weeks at Plymouth Superior Court. Patrick Clancy's side and Lindsay's parents — Michael and Paula Musgrove — watched over eighty witnesses testify about the deaths of Cora, Dawson, and Callan. Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta of Defense Diaries was in the room for every session.Bob joins Tony Brueski to describe what the broadcast could not capture. He walks through the jury's visible reactions during the prosecution's most difficult evidence — the autopsy testimony, the crime scene descriptions, and ADA Jennifer Sprague's closing argument about how Lindsay used exercise bands on each child separately. Nine women and three men sat through all of it. Bob describes what their faces looked like.He also describes Lindsay's in-person appearance and behavior throughout the trial — the moments she was composed, the moments she was not, and how she responded to specific testimony about her children. Bob addresses the gallery tension during recesses: the tension between the families, the energy between the legal teams, and the silence that filled the hallways when court was not in session.There was a moment when the entire room shifted in one direction. Bob identifies it and explains what it told him about where the case was headed.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #BobMotta #TrueCrime #PlymouthCourt #PostpartumPsychosis #HiddenKillers #MurderTrial #DefenseDiaries #Courtroom

The prosecution's case for premeditation depended on proving Lindsay Clancy was clear-headed when she killed her three children on January 24, 2023. Their strongest evidence: she sent Patrick to CVS and a Thai restaurant, creating a twenty-minute window. ADA Jennifer Sprague argued that a woman being controlled by a hallucinated voice cannot plan a pickup order, time a pharmacy trip, and carry out three separate acts in that span.The defense called that argument a misunderstanding of psychosis. Kevin Reddington told the jury that organized behavior and psychiatric crisis coexist every day in every hospital in the country. He showed the jury a chart of Lindsay's prescriptions — over a dozen psychiatric medications prescribed by providers who were not coordinating her care. He showed her journal entries from December 2022, one month before the killings, where her handwriting had deteriorated into scrawl.Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta was in the courtroom for both arguments. He joins Tony Brueski to examine which version the parents on the jury appeared to believe. Bob walks through the medication evidence, Lindsay's documented attempts to seek help, and the prosecution's argument that reaching for treatment proves she understood what was happening — not that she was sick.Lindsay told her doctors she was having intrusive thoughts about harming her children. She checked herself into two hospitals. She was prescribed medication after medication. The prosecution called it a cover story. The defense called it a system that destroyed her.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodCheck out Robin Dreeke's Master Class https://www.masterclass.com/classes/become-the-person-everyone-trustsThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #PostpartumPsychosis #LindsayClancyTrial #TrueCrime #BobMotta #MaternalMentalHealth #HiddenKillers #MurderTrial #KevinReddington #CriminalJustice

Lindsay Clancy has been at Tewksbury Hospital since January 2023. The room has not changed. The medication schedule has not changed. The locked ward has not changed. She is paralyzed from the waist down after her suicide attempt the same night she killed her three children. She has not reported hearing voices since that day.Andrea Yates killed her five children in 2001 and was found not guilty by reason of insanity in 2006. She has been in a state psychiatric facility for twenty years. Massachusetts law allows the same outcome: commitment with no maximum term, six months initially, renewed annually. If the state petitions and the court agrees Lindsay remains mentally ill and a danger, she stays.Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta was inside Plymouth Superior Court for the trial. He joins Tony Brueski to explain each verdict option, how the commitment process works under Massachusetts law, and what distinguishes life inside a psychiatric facility from life inside a prison for a woman in Lindsay's physical condition.Bob also addresses the malpractice lawsuits filed by both Lindsay and Patrick against her medical providers and whether the criminal case outcome affects those suits. He examines whether this trial moves the needle on how the legal system treats maternal mental health or whether it just leaves everyone feeling broken.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #InsanityDefense #LindsayClancyTrial #TrueCrime #BobMotta #AndreaYates #HiddenKillers #CriminalJustice #MurderTrial #JuryDeliberation

Headlines and courtroom photos built one version of Lindsay Clancy. Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta sat feet from her for the full five-week trial at Plymouth Superior Court and saw another. The distance between the media image and the woman in the courtroom is the subject of this conversation.Bob joins Tony Brueski to describe what Lindsay looked like in person — her physical condition, her demeanor during different phases of testimony, and the moments when her composure broke. Lindsay is paralyzed from the waist down after her suicide attempt on January 24, 2023. She has been at Tewksbury Hospital since then. Seeing her in person, in a courtroom, feet from the families of her three dead children, was a different experience than watching the broadcast.Bob also describes what the jury's nine mothers looked like during the worst testimony — the autopsy evidence, the 911 call, and the prosecution's closing argument about how each child died. He walks through the gallery's response, the family tensions visible only from inside the room, and the specific moment when the entire courtroom's energy shifted.What the camera showed was testimony. What the room held was grief, tension, and the weight of three children who are never coming home.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #BobMotta #TrueCrime #PlymouthCourt #PostpartumPsychosis #HiddenKillers #MurderTrial #DefenseDiaries #Courtroom

Lindsay Clancy sent Patrick to pick up dinner and a prescription from CVS. The prosecution called the timing deliberate — she created a twenty-minute window and used every second of it. She brought each of her three children to the basement and strangled them with exercise bands. The state argued that level of organized behavior is incompatible with psychosis.The defense argued the opposite. Kevin Reddington told the jury that mothers in psychiatric crisis manage routines every day. They order food, pick up prescriptions, care for children, and hold conversations — all while their brains are in freefall. Organized behavior does not rule out psychosis. Hospitals see it constantly.Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta was inside Plymouth Superior Court for the full trial. He joins Tony Brueski to evaluate the prosecution's strongest evidence of premeditation — the CVS run, the phone call Lindsay made after the killings, and the state's three rebuttal experts who testified she was not psychotic. Bob also examines the defense's medication cascade: over a dozen prescriptions in months from providers who were not coordinating her care.Lindsay documented her symptoms. She sought help repeatedly. She told her doctors she was having intrusive thoughts about harming her children. The prosecution used that treatment history against her. Bob explains how both arguments played in the room.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodCheck out Robin Dreeke's Master Class https://www.masterclass.com/classes/become-the-person-everyone-trustsThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #PostpartumPsychosis #LindsayClancyTrial #TrueCrime #BobMotta #MaternalMentalHealth #HiddenKillers #MurderTrial #KevinReddington #CriminalJustice

Lindsay Clancy has been inside Tewksbury Hospital since 2023. She is paralyzed from the waist down. She takes psychotropic medications daily. A not-guilty verdict in her case does not open a door. It locks a different one. Massachusetts allows the state to petition for commitment to a secure psychiatric facility — six months initially, renewable every year, no cap.Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta was in the courtroom for the full five-week trial. He joins Tony Brueski to explain what commitment looks like compared to prison, what the annual evaluation process involves, and whether any realistic path exists for Lindsay to be deemed restored and released. He walks through the five verdict options the jury had for each of Lindsay's three children and what each outcome means for the rest of her life.Andrea Yates was found not guilty by reason of insanity in 2006. She has been committed for over twenty years. She has never been released. Bob addresses whether that precedent tells us anything about Lindsay's trajectory.He also addresses what the jurors as parents had to set aside to reach a verdict. The photographs. The autopsy evidence. The 911 call. Whether regular people can separate grief from legal analysis when three children are dead. Both sides agreed Lindsay was mentally ill. The fight was over whether that illness made her unable to control her actions.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #InsanityDefense #LindsayClancyTrial #TrueCrime #BobMotta #AndreaYates #HiddenKillers #CriminalJustice #MurderTrial #JuryDeliberation

Five weeks. Over eighty witnesses. The prosecution says Lindsay Clancy chose to kill her three children. The defense says her doctors broke her with medications and she was psychotic when it happened. Online, thousands are accusing Patrick of the murders Lindsay admitted to committing.Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta was in the courtroom for the trial. He joins Tony Brueski for the full breakdown — prosecution, defense, and what comes next.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #TrueCrime #PostpartumPsychosis #BobMotta #PatrickClancy #InsanityDefense #HiddenKillers #CriminalJustice #MurderTrial

The prosecution says Lindsay Clancy chose the basement three times. The defense says her doctors piled on medications until her brain broke. The jury has five options for each child — prison, hospital, or freedom are all on the table.Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta of Defense Diaries was inside the courtroom for the full trial. He joins Tony Brueski for the complete breakdown — prosecution, defense, the Patrick conspiracy, and what happens to Lindsay no matter what the jury decides.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #TrueCrime #PostpartumPsychosis #BobMotta #PatrickClancy #InsanityDefense #HiddenKillers #CriminalJustice #MurderTrial

Criminal defense trial attorney Bob Motta sat inside Plymouth Superior Court for every day of Lindsay Clancy's murder trial. He watched the prosecution argue choice, the defense argue psychosis, and the jury receive five verdict options for each of three children.Bob joins Tony Brueski for the full three-part conversation: how the closing arguments landed, whether the jury was moved, and what happens next — including the conspiracy blaming Patrick and the malpractice lawsuits filed by both sides.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #TrueCrime #PostpartumPsychosis #BobMotta #PatrickClancy #InsanityDefense #HiddenKillers #CriminalJustice #MurderTrial

After Lindsay Clancy killed her three children in the basement of her Duxbury home, she missed a phone call. Then she called the person back, had a conversation, and hung up. ADA Jennifer Sprague told the jury a woman being controlled by a voice cannot do those things.Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta was in the courtroom. He joins Tony Brueski to evaluate whether the prosecution's closing argument proved Lindsay was criminally responsible — and which of the state's three rebuttal experts was the strongest.END LINKSListen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #ClosingArguments #TrueCrime #PostpartumPsychosis #PlymouthCourt #BobMotta #HiddenKillers #MurderTrial #CriminalJustice

A month before Lindsay Clancy killed her three children, she was writing in a journal tracking her psychiatric medications and her mental state. By December 2022 the handwriting had fallen apart. Kevin Reddington held those pages in front of the jury and told them Lindsay's mind was already gone.Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta was in the courtroom. He joins Tony Brueski to break down the defense closing — the medication chart, the journal, the Resnick comparison to Andrea Yates, and whether the jury bought it.END LINKSListen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #KevinReddington #InsanityDefense #TrueCrime #PostpartumPsychosis #LindsayClancyTrial #BobMotta #HiddenKillers #CriminalDefense #MurderTrial

Lindsay Clancy's jury has five options for each of her three children — not guilty, not criminally responsible, first-degree murder, second-degree murder, or manslaughter. If the jury finds her not criminally responsible, the state can commit her to a psychiatric facility with no end date.Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta was in the courtroom. He joins Tony Brueski to explain what each verdict means for Lindsay's future. Bob also addresses the online conspiracy accusing Patrick of the murders and breaks down whether the malpractice lawsuits survive regardless of the criminal verdict.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #PatrickClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #TrueCrime #ConspiracyTheory #PostpartumPsychosis #BobMotta #HiddenKillers #MedicalMalpractice #TrueCrimeCommunity

Lindsay Clancy's defense attorney rattled off prescription after prescription for the jury. The defense argued her doctors kept piling on psychiatric medications without coordinating her care — and that the result was a woman whose brain broke before she ever walked into that basement.Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta of Defense Diaries was inside Plymouth Superior Court. He joins Tony Brueski to assess how the defense case played in the courtroom and whether the medication evidence moved the jury.END LINKSListen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #KevinReddington #InsanityDefense #TrueCrime #PostpartumPsychosis #LindsayClancyTrial #BobMotta #HiddenKillers #CriminalDefense #MurderTrial

If the jury finds Lindsay Clancy not criminally responsible, she does not go home. Massachusetts law allows the state to commit her to a psychiatric facility — six months initially, renewable every year, no maximum sentence. Andrea Yates was found not guilty by reason of insanity in 2006. She is still committed twenty years later.Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta of Defense Diaries joins Tony Brueski to break down the verdict options, the conspiracy theories blaming Patrick, and what the rest of Lindsay's life actually looks like.END LINKSListen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #PatrickClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #TrueCrime #ConspiracyTheory #PostpartumPsychosis #BobMotta #HiddenKillers #MedicalMalpractice #TrueCrimeCommunity

Patrick Clancy came home and found all three of his children in the basement with exercise bands still around their necks. The prosecution says Lindsay put them there deliberately. The defense says her brain was in psychosis and she could not have stopped herself.Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta of Defense Diaries was inside the Plymouth courtroom. He joins Tony Brueski to break down how the prosecution's closing argument landed with the jury — the puppet analogy, the phone call, and whether the state proved Lindsay knew what she was doing.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #ClosingArguments #TrueCrime #PostpartumPsychosis #PlymouthCourt #BobMotta #HiddenKillers #MurderTrial #CriminalJustice

The prosecution in Lindsay Clancy's murder trial told a jury of nine women and three men that Lindsay knew exactly what she was doing when she killed her three children. ADA Jennifer Sprague argued Lindsay sent Patrick away, chose the basement, and repeated the same method three times.Criminal defense trial attorney Bob Motta was inside Plymouth Superior Court. He joins Tony Brueski to assess whether the prosecution met its burden and how the jury responded to the state's case.END LINKSListen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #ClosingArguments #TrueCrime #PostpartumPsychosis #PlymouthCourt #BobMotta #HiddenKillers #MurderTrial #CriminalJustice

The defense in Lindsay Clancy's murder trial argued that her medical providers prescribed medication after medication without talking to each other. Kevin Reddington showed the jury her journal entries from December 2022 — the handwriting falling apart, the mind deteriorating a month before the killings.Criminal defense trial attorney Bob Motta was in the courtroom. He joins Tony Brueski to evaluate whether the defense proved overmedication caused a psychotic break — and whether the Resnick testimony carried the weight Reddington needed.END LINKSListen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #KevinReddington #InsanityDefense #TrueCrime #PostpartumPsychosis #LindsayClancyTrial #BobMotta #HiddenKillers #CriminalDefense #MurderTrial

Thousands of people online are accusing Patrick Clancy of murdering his own children. Surveillance footage places him outside the home. Lindsay admitted she did it. The defense's entire case depends on her having done it during a psychotic break.Criminal defense trial attorney Bob Motta was inside Plymouth Superior Court. He watched Patrick testify. He joins Tony Brueski to address the conspiracy directly, explain whether Patrick has legal recourse, and break down what happens to Lindsay regardless of the verdict.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #PatrickClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #TrueCrime #ConspiracyTheory #PostpartumPsychosis #BobMotta #HiddenKillers #MedicalMalpractice #TrueCrimeCommunity

The prosecution called more than seventy witnesses over fourteen days in the Lindsay Clancy murder trial — and some of the most damaging testimony for their own case came from their own witness stand. Dr. Jennifer Tufts, who prescribed twelve of Lindsay's thirty medications through telehealth-only appointments, admitted she never met her patient in person and never requested records from another clinic treating Lindsay at the same time. When defense attorney Kevin Reddington asked her directly, she said no. "Seriously?" he replied, before reading her own chart notes back to her — documentation of pressured speech, a possible mania symptom — which she then told the jury she didn't stand behind. Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta and retired FBI behavioral analyst Robin Dreeke both sat through it, and Tony Brueski combines their courtroom breakdowns into one episode. Psychiatric nurse practitioners followed, describing Lindsay pleading to change medications that were making her condition worse — while one nurse told prosecutors she had no concerns about postpartum psychosis at all. Patrick Clancy opened the prosecution's case, describing his wife's "best day" hours before the killings, then months of intrusive thoughts and a mounting list of prescriptions. This episode lays out what the jury actually heard from the Commonwealth's own witnesses, and whether it helped their case or handed the defense its argument. Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. #LindsayClancy #BobMotta #RobinDreeke #TrueCrimeToday #LindsayClancyTrial #TrueCrime #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #PostpartumPsychosis #MurderTrial #DefenseDiaries 

A psychiatrist who prescribed twelve of Lindsay Clancy's thirty medications in four months sat on the stand at Plymouth Superior Court and couldn't defend her own paperwork. Dr. Jennifer Tufts treated Lindsay exclusively over telehealth, never meeting her face to face, and never pulled records from another clinic treating her at the same time. When defense attorney Kevin Reddington asked if she had, she said no. "Seriously?" he replied. Then he confronted her with her own chart notes documenting pressured speech — a potential mania symptom — and she told the jury the notes didn't reflect what she meant. Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta and retired FBI behavioral analyst Robin Dreeke were both in the room for it, and Tony Brueski combines their breakdowns of a prosecution witness who may have done more for the defense than the defense did for itself. Nurse practitioners also testified, describing Lindsay pleading to change medications that were making her worse, while one nurse told the prosecution directly she saw no signs of postpartum psychosis. Patrick Clancy opened for the prosecution, describing his wife's "best day" hours before their children died, followed by months of intrusive thoughts and a growing list of prescriptions. After fourteen days and more than seventy witnesses, this episode asks the question the jury is now sitting with: did the Commonwealth's own case just make the defense's argument for them? Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. #LindsayClancy #BobMotta #RobinDreeke #HiddenKillers #LindsayClancyTrial #TrueCrime #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #PostpartumPsychosis #DefenseDiaries #MurderTrial 

Fourteen days. Seventy-plus witnesses. And the moment everyone in the Lindsay Clancy trial is still talking about came from the prosecution's own doctor. Dr. Jennifer Tufts, who prescribed twelve of Lindsay's thirty medications over four months of telehealth-only appointments, never met her patient in person and never pulled records from another clinic treating Lindsay simultaneously. Defense attorney Kevin Reddington asked her directly whether she had. She said no. "Seriously?" he said back. He then read her own chart notes to her — documentation of pressured speech, a possible sign of mania — and she told the courtroom she didn't stand behind them. Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta and retired FBI behavioral analyst Robin Dreeke both watched it happen live, and Tony Brueski brings their two takes together in one conversation. Psychiatric nurse practitioners added more to the pile, testifying that Lindsay begged to change medications that were making her feel worse — while one nurse told prosecutors she personally saw no signs of postpartum psychosis. Patrick Clancy, the Commonwealth's first witness, described his wife's supposed "best day" hours before three children died, then walked the jury through months of intrusive thoughts and a growing prescription list. This episode breaks down whether the prosecution spent two weeks building its own case — or the defense's. Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. #LindsayClancy #BobMotta #RobinDreeke #HiddenKillersLive #LindsayClancyTrial #TrueCrime #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #PostpartumPsychosis #Duxbury #TrialWatch 

Something happened in the Lindsay Clancy murder trial that's harder to process than the crime itself. Jurors cried as the medical examiner walked through injuries consistent with asphyxia in two of Clancy's three children. Clancy broke down sobbing at the defense table. The judge called multiple recesses. Her defense attorney, who spent three brutal hours cross-examining her psychiatrist days before, didn't ask the medical examiner a single follow-up.But it's what her husband said that's dominating conversation around this trial. Patrick Clancy took the stand and described the final morning his three children were alive — and his choice of words has people arguing.Clancy has pleaded not guilty to first-degree murder in the deaths of Cora, 5, Dawson, 3, and Callan, 8 months, at the family's Duxbury home. Her defense is built on undiagnosed postpartum psychosis, supported by a medication history that reads like a system failure: thirteen psychiatric prescriptions across five prescribers in four months, none of them coordinating care, a hospital that allegedly declined to treat her, a nurse practitioner who called her symptoms "quite common." Journal entries entered into the trial record document her unraveling in her own words, days before everything changed.Bob Motta watched all of it unfold ten feet from Clancy. This episode covers the testimony, the paper trail the medical system left behind, and the one line from her husband that's proving impossible to square with everything else in this case.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #PatrickClancy #TrueCrimeToday #TrueCrime #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #BobMotta #PostpartumPsychosis #DuxburyMA #MurderTrial #KevinReddington

There's a moment in the Lindsay Clancy murder trial that's harder to sit with than the autopsy testimony — and that's saying something. Jurors wept when the medical examiner described injuries consistent with asphyxia in two of Clancy's three children. Clancy sobbed at the defense table and said she couldn't go through it. The judge called multiple recesses. Her attorney, who'd torn into her psychiatrist for three straight hours days before, sat silent through the medical examiner's testimony.But it's her husband's words that this episode keeps circling back to. Patrick Clancy took the stand and described the day their three children died in a way the courtroom did not expect.Clancy has pleaded not guilty to first-degree murder in the deaths of Cora, 5, Dawson, 3, and Callan, 8 months, at the family's Duxbury home. Her defense rests on undiagnosed postpartum psychosis, built on a paper trail that's hard to look away from: thirteen psychiatric medications from five prescribers in four months, none of them coordinating, one hospital that allegedly turned her away for being overmedicated, a nurse practitioner who called her symptoms "quite common." Her journal entries, read into the trial record, chart a woman losing her grip on her own mind days before it happened.Bob Motta was in that courtroom watching the jury process all of it in real time. This episode walks through what jurors saw, what the medical record documents, and why a husband's single description of that morning is the detail nobody's stopped talking about.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #PatrickClancy #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #DuxburyMA #BobMotta #PostpartumPsychosis #MurderTrial #KevinReddington

The Lindsay Clancy murder trial reached a point this week that even seasoned court-watchers weren't ready for. Two jurors cried as the medical examiner testified to injuries consistent with asphyxia in two of Clancy's children. Clancy sobbed openly at the defense table, telling the courtroom she couldn't get through it. The judge called multiple recesses to let the room reset. Her own defense attorney, fresh off three hours of aggressive cross-examination of her psychiatrist, asked the medical examiner nothing at all.And then her husband spoke. Patrick Clancy described the last morning his three children were alive in a way that's split public opinion right down the middle.Clancy has pleaded not guilty to three counts of first-degree murder in the deaths of Cora, 5, Dawson, 3, and Callan, 8 months, at their Duxbury home. Her defense argues undiagnosed postpartum psychosis, layered under a medication history that's genuinely staggering: thirteen psychiatric prescriptions from five different providers in four months, none of them talking to each other, a specialty hospital that allegedly refused to treat her, and journal entries — now part of the trial record — that read like a woman watching herself vanish in real time.Bob Motta was ten feet from Clancy in that courtroom, watching jurors weigh grief against calculation. This episode breaks down the testimony, the medical paper trail behind it, and the single sentence from a husband that's proving impossible to explain away.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #PatrickClancy #HiddenKillersLive #TrueCrime #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #BobMotta #PostpartumPsychosis #DuxburyMA #MurderTrial #TrueCrimePodcast

The prosecution's psychiatrist contradicted her own medical records. The defendant sobbed and told the courtroom she couldn't continue during autopsy testimony. Some jurors cried. And a conspiracy theory accusing Patrick Clancy of framing his wife persists despite having no foundation in the trial evidence.All of it happened this week inside Plymouth Superior Court during the Lindsay Clancy murder trial. Clancy has pleaded not guilty to three counts of first-degree murder in the deaths of her children Cora, 5, Dawson, 3, and Callan, 8 months. She admits to killing them. The defense argues postpartum psychosis and overmedication. The prosecution says she acted intentionally.Criminal defense trial attorney Bob Motta of Defense Diaries was in the courtroom. He covers the Commonwealth's witness problem and the emotional toll of the autopsy testimony on everyone in that room. He also examines why Patrick Clancy — a man treated as a grieving father inside the courtroom — is being tried on TikTok.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJgJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #BobMotta #PatrickClancy #KevinReddington #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #DefenseDiaries #TrueCrimeToday

Three things happened inside Plymouth Superior Court during the third week of the Lindsay Clancy murder trial. The prosecution's own psychiatric witnesses described a woman desperate for help she never received. The autopsy testimony reduced jurors and the defendant to tears. And every piece of evidence presented continued to contradict the conspiracy theory millions of people are spreading on social media.Clancy has pleaded not guilty to three counts of first-degree murder in the deaths of Cora, 5, Dawson, 3, and Callan, 8 months. She admits killing her children. Her defense argues postpartum psychosis and overmedication. Prosecutors allege deliberate, rational action.Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta of Defense Diaries was in the courtroom for all of it. He takes on the prosecution's growing witness problem and what it was like being in the room when Lindsay collapsed during testimony about her daughter's autopsy. He also addresses why the TikTok theory that Patrick Clancy framed his wife dies on contact with the trial record.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJgJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #BobMotta #PatrickClancy #KevinReddington #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #DefenseDiaries #TrueCrimeToday

Week 3 of the Lindsay Clancy murder trial produced psychiatric witnesses who undercut the prosecution's case, autopsy testimony that left the courtroom in tears, and a conspiracy theory about Patrick Clancy that has no basis in the evidence.Clancy has pleaded not guilty to three counts of first-degree murder in the deaths of Cora, 5, Dawson, 3, and Callan, 8 months. She admits to killing her children. Her defense argues she was overmedicated and in a postpartum psychotic state. Prosecutors say she was deliberate.Criminal defense trial attorney Bob Motta of Defense Diaries was present throughout the week at Plymouth Superior Court. He examines the prosecution's problem with its own witnesses, what the jury is experiencing as the emotional weight of the trial escalates, and the distance between what the evidence shows about Patrick Clancy and what TikTok claims he did.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJgJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #BobMotta #PatrickClancy #KevinReddington #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #DefenseDiaries #TrueCrimeToday

Patrick Clancy testified for two days at Plymouth Superior Court about finding the bodies of his three children. He was cross-examined by both sides. Neither accused him of killing anyone. Both treated him as a father whose children were taken from him.TikTok has a different version. A conspiracy theory with millions of views says Patrick strangled his own children and pushed his wife from a second-story window to cover it up. The theory's key evidence is that someone changed shoes.Lindsay Clancy has pleaded not guilty to three counts of first-degree murder in the deaths of Cora, 5, Dawson, 3, and Callan, 8 months. She admits to the killings. Her defense attorney Kevin Reddington says she was in a postpartum psychotic state. Patrick has since remarried and has a new baby. People online treat his ability to move forward as evidence of guilt.Bob Motta of Defense Diaries was in the courtroom watching all of it. He examines what the trial evidence actually reveals about Patrick, why the conspiracy collapses under facts, and what drives an audience to invent an alternate killer when a mother admits she took her children's lives.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJgJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #PatrickClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #BobMotta #TikTok #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #MurderTrial #DefenseDiaries

Five mental health professionals took the witness stand this week at Plymouth Superior Court as prosecution witnesses in the Lindsay Clancy murder trial. Every one of them described a woman in psychiatric crisis — cycling through medications, unable to sleep, calling a suicide hotline, begging providers to help her. The prosecution called them to prove Clancy was rational. The jury heard something else.Clancy has pleaded not guilty to three counts of first-degree murder in the deaths of her children Cora, 5, Dawson, 3, and Callan, 8 months. Her defense attorney Kevin Reddington argues she was overmedicated and suffering from postpartum psychosis.The most damaging moment for the prosecution came when Dr. Jennifer Tufts, the psychiatrist who treated Clancy for four months exclusively through telehealth, contradicted her own medical records on the stand. Reddington read the notes back to her. She told the jury she didn't mean what she wrote.Criminal defense trial attorney Bob Motta of Defense Diaries has been in the courtroom observing the prosecution's case. He breaks down what the jury is actually hearing, what Tufts's cross-examination revealed, and whether the Commonwealth's own witness list is doing the defense's work.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJgJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #BobMotta #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #PostpartumPsychosis #MurderTrial #DefenseDiaries #TrueCrimeToday

Lindsay Clancy told a Plymouth Superior Court courtroom she couldn't do it. She was sobbing at the defense table as a medical examiner described the autopsy findings for her five-year-old daughter. The judge halted proceedings. Her father wept in the gallery. Some members of the jury were crying.Clancy has pleaded not guilty to three counts of first-degree murder. She admits to killing her children Cora, 5, Dawson, 3, and Callan, 8 months, but argues postpartum psychosis and overmedication are at the center of what happened in their Duxbury home in January 2023. Prosecutors allege the killings were intentional.Defense attorney Kevin Reddington did not ask the autopsy witness a single question. He stayed at the table holding his client's shoulder while she wept. The jury watched all of it.Criminal defense trial attorney Bob Motta was inside that courtroom. He breaks down what happens to a defendant after three weeks of trial testimony, what the jury's reactions are telling him, and whether Lindsay Clancy's visible anguish is devastating the prosecution's argument that she acted rationally.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJgJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #BobMotta #KevinReddington #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #MurderTrial #DefenseDiaries #TrueCrimeToday

Lindsay Clancy called a suicide hotline twice before her three children died. The psychiatrist treating her at the time had no idea. That psychiatrist, Dr. Jennifer Tufts, took the witness stand this week as a prosecution witness at Plymouth Superior Court — and defense attorney Kevin Reddington spent three hours pulling her treatment decisions apart.Clancy has pleaded not guilty to three counts of first-degree murder in the deaths of Cora, 5, Dawson, 3, and Callan, 8 months. The defense argues she was suffering from postpartum psychosis and was overmedicated by the providers now testifying against her.Tufts treated Lindsay for four months through telehealth. She never met her patient in person. She did not request records from another clinic. When Reddington confronted her with her own medical notes, she told the courtroom her written documentation did not reflect what she meant.Criminal defense trial attorney Bob Motta of Defense Diaries has been in the courtroom watching the prosecution's witness parade all week. Five mental health professionals took the stand, and every one of them described a woman who was cycling through medications, losing sleep, and asking for help she wasn't getting.Motta breaks down what he saw, what the jury is absorbing, and whether the prosecution's case is surviving its own witnesses.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJgJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #BobMotta #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #PostpartumPsychosis #MurderTrial #DefenseDiaries #TrueCrimeToday

Lindsay Clancy's father sat in the gallery at Plymouth Superior Court and watched the medical examiner begin testimony about his granddaughter's autopsy. He started crying. His daughter was sobbing at the defense table, telling the room she couldn't do it. The judge called a recess and had Clancy wheeled out of the courtroom.Clancy has pleaded not guilty to three counts of first-degree murder in the deaths of Cora, 5, Dawson, 3, and Callan, 8 months. She admits killing her children but argues postpartum psychosis and overmedication caused a psychotic break. Prosecutors allege she planned the killings.Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta of Defense Diaries was in the courtroom during the autopsy testimony and throughout Week 3. He walks through what the jury is seeing that the livestream cannot capture — the reactions, the body language, and what Lindsay Clancy actually looks like after twenty-one days in that chair. He also examines whether jurors can follow the judge's instruction to set their emotions aside after seeing those photographs.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJgJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #BobMotta #KevinReddington #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #MurderTrial #DefenseDiaries #TrueCrimeToday

Patrick Clancy sat on the witness stand at Plymouth Superior Court and described finding the bodies of his three children. He testified for two days. Both the prosecution and defense questioned him. Neither accused him of anything. Both treated him as a father who lost everything.On TikTok, millions of people believe he orchestrated the entire thing. The evidence they cite is a pair of boots.Lindsay Clancy has pleaded not guilty to three counts of first-degree murder in the deaths of Cora, 5, Dawson, 3, and Callan, 8 months. She admits she killed them. Her attorney Kevin Reddington admits it. The trial is not about who killed those children. It is about whether Lindsay was criminally responsible.Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta of Defense Diaries was in the courtroom for Patrick's testimony and has been present throughout the trial. He examines what the evidence actually proves about Patrick Clancy, why the conspiracy persists despite unanimous agreement in the courtroom, and whether a jury in 2026 can remain sealed off from the theories flooding their social media feeds.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJgJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #PatrickClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #BobMotta #TikTok #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #MurderTrial #DefenseDiaries

Every person in the Lindsay Clancy murder trial agrees that Lindsay killed her three children. She admitted it. Her attorney Kevin Reddington admitted it. Patrick Clancy confirmed it on the witness stand. The prosecution built their entire case around it. No one disputes what happened inside that Duxbury home in January 2023.On TikTok, millions of people have decided Patrick is the killer. The conspiracy says he framed Lindsay and pushed her from the window. The evidence behind the theory is a pair of boots.Clancy has pleaded not guilty to three counts of first-degree murder in the deaths of Cora, 5, Dawson, 3, and Callan, 8 months. The defense argues postpartum psychosis and overmedication.Criminal defense trial attorney Bob Motta of Defense Diaries has been inside Plymouth Superior Court all week. He breaks down the gap between what the courtroom evidence shows and what social media believes, and what it means when an audience constructs a new villain because the real story is too painful to accept.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJgJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #PatrickClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #BobMotta #TikTok #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #MurderTrial #DefenseDiaries

Twenty-one days of testimony. Sixty-plus witnesses. Autopsy photographs of her children shown to the jury. A birthday spent in a wheelchair inside Plymouth Superior Court. And Lindsay Clancy's murder trial is not close to finished.Clancy has pleaded not guilty to three counts of first-degree murder in the deaths of Cora, 5, Dawson, 3, and Callan, 8 months. Her defense argues postpartum psychosis and overmedication. The prosecution says she was deliberate.This week Clancy broke down during the autopsy testimony. She sobbed and said she couldn't continue. The judge ordered recesses. Her father was in tears in the gallery. Some jurors cried when they saw the photographs.Bob Motta of Defense Diaries has been in the courtroom watching it all. He describes what Lindsay looks like now, how defense attorney Kevin Reddington is handling the emotional weight, and whether the jury that walked in three weeks ago is the same jury sitting in those chairs today.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJgJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #BobMotta #KevinReddington #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #MurderTrial #DefenseDiaries #TrueCrimeToday

Defense attorney Kevin Reddington read Dr. Jennifer Tufts's own medical records back to her on the witness stand. She had documented pressured speech in Lindsay Clancy's chart — a potential indicator of mania. On the stand, Tufts told the jury she did not mean what her notes said. Her exact words: "I don't care what it says. I know what I meant."Tufts treated Clancy through telehealth for four months before the January 2023 deaths of her three children. She never met her patient face to face. She did not request records from another provider. She did not know Clancy had contacted a suicide crisis line twice during treatment.Clancy has pleaded not guilty to three counts of first-degree murder. The defense argues she was overmedicated and experiencing postpartum psychosis. The prosecution alleges she acted intentionally.Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta, host of Defense Diaries, has been inside Plymouth Superior Court watching the prosecution present its case. He walks through what Tufts's testimony means for the jury, what the other psychiatric witnesses revealed, and whether the prosecution's own evidence is telling the defense's story.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJgJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #BobMotta #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #PostpartumPsychosis #MurderTrial #DefenseDiaries #TrueCrimeToday

Bryan Kohberger broke three and a half years of silence with a statement that thanks a lot of people. The public. The state. His own family. The strangers online who believe he's innocent. Four names never show up anywhere in it: Kaylee, Madison, Xana, Ethan. Psychotherapist Shavaun Scott breaks down what that statement is actually doing — an opening that positions Kohberger as the wronged party, the line "my actual innocence is my truth," and a new affidavit accusing his own defense attorneys of telling him guilt wasn't an important factor when he took the plea. At the same time, his handwritten petition to withdraw that plea has a paper trail of its own. Reporters traced the phrase "broken plea" straight to the title of a true crime book, and "clumps of hair," the detail he leans on hardest, doesn't appear in a single court filing — only in that book. His own defense team previously tried to shut the book down with a cease-and-desist letter. A DNA expert his defense hired had already tested that hair and, according to PEOPLE, found it consistent with Ethan Chapin's own. Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta of Defense Diaries and Tony Brueski cover what Kohberger swore to under oath on a nine-page questionnaire before this plea was accepted, and why Steve Goncalves — the father who resisted the deal harder than anyone in that courtroom — now says he wants a trial and the death penalty back on the table. It's the full picture of a case built on a book, an omission, and a father who changed his mind. Hashtags #BryanKohberger #IdahoStudentMurders #TrueCrimeToday #ShavaunScott #BobMotta #DefenseDiaries #EthanChapin #BrokenPlea #KohbergerCase #TrueCrime Links & Legal Footer Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. 

After three and a half years of silence, Bryan Kohberger finally spoke — and psychotherapist Shavaun Scott noticed what he left out before she noticed what he put in. His statement calls the case against him "a work of fiction," invites the state to seek the death penalty again, and thanks the people who believe he's innocent. He references the public, the state, his family, his supporters. He never once names Kaylee, Madison, Xana, or Ethan. Scott breaks the statement down line by line — the opening that positions Kohberger as the wronged party, the phrase "my actual innocence is my truth," and a new affidavit accusing his own defense attorneys of telling him guilt wasn't an important factor in taking the plea. Meanwhile, his handwritten petition to withdraw that plea has its own origin story. Reporters traced key phrases in it back to a true crime book — "broken plea" is literally the book's title, and "clumps of hair," the detail Kohberger cites as proof of his innocence, appears nowhere in any court filing. His own defense team once tried to suppress that same book with a cease-and-desist letter. A DNA expert his defense hired had already tested that hair and found it consistent with Ethan Chapin's own, according to PEOPLE. Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta of Defense Diaries joins Tony Brueski to explain why Steve Goncalves — the father who resisted this plea deal hardest — is now the one pushing for a trial and the death penalty, and whether any of what Kohberger filed has a real shot in court. They also walk through the nine-page questionnaire where Kohberger answered "yes" under oath, confirming the plea he's now trying to take back was entered voluntarily. Hashtags #BryanKohberger #IdahoStudentMurders #HiddenKillers #ShavaunScott #BobMotta #DefenseDiaries #EthanChapin #BrokenPlea #KohbergerCase #TrueCrime Links & Legal Footer Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. 

Three and a half years of silence, and this is what Bryan Kohberger chose to say first: the case against him is "a work of fiction." He invited the state to seek the death penalty again. He thanked the people who believe he's innocent. He named the public, the state, his own family, his supporters online. He did not name Kaylee, Madison, Xana, or Ethan. Not once, in the entire statement. Live, psychotherapist Shavaun Scott and Tony Brueski go through it line by line — how the opening reframes Kohberger as the one who's been wronged, what "my actual innocence is my truth" is actually doing rhetorically, and the new affidavit where he accuses his own defense attorneys of telling him guilt wasn't an important factor in the plea. Then the conversation turns to where some of that language actually came from. Reporters traced "broken plea" and "clumps of hair" — phrases central to Kohberger's petition — directly to a true crime book, not to any court filing. His own defense team once sent that book's author a cease-and-desist letter. A DNA expert his defense hired had already tested the hair in question and found it consistent with Ethan Chapin's own, according to PEOPLE. Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta joins to explain what Kohberger is actually facing if a judge lets any of this move forward, and why Steve Goncalves, who fought this plea deal harder than anyone, is now the one saying he wants a trial. It's a live breakdown of a statement built to sound like a man fighting for the truth — and what got left out to make that sound convincing. Hashtags #BryanKohberger #IdahoStudentMurders #HiddenKillersLive #ShavaunScott #BobMotta #DefenseDiaries #EthanChapin #BrokenPlea #KohbergerCase #TrueCrime Links & Legal Footer Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. 

A father takes the stand for the prosecution — then sues the doctors instead. That's where the Lindsay Clancy murder trial stands after its first week in Plymouth Superior Court, and it's not the story anyone expected walking in. Patrick Clancy testified that the day before his three children died, Lindsay seemed fine — she built a snowman with them, texted normally, gave no outward sign anything was wrong. Prosecutors are using that testimony to argue she was rational enough to plan what came next. Jurors also heard a seven-minute 911 call, saw pajamas and exercise bands entered as evidence, and learned about a fourteen-second phone call Patrick received after the children were already dead, with no idea anything had happened. But the defense pulled a different thread on cross-examination. Lindsay had checked into McLean Hospital on New Year's Eve. She'd been to the ER. She'd told providers, repeatedly, about intrusive thoughts involving her own children — and Women and Infants Hospital had already flagged overmedication and a possible misdiagnosis that nobody followed up on. Now here's the twist: Patrick and Lindsay have both filed separate civil lawsuits against the healthcare providers who treated her. The same man who testified against his wife is, outside the courtroom, blaming the medical system for what happened. Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta of Defense Diaries joins Tony Brueski to break down what it means for a jury to hear both stories at once, and whether a case built on "she seemed fine" can survive a father who doesn't seem to believe it either. They also unpack ADA Buckingham's opening line — that people with mental illness commit crimes every day and are still responsible — and whether the jury will still buy it after cross. Hashtags #LindsayClancy #PatrickClancy #TrueCrimeToday #BobMotta #DefenseDiaries #PostpartumPsychosis #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #MurderTrial #TrueCrime #CriminalResponsibility Links & Legal Footer Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. 

Patrick Clancy sat in the witness box for the prosecution in Lindsay Clancy's murder trial — and by the time cross-examination finished, jurors had heard a very different story than the one that put him there. Plymouth Superior Court opened its first full week with a seven-minute 911 call, pajamas and exercise bands entered as physical evidence, and a fourteen-second phone call Patrick received after his children were already gone, with no idea what had happened on the other end of the line. The state leans hard on one detail: Patrick testified that the day before, Lindsay built a snowman with the kids and texted like everything was normal. Prosecutors call that proof she was lucid enough to plan. ADA Buckingham told jurors flatly that people with mental illness commit crimes every day and are still held responsible for them. Then the defense got its turn. Records showed Lindsay checked into McLean Hospital on New Year's Eve. She went to the emergency room. She told providers, repeatedly, about intrusive thoughts involving her own children. Women and Infants Hospital had already flagged overmedication and a possible misdiagnosis — a flag nobody ever answered. What the jury may not expect: both Patrick and Lindsay have filed separate civil lawsuits against the healthcare providers who treated her. The man testifying for the prosecution is, outside the courtroom, blaming the same system the state is asking jurors to look past. Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta of Defense Diaries joins Tony Brueski to unpack what actually hurt the prosecution on cross-examination, what Massachusetts asks a jury with no medical background to decide, and what it means that the children's own father says the doctors failed first. They also break down whether the civil suits undercut the state's timeline, or whether a jury can hold both stories in its head at once. Hashtags #LindsayClancy #PatrickClancy #HiddenKillers #BobMotta #DefenseDiaries #PostpartumPsychosis #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #MurderTrial #TrueCrime #CriminalResponsibility Links & Legal Footer Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. 

Same attorney. Two cases that look nothing alike once you get past the headlines.In Plymouth, the prosecution is arguing that Lindsay Clancy's best moments prove she was rational enough to plan what happened. Patrick Clancy — the prosecution's own witness — filed a civil lawsuit against her doctors. The defense has a hospital that identified overmedication and tried to intervene before it was too late.In Idaho, Bryan Kohberger is trying to undo a guilty plea he confirmed under oath using arguments traced to a true crime book. The evidence he says was withheld was tested by his own defense team. The family that fought the plea harder than anyone is welcoming a retrial.Bob Motta of Defense Diaries examines both cases with Tony Brueski — the emotional strategy in Plymouth, the legal reality in Idaho, and what connects them.Tony Brueski and criminal defense attorney Bob Motta of Defense Diaries.END LINKSJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS#LindsayClancy #BryanKohberger #TrueCrimeToday #BobMotta #DefenseDiaries #TrueCrime #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #IdahoMurders #PostpartumPsychosis #PleaWithdrawal

The prosecution's own lead witness walked out of the courtroom and filed a civil lawsuit against the people who were supposed to help his wife. Patrick Clancy is not suing to punish Lindsay. He is suing the doctors. Both he and Lindsay filed separate suits naming the providers who prescribed, adjusted, and failed to monitor seven medications that were in her blood that night.Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta of Defense Diaries examines what the defense extracted from cross-examination — testimony that no provider warned Patrick it was unsafe to leave Lindsay alone with the children despite her ER visits and documented intrusive thoughts. Motta covers the documented fact that Women and Infants Hospital identified overmedication, reached out to her nurse practitioner, and never heard back. He also addresses what it means to ask a jury of non-medical professionals to decide whether someone was sick enough to lack criminal responsibility.Tony Brueski and criminal defense attorney Bob Motta of Defense Diaries.END LINKSJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS#LindsayClancy #PatrickClancy #HiddenKillers #BobMotta #DefenseDiaries #PostpartumPsychosis #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #CriminalResponsibility #TrueCrime #HealthcareFailure

The Lindsay Clancy trial is playing out in Plymouth Superior Court. The prosecution says her best day is proof she planned what happened. Her husband testified for the prosecution and then sued her doctors. The defense says seven medications were in her blood and a hospital identified the problem before it was too late and nobody responded.In Idaho, Bryan Kohberger wants to take back a guilty plea for four murders using arguments traced to a true crime book. The evidence he says was hidden was already examined by an expert his lawyers hired. The family that opposed the plea deal is daring him to go to trial.Bob Motta of Defense Diaries covers both cases with Tony Brueski — the emotional architecture of the prosecution in Plymouth, the defense case built from the prosecution's own witnesses, and the Kohberger petition's legal reality.Tony Brueski and criminal defense attorney Bob Motta of Defense Diaries.END LINKSJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS#LindsayClancy #BryanKohberger #HiddenKillers #BobMotta #DefenseDiaries #TrueCrime #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #IdahoMurders #PostpartumPsychosis #PleaWithdrawal

Bryan Kohberger's handwritten petition uses a phrase that is the title of a book published months before he filed. The evidence term he cites appears in no court record — only in that book. And the evidence he says was hidden from him was examined by an expert his own lawyers paid for.Bob Motta of Defense Diaries joins Tony Brueski to break down what this petition is built on, what the sworn record says about whether the plea was voluntary, and what the historical pattern tells you about defendants who tried to undo pleas they took to avoid execution.They also cover Steve Goncalves welcoming a retrial, the procedural reality of what happens if the plea is withdrawn, and why the question that matters most is not whether Kohberger can get this heard — it is whether any attorney would stand beside him at trial.Tony Brueski and criminal defense attorney Bob Motta of Defense Diaries.END LINKSJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS#BryanKohberger #KohbergerPlea #TrueCrimeToday #BobMotta #DefenseDiaries #IdahoMurders #UniversityOfIdaho #PostConvictionRelief #BrokenPlea #TrueCrime

The prosecution put Patrick Clancy on the stand to prove Lindsay had intent. What came out on cross told a different story — a woman who sought help from providers who never warned her husband it was unsafe to leave her alone with the children.Patrick filed a civil lawsuit. So did Lindsay. Both suits name the healthcare providers who managed her medications. The father of three dead children looked at everything and decided the system failed his family.Bob Motta of Defense Diaries joins Tony Brueski to cover the cross-examination testimony the prosecution did not plan for, the documented fact that a hospital identified overmedication and tried to intervene before it was too late, and the question of whether the people in the courtroom are the right defendants.Tony Brueski and criminal defense attorney Bob Motta of Defense Diaries.END LINKSJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS#LindsayClancy #PatrickClancy #TrueCrimeToday #BobMotta #DefenseDiaries #PostpartumPsychosis #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #CriminalResponsibility #TrueCrime #HealthcareAccountability

The language in Bryan Kohberger's handwritten post-conviction petition mirrors a true crime book published in April 2026. The key evidence term he uses appeared nowhere in court records — only in the book. And the evidence he claims was hidden was already tested by an expert his own defense team hired.Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta of Defense Diaries examines the petition against the record. He covers the nine-page questionnaire Kohberger signed confirming his plea was free and voluntary, Steve Goncalves welcoming a retrial and saying the family will pursue the death penalty, and the historical pattern of defendants who tried to undo death-penalty-avoidance pleas and failed.Motta also addresses the one question that hangs over this entire filing: is there a single defense attorney in the country who would take Kohberger to trial carrying a signed confession and a sworn admission under oath?Tony Brueski and criminal defense attorney Bob Motta of Defense Diaries.END LINKSJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS#BryanKohberger #KohbergerPlea #HiddenKillers #BobMotta #DefenseDiaries #IdahoMurders #UniversityOfIdaho #PostConvictionRelief #SteveGoncalves #TrueCrime

The prosecution at Plymouth Superior Court spent its first week doing something specific. Not just presenting evidence — building a sequence. The 911 call first. Then the pajamas. Then the exercise bands. Then the fourteen-second phone call. By the time any psychiatric expert takes the stand, the prosecution is betting the jury has already decided.Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta of Defense Diaries joins Tony Brueski to examine the prosecution's approach — from the "best day" testimony to the argument that Lindsay was doctor shopping, to ADA Buckingham's opening statement that people with mental illness commit crimes every day and are held responsible.They cover whether the prosecution's evidence sequence is designed to prove intent or overwhelm a defense before it begins, what happens when jurors absorb emotional testimony before hearing clinical explanations, and what Massachusetts law actually requires for criminal responsibility.Tony Brueski and criminal defense attorney Bob Motta of Defense Diaries.END LINKSJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #HiddenKillers #BobMotta #DefenseDiaries #PostpartumPsychosis #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #CriminalResponsibility #TrueCrime #MurderTrial