Podcasts about legally

Are you so energetically sensitive that staying home sometimes feels easier than dealing with crowds, conversations, and other people's energy?In this episode of The Constance Messmer Podcast, we explore energy fields, aura protection, empath sensitivity, and how to handle the physical and psychic “space invaders” that can leave you feeling anxious, depleted, frazzled, or completely out of your body.Your auric field is an active part of your daily life. Think of it as your soul's spacesuit, your radar dish, your mirror, your wetsuit, and your first line of energetic interaction with the world. Spirit takes this conversation from physical space invaders into psychic spaces, thought connections, unfinished emotional business, energetic cords, and the ethics of intuitive work.

Lindsay Clancy had her first hearing since the mistrial, and Kevin Reddington made a shocking move… What’s next?Plus, Caleb Flynn’s fate is now in the hands of the jury. What do Emily and Shane think about the AI songs and 100,000+ text messages between him and his mistress? See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

⚖️ How to Legally Change Custody Arrangements After a Divorce? | Los Angeles Divorce ⚖️ Can custody arrangements be changed after a divorce is finalized? Yes, custody orders are not always permanent. When circumstances change, parents may be able to request an update to their custody arrangement through the proper legal process. Changes in schedules, a child's needs, or other significant circumstances may require a review of the existing custody order. If both parents agree, they may be able to submit a written agreement for court approval. If they do not agree, a parent may need to file the appropriate request with the court.

CJAD 800 legal contributor Chris Dimakos is a lawyer and managing partner at Dimakos Law Group. He can be heard regularly on Montreal Now with Aaron Rand.

Send us Fan MailStudent discipline can seem straightforward: A student breaks a rule, the district determines what happened and there's a consequence. Legally, there can be much more to consider.OSBA attorneys Sara Clark and Dustin Koslen join Scott Gerfen to discuss suspensions and expulsions, students with IEPs and 504 plans, discipline involving younger students and other legal considerations school leaders should keep in mind.They also preview OSBA's Student Discipline webinar on Oct. 7, featuring Jessica Dawso of Scott Scriven LLP.Learn more and register at ohioschoolboards.org.Subscribe to the OSBA Today podcast network on your favorite podcast app.For more resources, training and advocacy updates from the Ohio School Boards Association, visit ohioschoolboards.org.

Former American Idol contestant, Caleb Flynn, is currently on trial for the murder of his wife, Ashley. Though Caleb pleads “not guilty”, the prosecution has hard evidence against him, including over 100,000 text messages with his mistress… **Disclaimer: this trial is ongoing. We will provide updates as it progresses. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

They're on different continents again… Joanne is in the US for the start of her tour (which you should DEFINITELY see by the way…) and Vogue is in London with little Remy right there in his papoose. He's too much! There's so much to discuss though… Did Channing Tatum have a burner account (LEGALLY - he did NOT) and will Joanne get a hair transplant in the near future? All of these things are VERY important. My Therapist Ghosted Me is a Global Production.Tickets for Joanne's tour Pinotphile are now LIVE: www.joannemcnally.comIf you'd like to get in touch, you can send an email to hello@MTGMpod.comPlease review Global's Privacy Policy: https://global.com/legal/privacy-policy/For merch, tour dates and more visit: www.mytherapistghostedme.comThis episode contains explicit language and adult themes that may not be suitable for all listeners.

Imagine somebody knocks on your door. They've got an interesting proposition. Pack up your family. Sell what you can't carry. Leave your home. Travel hundreds of miles into a country you've probably never seen. The roads aren't really roads. There aren't many towns. There are no hospitals. No grocery stores. No police department. And once you arrive, you're pretty much on your own. But... There's land. A lot of land. And you can have some. There's just one other little detail. You're leaving the United States. You're immigrating to Mexico. Interested? Apparently, quite a few people were. This is the Hidden History of Texas. And today we're going to meet the people who looked at that proposition... and said yes. Hello, I'm Hank Wilson and Welcome to Episode 99 of the Hidden History of Texas We've talked before about Stephen F. Austin. We've talked about the Old Three Hundred. And if you grew up in Texas, you probably heard at least some version of the story. Moses Austin received permission to bring three hundred families into Texas. Moses died. His son Stephen took over. The settlers came. And eventually they became known as the Old Three Hundred. That's all true. But it makes the whole thing sound remarkably organized. It wasn't. In fact, when this began, nobody could have been completely certain which government was going to be in charge by the time everybody arrived. The story really begins with Moses Austin. Austin had been involved in lead mining and banking in Missouri, and like a lot of Americans, he was hit hard by the Panic of 1819. He needed another opportunity. Texas looked like one. But Texas wasn't American territory. It belonged to Spain. So in 1820, Moses Austin traveled to San Antonio and asked Spanish authorities for permission to bring families from the United States into Texas. Initially, the answer wasn't particularly encouraging. But Austin had previously lived in Spanish territory and had become a Spanish citizen. Eventually his proposal was accepted. In January 1821, Spanish authorities approved a plan allowing Austin to bring three hundred families into Texas. They wanted families who were hardworking, respectable, and Catholic. From the Spanish government's perspective, this wasn't charity. Texas was enormous. It was sparsely populated by Spanish and Mexican settlers. And Spain wanted people living there who could farm the land, create communities, strengthen the economy, and help secure the frontier. Moses Austin headed home to begin organizing the venture. He never got the chance. He became ill and died in June 1821. The Texas project passed to his son. Stephen F. Austin. And almost immediately, the ground shifted underneath him. Mexico became independent from Spain. Think about that. The government that had authorized the colony no longer existed. Austin had settlers preparing to move to Texas under an agreement made with Spain... and Texas wasn't Spanish anymore. It was Mexican. Stephen Austin went to San Antonio and persuaded Governor Antonio María Martínez to recognize him as his father's successor. Austin and Martínez worked out terms for distributing land. A head of household could receive 640 acres. There could be additional acreage for a wife and children. Even additional acreage for enslaved people brought into the colony. Austin returned east and began advertising. And people responded. Why wouldn't they? America was still recovering from the Panic of 1819. People had lost farms. Banks had failed. Credit had collapsed. Land in the United States was becoming more expensive and, in some places, harder to obtain on favorable terms. Then somebody tells you that enormous amounts of fertile land are available in Texas. Cheap. Very cheap. For a farmer with little money and several children, that wasn't simply an investment opportunity. It was a chance to start over. The first colonists began arriving late in 1821. Some traveled overland. Others came by sea. And their experiences tell us something about what moving to Texas actually meant. One group sailed from New Orleans aboard a small schooner named the Lively. They were supposed to meet Austin at the mouth of the Colorado River. Instead, bad weather blew them off course. After weeks at sea they reached the Texas coast... and mistook the Brazos River for the Colorado. That was frontier GPS in 1821. Eventually they made their way upriver. Their food supplies dwindled. They planted corn. They waited. They couldn't find Austin. And most of them eventually became discouraged and went back to the United States. That's something worth remembering. Not everybody who came to Texas stayed. And not everybody who tried succeeded. Those who did stay discovered that the advertisements couldn't possibly describe everything they were getting themselves into. The land could be magnificent. Rich bottomland stretched along the Brazos and Colorado rivers. There was timber. Grassland. Wildlife. And enough acreage to make somebody who had struggled to acquire a small farm back east feel unimaginably wealthy. But acreage isn't the same thing as prosperity. First you've got to survive long enough to do something with it. You need shelter. You need food. You need tools. You need seed. You need livestock. You need neighbors. And when something breaks, there isn't a hardware store fifteen minutes away. If somebody gets seriously injured, there's no ambulance coming. If your crop fails, there isn't necessarily another source of food. If the river floods, you're dealing with it. If disease arrives, you're dealing with that too. And then there were the people already living here. This is another place where the traditional Texas story can become misleading. Texas wasn't empty. It wasn't simply unused land waiting for American farmers. Indigenous peoples had lived, hunted, traded, traveled, and fought across this country for generations. The Karankawa lived along portions of the Gulf Coast. Tonkawa groups occupied and traveled through areas farther inland. Wichita peoples lived and hunted farther north. And beyond the settlements were Comanche-controlled regions whose political and military power could not simply be ignored. When Austin's colonists arrived, they weren't moving into empty wilderness. They were moving into an already occupied human landscape. And conflict followed. Austin organized militia forces. Settlers and Indigenous groups raided one another. There were killings on both sides. Austin ordered and participated in military expeditions against Indigenous communities. There were also negotiations, trade, agreements, and periods of cooperation. The frontier was never as simple as the old movies made it. Meanwhile, Stephen Austin had another problem. Paperwork. Lots and lots of paperwork. Because Mexico still had to decide whether the agreement originally made under Spanish rule was valid. Austin traveled all the way to Mexico City. And then waited. And negotiated. And waited some more. Mexico itself was undergoing enormous political change. There had been a war for independence. Then an empire. Then the empire collapsed. Then a republic. Imagine trying to get a subdivision approved while the entire national government keeps changing. Eventually Austin succeeded. In 1823, the Mexican government confirmed his authority to establish the colony and introduce three hundred families. The arrangement became the foundation of what we remember as the Old Three Hundred. But the people receiving those grants were not Americans establishing American territory. Legally, they were colonists in Mexico. And Mexico had expectations. Religion was one of them. The colonists were expected to be Catholic. For some immigrants that wasn't a problem. For others... Let's just say enforcement could be flexible. Many settlers coming from the United States were Protestants. Austin understood that. Mexican officials understood it too. What mattered in practice was often less straightforward than what appeared in the law. But the requirement existed. And there was another issue that would become far more serious. Slavery. Many immigrants came from the American South. Some brought enslaved men, women, and children with them. Slavery therefore became embedded in the economic development of Austin's colony, particularly in the cotton-growing regions. But Mexico's relationship with slavery was changing. Mexican law increasingly restricted it. Texas colonists repeatedly sought ways around those restrictions. Austin himself worked to protect slavery within the colony because he believed attracting settlers from the southern United States—and developing the cotton economy—depended upon it. That conflict didn't disappear. It became one of several increasingly serious differences between many Anglo settlers in Texas and the Mexican government. But in the early 1820s, those later conflicts weren't predetermined. The people arriving weren't marching toward a Texas Revolution they knew was coming. They were trying to build farms. And Mexico was offering them an extraordinary incentive. Land. Under the evolving Mexican colonization system, settlers engaged in farming or ranching could receive grants measured not in dozens of acres... but hundreds or thousands. Later colonization laws could provide a ranching family with a league of land. That's more than 4,400 acres. ...

County legislators raise multiple concerns Call it a "pause" or a "timeout." Either way, a proposal to use Putnam's outsize surplus to reward residents and businesses by not levying county taxes in 2027 ran aground amid concerns about the benefits to large taxpayers like New York City and Rockland County's experience in the 1980s. Dan Birmingham, chair of the county Legislature, brought the idea to the Budget and Finance Committee on Wednesday (Sept. 23). It was the latest proposal to shift to taxpayers some of the estimated $163 million in unrestricted reserves that Putnam had accumulated as of the most recent audit in 2024. Initially calling the property-tax suspension a pause, Birmingham, who said he paid $800 in county taxes last year, offered to "reframe it" as "a tax-levy timeout." He expects the surplus to rise again once the 2025 audit is complete, and he called "meager" the $1 million reduction in the $45 million tax levy approved for the 2026 budget. "I don't think we should be drunken sailors; I don't think we should look at this lightly," said Birmingham. "But we should ask the question: Would I like $800 off my tax bill next year?" Spurred by a $50 million surplus, Rockland County approved a one-year tax holiday in 1987 — considered the first-ever in the state. John Grant, the county executive at the time, said that using $37.7 million of the surplus to eliminate a levy for 1988 would save the average taxpayer $410. Four years later, Grant announced he would be eliminating 276 positions, half of them vacant. "It was a disaster in Rockland County," said Legislator Amy Sayegh. She said Putnam's surplus allows it to pay cash for projects, rather than borrowing, and earns interest. "I don't want to grab more money from the taxpayer, but I want to safeguard what we have," said Sayegh. "I would support gradually lowering property taxes, but not pausing them for one year." New York City, described as Putnam's biggest taxpayer because of land it owns, would benefit, as would utility companies. Legally, they could not be excluded. "The concept that the City of New York, NYSEG [New York State Electric and Gas] and Verizon would also benefit from a pause is something that we just can't get around," said Legislator Tommy Regan. Nancy Montgomery, who represents Philipstown and part of Putnam Valley as the Legislature's sole Democrat, said she is a "big fan of services and programs," such as helping local fire departments and emergency medical personnel replace outdated equipment like stair chairs and turnout gear. Montgomery said she preferred extending and increasing the county's pause on collecting its portion of the gas tax and renewing an exemption from Putnam's sales tax on clothing and footwear costing less than $110 before it expires in March. (County Executive Kevin Byrne says he would like to make the exemption permanent.) "There are always great needs from the towns for emergency services equipment — fire trucks, ambulances," said Montgomery. "Those are the kinds of ways I prefer to give back." Earlier this month, the Legislature rescinded a 14-year-old policy letting the finance commissioner determine how surplus funds are allocated. Since the policy's adoption in 2012, Putnam's budget surplus swelled from $33.9 million to $191 million in 2024 because of "over-appropriation, underestimation of revenues [and] increased sales tax receipts and other revenues," according to the resolution. Last year, legislators approved setting aside $6 million of the surplus for taxpayer relief but have not settled on how to use the money. "Maybe this is the year where we can use that for particular town needs," said Montgomery. After the discussion, the Budget Committee approved a charter amendment that would allow five of the nine legislators, instead of a supermajority of six, to override a county executive's veto of their cuts or reductions to appropriations in a tentative budget. A supermajority would still be needed to overri...

You can't spell "Love Expert" without "Kellie Rasberry." See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

In this episode of This Week@Work, business and HR leaders will learn how a recent Texas court ruling could reshape the conversation around AI, confidentiality, attorney-client privilege, and attorney work product. We'll explore when AI chats might receive legal protection, when they could become discoverable evidence, how courts are taking different approaches, and what employers should consider when employees use AI for investigations, employee relations, or litigation-related matters. The critical takeaway: Before employees put sensitive workplace or legal information into an AI tool, they need to know when to stop prompting and call counsel. Join Phil Brandt, CEO of AAIM Employers' Association, and Burt Garland, Shareholder with Ogletree Deakins, as they discuss the potential impact in the workplace. EP373

Why was Patrick Clancy’s “60 Minutes” interview just 14 minutes long?! Do we think lawyers got involved?Rachel Danis has officially confirmed her pregnancy. Did this announcement come across as…inappropriate?Plus, what’s our final takeaway after seeing Patrick in this new light?See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The gruesome double homicide that Lizzie Borden was accused of back in 1892 is being brought to light in Netflix's latest “Monsters” anthology… What did the docuseries get right & what was completely fabricated? Do we believe that Lizzie Borden actually killed her father and stepmother?See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

This Day in Legal History: Sandra Day O'Connor ConfirmedOn September 21, 1981, the United States Senate voted 99 to 0 to confirm Sandra Day O'Connor to the Supreme Court of the United States, making her the first woman ever to sit on the nation's highest court—191 years after the Court was established. Nominated by President Ronald Reagan, who had pledged during his campaign to name a woman to the Court, O'Connor sailed through confirmation with unanimous support, the lone missing vote belonging to a senator away at a conference.O'Connor's path to that seat is a story about the barriers she broke to get there. A graduate near the top of her class at Stanford Law School, she nonetheless found that law firms in the early 1950s would not hire a woman as an attorney—one offered her a job as a legal secretary. She built her career in public service and Arizona state government and judiciary instead, and that pragmatic, real-world background shaped the justice she became: not an ideologue, but a cautious, case-by-case decider who for years held the pivotal swing vote on a closely divided Court, casting the deciding ballot on questions from affirmative action to abortion to the limits of executive power.The significance of September 21, 1981 is both symbolic and substantive. Symbolically, it shattered a two-century barrier and reshaped who Americans could imagine wielding the judicial power. Substantively, O'Connor's controlling opinions defined American law for a generation. And it's a fitting anniversary for today, because our lead story is about a workplace accused of denying opportunity on the basis of who people are—a reminder that the promise of equal treatment that O'Connor's own career embodied remains, so often, a promise the law is still fighting to keep.Tesla is heading to trial in California over allegations that it allowed rampant race discrimination against Black workers at its flagship Fremont assembly plant—one of the most significant employment-discrimination cases against a major American company to reach a courtroom in years. The suit was brought by California's Civil Rights Department, and that's the first thing worth understanding: this isn't a private plaintiff, it's a state civil-rights agency suing on behalf of workers, which brings the enforcement power of the state to bear. The trial opened Monday in Oakland before state Superior Court Judge Peter Borkon, and it's scheduled to run all the way to October 30—a long trial that signals how much evidence is in play. The allegations, filed back in 2022, are stark. The department claims Black workers at Fremont were subjected to pervasive harassment—racial slurs, racist graffiti, including in bathrooms—and that Tesla failed to prevent or stop it. It further alleges the plant was effectively racially segregated, with Black workers funneled into the lowest-paying, least desirable jobs, paid less, and passed over for promotions. Legally, these are claims under California's Fair Employment and Housing Act, the state's robust anti-discrimination statute, and they sound in two theories we should distinguish: hostile-work-environment harassment, where the question is whether the workplace was permeated with discriminatory intimidation severe enough to alter employment conditions, and disparate treatment in pay and promotion. Tesla denies wrongdoing, says it doesn't tolerate discrimination, and says it has fired workers who engaged in misconduct—which previews its likely defense: that any harassment was the work of rogue bad actors the company addressed, not a condition it allowed to fester. The significance is considerable. This is one of a whole series of discrimination cases Tesla has faced over Fremont, including a parallel federal EEOC suit, and a state agency taking one to a full jury trial—rather than settling—makes it a landmark test. Thousands of workers are implicated, the company is among the most high-profile in the world, and the outcome will say something about how seriously the law will hold a corporate giant responsible for the culture of its factory floor.Tesla faces major trial for alleged bias against Black workers, after years of lawsuits | Reuters · US News · Business StandardThree major news organizations—CNN, MS NOW, and Politico—have sued the Trump administration after being banned from the White House, in a First Amendment fight with real echoes of a case from the last Trump term. Here's what happened: the President announced he was barring the three outlets from the White House because, in his telling, he didn't like their “negative stories,” and over the weekend their reporters—including journalists from each outlet—tried to enter the grounds to cover the news and were turned away by the Secret Service, which deactivated and seized their press passes. The outlets are now in court arguing this is unconstitutional viewpoint discrimination and a violation of press freedom. The legal framework here is well-developed, and it's why the outlets have a strong hand. The controlling precedent traces to a 1977 D.C. Circuit case, Sherrill v. Knight, which held that once the White House opens press access, it can't deny a journalist a hardpass without due process and a compelling reason—the government can't hand out access based on whether it likes the coverage. That principle was reaffirmed in 2018, when a court sided with CNN after the first Trump administration pulled correspondent Jim Acosta's press pass—and, tellingly, CNN has brought back Ted Boutrous, the First Amendment lawyer who won that Acosta case, to lead this one. The core constitutional problem for the administration is that its stated reason—punishing outlets for critical coverage—is close to a textbook definition of unconstitutional viewpoint-based retaliation against the press. Now, the courts have never said White House access is unlimited or that any journalist can demand entry, so there's nuance about what process and standards apply. But retaliating against specific outlets for the content of their reporting sits at the very core of what the First Amendment forbids the government from doing. The significance is that this is a direct test of press freedom against executive power—whether a President can use physical access to the White House as a cudgel to reward friendly coverage and punish critical coverage. Given the precedent, the outlets enter court with the wind at their backs.CNN, MS NOW and Politico file lawsuit against Trump administration over White House access | Reuters · CNN · MS NOWAnd finally, a story close to my own world: American law schools are grappling with how to teach law in the age of AI—and some are responding by banning the technology from the classroom entirely. The University of Chicago Law School, notably, has barred phones, tablets, and laptops from its core first-year classrooms this academic year. The rationale is worth taking seriously, because it's not mere technophobia. The concern is that generative AI, and screens generally, undermine the Socratic method—the centuries-old back-and-forth of cold-calling and live argument that is the signature of legal education. As the chair of Chicago's AI committee put it, the whole point is to do things “the hard way—because that's how you learn.” The worry is that if a first-year law student can have ChatGPT instantly summarize a case, spot the issue, and draft the analysis, they never actually build the mental muscles—the close reading, the legal reasoning, the ability to think on their feet under pressure—that the profession requires. And here's the crucial nuance that makes this more than a simple ban: schools like Chicago aren't rejecting AI for the whole curriculum. The plan is foundational skills first, AI later—teach students to reason without the tool in year one, then teach them to use it ethically and effectively in advanced research, writing, and clinical work down the line. It mirrors a genuine debate splitting legal education, with many schools racing in the opposite direction, expanding AI instruction from day one. As someone who teaches at the intersection of law and technology, I find this the right instinct: you have to understand what the tool is doing before you can responsibly delegate to it, and every disaster we've covered on this show—the hallucinated citations, the sanctioned lawyers, the ChatGPT-fabricated testimony in that New Mexico murder appeal—is ultimately a story about someone who trusted the tool before they'd mastered the underlying judgment. The significance is that the profession's training pipeline is being redesigned in real time around a single question: how do you produce lawyers who can harness AI without being hollowed out by it?Laptop bans, new tech courses: US law schools grapple with AI | Reuters · Inside Higher Ed · Forbes This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

⚖️ How to Legally Protect Yourself from an Uncooperative Ex-Spouse? | Los Angeles Divorce What can you do when your ex-spouse refuses to cooperate after divorce? When communication becomes difficult or agreements are not followed, protecting yourself starts with organization, documentation, and following the proper legal process. Keeping important conversations in writing, maintaining records, and following court orders carefully can help create clarity if issues need to be addressed later. If problems continue, there may be legal options available depending on the situation, including requests for enforcement or modifications when appropriate. This video explains practical steps for protecting yourself during post-divorce disputes and why staying calm and organized can make a difference.

In this episode Rich sits down with Rondi Lambeth who explains how business owners can legally reduce their taxes through corporate structuring, income shifting, asset protection, and lesser-known provisions in the tax code. Rondi breaks down why he believes most entrepreneurs pay more taxes than legally required, how companies like Apple shift income between jurisdictions, and how combining operating companies, holding companies, and C corporations can potentially change how business income is taxed.They also take a deep dive into the Augusta Rule, including how business owners may rent their homes to their companies for up to 14 days and receive the income tax-free when properly documented. Rondi covers employing your children, Section 179, bonus depreciation, depreciation recapture, and using real estate, vehicles, energy investments, and job creation to reduce taxable income. He also shares how he recovered after losing nearly $5 million following COVID and reveals the financial principles he wishes he had understood earlier.Listeners can get Fortress Tax's $2,497 Tax Assessment for just $997. Their team will show you what your CPA may be missing and identify at least $10K in potential tax savings. Get yours here: https://fortress.tax/richsomers Connect with Rich on Instagram: @rich_somers

Caleb Flynn's defense opened its case to the jury with an unusual choice: acknowledge the affair, acknowledge the lie, and then tell jurors those facts do not make him a murderer.Defense attorney Emily Smith delivered that message after Miami County Prosecuting Attorney Paul Watkins presented the prosecution's opening statement in the trial over the death of Caleb's wife, Ashley Flynn.Caleb Flynn, 40, has pleaded not guilty to 11 charges, including aggravated murder. Prosecutors allege Ashley, 37, was killed inside the couple's Tipp City home on February 16, 2026, and that Caleb carefully staged the scene to resemble a home-invasion burglary.The defense says investigators got it wrong. Smith maintains that Ashley was actually killed during a burglary and that authorities focused on Caleb too quickly.Smith also addressed something the defense apparently does not intend to spend time pretending never happened: Caleb had an affair and lied about it. Her message to the jury was blunt: “A man can fail as a husband without being a murderer.”Legally, that distinction matters. Jurors may hear evidence they find ugly, dishonest, or personally offensive. None of those reactions can replace the state's burden to prove the charged crimes beyond a reasonable doubt. Smith's opening made clear that the defense wants jurors separating Caleb Flynn's conduct within his marriage from the question of whether prosecutors can prove he killed Ashley.Watkins, meanwhile, began outlining the prosecution's version of what happened inside that home and why the state believes Caleb is responsible.Judge Jeannine Pratt also gave the jury its instructions, setting the rules for how jurors are expected to evaluate what comes next.The lawyers have now told jurors what they believe the evidence will show. The testimony and exhibits get the final word.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodContent on this site is based on publicly available information and reflects commentary and opinion. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty. Nothing published here constitutes legal, medical, or professional advice.#CalebFlynn #AshleyFlynn #TrueCrimeToday #CalebFlynnTrial #OpeningStatements #OhioCourt #MurderTrial #EmilySmith #PaulWatkins #TrueCrime

⚖️ How to Make Sure Your Divorce Agreement Is Legally Binding? | Los Angeles Divorce

We opened up 4 real seller-financed notes and found problems in almost every single one. Here's what to fix before you buy or sell.

Jurors from the Lindsay Clancy trial are speaking out, but is it a good call? Do we understand why the one holdout juror had his doubts? Where did the other jurors go wrong? Plus, will Lindsay Clancy be receiving a Presidential pardon? See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

**Squatters Take Over $4.4 Million Home in San Francisco, Leaving Neighbors Frustrated**Imagine waking up to find strangers living in your neighbor's $4.4 million home, with no regard for the rightful owner's property. This is the reality for the neighbors of a Seacliff home in San Francisco, where a pair of alleged squatters have been living for over a year, claiming ownership of the property through forged deeds. The situation has left the community frustrated and concerned, with many questioning the city's ability to address the issue.The alleged squatters, who have a history of similar crimes, have been using the property as a hub for their illicit activities, with neighbors reporting suspicious behavior and the police receiving multiple calls about the situation. Despite the city's efforts to investigate, the squatters seem to be one step ahead, with the district attorney's office citing a lack of jurisdiction to comment on the case. The city's treasurer's office has filed a resolution to move the property towards an auction, but the process is expected to take years.The case highlights the complexities of California's laws regarding property ownership and the challenges of addressing squatting in the state. The city's inability to take action has left the neighbors feeling helpless, with some considering a class-action lawsuit to resolve the issue. The situation raises questions about the city's priorities and the need for better laws to protect property owners.Tune in to this episode to hear the full story of the alleged squatters and the community's fight for justice. Join the conversation and share your thoughts on the issue. Listen now and learn more about the complexities of property ownership in California and the impact on communities like San Francisco.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

**Squatters Take Over $4.4 Million Home in San Francisco, Leaving Neighbors Frustrated** Imagine waking up to find strangers living in your neighbor's $4.4 million home, with no regard for the rightful owner's property. This is the reality for the neighbors of a Seacliff home in San Francisco, where a pair of alleged squatters have been living for over a year, claiming ownership of the property through forged deeds. The situation has left the community frustrated and concerned, with many questioning the city's ability to address the issue. The alleged squatters, who have a history of similar crimes, have been using the property as a hub for their illicit activities, with neighbors reporting suspicious behavior and the police receiving multiple calls about the situation. Despite the city's efforts to investigate, the squatters seem to be one step ahead, with the district attorney's office citing a lack of jurisdiction to comment on the case. The city's treasurer's office has filed a resolution to move the property towards an auction, but the process is expected to take years.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

**Squatters Take Over $4.4 Million Home in San Francisco, Leaving Neighbors Frustrated**Imagine waking up to find strangers living in your neighbor's $4.4 million home, with no regard for the rightful owner's property. This is the reality for the neighbors of a Seacliff home in San Francisco, where a pair of alleged squatters have been living for over a year, claiming ownership of the property through forged deeds. The situation has left the community frustrated and concerned, with many questioning the city's ability to address the issue.The alleged squatters, who have a history of similar crimes, have been using the property as a hub for their illicit activities, with neighbors reporting suspicious behavior and the police receiving multiple calls about the situation. Despite the city's efforts to investigate, the squatters seem to be one step ahead, with the district attorney's office citing a lack of jurisdiction to comment on the case. The city's treasurer's office has filed a resolution to move the property towards an auction, but the process is expected to take years.The case highlights the complexities of California's laws regarding property ownership and the challenges of addressing squatting in the state. The city's inability to take action has left the neighbors feeling helpless, with some considering a class-action lawsuit to resolve the issue. The situation raises questions about the city's priorities and the need for better laws to protect property owners.Tune in to this episode to hear the full story of the alleged squatters and the community's fight for justice. Join the conversation and share your thoughts on the issue. Listen now and learn more about the complexities of property ownership in California and the impact on communities like San Francisco.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

What happens when the people enforcing the law are the ones crossing the line?Sergeant Erik Lavigne joins retired Detective Matt Thornton and retired Atlanta officer Zoel “Red Dog” Murphy for an audience-driven episode of Two Cops One Donut. Together, they review police encounters, challenge questionable decisions, and discuss what meaningful accountability should look like.The conversation covers officers interfering with recording, a driver's troubling traffic stop, and a lieutenant confronted by another officer over his use of emergency lights. The panel also debates unlawful arrests, excessive force, and the difference between protecting yourself and physically resisting police.Matt shares that his channel was affected by YouTube demonetization, adding a personal perspective to the concerns facing auditors and police-accountability creators.Audience questions take the discussion into phone searches, legally carried firearms, courtroom testimony, and whether police should respond to mental health crises. Expect candid disagreements, firsthand experiences, and plenty of humor as three experienced cops examine their own profession.In this episode:• 00:00:00 — Welcome, disclaimer, and guest introductions• 00:05:07 — Matt's demonetization and the mission of calling out misconduct• 00:12:09 — Philip Turner footage: officers interfering with recording• 00:23:19 — Encouraging citizens to record police encounters• 00:30:45 — Phone seizures, Ring cameras, and search warrants• 00:37:33 — Officers stepping in before a partner escalates• 00:50:14 — Should bystanders help officers or keep recording?• 00:57:24 — Traffic-stop review: recording, citations, and the driver's account• 01:06:46 — Legally carried firearms, consent, and officer safety• 01:18:13 — Citizens' rights, cooperation, and managing officer ego• 01:28:00 — Cop stops a lieutenant: rank, emergency lights, and double standards• 01:43:18 — First Amendment Protection Agency footage: questioning an arrest• 01:47:38 — Debating resistance to unlawful arrest and excessive force• 01:55:13 — Courtroom testimony, report writing, and bodycam evidence• 02:04:40 — Mental health calls, crisis intervention, and police response• 02:16:16 — Final thoughts, support for auditors, and the TCOD missionFollow Two Cops One Donut on your favorite podcast app, share this episode with someone who sees policing differently, and leave a review to help more people find the conversation.Join the live discussion Sundays at 8 PM Eastern / 7 PM Central on the Two Cops One Donut YouTube channel.Explicit language and discussion of violence and suicide. Views belong to the speakers. This episode is for education and discussion, not legal advice.send us a message! twocopsonedonut@yahoo.comSupport the showPlease see our Youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/c/TwoCopsOneDonut Join our Discord!! https://discord.gg/BdjeTEAc *Send us a message! twocopsonedonut@yahoo.com

Tim Bliefnick gave the public a reason to dislike him before he pulled the trigger on his wife… Was his answer on “Family Feud” a foreshadowing of their fate? Plus, how did a divorce attorney turn into a criminal attorney for Bliefnick? What are the reasons you should NEVER do this?See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Hosts: Ed Jones (Owner – Nutrition World) & Clint Powell A variety of topics all related to living a healthy life Presented by: Nutrition World www.nutritionw.com Broadcasting from the Nooga Dentistry Studio www.noogadentistry.com Production of: Whitfield Media Group www.vitalhealthradio.com Title: Pasture-Raised Eggs and Smarter Supplementation  [0:02:35] Clint's Podcasts & New Health Success-Story Show Clint mentions he has multiple podcasts under the Nuga Podcast umbrella. Shares that he's curating and sharing many shows (20+). Ed and Clint plan a new podcast through Nutrition World on health success stories. [0:03:02] Ed's Injury & The Body's Healing Power Ed describes nearly severing his middle finger in a steel door. Took 3 days to stop bleeding, now ~70% healed in 5 days. Uses this to illustrate the “magic” of the human body when given what it needs. Critiques tendency to credit treatments instead of the body's inherent healing capacity. Highlights tension between the traditional medical model and holistic philosophies. [0:04:25] New Azure Partnership for Food Products Announces partnership with Azure (AZURE): Nutrition World will stock ~100 new high-quality, holistic food items: Maple syrup, coconut oil, apple cider vinegar, organic chicken breast, cheeses, farm butters, etc. Positioned as top-quality natural food products aligned with Nutrition World's standards. [0:05:13] Ed's Bodybuilding Contest Prep & Carb Refeed Lesson Ed is training for his 4th Chattanooga fitness/bodybuilding contest. Coached by Matt Davis (Train Station gym owner) and his wife Julie. Current approach: High protein, ~40% fewer calories than usual. Dealing with hunger and caloric restriction. Matt's key advice: Eat 300g carbs (vs usual 50g) on a specific Sunday. Result: Ed realized how depleted he had been; refeed improved performance and appearance. [0:11:08] Segment with Kristy: Homesteading, Chickens, and Truly Pasture-Raised Eggs Christy: long-time friend and staff member at Nutrition World; now a homesteader. Has ~100 chickens, plus donkey, goats, dogs, cats, husband. Sells eggs through Nutrition World; Ed personally eats 12–18 of her eggs per week. Philosophy: Doesn't “domesticate” or Instagram her chickens. Lets chickens “do chicken things”: peck, eat bugs, scratch soil. No chemicals on property: no weed killers, garden chemicals, or pest sprays. Birds are effectively free-range in the woods, not fenced.  Predator Management with Donkey & Dogs Previously lost 3 chickens to a fox attack. Now uses: Bradford the donkey – daytime guardian; alerts with noise and stomping. Great Pyrenees dog – night guardian for coyotes. Roosters help herd hens to cover when alerted. [0:15:36] Water Filtration & “Structured Water” for Animals Christy filters all animal water with a strong (non-RO) filtration system. Then uses a “structuring” device that swirls water to mimic natural flowing water over rocks, restoring “life” and improving hydration. Reports animals (and people) feel more hydrated and less thirsty on structured water. [0:18:13] Egg Production, Breeds, and Yolk Color Different shell colors = different breeds (white Leghorn, Rhode Island Red, etc.). Shell color does NOT indicate health (brown ≠ healthier than white). Key health marker: deep orange yolk Pale yellow = missing nutrients, especially protein-rich, nutrient-dense feed. Production: A chicken lays about 5–6 eggs/week, with 3 most productive years. Christy does not cull hens at 2–3 years like many operations; keeps older birds for tick and bug control and because they're still valuable. [0:21:17] Feed, Herbs, and Natural Health Strategies Summer: chickens get very little commercial feed, mostly bugs and forage. Uses pumpkin seeds, oregano, rosemary, etc. daily to support gut health and control worms. Avoids antibiotics; instead builds terrain (overall resilience) through diet and environment. [0:22:07] Eggs as “Perfect Protein” & Cholesterol Discussion Ed: eggs have top-tier Protein Efficiency Ratio (PER) and complete amino acid profile. Highlights key yolk nutrients: especially choline for brain health. Addresses cholesterol myth: Ed eats 12–18 eggs/week, yet his total cholesterol is ~140 and ApoB is 43 (very low). Emphasizes ApoB and Lp(a) are more meaningful than plain cholesterol. Suggests dietary cholesterol from eggs is not the main driver of cardiovascular risk for most people. Organic eggs: chickens get organic feed, but may still be caged indoors. Producers can sometimes switch feed briefly and still qualify. Pasture-raised: chickens outdoors, in sunlight, foraging — Christy's preference and Ed's recommendation. Chickens are not vegetarians; they're meant to eat bugs and animal protein, so “vegetarian-fed” marketing is misleading for their natural diet. [0:26:34] Other Egg Tips Chickens love scrambled eggs as a high-protein treat. She also feeds them crushed eggshells back for calcium, supporting strong shells. Storing unwashed farm-fresh eggs: Have a natural “bloom” (protective coating). Can be kept unrefrigerated for ~6 weeks or more. Storing retail eggs: Legally must be washed, removing that coating. Must therefore be refrigerated and cannot safely sit on the counter. [0:33:27]  Segment with Curt Dearing: Deprescribing & “Desupplementing” Curt recaps prior discussion on deprescribing medications and the danger of polypharmacy (average American: ~17 prescriptions/year). Introduces “desupplementing”: Many people take too many supplements, often focused on low-impact (“tier 4”) items rather than foundational ones. Goal: simplify supplement regimens, cut redundancy, and focus on what truly matters. Warns about a false sense of security: People think “I'm taking a pill, so I don't need to improve diet or lifestyle.” Applies to pharmaceuticals and supplements. [0:37:41] Case Study: Simplifying a Real Person's Regimen Medications this person was on: Atorvastatin (for cholesterol) Nexium (PPI for reflux) Amlodipine (for blood pressure) Zoloft (for mood) Curt's key points: Standard lipid panel is limited; LDL number alone is not predictive. Recommends advanced lipoprotein testing (ApoB, etc.) and calcium score. Patient had a calcium score of 0 (good), but: That only measures calcified plaque, not soft plaque. Still must monitor inflammation markers like hs-CRP. On specific meds: Atorvastatin: Curt can support stopping it outright, especially with good advanced labs and zero calcium score. Notes statins lower numbers but don't always improve real-world outcomes or calcium scores. Nexium (PPI): Must taper (risk of rebound acid if stopped cold turkey). Long-term use harms magnesium, calcium, micronutrient absorption and may affect bones, kidneys, cognition. Amlodipine: Often tapered (half-dose a few weeks, then lower), while improving lifestyle and boosting magnesium intake. Curt believes conventional targets may push blood pressure too low in older adults. Zoloft: Psych meds generally need careful tapering, not abrupt cessation. [0:47:51] Desupplementing: Cutting Redundancy & Upgrading Quality Key supplement clean-up actions Curt recommends in the case study: Switch to a high-quality multivitamin that includes: B vitamins → drop separate B-complex. CoQ10 (100 mg) → drop separate CoQ10. Vitamin D: always pair with Vitamin K for calcium direction (bones vs arteries). Probiotics: Take breaks (e.g., a month off periodically). Rotate brands/strains, including spore-based options. Quercetin + stinging nettle for allergies: Great combo, but if allergies are seasonal, use it seasonally, not all year. Magnesium: Many people take too little and/or the wrong form. Curt prefers glycinate and taurate for blood pressure, relaxation, sleep, and broad benefits. Omega-3s: Ensure triglyceride form for better absorption. For blood pressure and inflammation, consider high-DHA formulas (e.g., DHA Extra ~960 mg DHA). Berberine/Bergamot: Combines as “Berbercol” to support lipids, blood sugar, and cardiovascular health. Weight-loss products: Instead of chasing stimulants, tackle sleep quality, mood, and lifestyle (he mentions different forms of saffron for mood vs weight management, with the right extract making a difference). Overall result: fewer pills, more targeted impact, and cost savings. [0:56:11] Policy Wins, Tax Treatment of Supplements, and Food Spots Ed shares good news on alternative health funding: Despite fears it might be cut from the federal budget, support for alternative/holistic health remains in the proposal. Dietary Supplement Access Act: Would classify dietary supplements as a qualified medical expense in the IRS code. Proposed annual limits: Up to $500/year per individual. $250/year for married filing separately. Could effectively make many people's basic supplement costs tax-advantaged. Ed plugs Tallow House in Cleveland (tallow-based burger concept, extremely busy) and his regular Cheesecake Factory order: Steak Diane, extra broccoli, extra mushrooms, no mashed potatoes. Matches his preferred macro pattern: high protein, healthy fat, and a colorful vegetable. Clint closes by encouraging listeners to control what they can about their health and keep making incremental improvements. The post Radio Show / Podcast – September 13, 2026 first appeared on Vital Health Radio.

The Fork In Your Ear Ep#221 "Author, Podcaster, Game Designer" - Podcast Show Notes & Summary 9-12-26   Quick Summary  Tim walks in barely held together and introduces himself as author, podcaster, and game designer — because he just dropped a playable HTML prototype of his Color Clash-inspired dual-grid RTS into the Fork Discord. The ring actually lands on Life first: Nate's kids demand VR mid-show, California is an air fryer, lane-splitters want six inches of courtesy, and both households are eating unexpected bills. Then the game firehose opens — Sony tells a courtroom that reasonable consumers know they don't own digital games, Xbox Cloud gets a 15-hour Ultimate cap, Nintendo dumps a Zelda 40th and a second Direct in two days, Ocarina of Time remake looks like a stop-motion maquette, Metroid Ravenous is metal as hell, and Kojima's canceled Sony IP is now an Xbox game. Entertainment is Coyote vs. Acme beating Warner Bros. at its own gag, Chad Powers season two sneaking back from the dead, Spider-Noir winning Emmys then getting canceled, and Nick Offerman as Big the Cat. Tech is Mac Studio M5 Max sticker shock, Apple's September event, the iPhone Duo foldable, and John Ternus's first week as CEO. Classic four-and-a-half-hour Fork: family chaos, Sony fumbles, Nintendo cooking, and Tim finally putting a game on the table.   Detailed Show Notes  

News with Sean 9-10-2026 …Can President Trump Legally do that? …It was the Hottest Summer on Earth

Elie Honig is a former Assistant U.S. Attorney and co-chief of the organized crime unit at the Southern District of New York, where he prosecuted more than 100 mobsters, including members of La Cosa Nostra, and the Gambino and Genovese crime families. He went on to serve as Director of the Department of Law and Public Safety at New Jersey Division of Criminal Justice. He is currently Special Counsel at Lowenstein Sandler and a CNN legal analyst.  For a transcript of Elie's note and the full archive of contributor notes, head to CAFE.com. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Caroline Herrling may have come across as a sweet, innocent woman at first glance… At least to her neighbors. Little did they know, she was taking over a dead man’s life & stealing his money before dismembering him on the roof of her building. And that's just the beginning. How did investigators catch Caroline and uncover her devious plans? Where is she now?See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Most high-income earners assume a massive tax bill is simply the price of making more money. In this episode, David Sinclair breaks down how wealthy investors and entrepreneurs approach the tax code differently — from real estate professional status and short-term rentals to cost segregation, Section 179, heavy equipment, and foreign exchange strategies designed to create significant tax deductions.David also explains when advanced tax strategies actually begin to make sense, why buying an investment solely for the tax deduction can backfire, and how high earners should think about private jets, depreciation, net operating losses, Roth conversions, and building long-term generational wealth. If you're making serious money and want to better understand how sophisticated investors think about taxes, investments, and keeping more of what they earn, this episode gives you a look inside that playbook.At this point in the year, the focus should be on what steps you can take to reduce how much you'll have to pay in taxes for 2026.- Cut your tax bill by up to 80% or more with a Darmen Tax Plan for just $15k(Special for Rich's audience; normally $25k)- If you already know you're going to have taxable income of $1M or more, thenyou should consider the DFX investment vehicle:• Generates 10% target annual cash flow• Provides projected annualized returns > 19%• Delivers a 10-to-1 tax deduction in the year of investmentInvest $100k this year and get a $1M active income tax deduction on your2026 taxes, along with $10k targeted annual cash flow each year, and aprojected 19.75% annualized return over the 10-year hold period for theinvestment. Connect with Rich on Instagram: @rich_somers

"It's not how much money you make that matters. It's how much money you keep."   The tax code is a rulebook and it tells you exactly what you have to pay taxes on and what you don't. Most people never read it, which is why they overpay. This episode walks through three legal strategies that allow business owners, real estate investors, and stock market investors to reduce their tax bill to zero.   Jaspreet Singh breaks down each strategy with specific numbers: how ordinary and necessary business expenses work, how real estate depreciation (including accelerated depreciation and the 1031 exchange) can create a paper tax loss while cash sits in the bank, and how the 0% capital gains bracket lets investors earn investment income completely tax-free.   In this episode, you'll learn: Why a person making $90,000 with a 0% tax rate ends up keeping more money than someone making $100,000 at a 25% effective rate and why that framing changes how you should think about taxes Who qualifies for the ordinary and necessary expense deduction: LLC owners, S-corp owners, and 1099 contractors and how a side business losing $4,000 a year can offset W2 job income Common ordinary and necessary write-offs: home office, vehicle, cell phone, hardware, software, and business travel and how the Section 179 deduction applies to heavy vehicles over 6,000 pounds used for business How the QBI (Qualified Business Income) deduction gives LLC and S-corp owners an additional 20% write-off on top of regular business expenses How basic real estate depreciation works: take the building's value, divide by 27.5, and deduct that amount from taxable income every year, even if the property is appreciating How accelerated depreciation through a cost segregation study can generate a first-year paper loss large enough to eliminate all rental income tax and offset other income for investors earning under $100,000 a year How the 1031 like-kind exchange allows investors to sell a rental property for a profit, roll all proceeds into new real estate, and pay $0 in capital gains taxes How the 0% long-term capital gains bracket works: single filers earning under $49,000 and married filers under $98,000 pay zero federal tax on investment income   Keywords: tax strategy, tax deductions, ordinary and necessary expenses, real estate depreciation, 1031 exchange, capital gains tax, QBI deduction, LLC, tax-free income, financial education     Want more financial news? Join Market Briefs, my free daily financial newsletter: https://link2.briefs.co/gie Below are my recommended tools! Please note: Yes, these are our sponsors & advertisers. However, these are companies that I trust and use (or have used). The compensation doesn't affect my recommendations or advice. That being said, you should always do your own research & never blindly listen to a random guy on YouTube (or podcast). ---------- ➤ Invest In Stocks Passively 1) M1 Finance - Buy stocks & ETFs automatically: https://theminoritymindset.com/m1 ---------- ➤ Life Insurance 2) Policygenius - Get a free life insurance quote: https://theminoritymindset.com/policygenius ---------- ➤ Real Estate Investing Online 3) Fundrise - Invest in real estate with as little as $10! https://theminoritymindset.com/fundrise ----------

⚖️ How to Make Sure Your Divorce Paperwork Is Legally Sound. | Los Angeles Divorce

Dr. Don and Professor Ben talk about the risks associated with butchering a legally hunted bear in a communal residence hall kitchen. Dr. Don - risky ☣️ Professor Ben - risky ☣️ Land-Grant University FAQ - APLU (14) Post by @pkpd-babe.bsky.social — Bluesky University Prohibits Processing Wild Animals in Communal Kitchens After Bear Skinning Uproar - The Cornell Daily Sun Cornell Students Skin Bear in Ganędagǫ: Hall Communal Kitchen, No Charges Filed - The Cornell Daily Sun The Cornell Bear Skinner Speaks Out | The MeatEater Podcast Ep. 770 - YouTube Ganędagǫ: Hall | Student & Campus Life | Cornell University Ganędagǫ: Hall - Google Maps Meat sources of infection for outbreaks of human trichinellosis - ScienceDirect Eurosurveillance | Outbreak of trichinellosis due to consumption of bear meat from Canada, France, September 2005 Occurrence of Trichinella spp. infestations in black bears in Quebec, Canada - Simon Krückemeier, Christopher Fernandez-Prada, Marie-Odile Benoit-Biancamano, 2026 "Letterkenny" Les Hiques (TV Episode 2017) - IMDb Goat Slaughtered in China Grove Captain's Galley Possible Source of E. coli | Marler Blog Escherichia coli isolated from feces of brown bears (Ursus arctos) have a lower prevalence of human extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli virulence-associated genes - PMC New-to-U.S. antibiotic-resistant Salmonella found in bear | Cornell University College of Veterinary Medicine Ontario Academic Credit - Wikipedia hockey - Risky or Not? Lambton Hall | University of Guelph Cuyahoga Valley National Park (U.S. National Park Service) Lifes Rich Pageant - Wikipedia Cuyahoga (song) - Wikipedia

Emily and Shane are recapping this month’s true crime cases. From pastors to satanic rituals and fake doctors to scorned daughters…See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The jury is deliberating and they hold the fate of Lindsay Clancy in their hands… The question that everyone is asking: can Lindsay be fully acquitted? What do Emily and Shane believe the final verdict will be? See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

It's the final day of August, Moon is somewhere in parts unknown, Lern is back, and The Rizzuto Show has officially entered BABY WATCH. The baby is now past the due date, predictions are flying around the studio, and Rizz is keeping his ringer on because that phone call could come at any moment. Naturally, while waiting for the miracle of life, the crew spends a significant amount of time celebrating another miracle: Rafe Williams finally has legal license plates.Yes, Rafe went to the DMV. Voluntarily. Sort of.What should have been a routine trip to get his truck squared away became a full-blown battle with Missouri bureaucracy. There's a packed Creve Coeur DMV, a confusing sign-in system, expired temp tags, paperwork, an emissions-test surprise and a ticking clock. At one point Rafe has until 4:30 to get an emissions test completed or face the horrifying possibility of coming back Monday and waiting all over again.That's when a listener at the auto shop recognizes him, gets the Tacoma squeezed in, and sends our hero racing back to the DMV with paperwork held high like he just returned from the Crusades. By the end, Rafe is trying to get the entire waiting room to cheer for the woman who helped him. This is the kind of inspirational story your favorite comedy podcast provides because apparently our standards for heroism have become “successfully registering a motor vehicle.”The DMV adventure also sends the crew into everything from old people trying to navigate touchscreen kiosks to modern cars putting every basic function behind another touchscreen. We have reached the future, and the future apparently requires three menus just to turn down the air conditioning.Then Lern returns from Colorado with stories involving the Grizzly Rose, mechanical bulls, mountain towns, wineries, peaches, e-bikes and some legitimately terrifying drives through the Rockies. Her relaxing family getaway somehow includes bull riding and flying around mountain roads, because nobody associated with this show is capable of having a normal vacation.Rizz has his own driving adventure after the intro to “Money for Nothing” hits at exactly the wrong—or right—time and suddenly he's doing 80 with a police officer behind him. Is getting completely lost in a song a valid speeding defense? Legally, probably don't take our advice. Spiritually? Absolutely.The weekend recaps keep rolling as Rizz gets his first full Friday Night Lights experience watching his daughter cheer at Lafayette, then attends a 40th birthday party extravagant enough to make everyone reconsider their current tax bracket. Meanwhile, Rafe survives Jamie Rivers' bachelor party, gets his first real taste of the Cafe Napoli scene and discovers that former professional hockey players apparently possess a completely different transmission when it comes to staying out late.And because this comedy podcast refuses to remain anywhere near the rails for long, the conversation keeps finding new and increasingly questionable destinations—including St. Louis weird news and the kind of stories that make you reconsider ever accepting a job that requires entering a stranger's home.Baby watch. DMV purgatory. Colorado adventures. Friday night football. St. Louis nightlife. Questionable driving decisions. And Rafe becoming a legally compliant Missouri resident against all odds.Just another Monday with The Rizzuto Show.Follow The Rizzuto Show → linktr.ee/rizzshow for more from your favorite daily comedy show.Connect with The Rizzuto Show Comedy Podcast online → 1057thepoint.com/RizzShow.Hear The Rizz Show daily on the radio at 105.7 The Point | Hubbard Radio in St. Louis, MO.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

It's the final day of August, Moon is somewhere in parts unknown, Lern is back, and The Rizzuto Show has officially entered King Scott's BABY WATCH. The baby is now past the due date, predictions are flying around the studio, and Rizz is keeping his ringer on because that phone call could come at any moment. Naturally, while waiting for the miracle of life, the crew spends a significant amount of time celebrating another miracle: Rafe Williams finally has legal license plates.Yes, Rafe went to the DMV. Voluntarily. Sort of.What should have been a routine trip to get his truck squared away became a full-blown battle with Missouri bureaucracy. There's a packed Creve Coeur DMV, a confusing sign-in system, expired temp tags, paperwork, an emissions-test surprise and a ticking clock. At one point Rafe has until 4:30 to get an emissions test completed or face the horrifying possibility of coming back Monday and waiting all over again.That's when a listener at the auto shop recognizes him, gets the Tacoma squeezed in, and sends our hero racing back to the DMV with paperwork held high like he just returned from the Crusades. By the end, Rafe is trying to get the entire waiting room to cheer for the woman who helped him. This is the kind of inspirational story your favorite comedy podcast provides because apparently our standards for heroism have become “successfully registering a motor vehicle.”The DMV adventure also sends the crew into everything from old people trying to navigate touchscreen kiosks to modern cars putting every basic function behind another touchscreen. We have reached the future, and the future apparently requires three menus just to turn down the air conditioning.Then Lern returns from Colorado with stories involving the Grizzly Rose, mechanical bulls, mountain towns, wineries, peaches, e-bikes and some legitimately terrifying drives through the Rockies. Her relaxing family getaway somehow includes bull riding and flying around mountain roads, because nobody associated with this show is capable of having a normal vacation.Rizz has his own driving adventure after the intro to “Money for Nothing” hits at exactly the wrong—or right—time and suddenly he's doing 80 with a police officer behind him. Is getting completely lost in a song a valid speeding defense? Legally, probably don't take our advice. Spiritually? Absolutely.The weekend recaps keep rolling as Rizz gets his first full Friday Night Lights experience watching his daughter cheer at Lafayette, then attends a 40th birthday party extravagant enough to make everyone reconsider their current tax bracket. Meanwhile, Rafe survives Jamie Rivers' bachelor party, gets his first real taste of the Cafe Napoli scene and discovers that former professional hockey players apparently possess a completely different transmission when it comes to staying out late.Rizz has a problem. For years, he thought sending someone a

With the Clancy trial blowing up, there is another case of a husband framing his wife for a suicide and it’s going viral… Coincidentally, they share the same name: Lindsey and Patrick. Why did Patrick Barnett stage his wife’s suicide and where did he go wrong? Are there similarities between this case and what the public is allegedly assuming happened between the Clancy’s?See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Tim Fergestad is the Founder and Principal of Oak Street Assets, specializing in private real estate investing and multifamily properties. He holds a Ph.D. in Neuroscience and brings an analytical approach to investing. Tim joined Rod's Warrior Group around COVID, which helped him scale into larger multifamily investments. Today, he focuses on helping investors build passive income, long-term wealth, and financial freedom. Here's some of the topics we covered:   Tim's journey from neuroscience to real estate investing Scaling from single family to multifamily Building a strong network and raising capital The challenges and lessons from a Nashville motel conversion Navigating rising rates, falling rents, and market volatility Finding distressed deals and investing through preferred equity Exploring senior housing and new real estate opportunities   If you'd like to apply to the warrior program and do deals with other rockstars in this business: Text crush to 72345 and we'll be speaking soon.   For more about Rod and his real estate investing journey go to www.rodkhleif.com  

Kevin Harper was sentenced to life in prison after a jury found him guilty of killing his 6-month-old son. Investigators claimed the cause of death was shaken baby syndrome. Kevin was sentenced to prison, unable to grieve the loss of his son, and forced into survival mode for 13 years while he remained behind bars. He is here to tell his story about being wrongfully convicted, and shedding a light on The Northern California Innocence Project, who stepped in to free him.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Christa Pike was just 18 years old when she murdered her fellow classmate, Colleen Slemmer, and carved Satanic pentagrams into her body. Was this a calculated murder? Did Christa and her accomplices try to hide their involvement? Christa became the youngest woman in modern history to be sentenced to death for her crimes. On September 30, 2026, she is scheduled for execution... Is there a way out? See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

With the Lindsay Clancy trial still in full swing, Emily and Shane are going over the most shocking discoveries from the past week. The prosecution has rested its case, and now the defense has the floor… What will happen?See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.