Podcast appearances and mentions of robin dreeke

Nobody coordinated Lindsay Clancy's care. Four providers treated her in the months before her children died, and not one of them ever spoke to the others. Her nurse practitioner had no idea she'd seen her psychiatrist fourteen times in four months. Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer and retired FBI behavioral analyst Robin Dreeke join Tony Brueski to break down what that gap in care meant — and what the jury at Plymouth Superior Court has heard since. Clancy searched "hallucinations" on her phone five days before the killings. A postpartum program turned her away for already being overmedicated. Afterward, she jumped from a second-story window and is now permanently paralyzed; she also slashed her neck and wrists and went into cardiac arrest in the ICU. The prosecution rested after fourteen days and more than seventy witnesses. The defense opened that same afternoon with three: Lindsay's mother, her sister, and a former coworker. Patrick testified that Lindsay described hearing a man's voice telling her to act — prosecutors have never disputed she heard it, only argued she could have resisted it. None of the prosecution's own psychiatrists or nurse practitioners had ever treated a patient with postpartum psychosis before this trial. This episode walks through the missed coordination, the lopsided witness count, and what's left for the defense to prove. Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. #LindsayClancy #JenniferCoffindaffer #RobinDreeke #TrueCrimeToday #LindsayClancyTrial #TrueCrime #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #PostpartumPsychosis #Duxbury #MurderTrial 

The prosecution called more than seventy witnesses over fourteen days in the Lindsay Clancy murder trial — and some of the most damaging testimony for their own case came from their own witness stand. Dr. Jennifer Tufts, who prescribed twelve of Lindsay's thirty medications through telehealth-only appointments, admitted she never met her patient in person and never requested records from another clinic treating Lindsay at the same time. When defense attorney Kevin Reddington asked her directly, she said no. "Seriously?" he replied, before reading her own chart notes back to her — documentation of pressured speech, a possible mania symptom — which she then told the jury she didn't stand behind. Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta and retired FBI behavioral analyst Robin Dreeke both sat through it, and Tony Brueski combines their courtroom breakdowns into one episode. Psychiatric nurse practitioners followed, describing Lindsay pleading to change medications that were making her condition worse — while one nurse told prosecutors she had no concerns about postpartum psychosis at all. Patrick Clancy opened the prosecution's case, describing his wife's "best day" hours before the killings, then months of intrusive thoughts and a mounting list of prescriptions. This episode lays out what the jury actually heard from the Commonwealth's own witnesses, and whether it helped their case or handed the defense its argument. Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. #LindsayClancy #BobMotta #RobinDreeke #TrueCrimeToday #LindsayClancyTrial #TrueCrime #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #PostpartumPsychosis #MurderTrial #DefenseDiaries 

None of the four providers treating Lindsay Clancy in the months before her children died ever spoke to one another. Her nurse practitioner didn't know she'd seen her psychiatrist fourteen times in four months. Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer and retired FBI behavioral analyst Robin Dreeke join Tony Brueski to break down what that disconnect — and what came after it — mean for the jury at Plymouth Superior Court. Clancy searched "hallucinations" on her phone five days before the killings. A postpartum program turned her away for being overmedicated. After the deaths she jumped from a second-story window, breaking her spine and leaving her permanently paralyzed; she also slashed her neck and wrists and went into cardiac arrest in the ICU. The Commonwealth rested its case after fourteen days and more than seventy witnesses, and the defense started that same afternoon with three: Lindsay's mother, her sister, and a former coworker. Her mother testified about a daughter who texted that something was wrong. Patrick told the jury Lindsay described hearing a man's voice telling her to act — prosecutors have never disputed that she heard it, only argued she could have resisted. None of the prosecution's own psychiatrists or nurse practitioners had ever treated a patient with postpartum psychosis before this case. This episode traces the missed coordination, the witness gap, and what the jury is now weighing. Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. #LindsayClancy #JenniferCoffindaffer #RobinDreeke #HiddenKillers #LindsayClancyTrial #TrueCrime #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #PostpartumPsychosis #Duxbury #MurderTrial 

A psychiatrist who prescribed twelve of Lindsay Clancy's thirty medications in four months sat on the stand at Plymouth Superior Court and couldn't defend her own paperwork. Dr. Jennifer Tufts treated Lindsay exclusively over telehealth, never meeting her face to face, and never pulled records from another clinic treating her at the same time. When defense attorney Kevin Reddington asked if she had, she said no. "Seriously?" he replied. Then he confronted her with her own chart notes documenting pressured speech — a potential mania symptom — and she told the jury the notes didn't reflect what she meant. Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta and retired FBI behavioral analyst Robin Dreeke were both in the room for it, and Tony Brueski combines their breakdowns of a prosecution witness who may have done more for the defense than the defense did for itself. Nurse practitioners also testified, describing Lindsay pleading to change medications that were making her worse, while one nurse told the prosecution directly she saw no signs of postpartum psychosis. Patrick Clancy opened for the prosecution, describing his wife's "best day" hours before their children died, followed by months of intrusive thoughts and a growing list of prescriptions. After fourteen days and more than seventy witnesses, this episode asks the question the jury is now sitting with: did the Commonwealth's own case just make the defense's argument for them? Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. #LindsayClancy #BobMotta #RobinDreeke #HiddenKillers #LindsayClancyTrial #TrueCrime #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #PostpartumPsychosis #DefenseDiaries #MurderTrial 

Fourteen days. Seventy-plus witnesses. And the moment everyone in the Lindsay Clancy trial is still talking about came from the prosecution's own doctor. Dr. Jennifer Tufts, who prescribed twelve of Lindsay's thirty medications over four months of telehealth-only appointments, never met her patient in person and never pulled records from another clinic treating Lindsay simultaneously. Defense attorney Kevin Reddington asked her directly whether she had. She said no. "Seriously?" he said back. He then read her own chart notes to her — documentation of pressured speech, a possible sign of mania — and she told the courtroom she didn't stand behind them. Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta and retired FBI behavioral analyst Robin Dreeke both watched it happen live, and Tony Brueski brings their two takes together in one conversation. Psychiatric nurse practitioners added more to the pile, testifying that Lindsay begged to change medications that were making her feel worse — while one nurse told prosecutors she personally saw no signs of postpartum psychosis. Patrick Clancy, the Commonwealth's first witness, described his wife's supposed "best day" hours before three children died, then walked the jury through months of intrusive thoughts and a growing prescription list. This episode breaks down whether the prosecution spent two weeks building its own case — or the defense's. Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. #LindsayClancy #BobMotta #RobinDreeke #HiddenKillersLive #LindsayClancyTrial #TrueCrime #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #PostpartumPsychosis #Duxbury #TrialWatch 

Henry Tenon admitted he killed Jared Bridegan. He took the deal that came with that admission — second-degree murder, fifteen years minimum, and a promise to testify against the two people accused of hiring him. In February 2026, he walked that away. He told the judge he wants a trial. The confession that was supposed to close this case now has to be proven all over again, without him helping. Mario Fernandez is the one in the courtroom now, on trial for first-degree murder and solicitation, accused of hiring his former tenant to kill a man he'd never met. An FBI agent testified that Tenon's phone made a run eighteen days before the murder — out of Fernandez's rental, past Bridegan's neighborhood and his children's gymnastics facility, and on to Jacksonville Beach, while Fernandez's own phone never left the property. Prosecutors call that a dry run. The defense calls it a workday, backed by video of Fernandez with contractors at the same address. Still, no DNA, no fingerprints, and no surveillance put Fernandez anywhere near the truck used in the ambush, and investigators never even searched the property where that truck was later found. Then there's the money — three checks, ten thousand dollars, written to Tenon roughly six weeks after Bridegan died, marked "landscaping" and "Kickstarter Good Luck!!" And a prosecutor's aside that a second, unnamed person was at the scene that night. Bridegan was a thirty-three-year-old father of four, shot after stopping to move a tire on a dark road with his toddler in the car. Robin Dreeke and Tony Brueski dig into what Tenon's reversal really costs the state, with Gardner's trial next and Tenon's own trial still two years out. LINKS Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod DISCLAIMER This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. HASHTAGS #JaredBridegan #MarioFernandez #HenryTenon #ShannaGardner #MurderForHire #JacksonvilleBeach #BrideganTrial #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #TrueCrimePodcast 

The providers responsible for keeping Lindsay Clancy stable in the months before her children died never once compared notes. Four of them treated her. None of them talked to each other. Her nurse practitioner didn't even know she'd seen her psychiatrist fourteen times in four months. Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer and retired FBI behavioral analyst Robin Dreeke join Tony Brueski for a full breakdown of what Plymouth Superior Court has heard — and what's coming next. Clancy searched "hallucinations" on her phone five days before the killings. A postpartum treatment program turned her away for being overmedicated already. She later jumped from a second-story window, leaving her permanently paralyzed, and separately slashed her own neck and wrists, going into cardiac arrest in the ICU. The prosecution rested after fourteen days and more than seventy witnesses; the defense answered that same afternoon with exactly three — Lindsay's mother, her sister, and a former coworker who called her a dedicated nurse. Patrick testified Lindsay described hearing a man's voice telling her to act, and prosecutors have never challenged that she heard it — only that she could have resisted. Not one of the Commonwealth's psychiatrists or nurse practitioners had ever treated a postpartum psychosis patient before this case. Coffindaffer and Dreeke lay out where the coordination broke down and whether three witnesses can carry the weight of seventy. Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. #LindsayClancy #JenniferCoffindaffer #RobinDreeke #HiddenKillersLive #LindsayClancyTrial #TrueCrime #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #PostpartumPsychosis #InsanityDefense #TrialWatch 

Patrick Clancy has never been charged with anything in his children's deaths. That hasn't stopped the internet from trying him anyway — twice, from two different directions. Retired FBI behavioral analyst Robin Dreeke and psychotherapist Shavaun Scott join Tony Brueski to break down the online case against a man neither prosecutors nor Lindsay's own defense team has ever pointed at. On TikTok, testimony about a blood stain on a windowsill turned into a fully staged theory by the same night: Patrick pushing Lindsay out the window. New photos of his second wife got lined up next to old photos of Lindsay — same hair, same build — and a wedding three years after the deaths became proof of a plan. On a separate front, the case has split almost entirely by gender. Men on X want Lindsay punished as severely as possible and ignore the psychosis defense outright. Women online have gone the other way, branding Patrick a narcissist and repeatedly invoking Chris Watts by name. Patrick told the jury directly he wasn't married to a monster. Dreeke and Scott walk through how a medical symptom Lindsay described got reread online as evidence against her husband, why his remarriage reads as guilt to two completely different audiences, and what it does to a grieving father to be convicted by an internet that was never in the courtroom and never heard the evidence. Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. #PatrickClancy #LindsayClancy #TrueCrimeToday #RobinDreeke #ShavaunScott #LindsayClancyTrial #TrueCrime #ConspiracyTheory #GenderWar #Duxbury

Nobody in the Lindsay Clancy courtroom has accused Patrick Clancy of anything. Online, it's a different story entirely. Retired FBI behavioral analyst Robin Dreeke and psychotherapist Shavaun Scott join Tony Brueski to unpack how a man who testified about burying his own three children became a target for two opposite theories running at the same time. On TikTok, a blood-stain expert's testimony about the windowsill turned into a fully built scenario overnight: Patrick shoving Lindsay through the glass. Photos of his new wife got placed next to old photos of Lindsay, hair and build matched up, and a wedding three years after his children's deaths became evidence of a plan. On a separate front, the case has split almost cleanly by gender. Men on X want maximum punishment for Lindsay and no engagement with the psychosis defense or the thirteen medications from five prescribers. Women online have taken the opposite position, casting Patrick as a narcissist and invoking Chris Watts by name. Patrick told the jury directly that he wasn't married to a monster. Lindsay's own attorney has told the jury she killed her children. Dreeke and Scott trace how a medical symptom got recast as a motive, why remarriage reads as guilt to both camps for opposite reasons, and what it costs a father to be tried by an audience that was never in the courtroom. Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. #PatrickClancy #LindsayClancy #HiddenKillers #RobinDreeke #ShavaunScott #LindsayClancyTrial #TrueCrime #ConspiracyTheory #GenderWar #Duxbury 

The Lindsay Clancy trial has produced a second trial that's happening entirely online — and Patrick Clancy is the one standing in the dock. Robin Dreeke, retired FBI behavioral analyst, and psychotherapist Shavaun Scott join Tony Brueski to break down how two very different corners of the internet reached the same conclusion about a man neither prosecutors nor the defense has ever accused. TikTok watched testimony about a windowsill blood stain and had a full scene constructed by nightfall — Patrick pushing Lindsay through the window. New photos of his second wife got set beside old photos of Lindsay, and a wedding that happened three years after his children died turned into a theory about replacement. Elsewhere, the fight has split by gender: men on X pushing for Lindsay to face maximum punishment with no interest in her psychosis defense, women on Threads and Instagram calling Patrick a narcissist and invoking the name Chris Watts. He testified, in his own words, that he wasn't married to a monster. Dreeke and Scott explain how a medical symptom — a voice Lindsay said she heard — got reinterpreted online as evidence against her husband instead, why remarriage became proof of guilt to two audiences reading it in opposite directions, and what all of it does to a father who buried three children and then had to defend himself to strangers who were never in that courtroom. Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. #PatrickClancy #LindsayClancy #HiddenKillersLive #RobinDreeke #ShavaunScott #LindsayClancyTrial #TrueCrime #TikTokConspiracy #GenderWar #TrialWatch 

The prosecution called more than seventy witnesses over fourteen days in the Lindsay Clancy trial at Plymouth Superior Court. The defense called three the same afternoon the prosecution rested. And on TikTok, a completely different trial is running. Tony Brueski and retired FBI behavioral analyst Robin Dreeke break down all of it.The prosecution's case began with Patrick Clancy describing Lindsay's best day and ended with a digital forensics expert mapping her Apple Watch data. In between, medical providers admitted they never coordinated care, a 911 call stopped the courtroom, and the defense stipulated to the act — putting everything on Lindsay's mental state.The defense started with Lindsay's mother testifying that her daughter said the medications were destroying her mind. The psychiatric experts are coming next. The jury has to decide whether the providers who treated Lindsay missed postpartum psychosis or whether it was never there.The TikTok trial runs parallel. Creators are comparing Patrick's new wife to Lindsay, building a pushed-from-the-window theory from blood stain testimony, and reinterpreting a command hallucination as Patrick's voice. Dreeke examines all three threads and reads where the jury is after absorbing everything the prosecution put in front of them.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS:#LindsayClancy #RobinDreeke #HiddenKillers #LindsayClancyTrial #PatrickClancy #TrueCrime #TrueCrimePodcast #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #Duxbury #TrialWatch

The Lindsay Clancy murder trial is being argued in Plymouth Superior Court and rebuilt on TikTok at the same time. Tony Brueski and Robin Dreeke, a retired FBI special agent who ran the Bureau's Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program, walk through both.The prosecution rested after calling more than seventy witnesses over fourteen days. Patrick Clancy described Lindsay's best day and her worst months. The 911 call stopped the courtroom. Medical witnesses admitted they never coordinated Lindsay's psychiatric care. The defense team used cross-examination to turn each provider into evidence that the system failed her.The defense started the same afternoon. Lindsay's mother testified about a daughter who said the medications were destroying her mind. The psychiatric experts are coming next. The jury has to decide whether Lindsay could understand what she was doing — and whether they trust the doctors who treated her or the ones who will evaluate her.Then the parallel trial. TikTok creators are comparing photos of Patrick's new wife to Lindsay. They took a blood stain expert's testimony and built a theory that he pushed her from the window. They've turned a command hallucination into his voice on the phone. No investigator supports any of it.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS:#LindsayClancy #RobinDreeke #HiddenKillers #LindsayClancyTrial #PatrickClancy #TrueCrime #TrueCrimePodcast #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #Duxbury #TrialWatch

The prosecution rested in the Lindsay Clancy trial at Plymouth Superior Court. The defense called three witnesses the same afternoon. And TikTok kept building a case against Patrick Clancy. Tony Brueski and retired FBI behavioral analyst Robin Dreeke cover the full picture.Fourteen days of prosecution testimony produced more than seventy witnesses. Patrick Clancy gave the jury a mother's best day and a wife's worst months. Medical providers admitted under cross they never coordinated Lindsay's care. The digital forensics expert mapped her Apple Watch to a timeline prosecutors hoped would prove she was rational. The defense used every piece of it.Lindsay's mother, Paula Musgrove, took the stand and told the jury her daughter believed the medications were destroying her mind. Lindsay's sister called what happened a decompensation. The psychiatric experts haven't testified yet. The jury has heard the prosecution's case and now has to decide whether it proved what it intended.Meanwhile, TikTok creators are scrutinizing trial footage, comparing Patrick's new wife to Lindsay, and building a murder theory from a blood stain expert's testimony. Dreeke reads both courtrooms and examines what the obsession is doing to a man who already buried three children.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS:#LindsayClancy #RobinDreeke #HiddenKillers #LindsayClancyTrial #PatrickClancy #TrueCrime #TrueCrimePodcast #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #Duxbury #TrialWatch

The Lindsay Clancy murder trial is being livestreamed. By the time each witness finishes testifying at Plymouth Superior Court, TikTok has clipped the footage and built a conspiracy theory from it. Tony Brueski and retired FBI behavioral analyst Robin Dreeke examine the obsession with Patrick Clancy.Creators are comparing photos of Patrick's new wife, Rachel Danis, to Lindsay. They took a blood stain expert's testimony and constructed a scene where Patrick pushed Lindsay from the window. They reinterpreted the command hallucination Lindsay described — a man's voice — as Patrick on the phone.The prosecution argues Lindsay planned the killings and sent Patrick to the store. The defense argues she was psychotic. Both legal teams agree on one thing: Patrick wasn't involved. The theory has no support from any professional who has examined the evidence firsthand.Dreeke reads the claims, breaks down how a theory grows when the evidence contradicts it, and examines what happens to a man who lost three children and became one of the most accused people on the internet.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS:#PatrickClancy #RobinDreeke #HiddenKillers #LindsayClancyTrial #TrueCrime #TrueCrimePodcast #TikTokConspiracy #Duxbury #ConspiracyTheory #TrialWatch

The prosecution called more than seventy witnesses in the Lindsay Clancy trial at Plymouth Superior Court. The defense called three the same afternoon. Tony Brueski and retired FBI behavioral analyst Robin Dreeke break down whether those numbers mean what they seem to.Paula Musgrove, Lindsay's mother, told the jury about a daughter who texted her saying something was wrong and kept reaching out for months. Musgrove said Lindsay believed the medications were destroying her mind. Lindsay's sister described a decompensation. A former coworker at Massachusetts General called her a dedicated nurse.The prosecution's psychiatrists testified they never saw psychosis. None had treated postpartum psychosis before. The defense experts coming next will likely tell the jury those providers missed what they weren't trained to find. And the jury has to decide which set of doctors to believe about the same woman's mental state.Dreeke examines what jurors are likely carrying after fourteen days of prosecution evidence, whether emotional testimony can be separated from fact, and whether the verdict hinges on evidence or on fear of what acquittal means.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS:#LindsayClancy #RobinDreeke #HiddenKillers #LindsayClancyTrial #TrueCrime #TrueCrimePodcast #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #InsanityDefense #Duxbury #TrialWatch

The prosecution called more than seventy witnesses over fourteen days in the Lindsay Clancy trial at Plymouth Superior Court and then rested. Tony Brueski and retired FBI behavioral analyst Robin Dreeke break down whether the prosecution built what it intended.Patrick Clancy was the first witness. He described Lindsay's best day and the months of intrusive thoughts, thirteen medications, and a wife whose condition he called confusing. The 911 call shattered the courtroom. The defense stipulated to the act and forced the entire trial onto Lindsay's mental state.Then the prosecution called the doctors. Under cross-examination, each one admitted a version of the same failure. They didn't coordinate. They didn't access each other's records. A psychiatrist who wrote twelve of Lindsay's thirty prescriptions treated her entirely over video and had no idea she'd called a suicide hotline twice.Dreeke reads how each prosecution phase likely registered with the jury — the emotional testimony, the forensic timeline, the medical evidence — and whether the prosecution's case may have handed the defense its strongest argument on cross-examination.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS:#LindsayClancy #RobinDreeke #HiddenKillers #LindsayClancyTrial #TrueCrime #TrueCrimePodcast #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #PostpartumPsychosis #Duxbury #TrialWatch

The prosecution rested in the Lindsay Clancy murder trial after fourteen days. The defense called three witnesses that same afternoon. Tony Brueski and Robin Dreeke, a retired FBI special agent who ran the Bureau's Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program, examine what comes next.Paula Musgrove testified that Lindsay texted her in October 2022 saying she was sick and something was wrong. She drove from Connecticut to Duxbury and kept returning for months. She told the jury Lindsay was afraid to drive, afraid the school would notice, and convinced the medications were destroying her mind.The prosecution's medical witnesses all said they never saw signs of psychosis. Under cross, none had treated postpartum psychosis before. The defense's psychiatric experts are coming next — the ones who will tell the jury whether Lindsay could understand what she was doing or control her actions.Dreeke examines the jury's state after absorbing the prosecution's case, whether three afternoon witnesses can shift the frame, and what happens when the experts on both sides give the jury contradictory opinions about the same woman's mind.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS:#LindsayClancy #RobinDreeke #HiddenKillers #LindsayClancyTrial #TrueCrime #TrueCrimePodcast #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #InsanityDefense #Duxbury #TrialWatch

Fourteen days of prosecution testimony in the Lindsay Clancy trial at Plymouth Superior Court produced more than seventy witnesses. Tony Brueski and retired FBI behavioral analyst Robin Dreeke examine the prosecution's case and what the jury is likely carrying after hearing it.The prosecution led with Patrick Clancy, the children's father. He described a confusing picture — a wife who was having her best day and a wife who had told him about intrusive thoughts about harming the children. Prosecutors played the 911 call. The courtroom stopped functioning. Then the stipulation took the question of who off the table entirely.The medical witnesses became the trial's pivot point. Dr. Jennifer Tufts, a psychiatrist who issued twelve of Lindsay's thirty prescriptions in four months, never met her patient face to face. Rebecca Jollotta, a psychiatric nurse practitioner, never consulted records from another clinic treating Lindsay at the same time. Neither one knew the full medical picture. Reddington's cross-examination made that undeniable.Dreeke reads the behavioral signals from a jury that heard the worst night of a family's life and a healthcare system that may have made it inevitable.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS:#LindsayClancy #RobinDreeke #HiddenKillers #LindsayClancyTrial #TrueCrime #TrueCrimePodcast #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #PostpartumPsychosis #Duxbury #TrialWatch

TikTok creators are putting photos of Rachel Danis next to photos of Lindsay Clancy. Same hair, same build. They're calling it a replacement and treating it as proof that Patrick Clancy planned the deaths of his three children to start a new life. Tony Brueski and retired FBI behavioral analyst Robin Dreeke examine the specific claims.The original conspiracy theory said Patrick killed the children and framed Lindsay. The version circulating during the trial adds a new claim — that he pushed her out the second-story window. That theory came from social media users who watched a forensic expert testify about blood stains and built a scene no one in Plymouth Superior Court has described.Lindsay told Patrick she heard a voice telling her to act. The conspiracy crowd has decided the voice was Patrick. The prosecution spent fourteen days arguing that Lindsay planned the killings and sent Patrick to the pharmacy. The defense argues Lindsay was psychotic. Neither legal team has ever suggested Patrick was involved in the children's deaths.Dreeke reads the claims, the specific trial footage being weaponized, and what happens to a private citizen when millions of people decide he's guilty based on livestream clips.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS:#PatrickClancy #RobinDreeke #HiddenKillers #LindsayClancyTrial #TrueCrime #TrueCrimePodcast #TikTokConspiracy #Duxbury #ConspiracyTheory #TrialWatch

Kevin Reddington called his first witnesses the same afternoon the prosecution rested in the Lindsay Clancy trial at Plymouth Superior Court. Tony Brueski and retired FBI behavioral analyst Robin Dreeke assess the transition from prosecution to defense and what the jury is carrying.Lindsay's mother, Paula Musgrove, testified about a daughter who texted her saying she was sick and didn't know how she would get through the day. Musgrove told the jury Lindsay said the medications were destroying her mind. She was afraid to drive. She was afraid the school would find out she was struggling.Throughout fourteen days of prosecution evidence, Lindsay sobbed during autopsy testimony hard enough to stop the proceedings. The judge told jurors to set aside their emotional reactions. Patrick testified she heard a man's voice telling her to act. The prosecution hasn't disputed the voice — they've argued she should have resisted it.Dreeke reads whether a jury can separate emotion from evidence, what happens when defense psychiatric experts contradict the prosecution's doctors, and how much fear of the outcome shapes a verdict.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS:#LindsayClancy #RobinDreeke #HiddenKillers #LindsayClancyTrial #TrueCrime #TrueCrimePodcast #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #InsanityDefense #Duxbury #TrialWatch

The prosecution rested its case in the Lindsay Clancy murder trial at Plymouth Superior Court after fourteen days and more than seventy witnesses. Tony Brueski and Robin Dreeke, a retired FBI special agent who ran the Bureau's Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program, assess where the prosecution's case landed.Patrick Clancy opened the testimony. He gave the jury a mother having her best day and a wife spiraling through thirteen medications in four months. The 911 call made jurors cry. The stipulation removed the question of who and left only the question of Lindsay's mind.The prosecution's medical witnesses became its most exposed flank. Multiple providers admitted under cross-examination that they treated Lindsay without consulting each other's records or coordinating care. Dr. Jennifer Tufts never met Lindsay in person. Rebecca Jollotta never spoke to the hospital that admitted Lindsay. Nobody had the full picture, and Reddington made the jury watch each of them admit it.Dreeke examines what the prosecution intended versus what the jury received, and whether the medical testimony did more to establish the defense's argument than the prosecution's.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS:#LindsayClancy #RobinDreeke #HiddenKillers #LindsayClancyTrial #TrueCrime #TrueCrimePodcast #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #PostpartumPsychosis #Duxbury #TrialWatch

turned that testimony into conspiracy fuel. Tony Brueski and Robin Dreeke, a retired FBI special agent who ran the Bureau's Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program, examine the specific claims.Creators are scrutinizing surveillance footage from Kingston CVS, comparing photos of Patrick's new wife to Lindsay, and reinterpreting a blood stain expert's testimony as evidence Patrick pushed Lindsay from the second floor. The command hallucination Lindsay reported — a man's voice telling her to act — has been recast as Patrick coaching her over the phone.On August 11th, defense attorney Kevin Reddington asked the judge to let a former McLean Hospital employee testify after he found her through a TikTok video disputing the prosecution's portrayal of the facility. The judge denied the request. Social media and the courtroom are bleeding into each other.Dreeke breaks down how specific trial moments get clipped and rebuilt as evidence, what the conspiracy requires Lindsay to be doing from her hospital bed, and when an internet obsession crosses a line.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS:#PatrickClancy #RobinDreeke #HiddenKillers #LindsayClancyTrial #TrueCrime #TrueCrimePodcast #TikTokConspiracy #Duxbury #ConspiracyTheory #TrialWatch

The Plymouth County District Attorney charged one person in the deaths of the three Clancy children. State Police investigated and landed on that same name. It wasn't Patrick Clancy. So why does a growing slice of the internet keep insisting otherwise? Tony Brueski runs the theory down. The claims circulating on Instagram and TikTok form a full list: Patrick drugged his wife for months, he held the restraints, he staged the bedroom window, the locked door was his doing, and his 2026 remarriage is proof he had a motive all along. Tony checks each one against actual courtroom testimony — NMS Laboratories toxicologist Justin Brower's findings on four medications in Lindsay Clancy's blood, the direction an interior bedroom lock actually turns, and a fingerprint claim that turns out to misread what a state trooper said on the stand. Retired FBI behavioral analyst Robin Dreeke joins to explain why online crowds gravitate toward the husband as a suspect almost by reflex, no matter what the paper trail shows, and what it would genuinely take to change that. His answer isn't the easy one. Patrick's alibi is backed by CVS surveillance and phone records down to the minute. The remarriage detail came out in open court — Lindsay's own attorney disclosed it and told the judge Patrick had lived through one of the worst tragedies a person can survive. Three providers who treated Lindsay have since testified, and civil filings name all three as defendants in the case some are calling a cover story. Hear the full breakdown and decide where the evidence actually points. Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. #LindsayClancy #PatrickClancy #HiddenKillers #LindsayClancyTrial #TrueCrime #Duxbury #RobinDreeke #TrialWatch #PostpartumPsychosis #ConspiracyTheories 

One day, Pima County's sheriff said there was no ransom note in the Nancy Guthrie case. The next day, his department released two. Tony Brueski and retired FBI behavioral analyst Robin Dreeke take listener questions on that reversal and everything else this case has surfaced in the six months since Nancy was taken from her Tucson home. The first note opens with 'Hello Savannah,' demands four million dollars in Bitcoin, and knows details only someone inside the house would know: a white smart watch on the floor by the bed, a destroyed flood light out back. The second asks for nothing at all. It claims Nancy died shortly after she was taken, that she's buried in nature, and that the writer hopes her children find peace. Listeners want to know who abandons four million dollars, how the writer knew the inside of that house, and whether a sheriff who reversed himself overnight can be trusted with the rest of this case. The financial trail raises its own questions. Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer's trace shows the only money that ever moved into the alleged kidnapper's wallet came from the FBI itself, roughly three hundred dollars, and it's still sitting there untouched. No ransom was ever paid, despite Savannah Guthrie's public statement that the family did their part. Messages written directly to that wallet echo Savannah's exact on-camera words, and that line has never been answered. Search teams have gone back to the brush behind Nancy's own home since the monsoons. Dreeke and Coffindaffer weigh what all of it adds up to. Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. #NancyGuthrie #SavannahGuthrie #HiddenKillers #RansomNote #TrueCrime #Tucson #FBI #Bitcoin #MissingPerson #PimaCounty 

Lindsay Clancy's own defense attorney stood up in Plymouth Superior Court and said something about Patrick Clancy's remarriage that cuts directly against the theory that he's secretly guilty. Tony Brueski breaks down what actually got said, and why it matters. The backdrop: online accounts pulling hundreds of thousands of views are working through a full list of claims against Patrick — that he drugged his wife for months, that he held the restraints, that he staged the bedroom window, that the locked door was his doing, and that the remarriage itself is proof of motive. Tony takes the list item by item against courtroom testimony, including NMS Laboratories toxicologist Justin Brower's account of four medications found in Lindsay's blood and the direction an interior bedroom lock actually operates. Retired FBI behavioral analyst Robin Dreeke joins to unpack why an internet crowd defaults to suspecting the husband almost on instinct, regardless of what the paper trail shows, and what would genuinely change their minds. His answer is more interesting than a simple 'nothing ever will.' Patrick's timeline is backed by CVS surveillance footage and phone records. The Plymouth County District Attorney has charged one person. State Police investigated and arrived at the same name. Nobody with subpoena power has pointed at Patrick. Three of the providers who treated Lindsay have now testified, and civil filings name all three as defendants — the same lawsuit some corners of the internet are calling a cover story. This episode pulls both threads together: the behavioral science of why the theory took hold, and the specific claims driving it, checked line by line against what witnesses actually said under oath. Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. #LindsayClancy #PatrickClancy #HiddenKillers #LindsayClancyTrial #TrueCrime #Duxbury #RobinDreeke #TrialWatch #PostpartumPsychosis #ConspiracyTheories 

Search teams have gone back into the brush behind Nancy Guthrie's own home since the monsoons passed through Tucson, and Tony Brueski and retired FBI behavioral analyst Robin Dreeke dig into what that choice might actually mean six months into this investigation. It comes alongside a financial trail that doesn't line up with what the public has been told. The ransom demand was four million dollars in Bitcoin. Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer's trace shows the only funds that ever reached the alleged kidnapper's wallet were roughly three hundred dollars, sent by the FBI itself on February 10, and never touched since. No ransom was ever paid, which sits directly against Savannah Guthrie's own statement that the family did their part. Messages written straight to that wallet include the exact words Savannah said on camera, meaning a direct line to whoever holds it has existed the whole time and gone unanswered. Then there are the two ransom notes, released by Pima County on July 31. One opens with 'Hello Savannah,' demands four million, and knows details only someone inside the house would know, including a white smart watch on the floor and a destroyed flood light. The other asks for nothing, claims Nancy died shortly after she was taken, and says she's buried in nature. Dreeke and Coffindaffer both question whether one writer produced both. Sheriff Nanos calls his relationship with the FBI great while thousands of hours of video remain unreviewed. This episode traces the money, the messages, and now the renewed search, all at once. Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. #NancyGuthrie #SavannahGuthrie #HiddenKillers #RansomNote #TrueCrime #Tucson #FBI #Bitcoin #MissingPerson #PimaCounty 

Patrick Clancy has a timeline verified by CVS surveillance and phone records. His wife's own attorney told a jury she killed their three children. And a growing internet mob is convinced he's the real killer anyway. Tony Brueski asks retired FBI behavioral analyst Robin Dreeke a direct question: is there any evidence that would actually satisfy this crowd? Robin ran the FBI's Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program, and he walks through what's driving the instinct to suspect the husband — the alibi read through a trained investigator's eyes, the way people interpret Patrick's composure on the stand as guilt, and the remarriage three years later that some have turned into a motive. Then the episode gets specific. NMS Laboratories toxicologist Justin Brower testified to four medications found in Lindsay Clancy's blood. A state trooper's testimony about fingerprints has been misread into a claim it never supported. The interior bedroom lock at the center of one theory only turns one direction. And there's the anniversary phone call — two years old, sitting in plain sight — where Patrick asked his wife the exact question people assume he's avoided. The remarriage detail didn't leak from a tabloid. Lindsay's own attorney raised it in Plymouth Superior Court and told the judge Patrick had endured one of the worst tragedies a person can survive and was trying to move forward. Nobody with the authority to subpoena a phone record has ever pointed at him. Robin's answer to what it would take for the online crowd to finally drop the theory is the one worth sticking around for — and it might not be what you'd guess. Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. #LindsayClancy #PatrickClancy #HiddenKillers #LindsayClancyTrial #TrueCrime #Duxbury #RobinDreeke #TrialWatch #PostpartumPsychosis #ConspiracyTheories 

Two ransom notes now exist in the Nancy Guthrie case, released by the Pima County Sheriff's Department on July 31, and they read like they came from two different people. Tony Brueski, retired FBI behavioral analyst Robin Dreeke, and retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer break down why. The first letter opens with 'Hello Savannah,' demands four million dollars in Bitcoin, and knows specific details inside the house, including a white smart watch on the floor by the bed and a destroyed flood light out back. It reads like a script: deadlines, threats, demands. The second asks for nothing. It claims Nancy died shortly after she was taken, that she's buried in nature, and that the writer hopes her children find peace, and it reads like someone who was actually inside that house, apologizing. The financial trail adds another layer. Coffindaffer's trace of the alleged kidnapper's Bitcoin wallet shows the only funds that ever arrived were roughly three hundred dollars, sent by the FBI itself, and untouched since February 10. No ransom was ever paid, which contradicts Savannah Guthrie's own public statement that the family did their part. Messages written directly to that wallet include the exact words Savannah said on camera, meaning a line to whoever controls it has existed the entire time and gone unanswered. Six months into the case, Sheriff Nanos calls his relationship with the FBI great while thousands of hours of video sit unreviewed, and search teams have returned to the brush behind Nancy's own home since the monsoons. Hear the full breakdown of both notes and the money trail behind them. Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. #NancyGuthrie #SavannahGuthrie #HiddenKillers #RansomNote #TrueCrime #Tucson #FBI #Bitcoin #MissingPerson #PimaCounty 

One trial is live. One retrial is more than a year out. Tony Brueski takes listener questions on both in a single combined cut. His guest is Robin Dreeke, retired FBI Special Agent and former chief of the Bureau's Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program.The Lindsay Clancy trial is in the middle of medical testimony at Plymouth Superior Court, with the case expected to run six to eight weeks and more than a hundred and eighty witnesses on the list. Two treating psychiatrists have testified they saw no psychosis. One of them acknowledged she does not think she has ever treated a patient with postpartum psychosis, a condition that affects roughly one to two mothers per thousand births.The Alex Murdaugh retrial is tentatively set for April 5, 2027 before Judge Debra McCaslin. Pretrial proceedings are running out of Lexington County. Prosecutors have moved to admit his 2023 trial testimony and to bar polygraph evidence and third-party guilt. The defense has demanded a fresh Brady and Giglio search with written certification inside thirty days, independent DNA testing, and a change of venue.Different states, different crimes, different defendants. What lines up is the fight over what the record does not contain and who is responsible for that.Lindsay Clancy has pleaded not guilty to three counts of first-degree murder and is presumed innocent. Her defense argues she was not criminally responsible. Alex Murdaugh's convictions were overturned by the South Carolina Supreme Court. He awaits retrial and is presumed innocent. He has denied the killings throughout.Robin Dreeke takes all three segments and listeners run the questions. Postpartum psychosis affects roughly one to two mothers per thousand births. 988 is available if you need it.END LINKSJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS#LindsayClancy #AlexMurdaugh #HiddenKillers #MurdaughRetrial #LindsayClancyTrial #PostpartumPsychosis #SLED #TrueCrime #ExpertTestimony #RobinDreeke

Set the Lindsay Clancy trial beside the Alex Murdaugh retrial and the witness lists start to rhyme. Tony Brueski takes the mail across all three segments with Robin Dreeke, a retired FBI Special Agent who spent his career in behavioral analysis.Clancy's psychiatrists testified for the prosecution that they saw no signs of psychosis. One of them, Dr. Jennifer Tufts, told jurors she did not have or seek Clancy's records from other providers and relied on her patient to disclose what mattered. The other, Dr. Alia Goodheart of McLean Hospital, testified the hospital did not obtain those records either. Neither knew about the two crisis line calls Clancy's civil suit describes.In South Carolina, Murdaugh's defense is demanding updated personnel files, disciplinary records and internal affairs materials on the investigators and forensic analysts who built the case. The state is moving the other way, seeking to admit Murdaugh's 2023 testimony and to keep third-party guilt away from the jury.One structure, two jurisdictions. A record assembled by people who were not looking for the thing the defense now says was sitting there.Prosecutors in Massachusetts argue Clancy's providers are not to blame and that she acted intentionally. Prosecutors in South Carolina argue the evidence against Murdaugh is overwhelming and that speculation about other suspects is not evidence.Clancy's trial is expected to run six to eight weeks with more than a hundred and eighty witnesses. Murdaugh's retrial is tentatively set for April 5, 2027.Lindsay Clancy has pleaded not guilty and is presumed innocent. Alex Murdaugh awaits retrial after his convictions were overturned and is presumed innocent.Robin Dreeke handles all of it, including what a witness leaves out and how you hear it. 988 is answered around the clock.END LINKSJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS#LindsayClancy #AlexMurdaugh #HiddenKillers #MurdaughRetrial #LindsayClancyTrial #PostpartumPsychosis #SLED #TrueCrime #ExpertTestimony #RobinDreeke

Robin Dreeke spent a career at the FBI working out what people are not saying. That is the exact skill this combined cut needs. Tony Brueski runs listener questions on two very different cases past him in one sitting.The Lindsay Clancy material is medical. Her outpatient psychiatrist finished residency in July 2022 and joined a private practice the month before Clancy became a patient. The McLean physician who cleared her to go home said she does not think she has treated a case of the condition at issue. Neither knew about two calls Clancy made to a crisis line.The Alex Murdaugh material is paper. The state wants his own prior testimony read to a new jury. The defense wants a signed certification that the files have been searched again, and it wants DNA from under Maggie Murdaugh's fingernails sent to an outside lab before the state's analysts touch what is left.Underneath both sits one behavioral question. When a professional testifies they saw nothing, how do you tell an absence from a blind spot?Dreeke spent years assessing exactly that in counterintelligence interviews, where the useful signal was rarely in what a subject volunteered.On all three first-degree murder counts, Clancy pleaded not guilty and is presumed innocent. Murdaugh's verdicts fell over what a court clerk said to jurors, and with them vacated he is presumed innocent at the retrial. Judge Debra McCaslin has tentatively set that trial for April 5, 2027.Three segments, one conversation, and listeners running the agenda. If the mental health material is close to home for you, 988 connects you to someone trained.END LINKSJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS#LindsayClancy #AlexMurdaugh #HiddenKillers #MurdaughRetrial #LindsayClancyTrial #PostpartumPsychosis #SLED #TrueCrime #ExpertTestimony #RobinDreeke

Both of the psychiatrists the prosecution has called in the Lindsay Clancy trial are also named defendants in the medical malpractice litigation over her care. Tony Brueski takes listener questions to Robin Dreeke, retired FBI Special Agent and former chief of the Bureau's Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program.That is an unusual position for a witness. Each is testifying that she saw no signs of psychosis, while separately defending a civil claim that she missed exactly that condition.Dr. Jennifer Tufts told the court directly that she does not believe she was negligent. Under cross-examination she was asked about her experience level. She had completed her psychiatric residency in July 2022 and joined a private practice the month before Clancy became her patient.Dr. Alia Goodheart, questioned about her own background, said she does not think she has treated a patient with postpartum psychosis. She described Clancy as future-oriented, invested in her children, and a caring mother.Both suits, one filed by Lindsay and one by Patrick, name providers involved in her treatment. Those providers deny negligence, dispute what Clancy reported to them, and have moved to dismiss.The question this segment keeps returning to is a real one. A jury weighing whether a condition existed is hearing that answer from people with a stake in the answer, and juries are not always told what that stake is.The charges are three counts of first-degree murder. Clancy pleaded not guilty. She is presumed innocent. Prosecutors argue her providers bear no blame for what happened.Robin Dreeke handles the mailbag on credibility, incentive and what a jury does with any of it. 988 is there if you need it.END LINKSJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #HiddenKillers #PostpartumPsychosis #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #MaternalMentalHealth #CriminalResponsibility #TrueCrime #MentalHealthCare #RobinDreeke

Two cases with nothing in common except the grip they hold on this audience: the Nancy Guthrie disappearance and the Lindsay Clancy murder trial. Tony Brueski and retired FBI behavioral analyst Robin Dreeke give both a full listener-question treatment in one extended session.The Guthrie letters, public since July 31, supply half the questions. The abandoned $4 million demand. The claim that an 84-year-old grandmother is buried in nature. The apology to her children, and a sheriff whose denial of the note's existence lasted exactly one day. The Clancy trial supplies the rest. A prosecution whose witnesses keep humanizing the defendant. Pill bottles counted out like evidence for both sides at once. And the online movement that built a case against Patrick Clancy out of a verified alibi and a grieving man's composure.Robin's career was reading people who lie for a living. That makes him the right analyst for an unidentified letter writer and a theory that outlives its own debunking. However deep you are into either case, this session will take you deeper.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #NancyGuthrie #TrueCrimeToday #TrueCrime #TrueCrimePodcast #SavannahGuthrie #PatrickClancy #RansomNote #TrialWatch #CrimeNews

There is a pretrial hearing coming in the Alex Murdaugh retrial, and a stack of new filings landed in front of Judge Debra McCaslin ahead of it. Tony Brueski works through the listener mail with Robin Dreeke, retired FBI Special Agent and former chief of the Bureau's Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program.Not every motion matters equally, and separating the two is most of the work here. Pretrial practice in a case this size runs for months. A hearing can end with nothing settled and still tell you where a judge is leaning.The filing with real reach is the one seeking to put Murdaugh's own sworn words in front of the second jury. He chose to take the stand in 2023. Nobody compelled him. If those words come in, his lawyers are building a defense around explaining them, whether or not he ever testifies again.The rest tighten the edges. Two of them close doors the state already closed once, one asks for another look at the digital material, and one blocks a defense testing request.Judge McCaslin has told the attorneys she knows nothing about the first trial and expects them to be thorough when they explain it. She tentatively set the retrial for April 5, 2027.The South Carolina Supreme Court threw out Murdaugh's convictions over what the clerk of court told jurors. He is presumed innocent at the retrial and has denied the killings throughout. He stays behind bars either way, serving concurrent state and federal financial crime sentences of twenty-seven and forty years.Robin Dreeke takes the mailbag on what is procedural, what is decisive, and how to tell the two apart before April.END LINKSJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS#AlexMurdaugh #MurdaughRetrial #HiddenKillers #MaggieMurdaugh #PaulMurdaugh #DebraMcCaslin #SouthCarolina #TrueCrime #MurdaughMurders #CreightonWaters

Alex Murdaugh's defense is asking a judge to move the retrial out of the entire fourteenth judicial circuit, and it is the motion people argue about most. Tony Brueski takes listener questions with Robin Dreeke, retired FBI Special Agent and former chief of the Bureau's Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program.The filing calls the case among the most heavily publicized criminal prosecutions in South Carolina history. It asks the court to move the trial outside the circuit where Murdaugh's family operated for generations. His great-grandfather, grandfather and father served consecutively as the region's elected solicitor from 1920 to 2006. The circuit covers five counties: Allendale, Beaufort, Colleton, Hampton and Jasper.Judge Debra McCaslin has left it to the state and the defense to discuss possible locations and bring her options. Pretrial proceedings are running out of her home court in Lexington County.The listener objection is a fair one. Documentaries, books and streaming series about this family reached the whole country, not five counties. Moving the trial also means the community where Maggie and Paul Murdaugh lived and died does not get to sit in judgment.The counterargument holds that saturation is not uniform. Jurors drawn from counties the family ran for a century carry associations jurors elsewhere do not. That is the standard a venue motion is measured against.The defense's other pending filings include a demand for a fresh Brady and Giglio search with written certification inside thirty days, plus a bid for independent DNA testing. McCaslin has also ruled Murdaugh will appear before the new jury in street clothes and without restraints, over the state's objection.Murdaugh's convictions were overturned, he awaits retrial, and he is presumed innocent.END LINKSJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS#AlexMurdaugh #MurdaughRetrial #HiddenKillers #SLED #BradyMotion #MaggieMurdaugh #DickHarpootlian #TrueCrime #MurdaughMurders #SouthCarolina

Two of the motions prosecutors just renewed in the Alex Murdaugh retrial are about what the jury will never hear. Tony Brueski takes the listener mail on them with Robin Dreeke, a retired FBI Special Agent who spent his career in behavioral analysis.The first would exclude evidence of third-party guilt. The state won that fight before the 2023 trial. Winning it again means Murdaugh's lawyers cannot stand up and point at another person as the killer without clearing a bar the court sets.The second would exclude any mention of a polygraph. That one has a history. In an October filing before the first trial, Murdaugh's own attorneys wrote that Curtis Eddie Smith failed a polygraph when he was questioned about whether he murdered Maggie and Paul. Smith has denied wrongdoing in the murders. Prosecutors argued then, and are arguing again, that juries give polygraphers more weight than the science supports.Prosecutors are also asking the court to admit Murdaugh's 2023 testimony at the retrial, seeking a fresh review of digital evidence, and opposing the defense's bid for outside DNA testing.The question listeners keep raising is worth taking seriously. An office that calls its evidence overwhelming is asking a judge to close two doors it already closed once. Prosecutors would say that is standard practice and that speculation is not evidence.Maggie Murdaugh and Paul Murdaugh were killed at the family's Colleton County property on June 7, 2021. Paul was twenty-two. Murdaugh has said he found their bodies.Judge Debra McCaslin has tentatively set the retrial for April 5, 2027, and is handling pretrial proceedings in Lexington County.With the verdicts vacated, Murdaugh stands as an untried defendant again, presumed innocent. Robin Dreeke takes the mailbag on what gets kept out and who it actually protects.END LINKSJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS#AlexMurdaugh #MurdaughRetrial #HiddenKillers #MaggieMurdaugh #PaulMurdaugh #DebraMcCaslin #SouthCarolina #TrueCrime #MurdaughMurders #CreightonWaters

Two of the most followed cases in the country share one full episode: the Nancy Guthrie ransom letters and the Lindsay Clancy murder trial, with Tony Brueski taking listener questions alongside retired FBI behavioral analyst Robin Dreeke.The Guthrie half runs on the July 31 release. A first letter demanded $4 million and carried details from inside her home. A second letter withdrew every demand and told Savannah Guthrie and her siblings that their mother perished and is buried in nature. Add the sheriff's on-camera denial one day before the release, and the audience questions write themselves. The Clancy half runs on the courtroom pattern the audience spotted first. Prosecution witnesses keep describing a loving mother. Nine pill bottles were counted before the jury. A hospital discharged her 19 days before the deaths. A dedicated segment covers why the internet keeps prosecuting Patrick Clancy after the evidence cleared him.One behavioral analyst, two cases, and the sharpest questions our audience has ever sent. By the end you'll know exactly where you stand on both — or you'll know why you can't decide.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #NancyGuthrie #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #TrueCrimePodcast #SavannahGuthrie #PatrickClancy #RansomNote #TrialWatch #CrimeNews

The Lindsay Clancy trial has spent days on her medical care, and the timeline that came out of it does not line up the way either side wants. Tony Brueski works through the questions listeners are sending in with Robin Dreeke, a retired FBI Special Agent who spent his career on behavioral analysis.Start with the calendar. Clancy began seeing Dr. Jennifer Tufts in September 2022, and fourteen appointments followed by video through January 23, 2023. Tufts testified Clancy was deteriorating across that stretch, with worsening depression, insomnia and anxiety. She raised the possibility of bipolar disorder at a November appointment, then concluded Clancy did not meet the criteria.Then New Year's Day 2023. Clancy admitted herself to McLean Hospital. Dr. Alia Goodheart joined her care on January 3 and discharged her on January 5. Goodheart testified Clancy was polite, cooperative, appropriately dressed, and denied any plan to harm herself or anyone else.Somewhere inside that same window, according to Clancy's own civil filings, she called a crisis line twice. Neither psychiatrist knew it had happened. Neither had the other's records, and neither obtained records from Clancy's earlier providers.That is the question listeners keep asking, and it is a fair one. Two calls placed by a woman under psychiatric care, and no clinician treating her ever learned they happened.On all three counts of first-degree murder, Clancy pleaded not guilty and remains presumed innocent. Prosecutors argue she was not seriously pursuing treatment and that her providers bear no responsibility. The providers deny negligence.Robin Dreeke takes the mailbag on what a handoff is supposed to look like and where this one broke. Support is available any time at 988.END LINKSJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #HiddenKillers #PostpartumPsychosis #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #MaternalMentalHealth #CriminalResponsibility #TrueCrime #MentalHealthCare #RobinDreeke

The part of Alex Murdaugh's new defense filing that matters most is the part about personnel files. Tony Brueski works the listener mail with Robin Dreeke, a retired FBI Special Agent who spent his career in behavioral analysis.The motion asks the court to order prosecutors to produce updated disciplinary records and internal affairs materials. It covers misconduct findings on any officer or forensic analyst tied to the investigation, arrest or prosecution. It names no one. The language is broad enough to reach several people.One of them is former SLED senior special agent Ryan Kelly. He led the investigation into the September 2021 roadside shooting involving Murdaugh and Curtis Eddie Smith. Kelly testified at the 2023 murder trial. He told jurors investigators had found nothing whatsoever connecting Smith to the killings of Maggie and Paul. Kelly left SLED in 2025 and joined the Charleston County Sheriff's Office as chief inspector of internal affairs. He was fired from that job in June 2026 after an administrative investigation into allegations of harassment, conduct unbecoming, improper procedures and unsatisfactory performance.That termination has not been linked to anything Kelly did while at SLED, and there is no indication the allegations involved any Murdaugh-related investigation. Whether any of it would be admissible is a question for the court. Publicly available records do not describe the underlying conduct.That is exactly the kind of post-trial development the motion appears built to capture, and it is why listeners keep asking how exposed the state's witness list actually is.His convictions no longer stand, and Murdaugh is presumed innocent heading into April. Robin Dreeke handles the mailbag on credibility files, impeachment, and what a jury never sees.END LINKSJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS#AlexMurdaugh #MurdaughRetrial #HiddenKillers #SLED #BradyMotion #MaggieMurdaugh #DickHarpootlian #TrueCrime #MurdaughMurders #SouthCarolina

Full live session with Tony Brueski and retired FBI behavioral analyst Robin Dreeke, covering the two stories dominating the mailbag. First, the Nancy Guthrie ransom notes. Then the Lindsay Clancy trial, including the conspiracy theory that refuses to release Patrick Clancy.Everything is on the table live. Whether the Guthrie family should accept a letter claiming their mother is buried in nature, from a writer who walked away from $4 million and wished her children peace. Whether a sheriff who denied having that note one day before releasing it still has the room's trust. Whether Lindsay Clancy's prosecution is quietly helping her defense, one loving-mother witness at a time. And whether any amount of CVS footage and phone records will ever satisfy the crowd convinced Patrick did it.The chat drives all of it. Every question tonight was built to split the room, Robin has a professional read on each one, and the disagreements are the show. Show up with an opinion — or lose one.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #NancyGuthrie #HiddenKillersLive #TrueCrime #TrueCrimePodcast #SavannahGuthrie #PatrickClancy #RansomNote #TrialWatch #CrimeNews

What actually happens when someone calls a crisis line? Nothing about that call routes automatically to the psychiatrist writing your prescriptions. Tony Brueski brings your questions on that gap to retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke.A crisis line is not a medical record. It is not a referral. Nothing about the call guarantees the clinician managing someone's care ever learns it happened. In the Lindsay Clancy trial, that structure stopped being theoretical.Clancy's civil lawsuit describes a woman who sought treatment, went to emergency rooms, called crisis hotlines and admitted herself to hospitals. Both psychiatrists who have testified for the prosecution said the hotline calls were news to them. One testified it surprised her.Goodheart, the McLean physician, also testified she did not know Clancy had gone roughly two days without sleep after starting a medication earlier in her treatment. She told the court sleep deprivation can contribute to a manic episode, and that she would have wanted to keep observing Clancy's sleep after discharge.That is the part listeners keep writing in about. Several outpatient providers, one inpatient stay, two hotline calls, and no single person holding all of it.Clancy pleaded not guilty to the murder charges against her and is presumed innocent. Prosecutors argue she acted with intent and that her care team is not responsible. Her defense argues postpartum psychosis and a lack of criminal responsibility. The providers deny negligence.Robin Dreeke answers what listeners are asking about warning signs, handoffs, and who is supposed to be holding the whole picture. If you need someone, 988 is answered every hour of the day.END LINKSJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #HiddenKillers #PostpartumPsychosis #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #MaternalMentalHealth #CriminalResponsibility #TrueCrime #MentalHealthCare #RobinDreeke

There is a limited amount of DNA left from under Maggie Murdaugh's left hand, and both sides want to test it first. Tony Brueski takes your questions on that fight with retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke.SLED previously determined the material belonged to an unknown, unrelated male, but did not identify him. The state uses STR analysis, which checks samples against law enforcement databases and cannot name someone who is not already in the system. The defense wants the reserve samples sent first to Othram, a Texas laboratory that runs SNP testing and forensic genetic genealogy, the approach that can build out a family tree from an unknown contributor.In a July filing, Murdaugh's attorneys told the court something new. Prosecutors had just disclosed that reserve samples from two evidence items remain unprocessed, and that SLED wants to run repeat testing on them. Every test consumes material. The defense argues a retest risks exhausting the only sample capable of producing a name. Othram, they say, could finish in sixty to ninety days.The same filing accuses SLED of mishandling the white T-shirt Murdaugh wore the night of the killings. Testing returned negative for human blood on the stained areas, and the shirt was later rendered unavailable for additional testing after a chemical enhancement agent was applied. The defense calls that a reason to doubt the agency's good faith. That is their allegation, not a court finding.Prosecutors oppose the defense's access request. Judge Debra McCaslin decides the sequence. A July conference on the testing brought defense attorneys, prosecutors, SLED forensic scientists and Othram's chief executive into the same call.The verdicts against him were reversed on appeal, and Murdaugh returns to trial presumed innocent. Robin Dreeke takes the mail on what a name under those fingernails would and would not prove.END LINKSJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS#AlexMurdaugh #MurdaughRetrial #HiddenKillers #SLED #BradyMotion #MaggieMurdaugh #DickHarpootlian #TrueCrime #MurdaughMurders #SouthCarolina

The South Carolina Supreme Court did not only fault the clerk of court when it threw out Alex Murdaugh's convictions. The justices also flagged how much of the 2023 trial was spent on the money he stole. Tony Brueski takes your questions on what that means for the retrial with retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke.Prosecutors spent close to two weeks of the first trial on Murdaugh's financial crimes. That evidence was not tied to the murder charges directly. It was offered to establish motive: his thefts were about to be exposed, and the state argued the killings bought him sympathy and time.Judge Debra McCaslin now decides how much of that comes in the second time. She has told the attorneys she knows nothing about the first trial and wants them complete when they explain it to her.The state's newest filings run the other direction. Prosecutors moved to admit Murdaugh's own 2023 testimony at the retrial, renewed motions to exclude polygraph evidence and third-party guilt, requested a fresh review of digital evidence, and opposed the defense's push for independent DNA analysis.Listeners are asking a sharp question about the arithmetic. If the financial evidence gets trimmed and the third-party door stays shut, what is the state walking into April 2027 with, and is it enough for twelve people who have never heard any of this.Murdaugh has denied the killings of Maggie and Paul Murdaugh since 2021. His convictions were vacated, he awaits retrial, and he is presumed innocent. He pleaded guilty to dozens of financial crimes and remains in prison on those sentences.Robin Dreeke handles the mail on motive, money, and what a jury actually does with a man's finances.END LINKSJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS#AlexMurdaugh #MurdaughRetrial #HiddenKillers #MaggieMurdaugh #PaulMurdaugh #DebraMcCaslin #SouthCarolina #TrueCrime #MurdaughMurders #CreightonWaters

Inside the Lindsay Clancy murder trial there's no dispute about who caused the deaths of Cora, Dawson, and Callan — the defense conceded it on day one. Outside the courtroom, a second trial is running with no judge, no rules, and no end date, and Patrick Clancy is its defendant. Tony Brueski and retired FBI behavioral analyst Robin Dreeke take the online case against Patrick apart.Every element of the theory gets its turn. The verified timeline and why conspiracy communities read it as too clean. The universal instinct that points at the husband. The armchair reads on his composure, his grief, and his remarriage. The detail the theory can't digest: Patrick sued Lindsay's doctors for failing her, putting his money behind the same argument her defense makes in court.Robin's specialty is why smart people hold beliefs that evidence should kill. By the end of this conversation you'll understand what drives every internet mob you've ever watched form. You'll also know his honest answer on whether this one ever releases its grip.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #PatrickClancy #TrueCrimeToday #TrueCrime #TrueCrimePodcast #LindsayClancyTrial #Duxbury #Massachusetts #RobinDreeke #TrialWatch

The letters at the center of the Nancy Guthrie disappearance are public at last, and they raise more questions than the six months of silence that preceded them. Tony Brueski and retired FBI behavioral analyst Robin Dreeke take on the listener mailbag for the case that has gripped the country since an 84-year-old mother vanished from her Tucson home.The first note promised her safe return for $4 million in Bitcoin and carried details from inside the house to prove itself. The second withdrew everything — no demand, no negotiation, just a claim that Nancy perished shortly after she was taken and a wish that her children find peace. Retired FBI agents told CBS News that people motivated by money don't abandon $4 million, and that one writer likely produced both letters. Meanwhile the sheriff's own words the day before the release, and a Wall Street Journal accounting of the investigation's early missteps, have listeners asking who exactly is in control of this case.From the daughter worried about her own mother living alone to the question of what the renewed search behind Nancy's home really means, these are the eight questions this case comes down to.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NancyGuthrie #SavannahGuthrie #TrueCrimeToday #TrueCrime #TrueCrimePodcast #RansomNote #Tucson #FBI #MissingPerson #PimaCounty

Six months into the Nancy Guthrie investigation, the Pima County Sheriff's Department put its two most closely held pieces of evidence in front of the public: the purported ransom notes. Tony Brueski and retired FBI behavioral analyst Robin Dreeke answer the listener questions those letters unleashed.Start with the night itself. Doorbell camera disconnected at 1:47 a.m., a person detected at 2:12 with no video surviving, her pacemaker offline at 2:28, her blood on the porch. Then the letters. A $4 million Bitcoin demand backed by details only someone inside the house should know. Four days later, a second note with no demand at all: she perished, she is buried in nature, we hope you find peace, we are truly sorry. And around it all, a sheriff who denied having any note indicating death just one day before his department released one.Robin built his career reading people through their words, and these are the most consequential words this case has produced. From the listener whose own mother lives alone to the one who thinks the search behind Nancy's house means investigators know more than they're saying — this episode is the conversation the whole audience is having.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NancyGuthrie #SavannahGuthrie #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #TrueCrimePodcast #RansomNote #Tucson #FBI #MissingPerson #PimaCounty

The Lindsay Clancy trial settled the question of who before it started — her attorney conceded it in his opening. So why is a growing crowd online convinced Patrick Clancy is the real killer? Tony Brueski and retired FBI behavioral analyst Robin Dreeke spend a full segment inside that question.Consider what the theory has to survive. Patrick left at 5:15. A Kingston CVS camera has him at 5:32. Phone records run unbroken to the 911 call. Lindsay's journal documented her decline for months. She told Patrick that night what she had done, and in three and a half years she has never claimed otherwise. Patrick's response was to forgive her, keep talking to her, and sue the doctors he says failed her.Robin explains why none of that penetrates, what people think they're seeing when they watch a grieving father stay composed, and whether a theory this dug-in can ever actually die. The last question Tony asks him is the one the whole episode builds toward. His answer says as much about the audience as it does about the case.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #PatrickClancy #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #TrueCrimePodcast #LindsayClancyTrial #Duxbury #Massachusetts #RobinDreeke #TrialWatch

Live with Tony Brueski and retired FBI behavioral analyst Robin Dreeke. On the table: the ransom notes in the Nancy Guthrie case, released by the Pima County Sheriff's Department on July 31. Underneath them sits the question no family should ever face, whether to believe a letter that says their mother is gone.This session runs on listener submissions, and they don't hold back. The $4 million demand that simply vanished from the second note. The proof details, the white smart watch and the broken flood light, that put the writer inside that house. The apology and the wish for peace, which Robin can read like a case file. The sheriff who told CBS he had no note indicating death, twenty-four hours before releasing one, while a Wall Street Journal report questions his department's early moves. And the federal search teams back in the brush behind Nancy's own home.The chat carries this one. Whether you believe the notes are real, a hoax, or something in between, bring your reasoning — because the room will not agree, and that's exactly why this case needs a live hour.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NancyGuthrie #SavannahGuthrie #HiddenKillersLive #TrueCrime #TrueCrimePodcast #RansomNote #Tucson #FBI #MissingPerson #PimaCounty

Live with Tony Brueski and Robin Dreeke: the conspiracy theory chasing Patrick Clancy through his wife's murder trial. Lindsay Clancy's attorney conceded to the jury that she killed their three children, prosecutors laid out Patrick's movements minute by minute, and thousands of people online still insist the husband did it.Robin spent his FBI career studying belief — why people form it, why evidence bounces off it, and what actually changes a mind. Tony puts the whole theory in front of him live. The airtight timeline versus the conspiracy read of it. The crowd's certainty that Patrick's grief looked wrong, and the remarriage they call a tell. The lawsuit against Lindsay's doctors that makes her defense's argument for her.Bring your take to the chat. Whether you've dismissed this theory from day one or you've caught yourself wondering, the room is going to be split — and that's the point. The question that ends the segment goes to everyone watching: what would it take to let it go?Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #PatrickClancy #HiddenKillersLive #TrueCrime #TrueCrimePodcast #LindsayClancyTrial #Duxbury #Massachusetts #RobinDreeke #TrialWatch

Neither of these cases will ever answer the question that matters most to the families in them.Tony Brueski and Robin Dreeke, a retired FBI Special Agent with twenty-one years reading behavior under pressure, cover the Lindsay Clancy trial openings and Bryan Kohberger's petition to withdraw his guilty plea.On Clancy, this works through Patrick Clancy's testimony about the last ordinary day, including the photos traded that morning and his line that she was having one of her best days. It also covers the hospital stay, and the discharge he testified he never knew she had asked for. Cora, Dawson and Callan died in January 2023. Criminal responsibility is the only live question, and the Commonwealth owns that burden.On Kohberger, this covers the handwritten petition filed in Ada County District Court, his claim of actual innocence, and his assertion that he was convinced to falsely confess. It also covers the letter Latah County prosecutors sent the families of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin, promising the plea would spare them decades of post-conviction appeals. There was never a trial and there has never been a motive on the record.In Plymouth, a chain of licensed professionals made every call and faces nothing. In Boise, an office traded away a trial and guaranteed an ending it could not deliver. One family will never hear why. The other is watching a man they were told was finished file paperwork to start it all again.The Clancy trial has weeks to run and the Kohberger petition is still pending, so neither of these ends here. Subscribe to True Crime Today for the next development in each case.END LINKSJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS (10)#LindsayClancy #BryanKohberger #TrueCrimeToday #ClancyTrial #IdahoStudentMurders #PostpartumPsychosis #ActualInnocence #TrueCrime #RobinDreeke #PostConvictionRelief