Podcasts about Misconduct

Tennessee's Metro Public Schools - Student Misconduct, Grade Manipulation & Fraud…TN County Sued by Global Developer Over Data Center Regulations…& 2 Calls to Action for Tennessee voters!

Parliament will have a hectic week ahead in its legislative processes. Parliamentarians are expected to return from the constituency break to resume their fourth quarter programme. Both the Ad Hoc Committee and the Impeachment Committee are part of the line up. In addition, the Powers and Priviledges Committee into allegations of alleged misconduct constituting contempt of Parliament committees by the EFF leader, Julius Malema, and fellow party MP, Sinawo Thambo, are on the scorecard of the political enrolment. Abongwe Kobokana reports...

In part one of this two-part episode, investigative journalists Mandy Matney and Liz Farrell finally get an answer to the question they've asked for years: when will South Carolina's Office of Disciplinary Counsel (ODC) and Commission on Judicial Conduct (CJC) act on the ethics complaints against 14th Circuit Court Judge Carmen Tevis Mullen? At 10 a.m. Sept. 29, 2026, Judge Mullen will appear before the CJC in Columbia to defend herself against at least four counts of judicial misconduct stemming from a 2017 tenant dispute in her gated Hilton Head Island neighborhood. According to a police report, she wanted a man known as “Ernie the Attorney” arrested, searched for probable cause, and even suggested she could sign a warrant on the spot. Judge Mullen claims she only wanted Ernie to get mental health care. Mandy and Liz examine the charging document and her answers. In Part Two, the receipts come out. Let's Dive In…

In this episode of John Solomon Reports, host John Solomon dives into the latest revelations surrounding the COVID-19 origins and the ongoing investigation led by Senator Rand Paul, Chairman of the Senate Homeland Security Committee. Paul shares exclusive insights into the evidence he has uncovered over the years, including bombshell documents that challenge the narrative surrounding Anthony Fauci and gain-of-function research. He discusses the failed attempt to grant immunity to a key witness and what this means for accountability in the pandemic response.In the second segment, David Fotouhi, the Deputy Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, joins the show to discuss a significant rollback of regulations affecting utility companies. Fotouhi reveals how these changes are projected to save Americans over $310 billion in utility costs over the next two decades, marking one of the largest regulatory relief efforts in U.S. history.Finally, the episode features Ira Intellis, founder of 120Life, who discusses his journey in creating a superfruit drink that helps manage high blood pressure. Intellis emphasizes the importance of monitoring blood pressure and shares how his product can make a difference in health outcomes.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Bryan Kohberger's defense asked the court to dismiss the indictment against him by attacking the way the grand jury proceedings were handled, arguing that prosecutors had presented the case in a manner that deprived him of a fair and lawful charging process. The defense raised multiple complaints about the evidence and instructions given to grand jurors, including claims that prosecutors had presented inadmissible or misleading material, failed to properly explain the legal standards the jurors were supposed to apply and allowed the grand jury to return an indictment without an adequate showing of probable cause. Kohberger's attorneys argued that the cumulative effect of those alleged defects was serious enough that the indictment should be thrown out rather than simply allowed to stand.Prosecutors rejected that argument and told the court that the grand jury process had complied with Idaho law. The state maintained that the evidence presented was sufficient to establish probable cause for the murder and burglary charges and argued that the defense was trying to impose trial-level evidentiary standards on a grand jury proceeding, where the legal threshold was much lower. Prosecutors also disputed the claim that any alleged irregularities had prejudiced Kohberger or undermined the validity of the indictment, and they urged the judge to deny the motion and allow the case to proceed on the charges already returned by the grand jury.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Welcome to our three-part series exploring how AI is being used, and sometimes misused, by employees across the employment lifecycle from job applications, day-to-day employment, to workplace disputes. Each episode explores what this means for employers, the risks to watch for, and the practical steps your organisation can take. In this episode, we look at what happens when employees use GenAI tools at work without proper guardrails and how misuse can expose your organisation to serious legal, regulatory, and reputational risk.

Bryan Kohberger's defense asked the court to dismiss the indictment against him by attacking the way the grand jury proceedings were handled, arguing that prosecutors had presented the case in a manner that deprived him of a fair and lawful charging process. The defense raised multiple complaints about the evidence and instructions given to grand jurors, including claims that prosecutors had presented inadmissible or misleading material, failed to properly explain the legal standards the jurors were supposed to apply and allowed the grand jury to return an indictment without an adequate showing of probable cause. Kohberger's attorneys argued that the cumulative effect of those alleged defects was serious enough that the indictment should be thrown out rather than simply allowed to stand.Prosecutors rejected that argument and told the court that the grand jury process had complied with Idaho law. The state maintained that the evidence presented was sufficient to establish probable cause for the murder and burglary charges and argued that the defense was trying to impose trial-level evidentiary standards on a grand jury proceeding, where the legal threshold was much lower. Prosecutors also disputed the claim that any alleged irregularities had prejudiced Kohberger or undermined the validity of the indictment, and they urged the judge to deny the motion and allow the case to proceed on the charges already returned by the grand jury.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

After Ghislaine Maxwell was convicted in December 2021, her legal team moved quickly when Juror 50, Scotty David, revealed in post-trial interviews that he had been sexually abused as a child and had discussed that experience during deliberations. The disclosure raised an immediate problem because the jury questionnaire had specifically asked prospective jurors whether they or close family members had been victims of sexual abuse, and David had answered no. Maxwell's attorneys argued that the omission amounted to juror misconduct and deprived them of the chance to question him further or seek his removal during jury selection. Prosecutors responded that a new trial was not automatically warranted and that the key questions were whether David had intentionally lied and whether his personal history showed actual bias. Judge Alison Nathan ordered a formal evidentiary hearing rather than deciding the issue from media reports alone.At that hearing, David testified under oath that he had rushed through the questionnaire and had not deliberately concealed his past in order to get on the jury. He also acknowledged that he had drawn on his own experience during deliberations when discussing why abuse survivors might remember events imperfectly or disclose them inconsistently. Maxwell's lawyers argued that this showed his personal experience had improperly influenced the jury, while prosecutors maintained that jurors were allowed to bring ordinary life experience into deliberations so long as they remained impartial and followed the court's instructions. Judge Nathan ultimately found that David's incorrect questionnaire answer was inadvertent, not a calculated deception, and that Maxwell had failed to prove he was biased against her. She denied the motion for a new trial, allowing the convictions to stand despite one of the most serious juror-conduct controversies to emerge from the case.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

After Ghislaine Maxwell was convicted in December 2021, her legal team demanded a new trial after Juror 50, Scotty David, revealed in media interviews that he had been sexually abused as a child and had discussed that experience during jury deliberations. The disclosure immediately became a major issue because the juror questionnaire had specifically asked prospective jurors whether they or close family members had ever been victims of sexual abuse, and David had answered no. Maxwell's attorneys argued that the omission deprived them of the opportunity to question him further or potentially remove him from the jury, and they contended that his personal history could have influenced how he evaluated the testimony of Epstein's accusers. The defense therefore asked Judge Alison Nathan to throw out the verdict and grant a new trial, arguing that the integrity of the jury-selection process had been compromised.Judge Nathan ordered an evidentiary hearing and questioned David under oath about how he had answered the questionnaire. David testified that he had rushed through the form, misunderstood or overlooked the relevant questions and had not intentionally concealed his past in order to get onto the jury. He also acknowledged that he had used his own experience during deliberations to explain to other jurors why survivors might not remember every detail of abuse consistently. Nathan ultimately found that his false questionnaire answers were not deliberate and that Maxwell had failed to show he was actually biased against her, so she denied the motion for a new trial. Maxwell's lawyers continued to argue on appeal that the controversy warranted overturning the conviction, but the juror issue did not undo the verdict.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The news of Texas covered today includes:Our Lone Star story of the day: Are Texas Democrats, through a Soros-funded PAC, effectively paying people to vote? One of the group's own managers says “Yes!”Also, more alarming anti-moral, anti-Christian items coming from little Jimmy “The Creep” Talarico's Austin so-called “church”: Lesbian “Minister” at James Talarico's “Church” Brags About Him Fooling People As a Moderate (WATCH) Why Is James Talarico Silent About Reported Support for Political Violence Among Members of His Church? – the key part of this is not the violence issue but the media double standard we've lived through seemingly forever. Our Lone Star story of the day is sponsored by Allied Compliance Services providing the best service in DOT, business and personal drug and alcohol testing since 1995.Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick calls on ERCOT to reverse $150,000 retention bonuses for its board members. Why the heck are they paid beyond meeting expenses to begin with? What happened to civic service?For the informed, Bowtie Bully Curtis Parrish's statement today on his phantom commissioner pay scandal is worthy of tremendous derision. He created the problem, involved Meurer in it, made sure the pay checks didn't stop after a court ruled Meurer is not the commissioner, and now acts as if it all just happened and we are to feel sorry for Meurer when it is Parrish who created the entire affair.Texas Teacher Misconduct Reports Triple in 2026 reports Erin Anderson of  Texas Scorecard.Get updates on Texas Wildfires here. The Forest Service responded to 8 active wildfires yesterday.Listen on the radio, or station stream, at 5pm Central. Click for our radio and streaming affiliates.www.PrattonTexas.com

Anat Admati, professor of finance and economics at Stanford University, joins the Business Scholarship Podcast to discuss her paper Profitable Misconduct, Corporate Governance, and Law Enforcement. The paper is co-authored with Nathan Atkinson of the University of Wisconsin Law School and Paul Pfleiderer, also of Stanford. This episode is hosted by Andrew Jennings, associate professor of law at Emory University, and was edited by Tanya Eathakotti, a law student at Emory University.

Afsarah Haque-Hassan and Michelle Clarke discuss management of behavioural issues and the steps and considerations that employers should be thinking about.This discussion covers when to use informal conversations rather than formal disciplinary procedures, why focusing on specific behaviours is often more effective than applying labels, and how managers can avoid common pitfalls when addressing workplace concerns. Michelle and Afsarah also examine the importance of consistency, manager training, and considering wider factors such as disability, wellbeing and neurodiversity before taking action.

It's Tuesday, September 15. Here are today's top stories around Central Indiana. Want to go deeper on the stories you hear on WFYI News Now? Visit wfyi.org and follow us on social media to get local news every day. WFYI News Now is hosted by Barb Anguiano and produced by Zach Bundy. Subscribe wherever you get your podcasts.

This Day in Legal History: The 16th Street Baptist Church BombingOn September 15, 1963, members of the Ku Klux Klan planted dynamite beneath the steps of the 16th Street Baptist Church in Birmingham, Alabama—a hub of the civil rights movement—and detonated it on a Sunday morning. The blast killed four young Black girls: Addie Mae Collins, Cynthia Wesley, Carole Robertson, and Denise McNair. It was an act of racial terrorism aimed at the heart of a community, and it became one of the galvanizing atrocities of the civil rights era.The legal aftermath is a study in the agonizing slowness of justice. Though the FBI identified suspects within a few years, no one was prosecuted at the time—an all-too-familiar failure of Southern justice to hold white supremacists accountable for violence against Black Americans. It took fourteen years for the first conviction: Robert Chambliss, found guilty of murder in 1977. And it took until the twenty-first century for the rest—the FBI reopened the case in 1997, leading to the convictions of Thomas Blanton in 2001 and Bobby Frank Cherry in 2002, nearly forty years after the crime. A fourth suspect died before he could be charged.The significance of September 15, 1963 for the law is twofold. The bombing helped build the political will that produced the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965—the deaths of those four girls were not in vain in the sense that they hardened the nation's resolve to write equality into law. And the decades-long road to conviction is a sobering lesson about accountability: that justice delayed is a profound injustice, but also that the law's memory can be long, and that consequences can reach the responsible actors even many years after the fact. That last idea—that accountability shouldn't expire just because time has passed or the guilty have moved on—runs, in a much quieter register, straight through my column today.In a significant loss for the administration, the Supreme Court has refused to let the U.S. Postal Service impose its new mail-ballot restrictions for this November's midterm elections—effectively ending, for this cycle, a fight we've been tracking for weeks. Recall the sequence: an executive effort to have the Postal Service dictate new requirements on how states handle mail-in ballots; a Boston federal judge, Indira Talwani, blocking it as likely unlawful because the Postal Service has no authority to control mail-in voting; the administration racing to the Supreme Court on the emergency docket; and then, just yesterday, a second judge blocking it too. Now the Supreme Court has spoken, and it kept the injunction in place, finding the administration was unlikely to succeed on the merits. The most telling part is Justice Kavanaugh's concurrence. He didn't fully close the door on the government's statutory argument—he wrote there's “at least a fair prospect” the rule falls within the Postal Service's authority—but he said that imposing this rule in the middle of the 2026 election would be arbitrary and capricious under the Administrative Procedure Act. That's the Purcell principle in spirit: courts are extremely wary of changing election rules right before an election, because doing so breeds chaos and confusion for voters and administrators. So the practical outcome is clear: the old rules govern this midterm, and the mail-ballot restrictions are off the table for now. The significance is that the judiciary—including a conservative justice—drew a hard line against reshaping the mechanics of a national election, on the fly, weeks before people vote. The merits question may return in calmer times, but the attempt to change the rules mid-election has failed.In loss for Trump, US Supreme Court won't let Postal Service restrict mail ballots | Reuters · NPR · CNBCElon Musk's X Corp and his AI venture—now operating as SpaceXAI—have dropped Apple from the antitrust lawsuit they filed last year, while vowing to press on against their real target: OpenAI. The suit, filed in federal court in Texas, accused Apple of illegally conspiring with OpenAI to monopolize the markets for smartphones and generative-AI chatbots, essentially by baking ChatGPT into Apple Intelligence on iPhones and freezing out rival chatbots like Musk's Grok. In a court filing, Musk's companies moved to dismiss the claims against Apple—without explaining why, and without saying whether a settlement was reached—but they made clear the case against OpenAI continues. Here's the legal meat. The core theory is an exclusive-dealing and monopolization claim: the allegation that a dominant platform, Apple, and a dominant AI provider, OpenAI, struck a deal that unlawfully forecloses competitors from a critical distribution channel. That's a serious antitrust argument in the abstract—exclusive arrangements by dominant firms can violate the Sherman Act if they lock rivals out of the market. But it sits inside a very tangled rivalry: Musk co-founded OpenAI, is now its bitter competitor and litigation adversary on multiple fronts, and runs a competing chatbot. Dropping Apple while keeping OpenAI in the case tells you where Musk sees leverage—and possibly that Apple, facing its own separate antitrust battles, found a way to resolve its piece. The significance is that this is a live front in the biggest question in tech antitrust right now: as AI gets embedded into the dominant platforms we all use, who controls the gateways, and do those integration deals help consumers or unlawfully entrench the incumbents? That fight is very much still on—just now aimed squarely at OpenAI.Musk's X Corp and SpaceXAI resolve antitrust lawsuit against Apple | Reuters · CNBC · The WrapAnd finally, in my column for Bloomberg Tax this week, I take on a question that's playing out in Australia but has direct lessons for the U.S.: what to actually do about misconduct at the Big Four accounting firms. Australia is considering breaking up its Big Four—separating audit from consulting—in the wake of a KPMG scandal, and my argument is that structural separation, while fine, is only part of the answer, and policymakers shouldn't mistake it for a cure-all. Here's the core of the problem. KPMG Australia is accused of using confidential information from one client to win audit business from others. And here's the key insight: splitting off the consulting arm wouldn't stop that. An audit-only firm still holds confidential information its competitors don't have, and it can still be tempted to weaponize that information to win the next audit client. In fact, we've seen exactly this in the U.S.—back in 2019, the SEC settled with KPMG's U.S. firm over a partner who tried to use improperly obtained information about regulatory inspections to win audit business. Spinning off consulting wouldn't have prevented it, because the misconduct arose from competition inside the audit sector itself. So what do I actually propose? Two things. First, target how firms compete for business: require real controls on who can access confidential client and regulatory information, mandate independent review of major sales pitches by someone whose pay isn't tied to winning the contract, and let regulators spot-check bids. Second—and this is the part I care most about—fix who pays. Right now, a partner can win business improperly, collect the bonus, and leave the firm years before anyone notices. When the penalty finally lands, it's paid by the current partners, people who may have had nothing to do with it, while the wrongdoer keeps the spoils. Australia has moved to increase individual penalties, which is good, but penalties aren't the same as clawing back the money. I argue firms should structure partner compensation so that pay tied to misconduct stays recoverable for a set period—even after the partner walks out the door. The deeper principle, and you'll recognize it from today's legal-history segment, is that accountability shouldn't expire just because time has passed or the guilty party has moved on. Breaking up the Big Four might change what firms sell. But we also need to change how they win business—and who pays when the lines are crossed.KPMG Australia Scandal Shows Misconduct Rules Need Strengthening | Bloomberg Tax This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

Federal employees will see a major shift in the way misconduct cases are handled. Going forward, the Merit Systems Protection Board will evaluate disciplinary actions using case-by-case criteria, rather than 12 longstanding considerations called the “Douglas factors.” The change is meant to add flexibility, but some have raised concerns that it will lead to bias or subjectivity. Federal News Network's Drew Friedman gets more from Michael Fallings, a managing partner at Tully Rinckey law firm.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

John Fetterman asks Abdul El-Sayed to explain to the American people why we deserve 911 and offered $50,000 to host a rally on 9/11 where he can issue the explanation. Rumors have it that Maria Bartiromo was fired for sharing FOX News information with the Trump Administration but her lawyer says they are all lies.Looking back on 9/11 and the guide lines the 9/11 commission has laid out.Support for Hamas on college campuses. Far Right group in Germany seem posed to take over government office. Migration changing politics. Misconduct report on former Labor Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer shows inappropriate relationship with bodyguard, trip to strip clubs, alcohol on federal property, maintaining a hostile work environment and more. Derek from TMZ calls in to talk about the Lindsay Clancy mistrial, the prosecution plans to retry, Lindsay's ex husband and new wife unbothered by the trial, Dolly Patron Hollywood Walk of star defaced. Beyonce age-less at 45, Lori Chavez-DeRemer , and Maria Bartiromo. See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Attorneys are held to a strict ethical code, but that does not mean they always follow it. Attorney Cynthia Payne, Executive Vice President of US Legal Groups, joins the show to unpack why it took until 2002 for the American Bar Association to formally address whether attorneys can have sexual relationships with clients, and why the power imbalance in that dynamic makes consent far more complicated than it appears. Payne walks through real cases from her decades in the profession, including an attorney whose relationship with a client on a murder case led to a vacated conviction, a case involving a client who felt coerced into a relationship with her own divorce attorney, and an especially extreme case of an attorney who bribed witnesses, revealed client confidences in court filings, and was ultimately disbarred after shooting someone in his office. The conversation also turns to judges who abused their positions, from arrests involving drugs and domestic violence to one particularly bizarre courtroom scandal, and to the gender dynamics Payne has witnessed firsthand across thirty years of practice, including moments early in her career when jurors commented on her appearance rather than her performance. Payne closes with guidance for anyone who feels taken advantage of by their attorney, including how to seek a second opinion, file a disciplinary complaint, and exercise the right to fire an attorney at any time, even mid case. Subscribe to Confessions of a Divorce Assassin: https://play.megaphone.fm/yddxa_zfqjimbgjtoqzijw

In this episode, we're joined by Philippa Hann and Dr. Moira Somers, co-authors of The Fault Lines of Finance: Understanding and Preventing Financial Misconduct, for a deep dive into why good people can do bad things with other people's money. Philippa brings two decades of experience suing financial advisors, wealth managers, and banks, while Moira brings her expertise as a clinical neuropsychologist working with financial professionals, families, and the human side of money.   We explore the psychology and systems that can allow financial misconduct to happen, from financial stress, incentives, and information asymmetry to workplace culture, poor training, exhaustion, and the pressure to please. Philippa and Moira explain why ethical behavior is not simply about knowing right from wrong, and why developing "ethical health" requires understanding your own vulnerabilities, building a moral operating system, and having people you can turn to when doing the right thing becomes difficult.   We also discuss how investors can evaluate financial professionals, why complexity and exciting financial products deserve extra scrutiny, the role of regulators and insurers, and why financial sophistication doesn't necessarily protect people from being exploited. Along the way, Philippa and Moira share case studies illustrating ethical drift, confirmation bias, and the ways seemingly small decisions can compound into serious misconduct. The conversation ultimately makes the case for moral humility, strong relationships, healthy organizational cultures, and the willingness to tolerate discomfort when something doesn't feel right.   Key Points From This Episode: (0:00:00) Introduction. (0:02:02) What financial misconduct means and why "other people's money" matters. (0:02:35) Philippa's 20 years in litigation and the core question: why do good people do bad things?  (0:05:02) Moving beyond harm prevention toward promoting positive change in financial services.  (0:07:36) Why financial services are especially vulnerable: access, incentives, and opportunity. (0:09:40) Information inequality and extraordinary client trust in advisors. (0:11:15) Even sophisticated investors can fail to ask critical questions. (0:11:57) Misconduct isn't simply "good vs. bad people." (0:12:45) How systems, incentives, and culture can draw well-intentioned people into misconduct. (0:17:40) Ethical drift: how innocent mistakes can escalate into lying and misconduct. (0:19:05) Building a personal "moral operating system" to prepare for dilemmas.  (0:20:00) Identifying vulnerabilities: people-pleasing, exhaustion, dependence, conflict avoidance. (0:21:00) Journaling, defining non-negotiables, and developing ethical self-awareness. (0:25:22) Importance of trusted people who can challenge your thinking. (0:27:13) Personal strengths (confidence, ambition) can become vulnerabilities. (0:28:38) Systems and culture can enable misconduct or make ethics easier (0:30:10) Organizations must make it safe to surface mistakes. (0:34:43) Developing "ethical health" alongside physical and mental health. (0:40:15) Ethics requires more than knowing the right answer—it requires character and motivation. (0:44:29) Why traditional ethics training often fails in real-world dilemmas.  (1:14:11) The moral operating system as an actionable framework for behavioral ethics. Links From Today's Episode: Meet with PWL Capital: https://calendly.com/d/3vm-t2j-h3p Rational Reminder on iTunes — https://itunes.apple.com/ca/podcast/the-rational-reminder-podcast/id1426530582. Rational Reminder on Instagram — https://www.instagram.com/rationalreminder/ Rational Reminder on YouTube — https://www.youtube.com/channel/ Benjamin Felix — https://pwlcapital.com/our-team/ Benjamin on X — https://x.com/benjaminwfelix Benjamin on LinkedIn — https://www.linkedin.com/in/benjaminwfelix/   Editing and post-production work for this episode was provided by The Podcast Consultant (https://thepodcastconsultant.com)  

Back in February, NSW police clashed with protesters at a Sydney rally that sparked national conversation. This week, new body-cam footage has surfaced, showing an officer bragging about beating a protestor. On today’s podcast we’re going to break down what's in this new video, where the police watchdog's investigation is up to, and why the legal case against the arrested protesters might be falling apart. Host: Elliot Lawry and Sam KoslowskiProducer: Orla MaherVideo Editor: Imogen Abbott Want to support The Daily Aus? That's so kind! The best way to do that is to click ‘follow’ on Spotify or Apple and to leave us a five-star review. We would be so grateful. The Daily Aus is a media company focused on delivering accessible and digestible news to young people. We are completely independent. Want more from TDA?Subscribe to The Daily Aus newsletterSubscribe to The Daily Aus’ YouTube Channel Have feedback for us?We’re always looking for new ways to improve what we do. If you’ve got feedback, we’re all ears. Tell us here. Shot on Fujifilm.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Shannon's 7:30 Dirty 9-2-2026 See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

This episode is presented by Create A Video – North Carolina Rep. Chuck Edwards (R-NC) was formally censured by the US House yesterday for inappropriate behavior towards young female staffers. Plus, mixed results from the Massachusetts Democrat primary as some "moderates" win and "progressives" win others.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-pete-kaliner-show--6946691/support.Subscribe to the podcast My preferred podcast platform: SpreakerCheck out my preferred gold & silver company: Revelation Gold GroupHelp support Pete's Walk to End Alzheimers here.All the links to Pete's Prep are free! Plus get exclusive content here!Media Bias Check: GroundNews promo code!Advertising and Booking inquiries: Pete@ThePeteKalinerShow.com  

Clement Manyathela has a heated debate with Advocate Norman Arendse SC, Chair of UCT Council, about how the council has handled a former University of Cape Town staff member who has demanded an independent inquiry after discovering her name was used in a fabricated misconduct complaint against Vice-Chancellor, Professor Mosa Moshabela. The Clement Manyathela Show is broadcast on 702, a Johannesburg based talk radio station, weekdays from 09:00 to 12:00 (SA Time). Clement Manyathela starts his show each weekday on 702 at 9 am taking your calls and voice notes on his Open Line. In the second hour of his show, he unpacks, explains, and makes sense of the news of the day. Clement has several features in his third hour from 11 am that provide you with information to help and guide you through your daily life. As your morning friend, he tackles the serious as well as the light-hearted, on your behalf. Thank you for listening to a podcast from The Clement Manyathela Show. Listen live on Primedia+ weekdays from 09:00 and 12:00 (SA Time) to The Clement Manyathela Show broadcast on 702 https://buff.ly/gk3y0Kj For more from the show go to https://buff.ly/XijPLtJ or find all the catch-up podcasts here https://buff.ly/p0gWuPE Subscribe to the 702 Daily and Weekly Newsletters https://buff.ly/v5mfetc Follow us on social media: 702 on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/TalkRadio702 702 on TikTok https://www.tiktok.com/@talkradio702 702 on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/talkradio702/ 702 on X: https://x.com/Radio702 702 on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@radio702 See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Moms for Liberty St. Charles Chapter founder and former Francis Howell School Board candidate Lauren Greenwood joins the show to discuss recent online interactions involving local school district leadership. Greenwood details online comments directed toward her following questions raised on her district watch list page regarding neurodiversity programming. The conversation focuses on social media endorsements from community leaders, public commentary strategies at upcoming school board meetings, and long-term electoral dynamics in St. Charles County. Hashtags: #LaurenGreenwood #FrancisHowell #MomsForLiberty #StCharlesCounty #SchoolBoard #ParentalRights #TalkRadio

2 Timothy 3:1-9 (NKJV)Andrew and Edwin discuss those who have a form or appearance of godliness but deny its power.Read the written devo that goes along with this episode by clicking here.    Let us know what you are learning or any questions you have. Email us at TextTalk@ChristiansMeetHere.org.    Join the Facebook community and join the conversation by clicking here. We'd love to meet you. Be a guest among the Christians who meet on Livingston Avenue. Click here to find out more. Michael Eldridge sang all four parts of our theme song. Find more from him by clicking here.   Thanks for talking about the text with us today.________________________________________________If the hyperlinks do not work, copy the following addresses and paste them into the URL bar of your web browser: Daily Written Devo: https://readthebiblemakedisciples.wordpress.com/?p=26603The Christians Who Meet on Livingston Avenue: http://www.christiansmeethere.org/Facebook Page: https://www.facebook.com/TalkAboutTheTextFacebook Group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/texttalkMichael Eldridge: https://acapeldridge.com/ 

Why do some CEOs get second chances after misconduct? A new Wall Street Journal report points to a familiar pattern: executives accused of violating company rules can sometimes land top jobs elsewhere. We talked about company culture and consequences with career strategist, Julie Bauke.

Story of the Week (DR):L3Harris ousts CEO after investigation into conduct MML3Harris Technologies, the company that overhauled a Qatari plane now used as Air Force One, has replaced Christopher Kubasik as chairman and chief executive after an investigation determined he violated the defense contractor's code of conduct.Kubasik's alleged conduct didn't involve and has no impact on the Melbourne, Fla., company's financial reporting, controls, customer relationships or operational performance, L3Harris said Monday.The company didn't give details on when it received a report of the potential violation. With the aid of independent counsel, the board determined that Kubasik's removal would be in the company's best interest, L3Harris said. He will be allowed to retain and exercise some previously vested stock options but won't receive severance payments, benefits or accelerated stock-based awards.L3Harris Technologies Appoints Sam Mehta, Proven Aerospace and Defense Executive, as President and Chief Executive Officer“The Board determined that the Executive engaged in conduct that was not consistent with the values of the Company as outlined in its Code of Conduct.”Kubasik will still hold onto some of his options that can net him stock worth about $23 million, as well as more than 200,000 shares of stock in L3Harris that he already owns, valued at nearly $57 million. L3Harris has paid Kubasik compensation valued at $66.3 million during the past three years, including $25.6 million in fiscal 2025.The separation disclosure says the L3Harris board decided to reach a deal with Kubasik to get him to leave rather than trying to fire him for cause. Kubasik did not admit to any violation of the company code of conduct, and the deal expressively forbids any of the parties or their representatives from making public statements “inconsistent” with Monday's disclosure.AND THIS:Women at L3Harris Shared Concerns About CEO's Behavior Years Before OusterIt was a warning that was shared among women who worked for Chris Kubasik: Avoid being alone with the executive and be careful on the corporate jet.Multiple women at defense contractor L3Harris Technologies LHX had raised concerns about Kubasik's behavior, including a formal complaint from one woman to human resources that was made around 2023, according to people familiar with the matter. The employee accused the CEO of sexual harassment, the people said.Kubasik stayed on in his role. The woman left L3Harris. Not all L3Harris board members were briefed on the 2023 complaint and it is unclearOusted L3Harris CEO was previously forced out of Lockheed Martin jobChristopher Kubasik's ouster as the L3Harris CEO was not the first time he was forced out of a company amid an allegation of misconduct.In 2012, Kubasik was set to become the CEO of Lockheed Martin when he was forced to resign after an ethics investigation confirmed that he had a close personal relationship with a subordinate employee.Why Do Boards Keep Giving Misbehaving CEOs Second Chances?L3Harris Technologies' LHX chief executive is out because of misconduct allegations, and it isn't the first time: More than a decade ago, Christopher Kubasik resigned from Lockheed Martin because he was accused of having a relationship with a subordinate.The Crucial Moment That Companies Miss After They Oust a CEOIt matters how a company responds to a scandal once it's caught in one, most blow the moment by choosing secrecy over transparency. It's an opportunity to reset the culture that led to the breach in the first place, but instead “your PR team and your legal team tell you ‘Don't dig into these things—it's not good for the company,' so you silence all the debates.”.Meta faces a $1.4 trillion threat that could mean ‘turning in the keys and walking away'—but the stakes of the case reach across techThe trial involves a coalition of 29 state attorneys general in a unified case against Meta that was brought in 2023, and will be argued by lawyers representing California, Colorado, New Jersey and Kentucky. The stakes are enormous as leading government officials across the country push for Meta to be held accountable for allegedly violating federal and state laws, including the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act, or COPPA, and various consumer protection statutes.States accuse Meta of targeting children for Facebook, Instagram addiction: 'The young ones are the best ones'Meta whistleblower told jury the company took a 'don't ask, don't tell' approach to kids' safety‘Harvest their data and hide the truth from the public': Four states seek billions from Meta over child safety practicesSEC says it will stop responding to no-action requests ‘entirely'The Securities and Exchange Commission plans to stop responding to no-action requests “entirely … effective immediately,” the agency said in a statement Friday.The decision comes after the SEC sat out the bulk of the no-action process during the 2025-26 proxy season. Investor advocates have since sued the agency, alleging the change violates the Administrative Procedure Act.AI data center outrage is showing up everywhere from ads to electionsAI data center outrage is showing up everywhere from ads to electionsGOP Begs AI Firms to Fix Data Centers' “Toxic Brand” to Help Midterm Chances As A.I. Data Centers Spread, Pressure Mounts to Share ProfitsThe Data Center Industry's PR Blitz Is BackfiringData center backlash echoes fossil-fuel politicsMajor data center bills advance in California despite industry pushbackThe ‘Country Hicks' Who Refused $26 Million from an AI Data Center Bad news for Jason Kelce: Postal Service rules say you shouldn't mail pee to data centersPoliticians Who Once Championed Data Centers Are Now Bashing ThemPennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro cracks down on data centers, says speculators are 'scaring our communities'Data centers are using more electricity than anyone predicted. What happens next?Trump oblivious to voter fury about data centers, saying ‘the jobs are enormous and the money paid, the taxes paid, are just enormous'Politicians Turn Against Data Centers as Anger Over AI SpreadsAmazon is buying rare books and destroying them to train its AI modelsThe team's logo features a dinosaur holding a book.Data center hysteria is the new woke | OpinionBring back the corporate death penaltyMore formally known as judicial dissolution, the corporate death penalty basically happens when the government is so pissed off by the corruption or damage a corporation causes that it yanks away their charter.Andreessen Horowitz Focus of DOJ Probe Over Board DirectorsVenture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz is the focus of a Justice Department antitrust probe over whether its investment partners are improperly serving on the boards of competing artificial intelligence companies, according to people familiar with the matter.The companies at issue include Databricks Inc., one of the most valuable privately held technology companies in the world, and Fivetran Inc., both backed by the VC firm, according to the people, who asked not to be named discussing a confidential matter. Andreessen Horowitz co-founder Ben Horowitz serves on the board of Databricks, and partner Martin Casado is a board member of Fivetran. Both companies help businesses collect, organize and analyze massive troves of data.Goodliest of the Week (MM/DR):MacKenzie Scott gave California public education $461 million—and let the recipients decide how to spend every dollarMM: Andreessen Horowitz Focus of DOJ Probe Over Board Directors DRAssholiest of the Week (MM):Bill Brown and Robert Millard DRNever accountable for anything directorsL3Harris ousts CEO after investigation into conductHistory lesson:Kubasik hired in 2015 after Lockheed disaster firing, hired as COO and PresidentPresiding CEO: Michael Strianese, Chair from 2008, CEO from 2006Board: Claude Canizares (71, MIT physics professor, 2003)Thomas Corcoran (72, Carlyle, consulting, 1997)Ann Dunwoody (64, only woman, US Army Gen, 2013)Lewis Kramer (69, EY accountant, 2009)Robert Millard (66, MIT Chair, Lehman until 2008 collapse, LID, 1997)Lloyd Newton (74, only PoC - token black guy - US Air Force General, 2012)Vincent Pagano, Jr (66, lawyer, Simpson Thacher, chair of nom, 2013)Hugh Shelton (75, US Army Gen, 2011), Arthure Simon (85, accountant, 2001)8 white men, 1 woman, 1 black dude2018, Kubasik named CEO of L3 TechnologiesMichael Strianese retires and Kubasik takes overSame exact board minus Strianese2019, L3 and Harris merge to be L3HarrisKubasik added to L3Harris board, named COO and President of the company under Bill Brown, CEO and ChairSurviving the board merger:Thomas CorcoranRobert Millard - LID, nom memberLloyd Newton - chair of nomLewis KramerAdjacent - Roger Fradin of Carlyle on board, Corcoran also of CarlyleJune 2021, Kubasik becomes CEO and Bill Brown moves to exec chair (obviously)Board:Sallie BaileyBill BrownPeter ChiarelliThomas CorcoranThomas Dattilo (nom) - ex tire CEORober GradinHarry HarrisLewis Hay III (nom) - lawyer, ex CEo of NextEraLewis KramerRita LanRobert Millard (nom) - MIT Chair, LehmanLloyd Newton (nom chair) - generalSo given that the CEOs choose their successors, the nom committees approve them, the rest of the board rubber stamps it… we can thank:Michael Strianese - hires Kubasik, names him CEO at L3, despite Lockheed problemsNom approval: Ann Dunwoody (64, only woman, US Army Gen, 2013), Vincent Pagano, Jr (66, lawyer, Simpson Thacher, chair of nom, 2013), Hugh Shelton (75, US Army Gen, 2011) - a nom committee composed of the ONLY woman, two generals and a lawyer - all of whom are the LOWEST TENURED ON THE BOARD at the timeThen Bill Brown - names Kubasik CEO of combined L3Harris, one year of babysitting as exec chairNom approval: Thomas Dattilo (nom) - ex tire CEO, Robert Millard (nom) - MIT Chair, Lehman, Lloyd Newton (nom chair) - generalFamiliar names: Millard and Newton - see Kubasik all the way throughAnd the CEOs and directors can keep failing… Bill Brown on the Becton Dickinson boardRobert Millard on the Green Dot Corp (nom!), iHeartMedia, Evercore (nom!) boardsBrought on to iHeart board just 3 years after an exec there went on a racial slur rant, the company was sued for gender and wage discrimination, and a radio host of the companies were accused of severe harassment - not sure what will change?Dario Amodei“Public benefit corporation” Anthropic: Anthropic Prepares Supervoting Power for Founders as it Readies for Mega-IPOBoard: Dario Amodei, Daniela Amodei (President, Dario's sister), Yasmin Razavi (VC, crypto and prediction market investor), Reed Hastings (Netflix), Chris Liddell (ex Trump WH Deputy Secretary), and Vas Narasimhan (Novartis) - zero “public benefit” (or even public safety) peoplePublic Benefit Corporation: “A benefit corporation's directors and officers operate the business with the same authority and behavior as in a traditional corporation, but are required to consider the impact of their decisions not only on shareholders but also on employees, customers, the community, and the local and global environment”What is the impact of supervoting shares? AI on society? AI on the environment? Who on this board is even remotely qualified to answer those questions?Paul AtkinsExhausting and perpetual gaslightingSEC says it will stop responding to no-action requests ‘entirely'In order to focus Division resources on the review of Securities Act and Exchange Act filings, including those reviews that are statutorily required, for the protection of investors and facilitation of capital formation, and in light of the extensive body of guidance from the Commission and the staff available to both companies and proponents on Rule 14a-8, the Division has determined to discontinue responding to Rule 14a-8 no-action requests entirely, including those submitted under Rule 14a-8(i)(1),[2] effective immediately, unless and until the Division announces otherwise. It also will no longer respond to notices filed under Rule 14a-8(j) with a letter indicating that it will not object if a company omits a proposal from its proxy materials.From the 1934 House Report about the importance of Rule 14a-8: “Fair corporate suffrage is an important right that should attach to every equity security bought on a public exchange.”“Managements of properties owned by the investing public should not be permitted to perpetuate themselves by the misuse of corporate proxies. Insiders having little or no substantial interest in the properties they manage have often retained their control without an adequate disclosure of their interest and without an adequate explanation of the management policies they intend to pursue. Insiders have at times solicited proxies without fairly informing the stockholders of the purposes for which the proxies are to be used and have used such proxies to take from the stockholders for their own selfish advantage valuable property rights. Inasmuch as only the exchanges make it possible for securities to be widely distributed among the investing public, it follows as a corollary that the use of the exchanges should involve a corresponding duty of according to shareholders fair suffrage. For this reason the proposed bill gives the . . . Commission power to control the conditions under which proxies may be solicited with a view to preventing the recurrence of abuses which have frustrated the free exercise of the voting rights of stockholders.Investors Slam SEC Plan to Remove Best-Price RuleAtkins also is listening to the crypto bros who want to offer “tokenized securities” off exchanges and is hoping to eliminate a really basic rule that says “investors are entitled to the best price available for stocks they buy”Separately, DOJ Withdraws Antitrust Guidance for Proxy Advisory Industry - no antitrust protections for ISS (good!) but still can't do anything about the socialist NFL, MLB, NHL, NBA (bad!)Headliniest of the WeekDR: Popular breakfast chain closes half its restaurantsDR: The man leading Trump's RTO charge for government workers says he filmed a video in front of a blank wall to avoid work-from-home suspicionOffice of Personnel Management (OPM) Director Scott Kupor, the key driver of President Donald Trump's return-to-office agenda, admitted in a hot mic moment that he intentionally filmed a video in front of a blank wall while he was working from home so he wouldn't get blowback over working at home.“I was in my bedroom, but I was trying to find—because I knew someone was going to give me shit if like, they knew, ‘You were out of the office.' …I was trying to find something that was not recognizable as being in my house, basically. So I was just trying to find a plain corner with a white wall, which was not that easy to find.”Kupor was the first employee hired by Andreessen and Horowitz's venture capital firm, Andreessen Horowitz.MM: Flock Says It's “Taking a Break” From Responding to Media RequestsMM: Eric Schmidt is selling his superyachtWho is this headline for? Billionaire yacht buyers? Poor people who hate billionaires with yachts?Who Won the Week?DR: The women at L3Harris Shared Concerns About CEO's Behavior Years Before OusterMM: Joshua Ramer, the CEO at PeopleReturn (one of the last vestiges of diversity data in the US), whose newsletter today did the most Free Float thing I've seen anyone other than us do: they tracked a single Getty Image across SIX different company reportsThe image was called 1325876463 “Young Boy Leaping Into Father Arms In Playground”, mostly for sustainability reports because it's brown peopleThey found it in Danaher, Crown Castle, TD, Capital One, CSL Plasma, and Toyota EuropePredictionsDR: The meritocro-mano-sphere-o hires Christopher Kubasik again without any push back from anything or anyoneMM: We decide that, since everyone is trying to make companies immune from climate change lawsuits, that we just make CEOs personally immune for any behavior

What happens when a religious congregation discovers its' minister has been guilty of misconduct? One of them hired Rev. Sarah York and she wrote a book about it. #PrattPodcasting #PrattMarketingAgency

Dylan Sprouse Called Out Jared Leto's Alleged Behavior Toward Teenage Models 8 Years Before Disturbing Misconduct AllegationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

It was another busy week in the world of politics. We discuss a Senate committee's vote to hold Anthony Fauci in contempt of Congress, Todd Blanche's newly cleared path toward confirmation as attorney general, and how Republicans are handling misconduct allegations against two House members. This episode: senior political correspondent Tamara Keith, political reporter Elena Moore, Supreme Court and justice correspondent Carrie Johnson and White House correspondent Deepa Shivaram.This podcast was produced by Casey Morell and edited by Rachel Baye.Our executive producer is Muthoni Muturi.Support public media with NPR+ and enjoy perks for over 25 podcasts like this one. This show's perks include bonus episodes and sponsor-free listening. Learn more at plus.npr.org.See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for sponsorship and to manage your podcast sponsorship preferences.NPR Privacy Policy

The show opened with an update in the ongoing case surrounding Nolan Wells, as his mother, Christine Wonsley, announced that a professional misconduct complaint filed against her nursing license had been closed while her family continues to seek answers about her son’s death. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The Rickey Smiley Morning Show delivered a blend of breaking news, entertainment, and heartfelt conversation as the crew unpacked several stories generating national attention. The show opened with an update in the ongoing case surrounding Nolan Wells, as his mother, Christine Wonsley, announced that a professional misconduct complaint filed against her nursing license had been closed while her family continues to seek answers about her son’s death. The crew also discussed the release of a limited-edition Angel Reese Barbie doll, which celebrates the WNBA star’s impact on and off the court. Recent reports note that Mattel’s collectible doll honors Reese’s achievements, philanthropy, and growing cultural influence, further cementing her “Bayou Barbie” brand. Meanwhile, Gary’s Tea sparked conversation around online criticism Reese received after comments about playing with Barbie dolls as a child. The show also tackled a heartbreaking Georgia case involving a mother charged with second-degree murder after her 1-year-old son died after being left in a hot car while she worked a hospital shift. The emotional discussion focused on parental responsibility, exhaustion, grace, and whether tragic mistakes should carry criminal consequences, with listeners passionately weighing in on both sides. Ending on a lighter note, the crew celebrated the official premiere date for The Varnell Hill Show, the long-awaited Martin spinoff starring Tommy Davidson, which is set to debut September 1 on Paramount+ with appearances from Martin Lawrence and a star-studded guest lineup. Alongside the headlines, listeners enjoyed lively discussions on Ryan Clark and Sage Steele’s ongoing ESPN controversy, Keke Palmer’s new hosting role on The Voice Celebrity, nostalgic throwback memories, and the humor and commentary that make the show a daily favorite. Website: https://www.urban1podcasts.com/rickey-smiley-morning-show See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

A California bill meant to keep problematic teachers out of the classroom has collapsed. It would have created a database to allow schools to see if teachers applying to work there had previously been fired or resigned over claims of misconduct. But that proposal was dropped after pushback from the state's teachers licensing agency and unions. They warned it would violate privacy and due process. Guest: Holly McDede, KQED California is suing the Trump administration in an effort to protect the private information of people on a federal cash assistance program. Reporter: Julie Small, KQED Washington state is in its most destructive wildfire season on record. It's been a rough fire summer around the West, but not necessarily in California. Reporter: Danielle Venton, KQED Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

This is the All Local 4:00 P.M. update for Sunday, August 2, 2026.

A prominent local lawyer faces probation for misconduct. A flea-borne typhus outbreak launches an investigation in Pico-Union. And the details on today's hazmat incident in Huntington Beach. Plus, more from Evening Edition. Support The L.A. Report by donating at LAist.com/join and by visiting https://laist.comSupport the show: https://laist.com

Siyabonga Motha speaks to Kishene Chetty, Businessman…facing several corruption-related criminal charges who breaks down some of the cases he is accused of. He also lays allegations of corruption and fraud in the SAPS and IDAC. Tags: 702, The Aubrey Masango Show, Siyabonga Motha, Crime Time, Kishene Chetty, Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi, IDAC, SAPS, ADHOC Committee, Court Cases, Corruption, Fraud The Aubrey Masango Show is presented by late night radio broadcaster Aubrey Masango. Aubrey hosts in-depth interviews on controversial political issues and chats to experts offering life advice and guidance in areas of psychology, personal finance and more. All Aubrey’s interviews are podcasted for you to catch-up and listen. Thank you for listening to this podcast from The Aubrey Masango Show. Listen live on weekdays between 20:00 and 24:00 (SA Time) to The Aubrey Masango Show broadcast on 702 https://buff.ly/gk3y0Kj and on CapeTalk between 20:00 and 21:00 (SA Time) https://buff.ly/NnFM3Nk Find out more about the show here https://buff.ly/lzyKCv0 and get all the catch-up podcasts https://buff.ly/rT6znsn Subscribe to the 702 and CapeTalk Daily and Weekly Newsletters https://buff.ly/v5mfet Follow us on social media: 702 on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/TalkRadio702 702 on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@talkradio702 702 on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/talkradio702/ 702 on X: https://x.com/Radio702 702 on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@radio702 CapeTalk on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/CapeTalk CapeTalk on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@capetalk CapeTalk on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/ CapeTalk on X: https://x.com/CapeTalk CapeTalk on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@CapeTalk567 See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

John Maytham speaks to Mbekezeli Benjamin, Research and Advocacy Officer at Judges Matter, to unpack the legal and constitutional significance of the JSC's recommendation, the role President Ramaphosa and Parliament will now play, and what the case means for judicial independence and accountability. Mbenenge, who is accused of making unwanted sexual advances towards a junior court employee between 2021 and 2022, is challenging both the Tribunal's and the JSC's findings in court and is seeking to prevent the President from suspending or removing him while his legal review is underway. Presenter John Maytham is an actor and author-turned-talk radio veteran and seasoned journalist. His show serves a round-up of local and international news coupled with the latest in business, sport, traffic and weather. The host’s eclectic interests mean the program often surprises the audience with intriguing book reviews and inspiring interviews profiling artists. A daily highlight is Rapid Fire, just after 5:30pm. CapeTalk fans call in, to stump the presenter with their general knowledge questions. Another firm favourite is the humorous Thursday crossing with award-winning journalist Rebecca Davis, called “Plan B”. Thank you for listening to a podcast from Afternoon Drive with John Maytham Listen live on Primedia+ weekdays from 15:00 and 18:00 (SA Time) to Afternoon Drive with John Maytham broadcast on CapeTalk https://buff.ly/NnFM3Nk For more from the show go to https://buff.ly/BSFy4Cn or find all the catch-up podcasts here https://buff.ly/n8nWt4x Subscribe to the CapeTalk Daily and Weekly Newsletters https://buff.ly/sbvVZD5 Follow us on social media: CapeTalk on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/CapeTalk CapeTalk on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@capetalk CapeTalk on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/ CapeTalk on X: https://x.com/CapeTalk CapeTalk on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@CapeTalk567 See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Karen Conti, Partner at Conti & Dolan, LLC, joins Lisa Dent to the charges against ex-Olympian, David Hearn, who allegedly damaged the Lincoln Memorial’s Reflecting Pool back in June. She brings up Hearn’s lawyer who has hinted at potential misconduct on the part of the grand jury handling the proceedings. Later she provides an update […]

Karen Conti, Partner at Conti & Dolan, LLC, joins Lisa Dent to the charges against ex-Olympian, David Hearn, who allegedly damaged the Lincoln Memorial’s Reflecting Pool back in June. She brings up Hearn’s lawyer who has hinted at potential misconduct on the part of the grand jury handling the proceedings. Later she provides an update […]

The head of Washington's public school system wants to speed up reporting of teachers accused of sexual abuse, but what took so long? Parents told to keep fingerprints of their children after violent predator released. Suspicious GoFundMe for ICE detainee. Misgendering meltdown. 

A district court judge has thrown out a state senator's guilty verdict less than 24 hours after it was spoken. Sen. Jason Ellsworth was found guilty of using his access to Senate funds to privately award $170,000 in government contracts to a longtime friend, using a loophole to avoid a public bid. A retrial is scheduled for December.

Earnings season rolls on as Charles Schwab CEO Rick Wurster discusses the firm's latest results, investor activity, and the outlook for markets, while Hasbro CEO Chris Cocks breaks down the toymaker's earnings and the strength of its gaming and entertainment businesses. Plus, Social Security Administration Commissioner and IRS CEO Frank Bisignano responds to a Wall Street Journal report alleging he spied on colleagues while Co-COO at JPMorgan, more than a decade ago. Squawk on the Street Disclaimer Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission says it has secured a record $830 million in civil penalties orders during the 2025-2026 Financial Year. It launched more than 250 investigations, which led to 25 criminal convictions and 11 individuals being sentenced to prison. Businesses subjected to major civil penalties include Union Standard International Group, HSBC Bank Australia, Westpac, Walker Stores and Mercer Super. SBS Reporter Stephanie Youssef has been speaking with ASIC Commissioner Alan Kirkland

In this hour Howie discusses the recent problems the Mass. State Police have encountered. During an interview, MSP Col. Geoffrey Noble was asked if the MSP had a culture problem, Col. Noble said they have "misconduct proliferation". See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

What happens when a public servant reports what he believes is election misconduct? Former Colorado Fire Chief Erik Holt joins Michael Jaco to share the story he says changed his life forever. After serving nearly two decades in federal service, Erik accepted the role of Fire Chief in a rural Colorado community. Following a local election held at his fire station, he says he received complaints from citizens, reviewed surveillance footage, and reported what he believed was evidence of election misconduct to law enforcement. According to Erik, that decision led to retaliation, the loss of his career, years of litigation, and a legal battle over whether public servants retain First Amendment protections when reporting alleged government wrongdoing. In this powerful conversation, Erik discusses: • Free speech and First Amendment protections • Election integrity and government accountability • Whistleblower retaliation • Due process and the right to a jury trial • The personal cost of standing by your oath • Why he continues to fight despite losing his career, home, and savings Erik believes his case has implications far beyond Colorado and could affect every American who serves in public office or government employment. He explains why he is continuing his appeal and why he believes protecting constitutional rights requires ordinary citizens to stand up when they witness wrongdoing. If you believe in free speech, due process, government accountability, and protecting those who come forward, this is a conversation you won't want to miss. Support Erik Holt's Legal Appeal https://www.givesendgo.com/justiceforholt Get Erik's Book Free Speech, Retaliation, and the Cost of Integrity https://www.amazon.com/Free-Speech-Retaliation-Cost-Integrity/dp/B0H8JYYNPD Michael Jaco https://michaelkjaco.com https://www.youtube.com/user/MichaelJaco https://www.lifewavemichaeljaco.com https://www.lifewave.com/michaeljaco/ Wakey Wakey America. Protect free speech. Defend the Constitution. Stay in the love vibrations.      

On the July 16 edition: Three Georgia school systems are suspected of mishandling accusations of sexual misconduct by teachers; a college baseball player has been released from ICE custody; and it's the 50th anniversary of Georgia's death penalty.

After months of rumors, journalist Alan Shipnuck investigates why Phil Mickelson has basically vanished from the LIV Golf Tour — and social media. Leading us down a rabbit hole of hidden misconduct claims and exits from three different golf clubs. Not to mention 19 sources, an off-shore oil pipeline and an ex-friend's ex-wife: Ashley Perez.Read Alan Shipnuck's reporting at Skratch Golf: https://www.skratch.golf/news/pro-golf/phil-mickelson-misconduct-women-madison-club-bridges-farms-exitsRead Phil Mickelson's spokesperson's statement: https://x.com/_davidrumsey/status/2072655169792225420?s=46Read Skratch's response: https://x.com/_davidrumsey/status/2072696394997981241?s=46 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

While secular journalists, scholars, and even the Pope are wrestling with big questions about Artificial Intelligence, the war in the Middle East, and what it means to be truly human, the Southern Baptists have decided the most urgent problem in 2026 is banning women from preaching. Phil asks why evangelicals are still fixated on issues from 50 years ago, while other Christian traditions are leading the culture in tackling modern questions. Zachary Wagner, author of "Men of Virtue," joins Skye and Kaitlyn for a roundup of masculine news. Wagner says the excesses of some expressions of feminism have fueled a subculture of male grievance, and that a pagan vision of masculinity is now masquerading as Christian throughout the manosphere. Also this week, nuns are challenging the tech giants, and Google wants permission to "debug" Florida.   Holy Post Plus: Ad-Free Version of this Episode: https://holypost.substack.com/p/724-the-problem-with-pagan-masculinity   Looksmaxing, Beauty, and Masculinity - Bonus Interview with Zachary Wagner: https://holypost.substack.com/p/looksmaxing-beauty-and-masculinity   0:00 - Intro   2:58 - Theme Song   3:20 - Sponsor - Our Place - Go to https://www.fromourplace.com and use code HOLYPOST to get 10% off site wide on beautiful cookware!   4:22 - Sponsor - AG1 - Heavily researched, thoroughly purity-tested, and filled with stuff you need. Get the AG1 $76 Welcome Pack for free when you order from https://www.drinkag1.com/HOLYPOST   5:48 - Google Mosquitos!   11:27 - Nuns Pressuring A.I.!   14:48 - A.I. Misconduct and Sin   20:15 - Sponsor - Feeding America - Feeding America, led by neighbors! Give now to end hunger at https://www.feedingamerica.org   20:46 -  - Sponsor - World Challenge - Get your 30-day devotional free from World Challenge at https://worldchallenge.org/HOLYPOST   21:50 - Sponsor - BetterHelp - This episode is sponsored by BetterHelp. Give online therapy a try at https://www.betterhelp.com/HOLYPOST and get 10% off your first month!   22:49 - Frozen in the Cold War   46:22 - Interview   48:40 - Aspirational Masculinity   59:13 - Are the Fruit of the Spirit Gendered?   1:10:28 - Unified by Antifeminism   1:26:50 - End Credits   Links Mentioned in News Segment: Google's Literal Debugging: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/jun/01/google-permission-release-mosquitoes-california-florida   Catholic Nuns and Palantir A.I. https://religionnews.com/2026/06/03/catholic-sisters-push-palantir-on-human-rights-as-faith-leaders-rally-in-new-york/   A.I. and Sin https://www.theatlantic.com/culture/2026/06/pope-leo-ai-christian/687388/   Other Resources: Men of Virtue: How the Fruit of the Spirit Forms Male Character in the Modern World (A Guide for Men Seeking Biblical Masculinity, Perfect Father's Day Gift) by Zachary Wagner: https://amzn.to/4uZRL9o   Holy Post website: https://www.holypost.com/   Holy Post Plus: www.holypost.com/plus   Holy Post Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/holypost   Holy Post Merch Store: https://www.holypost.com/shop   The Holy Post is supported by our listeners. We may earn affiliate commissions through links listed here. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.  

Use code EDB at https://jonesroadbeauty.com to get a Free Gift with your first purchase! #JonesRoadBeauty #ad Watch the full coverage of the live stream on The Emily D. Baker YouTube channel: https://youtu.be/OLiagNatxIE  This Case Brief provides a deep dive into the intensifying legal battles surrounding the Karen Read case, featuring an analysis of a contentious civil hearing where the judge expressed extreme frustration over discovery delays and the minimal number of depositions completed to date. Emily also details a major new federal lawsuit filed by Read against the Massachusetts State Police and the Town of Canton, which alleges a deep-seated culture of bigotry and institutional rot, citing horrific and graphic text messages exchanged between former investigators Michael Proctor and Sergeant Sean Goode. The discussion also covers the sudden resignation of Sergeant Goode following an internal misconduct probe and the revelation of Proctor's extensive iCloud data—dating back to 2013—containing racial slurs, misogynistic remarks, and discussions of planting evidence. Ultimately, the speaker reflects on the systemic failures that have hampered a just investigation into the death of John O'Keefe, leaving his family without the clear answers they deserve. RESOURCES Karen Read v. MSP & Canton -- https://emilydbaker.com/readvmsp  Karen Read 2025 Retrial Playlist - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsbUyvZas7gL3CbMJHvrKiAD1aDNcblnO  Karen Read 2024 Mistrial Playlist - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsbUyvZas7gKUeCUzApgsEuQRXu5IXeTS Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Mary and Andrew begin this week by tackling a decision by a U.S. District Judge to dismiss criminal charges against Kilmar Ábrego García, calling the administration's case against García a vindictive prosecution for challenging his illegal deportation last year. Mary and Andrew couple this topic with a conversation about the “Broadview Six” case, involving a group of Chicago ICE protesters whose criminal case was dropped, similarly, due to misconduct by the DOJ. Then, Mary and Andrew continue a discussion from last week about Trump's $1.776 billion settlement with the IRS — specifically about an addendum to the settlement which grants Trump and "affiliated individuals" extremely broad protections from future prosecutions. They then talk about Carmen Lineberger, a former federal prosecutor indicted for sending unreleased files from the Jack Smith report to her personal email account. Plus, a conversation about a decision by a federal judge who has ordered the White House to comply with the Presidential Records Act, undermining the DOJ's ability to give the administration a legal way to destroy White House records from the second Trump term. This podcast is also available on YouTube at ms.now/mainjustice.  Further reading: HERE is the 'Broadway Six' case transcript    Sign up for MS NOW Premium on Apple Podcasts to listen to this show and other MS podcasts without ads. You'll also get exclusive bonus content from this and other shows. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.