Podcast appearances and mentions of tony brueski

Nine women and three men had to decide whether Lindsay Clancy chose to kill her children or whether her doctors broke her brain with medications. The prosecution held up a CVS receipt as proof of planning. The defense rattled off prescriptions one by one until the chart ran off the page. Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta sat in the gallery for every day of it.Bob joins Tony Brueski for the full conversation covering all three parts of the interview. He starts with what the cameras missed — the grief in the gallery, the jury's reactions during the worst testimony, Lindsay's in-person appearance, and the moment the room shifted. He moves to the prosecution's strongest evidence: the twenty-minute window, the takeout timing, and ADA Jennifer Sprague's argument that Lindsay resented her life. He examines the defense's medication cascade and Kevin Reddington's closing.Bob closes with the question everyone is asking: what happens to Lindsay Clancy? She has been inside Tewksbury Hospital since 2023, paralyzed from the waist down. Andrea Yates has been committed for twenty years. Whether the verdict is guilty or not criminally responsible, Lindsay's life is inside a locked building. Bob explains the commitment process, the annual evaluations, and whether any realistic scenario involves her walking out.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #BobMotta #TrueCrime #PostpartumPsychosis #InsanityDefense #HiddenKillers #PatrickClancy #MurderTrial #DefenseDiaries

Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta sat inside Plymouth Superior Court for every day of Lindsay Clancy's five-week murder trial. He joins Tony Brueski for the full three-part conversation — the courtroom experience the cameras could not show, the prosecution's premeditation evidence versus the defense's medication argument, and what Lindsay's future holds regardless of the verdict.Bob describes what the room felt like during the worst testimony — the jury's nine mothers watching the prosecution describe how each child died, the families splitting the gallery, and the moment the energy shifted. He walks through ADA Jennifer Sprague's argument that the CVS run proves planning and Kevin Reddington's response that organized behavior and psychosis coexist every day.Lindsay was prescribed over a dozen psychiatric medications in months by providers who were not coordinating her care. She documented her symptoms. She sought help. The prosecution called it a cover story. The defense called it a system that destroyed a mother. Bob examines which argument landed in the room.He closes with the Andrea Yates precedent — twenty years committed — and what Lindsay's life inside Tewksbury Hospital looks like now. Paralyzed, medicated, locked in since 2023. The five verdict options the jury had for each child all lead to the same place: a locked building.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #BobMotta #TrueCrime #PostpartumPsychosis #InsanityDefense #HiddenKillers #PatrickClancy #MurderTrial #DefenseDiaries

The prosecutor told the jury Lindsay Clancy left her children on the basement floor with exercise bands still around their necks and called them broken toys. The defense attorney held up a honeymoon wish jar and told the jury the prosecution ripped the soul out of a woman destroyed by thirteen psychiatric medications.Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer joins Tony Brueski for a three-part verdict-watch interview covering the prosecution, the defense, and what could happen next. They disagree on this case and every question is a place where their reads collide.The prosecution's own expert Kirk Heilbrun called the killings out of love — a serious suicide attempt where Clancy could not bear to leave the children behind. Defense expert Phillip Resnick called her a puppet. The voice she described appeared once, lasted eighteen minutes, and vanished the moment the children were dead.Nine women and three men are deliberating at Plymouth Superior Court. Five verdict options. First-degree carries life without parole. Not criminally responsible means a psychiatric facility with periodic reviews.Andrea Yates received that verdict twenty years ago. She is still in a state hospital.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #TrueCrimeToday #JenniferCoffindaffer #TrueCrime #PostpartumPsychosis #VerdictWatch #ClosingArguments #MurderTrial #MaternalMentalHealth

The families sat in the same gallery for five weeks at Plymouth Superior Court. Patrick Clancy's side and Lindsay's parents — Michael and Paula Musgrove — watched over eighty witnesses testify about the deaths of Cora, Dawson, and Callan. Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta of Defense Diaries was in the room for every session.Bob joins Tony Brueski to describe what the broadcast could not capture. He walks through the jury's visible reactions during the prosecution's most difficult evidence — the autopsy testimony, the crime scene descriptions, and ADA Jennifer Sprague's closing argument about how Lindsay used exercise bands on each child separately. Nine women and three men sat through all of it. Bob describes what their faces looked like.He also describes Lindsay's in-person appearance and behavior throughout the trial — the moments she was composed, the moments she was not, and how she responded to specific testimony about her children. Bob addresses the gallery tension during recesses: the tension between the families, the energy between the legal teams, and the silence that filled the hallways when court was not in session.There was a moment when the entire room shifted in one direction. Bob identifies it and explains what it told him about where the case was headed.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #BobMotta #TrueCrime #PlymouthCourt #PostpartumPsychosis #HiddenKillers #MurderTrial #DefenseDiaries #Courtroom

The prosecution's case for premeditation depended on proving Lindsay Clancy was clear-headed when she killed her three children on January 24, 2023. Their strongest evidence: she sent Patrick to CVS and a Thai restaurant, creating a twenty-minute window. ADA Jennifer Sprague argued that a woman being controlled by a hallucinated voice cannot plan a pickup order, time a pharmacy trip, and carry out three separate acts in that span.The defense called that argument a misunderstanding of psychosis. Kevin Reddington told the jury that organized behavior and psychiatric crisis coexist every day in every hospital in the country. He showed the jury a chart of Lindsay's prescriptions — over a dozen psychiatric medications prescribed by providers who were not coordinating her care. He showed her journal entries from December 2022, one month before the killings, where her handwriting had deteriorated into scrawl.Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta was in the courtroom for both arguments. He joins Tony Brueski to examine which version the parents on the jury appeared to believe. Bob walks through the medication evidence, Lindsay's documented attempts to seek help, and the prosecution's argument that reaching for treatment proves she understood what was happening — not that she was sick.Lindsay told her doctors she was having intrusive thoughts about harming her children. She checked herself into two hospitals. She was prescribed medication after medication. The prosecution called it a cover story. The defense called it a system that destroyed her.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodCheck out Robin Dreeke's Master Class https://www.masterclass.com/classes/become-the-person-everyone-trustsThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #PostpartumPsychosis #LindsayClancyTrial #TrueCrime #BobMotta #MaternalMentalHealth #HiddenKillers #MurderTrial #KevinReddington #CriminalJustice

Lindsay Clancy has been at Tewksbury Hospital since January 2023. The room has not changed. The medication schedule has not changed. The locked ward has not changed. She is paralyzed from the waist down after her suicide attempt the same night she killed her three children. She has not reported hearing voices since that day.Andrea Yates killed her five children in 2001 and was found not guilty by reason of insanity in 2006. She has been in a state psychiatric facility for twenty years. Massachusetts law allows the same outcome: commitment with no maximum term, six months initially, renewed annually. If the state petitions and the court agrees Lindsay remains mentally ill and a danger, she stays.Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta was inside Plymouth Superior Court for the trial. He joins Tony Brueski to explain each verdict option, how the commitment process works under Massachusetts law, and what distinguishes life inside a psychiatric facility from life inside a prison for a woman in Lindsay's physical condition.Bob also addresses the malpractice lawsuits filed by both Lindsay and Patrick against her medical providers and whether the criminal case outcome affects those suits. He examines whether this trial moves the needle on how the legal system treats maternal mental health or whether it just leaves everyone feeling broken.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #InsanityDefense #LindsayClancyTrial #TrueCrime #BobMotta #AndreaYates #HiddenKillers #CriminalJustice #MurderTrial #JuryDeliberation

Broken toys. That is what the prosecutor called the three children Lindsay Clancy left on the basement floor. Defense attorney Kevin Reddington held up a honeymoon wish jar and thirteen medications and called this prosecution the thing that ripped the soul out of a woman who never did anything wrong.Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer joins Tony Brueski live for a three-part interview as the jury deliberates. They see this case very differently and cover how the prosecution landed, how the defense landed, and what could happen next.The prosecution's own expert called the killings out of love. The defense's expert called Clancy a puppet controlled by command hallucinations. The voice she described appeared once, lasted eighteen minutes, and stopped the moment the children were dead.Nine women and three men have five verdict options at Plymouth Superior Court. Three and a half hours of deliberation on day one produced no verdict. The judge added manslaughter at the defense's request — up to twenty years instead of life.Patrick Clancy's wrongful death lawsuit against Lindsay's providers is already filed.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #HiddenKillers #JenniferCoffindaffer #TrueCrime #PostpartumPsychosis #VerdictWatch #ClosingArguments #HKLive #MaternalMentalHealth

Headlines and courtroom photos built one version of Lindsay Clancy. Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta sat feet from her for the full five-week trial at Plymouth Superior Court and saw another. The distance between the media image and the woman in the courtroom is the subject of this conversation.Bob joins Tony Brueski to describe what Lindsay looked like in person — her physical condition, her demeanor during different phases of testimony, and the moments when her composure broke. Lindsay is paralyzed from the waist down after her suicide attempt on January 24, 2023. She has been at Tewksbury Hospital since then. Seeing her in person, in a courtroom, feet from the families of her three dead children, was a different experience than watching the broadcast.Bob also describes what the jury's nine mothers looked like during the worst testimony — the autopsy evidence, the 911 call, and the prosecution's closing argument about how each child died. He walks through the gallery's response, the family tensions visible only from inside the room, and the specific moment when the entire courtroom's energy shifted.What the camera showed was testimony. What the room held was grief, tension, and the weight of three children who are never coming home.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #BobMotta #TrueCrime #PlymouthCourt #PostpartumPsychosis #HiddenKillers #MurderTrial #DefenseDiaries #Courtroom

Lindsay Clancy sent Patrick to pick up dinner and a prescription from CVS. The prosecution called the timing deliberate — she created a twenty-minute window and used every second of it. She brought each of her three children to the basement and strangled them with exercise bands. The state argued that level of organized behavior is incompatible with psychosis.The defense argued the opposite. Kevin Reddington told the jury that mothers in psychiatric crisis manage routines every day. They order food, pick up prescriptions, care for children, and hold conversations — all while their brains are in freefall. Organized behavior does not rule out psychosis. Hospitals see it constantly.Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta was inside Plymouth Superior Court for the full trial. He joins Tony Brueski to evaluate the prosecution's strongest evidence of premeditation — the CVS run, the phone call Lindsay made after the killings, and the state's three rebuttal experts who testified she was not psychotic. Bob also examines the defense's medication cascade: over a dozen prescriptions in months from providers who were not coordinating her care.Lindsay documented her symptoms. She sought help repeatedly. She told her doctors she was having intrusive thoughts about harming her children. The prosecution used that treatment history against her. Bob explains how both arguments played in the room.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodCheck out Robin Dreeke's Master Class https://www.masterclass.com/classes/become-the-person-everyone-trustsThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #PostpartumPsychosis #LindsayClancyTrial #TrueCrime #BobMotta #MaternalMentalHealth #HiddenKillers #MurderTrial #KevinReddington #CriminalJustice

Lindsay Clancy has been inside Tewksbury Hospital since 2023. She is paralyzed from the waist down. She takes psychotropic medications daily. A not-guilty verdict in her case does not open a door. It locks a different one. Massachusetts allows the state to petition for commitment to a secure psychiatric facility — six months initially, renewable every year, no cap.Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta was in the courtroom for the full five-week trial. He joins Tony Brueski to explain what commitment looks like compared to prison, what the annual evaluation process involves, and whether any realistic path exists for Lindsay to be deemed restored and released. He walks through the five verdict options the jury had for each of Lindsay's three children and what each outcome means for the rest of her life.Andrea Yates was found not guilty by reason of insanity in 2006. She has been committed for over twenty years. She has never been released. Bob addresses whether that precedent tells us anything about Lindsay's trajectory.He also addresses what the jurors as parents had to set aside to reach a verdict. The photographs. The autopsy evidence. The 911 call. Whether regular people can separate grief from legal analysis when three children are dead. Both sides agreed Lindsay was mentally ill. The fight was over whether that illness made her unable to control her actions.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #InsanityDefense #LindsayClancyTrial #TrueCrime #BobMotta #AndreaYates #HiddenKillers #CriminalJustice #MurderTrial #JuryDeliberation

Lindsay Clancy told evaluators a male voice appeared for the first time on the afternoon of January 24, 2023. The voice told her this was her last chance — kill the children and then herself. It lasted roughly eighteen minutes. It stopped the moment the children were dead. She has not reported hearing it since.The prosecution's own expert Gregory Saathoff called that pattern unusual. Command hallucinations do not typically appear once and vanish. Defense experts Paul Zeizel and Phillip Resnick both testified the voice was consistent with postpartum psychosis. Resnick called Clancy a puppet and categorized the killings as altruistic filicide — killing out of a belief she was protecting her children from suffering without her.Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer joins Tony Brueski as the jury deliberates in Plymouth Superior Court. They disagree on this case and dig into what the defense actually proved — and whether a jury of nine women and three men can convict after hearing it.Reddington blamed the medications and the doctors. Sprague blamed the woman who made a choice. The jury is deciding which version they believe.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #TrueCrimeToday #JenniferCoffindaffer #TrueCrime #PostpartumPsychosis #VerdictWatch #CommandHallucination #MurderTrial #JuryDeliberations

Nine women and three men walked into the deliberation room. Three and a half hours. No verdict. Five options sit on those slips — first-degree murder, second-degree murder, manslaughter, not criminally responsible, or not guilty.First-degree carries life in prison without parole. Not criminally responsible means commitment to a psychiatric facility — not release. Andrea Yates has been in a state hospital for twenty years after receiving that verdict in a postpartum case.Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer joins Tony Brueski as the jury deliberates. They disagree on this case and dig into the verdict options, the jury composition, and what happens if those twelve people can't agree.The judge added manslaughter at the defense's request — up to twenty years instead of life. Clancy has already spent three and a half years at Tewksbury Hospital, paralyzed from the waist down after her suicide attempt. Patrick Clancy's wrongful death lawsuit against her providers is filed.Every mother who ever had a dark thought after having a baby is watching what nine women decide next.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #TrueCrimeToday #JenniferCoffindaffer #TrueCrime #PostpartumPsychosis #VerdictWatch #JuryDeliberations #MurderTrial #MaternalMentalHealth

Five weeks. Over eighty witnesses. The prosecution says Lindsay Clancy chose to kill her three children. The defense says her doctors broke her with medications and she was psychotic when it happened. Online, thousands are accusing Patrick of the murders Lindsay admitted to committing.Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta was in the courtroom for the trial. He joins Tony Brueski for the full breakdown — prosecution, defense, and what comes next.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #TrueCrime #PostpartumPsychosis #BobMotta #PatrickClancy #InsanityDefense #HiddenKillers #CriminalJustice #MurderTrial

Forensic psychologist Kirk Heilbrun took the stand for the prosecution to prove Lindsay Clancy was criminally responsible for killing her three children. He told the jury it was a serious suicide attempt accompanied by killing the children out of love. He said Clancy retained moral awareness — but his own language characterized the motive as love, not deliberate cruelty.A second prosecution expert, forensic psychiatrist Gregory Saathoff, agreed on the stand that the prosecution's own opening statement minimized what Clancy had endured. Saathoff also pointed to inconsistencies in Clancy's account of the command hallucination she described — including that the voice appeared for the first time on the day of the killings and stopped the moment the children were dead.Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer joins Tony Brueski as the jury deliberates. They see this case very differently and get into where the prosecution landed after four weeks of testimony and closing arguments.Sprague told the jury Clancy planned it, calculated the window, and made a rational choice. She called the children broken toys left on the basement floor.The jury — nine women and three men — deliberated for three and a half hours on day one with no verdict.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #TrueCrimeToday #JenniferCoffindaffer #TrueCrime #PostpartumPsychosis #VerdictWatch #ClosingArguments #MurderTrial #MaternalMentalHealth

The prosecution called forensic psychologist Kirk Heilbrun to prove Lindsay Clancy was criminally responsible for killing her three children. He told the jury she committed a serious suicide attempt accompanied by killing the children out of love.Heilbrun said Clancy retained moral awareness of what she was doing. But his own characterization — love as the motive, not cruelty — landed squarely in the defense's territory. A second prosecution expert, Gregory Saathoff, agreed on the stand that the prosecution's opening statement minimized what Clancy was going through.Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer joins Tony Brueski as the jury deliberates in Plymouth Superior Court. They disagree on this case and dig into how the prosecution's closing argument landed — and whether it survived its own witnesses.Sprague argued Clancy made a rational choice to end her life and removed her children because they were the protective factor keeping her alive. She told the jury Clancy left the children on the basement floor with exercise bands still around their necks and went upstairs to finish her plan.Nine women and three men are deliberating. Five verdict options sit on those slips.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #HiddenKillers #JenniferCoffindaffer #TrueCrime #PostpartumPsychosis #VerdictWatch #ClosingArguments #JuryDeliberations #MaternalMentalHealth

The prosecution says Lindsay Clancy chose the basement three times. The defense says her doctors piled on medications until her brain broke. The jury has five options for each child — prison, hospital, or freedom are all on the table.Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta of Defense Diaries was inside the courtroom for the full trial. He joins Tony Brueski for the complete breakdown — prosecution, defense, the Patrick conspiracy, and what happens to Lindsay no matter what the jury decides.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #TrueCrime #PostpartumPsychosis #BobMotta #PatrickClancy #InsanityDefense #HiddenKillers #CriminalJustice #MurderTrial

A male voice appeared on the afternoon of January 24, 2023 — the first time Lindsay Clancy had ever heard it. The voice told her this was her last chance. She had to kill her children and then kill herself. It lasted roughly eighteen minutes and stopped the moment the children were dead.The prosecution's expert called the pattern unusual. Defense experts Paul Zeizel and Phillip Resnick both diagnosed bipolar disorder with postpartum psychosis and testified Clancy had no appreciation for the wrongfulness of what she did. Resnick called her a puppet. He is the same expert who testified for Andrea Yates.Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer joins Tony Brueski as the jury deliberates. They disagree on this case and dig into whether the defense's evidence — the voice, the medication history, the journal entries, the chaplain's testimony — actually blocked the prosecution from proving criminal responsibility.Reddington held up a wish jar from the Clancy honeymoon filled with handwritten wishes for healthy children. He held up a poster listing thirteen psychiatric medications. He blamed the pills and the doctors who never talked to each other.The jury — nine women, three men — has five verdict options on those slips.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #HiddenKillers #JenniferCoffindaffer #TrueCrime #PostpartumPsychosis #VerdictWatch #CommandHallucination #DefenseCase #JuryDeliberations

Lindsay Clancy described a male voice that appeared for the first time on the afternoon of January 24, 2023. The voice commanded her to kill her children and then kill herself. It lasted roughly eighteen minutes. It stopped the moment the children were dead. She has never reported hearing it again.The prosecution's forensic psychiatrist Gregory Saathoff called that onset-and-vanish pattern clinically unusual. Defense experts Paul Zeizel and Phillip Resnick both testified the voice was consistent with postpartum psychosis. Resnick said Clancy was a puppet controlled by an external force and that she genuinely believed killing the children was protecting them.Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer joins Tony Brueski live as the jury deliberates. They disagree on this case and dig into the defense's evidence — the voice, the thirteen medications, the journal entries, the chaplain who testified Clancy said she was glad her children were safe.Reddington's closing attacked the medications, the providers who never coordinated care, and the prosecution for building a case against a woman whose brain was under chemical siege.Nine women and three men are deliberating. Five verdict options sit on those slips.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #HiddenKillers #JenniferCoffindaffer #TrueCrime #PostpartumPsychosis #VerdictWatch #CommandHallucination #HKLive #JuryDeliberations

The prosecution's own forensic psychologist Kirk Heilbrun told the jury Lindsay Clancy killed her children out of love — a serious suicide attempt where she could not bear to leave them behind. Heilbrun said she was criminally responsible, but his characterization of the motive cut against the prosecution's theory of premeditated cruelty.Forensic psychiatrist Gregory Saathoff, also testifying for the prosecution, agreed under questioning that the state's opening statement minimized what Clancy had been going through. Saathoff found what he called significant inconsistencies in Clancy's account of the voice she says commanded the killings.Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer joins Tony Brueski live as the jury deliberates. They disagree on this case and dig into whether the prosecution can convict when its own experts softened the case on the stand.Assistant District Attorney Jennifer Sprague told the jury Clancy planned it — mapped the distance to the restaurant, added the CVS stop, calculated the window. Sprague called the children protective factors Clancy removed so she could end her own life.Nine women and three men have five verdict options. They deliberated three and a half hours on day one.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #HiddenKillers #JenniferCoffindaffer #TrueCrime #PostpartumPsychosis #VerdictWatch #ClosingArguments #HKLive #MaternalMentalHealth

Nine women and three men walked into the deliberation room at Plymouth Superior Court. Three and a half hours on day one. No verdict. Five options on those slips — first-degree murder, second-degree, manslaughter, not criminally responsible, or not guilty.Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer joins Tony Brueski live as the jury deliberates. They disagree on this case and dig into what could happen next. Can nine women convict a mother in a postpartum psychosis case? Is manslaughter the jury's way out? What happens if they cannot reach a unanimous verdict?First-degree murder means life without parole. Not criminally responsible means commitment to a psychiatric facility with periodic reviews. The judge explained that even an NCR finding does not mean Clancy goes free — prosecutors can petition for commitment, and the person is evaluated periodically.Patrick Clancy's wrongful death lawsuit against Lindsay's providers is already filed. Thirteen medications from providers who never compared notes.Andrea Yates received the NCR verdict twenty years ago. She is still in a state hospital. Every mother watching this case is watching those nine women right now.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #HiddenKillers #JenniferCoffindaffer #TrueCrime #PostpartumPsychosis #VerdictWatch #JuryDeliberations #HKLive #MaternalMentalHealth

Criminal defense trial attorney Bob Motta sat inside Plymouth Superior Court for every day of Lindsay Clancy's murder trial. He watched the prosecution argue choice, the defense argue psychosis, and the jury receive five verdict options for each of three children.Bob joins Tony Brueski for the full three-part conversation: how the closing arguments landed, whether the jury was moved, and what happens next — including the conspiracy blaming Patrick and the malpractice lawsuits filed by both sides.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #TrueCrime #PostpartumPsychosis #BobMotta #PatrickClancy #InsanityDefense #HiddenKillers #CriminalJustice #MurderTrial

A month before Lindsay Clancy killed her three children, she was writing in a journal tracking her psychiatric medications and her mental state. By December 2022 the handwriting had fallen apart. Kevin Reddington held those pages in front of the jury and told them Lindsay's mind was already gone.Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta was in the courtroom. He joins Tony Brueski to break down the defense closing — the medication chart, the journal, the Resnick comparison to Andrea Yates, and whether the jury bought it.END LINKSListen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #KevinReddington #InsanityDefense #TrueCrime #PostpartumPsychosis #LindsayClancyTrial #BobMotta #HiddenKillers #CriminalDefense #MurderTrial

Lindsay Clancy's jury has five options for each of her three children — not guilty, not criminally responsible, first-degree murder, second-degree murder, or manslaughter. If the jury finds her not criminally responsible, the state can commit her to a psychiatric facility with no end date.Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta was in the courtroom. He joins Tony Brueski to explain what each verdict means for Lindsay's future. Bob also addresses the online conspiracy accusing Patrick of the murders and breaks down whether the malpractice lawsuits survive regardless of the criminal verdict.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #PatrickClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #TrueCrime #ConspiracyTheory #PostpartumPsychosis #BobMotta #HiddenKillers #MedicalMalpractice #TrueCrimeCommunity

After Lindsay Clancy killed her three children in the basement of her Duxbury home, she missed a phone call. Then she called the person back, had a conversation, and hung up. ADA Jennifer Sprague told the jury a woman being controlled by a voice cannot do those things.Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta was in the courtroom. He joins Tony Brueski to evaluate whether the prosecution's closing argument proved Lindsay was criminally responsible — and which of the state's three rebuttal experts was the strongest.END LINKSListen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #ClosingArguments #TrueCrime #PostpartumPsychosis #PlymouthCourt #BobMotta #HiddenKillers #MurderTrial #CriminalJustice

Lindsay Clancy's defense attorney rattled off prescription after prescription for the jury. The defense argued her doctors kept piling on psychiatric medications without coordinating her care — and that the result was a woman whose brain broke before she ever walked into that basement.Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta of Defense Diaries was inside Plymouth Superior Court. He joins Tony Brueski to assess how the defense case played in the courtroom and whether the medication evidence moved the jury.END LINKSListen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #KevinReddington #InsanityDefense #TrueCrime #PostpartumPsychosis #LindsayClancyTrial #BobMotta #HiddenKillers #CriminalDefense #MurderTrial

If the jury finds Lindsay Clancy not criminally responsible, she does not go home. Massachusetts law allows the state to commit her to a psychiatric facility — six months initially, renewable every year, no maximum sentence. Andrea Yates was found not guilty by reason of insanity in 2006. She is still committed twenty years later.Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta of Defense Diaries joins Tony Brueski to break down the verdict options, the conspiracy theories blaming Patrick, and what the rest of Lindsay's life actually looks like.END LINKSListen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #PatrickClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #TrueCrime #ConspiracyTheory #PostpartumPsychosis #BobMotta #HiddenKillers #MedicalMalpractice #TrueCrimeCommunity

Patrick Clancy came home and found all three of his children in the basement with exercise bands still around their necks. The prosecution says Lindsay put them there deliberately. The defense says her brain was in psychosis and she could not have stopped herself.Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta of Defense Diaries was inside the Plymouth courtroom. He joins Tony Brueski to break down how the prosecution's closing argument landed with the jury — the puppet analogy, the phone call, and whether the state proved Lindsay knew what she was doing.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #ClosingArguments #TrueCrime #PostpartumPsychosis #PlymouthCourt #BobMotta #HiddenKillers #MurderTrial #CriminalJustice

The prosecution in Lindsay Clancy's murder trial told a jury of nine women and three men that Lindsay knew exactly what she was doing when she killed her three children. ADA Jennifer Sprague argued Lindsay sent Patrick away, chose the basement, and repeated the same method three times.Criminal defense trial attorney Bob Motta was inside Plymouth Superior Court. He joins Tony Brueski to assess whether the prosecution met its burden and how the jury responded to the state's case.END LINKSListen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #ClosingArguments #TrueCrime #PostpartumPsychosis #PlymouthCourt #BobMotta #HiddenKillers #MurderTrial #CriminalJustice

The defense in Lindsay Clancy's murder trial argued that her medical providers prescribed medication after medication without talking to each other. Kevin Reddington showed the jury her journal entries from December 2022 — the handwriting falling apart, the mind deteriorating a month before the killings.Criminal defense trial attorney Bob Motta was in the courtroom. He joins Tony Brueski to evaluate whether the defense proved overmedication caused a psychotic break — and whether the Resnick testimony carried the weight Reddington needed.END LINKSListen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #KevinReddington #InsanityDefense #TrueCrime #PostpartumPsychosis #LindsayClancyTrial #BobMotta #HiddenKillers #CriminalDefense #MurderTrial

Thousands of people online are accusing Patrick Clancy of murdering his own children. Surveillance footage places him outside the home. Lindsay admitted she did it. The defense's entire case depends on her having done it during a psychotic break.Criminal defense trial attorney Bob Motta was inside Plymouth Superior Court. He watched Patrick testify. He joins Tony Brueski to address the conspiracy directly, explain whether Patrick has legal recourse, and break down what happens to Lindsay regardless of the verdict.Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#LindsayClancy #PatrickClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #TrueCrime #ConspiracyTheory #PostpartumPsychosis #BobMotta #HiddenKillers #MedicalMalpractice #TrueCrimeCommunity

Jerry and Tracy discuss Kyteller's Inn located in Kilkenny, Ireland and the story of the bars original owner Alice de Kyteller, the 1st person in Ireland to be put on trial for being a witch. Tony Brueski from Real Ghost Stories Online and The Grave Talks stops by to discuss shadow people.

A commenter on this channel claimed Lindsay Clancy searched "Andrea Yates" before the killings to build herself an alibi. Her former coworker testified to something else entirely. Margaret Hamp worked nights with Lindsay on the labor and delivery floor at Mass General, and during Lindsay's first year there, she asked Lindsay if she knew the Yates case after a pregnant patient came in planning to hurt herself. Lindsay didn't know it. Hamp had to explain it to her. That gap between online claims and courtroom testimony runs through this entire trial. Every expert who examined Lindsay, on both sides, came back with bipolar disorder or major depression. Not one called her a sociopath or a psychopath, even though a text pulled from her phone on January 20 asks whether a sociopath can be treated, a line prosecutors lean on hard. Messages from the day before describe hallucinations and postpartum psychosis symptoms. Same phone, same week, two different stories. The prosecution's own psychiatrist, Dr. Avram Mack, testified Lindsay described a male, laughing voice telling her it was her last chance, the same account she gave a hospital chaplain in the first week after her arrest. One popular claim online insists she only ever told her own psychologist about that voice. The record says otherwise: she told the state's own witness too. Judge Sullivan's instructions to the jury lay out two separate prongs: whether she could appreciate that what she was doing was wrong, or whether she could control what she did. Knowing right from wrong only answers one of those questions. Tony Brueski checks the loudest theories about this case against what actually got said under oath. Links & Legal Footer: Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. Hashtags: #LindsayClancy #MargaretHamp #TrueCrimeToday #LindsayClancyTrial #AndreaYates #InsanityDefense #PostpartumPsychosis #TrueCrime #Duxbury #MurderTrial 

Patrick Clancy testified about the last normal afternoon of his life, the photos his kids texted him, the check-in before he left the house, and how none of it looked like anything except an ordinary day. Weeks before the killings, nurse practitioner Rebecca Jollotta had raised bipolar disorder with the couple directly, and Patrick answered her in five words. Every expert on both sides of this trial has since weighed in on whether that diagnosis fits, because the entire case turns on the difference between psychosis and something else entirely. Patrick was never a suspect and never charged. He testified for the prosecution across two days, moved to Manhattan four months after burying his children, and took a sales job at Microsoft. He filed for divorce in February 2024, was already in a relationship with Dr. Rachel Danis that same month, and married her this April in Central Park, three years and three months after the day his children died. Lindsay's own attorney called what happened to him one of the worst tragedies anyone could suffer. Online, self-described profilers with no real credentials have built entire theories out of that timeline, and Andrea Yates' husband Rusty knows exactly what that feels like from twenty-five years of surviving it himself. He reached out to Patrick during this trial, and his new wife has received death threats over accusations Patrick's attorneys call defamatory. Both sides of the courtroom agree on one thing: Patrick did nothing but come home to a catastrophe he never saw coming. Tony Brueski walks through what the record actually shows about the man at the center of every online theory, and what it doesn't. Links & Legal Footer: Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. Hashtags: #PatrickClancy #RebeccaJollotta #HiddenKillers #LindsayClancyTrial #LindsayClancy #PostpartumPsychosis #Duxbury #RustyYates #TrueCrime #MentalHealth 

Dr. Phillip Resnick examined two women who killed their own children in the exact same way, decades apart, and reached the same conclusion both times. He evaluated Andrea Yates before her 2001 case ended in a not guilty by reason of insanity verdict, and he told Lindsay Clancy's jury she was following a command voice too, the same finding, one expert, two mothers. That comparison sits at the center of a defense case that's now rested. The record shows Lindsay in session with her psychiatrist on January 23, 2023, one day before the killings, on top of two nurse practitioners, a therapist, two December calls to a suicide hotline, and a five-day inpatient stay at McLean Hospital that ended nineteen days before. The planning theory, built on errands and timing, runs into Resnick's testimony that the Commonwealth's own testing found no evidence of faking, and that Lindsay downplayed her symptoms rather than exaggerated them. The staged-jump theory runs into the fact that she's paralyzed for life and remains on suicide watch at Tewksbury Hospital. Prosecutors have their own expert. Dr. Avram Mack, who interviewed Lindsay in April 2026, testified she could tell right from wrong, and told the jury she said "go to God" to her children during the killings, a statement she reportedly framed very differently to a hospital chaplain a week later and to Resnick himself months after that. Closings are next. Lindsay's plea is not guilty on three counts of murder, on the ground that she lacked criminal responsibility, and a conviction would mean life without parole starting at age thirty-six for a woman already paralyzed and under suicide watch. Tony Brueski asks what it means when the same doctor who helped clear one mother says the same thing about another. Links & Legal Footer: Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. Hashtags: #LindsayClancy #AndreaYates #TrueCrimeToday #LindsayClancyTrial #PhillipResnick #InsanityDefense #PostpartumPsychosis #AvramMack #TrueCrime #MurderTrial 

Lindsay Clancy was sitting across from her psychiatrist on January 23, 2023, one day before she killed her three children. Jennifer Coffindaffer, 25 years in the FBI and no stranger to the guilty camp, joins Tony Brueski to hold every argument for Lindsay's guilt up against what actually made it into the record. The paper trail is the starting point. Beyond that psychiatrist visit, Lindsay had two nurse practitioners, a therapist, two December calls to a suicide hotline, and a five-day inpatient stay at McLean Hospital that ended nineteen days before the killings. The planning argument leans on errands, timing, and exercise bands as proof she knew what she was doing, but Dr. Phillip Resnick, who examined both Lindsay and Andrea Yates, told this jury she was following a command voice. The theory that a search about treating a sociopath proves she was faking runs into Resnick's own testimony that the Commonwealth's testing found no evidence of faking, and that she downplayed her symptoms rather than exaggerated them. The staged-jump theory doesn't hold up against a woman who cut her own wrists, cut her own neck, is paralyzed for life, and remains on suicide watch at Tewksbury Hospital. Prosecutors have countered with Dr. Avram Mack, who interviewed Lindsay in April 2026, testified she could tell right from wrong, and told the jury she said "go to God" to her children during the killings, a statement that sits uneasily next to what she told a hospital chaplain a week later and Dr. Resnick months after that. Closings are next. Lindsay's plea is not guilty on three counts of murder, on the ground that she lacked criminal responsibility. Coffindaffer and Brueski ask how sick someone has to be before a jury calls it not responsible. Links & Legal Footer: Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. Hashtags: #LindsayClancy #PhillipResnick #HiddenKillers #LindsayClancyTrial #PostpartumPsychosis #InsanityDefense #AndreaYates #AvramMack #TrueCrime #MurderTrial 

State Police Sgt. Timothy Chiappini and Cellebrite examiner Ian Whiffin pulled two sets of messages off Lindsay Clancy's phone, one day apart, and prosecutors and defense attorneys are now building opposite cases out of the same device. On January 20, a message asks whether a sociopath can be treated. Prosecutors point to that line as evidence of a woman thinking strategically, not psychotically. The day before, on January 19, other messages describe hallucinations and symptoms of postpartum psychosis, and a second message on the 20th uses the word "intrusive." The defense says that's the real record of what was happening in her head. The digital evidence sits inside a bigger fight over who Lindsay Clancy told what, and when. The prosecution's own psychiatrist, Dr. Avram Mack, testified she described a male, laughing voice telling her it was her last chance, the same account she gave everyone else, including a hospital chaplain in the first week after her arrest, back in January 2023. Dr. Phillip Resnick and Dr. Paul Zeizel both separately diagnosed bipolar disorder with postpartum psychosis after spending hours and, in Zeizel's case, roughly sixty sessions with her. Mack disagrees and says he found no evidence of mania. Her family had already tried to intervene. She told them in December 2022 that she'd had thoughts of harming the kids, and they got her admitted to McLean Hospital, which sent her home as low risk nineteen days before the deaths. Her outpatient providers knew about those thoughts too, well before anyone examined a single text message. Closings are next. She's pleaded not guilty on three murder counts on the ground that she wasn't criminally responsible. Prosecutors allege planning and a faked suicide attempt. Tony Brueski walks through what the phone actually shows, and what it doesn't. Links & Legal Footer: Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. Hashtags: #LindsayClancy #IanWhiffin #HiddenKillers #LindsayClancyTrial #CellebriteEvidence #PostpartumPsychosis #InsanityDefense #Duxbury #TrueCrime #MurderTrial 

Public records place Patrick Clancy in Manhattan by May 2023, four months after burying his children, with a new sales job at Microsoft and, according to reporting, solo trips through Latin America and Europe not long after. To some corners of the internet, that timeline reads like guilt. To Lindsay's own defense attorney, who told the jury in opening that Patrick suffered one of the worst tragedies imaginable, it reads like a man trying to survive. The actual testimony sits between those two extremes. Weeks before the killings, nurse practitioner Rebecca Jollotta raised bipolar disorder with the couple directly, and Patrick responded in five words that have since been picked apart online by commenters, some of whom present themselves as former FBI profilers with no record of ever working there. He filed for divorce in February 2024, was already involved with Dr. Rachel Danis that month, and married her in Central Park this April, three years and three months after the day his children died. He was never a suspect. He was never charged. He testified for the prosecution across two days. Andrea Yates' husband Rusty, who lost five children the same way in 2001, reached out to Patrick during the trial with a message built from twenty-five years of living through the same public scrutiny, only louder now that social media exists to fuel it. Patrick's new wife has already received death threats tied to accusations his attorneys call defamatory, aimed at a man both sides of the courtroom agree did nothing but come home to catastrophe he never saw coming. Tony Brueski separates what the timeline actually proves from what the comment section has decided it means. Links & Legal Footer: Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. Hashtags: #PatrickClancy #RachelDanis #TrueCrimeToday #LindsayClancyTrial #LindsayClancy #RustyYates #Duxbury #PostpartumPsychosis #TrueCrime #MentalHealth 

The theory floating around Lindsay Clancy's trial says she invented the voice she heard for a malpractice lawsuit filed in January 2026. Hospital chaplain Sheila Cavanaugh testified Clancy told her about that same voice in the first week of her hospitalization, in January 2023, three years before any lawsuit existed. Cavanaugh has visited her roughly two hundred times since. The timeline matters because of who else heard the same story. The prosecution's own psychiatrist, Dr. Avram Mack, called by the Commonwealth to argue Clancy was responsible for her actions, testified she described a male, laughing voice telling her it was her last chance. Mack's first interview with her didn't happen until April 2026, more than three years after the killings, well after Dr. Phillip Resnick's three-hour evaluation four months out and Dr. Paul Zeizel's roughly sixty sessions with her. Both Resnick and Zeizel diagnosed bipolar disorder with postpartum psychosis. Mack says there's no evidence of mania, and that Clancy isn't convinced she's bipolar at all. None of this started in a courtroom. Lindsay told her family in December 2022 that she'd had thoughts of harming the kids. They got her admitted to McLean Hospital, which sent her home as low risk nineteen days before the deaths, and her outpatient providers already knew about those thoughts too. She's pleaded not guilty on three counts of murder on the ground that she wasn't criminally responsible, and prosecutors allege planning and a faked suicide attempt. She's admitted she did it. What she was when she did it is the only question left for the jury. Tony Brueski and a guest lay the lawsuit theory next to the actual dates, and let the timeline speak for itself. Links & Legal Footer: Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. Hashtags: #LindsayClancy #SheilaCavanaugh #HiddenKillersLive #LindsayClancyTrial #PostpartumPsychosis #InsanityDefense #AvramMack #MentalHealth #TrueCrime #Duxbury 

If this jury convicts Lindsay Clancy, her life sentence starts at age thirty-six, with no parole, ever. Psychotherapist Shavaun Scott joins Tony Brueski to explain exactly what that number means for a woman who is paralyzed from the chest down and has been under constant watch since January 2023. For three and a half years, everyone around Lindsay has existed to keep her alive and treat her illness. Conviction flips that mission entirely. Shavaun breaks down what it means to go from patient to inmate, and why that transition hits harder for someone in her physical condition than for almost anyone else facing sentencing this year. The Department of Justice has already investigated Massachusetts prisons for isolating suicidal inmates in bare cells for months at a time, and a paralyzed woman with a documented history of self-harm would enter that system with no way to physically defend herself. None of it happens in a vacuum. The defense has rested on a record that includes a psychiatrist visit the day before the killings, a five-day inpatient stay at McLean that ended nineteen days before, and testimony from Dr. Phillip Resnick, who also examined Andrea Yates, that Lindsay was following a command voice. Prosecutors counter with Dr. Avram Mack, who says she could tell right from wrong, and Lindsay's own words to her children during the killings, which the defense argues sit alongside very different words she gave a chaplain and a second doctor in the months that followed. Shavaun and Tony take on the argument splitting the audience in half: does she pay with her life, or does a cell become just another kind of sentence for an illness nobody in this courtroom actually disputes she has. Links & Legal Footer: Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. Hashtags: #LindsayClancy #ShavaunScott #HiddenKillersLive #LindsayClancyTrial #PostpartumPsychosis #PrisonSystem #InsanityDefense #Massachusetts #TrueCrime #MurderTrial 

The only real fight over Lindsay Clancy's bloodstains is whether she jumped from that window or slid out of it. Not whether she staged anything. Not whether someone else was involved. The bloodstain analyst called the marks on the outside of the window transfer stains, consistent with a body going through it, and both attorneys have accepted that starting point. That single detail says a lot about how far online theories have drifted from what fourteen days and more than seventy witnesses actually established at Plymouth Superior Court. The defense admitted before the trial started that Lindsay killed her three children, so the only question for this jury is criminal responsibility. Every prosecution witness who personally knew her, including Patrick, called her a wonderful, loving mother on the stand. Dr. Paul Zeizel, who has met with her more than sixty times, testified a male voice ordered her to kill the children and herself, though prosecutors pointed out on cross that she only ever described that voice when discussing January 24th. Her hospital records call her "critically ill, postpartum psychosis," while a psychiatrist who saw her days later called her "calm and cooperative." The rope-on-the-door claim making the rounds online has no basis in testimony. Patrick found that door locked and said it was the moment he knew something was wrong. The prosecution's own rebuttal psychiatrist testified Lindsay told him she never locked it, and the exercise bands investigators actually found were sitting in the basement with a laptop. Tony Brueski lays the record next to the rumors and lets viewers see the gap for themselves, one claim at a time. Links & Legal Footer: Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. Hashtags: #LindsayClancy #AvramMack #TrueCrimeToday #LindsayClancyTrial #PostpartumPsychosis #PaulZeizel #InsanityDefense #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #TrueCrime #MurderTrial 

Two of Lindsay Clancy's own expert witnesses looked at the same woman and walked away with different diagnoses, and that disagreement might matter more than anything the prosecution said in fourteen days at Plymouth Superior Court. The courtroom conduct alone has raised eyebrows. The prosecution opened by calling Lindsay "controlling, meticulous, and manipulative" and telling the jury she faked a suicide attempt, even though she's paralyzed from the waist down after cutting her own wrists and neck and jumping from a second-story window. On cross-examination, the prosecutor asked Lindsay's former mother-in-law, who described her as a wonderful and nurturing mother, whether she knew murder was a mortal sin. The judge struck the question. When Lindsay's mother testified that her daughter said the medication was destroying her mind, the prosecutor asked why she was never committed. During autopsy testimony for eight-month-old Callan, Lindsay sobbed hard enough that the judge called a recess, and the next morning brought accusations of a hot mic catching someone on the prosecution's side saying "shut her up," which the DA's office denies. But the diagnosis fight is the one that actually decides what happens next. If the jury returns a not guilty by reason of insanity verdict, Massachusetts law allows the state to keep refiling commitment petitions every six months, indefinitely, and release requires convincing a judge she's no longer mentally ill or dangerous. Andrea Yates, acquitted the same way in 2006, is still institutionalized today. Getting out isn't just about proving her innocence anymore. It means proving, to a judge, over and over, that a diagnosis her own defense says she'll carry for life no longer makes her dangerous. Defense attorney Eric Faddis and psychotherapist Shavaun Scott join Tony Brueski to separate the theater from what actually determines Lindsay Clancy's future. Links & Legal Footer: Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. Hashtags: #LindsayClancy #EricFaddis #TrueCrimeToday #LindsayClancyTrial #InsanityDefense #AndreaYates #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #MentalHealth #TrueCrime #ShavaunScott 

Nolan Wells' district attorney says the grand jury will eventually get every piece of evidence collected in his case. Seven weeks after Nolan died on Horn Island, Mississippi, his phone, the device his friends carried off that island, has never actually been collected. His mother already looked. Before any forensic protocol existed, she and her sister went through the phone themselves and opened both of Nolan's Snapchat accounts. They were completely empty. On July 15, the family's lawyers and District Attorney Angel Myers McIlrath agreed to a joint forensic exam at a community college digital forensics lab, possibly with the FBI involved. No date was ever set. A month later came a letter giving the family 48 hours to hand the phone over, while Nolan's parents were out of state. Five days after that, the family offered four dates on twelve hours' notice. Still no exam. This case has pulled in more outside attention than most. The Congressional Black Caucus has asked the Department of Justice for a federal review. The NAACP joined the family's legal team. Prominent voices, including Al Sharpton, have said outright that the phone was wiped, all before a single forensic test has been run on it. Meanwhile, the three friends who were on the island with Nolan handed their own devices to federal agents with no subpoena required, and the sheriff's office ruled out foul play within two days, ahead of the completed autopsy. No charges have been filed. The friends deny tampering. The family has subpoenaed Snapchat, Meta, TikTok, WhatsApp, and Life360 for the server records the phone can't hold on its own. Tony Brueski separates what's actually been proven from what's been claimed, and asks what it means when a case draws this much national noise before the most basic piece of evidence has even been opened. Links & Legal Footer: Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. Hashtags: #NolanWells #AlSharpton #TrueCrimeToday #HornIsland #Mississippi #GrandJury #DigitalForensics #JusticeForNolan #NAACP #TrueCrime 

Lindsay Clancy's own defense doesn't dispute what happened to her three children. The trial is about what was happening inside her mind, and the prosecution just spent fourteen days at Plymouth Superior Court trying to convince a jury it was less than it looks. The prosecutor opened by calling Lindsay "controlling, meticulous, and manipulative" and told the jury she faked a suicide attempt. Lindsay is paralyzed from the waist down. She cut her own wrists and neck before jumping from a second-story window, and the jury has watched her sit in a wheelchair through every day of testimony since. On cross-examination, the prosecutor asked Lindsay's former mother-in-law, who called her a wonderful and nurturing mother, whether she knew murder was a mortal sin. The judge struck the question before it could sit with the jury. When Lindsay's own mother testified that her daughter had said the medication was destroying her mind, the prosecutor asked why she never had Lindsay committed. Then came the recess. During autopsy testimony for eight-month-old Callan, Lindsay sobbed hard enough that the judge stopped the proceedings. The next morning, defense attorney Kevin Reddington accused someone on the prosecution's side of being caught on a hot mic saying "shut her up." The DA's office insists the words were "shut it off." None of this changes what a not guilty by reason of insanity verdict would actually cost Lindsay. Massachusetts law allows the state to keep refiling commitment petitions every six months, indefinitely, and Andrea Yates, acquitted the same way back in 2006, is still institutionalized today. Eric Faddis and Shavaun Scott join Tony Brueski to weigh a prosecution strategy that could be alienating the jury it needs, against a verdict that might not free her at all. Links & Legal Footer: Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. Hashtags: #LindsayClancy #PlymouthDA #HiddenKillers #LindsayClancyTrial #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #KevinReddington #InsanityDefense #AndreaYates #MentalHealth #TrueCrime 

Nolan Wells died on Horn Island, Mississippi on July 4, and the sheriff's office ruled out foul play within two days, before the state autopsy was finished, before anyone official had opened his phone. Seven weeks later, that phone still hasn't been forensically examined. The device left the island with Nolan's friends. His mother retrieved it from them in the first days and, before any forensic protocol existed, went through it herself with her sister. Both of his Snapchat accounts were completely empty. On July 15, the family's lawyers and District Attorney Angel Myers McIlrath agreed to a joint forensic exam at the Digital Forensics Lab at Mississippi Gulf Coast Community College, with both sides' experts and possibly the FBI in the room. No date was ever scheduled. Nearly a month passed before the DA's office sent a letter giving the family 48 hours to hand the phone over, while Nolan's parents were out of state. The three friends who were with Nolan that weekend handed their own phones directly to federal agents, no subpoena needed. The family still has Nolan's phone and says it's ready to go the moment there's a real chain-of-custody protocol in writing. Forensic examiners say deleted data can often be recovered from a device like this one, but platforms purge their own servers over time, and every week of delay narrows that window. No charges have been filed. The friends deny any tampering. The family has already subpoenaed Snapchat, Meta, TikTok, WhatsApp, and Life360 for the server-side records the phone itself can't hold. Tony Brueski breaks down how a sheriff's office reached a conclusion about Nolan Wells' death before the evidence that could confirm or contradict it was ever examined, and why that order of operations should bother everyone paying attention. Links & Legal Footer: Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. Hashtags: #NolanWells #HornIslandSheriff #HiddenKillers #HornIsland #Mississippi #DigitalForensics #FoulPlay #JusticeForNolan #TrueCrime #GrandJury 

Nolan Wells' family says they've offered the district attorney four different dates, on twelve hours' notice, to forensically examine his phone. Seven weeks after Nolan died on Horn Island, Mississippi, no exam has happened. The phone came off the island with Nolan's friends and has been with his family since the first days after his death. Before any official protocol existed, his mother and her sister opened it themselves and went through both of his Snapchat accounts. They were completely empty. On July 15, the family's legal team and District Attorney Angel Myers McIlrath agreed on paper to a joint exam at the Digital Forensics Lab at Mississippi Gulf Coast Community College, both sides' experts included, possibly the FBI too. No date got set. Then the DA's office sent a letter demanding the phone within 48 hours, while Nolan's parents were nowhere near Mississippi. Five days later, the family came back with four separate dates and twelve hours' notice each. Still nothing. Compare that to the three friends who were with Nolan that weekend: they handed their own phones straight to the FBI, no subpoena, no ultimatum, no back-and-forth. The family is asking for one thing before they do the same, a written chain-of-custody protocol that protects what's actually on that device. Forensic examiners say deleted messages can often be pulled from a phone like Nolan's, but the apps themselves purge data from their servers over time, and every week this drags on shrinks that window a little more. No one has been charged. The friends deny touching anything. The family has already subpoenaed Snapchat, Meta, TikTok, WhatsApp, and Life360 for the server-side records the phone alone can't provide. Tony Brueski walks through the paper trail, who offered what, who ignored it, and why a family that's tried this hard to cooperate is still holding a phone nobody official has opened. Links & Legal Footer: Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. Hashtags: #NolanWells #AngelMyersMcIlrath #HiddenKillersLive #HornIsland #Mississippi #ChainOfCustody #DigitalForensics #JusticeForNolan #TrueCrime #NolanWellsPhone 

Every six months, for as long as the state wants, prosecutors could ask a judge to keep Lindsay Clancy locked inside a hospital instead of a prison. That's the mechanism waiting behind whatever verdict comes out of Plymouth Superior Court, and it's the part almost nobody watching this trial has actually thought through. Massachusetts law follows an insanity acquittal with a forty-day observation window, then commitment petitions that renew in six-month blocks with no ceiling on how many times the state can file. Getting released means convincing a judge Lindsay is no longer mentally ill or dangerous, while carrying a diagnosis her own defense told the jury she'll be managing for the rest of her life. Andrea Yates, acquitted by reason of insanity back in 2006, is still inside a Texas state facility today. That's the closest precedent this case has. It matters more given what jurors have already sat through. The prosecution opened by calling Lindsay "controlling, meticulous, and manipulative" and claiming she faked a suicide attempt, despite the fact that she's paralyzed from the waist down after cutting her own wrists and neck and jumping from a second-story window. During autopsy testimony for eight-month-old Callan, she sobbed hard enough that the judge called a recess. The next morning brought accusations of a hot mic catching someone on the prosecution's side saying "shut her up," which the DA's office disputes. Dueling experts have already left this jury with two incompatible diagnoses, and whichever one wins the verdict will control her treatment, her medication, and her odds of ever walking out of that facility. Psychotherapist Shavaun Scott joins Tony Brueski to lay out exactly how long "not guilty" can actually keep someone confined, and why the number most people assume is nowhere close to the one the law actually allows. Links & Legal Footer: Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. Hashtags: #LindsayClancy #AndreaYates #HiddenKillersLive #LindsayClancyTrial #InsanityDefense #Massachusetts #MentalHealth #CivilCommitment #TrueCrime #PlymouthSuperiorCourt 

Door one: a prison cell, life without parole, the oldest women's facility in America receiving its most notorious inmate. Door two: a state hospital, commitments renewed twice a year, a release standard she may never satisfy. Psychotherapist Shavaun Scott joins Tony Brueski for the complete three-part interview on why the Lindsay Clancy verdict decides which door — not whether one closes.Shavaun brings a career of forensic and clinical work to every branch of this story. She explains what incarceration demands of a woman who needs two people to leave her bed, and what a no-parole sentence does to a thirty-six-year-old with no family left outside. She dismantles the assumption that an insanity finding equals mercy, tracing the legal machinery that has kept Andrea Yates hospitalized for two decades after her acquittal. She maps that machinery onto the road ahead for Clancy — including the unresolved expert war over what's actually wrong with her.And she gives the third figure in this tragedy his due: Patrick Clancy, the father carrying a loss with no name and absorbing accusations his attorneys condemn as patently false. His survival lessons come from Rusty Yates, because no one else alive can offer them.The complete conversation, all three parts, one sitting. When the verdict lands, you'll understand what it actually decided — and what it never could.END LINKS:Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodDISCLAIMER:This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS:#LindsayClancy #PatrickClancy #TrueCrime #LindsayClancyTrial #TrueCrimePodcast #TrueCrimeCommunity #PostpartumPsychosis #HiddenKillers #Massachusetts #MentalHealth

One trial, three reckonings. Psychotherapist Shavaun Scott sits with Tony Brueski for the complete interview on what the verdict coverage leaves out: the prison that waits, the hospital that never lets go, and the husband strangers decided to put on trial themselves.The prison conversation confronts the physical truth first: a conviction sends a woman who cannot stand into a facility built on the assumption that inmates can. Shavaun, drawing on decades in forensic settings, describes the collision between mandatory life without parole and a defendant this dependent — and what becomes of a mind serving a sentence with no end date and no one left to visit.The hospital conversation flips the script on the insanity verdict. Renewable commitments, a release standard nearly impossible to meet with a permanent diagnosis, dueling experts whose conflicting testimony will shape her treatment for years — and the Andrea Yates precedent hanging over all of it like a forecast.The final conversation is Patrick's. The accusations his attorneys call patently false. The threats against his new wife. The testimony about a happy afternoon that ended in catastrophe. And the counsel of Rusty Yates, who has spent twenty-five years surviving what Patrick is just beginning.Three parts, one question underneath: when the crime is this entangled with illness, what does justice even mean? Shavaun's answer earns the full runtime.END LINKS:Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodDISCLAIMER:This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS:#LindsayClancy #PatrickClancy #TrueCrime #LindsayClancyTrial #TrueCrimePodcast #TrueCrimeCommunity #PostpartumPsychosis #HiddenKillers #Massachusetts #MentalHealth

Her best-case scenario is the insanity verdict — the one where the jury agrees her mind was broken and she isn't criminally responsible. Live with Tony Brueski, psychotherapist Shavaun Scott spends three full segments showing why even that outcome keeps Lindsay Clancy behind locked doors, possibly forever — and why the alternative is darker still.The full interview runs the board. Segment one: the conviction path, where life without parole meets a paralyzed body and a psychiatric history inside a prison system federal investigators already flagged for how it treats inmates in crisis. Segment two: the commitment path, where six-month renewals stack into decades, release means disproving a lifelong illness, and Andrea Yates — twenty years confined after her own acquittal — stands as the cautionary tale. Segment three: Patrick Clancy's parallel ordeal, from the accusations his attorneys call patently false to the death threats against his new wife to the guidance of the one man who's survived this before him.Shavaun brings decades of clinical and forensic experience; Tony brings the questions the audience shouts at their screens. The chat gets the final segment, and the debate is already raging: if no door ever opens for Lindsay Clancy, did this trial ever really have stakes?Come argue. This one runs deep.END LINKS:Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodDISCLAIMER:This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS:#LindsayClancy #PatrickClancy #TrueCrime #LindsayClancyTrial #TrueCrimePodcast #TrueCrimeCommunity #PostpartumPsychosis #HiddenKillers #Massachusetts #MentalHealth

Three and a half years of hospital care ends the moment a guilty verdict is read. Psychotherapist Shavaun Scott and Tony Brueski examine the version of Lindsay Clancy's future that starts with a conviction — life without parole, served in a body that cannot move itself and a mind the entire trial was fought over.The numbers frame the problem. By one estimate, roughly eighty-five percent of the women in the state prison that would receive her already carry a mental health diagnosis — and the facility has been operating since 1877, the oldest women's prison in the country. Federal investigators documented how the Massachusetts system responds when inmates reach psychiatric crisis, and the findings involved isolation, not treatment.Shavaun brings the clinical lens the coverage is missing. She explains what institutional dependence does to someone who was a nurse before she was a defendant, and why a diagnosis like the one her defense describes gets worse under stress and broken sleep. She also takes on what decades of confinement do to a person who entered at thirty-six with nothing left outside the walls.Tony asks the questions the audience is actually asking — including whether a sentence like this punishes her, warehouses her, or both. The answer Shavaun gives isn't the one either side of the courtroom would want to hear.END LINKS:Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodDISCLAIMER:This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS:#LindsayClancy #PatrickClancy #TrueCrime #LindsayClancyTrial #TrueCrimePodcast #TrueCrimeCommunity #PostpartumPsychosis #HiddenKillers #Massachusetts #PrisonSystem