Podcasts about editon

Plus Guest #RalphWilliams From The #RalphWilliams Show To Talk #Steelers Job Opening And More On #TheRealSportsSkope 1-21-26 Editon

Picks With #TheMadNewYorker On #TheRealSportsSkope 1-15-26 Editon

ENJOY!!HAPPY NEW YEAR 2026 :) BE SAFE!!!NEXT UP GLOW JANUARY 10TH for my first 2026 event!!

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-buckeye-scoop-podcast--4429642/support.

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-buckeye-scoop-podcast--4429642/support.

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-buckeye-scoop-podcast--4429642/support.

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-buckeye-scoop-podcast--4429642/support.

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-buckeye-scoop-podcast--4429642/support.

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-buckeye-scoop-podcast--4429642/support.

OTF's Longhorn Livestream is LIVE breaking down the Texas win over Vanderbilt, offense potentially finding their rhythm, look ahead to the future and take your questions! Drop your questions and comments in the chat!   Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Which of these hypothetical Halloween scenarios is better than the other? See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-buckeye-scoop-podcast--4429642/support.

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-buckeye-scoop-podcast--4429642/support.

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-buckeye-scoop-podcast--4429642/support.

Under Review HR 3 8.15.25 Fair Food Editon of In Or Out! by Fanrun Radio

Amazon Bond 1 has a writer. Naturally, the blog has questions.

The topic "black fatigue" was so massive all week online and off that we did multiple shows with it as the main topic of discussion. I had so many clips that I just decided to do an entirely separate "best of the week" episode exclusively with clips on this topic only. This is also the 2nd week in a row we were able to drop 2 best of the week shows in a single weekend. 

​In the case of United States v. Sean Combs (Case No. 1:24-cr-00542-AS), the defense has filed a reply memorandum supporting their motion to suppress evidence obtained through search warrants executed at Combs' residences in Los Angeles and Miami, as well as his electronic accounts and devices. The defense argues that the government obtained these warrants by making false statements and omitting critical exculpatory evidence, thereby presenting a misleading portrayal of the facts to justify the searches. They contend that certain evidence, which suggested that participation in the alleged "Freak-Off" parties was voluntary and consensual, was intentionally excluded from the warrant applications. The defense asserts that this misconduct led to the issuance of overly broad warrants, allowing the seizure of extensive personal and digital records unrelated to the alleged offenses.Alternatively, the defense requests a Franks hearing to challenge the validity of the search warrants. A Franks hearing is warranted when a defendant makes a substantial preliminary showing that a false statement was knowingly and intentionally, or with reckless disregard for the truth, included in a warrant affidavit, and that the allegedly false statement is necessary to the finding of probable cause. The defense maintains that the government's alleged omissions and misrepresentations meet this standard, necessitating such a hearing. They emphasize that without the purportedly misleading information, the warrants would lack probable cause, rendering the seized evidence inadmissible.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:  gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.187.0.pdf

​In the case of United States v. Sean Combs (Case No. 1:24-cr-00542-AS), the defense has filed a reply memorandum supporting their motion to suppress evidence obtained through search warrants executed at Combs' residences in Los Angeles and Miami, as well as his electronic accounts and devices. The defense argues that the government obtained these warrants by making false statements and omitting critical exculpatory evidence, thereby presenting a misleading portrayal of the facts to justify the searches. They contend that certain evidence, which suggested that participation in the alleged "Freak-Off" parties was voluntary and consensual, was intentionally excluded from the warrant applications. The defense asserts that this misconduct led to the issuance of overly broad warrants, allowing the seizure of extensive personal and digital records unrelated to the alleged offenses.Alternatively, the defense requests a Franks hearing to challenge the validity of the search warrants. A Franks hearing is warranted when a defendant makes a substantial preliminary showing that a false statement was knowingly and intentionally, or with reckless disregard for the truth, included in a warrant affidavit, and that the allegedly false statement is necessary to the finding of probable cause. The defense maintains that the government's alleged omissions and misrepresentations meet this standard, necessitating such a hearing. They emphasize that without the purportedly misleading information, the warrants would lack probable cause, rendering the seized evidence inadmissible.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:  gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.187.0.pdfshow lessBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

​In the case of United States v. Sean Combs (Case No. 1:24-cr-00542-AS), the defense has filed a reply memorandum supporting their motion to suppress evidence obtained through search warrants executed at Combs' residences in Los Angeles and Miami, as well as his electronic accounts and devices. The defense argues that the government obtained these warrants by making false statements and omitting critical exculpatory evidence, thereby presenting a misleading portrayal of the facts to justify the searches. They contend that certain evidence, which suggested that participation in the alleged "Freak-Off" parties was voluntary and consensual, was intentionally excluded from the warrant applications. The defense asserts that this misconduct led to the issuance of overly broad warrants, allowing the seizure of extensive personal and digital records unrelated to the alleged offenses.Alternatively, the defense requests a Franks hearing to challenge the validity of the search warrants. A Franks hearing is warranted when a defendant makes a substantial preliminary showing that a false statement was knowingly and intentionally, or with reckless disregard for the truth, included in a warrant affidavit, and that the allegedly false statement is necessary to the finding of probable cause. The defense maintains that the government's alleged omissions and misrepresentations meet this standard, necessitating such a hearing. They emphasize that without the purportedly misleading information, the warrants would lack probable cause, rendering the seized evidence inadmissible.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:  gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.187.0.pdfshow lessBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Vacation Rental Horror Stories and Karson Vs Lana Christmas Editon

To celebrate Presidents' Day, we're revisiting interviews that would EASILY win the popular vote, including Ray Romano, Rosie Perez, Steve Earle, and more!Get access to bonus episodes, sponsor-free listening, and the chance to participate in a quiz with Peter Sagal when you sign up for Wait Wait... Don't Tell Me!+ at plus.npr.org/waitwait.Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoicesNPR Privacy Policy