Podcasts about Bad Boy

Sarah is over the moon that we're talking about celebrities again, especially because we're keeping it tight this time around and limiting it to celebrity/normal person romance (mostly -- Jen is ungovernable)! Yes, Sarah is going to talk about Perfect, but also we're going to talk about celebrities who fall for stranger normies, for normies they knew before they were celebrities, for normies who work with them, and for normies who protect them. The episode is 1200 books long and honestly, we're not sorry. In case you wondered why Sarah is breaking her rule about talking about her own books, it's that time of year again! Her next book, These Summer Storms (complete with sexy, silent, deeply competent hero) is out in July and is going on tour, and there is a real deal Fated Mates LIVE planned for July 8th in St. Louis, MO! Get tickets to any of these events (Jen will be at a bunch of them, and other pod friends will be popping up along the way) at sarahmaclean.net/tour! If you can't make the tour, you can preorder These Summer Storms signed with a special romance dust jacket from The Ripped Bodice. If you want more Fated Mates in your life, please join our Patreon, which comes with an extremely busy and fun Discord community! Join other magnificent firebirds to hang out, talk romance, and be cool together in a private group full of excellent people. Learn more at patreon.com.Our next read along is Cate C Wells's Run Posy Run, available right now in print or ebook, or with your monthly subscription to Kindle Unlimited at Amazon, Apple Books, and Libro.fm.The Books Perfect by Judith McNaughtAll The Feels by Olivia DadeThe Hollywood Jinx by Sariah WilsonFan Service by Rosie DananNot a Bad Boy by Louisa EdwardsLOL by Lucy Lennox & Molly MaddoxThe Mechanic by Reina TorresThe Stand-In by Lily ChuThe Decoy Girlfriend by Lillie Vale32 Days in May by Betty CorrelloThe Bollywood Bride by Sonali DevGhosted by JM DarhowerSmall Town Swoon by Melanie Harlow

Episode 325. From the roaring '90 dance floor to billion-dollar mogul status, Sean "Diddy" Combs seemed untouchable. But today, a storm of lawsuits and explosive allegations is shaking the foundations of his Bad Boy empire. In the episode, we rewind Diddy's meteoric rise, unpack the courtroom drama now unfolding, and what these revelations mean for hip hop, and pop culture, and power itself. Buckle up because when a wild boy's world unravels, the fallout is anything but quiet.   LRPod Website Exclusive LRPod Content   Quick Links ========== The Future of Networking is Here!!!

Originally Aired: 05/23/25 – We review Mission Impossible: The Final Reckoning. We talk with director Daniel Robbins of Bad Shabbos and also with creators Hagar Ben-Asher and Ron Leshem of Bad Boy. The post Geek Hard: Episode 780 – From Bad to Impossible appeared first on Geek Hard.

On today's show, Don dives into reports with the likes of Robbie Campo on the importance of staying safe on the water and a Sea Tow membership as well as how the fishing has been as it has been "spectacular", Daryl Carpenter sounds off on the proper way to use Croakers as bait for larger catches. Later on, we got an extra special edition of Bad Boys, Mike Gallo goes over how changes in temperature are starting to affect where and how we fish, Brendan Bayard tells us about his plans to head north for a bit, another Bad Boy case later on involving on dedicated effort to get some crawfish, Ryan Lambert is doing the opposite of Brendan as he looks towards Argentina, and so much more!

We discuss the work of Jacques Rivette, one of the core French New Wave Directors, and his films PARIS BELONGS TO US, CELINE AND JULIE GO BOATING, LA BELLE NOISEUSE, and VA SAVOIR. Send us stuff like zines, movie related books, physical media or memorabilia c/o Justin Decloux, Unit 1010, 3230 Yonge St, Toronto, ON, M4N 3P6, Canada Join the Patreon now for an exclusive episode every week, access to our entire Patreon Episode back catalogue, your name read out on the next episode, and the friendly Discord chat: patreon.com/theimportantcinemaclub Subscribe, Review and Rate Us on Apple Podcasts: podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-…ub/id1067435576 Follow the Podcast: twitter.com/ImprtCinemaClub Follow Will: twitter.com/WillSloanESQ Follow Justin: twitter.com/DeclouxJ Check out Justin's other podcasts, THE BAY STREET VIDEO PODCAST (@thebaystreetvideopodcast), THE VERY FINE COMIC BOOK PODCAST (www.theveryfinecomicbookpodcast.com) and NO SUCH THING AS A BAD MOVIE (@nosuchthingasabadmovie), as Will's MICHAEL AND US (@michael-and-us).

Send us a textThree friends navigating the murky waters of modern masculinity through unfiltered conversations—that's the essence of this Village Vets episode. The chemistry between these longtime companions creates a rare safe space where vulnerability and strength coexist without contradiction.When Dean reveals he's becoming a father, the conversation shifts from playful banter to a soul-baring examination of what it means to step into parenthood. "I got scared really fast," he admits, wondering if he has what it takes to guide another human being through life. His friends respond with equal parts tough love and genuine support, sharing their own parenting journeys while acknowledging there's no perfect roadmap.The trio doesn't shy away from controversy, tackling the Diddy trial with nuanced perspectives on accountability and victimhood. "Some people make decisions to be victims," one host argues, while another pushes back, highlighting how trauma complicates our choices. This tension—presenting multiple angles without settling for easy answers—becomes the podcast's signature strength.Their discussion of the Angel Reese and Caitlin Clark "rivalry" reveals how media narratives shape our perceptions of athletes, especially when race enters the conversation. The friends disagree passionately but respectfully, demonstrating how difficult conversations can happen without burning bridges.Underlying every topic is an exploration of what it means to be a man in 2024—balancing traditional expectations with evolving understandings of masculinity. These aren't idealized role models offering perfect solutions; they're real men working through complex issues in real-time, inviting listeners to join their village of veterans navigating life's challenges together.Ready to experience raw, unfiltered conversation that doesn't shy away from difficult truths? Join the Village Vets and become part of a community where authenticity trumps perfection every time.Support the show

In this English lesson, we explore a surprising news story about Mr. Beast making the Mexican government me. Learn 30 or more key vocabulary words and expressions while diving into this puzzling story. Perfect for English learners who want to build their vocabulary using real news stories!

Before the name Angry Anderson was etched into the annals of Australian rock music history, before the explosive energy of Rose Tattoo dominated stages, and before the emotional hit single “Suddenly” melted hearts across the world, there was just a working-class kid from Melbourne with a lot of grit and one hell of a voice.Born Gary Stephen Anderson in 1947, in Melbourne, Angry's early years were shaped by a rough-and-tumble environment that would later fuel his gritty, growling vocal style and hard-edged lyrics. Growing up in a tough household and navigating the chaos of suburban Australia during the 50s and 60s, Angry developed a rebellious spirit early on. He wasn't just angry in name—it was an energy, a rawness, a defiance that became his brand.Angry's first brush with the music world came in the late 60s when he joined the psychedelic band Peace Power and Purity, but it wasn't long before he migrated toward something heavier, something louder, something that matched the fury he carried inside. He soon found himself fronting the Buster Brown band—a raw, blues-rock outfit that blended searing guitar riffs with Angry's sandpaper vocals.Buster Brown became known in the Australian pub rock circuit, with Anderson's stage presence quickly earning him a reputation as a firecracker performer who gave everything on stage.In 76, Angry joined a new band called Rose Tattoo. It was ferocious and unapologetically Aussie. Rose Tattoo wasn't just a rock band. They were a statement. With their bald heads, tattooed bodies, and denim-stained bravado, they embodied working-class rebellion, pub rock pride, and that dangerous edge of Aussie outlaw culture. Their debut self-titled album in 78, featuring hits like “Bad Boy for Love” and “Rock 'n' Roll Outlaw,” exploded onto the Australian charts and gained attention in Europe.Rose Tattoo were frequent support acts for AC/DC, and they earned massive respect from international bands like Guns N' Roses, who cited them as a major influence.But just when everyone thought they had Angry figured out—tattooed tough guy, snarling rock dog—he flipped the script. In 87, Angry released “Suddenly”, an emotional power ballad that no one saw coming. The song became a global phenomenon when it was used in Kylie Minogue and Jason Donovan's wedding episode on the soap Neighbours, watched by millions.As the 90s rolled around, Angry became more than just a rock singer. He emerged as a tv personality. His charisma, honesty, and at times fiery opinions made him a household name in Australian media.In 92, he showed off his acting chops in the post-apocalyptic classic Mad Max: Beyond Thunderdome, starring alongside Mel Gibson and Tina Turner.But Angry also channeled his influence into causes he cared about. He became a passionate youth advocate, speaking out against domestic violence and drug abuse, drawing on his own difficult upbringing to connect with vulnerable communities. He even flirted with politics—running as a Senate candidate in later years.Despite countless lineup changes, personal tragedies—including the loss of many original Rose Tattoo members to cancer—and the ever-changing music landscape, Angry has kept the Rose Tattoo flame burning. He's the longest-tenured member and has fronted the band through decades of Australian and international tours.In recent years, Rose Tattoo have toured extensively across Australia and Europe, proving the band's enduring legacy. Angry, now in his 70s, continues to perform with the same raw energy that made him a legend in the first place.Angry Anderson isn't just an Australian rock icon—he's a survivor, a storyteller, and a symbol of the grit and soul that defines Australian hard rock.Discover all that makes Angry Anderson tick in this compelling episode. Reach out to me with comments or requests for future guests: https//:www.abreathoffreshair.com.au

Julie Grant's top story covers Dawn Richard's testimony regarding what she views as threats from music mogul Sean 'Diddy' Combs. Plus, John O'Keefe's head injuries are analyzed on this episode of the Opening Statements Podcast.#CourtTV - What do YOU think?Catch up on the case against #KarenRead here: https://www.courttv.com/tag/karen-read/Watch 24/7 Court TV LIVE Stream Today https://www.courttv.com/Join the Investigation Newsletter https://www.courttv.com/email/Court TV Podcast https://www.courttv.com/podcast/Join the Court TV Community to get access to perks:https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCo5E9pEhK_9kWG7-5HHcyRg/joinFOLLOW THE CASE:Facebook https://www.facebook.com/courttvTwitter/X https://twitter.com/CourtTVInstagram https://www.instagram.com/courttvnetwork/TikTok https://www.tiktok.com/@courttvliveYouTube https://www.youtube.com/c/COURTTVWATCH +140 FREE TRIALS IN THE COURT TV ARCHIVEhttps://www.courttv.com/trials/HOW TO FIND COURT TVhttps://www.courttv.com/where-to-watch/This episode of the Opening Statements Podcast is hosted by Julie Grant, produced by Eric Goldson, and edited by Autumn Sewell.

The first week of Sean "Diddy" Combs' federal sex trafficking and racketeering trial in New York featured emotionally charged testimony from his former partner, singer Cassie Ventura. Over four days, Ventura detailed an 11-year relationship marked by coercion, physical abuse, and manipulation. She described being forced into drug-fueled "freak-offs"—group sex encounters with paid escorts—often filmed and allegedly used by Combs for blackmail. A 2016 hotel surveillance video showing Combs assaulting Ventura was presented as evidence. Ventura also recounted an incident where Combs allegedly threatened to suspend someone over a balcony, illustrating a pattern of intimidation and control.The defense acknowledged Combs' history of violence and substance abuse but argued that these actions did not constitute sex trafficking. They portrayed the events as part of a consensual lifestyle, aiming to separate personal misconduct from criminal enterprise. Additional testimony from singer Dawn Richard supported Ventura's claims, recalling a 2009 incident where Combs allegedly assaulted Ventura over a domestic dispute. The prosecution contends that Combs operated a criminal network involving staff who facilitated the alleged abuses. The trial, expected to last several more weeks, continues to draw significant public attention.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

In April 2014, Sean "Diddy" Combs hosted a lavish birthday party for rapper Meek Mill at a rented mansion in Las Vegas, reportedly costing $25,000. The event attracted over 900 guests, surpassing the anticipated 850, and featured notable attendees such as Lil Durk and French Montana. The party included unconventional elements, like guests consuming sushi from a naked woman's body, contributing to its notoriety.Following the festivities, the property manager, Jason Haight, described the aftermath as "disgusting." He reported finding broken bottles, used condoms, blood-stained sheets, cocaine, and razors scattered throughout the mansion. Additionally, items like bras, panties, and iPhones were discovered in the bushes. These revelations have resurfaced amid Diddy's recent legal troubles, including charges of racketeering conspiracy and sex trafficking, for which he is currently awaiting trial.(commercial at 10:27)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:New Diddy party footage shows debauchery at a birthday bash he threw for Meek Mill at $7.5M Las Vegas mansion | Daily Mail Online

​Kristina Khorram, who served as Sean "Diddy" Combs' chief of staff, has been implicated in multiple lawsuits alleging her involvement in Combs' purported criminal activities, including sex trafficking and abuse. In these lawsuits, Khorram is accused of facilitating the procurement of sex workers for Combs and managing operations related to alleged illicit activities. One lawsuit notably compared her role to that of Ghislaine Maxwell in Jeffrey Epstein's criminal network, suggesting she played a pivotal part in the alleged misconduct.In response to these allegations, Khorram has categorically denied any involvement in or condonation of such activities. In a statement to Rolling Stone, she expressed profound distress over the accusations, stating: "I have never condoned or aided and abetted the sexual assault of anyone. Nor have I ever drugged anyone." She further emphasized that the notion of her being implicated in such acts is "beyond upsetting, disturbing, and unthinkable," and expressed confidence that the allegations against her would be proven untrue.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Diddy's chief of staff calls accusations against her "disturbing and unthinkable"

​Kristina Khorram, who served as Sean "Diddy" Combs' chief of staff, has been implicated in multiple lawsuits alleging her involvement in Combs' purported criminal activities, including sex trafficking and abuse. In these lawsuits, Khorram is accused of facilitating the procurement of sex workers for Combs and managing operations related to alleged illicit activities. One lawsuit notably compared her role to that of Ghislaine Maxwell in Jeffrey Epstein's criminal network, suggesting she played a pivotal part in the alleged misconduct.In response to these allegations, Khorram has categorically denied any involvement in or condonation of such activities. In a statement to Rolling Stone, she expressed profound distress over the accusations, stating: "I have never condoned or aided and abetted the sexual assault of anyone. Nor have I ever drugged anyone." She further emphasized that the notion of her being implicated in such acts is "beyond upsetting, disturbing, and unthinkable," and expressed confidence that the allegations against her would be proven untrue.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Diddy's chief of staff calls accusations against her "disturbing and unthinkable"

Brendan Paul, a close assistant to Sean "Diddy" Combs, was arrested in March 2024 at Miami-Opa Locka Executive Airport during a federal raid. Authorities found cocaine and marijuana-laced candy in his travel bags. This arrest coincided with searches of Diddy's properties in Miami and Los Angeles as part of a larger federal investigation involving Diddy. Brendan Paul was charged with felony drug possession, and his case was seen as potentially impacting Diddy's ongoing legal troubles, which include allegations related to sex trafficking and illegal firearms.Paul, a former Syracuse University basketball player, was referred to as Diddy's "drug mule" in a separate civil lawsuit, where he was accused of acquiring and distributing drugs and guns for Diddy. Despite the serious charges, Paul avoided jail time by accepting a plea deal, entering a drug diversion program that will result in the charges being dismissed upon completion.(commercial at 10:34)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:

The first week of Sean "Diddy" Combs' federal sex trafficking and racketeering trial in New York featured emotionally charged testimony from his former partner, singer Cassie Ventura. Over four days, Ventura detailed an 11-year relationship marked by coercion, physical abuse, and manipulation. She described being forced into drug-fueled "freak-offs"—group sex encounters with paid escorts—often filmed and allegedly used by Combs for blackmail. A 2016 hotel surveillance video showing Combs assaulting Ventura was presented as evidence. Ventura also recounted an incident where Combs allegedly threatened to suspend someone over a balcony, illustrating a pattern of intimidation and control.The defense acknowledged Combs' history of violence and substance abuse but argued that these actions did not constitute sex trafficking. They portrayed the events as part of a consensual lifestyle, aiming to separate personal misconduct from criminal enterprise. Additional testimony from singer Dawn Richard supported Ventura's claims, recalling a 2009 incident where Combs allegedly assaulted Ventura over a domestic dispute. The prosecution contends that Combs operated a criminal network involving staff who facilitated the alleged abuses. The trial, expected to last several more weeks, continues to draw significant public attention.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

The first week of Sean "Diddy" Combs' federal sex trafficking and racketeering trial in New York featured emotionally charged testimony from his former partner, singer Cassie Ventura. Over four days, Ventura detailed an 11-year relationship marked by coercion, physical abuse, and manipulation. She described being forced into drug-fueled "freak-offs"—group sex encounters with paid escorts—often filmed and allegedly used by Combs for blackmail. A 2016 hotel surveillance video showing Combs assaulting Ventura was presented as evidence. Ventura also recounted an incident where Combs allegedly threatened to suspend someone over a balcony, illustrating a pattern of intimidation and control.The defense acknowledged Combs' history of violence and substance abuse but argued that these actions did not constitute sex trafficking. They portrayed the events as part of a consensual lifestyle, aiming to separate personal misconduct from criminal enterprise. Additional testimony from singer Dawn Richard supported Ventura's claims, recalling a 2009 incident where Combs allegedly assaulted Ventura over a domestic dispute. The prosecution contends that Combs operated a criminal network involving staff who facilitated the alleged abuses. The trial, expected to last several more weeks, continues to draw significant public attention.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

ONE WEEK DOWN IN THE DIDDY TRIAL AND WE HAVE MORE QUESTIONS THAN ANSWERS. TODAY WE WILL BREAKDOWN ALL THE NASTY ALLEGATIONS. TRUMP WELCOMES WHITE SOUTH AFRICANS INTO THE US, BUT WHAT IS HIS MOTIVE? ARE JASMINE CROCKETT'S CONTROVERSIAL COMMENTS BAD FOR THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY? ALL THIS AND MORE ON CULTURE NO CAP!

In the United States, federal investigators may use testimony from accusers in civil matters to pursue criminal charges if a crime has been committed. Here's how this process generally works:Separation of Civil and Criminal Proceedings: Civil and criminal matters are typically handled separately in the legal system. Civil cases involve disputes between individuals or entities seeking monetary damages or specific performance, while criminal cases involve the prosecution of individuals by the government for violating laws.Accuser Testimony in Civil Cases: In civil cases, individuals (the accusers) may testify under oath about their experiences, allegations, or claims against the defendant. This testimony is presented before a judge or jury, and the standard of proof is typically lower than in criminal cases. In civil cases, the standard of proof is usually based on a preponderance of the evidence, meaning the evidence supports the accuser's claims more than it supports the defendant's position.Federal Investigation: If the accuser's testimony in a civil case suggests that a crime may have been committed, federal investigators, such as those from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) or other relevant agencies, may launch a criminal investigation. They will gather additional evidence, interview witnesses, and assess the credibility of the accuser's testimony in the context of potential criminal charges.Criminal Charges: If the investigation uncovers sufficient evidence to support criminal charges, prosecutors may bring charges against the accused individual or entity. The decision to pursue criminal charges is typically based on the sufficiency of evidence, the applicable laws, and prosecutorial discretion.Use of Accuser Testimony: Accuser testimony from the civil case may be used as evidence in the criminal trial, subject to rules of evidence and the defendant's rights to confront witnesses. The credibility of the accuser and the reliability of their testimony will likely be scrutinized during the criminal proceedings.Criminal Trial: The defendant in the criminal case will have the opportunity to present a defense, including challenging the accuser's testimony, presenting alibi evidence, or disputing the prosecution's evidence. The prosecution must prove the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, which is a higher standard of proof than in civil cases.Potential Outcomes: If the defendant is found guilty in the criminal trial, they may face penalties such as imprisonment, fines, probation, or other consequences depending on the nature of the crime and applicable laws. If found not guilty, they will be acquitted of the charges.So, what, if any sort of information are the accusers providing to the Feds?   Let's dive in and see if we can find some clarity in all of this muck.(commercial at 9:26)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Sean 'Diddy' Combs' ex Cassie likely 'important' witness in Homeland Security trafficking probe: expert | Fox News

​In the case of Burrowes v. Smalls et al., filed in the Southern District of New York under Index No. 25-1618, plaintiff Kirk Burrowes brings a civil action against defendants including Janice Smalls (also known as Janice Combs), James Doe 1, Lawyer Doe 1, ABC Company 1, John and Jane Does 1-10, and ABC Corporations 1-10. The complaint alleges that the defendants engaged in actions that caused harm to the plaintiff, leading to the pursuit of legal remedies.​Kirk Burrowes, co-founder and former president of Bad Boy Entertainment, has filed a lawsuit against Janice Combs (also known as Janice Smalls), alleging her involvement in a scheme to unlawfully seize his 25% stake in the company. The complaint asserts that in 1996, Sean "Diddy" Combs, accompanied by the company's attorney, Kenneth Meiselas, confronted Burrowes with a baseball bat, coercing him into signing over his ownership stake to Janice Combs. Burrowes claims that this act was part of a broader plan orchestrated by Janice Combs to gain full control of Bad Boy Entertainment, employing tactics of intimidation, violence, and financial deception. He further alleges that following this incident, he was blacklisted from the music industry, resulting in financial ruin and homelessness. Burrowes is seeking damages for financial losses, reinstatement of his ownership interest, and a forensic audit of the company's financial records since its inception.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:burrowes-v-janice-combs-1-25-cv-01618-feb-2025.pdf

​In the case of Burrowes v. Smalls et al., filed in the Southern District of New York under Index No. 25-1618, plaintiff Kirk Burrowes brings a civil action against defendants including Janice Smalls (also known as Janice Combs), James Doe 1, Lawyer Doe 1, ABC Company 1, John and Jane Does 1-10, and ABC Corporations 1-10. The complaint alleges that the defendants engaged in actions that caused harm to the plaintiff, leading to the pursuit of legal remedies.​Kirk Burrowes, co-founder and former president of Bad Boy Entertainment, has filed a lawsuit against Janice Combs (also known as Janice Smalls), alleging her involvement in a scheme to unlawfully seize his 25% stake in the company. The complaint asserts that in 1996, Sean "Diddy" Combs, accompanied by the company's attorney, Kenneth Meiselas, confronted Burrowes with a baseball bat, coercing him into signing over his ownership stake to Janice Combs. Burrowes claims that this act was part of a broader plan orchestrated by Janice Combs to gain full control of Bad Boy Entertainment, employing tactics of intimidation, violence, and financial deception. He further alleges that following this incident, he was blacklisted from the music industry, resulting in financial ruin and homelessness. Burrowes is seeking damages for financial losses, reinstatement of his ownership interest, and a forensic audit of the company's financial records since its inception.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:burrowes-v-janice-combs-1-25-cv-01618-feb-2025.pdf

​In the case of Burrowes v. Smalls et al., filed in the Southern District of New York under Index No. 25-1618, plaintiff Kirk Burrowes brings a civil action against defendants including Janice Smalls (also known as Janice Combs), James Doe 1, Lawyer Doe 1, ABC Company 1, John and Jane Does 1-10, and ABC Corporations 1-10. The complaint alleges that the defendants engaged in actions that caused harm to the plaintiff, leading to the pursuit of legal remedies.​Kirk Burrowes, co-founder and former president of Bad Boy Entertainment, has filed a lawsuit against Janice Combs (also known as Janice Smalls), alleging her involvement in a scheme to unlawfully seize his 25% stake in the company. The complaint asserts that in 1996, Sean "Diddy" Combs, accompanied by the company's attorney, Kenneth Meiselas, confronted Burrowes with a baseball bat, coercing him into signing over his ownership stake to Janice Combs. Burrowes claims that this act was part of a broader plan orchestrated by Janice Combs to gain full control of Bad Boy Entertainment, employing tactics of intimidation, violence, and financial deception. He further alleges that following this incident, he was blacklisted from the music industry, resulting in financial ruin and homelessness. Burrowes is seeking damages for financial losses, reinstatement of his ownership interest, and a forensic audit of the company's financial records since its inception.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:burrowes-v-janice-combs-1-25-cv-01618-feb-2025.pdf

In United States v. Sean Combs, case number 24 Cr. 542 (ALC), Combs—also known as Puff Daddy, P. Diddy, Diddy, PD, and Love—is facing a series of federal charges, including sex trafficking, racketeering, and conspiracy. The indictment alleges that Combs orchestrated a criminal enterprise that spanned several decades, using his music and entertainment businesses as fronts to facilitate illicit activities. The charges claim he engaged in sex trafficking schemes involving coercion, threats, and abuse of power to exploit victims for sexual purposes.Combs has filed a bond appeal following the denial of his release by a lower court. His defense argues that he poses no flight risk and maintains his innocence, emphasizing that he intends to clear his name in court. The appeal also points to alleged procedural issues in the original detention ruling, citing concerns about media influence on the judicial process and the need for a fair trial. The prosecution, however, asserts that Combs' vast resources, alleged witness tampering, and international connections make him a significant flight risk. The outcome of the bond appeal remains pending.(commercial at 7:30)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.ca2.234342fd-2384-426f-a4a4-aeca250ee12d.5.2.pdf

​In the case of Burrowes v. Smalls et al., filed in the Southern District of New York under Index No. 25-1618, plaintiff Kirk Burrowes brings a civil action against defendants including Janice Smalls (also known as Janice Combs), James Doe 1, Lawyer Doe 1, ABC Company 1, John and Jane Does 1-10, and ABC Corporations 1-10. The complaint alleges that the defendants engaged in actions that caused harm to the plaintiff, leading to the pursuit of legal remedies.​Kirk Burrowes, co-founder and former president of Bad Boy Entertainment, has filed a lawsuit against Janice Combs (also known as Janice Smalls), alleging her involvement in a scheme to unlawfully seize his 25% stake in the company. The complaint asserts that in 1996, Sean "Diddy" Combs, accompanied by the company's attorney, Kenneth Meiselas, confronted Burrowes with a baseball bat, coercing him into signing over his ownership stake to Janice Combs. Burrowes claims that this act was part of a broader plan orchestrated by Janice Combs to gain full control of Bad Boy Entertainment, employing tactics of intimidation, violence, and financial deception. He further alleges that following this incident, he was blacklisted from the music industry, resulting in financial ruin and homelessness. Burrowes is seeking damages for financial losses, reinstatement of his ownership interest, and a forensic audit of the company's financial records since its inception.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:burrowes-v-janice-combs-1-25-cv-01618-feb-2025.pdf

​In the case of Burrowes v. Smalls et al., filed in the Southern District of New York under Index No. 25-1618, plaintiff Kirk Burrowes brings a civil action against defendants including Janice Smalls (also known as Janice Combs), James Doe 1, Lawyer Doe 1, ABC Company 1, John and Jane Does 1-10, and ABC Corporations 1-10. The complaint alleges that the defendants engaged in actions that caused harm to the plaintiff, leading to the pursuit of legal remedies.​Kirk Burrowes, co-founder and former president of Bad Boy Entertainment, has filed a lawsuit against Janice Combs (also known as Janice Smalls), alleging her involvement in a scheme to unlawfully seize his 25% stake in the company. The complaint asserts that in 1996, Sean "Diddy" Combs, accompanied by the company's attorney, Kenneth Meiselas, confronted Burrowes with a baseball bat, coercing him into signing over his ownership stake to Janice Combs. Burrowes claims that this act was part of a broader plan orchestrated by Janice Combs to gain full control of Bad Boy Entertainment, employing tactics of intimidation, violence, and financial deception. He further alleges that following this incident, he was blacklisted from the music industry, resulting in financial ruin and homelessness. Burrowes is seeking damages for financial losses, reinstatement of his ownership interest, and a forensic audit of the company's financial records since its inception.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:burrowes-v-janice-combs-1-25-cv-01618-feb-2025.pdf

​In the case of Burrowes v. Smalls et al., filed in the Southern District of New York under Index No. 25-1618, plaintiff Kirk Burrowes brings a civil action against defendants including Janice Smalls (also known as Janice Combs), James Doe 1, Lawyer Doe 1, ABC Company 1, John and Jane Does 1-10, and ABC Corporations 1-10. The complaint alleges that the defendants engaged in actions that caused harm to the plaintiff, leading to the pursuit of legal remedies.​Kirk Burrowes, co-founder and former president of Bad Boy Entertainment, has filed a lawsuit against Janice Combs (also known as Janice Smalls), alleging her involvement in a scheme to unlawfully seize his 25% stake in the company. The complaint asserts that in 1996, Sean "Diddy" Combs, accompanied by the company's attorney, Kenneth Meiselas, confronted Burrowes with a baseball bat, coercing him into signing over his ownership stake to Janice Combs. Burrowes claims that this act was part of a broader plan orchestrated by Janice Combs to gain full control of Bad Boy Entertainment, employing tactics of intimidation, violence, and financial deception. He further alleges that following this incident, he was blacklisted from the music industry, resulting in financial ruin and homelessness. Burrowes is seeking damages for financial losses, reinstatement of his ownership interest, and a forensic audit of the company's financial records since its inception.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:burrowes-v-janice-combs-1-25-cv-01618-feb-2025.pdf

A Michigan woman, identified as Jane Doe, has filed a lawsuit against Sean "Diddy" Combs and Harve Pierre, alleging sexual assault and exploitation. She claims that in 2015, during a visit to New York City, Combs and Pierre coerced her into non-consensual sexual activities under the pretense of discussing a potential music career. The alleged incident occurred after a party at Combs' residence, where the plaintiff asserts she was manipulated and intimidated into compliance.The lawsuit further alleges that Combs and Pierre leveraged their positions of power within the music industry to silence Jane Doe, threatening to blacklist her if she disclosed the assault. This, she claims, led to significant emotional and psychological distress, as well as detrimental impacts on her professional aspirations. The legal action seeks damages for the alleged assault, emotional suffering, and career harm. Both Combs and Pierre have denied these allegations, describing them as baseless attempts to damage their reputations.(commercial at 8:28)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Doe v. Combs, 1:23-cv-10628 – CourtListener.com

Sean "Diddy" Combs has collaborated with many influential figures in the music industry over the years. Here's an update on some of his closest music industry associates:L.A. Reid: The music executive and co-founder of LaFace Records has been accused of sexual assault by former music executive Drew Dixon. Despite denying the allegations, Reid's motion to dismiss the lawsuit was denied in 2024, allowing the case to move forward.Russell Simmons: The Def Jam co-founder has faced multiple allegations of sexual misconduct, including a lawsuit filed in late 2022. Simmons has denied these claims and has been living in Bali, Indonesia, amid ongoing legal battles.Suge Knight: Co-founder of Death Row Records, Knight has been imprisoned since 2018 after a fatal hit-and-run. While serving his sentence, he continues to speak out about the music industry, often criticizing other executives and artists.Jay-Z: A prominent figure in the music and business worlds, Jay-Z has faced criticism for remaining silent about Combs' legal troubles. He has not commented publicly on the allegations.In this episode, we take a look at what some of the other moguls in the music indsutry who acted as mentors to Diddy are up to these days and how they are all facing their own legal issues.(commercial at 12:52)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Powerful pals – where is Sean 'Diddy' Combs' music industry inner circle now? | Fox NewsAccording to a lawsuit, Combs allegedly sexually assaulted a Los Angeles businessman during a Cîroc Vodka party in 2022. The businessman claimed that Combs made inappropriate advances and assaulted him during the event. An athlete, who was present at the party, reportedly intervened during the alleged assault.This allegation is part of a series of accusations against Combs, with multiple individuals coming forward with claims of sexual assault and misconduct. Combs has denied these allegations, and his legal team has stated that he intends to defend himself against these claims..Let's dive in!to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:'Well known' athlete intervened as Diddy groped young man at Ciroc vodka party, lawsuit claims | Daily Mail Online

Sean "Diddy" Combs has filed a $100 million defamation lawsuit against NBCUniversal, Peacock, and production company Ample Entertainment, alleging that their documentary, "Diddy: The Making of a Bad Boy," contains false and defamatory statements. The lawsuit claims that the documentary portrays Combs as a "monster" and the "embodiment of Lucifer," falsely accusing him of heinous crimes such as serial murder, rape of minors, and sex trafficking. Specific allegations include insinuations of Combs' involvement in the deaths of his ex-partner Kim Porter and rapper The Notorious B.I.G., as well as unfounded claims of sexual misconduct with minors. Combs' legal team argues that these baseless assertions have caused severe reputational and economic harm, and that the defendants prioritized sensationalism over journalistic integrity.The lawsuit emphasizes that the documentary advances unfounded conspiracy theories, relying on speculative interviews and discredited sources. Combs' attorneys assert that the defendants were aware of the falsehoods yet proceeded with broadcasting the documentary, thereby exploiting public interest for profit. They contend that this reckless dissemination of unverified information not only damages Combs' reputation but also jeopardizes his right to a fair trial, as he is currently awaiting trial on unrelated federal charges. Through this legal action, Combs seeks to hold the defendants accountable for the substantial harm caused by their actions.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:sean-combs-nbcu-complaint.pdf

In a letter to Judge Subramanian, the Government formally requested that the court limit the defense's cross-examination of Cassie Ventura to ensure it concludes by the end of the trial day on May 16, 2025. Prosecutors argued that the court has broad discretion to manage trial proceedings efficiently and that the defense has already had ample time to prepare and conduct its questioning. They noted that the cross-examination has been granted nearly two full trial days—already exceeding the duration of Ventura's direct examination—making further extension unnecessary and potentially disruptive to the trial schedule.The Government also stated that it had consulted with the defense before submitting the request. While defense counsel reportedly expressed a desire to finish by the end of the trial day, they could not guarantee they would do so. In light of this, the Government urged the court to formally impose a hard cutoff at 4:30 p.m. to prevent undue delays and ensure a balanced and orderly progression of the trial.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.337.0.pdf

In her opening testimony at Sean Combs's federal trial, Casandra “Cassie” Ventura delivered a harrowing account of her years-long relationship with the music mogul, describing a pattern of psychological control, degradation, and forced sexual encounters. Cassie testified that Combs regularly orchestrated drug-fueled sex sessions involving male prostitutes, during which she was instructed to participate while he watched. These sessions, often involving excessive alcohol and drugs, left her feeling “disgusting,” “ashamed,” and “humiliated.” Her testimony painted a picture of a coercive dynamic where Combs maintained power over her through manipulation, surveillance, and fear.Cassie's testimony also introduced key elements of the government's sex trafficking case: interstate travel under Combs's orders, the use of intimidation and drugs to compel participation, and a consistent effort by Combs to isolate and dominate her. She detailed how she was told what to wear, how to behave, and was repeatedly forced into situations she found degrading. These initial statements from Cassie not only humanized the allegations but laid the emotional groundwork for the prosecution's case by portraying Combs not just as a controlling partner, but as a calculated figure who used his wealth and fame to conceal a deeply abusive private life.to contact  me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Takeaways From Cassie's Opening Testimony in Sean ‘Diddy' Combs Trial - The New York Times

​In the case of Burrowes v. Smalls et al., filed in the Southern District of New York under Index No. 25-1618, plaintiff Kirk Burrowes brings a civil action against defendants including Janice Smalls (also known as Janice Combs), James Doe 1, Lawyer Doe 1, ABC Company 1, John and Jane Does 1-10, and ABC Corporations 1-10. The complaint alleges that the defendants engaged in actions that caused harm to the plaintiff, leading to the pursuit of legal remedies.​Kirk Burrowes, co-founder and former president of Bad Boy Entertainment, has filed a lawsuit against Janice Combs (also known as Janice Smalls), alleging her involvement in a scheme to unlawfully seize his 25% stake in the company. The complaint asserts that in 1996, Sean "Diddy" Combs, accompanied by the company's attorney, Kenneth Meiselas, confronted Burrowes with a baseball bat, coercing him into signing over his ownership stake to Janice Combs. Burrowes claims that this act was part of a broader plan orchestrated by Janice Combs to gain full control of Bad Boy Entertainment, employing tactics of intimidation, violence, and financial deception. He further alleges that following this incident, he was blacklisted from the music industry, resulting in financial ruin and homelessness. Burrowes is seeking damages for financial losses, reinstatement of his ownership interest, and a forensic audit of the company's financial records since its inception.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:burrowes-v-janice-combs-1-25-cv-01618-feb-2025.pdf

In United States v. Sean Combs, case number 24 Cr. 542 (ALC), Combs—also known as Puff Daddy, P. Diddy, Diddy, PD, and Love—is facing a series of federal charges, including sex trafficking, racketeering, and conspiracy. The indictment alleges that Combs orchestrated a criminal enterprise that spanned several decades, using his music and entertainment businesses as fronts to facilitate illicit activities. The charges claim he engaged in sex trafficking schemes involving coercion, threats, and abuse of power to exploit victims for sexual purposes.Combs has filed a bond appeal following the denial of his release by a lower court. His defense argues that he poses no flight risk and maintains his innocence, emphasizing that he intends to clear his name in court. The appeal also points to alleged procedural issues in the original detention ruling, citing concerns about media influence on the judicial process and the need for a fair trial. The prosecution, however, asserts that Combs' vast resources, alleged witness tampering, and international connections make him a significant flight risk. The outcome of the bond appeal remains pending.(commercial at 7:30)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.ca2.234342fd-2384-426f-a4a4-aeca250ee12d.5.2.pdf

​Sean "Diddy" Combs' legal team has alleged that CNN altered and destroyed the original surveillance footage depicting Combs assaulting his then-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura, in a 2016 incident. According to a letter filed in Manhattan federal court, Combs' attorneys claim that a forensic video analysis revealed significant alterations, including the removal of timestamps, sequence changes, and speed adjustments, which they argue misrepresent the events. They assert that CNN purchased the sole known copy of the footage from the hotel, edited it using free software, and subsequently destroyed the original, despite being aware of an ongoing federal investigation.CNN has refuted these allegations, stating that they neither modified the video nor destroyed the original footage, which was retained by their source. Cassie Ventura's attorney, Douglas Wigdor, dismissed the claims as disingenuous attempts to exclude the video from evidence, expressing confidence that the footage accurately depicts the incident and will be admitted in court. This dispute arises as Combs faces charges of racketeering conspiracy and sex trafficking, with his trial scheduled to commence on May 5, 2025.Sean "Diddy" Combs' legal team is currently engaged in a battle to prevent the use of a video showing him assaulting his ex-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura, from being used as evidence in his upcoming trial. The video, reportedly from a 2016 incident at a hotel, surfaced publicly through CNN in May 2024. Diddy's lawyers argue that the government, specifically the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), unlawfully leaked the footage to tarnish his reputation and compromise his right to a fair trial.In their legal filings, Diddy's team claims that the release of the video was strategically aimed at influencing public opinion and tainting the potential jury pool. They have requested an evidentiary hearing to investigate the alleged government misconduct, along with access to related documents and communications. Additionally, they are pushing for a gag order to prevent further leaks from government personnel and seeking to suppress the video from being admitted in court as evidence.The legal strategy centers on the argument that the video's publication has led to damaging pre-trial publicity, which they claim jeopardizes Diddy's ability to receive an impartial trial. Meanwhile, Diddy faces serious charges, including racketeering and sex trafficking, and remains in custody awaiting his trial, scheduled for May 2025.This legal move reflects the high stakes for both Diddy and his legal team, as the video serves as a critical piece of evidence in the broader criminal case against him, alongside multiple civil lawsuits alleging abuse and misconduct.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:CNN Diddy video beating Cassie altered, lawyers claim; network defends

In a recent ruling, U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian determined that the graphic video evidence tied to Cassie Ventura's allegations against Sean "Diddy" Combs—including footage allegedly depicting non-consensual sexual encounters and surveillance material collected during the investigation—will not be made available to the public or press. The judge cited the intensely private nature of the content, the potential for irreparable harm to the individuals depicted, and the risk of tainting the jury pool in an already high-profile case. He acknowledged the First Amendment interest in transparency but ruled that the need to protect the dignity, safety, and privacy of the victims—particularly in cases involving alleged sex trafficking and abuse—outweighed public access at this stage of the proceedings.Judge Subramanian emphasized that his decision does not shield Combs from scrutiny, nor does it prevent the jury from reviewing the footage in closed session as evidence. He clarified that the material in question was obtained legally and would still play a critical role in the government's case, including establishing patterns of behavior consistent with the charges. However, he also warned that public dissemination of the videos could lead to exploitation, online harassment of victims and witnesses, and broader harm to the judicial process. His ruling underscores the court's attempt to strike a balance between transparency and the need to preserve the integrity of a trial centered around deeply personal and graphic allegations.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Diddy judge rules on whether freak-off videos will be made public as rapper pleads for his privacy | Daily Mail Online

In United States v. Sean Combs, case number 24 Cr. 542 (ALC), Combs—also known as Puff Daddy, P. Diddy, Diddy, PD, and Love—is facing a series of federal charges, including sex trafficking, racketeering, and conspiracy. The indictment alleges that Combs orchestrated a criminal enterprise that spanned several decades, using his music and entertainment businesses as fronts to facilitate illicit activities. The charges claim he engaged in sex trafficking schemes involving coercion, threats, and abuse of power to exploit victims for sexual purposes.Combs has filed a bond appeal following the denial of his release by a lower court. His defense argues that he poses no flight risk and maintains his innocence, emphasizing that he intends to clear his name in court. The appeal also points to alleged procedural issues in the original detention ruling, citing concerns about media influence on the judicial process and the need for a fair trial. The prosecution, however, asserts that Combs' vast resources, alleged witness tampering, and international connections make him a significant flight risk. The outcome of the bond appeal remains pending.(commercial at 7:30)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.ca2.234342fd-2384-426f-a4a4-aeca250ee12d.5.2.pdf

Sean "Diddy" Combs' legal team faces a delicate and dangerous balancing act as they prepare to cross-examine the accusers in his federal sex trafficking trial. On one hand, the defense must challenge the credibility of the witnesses to weaken the prosecution's case—scrutinizing timelines, motivations, and inconsistencies without appearing dismissive of traumatic testimony. On the other hand, these are accusers alleging severe abuse, coercion, and exploitation. If the defense appears too aggressive or tone-deaf during questioning—particularly toward witnesses like Cassie Ventura, whose testimony has been emotional, graphic, and widely publicized—they risk alienating the jury and reinforcing the perception of a power imbalance at the heart of the government's case.This high-wire strategy carries the potential to completely backfire. Federal juries are often attuned to the dynamics of abuse, especially in cases involving intimate partners or sexual exploitation. If the cross-examinations are perceived as victim-blaming or overly combative, it could backfire by humanizing the accusers further and drawing sympathy toward them. Moreover, in this trial—already saturated in public scrutiny—the defense has to counteract not just the testimony itself but the overwhelming narrative forming around it. A misstep during cross could solidify the prosecution's framing: that Combs used his wealth and power to manipulate and silence vulnerable individuals. The more combative the tone, the more it risks reinforcing the very abuse the defense is trying to deny.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Inside Diddy's 'toxic strategy' to get out of human trafficking charges | Daily Mail Online

On the fourth day of Sean "Diddy" Combs' federal sex trafficking and racketeering trial, Cassie Ventura faced intense cross-examination from the defense. Attorney Anna Estevao sought to portray Ventura as a consenting participant in their tumultuous relationship, highlighting text messages and emails that suggested mutual affection and willingness to engage in the so-called "freak-offs"—drug-fueled group sex encounters central to the prosecution's case. The defense emphasized instances where Ventura appeared to plan these events, referencing messages where she expressed anticipation and involvement in organizing them. They also delved into her past relationships, including with rapper Kid Cudi and actor Michael B. Jordan, to suggest mutual jealousy and complexity in her relationship with Combs.Ventura, who is currently eight months pregnant, maintained that her participation in these events was driven by fear and manipulation. She testified that Combs exerted control over her, using threats and violence to coerce her into compliance. When questioned about their drug use, Ventura acknowledged that they both used substances but asserted that Combs became angry if she used drugs without him, indicating a controlling dynamic. She also recounted incidents of violence, including an episode where Combs allegedly threw a wooden hanger at her friend, leading to the end of that friendship. Despite the defense's efforts to challenge her credibility, Ventura remained composed, reiterating that her actions were often a result of coercion and fear.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:May 15, 2025 - Day 4 of testimony in the Sean ‘Diddy' Combs trial | CNN

In United States v. Sean Combs, case number 24 Cr. 542 (ALC), Combs—also known as Puff Daddy, P. Diddy, Diddy, PD, and Love—is facing a series of federal charges, including sex trafficking, racketeering, and conspiracy. The indictment alleges that Combs orchestrated a criminal enterprise that spanned several decades, using his music and entertainment businesses as fronts to facilitate illicit activities. The charges claim he engaged in sex trafficking schemes involving coercion, threats, and abuse of power to exploit victims for sexual purposes.Combs has filed a bond appeal following the denial of his release by a lower court. His defense argues that he poses no flight risk and maintains his innocence, emphasizing that he intends to clear his name in court. The appeal also points to alleged procedural issues in the original detention ruling, citing concerns about media influence on the judicial process and the need for a fair trial. The prosecution, however, asserts that Combs' vast resources, alleged witness tampering, and international connections make him a significant flight risk. The outcome of the bond appeal remains pending.(commercial at 7:30)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.ca2.234342fd-2384-426f-a4a4-aeca250ee12d.5.2.pdf

In United States v. Sean Combs, case number 24 Cr. 542 (ALC), Combs—also known as Puff Daddy, P. Diddy, Diddy, PD, and Love—is facing a series of federal charges, including sex trafficking, racketeering, and conspiracy. The indictment alleges that Combs orchestrated a criminal enterprise that spanned several decades, using his music and entertainment businesses as fronts to facilitate illicit activities. The charges claim he engaged in sex trafficking schemes involving coercion, threats, and abuse of power to exploit victims for sexual purposes.Combs has filed a bond appeal following the denial of his release by a lower court. His defense argues that he poses no flight risk and maintains his innocence, emphasizing that he intends to clear his name in court. The appeal also points to alleged procedural issues in the original detention ruling, citing concerns about media influence on the judicial process and the need for a fair trial. The prosecution, however, asserts that Combs' vast resources, alleged witness tampering, and international connections make him a significant flight risk. The outcome of the bond appeal remains pending.(commercial at 7:30)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.ca2.234342fd-2384-426f-a4a4-aeca250ee12d.5.2.pdf

In United States v. Sean Combs, case number 24 Cr. 542 (ALC), Combs—also known as Puff Daddy, P. Diddy, Diddy, PD, and Love—is facing a series of federal charges, including sex trafficking, racketeering, and conspiracy. The indictment alleges that Combs orchestrated a criminal enterprise that spanned several decades, using his music and entertainment businesses as fronts to facilitate illicit activities. The charges claim he engaged in sex trafficking schemes involving coercion, threats, and abuse of power to exploit victims for sexual purposes.Combs has filed a bond appeal following the denial of his release by a lower court. His defense argues that he poses no flight risk and maintains his innocence, emphasizing that he intends to clear his name in court. The appeal also points to alleged procedural issues in the original detention ruling, citing concerns about media influence on the judicial process and the need for a fair trial. The prosecution, however, asserts that Combs' vast resources, alleged witness tampering, and international connections make him a significant flight risk. The outcome of the bond appeal remains pending.(commercial at 7:30)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.ca2.234342fd-2384-426f-a4a4-aeca250ee12d.5.2.pdf

On the fourth day of Sean "Diddy" Combs' federal sex trafficking and racketeering trial, Cassie Ventura faced intense cross-examination from the defense. Attorney Anna Estevao sought to portray Ventura as a consenting participant in their tumultuous relationship, highlighting text messages and emails that suggested mutual affection and willingness to engage in the so-called "freak-offs"—drug-fueled group sex encounters central to the prosecution's case. The defense emphasized instances where Ventura appeared to plan these events, referencing messages where she expressed anticipation and involvement in organizing them. They also delved into her past relationships, including with rapper Kid Cudi and actor Michael B. Jordan, to suggest mutual jealousy and complexity in her relationship with Combs.Ventura, who is currently eight months pregnant, maintained that her participation in these events was driven by fear and manipulation. She testified that Combs exerted control over her, using threats and violence to coerce her into compliance. When questioned about their drug use, Ventura acknowledged that they both used substances but asserted that Combs became angry if she used drugs without him, indicating a controlling dynamic. She also recounted incidents of violence, including an episode where Combs allegedly threw a wooden hanger at her friend, leading to the end of that friendship. Despite the defense's efforts to challenge her credibility, Ventura remained composed, reiterating that her actions were often a result of coercion and fear.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:May 15, 2025 - Day 4 of testimony in the Sean ‘Diddy' Combs trial | CNN

In a newly filed civil lawsuit, a woman identified as Jane Doe accuses Sean "Diddy" Combs of raping her in July 2001 at his Manhattan apartment. According to the complaint, after meeting Combs in May 2001 and socializing with him multiple times, she was invited to his apartment, where he allegedly locked her in his bedroom, choked her, and raped her despite her objections. In her detailed account, she described his genitalia in graphic terms, comparing it to a "large Tootsie Roll." Following the alleged assault, she claims to have undergone psychotherapy to cope with the trauma.This lawsuit adds to the growing list of legal challenges Combs is facing, including a federal sex-trafficking and racketeering trial in Manhattan. His ex-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura, has also testified about years of abuse, including rape, coercion, and forced group sex during their relationship from 2007 to 2018. Combs, who has pleaded not guilty to all charges, faces the potential of a life sentence if convicted. His legal team has yet to respond to the latest accusations.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Accuser details Diddy's ‘violent sexual assault' in new civil suit — and paints an unflattering image of his manhood | The Independent

On the second day of Diddy's federal trial, all eyes turned to star witness Cassie Ventura. The singer, once signed to Bad Boy records, had a complex relationship with Diddy marked by abuse. But will the jury see her only as a victim? We'll ask one of Bill Cosby's former attorneys, Monique Pressley. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

​On April 1, 2025, plaintiff Manzaro Joseph filed a federal lawsuit in the Southern District of Florida against Sean "Diddy" Combs and several associates, including Eric Mejias, Brendan Paul, Emilio Estefan, and Adria English. The complaint alleges that the defendants participated in a criminal enterprise involving human trafficking, sexual exploitation, kidnapping, and obstruction of justice. Joseph claims he was drugged, transported across state lines, and subjected to sexual violence orchestrated by Combs, with assistance from the other named individuals. The lawsuit invokes federal statutes such as the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act (TVPRA), the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), and the Civil Rights Act, as well as Florida's human trafficking laws.The complaint details each defendant's alleged role: Mejias is accused of drugging and threatening Joseph; Paul of coordinating transportation; Estefan of facilitating and approving the transport; and English of aiding in Joseph's targeting and concealment. Joseph also references unidentified individuals ("DOE Johns") who may have contributed to the alleged crimes. He seeks damages and injunctive relief, asserting that the defendants' actions violated multiple federal and state laws. The case brings renewed scrutiny to Combs, who has faced previous legal challenges, and raises questions about the involvement of high-profile individuals in alleged criminal activities.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.flsd.686843.1.0.pdf

On the third day of Sean "Diddy" Combs' federal sex trafficking and racketeering trial, Cassie Ventura delivered harrowing testimony detailing years of alleged abuse during their 11-year relationship. She recounted being coerced into drug-fueled sexual encounters, termed "freak-offs," often involving male escorts and filmed by Combs for blackmail purposes. Ventura described suffering physical injuries, including a 2013 incident where Combs threw a vase at her, resulting in a cut to her eyebrow. She also testified about a 2016 assault captured on hotel surveillance footage, where Combs was seen attacking her in a hallway. Despite settling a civil lawsuit in 2023 for $20 million, Ventura chose to testify in the criminal trial to confront the truth and end her silence.Ventura further alleged that Combs raped her in 2018 after their breakup, during a visit to her home following a lunch meeting intended for closure. She described the assault as swift and traumatic, stating she cried and said "no," but Combs proceeded regardless. Additionally, Ventura testified about the psychological toll of the abuse, revealing she suffered from PTSD and had contemplated suicide before seeking therapy in 2023. Her testimony also included claims that Combs threatened others, including rapper Kid Cudi, and used explicit videos to manipulate and control her. Combs has pleaded not guilty to all charges and remains in custody; if convicted, he faces up to life in prison.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:May 14, 2025 - Day 3 of testimony in the Sean ‘Diddy' Combs trial | CNN

​On April 1, 2025, plaintiff Manzaro Joseph filed a federal lawsuit in the Southern District of Florida against Sean "Diddy" Combs and several associates, including Eric Mejias, Brendan Paul, Emilio Estefan, and Adria English. The complaint alleges that the defendants participated in a criminal enterprise involving human trafficking, sexual exploitation, kidnapping, and obstruction of justice. Joseph claims he was drugged, transported across state lines, and subjected to sexual violence orchestrated by Combs, with assistance from the other named individuals. The lawsuit invokes federal statutes such as the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act (TVPRA), the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), and the Civil Rights Act, as well as Florida's human trafficking laws.The complaint details each defendant's alleged role: Mejias is accused of drugging and threatening Joseph; Paul of coordinating transportation; Estefan of facilitating and approving the transport; and English of aiding in Joseph's targeting and concealment. Joseph also references unidentified individuals ("DOE Johns") who may have contributed to the alleged crimes. He seeks damages and injunctive relief, asserting that the defendants' actions violated multiple federal and state laws. The case brings renewed scrutiny to Combs, who has faced previous legal challenges, and raises questions about the involvement of high-profile individuals in alleged criminal activities.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.flsd.686843.1.0.pdf

​On April 1, 2025, plaintiff Manzaro Joseph filed a federal lawsuit in the Southern District of Florida against Sean "Diddy" Combs and several associates, including Eric Mejias, Brendan Paul, Emilio Estefan, and Adria English. The complaint alleges that the defendants participated in a criminal enterprise involving human trafficking, sexual exploitation, kidnapping, and obstruction of justice. Joseph claims he was drugged, transported across state lines, and subjected to sexual violence orchestrated by Combs, with assistance from the other named individuals. The lawsuit invokes federal statutes such as the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act (TVPRA), the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), and the Civil Rights Act, as well as Florida's human trafficking laws.The complaint details each defendant's alleged role: Mejias is accused of drugging and threatening Joseph; Paul of coordinating transportation; Estefan of facilitating and approving the transport; and English of aiding in Joseph's targeting and concealment. Joseph also references unidentified individuals ("DOE Johns") who may have contributed to the alleged crimes. He seeks damages and injunctive relief, asserting that the defendants' actions violated multiple federal and state laws. The case brings renewed scrutiny to Combs, who has faced previous legal challenges, and raises questions about the involvement of high-profile individuals in alleged criminal activities.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.flsd.686843.1.0.pdf

The federal racketeering and prostitution trial against rap star and producer Sean “Diddy” Combs got underway in New York on Monday. In our new series Trial By Jury, we bring you an inside look into the explosive opening arguments and the shock waves the trial is sending through the music world. CNN's Laura Coates sits down with music journalist and culture critic Touré to dig into how this trial is reshaping Diddy's legacy. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

The federal racketeering and prostitution trial against rap star and producer Sean “Diddy” Combs got underway in New York on Monday. In our new series Trial By Jury, we bring you an inside look into the explosive opening arguments and the shock waves the trial is sending through the music world. CNN's Laura Coates sits down with music journalist and culture critic Touré to dig into how this trial is reshaping Diddy's legacy. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices