Podcasts about Mega

Prince Andrew's entanglement with Jeffrey Epstein reached a point where there was no off-ramp, no graceful escape route left for him to take. From the moment photos surfaced of him walking with Epstein in Central Park after Epstein's 2008 conviction, his public credibility began to erode. Every attempt to distance himself only made things worse—his disastrous 2019 BBC interview cemented his reputation as arrogant, evasive, and tone-deaf. Instead of expressing remorse or empathy for Epstein's victims, he portrayed himself as the victim, insisting he'd done nothing wrong while offering implausible excuses about medical conditions and faulty memories. The public and the press weren't buying it. With Epstein's death reigniting global outrage, Andrew found himself cornered by mounting evidence of his closeness to the financier—flight logs, photos, and testimony from Virginia Giuffre made denial untenable.By the time Andrew settled Giuffre's civil lawsuit in 2022, reportedly for millions, his royal career was finished. The Queen stripped him of his military titles and public duties, while King Charles quietly ensured his permanent exile from frontline royal life. Every possible exit strategy—silence, denial, legal settlements, staged contrition—had failed. Epstein's shadow had consumed Andrew's reputation, leaving him radioactive even within his own family. What began as an elite friendship turned into a life sentence of disgrace; there was no PR fix, no royal favor, no public forgiveness that could undo the damage. Epstein's name became an anchor Andrew could never cut loose from—dragging him deeper every time he tried to escape.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

In her December 2023 ruling, Loretta Preska, the U.S. District Judge overseeing the case stemming from the civil suit by Virginia Giuffre against Ghislaine Maxwell, determined that more than 150 names that had been redacted from court filings would be unsealed as of January 1, 2024. She explained that the public interest in transparency outweighed the privacy interests of many involved, particularly because a significant portion of the information—such as names of associates and witnesses—was already in the public domain via media reporting, depositions, or previous filings. She granted anyone named in the documents a deadline to request a further redaction before the release.However, Judge Preska also made clear that not all records would become public: she insisted that names of minors or individuals whose involvement stemmed solely from victim-status would remain shielded, because their privacy interests outweighed any public benefit in disclosure. She cautioned that many of the names being released may lack context as to how they relate to the litigation or alleged misconduct — meaning a name in the filings does not automatically imply innocence or guilt.We also hear from Tartaglione's lawyer about the missing video.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Jeffrey Epstein's relationship with transhumanism was never some passing curiosity—it was one of the central obsessions that animated the final decade of his life. He fancied himself a benefactor of “the future of humanity,” throwing money and influence at scientists who were willing to indulge his fantasies about genetic engineering, human enhancement, brain-mapping, and even selective breeding. Epstein hosted salons with top-tier researchers, funded fringe-adjacent longevity experiments, and pushed for projects that blurred the line between visionary science and eugenic delusion. Behind the PR gloss of “advancing human potential,” there was always the darker subtext: Epstein wanted to shape evolution in his own image, to create a world where elite men—just like him—could extend their lineage, their power, and their biological footprint.His relationship with Marvin Minsky fit neatly into that same paradigm. Minsky, an MIT legend and one of the founding fathers of artificial intelligence, became one of Epstein's most publicly controversial scientific associates. Epstein courted Minsky aggressively—donations to MIT, invitations to his private gatherings, a seat at the table for any cutting-edge conversation Epstein thought he could buy his way into. Minsky, known for his brilliance but also for a certain intellectual detachment from moral scrutiny, was drawn into Epstein's orbit at the same time Epstein was shaping his network of scientists into something between an advisory board and a trophy case. After Epstein's arrest, Minsky's name became part of the fallout, including allegations from Virginia Giuffre placing him at Epstein's island—allegations Minsky was never able to respond to before his death. Their connection underscores a larger truth:to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Prince Andrew's fall from grace is a portrait of unchecked privilege, arrogance, and moral rot. Once celebrated as the “Playboy Prince,” his lifestyle spiraled into decadence and scandal — marked by his association with Jeffrey Epstein, lavish parties, and a pattern of reckless indulgence that blurred royal decorum with outright degeneracy. Accounts from multiple sources depict Andrew as consumed by lust, status, and ego, surrounding himself with the world's richest and most corrupt figures while maintaining a reputation for being boorish and entitled. His close relationship with Epstein — a man accused of preying on minors — wasn't a coincidence, but a reflection of his own appetites and blindness to consequence. Even before Epstein's crimes became public, Andrew's behavior was infamous among insiders who quietly regarded him as a liability to the Crown.Jeffrey Epstein allegedly bragged in a documentary that there was “only one person who likes sex more than me, and that's Andrew,” referring to Prince Andrew, Duke of York. The film, which examines the close friendship between Epstein and the disgraced royal, paints a picture of mutual indulgence and depravity. Epstein reportedly described Andrew as his “real best buddy,” claiming they shared similar appetites and circles of company. According to the documentary, Epstein kept Andrew's contact information prominently listed multiple times in his black book — a testament to how close their bond was. The insinuation from those who knew Epstein was clear: this was not just a social friendship, but one built on shared secrets and vices, and Epstein took pride in boasting about it.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Bitcoin is crashing HARD, liquidity is evaporating, and fear is surging across the entire crypto market… but here's the twist: I'm BUYING. In this episode, I break down exactly why this massive Bitcoin selloff may actually be one of the best opportunities of the cycle.

The court's apology to the Jeffrey Epstein survivors came as a long-overdue acknowledgment of how profoundly the justice system had failed them. In open court, federal judges conceded that the victims had been deliberately misled during the original 2008 non-prosecution deal—kept in the dark while prosecutors secretly negotiated Epstein's immunity and that of his co-conspirators. The apology recognized that these survivors were denied their rights under the Crime Victims' Rights Act and that the system's betrayal compounded their trauma, allowing Epstein years of freedom to continue abusing others. While symbolic, the apology served as a public admission that the government's handling of the case was inexcusable, marking a rare moment of institutional accountability in a saga defined by corruption, influence, and silence.Meanwhile...Bruce Reinhart is a federal magistrate judge for the Southern District of Florida who became tied to the Jeffrey Epstein saga due to his career moves before taking the bench. Prior to becoming a judge, Reinhart served as an assistant U.S. attorney in the very office that was investigating Epstein during the 2006–2008 sex trafficking probe. In a move that raised serious ethical concerns, Reinhart abruptly resigned from the U.S. Attorney's Office in 2008—just as Epstein's sweetheart non-prosecution agreement was being finalized—and within days began representing several of Epstein's employees, including pilots and schedulers who were viewed as potential co-conspirators. That revolving-door transition, from prosecutor to defense lawyer for Epstein's inner circle, sparked outrage and remains one of the most glaring examples of the systemic coziness that surrounded Epstein's first case.Reinhart's actions were later cited in lawsuits accusing the Department of Justice of mishandling the Epstein investigation, with questions raised about conflicts of interest and whether his departure influenced prosecutorial leniency. Though Reinhart denied any wrongdoing, the optics were damaging—particularly as more details surfaced about how the 2008 non-prosecution deal effectively protected Epstein and his associates from serious federal charges. Years later, Reinhart reentered public controversy when he signed off on the search warrant for former President Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate, bringing renewed attention to his past ties to the Epstein affair. His name has since become emblematic of the quiet backroom dealings and blurred ethical lines that defined the first Epstein investigation and the broader failure of justice that followed.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

From the very beginning, the prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein was designed to protect him, not punish him. Instead of a normal criminal process, what unfolded in South Florida looked more like a negotiation between powerful friends. Prosecutors gave Epstein a level of deference that no other accused sex offender would ever receive. His lawyers were allowed to dictate terms, stall proceedings, and ultimately secure the secret Non-Prosecution Agreement that protected him and his accomplices from federal charges. Epstein's victims were never told about the deal, his “sentence” let him work from his private office six days a week, and the prosecutors went out of their way to coordinate with his defense team to control media exposure. Every decision, from his jail privileges to the classified nature of the deal itself, showed that the system wasn't just compromised — it was actively serving him.That preferential treatment revealed a justice system that bent under pressure from money and influence. The U.S. Attorney's Office, led by Alex Acosta, treated Epstein's wealth and connections as untouchable factors, and in doing so, erased any pretense of equality under the law. Even when later reviews tried to frame the debacle as “poor judgment,” it was clear that this was intentional — a calculated effort to shield Epstein and anyone tied to him. Prosecutors who should have fought for victims instead worked to silence them. What was supposed to be a federal criminal case became a containment operation, carefully managed to keep Epstein's network out of the public eye and preserve the reputations of everyone standing behind him.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

In the months leading up to her trial, Ghislaine Maxwell and her defense team attempted a calculated smear campaign against her accusers, portraying them as opportunists motivated by money, fame, and distorted memories. They tried to cast doubt on the credibility of the women who came forward, suggesting that their stories were inconsistent and influenced by the substantial compensation fund set up by the Epstein estate. Maxwell's attorneys argued that she was being scapegoated for Epstein's crimes after his death, positioning her as a victim of the public's need for retribution. But the strategy backfired badly. Jurors were turned off by the tone of personal attacks, and prosecutors effectively countered with evidence showing decades of coordinated sexual abuse that Maxwell enabled, organized, and facilitated.By the time the trial reached its closing arguments, Maxwell's attempt to discredit her accusers had collapsed under the weight of her own history and the testimony of those who once worked alongside her. The women's accounts—harrowing, consistent, and corroborated by flight logs, photos, and financial records—left little room for doubt. Rather than appearing as a wrongfully accused associate, Maxwell came across as a manipulative enabler whose arrogance and lack of remorse sealed her fate. Her smear tactics, which may have once worked in Epstein's world of influence and intimidation, had no power in a courtroom stripped of his protection. The verdict proved that the jury—and the public—saw through her defense, rejecting the narrative that these women were anything but victims of a long-running and calculated pattern of abuse.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Dan Nathan and Gene Munster discuss upcoming earnings for Nvidia and the recent trends in the technology and AI domain for major companies including SoftBank's sell-off of Nvidia shares. They also wrap up Q3 earnings for the 'Mag Seven' tech giants such as Microsoft, Meta, Amazon, Google, and Apple. They address key points about Microsoft's Azure growth, Meta's controversial spending on AI, Amazon's financials amidst AWS growth, Google's AI-driven search improvements, and Apple's forthcoming AI developments. The market's recent shift favoring AI-related stocks and the debate over Amazon's strategic investments without their own AI models are also covered. They conclude by emphasizing the significant role of Nvidia's next report and its effect on AI market sentiment. —FOLLOW USYouTube: @RiskReversalMediaInstagram: @riskreversalmediaTwitter: @RiskReversalLinkedIn: RiskReversal Media

On today's show Torres gets you ready for a WILD couple days in college football. He previews the mega showdowns between Texas and Georgia + Alabama and Oklahoma. Then he gives updates on the Auburn and Arkansas coaching jobs - including those pesky James Franklin/Hogs rumors. What's fact and what's fiction? Finally, a surprise name comes to the defense of struggling Florida star DJ Lagway Texas-Georgia, Oklahoma-Alabama previews (2:00): Torres opens the show by previewing the two MEGA showdowns in the SEC. Texas-Georgia and Oklahoma-Alabama. Who wins and what does it mean for the playoff picture? James Franklin Arkansas rumors + a new favorite at Auburn (30:00): Next up, Torres reacts to new twists on the coaching carousel. There are major rumors that James Franklin could be next at Arkansas - what's fact and what's fiction? Plus, has a favorite emerged at Auburn? A surprise name comes to the defense of DJ Lagway (57:00): Finally, a surprise name has come to the defense of Florida QB DJ Lagway amid his struggles. Who spoke up? What'd they say? And what's it mean for the QB's future? Circa is the OFFICIAL hotel and gaming partner of the Aaron Torres Podcast: Check out their NEW sportsbook in Franklin, Kentucky or visit their Las Vegas property! Want to watch your favorite college football team or get tickets to ANY big game - ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠at SeatGeek you can use code "TORRES" and get $20 off your first purchase! ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Also, thank you to ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Caulipuffs, the healthy, yet delicious snack⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ that is taking over your grocery isle! For more details - ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠visit CauliPuffs.com⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠! Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Queen Elizabeth's deep affection for Prince Andrew blinded her to his flaws and shielded him from the consequences of his own arrogance. From the moment he was born, Andrew was said to be her favorite—her “darling boy”—and that sentiment became a shield he would hide behind for decades. Even as whispers of inappropriate behavior, financial improprieties, and questionable friendships grew louder, the Queen consistently stepped in to protect him. She refused to believe the worst, brushing off concerns as gossip and assuming that the monarchy's institutional authority could outlast any scandal. When the Epstein connection surfaced, she leaned into that same instinct, surrounding him with the palace's most trusted handlers and instructing courtiers to minimize the damage rather than confront the truth.But that unwavering loyalty ultimately detonated in spectacular fashion. By standing by Andrew for too long, the Queen not only undermined her own moral authority but tainted the institution she spent seventy years preserving. The infamous BBC “Newsnight” interview—Andrew's catastrophic attempt to clear his name—became a global humiliation that exposed the rot her protection had allowed to fester. In the end, she was forced to strip him of his titles and banish him from public duties, a move that must have pained her deeply. Yet the damage was done: her favoritism turned into her Achilles' heel, proving that even the most revered monarch could be undone not by enemies, but by the blindness of maternal love.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Prince Andrew has become the royal family's permanent embarrassment—a man so toxic that even his own relatives now keep him at arm's length. Once the Queen's beloved son and a fixture at royal gatherings, he is now the pariah of the monarchy, stripped of his military titles, patronages, and any semblance of public duty. His name alone evokes scandal, his presence a reminder of the Epstein catastrophe that refuses to fade. Invitations to official functions quietly stopped arriving, and the palace's inner circle made it clear that his rehabilitation was off the table. The man who once strutted with entitlement now shuffles through Windsor's halls in isolation, a ghost among royals who would rather pretend he isn't there.Even family holidays have become awkward exercises in avoidance. At Christmas and Easter gatherings in Sandringham and Balmoral, Andrew's presence is reportedly tolerated, not welcomed—a concession to bloodline rather than affection. He is kept out of official family photos, and the public is carefully shielded from any image that might suggest he's been forgiven. Behind the palace walls, he eats with a smaller group or arrives late to avoid uncomfortable encounters, while his siblings maintain polite distance. Once the Queen's “favorite son,” Andrew is now the relative no one wants to sit next to—a man whose downfall has made him a living reminder of the monarchy's most shameful chapter.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Prince Andrew and Ghislaine Maxwell shared a bond that went far deeper than casual friendship—it was one built on privilege, shared social circles, and a mutual sense of untouchability. They moved in the same rarefied world of aristocrats, billionaires, and power brokers where discretion was currency and boundaries were elastic. Maxwell, the daughter of disgraced media mogul Robert Maxwell, found in Andrew both status and protection within royal circles, while he found in her a glamorous, well-connected confidante who opened doors to an elite international network. Their rapport was easy, flirtatious, and enduring; she was often described as his “gatekeeper” and closest companion during the 1990s and early 2000s, attending royal events and social gatherings that blurred the line between friendship and partnership.That closeness, however, became radioactive once her connection to Jeffrey Epstein exploded into public view. Andrew's decades-long relationship with Maxwell became impossible to separate from the broader scandal, as photos, flight logs, and witness statements linked them together at Epstein's properties. Even after Epstein's first conviction, Andrew reportedly maintained contact with her, suggesting a bond built on deep loyalty—or shared secrets. In the end, Maxwell's downfall dragged Andrew down with her, transforming their once-glittering alliance into a cautionary tale of arrogance and denial. What was once whispered about as a friendship of privilege and trust is now remembered as a partnership that helped destroy both their reputations.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Welcome back to Open The Voice Gate! Case (https://twitter.com/_inyourcase) and Mike (https://twitter.com/fujiiheya) are back with an update on the comings and goings of Dragongate.As King of Gate 2025 continues to finish it's first round, OTVG is back to talk about the tournament so far. Case and Mike give their spoiler free recommendations before breaking down the tournament stops in Kobe (11/8), Matsuyama (11/9) and Tottori (11/10), including more Gianni Valletta greatness, a historical match for Hyo, the return of Homecoming matches on the network and more. To close out the show, they discuss El Lindaman vs CIMA from Gleat's 11/3 Ver.Mega show, CIMA”s injury, and how to interpret what might come next.Our podcast provider, Red Circle, offers the listeners the option to sponsor the show. Click on “Sponsor This Podcaster” at https://redcircle.com/shows/open-the-voice-gate and you can donate a single time, or set up a monthly donation to Open The Voice Gate!Please Rate and Review Open The Voice Gate on the podcast platform of your choice and follow us on Twitter at https://twitter.com/openvoicegate.Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Donate (no account necessary) | Subscribe (account required) Join Bryan Dean Wright, former CIA Operations Officer, as he dives into today's top stories shaping America and the world. In this episode of The Wright Report, Bryan examines President Trump's defense of his plan to double the number of Chinese students in America, Beijing's latest moves to weaponize rare earth minerals, the deepening conflicts in Gaza and Guinea, and how Sweden's cultural war on assimilation mirrors the decline of the West. He closes with promising new medical breakthroughs on Alzheimer's, cancer, heart rhythm, and anxiety. Trump Defends 600,000 Chinese Student Visas: President Trump told Fox News that Chinese students keep American colleges solvent, calling the plan "a business decision." Critics, including Laura Ingraham, warned that Chinese nationals pose espionage and bioweapon risks, while Trump insisted, "MAGA was my idea — I know what MAGA wants better than anybody else." Bryan argues the move exposes Trump's blind spot: treating adversaries as business partners instead of ideological foes. China's Rare Earth Slowdown: Xi Jinping is quietly delaying rare earth export licenses for U.S. buyers, especially those tied to military contracts, while expanding Chinese control of mines in Brazil and Central Asia. Bryan warns that "Beijing seeks domination, not cooperation — we can never trust China on anything." Gaza, Guinea, and the Global Chessboard: Trump's Pentagon is exploring a new base near Gaza to support a 10,000-member Arab stabilization force, while King Abdullah of Jordan says no Arab nation wants to "touch that mission." In Africa, China now controls the world's largest iron-ore mine in Guinea, giving it leverage to flood global steel markets and crush Western industry. Sweden's Self-Destruction: Leftist mayors in Sweden argue that native Swedes must integrate with Arab migrants, not the other way around. Bryan calls it "civilizational suicide" and a warning for America's future: "When a culture stops believing in itself, it dies." Good News in Medicine: Scientists report that NAD⁺ supplements may reverse Alzheimer's symptoms, a high-fiber diet improves melanoma survival, coffee may reduce A-Fib risk, and choline — found in salmon and eggs — helps ease anxiety. Bryan calls it "proof that science, faith, and common sense can still work together."   "And you shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." - John 8:32     Keywords: Trump Chinese student visas Fox News, Laura Ingraham MAGA debate, China rare earth exports Xi Jinping, Gaza stabilization force Jordan Abdullah, Guinea Simandou iron mine Rio Tinto, Sweden migrant assimilation debate, NAD Alzheimer's research, coffee A-Fib study, choline anxiety nutrient

PODCAST LAS NOTICIAS CON CALLE DE 12 DE NOVIEMBRE 2025 - Plantean aumento de la luz para arreglar grid energético - El Nuevo DíaLUMA da contrato a otra empresa de sus dueños por 75 millones - El Nuevo Día Otra vez el gas natural en contrato de New Fortress - El Nuevo Día  Frío pelú en USA en la costa este - Primera Hora Llega el Gerald Ford al Caribe, mientras Maduro activa 200 mil - NYTPR contra RD en Citi Field de NY, nuestro capi Machete Maldonado - Primera HoraResidenciales ya son casi todos privados en su administración - El Nuevo Día Votarán ya por medida que limita acceso a la información - El Nuevo Día Gobernadora nombra comité, pero no lo reúne en cuanto a impuesto a inventario - El Nuevo Día Hospitalizaciones para adolescentes con crisis mental aumenta sustancialmente - El Nuevo DíaHoy votan para reabrir el gobierno federal a las 4PM - WSJPelea entre LUMA y AEE provoca problemas con pérdidas millonarias - El Nuevo Día Marketplace a la quiebra, el famoso 24 - El Nuevo Día Mega controversia por si una niña de 9 años debió hacer el Lola - El Nuevo Día Sacan del mercado fórmula de bebé que provoca botulismo - El Vocero Regresa hoy Anthonieska Avilés al tribunal ahora con Mayra López Mulero - El Vocero Cerrarán 15 mil iglesias en USA tras 29% de la gente no tener afiliación religiosa, Jesus GPT para muchos - Axios Hoy aparecen los votos para lograr el 218 para poder sacar los Epstein files - Axios Al fin cambian formato de juego de estrellas de la NBA, ahora será USA contra el Mundo Colombia deja de compartir inteligencia con USA por ataques de Trump a barcos - EconomistNieto de JFK corre para el Congreso - NYTIncluye auspicio 

In this episode of the Tax Smart REI Podcast, Thomas Castelli and Nathan Sosa, Head of the National Tax Department at Hall CPA, sit down with Alex Savage, CPA, CFP, to unpack the Mega Backdoor Roth 401(k), one of the most powerful yet underutilized tax strategies for high-income earners. They break down how the strategy works, who qualifies, and why it can be a game-changer for those looking to build long-term, tax-free retirement wealth, all while balancing real estate investing and other income streams. From contribution limits and in-plan conversions to control group rules and timing, this episode covers everything you need to know to decide whether this advanced strategy fits your situation. You'll learn: - What makes the “Mega” Backdoor Roth 401(k) different from a traditional or standard Roth IRA - How high-income W-2 earners and solopreneurs can contribute up to $70,000+ in after-tax dollars - Why this strategy can help you manage future tax rates, Social Security taxation, and estate planning - The key testing and timing rules to avoid IRS pitfalls - When a Mega Backdoor Roth makes sense and when real estate might be the better play Whether you're a tech executive, business owner, or high-earning real estate investor, this episode gives you the clarity to determine if the Mega Backdoor Roth 401(k) belongs in your financial toolkit and how to use it strategically alongside your real estate portfolio. To become a client, request a consultation from Hall CPA, PLLC at go.therealestatecpa.com/3KSEev6 Subscribe to REI Daily & Enter to Win a FREE Strategy Call: go.therealestatecpa.com/41JuQBX Connect with Engineered Tax Services: https://portal.engineeredtaxservices.com/cost-segregation/quick-start?utm_source=Live+Event&utm_medium=Others&utm_campaign=hall_cpa&pagesense_source=729733000061045013&utm_term=kim_lochridge&utm_content=cost_segregation Get the Solar White Paper: www.therealestatecpa.com/solar-white-paper/ The Tax Smart Real Estate Investors podcast is for general information purposes only and is not intended to provide, and should not be relied on for, tax, legal, or accounting advice. Information on the podcast may not constitute the most up-to-date legal or other information. No reader, user, or listener of this podcast should act or refrain from acting on the basis of information on this podcast without first seeking legal and tax advice from counsel in the relevant jurisdiction. Only your individual attorney and tax advisor can provide assurances that the information contained herein – and your interpretation of it – is applicable or appropriate to your particular situation. Use of, and access to, this podcast or any of the links or resources contained or mentioned within the podcast show and show notes do not create a relationship between the reader, user, or listener and podcast hosts, contributors, or guests. Any mention of third-party vendors, products, or services does not constitute an endorsement or recommendation. You should conduct your own due diligence before engaging with any vendor.

In the years following Jeffrey Epstein's death, one of the more disturbing revelations about his compensation fund emerged when a self-identified recruiter — referred to in court documents only as “Jane Doe” — attempted to claim money from it. This woman openly admitted that she had helped Epstein recruit underage girls but simultaneously described herself as a victim, saying she had been sexually abused and trafficked by Epstein for more than a decade. Instead of continuing her federal lawsuit against his estate, she withdrew it and pursued a payout through the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program, a fund specifically intended to compensate those exploited by Epstein's network. The move ignited outrage among other victims and their attorneys, who saw it as a grotesque inversion of justice: a recruiter trying to profit from a fund meant to heal the very wounds she helped inflict.The controversy underscored the moral and legal murk that has long surrounded Epstein's empire. His trafficking operation relied on a pyramid-like system in which victims were sometimes coerced into recruiting others, blurring the line between participant and prey. But many advocates argued that this woman's decade-long role as an active recruiter made her claim fundamentally illegitimate. Though her application highlighted the psychological manipulation and coercion Epstein used to control his circle, critics countered that intent doesn't erase culpability. In the end, the episode became another reminder of how Epstein's network corrupted everything it touched — even the very mechanisms meant to deliver justice to his victims.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Sarah Kellen (also known as Sarah Vickers or Sarah Kensington) is widely described as one of the key assistants to Jeffrey Epstein during the 2000s — a role in which she allegedly managed and coordinated many of the logistical and operational elements of Epstein's sex-trafficking network. Court records, witness statements, and investigative reporting claim that Kellen was responsible for arranging “massages” (in many cases euphemisms for sexual encounters), scheduling flights on Epstein's private jets, keeping contact lists of girls, and effectively acting as a gatekeeper for victims who were transported to various propertiesDespite her deep involvement, Kellen has never faced criminal charges. Federal judges and prosecutors have described her as a “knowing participant” and a “criminally responsible” figure in Epstein's network, yet she remains free — claiming she was also a victim of Epstein's control. Many survivors reject that narrative, arguing that she had full agency and willingly helped enable the abuse of minors. Her story underscores a broader truth about the Epstein case: that key facilitators, assistants, and coordinators — often women — operated the machinery of exploitation with precision, and most have evaded accountability under the guise of victimhood.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

For years, Queen Elizabeth II acted as Prince Andrew's unwavering shield against the fallout of the Jeffrey Epstein scandal. Even as allegations mounted, she reportedly resisted internal and external pressure to sideline her son, allowing him to retain royal privileges, honors, and public duties long after the public tide had turned. Her personal loyalty was said to eclipse political and institutional logic—Andrew remained a fixture at Balmoral and Windsor, even as palace staff urged the Queen to distance herself. Royal insiders and biographers have described her as deeply maternal in her defense of him, believing he was being unfairly vilified and refusing to entertain discussions about exile or disownment. This protective stance allowed Andrew to delay accountability for years while the rest of the royal household absorbed the reputational damage.But by early 2022, under overwhelming public and institutional pressure, even the Queen's protection could no longer hold back the storm. She reluctantly approved the removal of Andrew's military titles, royal patronages, and the use of his HRH style—a move seen as both a last resort and a symbolic cutting of ties to preserve the monarchy. Still, until her death later that year, she continued to privately support him, hosting him at Balmoral and reportedly helping fund parts of his legal settlement with Virginia Giuffre. It was the ultimate act of maternal loyalty—protecting her son from disgrace even as the monarchy fought to survive the wreckage his scandals had created.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

We try and find someone who has the Starbucks Bearista Cup, and we discover what makes Hannah and Ab CRINGE.

We talk about a weird Christmas movie that Bret finally watched, and we discover who got secretly married.

Prince Andrew's fall from grace is a portrait of unchecked privilege, arrogance, and moral rot. Once celebrated as the “Playboy Prince,” his lifestyle spiraled into decadence and scandal — marked by his association with Jeffrey Epstein, lavish parties, and a pattern of reckless indulgence that blurred royal decorum with outright degeneracy. Accounts from multiple sources depict Andrew as consumed by lust, status, and ego, surrounding himself with the world's richest and most corrupt figures while maintaining a reputation for being boorish and entitled. His close relationship with Epstein — a man accused of preying on minors — wasn't a coincidence, but a reflection of his own appetites and blindness to consequence. Even before Epstein's crimes became public, Andrew's behavior was infamous among insiders who quietly regarded him as a liability to the Crown.Jeffrey Epstein allegedly bragged in a documentary that there was “only one person who likes sex more than me, and that's Andrew,” referring to Prince Andrew, Duke of York. The film, which examines the close friendship between Epstein and the disgraced royal, paints a picture of mutual indulgence and depravity. Epstein reportedly described Andrew as his “real best buddy,” claiming they shared similar appetites and circles of company. According to the documentary, Epstein kept Andrew's contact information prominently listed multiple times in his black book — a testament to how close their bond was. The insinuation from those who knew Epstein was clear: this was not just a social friendship, but one built on shared secrets and vices, and Epstein took pride in boasting about it.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

From the very beginning, the prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein was designed to protect him, not punish him. Instead of a normal criminal process, what unfolded in South Florida looked more like a negotiation between powerful friends. Prosecutors gave Epstein a level of deference that no other accused sex offender would ever receive. His lawyers were allowed to dictate terms, stall proceedings, and ultimately secure the secret Non-Prosecution Agreement that protected him and his accomplices from federal charges. Epstein's victims were never told about the deal, his “sentence” let him work from his private office six days a week, and the prosecutors went out of their way to coordinate with his defense team to control media exposure. Every decision, from his jail privileges to the classified nature of the deal itself, showed that the system wasn't just compromised — it was actively serving him.That preferential treatment revealed a justice system that bent under pressure from money and influence. The U.S. Attorney's Office, led by Alex Acosta, treated Epstein's wealth and connections as untouchable factors, and in doing so, erased any pretense of equality under the law. Even when later reviews tried to frame the debacle as “poor judgment,” it was clear that this was intentional — a calculated effort to shield Epstein and anyone tied to him. Prosecutors who should have fought for victims instead worked to silence them. What was supposed to be a federal criminal case became a containment operation, carefully managed to keep Epstein's network out of the public eye and preserve the reputations of everyone standing behind him.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In her December 2023 ruling, Loretta Preska, the U.S. District Judge overseeing the case stemming from the civil suit by Virginia Giuffre against Ghislaine Maxwell, determined that more than 150 names that had been redacted from court filings would be unsealed as of January 1, 2024. She explained that the public interest in transparency outweighed the privacy interests of many involved, particularly because a significant portion of the information—such as names of associates and witnesses—was already in the public domain via media reporting, depositions, or previous filings. She granted anyone named in the documents a deadline to request a further redaction before the release.However, Judge Preska also made clear that not all records would become public: she insisted that names of minors or individuals whose involvement stemmed solely from victim-status would remain shielded, because their privacy interests outweighed any public benefit in disclosure. She cautioned that many of the names being released may lack context as to how they relate to the litigation or alleged misconduct — meaning a name in the filings does not automatically imply innocence or guilt.We also hear from Tartaglione's lawyer about the missing video.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

HABLANDO ACELERAO, EN ESTE PODCAST TE PONDRÁS AL DÍA DE TODO LO QUE ESTÁ SUCEDIENDO EN LA FÓRMULA 1 Y MOTORSPORTS.Síguenos en instagram @puertoricoracingsportsBUSCA NUESTRA TIENDA www.prracingshop.com Busca nuestro website de noticias www.prrsnews.comModelos a escala www.topdiecaststore.comMercancia de F1 con @oteromotorsports Auspiciado por :High Category, los mejores productos para el cuidado de tu auto.Síguelos en instagram @highcategory#f1 #redbull #podcast

US based mega store Costco is branching out with a second store in the Auckland region. A 6.5-hectare site in Drury south of Auckland city has been ear marked for the big box store that sells everything from cut price groceries to designer denim. Retired Costco vice president country manager for Australia and New Zealand, Patrick Noone spoke to Lisa Owen.

Czabe delivers a MEGA-sized pod today, with a thought on why some media personalities seem to be beyond embarrassment at doing a truly shoddy job. Mr. X joins to break down the nuggets and narratives of Week 10 in the NFL. Then Matt Mueller - aka: A Man About Film - talks ESPN v. Disney dispute, and who's "winning." Plus, was 1998 the greatest movie year, ever? MORE....Our Sponsors:* Check out CBDfx and use my code CZABE for a great deal: https://cbdfx.com* Check out Hims: https://hims.com/CZABE* Check out Indeed: https://indeed.com/CZABE* Check out Infinite Epigenetics: https://infiniteepigenetics.com/CZABE* Check out Uncommon Goods: https://uncommongoods.com/czabeAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Welcome to the 257th episode of the Meta Pod podcast, the #PokémonTCG podcast that revolves around the evolving meta! @AtrociousJake & @gyrosean sit down to talk about the latest #PlayPokemon & #Pokemon news!--Here's the video by okJLUV that Jake referenced: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cd5SBRDtHTo--We have a Discord server! Join here: https://discord.gg/5DhX4sbJu3--Reach out to us with any thoughts or topic suggestions viaTwitter: https://twitter.com/metapodtcg Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/metapodtcg/TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@metapodtcgCheck out the Meta Pod YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWcPqrzElSZKqYOIkMgOZuwFollow our Threads: https://www.threads.net/@metapodtcgSee the decks we showcase: https://pokemoncard.io/author/?author=54755-- Here are a few of the other places where we make content: Sean's YouTube: https://youtube.com/gyrosean Jake's YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/atrociousjake Sean's Twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/gyrosean Jake's Twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/atrociousjakeSean's Threads: https://www.threads.net/@gyroseanJake's Threads: https://www.threads.net/@atrociousjake

In the years following Jeffrey Epstein's death, one of the more disturbing revelations about his compensation fund emerged when a self-identified recruiter — referred to in court documents only as “Jane Doe” — attempted to claim money from it. This woman openly admitted that she had helped Epstein recruit underage girls but simultaneously described herself as a victim, saying she had been sexually abused and trafficked by Epstein for more than a decade. Instead of continuing her federal lawsuit against his estate, she withdrew it and pursued a payout through the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program, a fund specifically intended to compensate those exploited by Epstein's network. The move ignited outrage among other victims and their attorneys, who saw it as a grotesque inversion of justice: a recruiter trying to profit from a fund meant to heal the very wounds she helped inflict.The controversy underscored the moral and legal murk that has long surrounded Epstein's empire. His trafficking operation relied on a pyramid-like system in which victims were sometimes coerced into recruiting others, blurring the line between participant and prey. But many advocates argued that this woman's decade-long role as an active recruiter made her claim fundamentally illegitimate. Though her application highlighted the psychological manipulation and coercion Epstein used to control his circle, critics countered that intent doesn't erase culpability. In the end, the episode became another reminder of how Epstein's network corrupted everything it touched — even the very mechanisms meant to deliver justice to his victims.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Sarah Kellen (also known as Sarah Vickers or Sarah Kensington) is widely described as one of the key assistants to Jeffrey Epstein during the 2000s — a role in which she allegedly managed and coordinated many of the logistical and operational elements of Epstein's sex-trafficking network. Court records, witness statements, and investigative reporting claim that Kellen was responsible for arranging “massages” (in many cases euphemisms for sexual encounters), scheduling flights on Epstein's private jets, keeping contact lists of girls, and effectively acting as a gatekeeper for victims who were transported to various propertiesDespite her deep involvement, Kellen has never faced criminal charges. Federal judges and prosecutors have described her as a “knowing participant” and a “criminally responsible” figure in Epstein's network, yet she remains free — claiming she was also a victim of Epstein's control. Many survivors reject that narrative, arguing that she had full agency and willingly helped enable the abuse of minors. Her story underscores a broader truth about the Epstein case: that key facilitators, assistants, and coordinators — often women — operated the machinery of exploitation with precision, and most have evaded accountability under the guise of victimhood.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

For years, Queen Elizabeth II acted as Prince Andrew's unwavering shield against the fallout of the Jeffrey Epstein scandal. Even as allegations mounted, she reportedly resisted internal and external pressure to sideline her son, allowing him to retain royal privileges, honors, and public duties long after the public tide had turned. Her personal loyalty was said to eclipse political and institutional logic—Andrew remained a fixture at Balmoral and Windsor, even as palace staff urged the Queen to distance herself. Royal insiders and biographers have described her as deeply maternal in her defense of him, believing he was being unfairly vilified and refusing to entertain discussions about exile or disownment. This protective stance allowed Andrew to delay accountability for years while the rest of the royal household absorbed the reputational damage.But by early 2022, under overwhelming public and institutional pressure, even the Queen's protection could no longer hold back the storm. She reluctantly approved the removal of Andrew's military titles, royal patronages, and the use of his HRH style—a move seen as both a last resort and a symbolic cutting of ties to preserve the monarchy. Still, until her death later that year, she continued to privately support him, hosting him at Balmoral and reportedly helping fund parts of his legal settlement with Virginia Giuffre. It was the ultimate act of maternal loyalty—protecting her son from disgrace even as the monarchy fought to survive the wreckage his scandals had created.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Prince Andrew and Ghislaine Maxwell shared a bond that went far deeper than casual friendship—it was one built on privilege, shared social circles, and a mutual sense of untouchability. They moved in the same rarefied world of aristocrats, billionaires, and power brokers where discretion was currency and boundaries were elastic. Maxwell, the daughter of disgraced media mogul Robert Maxwell, found in Andrew both status and protection within royal circles, while he found in her a glamorous, well-connected confidante who opened doors to an elite international network. Their rapport was easy, flirtatious, and enduring; she was often described as his “gatekeeper” and closest companion during the 1990s and early 2000s, attending royal events and social gatherings that blurred the line between friendship and partnership.That closeness, however, became radioactive once her connection to Jeffrey Epstein exploded into public view. Andrew's decades-long relationship with Maxwell became impossible to separate from the broader scandal, as photos, flight logs, and witness statements linked them together at Epstein's properties. Even after Epstein's first conviction, Andrew reportedly maintained contact with her, suggesting a bond built on deep loyalty—or shared secrets. In the end, Maxwell's downfall dragged Andrew down with her, transforming their once-glittering alliance into a cautionary tale of arrogance and denial. What was once whispered about as a friendship of privilege and trust is now remembered as a partnership that helped destroy both their reputations.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Prince Andrew has become the royal family's permanent embarrassment—a man so toxic that even his own relatives now keep him at arm's length. Once the Queen's beloved son and a fixture at royal gatherings, he is now the pariah of the monarchy, stripped of his military titles, patronages, and any semblance of public duty. His name alone evokes scandal, his presence a reminder of the Epstein catastrophe that refuses to fade. Invitations to official functions quietly stopped arriving, and the palace's inner circle made it clear that his rehabilitation was off the table. The man who once strutted with entitlement now shuffles through Windsor's halls in isolation, a ghost among royals who would rather pretend he isn't there.Even family holidays have become awkward exercises in avoidance. At Christmas and Easter gatherings in Sandringham and Balmoral, Andrew's presence is reportedly tolerated, not welcomed—a concession to bloodline rather than affection. He is kept out of official family photos, and the public is carefully shielded from any image that might suggest he's been forgiven. Behind the palace walls, he eats with a smaller group or arrives late to avoid uncomfortable encounters, while his siblings maintain polite distance. Once the Queen's “favorite son,” Andrew is now the relative no one wants to sit next to—a man whose downfall has made him a living reminder of the monarchy's most shameful chapter.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Queen Elizabeth's deep affection for Prince Andrew blinded her to his flaws and shielded him from the consequences of his own arrogance. From the moment he was born, Andrew was said to be her favorite—her “darling boy”—and that sentiment became a shield he would hide behind for decades. Even as whispers of inappropriate behavior, financial improprieties, and questionable friendships grew louder, the Queen consistently stepped in to protect him. She refused to believe the worst, brushing off concerns as gossip and assuming that the monarchy's institutional authority could outlast any scandal. When the Epstein connection surfaced, she leaned into that same instinct, surrounding him with the palace's most trusted handlers and instructing courtiers to minimize the damage rather than confront the truth.But that unwavering loyalty ultimately detonated in spectacular fashion. By standing by Andrew for too long, the Queen not only undermined her own moral authority but tainted the institution she spent seventy years preserving. The infamous BBC “Newsnight” interview—Andrew's catastrophic attempt to clear his name—became a global humiliation that exposed the rot her protection had allowed to fester. In the end, she was forced to strip him of his titles and banish him from public duties, a move that must have pained her deeply. Yet the damage was done: her favoritism turned into her Achilles' heel, proving that even the most revered monarch could be undone not by enemies, but by the blindness of maternal love.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Buying myself some time after nose surgery, and preparing for the future . . .Here's the segment on Mega Evolution from every relevant episode so far, from Bulbasaur in 2018 all the way up to Audino at the end of 2023.Next we'll finish off Generation Six, then before Generation Seven we might need another episode like this . . .Get in touch on bluesky: https://bsky.app/profile/podcastpodcast.bsky.socialWatch Pokémon Legends Z-A https://twitch.tv/buskalilly Fridays from 9 or 10PM!Episodes on new megas will be coming soon!Check out other podcasts I make at https://podcastiopodcastius.orgMonster Mash https://monstermash.transistor.fm/Films and Filth. https://filmsandfilth.transistor.fm/Game Game Show. https://gamegameshow.transistor.fm/Support the show!https://patreon.com/PodcastioPodcastius ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★

Mega Pokémon spoilers for Legends Z-A. We go over all the Mega Pokémon in Legends Z-A and rank them on a tier list. This is our list, so if you have your own opinions, please share them in our Discord, Slack, or on YouTube. No news this week as there was travel. TIMESTAMPS00:00:00-Introduction00:02:30-Mega Pokémon, Part 100:30:40-Mega Pokémon, Part 201:05:45-Mega Pokémon, Part 301:44:50-CreditsLINKS

Thatch is joined by Lynian and The Fluffiest Whimsicott to talk about the recent details of Pokemon Legends ZA's DLC Mega Dimension and Mega Chimecho!Mailbag Question: What do you think of the DLC announcement? puclpodcast@gmail.comIntro: 0:01:01News: 0:10:31Mega Dimension ZA DLC Topic: 0:20:34PokeQuiz: 0:57:51Poke Opinion: 1:16:51Mailbag: 1:28:26PUCL Survey Link: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSdhx-6MT5XBhGASO6bIwg7Ze-QBCwuizZeMpx9f7uVBEJUCFw/viewform?usp=headerUse Code PUCLPOD5 at trollandtoad.com for 5% off and support the show!Check us out on Discord!www.pucldiscord.comTwitter: https://twitter.com/puclpodcastFacebook: https://Facebook.com/puclpodcastBlusky: https://bsky.app/profile/puclpodcast.bsky.socialTwitch: https://twitch.tv/thepuclpodcast Support us at https://Patreon! Patreon.com/puclpodcast#pokemonpodcast #pokecast #pokemontalk #pokemonxy #pokemonza #pokemontcg #pokemongo #pokemontalk #pokemon #nintendo #nintendoswitch #nintendoswitchlite #nintendoswitch2 #pokemonchampions #pokemonlegendsza #pokemonlegendsarceus #pokemonscarletandviolet Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Ev Randle is a General Partner @ Benchmark, one of the best funds in venture capital. In their latest fund, they have Mercor ($10BN valuation), Sierra ($10BN valuation), Firework ($4BN valuation), Legora ($2Bn valuation) and Langchain ($1.4Bn valuation). To put this in multiples on invested capital, that is a 60x, two 30x and two 20x. Before Benchmark, Ev was a Partner @ Kleiner Perkins and before Kleiner, Ev was an investor at Founders Fund and Bond.  AGENDA: 05:25 Biggest Investing Lessons from Peter Thiel, Mary Meeker and Mamoon Hamid 14:36 OpenAI Will Be a $TRN Company & OpenAI or Anthropic: Who Wins Coding? 22:27 Why We Should Not Focus on Margin But Gross Dollar Per Customer 30:25 Why AI Labs are the Biggest Threat to AI App Companies 44:26 Do Benchmark Fire Founders? If so… Truly the Best Partner? 54:38 People, Product, Market: Rank 1-3 and Why? 57:36 Why the Mega Funds Have Just Replaced Tiger 01:04:08 GC, Lightspeed and a16z Cannot Do 5x on Their Funds…  01:14:09 Single Biggest Threat to Benchmark  

Donald Trump's ever-changing narrative about his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein has grown increasingly incoherent, with his latest claim being that Epstein “stole” spa workers from Mar-a-Lago—including, allegedly, Virginia Giuffre. Instead of expressing outrage over Epstein's crimes or sympathy for the survivors, Trump framed the fallout like a staffing dispute, saying Epstein took people who worked for him and that Giuffre “had no complaints.” The shifting timelines—from calling Epstein a “terrific guy” to suddenly claiming moral indignation or workplace betrayal—don't inspire confidence in his account.Giuffre's family responded critically to Trump's comments, describing them as insensitive and reducing Virginia to an object rather than acknowledging her as a survivor. They emphasized that she was a person who endured serious trauma and should not be spoken about in such transactional terms. Their reaction raised broader concerns about the tone and framing of Trump's statements—particularly the absence of empathy toward those harmed by Epstein. By focusing on staffing disputes and loyalty rather than addressing the abuse itself, Trump's remarks were seen as overlooking the core human cost of the scandal.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Donald Trump's ever-changing narrative about his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein has grown increasingly incoherent, with his latest claim being that Epstein “stole” spa workers from Mar-a-Lago—including, allegedly, Virginia Giuffre. Instead of expressing outrage over Epstein's crimes or sympathy for the survivors, Trump framed the fallout like a staffing dispute, saying Epstein took people who worked for him and that Giuffre “had no complaints.” The shifting timelines—from calling Epstein a “terrific guy” to suddenly claiming moral indignation or workplace betrayal—don't inspire confidence in his account.Giuffre's family responded critically to Trump's comments, describing them as insensitive and reducing Virginia to an object rather than acknowledging her as a survivor. They emphasized that she was a person who endured serious trauma and should not be spoken about in such transactional terms. Their reaction raised broader concerns about the tone and framing of Trump's statements—particularly the absence of empathy toward those harmed by Epstein. By focusing on staffing disputes and loyalty rather than addressing the abuse itself, Trump's remarks were seen as overlooking the core human cost of the scandal.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

When it comes to Jeffrey Epstein, the world's most powerful people all seem to suffer from a highly selective strain of amnesia. Presidents, princes, professors, and billionaires who once took his calls, rode his planes, and cashed his checks suddenly can't recall how they knew him or why. Bill Clinton can't quite remember how many times he flew on Epstein's jet. Prince Andrew claims he doesn't remember that infamous photo with Virginia Giuffre. Les Wexner “doesn't recall” signing over his mansion. Ehud Barak “barely knew the man.” Even Alan Dershowitz, who was practically Epstein's legal shadow, insists any contact was purely academic. It's like the entire upper crust of global power suddenly developed synchronized memory loss the moment the cameras turned on.This “collective amnesia” isn't accidental—it's a survival mechanism. The same people who built and benefited from Epstein's network now pretend they barely knew the guy who managed their money, funded their projects, and connected them to each other. Their stories always change, their timelines blur, and their denials sound like rehearsed lines from the same crisis-management manual. When it comes to Epstein, the elite don't just forget—they professionally unremember.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Jalen Green is hurt again! Derik Queen is showing his skills! The Mavs and Kings are terrible. Luckily, in all this mess, we can find the best adds, stashes, drops and holds as we reset all 30 teams heading into week 4! The Old Man Squad has a PATREON now. It's $1 and doesn't get a single benefit. It is entirely to support the mission here but won't change anything we do. https://www.patreon.com/cw/oldmansquad Follow Dan Besbris on Twitter: https://x.com/danbesbris Find Dan on the brand new BlueSky social network: https://bit.ly/3Vo5M0N Check out Dan's Google Sheet with Ranks, Weekly Streaming Schedule Charts & Injury Replacement Adds FREE! https://bit.ly/3XrAdEW Listen and subscribe on iTunes: https://apple.co/3XiUzQK Listen and subscribe on Spotify: https://spoti.fi/3ACCHYe Float on over to the new Old Man Squad Sports Network YouTube page to watch videos from the network's top talent: https://bit.ly/46Z6fvb Join the Old Man Squad Discord to chat with Dan and all the other hosts: https://t.co/aY9cqDrgRY Follow Old Man Squad Fantasy on Instagram for all our short videos: https://bit.ly/3ZQbxrt Podcast logo by https://twitter.com/freekeepoints Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

We wonder if teachers get nervous before parent/teacher conferences, and we find out what you found out by Googling someone.

We find who has NEVER won a Grammy and who can "Think Fast".

For years, Queen Elizabeth II acted as Prince Andrew's unwavering shield against the fallout of the Jeffrey Epstein scandal. Even as allegations mounted, she reportedly resisted internal and external pressure to sideline her son, allowing him to retain royal privileges, honors, and public duties long after the public tide had turned. Her personal loyalty was said to eclipse political and institutional logic—Andrew remained a fixture at Balmoral and Windsor, even as palace staff urged the Queen to distance herself. Royal insiders and biographers have described her as deeply maternal in her defense of him, believing he was being unfairly vilified and refusing to entertain discussions about exile or disownment. This protective stance allowed Andrew to delay accountability for years while the rest of the royal household absorbed the reputational damage.But by early 2022, under overwhelming public and institutional pressure, even the Queen's protection could no longer hold back the storm. She reluctantly approved the removal of Andrew's military titles, royal patronages, and the use of his HRH style—a move seen as both a last resort and a symbolic cutting of ties to preserve the monarchy. Still, until her death later that year, she continued to privately support him, hosting him at Balmoral and reportedly helping fund parts of his legal settlement with Virginia Giuffre. It was the ultimate act of maternal loyalty—protecting her son from disgrace even as the monarchy fought to survive the wreckage his scandals had created.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Sarah Kellen (also known as Sarah Vickers or Sarah Kensington) is widely described as one of the key assistants to Jeffrey Epstein during the 2000s — a role in which she allegedly managed and coordinated many of the logistical and operational elements of Epstein's sex-trafficking network. Court records, witness statements, and investigative reporting claim that Kellen was responsible for arranging “massages” (in many cases euphemisms for sexual encounters), scheduling flights on Epstein's private jets, keeping contact lists of girls, and effectively acting as a gatekeeper for victims who were transported to various propertiesDespite her deep involvement, Kellen has never faced criminal charges. Federal judges and prosecutors have described her as a “knowing participant” and a “criminally responsible” figure in Epstein's network, yet she remains free — claiming she was also a victim of Epstein's control. Many survivors reject that narrative, arguing that she had full agency and willingly helped enable the abuse of minors. Her story underscores a broader truth about the Epstein case: that key facilitators, assistants, and coordinators — often women — operated the machinery of exploitation with precision, and most have evaded accountability under the guise of victimhood.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In the years following Jeffrey Epstein's death, one of the more disturbing revelations about his compensation fund emerged when a self-identified recruiter — referred to in court documents only as “Jane Doe” — attempted to claim money from it. This woman openly admitted that she had helped Epstein recruit underage girls but simultaneously described herself as a victim, saying she had been sexually abused and trafficked by Epstein for more than a decade. Instead of continuing her federal lawsuit against his estate, she withdrew it and pursued a payout through the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program, a fund specifically intended to compensate those exploited by Epstein's network. The move ignited outrage among other victims and their attorneys, who saw it as a grotesque inversion of justice: a recruiter trying to profit from a fund meant to heal the very wounds she helped inflict.The controversy underscored the moral and legal murk that has long surrounded Epstein's empire. His trafficking operation relied on a pyramid-like system in which victims were sometimes coerced into recruiting others, blurring the line between participant and prey. But many advocates argued that this woman's decade-long role as an active recruiter made her claim fundamentally illegitimate. Though her application highlighted the psychological manipulation and coercion Epstein used to control his circle, critics countered that intent doesn't erase culpability. In the end, the episode became another reminder of how Epstein's network corrupted everything it touched — even the very mechanisms meant to deliver justice to his victims.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Una historia del 2017 que contamos en el 2018, pero que en retrospectiva es interesante y reveladora.Parte 1: https://divulgaciontotal.com/w/?p=2305Parte 2: https://divulgaciontotal.com/w/?p=2444

Boxing Podcast & News - Sports -