Podcast appearances and mentions of Sean Combs

Our friend Rashone joins the show, a new Nancy Guthrie suspect video, US Olympians getting screwed, Nicole Curtis n-word fallout, a new bonerline, and Jim's Picks: Top 10 Rap Songs Using Rock Samples. Nancy Guthrie Update: Everyone wants Savannah Guthrie's chair. There's a new video out of some dope 5 miles down the road. James Van Der Beek GoFundMe is up to $1.5M. Katie Holmes & Stacy Kiebler miss him terribly and want all of the internet to know it. 2026 Olympics: USA Figure Skaters screwed. USA snowboarder rocks...And then doesn't. Gay Per View. Amber Glenn is mad about all the online hate. The Epstein Files are getting better than ever. Prince Andrew is in trouble...AGAIN. Yet no one seems to be getting in real trouble. Karyna Shuliak was Epstein's main squeeze. Now she's a dentist. And somehow she got her degree from Columbia. Casey Wasserman's clients are just starting to leave after his connection to Epstein. More from The Fighter & The Kid. Who is dumber...Bryan Callen or Brendan Schaub? Chris Watts' side piece that he killed his wife and kids for, Nichol Kessinger, is tough to find. I wonder if it has anything to do with how she looks now. Rashone is in the building. Check out The Sneakerbox Podcast. We ask Rashone what he thinks about Nicole Curtis saying the N-Word. Ryan Reynolds & Blake Lively are the devil. New Bonerline. More Super Bowl Halftime talk. Electric cars...Good or bad? Which black guy is going down next? What does Rashone think about Diddy? Jim's Black History Month Picks: Top 10 Rap Songs Using Rock Samples Merch can still be purchased. Click here to see what we have to offer for a limited time. If you'd like to help support the show… consider subscribing to our YouTube Channel, Facebook, Instagram and Twitter (Drew Lane, Marc Fellhauer, Trudi Daniels, Jim Bentley and BranDon)

Katt Williams' new Netflix special and his controversial comments about Hollywood parties, an upcoming Bob Saget documentary, and Bill Maher's feud with Jimmy Kimmel. Chris Fleming is set for an HBO Max special, and Pete Davidson's new Netflix 'video podcast' faces criticism for lack of format.Additionally, Eddie Murphy will star in a new Amazon comedy film, Kevin Hart invests in Burn Bootcamp, and Jerry Seinfeld is featured on a special Mets baseball card.  00:19 Katt Williams' Netflix Special and Hollywood Parties01:33 Bob Saget Documentary Announcement02:23 Bill Maher and Jimmy Kimmel's Feud03:27 Chris Fleming's HBO Max Special05:18 Pete Davidson's Netflix Show Controversy10:18 Eddie Murphy's New Comedy Movie10:43 Kevin Hart's Investment in Burn Bootcamp11:21 Jerry Seinfeld's Mets Baseball Card Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/daily-comedy-news-with-johnny-mac--4522158/support.Daily Comedy News is the number one comedy news podcast, delivering daily coverage of standup comedy, late night television, comedy specials, tours, and the business of comedy.COMEDY SURVIVOR in the facebook group.Contact John at John@thesharkdeck dot com For Uninterrupted Listening, use the Apple Podcast App and click the banner that says Uninterrupted Listening.  $4.99/month John's Substack about media is free.This is the animal sanctuary mentioned in the February 10 episode.

Você sente que sua mente está sendo programada pelo algoritmo? Neste vídeo, analisamos a "Teoria da Internet Morta", o fenômeno bizarro dos vídeos de Family Guy e Minecraft (Brain Rot) e como a Teoria da Simulação pode explicar o que estamos vivendo em 2025.Discutimos a fundo o novo documentário do Kanye West (Ye), "In Whose Name?", e o especial polêmico do Dave Chappelle, conectando os pontos sobre os rituais de humilhação em Hollywood e o caso P. Diddy.Além disso, um guia completo de cultura pop com críticas dos filmes The Surfer (Nicolas Cage), If I Had Legs I'd Kick You (A24) e os Melhores Álbuns de 2025 (Rosalia, FKA Twigs, Pusher). Para fechar, relatos exclusivos da minha viagem ao Japão, dicas gastronômicas e perrengues médicos em Osaka.

The panel reacts to wild Super Bowl commercials, from 50 Cent's savage DoorDash ad to Coinbase's viral sing-along marketing play. They break down trolling, branding genius, and how advertisers use culture, nostalgia, and controversy to win the biggest stage in media.

This week the gang talked about Guitar Hero III: Legends of Rock, Trails in the Sky 1st Chapter Remake, Dragon Quest VII Reimagined, Marvel Rivals, Medabots, Rhapsody: A Musical Adventure, Shift,Madō Monogatari, and more!Follow us on Instagram Leave us a voicemail at (804) 286-0626 and consider supporting us through our Patreon Check out the Discord! Theme song remixed by Poisonfrog News Links:Nintendo Direct Pokémon gen 10 leaks VA accidentally leaks Xeno game Sony is making AI podcasts FOR YOU! New next gen Xbox info State of Play coming 

Marie Faustin and Alex English return to the show (for the first time together!) to discuss Stavvy's World's Black History Month programming, what Rachel Dolezal's been up to, going 50/50 on dates, getting in trouble for spilling parental gossip to family friends, Cam Newton's fits, Diddy, and much more. Marie, Alex and Stav help callers including a trans man whose bodybuilding roommate is stealing his testosterone, a woman whose boyfriend won't eat it after she co-signed his car, and a young man who has trouble dating due to his over-the-top Canadian accent. Rufat Agayev also joins briefly to help give advice to a woman with a twisted question about a massive inheritance that her roommate is expecting. Follow Marie Faustin on social media:https://www.instagram.com/reeezyhttps://x.com/MsReeezy  https://www.tiktok.com/@mareeezy  https://www.youtube.com/@MaReeezy   Follow Alex English on social media:https://www.instagram.com/alex3nglishhttp://twitter.com/alex3nglishhttps://www.tiktok.com/@alex3nglish   Follow Rufat Agayev on social media:https://www.rufatagayev.com/https://twitter.com/Rufat__Agayevhttps://www.instagram.com/rufat_agayev/https://www.youtube.com/@rufat_agayev     Thank you to our sponsors!Cash App - https://cash.app/ CODE SECURE10Visible - https://www.visible.com/ switch now!Twisted Tea - https://www.twistedtea.com/locations Keep It Twisted!! ☎️ Want to be a part of the show? Call 904-800-STAV and leave a voicemail to get advice!

Hollywood preaches compassion — then protects predators. Jillian sits down with PragerU's Xaviaer DuRousseau to expose elite hypocrisy, celebrity double standards, and the ideological collapse reshaping America. We cover: • Epstein's Cabal — why elites keep shielding predators like Jeffrey Epstein, Diddy, Jay-Z, and Chrissy Teigen while lecturing the public on morality • Celebrity hypocrisy — Bad Bunny cashing a Super Bowl paycheck after claiming he'd stop performing in the U.S., Billie Eilish's “stolen land” virtue signaling, and the disturbing deleted tweets cancel culture forgot • White liberal meltdown — racial slurs aimed at Black ICE agents, vigilante tactics, and political candidates openly encouraging gangs to confront federal law enforcement • “Mamdani Madness” & NYC decline — how Zohran Mamdani represents a broader collapse: radical optics, criminals being courted, trash barriers rising, taxpayer dollars flowing to undocumented immigrants — plus outrage over tapping a former Al-Qaeda–linked 9/11 defense attorney to help run legal affairs in New York • Taqiyya explained — how ideological deception operates in modern politics and activism • Culture-war flashpoints — trans ideology, the SAVE Act, voter ID suddenly labeled “racist,” and the broken social contract • Adrenochrome & elite conspiracies — separating internet myth from real questions about power, corruption, and institutional rot Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Maureen Comey, a federal prosecutor and daughter of former FBI Director James Comey, was recently removed from her position following a series of high-profile prosecutorial failures, most notably her handling of the Sean “Diddy” Combs case and the ongoing fallout from the Jeffrey Epstein investigation. In the Diddy case, despite mounting public allegations, corroborating testimony, and a sprawling federal investigation, Comey failed to secure a conviction on key charges—prompting criticism from within the DOJ and from the public, who viewed it as yet another instance of the wealthy and powerful skirting justice. Her role in the Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell matters had already drawn skepticism, particularly over the slow pace of disclosures and missing evidence. Combined, these failures painted a picture of a prosecutor either unwilling or unable to push cases against elite defendants across the finish line.Comey's dismissal is being viewed by many as symbolic of a broader institutional failure. For years, she was positioned as a central figure in prosecutions that promised accountability for Epstein's network of enablers, yet few meaningful outcomes followed. The fact that she is now gone—without fanfare, without accountability, and without explanation—only fuels suspicions that her presence was more about containment than prosecution. Her firing doesn't feel like justice—it feels like an after-the-fact cleanup, a quiet reshuffling meant to relieve pressure while continuing to protect the same circles that have evaded consequences all along.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:DOJ fires Maurene Comey, daughter of James Comey and a prosecutor in Sean Combs' and Ghislaine Maxwell's cases

Watch all of our Epstein videos here:    • Epstein  Jay Dyer's links: Youtube:    / @jaydyer  X: https://x.com/Jay_D007IG: https://www.instagram.com/jaysanalysi...Website: https://jaysanalysis.comWatch more of our P-Diddy videos here:     • P Diddy  #truecrime #news #youtubenews #podcast #livestream #youtube #trump #epstein #musk #news #usa #uk #royals #royal #royalfamily #princeandrew

Clayton Howard, a former male escort and frequent participant in Diddy's private sex parties known as “freak-offs,” has filed a lawsuit accusing both Sean “Diddy” Combs and Cassie Ventura of sex trafficking, coercion, and abuse. According to his claims, he was recruited to perform sex acts under the guise of high-end parties, only to find himself drugged, manipulated, and transported across state lines for increasingly degrading and violent encounters. He alleges that Diddy exercised complete control over the events, orchestrating who did what and with whom, often while recording the acts without consent. Howard describes a world of intimidation, where refusal meant exile, and participation meant surrendering autonomy and dignity.What makes his allegations even more explosive is his assertion that Cassie wasn't just a victim of Diddy's abuse—but an active participant in his exploitation. He accuses her of knowingly infecting him with an STD, coercing him into sexual acts, demanding he masturbate for hours while she filmed him, and ultimately pressuring him into an abortion. Howard paints a picture of Cassie as someone who embraced the power dynamic created by Diddy, allegedly using it to dominate and humiliate others in turn. His lawsuit portrays the entire environment as a sadistic, hierarchical structure of abuse where both Diddy and Cassie held power and used it to break down and control those beneath them.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - Howard v Combs Ventura

Clayton Howard, a former male escort and frequent participant in Diddy's private sex parties known as “freak-offs,” has filed a lawsuit accusing both Sean “Diddy” Combs and Cassie Ventura of sex trafficking, coercion, and abuse. According to his claims, he was recruited to perform sex acts under the guise of high-end parties, only to find himself drugged, manipulated, and transported across state lines for increasingly degrading and violent encounters. He alleges that Diddy exercised complete control over the events, orchestrating who did what and with whom, often while recording the acts without consent. Howard describes a world of intimidation, where refusal meant exile, and participation meant surrendering autonomy and dignity.What makes his allegations even more explosive is his assertion that Cassie wasn't just a victim of Diddy's abuse—but an active participant in his exploitation. He accuses her of knowingly infecting him with an STD, coercing him into sexual acts, demanding he masturbate for hours while she filmed him, and ultimately pressuring him into an abortion. Howard paints a picture of Cassie as someone who embraced the power dynamic created by Diddy, allegedly using it to dominate and humiliate others in turn. His lawsuit portrays the entire environment as a sadistic, hierarchical structure of abuse where both Diddy and Cassie held power and used it to break down and control those beneath them.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - Howard v Combs Ventura

Clayton Howard, a former male escort and frequent participant in Diddy's private sex parties known as “freak-offs,” has filed a lawsuit accusing both Sean “Diddy” Combs and Cassie Ventura of sex trafficking, coercion, and abuse. According to his claims, he was recruited to perform sex acts under the guise of high-end parties, only to find himself drugged, manipulated, and transported across state lines for increasingly degrading and violent encounters. He alleges that Diddy exercised complete control over the events, orchestrating who did what and with whom, often while recording the acts without consent. Howard describes a world of intimidation, where refusal meant exile, and participation meant surrendering autonomy and dignity.What makes his allegations even more explosive is his assertion that Cassie wasn't just a victim of Diddy's abuse—but an active participant in his exploitation. He accuses her of knowingly infecting him with an STD, coercing him into sexual acts, demanding he masturbate for hours while she filmed him, and ultimately pressuring him into an abortion. Howard paints a picture of Cassie as someone who embraced the power dynamic created by Diddy, allegedly using it to dominate and humiliate others in turn. His lawsuit portrays the entire environment as a sadistic, hierarchical structure of abuse where both Diddy and Cassie held power and used it to break down and control those beneath them.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - Howard v Combs Ventura

Noted sicko the Dalai Lama takes home his first Grammy and Bob Dylan and Paul McCartney are announced for Turning Point USA's Super Bowl halftime show (source: Facebook). Full episode on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/posts/290-diddy-lama-150112918

Here we are with another N64 Racing game..... if you haven't noticed yet this is not my favorite genre, but i am always up for new things. For this Episode we take a look at the Legendary Diddy Kong Racing.  A game that many  people love. Does this game still holds up in 2026?  Come hear what we have to say about this game. Starring Mike Albertin, Vincent Goodwin, and Cody Laveau.  Vincent's Podcast - https://somfrc.libsyn.com/ Cody's TikTok - https://www.tiktok.com/@cajuncrippler A Gamer Looks at 40 - https://agamerlooksat40.com/ Carrying My Cross - https://podcasts.apple.com/pl/podcast/carrying-my-cross-a-faith-journey-podcast/id1865524685 Phoebe's Twitch - https://www.twitch.tv/theletsplayprincess Phoebe's Podcast - https://nerdsabroadcast.podbean.com/ Zac's Podcast - https://linktr.ee/absolutelythebest Helena - https://linktr.ee/helhathfury Patreon - https://www.patreon.com/GamesMyMomFound Follow us on Facebook. Instagram - gamesmymomfound_ YouTube  - https://youtube.com/c/GamesMyMomFoundPodcast Discord - https://discord.gg/ Donkey Kong 94 (Mini 67) - GMMF https://gamesmymomfoundpodcast.podbean.com/e/donkey-kong-94-mini-67-gmmf Donkey Kong Country 3: Dixies Double Trouble - GMMF 202 https://gamesmymomfoundpodcast.podbean.com/e/donkey-kong-country-3-dixies-double-trouble-gmmf-202 Donkey Kong Country 2 Diddy's Kong Quest - GMMF 173 https://gamesmymomfoundpodcast.podbean.com/e/donkey-kong-country-2-diddy-s-kong-quest-gmmf-173 Donkey Kong Country - GMMF 98 https://gamesmymomfoundpodcast.podbean.com/e/donkey-kong-country-gmmf-98  

*Originally aired September 22nd, 2025 In this episode of Perspektives, Big Bank sits down with music executive Ray Daniels for an insightful conversation on consistency, self-discovery, and the changing landscape of the music industry. They explore the importance of effort, the challenges artists face in a gatekept industry, and the necessity of recognizing one’s value in a competitive environment. The discussion expands beyond music to address current economic challenges, the role of friendship and loyalty in business, and cultural reflections on leadership. Ray also shares his thoughts on the controversy surrounding Puff Daddy, the future of humanity in relation to technology, and even the possibilities of extraterrestrial life. Tune in and join the conversation in the socials below. Rate, subscribe, comment and share. Follow Perspektives With Bank on IG @perspektiveswithbank @raydanielsSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Bone Homegurl! On Diddy, Tory Lanez, Rap Economics, TrillTalkNoPillTalk, New Dallas! The South!

On this episode of The Other Side Of Midnight, join Lionel and Lynn Shaw for a volatile "Warrior Wednesday" as they rip the curtain back on the silent epidemic of teen dating violence, exposing how "digital pressure cookers" and violent pornography are normalizing abuse among youth. Lynn breaks down the warning signs every parent must know while discussing the lawsuits aiming to hold Big Tech accountable. Then, the episode takes a sharp turn into the bizarre as Lionel dissects the suspicious kidnapping of Savannah Guthrie's mother, roasting the "clichéd" media coverage and the logic behind a Bitcoin ransom note sent to TMZ. From Epstein document drops to wild tangents involving Diddy and enough body oil to cover Aretha Franklin, this is a dark, humorous, and skeptical look at a world where conspiracy theories might just be the truth. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In this episode of The Other Side of Midnight, Lionel dissects the bizarre and suspicious disappearance of Nancy Guthrie, Savannah Guthrie's mother, scrutinizing the "clichéd" media coverage and the alleged Bitcoin ransom note sent to TMZ. Lionel questions the logic of the investigation, asking why tracking dogs failed and debating if the cartel angle holds water in the Arizona high desert. Amidst the mystery, Lionel roasts the "incompetence" of political figures like Kash Patel and Pam Bondi, redefines the modern meaning of "conspiracy theory," and goes on a wild tangent involving Diddy, Epstein, and enough body oil to cover Aretha Franklin. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Watch all of our Hamamoto videos here:    • Professor Hamamoto  Hamamoto on YouTube:    / @professorhamamoto  Prof. Darrell Hamamoto, who is an American writer, academic, and specialist in U.S. media and ethnic studies.Professors Facebook : https://www.facebook.com/share/hZajgC...UNTOUCHABLE - Jimmy Savile documentary    • UNTOUCHABLE - Jimmy Savile documentary by ...  ADOPTED KID'S CA HORROR STORY & BOYS TOWN! PASTOR Eddie https://youtube.com/live/vD3SGWpnfyMWatch Used By ELITES From Age 6 - Survivor Kelly Patterson https://youtube.com/live/nkKkIfLkRx0KELLY'S 2 HOUR VIDEO ON VIRGINIA    • Video  BOOK LINKS: Who Killed Epstein? Prince Andrew or Bill Clinton by Shaun Attwood UK: https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B093QK1GS1 USA: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B093QK1GS1 Worldwide: https://books2read.com/u/bQjGQD All of Shaun's books on Amazon UK: https://www.amazon.co.uk/stores/Shaun...All of Shaun's books on Amazon USA: https://www.amazon.com/stores/Shaun-A...Follow P Diddys latest:   • P Diddy  #jayz #beyonce #hollywood #countrymusic #nashville #pdiddy #puffdaddy #truecrime #news #youtubenews #podcast #livestream #youtube #thepope #vatican #church Here are Hamamoto's recommended books:Can't Stop Won't Stop:A History of the Hip-Hop Generation ——-The Psychological Covert War on Hip-Hop——-The Covert War Against Rock:What You Don't Know About The Deaths of;(Jim Morrison, Tupac Shakur, Michael Hutchence, Brian Jones, Jimi Hendrix,Phil Ochs, Bob Marley, Peter Tosh, John Lennon & The Notorious B.I.G)——-Hit Men:Power Brokers and Fast Money Inside the Music Business——-Me, the Mob, and the Music:One Helluva Ride Tommy James and the Shondells——-Godfather of the Music Business:Morris Levy (American Made Music Series)——-LAbyrinth:A Detective Investigates the Murders of Tupac Shakur and Notorious B.I.G., the Implication of Death Row Records, Suge Knight, and the Origins of the Los Angeles——-The FBI war on Tupac Shakur:State repression of Black Leaders from the Civil Rights Error to the 1990s (real world)——-The FBI war on Tupac Shakur and Black Leaders:US Intelligence's: Murderous Targeting of Tupac, MLK, Malcol, Panthers, Hendrix, Marley rappers and Linked Ethic Leftists——-Have Gun Will Travel:The Spectacular Rise and Violent Fall of Death Row Records——-The Big Payback:The History of the Business of Hip-Hop——-Ruthless:A Memoir——-Hip-Hop Decoded——-Q: The Autobiography of Quincy Jones——-How to Wreck a Nice Beach:The Vocoder from WW II to Hip-Hop, The Machine Speaks——-Dancing with the Devil:How Puff burned the bad boys of Hip-Hop——-Hiding in Hip-Hop:On the Down Low in the Entertainment industry—from Music to Hollywood

Welcome to another amazing The Pop Culture Cafe. Well, hopefully it will be amazing. The show we review the Sean Combs doc and StarFleet Academy. Also, thoughts about the Masters of the Universe trailer. Plus many other things. 

Ставьте лайки, чтоб видео продвигалось лучше! Таймкоды:00:00 Начало01:07 Научное открытие01:14 Отменакондаз11:04 Математическое уравнение11:41 Биба и Боба — два президента13:26 Сомнительное предложение14:28 Необдуманный поступок15:01 Тотальное замерзание15:41 Обычный день в Миннеаполисе18:02 Доприбалтялись18:31 Хованский31:27 Двойные стандарты33:31 Мусульманская Британия34:04 Запрещаем стресс34:35 ОЧЕНЬ умная Кая Каллас35:10 Учительница в психушке36:34 Новые файлы Эпштейна39:37 Билл Гейтс скрывает ЗППП41:03 Хорошо там, где нас нет41:46 Аниме и СВО42:43 Зеленский ставит задачи45:52 Бездумное использование ИИ46:29 Номер — свалка46:58 Боевой учитель47:33 Блэкаут в Киеве48:01 Трамп доволен!48:43 Российская Ёлка49:04 Press F50:22 Поджег или выселение?52:01 Очередное предложение…54:19 Кадыров, но другой57:29 Ошиблись дверью58:20 ЧП в США01:02:48 Зеленский не сдастся без боя01:03:41 Поднятие цен01:03:52 Телефон не нужен01:05:03 День водки01:05:21 Венесуэльская нефти01:07:08 Жириновский и Эпштейн01:08:55 Эминем не остановил P Diddy Сотрудничество – ТГ — @maryronmanagerСасфликс – https://sasflix.ru/Мой магазин – https://podsas.ruВКонтакте – https://vk.com/ikakprostoНа Рутубе – https://rutube.ru/channel/21014334/Телеграм – https://t.me/ikakprostoВ Дзене – https://dzen.ru/ikakprostoАудиоверсия – https://band.link/ikakprosto

Quake discusses Michael “5000” Watts passing away at 52, Diddy filing statement in NBC lawsuit denying role in multiple deaths, prosecutors fighting to keep Lil Durk's music as murder-for-hire trial evidence, J. Cole revealing “The Fall Off” evolved into a double album following Drake/Kendrick beef, The Game challenging Kendrick Lamar to a battle, Jay-Z and Pusha T getting named in Jeffrey Epstein files, 50 Cent saying he's going to make a documentary on Jay-Z, Kendrick Lamar officially winning the most Grammys for a rapper ever and much more.(00:00) - Intro(03:14) - Michael “5000” Watts Passes Away At 52(06:41) - Diddy Files Statement In NBC Lawsuit Denying Role In Multiple Deaths(09:59) - Prosecutors Fight To Keep Lil Durk's Music As Murder-For-Hire Trial Evidence(14:05) - J. Cole Reveals “The Fall Off” Evolved Into A Double Album Following Drake/Kendrick Beef(19:53) - The Game Challenges Kendrick Lamar To A Battle(24:44) - Jay-Z And Pusha T Get Named In Jeffrey Epstein Files(34:40) - 50 Cent Says He's Going To Make A Documentary On Jay-Z(41:45) - Kendrick Lamar Has Officially Won The Most Grammys For A Rapper Ever(44:47) - New Music(45:23) - Album Sales

The first week of Sean "Diddy" Combs' federal sex trafficking and racketeering trial in New York featured emotionally charged testimony from his former partner, singer Cassie Ventura. Over four days, Ventura detailed an 11-year relationship marked by coercion, physical abuse, and manipulation. She described being forced into drug-fueled "freak-offs"—group sex encounters with paid escorts—often filmed and allegedly used by Combs for blackmail. A 2016 hotel surveillance video showing Combs assaulting Ventura was presented as evidence. Ventura also recounted an incident where Combs allegedly threatened to suspend someone over a balcony, illustrating a pattern of intimidation and control.The defense acknowledged Combs' history of violence and substance abuse but argued that these actions did not constitute sex trafficking. They portrayed the events as part of a consensual lifestyle, aiming to separate personal misconduct from criminal enterprise. Additional testimony from singer Dawn Richard supported Ventura's claims, recalling a 2009 incident where Combs allegedly assaulted Ventura over a domestic dispute. The prosecution contends that Combs operated a criminal network involving staff who facilitated the alleged abuses. The trial, expected to last several more weeks, continues to draw significant public attention.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

The first week of Sean "Diddy" Combs' federal sex trafficking and racketeering trial in New York featured emotionally charged testimony from his former partner, singer Cassie Ventura. Over four days, Ventura detailed an 11-year relationship marked by coercion, physical abuse, and manipulation. She described being forced into drug-fueled "freak-offs"—group sex encounters with paid escorts—often filmed and allegedly used by Combs for blackmail. A 2016 hotel surveillance video showing Combs assaulting Ventura was presented as evidence. Ventura also recounted an incident where Combs allegedly threatened to suspend someone over a balcony, illustrating a pattern of intimidation and control.The defense acknowledged Combs' history of violence and substance abuse but argued that these actions did not constitute sex trafficking. They portrayed the events as part of a consensual lifestyle, aiming to separate personal misconduct from criminal enterprise. Additional testimony from singer Dawn Richard supported Ventura's claims, recalling a 2009 incident where Combs allegedly assaulted Ventura over a domestic dispute. The prosecution contends that Combs operated a criminal network involving staff who facilitated the alleged abuses. The trial, expected to last several more weeks, continues to draw significant public attention.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

A memorandum in support of a request for dismissal of a complaint is a legal document submitted to a court that outlines the reasons why a complaint should be dismissed. This type of memorandum is typically prepared by the defendant or their legal counsel and presented to the court as part of the pre-trial proceedings.In this document, the defendant usually provides legal arguments and evidence to support their request for dismissal. This could include demonstrating that the complaint fails to state a valid legal claim, that there is a lack of jurisdiction, or that there are other legal grounds for dismissal.The memorandum serves as a persuasive tool for the court, aiming to convince the judge that the complaint does not have merit and should not proceed to trial. It is important for the memorandum to be well-researched, clearly written, and supported by relevant legal precedent.In this episode we begin our look at the UMG memorandum in support of dismissing the complaint filed against them by Rodney Jones.   to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.616406.41.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)

A memorandum in support of a request for dismissal of a complaint is a legal document submitted to a court that outlines the reasons why a complaint should be dismissed. This type of memorandum is typically prepared by the defendant or their legal counsel and presented to the court as part of the pre-trial proceedings.In this document, the defendant usually provides legal arguments and evidence to support their request for dismissal. This could include demonstrating that the complaint fails to state a valid legal claim, that there is a lack of jurisdiction, or that there are other legal grounds for dismissal.The memorandum serves as a persuasive tool for the court, aiming to convince the judge that the complaint does not have merit and should not proceed to trial. It is important for the memorandum to be well-researched, clearly written, and supported by relevant legal precedent.In this episode we begin our look at the UMG memorandum in support of dismissing the complaint filed against them by Rodney Jones.   to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.616406.41.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)

The allegations that Sean "Puff Daddy" Combs is currently facing are not new to him.   In fact, he's been accused of things similar many times in the past.   Now, with the dam breaking and many accusers coming forward, for those of us who have followed the Jeffrey Epstein case, the similarities are very, very apparent and when looking at the way things have transpired since these most recent allegations have been made, it's not hard to follow the thread connecting these civil allegations and the current criminal ones.   In this episode we get a look at those allegations for ourselves and why this is looking like it's going to be a major RICO case against Sean "Puff Daddy" Combs.The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) is a United States federal law enacted in 1970 to combat organized crime. RICO targets individuals or groups involved in illegal enterprises, known as "racketeering activities," such as bribery, extortion, fraud, and money laundering.Key features of RICO include:Criminalization of Racketeering Activity: RICO makes it a federal crime to participate in, or conspire to participate in, the affairs of an enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity.Enterprise: RICO applies to both legitimate and illegitimate enterprises, including corporations, partnerships, and other associations.Pattern of Racketeering Activity: A pattern is established by engaging in at least two instances of racketeering activity within ten years.Consequences: Individuals convicted under RICO can face substantial fines, forfeiture of assets, and imprisonment for up to 20 years per racketeering count, with potential enhancements for multiple offenses.RICO has been used extensively against organized crime syndicates, such as the Mafia, but it has also been employed in cases involving various other criminal enterprises, including drug trafficking, securities fraud, and corruption. Prosecutors often use RICO to dismantle criminal organizations by targeting not only the individuals directly involved in criminal activities but also those who facilitate or benefit from them, such as leaders, associates, and even legitimate businesses linked to the enterprise.To successfully prosecute under RICO, prosecutors must demonstrate the existence of an enterprise engaged in a pattern of racketeering activity, as well as the defendant's involvement in that enterprise and its illegal activities. RICO has been praised for its effectiveness in dismantling criminal organizations but has also faced criticism for its broad scope and potential for abuse in certain cases.In this episode, we get a look at the amended complaint that has been filed by Rodney Jones.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.616406.30.1.pdf (courtlistener.com)

The allegations that Sean "Puff Daddy" Combs is currently facing are not new to him.   In fact, he's been accused of things similar many times in the past.   Now, with the dam breaking and many accusers coming forward, for those of us who have followed the Jeffrey Epstein case, the similarities are very, very apparent and when looking at the way things have transpired since these most recent allegations have been made, it's not hard to follow the thread connecting these civil allegations and the current criminal ones.   In this episode we get a look at those allegations for ourselves and why this is looking like it's going to be a major RICO case against Sean "Puff Daddy" Combs.The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) is a United States federal law enacted in 1970 to combat organized crime. RICO targets individuals or groups involved in illegal enterprises, known as "racketeering activities," such as bribery, extortion, fraud, and money laundering.Key features of RICO include:Criminalization of Racketeering Activity: RICO makes it a federal crime to participate in, or conspire to participate in, the affairs of an enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity.Enterprise: RICO applies to both legitimate and illegitimate enterprises, including corporations, partnerships, and other associations.Pattern of Racketeering Activity: A pattern is established by engaging in at least two instances of racketeering activity within ten years.Consequences: Individuals convicted under RICO can face substantial fines, forfeiture of assets, and imprisonment for up to 20 years per racketeering count, with potential enhancements for multiple offenses.RICO has been used extensively against organized crime syndicates, such as the Mafia, but it has also been employed in cases involving various other criminal enterprises, including drug trafficking, securities fraud, and corruption. Prosecutors often use RICO to dismantle criminal organizations by targeting not only the individuals directly involved in criminal activities but also those who facilitate or benefit from them, such as leaders, associates, and even legitimate businesses linked to the enterprise.To successfully prosecute under RICO, prosecutors must demonstrate the existence of an enterprise engaged in a pattern of racketeering activity, as well as the defendant's involvement in that enterprise and its illegal activities. RICO has been praised for its effectiveness in dismantling criminal organizations but has also faced criticism for its broad scope and potential for abuse in certain cases.In this episode, we get a look at the amended complaint that has been filed by Rodney Jones.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.616406.30.1.pdf (courtlistener.com)

Sean "Diddy" Combs, a prominent music mogul and entrepreneur, has faced multiple allegations of sexual assault spanning several decades. One such allegation involves a woman identified as Jane Doe, who claims she was assaulted by Combs during an event related to the MTV reality show Making the Band.BackgroundIn 2004, Jane Doe, then 19 years old, was a college student in Brooklyn. She met Combs during a promotional event for Making the Band, a reality show he produced that aimed to form a new music group.According to Jane Doe's lawsuit:Invitation to Hotel Room: Combs invited her and a friend to his hotel room in Manhattan under the pretense of discussing potential opportunities in the music industry.Unwanted Advances: Once in the room, Combs allegedly made unsolicited sexual advances, including inappropriate touching and attempts to kiss her.Physical Resistance: Jane Doe resisted his advances, leading to a physical struggle where she was reportedly pushed onto the bed.Assault: She alleges that Combs then sexually assaulted her despite her protests.Following the alleged incident, Jane Doe states she experienced significant emotional distress, including feelings of shame and humiliation. She also claims to have faced professional setbacks as a result of the assault.Jane Doe filed a lawsuit against Combs, seeking compensatory and punitive damages for the alleged assault. The case is currently pending in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New YorkThis allegation is part of a series of accusations against Combs, with multiple individuals coming forward with claims of sexual assault and misconduct. Combs has denied these allegations, and his legal team has stated that he intends to defend himself against these claims.(commercial at 7:57)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:combs-da-band-photoshoot-complaint.pdf

Sean "Diddy" Combs, a prominent music mogul and entrepreneur, has faced multiple allegations of sexual assault spanning several decades. One such allegation involves a woman identified as Jane Doe, who claims she was assaulted by Combs during an event related to the MTV reality show Making the Band.BackgroundIn 2004, Jane Doe, then 19 years old, was a college student in Brooklyn. She met Combs during a promotional event for Making the Band, a reality show he produced that aimed to form a new music group.According to Jane Doe's lawsuit:Invitation to Hotel Room: Combs invited her and a friend to his hotel room in Manhattan under the pretense of discussing potential opportunities in the music industry.Unwanted Advances: Once in the room, Combs allegedly made unsolicited sexual advances, including inappropriate touching and attempts to kiss her.Physical Resistance: Jane Doe resisted his advances, leading to a physical struggle where she was reportedly pushed onto the bed.Assault: She alleges that Combs then sexually assaulted her despite her protests.Following the alleged incident, Jane Doe states she experienced significant emotional distress, including feelings of shame and humiliation. She also claims to have faced professional setbacks as a result of the assault.Jane Doe filed a lawsuit against Combs, seeking compensatory and punitive damages for the alleged assault. The case is currently pending in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New YorkThis allegation is part of a series of accusations against Combs, with multiple individuals coming forward with claims of sexual assault and misconduct. Combs has denied these allegations, and his legal team has stated that he intends to defend himself against these claims.(commercial at 7:57)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:combs-da-band-photoshoot-complaint.pdf

The allegations that Sean "Puff Daddy" Combs is currently facing are not new to him.   In fact, he's been accused of things similar many times in the past.   Now, with the dam breaking and many accusers coming forward, for those of us who have followed the Jeffrey Epstein case, the similarities are very, very apparent and when looking at the way things have transpired since these most recent allegations have been made, it's not hard to follow the thread connecting these civil allegations and the current criminal ones.   In this episode we get a look at those allegations for ourselves and why this is looking like it's going to be a major RICO case against Sean "Puff Daddy" Combs.The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) is a United States federal law enacted in 1970 to combat organized crime. RICO targets individuals or groups involved in illegal enterprises, known as "racketeering activities," such as bribery, extortion, fraud, and money laundering.Key features of RICO include:Criminalization of Racketeering Activity: RICO makes it a federal crime to participate in, or conspire to participate in, the affairs of an enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity.Enterprise: RICO applies to both legitimate and illegitimate enterprises, including corporations, partnerships, and other associations.Pattern of Racketeering Activity: A pattern is established by engaging in at least two instances of racketeering activity within ten years.Consequences: Individuals convicted under RICO can face substantial fines, forfeiture of assets, and imprisonment for up to 20 years per racketeering count, with potential enhancements for multiple offenses.RICO has been used extensively against organized crime syndicates, such as the Mafia, but it has also been employed in cases involving various other criminal enterprises, including drug trafficking, securities fraud, and corruption. Prosecutors often use RICO to dismantle criminal organizations by targeting not only the individuals directly involved in criminal activities but also those who facilitate or benefit from them, such as leaders, associates, and even legitimate businesses linked to the enterprise.To successfully prosecute under RICO, prosecutors must demonstrate the existence of an enterprise engaged in a pattern of racketeering activity, as well as the defendant's involvement in that enterprise and its illegal activities. RICO has been praised for its effectiveness in dismantling criminal organizations but has also faced criticism for its broad scope and potential for abuse in certain cases.In this episode, we get a look at the amended complaint that has been filed by Rodney Jones.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.616406.30.1.pdf (courtlistener.com)

The allegations that Sean "Puff Daddy" Combs is currently facing are not new to him.   In fact, he's been accused of things similar many times in the past.   Now, with the dam breaking and many accusers coming forward, for those of us who have followed the Jeffrey Epstein case, the similarities are very, very apparent and when looking at the way things have transpired since these most recent allegations have been made, it's not hard to follow the thread connecting these civil allegations and the current criminal ones.   In this episode we get a look at those allegations for ourselves and why this is looking like it's going to be a major RICO case against Sean "Puff Daddy" Combs.The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) is a United States federal law enacted in 1970 to combat organized crime. RICO targets individuals or groups involved in illegal enterprises, known as "racketeering activities," such as bribery, extortion, fraud, and money laundering.Key features of RICO include:Criminalization of Racketeering Activity: RICO makes it a federal crime to participate in, or conspire to participate in, the affairs of an enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity.Enterprise: RICO applies to both legitimate and illegitimate enterprises, including corporations, partnerships, and other associations.Pattern of Racketeering Activity: A pattern is established by engaging in at least two instances of racketeering activity within ten years.Consequences: Individuals convicted under RICO can face substantial fines, forfeiture of assets, and imprisonment for up to 20 years per racketeering count, with potential enhancements for multiple offenses.RICO has been used extensively against organized crime syndicates, such as the Mafia, but it has also been employed in cases involving various other criminal enterprises, including drug trafficking, securities fraud, and corruption. Prosecutors often use RICO to dismantle criminal organizations by targeting not only the individuals directly involved in criminal activities but also those who facilitate or benefit from them, such as leaders, associates, and even legitimate businesses linked to the enterprise.To successfully prosecute under RICO, prosecutors must demonstrate the existence of an enterprise engaged in a pattern of racketeering activity, as well as the defendant's involvement in that enterprise and its illegal activities. RICO has been praised for its effectiveness in dismantling criminal organizations but has also faced criticism for its broad scope and potential for abuse in certain cases.In this episode, we get a look at the amended complaint that has been filed by Rodney Jones.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.616406.30.1.pdf (courtlistener.com)

The allegations that Sean "Puff Daddy" Combs is currently facing are not new to him.   In fact, he's been accused of things similar many times in the past.   Now, with the dam breaking and many accusers coming forward, for those of us who have followed the Jeffrey Epstein case, the similarities are very, very apparent and when looking at the way things have transpired since these most recent allegations have been made, it's not hard to follow the thread connecting these civil allegations and the current criminal ones.   In this episode we get a look at those allegations for ourselves and why this is looking like it's going to be a major RICO case against Sean "Puff Daddy" Combs.The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) is a United States federal law enacted in 1970 to combat organized crime. RICO targets individuals or groups involved in illegal enterprises, known as "racketeering activities," such as bribery, extortion, fraud, and money laundering.Key features of RICO include:Criminalization of Racketeering Activity: RICO makes it a federal crime to participate in, or conspire to participate in, the affairs of an enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity.Enterprise: RICO applies to both legitimate and illegitimate enterprises, including corporations, partnerships, and other associations.Pattern of Racketeering Activity: A pattern is established by engaging in at least two instances of racketeering activity within ten years.Consequences: Individuals convicted under RICO can face substantial fines, forfeiture of assets, and imprisonment for up to 20 years per racketeering count, with potential enhancements for multiple offenses.RICO has been used extensively against organized crime syndicates, such as the Mafia, but it has also been employed in cases involving various other criminal enterprises, including drug trafficking, securities fraud, and corruption. Prosecutors often use RICO to dismantle criminal organizations by targeting not only the individuals directly involved in criminal activities but also those who facilitate or benefit from them, such as leaders, associates, and even legitimate businesses linked to the enterprise.To successfully prosecute under RICO, prosecutors must demonstrate the existence of an enterprise engaged in a pattern of racketeering activity, as well as the defendant's involvement in that enterprise and its illegal activities. RICO has been praised for its effectiveness in dismantling criminal organizations but has also faced criticism for its broad scope and potential for abuse in certain cases.In this episode, we get a look at the amended complaint that has been filed by Rodney Jones.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.616406.30.1.pdf (courtlistener.com)

The allegations that Sean "Puff Daddy" Combs is currently facing are not new to him.   In fact, he's been accused of things similar many times in the past.   Now, with the dam breaking and many accusers coming forward, for those of us who have followed the Jeffrey Epstein case, the similarities are very, very apparent and when looking at the way things have transpired since these most recent allegations have been made, it's not hard to follow the thread connecting these civil allegations and the current criminal ones.   In this episode we get a look at those allegations for ourselves and why this is looking like it's going to be a major RICO case against Sean "Puff Daddy" Combs.The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) is a United States federal law enacted in 1970 to combat organized crime. RICO targets individuals or groups involved in illegal enterprises, known as "racketeering activities," such as bribery, extortion, fraud, and money laundering.Key features of RICO include:Criminalization of Racketeering Activity: RICO makes it a federal crime to participate in, or conspire to participate in, the affairs of an enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity.Enterprise: RICO applies to both legitimate and illegitimate enterprises, including corporations, partnerships, and other associations.Pattern of Racketeering Activity: A pattern is established by engaging in at least two instances of racketeering activity within ten years.Consequences: Individuals convicted under RICO can face substantial fines, forfeiture of assets, and imprisonment for up to 20 years per racketeering count, with potential enhancements for multiple offenses.RICO has been used extensively against organized crime syndicates, such as the Mafia, but it has also been employed in cases involving various other criminal enterprises, including drug trafficking, securities fraud, and corruption. Prosecutors often use RICO to dismantle criminal organizations by targeting not only the individuals directly involved in criminal activities but also those who facilitate or benefit from them, such as leaders, associates, and even legitimate businesses linked to the enterprise.To successfully prosecute under RICO, prosecutors must demonstrate the existence of an enterprise engaged in a pattern of racketeering activity, as well as the defendant's involvement in that enterprise and its illegal activities. RICO has been praised for its effectiveness in dismantling criminal organizations but has also faced criticism for its broad scope and potential for abuse in certain cases.In this episode, we get a look at the amended complaint that has been filed by Rodney Jones.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.616406.30.1.pdf (courtlistener.com)

The allegations that Sean "Puff Daddy" Combs is currently facing are not new to him.   In fact, he's been accused of things similar many times in the past.   Now, with the dam breaking and many accusers coming forward, for those of us who have followed the Jeffrey Epstein case, the similarities are very, very apparent and when looking at the way things have transpired since these most recent allegations have been made, it's not hard to follow the thread connecting these civil allegations and the current criminal ones.   In this episode we get a look at those allegations for ourselves and why this is looking like it's going to be a major RICO case against Sean "Puff Daddy" Combs.The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) is a United States federal law enacted in 1970 to combat organized crime. RICO targets individuals or groups involved in illegal enterprises, known as "racketeering activities," such as bribery, extortion, fraud, and money laundering.Key features of RICO include:Criminalization of Racketeering Activity: RICO makes it a federal crime to participate in, or conspire to participate in, the affairs of an enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity.Enterprise: RICO applies to both legitimate and illegitimate enterprises, including corporations, partnerships, and other associations.Pattern of Racketeering Activity: A pattern is established by engaging in at least two instances of racketeering activity within ten years.Consequences: Individuals convicted under RICO can face substantial fines, forfeiture of assets, and imprisonment for up to 20 years per racketeering count, with potential enhancements for multiple offenses.RICO has been used extensively against organized crime syndicates, such as the Mafia, but it has also been employed in cases involving various other criminal enterprises, including drug trafficking, securities fraud, and corruption. Prosecutors often use RICO to dismantle criminal organizations by targeting not only the individuals directly involved in criminal activities but also those who facilitate or benefit from them, such as leaders, associates, and even legitimate businesses linked to the enterprise.To successfully prosecute under RICO, prosecutors must demonstrate the existence of an enterprise engaged in a pattern of racketeering activity, as well as the defendant's involvement in that enterprise and its illegal activities. RICO has been praised for its effectiveness in dismantling criminal organizations but has also faced criticism for its broad scope and potential for abuse in certain cases.In this episode, we get a look at the amended complaint that has been filed by Rodney Jones.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.616406.30.1.pdf (courtlistener.com)

A  plaintiff identified as Jane Doe filed a lawsuit against Sean "Diddy" Combs, alleging sexual assault during her participation in the reality television show "Making the Band." Concurrently, she submitted a motion to proceed anonymously, citing concerns for her safety and privacy. Doe argued that revealing her identity could lead to harassment, public scrutiny, and potential professional repercussions, given Combs' prominence in the entertainment industry. She emphasized that anonymity was crucial to protect her mental health and personal well-being.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.630450.15.0_1.pdf

50 Cent (Curtis Jackson) is the executive producer of a new, multi-part Netflix documentary about Sean "Diddy" Combs, titled "Sean Combs: The Reckoning," which examines Diddy's career, controversies, and recent legal issues, featuring exclusive footage from leading up to his arrest. 50 Cent stated he stepped up to produce it because no one else in hip-hop would, aiming to address the culture's silence despite his long-standing feud with Combs Early Career & Origins: The episode details Combs' origins in Harlem/Mount Vernon and how he transformed into "Puff Daddy," focusing on his early work as an intern and talent scout at Uptown Records.The City College Stampede: The documentary explores the tragic events of a 1991 charity basketball event at the College of the City of New York, organized by Combs and Heavy D, which resulted in the deaths of nine people in a stampede. The series implicates Combs' negligence and push for more attendees in the tragedy.Founding Bad Boy Records: Following his firing from Uptown Records, the episode covers Combs' co-founding of Bad Boy Records and the signing of The Notorious B.I.G. (Christopher Wallace), which launched the label into prominence.Early Allegations: The episode introduces early, disturbing allegations, including Joi Dickerson-Neal's claim that in 1991, Combs drugged and raped her, filmed the assault, and showed the footage to others at his partiesBad Boy vs. Death Row: The episode details how Sean Combs' Bad Boy Records flourished, creating intense competition with Suge Knight's Death Row Records, culminating in the East Coast/West Coast hip-hop feud.Tupac & Biggie Murders: It explores the lingering questions surrounding the murders of Tupac and Biggie, featuring insights from the former LAPD detectives who handled their cases.Allegations of Violence & Bribery: The docuseries examines past incidents, including a 1995 shooting where Combs allegedly tried to bribe someone to take the blame for a gun, and allegations from Keffe D (related to Tupac's murder) about Combs offering money for deaths.The 1991 Stampede: The documentary revisits the tragic 1991 basketball event at City College, where a stampede led to nine deaths, questioning Combs' responsibility for poor planning and insurance issues, notes Netflix.Combs' Own Footage: The series uses extensive personal footage of Combs, showing him documenting his life, as he strategizes with legal teams amidst new accusations, even as he faces the consequences of the recent hotel assault videoSean Combs: The Reckoning Episode 3, "Official Girl," focuses on Combs' post-Biggie era, linking his skyrocketing fame with alleged abusive relationships, particularly with his artists and partners like Kim Porter, and introducing disturbing sex performance claims from former sex worker Clayton Howard, while exploring his potential role in the Tupac/Biggie murders alongside Keefe D's allegations and how Combs allegedly profited from the chaos

Sean "Diddy" Combs, a prominent music mogul and entrepreneur, has faced multiple allegations of sexual assault spanning several decades. One such allegation involves a woman identified as Jane Doe, who claims she was assaulted by Combs during an event related to the MTV reality show Making the Band.BackgroundIn 2004, Jane Doe, then 19 years old, was a college student in Brooklyn. She met Combs during a promotional event for Making the Band, a reality show he produced that aimed to form a new music group.According to Jane Doe's lawsuit:Invitation to Hotel Room: Combs invited her and a friend to his hotel room in Manhattan under the pretense of discussing potential opportunities in the music industry.Unwanted Advances: Once in the room, Combs allegedly made unsolicited sexual advances, including inappropriate touching and attempts to kiss her.Physical Resistance: Jane Doe resisted his advances, leading to a physical struggle where she was reportedly pushed onto the bed.Assault: She alleges that Combs then sexually assaulted her despite her protests.Following the alleged incident, Jane Doe states she experienced significant emotional distress, including feelings of shame and humiliation. She also claims to have faced professional setbacks as a result of the assault.Jane Doe filed a lawsuit against Combs, seeking compensatory and punitive damages for the alleged assault. The case is currently pending in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New YorkThis allegation is part of a series of accusations against Combs, with multiple individuals coming forward with claims of sexual assault and misconduct. Combs has denied these allegations, and his legal team has stated that he intends to defend himself against these claims.(commercial at 7:57)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:combs-da-band-photoshoot-complaint.pdf

In the on going battle being waged by Diddy in the courtroom, his victories have been far and few between.   However, in his lawsuit with "Miami John Doe", Judge Kaplan has ordered that his accuser will have to unmask himself if he wants to move forward with his lawsuit.   In this episode, we take a look at that order.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.632026.17.0.pdf

Another day, another Diddy lawsuit to dive into...In Case 1:24-cv-08810, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, involves a plaintiff identified as John Doe, who has lodged serious allegations against Sean "Diddy" Combs and affiliated entities, including Bad Boy Entertainment Holdings, Inc. and Bad Boy Records LLC. The lawsuit is classified under personal injury, alleging harm that stems from Combs' actions and potentially those of his associates. The plaintiff has requested to proceed anonymously, reflecting concerns over privacy and safety due to the sensitive nature of the claims.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.632026.1.0.pdf

Another day, another Diddy lawsuit to dive into...In Case 1:24-cv-08810, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, involves a plaintiff identified as John Doe, who has lodged serious allegations against Sean "Diddy" Combs and affiliated entities, including Bad Boy Entertainment Holdings, Inc. and Bad Boy Records LLC. The lawsuit is classified under personal injury, alleging harm that stems from Combs' actions and potentially those of his associates. The plaintiff has requested to proceed anonymously, reflecting concerns over privacy and safety due to the sensitive nature of the claims.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.632026.1.0.pdf

Kathy and Jim discuss the 50cent documentary entitled Sean Combs: The Reconing, about his reign of terror and the trail of destruction he has left behind. See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

er and cultural critic Christiana Mbakwe Medina joins Question Everything to dissect the strange, shifting logic of our current moment, from the collapse of celebrity mystique to our obsession with wealth, power, and proximity to influence. Christiana and Danielle, explore why “cancel culture” doesn’t really cancel anyone, how pop culture functions as soft power, and why so many modern myths, from the tradwife fantasy to the American Dream, are starting to crack. They also look ahead to what 2026 might bring: a more irreverent cultural mood shaped by fear fatigue, AI, and a hunger for something that feels human. In this episode, you’ll learn: Why pop culture is a mirror of society, not a distraction from it How celebrity lost its mystique in the age of access and social media Why cancel culture rarely has lasting consequences Why Lauren Sánchez Bezos may be one of the most important power brokers in culture right now What the Diddy verdict reveals about power, fame, and forgiveness How and why powerful men are so often culturally forgiven What “soft power” really means—and how culture shapes politics more than we think Why we confuse wealth with moral worth How the American Dream functions more like a myth than a reality What the tradwife / “soft life” fantasy is really selling to burned-out women Why staying home is far harder and riskier than TikTok makes it look How AI is quietly reshaping creativity and culture already Why culture may be entering a more irreverent, punk era after years of fear and caution What’s actually changing about fame, influence, and the influencer economy Why celebrity apologies rarely work (and never really have) How we should think about aging, relevance, and cultural exits (including Beyoncé) What we’re misreading about power, gender, and modern ambition Follow Christiana on Instagram @christianaama, and don’t miss her Substack and podcast, Pop Syllabus. Book recommendation: The Warmth of Other Suns by Isabel Wilkerson Substack: https://popsyllabus.substack.com/ Podcast: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/pop-syllabus/id1866754314See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In 2025, rapper and producer Sean "Diddy" Combs was convicted on two counts of transportation for prostitution in a trial that captured the attention of the nation. But while Combs was acquitted of the more serious charges leveled against him, more people have come forward to share their experiences with the controversial figure. The new documentary series "Sean Combs: The Reckoning" provides an in-depth look at the life and career of Combs, going back to his roots in Harlem, his role in the East Coast/West Coast rap battles of the 1990s, and his alleged abuse of women throughout his life. Director Alexandria Stapleton discusses the documentary, which is available to stream now on Netflix.

Another day, another Diddy lawsuit to dive into...In Case 1:24-cv-08810, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, involves a plaintiff identified as John Doe, who has lodged serious allegations against Sean "Diddy" Combs and affiliated entities, including Bad Boy Entertainment Holdings, Inc. and Bad Boy Records LLC. The lawsuit is classified under personal injury, alleging harm that stems from Combs' actions and potentially those of his associates. The plaintiff has requested to proceed anonymously, reflecting concerns over privacy and safety due to the sensitive nature of the claims.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.632026.1.0.pdf

Sean "Diddy" Combs has filed a $100 million defamation lawsuit against NBCUniversal, Peacock TV, and Ample Entertainment, alleging that their documentary, "Diddy: The Making of a Bad Boy," contains false and malicious accusations. The lawsuit claims the documentary portrays Combs as a "monster" comparable to Jeffrey Epstein, accusing him of heinous crimes such as serial murder, rape of minors, and sex trafficking, without any credible evidence. Specific allegations include insinuations of Combs' involvement in the deaths of his ex-partner Kim Porter and rapper The Notorious B.I.G., as well as unfounded claims of sexual misconduct with minors. Combs' legal team argues that these baseless assertions have caused severe reputational and economic harm, and that the defendants prioritized sensationalism over journalistic integrity.The lawsuit emphasizes that the documentary advances unfounded conspiracy theories, relying on speculative interviews and discredited sources. Combs' attorneys assert that the defendants were aware of the falsehoods yet proceeded with broadcasting the documentary, thereby exploiting public interest for profit. They contend that this reckless dissemination of unverified information not only damages Combs' reputation but also jeopardizes his right to a fair trial, as he is currently awaiting trial on unrelated federal charges. Through this legal action, Combs seeks to hold the defendants accountable for the substantial harm caused by their actions.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Diddy launches $100m lawsuit against NBCUniversal over documentary... ahead of sex trafficking trial | Daily Mail Online

Diddy scored a significant partial win in April Lampros's civil suit after a judge dismissed most of her claims—covering alleged rape, battery, and emotional distress from the 1990s—as time-barred by New York's statute of limitations and lacking sufficient factual detail. Additionally, any claims against Bad Boy Records and Sony Music were dropped, narrowing the legal firestorm to focus almost exclusively on Combs himself.What's left is a single active allegation under New York's Gender‑Motivated Violence Protection Law. Lampros claims that in late 2000 or early 2001, Combs physically grabbed her and tried to force himself on her—a moment she says she resisted. With that as the only surviving allegation, both parties are now entering discovery. Diddy's legal team sees the much narrower case as a major strategic win, while Lampros's attorney emphasizes that the remaining claim keeps her pursuit of accountability alive.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Diddy team claims legal win in April Lampros' sexual assault lawsuit

Go to https://www.squarespace.com/BOBANDSHERI to save 10% off your first purchase of a website or domain using code BOBANDSHERI.   Sheri is Melting. Morons in the News. The Best People Ever.   Everyone Needs a Laugh. Lamar watches “The Substance” Diddy has to Sell Private Jets.   Talkback Callers. Can You Believe This? Jury Duty.   From the Vault. Don’t Put That There.

Emily and Shane are sitting down with Judge Elizabeth Scherer, who presided over the Parkland school shooter’s trial in 2022. Judge Liz faced controversy after this trial due to alleged biases towards the prosecution and unfair treatment of the defense. However, she’s here to set the record straight and tell us what led to this apparent “unethical” behavior. Plus, we’re discussing Nick Reiner and the sudden loss of his legal team, as well as the Diddy trial and where the prosecution went wrong…See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.