Podcasts about Combs

In the case of United States v. Combs (24-cr-542), attorney Teny Geragos submitted a declaration supporting a motion for an evidentiary hearing regarding alleged government misconduct. The declaration outlines instances where federal agents purportedly leaked confidential information to the media, including details about search warrants and witness interviews. Geragos contends that these actions have compromised Sean Combs' right to a fair trial by influencing public perception and potentially tainting the jury pool.Additionally, the declaration highlights the release of a 2016 hotel surveillance video involving Combs and his ex-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura. Geragos argues that the video's leak to the media was orchestrated by government agents, violating grand jury secrecy rules. The defense asserts that such leaks are part of a broader pattern of misconduct aimed at prejudicing the case against Combs. Consequently, they request an evidentiary hearing to investigate these allegations and seek appropriate remedies to ensure a fair judicial process.(commercial at 7:48)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.81.0_1.pdf

Following Sean "Diddy" Combs' recent arrest on serious charges including sex trafficking, racketeering, and kidnapping, his alleged co-conspirators could be facing significant legal jeopardy. Prosecutors have accused Combs of leading a criminal enterprise involving forced labor, trafficking, and violence spanning decades. These associates were allegedly instrumental in facilitating his activities, from arranging illicit gatherings to helping cover up the abuse.If the co-conspirators are found to have played roles in these events—such as arranging travel, securing locations for the alleged crimes, or participating in acts of intimidation—they could face charges similar to Combs, such as racketeering, conspiracy, and witness tampering. Notably, one co-conspirator is already accused of kidnapping a person at gunpoint to facilitate a break-in, which later escalated to setting fire to the victim's car. These charges, if proven, could result in lengthy prison sentences for the co-conspirators, as they are closely tied to the violent and coercive aspects of Combs' criminal enterprise​Given the severity of the charges against Combs, those involved may also be subject to intense scrutiny, as prosecutors have made it clear they intend to pursue all parties who participated in the operation. With mounting evidence—including seized videos, narcotics, and firearms—legal outcomes for his associates could be just as dire, particularly if they are implicated in covering up or enabling the alleged abuses(commercial at 8:03)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Diddy's entourage could be charged over 'Freak Off' supplies after 1,000 bottles of lube seized, lawyer warns | The US Sun (the-sun.com)

The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) is a United States federal law enacted in 1970 that provides for extended criminal penalties and a civil cause of action for acts performed as part of an ongoing criminal organization.The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) is a United States federal law enacted in 1970 that provides for extended criminal penalties and a civil cause of action for acts performed as part of an ongoing criminal organization.Under RICO, individuals and organizations can be charged with racketeering if they are found to have engaged in a pattern of illegal activity, such as bribery, extortion, fraud, or trafficking. A "pattern of racketeering activity" requires at least two acts of racketeering within a ten-year period.To take down a human trafficking network using RICO, law enforcement agencies would typically investigate the network's operations, identify key individuals involved, gather evidence of their illegal activities, and establish a pattern of racketeering. This evidence could include financial transactions, communications, witness testimony, and physical evidence linking the individuals to the trafficking activities.Once the evidence is compiled, prosecutors can bring RICO charges against the leaders and members of the trafficking network. If convicted, they could face significant criminal penalties, including imprisonment and forfeiture of assets.Additionally, RICO allows victims of the trafficking network to file civil lawsuits against the perpetrators, seeking damages for the harm they have suffered. This can provide victims with a means of seeking justice and compensation for their ordeal.In this episode we get some confirmation that there are witnesses cooperating with the federal government as far as their RICO investigation goes, and we also get more evidence that the timeline of the Lil Rod suit and the eventual raid was not coincidence, but in fact, connected.  We also get a look at the list of allegations against Puffy over the past few years.  (commercial at 14:10)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Sean 'Diddy' Combs' alleged victims 'talking a lot,' feds claim 'concrete, detailed, explicit allegations of sex trafficking' (nypost.com)Diddy raided: Here are all the allegations made against Sean Combs | The Independent

Sean "Diddy" Combs trial jury sees shocking photos of drugs, baby oil, lube, and guns, at Combs LA Mansion as his former assistant, who has immunity to testify against Combs, talks about cleaning up after "Wild King Night" and getting drugs for Diddy. In Idaho, a woman caught on police body cam saying she saw Bryan Kohberger at the Moscow, Idaho, home minutes before the murders as she delivered food to Xana Kernodle. Dave Mack ReportsSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Diddy on Trial: Latest Updates & Unfolding Allegations In this episode, we unpack the latest developments in the ongoing legal saga surrounding music mogul Sean "Diddy" Combs. What began as isolated accusations has grown into a web of lawsuits, federal investigations, and explosive claims that are shaking the entertainment industry. #DiddyTrial #CelebrityAccountability #HipHopNews #BreakingNews #JusticeForSurvivors 

James Cummings, a 57‑year‑old actor and film producer, recalled that in 2002 he and Combs were alone inside an LA Fitness steam room in Los Angeles when Combs made an unprovoked sexual advance. Cummings described seeing Combs reach toward the ceiling before suddenly bending toward him, placing his fingers on Cummings's legs. When Cummings rebuffed him—shouting “Hey, stop!”—Combs allegedly lunged at him and attempted to perform a sexual act. Cummings defended himself by punching him in the face, dragging him out, and continuing to fight until Combs fled naked, leaving behind only his sneakers.Cummings said the incident was terrifying and humiliating, and later even triggered a physical reaction—he was “depressed” and shaken afterward, according to his wife Jennifer, who was present when he emerged from the steam room shouting that the rapper had tried to orally assault him.  Though Combs reportedly avoided contact at a later encounter in a steakhouse, Cummings emphasized that he fought back effectively: “I beat him like the b***h he is,” expressing both pride in his self-defense and lingering emotional impact from the confrontation.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Hollywood producer James Cummings claims Diddy tried to force disturbing sexual act in gym steam room leading to nude brawl | Daily Mail Online

Sara Rivers, formerly known as Sara Stokes from MTV's Making the Band 2 and a member of Da Band, filed a $60 million lawsuit against Sean "Diddy" Combs alleging a pattern of sexual harassment, battery, psychological abuse, and professional sabotage. Rivers claims that Combs subjected her to degrading treatment throughout her time on the reality series and beyond, including groping her without consent, making sexually explicit comments, and mocking her bulimia. She further alleges that Combs controlled contestants' food, sleep, and movement, orchestrated humiliating stunts like the infamous "cheesecake walk," and forced her into uncompensated labor under exploitative conditions. According to the complaint, Rivers was made to sleep in exposed, unsafe quarters with male co-stars and denied basic dignity and protection.The lawsuit names more than two dozen other parties, including executives at Bad Boy, Universal Music Group, MTV, and even Combs's mother, asserting that they either enabled or failed to intervene in the abuse. Rivers accuses Combs of deliberately dismantling Da Band to assert dominance and retain control of her earnings, effectively sabotaging her career. She asserts that this behavior was not isolated but part of a systemic pattern of exploitation and intimidation that targeted young, vulnerable performers. Combs's legal team has dismissed the suit as meritless and opportunistic, noting it was filed just before the deadline under the New York City Gender-Motivated Violence Act. The case joins a growing list of lawsuits and criminal investigations currently surrounding Combs.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Sara cmplt

Brendan Paul, a former Syracuse University basketball player turned personal assistant to Sean “Diddy” Combs, has emerged as a central figure in the federal RICO case against the music mogul. Initially arrested in March 2024 at Miami's Opa-Locka Executive Airport for possession of cocaine and marijuana edibles, Paul entered a pre-trial diversion program that allowed him to avoid formal prosecution. However, his arrest marked the beginning of a deeper legal entanglement. Named in civil lawsuits as Combs's alleged “drug mule,” Paul was accused of facilitating the logistics for drug-fueled, multi-day sex parties—known as “freak-offs”—at the heart of the trafficking and conspiracy allegations. Facing potential felony charges and even a federal RICO conspiracy indictment, Paul ultimately chose to cooperate with authorities. Granted immunity in exchange for truthful testimony, he is now positioned to provide jurors with an insider's perspective on how the alleged criminal enterprise functioned behind the scenes.Paul's testimony is expected to be devastating to the defense, serving as the linchpin that connects months of emotionally charged witness accounts to a coherent and systematic criminal operation. Unlike accusers with civil suits or public vendettas, Paul is viewed as a neutral actor—once fiercely loyal to Combs, now legally compelled to tell the truth under penalty of perjury. Prosecutors are strategically presenting him at the end of their case to leave a lasting impact on the jury, believing he will offer not just anecdotes but detailed infrastructure: how drugs were acquired, how events were planned, and who gave the orders. In doing so, Paul is expected to validate prior testimony, reinforce the prosecution's narrative of a tightly orchestrated enterprise, and drive home the gravity of the charges. His transformation from silent facilitator to key witness could prove to be the exclamation point that seals Combs's legal fate.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Sara Rivers, formerly known as Sara Stokes from MTV's Making the Band 2 and a member of Da Band, filed a $60 million lawsuit against Sean "Diddy" Combs alleging a pattern of sexual harassment, battery, psychological abuse, and professional sabotage. Rivers claims that Combs subjected her to degrading treatment throughout her time on the reality series and beyond, including groping her without consent, making sexually explicit comments, and mocking her bulimia. She further alleges that Combs controlled contestants' food, sleep, and movement, orchestrated humiliating stunts like the infamous "cheesecake walk," and forced her into uncompensated labor under exploitative conditions. According to the complaint, Rivers was made to sleep in exposed, unsafe quarters with male co-stars and denied basic dignity and protection.The lawsuit names more than two dozen other parties, including executives at Bad Boy, Universal Music Group, MTV, and even Combs's mother, asserting that they either enabled or failed to intervene in the abuse. Rivers accuses Combs of deliberately dismantling Da Band to assert dominance and retain control of her earnings, effectively sabotaging her career. She asserts that this behavior was not isolated but part of a systemic pattern of exploitation and intimidation that targeted young, vulnerable performers. Combs's legal team has dismissed the suit as meritless and opportunistic, noting it was filed just before the deadline under the New York City Gender-Motivated Violence Act. The case joins a growing list of lawsuits and criminal investigations currently surrounding Combs.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Sara cmplt

In the case of United States v. Combs, S3 24 Cr. 542 (AS), the Government filed a letter opposing the defendant's objections to certain exhibits intended to be introduced during the testimony of the witness identified as “Jane.” Despite ongoing discussions between the parties, two main areas of dispute remain. First, the defense argues that selected text message exchanges should be excluded under the rule of completeness, suggesting that the Government is presenting messages out of context. Second, the defense raises hearsay objections to specific exhibits, including a text message exchange, a screenshot of a media headline, and several personal notes written by Jane in her phone's Notes app.The Government maintains that these objections lack merit. Regarding the completeness argument, the prosecution contends that the messages they seek to introduce are independently admissible and not misleading or taken out of context. As for the hearsay objections, the Government argues that the exhibits in question either do not constitute hearsay, fall within recognized exceptions, or are not offered for the truth of the matter asserted. Ultimately, the Government urges the Court to overrule the objections and allow the contested materials to be admitted into evidence during Jane's testimony.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.411.0_1.pdf

In a recent development from the federal trial of Sean "Diddy" Combs, legal experts note that the defense team's apparent decision to streamline or potentially shorten its presentation may signal a calculated strategic shift rather than a defensive retreat. As the prosecution nears the conclusion of its case-in-chief, sources close to the proceedings and trial analysts suggest the defense might now believe that the government has failed to present a sufficiently persuasive case. By minimizing their own witness list or not calling Combs to testify, the defense could be aiming to highlight the perceived gaps or inconsistencies in the prosecution's argument rather than risk opening new vulnerabilities.This strategy, often employed when defense counsel perceives prosecutorial overreach or a lack of clear burden fulfillment, may also be designed to maintain a laser focus on reasonable doubt. A shorter defense case can prevent jurors from being overwhelmed or confused, and avoids introducing unnecessary evidence that prosecutors could use to their advantage on rebuttal. Experts emphasize that such a move doesn't necessarily mean Combs' team is surrendering ground; instead, it may reflect confidence that the jury has already begun to question the strength or coherence of the government's narrative.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Sean 'Diddy' Combs' defense shortens timeline in federal racketeering trial | Fox News

Brendan Paul, a former Syracuse basketball player turned personal assistant to Sean Combs from late 2022 to March 2024, testified under immunity that his duties included purchasing cocaine, ketamine, ecstasy, marijuana, and other substances for Combs, as well as preparing hotel rooms for Combs's so‑called “wild king nights” or “freak‑offs.” He described going days without sleep, relying on Adderall and occasional cocaine use to cope, and even sampling a pink-drug blend ("tusi") to demonstrate loyalty. Paul recounted incidents where he was reprimanded—at times fired—for minor mistakes like forgetting a Gucci fanny pack loaded with drugs. He clarified that he was not a drug mule, maintaining he transported only small amounts for Combs's personal use, and that he ultimately assisted in the cleanup of these drug-fueled sex parties.On cross‑examination, Paul emphasized that procuring drugs was a minor aspect of his role and insisted that the narcotics were used solely by Combs. He recounted how he accidentally carried cocaine through a Miami airport—picked up during cleaning Combs's hotel room—and was arrested but later had charges dropped after completing a diversion program, attributing his silence to loyalty. Paul described Combs's expectations that his staff operate with “militant” discipline, likening them to "SEAL Team 6." He testified that Combs became particularly “extremely creative” when under the influence, using charts, messages, and communications about these events as part of the prosecution's racketeering-sex trafficking case.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:(1) Live updates: Sean ‘Diddy' Combs trial coverage | CNN

On November 3, 2024, Sean "Diddy" Combs' legal team submitted a letter to the federal judge overseeing his case, urgently requesting the implementation of a gag order. This plea was prompted by recent public statements from Courtney Burgess, a grand jury witness, who claimed to possess videos allegedly depicting Combs in compromising situations. Combs' attorneys argue that such statements have led to a "deluge of improper pretrial publicity," jeopardizing his right to a fair trial and undermining the integrity of the grand jury proceedings.In this episode, we dive into the latest developments and see where things  stand.(commercial at 8:15)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Diddy makes shock attempt to silence grand jury witness who made bombshell claims about rapper's 'freak-off' parties | Daily Mail Online

Adria Sheri English has recently made strong statements about her intent to testify against Sean "Diddy" Combs in his upcoming federal trial. English, who previously accused Combs of sex trafficking, claimed that she was coerced into performing sexual acts with guests at his parties between 2004 and 2009. She expressed her commitment to ensuring that Combs is held accountable, stating that she hopes her testimony will lead to his imprisonment for life.English's legal team has emphasized that she felt manipulated by Combs' influence and power, describing how she was allegedly pressured to participate in these acts due to fear of being blacklisted from the music industry. English has also detailed how alcohol at these events was often laced with drugs, which further impaired her ability to resist. Her attorney has made it clear that English is eager to see justice served, and she has already filed both civil and criminal complaints against Combs.Combs' legal team has denied all allegations, dismissing them as baseless, and expressed confidence that he will prevail in court.(commercial at 14:02)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Sean 'Diddy' Combs forced women to have sex with guests at drugged-up parties — says dancer who wants rapper in jail 'for life' (nypost.com)

The sixth week of Sean "Diddy" Combs trial ends with Combs assistant/drug mule on the stand with immunity. Brendan Paul talks of drugs, being fired, cleaning up hotel rooms after "wild king nights" and the jury sees evidence photos from Combs LA Mansion. Dave Mack ReportsSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In a lawsuit filed in October 2024, a personal trainer, identified as "John Doe," accused Sean "Diddy" Combs of drugging and sexually assaulting him during an after-party at Combs' Los Angeles mansion in June 2022. The trainer alleged that upon arrival, he was asked to sign a nondisclosure agreement and was given a drink that caused him to feel disoriented and weak. He claimed that Combs led him to a room where multiple individuals, including celebrities, were engaged in sexual activities. The trainer asserted that Combs removed his pants and performed non-consensual oral sex on him, then directed him to perform similar acts on another male celebrity. He described feeling incapacitated and unable to resist, stating that he was "passed around like a party favor" for others' sexual gratification.The lawsuit further alleged that the trainer experienced periods of unconsciousness during the assaults and later found himself outside his apartment without his shirt or phone, with no recollection of how he got there. He claimed that the incident led to severe emotional distress and financial losses. The lawsuit included a photograph of a container allegedly used by Combs or his associates to administer gamma-hydroxybutyrate (GHB), a substance often linked to drug-facilitated sexual assault. Combs' legal team denied the allegations, labeling them as false and publicity-driven.(commercial at 7:58)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.630243.1.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

James Cummings, a 57‑year‑old actor and film producer, recalled that in 2002 he and Combs were alone inside an LA Fitness steam room in Los Angeles when Combs made an unprovoked sexual advance. Cummings described seeing Combs reach toward the ceiling before suddenly bending toward him, placing his fingers on Cummings's legs. When Cummings rebuffed him—shouting “Hey, stop!”—Combs allegedly lunged at him and attempted to perform a sexual act. Cummings defended himself by punching him in the face, dragging him out, and continuing to fight until Combs fled naked, leaving behind only his sneakers.Cummings said the incident was terrifying and humiliating, and later even triggered a physical reaction—he was “depressed” and shaken afterward, according to his wife Jennifer, who was present when he emerged from the steam room shouting that the rapper had tried to orally assault him.  Though Combs reportedly avoided contact at a later encounter in a steakhouse, Cummings emphasized that he fought back effectively: “I beat him like the b***h he is,” expressing both pride in his self-defense and lingering emotional impact from the confrontation.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Hollywood producer James Cummings claims Diddy tried to force disturbing sexual act in gym steam room leading to nude brawl | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In a recent development from the federal trial of Sean "Diddy" Combs, legal experts note that the defense team's apparent decision to streamline or potentially shorten its presentation may signal a calculated strategic shift rather than a defensive retreat. As the prosecution nears the conclusion of its case-in-chief, sources close to the proceedings and trial analysts suggest the defense might now believe that the government has failed to present a sufficiently persuasive case. By minimizing their own witness list or not calling Combs to testify, the defense could be aiming to highlight the perceived gaps or inconsistencies in the prosecution's argument rather than risk opening new vulnerabilities.This strategy, often employed when defense counsel perceives prosecutorial overreach or a lack of clear burden fulfillment, may also be designed to maintain a laser focus on reasonable doubt. A shorter defense case can prevent jurors from being overwhelmed or confused, and avoids introducing unnecessary evidence that prosecutors could use to their advantage on rebuttal. Experts emphasize that such a move doesn't necessarily mean Combs' team is surrendering ground; instead, it may reflect confidence that the jury has already begun to question the strength or coherence of the government's narrative.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Sean 'Diddy' Combs' defense shortens timeline in federal racketeering trial | Fox NewsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Brendan Paul, a former Syracuse University basketball player turned personal assistant to Sean “Diddy” Combs, has emerged as a central figure in the federal RICO case against the music mogul. Initially arrested in March 2024 at Miami's Opa-Locka Executive Airport for possession of cocaine and marijuana edibles, Paul entered a pre-trial diversion program that allowed him to avoid formal prosecution. However, his arrest marked the beginning of a deeper legal entanglement. Named in civil lawsuits as Combs's alleged “drug mule,” Paul was accused of facilitating the logistics for drug-fueled, multi-day sex parties—known as “freak-offs”—at the heart of the trafficking and conspiracy allegations. Facing potential felony charges and even a federal RICO conspiracy indictment, Paul ultimately chose to cooperate with authorities. Granted immunity in exchange for truthful testimony, he is now positioned to provide jurors with an insider's perspective on how the alleged criminal enterprise functioned behind the scenes.Paul's testimony is expected to be devastating to the defense, serving as the linchpin that connects months of emotionally charged witness accounts to a coherent and systematic criminal operation. Unlike accusers with civil suits or public vendettas, Paul is viewed as a neutral actor—once fiercely loyal to Combs, now legally compelled to tell the truth under penalty of perjury. Prosecutors are strategically presenting him at the end of their case to leave a lasting impact on the jury, believing he will offer not just anecdotes but detailed infrastructure: how drugs were acquired, how events were planned, and who gave the orders. In doing so, Paul is expected to validate prior testimony, reinforce the prosecution's narrative of a tightly orchestrated enterprise, and drive home the gravity of the charges. His transformation from silent facilitator to key witness could prove to be the exclamation point that seals Combs's legal fate.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In a lawsuit filed in October 2024, a personal trainer, identified as "John Doe," accused Sean "Diddy" Combs of drugging and sexually assaulting him during an after-party at Combs' Los Angeles mansion in June 2022. The trainer alleged that upon arrival, he was asked to sign a nondisclosure agreement and was given a drink that caused him to feel disoriented and weak. He claimed that Combs led him to a room where multiple individuals, including celebrities, were engaged in sexual activities. The trainer asserted that Combs removed his pants and performed non-consensual oral sex on him, then directed him to perform similar acts on another male celebrity. He described feeling incapacitated and unable to resist, stating that he was "passed around like a party favor" for others' sexual gratification.The lawsuit further alleged that the trainer experienced periods of unconsciousness during the assaults and later found himself outside his apartment without his shirt or phone, with no recollection of how he got there. He claimed that the incident led to severe emotional distress and financial losses. The lawsuit included a photograph of a container allegedly used by Combs or his associates to administer gamma-hydroxybutyrate (GHB), a substance often linked to drug-facilitated sexual assault. Combs' legal team denied the allegations, labeling them as false and publicity-driven.(commercial at 7:58)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.630243.1.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In a lawsuit filed in October 2024, a personal trainer, identified as "John Doe," accused Sean "Diddy" Combs of drugging and sexually assaulting him during an after-party at Combs' Los Angeles mansion in June 2022. The trainer alleged that upon arrival, he was asked to sign a nondisclosure agreement and was given a drink that caused him to feel disoriented and weak. He claimed that Combs led him to a room where multiple individuals, including celebrities, were engaged in sexual activities. The trainer asserted that Combs removed his pants and performed non-consensual oral sex on him, then directed him to perform similar acts on another male celebrity. He described feeling incapacitated and unable to resist, stating that he was "passed around like a party favor" for others' sexual gratification.The lawsuit further alleged that the trainer experienced periods of unconsciousness during the assaults and later found himself outside his apartment without his shirt or phone, with no recollection of how he got there. He claimed that the incident led to severe emotional distress and financial losses. The lawsuit included a photograph of a container allegedly used by Combs or his associates to administer gamma-hydroxybutyrate (GHB), a substance often linked to drug-facilitated sexual assault. Combs' legal team denied the allegations, labeling them as false and publicity-driven.(commercial at 7:58)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.630243.1.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Now in year three of my Pride Month Feature coverage on the show, I'm more excited than I've ever been about shining a light onto the diversity of projects representing queer focused characters and getting to chat with the creators who make them. For myself, Pride this year feels like a more somber affair as the current administration seeks to not only suppress the struggle of the queer community but also to attempt to eliminate their history and in the most extreme cases, invalidating that certain people even have the right to exist but instead of getting down about it, let's flip the script so it is my pleasure to host comic creators Alex L. Combs and Andrew Eakett to talk about their engaging new graphic novel out now Trans History: From Ancient Times to the Present Day from Candlewick Press. I encourage everyone to pick up Trans History: From Ancient Times to the Present Day and to approach it with an open and curious mind. I went into it not knowing exactly what to expect and came out with a much more rounded historical perspective and love the use of a comics formatting to make what many consider a drier subject matter with history in general, far more engaging. Buy it direct from Candlewood Press. Alex's website Alex on BlueSky Further education as discussed by Alex and Andrew on the show Ajuan Mance author of Gender Studies: The Confessions of an Accidental Outlaw Bishakh Som author of Spellbound Breena Nuñez and Lawrence Lindell (I mispronounced "Lindell" and am really embarrassed!) creators of the indie comics collective Laneha House Sensitivity readers used in the book: Writing Diversely Hans Lindahl Trans History: From Ancient Times to the Present Day From the publisher An essential introduction to trans history, from ancient times to the present day, in full-color graphic nonfiction format. Deeply researched, highly readable, and featuring a broad range of voices. What does “trans” mean, and what does it mean to be trans? Diversity in human sex and gender is not a modern phenomenon, as readers will discover through illustrated stories and records that introduce historical figures ranging from the controversial Roman emperor Elagabalus to the swashbuckling seventeenth-century conquistador Antonio de Erauso to veterans of the Stonewall uprising Marsha P. Johnson and Sylvia Rivera. In addition to these individual profiles, the book explores some of the societal roles played by trans people beginning in ancient times and shows how European ideas about gender were spread across the globe. It explains how the science of sexology and the growing acceptance of (and backlash to) gender nonconformity have helped to shape what it means to be trans today. Illustrated conversations with modern activists, scholars, and creatives highlight the breadth of current trans experiences and give readers a deeper sense of the diversity of trans people, a group numbering in the millions. Extensive source notes provide further resources. Moving, funny, heartbreaking, and empowering, this remarkable compendium from trans creators Alex L. Combs and Andrew Eakett is packed with research on every dynamic page. PATREON We have a new Patreon, ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠CryptidCreatorCornerpod⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠. If you like what we do, please consider supporting us. We got two simple tiers, $1 and $3. Want to know more, you know what to do. THE ORDER OF THE NUN-YA STARBURST: VIOLA Make sure to check out our friend's new crowdfunding campaign ⁠The Order of the Nun-Ya Starburst: Viola⁠ that I mentioned in the episode. ⁠(LINK)⁠ ARKENFORGE Play TTRPG games? Make sure to check out our partner ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Arkenforge⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠. Use the discount code YETI5 to get $5 off your order. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Former assistant Brendan Paul, who worked for Sean Combs from late 2022 until his arrest in 2024, recalled procuring drugs for Combs from drug dealers known as Guido, One Stop, Baby Girl and Ovi. He referred to hard drugs as "Gucci items," which he would put into a Gucci pouch that Combs kept in a backpack or on his person. A sixth week of testimony concluded with a summary witness, HSI special agent Joseph Cerciello, walking the jury through text messages and other documents. He will return for what will likely be a full day of testimony Monday. Federal prosecutor Maurene Comey said the government expected to rest on Monday. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

In a recent development from the federal trial of Sean "Diddy" Combs, legal experts note that the defense team's apparent decision to streamline or potentially shorten its presentation may signal a calculated strategic shift rather than a defensive retreat. As the prosecution nears the conclusion of its case-in-chief, sources close to the proceedings and trial analysts suggest the defense might now believe that the government has failed to present a sufficiently persuasive case. By minimizing their own witness list or not calling Combs to testify, the defense could be aiming to highlight the perceived gaps or inconsistencies in the prosecution's argument rather than risk opening new vulnerabilities.This strategy, often employed when defense counsel perceives prosecutorial overreach or a lack of clear burden fulfillment, may also be designed to maintain a laser focus on reasonable doubt. A shorter defense case can prevent jurors from being overwhelmed or confused, and avoids introducing unnecessary evidence that prosecutors could use to their advantage on rebuttal. Experts emphasize that such a move doesn't necessarily mean Combs' team is surrendering ground; instead, it may reflect confidence that the jury has already begun to question the strength or coherence of the government's narrative.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Sean 'Diddy' Combs' defense shortens timeline in federal racketeering trial | Fox NewsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

James Cummings, a 57‑year‑old actor and film producer, recalled that in 2002 he and Combs were alone inside an LA Fitness steam room in Los Angeles when Combs made an unprovoked sexual advance. Cummings described seeing Combs reach toward the ceiling before suddenly bending toward him, placing his fingers on Cummings's legs. When Cummings rebuffed him—shouting “Hey, stop!”—Combs allegedly lunged at him and attempted to perform a sexual act. Cummings defended himself by punching him in the face, dragging him out, and continuing to fight until Combs fled naked, leaving behind only his sneakers.Cummings said the incident was terrifying and humiliating, and later even triggered a physical reaction—he was “depressed” and shaken afterward, according to his wife Jennifer, who was present when he emerged from the steam room shouting that the rapper had tried to orally assault him.  Though Combs reportedly avoided contact at a later encounter in a steakhouse, Cummings emphasized that he fought back effectively: “I beat him like the b***h he is,” expressing both pride in his self-defense and lingering emotional impact from the confrontation.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Hollywood producer James Cummings claims Diddy tried to force disturbing sexual act in gym steam room leading to nude brawl | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Brendan Paul, a former Syracuse basketball player turned personal assistant to Sean Combs from late 2022 to March 2024, testified under immunity that his duties included purchasing cocaine, ketamine, ecstasy, marijuana, and other substances for Combs, as well as preparing hotel rooms for Combs's so‑called “wild king nights” or “freak‑offs.” He described going days without sleep, relying on Adderall and occasional cocaine use to cope, and even sampling a pink-drug blend ("tusi") to demonstrate loyalty. Paul recounted incidents where he was reprimanded—at times fired—for minor mistakes like forgetting a Gucci fanny pack loaded with drugs. He clarified that he was not a drug mule, maintaining he transported only small amounts for Combs's personal use, and that he ultimately assisted in the cleanup of these drug-fueled sex parties.On cross‑examination, Paul emphasized that procuring drugs was a minor aspect of his role and insisted that the narcotics were used solely by Combs. He recounted how he accidentally carried cocaine through a Miami airport—picked up during cleaning Combs's hotel room—and was arrested but later had charges dropped after completing a diversion program, attributing his silence to loyalty. Paul described Combs's expectations that his staff operate with “militant” discipline, likening them to "SEAL Team 6." He testified that Combs became particularly “extremely creative” when under the influence, using charts, messages, and communications about these events as part of the prosecution's racketeering-sex trafficking case.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:(1) Live updates: Sean ‘Diddy' Combs trial coverage | CNNBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Brendan Paul, a former Syracuse University basketball player turned personal assistant to Sean “Diddy” Combs, has emerged as a central figure in the federal RICO case against the music mogul. Initially arrested in March 2024 at Miami's Opa-Locka Executive Airport for possession of cocaine and marijuana edibles, Paul entered a pre-trial diversion program that allowed him to avoid formal prosecution. However, his arrest marked the beginning of a deeper legal entanglement. Named in civil lawsuits as Combs's alleged “drug mule,” Paul was accused of facilitating the logistics for drug-fueled, multi-day sex parties—known as “freak-offs”—at the heart of the trafficking and conspiracy allegations. Facing potential felony charges and even a federal RICO conspiracy indictment, Paul ultimately chose to cooperate with authorities. Granted immunity in exchange for truthful testimony, he is now positioned to provide jurors with an insider's perspective on how the alleged criminal enterprise functioned behind the scenes.Paul's testimony is expected to be devastating to the defense, serving as the linchpin that connects months of emotionally charged witness accounts to a coherent and systematic criminal operation. Unlike accusers with civil suits or public vendettas, Paul is viewed as a neutral actor—once fiercely loyal to Combs, now legally compelled to tell the truth under penalty of perjury. Prosecutors are strategically presenting him at the end of their case to leave a lasting impact on the jury, believing he will offer not just anecdotes but detailed infrastructure: how drugs were acquired, how events were planned, and who gave the orders. In doing so, Paul is expected to validate prior testimony, reinforce the prosecution's narrative of a tightly orchestrated enterprise, and drive home the gravity of the charges. His transformation from silent facilitator to key witness could prove to be the exclamation point that seals Combs's legal fate.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In the case of United States v. Combs, S3 24 Cr. 542 (AS), the Government filed a letter opposing the defendant's objections to certain exhibits intended to be introduced during the testimony of the witness identified as “Jane.” Despite ongoing discussions between the parties, two main areas of dispute remain. First, the defense argues that selected text message exchanges should be excluded under the rule of completeness, suggesting that the Government is presenting messages out of context. Second, the defense raises hearsay objections to specific exhibits, including a text message exchange, a screenshot of a media headline, and several personal notes written by Jane in her phone's Notes app.The Government maintains that these objections lack merit. Regarding the completeness argument, the prosecution contends that the messages they seek to introduce are independently admissible and not misleading or taken out of context. As for the hearsay objections, the Government argues that the exhibits in question either do not constitute hearsay, fall within recognized exceptions, or are not offered for the truth of the matter asserted. Ultimately, the Government urges the Court to overrule the objections and allow the contested materials to be admitted into evidence during Jane's testimony.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.411.0_1.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In this filing, Sean Combs opposes the government's motion seeking permission to withhold the identities of certain witnesses in the civil RICO case, arguing that such secrecy is unjustified and prejudicial. Combs' legal team contends that the government's vague claims of witness safety concerns lack any factual foundation or evidence of real threats from Combs or his legal team. They argue that the government's request to conceal witness identities, even during the early stages of discovery, violates basic principles of due process and fairness, as it would prevent Combs from meaningfully preparing his defense and testing the credibility of key accusers.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.248.0_1.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Sara Rivers, formerly known as Sara Stokes from MTV's Making the Band 2 and a member of Da Band, filed a $60 million lawsuit against Sean "Diddy" Combs alleging a pattern of sexual harassment, battery, psychological abuse, and professional sabotage. Rivers claims that Combs subjected her to degrading treatment throughout her time on the reality series and beyond, including groping her without consent, making sexually explicit comments, and mocking her bulimia. She further alleges that Combs controlled contestants' food, sleep, and movement, orchestrated humiliating stunts like the infamous "cheesecake walk," and forced her into uncompensated labor under exploitative conditions. According to the complaint, Rivers was made to sleep in exposed, unsafe quarters with male co-stars and denied basic dignity and protection.The lawsuit names more than two dozen other parties, including executives at Bad Boy, Universal Music Group, MTV, and even Combs's mother, asserting that they either enabled or failed to intervene in the abuse. Rivers accuses Combs of deliberately dismantling Da Band to assert dominance and retain control of her earnings, effectively sabotaging her career. She asserts that this behavior was not isolated but part of a systemic pattern of exploitation and intimidation that targeted young, vulnerable performers. Combs's legal team has dismissed the suit as meritless and opportunistic, noting it was filed just before the deadline under the New York City Gender-Motivated Violence Act. The case joins a growing list of lawsuits and criminal investigations currently surrounding Combs.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Sara cmpltBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

When influencer couples break up, who gets the followers? Today Nicole is joined by celebrity divorce attorney Jackie Combs to unpack what really goes down when digital empires built on love and likes have to be divided. Nicole and Jackie cover brand prenups, postnups, and how to legally—and financially—protect yourself when business and romance mix. Whether you're sharing a bank account or a TikTok account, this one's for you. Follow Jackie's work here. Today you'll hear about: 00:00 Money Rehab Contest 01:06 Meet Celebrity Divorce Attorney Jackie Combs 01:22 Financial Lessons from Celebrity Divorces 01:40 Navigating Brand Prenups and Postnups 02:13 Legal Nuances of Influencer Divorces 02:54 Prenups for Content Creators 03:24 Dividing Digital Empires in Divorce 04:14 Protecting Intellectual Property 08:04 How Social Media Brands Get Valued 13:29 Financial Risks and Scandals 19:42 Dividing Luxury Assets 22:11 Parental Guidance on Prenups 24:41 Forecasting Legal Costs 26:03 How to Choose the Right Lawyer 27:26 (Sadly) Unenforceable Clauses in Prenups 34:11 Final Tips The content in this episode is for entertainment purposes only and should not be considered legal or financial advice

Sean Diddy Combs Trial HALTED Juror's Vertigo Exposes Federal Case Chaos Day 28 Updates The Sean "Diddy" Combs federal trial took an unexpected turn on June 18, 2025, when a juror's vertigo forced Judge Arun Subramanian to adjourn proceedings. This marks the latest disruption in the high-stakes racketeering and sex trafficking case that could send the hip-hop mogul to prison for life. In this comprehensive true crime analysis, we examine Day 28 of the federal trial, including the delayed testimony of Brendan Paul, Combs' former assistant who received immunity in exchange for cooperation. Paul, a former Syracuse basketball player, was expected to provide crucial testimony about his alleged role in drug transportation and other criminal activities within what prosecutors call Combs' "criminal enterprise." The trial has revealed disturbing evidence, including $46,000 in hotel damages from alleged "freak-offs," explicit videos shown to the jury, and testimony from Special Agent DeLeassa Penland detailing the sophisticated logistics behind the alleged crimes. With five federal charges including racketeering conspiracy and sex trafficking by force, fraud, or coercion, Combs faces the possibility of life imprisonment. This video breaks down the legal strategies, analyzes the psychological dynamics of power and control, and examines how Wednesday's delay impacts the prosecution's timeline. We also discuss the recent dismissal of Juror #6 and what this means for the defense team led by Marc Agnifilo. Whether you're following this case closely or just learning about these serious allegations, this video provides essential context about one of the most significant celebrity criminal trials of 2025. #DiddyTrial #SeanCombs #TrueCrime #FederalTrial #Racketeering #SexTrafficking #BreakingNews #CourtUpdate #CriminalJustice #BrendanPaul Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872  

Sean Diddy Combs Trial HALTED Juror's Vertigo Exposes Federal Case Chaos Day 28 Updates The Sean "Diddy" Combs federal trial took an unexpected turn on June 18, 2025, when a juror's vertigo forced Judge Arun Subramanian to adjourn proceedings. This marks the latest disruption in the high-stakes racketeering and sex trafficking case that could send the hip-hop mogul to prison for life. In this comprehensive true crime analysis, we examine Day 28 of the federal trial, including the delayed testimony of Brendan Paul, Combs' former assistant who received immunity in exchange for cooperation. Paul, a former Syracuse basketball player, was expected to provide crucial testimony about his alleged role in drug transportation and other criminal activities within what prosecutors call Combs' "criminal enterprise." The trial has revealed disturbing evidence, including $46,000 in hotel damages from alleged "freak-offs," explicit videos shown to the jury, and testimony from Special Agent DeLeassa Penland detailing the sophisticated logistics behind the alleged crimes. With five federal charges including racketeering conspiracy and sex trafficking by force, fraud, or coercion, Combs faces the possibility of life imprisonment. This video breaks down the legal strategies, analyzes the psychological dynamics of power and control, and examines how Wednesday's delay impacts the prosecution's timeline. We also discuss the recent dismissal of Juror #6 and what this means for the defense team led by Marc Agnifilo. Whether you're following this case closely or just learning about these serious allegations, this video provides essential context about one of the most significant celebrity criminal trials of 2025. #DiddyTrial #SeanCombs #TrueCrime #FederalTrial #Racketeering #SexTrafficking #BreakingNews #CourtUpdate #CriminalJustice #BrendanPaul Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Sara Rivers, formerly known as Sara Stokes from MTV's Making the Band 2 and a member of Da Band, filed a $60 million lawsuit against Sean "Diddy" Combs alleging a pattern of sexual harassment, battery, psychological abuse, and professional sabotage. Rivers claims that Combs subjected her to degrading treatment throughout her time on the reality series and beyond, including groping her without consent, making sexually explicit comments, and mocking her bulimia. She further alleges that Combs controlled contestants' food, sleep, and movement, orchestrated humiliating stunts like the infamous "cheesecake walk," and forced her into uncompensated labor under exploitative conditions. According to the complaint, Rivers was made to sleep in exposed, unsafe quarters with male co-stars and denied basic dignity and protection.The lawsuit names more than two dozen other parties, including executives at Bad Boy, Universal Music Group, MTV, and even Combs's mother, asserting that they either enabled or failed to intervene in the abuse. Rivers accuses Combs of deliberately dismantling Da Band to assert dominance and retain control of her earnings, effectively sabotaging her career. She asserts that this behavior was not isolated but part of a systemic pattern of exploitation and intimidation that targeted young, vulnerable performers. Combs's legal team has dismissed the suit as meritless and opportunistic, noting it was filed just before the deadline under the New York City Gender-Motivated Violence Act. The case joins a growing list of lawsuits and criminal investigations currently surrounding Combs.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Sara cmplt

The similarities between the indictment and conviction of R. Kelly and the indictment of Sean "Diddy" Combs are indeed striking and noteworthy.   In this episode we take a look at some of the core parallels. Both R. Kelly and Diddy have been indicted under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act. This is significant because the RICO statute was traditionally used to prosecute organized crime but is now being applied to individuals accused of long-term patterns of sexual abuse. Prosecutors argue that both men ran "enterprises" through which they were able to commit and conceal their crimes. In R. Kelly's case, his team—managers, bodyguards, and assistants—helped him recruit, exploit, and silence victims. Similarly, Diddy is accused of using his business empire and staff to coerce women into sexual activity and to cover up the abuse.In both cases, the allegations point to systemic, decades-long abuse. R. Kelly's sexual abuse spanned decades, involving minors, child pornography, and coercion. Diddy's indictment, while focused on adult women, similarly accuses him of long-term, repeated abuse, where he allegedly leveraged his power and wealth to manipulate victims​.Both R. Kelly and allegedly Diddy used their status as powerful figures in the music industry to facilitate their crimes. Their fame afforded them protection, access to vulnerable individuals, and influence over those around them, including their teams, who allegedly helped perpetuate and cover up the abuse. This exploitation of celebrity status is a central theme in both cases, as both men allegedly relied on their empires to intimidate victims and prevent them from coming forward.Both men are accused of manipulating and coercing victims into sexual activities. R. Kelly used coercion, often involving minors, to control and sexually exploit young women. Similarly, Diddy is accused of coercing adult women, with allegations of threats, violence, and manipulation, including using drugs to maintain control. In both cases, the prosecution has built a narrative that emphasizes the use of power to force complianceBoth cases involve sophisticated efforts to conceal the abuse. R. Kelly used his wealth and influence to silence victims and avoid legal consequences for years. Diddy's case also alleges that he used his network of business connections and financial resources to pay off victims, keep his actions hidden, and control the narrative around his conduct. Both men are accused of orchestrating a broad network of people and resources to maintain their abusive activities and evade justice.The similarities between the R. Kelly and Sean "Diddy" Combs cases lie in the pattern of long-term, systematic abuse, the use of celebrity status to facilitate and cover up crimes, and the application of RICO charges to hold these individuals accountable. In this episode we take a look at those similiarities.(commercial at 10:08)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:The Sean ‘Diddy' Combs case brings to mind R. Kelly criminal case | CNN

In the case of United States v. Combs, S3 24 Cr. 542 (AS), the Government filed a letter opposing the defendant's objections to certain exhibits intended to be introduced during the testimony of the witness identified as “Jane.” Despite ongoing discussions between the parties, two main areas of dispute remain. First, the defense argues that selected text message exchanges should be excluded under the rule of completeness, suggesting that the Government is presenting messages out of context. Second, the defense raises hearsay objections to specific exhibits, including a text message exchange, a screenshot of a media headline, and several personal notes written by Jane in her phone's Notes app.The Government maintains that these objections lack merit. Regarding the completeness argument, the prosecution contends that the messages they seek to introduce are independently admissible and not misleading or taken out of context. As for the hearsay objections, the Government argues that the exhibits in question either do not constitute hearsay, fall within recognized exceptions, or are not offered for the truth of the matter asserted. Ultimately, the Government urges the Court to overrule the objections and allow the contested materials to be admitted into evidence during Jane's testimony.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.411.0_1.pdf

In United States v. Combs, the Government responds to the defendant's motion to strike portions of Mr. Mescudi's testimony. The defendant contends that certain parts of Mescudi's testimony should be excluded from the trial, asserting that they are irrelevant or prejudicial. The Government argues that Mescudi's testimony is both relevant and integral to its case, and it should not be excluded. They emphasize that Mescudi's statements provide important context and details that directly relate to the charges and help to establish key aspects of the prosecution's narrative.Additionally, the Government identifies disputed evidentiary issues regarding the upcoming testimony of Deonte Nash and Mia. The defense has raised objections about the admissibility of certain aspects of their testimonies, questioning their relevance and the potential for bias. The Government contends that both witnesses are critical to the case and their testimonies should be allowed to stand, as they provide essential evidence regarding the defendant's actions. The Government's position is that any objections to their testimony should be rejected, as it aligns with the facts and is necessary for proving the charges.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.406.0.pdf

In United States v. Combs, the Government responds to the defendant's motion to strike portions of Mr. Mescudi's testimony. The defendant contends that certain parts of Mescudi's testimony should be excluded from the trial, asserting that they are irrelevant or prejudicial. The Government argues that Mescudi's testimony is both relevant and integral to its case, and it should not be excluded. They emphasize that Mescudi's statements provide important context and details that directly relate to the charges and help to establish key aspects of the prosecution's narrative.Additionally, the Government identifies disputed evidentiary issues regarding the upcoming testimony of Deonte Nash and Mia. The defense has raised objections about the admissibility of certain aspects of their testimonies, questioning their relevance and the potential for bias. The Government contends that both witnesses are critical to the case and their testimonies should be allowed to stand, as they provide essential evidence regarding the defendant's actions. The Government's position is that any objections to their testimony should be rejected, as it aligns with the facts and is necessary for proving the charges.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.406.0.pdf

Sara Rivers, formerly known as Sara Stokes from MTV's Making the Band 2 and a member of Da Band, filed a $60 million lawsuit against Sean "Diddy" Combs alleging a pattern of sexual harassment, battery, psychological abuse, and professional sabotage. Rivers claims that Combs subjected her to degrading treatment throughout her time on the reality series and beyond, including groping her without consent, making sexually explicit comments, and mocking her bulimia. She further alleges that Combs controlled contestants' food, sleep, and movement, orchestrated humiliating stunts like the infamous "cheesecake walk," and forced her into uncompensated labor under exploitative conditions. According to the complaint, Rivers was made to sleep in exposed, unsafe quarters with male co-stars and denied basic dignity and protection.The lawsuit names more than two dozen other parties, including executives at Bad Boy, Universal Music Group, MTV, and even Combs's mother, asserting that they either enabled or failed to intervene in the abuse. Rivers accuses Combs of deliberately dismantling Da Band to assert dominance and retain control of her earnings, effectively sabotaging her career. She asserts that this behavior was not isolated but part of a systemic pattern of exploitation and intimidation that targeted young, vulnerable performers. Combs's legal team has dismissed the suit as meritless and opportunistic, noting it was filed just before the deadline under the New York City Gender-Motivated Violence Act. The case joins a growing list of lawsuits and criminal investigations currently surrounding Combs.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Sara cmplt

In the case of United States v. Sean Combs, 24 Cr. 542 (AS), the Government has responded to the defendant's recent claims regarding access to a laptop for reviewing discovery materials and the sharing of attorney visitation forms at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) Brooklyn. The Government asserts that the defendant's requests for relief are either premature or moot. They argue that the MDC has provided the necessary accommodations to allow Combs to review discovery materials, implying that his access to resources for preparing his defense has not been unduly hinder.Additionally, the Government addresses the issue of attorney visitation forms, arguing that there is no substantiated infringement of Combs' rights in this regard. They contend that the provision of these forms does not amount to a breach of attorney-client privilege or impede the defendant's legal defense. By positioning the defendant's concerns as unwarranted at this stage, the Government suggests that the existing measures at MDC are adequate and that Combs' allegations lack sufficient merit to justify judicial intervention at this time.(commercial at 8:16)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.99.0.pdf

In the Memorandum of Law supporting Sean Combs's Motion to Dismiss Count Three of the Superseding Indictment in case 1:24-cr-00542-AS, the defense argues that the charge is legally insufficient and fails to meet the required statutory elements. They contend that the indictment lacks specificity, particularly in detailing the alleged conduct and its connection to the purported criminal enterprise. Furthermore, the defense asserts that the prosecution's interpretation of the statute is overly broad, potentially criminalizing behavior beyond the law's intent. They emphasize that without clear evidence linking Combs to the alleged illegal activities in Count Three, the charge should be dismissed to uphold the principles of fair notice and due process.to contact  me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.153.0.pdf

Sean 'Diddy' Combs sex trafficking trial was abruptly halted Wednesday when a juror called out sick with Vertigo. Court is observing Juneteenth, so no session will be held today. Testimony will resume Friday with an Ex-assistant, Brendan Paul taking the stand for the prosecution. A son confesses to a horrific hammer attack against his mom, then he texts a buddy, "I can't go to prison." Plus, a case of "I...DIDN'T" at the altar! Jennifer Gould reports. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Sara Rivers, formerly known as Sara Stokes from MTV's Making the Band 2 and a member of Da Band, filed a $60 million lawsuit against Sean "Diddy" Combs alleging a pattern of sexual harassment, battery, psychological abuse, and professional sabotage. Rivers claims that Combs subjected her to degrading treatment throughout her time on the reality series and beyond, including groping her without consent, making sexually explicit comments, and mocking her bulimia. She further alleges that Combs controlled contestants' food, sleep, and movement, orchestrated humiliating stunts like the infamous "cheesecake walk," and forced her into uncompensated labor under exploitative conditions. According to the complaint, Rivers was made to sleep in exposed, unsafe quarters with male co-stars and denied basic dignity and protection.The lawsuit names more than two dozen other parties, including executives at Bad Boy, Universal Music Group, MTV, and even Combs's mother, asserting that they either enabled or failed to intervene in the abuse. Rivers accuses Combs of deliberately dismantling Da Band to assert dominance and retain control of her earnings, effectively sabotaging her career. She asserts that this behavior was not isolated but part of a systemic pattern of exploitation and intimidation that targeted young, vulnerable performers. Combs's legal team has dismissed the suit as meritless and opportunistic, noting it was filed just before the deadline under the New York City Gender-Motivated Violence Act. The case joins a growing list of lawsuits and criminal investigations currently surrounding Combs.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Sara cmpltBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In the amended complaint filed in Joseph Rose v. Sean Combs et al., Case No. 1:24-cv-07974-JMF, plaintiff Joseph Rose brings a civil action against Sean Combs and various affiliated entities, including Daddy's House Recordings, Combs Global (formerly Combs Enterprises), multiple Bad Boy corporate entities, and unnamed organizational and individual defendants. The plaintiff alleges a range of misconduct tied to Combs and his corporate network, seeking to hold them liable for damages stemming from what appears to be a pattern of unlawful, abusive, or otherwise harmful conduct.The complaint, which includes a demand for a jury trial, reflects an effort by Rose to pierce the corporate veil and hold Combs and his business empire accountable through civil litigation. By naming multiple corporate shells and unidentified individuals and organizations, the plaintiff signals an intent to expose a broader network potentially involved in or facilitating the alleged wrongdoing. The lawsuit seeks legal redress under federal jurisdiction and continues a growing list of civil claims now surrounding Combs and his business operations.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.630243.64.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In the amended complaint filed in Joseph Rose v. Sean Combs et al., Case No. 1:24-cv-07974-JMF, plaintiff Joseph Rose brings a civil action against Sean Combs and various affiliated entities, including Daddy's House Recordings, Combs Global (formerly Combs Enterprises), multiple Bad Boy corporate entities, and unnamed organizational and individual defendants. The plaintiff alleges a range of misconduct tied to Combs and his corporate network, seeking to hold them liable for damages stemming from what appears to be a pattern of unlawful, abusive, or otherwise harmful conduct.The complaint, which includes a demand for a jury trial, reflects an effort by Rose to pierce the corporate veil and hold Combs and his business empire accountable through civil litigation. By naming multiple corporate shells and unidentified individuals and organizations, the plaintiff signals an intent to expose a broader network potentially involved in or facilitating the alleged wrongdoing. The lawsuit seeks legal redress under federal jurisdiction and continues a growing list of civil claims now surrounding Combs and his business operations.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.630243.64.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In the case of United States v. Combs, S3 24 Cr. 542 (AS), the Government filed a letter opposing the defendant's objections to certain exhibits intended to be introduced during the testimony of the witness identified as “Jane.” Despite ongoing discussions between the parties, two main areas of dispute remain. First, the defense argues that selected text message exchanges should be excluded under the rule of completeness, suggesting that the Government is presenting messages out of context. Second, the defense raises hearsay objections to specific exhibits, including a text message exchange, a screenshot of a media headline, and several personal notes written by Jane in her phone's Notes app.The Government maintains that these objections lack merit. Regarding the completeness argument, the prosecution contends that the messages they seek to introduce are independently admissible and not misleading or taken out of context. As for the hearsay objections, the Government argues that the exhibits in question either do not constitute hearsay, fall within recognized exceptions, or are not offered for the truth of the matter asserted. Ultimately, the Government urges the Court to overrule the objections and allow the contested materials to be admitted into evidence during Jane's testimony.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.411.0_1.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In United States v. Combs, the Government responds to the defendant's motion to strike portions of Mr. Mescudi's testimony. The defendant contends that certain parts of Mescudi's testimony should be excluded from the trial, asserting that they are irrelevant or prejudicial. The Government argues that Mescudi's testimony is both relevant and integral to its case, and it should not be excluded. They emphasize that Mescudi's statements provide important context and details that directly relate to the charges and help to establish key aspects of the prosecution's narrative.Additionally, the Government identifies disputed evidentiary issues regarding the upcoming testimony of Deonte Nash and Mia. The defense has raised objections about the admissibility of certain aspects of their testimonies, questioning their relevance and the potential for bias. The Government contends that both witnesses are critical to the case and their testimonies should be allowed to stand, as they provide essential evidence regarding the defendant's actions. The Government's position is that any objections to their testimony should be rejected, as it aligns with the facts and is necessary for proving the charges.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.406.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In United States v. Combs, the Government responds to the defendant's motion to strike portions of Mr. Mescudi's testimony. The defendant contends that certain parts of Mescudi's testimony should be excluded from the trial, asserting that they are irrelevant or prejudicial. The Government argues that Mescudi's testimony is both relevant and integral to its case, and it should not be excluded. They emphasize that Mescudi's statements provide important context and details that directly relate to the charges and help to establish key aspects of the prosecution's narrative.Additionally, the Government identifies disputed evidentiary issues regarding the upcoming testimony of Deonte Nash and Mia. The defense has raised objections about the admissibility of certain aspects of their testimonies, questioning their relevance and the potential for bias. The Government contends that both witnesses are critical to the case and their testimonies should be allowed to stand, as they provide essential evidence regarding the defendant's actions. The Government's position is that any objections to their testimony should be rejected, as it aligns with the facts and is necessary for proving the charges.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.406.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The day began with the judge interrogating both legal teams over the source of a leak. It ended with a closed-door discussion about a newly discovered juror issue. In between, the prosecution showed receipts, including some that showed Bad Boy Productions on the hook for an AMEX that paid for "hotel nights." The defense showed more text messages, including some where Cassie Ventura seemed receptive to Combs's requests for the sexual encounters they called Freak Offs.If you want to read NBC's coverage of the trial, check out our newsletter, “Diddy On Trial”: NBCNews.com/Diddy 

The prosecution called a paralegal and an investigator to introduce messages of all kinds between Combs's chief of staff, his other employees, his ex-girlfriends -- and him. The government alleges the messages show proof of a RICO conspiracy that involves the people who worked for him. On cross, the defense pointed out how many messages the government was ignoring and showed additional messages to contextualize the prosecution's exhibits. Combs was yawning.If you want to read NBC's coverage of the trial, check out our newsletter, “Diddy On Trial”: NBCNews.com/Diddy