Podcasts about intuition pumps

Chapter 1 What's Intuition Pumps and Other Tools for Thinking Book by Daniel Clement DennettIntuition Pumps and Other Tools for Thinking is a book written by philosopher Daniel Dennett. In this book, Dennett presents a collection of thinking tools and techniques that can help readers improve their critical thinking skills and make better decisions. The book covers a wide range of topics, including cognitive biases, logical fallacies, and the nature of consciousness. Dennett offers practical advice and exercises to help readers sharpen their reasoning abilities and navigate the complexities of modern life. Overall, Intuition Pumps and Other Tools for Thinking is a valuable resource for anyone looking to enhance their cognitive abilities and become a more effective thinker.Chapter 2 Is Intuition Pumps and Other Tools for Thinking Book A Good BookYes, many readers and critics consider "Intuition Pumps and Other Tools for Thinking" by Daniel Clement Dennett to be a valuable and insightful book on critical thinking and problem-solving. Dennett is a renowned philosopher known for his clarity of thought and ability to explain complex ideas in a accessible way. The book offers a range of tools and techniques for sharpening our thinking skills and making more informed decisions. Overall, it is highly recommended for anyone interested in improving their critical thinking abilities.Chapter 3 Intuition Pumps and Other Tools for Thinking Book by Daniel Clement Dennett Summary"Intuition Pumps and Other Tools for Thinking" is a book by Daniel Clement Dennett, a prominent philosopher known for his work in cognitive science and evolutionary psychology. The book explores various techniques and strategies that people can use to improve their critical thinking skills and make better decisions.Dennett introduces the concept of "intuition pumps," which are mental tools that help to stimulate and clarify thinking processes. These tools can include thought experiments, analogies, and linguistic tricks that challenge assumptions and uncover hidden biases.Throughout the book, Dennett discusses a range of topics, such as consciousness, free will, and the nature of reality, using these intuition pumps to examine different perspectives and challenge conventional wisdom. He encourages readers to think critically, question their own beliefs, and consider alternative explanations for complex issues.Dennett also emphasizes the importance of skepticism and scientific inquiry in shaping our understanding of the world. By using the tools and techniques outlined in the book, readers can become more effective thinkers and make more informed decisions in a world filled with uncertainty and ambiguity.Overall, "Intuition Pumps and Other Tools for Thinking" is a thought-provoking and insightful exploration of the ways in which we can improve our reasoning abilities and navigate the complexities of the modern world. It offers valuable guidance for anyone seeking to enhance their critical thinking skills and make sense of the world around them. Chapter 4 Intuition Pumps and Other Tools for Thinking Book AuthorDaniel Clement Dennett is an American philosopher, writer, and cognitive scientist known for his work in the fields of philosophy of mind, cognitive science, and evolutionary psychology. He is the author of several influential books, including "Consciousness Explained," "Darwin's Dangerous Idea," and "Breaking the Spell.""Intuition Pumps and Other Tools for Thinking" was released in 2013. This book is a collection of essays and thought...

Daniel Dennett, Professor at Tufts University, may be the most important living philosopher, tackling the biggest questions around: what is consciousness, do we have free will, how does evolutionary adaptation occur? In this episode, Dan tells us about some of his ‘intuition pumps' - tools that are as indispensable for thinking as hammers and saws are for carpentry. We discuss how creativity really is just a bag of tricks, what Descartes‘ biggest mistake was, and how to ‘jump out of the system‘ to make creative leaps. Dan tells us about how magic tricks can teach us about thinking, and how an irrational fear of the intentional stance can slow us down. And Dan assures us that when we scientists wonder what is the right way to phrase a research question, we‘re really doing philosophy. For more information on Night Science, visit https://www.biomedcentral.com/collections/night-science .

Get tickets for our event: skeptic.com/event Daniel Dennett, preeminent philosopher and cognitive scientist, has spent his career considering the thorniest, most fundamental mysteries of the mind. Do we have free will? What is consciousness and how did it come about? What distinguishes human minds from the minds of animals? Dennett's answers have profoundly shaped our age of philosophical thought. In this episode, he reflects on his amazing career and lifelong scientific fascinations, as well as the value of life beyond the university, one enriched by sculpture, music, farming, and family.  Daniel C. Dennett is Professor Emeritus at Tufts University and the author of numerous books, including Intuition Pumps and Other Tools for Thinking, Breaking the Spell, Darwin's Dangerous Idea, and Consciousness Explained.

Link to original articleWelcome to The Nonlinear Library, where we use Text-to-Speech software to convert the best writing from the Rationalist and EA communities into audio. This is: Slow motion videos as AI risk intuition pumps, published by Andrew Critch on June 14, 2022 on LessWrong. tl;dr: When making the case for AI as a risk to humanity, trying showing people an evocative illustration of what differences in processing speeds can look like, such as this video. Over the past ~12 years of making this case to various people inside and outside academia, I've found folks often ask for a single story of how AI "goes off the rails". When given a plausible story, the mind just thinks of a way humanity could avoid that-particular-story, and goes back to thinking there's no risk, unless provided with another story, or another, etc.. Eventually this can lead to a realization that there's a lot of ways for humanity to die, and a correspondingly high level of risk, but it takes a while. Nowadays, before getting into a bunch of specific stories, I try to say something more general, like this: There's a ton of ways humanity can die out from the introduction of AI. I'm happy to share specific stories if necessary, but plenty of risks arise just from the fact that humans are extremely slow. Transistors can fire about 10 million times faster than human brain cells, so it's possible we'll eventually have digital minds operating 10 million times faster than us, meaning form a decision-making perspective we'd look to them like stationary objects, like plants or rocks. This speed differential exists whether or not you believe in a centralized AI system calling the shots, or an economy of many, so it applies is a wide variety of "stories" for how the future could go. To give you a sense, here's what humans look like when slowed down by only around 100x:

Welcome to The Nonlinear Library, where we use Text-to-Speech software to convert the best writing from the Rationalist and EA communities into audio. This is: Slow motion videos as AI risk intuition pumps, published by Andrew Critch on June 14, 2022 on LessWrong. tl;dr: When making the case for AI as a risk to humanity, trying showing people an evocative illustration of what differences in processing speeds can look like, such as this video. Over the past ~12 years of making this case to various people inside and outside academia, I've found folks often ask for a single story of how AI "goes off the rails". When given a plausible story, the mind just thinks of a way humanity could avoid that-particular-story, and goes back to thinking there's no risk, unless provided with another story, or another, etc.. Eventually this can lead to a realization that there's a lot of ways for humanity to die, and a correspondingly high level of risk, but it takes a while. Nowadays, before getting into a bunch of specific stories, I try to say something more general, like this: There's a ton of ways humanity can die out from the introduction of AI. I'm happy to share specific stories if necessary, but plenty of risks arise just from the fact that humans are extremely slow. Transistors can fire about 10 million times faster than human brain cells, so it's possible we'll eventually have digital minds operating 10 million times faster than us, meaning form a decision-making perspective we'd look to them like stationary objects, like plants or rocks. This speed differential exists whether or not you believe in a centralized AI system calling the shots, or an economy of many, so it applies is a wide variety of "stories" for how the future could go. To give you a sense, here's what humans look like when slowed down by only around 100x:

Čo robiť, ak s niekým zásadne nesúhlasíme? Aké pravidlá môžu pomôcť lepšiemu rozhovoru? Je vždy dôležité "mať pravdu"? ----more---- Prečítajte si túto dávku aj ako článok na SME. Použitá a odporúčaná literatúra: Boghossian, Lindsay, How to Have Impossible Conversations: A Very Practical Guide, 2019. Dennett, Intuition Pumps and Other Tools for Thinking, 2013. Rapoportové pravidlá Súvisiace dávky: PD#185 Scientizmus, https://bitly.com/davka185 *** Dobré veci potrebujú svoj čas. Staň sa patrónom Tvojho obľúbeného podcastu cez Patreon ❤️ (https://bit.ly/PatreonPD) alebo nás podpor jednorazovo či trvalým príkazom (https://bit.ly/CHCEMpodporit). Ďakujeme!

Imagine a beginner's luck without a point of reference, without any obvious design  and you'll have a better picture of intuition and the role it plays in ego and illusion. So there is no luck. There is no accident. Some thinkers are just so in touch with the universe they need not appeal to another authority because they ARE the authority.  In this episode we Dawdlers try to critique how intuition is used in philosophy. Fair warning however. Harland gets pretty chimpy and Ryan enjoys Harland's chimpy-ness perhaps a little too much. Doesn't matter if you lean in or lean back. Either way, your armchair is being sold on Craigslist tomorrow.  -The Dawdlers  00:02:20 - The Armchair Activities, Intuition, Herman Cappelen's Philosophy Without Intuitions & Centrality: What is 'Intuition', How central to philosophy, Is that 'good'/'bad'? 00:22:30 - Cappelen's Questions to the Centralists, Epistemic Hedging, Trophy Problems, Common Ground 00:31:18 - 'Intuitive Plausibility' vs. Conditionals vs. Proofs, Intellectual Egos 00:41:00 - Argumentation Norms and Intellectual Progress, Chimp Warning, Hilary Putnam's Reason, Truth, and History 00:45:30 - Putnam's Intuitionalistic Methodology: Artistic Ants, Twin Earth Dendrology, & Brains in Vats 00:53:50 - Intuition Pumps, Similarity, Representation, & Reference, Sleight of Mind 01:10:10 - Monkeys on Typewriters & Intrinsic Meaning, Causal Theory of Reference, Alternative Intuitive Teleologies 01:22:45 - Putnam Butchers Turing 01:32:12 - Throwing Putnam at Cappelen, An Argument for Centrality 01:43:50 - Ryan puts Harland on the spot to make a bunch of irresponsible snap judgments

Jake and Phil are joined by Olivia Garard (@teaandtactics) of The Strategy Bridge (https://thestrategybridge.org/editorial-team/2016/8/16/olivia-a-garard) to discuss Oulipo member Anne Garréta's "On Bookselves" and Guy Debord’s “The Naked City” Works cited: R.O. Kwon, In Defense of Keeping Books Spine In https://lithub.com/in-defense-of-keeping-books-spine-in/ Anne Garréta, On Bookselves http://oulipo.net/fr/on-bookselves Wittgenstein's private language argument https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/private-language/ Borges, The Library of Babel https://libraryofbabel.info/libraryofbabel.html Daniel Dennett, Intuition Pumps and Other Tools for Thinking http://books.wwnorton.com/books/Intuition-Pumps-And-Other-Tools-for-Thinking/ Phil Klay, What We're Fighting For https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/10/opinion/sunday/what-were-fighting-for.html Michel Houellebecq's face https://s1.lemde.fr/image/2015/01/07/534x0/455066378cd6michel-houellebecq-en-septembre-201468730539b00035181bbb264f4a38e9e9.jpg Guy Debord, The Naked City https://paulwalshphotographyblog.wordpress.com/2013/07/08/the-naked-city/ Guy Debord, The Society of the Spectacle https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/debord/society.htm Michel de Certeu, The Practice of Everyday Life https://www.ucpress.edu/book/9780520271456/the-practice-of-everyday-life Marc Auge, Non-Places: An Introduction to Supermodernity https://www.amazon.com/Non-Places-Introduction-Supermodernity-Marc-Auge/dp/1844673111 Jean Baudrillard, Simulacra and Simulation https://www.press.umich.edu/9900/simulacraandsimulation Isaac Babel, Guy de Maupaussant https://rosswolfe.files.wordpress.com/2015/03/isaak-babel-complete-works.pdf Audio Clip: Method Man at Def Jam offices in 1994 https://www.youtube.com/watch?reload=9&v=BWml7yoFwHA

This time the Dawdler's examine Daniel Dennett's book “Intuition Pumps and Other Tools for Thinking” (2013). Regardless of all that, these two tools think they think. Topics explored are philosophical zombies, Occam's Razor, black boxes, and sorta operators. Do you smell that? It's the sweet potpourri of Dennettian thinkadinks. -Dawds 00:08:24 – Thinking Tools 00:39:32 – Folk Psychology, etc. 00:51:21 – Heterophenomenology and Zombies 01:15:01 – The Tuned Deck and Two Black Boxes 01:39:09 – Ryan does not Understand Dennett

Is living forever a good thing? Could we maintain our values and personal attachments throughout eternity? Would we be motivated to accomplish anything? Can we make sense of a human life that doesn't have a fixed endpoint? We try to alleviate David's paralyzing fear of death by examining two articles - one on how immortality is worse than we think, and the other providing evidence that dying might be better than we think. Plus,we examine some famous thought experiments - if they were porn. And a special bonus: after the outro music, Eliza Sommers joins her Dad at to give her theory about Twin Peaks: The Return (contains spoilers). Special Guest: Eliza Sommers.

Watch the video here. ''Perhaps America's most widely read (and debated) living philosopher'' (New York Times), Daniel C. Dennett is the author of a score of books that explore the intersection of human consciousness and evolutionary biology, including Consciousness Explained, Darwin's Dangerous Idea, and Intuition Pumps and Other Tools for Thinking. He is Co-Director of the Center for Cognitive Studies and Austin B. Fletcher Professor of Philosophy at Tufts University. Building on ideas from computer science and biology, From Bacteria to Bach and Back posits bold stances upon how we came to have conscious minds.  A longtime writer for The New Yorker, Adam Gopnik is the author of Paris to the Moon and Angels and Ages: Lincoln, Darwin, and the Birth of the Modern Age, among other books. (recorded 2/9/2017)

Michael starts an email from a listener that starts with praise, then turns around and claims that a top trend following trader has 400 employees and “super computers” to carry out trades, and that is why he is so successful. Michael uses this listener as just one example of how millions think. They are confused by what a computer does, and simply don’t understand what trend following is all about. The trader he refers to is on record saying that he trades off of Excel spreadsheets. For the remainder of the podcast, Michael expands on his response to the listeners email, and breaks apart algorithmic trading. Michael next reads an excerpt from “Intuition Pumps and Other Tools for Thinking”, by Daniel Dennett. The excerpt breaks down algorithms in depth. Michael’s point is to show that a computer doesn’t make a great trader, it is the algorithms programed in the computer that creates the success. Where do the algorithms come from? Humans. Trend following is all about having the brilliance to come up with a strategy, but the execution is straightforward. In this episode of Trend Following Radio: “Super computers” Systematic trading Creating algorithms Coding Machines replacing humans Breaking down the use of software

DANIEL C. DENNETT (https://www.edge.org/memberbio/daniel_c_dennett) is a Philosopher; Austin B. Fletcher Professor of Philosophy, Co-Director, Center for Cognitive Studies, Tufts University; Author, Intuition Pumps. The Conversation: https://www.edge.org/panel/daniel-c-dennett-the-de-darwinizing-of-cultural-change-headcon-13-part-x

Tools For Thinking. This week we talk about songwriter Frank Loesser, immigration, the Boy Scouts ban on atheists, and religious symbols on government property. Then we interview philosopher Daniel C. Dennett about his new book, Intuition Pumps and Other Tools For Thinking.

Host: Indre Viskontas Having spent 50 years as an influential thinker, Daniel Dennett has earned the right to tell us how to think. His latest book is a collection of 77 tools for thinking, which every self-respecting critical thinker should consider, if not actively use. American philosopher and author Daniel C. Dennett is perhaps best known in cognitive science for his multiple drafts (or "fame in the brain") model of human consciousness and he is among the most influential philosophers of our day. He is the Austin B. Fletcher Professor of Philosophy, and Co-Director of the Center for Cognitive Studies at Tufts University, and the author of 16 books including Elbow Room; The Intentional Stance; Consciousness Explained; Darwin's Dangerous Idea and most recently, Intuition Pumps and other Tools for Thinking. Prof Dennett has also published more than 300 scholarly articles and was awarded the Erasmus Prize for his contributions to society in 2012.

Daniel Dennett LAFs with us! One of the Four Horsemen of the anti-apocalypse, Daniel Dennett is the author of many books, including Breaking The Spell, which is a must-read for anyone leaving religion. His latest book, Intuition Pumps and Other Tools for Thinking is available now. Special thanks to Sarah Morehead with Recovering From Religion for … Continue reading Daniel Dennett – Episode 68