POPULARITY
Scott and Wes look into their crystal ball to predict what's coming in web development next year. From the rise of on-device AI to the vanilla CSS comeback, Bun's big moves, and React's evolution, this episode is packed with bold predictions and hot takes! Show Notes 00:00 Welcome to Syntax! 02:00 Brought to you by Sentry.io. 03:09 The agenda. 03:40 Temporal Javascript api will ship in Safari and Chrome. Temporal Proposal. 06:23 On device AI. WebGPU API Dawn Native WebGPU 10:26 Models will plateau. Bolt.new, v0, Lovable.dev. 13:40 Web Awesome will become the most used web components library. Web Awesome. 15:57 We will be using more web components. 16:59 A push towards the ‘standard stack'. 19:38 We can really use relative color. 21:39 Vanilla CSS comeback. 23:35 A complete Mixins / Functions API for CSS. 24:27 Conditionals will ship in all browsers. 25:50 People will still make vertical centering jokes. 27:08 VSCode will be feature parity with Cursor. 28:22 Framework choice will matter less with AI tools. 29:12 OpenAI will launch a browser. Dupe.com. Buy Now! The Shopping Conspiracy. Krazy Binz. 37:18 React will drop Babel. BabelJS. 38:05 React Server Components will pop. 39:46 Remix will relaunch as something entirely different. 41:11 React Native will have it's time. 42:06 Svelte will get component-based islands or data loading. 44:19 Server Runtimes, Bun will continue to do non-standard, lovable things. 44:44 Bun will release a PAS to compete with NPM, Vercel, and Vite. 46:06 Laravel will release a CMS. 47:57 Vite will stay king. 48:03 Rolldown ships in the next version of Vite. Rolldown. Statamic. 49:35 Sick Picks & Shameless Plugs. Sick Picks Scott: PHILIPS A19 Ultra Definition Dimmable Light Bulb. Wes: Stats App. Shameless Plugs Scott: Syntax on YouTube. Hit us up on Socials! Syntax: X Instagram Tiktok LinkedIn Threads Wes: X Instagram Tiktok LinkedIn Threads Scott: X Instagram Tiktok LinkedIn Threads Randy: X Instagram YouTube Threads
How to Master LSAT Conditionals Free Easy LSAT Cheat Sheet: https://bit.ly/easylsat Book A Call: https://form.typeform.com/to/Et1l5Dg6 LSAT Unplugged Courses: http://www.lsatunplugged.com Unlimited Application Essay Editing: https://www.lsatunplugged.com/law-school-admissions Unplugged Prep: http://www.unpluggedprep.com/ Get my book for only $4.99: https://www.lsatmasterybook.com LSAT Unplugged Podcast: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/lsat-unplugged/id1450308309?mt=2 LSAT Unplugged Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/lsatunplugged/ LSAT Unplugged TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@lsatunplugged LSAT Coaching YouTube Playlist: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLgOHAiSs08EbD-kfDFqIEoMC_hzQrH-J5 Law School Admissions Coaching YouTube Playlist: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLgOHAiSs08EbsqveKs_RZEy2sqqbz3HUL Subscribe: https://www.youtube.com/user/LSATBlog/?sub_confirmation=1 ***
How to Master LSAT Conditionals Free Easy LSAT Cheat Sheet: https://bit.ly/easylsat Book A Call: https://form.typeform.com/to/Et1l5Dg6 LSAT Unplugged Courses: http://www.lsatunplugged.com Unlimited Application Essay Editing: https://www.lsatunplugged.com/law-school-admissions Unplugged Prep: http://www.unpluggedprep.com/ Get my book for only $4.99: https://www.lsatmasterybook.com LSAT Unplugged Podcast: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/lsat-unplugged/id1450308309?mt=2 LSAT Unplugged Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/lsatunplugged/ LSAT Unplugged TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@lsatunplugged LSAT Coaching YouTube Playlist: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLgOHAiSs08EbD-kfDFqIEoMC_hzQrH-J5 Law School Admissions Coaching YouTube Playlist: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLgOHAiSs08EbsqveKs_RZEy2sqqbz3HUL Subscribe: https://www.youtube.com/user/LSATBlog/?sub_confirmation=1 ***
Finn and Callum look at all kinds of 'if' clauses.FIND BBC LEARNING ENGLISH HERE: Visit our website ✔️ https://www.bbc.co.uk/learningenglish Follow us ✔️ https://www.bbc.co.uk/learningenglish/followusSUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER: ✔️ https://www.bbc.co.uk/learningenglish/newslettersLIKE PODCASTS? Try some of our other popular podcasts including: ✔️Learning English for Work ✔️6 Minute Vocabulary ✔️Learning English StoriesThey're all available by searching in your podcast app.
Now that really is a tricky question !! The conditionals may seem hard but in fact they are pretty simple and they will take your English to another level. As a language learner it's time to expand your conversation from the past, present and future.... go further with the conditionals !
Ben looks at how to form mixed conditional sentences and gives you some exercises to practise. Patreon: patreon.com/learnenglishwithben - For transcripts, comprehension quizzes, and video tutorials, join the fan club.Instagram: instagram.com/learnenglishwithbenWebsite: learnenglishwithben.comEmail: learnenglishwithben88@gmail.com - send me an email if you're interested in classes Hébergé par Acast. Visitez acast.com/privacy pour plus d'informations.
Ben looks at the structure of the 3rd conditional and gives you some sentences to complete.Patreon: patreon.com/learnenglishwithben - For transcripts, comprehension quizzes, and video tutorials, join the fan club.Instagram: instagram.com/learnenglishwithbenWebsite: learnenglishwithben.comEmail: learnenglishwithben88@gmail.com - send me an email if you're interested in classes Hébergé par Acast. Visitez acast.com/privacy pour plus d'informations.
Ben looks at the grammar for the unreal conditional and gives you some exercises.Patreon: patreon.com/learnenglishwithben - For transcripts, comprehension quizzes, and video tutorials, join the fan club.Instagram: instagram.com/learnenglishwithbenWebsite: learnenglishwithben.comEmail: learnenglishwithben88@gmail.com - send me an email if you're interested in classes Hébergé par Acast. Visitez acast.com/privacy pour plus d'informations.
Ben explains how to correctly use the first conditional, also known as the real future conditional.Patreon: patreon.com/learnenglishwithben - For transcripts, comprehension quizzes, and video tutorials, join the fan club.Instagram: instagram.com/learnenglishwithbenInstagram: instagram.com/learnenglishwithbenWebsite: learnenglishwithben.comEmail: learnenglishwithben88@gmail.com - send me an email if you're interested in classes Hébergé par Acast. Visitez acast.com/privacy pour plus d'informations.
Send us a Text Message.
Send us a Text Message.In today's episode of Englishway RD, we delve into advanced grammar hacks designed to help you improve your English fluency quickly and effectively. You'll learn how to construct complex sentences, use advanced tenses, master conditionals, employ the passive voice, and incorporate modal verbs into your daily conversations. These tips will enable you to speak English with greater accuracy and confidence. Don't miss this episode packed with key strategies to elevate your English skills. Tune in and transform your command of English today!Related Episodes: Ep 247:Domina las Frases Condicionales AvanzadasEp 178: "Desbloqueando el poder de los verbos auxiliares: Guía esencial de gramática inglesa"Ep 78: If: Aprende los condicionales (If) de tipo 0, 1, 2, y 3!Ep 72: Aprende el passive Voice: La guía indispensableEp 65: APRENDE los Modal Verbs: may, might, shall, ought to, and have to: La Guía que estabas buscando!
Easily listen to Social Skills Coaching in your podcast app of choice at https://bit.ly/social-skills-home00:02:55 Are You a Conversational Narcissist?00:11:01 The Power of the Support Response00:17:03 ALBRECHT'S RULE OF THREE FOR CONVERSATIONSHear it Here - https://adbl.co/3N9lsjI• The biggest threat to connecting well with others is conversational narcissism—i.e., the tendency of centering ourselves, talking too much, steering the topic, interrupting, invalidating others, bragging, manipulating, or acting superior to others. Everyone has the potential to be narcissistic in conversation at times.• A shift response is an attempt to bring the focus and attention of a conversation back to yourself. A support response maintains that focus and attention on the other person. A great way to reduce conversational narcissism is to use fewer shift responses and more support responses. When used well, support responses lead to better, more fulfilling conversations for everyone.• Dr. Karl Albrecht says that all conversations can be broken down into three fundamental components: declaratives, questions, and conditionals. His rule of three is to never make three declarative statements in a row without a question or conditional statement. • Declarations can be presented as statements of fact whether they are or aren't, and can shut down conversations or act as shift responses. Conditionals are modified, weaker forms of declarations that acknowledge their own subjectivity. #Keywords #Make #RussellNewton #NewtonMG #PatrickKing #PatrickKingConsulting #SocialSkillsCoaching #MakeFriendsEasily #WhenEgoGetsInTheWayPatrickKing
Listen with FREE Digital Transcript only on the RealLife App. Let's call it a day or let's call it a night, but first don't forget to grab a bite! These are some of the great phrases natives use in everyday situations. Listen to the full episode to learn the meaning and use them in your conversation! We also talk about the new Wonka movie and watch a funny show with the movie cast. You can't miss it!And as a bonus, we review all 5 Conditional types of sentences with our explanations and examples. Show notes here. ......... Follow us on:RealLife English (YouTube)Learn English with TV Series (YouTube)Instagram: reallife.english --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/ethan0661/message
Reflect and Rejoice: An Enlightening Episode Unveiling the Magic of Conditionals, Coupled with Year-End Reflections and a Toast to the Art of English Mastery.
Finn and Callum look at all kinds of 'if' clauses.
Welcome to The Nonlinear Library, where we use Text-to-Speech software to convert the best writing from the Rationalist and EA communities into audio. This is: Conditionals All The Way Down, published by lunatic at large on October 2, 2023 on LessWrong. (I thought about this idea on my own before Googling to see if anyone had already written it up. I found something very similar at so all credit for this line of thinking should go to the authors of that paper. Still, I think that this concept deserves a writeup on Lesswrong and I also want to write a series of posts on this kind of topic so I need to start somewhere. If this idea has already been written up on Lesswrong then please let me know!) Alice and Bob are driving in a car and Alice wants to know whether the driver in front of them will turn at the next light. Alice asks Bob, "What's the probability that the driver will turn at the next light?" Unfortunately, Bob doesn't know how to estimate that. However, Bob does know that there are cherry blossoms which might be in bloom off the next exit. Bob is able to use his predictive talent to determine that there's a 50% chance that the driver will turn if there are cherry blossoms on display and that there's a 25% chance that the driver will turn if there aren't any cherry blossoms on display. Bob tells Alice that no other variables will interfere with these conditional probabilities. Alice then asks Bob, "What's the probability that there will be cherry blossoms on display?" Again, Bob is unable to determine this probability. However, Bob does know that the city government was considering chopping the cherry trees down. Bob tells Alice that if the city chopped them down then there's a 5% chance of finding cherry blossoms and that if the city didn't chop them down then there's a 70% of finding cherry blossoms. Bob knows that no other variables can impact these conditional probabilities. Alice now asks Bob, "What's the probability that the city cut down the cherry trees?" Predictably, Bob doesn't know how to answer that. However, Bob again uses his magical powers of perception to deduce that there's an 80% chance the city chopped them down if the construction company that was lobbying for them to be cut down won its appeal and a 10% chance the city chopped them down if the construction company that was lobbying for them to be cut down lost its appeal. Now imagine that this conversation goes on forever: whether the construction company won is determined by whether the pro-business judge was installed which is determined by whether the governor was under pressure and so on. At the end we get an infinite Bayesian network that's a single chain extending infinitely far in one direction. Importantly, there's no "starting" node we can assign an outright probability to. So Alice will never be able to get an answer, right? If there's no "starting" node we have an outright probability for then how can Alice hope to propagate forward to determine the probability that the driver will turn at the light? I claim that Alice can actually do pretty well. Let's draw a picture to see why: I'm using A0 to denote the event where the driver turns right, A1 to denote the event where the cherry blossoms are on display, and so on. If we know P(Ai) for positive integer i then we can compute P(Ai-1) via P(Ai-1)=P(Ai-1|Ai)P(Ai)+P(Ai-1|ACi)P(ACi) =P(Ai-1|Ai)P(Ai)+P(Ai-1|ACi)(1-P(Ai)) =P(Ai-1|ACi)+(P(Ai-1|Ai)-P(Ai-1|ACi))P(Ai) where P(Ai-1|Ai) and P(Ai-1|ACi) are the constants which Bob has provided to Alice. Let's think of these as functions fi:[0,1][0,1] defined by fi(x)=P(Ai-1|ACi)+(P(Ai-1|Ai)-P(Ai-1|ACi))x where we know that P(Ai-1)=fi(P(Ai)). I've illustrated the behavior of these functions with black arrows in the diagram above. Alice wants to find P(A0). What can she do? Well, she knows that P(A0) must be an output of f1, i.e. P(A0)∈f1([0,1]). Visually: Alice also knows that P(A1) is an output of f2, so actually P(A0)∈f1(f2([0,1])): Alice can kee...
Link to original articleWelcome to The Nonlinear Library, where we use Text-to-Speech software to convert the best writing from the Rationalist and EA communities into audio. This is: Conditionals All The Way Down, published by lunatic at large on October 2, 2023 on LessWrong. (I thought about this idea on my own before Googling to see if anyone had already written it up. I found something very similar at so all credit for this line of thinking should go to the authors of that paper. Still, I think that this concept deserves a writeup on Lesswrong and I also want to write a series of posts on this kind of topic so I need to start somewhere. If this idea has already been written up on Lesswrong then please let me know!) Alice and Bob are driving in a car and Alice wants to know whether the driver in front of them will turn at the next light. Alice asks Bob, "What's the probability that the driver will turn at the next light?" Unfortunately, Bob doesn't know how to estimate that. However, Bob does know that there are cherry blossoms which might be in bloom off the next exit. Bob is able to use his predictive talent to determine that there's a 50% chance that the driver will turn if there are cherry blossoms on display and that there's a 25% chance that the driver will turn if there aren't any cherry blossoms on display. Bob tells Alice that no other variables will interfere with these conditional probabilities. Alice then asks Bob, "What's the probability that there will be cherry blossoms on display?" Again, Bob is unable to determine this probability. However, Bob does know that the city government was considering chopping the cherry trees down. Bob tells Alice that if the city chopped them down then there's a 5% chance of finding cherry blossoms and that if the city didn't chop them down then there's a 70% of finding cherry blossoms. Bob knows that no other variables can impact these conditional probabilities. Alice now asks Bob, "What's the probability that the city cut down the cherry trees?" Predictably, Bob doesn't know how to answer that. However, Bob again uses his magical powers of perception to deduce that there's an 80% chance the city chopped them down if the construction company that was lobbying for them to be cut down won its appeal and a 10% chance the city chopped them down if the construction company that was lobbying for them to be cut down lost its appeal. Now imagine that this conversation goes on forever: whether the construction company won is determined by whether the pro-business judge was installed which is determined by whether the governor was under pressure and so on. At the end we get an infinite Bayesian network that's a single chain extending infinitely far in one direction. Importantly, there's no "starting" node we can assign an outright probability to. So Alice will never be able to get an answer, right? If there's no "starting" node we have an outright probability for then how can Alice hope to propagate forward to determine the probability that the driver will turn at the light? I claim that Alice can actually do pretty well. Let's draw a picture to see why: I'm using A0 to denote the event where the driver turns right, A1 to denote the event where the cherry blossoms are on display, and so on. If we know P(Ai) for positive integer i then we can compute P(Ai-1) via P(Ai-1)=P(Ai-1|Ai)P(Ai)+P(Ai-1|ACi)P(ACi) =P(Ai-1|Ai)P(Ai)+P(Ai-1|ACi)(1-P(Ai)) =P(Ai-1|ACi)+(P(Ai-1|Ai)-P(Ai-1|ACi))P(Ai) where P(Ai-1|Ai) and P(Ai-1|ACi) are the constants which Bob has provided to Alice. Let's think of these as functions fi:[0,1][0,1] defined by fi(x)=P(Ai-1|ACi)+(P(Ai-1|Ai)-P(Ai-1|ACi))x where we know that P(Ai-1)=fi(P(Ai)). I've illustrated the behavior of these functions with black arrows in the diagram above. Alice wants to find P(A0). What can she do? Well, she knows that P(A0) must be an output of f1, i.e. P(A0)∈f1([0,1]). Visually: Alice also knows that P(A1) is an output of f2, so actually P(A0)∈f1(f2([0,1])): Alice can kee...
What if understanding the unspoken language of therapy could revolutionize your healing process? In this reverse episode, your guides, Lisa Mustard, from the podcast "The Therapy Show" , and I take you on a fascinating journey through the world of therapy. Our candid conversations aim to demystify the intricacies of therapy, from recognizing your gut instinct when choosing a therapist to the potent impact of unconditional positive regard in a therapeutic relationship. We dissect how discomfort can be an essential part of growth and how shame can facilitate vital dialogues with your therapist.Therapy is not a one-size-fits-all process, and we delve into the importance of a therapist who can tailor their approach to your unique needs. We'll also debunk the myth of quick fixes and emphasize the value of consistent, patient work in therapy. Together, we explore the transformational power of the therapeutic relationship and the profound personal growth that can come from being truly seen and heard by a therapist. We also discuss the intriguing dynamic of therapist-client relationships and how they can offer mutual benefit.As an added bonus, we talk about the importance of surrounding yourself with good friendships and nurturing therapeutic relationships for personal growth. We also explore the Atomic Habits approach of tracking accomplishments, providing you with actionable insights to apply in your own life. We'll also introduce you to a 30-day journal, Empower Your Mind, designed to guide you on your journey to mental clarity. Finally, I share some exciting news about an upcoming documentary on first responders in crisis situations, shedding light on their crucial role. Join us for this transformative episode, as we illuminate the path to emotional healing and personal growth. You won't want to miss it!YouTube Channel For The PodcastCoaching Program
Enjoy this bitesize episode on an advanced English grammar topic and learn all about how to form mixed conditionals.
Join us at Eigo Garden for free learning materials and lessons!英語ガーデン:日本人向けの英語アカデミーwww.eigogarden.comhttps://discord.gg/xhzFHZAF6NSupport this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/learn-natural-english-idioms-and-metaphors/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy
Anastatia Mayers and her mum Keisha Schahaff will also be the first people from the Caribbean to make the journey.Skip to 3 minutes to jump straight to the story.To find out more about the inverted structure (mentioned in the news story), go to my other podcast, Parler Anglais, and find the episode entitled 'Inversions, part three: Conditionals' from June 28th 2023.Read the episode transcript and test your understanding with a comprehension quiz by joining the Learn English with Ben fan club. For €5 / £4, you'll get access to transcripts and quizzes for every episode of Apprendre L'Anglais Avec L'Actu. Visit patreon.com/learnenglishwithben for more information and to join now.Patreon: patreon.com/learnenglishwithben - For transcripts, comprehension quizzes, and discounted group classes, join the fan club.Instagram: instagram.com/learnenglishwithbenWebsite: learnenglishwithben.comEmail: learnenglishwithben88@gmail.com - send me an email if you're interested in classes - either group or private Hébergé par Acast. Visitez acast.com/privacy pour plus d'informations.
Anastatia Mayers and her mum Keisha Schahaff will also be the first people from the Caribbean to make the journey. Skip to 3 minutes to jump straight to the story. To find out more about the inverted structure (mentioned in the news story), go to my other podcast, Parler Anglais, and find the episode entitled 'Inversions, part three: Conditionals' from June 28th 2023. Read the episode transcript and test your understanding with a comprehension quiz by joining the Learn English with Ben fan club. For €5 / £4, you'll get access to transcripts and quizzes for every episode of Apprendre L'Anglais Avec L'Actu. Visit patreon.com/learnenglishwithben for more information and to join now. Patreon: patreon.com/learnenglishwithben - For transcripts, comprehension quizzes, and discounted group classes, join the fan club. Instagram: instagram.com/learnenglishwithben Website: learnenglishwithben.com Email: learnenglishwithben88@gmail.com - send me an email if you're interested in classes - either group or private Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Join us at Eigo Garden for free learning materials and lessons!英語ガーデン:日本人向けの英語アカデミーwww.eigogarden.comhttps://discord.gg/xhzFHZAF6NSupport this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/learn-natural-english-idioms-and-metaphors/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy
Should is a pretty versatile word in the world of English grammar. I've talked about using should in a few other episodes of the Happy English podcast, and today I'd like to talk about how we use should with conditionals. Some of this has a formal sound, which means these three patterns are likely to show up on English exams, like the TOEIC.Join my Podcast Learner's Study Group here: https://learn.myhappyenglish.com/transcriptVisit my website : https://learn.myhappyenglish.com/Get TOEIC Mastery: https://learn.myhappyenglish.com/TOEIC-Mastery-Online-English-CourseThis show is part of the Spreaker Prime Network, if you are interested in advertising on this podcast, contact us at https://www.spreaker.com/show/5900997/advertisement
Ben looks at how to use the inverted structure in conditional sentences. Hébergé par Acast. Visitez acast.com/privacy pour plus d'informations.
Ben looks at how to use the inverted structure in conditional sentences. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Is "truth" a redundant concept? Listen as Simon Blackburn grapples with the topic. Looking for a link we mentioned? It's here: https://linktr.ee/philosophyforourtimesTruth has had a difficult century. More than ever we are lost as to both 'what truth is' and 'what is true'. Should we instead turn to pragmatism? Join Simon Blackburn to explore why truth and pragmatism may be more aligned than at first it may seem.Author of Think and Truth: A guide for the perplexed, Simon Blackburn has worked to bring philosophy to a wider audience. He was a Professor of Philosophy at Cambridge University and Vice President of the British Humanist Association.There are thousands of big ideas to discover at IAI.tv – videos, articles, and courses waiting for you to explore. Find out more: https://iai.tv/podcast-offers?utm_source=podcast&utm_medium=shownotes&utm_campaign=a-tale-of-truth-with-simon-blackburnSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
Today, we continue our journey into the world of IELTS listening any how the exam writers try to confuse you by playing with opposites. This week, we move away from lexis and into the word of grammar. In particular, the 2nd and 3rd conditionals. Nick and I will explain exactly what the 2nd and 3rd conditional are, how they are formed, and how IELTS using them in listening recordings to confuse you!This is an interactive episode so please have a pen and piece of paper ready so that you can join in the activities. Useful Links Join our intensive listening course: https://www.myieltsclassroom.com/pages/listeningWatch the first three lessons in my IELTS essay video course: https://www.myieltsclassroom.com/programs/writing-task-2-academic-general-trainingRate and review My IELTS ClassroomIf you are on Apple Podcasts, help us to help more people just like you by rating and reviewing our show. Reviews let other students - just like you - find our information-packed episodes and start their IELTS journey in the best possible way. Remember, My IELTS Classroom offers a range of IELTS services:IELTS Video courses: https://www.myieltsclassroom.com/pages/writingIELTS Essay Corrections:https://www.myieltsclassroom.com/pages/markingIELTS Speaking lessons: https://www.myieltsclassroom.com/pages/speakingFree blog lessons: http://blog.myieltsclassroom.comFree Podcast episodes: https://myieltsclassroom.buzzsprout.comSupport the show
Join us at Eigo Garden for free learning materials and lessons!英語ガーデン:日本人向けの英語アカデミーwww.eigogarden.comhttps://discord.gg/xhzFHZAF6NSupport this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/learn-natural-english-idioms-and-metaphors/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy
Conoce cómo presentar, defender y negociar de manera efectiva. La atención se centrará en el inglés de negocios y en cómo usar estructuras gramaticales avanzadas de manera efectiva en una negociación.
Bart continues his miniseries on shell scripting by teaching us conditionals in the shell. In order to explain why conditionals are a bit odd in shell scripting, Bart first walks us through how it was originally done and then shows us the evolution to a much better method. It's still weird, and many things are opposite of what you'd expect (like 4 is actually > 10), but he gets us there in the end. I was most excited to finally learn what `fi` means, which shows up in shell scripting and I'd seen before in AppleScript. You can find Bart's fabulous tutorial shownotes at pbs.bartificer.net. Read an unedited, auto-generated transcript: CCATP_2023_02_18
Bart continues his miniseries on shell scripting by teaching us conditionals in the shell. In order to explain why conditionals are a bit odd in shell scripting, Bart first walks us through how it was originally done and then shows us the evolution to a much better method. It's still weird, and many things are opposite of what you'd expect (like 4 is actually > 10), but he gets us there in the end. I was most excited to finally learn what `fi` means, which shows up in shell scripting and I'd seen before in AppleScript. You can find Bart's fabulous tutorial shownotes at pbs.bartificer.net. Read an unedited, auto-generated transcript: CCATP_2023_02_18
In this episode, I talk about my advice on surviving a zombie outbreak based on my extensive experience watching zombie TV series and playing video games. It's a bit of fun, but we also include some pretty advanced grammar. While talking, I use the inverted versions of the first, second and third conditionals. Check out the show notes page below for extra help. Show notes page - https://levelupenglish.school/podcast206Sign Up for Free Lessons - https://www.levelupenglish.school/#freelessonsJoin Level Up English - https://courses.levelupenglish.schoolBy becoming a member, you can access all podcast transcripts, listen to the private podcast and join live lessons and courses on the website.Support the show
In this extra episode, we listen to a conversation between Mark and Thomas about their plans for the weekend. The conversation contains lots of examples of the first conditional, so listen carefully!Would you like to receive free lesson notes to accompany this lesson? If so then click here to go to our website and enter your name and email address in the form below the episode. We'll deliver the lesson notes for the current and future episodes to your inbox. Please note, the notes for this extra episode can be found at the end of the notes for episode 6. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
What is the relationship between conditionals and biconditionals? Do they play a similar role in First Order Logic or are they completely different? In this video, we discuss what are conditionals, what are biconditionals and how they can be used to further your understanding of logic. For a complete introduction into First Order Logic, make sure you check out the full video here:https://youtu.be/gIuc-L68F9w Support the show-------------------------- Where else to find Josh Yen: Philosophy: https://bit.ly/philforallEducation: https://bit.ly/joshyenBuisness: https://bit.ly/logoseduMy Website: https://joshuajwyen.com/
This week, we're looking back at one of our most popular podcast episodes, “A Complete Guide to Learning JavaScript”.Here's what this episode covers:Why Learn JavaScriptWhat is JavaScript's Role in Web Development?The 7 parts of JavaScriptThe JavaScript Environment (where to write it)JS 1: Declaring Variables in JSJS 2: Conditionals in JSJS 3: JS Data TypesJS 4: Data Structures in JSJS 5: Objects in JSJS 6: Arrays in JSJS 7: Loops in JSJS 8: Functions in JSJS 9: Putting it all TogetherShameless PlugsJunior to SeniorParsitydev30.xyzPeter's YouTube channel
Los condicionales se emplean para especular acerca de lo que podría ocurrir, lo que puede haber ocurrido y lo que desearíamos que ocurriese. En inglés, la mayoría de las oraciones que emplean el tiempo verbal condicional contienen el término "if". Estudiaremos los 4 tipos de condicionales que existen y sus variaciones.
English language learners often struggle with the English grammar concept of conditionals. In this lesson, I'll explain the 4 conditional types in a straightforward way, along with examples of each type and its use. As a bonus, there is even a quiz at the end of the lesson to check you have improved your understanding. A Practical English Grammar Lesson To Help You Understand And Use Conditionals In English ✔Lesson transcript: https://adeptenglish.com/lessons/esl-english-grammar-4-conditionals/ Given there are only 4 types of conditional, you would think it is a pretty simple topic. Just learn the 4 types and it's done. But as we often find in English grammar, the devil is in the detail. There are so many potential use cases for conditional types you can feel overwhelmed. So in this English podcast lesson, we start with making sure you understand the rules for each type. So you have the tools to understand any use of conditional you might come across. Even if you've never taken an English grammar class, you'll be able to follow my logical explanations and examples. Your grammar is a reflection of your image. Good or bad, you have made an impression. And like all impressions, you are in total control. ⭐ Jeffrey Gitomer, Author You may notice this lesson is a Listen&Learn lesson. If you want to understand more about our approach to helping you speak English fluently, sign up for our free English language course here. You can also read more about us and our approach on our website here. Learn more about our courses here: https://adeptenglish.com/language-courses/ Adept English is here to help with FREE English lessons and language courses that are unique, modern and deliver results. You can learn to speak English quickly using our specialised brain training. We get straight to the point of how you should learn to speak English. We teach you in a fun and simple way that delivers results. If you want to learn to speak English, our approach to learning through listening will improve your English fluency.
Finn and Callum look at all kinds of 'if' clauses.
Join us for this programme as we review four different types of conditionals.
To learn JavaScript through our JavaScript Prep Course, register here: parsity.io/prepTo review individual JavaScript concepts, find explanations at these timestamps in the podcast:2:01 - Why Learn JavaScript9:05 - What is JavaScript's Role in Web Development?16:24 - The 7 parts of JavaScript17:11 - The JavaScript Environment (where to write it)19:46 - JS 1: Declaring Variables in JS22:23 - JS 2: Conditionals in JS25:22 - JS 3: JS Data Types30:19 - JS 4: Data Structures in JS31:29 - JS 5: Objects in JS33:46 - JS 6: Arrays in JS40:10 - JS 7: Loops in JS44:52 - JS 8: Functions in JS51:44 - JS 9: Putting it all Together
What would you do, if you had a million Dollars? Will you go to the beach if the weather is good tomorrow? Ready for Conditionals?
Welcome to season 2 of Finding Your Way Through Therapy. This episode contains one of my own creations, derived from some of the work I have done in the CBT words: The Seven Dirty Words in My Office. You will learn how these words sabotage your though process, how it is linked to cognitive behavioral therapy, as well as why these words can short-circuit your work in therapy.
Imagine a beginner's luck without a point of reference, without any obvious design and you'll have a better picture of intuition and the role it plays in ego and illusion. So there is no luck. There is no accident. Some thinkers are just so in touch with the universe they need not appeal to another authority because they ARE the authority. In this episode we Dawdlers try to critique how intuition is used in philosophy. Fair warning however. Harland gets pretty chimpy and Ryan enjoys Harland's chimpy-ness perhaps a little too much. Doesn't matter if you lean in or lean back. Either way, your armchair is being sold on Craigslist tomorrow. -The Dawdlers 00:02:20 - The Armchair Activities, Intuition, Herman Cappelen's Philosophy Without Intuitions & Centrality: What is 'Intuition', How central to philosophy, Is that 'good'/'bad'? 00:22:30 - Cappelen's Questions to the Centralists, Epistemic Hedging, Trophy Problems, Common Ground 00:31:18 - 'Intuitive Plausibility' vs. Conditionals vs. Proofs, Intellectual Egos 00:41:00 - Argumentation Norms and Intellectual Progress, Chimp Warning, Hilary Putnam's Reason, Truth, and History 00:45:30 - Putnam's Intuitionalistic Methodology: Artistic Ants, Twin Earth Dendrology, & Brains in Vats 00:53:50 - Intuition Pumps, Similarity, Representation, & Reference, Sleight of Mind 01:10:10 - Monkeys on Typewriters & Intrinsic Meaning, Causal Theory of Reference, Alternative Intuitive Teleologies 01:22:45 - Putnam Butchers Turing 01:32:12 - Throwing Putnam at Cappelen, An Argument for Centrality 01:43:50 - Ryan puts Harland on the spot to make a bunch of irresponsible snap judgments
On the Team Functionised podcast we are joined by psychologist Dr. Glenn Livingston. Dr. Livingston once struggled with obesity and spent years working for the food industry in addition to seeing patients. We discuss a variety of topics such as: Why are overeating, stress eating, and binge eating so prevalent in our culture today? We discuss the Food Industry, Bad Psychological Model of Addiction, and Evolution. How to make ending overeating simple. How do you create your own food plan? Make 4 categories of rules: Always, Nevers, Conditionals, and Unrestricteds Is it really possible to “Never Binge AgainTM?” Applying the psychology of winners to eating and "Reprogram Yourself to Think Like a Permanently Thin Person. Plus get a FREE copy of Never Binge Again! Check out the show notes at: Team Functionised Podcast