Podcast appearances and mentions of oscar schwartz

This podcast is a commentary and does not contain any copyrighted material of the reference source. We strongly recommend accessing/buying the reference source at the same time. ■Reference Source https://www.ted.com/talks/oscar_schwartz_can_a_computer_write_poetry ■Post on this topic (You can get FREE learning materials!) https://englist.me/70-academic-words-reference-from-oscar-schwartz-can-a-computer-write-poetry-ted-talk/ ■Youtube Video https://youtu.be/CjdUABQeRF4 (All Words) https://youtu.be/PSmGs_5tBr4 (Advanced Words) https://youtu.be/34WPioTk3qg (Quick Look) ■Top Page for Further Materials https://englist.me/ ■SNS (Please follow!)

In Australia, DNA testing has been routinely used for decades in deciding who can and can't enter the country.The tests can be used to unify families, but they can also tear them apart.The story of one couple trying to make a new home in Australia has raised new questions about how exactly the tests work, and if they discriminate against people from certain racial backgrounds.Today, writer Oscar Schwartz on the faulty science that is keeping families separated.Guest: Writer for The Monthly Oscar Schwartz. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

Protests have broken out across the US in response to Donald Trump’s attempts to cling to power. But as counting continues in key states, Joe Biden’s position is becoming stronger. Today, Oscar Schwartz on what a potential Biden presidency could look like, and whether Trump will succeed in hijacking the result. Guest: Reporter for 7am Oscar Schwartz. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

After a full night of counting votes, the outcome of the US Presidential election still remains in doubt, with Donald Trump holding on to key states that delivered him victory in 2016. Today, Oscar Schwartz on what drove voters to each candidate, and what the results mean for a nation already exhausted by division. Guest: Reporter for 7am, Oscar Schwartz. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

The signals you're putting off makes you less attractive. Today's story 'Showing off how rich you are won't help you make friends' by Oscar Schwartz → https://theoutline.com/post/5907/flexing-your-wealth-wont-make-you-any-friends?utm_source= Credits Today you heard from Oscar Schwartz. We're hosted and produced by James T. Green. Our theme is by John Lagomarsino. If you're interested in pitching a story to the Dispatch? Email james.green@theoutline.com. Find the Dispatch on Twitter, @OutlineDispatch. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Russell, Matt and Gee tackle Egyption myths and mysteries with Graham Hancock, AI and poetry with Oscar Schwartz and the glass panel may or may not finally see it's first incumbents   If anyone wants to donate even a pound to help with the costs of hosting the podcasts it would be much appreciated! PayPal is Bellybouncelinglongling@gmail.com

Russell, Matt and Gee tackle Egyption myths and mysteries with Graham Hancock, AI and poetry with Oscar Schwartz and the glass panel may or may not finally see it's first incumbents. Talk to us via russell@radiox.co.uk and hit subscribe if you're listening to this via iTunes so we shoot right up those charts like belly worms being birthed into the world.

The second leg of MRelay is Ritual. It’s all about the origin of form, and its connection to the invention and interpretation of rituals. Do we offer a means of communication when we conduct a set of routine actions in the same manner, or perform a set of actions in a fixed sequence? Can these symbolic sets of actions create community? How do they persist in and affect our everyday lives? How important is architecture to rituals? Do buildings express rules that go on to influence formal actions and even cultural movements? Do buildings lose their original functions and become monuments? The birth of contemporary rituals also enables our ideas of ‘design’ to evolve in ways whose shapes and languages are yet to be invented. Ritual was hosted by Robyn Archer AO, singer, writer and artistic director. Speakers included artist and director in the performing, visual and media arts David Pledger; jewellery designer Susan Cohn; researcher, writer and poet Oscar Schwartz; journalist and writer Gabriella Coslovich; Indigenous contemporary artist Reko Rennie; Australian Centre for the Moving Image curator Sarah Tutton; and theatre designer Richard Roberts.

If you read a poem and feel moved by it, but then find out it was actually written by a computer, would you feel differently about the experience? Would you think that the computer had expressed itself and been creative, or would you feel like you had fallen for a cheap trick? In this talk, writer Oscar Schwartz examines why we react so strongly to the idea of a computer writing poetry -- and how this reaction helps us understand what it means to be human.

Wenn Sie ein Gedicht lesen, das Sie berührt, und dann herausfinden, dass es in Wahrheit von einem Computer geschrieben wurde, würden Sie dann anders darüber denken? Würden Sie denken, dass der Computer sich selbst zum Ausdruck gebracht hat und kreativ war? Oder würden Sie denken, dass Sie auf einen billigen Trick hereingefallen sind? In diesem TEDTalk untersucht der Schriftsteller Oscar Schwartz, warum die Vorstellung eines dichtenden Computers emotionale Reaktionen hervorruft und wie wir dadurch besser verstehen können, was das Menschsein eigentlich ausmacht.

여러분이 시 한 편을 읽고 감동 받았는데, 그 시를 컴퓨터가 썼다면 여러분이 느낀 감동은 달라질까요? 여러분은 컴퓨터가 자신을 표현하고 창의력을 발휘했다고 생각할까요? 아니면 저급한 농간에 놀아났다고 생각할까요? 이 강연에서 오스카 슈워츠는 컴퓨터가 시를 쓰는 것에 우리가 강하게 반발하는지, 그리고 이런 반응이 인간이라는 것이 무슨 뜻인지 이해하게 해주는지 알려 줍니다. 시 테스트 #1 시 1 Little Fly Thy summer’s play, My thoughtless hand Has bush’d away. Am not I A fly like thee? Or art not thou A man like me? 시 2 We can feel Activist through your life’s Morning Pauses to see, pope I hate the Non all the night to start a great otherwise I’ll snake swirling Vastness guess Totally mental hamsters if I Know I put on a year a crucial Absolutely. 시 테스트 #2 시 1 A lion roars and a dog barks. It is interesting and fascinating that a bird will fly and not roar or bark. Enthralling stories about animals are in my dreams and I will sing them all if I am not exhausted and weary. 시 2 Oh! kangaroos, sequins, chocolate sodas! You really are beautiful! Pearls, harmonicas, jujubes, aspirins! All the stuff they’ve always talked about still makes a poem a surprise! These things are with us every day even on beachheads and biers. They do have meaning. They’re strong as rocks. 시 테스트 #3 시 1 Red flags the reason for pretty flags. And ribbons. Ribbons of flags And wearing material Reason for wearing material. Give pleasure. Can you give me the regions. The regions and the land. The regions and wheels. All wheels are perfect. Enthusiasm. 시 2 A wounded deer leaps highest, I’ve heard the daffodil I’ve heard the flag to-day I’ve heard the hunter tell; ‘Tis but the ecstasy of death, And then the brake is almost done, And sunrise grows so near sunrise grows so near That we can touch the despair and frenzied hope of all the ages.

إذا كنت تقرأ قصيدة وتتأثر بها، إلا أنك تكتشف لاحقا أنها كُتبت من قبل برنامج كمبيوتر، هل ستتغير نظرتك للتجربة؟ هل ستشعر أن برنامج الكمبيوتر عبر عن مكنوناته وكان مُبدعًا أو أنك ستشعر أنه تم خداعك؟ في هذه المحادثة، يُفسر الكاتب أوسكار شوارتز ردة فعلنا الشديدة عندما نعلم أن برنامج الكمبيوتر كتب الشعر - وكيف تُساعدنا على فهم المعنى الحقيقي للإنسان. - اختبار الشعر *1 القصيدة 1 ذبابة صغيرة ألعاب الصيف، يدي الطائشة قد مرت بعيدة. ألست أنا ذبابة مثلك؟ أو الفن لست أنت رجل مثلي؟ قصيدة 2 يمكن أن نشعر بالنشاط خلال حياتك الصباحية توقف لرؤية، بابا أنا أكره ليس كل ليلة لبدء خلاف عظيم سأكون كالثعبان الذي يدور حول نفسه تخمين قوي عقل صغير شبيه بعقل الهامستير إذا كنت أعرف أنني وضعت سنة حاسما على الإطلاق. اختبار الشعر * 2 القصيدة 1: أسد يزأر وكلبٌ ينبح. من مثير للاهتمام والرائع أن العصفور سيطير ولن يزأر أو ينبح. توجد قصص مُشوقة عن الحيوانات في أحلامي وسأغني لهم جميعًا إن لم أكن مُتعبا أو حزينا. القصيدة 2 اوه! كنغر، ترتر ، شوكلاتة مشروبات غازية / أنت حقا جميل! لآلئ، هرمونيكا، العناب، أسبيرين! كل / الأشياء التي لطالما تحدثنا عنها لاتزال كتابة قصيدة مفاجأة! تُرافقنا هذه الأشياء كل يوم حتى في المرابط وفي النعوش. لديها معنى. إنها قوية مثل الصخور. اختبار الشعر * 3 القصيدة 1: الأعلام الحمراء هي السبب أن الأعلام جميلة والشرائط. شرائط من الأعلام والمواد التي تُرتدى. أسباب من المواد التي تُلبس. إعطاء المتعة . هل يمكنك إعطائي المناطق. المناطق والأرض. المناطق والعجلات. كل العجلات مثالية. الحماس. القصيدة 2 الأيل المجروح يقفز للأعلى لقد سمعت النرجس البري لقد سمعت العلم إلى اليوم لقد سمعت الصياد يقول، "تيس" لكن نشوة الموت وبعدها يكون الفاصل قد انتهى تقريبا. وتشرق الشمس من منطقة قريبة جدا تشرق الشمس من منطقة قريبة جدا حيث تلمس اليأس والأمل المضطرب لكل الأعمار.

Si lees un poema que te conmueve pero luego descubres que en realidad fue escrito por una máquina, ¿cambiaría eso en algo tu experiencia? ¿Pensarías que la máquina se ha expresado y que ha sido creativa, o sentirías que has sido víctima de un engaño barato? En esta charla, el escritor Oscar Schwartz examina por qué nuestra reacción es tan emocional a la idea de la poesía escrita por una máquina... y cómo esta reacción ayuda a entender lo que significa ser humanos.

E se você ler um poema e se sentir comovido, mas então descobre que, na verdade, ele foi escrito por um computador, você se sentiria diferente com relação à experiência? Você sentiria que o computador se expressou e foi criativo, ou sentiria que caiu em um truque barato? Nessa palestra, o escritor Oscar Schwartz examina por que reagimos tão vigorosamente à ideia de um computador escrevendo poesia; e como essa reação nos ajuda a entender o que significa ser humano. -- Teste de poesia #1 Poema 1 Mosquinha Tua peça de verão, Minha mão descuidada A afastou. Será que não sou Uma mosquinha também? Ou será que és Um homem como eu? Poema 2 Podemos sentir-nos Ativistas pela manhã De sua vida Pausa para ver, papa odeio Não a noite para começar Uma grande a não ser Eu vou cobra redemoinho Vastidão palpite Totalmente hamsters mentais se eu Saber eu ponho um ano uma crucial Absolutamente. Teste de poesia #2 Poema 1 Um leão urra e um cachorro late. É interessante e fascinante que uma ave voa e não urra ou late. História fascinantes sobre animais estão em meus sonhos e vou cantá-las todas se eu não estiver cansado ou exausto. Poema 2 Oh! cangurus, lantejoulas, chocolate! Vocês são muito bonitos! Pérolas, gaitas, jujubas, aspirinas! Todas as coisas de que sempre falaram ainda fazem do poema uma surpresa! Essas coisas estão conosco todos os dias até em praça d'armas e esquifes. Elas têm significado. Elas são fortes como rochas. Teste de poesia #3 Poema 1 O vermelho indica a razão para bandeiras bonitas. E laços. Laços de bandeiras E material de vestir Razão para vestir material. Dar prazer. Pode me dar as regiões. As regiões e a terra. As regiões e as rodas. Todas as rodas são perfeitas. Entusiasmo Poema 2 Um cervo salta mais alto, Eu escutei o narciso Eu escutei a bandeira hoje Eu escutei o caçador dizer; Isso mas o êxtase da morte, E então o freio está quase pronto, E o nascer do sol está tão perto o nascer do sol está tão perto Que podemos tocar o desespero e a esperança frenética de todas as gerações.

Si vous lisiez un poème qui vous émeut pour découvrir ensuite qu'il a été écrit par un ordinateur, l'expérience prendrait-elle un autre sens ? Penseriez-vous que l'ordinateur s'est exprimé et a été créatif ou bien que vous êtes tombé dans un piège grossier ? Dans cette conférence, l'écrivain Oscar Schwartz examine la raison de notre réaction si forte à l'idée d'un ordinateur qui écrit de la poésie -- et comment cette réaction nous aide à comprendre la signification de l'humanité.