Podcast appearances and mentions of jack park

This week, we discuss the effects of Accutane, an acne medication, with Jocelyn and Trian (and Jack). The three have had experience with the treatment and told us their stories and opinions about it. We also take turns sharing our skincare recommendations and routines!

In this week's episode, we are joined by Marco, Josh, and Jack (again) to discuss a wide variety of topics including marching band, Minecraft, clams, and Latin. If you're confused... honestly so are we.

In the first ever episode of Spaced Out, we discuss our past, our ethnicities, the media and its portrayal of Asian-Americans, and Nigahiga. Joined by Jack Park and Allen Jung.

From Cook Park to Jack Park to everything in between, the community loves its park system. Martin McKnight, Parks Supervisor, talks about the staffing and funding needed to maintain these assets.  He also shares information on: Whether a splash pad is in Tigard's future When playground equipment will be replaced at Cook Park The importance of the Parks & Rec Fee Host: Kent Wyatt, Communications Manager

The Lantern Sports podcast welcomed Ohio State football historian Jack Park to discuss his top five greatest single-game performances in Buckeye history. Park provides extensive insight and a flash to the past to recall the most legendary performances in Ohio State's 130 years of football. And with the Big Ten season starting back up, more legendary performances may be in store in 2020. You can follow Park's work and find his books on his website: jackpark.com. For more coverage of Ohio State football and its history, follow us on Twitter, Instagram, Facebook and our website.

Buckeye Bar Guys Episode 6: Last hope for the Buckeyes? Please remember to give us a follow over the podcast network of your choice. If your podcast network asks for a rating, please remember to give us a high rating and please leave us some comments because we would love to hear from you. See the below link to find us on the podcast networks we are currently available on https://linktr.ee/buckeyebartalk On this episode: - Ryan Shazier retires - Wyatt Davis opts out - Power 5 Kicking off Notre Dame vs Duke Clemson vs Wake Forest Florida State vs Georgia Tech and more - Espn Article on planned presentations and conference re-vote - Jack Park facebook post Then Part 5 of 6 of the Super League: Division: Florida Florida State Miami Central Florida Georgia Georgia Tech Division: Clemson South Carolina North Carolina North Carolina St Tennessee Virginia Tech And remember our network is our version of a digital sportsbar. Come on down and hang. Subscribe/follow/support our pages, rate our podcasts high, share our FB posts, retweet our tweets, create your own posts in our facebook community group, like all of our content across youtube/facebook/twitter/instagram and the others, and please please leave us comments across all of our pages as we want to share our passion with the community. See the below link to find us everywhere https://linktr.ee/buckeyebartalk Go Buckeyes https://www.espn.com/college-football/story/_/id/29863935/big-ten-medical-subcommittee-present-options-possible-return-football-fall --- This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/buckeye-bar-talk/support

On this podcast, the legendary Jack Park shares his personal stories about meeting Woody Hayes for the first time, the greatest Ohio State football team he has ever seen, and how Lou Holtz hired Urban Meyer. Hope you enjoy this episode of Tell Us a Good Story.

On today's incredible episode, I'm speaking with the lovely and talented Maureen Zappala, author of ... Pushing Your Envelope: How Smart People Defeat Self-Doubt and Live With Bold Enthusiasm Maureen Zappala, a New York City native, is an award winning speaker, author and presentation coach. She has a BS in Mechanical Engineering from the University Of Notre Dame and spent 13 years conducting jet engine research at the NASA Lewis Research Center (now the NASA Glenn Research Center) in Cleveland, Ohio. At NASA, she became the first female and youngest manager of NASA’s Propulsion Systems Laboratory. She’s the founder of High Altitude Strategies, a speaking and coaching organization where she encourages exceptionally high-performing people who struggle with the “Impostor Syndrome,” the internal voice that says “I’m not as smart as everyone thinks I am!” In 2009, she was in the top 10 of 30,000 contestants in the Toastmasters International World Champion of Public Speaking contest. She’s the author of four books: “Girl, U. R. H. O. T.! Five Firestarters that will Ignite Your Influence”, “Great Speakers are Not Born. They’re Built: How to construct clear, credible and compelling communication” and “Buckeye Reflections: Legendary Moments from Ohio State football (co-authored with Ohio State historian Jack Park.) and “Pushing Your Envelope: How Smart People Defeat Self-Doubt and Live with Bold Enthusiasm.” She’s a professional member of the National Speakers Association (NSA), and is the 2017-18 President of the NSA-Ohio chapter. Maureen lives in Las Vegas, Nevada. You can find out more about Maureen below: Website: maureenz.com Facebook: facebook.com/maureen.zappala Twitter: twitter.com/mzappala10 Instagram: instagram.com/maureenzappala By the way, if you are ready to share you story and write your book, go to Write a Book University to get a free video course to help you on your book writing journey ...

OSU wants to trade mark the word "THE" but why? Is that word used often at Ohio State? Jack Park, Ohio State Historian, joined the show to discuss.

OSU wants to trade mark the word "THE" but why? Is that word used often at Ohio State? Jack Park, Ohio State Historian, joined the show to discuss.

Human Encyclopedia, Ohio State Football Historian, and all-around amazing person Jack Park is with us today dazzling us with his incredible brain, and sharing his story!

Goodbye BYE week! Shembechler and Stanley talk to OSU Historian Jack Park for some perspective, and Detroit Lions QB Jake Rudock, who was a transfer to U of M under Harbaugh. Plus predictions for both games this week!

What do a cow, a snapping turtle, and a goat have in common? Ohio State Football (really, we’re not kidding)! This is just one of the fascinating anecdotes you’ll find in the new book Buckeye Reflections: Legendary Moments from Ohio State Football.   We’ve talked to both Jack Park and Maureen Zappala on previous episodes of the podcast (episode 13 and episode 39, respectively), but today they’re joining us together to discuss their two-and-a-half year journey co-writing Buckeye Reflections.   Even if you’re not a football fan, I think you’ll enjoy the work they’ve done and the stories they’ve uncovered while developing the book. You can download the first chapter for FREE by going to BuckeyeReflectionsBook.com.   “Games are won and lost at the line of scrimmage, but it’s the stories of the people that really make the legacy.” –Maureen Zappala   Resources: Buckeye Reflections: Legendary Moments from Ohio State Football Learn more about Brutus Mascot Camp --   Production & Development for Improv Is No Joke by Podcast Masters Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

On March 1, 2017, the Supreme Court decided Bethune-Hill v. Virginia State Board of Elections. Plaintiffs in Bethune-Hill each resided in one of twelve newly proposed majority-minority districts for the Virginia Legislature, created to satisfy Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act (VRA), which requires that any new districting plan must ensure that there be no “retrogression” in the ability of racial minorities to elect the candidate of their choice. Plaintiffs argued that the new districts constituted racial gerrymanders that violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. A three-judge panel of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia disagreed, holding that the plaintiffs had failed to establish that race was the predominant factor in the creation of 11 of the 12 challenged districts. The district court also held that, although race was the predominant factor in the creation of one district--District 75--the state legislature had satisfied the requirements of a compelling state interest and narrow tailoring. -- On appeal to the United States Supreme Court, plaintiffs argued that the district court panel erred in a number of respects, including in determining that that race could not predominate unless its use resulted in an “actual conflict” with traditional districting criteria. Plaintiffs also argued that the use of race in drawing House District 75 was not narrowly tailored to serve a compelling government interest. -- By a vote of 7-1, the Supreme Court affirmed the judgment of the district court panel in part, vacated it in part, and remanded the case. In an opinion delivered by Justice Kennedy, the Court held that the district court panel had employed an incorrect legal standard to determine whether race predominated, noting that challengers are permitted to establish racial predominance in the absence of an “actual conflict” by presenting direct evidence of the legislative purpose and intent or other compelling circumstantial evidence. The Court rejected Plaintiffs’ challenge to District 75, however, determining that the legislature’s action ultimately survived strict scrutiny. -- Justice Kennedy’s majority opinion was joined by the Chief Justice and Justices Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan. Justice Alito filed an opinion concurring in part and concurring in the judgment. Justice Thomas filed an opinion concurring in the judgment in part and dissenting in part. -- To discuss the case, we have Jack Park, who is Of Counsel at Strickland Brockington Lewis LLP.

On December 5, 2016, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in McCrory v. Harris and Bethune-Hill v. Virginia State Board of Elections. In these related cases, the Court considered redistricting plans introduced in North Carolina and Virginia after the 2010 census. -- Plaintiffs in McCrory argued that North Carolina used the Voting Rights Act’s “Black Voting Age Population” requirements as a pretext to place more black voters in two particular U.S. House of Representatives districts in order to reduce black voters’ influence in other districts. The district court determined that the redistricting plan was an unconstitutional racial gerrymander that violated the Equal Protection Clause because race was the predominant factor motivating the new plan. -- Plaintiffs in Bethune-Hill each resided in one of twelve newly proposed majority-minority districts for the Virginia Legislature, created to satisfy Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act (VRA), which requires that any new districting plan must ensure that there be no “retrogression” in the ability of racial minorities to elect the candidate of their choice. They argued that the new districts constituted racial gerrymanders that violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The district court held that the plaintiffs did not establish that race was the predominant factor in the creation of 11 of the 12 challenged districts. The district court also held that, although race was the predominant factor in the creation of one district, the General Assembly was pursuing a narrowly tailored compelling state interest in creating it. -- In McCrory, appellants contend the lower court decision against them erred in five critical ways: (1) presuming racial predominance from North Carolina's legitimate reliance on Supreme Court precedent; (2) applying a standard of review that required the State to demonstrate its construction of North Carolina Congressional District 1 was “actually necessary” under the VRA instead of simply showing it had “good reasons” to believe the district, as created, was needed to foreclose future vote dilution claims; (3) relieving plaintiffs of their burden to prove “race rather than politics” predominated with proof of a workable alternative plan; (4) clearly erroneous fact-finding; and (5) failing to dismiss plaintiffs' claims as being barred by claim preclusion or issue preclusion. Appellants further argue that, in the interests of judicial comity and federalism, the Supreme Court should order full briefing and oral argument to resolve the split between the court below and the North Carolina Supreme Court which reached the opposite result in a case raising identical claims. -- The Bethune-Hill appellants also assert five errors by the lower court: (1) holding that race cannot predominate even where it is the most important consideration in drawing a given district unless the use of race results in “actual conflict” with traditional districting criteria; (2) concluding that the admitted use of a one-size-fits-all 55% black voting age population floor to draw twelve separate House of Delegates districts did not amount to racial predominance and trigger strict scrutiny; (3) disregarding the admitted use of race in drawing district lines in favor of examining circumstantial evidence regarding the contours of the districts; (4) holding that racial goals must negate all other districting criteria in order for race to predominate; and (5) concluding that the General Assembly's predominant use of race in drawing House District 75 was narrowly tailored to serve a compelling government interest. -- To discuss the case, we have Jack Park, who is Of Counsel at Strickland Brockington Lewis LLP.

I’m really excited to sit down and talk with Jack Park, Certified Speaking Professional, Corporate Advisor, Football Radio Commentator and Best Selling Author. He has some powerful thoughts about what makes a good leader, plus a bunch of fun stories about football history. Jack formed the business Financial Insights more than 20 years, which does leadership training for corporations and associations across the country. For the past 38 years, he has been a radio commentator for Ohio State Football, with weekly and daily segments when the Buckeyes are in season. About 10 years ago, Jack married his two passions, football and leadership training, and he created The Leadership Secrets of Football’s Master Coaches. It is a leadership program that explains how to develop leadership within an organization or association based upon what made the greatest football coaches of all time so successful. “With almost no exceptions, the great coaches were great coaches because they were even greater leaders than they were coaches.” Jack wraps up his leadership course, The Leadership Secrets of Football’s Master Coaches, by highlighting five coaches: Woody Hayes – What we can learn from Coach Hayes is that you will get to a place in life where you can look back and say, “Gee, I’ve been able to accomplish a fair amount, and I’d sure like to thank those people that helped me get where I am. While you can’t always thank the people that helped you, you can pay it forward. Knute Rockne – “Rockne is the type of guy you want to learn a lot about to help create a new industry.” He helped create American Football, and he teaches us that, “Whatever stage we are within the business world, we can enhance that by looking into the future.” Vince Lombardi – Organizations often try to do too many things. Lombardi’s basic philosophy was to focus on what they could do best, and to become the best at that thing at the exclusion of everything else. “He left a lot behind. He left his leadership model.” Urban Meyer – “Urban is basically the organization man … A lot of coaches have plans, Urban has a system.” He has an excellent system, he’s an excellent recruiter, and he surrounds himself with tremendously talented people. Bo Schembechler – “Bo really put a high priority on the people. Now other coaches do too, but I don’t think anybody ever did it any better than Bo.” There is a story from Michigan State alumni that, if any player ever came to his office unannounced, his secretary was to make sure they didn’t leave until Bo could speak to them. Bo recognized early on that the business he was in was not the football business, but the people business. The one coach that Jack probably uses more than any other, and the coach that Jack ranks as the best of the five, is Vince Lombardi. “Maybe his biggest strength was his persistence.” It took Lombardi 20 years to find a head coaching position, and at one point it was estimated he got turned down 22 times. “He had confidence in himself when other people apparently didn’t,” but he wasn’t arrogant. He continued to hone his craft. Lombardi was successful because he was a hard worker with a dedication to excellence. Between 1959 and 1967, Lombardi led 5 NFL championship victories, in addition to the first two Super Bowls victories, as head coach of the Green Bay Packers. Jack has written four books on Ohio State history, which won’t surprise anybody who has heard his amazing stories, and he has a fifth on the way, tentatively titled “Buckeye Reflections.” Jack is working with Maureen Zappala, a motivational speaker, amazing writer and huge football fan. “It’s going to be made up of short, anecdotal stories connected to the Ohio football program: unusual things that have happened, outstanding things that have happened, humorous things that have happened.” I really enjoyed sitting down with Jack and talking to him today. He’s always a delight to be around, and he has collected a lot of wisdom that he is more than happy to share.   IN THIS EPISODE, YOU WILL LEARN: How to take your passion and turn it into something that helps others Why the best football coaches are the best models for good leadership Leadership tips learned from five of the best coaches in football history A lot more about Ohio State football and the Buckeyes DON’T STOP HERE… Learn more about Jack: Website Contact Jack: jp31@jackpark.com | Phone: 614-481-0214 ADDITIONAL RESOURCES: How to Identify, Explain, and Present Pertinent Financial Information to Non-Accountants Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

On January 12, 2016, the Supreme Court decided Hurst v. Florida. The question before the Court was whether Florida’s death sentencing scheme--which Hurst contends does not require unanimity in the jury death recommendation or in the finding of underlying aggravating factors--violates the Sixth and/or Eighth Amendments in light of the Court’s 2002 decision Ring v. Arizona, which requires that the aggravating factors necessary for imposition of a death sentence be found by a jury. The Florida Supreme Court upheld Hurst’s death sentence. -- By a vote of 8-1, the Supreme Court reversed the judgment of the Florida Supreme Court and remanded the case, holding that Florida’s capital sentencing scheme did violate the Sixth Amendment in light of Ring. Justice Sotomayor’s opinion for the Court was joined by the Chief Justice and Justices Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, Ginsburg, and Kagan. Justice Breyer filed an opinion concurring in the judgment. Justice Alito filed a dissenting opinion. -- To discuss the case, we have Jack Park, who is Of Counsel with Strickland Brockington Lewis LLP.

Ohio State football has only played Notre Dame a handful of times in the long and storied history of the two schools, so this week Johnny and Michael bring on Ohio State football historian Jack Park to talk about the history of the rivalry.

On October 13, 2015, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Hurst v. Florida. Timothy Lee Hurst was convicted of murdering his co-worker and sentenced to death after a jury recommended that penalty by a vote of 7-5. The question before the Court here is whether Florida’s death sentencing scheme--which Hurst contends does not require unanimity in the jury death recommendation or in the finding of underlying aggravating factors--violates the Sixth or Eighth Amendments in light of the Court’s 2002 decision Ring v. Arizona, which holds that the aggravating factors necessary for imposition of a death sentence be found by a jury. -- To discuss the case, we have Jack Park, who is Of Counsel with Strickland Brockington Lewis LLP.