Podcasts about imrad

Résumé : Dans cet épisode, Clément discute avec Mathias Soulhol de l'accès aux études scientifiques en sciences du sport et de leur interprétation. Ils abordent des méthodes pour accéder gratuitement aux publications, l'importance de la méthodologie, et la structure IMRAD des études. Mathias insiste sur la validité interne et externe, la santé écologique, la transparence en recherche, et les critères de qualité. Ils traitent aussi des statistiques, des erreurs courantes, de l'importance des groupes témoins, et de la hiérarchie des preuves. Le rôle des études scientifiques pour les novices, les préjugés dans la musculation, et l'importance de ne pas juger sur l'apparence sont aussi discutés, ainsi que la relation entre la science et d'autres formes de connaissances. Pour approfondir vos connaissances sur la lecture d'articles scientifiques, découvrez la formation de Mathias Soulhol ici. Suivez Mathias sur Instagram : @mathias_soulhol.Plats À Emporter :Accès gratuit aux études scientifiques via des moyens comme Scihub, les e-mails aux auteurs, et ResearchGate.Importance de la méthodologie et de la validité interne pour comprendre une étude.Structure des études selon le format IMRAD et importance de la validité externe et écologique.Transparence et critères de qualité dans la recherche.Nécessité de comprendre les statistiques et de considérer le contexte clinique pour l'interprétation des résultats.Risques de confusion et importance du groupe témoin.Prudence avec la hiérarchie des preuves et utilité des études pour les novices.Ne pas juger sur l'apparence physique; rigueur dans l'interprétation des études.Reconnaissance de la diversité des connaissances en dehors de la science.Chapitres : 00:00 Introduction et accès aux études scientifiques 03:04 Présentation de Mathias Soulhol 06:20 Comprendre les études scientifiques 17:43 Structuration d'une étude scientifique 27:33 Évaluer la qualité d'une étude scientifique 33:08 Validité externe 35:04 Validité écologique 37:00 Transparence 39:10 Critères de qualité des études 49:57 Biais de publication 55:25 Difficulté des statistiques 01:03:01 Résultats significatifs 01:05:43 Interprétation des résultats statistiques 01:10:29 Erreurs courantes dans l'interprétation des études 01:13:57 L'importance du groupe témoin dans une étude 01:17:36 La hiérarchie des preuves et les critères de validité 01:29:31 L'utilisation des études scientifiques chez les novices 01:32:38 Critique de l'utilisation des études scientifiques dans le milieu de la musculation 01:38:48 Ne pas juger sur l'apparence physique 01:39:37 La confiance en la science 01:41:17 La science et la religion 01:42:07 Critique des scientifiques 01:43:32 Diversité des connaissances 01:44:06 Prendre du recul sur les études scientifiques 01:45:23 Recommandations culturelles 01:46:23 Conclusion et code promoMessage de Fin : Merci d'avoir écouté cet épisode ! Si vous avez trouvé notre discussion avec Mathias Soulhol enrichissante, n'oubliez pas de vous abonner et nous apprécierions grandement que vous laissiez une note de 5 étoiles et partagiez votre avis. Cela aide énormément à faire connaître notre travail et à continuer à fournir un contenu de qualité. À bientôt pour un nouvel épisode !Hébergé par Ausha. Visitez ausha.co/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

IMRaD, or Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion (and Conclusion) has become something of a Gold Standard for scientific, peer-reviewed writing. Because of this 'standardization' of science writing structure, IMRaD can be taken for granted, meaning that students might not receive enough information on when and why to use IMRaD. So why do we use IMRaD? How much flexibility is there in the IMRaD structure? What if I don't have explicitly research methods? Are there any alternatives to IMRaD, and if so, what are they and when should I use alternative structures? If you have ever wanted an answer to such questions, you've come to the right place. Resources A fifty-year study of IMRaD (Article Clay cites in the episode): https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC442179/ Visual resource of IMRaD construction: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/257616774_Improving_the_writing_of_research_papers_IMRAD_and_beyond/figures?lo=1 Writing a Research Paper in the Natural Sciences: http://ctl.yale.edu/sites/default/files/files/Schultz_ResearchPaper_NaturalSciences_formatted.pdf Research Guide for Writing in the Social Sciences (Use the Left side Menu to access resources on the page): https://libguides.usc.edu/writingguide/purpose

I denne episoden snakker jeg nok en gang med seniorforsker, luftambulanselege Marius Rehn. Vi tar opp tråden fra forrige episode og snakker om hvordan artiklene er bygd opp, hvordan lese artikkelen og hvor du finner artikkelen du er på let etter.  IMRAD, predatortidskrifter og Bias er noe av innholdet i episoden.  Vi snakker også om journal Club, om du ønsker å delta ta kontakt på denne epost adressen: journalclub@norskluftambulanse.no      

Another season is coming to an end. Niklas and Clay decided to participate in a Digital Study Hall and do a live Question and Answer Period with anyone who joined the Study Group. Since we were not sure how many people might attend, we also solicited questions from our Writing Advisors, and from students via social media. In this season finale, we offer our take on questions from a variety of people. This episode will be more disjointed than previous episodes, but we have a lot of fun making it. Apologies for the audio quality. We had a recording issue and tried to edit the podcast as best as possible. Resources Structure, Cohesion, and IMRAD: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XpSOSinp2Sw Narratives in Science: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OBPzhNUAris https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HxJY2yVbHRU Narrative and Ant-Narrative in Science: https://academic.oup.com/icb/article/58/6/1224/5032878 Writing Stories in Science: https://www.jstor.org/stable/43631863?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents How can we use the 'science of stories' to produce persuasive scientific stories? https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-017-0047-7 Writing a Research Statement: https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/general_writing/graduate_school_applications/writing_a_research_statement.html

Reports are a common academic genre at university. Although the exact nature will vary according to discipline, the general structure is broadly similar for all disciplines. This podcast examines the typical structure of a report, often referred to as IMRAD, which is short for Introduction, Method, Results And Discussion.

FOX physical therapists Connie Lewis, PT, DPT, GCS, and Megan Mitchell, PT, DPT critically appraise a new article from the Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy. They use the IMRaD format to look into the article titled, "Functional Performance With Age: The Role of Long-Term Strength Training." Listen: Apple Podcasts | Google Podcasts | Google Play | Stitcher  | TuneIn | Other Android Apps

FOX PT's Connie Lewis, PT, DPT, GCS and Megan Mitchell, PT, DPT critically appraise a new article from the Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy. They use the IMRaD format to look into the article titled, "Functional Performance With Age: The Role of Long-Term Strength Training." Listen: Apple Podcasts | Google Podcasts | Google Play | Stitcher  | TuneIn | Other Android Apps

FOX PT's Connie Lewis, PT, DPT, GCS and Megan Mitchell, PT, DPT critically appraise a new article from the Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy. They use the IMRaD format to look into the article titled, "Functional Performance With Age: The Role of Long-Term Strength Training." Listen: Apple Podcasts | Google Podcasts | Google Play | Stitcher  | TuneIn | Other Android Apps

FOX PT's Connie Lewis, PT, DPT, GCS and Megan Mitchell, PT, DPT critically appraise a new article from the Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy. They use the IMRaD format to look into the article titled, "Functional Performance With Age: The Role of Long-Term Strength Training." Listen: Apple Podcasts | Google Podcasts | Google Play | Stitcher  | TuneIn | Other Android Apps

IMRad 和睡眠恢复，奶昔羊闭着眼录制的一期 Support our show Outline IMRaD Introduction 睡眠问题 建立深度睡眠 睡眠革命-五个九十分钟睡眠 斯坦福高效睡眠-第一个九十分钟最重要 圆桌派第四季睡眠- 放下失眠的执念 认识身体-自我意识 余光中散文精选-形而上的帮助 Why we sleep 恢复正常睡眠 如何恢复正常睡眠 从过度关注中解脱出来 作出有规律的调整 睡眠是一种心流体验 Method 用控制变量法观察自己 作息 饮食 彻底打乱生物钟 心流的八个要素 可完成 全神贯注 明确的目标 即时的反馈 能深入而毫不牵强地投入到行动中 自由控制自己的行动 忘我又自我 时间感会改变 Results and Discussion 饮食 温度控制 作息 清洁空调 空气净化器 时差 Conclusions 正常睡眠是一种心流体验 睡眠相关书摘 Links IMRaD 睡眠革命 斯坦福高效睡眠法 圆桌派第四季：睡梦 心流 睡眠相关书摘 Host MilkShake羊 Sound Editor 奶昔羊 Contact 网站：http://Byte.Coffee/ Support our show 订阅和收听方式 邮箱：hi@Byte.Coffee Slack 听众群 新浪微博/Twitter/Instagram：@ByteCoffee Support Byte.Coffee

In this podcast, we talk about how one can structure a paper logically to provide good flow. Professor Jo Røislien is an avid fan of the so-called IMRaD format. Are you familiar with it? Program host: Ingeborg Marie Jensen, Study Lab Coordinator at Stavanger University Library.

Here's how to use the IMRAD structure to write your next research paper. ---- Follow Us Online Here: Website: Facebook: Twitter: Instagram: YouTube: Medium: Spotify: --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/homework-help-global/message

Have you ever heard of the IMRAD structure? This structure is essential to know if you'll be writing research papers during your academic career. Listen to EP 49 to hear the full version! ---- Follow Us Online Here: Website: Facebook: Twitter: Instagram: YouTube: Medium: Spotify: --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/homework-help-global/message

Some of you have probably seen the acronym IMRaD before. If you haven't you need to know what it means and what disciplines use this structure for in essays and research papers. IMRaD is an acronym that stands for introduction, methods, results, and discussion. It is the most commonly used format for scientific papers or papers that are based on experimental studies. Join Cath Anne on Episode 49 as she walks you through the IMRaD structure. Looking for study tips, help with essay writing, or advice on how to be a better student? Welcome to The Homework Help Show, a weekly show where we teach, assist, and offer valuable insights for student life. From study hacks to writing tips, discussions about student mental health to step-by-step guides on academic writing and how to write a resume, we've got you covered. Want your questions answered? Write them below or join the conversation on social media using the hashtag #askHHG ---- Follow Us Online Here: Website: Facebook: Twitter: Instagram: YouTube: Medium: Spotify: --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/homework-help-global/message

I denne podkasten snakker vi om hvordan du kan strukturere oppgaven din, sånn at den får god flyt og en logisk sammenheng. Matematikkprofessor Jo Røislien er begeistret for den såkalte IMRaD-strukturen. Kjenner du til den? Programleder: Ingeborg Marie Jensen, koordinator for Studieverkstedet, Universitetsbiblioteket i Stavanger.

Hør her Merete Rasmussen fortælle om, hvad IMRAD formatet er, og hvordan det skal bruges – både til at skrive og læse efter!

Her følger anden del af vores gennemgang af IMRAD i selskab af Merete Rasmussen. Denne podcast er en mere detaljeret tur igennem brugen af IMRAD formatet.