Podcast appearances and mentions of matt sands

Kinsella on Liberty Podcast: Episode 496. Matt Sands of the Nations of Sanity project and I discuss the possible interrelationship between his project and my The Universal Principles of Liberty. Recorded Aug. 14, 2026. https://youtu.be/ET2ucqFU7Ak?si=VVcdipDX-umElPxR Related The Universal Principles of Liberty  Supplemental Principles | Kinsella's Annotations and Commentary KOL442 | Together Strong Debate vs. Walter Block on Voluntary Slavery (Matthew Sands of Nations of Sanity) Fusillo on the Universal Principles of Liberty and Liberland Libertarian Nation and Related Projects Liberland KOL480 | The Liberland Constitution and Libertarian Principles (Liberland Prague, 2025) The Voluntaryist Constitution Liberland Constitution Christmas Party Prague 2025 See also draft Liberland Constitution, Art. I, §1, ¶¶3, 4: The Universal Principles of Liberty, adopted on 14 August 2025 and as they stand on the date of adoption of this Constitution, are hereby incorporated by reference and may be consulted for interpretive and suppletive purposes, to the extent that they are not incompatible with the provisions of this Constitution. Any further amendment to the Universal Principles of Liberty shall have no force within Liberland unless adopted as an amendment to this Constitution in accordance with the procedures set forth herein. Note: In the discussion we disagree on whether the standard of proof in a normal property dispute should be preponderance of the evidence or beyond a reasonable doubt. In subsequent offline discussion I sent the following comments to Matt (edited): Thinking more about the preponderance of the evidence issue we discussed. See for example this tweet about a property owner using force to eject someone who is a trespasser: always causing problems pic.twitter.com/mdecFjVTnW — Wolverine land (@Breaking57) August 15, 2026 Note: the property owner didn't have to prove "beyond reasonable doubt" that they own the store to have the cops threaten force to eject him. Just like you don't have to "prove" "beyond a reasonable doubt" that you own your car, or your body, or are "not an aggressor," to have a right to use force against a trespasser/aggressor: someone attempting to use, alter the physical integrity of, or invade the borders of, your body or other resources that you own in accordance with principles of original appropriation and contractual transfer. Having rights, per se, has nothing to do with proof or standards. It's an if-then thing: if you have certain justified rights of exclusive control to certain resources, then you are justified in using force against the body or other resources possessed or owned by an aggressor. This general statement is not a statement about trials or proof in such fora. It's a statement about justifiable action. To return to one example I gave: if A and B claim grandpa's house (say, from his will), then if you use preponderance to award it to A, then later A can use that property claim to use force to prevent B from entering. Even that use of defensive force does not require any "proof." It is just the right of the owner. Matters of proof only apply in some later forum addressing the actions taken and seeking to recognize certain property rights claims or order punishment of a malfeasor. You have to keep in mind that things like the "right" to jury trial, due process, presumption of innocence, the exclusionary rule, beyond a reasonable doubt—none of these are actual rights. They are just "rights" that accompany being part of a political community: civil or political rights, not natural rights. They are just limits we want placed on powerful actors like the state. So, by arguing for employing the BRD standard in any forum determining ownership of a contested resource based on the general libertarian principles of self-ownership, original appropriation, contract, and rectification, you are importing standards that really meant as limits on the state's power, into how property rights are determined, applied, recognized, and enforced. There is simply no reason to do this. These things are not really even related. Property rights emerge as normative support for natural aspects of action such as control of one's body and homesteading and trading of external scarce resources. See On Property Rights in Superabundant Bananas and Property Rights as Normative Support for Possession. These principles have nothing to do with the state: only with (a) human action, praxeology, economics (descriptive); and (b) society and human interaction: norms, rights (normative). It is possible to have, and to imagine, any of the following, without a state invovled: (a) isolated Robinsonades, with human action and praxeology only (and personal, but not interpersonal, morals); (b) a non-normative society with trade and interaction, both cooperative and conflictual, a might-makes-right society; (c) a stateless normative society laws and rights that provide normative support for the natural aspects of action such as control of one's body and homesteading and trading of external scarce resources (and this society can be either pre-catallactic, or employ money). You can also have (d) something like (c) but with a state that undermines the normative role of private law and rights and is instead a sort of hybrid between (b) and (c). And when you have a state that assumes the power to create and enforce law including imposing punishment or sanctions on people for violating the state's criminal law, the state's claim of authority is usually cloaked in a variety of coverings that masque or even pretend to or maybe do blunt its nature. In other words, the balance between the state and its power and the populace it governs hinges on the great fiction of the state which is maintained by propaganda, by the state giving at least lip service to some obligations and duties that it has, some limits on its power, such as heeding the due process and other political or civil rights of its subjects; this can be done organically, as in Britain's unwritten "constitution," or in a written constitution such as the US Constitution that claims to authorize and limit a new state. The limits can be implied or stated as limits on power: such as in the enumerated powers structure of the constitution itself, (( See, e.g., Thomas B. McAffee, “Federalism and the Protection of Rights: The Modern Ninth Amendment's Spreading Confusion [2],” Brigham Young University Law Review 1996, no. 2 (1996): 351–388 (arguing that the framers regarded the Constitution's limited/enumerated powers scheme itself as a primary structural guarantor of popular rights, and that the Ninth Amendment was designed to preserve that federal structure against the risk that enumerating specific rights would be misread as creating a government of general powers limited only by the listed rights); idem, “The Bill of Rights, Social Contract Theory, and the Rights ‘Retained' by the People,” Southern Illinois University Law Journal 16 (1992): 267–305  (arguing that the “other rights retained by the people” under the Ninth Amendment are those secured residually by the Constitution's grant of only limited, enumerated powers to the national government, so that the amendment protects the original limited-powers design rather than authorizing judicial enforcement of unenumerated natural rights outside the written Constitution). )) or in statements about that the government may not do, or in "rights" such as those in the Bill of Rights that also limit federal government power. But such rights are not always real rights. (( By "real rights," as I am not speaking to a civil law audience, I do not mean what the civil law means, which is property rights pertaining to a "thing," a "res" (droits réels, derechos reales, iura in re), rights enforceable against the whole world (erga omnes)—as opposed to personal rights (droits personnels, iura in personam), rights against a specific person (typically arising from obligations/contracts) (which I object to in my theory of contracts; see The Title-Transfer Theory of Contract; KOL495 | “Rothbard's Revolutionary Contract Theory,” Sociedad de la Libertad Latam (Peru): Rothbard 100: A Legacy for Future Generations). Instead I mean actual or legitimate rights, those recognized by libertarianism. )) If you wanted to limit federal power and prevent it from regulating normal crimes like murder and leave that demesne to the states, you could (attempt to) set up a government of enumerated and limited powers and just omit that power from the list. You could add something like the Tenth Amendment to emphasize the point that was already implied. This does not mean citizens have the right to commit murder, only that the fedgov has no jurisdiction over this. (( See my similar jurisdictional argument in KOL443 | Abortion: A Radically Decentralist Approach (PFS 2024). I argue that the external legal system has no jurisdiction over abortion, even if it is "murder"; it is governed by the mother's legal system itself. )) For other rights, actual rights like the right to bear arms or free speech, you could again protect this right from federal encroachment in multiple ways: you limit congress's power to regulate these activities by denying them a grant of power in an enumerated and limited powers scheme constitution; or you add a Bill of Rights limiting federal power; or both, for "great caution" as Madison said: The exceptions here or elsewhere in the Constitution, made in favor of particular rights, shall not be so construed as to diminish the just importance of other rights retained by the people, or as to enlarge the powers delegated by the Constitution; but either as actual limitations of such powers, or as inserted merely for greater caution. You could also limit the state by requiring it to respect "fake" "rights" of the citizens, like "due process,...

What if the land you buy could pay you monthly without flipping it, developing it, or lifting a finger?In this episode, Matt Sands breaks down the world of mineral rights, a whole side of land investing most people overlook. With over 26 years in oil and gas and now hosting The Mineral Rights Podcast, Matt shares how land investors can unlock passive income from what's under the ground.We're talking royalties, pooling, deal structures, and how to find areas where mineral rights actually cash flow.In this episode:What mineral rights are and how they really workHow royalties are calculated and what those checks can look likeWhere the best states are for mineral investingWhat to watch out for before making your first mineral play

Welcome back to the podcast! We are very excited to have Matt Sands, President at Dry Force & SVP at HighGround, and Ben Balsley, CEO at HighGround on to talk though the history of DryForce and: What led DryForce down the path to HighGround? What are a few things they see keeping other contractors up at night? What advice would they give other contractors who are worried about the continuing consolidation of the industry? Leveraging technology What's it like being on both sides? A favorite industry story ...and MORE!

Welcome back to the podcast! We are very excited to have Matt Sands, President at Dry Force & SVP at HighGround, and Ben Balsley, CEO at HighGround on to talk though the history of DryForce and: What led DryForce down the path to HighGround? What are a few things they see keeping other contractors up at night? What advice would they give other contractors who are worried about the continuing consolidation of the industry? Leveraging technology What's it like being on both sides? A favorite industry story ...and MORE!

My guest in. this episode is Matt Sands. Matt is an engineer with over 24 years of oil & gas industry experience. He was previously employed with Shell Exploration & Production Company and served in various engineering, planning, and leadership roles.  Matt owns Silverheels Investments LLC, a mineral rights and royalty interest consulting and investment company. He is currently the President of the National Association of Royalty Owners (NARO), Immediate Past President of the Rocky Mountain Chapter of NARO, and is a Certified Mineral Manager (CMM). Matt graduated from the Colorado School of Mines with a BS in Engineering with a Mechanical Specialty and a Minor in Public Affairs. When not helping other mineral owners, he enjoys spending time with his family in the Colorado outdoors cycling, camping, fishing, skiing, and golfing. Interview Links: Mineral Rights Podcast https://mineralrightspodcast.com/ Free Report: https://mineralrightspodcast.com/cashflow Course: https://mineralrights.teachable.com/courses/mineral-rights-basics?affcode=1232686_7sgrpxpl Subscribe To Our Weekly Newsletter: The Wealth Dojo: https://subscribe.wealthdojo.ai/ Download all the Niches Trilogy Books: The 21 Best Cashflow Niches Digital: ⁠⁠https://www.cashflowninjaprograms.com/the-21-best-cashflow-niches-book⁠⁠ Audio: ⁠https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/21-best-cashflow-niches⁠ The 21 Most Unique Cashflow Niches Digital: ⁠⁠https://www.cashflowninjaprograms.com/the-21-most-unique-cashflow-niches⁠⁠ Audio: ⁠https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/21-most-unique-niches⁠ The 21 Best Cash Growth Niches Digital: ⁠https://www.cashflowninjaprograms.com/the-21-best-cash-growth-niches⁠⁠ Audio: ⁠https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/21-cash-growth-niches Listen To Cashflow Ninja Podcasts: Cashflow Ninja ⁠https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/cashflowninja⁠ Cashflow Investing Secrets ⁠https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/cashflowinvestingsecrets⁠ Cashflow Ninja Banking ⁠https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/cashflow-ninja-banking⁠ Connect With Us: Website: http://cashflowninja.com Podcast: http://cashflowinvestingsecrets.com Podcast: http://cashflowninjabanking.com Substack: https://mclaubscher.substack.com/ Amazon Author's page: https://www.amazon.com/author/mclaubscher Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/cashflowninja/ Twitter: https://twitter.com/mclaubscher Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/thecashflowninja/ TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@cashflowninja Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/mclaubscher/ Gab: https://gab.com/cashflowninja Youtube: http://www.youtube.com/c/Cashflowninja Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/c-329875 --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/cashflowninja/message

Buddies - to celebrate a milestone here at the pod, we are extremely lucky to be joined by guest numero uno here on VCP: Matt Sands, co-owner of Gold Pan Records in Hillsboro, IL. But Matt brought two of his best pals to this episode to discuss one of the best things about this Vinyl Community of ours: fellowship. Joined us on this voyage are Sam "The Psych Professor", regular companion on Matt's YouTube channel, and their friend and shop owner of Noble Records in Matthews, North Carolina, Dillon Smith (aka The Silver Button Sniper), fresh off joining the ranks of the 100k Sub Club. We discuss how these guys started their respective journeys, and how YouTube and the Vinyl Community at large helped them meet, become fast friends, and make them all better collectors (and store owners) for it. This was one of our favorite episodes, and a great way to kick off year Two of Vinyl Community Podcasts!   On the serious tip, thank you for your support, encouragement, and patronage as this project has taken off and evolved. Each and every comment, like, download, and rating (yes, please rate us) helps fuel us to continue this project. It's no accident that it's called "Vinyl Community" Podcasts for a reason, and you, by listening and joining us for these programs, are most certainly a big part of that community.    For more information on host Concert Buddie: https://www.youtube.com/@ConcertBuddie   For more information on Matt Sands and Sam The Psych Professor + Gold Pan Records: YouTube https://www.youtube.com/@sandsy04 Facebook https://www.facebook.com/thegoldpan Instagram https://www.instagram.com/thegoldpan/   For more information on Dillon Smith + Noble Records: YouTube https://www.youtube.com/@noblerecords Instagram https://www.instagram.com/noblerecords Facebook https://www.facebook.com/NobleRecordstore WhatNot: https://www.whatnot.com/user/noblerecords   For more information on Vinyl Community Podcasts: https://vinylcommunitypodcasts.com https://www.instagram.com/vinylcommunitypodcasts     As always, friends of the show Vinyl Storage Solutions offer you a chance to save everyday on the best sleeves in the business using one of the following codes for 10% off: https://vinylstoragesolutions.ca CONCERTBUDDIE VCP10

In this episode, we visit with Matt Sands of Silverheels Investments to talk about all things Mineral Rights. In this episode, we discuss valuing your minerals, financial planning considerations with minerals, how to construct your mineral planning team, and investing in the asset class.For more information and show notes, visit: https://bwmplanning.com/episode59Connect With Us:Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/BrownleeWealthManagement/?ref=py_cLinkedin - https://www.linkedin.com/company/brownlee-wealth-management/

You can't get rid of me that easily Buddies! I'm back with part two of my conversation with Matt Sands (aka DJ Mellow Yellow), a long time (10 years + contributor to the #vinylcommunity on YouTube, a dedicated collector, and co-owner of Gold Pan Records in Hillsboro, IL. In this part of the conversationyYou'll hear Matt's thoughts on Whatnot as both a seller and a buyer plus I'll hit him with some #lightninground questions covering multiple aspects of the hobby. If you missed part one, please give it a shot in this same podcast feed. Sincere thanks for checking out the pod and look out for shows coming from some excellent channels in the VC. As always, when you get the Chance...just spin it!

Buddies! Welcome to my first contribution to the Vinyl Community Podcasts feed! In part one of the inaugural "Mind of The Record Collector", I talk to a longtime member of the #VC on YouTube, Matt Sands (aka DJ Mellow Yellow). In over 10 years of creating videos on YouTube, he's seen a lot of shifts and changes in the hobby and on YouTube from record collectors. He's also one of handful of VC members who took his love of vinyl and music to the next level by owning + operating his own record store (Gold Pan Records - Hillsboro, IL). As someone who initially learned of and from videos Matt (+ Sam aka The Psych Professor) have shared over the years, this is a conversation I've been eager to put together for some time. I hope you enjoy it as much as I did. And remember, when you get the Chance...just spin it! Look for part two later this week!

Peace Radicals Episode 42 - Matt Sands Nations of Sanity - The Nations of Sanity aims to bring about a real revolution with an intentionally simple ethos of basic and objective morality, which we define here as simple sanity. Find out more about Nations of Sanity: http://www.nationsofsanity.com https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCwRTcy7waI3J3eOnMhyY9Gw https://www.facebook.com/NationsOfSanity Voluntary is fine, forced is a crime. We present our case and ask all good people to kindly consider the points made and the proposals put forward and hope that we can motivate you to either join us in our efforts to support this movement or challenge it by scrutinizing any part of it. "It is our assertion that the only way to create a truly free society, with truly equal rights, is to establish the NAP (Non-Aggression Principle) as the law. A law that is universally applied and established as the terms of a 3 part peace agreement. For those unfamiliar with the NAP it is essentially a principle that defines crime by whether or not you are causing harm or loss to another (or at least threatening or attempting to). Many may associate this principle with what is known as Natural Law or Common Law or simply just the basic sense of right and wrong that should apply to all equally. Ultimately, it is what most people would recognize in their hearts as simple sanity. If the NAP was established as the law then we would have a free society, almost by default, as governments would no longer be able to rule people and would basically cease to exist in their current form. In its place, we can still have everything else we associate with government, including law enforcement, because it does not require the power to rule over people to be able to serve and you do not need to violate the NAP to be able to enforce it, which is why this is the only law that could actually be applied 100% equally. Enforcing the NAP would, by definition, only involve self-defense or the defense of others, so does not require anyone to have more or less rights than anyone else. There is much more that the Nations Of Sanity offers, with respect to going into more detail and offering various solutions and answers to questions and issues that may arise. We've even drawn up a 3 part agreement that could establish the NAP as law (The Sanity Agreement/Non Aggression Agreement). But when it comes to what we demand and what we think EVERYONE should unite in demanding, that is basically it. Make the Non-Aggression Principle the standard for law, a law that applies to everyone equally, and we will have, for the first time in recorded history, a truly free and sane society with true equal rights, true justice, and a level of sanity that is actually worthy of the name."

Kinsella on Liberty Podcast, Episode 362. I was a guest on California Gold #6, with guest host Matthew Sands. From the shownotes: Stephan and Matt covered a wide variety of libertarian themes, including property rights, self-ownership, the Non-Aggression Principle, intellectual property, Hoppean Argumentation Ethics, Georgism, Objectivism, utilitarianism, deontology and much more. Stephan was hosted by Matthew Sands of the Nation of Sanity project (http://www.nationsofsanity.com/), which aims to promote the Non-Aggression Principle as a universal peace agreement, hosting for California Gold for the first time. https://youtu.be/_usiT5Z2JXY

Kinsella on Liberty Podcast, Episode 362. I was a guest on California Gold #6, with guest host Matthew Sands. From the shownotes: Stephan and Matt covered a wide variety of libertarian themes, including property rights, self-ownership, the Non-Aggression Principle, intellectual property, Hoppean Argumentation Ethics, Georgism, Objectivism, utilitarianism, deontology and much more. Stephan was hosted by Matthew Sands of the Nation of Sanity project (http://www.nationsofsanity.com/), which aims to promote the Non-Aggression Principle as a universal peace agreement, hosting for California Gold for the first time. https://youtu.be/_usiT5Z2JXY

Join me with Matt Sands to talk about the Non-Aggression Principle and how it can be established with law and without government.

Fellow Podcaster Matt Sands joins us from The Mineral Rights Podcast to discuss how he got into the minerals space back in 2015 and why he saw the need to help educate mineral owners by generating content on his podcast. Find out more about the Oil & Gas Council here

From sales, service, accounting and of course the production floor Quality Matters. Regardless if you implementing lean or continuous improvement in the office or shop floor management buy in is key, but don't neglect the folks doing the work day to day. Continuous improvement is more than the tools and processes but an overall change management journey. "If it is going to be successful, it has got to be a part of the everyday way people do their work" Learn more about our guest today, Matt Sands, host of the Mineral Rights Podcast. Resource Guide Matt Sands has over 20 years of professional work experience in the oil & gas industry across all areas of the business.  The last 3 years of his corporate career with Shell were focused on helping to implement improvements in the way Shell’s unconventionals business managed business process, data, and systems.  For the past 5 years, he has exclusively focused on mineral rights & royalties.  Matt is the managing member of Silverheels Investments LLC which is a family-owned company focused on mineral rights advisory services and investing in minerals and royalties in select basins across the US.  He provides mineral valuation and advisory services for mineral owners who are looking for additional help in selling their property. Ep 74 - Matt Sands of "The Mineral Rights Podcast" discussing how to implement lean and continuous improvementhttps://mineralrightspodcast.com/ Learn more about #QualityMatters & Texas Quality Assurance :LinkedIn | Facebook | Twitter  | Instagram  | YouTubewww.qmcast.com | Texas Quality Assurance |QMS Bootcamp

Matt Sands joins us as we discuss continuous improvement and quality and their importance when the oil and gas industry in a downturn. Don’t do the wrong things righter! Quality shouldn’t be something else that costs you money.  Quality is getting your processes and procedures on paper and doing what you say you’re going to.  This is important anytime, but especially during a downturn when you might be facing a shut down.  Having your procedures in places helps to track everything from how much time a paper sat on someone’s desk for approval to waste to rework.  If you have a quality management program in place, you can track exactly where your money is spent and where you can cut back or do better.  Cushioning the bottom dollar when business is booming helps when a downturn comes.  If you don’t have one in place during a downturn, a quality management program will help you scale back exactly where you are able.  Yes, it’s money you have to spend up front on a consultant to help you, but it’s money well spent and that you’ll not only make back, but be able to track how you made it back.  Continual improvement is strategically names; business should always strive to improve, continuously.  A good quality management program helps that improvement along. Learn more about our guest today, Matt Sands, host of the Mineral Rights Podcast. Resource Guide Matt Sands has over 20 years of professional work experience in the oil & gas industry across all areas of the business.  The last 3 years of his corporate career with Shell were focused on helping to implement improvements in the way Shell’s unconventionals business managed business process, data, and systems.  For the past 5 years, he has exclusively focused on mineral rights & royalties.  Matt is the managing member of Silverheels Investments LLC which is a family-owned company focused on mineral rights advisory services and investing in minerals and royalties in select basins across the US.  He provides mineral valuation and advisory services for mineral owners who are looking for additional help in selling their property. https://mineralrightspodcast.com/ https://mineralrightspodcast.com/ https://mineralrightspodcast.com/ Avoid Doing the Wrong things Righter…But, “By What Method?”JUNE 30, 2020Guest post by Dr. Doug Stilwell, Drake Universityhttps://blog.deming.org/2020/06/avoid-doing-the-wrong-things-righter-but-by-what-method/ Learn more about #QualityMatters & Texas Quality Assurance :LinkedIn | Facebook | Twitter  | Instagram  | YouTubewww.qmcast.com | Texas Quality Assurance |QMS Bootcamp

Today we sit down with my good buddy Matt Sands. He is an expert on all things Psychedelic! Check him out! Matt's Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/user/sandsy04

In this episode we talk with Matt Sands, the host of the Mineral Rights podcast. The Mineral Rights Podcast is a show for you to learn about owning mineral rights. What is a lease? What taxes are involved? How do I check production for my wells? How do I calculate my royalty interest? What is a division order? I've got an offer to purchase or lease, but is it reasonable? How do I read my check stub? Matt gives you answers to these and more questions about managing mineral rights and royalty interests. Matt has over 19 years of Oil & Gas industry experience. Matt is a graduate of the Colorado School of Mines with a BS in Engineering with a Mechanical Specialty and a Minor in Public Affairs. Matt is the principal of Silverheels Investments LLC, a family-owned company focused on mineral rights advisory services and investing in minerals and royalties in select basins across the US. Highlights 5:00 - Why Matt went to the Colorado School of Mines 6:33 - Why Minerals interested Matt 8:30 - Matt's advice on surviving the oil & gas ups and downs 13:35 - Why the Mineral Rights Podcast exists. 16:01 - The most listened to Mineral Rights episodes 20:55 - Resources for Mineral Owners Links to websites: http://silverheelsinvestments.com/ http://mineralrightspodcast.com/ https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/mineral-rights-podcast-mineral-rights-royalties-oil/id1401506541?mt=2&ign-mpt=uo%3D8

What is your motivation to serve others? Many are motivated out of the desire for a good feeling. "I feel good when I help others," they say. Some are motivated out of guilt – they feel guilty about something in their life and use kindness as a way to assuage a guilty conscience. But, what should be the Christian's motivation for service? In his message on the ordination Sunday of David Luttrull and Matt Sands, Pastor Josh Crockett spoke on the need to have a biblical motivation for service.

What does it take to make you angry? An unkind word? A traffic jam? A disobedient child? In his message from Matthew 5, Matt Sands, the youth director at Grace, deals with a biblical response to anger.

There are a lot of questions about 3D Printing in metal with new technologies, materials and applications happening almost daily. Join us for our conversation with Matt Sands, CEO of 3DEO as we talk about their unique approach to Metal Additive and how they differ from the other 3D technologies. --- Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/3dtechtalks/support

Welcome back to another episode! This week’s episode is First Friday Q&A taken over by Matt Sands and Justin Williams of Mineral Rights Podcast. You ask the questions and we answer them. Big thanks to everyone who wrote in. If you want to get a question answered for next month’s FFQA, click the link below. […] The post First Friday Q&A on Oil & Gas This Week – OGTW158 appeared first on Oil and Gas This Week Podcast.