Podcasts about Jurisdiction

Welcome solo and group practice owners! We are Liath Dalton and Evan Dumas, your co-hosts of Group Practice Tech. In our latest episode, we answer a question we're getting a lot recently, about what's permitted when supervising pre-licensed therapists. We discuss: How compact privileges work for therapists PSYPACT and the upcoming Counseling Compact and Social Work Licensure Compact AAMFT and the push for licensure portability  How to manage supervision for pre-licensed folks Liability and ethical implications for unauthorized practice Listen here: https://personcenteredtech.com/group/podcast/ For more, visit our website. PCT Resources Article: Can My Supervisees Practice Across State Lines Under My Compact Privileges? Supervision & Compacts: Quick Reference Guide CE Training: Navigating Legal-Ethical Cross-Jurisdictional Teletherapy Practice in 2025: A Guide for Mental Health Professionals (2 legal-ethical CE credit hours, on-demand) CE Training: Telesupervision Nuts & Bolts: Best Practices and Ethical Considerations (3 legal-ethical CE credit hours, on-demand) CE Training Bundle: Incorporation of Interns and Supervisees in Mental Health Private Practice: Legal-Ethical, Training, and System Resource Management Considerations (2.5 legal-ethical CE credit hours, on-demand) CE Training Bundle & Certificate Program: Teletherapy Program Director/Supervisor Training (18.5+ CE Credit hours, on-demand) PCT's Teletherapy Practice Rules by State Tool PCT's Group Practice Teletherapy Program

DEAR PAO: Ombudsman also has jurisdiction over misconduct of barangay official | June 19, 2025Visit our website at https://www.manilatimes.netFollow us:Facebook - https://tmt.ph/facebookInstagram - https://tmt.ph/instagramTwitter - https://tmt.ph/twitterDailyMotion - https://tmt.ph/dailymotionSubscribe to our Digital Edition - https://tmt.ph/digitalSign up to our newsletters: https://tmt.ph/newslettersCheck out our Podcasts:Spotify - https://tmt.ph/spotifyApple Podcasts - https://tmt.ph/applepodcastsAmazon Music - https://tmt.ph/amazonmusicDeezer: https://tmt.ph/deezerStitcher: https://tmt.ph/stitcherTune In: https://tmt.ph/tunein#TheManilaTimes Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In this episode of Body Slam Briefs, hosts Evil Dose and special guest Anthony Thomas delve into the intricate details of the AEW lawsuit involving Jonathan Wood a.k.a. Jon Moxley and a cameraman named Dispensa. They discuss the lawsuit's background, the legal implications, and the broader impact on AEW. The episode covers topics such as the timing of the lawsuit, Moxley's past disciplinary incidents, and the potential outcomes. Insights into the legal landscape are provided, making it an essential listen.00:39 AEW Lawsuit Overview02:16 Details of the Incident03:57 Legal Implications and Contractor Status12:43 Jurisdiction and Venue20:28 Medical Attention and AEW's Responsibility26:26 Discussing Moxley's Alleged Incidents27:03 Legal Implications and Defamation27:39 Substance Abuse and Rehabilitation28:45 Liability and Legal Responsibility30:49 Assault and Battery Allegations34:57 Legal Procedures and Court Thresholds38:20 Settlement and Arbitration Speculations44:37 Final Thoughts and PlugsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/wrestling-soup--1425249/support.

Send me a DM here (it doesn't let me respond), OR email me: imagineabetterworld2020@gmail.comToday I'm honored to have back on the show for a second time: United Church Minister turned whistleblower, Canadian Hero, father of two, published writer and author, public speaker and podcaster, documentary filmmaker, Nobel Peace Prize nominee, co-founder of the International Tribunal into Crimes of Church and State, righteous soul, and Eagle Strong Voice: Kevin AnnettIn case you missed Kevin's first episode or if you are new here, here is a recap of Kevin's testimony: Kevin, a former United Church minister turned fearless whistleblower, stands as a Canadian hero in the relentless pursuit of truth and justice. For decades, he's exposed the horrific genocide of Indigenous children in church-run Indian Residential Schools, uncovering a dark campaign of abuse, murder, and cultural annihilation with a staggering 50% death rate. At great personal cost - his career, family, and reputation - Kevin sparked a global movement, becoming a beacon for survivors and a thorn in the side of the powerful.In the 1990s, his discoveries in Port Alberni, British Columbia, shattered his world and ignited his mission. He convened the first independent Tribunal into residential school crimes in 1998, founded The Truth Commission into Genocide in Canada in 2000, authored ‘Hidden from History: The Canadian Holocaust in 2001', and released the award-winning documentary ‘Unrepentant' in 2007. His work forced Canada's 2008 apology, though his name was erased from the narrative.Undaunted, Kevin co-founded the International Tribunal into Crimes of Church and State (ITCCS) in 2010, uniting survivors across 26 countries. His efforts led to the 2011 excavation of children's bones in Brantford, Ontario, and the 2012 prosecution of Pope Benedict, contributing to the pontiff's historic resignation. Despite blacklisting, smear campaigns, and state persecution - including a fraudulent 2021 COVID order targeting him - Kevin persists. He's authored over a dozen books, founded the Republic of Kanata in 2015, and earned two Nobel Peace Prize nominations. Today, Kevin's unyielding voice inspires millions to confront genocide, child trafficking, and oppression, proving one person's courage can change the world.Today, Kevin returns to continue his riveting saga as a relentless whistleblower and advocate. We'll dive into fresh evidence of these heinous crimes, explore how to prosecute and halt them through independent jurisdictions, and discuss the transformative potential of common law courts, sovereign Republics, and personal sovereignty. Kevin will share more of his harrowing experiences, offer insights from his Whistleblower's Manual, and inspire with his unwavering resolve. CONNECT WITH KEVIN:Email: angelfire101@protonmail.comPhone: 289-680-8724Websites:-Republic of Kanata: https://republicofkanata.org/-Radio Free Kanata: https://bbsradio.com/radiofreekanata-'Murder by Decree' & other books published by Kevin: https://murderbydecree.com/#books-'Unrepentant' Documentary: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Czej73SfYJcCONNECT WITH THE IMAGINATION:EMAIL: imagineabetterworld2020@gmail.comBUY ME A COFFEE: https://www.buymeacoffee.com/theimaginationAll links: https://direct.me/theimaginationpodcastRIFE TECHNOLOGIES:https://realrifetechnology.com/15% Code: Support the show

Clark County Sheriff John Horch addresses the unexpected inclusion of Clark County on a temporary DHS list of sanctuary jurisdictions. https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/news/sheriff-responds-to-dhs-listing-clark-county-as-a-sanctuary-jurisdiction/ #ClarkCounty #SheriffJohnHorch #SanctuaryJurisdiction #LawEnforcement #DHS #ImmigrationPolicy #FederalLaw #LocalNews #PublicSafety

Rev. Dr. Marshall MacClellan currently serves as the Canon Theologian for the Jurisdiction of the Armed Forces and Chaplaincy. Cn Marshall served 24 years as a Chaplain in the U.S. Air Force at tactical, operational, and strategic levels of leadership concluding with serving at the Pentagon as the Deputy Joint Staff Chaplain for the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Cn Marshall deployed four times in the CENTCOM AOR. He was an Instructor at the Air Force Chaplain Corps College leading the Education Division. Prior to entering the military in 1998, Cn Marshall was a United Methodist minister serving four parish churches in Florida. He has also served as a law enforcement chaplain with the Auburndale Police Department, FL, Val Verde County Sheriff's Office, TX and currently at the Green Cove Springs Police Department, FL. Cn Marshall was ordained in Anglican Holy Orders as a transitional Deacon in Feb 2011 and Priest in July 2011. He holds a Bachelor degree from Florida Southern College, a Master of Divinity from Duke University and a Doctor of Ministry Degree from Asbury Theological Seminary. He and Christy have been married for 38 years and have five children.

Another list includes Dutchess, Putnam counties The U.S. government's list of "sanctuary jurisdictions" that includes hundreds of communities, both red and blue, is confounding critics. They have noticed the list - which includes Beacon, Dutchess County and Putnam County - included misspellings, communities with small immigrant populations and those with strong support for cooperation with federal authorities. Jessica Vaughan is director of policy studies at the Center for Immigration Studies, which favors anti-sanctuary policies and started publishing a list of sanctuary jurisdictions 10 years ago. The CIS list is different from the government's but includes Dutchess and Putnam counties. The center says its list, most recently updated on May 30, includes "cities, counties, and states have laws, ordinances, regulations, resolutions, policies or other practices that obstruct immigration enforcement and shield criminals from ICE [Immigration and Customs Enforcement] - either by refusing to or prohibiting agencies from complying with ICE detainers, imposing unreasonable conditions on detainer acceptance, denying ICE access to interview incarcerated aliens, or otherwise impeding communication or information exchanges between their personnel and federal immigration officers." "That's one thing that I feel is missing from the [government's] list is some documentation as to why they're appearing on the list," Vaughan said. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) list is part of the Trump administration's efforts to target communities, states and jurisdictions that it says aren't doing enough to help its immigration enforcement agenda and the promises the president made to deport more than 11 million people living in the U.S. without legal authorization. What are the stakes? The DHS and the U.S. attorney general said they will send official notice to the 500 jurisdictions "regarding its defiance of federal immigration law enforcement and any potential violations of federal criminal law," according to an executive order from President Donald Trump. The list could be updated when the administration receives new information, but those that remain on the list could face serious financial consequences, including suspended or terminated federal grants and contracts by the Office of Management and Budget. It is not clear what legal actions the government will pursue. How was the list made? In response to questions, DHS reiterated that it was compiled using a number of factors, including whether the localities identified themselves as sanctuary jurisdictions, how much they complied with federal officials enforcing immigration laws, if they had restrictions on sharing information with immigration enforcement or had any legal protections for people in the country illegally. The agency noted in an email that the list will be updated regularly. But experts said it was difficult to understand the criteria. "It seems quite arbitrary because not all of these states or specific jurisdictions have a policy that limits cooperation with ICE," said Nithya Nathan-Pineau, an attorney with the Immigrant Legal Resource Center. How did communities that support Trump's policies end up on the list? Several communities said they have been outspoken supporters of the president and his stringent immigration policies and do not understand why they have been included. Among them: Shawano County, Wisconsin; Alexandria, Virginia; and Huntington Beach, California. Jim Davel, administrator for Shawano County, thinks the administration may have confused the county's vote in 2021 to become a "Second Amendment Sanctuary County" that prohibits gun control measures with it being a safe haven for immigrants. He said the county has approved no immigration sanctuary policies. What is a sanctuary city? It is generally understood to apply to state and local governments that limit cooperation with federal immigration authorities. DHS said it considered "factors like complianc...

Send us fan responses! What if everything you believed about your legal and financial identity was incomplete? What if the pathway to genuine wealth and freedom wasn't through grinding in the system, but by understanding how to position yourself outside of it?In this explosive lakeside conversation, Don Kilam pulls back the curtain on how private families create and run the government while public citizens remain caught in a matrix of limited financial potential. The distinction isn't just philosophical—it's worth potentially millions in accessible tax credits that most people never claim.At the core of this knowledge is a simple but revolutionary concept: your name is a business. When properly structured through family trusts, unincorporated associations under 508(c)(1)(A), and proper operating agreements, this business can access substantial tax credits. Don reveals how a single tax credit can potentially return $1.25 million when claiming 20 years of history, plus additional $250,000 credits for properly structured entities.Don challenges listeners to shift their thinking from "redemption" as some mystical process to understanding it as straightforward accounting and tax strategy. The true path to financial sovereignty isn't through fighting the system but through establishing proper private structures that the system already recognizes and respects.This isn't information freely shared in public education for a reason. Private families have preserved these strategies for generations, creating a two-tiered society: those who understand private jurisdiction and those who remain public citizens. The good news? The pathway to private status begins with education and proper structure, not endless paperwork battles with government agencies.Ready to transform your understanding of wealth creation and establish your family's private trust? Visit skool.com/donkilam and take the first step toward genuine financial sovereignty. Your prosperity is your divine birthright—but only when you understand the rules of the game.In "United States Of Pimpin'," Don Kilam shares his perceptions from his street culture to explain the corporate world in a way that may feel uncomfortable yet brutally honest. He outlines ten rules from the "pimp game" alongside ten principles that apply to society and governance. https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0F9QHGRGS FOLLOW THE YELLOW BRICK ROAD - DON KILAMGO GET HIS BOOK ON AMAZON NOW! https://www.amazon.com/Million-Dollars-Worth-Game-Kilam/dp/B09HQZNRB9 https://www.amazon.com/Cant-Touch-This-Diplomatic-Immunity/dp/B09X1FXMNQSupport the showhttps://donkilam.com

Jason talks with Kirby Moynagh, District 5 Commissioner for Wright County, about the federal list of "Sanctuary Jurisdictions" and why he thinks it was a mistake for Wright County to end up on it.

Mere Fidelity is back! Welcome to Mere Fidelity 2.0: A Mere Orthodoxy Podcast. Hosts Derek Rishmawy, Alastair Roberts, Brad East, and James Wood dive into the major news of Pope Francis's passing and Cardinal Robert Prevost's election as Pope Leo XIV. As Protestant theologians, they grapple with what this papal transition means for the broader Christian landscape. They discuss how evangelicals should approach papal authority, explore the potential for greater Christian unity under the new papacy, and examine the ongoing influence of Catholic social teaching. They also reflect on the challenges and opportunities of engaging with Catholic tradition while remaining committed to Protestant principles. — Chapters: 00:00 Mere Fidelity 2.0: A New Era 03:25 Protestant Perspectives on the Papacy 09:21 Toward a Unified Church 12:30 Papal "Authority" 15:25 The Role of the Pope in a Divided Church 18:23 Visions for Unity in the Church 23:53 Pope Not King 25:02 Protestant Perspectives on Tradition 27:55 Calvin in the Middle 32:46 Visible and Invisible 33:48 Encyclical Teaching 41:05 Extra Cautions 46:24 Future Ecumenical Councils 51:20 New Chapter

Vincent and Joel sit down with guest, new Senator Overture Walker, to discuss his family roots in Sumter, his education at U.S.C., how he got his start in Politics, his goals for his tenure as a Senator, how it feels being in the super minority of Senate Democrats, Problems with the Insurance Industry, SCOUT MOTORS Plant, School Vouchers, and what to look for in the coming terms. Hear Bourbon Briefs where the Senators discuss the latest updates from the capital, including the Supreme Court's sign-off on a strict abortion ban, a republican super majority in the senate AND the house, increasing S.C.'s energy production needs, and much more!Get your latest Statehouse update and hear firsthand the rationale behind some of the legislature's most controversial bills. Join Senators Sheheen and Lourie in this week's episode where they take a deeper look at upcoming legislation and lawmakers' actions in S.C.   Support the showKeep up to Date with BITBR: Twitter.com/BITBRpodcastFacebook.com/BITBRpodcasthttps://bourboninthebackroom.buzzsprout.com

Xia v. Bondi, No. 24-2304 (2d Cir. May 19, 2025)Patel; no jurisdiction to review USCIS denial of adjustment of status United States v. Doe, No. 22-14307 (11th Cir. May 21, 2025)criminal penalties under 8 U.S.C. § 1253(a)(1) for obstructing his removal or not cooperating with the procedures for obtaining travel out of the country; INA § 237(a); no requirement for admission; IIRIRA legislative history; deportation and exclusion  Ramos Goncalves v. Bondi, No. 24-1511 (1st Cir. May 20, 2025)untimely petition for review; post hoc extension; prison mailbox rule Gonzalez-Juarez v. Bondi, No. 21-927 (9th Cir. May 20, 2025)exceptional and extremely unusual hardship; Wilkinson; standard of review; substantial evidence; Loper Bright; hardship in Mexico  Singh-Kar v. Bondi, No. 22-6309 (2d Cir. May 21, 2025)unable or unwilling to protect; ineffective assistance of counsel; Badal Party; Mann party; Sikh asylum claim; India Sponsors and friends of the podcast!Kurzban Kurzban Tetzeli and Pratt P.A.Immigration, serious injury, and business lawyers serving clients in Florida, California, and all over the world for over 40 years.Cerenade"Leader in providing smart, secure, and intuitive cloud-based solutions"Demo Link!Click me too!Stafi"Remote staffing solutions for businesses of all sizes"Promo Code: STAFI2025Click me!Want to become a patron?Click here to check out our Patreon Page!CONTACT INFORMATIONEmail: kgregg@kktplaw.comFacebook: @immigrationreviewInstagram: @immigrationreviewTwitter: @immreviewAbout your hostCase notesRecent criminal-immigration article (p.18)Featured in San Diego VoyagerDISCLAIMER & CREDITSSee Eps. 1-200Support the show

Ordained in 1996, the Rev. Jerome “Jay” Cayangyang is a Navy Reserve chaplain with almost 35 years of service and currently also serves as rector and dean of Bishop Seabury Anglican Church, Pro-Cathedral of the Anglican Diocese of the Living Word. He has served numerous active duty and reserve assignments including two combat deployments to Iraq.  In addition to his parish duties, he currently serves as the Deputy Chaplain of the Marine Corps for Reserve Matters. Cayangyang and his wife, Linda, live in Connecticut and have five adult children. “I'm deeply humbled by this opportunity,” Cayangyang said. “I am truly grateful for all of my ministry to this point: the Jurisdiction of the Armed Forces and Chaplaincy, Anglican Diocese of the Living Word, and Bishop Seabury Church.  I am grateful for their love and friendship. The Lord used my time in those ministries to prepare me for this new role as a bishop. And finally, I am so thankful for my family and their partnership in the ministry.”

A Catholic charter school in Oklahoma is still unconstitutional.State lawmakers approve money to prosecutors to fight tribal jurisdiction.The Thunder takes a two to nothing lead in the Western Conference Finals.You can find the KOSU Daily wherever you get your podcasts, you can also subscribe, rate us and leave a comment.You can keep up to date on all the latest news throughout the day at KOSU.org and make sure to follow us on Facebook, Blue Sky and Instagram at KOSU Radio.This is The KOSU Daily, Oklahoma news, every weekday.

BECOME A YT MEMBER TODAY!!! https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCqzgGwRrOLH20OIc8bM_VAg/joinConnect with April https://shinealbum.therealshalil.com/ COME SEE ME DO COMEDY - Get Tickets Here https://linktr.ee/timross(Tim's Lip Balm) - GlowSkin Care - https://www.facebook.com/AllNaturalOrganicProductsMadeWithLove/

What do most new investors overlook when raising capital, and how can a single missing document expose the entire deal?   In this episode, Dugan Kelley breaks down the legal side of raising money for real estate deals, especially under Rule 506(b) exemptions. Dugan shares a clear, actionable breakdown of the syndication process, how securities laws apply, and the key legal structures every investor should understand. With over $4 billion in structured transactions under his belt, he walks through the must-have documents, how to avoid legal pitfalls, and the significance of understanding the difference between accredited and sophisticated investors. Whether you're syndicating your first deal or investing passively, this episode outlines what you need to know to stay compliant and protect your capital.     [00:01 - 05:42] Syndication Basics: What Are You Selling? The importance of understanding whether you're selling a security Why real estate syndication usually involves securities law The role of passive investors and operator equity in typical deal structures   [05:42 - 10:53] Securities Law 101: Are You in the SEC's Jurisdiction? What defines a security in real estate transactions Why even small deals may trigger SEC oversight The need for a Private Placement Memorandum (PPM) in most syndications   [10:54 - 15:27] The Six Ingredients Every PPM Must Have What the SEC expects in a compliant real estate offering The importance of risk disclosures, business plans, and subscription agreements Why a company agreement governs everything after the close   [15:28 - 20:33] Who Qualifies to Invest: Accredited vs. Sophisticated What makes someone an accredited investor (net worth or income thresholds) How recent SEC updates have expanded access to more people The significance of entity-based accreditation   [20:34 - 24:05] Sophisticated Investors: A Gray Area You Need to Understand What defines a sophisticated investor and how to evaluate suitability Why Rule 506(b) limits the number of these investors to 35 The risk tolerance, intent, and understanding needed to qualify       Connect with Dugan:   LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/dugan-kelley-0019b435/     Key Quotes:   “If your purpose is to raise capital and the buyer's purpose is to receive a profit, you're selling a security.” — Dugan Kelley   “If your deal is missing a company agreement or key disclosures, that's a red flag—don't invest.” — Dugan Kelley     Visit sponsorcloud.io/contact today and unlock $2,000 of free services exclusively for REI Rocks community members! Get automated syndication and investor relationship management tools to save time and money. Mention your part of the REI Rocks community for exclusive offers. Help make affordable, low-cost education summits possible. Check out Sponsor Cloud today!

Sine Die and the end of session create a fervor of activity at the State's Capital! Vincent and Joel sit down and have a few drinks at Tin Roof across from the Capitol Building. As Senators and Representatives finish up session, they walk across the street, join in on the drinks, and answer some pressing questions for South Carolina's most informational insider political podcast - Bourbon in the Back Room!Rep. Gary Simrill, Rep. Heather Bauer, Sen. Luke Rankin, Rep. Micah Caskey, Rep. Spencer Wetmore, Rep. Beth Bernstein, Rep. Hamilton grant, Sen. Jeffrey Graham, Sen. Brad Hutto, Sen. Greg Hembree, Rep. Todd Rutherford, Sen. Jason Elliot, Sen. Tom Davis, Sen. Ronnie Sabb, Sen. Tameika Isaac Devine, Sen. Thomas Alexander, Sen. Russell Ott, Sen. Ed Sutton, Sen. Sean Bennett, Sen. Deon Tedder, Reporter Maayan Schecter, Reporter Mary Green, Rep. Brandon Guffy, and Rep Heath Sessions, stop by to discuss the highlights of the year, what got done, and what's coming up!Get your latest Statehouse update and hear firsthand the rationale behind some of the General Assembly's controversial bills. Join Senator Sheheen and Representative Bakari Sellers in this week's episode where they take a deeper look at upcoming legislation and lawmakers' actions in S.C. Support the showKeep up to Date with BITBR: Twitter.com/BITBRpodcastFacebook.com/BITBRpodcasthttps://bourboninthebackroom.buzzsprout.com

'The adrenaline in my body was like nothing I've ever felt.'  Ten years ago, Derrick's world was rocked when his daughter was raped by a police officer. Fighting for justice in a system built against survivors, he pushes to have her voice heard. Derrick walks us through the experience of being a supportive parent during the aftermath of sexual assault, guiding us through the ways he cared for his daughter and fought for justice.  Derrick Hurley is a proud husband and father of three daughters. He spent his 37-year career in the Retail Technology industry and left his career early to advocate for survivors after his oldest daughter was assaulted in 2015.   Host: Katie Koestner Editor: Evan Mader Producers: Catrina Aglubat and Emily Wang

Sea breeze and jursidictions We have a Patreon! What to support us? Click HERE! You can find us on Instagram (chaosenginepod) and Bluesky (chaosenginepod) You can also email us at chaosenginepod@gmail.com We have a discord now! Feel free to stop by if that interests you! The Cast: Referee: Chris Blex Blex Blex - Jake Astrodomos "Toots" Rodgers - Meescha Jedt Coinbitter - Cody Zander Cross - Tyler Check out our friends: Pretending to be People! Stories & Lies Sorry, Honey I have to Take This Tabletop Talk Wilderspace Gaming Doomed to Repeat The Great Old Ones Gaming Negative Modifier Chaos Springs Eternal The Black Flare Podcast 9mm Retirement Radio Suffer Not

President Donald Trump's executive order seeking to end birthright citizenship has reignited debates over the 14th Amendment and the meaning of citizenship in America. Legal experts Gabriel Chin of the University of California, Davis School of Law; Amanda Frost of the University of Virginia School of Law; Kurt Lash of the University of Richmond School of Law; and Ilan Wurman of the University of Minnesota Law School analyze the legal challenges surrounding birthright citizenship, explore the constitutional and historical arguments on all sides of this debate, and discuss its broader implications for immigration. Jeffrey Rosen, president and CEO of the National Constitution Center, moderates. Resources Trump v. CASA, Inc., United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit (2025) Trump v. Washington, United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (2025) Trump v. New Jersey, United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit (2025) Amanda Frost, You Are Not American: Citizenship Stripping from Dred Scott to the Dreamers (2021) Amanda Frost, “The Coming Assault on Birthright Citizenship,” The Atlantic (Jan. 7, 2025) Ilan Wurman and Randy Barnett, “Trump Might Have a Case on Birthright Citizenship,” The New York Times (Feb. 15, 2025) Ilan Wurman, “Jurisdiction and Citizenship,” Minnesota Legal Studies Research Paper No. 25-27 (April 14, 2025) Gabriel “Jack” Chin and Paul Finkelman, “Birthright Citizenship, Slave Trade Legislation, and the Origins of Federal Immigration Regulation,” UC Davis Law Review, Vol. 54 (April 8, 2021) Gabriel J. Chin, “America Has Freaked Out Over Birthright Citizenship For Centuries,” Talking Points Memo (Aug. 2015) Kurt Lash, “Prima Facie Citizenship: Birth, Allegiance and the Fourteenth Amendment's Citizenship Clause,” SSRN (Feb. 22, 2025) Kurt Lash, The Fourteenth Amendment and the Privileges and Immunities of American Citizenship (2014) Stay Connected and Learn More Questions or comments about the show? Email us at ⁠podcast@constitutioncenter.org⁠ Continue the conversation by following us on social media @ConstitutionCtr. ⁠Sign up⁠ to receive Constitution Weekly, our email roundup of constitutional news and debate. Follow, rate, and review wherever you listen. Join us for an upcoming ⁠live program⁠ or watch recordings on ⁠YouTube⁠. Support our important work. ⁠Donate

Join Elizabeth Stevenson from New Direction Family Law and her colleague Ashley Oldham as they discuss the unique challenges of military divorces. In this episode, they delve into the nuances of divorce for military families, covering topics such as pension division, custody arrangements, and the Uniform Deployed Parents Custody and Visitation Act. Ashley, a board-certified family law specialist with extensive experience in military divorces, provides valuable insights on jurisdiction, survivor benefits, and child support. Whether you're a service member or a spouse, this episode is packed with essential information to help navigate the complexities of military divorces.00:00 Introduction and Guest Introduction00:38 Military Divorce Overview02:33 Jurisdiction in Military Divorces03:54 Custody Issues in Military Divorces09:49 Division of Military Pensions15:55 Domestic Violence and Military Personnel17:25 Military Support Programs and Conclusion

Randy Smallwood, President and CEO of Wheaton Precious Metals (TSX | NYSE | LSE: WPM), outlines the company's multi-year growth strategy and discusses how the streaming model is uniquely positioned to thrive in today's precious metals market.   Randy shares how Wheaton is entering a major growth cycle, targeting a 60% increase in production by 2031, supported by a robust balance sheet ($829M in cash, no debt) and four new mines beginning deliveries in 2025.   Key topics include: Flagship Asset Growth: Updates on Salobo Phase 3 and Antamina, both poised for higher-grade output. New Production in 2025: Blackwater (Artemis Gold), Goose (B2Gold), Mineral Park, and Platreef (Ivanhoe Mines). Strategic Leverage: The benefits of streaming over royalty models - especially in a rising gold price environment. Montage Gold Case Study: How a 100% stream-financed model could reshape single-asset project development. Jurisdiction & ESG Strategy: How Wheaton manages political and community risks, while recently expanding selectively into Africa. Investor Sentiment: Rising interest from generalist funds and Western retail investors, especially in silver exposure (~40% of WPM's revenue).   Click here to visit the Wheaton Precious Metals website.

On May 15, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in a case challenging the constitutionality of President Trump's executive order which seeks to end birthright citizenship for the children of undocumented immigrants. Legal scholars Gabriel Chin of the University of California, Davis School of Law; Amanda Frost of the University of Virginia School of Law; Kurt Lash of the University of Richmond School of Law; and Ilan Wurman of the University of Minnesota Law School join Jeffrey Rosen to debate the scope of the citizenship clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.   Resources Gabriel J. Chin and Paul Finkelman, “Birthright Citizenship, Slave Trade Legislation, and the Origins of Federal Immigration Regulation,” UC Davis Law Review (April 8, 2021)  Ilan Wurman, “Jurisdiction and Citizenship,” Minnesota Legal Studies Research Paper No.25-27 (April 14, 2025)  Amanda Frost, “The Coming Assault on Birthright Citizenship,” The Atlantic (Jan. 7 2025)  Kurt Lash, “Prima Facie Citizenship: Birth, Allegiance and the Fourteenth Amendment's Citizenship Clause,” SSRN (Feb. 22, 2025)  Amanda Frost, Testimony Before the Subcommittee on the Constitution and Limited Government, U.S. House of Representatives (Feb. 25, 2025)  Stay Connected and Learn More Questions or comments about the show? Email us at podcast@constitutioncenter.org Continue the conversation by following us on social media @ConstitutionCtr. Sign up to receive Constitution Weekly, our email roundup of constitutional news and debate. Follow, rate, and review wherever you listen. Join us for an upcoming live program or watch recordings on YouTube. Support our important work. Donate

A federal law passed in the 1950s gave six states, including Oregon, civil and criminal jurisdiction over tribal reservations. Tribal nations have argued that the law undermines their sovereignty.Oregon tribes have been able to petition the governor to repeal the law on their land, but there’s no official procedure or timeline for that process to take place. Senate Bill 1011 would change that by laying out clear guidelines for federally recognized tribes to regain control over civil and criminal matters that take place on tribal land.Brent Leonhard is an attorney in the Office of Legal Counsel for the Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation. He joins us with more details about the bill and its implications for tribal sovereignty.

On Wednesday's Mark Levin Show, you are hearing it in the leftwing press, in the Never-Trump editorial pages and more - you cannot and must not deport anyone without some kind of notice and due process. Yet, there's nothing from these people on how this is supposed to actually work. What kind of due process are they talking about? The kind of due process that applies to citizens? If not, then what lower standard suffices as constitutional due process? Exactly how would due process, of any kind, be administered to millions and millions of illegal immigrants? We don't have enough courts of any kind in our country to handle the tsunami of cases that would be involved. This was all intentional. The border was opened to anyone. This is the Cloward-Pivens strategy: flood the system, overwhelm the system, break the system, and in doing so achieve your goals. Effectively, this is massive amnesty. Also, it seems these Federal judges are trying to stop mass deportation efforts and disrupt the Trump administration's response to Biden's mass immigration policies. Later, Hans von Spakovsky calls in and explains that he was stunned by Judge Boasberg's order because he's blatantly defying the Supreme Court. Boasberg's order was void from the moment he signed it. So how can he hold the Trump administration in contempt? Either Boasberg is incompetent or he's deliberately ignoring the Supreme Court. Afterward, Jonathan Turley calls in to discuss the criminal referral against NY AG Letitia James. James claims ​that ​her ​Virginia ​home ​was ​her ​principal ​residence. ​That ​was ​not ​and ​cannot ​be ​true ​because ​she was and still ​is ​an ​official ​of ​the ​New ​York ​government ​who ​must ​live ​within ​the ​state. What's ​notable ​about ​her ​false ​statements ​is ​that ​each ​one ​​worked ​towards ​a ​better mortgage ​rate. ​ Then, the Declaration of Independence discusses natural law and natural rights. Where do these concepts originate? They are influenced by John Locke and Montesquieu, but not entirely, as they ultimately come from God. When they say the people are sovereign, that ide comes from God. This is why the government can never be sovereign. The United States is first county on earth to be founded on these principles. Finally, Heritage President, Kevin Roberts, calls in to discuss the organization's impactful projects and ongoing efforts to revitalize federalism in America. Roberts shares insights on the current political landscape, the significance of state legislative work, and the importance of maintaining a conservative agenda while addressing challenges such as tariffs and international relations. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Vincent and Joel sit down with guest, Representative Nathan Ballentine, to talk about updates on the legislative session, his years of public service, how he got into politics, and his extraordinary flag football expertise. Hear what voters really care about, the divide between public service and voter interaction, higher education's budget, charter schools, and efforts to address autism in our population. The Senators break down current events in their popular segment, Bourbon Briefs, and discuss the continuing controversy at the State Treasurer's office, frozen college tuition, national criticism of our State's BMW operation, a casino proposition in Orangeburg County, and so much more!Get your latest Statehouse update and hear firsthand the rationale behind some of the legislature's most controversial bills. Join Senators Sheheen and Lourie in this week's episode where they take a deeper look at upcoming legislation and lawmakers' actions in S.C.   Support the showKeep up to Date with BITBR: Twitter.com/BITBRpodcastFacebook.com/BITBRpodcasthttps://bourboninthebackroom.buzzsprout.com

Mark Meckler, President and co-founder of Convention of States Action, the largest nationwide movement seeking to call the first- ever Article V Convention of States. Fiscal Restraints | Limited Jurisdiction | Term Limits. Celebrating a Milestone: Convention of States Endorsers Join the New Administration

Miriam Patterson, Senior Director, Market Practice and Regulatory Policy, ICMA, discusses the use of asymmetric jurisdiction clauses in the international debt capital markets following the judgement of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in the Lastre SpA v. Agora SARL case.

Short-Answer QuizWhat is the fundamental purpose of personal jurisdiction, and what constitutional provision provides its basis?Personal jurisdiction ensures a court has the authority to compel a defendant to appear and litigate in the forum. Its constitutional basis lies in the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, preventing individuals from being unfairly haled into court in distant or unconnected locations.Explain the difference between general and specific personal jurisdiction, providing a brief example of how each might arise.General jurisdiction exists when a defendant's contacts with the forum state are so continuous and systematic that they can be sued there for any claim, even if unrelated to those contacts (e.g., a corporation with its headquarters in a state). Specific jurisdiction arises when the lawsuit directly relates to the defendant's specific contacts with the forum state (e.g., a contract dispute stemming from a sale made in the state).What are the two primary bases for subject matter jurisdiction in federal courts, and what is a key requirement for each?The two primary bases are federal question jurisdiction and diversity jurisdiction. For federal question jurisdiction, the plaintiff's claim must arise under federal law and be evident in the well-pleaded complaint. For diversity jurisdiction, the case must be between citizens of different states (or a state and a foreign national) with an amount in controversy exceeding $75,000, and there must be complete diversity of citizenship.How does venue differ from jurisdiction, and what is the primary goal of venue rules?Jurisdiction concerns a court's power to hear a case (either over the person or the subject matter), while venue dictates the specific geographic district where the case should be heard. The primary goal of venue rules is to ensure a convenient and appropriate location for the litigation, considering factors like the parties' residences and where the events occurred.Describe the key elements that must be included in a complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8.A complaint must contain a short and plain statement of the grounds for the court's jurisdiction, a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief, and a demand for the relief sought by the pleader.How have the Twombly and Iqbal Supreme Court decisions impacted the federal pleading standard?These decisions raised the pleading standard beyond mere notice pleading, requiring complaints to contain sufficient factual allegations to state a claim that is plausible on its face. This means the factual narrative must be more detailed and suggest a likelihood of liability, rather than just reciting the elements of a cause of action.What are the two main ways a defendant can respond to a complaint after being served? Briefly explain each.A defendant can file an answer, which requires them to admit or deny each of the plaintiff's allegations and assert any affirmative defenses they may have. Alternatively, a defendant can file a pre-answer motion under Rule 12(b), which raises legal objections to the complaint, such as lack of jurisdiction, improper venue, or failure to state a claim.List three examples of affirmative defenses a defendant might assert in their answer.Examples of affirmative defenses include the statute of limitations (the lawsuit was filed after the legal deadline), res judicata (the issue has already been decided by a court), and estoppel (the plaintiff is prevented from asserting a claim due to their prior conduct or statements).Under what circumstances can a party amend their pleading "as a matter of course"?A party can amend their pleading once as a matter of course within 21 days after serving the original pleading, or if the pleading is one to which a responsive pleading is required, within 21 days after service of a responsive pleading or a motion under Rule 12(b), (e), or (f), whichever is earlier.

This lecture on federal civil procedure outlines the initial stages of litigation. It begins by explaining jurisdiction, focusing on the court's power over parties (personal jurisdiction) and the types of cases it can hear (subject matter jurisdiction). The discussion then moves to venue, detailing where a case should be properly filed for trial. The lecture further examines pleadings, covering the initial complaint and the defendant's response, including motions and answers. Finally, it addresses the process of amending pleadings, which allows for changes as a case progresses. The goal is to provide a foundational understanding of these crucial procedural elements.

NEWS: Lawyer: Bid to challenge jurisdiction of ICC to fail | April 14, 2025Visit our website at https://www.manilatimes.netFollow us:Facebook - https://tmt.ph/facebookInstagram - https://tmt.ph/instagramTwitter - https://tmt.ph/twitterDailyMotion - https://tmt.ph/dailymotionSubscribe to our Digital Edition - https://tmt.ph/digitalSign up to our newsletters: https://tmt.ph/newslettersCheck out our Podcasts:Spotify - https://tmt.ph/spotifyApple Podcasts - https://tmt.ph/applepodcastsAmazon Music - https://tmt.ph/amazonmusicDeezer: https://tmt.ph/deezerStitcher: https://tmt.ph/stitcherTune In: https://tmt.ph/tunein#TheManilaTimesVisit our website at https://www.manilatimes.netFollow us:Facebook - https://tmt.ph/facebookInstagram - https://tmt.ph/instagramTwitter - https://tmt.ph/twitterDailyMotion - https://tmt.ph/dailymotionSubscribe to our Digital Edition - https://tmt.ph/digitalSign up to our newsletters: https://tmt.ph/newslettersCheck out our Podcasts:Spotify - https://tmt.ph/spotifyApple Podcasts - https://tmt.ph/applepodcastsAmazon Music - https://tmt.ph/amazonmusicDeezer: https://tmt.ph/deezerStitcher: https://tmt.ph/stitcherTune In: https://tmt.ph/tunein#TheManilaTimes Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit www.serioustrouble.showThere has been a cat-and-mouse game about venue in several of the cases brought by people protesting the Trump administration's efforts to remove their visas and remove them from the country. For example: if you thought your client was in New York when you filed your lawsuit, but he was really in New Jersey, and now he's in Louisiana, should the case be transferred to New Jersey, or to Louisiana? It sounds technical but the stakes are substantial. That conversation is for all listeners this week.For paying subscribers: an update on the Trump administration's war on law firms, the firms that are fighting instead of holding, how much it matters to a fancy law firm if its junior attorneys are unhappy, and whether their businesses are likely to survive the president's assault. Plus: an analysis from law professor Steve Vladeck, who's looked at the unusually large number of temporary restraining orders entered against the Trump Administration's executive actions.If you want to hear all of that, go to www.serioustrouble.show to upgrade! Unlike Paul Weiss, we don't cost $2,000 an hour, and we promise that we will never enter into a letter agreement with the Trump administration that contradicts our principles.

Welcome solo and group practice owners! We are Liath Dalton and Evan Dumas, your co-hosts of Group Practice Tech. In our latest episode, we debunk two common but dangerous myths about cross jurisdictional practice for therapists.  We discuss: Common myths we hear about practicing telehealth across jurisdictions The risks of unpermitted practice The threshold of client risk (and the only instances where cross-jurisdictional practice is permitted for clients in crisis) What constitutes client abandonment and what doesn't Requesting temporary practice permission from a different jurisdiction Our recent training on navigating legal-ethical cross-jurisdictional teletherapy practice for therapists Listen here: https://personcenteredtech.com/group/podcast/ For more, visit our website. PCT Resources New CE Training: Navigating Legal-Ethical Cross-Jurisdictional Teletherapy Practice in 2025: A Guide for Mental Health Professionals -- on-demand legal-ethical CE training. *Ideal for both leadership and any and all clinicians that provide client care via teletherapy* the must-know information on the current considerations for how to legally and ethically navigate cross-jurisdictional teletherapy practice. In particular, we will address licensure compacts, recent legal developments, state-specific rules, risk management strategies, custodian of record obligations, and working with minors across state lines. PCT's Clinical Staff Teletherapy Training PCT's Teletherapy Director and Supervisor Training for Group Practices PCT's Teletherapy Manuals and Forms for Group Practices Group Practice Care Premium weekly (live & recorded) direct support & consultation service, Group Practice Office Hours -- including monthly session with therapist attorney Eric Ström, JD PhD LMHC + assignable staff HIPAA Security Awareness: Bring Your Own Device training + access to Device Security Center with step-by-step device-specific tutorials & registration forms for securing and documenting all personally owned & practice-provided devices (for *all* team members at no per-person cost) + assignable staff HIPAA Security Awareness: Remote Workspaces training for all team members + access to Remote Workspace Center with step-by-step tutorials & registration forms for securing and documenting Remote Workspaces (for *all* team members at no per-person cost) + more For Solo Practitioners: PCT's Telemental Health Certificate Program

Our previous episode: https://www.cruxinvestor.com/posts/us-resource-equities-poised-to-rally-on-permitting-changes-and-project-pipelines-6275Recording date: 24th March 2025Compass, Episode 9Gold and copper prices have reached or are approaching all-time highs, creating favorable conditions across the mining industry. This price environment is beginning to positively impact equity valuations, particularly for producers adding cash to their bottom line at these record commodity prices.A significant indicator of market cycle progression is the accelerating pace of mergers and acquisitions. The M&A trend has evolved from producer-to-producer transactions to producer-to-developer deals, representing a natural maturation in the mining cycle. Recent notable transactions include Calibre-Equinox, Gold Fields' offer for Gold Road, Spartan's acquisition by Ramelius, and Northern Star's purchase of De Grey.What's particularly noteworthy is the increasing scale of these deals, with several multi-billion dollar transactions resetting expectations for developer valuations. The Australian market appears to be leading this trend.Several cash-rich producers remain positioned to make acquisitions, including Lundin Gold, Dundee, Iamgold, Barrick, and Centerra. With gold at all-time highs, producers are experiencing improved cash flows, making acquisitions easier to justify.The current market conditions are especially advantageous for single-asset producers looking to diversify and grow into multi-asset, mid-tier companies. Companies like Lundin Gold and Torex can leverage their strong market capitalizations to acquire additional properties, following a path similar to B2 Gold in previous cycles.Jurisdiction has become increasingly important, with a growing emphasis on secure Western locations. Recent policy developments in North America are enhancing project attractiveness, with Trump signing an executive order to streamline US permitting and Canada's federal government reducing its role in the permitting process. Finland and Sweden also represent favorable jurisdictions with straightforward regulatory frameworks.Three companies highlighted as particularly well-positioned in this environment include Troilus (with 13+ million ounces of gold in Quebec), Arizona Sonora (a copper project in the US with Rio Tinto involvement), and Omai (a gold project showing resource growth potential).As the market matures, investors are advised to position themselves in promising developers and explorers ahead of broader capital flows. While some companies have already seen significant share price appreciation, quality projects in favorable jurisdictions with clear paths to production remain available at attractive valuations.The progression from producer-focused to developer-focused M&A signals a maturing bull market that should benefit quality development projects, creating opportunities for investors who can identify valuable assets before they're recognized by the broader market.Sign up for Crux Investor: https://cruxinvestor.com

Each month, a panel of constitutional experts convenes to discuss the Court’s upcoming docket sitting by sitting. The cases covered in this preview are listed below.Louisiana v. Callais (March 24) - Election law, Civil Rights; Issue(s): (1) Whether the majority of the three-judge district court in this case erred in finding that race predominated in the Louisiana legislature’s enactment of S.B. 8; (2) whether the majority erred in finding that S.B. 8 fails strict scrutiny; (3) whether the majority erred in subjecting S.B. 8 to the preconditions specified in Thornburg v. Gingles; and (4) whether this action is non-justiciable.Riley v. Bondi (March 24) - Immigration; Issue(s): (1) Whether 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(1)'s 30-day deadline is jurisdictional, or merely a mandatory claims-processing rule that can be waived or forfeited; and (2) whether a person can obtain review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' decision in a withholding-only proceeding by filing a petition within 30 days of that decision.Environmental Protection Agency v. Calumet Shreveport Refining (March 25) - Jurisdiction, Federalism & Separation of Powers; Issue(s): Whether venue for challenges by small oil refineries seeking exemptions from the requirements of the Clean Air Act’s Renewable Fuel Standard program lies exclusively in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit because the agency’s denial actions are “nationally applicable” or, alternatively, are “based on a determination of nationwide scope or effect.”Oklahoma v. Environmental Protection Agency (March 25) - Jurisdiction, Federalism & Separation of Powers; Issue(s): Whether a final action by the Environmental Protection Agency taken pursuant to its Clean Air Act authority with respect to a single state or region may be challenged only in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit because the agency published the action in the same Federal Register notice as actions affecting other states or regions and claimed to use a consistent analysis for all states.Federal Communications Commission v. Consumers’ Research (March 26) - Federalism & Separation of Powers; Issue(s): (1) Whether Congress violated the nondelegation doctrine by authorizing the Federal Communications Commission to determine, within the limits set forth in 47 U.S.C. § 254, the amount that providers must contribute to the Universal Service Fund; (2) whether the FCC violated the nondelegation doctrine by using the financial projections of the private company appointed as the fund's administrator in computing universal service contribution rates; (3) whether the combination of Congress’s conferral of authority on the FCC and the FCC’s delegation of administrative responsibilities to the administrator violates the nondelegation doctrine; and (4) whether this case is moot in light of the challengers' failure to seek preliminary relief before the 5th Circuit.Catholic Charities Bureau v. Wisconsin Labor & Industry Review Commission (March 31) - First Amendment, Religion; Issue(s): Whether a state violates the First Amendment’s religion clauses by denying a religious organization an otherwise-available tax exemption because the organization does not meet the state’s criteria for religious behavior.Rivers v. Guerrero (March 31) - Criminal Law & Procedure; Issue(s): Whether 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(2) applies only to habeas filings made after a prisoner has exhausted appellate review of his first petition, to all second-in-time habeas filings after final judgment, or to some second-in-time filings — depending on a prisoner’s success on appeal or ability to satisfy a seven-factor test.Fuld v. Palestine Liberation Organization (April 1) - Due Process, Fifth Amendment; Issue(s): Whether the Promoting Security and Justice for Victims of Terrorism Act violates the due process clause of the Fifth Amendment.Kerr v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic (April 2) - Medicare; Issue(s): Whether the Medicaid Act’s any-qualified-provider provision unambiguously confers a private right upon a Medicaid beneficiary to choose a specific provider. Featuring:Allison Daniel, Attorney, Pacific Legal FoundationErielle Davidson, Associate, Holtzman VogelJennifer B. Dickey, Deputy Chief Counsel, U.S. Chamber Litigation Center, U.S. Chamber of CommerceElizabeth A. Kiernan, Associate Attorney, Gibson, Dunn & CrutcherMorgan Ratner, Partner, Sullivan & Cromwell LLP(Moderator) Sarah Welch, Issues & Appeals Associate, Jones Day

We open the show with the topic of how the Left has organized itself to go after Tesla and seem to be okay with the idea of “by any means necessary.” Rep. Ro Khanna (D-CA) is a lone voice of sanity, saying destruction of property is wrong. Kevin O'Leary made the same comment, suggesting law-breakers need to be made into an example. Shermichael Singleton added that Gov. Tim Walz (D-MN) was acting like a moron to delight in Tesla stock dropping at the hands of their coordinated attacks. Rep. Dean Phillips (D-MN) was also disappointed in Walz and in the Democrat party. In the meantime, Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-TX) was on a Leftist video call with 100's, helping to coordinate simultaneous attacks on 500+ Tesla locations/targets on March 29. As a member of Congress, she said all she wanted for her birthday on that day was “for Elon Musk to be taken down.” We then look at the transcript of the hearing in Judge Boasberg's courtroom. Seems the DOJ was supposed to read his mind and should have known how he was going to rule before he even held the hearing. I guess it's cool now to admit he is a partisan, activist hack who does not care about the rule of law. On the flip side, Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller commented on how the Trump team, while constantly attacked with lawfare, have been sticking to the rule of law. AG Pam Bondi issued a statement saying that the removal of designated foreign terrorists is not under the purview of district court judges. WH Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt also discussed how it's been obvious how Democrats have been “judge shopping” in an effort to slow-walk the President's agenda. Gov. Ron DeSantis (R-FL) spent more time today illustrating how to resolve the issue with these activist judges. It's a great three minutes of history, current events and an application of the Constitution. Seems Mark Cuban was once all for the reduction of personnel and waste in the government. That was all the way back in 2017. We wonder what's changed so much since then? Unhinged and dangerous founder of The Lincoln Project, Rick Wilson has been banned from X for 30 days for promoting acts of violence and terror against Elon Musk. And we close with some wise words from Sen. John Kennedy (R-LA). Please take a moment to rate and review the show and then share the episode on social media. You can find me on Facebook, X, Instagram, GETTR and TRUTH Social by searching for The Alan Sanders Show. And, consider becoming a sponsor of the show by visiting my Patreon page!!

Welcome back to the Bar Exam Toolbox podcast! This is the first of three episodes in which we review the substantive Civil Procedure law we've covered in our "Listen and Learn" series. Today we're talking about jurisdiction, or the power of a court to try a matter.  In this episode, we discuss: Subject matter jurisdiction Personal jurisdiction Venue and forum non conveniens Exam strategy for jurisdiction issues Resources: Private Bar Exam Tutoring (https://barexamtoolbox.com/private-bar-exam-tutoring/) International Shoe Co. v. Washington, 326 U.S. 310 (1945) (https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/326/310/) Podcast Episode 92: Listen and Learn – Subject Matter Jurisdiction (https://barexamtoolbox.com/podcast-episode-92-listen-and-learn-subject-matter-jurisdiction/) Podcast Episode 169: Listen and Learn – Personal Jurisdiction (Civ Pro) (https://barexamtoolbox.com/podcast-episode-169-listen-and-learn-personal-jurisdiction-civ-pro/) Podcast Episode 180: Listen and Learn – Venue (Federal Civil Procedure) (https://barexamtoolbox.com/podcast-episode-180-listen-and-learn-venue-federal-civil-procedure/) Download the Transcript (https://barexamtoolbox.com/episode-304-spotlight-on-civil-procedure-part-1-jurisdiction/) If you enjoy the podcast, we'd love a nice review and/or rating on  Apple Podcasts (https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/bar-exam-toolbox-podcast-pass-bar-exam-less-stress/id1370651486) or your favorite listening app. And feel free to reach out to us directly. You can always reach us via the contact form on the Bar Exam Toolbox website (https://barexamtoolbox.com/contact-us/). Finally, if you don't want to miss anything, you can sign up for podcast updates (https://barexamtoolbox.com/get-bar-exam-toolbox-podcast-updates/)! Thanks for listening! Alison & Lee

In this episode, Wade and Tain discuss subject matter jurisdiction. The written outline, with citations, can be found at goodjudgepod.com.

3pm: Guest - Seattle City Attorney Ann Davison // Seattle joins multi-jurisdiction lawsuit against Trump admin // The City Attorney’s Office ads new staff positions for “Federal Response Team” // West Virginia's Rich Rodriguez… Bans Players From TikTok Dancing

Follow Dan on LinkedIn at linkedin.com/in/cotterdanFollow Pat on LinkedIn athttps://www.linkedin.com/in/donald-patrick-eckler-610290824/ Predictions Sure To Go Wrong: Sandifar: Reverse East Gate: Dsimiss Fergurson: ReverseIN SCt: https://mycourts.in.gov/arguments/default.aspx?&id=2963&view=detail&yr=&when=&page=1&court=sup&search=&direction=%20ASC&future=False&sort=&judge=&county=&admin=False&pageSize=20 IN Court of appeals:https://mycourts.in.gov/arguments/default.aspx?&id=2962&view=detail&yr=&when=&page=1&court=app&search=&direction=%20ASC&future=False&sort=&judge=&county=&admin=False&pageSize=207TH CIRCUIT CASE:https://media.ca7.uscourts.gov/sound/external/nv.24-2696.24-2696_02_10_2025.mp3

From The Archives: (12:23-22)There have been a lot of questions and comments about why the Moscow Police Department doesn't hand over the investigation to the FBI. In this episode, we are going to look at some of the reasons why that isn't feasible and why a local department like Moscow will be the lead agency in localized crimes, even when the FBI is involved.(commercial at 6:11)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Idaho murders: Former FBI special agent explains why federal agency hasn't taken over investigation | Fox News

We have been rescued from one kingdom to another

God has rescued us from the kingdom of darkness

Most people have no idea they've unknowingly signed themselves into government jurisdiction—but once you see it, you can't unsee it. In this episode, 9 Ether, a powerhouse of knowledge on legal sovereignty, exposes how the system keeps us bound and, more importantly, how to break free. 9 Ether reveals how U.S. citizenship is structured as a corporate contract, how the Constitution is used to control rather than protect, and why birth certificates, taxes, and social security numbers are not what you think they are. If you've ever questioned the system, this conversation will show you the path to true autonomy.For more information, visit lukestorey.com/soecourt or lukestorey.com/soedebt and use code LUKE to get $250 off. You can also go to lukestorey.com/soecommerce and use code LUKE for $50 off.DISCLAIMER: This podcast is for educational purposes only and not intended for diagnosing or treating illnesses. The hosts disclaim responsibility for any adverse effects from using the information presented. Consult your healthcare provider before using referenced products. This podcast may include paid endorsements.THIS SHOW IS BROUGHT TO YOU BY:BON CHARGE | Use the code LIFESTYLIST for 15% off at boncharge.com/lifestylist.QUANTUM UPGRADE | Get a 15-day free trial with code LUKE15 at lukestorey.com/quantumupgrade.PIQUE | For a limited time, get 15% off Nandaka + a free rechargeable frother and cup at piquelife.com/luke.BLUSHIELD | Use code LUKE to save 10% off your order at lukestorey.com/blushield.MORE ABOUT THIS EPISODE:(00:00:00) Introduction(00:00:08) How Light, Energy, & Law Shape Our Reality(00:15:28) Redefining Law & Natural Order(00:38:44) Decoding Government, Citizenship, & True Freedom(01:00:01) The Truth About Birth Certificates & Trusts(01:18:08) Navigating Legal Identity (01:34:20) Mastering Litigation, Debt Discharge, & Commercial Law(01:56:51) Rethinking Voting & Social Conditioning(02:16:44) The Power of Discernment Resources:• Website: livingsoe.comThe Life Stylist is produced by Crate Media.

Vincent and Joel sit down with guest, Molly Fortune, to discuss celebrating SC's role in winning the revolutionary war! They then speak with Representative, Brandon Newton, to discuss raising teacher pay, serving on Ways and Means committee, tax reform, national political scene, Nancy Mace's new controversy, and so much more! Hear about the new "freedom to read" bill, funding school vouchers with lottery money, direct sale of electric cars to consumers, accountability on government money, and the most important new bills in the works at the Statehouse. Get your latest Statehouse update and hear firsthand the rationale behind some of the legislature's most controversial bills. Join Senators Sheheen and Lourie in this week's episode where they take a deeper look at upcoming legislation and lawmakers' actions in S.C. Support the showKeep up to Date with BITBR: Twitter.com/BITBRpodcastFacebook.com/BITBRpodcasthttps://bourboninthebackroom.buzzsprout.com

The judiciary, originally intended as a neutral arbiter of the law, has become an activist institution that repeatedly undermines the executive and legislative branches, overriding the will of the people. Judges have weaponized their authority to block lawful executive orders, interfere in immigration enforcement, and manipulate election laws, effectively placing themselves above the elected government. This unchecked judicial overreach has turned courts into a de facto ruling class, vetoing  policies they personally agree with while allowing other agendas to advance unchallenged. The Constitution grants Congress the power to regulate federal court jurisdiction under Article III, Section 2, allowing lawmakers to strip courts of the ability to hear cases where they have clearly overstepped their authority. By invoking this power, Congress can restore the proper balance between the branches of government, ensuring that the judiciary does not continue to function as a super-legislature with no accountability to the people.Jurisdiction stripping is not an attack on the judiciary but rather a constitutional safeguard against judicial tyranny. Courts are not meant to dictate national policy or obstruct elected leaders from governing within their constitutional authority. By removing federal courts' jurisdiction over immigration, election integrity, religious liberty, and executive orders, Congress can ensure that policy decisions remain in the hands of the people's elected representatives, not unelected judges with ideological agendas. If the courts can override the President's ability to enforce the law and Congress's ability to pass legislation, then elections become meaningless, and the judiciary becomes the ultimate power in the land. Jurisdiction stripping restores democratic control by ensuring that the judiciary is bound by the Constitution and prevented from overstepping its role. Without this action, the courts will continue to function as a political weapon, blocking lawful governance while shielding  policies of  people who share their ideological bend from legal challenges. The Constitution was designed to prevent any one branch from becoming too powerful, and jurisdiction stripping is the necessary tool to return the judiciary to its intended, limited role as an interpreter of the law—not its maker.In this episode, we take a look at the power that congress holds to reign this in.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

The judiciary, originally intended as a neutral arbiter of the law, has become an activist institution that repeatedly undermines the executive and legislative branches, overriding the will of the people. Judges have weaponized their authority to block lawful executive orders, interfere in immigration enforcement, and manipulate election laws, effectively placing themselves above the elected government. This unchecked judicial overreach has turned courts into a de facto ruling class, vetoing  policies they personally agree with while allowing other agendas to advance unchallenged. The Constitution grants Congress the power to regulate federal court jurisdiction under Article III, Section 2, allowing lawmakers to strip courts of the ability to hear cases where they have clearly overstepped their authority. By invoking this power, Congress can restore the proper balance between the branches of government, ensuring that the judiciary does not continue to function as a super-legislature with no accountability to the people.Jurisdiction stripping is not an attack on the judiciary but rather a constitutional safeguard against judicial tyranny. Courts are not meant to dictate national policy or obstruct elected leaders from governing within their constitutional authority. By removing federal courts' jurisdiction over immigration, election integrity, religious liberty, and executive orders, Congress can ensure that policy decisions remain in the hands of the people's elected representatives, not unelected judges with ideological agendas. If the courts can override the President's ability to enforce the law and Congress's ability to pass legislation, then elections become meaningless, and the judiciary becomes the ultimate power in the land. Jurisdiction stripping restores democratic control by ensuring that the judiciary is bound by the Constitution and prevented from overstepping its role. Without this action, the courts will continue to function as a political weapon, blocking lawful governance while shielding  policies of  people who share their ideological bend from legal challenges. The Constitution was designed to prevent any one branch from becoming too powerful, and jurisdiction stripping is the necessary tool to return the judiciary to its intended, limited role as an interpreter of the law—not its maker.In this episode, we take a look at the power that congress holds to reign this in.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In the Gaming Hut beloved Patreon backer Joshua Randall seeks tips on setting up a new campaign for success. Our latest Ken and/or Robin Talk to Someone Else segment features Ken's chat with Daniel Harms, author of The Encyclopedia Cthulhiana  and editor of the definitive edition of the 19th century American grimoire The Long-Lost Friend. […]

From birthright citizenship to an analysis of reasonable doubt, Trey answers questions on the latest legal headlines.   Later, Trey and Mary Langston recount their time on Capitol Hill.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices