Podcasts about Jurisdiction

A Massachusetts bill has been introduced that would raise the age of Juvenile Court jurisdiction from 18 to 21 years old. Proponents of the bill argue that the brain doesn’t fully develop until around the age of 24 or 25. Rather than be tried and sentenced in the state’s adult criminal system, juvenile offenders would instead be provided with access to mental health and behavioral programming. Do you support or oppose this bill? Rep. James O’Day, one of the bill’s sponsors, checked in to discuss!See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In the case Does 1-6 vs. Gov. John de Jongh, Jr., et al., the defense counsel for Gov. John de Jongh, Jr. submitted a supplemental briefing in compliance with the court's order to address topics discussed during a prior conference and highlight relevant cases or arguments raised by both parties. While primarily focusing on venue-related arguments, the defendant also joins and incorporates the arguments made by co-defendants in their respective submissions. The defense reiterates its position that the Second Amended Complaint (SAC) should be dismissed based on prior arguments made by the defendant and co-defendants.Should the SAC not be dismissed, including for reasons of improper venue, the defense asserts that the case should be transferred to the District of the Virgin Islands (D.V.I.), where it would be more appropriately handled.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.178.0.pdf

Hot take time. We're rewatching Star Trek: Enterprise Season 1, Episode 10 — “Fortunate Son.” LeVar Burton directs a tense Nausicaan revenge story that pits Boomer freighters against Starfleet ethics. Did Archer overstep? Did Travis Mayweather finally get a real character episode—or did the show fumble it?In this TREKNOPOD review, Shoff, Captain Linda, and Vactor debate:• Jurisdiction & authority over civilian ships• Revenge vs restraint (is Ryan justified?)• Boomer culture vs Starfleet ideals• The morality of kidnapping/torture to stop raids• Whether Mayweather was elevated… or sidelined againWe also shout out LeVar Burton's direction, the Nausicaans' legacy (TNG's “Tapestry,” dom-jot!), and some fun production notes.Tell us your verdict: Is “Fortunate Son” underrated, or the season's first real miss?#StarTrek #StarTrekEnterprise #TrekPodcast #Nausicaans #LeVarBurton

In the case Does 1-6 vs. Gov. John de Jongh, Jr., et al., the defense counsel for Gov. John de Jongh, Jr. submitted a supplemental briefing in compliance with the court's order to address topics discussed during a prior conference and highlight relevant cases or arguments raised by both parties. While primarily focusing on venue-related arguments, the defendant also joins and incorporates the arguments made by co-defendants in their respective submissions. The defense reiterates its position that the Second Amended Complaint (SAC) should be dismissed based on prior arguments made by the defendant and co-defendants.Should the SAC not be dismissed, including for reasons of improper venue, the defense asserts that the case should be transferred to the District of the Virgin Islands (D.V.I.), where it would be more appropriately handled.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.178.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In the case Does 1-6 vs. Gov. John de Jongh, Jr., et al., the defense counsel for Gov. John de Jongh, Jr. submitted a supplemental briefing in compliance with the court's order to address topics discussed during a prior conference and highlight relevant cases or arguments raised by both parties. While primarily focusing on venue-related arguments, the defendant also joins and incorporates the arguments made by co-defendants in their respective submissions. The defense reiterates its position that the Second Amended Complaint (SAC) should be dismissed based on prior arguments made by the defendant and co-defendants.Should the SAC not be dismissed, including for reasons of improper venue, the defense asserts that the case should be transferred to the District of the Virgin Islands (D.V.I.), where it would be more appropriately handled.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.178.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The Working Tools Podcast https://youtu.be/vkPTCPC7G4AJoin the Working Tools Podcast Team; WB Steven Chung, VWB David Colbeth, VWB Matthew Appel and Br Craig Graham as we talk with MWB Antonio Graham Grand Master Prince Hall of WA and Jurisdiction Part 2 S07 E35MOST WORSHIPFUL PRINCE HALL GRAND LODGE, F&AM WASHINGTON & JURISDICTIONhttps://www.mwphglwa.org/ORDER OF THE KNIGHTS OF PYTHAGORAShttps://www.kopknights.org/WILLIAM H. UPTON MEMORIAL CEREMONYSEATTLE TIMES ARTICLEhttps://archive.seattletimes.com/archive/19910616/1289382/headstone-placed-on-grave-of-mason-who-was-ahead-of-his-timeVIDEO https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k7V5C9gDcMMPlease consider supporting the show with a small monthly donation:https://creators.spotify.com/pod/profile/theworkingtoolspodcast/subscribeOur Website:http://www.TheWorkingToolsPodcast.comFollow us on Facebook!http://Facebook.TheWorkingToolsPodcast.comSPOTIFY: http://Spotify.TheWorkingToolsPodcast.comiTunes: http://itunes.TheWorkingToolsPodcast.comDISCLAIMER: Our opinions are our own, and do not reflect the opinions or stances of the various Grand Lodges or regular Lodges around the world.Freemasonry, Free masonry, Free mason, Mason, MasonicDISCLAIMER: Our opinions are our own, and do not reflect the opinions or stances of the various Grand Lodges or regular Lodges around the world.

Marcus Büsler joins us to break down why he thinks the gold bull market still has room to run, and how $4,000 gold could reshape the mining sector.We get into what's really driving this move, central bank buying, and why he's shifting from producers into junior miners right now. Marcus also shares how he's positioning through this correction and where he sees the biggest opportunities.------------Thank you to our #sponsor, FIRST MAJESTIC SILVER. Make sure to pay them a visit: https://www.firstmajestic.com/------------

     Slam The Gavel welcomes new guest, Anthony Perez. Anthony was raised in a small town in Idaho by his Aunt and Uncle and then joined the military from 1995-1998 and received an Honorable Discharge. From there he received a Paralegal Degree from an American Bar accredited school.      Anthony had been fighting with two different states, Idaho and California, on Child Support involving the SAME child and the excuse was that,"we didn't have JURISDICTION."    Working closely with Mark Ludwig for equal shared parenting, Anthony discussed his journey through family court, false allegations and how important it is for the child to have two parents. Co-parenting/shared parenting is vital to the child's emotional development. Not a podcast to be missed!To Reach Anthony Perez:  Facebook Anthony Michael Perez and National Council For Equal Shared Parenting (Mark Ludwig)Supportshow(https://www.buymeacoffee.com/maryannpetri)Maryann Petri: dismantlingfamilycourtcorruption.comhttps://www.tiktok.com/@maryannpetriFacebook:  https://www.youtube.com/@slamthegavelpodcasthostmar5536Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/guitarpeace/Pinterest: Slam The Gavel Podcast/@guitarpeaceLinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/maryann-petri-62a46b1ab/  YouTube:  https://www.youtube.com/@slamthegavelpodcasthostmar5536  Twitter https://x.com/PetriMaryannEzlegalsuit.com   https://ko-fi.com/maryannpetrihttps://www.zazzle.com/store/slam_the_gavel/about*DISCLAIMER* The use of this information is at the viewer/user's own risk. For information only and no affiliation with legislation, bills or laws. Not financial, medical nor legal advice as the content on this podcast does not constitute legal, financial, medical or any other professional advice. Viewer/user's should consult with the relevant professionals. Reproduction, distribution, performing, publicly displaying and making a derivative of the work is explicitly prohibited without permission from content creator. Podcast is protected by owner. The content creator maintains the exclusive right and any unauthorized copyright.Support the showSupportshow(https://www.buymeacoffee.com/maryannpetri)http://www.dismantlingfamilycourtcorruption.com/

What happens when justice hits a jurisdictional wall?In this episode, I sit down with Jerome Lucero, former police chief and three-time governor of the Pueblo of Zia tribe to unpack the tangled web of tribal law enforcement, federal oversight and the devastating consequences of legal fragmentation on Indigenous lands.From the landmark Supreme Court decisions in United States v. Cooley and McGirt v. Oklahoma to a haunting case of one of New Mexico's top fugitives being able to roam freely on tribal lands, Jerome shares firsthand insights into how sovereignty victories can both empower and complicate justice.-Submit your question or express interest in joining the 2025 Listeners Episode here: https://forms.gle/yf9aRU7BokGUTAFj6Contact me at silverliningshandbookpod@gmail.comCheck out the Silver Linings Handbook website at:https://silverliningshandbook.com/Check out our Patreon to support the show at:https://www.patreon.com/thesilverliningshandbookJoin our Facebook Group at:https://www.facebook.com/groups/1361159947820623Visit the Silver Linings Handbook store to support the podcast at:https://www.bonfire.com/store/the-silver-linings-handbook-podcast-storeVisit The True Crime Times Substack at:https://truecrimemessenger.substack.comThe Silver Linings Handbook podcast is a part of the ART19 network. ART19 is a subsidiary of Wondery and Amazon Music.See the Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and the California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

 Apostolic Ranking And Jurisdiction by Apostle Joseph Mintah in the series the Ministry System of the Believer 

Understanding Subject Matter Jurisdiction: A Key to Navigating Federal CourtsThis conversation delves into the complexities of subject matter jurisdiction (SMJ) in federal courts, emphasizing its foundational importance for legal exams and practice. The discussion covers federal question jurisdiction, diversity jurisdiction, supplemental jurisdiction, and the removal process, providing insights into key rules and exceptions that govern these areas. The speakers aim to equip listeners with a structured analysis to navigate jurisdictional issues effectively, highlighting the critical distinctions and procedural nuances that can impact case outcomes.Subject Matter Jurisdiction (SMJ) is a fundamental concept in the legal world, especially for those preparing for exams like the bar or Civ Pro finals. It's the gatekeeper to the federal court system, determining whether a court has the authority to hear a particular type of case. Understanding SMJ is crucial, as a misstep can lead to a case being dismissed outright.Federal Question Jurisdiction: One of the primary ways to establish SMJ is through federal question jurisdiction, which applies to cases arising under the Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States. The well-pleaded complaint rule is central here, requiring that the federal issue be a necessary element of the plaintiff's claim. The landmark case of Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Motley illustrates this principle, emphasizing that anticipated defenses do not suffice to establish federal jurisdiction.Diversity Jurisdiction: Another pathway into federal court is diversity jurisdiction, which requires complete diversity of citizenship between parties and an amount in controversy exceeding $75,000. This jurisdictional basis aims to protect out-of-state litigants from potential local bias. However, the rules are strict, with complete diversity being a non-negotiable requirement.Supplemental Jurisdiction: Supplemental jurisdiction allows federal courts to hear additional state law claims related to a case already under federal jurisdiction. This is governed by Section 1367, which codifies older doctrines like pendant and ancillary jurisdiction. However, in diversity-only cases, Section 1367B imposes limitations to prevent plaintiffs from circumventing the complete diversity requirement.Removal and Remand: The process of moving a case from state to federal court is known as removal, a tool available exclusively to defendants. The rules are stringent, with a 30-day deadline for filing a notice of removal and a one-year cap for diversity cases. The forum defendant rule further restricts removal in diversity cases if any defendant is a citizen of the state where the action is pending.Navigating the intricacies of subject matter jurisdiction is essential for legal practitioners. By understanding the pathways and limitations of federal question and diversity jurisdiction, as well as the nuances of supplemental jurisdiction and removal, one can effectively maneuver through the federal court system. For those preparing for exams, mastering these concepts is key to success.Subscribe now to stay updated on more legal insights and deepen your understanding of complex legal topics.TakeawaysSMJ is crucial for federal court access.Federal courts have limited jurisdiction defined by the Constitution and Congress.The well-pleaded complaint rule is essential for federal question jurisdiction.Diversity jurisdiction requires complete diversity and an amount in controversy exceeding $75,000.The Grable exception allows state law claims with significant federal issues to be heard in federal court.Supplemental jurisdiction allows related claims to be heard together in federal court.Subject Matter Jurisdiction, SMJ, Federal Question, Diversity Jurisdiction, Supplemental Jurisdiction, Removal Process, Legal Exam Tips, Civil Procedure, Federal Courts, Jurisdictional Analysis

In this episode, Jason Gottlieb, Chair of Morrison Cohen's Digital Assets Department and White Collar & Regulatory Enforcement Practice Group, breaks down the litigation trends shaping crypto today.Timestamps:➡️ 0:44 — Why litigation is shifting from regulators to private disputes➡️ 3:37 — Statute of limitations: the five-year vs. ten-year reality➡️ 8:14 — Inside the revamped Morrison Cohen Crypto Litigation Tracker➡️ 12:41 — How judges are learning (and misunderstanding) crypto➡️ 18:03 — The importance of amicus briefs in crypto cases➡️ 20:52 — Stablecoin-freezing disputes and why issuers keep getting dragged in➡️ 26:41 — Jurisdiction battles: extraterritoriality, comity & serving by NFTSponsor: Day One Law, a boutique corporate law firm founded by Nick Pullman. Nick and his team at Day One provide strategic legal counsel to startups, crypto projects, and Web3 innovators. ⁠You can get in contact with them via this link⁠: https://www.dayonelaw.xyz/#contactResources: Morrison Cohen Crypto Litigation Tracker: cryptotracker.morrisoncohen.comDisclaimer: Jacob Robinson and his guests are not your lawyer. Nothing herein or mentioned on the Law of Code podcast should be construed as legal advice. The material published is intended for informational, educational, and entertainment purposes only. Please seek the advice of counsel, and do not apply any of the generalized material to your individual facts or circumstances without speaking to an attorney.

The Working Tools Podcast https://youtu.be/cj1kmw1O3HwJoin the Working Tools Podcast Team; WB Steven Chung, VWB David Colbeth, VWB Matthew Appel and Br Craig Graham as we talk with MWB Antonio Graham Grand Master Prince Hall of WA and Jurisdiction Part 1 S07 E34MOST WORSHIPFUL PRINCE HALL GRAND LODGE, F&AM WASHINGTON & JURISDICTIONhttps://www.mwphglwa.org/ORDER OF THE KNIGHTS OF PYTHAGORAShttps://www.kopknights.org/WILLIAM H. UPTON MEMORIAL CEREMONYSEATTLE TIMES ARTICLEhttps://archive.seattletimes.com/archive/19910616/1289382/headstone-placed-on-grave-of-mason-who-was-ahead-of-his-timeVIDEO https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k7V5C9gDcMMPlease consider supporting the show with a small monthly donation:https://creators.spotify.com/pod/profile/theworkingtoolspodcast/subscribeOur Website:http://www.TheWorkingToolsPodcast.comFollow us on Facebook!http://Facebook.TheWorkingToolsPodcast.comSPOTIFY: http://Spotify.TheWorkingToolsPodcast.comiTunes: http://itunes.TheWorkingToolsPodcast.comDISCLAIMER: Our opinions are our own, and do not reflect the opinions or stances of the various Grand Lodges or regular Lodges around the world.Freemasonry, Free masonry, Free mason, Mason, MasonicDISCLAIMER: Our opinions are our own, and do not reflect the opinions or stances of the various Grand Lodges or regular Lodges around the world.

Navigating the Complexities of Civil Procedure: Jurisdiction and VenueThis conversation provides a comprehensive overview of civil procedure, focusing on the essential elements needed to navigate the complexities of lawsuits in America. It covers the foundational concepts of subject matter jurisdiction, personal jurisdiction, and venue, along with the importance of pleadings, joinder, summary judgment, and the Erie doctrine. The discussion emphasizes the procedural traps and analytical frameworks necessary for success in civil procedure exams and practice.In the intricate world of civil procedure, understanding the foundational elements of jurisdiction and venue is crucial for any aspiring lawyer. These concepts are not just academic exercises; they are the keys to unlocking the courtroom doors.The Three Keys to the CourthouseImagine the courthouse as a fortress with three locked doors: subject matter jurisdiction, personal jurisdiction, and venue. Each door requires a unique key, and they must be unlocked in a specific order. Subject matter jurisdiction determines the court's power over the type of case, personal jurisdiction assesses the court's authority over the defendant, and venue ensures the trial is held in the most appropriate location.Subject Matter Jurisdiction: The First GateFederal courts, unlike their state counterparts, are courts of limited jurisdiction. They can only hear cases authorized by the Constitution or Congress. The two main pathways into federal court are federal question jurisdiction, where the plaintiff's claim is based on federal law, and diversity jurisdiction, involving parties from different states with a dispute exceeding $75,000.Personal Jurisdiction: Fairness and Due ProcessPersonal jurisdiction is rooted in the due process clause, ensuring fairness to the defendant. The landmark case of International Shoe introduced the concept of "minimum contacts," shifting the focus from physical presence to the defendant's actions and intentions within the state.Venue: The Final StepVenue is about convenience and geography, determining the most logical courthouse for the trial. Governed by statutory rules, venue is typically proper where any defendant resides or where a substantial part of the events occurred.The Evolving LandscapeAs the legal landscape evolves, particularly with the rise of the internet, the application of these rules continues to be a dynamic and challenging area of law. Understanding and mastering these procedural elements is essential for success in both exams and practice.Subscribe Now to stay updated on the latest insights and developments in civil procedure.TakeawaysCivil procedure is a step-by-step logic puzzle.Subject matter jurisdiction (SMJ) is crucial for any case.Personal jurisdiction (PJ) focuses on fairness to the defendant.Venue is about convenience and geographic location.Pleadings must meet specific standards to survive motions to dismiss.Joinder rules allow for efficient litigation of related claims.Summary judgment can resolve cases before trial if no material facts are in dispute.The Erie doctrine determines which law applies in federal diversity cases.Preclusion doctrines prevent relitigation of claims and issues.Understanding these concepts is essential for success in civil procedure.Civil Procedure, Subject Matter Jurisdiction, Personal Jurisdiction, Venue, Pleadings, Joinder, Summary Judgment, Erie Doctrine, Preclusion

Mike & Dave debate who has kitchen jurisdiction while cooking Thanksgiving dinner. The guys dine on herb crusted rock fish served with a 2022 Anderson Valley 'Breggo' chardonnay. Also on the menu: the marketing geniuses at Omaha Steaks, Dave's fave in Scottsdale and who is Budapest Joey? See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Vincent and Joel sit down LIVE from the CoverSC conference with J. J. Gentry Senior Lawyer for the Ethics Committee to talk about his push for lung cancer awareness, Guest Senator Russell Ott to discuss statehouse updates and his recent election, and Guest, consultant Walter Whetsell, to discuss lobbying, consulting, and campaigns in South Carolina, along with the Coverage Gap and how CoverSC is trying to help South Carolinians. Hear Bourbon Briefs where the Senators go over the latest Nancy Mace controversy, Senator Climer's lawsuit against the general assembly, Special Election victory for Lee Bright in Spartanburg Senate, congressional gerrymandering, Jermaine Johnson's gubernatorial candidacy, and other exciting news!Get your latest Statehouse update and hear firsthand the rationale behind some of the legislature's most controversial bills. Join Senators Sheheen and Lourie in this week's episode where they take a deeper look at upcoming legislation and lawmakers' actions in S.C.   Support the showKeep up to Date with BITBR: Twitter.com/BITBRpodcastFacebook.com/BITBRpodcasthttps://bourboninthebackroom.buzzsprout.com

Full audio of the Supreme Court oral argument in Hain Celestial Group v. Palmquist (No. 24-724), argued November 4, 2025. In this case, the Justices examine whether a federal appellate court must vacate a district court's final judgment when it later concludes the case was improperly removed because a non-diverse defendant was wrongly dismissed at the outset—pitting strict jurisdictional rules against the need for finality in complex product-liability litigation. Hear counsel and the Court test the limits of Caterpillar v. Lewis, diversity jurisdiction, and what happens when federal courts try to fix their mistakes after the fact. Check out the official Crime Talk merch at the Crime Talk Store: scottreisch.com/crime-talk-store. #HainCelestial #SCOTUS #SupremeCourt #OralArgument #DiversityJurisdiction #CrimeTalk

    Slam The Gavel welcomes back Jamie Logan from Massachusetts. She was last on the podcast Season 5, Episode 175. Jamie's children were staying with her in Massachusetts for the past 11 months, however Colorado ruled the custody to the father BEFORE the findings of the UCCJEA (Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act) came out.      Jamie is sharing the TRANSCRIPT of the Body Cam footage or her minor child. What happened on 9/24/2025, a terrified teen walked into the Colorado, Erie Police Department asking for help and safety. Instead of protection, he encountered a system that dismissed his fear, minimized his injuries and blamed HIM for defending himself. The police normalized it, while the police sergeant reframed a child's panic and pleas for help as "normal discipline."     "Everything I've shared in this episode is based on the Colorado Erie Police Department body-camera recordings from September 24, 2025. These are my opinions and my reflections on what those recordings show.I'm sharing my story so people understand what families go through when the system fails to listen to a child." States Jamie Logan.To Reach Jamie Logan: jlmama952@gmail.comSupportshow(https://www.buymeacoffee.com/maryannpetri)Maryann Petri: dismantlingfamilycourtcorruption.comhttps://www.tiktok.com/@maryannpetriFacebook:  https://www.youtube.com/@slamthegavelpodcasthostmar5536Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/guitarpeace/Pinterest: Slam The Gavel Podcast/@guitarpeaceLinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/maryann-petri-62a46b1ab/  YouTube:  https://www.youtube.com/@slamthegavelpodcasthostmar5536  Twitter https://x.com/PetriMaryannEzlegalsuit.com   https://ko-fi.com/maryannpetrihttps://www.zazzle.com/store/slam_the_gavel/about*DISCLAIMER* The use of this information is at the viewer/user's own risk. For information only and no affiliation with legislation, bills or laws. Not financial, medical nor legal advice as the content on this podcast does not constitute legal, financial, medical or any other professional advice. Viewer/user's should consult with the relevant professionals. Reproduction, distribution, performing, publicly displaying and making a derivative of the work is explicitly prohibited without permission from content creator. Podcast is protected by owner. The content creator maintains the exclusive right and any unauthorized copyright.Support the showSupportshow(https://www.buymeacoffee.com/maryannpetri)http://www.dismantlingfamilycourtcorruption.com/

In this episode of Mining Stock Daily, Ian Wagner interviews Greg McCunn, CEO of Great Pacific Gold, providing a corporate update on their projects in Papua New Guinea, particularly focusing on the Kesar and Wild Dog projects. The conversation covers recent drilling results, future plans, and the regulatory environment in Papua New Guinea, highlighting the company's strategic positioning and potential for growth.TakeawaysGreat Pacific Gold is focused on gold and copper exploration in Papua New Guinea.The Kessar project has shown promising drilling results and is strategically located near profitable mines.Wild Dog is the flagship project with significant high-grade results and ongoing drilling.Analysts are impressed by the scale and potential of the Wild Dog project during site visits.The company has a large land package with excellent infrastructure support.Papua New Guinea offers a favorable regulatory framework for mining operations.Great Pacific Gold is fully funded for its 2026 drilling program.A spin-out of the Walhalla asset is expected to provide additional value to shareholders.Investors can anticipate accelerated drilling results from Wild Dog in the coming months.The company is well-positioned for future growth with a strong cash position.Sound bites"There is just incredible potential.""It's a great place to build a mine.""Investors can look forward to that."Chapters00:00 Introduction to Great Pacific Gold00:28 Kessar Project Update04:33 Wild Dog Project Insights11:19 Infrastructure and Jurisdiction in Papua New Guinea14:29 Future Outlook for Great Pacific Gold

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Broadcaster Sean Plunket isn't going down without a fight, as our broadcasting watchdog claims jurisdiction over his online-only company The Platform. The Broadcasting Standards Authority received a complaint from a member of the public - after the broadcaster described Māori tikanga as 'mumbo jumbo'. Sean Plunket says the BSA has 'messed this up' - and it's likely this complaint will never see the light of day. LISTEN ABOVESee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The Broadcasting Standards Authority (BSA) has issued a provisional decision claiming jurisdiction over a complaint about an online radio show. They said that the complaint fits their formal definition and requirements, meaning that they have to act. Chief Executive of the Broadcasting Standards Authority Stacey Wood told Mike Hosking that the BSA had long been debating expanding the boundaries of their jurisdiction. ‘Transmission of a programme by means of telecommunication includes the internet.' LISTEN ABOVESee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Radhika Das, IFN Journalist, interviews Adam Knight and Nancy Chien from Bedell Cristin, on the Jersey jurisdiction's Shariah compliant structuring appeal, its role in Sukuk and SPV innovation and rising demand from Islamic private wealth clients

Send us fan responses! Discover the hidden commercial framework behind our legal system and how understanding this structure can transform your approach to court proceedings. This eye-opening conversation reveals strategies used by entities like Disney, who leveraged the "Royal Lives Clause" to challenge tax obligations, and how similar approaches might be applied to personal legal matters.The speakers dive deep into court jurisdiction challenges, explaining the critical difference between appearing "pro se" versus "sui juris" and why this distinction matters. They outline practical steps for responding to court summons, including filing affidavits rather than motions, demanding delegation of authority from judges, and properly handling court communications. The conversation illuminates how judgments become securities that are bundled and sold as bonds, revealing the financial instruments generated through court cases.Perhaps most valuable is their breakdown of how to establish oneself as "foreign" to a jurisdiction by declaring state nationality and registering one's name as a business entity. This approach creates separation between the individual and what they describe as the "corporate fiction" that courts attempt to address. The speakers share specific documents to file, including letters of rogatory, certificates of identity, and fee schedules, all designed to establish that courts must prove their jurisdiction before proceedings can continue.Whether you're facing legal challenges or simply want to understand the commercial foundations of our court systems, this conversation provides rare insights into navigating legal proceedings from a position of knowledge rather than fear. Take control of your legal standing by learning how to properly challenge jurisdiction, respond to identification questions, and understand the true nature of what's happening when you enter a courtroom.https://donkilam.com FOLLOW THE YELLOW BRICK ROAD - DON KILAMGO GET HIS BOOK ON AMAZON NOW! https://www.amazon.com/Cant-Touch-This-Diplomatic-Immunity/dp/B09X1FXMNQ https://open.spotify.com/track/5QOUWyNahqcWvQ4WQAvwjj?autoplay=trueSupport the showhttps://donkilam.com

We're joined by Brien Lundin, editor of Gold Newsletter and host of the upcoming New Orleans Investment Conference (Nov 2–5). Shad and I will both be attending, and we hope to see many of you there as well. Brien shares his insights on the remarkable run in precious metals equities and where opportunities still remain, from development-stage “optionality plays” to the surge in exploration success stories. Key discussion points: Optionality plays: Once trading at $10/oz in the ground, many have rerated to $30–$50/oz. But history shows they've commanded $100-$300/oz in prior cycles. M&A may drive the next leg higher. Exploration upside: A wave of strong drill results, including standout discoveries like Prospector Metals in the Yukon, fueled by years of careful groundwork during leaner times. Financing boom: Juniors raising capital at unprecedented levels, often without warrants - creating both opportunity and caution around free-trading share overhangs. Strategic investments: Producers like Centerra Gold are increasingly backing juniors, bringing capital, technical expertise, and long-term support. Jurisdiction focus: Safe, established regions (Canada, Nevada, Yukon) are attracting the most capital and generating the most discoveries. Stocks & themes discussed: Prospector Metals (TSX.V:PPP - OTCQB:PMUSP), Centerra Gold (TSX:CG - NYSE:CGAU).   Click here to learn more about the New Orleans Investment Conference on November 2-5. ----------- For more market commentary & interview summaries, subscribe to our Substacks: https://kereport.substack.com/ https://excelsiorprosperity.substack.com/ Investment disclaimer: This content is for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, an offer, or a solicitation to buy or sell any security. Investing in equities and commodities involves risk, including the possible loss of principal. Do your own research and consult a licensed financial advisor before making any investment decisions. Guests and hosts may own shares in companies mentioned.

Constitutional Deep Dive: Article 3 - Section 2 - Part 3: Federal Jurisdiction Conversations centered around the American Experiment and our Constitution and Bill of Rights! Our goal is to provide different perspectives - give historical context - model how to talk with those whom we may disagree with - tie foundational principals to today's headlines - PLUS, have some fun along the way. Please leave us a review and share with your friends! (A PODCAST PROVIDED AND OWNED BY DURING THE BREAK PODCASTS) Brought to you by Eric Buchanan and Associates: www.buchanandisability.com This podcast is hosted by ZenCast.fm

Constitutional Deep Dive: Article 3 - Section 2 - Jurisdiction Over Federal Issues! Conversations centered around the American Experiment and our Constitution and Bill of Rights! Our goal is to provide different perspectives - give historical context - model how to talk with those whom we may disagree with - tie foundational principals to today's headlines - PLUS, have some fun along the way. Please leave us a review and share with your friends! (A PODCAST PROVIDED AND OWNED BY DURING THE BREAK PODCASTS) Brought to you by Eric Buchanan and Associates: www.buchanandisability.com This podcast is hosted by ZenCast.fm

Joel sits down with respected political Journalists Maayan Schechter and Jeff Collins to discuss their backgrounds in South Carolina, how they got into journalism, trends they see in political reporting, and to cover a wide range of HOT South Carolina political updates - including the death penalty, the gubernatorial race, ports authority, an in-depth breakdown of what to expect in the coming years of elections and policy, and more! Hear insiders whose full-time job is to track South Carolina politics give a deep dive into how our State's most contested races are looking to unfold. Join Senators Sheheen and Lourie in this week's episode where they take a deeper look at upcoming legislation and lawmakers' actions in S.C.  Support the showKeep up to Date with BITBR: Twitter.com/BITBRpodcastFacebook.com/BITBRpodcasthttps://bourboninthebackroom.buzzsprout.com

September 19, 2025Liana Garcia, Director of Government Affairs for the Arizona Supreme CourtHon. Charles Adornetto, Wickenburg Town MagistrateMaterials: https://onedrive.live.com/?authkey=%21AF3leE2px5b4PfE&id=9CE85FB54FDEDE40%2191340&cid=9CE85FB54FDEDE40Youtube:https://youtu.be/uKSss9uCPzA

The conflict playing out at Northern Cheyenne Tribal Headquarters began months ago, when President Gene Small attempted to get the tribal council to initiate a financial audit of more than $90 million it was awarded by the federal government through […] The post Funding, Jurisdiction, Transparency at Heart of No. Cheyenne Conflict first appeared on Voices of Montana.

This conversation provides a comprehensive overview of civil procedure, focusing on the critical concepts of jurisdiction, including personal and subject matter jurisdiction, venue, and the implications of landmark cases like Ford v. Montana. It emphasizes the importance of understanding procedural rules for effective legal practice and exam success, while also exploring the roles of due process, jurisdictional discovery, long arm statutes, and the nuances of removal jurisdiction and forum non-convenience.Imagine you're in a courtroom, the air thick with anticipation. The judge is about to make a ruling that could change lives. But what guides this process? The answer lies in the fundamentals of civil procedure and jurisdiction, the backbone of our legal system.The Role of Civil Procedure: Civil procedure is the framework that governs how civil cases are processed in court. It ensures fairness and consistency, providing a structured path from the initial filing to the final verdict. As legal expert Jane Doe states, "Civil procedure is the rulebook that ensures justice is served efficiently and equitably."Understanding Jurisdiction: Jurisdiction refers to a court's authority to hear a case. It determines which court will preside over a matter, based on factors like location and subject matter. John Smith, a seasoned attorney, explains, "Jurisdiction is crucial because it sets the stage for where and how a case will be heard."The fundamentals of civil procedure and jurisdiction are essential for maintaining order and fairness in the legal system. They ensure that every case is handled with the same level of scrutiny and justice. Understanding these concepts is key for anyone navigating the legal landscape.Subscribe Now: Stay informed about the intricacies of the legal world. Subscribe now for more insights and updates.TakeawaysUnderstanding where to sue is fundamental to legal cases.Civil procedure is the operating manual for courts.Personal jurisdiction is rooted in the 14th Amendment's Due Process Clause.Due process requires notice and an opportunity to be heard.Jurisdictional discovery is crucial for establishing personal jurisdiction.Federal courts have limited jurisdiction defined by the Constitution.Diversity jurisdiction requires complete diversity and an amount in controversy over $75,000.Supplemental jurisdiction allows related claims to be heard in federal court.Removal jurisdiction allows defendants to move cases from state to federal court.Forum non-convenience can lead to dismissal if a more appropriate forum exists.civil procedure, jurisdiction, personal jurisdiction, subject matter jurisdiction, venue, due process, Ford v. Montana, jurisdictional discovery, long arm statutes, removal jurisdiction, forum non-convenience

This conversation delves into the complexities of conflict of laws, focusing on jurisdiction, choice of law, and the recognition and enforcement of judgments across borders. It highlights the importance of understanding these principles for future legal professionals, especially in an increasingly interconnected world. The discussion contrasts the legal frameworks of the US and EU, explores the nuances of jurisdiction, and emphasizes the practical implications of enforcing judgments internationally.Imagine a scenario where a business dispute arises between parties located in different countries. The question of which country's laws apply and which court has the authority to hear the case becomes crucial. This is where the field of Conflict of Laws steps in, providing a framework to address these complex issues.Jurisdiction: Jurisdiction refers to the authority of a court to hear a case. In cross-border disputes, determining jurisdiction can be challenging. Courts often consider factors such as the location of the parties, the place where the contract was executed, and the nature of the dispute. As legal scholar John Doe notes, "Jurisdiction is the cornerstone of any legal proceeding, especially in international cases."Choice of Law: Once jurisdiction is established, the next step is to determine which country's laws will govern the dispute. This is known as the choice of law. Courts may apply various principles, such as the law of the place where the contract was made or the law of the place where the harm occurred. Jane Smith, a renowned legal expert, emphasizes, "The choice of law can significantly impact the outcome of a case, making it a critical consideration in international disputes."Recognition of Judgments: After a court renders a judgment, the question arises as to whether other jurisdictions will recognize and enforce it. The recognition of judgments is essential for ensuring that legal decisions have practical effects across borders. International treaties and agreements, such as the Hague Convention, play a vital role in facilitating the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments.Conclusion: Conflict of Laws is a complex and dynamic field that addresses the challenges of cross-border legal disputes. By understanding the principles of jurisdiction, choice of law, and recognition of judgments, parties can navigate the intricacies of international litigation more effectively. As global interactions continue to increase, the importance of Conflict of Laws will only grow.Subscribe Now: Stay informed about the latest developments in international law by subscribing. Don't miss out on expert insights and analysis!TakeawaysUnderstanding conflict of laws is fundamental for legal professionals.Jurisdiction is the first question a court must answer.Choice of law determines which country's laws apply to a case.Recognition and enforcement of judgments are crucial for justice.The US and EU have different approaches to jurisdiction.Public policy can limit the application of foreign law.Renvoy is a complex but rare concept in English law.Domicile is key in family law matters.The Brussels and Lugano Conventions streamline jurisdiction in Europe.Practical issues like currency and costs affect enforcement.conflict of laws, jurisdiction, choice of law, recognition of judgments, international law, legal principles, US law, EU law, family law, enforcement

Vincent and Joel sit down with guest - Executive Director of the SC Lottery - and discuss how the lottery works, how it benefits the state, and the Dolly's background in the State of South Carolina. Hear Bourbon Briefs to get your latest political update where the Senators discuss the newest developments in the gubernatorial race, new candidates in the upstate, guaranteed paid parental leave, the race for SC Supreme Court seats, and more!Join Senators Sheheen and Lourie in this week's episode where they take a deeper look at upcoming legislation and lawmakers' actions in S.C.  Support the showKeep up to Date with BITBR: Twitter.com/BITBRpodcastFacebook.com/BITBRpodcasthttps://bourboninthebackroom.buzzsprout.com

Welcome back for the conclusion of my interview with Marine, FBI Special Agent, and HRT Operator Rob D’Amico. Rob D’Amico has over thirty-six years of federal government service—ten years in the United States Marine Corps and nearly twenty-seven with the Federal Bureau of Investigation. He is the founder and principal consultant for Sierra One Consulting.  Rob began a life of service when he enlisted as a US Marine during college at The Ohio State University in Columbus, Ohio, and, after obtaining his bachelor's degree, was commissioned as an officer and served his first overseas tour in the first Gulf War. His work on reconnaissance missions with the Marine Corps paved the way for Rob’s long and successful career with the FBI. After four years based out of the Bureau’s Miami, Florida field office, apprehending the most violent felons of South Florida as a member of a multi-agency violent crime fugitive task force, Rob transitioned into deep undercover work against the most notorious U.S. and Italian-based organized crime families. Rob was among the few selected to the FBI’s elite Hostage Rescue Team, in which he served as a sniper and was first deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan. Rob’s career with and beyond the HRT team placed him at each pivotal step in the resolution of kidnapping and hostile detention matters. He has worked on every facet of operations—negotiating hostage releases and exchanges, operating under the highest pressure against pirates, negotiators, warlords, leaders of terrorist networks, as well as with ambassadors, generals, foreign ministers, and non-government organizations.  From being deep undercover, going after the mob, to dealing with Somali pirates, Rob has had a career that movies are literally made of. Today’s episode, we go deep into a hostage rescue operation on the high seas, dealing with Somali pirates!   In today’s episode, we discuss: ·      The difference between HRT and SWAT in the FBI?  ·      What attributes should HRT operators have? ·      What does HRT training look like? ·      The hijacking of the American SV Quest by Somali pirates and Rob's mission as an FBI HRT operator embedded with Navy SEALs regarding this mission. ·      Four United States citizens on board and 19 pirates. ·      The ultimate conclusion to the kidnapping? ·      Jurisdiction issues and maintaining and processing a floating crime scene that was in danger of sinking. ·      Going onto Somali soil to investigate and make arrests? ·      The strain on his family during this and other operations like this. How did Rob deal with it? What is his advice to someone about to do something similar to this work? ·      Retirement, how difficult was it to walk away from all of this? How did he cope/adjust? All of this and more on today’s episode of the Cops and Writers podcast. Visit Rob at his website! Check out the new Cops and Writers YouTube channel! Check out my newest book, The Good Collar (Michael Quinn Vigilante Justice Series Book 1)!!!!! Enjoy the Cops and Writers book series. Please visit the Cops and Writers website.  

What if the birth certificate was never for your baby—but a tool of control used by the state?In this episode, I sit down with Veda Ray, a freebirthing mother of two, who chose to walk a path most women never even consider: birthing and raising her second child completely outside the system. No pregnancy test. No monitoring. No birth certificate. No social security number.After her first birth at a birth center, Veda knew she wanted something different. This time, she listened deeply—to her body, to her baby, and to her own intuition—and what she heard was clear: this child was to be born free.We go deep into the realities of living outside the system, including how she navigated the legal terrain to secure a passport without government-issued ID, why she believes the birth certificate is a jurisdictional trap, and the spiritual responsibility of saying no to the state's contracts.Inside this episode:What really happens when you don't get a birth certificate or Social Security number for your childThe process Veda used to get a passport without a state-issued IDWhy a “family Bible” can hold legal weight in proving lineage and identityHow the social security number binds your child into the U.S. corporate systemThe link between freebirth and reclaiming jurisdiction over your body and familyWhat it's like to raise a child who has never been registered by the stateThe unseen cost of outsourcing authority—and what you reclaim when you stopTimestamps:[00:00] Introduction[02:01] Choosing radical self-trust after rejecting the medical model[09:21] Learning to sit in the unknown and trust yourself through freebirth[22:54] Rethinking the birth certificate as a contract with the state and choosing a sovereign path instead[26:08] Creating private records to get a passport without a birth certificate[36:47] Using private trusts and EINs as alternatives to social security numbers and state contracts[52:44] Facing fear, claiming trust, and birthing in full sovereignty with family by your sideResources Mentioned:The Business of Being Born | MovieIf you want to connect with Veda, you can find her website here, and follow her @veda.revival.Find more from Emilee on Instagram, YouTube and the Free Birth Society website.Disclaimer: Free Birth Society, LLC of North Carolina shares personal and educational stories and experiences related to freebirth and holistic care. This content is not medical advice, and we are not a licensed midwifery practice. Testimonials reflect individual experiences; results may vary. For services or scheduling, contact info@freebirthsociety.com. See full disclaimer at freebirthsociety.com/youtubeterms.

Vincent and Joel sit down with guest Jaime Harrison to talk about the reality of politics, how the toughest jobs get done, sticking with his party, and so much more! Hear a wonderful personal story about President Joe Biden's kindness and humility, the start of Jaime's podcast, reframing the democratic party, Joel's insightful comments on the Taylor Swift engagement, republican overreach, and the potential upcoming echo of 2006 in 2026. Get your latest Statehouse update and hear firsthand the rationale behind some of the legislature's most controversial bills. Join Senators Sheheen and Lourie in this week's episode where they take a deeper look at upcoming legislation and lawmakers' actions in S.C.  Support the showKeep up to Date with BITBR: Twitter.com/BITBRpodcastFacebook.com/BITBRpodcasthttps://bourboninthebackroom.buzzsprout.com

     Slam The Gavel welcomes back Olga Wilson to the podcast. Olga was last on  Season 5, Episode  274. Olga has been courageously exposing transcript falsification and corruption in the Butte County, Chico California family courts.      On our last podcast, Olga shared how records were altered to erase evidence and silence her. Since then a shocking new development emerged: a questionable reassignment of a retired judge back on to her case, the denial of her objections and evidence of a systemic cover-up at the highest levels of the California judiciary. However, this isn't just Olga's story, its a warning to the TAXPAYER about how far the courts will go to protect themselves instead of families and their children.To Reach Olga Wilson:  olgavwilson@gmail.comSupportshow(https://www.buymeacoffee.com/maryannpetri)Maryann Petri: dismantlingfamilycourtcorruption.comhttps://www.tiktok.com/@maryannpetriFacebook:  https://www.youtube.com/@slamthegavelpodcasthostmar5536Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/guitarpeace/Pinterest: Slam The Gavel Podcast/@guitarpeaceLinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/maryann-petri-62a46b1ab/  YouTube:  https://www.youtube.com/@slamthegavelpodcasthostmar5536  Twitter https://x.com/PetriMaryannEzlegalsuit.com   https://ko-fi.com/maryannpetrihttps://www.zazzle.com/store/slam_the_gavel/about*DISCLAIMER* The use of this information is at the viewer/user's own risk. Not financial, medical nor legal advice as the content on this podcast does not constitute legal, financial, medical or any other professional advice. Viewer/user's should consult with the relevant professionals. Reproduction, distribution, performing, publicly displaying and making a derivative of the work is explicitly prohibited without permission from content creator. Podcast is protected by owner. The content creator maintains the exclusive right and any unauthorized copyright infringement is subject to legal prosecution.Support the showSupportshow(https://www.buymeacoffee.com/maryannpetri)http://www.dismantlingfamilycourtcorruption.com/

This is a fascinating chat about Private Express Trusts, Sovereignty, Liberty and, what it means to stand in your own Jurisdiction. Ray's website:https://aguadiero.net/Tips are most welcome:⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠buymeacoffee.com/niish⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Our website:⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://thecosmicsalon.com⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠I want to thank the producers of this show:Meredith Walako (Scheduling, bookings, and social media manager). Cale Darnegie. Lalita Karoli. Jorge. Susan Jenkins. LynnRadius. Kerry Hoyal. Sarah Etta. Lizz Radican. Claire Cathcart. Steven Mercer. Pamela Holdahl. Jake Vanek. WiseNightOwl. Marcey Shapiro. Noël Jeanette. Melanie Poe. Jason Lambson. Neil Macnaughton. Mark Boettcher. Kate Kukulkan.Everlong,Niish-

Vincent and Joel sit down with guest - candidate in South Carolina's 2026 Governor's race - Republican Josh Kimbrell. They discuss the importance of State institutions, an insider's look at the brutality of State Politics, updates on State policy, his vision for the future of South Carolina, and his background in politics!In Bourbon Briefs hear about the hot Governor's race in South Carolina, Ralph Norman's announcement, Nancy Mace's latest messaging, Senator Wes Climer's bid for Congress, possible tax changes, and much more!Get your latest Statehouse update and hear firsthand the rationale behind some of the legislature's most controversial bills. Join Senators Sheheen and Lourie in this week's episode where they take a deeper look at upcoming legislation and lawmakers' actions in S.C.  Support the showKeep up to Date with BITBR: Twitter.com/BITBRpodcastFacebook.com/BITBRpodcasthttps://bourboninthebackroom.buzzsprout.com

Retired agent Raj Patel reviews the 2019 Sri Lanka Easter bombing case where 8 suicide subjects inspired by ISIS detonated themselves in three large Western hotels and three churches, killing approximately 270 people, including five Americans. Raj and other members of the team won the 2021 Director Award for Most Outstanding International Investigation. He served in the FBI for 20 years. Check out the episode show notes, photos, and related articles: https://jerriwilliams.com/364-raj-patel-sri-lanka-easter-bombings-2019-extraterritorial-jurisdiction/   Buy me a coffee - https://www.buymeacoffee.com/JerriWilliams   Join my Reader Team to get the FBI Reading Resource - Books about the FBI, written by FBI agents, the 20 clichés about the FBI Reality Checklist, and keep up to date on the FBI in books, TV, and movies via my monthly email. Join here. http://eepurl.com/dzCCmL    Check out my FBI books, non-fiction and crime fiction, available as audiobooks, ebooks and paperbacks wherever books are sold. https://jerriwilliams.com/books/

Join the conversation with C4 & Bryan Nehman.  MD dems could join the fight with Texas over redistricting.  Committee subpoenas over Epstein.  Baltimore County added as a sanctuary jurisdiction.  Madigan to not get raise as hold over county IG.  Delegate Chris Tomlinson joined the show this morning to discus his legislation to increase sentences for fentanyl distribution in the wake of the Penn North mass overdose event.  Listen to C4 & Bryan Nehman live weekdays from 5:30 to 10am on WBAL News Radio 1090, FM 101.5 & the WBAL Radio App.

Our hosts discuss the complexities of handling custody issues when co-parents live in different states. They delve into the legalities, jurisdiction matters, and real-life scenarios including military families and interstate relocations. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding state laws, getting court permissions, and the potential emotional and financial impacts on the children and parents involved. They also provide practical advice on dealing with such situations, emphasizing the significance of consulting with an attorney before making any moves.00:00 Introduction and Greetings00:41 Custody Issues Across State Lines00:57 Jurisdiction and Legal Complexities01:02 Case Study: California to North Carolina02:01 Challenges of Interstate Custody03:12 Real-Life Examples and Scenarios05:06 Impact on Children and Families06:27 Personal Experiences and Insights09:22 Judicial Decisions and Fairness09:50 Financial Implications of Custody Arrangements10:41 Navigating Child Support and Extraordinary Expenses11:04 Relocation and Its Legal Implications12:50 Getting Permission to Move: Legal Steps13:35 Factors Judges Consider in Relocation Cases15:44 Emergency Custody and Relocation Challenges17:30 Co-Parenting and Relocation: Practical Advice19:57 Consulting Attorneys Before Relocating20:38 Final Thoughts on Relocation and Custody

The Muscogee Nation will assume some law enforcement duties in the city of Tulsa, Okla., when it comes to tribal citizens. The development over jurisdiction ends a federal lawsuit filed by the Muscogee Nation in the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court's landmark McGirt decision in 2020. The Cherokee and Osage Nations also potentially have jurisdiction claims in Tulsa and other cities. Local law enforcement officials and Gov. Kevin Stitt (R-OK) oppose the agreement, saying it creates a two-tiered system of justice. We'll find out what the new agreement solves and what it leaves unanswered. Also, tribes connected to Florida are speaking out against the Trump administration's fast track plans to establish a detention center for immigration actions near the Florida Everglades. Miccosukee and Seminole tribal officials and citizens say the center, dubbed the “Alligator Alcatraz,” infringes on land that is their “cultural, spiritual, and historical identity.”

The Muscogee Nation will assume some law enforcement duties in the city of Tulsa, Okla., when it comes to tribal citizens. The development over jurisdiction ends a federal lawsuit filed by the Muscogee Nation in the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court's landmark McGirt decision in 2020. The Cherokee and Osage Nations also potentially have jurisdiction claims in Tulsa and other cities. Local law enforcement officials and Oklahoma Gov. Kevin Stitt oppose the agreement, saying it creates a two-tiered system of justice. We'll find out what the new agreement solves and what it leaves unanswered. Also, tribes connected to Florida are speaking out against the Trump administration's fast track plans to establish a detention center for immigration actions near the Florida Everglades. Miccosukee and Seminole tribal officials and citizens say the center, dubbed the “Alligator Alcatraz,” infringes on land that is their “cultural, spiritual and historical identity.” GUESTS Betty Osceola (Miccosukee), environmental educator State Rep. Scott Fetgatter (Choctaw/R-OK 16) Robert Miller (Eastern Shawnee), law professor at Arizona State University and tribal judge Jason Salsman, press secretary for the Muscogee (Creek) Nation

Vincent and Joel sit down with guest, Freshman Representative Gil Gatch, to discuss his life and politics in the low country, his background as a musician, pastor, lawyer, and politician, how the legislature really functions, and so much more! Hear the Senators break down current events in S.C., discuss the allegations and arrest of S.C. Freedom Caucus founder, his suspension and potential expulsion, the lawsuit surrounding legislative raises, try some new bourbon, and talk to Brandon Dermody about a new Bill in SC called the Equine Advancement Act. Get your latest Statehouse update and hear firsthand the rationale behind some of the legislature's most controversial bills. Join Senators Sheheen and Lourie in this week's episode where they take a deeper look at upcoming legislation and lawmakers' actions in S.C.   Support the showKeep up to Date with BITBR: Twitter.com/BITBRpodcastFacebook.com/BITBRpodcasthttps://bourboninthebackroom.buzzsprout.com

In this episode of Body Slam Briefs, hosts Evil Dose and special guest Anthony Thomas delve into the intricate details of the AEW lawsuit involving Jonathan Wood a.k.a. Jon Moxley and a cameraman named Dispensa. They discuss the lawsuit's background, the legal implications, and the broader impact on AEW. The episode covers topics such as the timing of the lawsuit, Moxley's past disciplinary incidents, and the potential outcomes. Insights into the legal landscape are provided, making it an essential listen.00:39 AEW Lawsuit Overview02:16 Details of the Incident03:57 Legal Implications and Contractor Status12:43 Jurisdiction and Venue20:28 Medical Attention and AEW's Responsibility26:26 Discussing Moxley's Alleged Incidents27:03 Legal Implications and Defamation27:39 Substance Abuse and Rehabilitation28:45 Liability and Legal Responsibility30:49 Assault and Battery Allegations34:57 Legal Procedures and Court Thresholds38:20 Settlement and Arbitration Speculations44:37 Final Thoughts and PlugsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/wrestling-soup--1425249/support.

BECOME A YT MEMBER TODAY!!! https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCqzgGwRrOLH20OIc8bM_VAg/joinConnect with April https://shinealbum.therealshalil.com/ COME SEE ME DO COMEDY - Get Tickets Here https://linktr.ee/timross(Tim's Lip Balm) - GlowSkin Care - https://www.facebook.com/AllNaturalOrganicProductsMadeWithLove/

On Wednesday's Mark Levin Show, you are hearing it in the leftwing press, in the Never-Trump editorial pages and more - you cannot and must not deport anyone without some kind of notice and due process. Yet, there's nothing from these people on how this is supposed to actually work. What kind of due process are they talking about? The kind of due process that applies to citizens? If not, then what lower standard suffices as constitutional due process? Exactly how would due process, of any kind, be administered to millions and millions of illegal immigrants? We don't have enough courts of any kind in our country to handle the tsunami of cases that would be involved. This was all intentional. The border was opened to anyone. This is the Cloward-Pivens strategy: flood the system, overwhelm the system, break the system, and in doing so achieve your goals. Effectively, this is massive amnesty. Also, it seems these Federal judges are trying to stop mass deportation efforts and disrupt the Trump administration's response to Biden's mass immigration policies. Later, Hans von Spakovsky calls in and explains that he was stunned by Judge Boasberg's order because he's blatantly defying the Supreme Court. Boasberg's order was void from the moment he signed it. So how can he hold the Trump administration in contempt? Either Boasberg is incompetent or he's deliberately ignoring the Supreme Court. Afterward, Jonathan Turley calls in to discuss the criminal referral against NY AG Letitia James. James claims ​that ​her ​Virginia ​home ​was ​her ​principal ​residence. ​That ​was ​not ​and ​cannot ​be ​true ​because ​she was and still ​is ​an ​official ​of ​the ​New ​York ​government ​who ​must ​live ​within ​the ​state. What's ​notable ​about ​her ​false ​statements ​is ​that ​each ​one ​​worked ​towards ​a ​better mortgage ​rate. ​ Then, the Declaration of Independence discusses natural law and natural rights. Where do these concepts originate? They are influenced by John Locke and Montesquieu, but not entirely, as they ultimately come from God. When they say the people are sovereign, that ide comes from God. This is why the government can never be sovereign. The United States is first county on earth to be founded on these principles. Finally, Heritage President, Kevin Roberts, calls in to discuss the organization's impactful projects and ongoing efforts to revitalize federalism in America. Roberts shares insights on the current political landscape, the significance of state legislative work, and the importance of maintaining a conservative agenda while addressing challenges such as tariffs and international relations. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices