Podcasts about Jurisdiction

In this segment from The Tara Show, host Tara Servatius and co-host Lee discuss the growing influence of far-left and socialist ideology within the Democratic Party, highlighting streamer Hasan Piker's speech at the College Democrats convention where he wore a Mao-style suit and condemned party moderates. Servatius and Lee draw a contrast between the historical anti-communist stances of past Democratic leaders, such as John F. Kennedy, and current progressive efforts, including NYC Mayor Zohran Mamdani's push to enforce International Criminal Court (ICC) warrants against foreign leaders like Benjamin Netanyahu. Examining a recent address by Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Servatius argues that progressive rhetoric regarding international courts threatens American national sovereignty and sets a dangerous precedent for future extraditions of U.S. military personnel and political figures.

On the July 20, 2026 edition of The Tara Show, host Tara Servatius breaks down key national security debates and political commentary. She examines Secretary of State Marco Rubio's forceful rejection of International Criminal Court (ICC) jurisdiction, contrasting his defense of U.S. sovereignty with progressive efforts to enforce international warrants against foreign leaders and domestic officials. Servatius also offers a sharp critique of foreign policy decisions under the Trump administration, specifically pointing to JD Vance's Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with Iran, which she argues enabled the regime to rearm and directly led to recent U.S. service member casualties in the Middle East. After sharing a reflective quote from Senator Lindsey Graham on the tendency of political figures to overestimate their competition, the broadcast addresses domestic enforcement measures, highlighting Stephen Miller's announcement of a Trump administration plan to strip undocumented immigrants of access to the American banking system as a catalyst for self-deportation.

On the July 20, 2026 broadcast of The Tara Show, host Tara Servatius and co-host Lee delve into a wide-ranging set of local political dynamics and international developments. The discussion focuses heavily on South Carolina's shifting political scene following the death of Senator Lindsey Graham, critiquing the state's GOP "machine" and President Donald Trump's local endorsements—including his backing of Graham's sister, Darlene Graham Nordone. The hosts also examine national security concerns regarding Chinese influence over election systems and the Democratic Party, alongside a foreign policy debate over the International Criminal Court (ICC). Pointing to clashes between Secretary of State Marco Rubio and NYC Mayor Zohran Mamdani over potential warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Servatius contends that progressive efforts to leverage international tribunals aim to establish precedents for targeting U.S. political opponents.

Joel and Meg Kinnard discuss the life of the late Senator Lindsey Graham, his impact on the SC political landscape, the fallout in SC, and so much more!Support the showKeep up to Date with BITBR: Twitter.com/BITBRpodcastFacebook.com/BITBRpodcasthttps://bourboninthebackroom.buzzsprout.com

In 1914 the British-built and Japanese-owned steamship Komagata Maru left Hong Kong for Vancouver carrying 376 Punjabi migrants. Chartered by railway contractor and purported rubber planter Gurdit Singh, the ship and its passengers were denied entry into Canada and two months later were deported to Calcutta. In Across Oceans of Law: The Komagata Maru and Jurisdiction in the Time of Empire (Duke University Press, 2018) Renisa Mawani retells this well-known story of the Komagata Maru. Drawing on "oceans as method"—a mode of thinking and writing that repositions land and sea—Mawani examines the historical and conceptual stakes of situating histories of Indian migration within maritime worlds. Through close readings of the ship, the manifest, the trial, and the anticolonial writings of Singh and others, Mawani argues that the Komagata Maru's landing raised urgent questions regarding the jurisdictional tensions between the common law and admiralty law, and, ultimately, the legal status of the sea. By following the movements of a single ship and bringing oceans into sharper view, Mawani traces British imperial power through racial, temporal, and legal contests and offers a novel method of writing colonial legal history. The conversation also covers how the book, published in 2018, has shaped the author's more recent work as well as how historical methods and approaches have evolved in the years since publication. Helen Dewar is an historian of the Atlantic World and French colonization in North America in the 17th and 18th centuries. She is a professor of history at the Université de Montréal (Québec, Canada) and the author of Disputing New France: Companies, Sovereignty and Law in the French Atlantic, 1598-1663 (McGill-Queen's University Press, 2022). Helen's institutional website Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/new-books-network

In 1914 the British-built and Japanese-owned steamship Komagata Maru left Hong Kong for Vancouver carrying 376 Punjabi migrants. Chartered by railway contractor and purported rubber planter Gurdit Singh, the ship and its passengers were denied entry into Canada and two months later were deported to Calcutta. In Across Oceans of Law: The Komagata Maru and Jurisdiction in the Time of Empire (Duke University Press, 2018) Renisa Mawani retells this well-known story of the Komagata Maru. Drawing on "oceans as method"—a mode of thinking and writing that repositions land and sea—Mawani examines the historical and conceptual stakes of situating histories of Indian migration within maritime worlds. Through close readings of the ship, the manifest, the trial, and the anticolonial writings of Singh and others, Mawani argues that the Komagata Maru's landing raised urgent questions regarding the jurisdictional tensions between the common law and admiralty law, and, ultimately, the legal status of the sea. By following the movements of a single ship and bringing oceans into sharper view, Mawani traces British imperial power through racial, temporal, and legal contests and offers a novel method of writing colonial legal history. The conversation also covers how the book, published in 2018, has shaped the author's more recent work as well as how historical methods and approaches have evolved in the years since publication. Helen Dewar is an historian of the Atlantic World and French colonization in North America in the 17th and 18th centuries. She is a professor of history at the Université de Montréal (Québec, Canada) and the author of Disputing New France: Companies, Sovereignty and Law in the French Atlantic, 1598-1663 (McGill-Queen's University Press, 2022). Helen's institutional website Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/south-asian-studies

In 1914 the British-built and Japanese-owned steamship Komagata Maru left Hong Kong for Vancouver carrying 376 Punjabi migrants. Chartered by railway contractor and purported rubber planter Gurdit Singh, the ship and its passengers were denied entry into Canada and two months later were deported to Calcutta. In Across Oceans of Law: The Komagata Maru and Jurisdiction in the Time of Empire (Duke University Press, 2018) Renisa Mawani retells this well-known story of the Komagata Maru. Drawing on "oceans as method"—a mode of thinking and writing that repositions land and sea—Mawani examines the historical and conceptual stakes of situating histories of Indian migration within maritime worlds. Through close readings of the ship, the manifest, the trial, and the anticolonial writings of Singh and others, Mawani argues that the Komagata Maru's landing raised urgent questions regarding the jurisdictional tensions between the common law and admiralty law, and, ultimately, the legal status of the sea. By following the movements of a single ship and bringing oceans into sharper view, Mawani traces British imperial power through racial, temporal, and legal contests and offers a novel method of writing colonial legal history. The conversation also covers how the book, published in 2018, has shaped the author's more recent work as well as how historical methods and approaches have evolved in the years since publication. Helen Dewar is an historian of the Atlantic World and French colonization in North America in the 17th and 18th centuries. She is a professor of history at the Université de Montréal (Québec, Canada) and the author of Disputing New France: Companies, Sovereignty and Law in the French Atlantic, 1598-1663 (McGill-Queen's University Press, 2022). Helen's institutional website Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law

In 1914 the British-built and Japanese-owned steamship Komagata Maru left Hong Kong for Vancouver carrying 376 Punjabi migrants. Chartered by railway contractor and purported rubber planter Gurdit Singh, the ship and its passengers were denied entry into Canada and two months later were deported to Calcutta. In Across Oceans of Law: The Komagata Maru and Jurisdiction in the Time of Empire (Duke University Press, 2018) Renisa Mawani retells this well-known story of the Komagata Maru. Drawing on "oceans as method"—a mode of thinking and writing that repositions land and sea—Mawani examines the historical and conceptual stakes of situating histories of Indian migration within maritime worlds. Through close readings of the ship, the manifest, the trial, and the anticolonial writings of Singh and others, Mawani argues that the Komagata Maru's landing raised urgent questions regarding the jurisdictional tensions between the common law and admiralty law, and, ultimately, the legal status of the sea. By following the movements of a single ship and bringing oceans into sharper view, Mawani traces British imperial power through racial, temporal, and legal contests and offers a novel method of writing colonial legal history. The conversation also covers how the book, published in 2018, has shaped the author's more recent work as well as how historical methods and approaches have evolved in the years since publication. Helen Dewar is an historian of the Atlantic World and French colonization in North America in the 17th and 18th centuries. She is a professor of history at the Université de Montréal (Québec, Canada) and the author of Disputing New France: Companies, Sovereignty and Law in the French Atlantic, 1598-1663 (McGill-Queen's University Press, 2022). Helen's institutional website Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/british-studies

Sable Offshore Oil Corp. reportedly sent a letter to the Trump administration asking to exercise eminent domain over public and private land in Santa Barbara county. Politico published the letter last week, it was dated June second. Sable's pipelines are connected to the land they're looking to acquire. The company has been actively operating after it resumed oil production in March and is looking to bypass prohibitive local and state law. Initially, the Trump administration approved the restart through an emergency order bypassing permission from California. KCSB's Mavis Holley spoke to UC Santa Barbara professor Paasha Mahdavi about what asserting eminent domain over private and public land means for both the pipeline project and California state rights.

Sparks Nevada, Marshal on Mars, "Pulp Jurisdiction"Written by Ben Acker & Ben BlackerStarring Marc Evan Jackson as Sparks Nevada; Mark Gagliardi as Croach the Deputy; Jean Grae as Moko Morato; Annie Savage as The Space Saloon; John Hodgman as Lavon Abbondondon; Joshua Malina as the Barkeep; Jonathan Coulton as Travis Baltimore; and Hal Lublin as the Folksy Narrator.THE THRILLING ADVENTURE HOUR IS 100% INDEPENDENT.Want every episode and more, including never-released audio, ad free? Want exclusive videos, including rehearsal videos?To support the show and the people who make it, and to gain access to our complete back catalogue including never-released episodes (from as far back as 2005!), early access to the podcast, early access to tickets to our live shows, and more, join our Patreon community: https://www.patreon.com/thrillingadventurehourVisit our store for Beyond Belief concert film DVDs!Visit our video vault to stream a ton of live and live-to-Zoom TAH shows!Produced by Ben Acker & Ben BlackerMusic by Jonathan DinersteinSparks theme by Eban SchletterPodcast produced and engineered by Jordan Katz Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Will Kenya be a venue for accountability for alleged crimes in Sudan? We talk to Antonia Mulvey and Owiso Owiso about a new 'first' in Kenya. If it's interesting, do like, subscribe and leave us a review. Want to find out more? Check out all the background information on our website including hundreds more podcasts on international justice covering all the angles: https://www.asymmetricalhaircuts.com/ Or you can sign up to our newsletter: https://www.asymmetricalhaircuts.com/newsletters/ Did you like what you heard? Tip us here: https://www.asymmetricalhaircuts.com/support-us/ Or want to support us long term? Check out our Patreon, where - for the price of a cup of coffee every month - you also become part of our War Criminals Bookclub and can make recommendations on what we should review next, here: https://www.patreon.com/c/AsymmetricalHaircuts Asymmetrical Haircuts is created, produced and presented by Janet Anderson and Stephanie van den Berg, together with a small team of producers, assistant producers, researchers and interns. Check out the team here: https://www.asymmetricalhaircuts.com/what-about-asymmetrical-haircuts/

The 14th Amendment of the US Constitution, Section 1 reads as follows: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside.” So all persons born in the US are citizens. We call this Birthright Citizenship. In Trump v Barbara, the US Supreme Court agreed. But only 5 of the 9 justices agreed. So what was the decision of the Court in this case, and what is the status of citizenship in the US? And how does it relate to the two asylum cases the Supreme Court decided, on temporary protective status or TPS and on where a person can claim asylum. On today's show, we discuss the US and immigration and asylum. [ dur: 58mins. ] Naomi Paik is Associate Professor of Global Asian Studies and Criminology, Law and Justice at University of Illinois, Chicago. She is the author of Bans, Walls, Raids, Sanctuary: Understanding U.S. Immigration for the 21st Century and Rightlessness: Testimony and Redress in U.S. Prison Camps since World War II, winner, Best Book in History. Gabriel “Jack” Chin is Distinguished Professor of Law and Director of Clinical Legal Education at UC Davies School of Law. The U.S. Supreme Court has cited his work in two cases: Chaidez v. United States and Padilla v. Kentucky. And Justice Sotomyer has cited his law article in Utah v. Strieff. He is the co-author of Birthright Citizenship, Slave Trade Legislation, and the Origins of Federal Immigration Regulation and  author of A Nation of White Immigrants: State and Federal Racial Preferences for White Noncitizens. Hiroshi Motomura is the Susan Westerberg Prager Distinguished Professor of Law at the University of California, Los Angeles. He is the author of Americans in Waiting: The Lost Story of Immigration and Citizenship in the United States and his latest book Borders and Belonging: Toward a Fair Immigration Policy. Anna Law holds the Herbert Kurz Chair in Constitutional Rights at Brooklyn College, City University of New York. She is the author of The Immigration Battle in American Courts and Migration and the Origins of American Citizenship: African Americans, Native Americans, and Immigrants. This program is produced by Ankine Aghassian, Doug Becker and Sudd Dongre. Politics and Activism, Governance / Law, Courts, Refugees, asylum seekers, birthright, Jurisdiction

In this essential Part 1 of our series on Estate Reclamation, we welcome back Russell Paul Arthur, a certified practitioner of sovereign law and the creator of the Grace Sovereignty Academy. Russell explains the lawful procedure of reclaiming your estate—the net worth of everything you own, earn, and owe—back from the control of the Crown Commonwealth. We explore the deception of property registration, the reality of the "public estate," and how the "citizen" functions as a legal franchise that keeps your assets in bondage. This episode provides the foundational knowledge needed to transition your assets from public control to private sovereign authority. ⏱️ Complete Chapter Points & Timestamps 0:03 Welcome to the Awakening Podcast and the Sovereign Man Podcast 0:36 Russell Paul Arthur's Bio and Credentials 1:05 Welcome Back, Russell 1:17 Today's Presentation: Estate Reclamation Explained 2:04 Disclaimer and Advisory Statement 4:15 What Exactly is an Estate? Definition and Components 5:55 Everything is Taxable Under Crown Estate Control 6:16 The Public Estate: Registered Citizens and Crown Authority 6:47 Registration at Public Agencies (HM Land Registry, DVLA, Companies House) 8:42 Registration Means Handing Over Paramount Authority and Control 9:49 Roman Civil Law: The Historical Roots of Modern Legal Systems 10:06 Roman Empire Across Europe and British Isles 10:19 Roman Civil Law Brought to Africa and West Asia 10:35 No Equity in Civil Law—Predetermined Penalties and Punishments 11:17 The Public Domain: An Area of Control and Extortion 12:00 The Public Domain Doesn't Exist in Reality—Only in Fiction 12:26 Venue and Jurisdiction as Mental Containment Fields 13:03 The United Kingdom as a Corporate Enterprise 13:22 HM Land Registry, Companies House, Ministry of Justice, DVLA 15:07 Corporate Officers and Hidden Controllers 15:59 The Illusion of Democracy and Voting 16:34 Everyone is Stuck in the World of Business (Busyness) 17:16 Citizenship is Deception and Fraud 17:45 Birth Registration: How They Create Legal Bondage 18:00 The General Registrar and the Creation of the UK Citizen 18:20 You Become Legally Bonded to the UK Citizen 19:00 Voluntary Acts and the Bonded Surety System 20:01 Becoming a General Member of the Public 21:00 You're in the Public Venue and Jurisdiction 23:00 Building Your Estate Over Time in Fiction and Fraud 30:06 Status Correction and Legal Joinder 31:30 Estate Reclamation: Claiming Back Your Entire Estate 31:49 Implied Trust Arrangements with Public Agencies 32:08 Companies House and Legal Titles (Director, Chairman, Secretary) 32:46 HM Revenue & Customs and the Taxpayer Status 33:16 Language is Important When Transitioning to Sovereignty 34:27 Creating a New Private Estate in the Sovereignty Movement 35:10 Private Estate Never Registered or Incorporated 35:32 Multi-Jurisdictional Private Estate Structure 36:10 Corporations in the Public Domain and Tax Codes 36:32 Private Estate as a Charitable Missionary Entity 37:02 Tax Relief and Exemptions for Charities 37:44 Transferring Funds from Public to Private with Tax Relief 38:27 VAT and the Extortion System 38:49 VAT Registration and the End User 39:16 The Joke of VAT and Taxation 40:24 Calculating Total Tax Burden (70-80% Over Lifetime) 42:56 Creators Funds and VAT (Patreon, Buy Me A Coffee) 44:17 Most People Operating as Registered Citizens 45:02 Everything You Think is Yours is Registered in Your Name 50:01 Resident as Another Legal Title and Status 50:25 Everything Built in the Name of the Citizen 51:53 Estate Dissolution and Liquidation in Courts 78:52 What We're Doing Inside Grace Private Society 85:09 Public Trust Arrangements and Crown Estate Control 86:39 Closing Discussion and Fair Payment System 87:05 The 10-Week Trial System 87:37 10% Completion Rate and Serious Commitment Required 88:12 Buyer Beware: Many False Sovereigns Out There 88:25 Freedom Comes from Within 88:59 The Importance of Good Teachers and Guidance 89:14 Shall We End It There? 89:20 Final Links and Contact Information 89:36 End of Episode TOTAL DURATION: 89 minutes 37 seconds

Send us fan responses! The fastest way to stay trapped is to let someone else define you on paper. From Vegas, Don Kilam lays out his controversial framework for “status correction” and why he believes prosperity and generational wealth get blocked by a hidden administrative corporate structure that most people never question, but sign into every day through IDs, registrations, and default tax classifications. We walk through his core distinction between a “citizen” and a “national,” why he ties nationality to land and allegiance, and how he uses the Amish as a real-world example of operating within society without fully participating in the same documentation and tax status pipeline. He also challenges modern identity categories, arguing that labels like black and white function as legal descriptions rather than nationalities, and he connects language, definitions, and form design to the way institutions assign rights, liabilities, and control. The conversation turns practical when he talks paperwork and structure: W-8BEN vs W-8BENE, individual vs entity treatment, and why mixing trusts with personal filings can undo asset protection. He also names foreign credential paths like Palau ID and Estonia e-Residency as tools he believes can support a foreign national posture. These are big claims with real legal and financial consequences, so treat them as prompts to research carefully and to consult qualified professionals before making changes. If this sparked curiosity or skepticism, subscribe, share it with a friend who loves deep system talk, and leave a review with the one point you want us to unpack next.https://donkilam.com FOLLOW THE YELLOW BRICK ROAD - DON KILAMGO GET HIS BOOK ON AMAZON NOW! https://open.spotify.com/track/5QOUWyNahqcWvQ4WQAvwjj?autoplay=trueSupport the showhttps://donkilam.com

Jim Fanell explains China's "salami slicing" tactics in the maritime domain, using law enforcement vessels to claim sovereign jurisdiction over waters east of Taiwan. He recommends the U.S. counter these moves by sending an aircraft carrier strike group through the Taiwan Strait to assert international law. (2)1910 IDAHO

The American Radicals Podcast covers birthright citizenship, carpet-bagging politicians in Michigan, and freedom of the press and religion. Check us out on Spotify! https://open.spotify.com/show/09AZ2WuYnWbZ2941wsb6jW?si=76c005605dc64dc1 https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2026/06/28/why-black-college-graduates-are-struggling-find-jobs-trumps-economy/  https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2026/06/30/birthright-citizenship-upheld-by-supreme-court-ruling-against-trump-order/  https://www.courthousenews.com/supreme-court-sides-with-gop-states-on-anti-trans-sports-ban/  https://www.themidwesterner.news/2026/06/report-michigan-democratic-candidates-for-congress-already-own-pricey-dc-homes/  https://www.nytimes.com/2026/06/30/business/media/pentagon-journalists-escort-rule.html  https://adfmedia.org/press-release/us-supreme-court-to-decide-whether-orthodox-jews-permit-to-pray-case-can-proceed/ 

Seasoned analyst Ron Stewart (Red Cloud) provides expert mining investment sector insights in this MSE episode. Stewart shares his bullish outlook for metals and comments on the current pullback in mining stocks. He sees a “generational opportunity” in gold stocks and offers valuation tips for producers and developers. Ron further comments on sector M&A, risks for juniors attempting to build mines and the current financing environment. 00:00 Intro 00:42 Market Shift Q1 to Q2 03:36 Gold Opportunity Now 04:34 Best Gold Equity Value 06:46 Jurisdiction and Management 10:42 M&A Drivers in Gold 13:37 Build or Sell the Mine 18:13 Capex and Project Economics 21:26 Copper Outlook and Demand 24:33 Small Copper Deposits 28:17 Royalties Dividends and Reinvestment 35:15 Project Generators and Exploration 37:13 Financing Market Update 39:02 Analyst Models and Assumptions 44:53 Replacement Value Advantage 45:50 Where to Follow Ron https://redcloudsecurities.com/ Sign up for our free newsletter and receive interview transcripts, stock profiles and investment ideas: http://eepurl.com/cHxJ39 Mining Stock Education (MSE) offers informational content based on available data but it does not constitute investment, tax, or legal advice. It may not be appropriate for all situations or objectives. Readers and listeners should seek professional advice, make independent investigations and assessments before investing. MSE does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of its content and should not be solely relied upon for investment decisions. MSE and its owner may hold financial interests in the companies discussed and can trade such securities without notice. MSE is biased towards its advertising sponsors which make this platform possible. MSE is not liable for representations, warranties, or omissions in its content. By accessing MSE content, users agree that MSE and its affiliates bear no liability related to the information provided or the investment decisions you make. Full disclaimer: https://www.miningstockeducation.com/disclaimer/

In the case Does 1-6 vs. Gov. John de Jongh, Jr., et al., the defense counsel for Gov. John de Jongh, Jr. submitted a supplemental briefing in compliance with the court's order to address topics discussed during a prior conference and highlight relevant cases or arguments raised by both parties. While primarily focusing on venue-related arguments, the defendant also joins and incorporates the arguments made by co-defendants in their respective submissions. The defense reiterates its position that the Second Amended Complaint (SAC) should be dismissed based on prior arguments made by the defendant and co-defendants.Should the SAC not be dismissed, including for reasons of improper venue, the defense asserts that the case should be transferred to the District of the Virgin Islands (D.V.I.), where it would be more appropriately handled.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.178.0.pdf

In the case Does 1-6 vs. Gov. John de Jongh, Jr., et al., the defense counsel for Gov. John de Jongh, Jr. submitted a supplemental briefing in compliance with the court's order to address topics discussed during a prior conference and highlight relevant cases or arguments raised by both parties. While primarily focusing on venue-related arguments, the defendant also joins and incorporates the arguments made by co-defendants in their respective submissions. The defense reiterates its position that the Second Amended Complaint (SAC) should be dismissed based on prior arguments made by the defendant and co-defendants.Should the SAC not be dismissed, including for reasons of improper venue, the defense asserts that the case should be transferred to the District of the Virgin Islands (D.V.I.), where it would be more appropriately handled.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.178.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

FaLa returns, establishing the differences between jurisdiction, covenant & contracts. This isn't about hostility, it's about recognizing when somethings are beyond what you thought you knew & moving according to truth. Honesty & Integrity governs the wise. All others live in the results of their own lies.

In this episode of the AVCA Podcast, we sit down with Hortense Mudenge, Chief Executive Officer, Kigali International Financial Centre (KIFC), to explore how Kigali has emerged as a leading jurisdiction for fund domiciliation in Africa, the policy choices that underpin its growth, and what fund managers should consider when selecting a domicile. Learn more about KIFC: kifc.rw

In the case Does 1-6 vs. Gov. John de Jongh, Jr., et al., the defense counsel for Gov. John de Jongh, Jr. submitted a supplemental briefing in compliance with the court's order to address topics discussed during a prior conference and highlight relevant cases or arguments raised by both parties. While primarily focusing on venue-related arguments, the defendant also joins and incorporates the arguments made by co-defendants in their respective submissions. The defense reiterates its position that the Second Amended Complaint (SAC) should be dismissed based on prior arguments made by the defendant and co-defendants.Should the SAC not be dismissed, including for reasons of improper venue, the defense asserts that the case should be transferred to the District of the Virgin Islands (D.V.I.), where it would be more appropriately handled.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.178.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

As universal jurisdiction gains momentum worldwide, we spoke with John Bosco Siboyintore and Nicola Palmer about its potential to close the accountability gap left by the 1994 Genocide Against the Tutsi in Rwanda. If it's interesting, do like, subscribe and leave us a review. Want to find out more? Check out all the background information on our website including hundreds more podcasts on international justice covering all the angles: https://www.asymmetricalhaircuts.com/ Or you can sign up to our newsletter: https://www.asymmetricalhaircuts.com/newsletters/ Did you like what you heard? Tip us here: https://www.asymmetricalhaircuts.com/support-us/ Or want to support us long term? Check out our Patreon, where - for the price of a cup of coffee every month - you also become part of our War Criminals Bookclub and can make recommendations on what we should review next, here: https://www.patreon.com/c/AsymmetricalHaircuts Asymmetrical Haircuts is created, produced and presented by Janet Anderson and Stephanie van den Berg, together with a small team of producers, assistant producers, researchers and interns. Check out the team here: https://www.asymmetricalhaircuts.com/what-about-asymmetrical-haircuts/

When a child or a nation chooses a path you are completely against, how do you respond without losing your strength? Discover "The Samuel Principle" and find out why a faith crisis or a transition in leadership is an invitation to evaluate our hearts—not just our outward appearances. Summary: In this episode, we unpack 1 Samuel 8–16, charting the shift from the rule of judges to the era of the kings. We navigate the messy landscape of parental grief, corporate peer pressure, and the personal conversion required to shift from a "hidden" potential to a "magnified" priesthood. The Samuel Principle: We analyze how to implement the three-part divine formula when a loved one exercises their agency poorly: hearken to their voice, protest solemnly, and show them the long-term consequences. Hiding Among the Stuff: We address Saul's overwhelming sense of inadequacy and why we are tempted to bury our potential under worldly distractions when God calls us to step forward. Turned into Another Man: We look at the spiritual alchemy that happens when the Spirit of the Lord comes upon a person, making them unrecognizable to those who only knew their "old" self. The Jurisdiction of Authority: We analyze Saul's fatal overreach at Gilgal, exploring the difference between doing a right thing in a wrong way and why waiting on the Lord's timing is an act of covenant trust. The Heart vs. The Stature: We conclude in Bethlehem, exploring why the Lord refused Eliab's height and chose the ruddy shepherd boy David, reminding us that man looks on the outward appearance, but God looks on the heart. Call-to-Action: Are you currently hiding "among the stuff" because you feel inadequate for what the Lord is asking you to do? How can David's hidden, shepherd-heart inspire you to step into the light this week? Share your thoughts in the comments! To keep your faith "Unshaken" while we walk through the Old Testament, please like, subscribe, and share this video. Chapter Timestamps: 0:00 Introduction 2:23 When a Loved One Makes a Choice You Don't Agree With 26:00 The Samuel Principle 40:12 The Call of Saul 52:51 Saul Anointed & Transformed 1:05:02 Israel United, Rebuked, & Reassured 1:19:46 Saul Offers Sacrifice 1:26:24 No Smiths in Israel 1:33:20 Jonathan & the Philistine Garrison 1:53:44 To Obey Is Better than Sacrifice 2:15:39 Samuel Chooses David

Several listeners have asked for a podcast on the topic of Jurisdiction. Here is the fly over introduction!

➔

When a company changes its name, sharpens its focus and adds technical leadership with deep Nevada experience, the change is worth noting. Maverick Gold and Silver did not simply rebrand in April 2026. It began building a more focused precious metals story around Nevada, one of North America's most established gold producing jurisdictions.Ian Foreman, VP Exploration, said Nevada was a major reason he joined Maverick. Peter Baxter, Senior Technical Advisor, brings decades of geological and capital markets experience, including extensive field experience in Nevada and 15 years in mining investment banking at Scotiabank. Together, they are helping advance Jericho and Gator, two Nevada gold-silver projects with strong surface indicators, historic work and clear next steps toward drill targeting.WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOWNevada Focus: Jericho expanded 370% to 1,683 acres on April 30, 2026, after Maverick staked 62 new claims to cover more of the mineralized system.Historic Validation: Jericho has seen small-scale mining and historic exploration, but according to Peter Baxter, it has no recent drilling. Management believes the project was overlooked due to portfolio history, not a negative geological conclusion.Systematic Work Underway: Maverick has 170 samples in the lab from Jericho from systematic sampling across the property. Historic samples cited in the interview included approximately highs of 3.4 g/t gold and 1,200 g/t silver.Gator sits near Battle Mountain in Nevada, with year-round access, a hydrothermal system extending over 7 kilometers and multiple target areas. The company has an existing drill permit in place and is working on permit modifications for GSX and Gator South.Third Project Advancing: Silver Vista in British Columbia remains a key part of the portfolio. Maverick has completed a flow-through financing, has a funded drill program planned and is only awaiting the required drill permit before the drill turns.STRATEGIC IMPLICATIONSFor junior explorers, jurisdiction matters as much as geology. Grade can attract attention, but location can determine how efficiently a project moves from concept to exploration, and eventually through more advanced stages if results justify it. Nevada offers a rare combination of gold endowment, infrastructure, mining history, technical expertise and an established regulatory framework.That is why Maverick's pivot to Nevada is important. The company is not trying to tell a broad, scattered story. It is concentrating on two projects in a jurisdiction where large gold systems are well understood and where experienced geologists can use modern tools to revisit ground that may not have been fully tested.Peter Baxter pointed to Nevada's major gold belts as mature but not exhausted. He noted that much of the production in north central Nevada has occurred within recent decades, while deeper exploration continues to change how known districts are understood. In his view, modern geophysics, detailed mapping and deeper drill testing can still create meaningful new exploration opportunities in areas with the right surface evidence.The timing is also important. Stronger precious metals markets have increased investor attention on gold and silver exploration, especially in established jurisdictions. Maverick is positioning itself around a simple question: can modern fieldwork and disciplined drilling unlock value from Nevada projects that have surface evidence, historic validation and limited modern testing?VP Exploration Ian Foreman, discussing the company's current fieldwork:“We've got about 170 samples in the lab right now from Jericho… As for Gator, the decision to drill has been made… There is a drill permit in place for the property… we are going to modify that drill permit so that we can put a couple of drill holes down into the GSX target and into Gator South. So, what work we're doing now is, in fact, not for a drill decision, but where the drill holes are going to go.”

Richard Epstein disputes the "plain meaning" application to the 14th Amendment, arguing that "subject to the jurisdiction" requires natural allegiance rather than mere physical presence. Critiquing the Wong Kim Ark ruling, he suggests that children of legal permanent aliens should inherit their parents' status rather than automatic citizenship.1880

Professor Richard Epstein analyzes the legal nuances of the 14th Amendment and the myth of birthright citizenship. He explains the "plain meaning" rule of the Constitution, distinguishing between being "subject to the jurisdiction"—which implies loyalty to a sovereign—and merely being "within the jurisdiction" as a temporary resident. His insights challenge standard interpretations of citizenship law.1937 SCOTUS

Mangione Case Follow-Up: Fourth Amendment, Search and Seizure, and Exclusionary Rule ExplainedThis time, Steve Palmer takes us back into the high-profile case of Luigi Mangione, the New York murder defendant whose arrest and evidence collection at a McDonald's in Pennsylvania stirred significant legal debate.Inside This EpisodeCase Recap: Steve Palmer revisits the facts—how Mangione was recognized, detained, and had his bag searched without a warrant, leading to the discovery of critical evidence (00:19–01:00).The Fourth Amendment in Action: Explore the ins and outs of search and seizure law, and why exceptions to the warrant requirement—like the Terry stop and Chimel's wingspan rule—matter in real cases (01:34–03:13).State vs. Federal Law: Why does it matter if it's Pennsylvania, New York, or federal law at play? Steve Palmer breaks down how constitutional rights can be interpreted differently by state and federal courts—and what that means for suppression of evidence (04:17–07:09).Dual Sovereignty Doctrine: Learn how evidence thrown out of state court may still live on in a federal case, thanks to the dual sovereign doctrine (07:41–08:46).The Exclusionary Rule Debate: “Why throw out evidence at all?” Steve Palmer discusses Mapp v. Ohio, why the exclusionary rule exists, and whether it should remain part of American law (09:15–11:19).Want more on Mangione or other cases raising constitutional questions?Send your thoughts and questions directly to us—your feedback shapes our future episodes!Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2026 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At LawMentioned in this episode:Circle 270 Media Podcast ConsultantsCircle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com

OPINION: International legal experts say ICC has no jurisdiction | May 22, 2026Subscribe to The Manila Times Channel - https://tmt.ph/YTSubscribe Visit our website at https://www.manilatimes.net Follow us: Facebook - https://tmt.ph/facebook Instagram - https://tmt.ph/instagram Twitter - https://tmt.ph/twitter DailyMotion - https://tmt.ph/dailymotion Subscribe to our Digital Edition - https://tmt.ph/digital Check out our Podcasts: Spotify - https://tmt.ph/spotify Apple Podcasts - https://tmt.ph/applepodcasts Amazon Music - https://tmt.ph/amazonmusic Deezer: https://tmt.ph/deezer Stitcher: https://tmt.ph/stitcher Tune In: https://tmt.ph/tunein #TheManilaTimes #KeepUpWithTheTimes Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

One of the greatest threat to early America was piracy, but it wasn’t found in the Caribbean or Gulf Coast. It was pirates on the Ohio and Mississippi Rivers. Samuel Mason fought bravely at the 1777 Siege of Fort Henry, became a Justice of the Peace in the Northwest Territory, then turned Cave-in-Rock into a strategic base for organized river piracy where he lured flatboat crews with promises of "liquor and entertainment" before robbing and murdering them. Mason thrived because the new republic had weak, fragmented control over its western territories. Jurisdiction overlapped between local authorities, territorial governments, Spanish Louisiana, and American claims. He exploited every gap. His story ended when two of his own men killed him, severed his head, and tried to collect bounty money in Natchez, only to be recognized as outlaws themselves and hanged. Today's guest is Carter Smith, author of From Patriot to Pirate: The Outlaw Life of Sam Mason. We discuss why Mason kicked the infamous Harpe brothers out of his gang because their extreme brutality threatened to draw too much attention to his organized operation. Smith explains how the collapse of frontier order after the Revolution pushed respected veterans into outlawry. Mason wasn't a wandering thug. He was organized, strategic, and dangerous. His life reveals what criminal opportunity looked like when the map said one thing but actual control on the ground said something else.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Explore strategic litigation across Asean countries against Myanmar's military rulers, with Chris Gunness, Zaj Uk, and Jenna Dolecek. If it's interesting, do like, subscribe and leave us a review. Want to find out more? Check out all the background information on our website including hundreds more podcasts on international justice covering all the angles: https://www.asymmetricalhaircuts.com/ Or you can sign up to our newsletter: https://www.asymmetricalhaircuts.com/newsletters/ Did you like what you heard? Tip us here: https://www.asymmetricalhaircuts.com/support-us/ Or want to support us long term? Check out our Patreon, where - for the price of a cup of coffee every month - you also become part of our War Criminals Bookclub and can make recommendations on what we should review next, here: https://www.patreon.com/c/AsymmetricalHaircuts Asymmetrical Haircuts is created, produced and presented by Janet Anderson and Stephanie van den Berg, together with a small team of producers, assistant producers, researchers and interns. Check out the team here: https://www.asymmetricalhaircuts.com/what-about-asymmetrical-haircuts/

There is a current Massachusetts bill sponsored by MA Senator Brendan Crighton, S.1061 “An Act to promote public safety and better outcomes for youths” that aims to gradually raise the juvenile-court age to 21 years old. Massachusetts currently treats anyone 18 or older as an adult in criminal court so if this bill passes, that will change. Do you support raising the age of juvenile jurisdiction to 21 years of age? Sen. Crighton joined us to discuss his bill.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

There is a current Massachusetts bill sponsored by MA Senator Brendan Crighton, S.1061 “An Act to promote public safety and better outcomes for youths” that aims to gradually raise the juvenile-court age to 21 years old. Massachusetts currently treats anyone 18 or older as an adult in criminal court so if this bill passes, that will change. Do you support raising the age of juvenile jurisdiction to 21 years of age? See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Wednesday, May 13th, 2026 Today, the Department of Homeland Security is closing Alligator Alcatraz citing costs; Trump's complaints about leaks regarding the Iran war has prompted aggressive investigations into journalists by the Justice Department; a federal grand jury has subpoenaed New York University's hospital system for the health records of transgender minors; Democrats on House Oversight have released a report showing how Epstein's sweetheart deal allowed him to expand his sex trafficking operation; the lone Democratic FCC commissioner tells Disney that the agency is out to censor them over disfavored speech; the 11th Circuit has denied Trump's request to rehear en banc his frivolous lawsuit against Hillary Clinton and 40 others that resulted in $1M in sanctions for Trump and Alina Habba; Allison talks Supreme Court with Elie Mystal; and Dana delivers your Good News. Thank You, HoneyLove Save 20% Off Honeylove by going to honeylove.com/DAILYBEANS #honeylovepod  #sponsored Thank You, WildGrain Get $30 off your first box + free Croissants in every box. Go to https://Wildgrain.com/DAILYBEANS to start your subscription. Guest: Elie Mystal Justice Correspondent for The Nation Magazine Elie Mystal | The NationElie v. U.S. Newsletter | The Nation Elienyc.bsky.socialAllow Me to Retort - The New PressBad Law - The New Press The Latest Breakdown:Epstein Survivor Reveals More Docs Hidden by Trump DOJ | The Breakdown Stories Epstein survivors give tearful testimony in House field hearing in Palm Beach | The Guardian Trump's Complaints About Iran War Leaks Prompt Aggressive DOJ Investigations | WSJ An FCC Commissioner Tells Disney the Agency Is on a Campaign to Censor It | WSJ NYU Langone Hospital Is Subpoenaed Over Youth Trans Care | The New York Times Trump hit with loss as court declines to rehear lawsuit against key presidential enemies | Raw Story Good TroubleChildrensRights.org Petition · Close Dilley ICE Detention Center: Protect Children - Change.org Ms Rachel on Instagram: "You can help close Dilley!

WMAL GUEST: REP. JIM JORDAN (R-Ohio, Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee) on the committee's expanded investigation into sanctuary jurisdictions, including Arlington County and Philadelphia. He discusses the subpoenas issued to prosecutors and sheriff’s offices for documents related to the refusal to cooperate with ICE, and the upcoming testimony of Fairfax officials before Congress. WEBSITE: Judiciary.House.gov SOCIAL MEDIA: X.com/Jim_Jordan Where to find more about WMAL's morning show: Follow Podcasts on Apple Podcasts, Audible, and Spotify Follow WMAL's "O'Connor and Company" on X: @WMALDC, @LarryOConnor, @JGunlock, and @HeatherHunterDC Facebook: WMALDC and Larry O'Connor Instagram: WMALDC Website: WMAL.com/OConnor-Company Episode: Wednesday, May 6, 2026 / 8 AM HourSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The Burmese military maintains its grip over Burma through arson, arbitrary detentions, airstrikes, killings, and other forms of intimidation and violence to instill fear in its people, including ethnoreligious minorities such as Rohingya and Chin. The lack of justice for the junta's atrocities has deepened its resolve, yet Burmese people are seeking accountability through the legal principle of universal jurisdiction. On this episode of the USCIRF Spotlight podcast, Commissioner Stephen Schneck speaks with Tun Khin, President of the Burmese Rohingya Organization UK, and Salai Za Uk Ling, the Executive Director of the Chin Human Rights Organization. Their discussion centers on the principle of universal jurisdiction and how civil society organizations are seeking to prosecute responsible individuals through courts overseas for their part in ordering and carrying out genocide and crimes against humanity.

What if everything you believe about tax and income was designed to keep you broke?Spoiler: it was.Tahlia Rochelle from The Living Council sits down with Laban for one of those conversations that makes you stare at the ceiling at 2am going "wait... WHAT?"If you've ever had that nagging feeling that the financial system wasn't exactly built with you in mind, buckle up. Turns out you were right. You just didn't have the receipts until now.IN THIS EPISODE:Ever wonder why certain pubs stayed open during COVID while everyone else was padlocked shut and crying into their home brew? There's a reason for that. A very specific, very legal reason. And once you hear it, you can't unhear it.Tahlia breaks down the difference between operating for profit vs. for purpose, why the same dollar gets taxed up to eight times in Australia, and how everyday Australians including teachers, designers, and business owners have quietly restructured their lives using the same tools the elite have always had access to.They just weren't advertising it.KEY CONCEPTS COVERED:For profit vs. for purpose and what it means legally. Private Members Associations and how they actually work in Australia. Jurisdiction explained in a way that finally makes sense. How this applies whether you're punching a clock, running a business, or somewhere in between. And the mindset shift required, plus how long it realistically takes.ABOUT THE LIVING COUNCIL:The Living Council is a private online community for everyday Australians who are done funding a system that was never designed for them. You start with a Clarity Call to see if it's a good fit, because they're not trying to collect warm bodies, they actually care who's in the room.Three ways to get involved once you're in:Done By You. Done With You. Done For You.Pick your speed.LINKS:The Living Council Website: https://ap1.hubs.ly/y0MHWV0Book a Clarity Call: https://ap1.hubs.ly/y0MHZg0ABOUT LABAN:Laban is going through this process himself right now, in real time, with The Living Council. Same as with health, therapeutic nicotine, ultramarathons, and everything else he's thrown himself into headfirst. He learns it, lives it, then shares it from a place of certainty. You know how he rolls by now.Listen to more: linktr.ee/LabanDitchburnGrab Bet On You: https://a.co/d/5WPd6MlThis content is educational and not legal or financial advice. Do your own research. If you haven't learned to do that by now, honestly, this episode is probably a great place to start.

Belgian Universal Jurisdiction - how does it work - with Mathias Holvoet. If it's interesting, do like, subscribe and leave us a review. Want to find out more? Check out all the background information on our website including hundreds more podcasts on international justice covering all the angles: https://www.asymmetricalhaircuts.com/ Or you can sign up to our newsletter: https://www.asymmetricalhaircuts.com/newsletters/ Did you like what you heard? Tip us here: https://www.asymmetricalhaircuts.com/support-us/ Or want to support us long term? Check out our Patreon, where - for the price of a cup of coffee every month - you also become part of our War Criminals Bookclub and can make recommendations on what we should review next, here: https://www.patreon.com/c/AsymmetricalHaircuts Asymmetrical Haircuts is created, produced and presented by Janet Anderson and Stephanie van den Berg, together with a small team of producers, assistant producers, researchers and interns. Check out the team here: https://www.asymmetricalhaircuts.com/what-about-asymmetrical-haircuts/

Tap here to send us a message!There is a difference between power and authority, for authority is the permission to exercise the power that has been given. Though earthly rulers may operate within a certain jurisdiction, their authority is limited and subject to a higher throne. Herod's Jurisdiction reveals that while man may claim authority, all power ultimately rests in Jesus, and every jurisdiction is under His rule.04/12/2026 - Sunday Afternoon Scriptures:Romans 13:1Luke 23:4-7

7. John Yoo outlines the history of birthright citizenship and the 14th Amendment's goal to overrule *Dred Scott*. He details Trump administration legal challenges concerning illegal migration and the definition of jurisdiction and domicile. (7)1877

8. John Yoo examines the landmark *United States v. Wong Kim Ark* case and the debate over "jurisdiction". He analyzes the Supreme Court's oral arguments and potential hurdles for the government's narrow interpretation of citizenship. (8)1890 LOUISIANA

On this episode of The Federalist Radio Hour, Ira Mehlman, media director at the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR), joins Federalist Senior Elections Correspondent Matt Kittle to break down the birthright citizenship arguments before the Supreme Court and outline how the birth tourism industry is exploiting the 14th Amendment. Read more about Trump v. Barbara here.The Federalist Foundation is a nonprofit, and we depend entirely on our listeners and readers — not corporations. If you value fearless, independent journalism, please consider a tax-deductible gift today at TheFederalist.com/donate. Your support keeps us going.

Joseph Duggar now faces criminal charges in two states — felony molestation charges in Florida and misdemeanor endangerment and false imprisonment charges in Arkansas — creating a dual-jurisdiction prosecution with distinct legal timelines and evidentiary standards that both point back to the same household.This week's look back at the most consequential legal developments in true crime examines the procedural architecture of the Duggar case. In Florida, Duggar, 31, is charged with lewd and lascivious molestation on a child under 12 and lewd and lascivious contact, stemming from alleged incidents during a 2020 family vacation to Panama City Beach. The arrest affidavit from the Bay County Sheriff's Office documents that a now-14-year-old victim disclosed the alleged abuse during a forensic interview, that her father confronted Duggar and he allegedly admitted to the conduct, and that Tontitown detectives subsequently arranged a monitored call in which Duggar allegedly admitted a second time. Bond was set at $600,000. The court barred unsupervised contact with any minor. Arraignment is scheduled for April 20.In Arkansas, both Joseph and his wife Kendra Duggar, 27, face four counts each of second-degree endangering the welfare of a minor and four counts each of second-degree false imprisonment — misdemeanor charges that correspond to the children in their home. Kendra was arrested and released on $1,470 bond. Both have Arkansas court dates in late April. Investigators reportedly found locks installed on the exterior of room doors in the home, a detail that carries potential evidentiary weight for both the endangerment and false imprisonment charges.The legal question that extends beyond these specific charges involves Jim Bob Duggar and the family's documented history of handling abuse allegations internally. Josh Duggar's molestation of family members was publicly reported to have been known to Jim Bob years before any law enforcement contact. Josh Duggar is now serving approximately 12 and a half years in federal prison for possession of child sexual abuse material. Whether mandatory reporting obligations were violated in prior incidents — and whether any statute of limitations forecloses accountability — are questions the legal system has yet to formally address.Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer and retired FBI Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Chief Robin Dreeke assess the procedural implications, the evidentiary significance of the documented admissions, and whether investigators are positioned to examine the broader family structure.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#JosephDuggar #KendraDuggar #DuggarFamily #TrueCrimeToday #JoshDuggar #ChildEndangerment #CriminalJustice #19KidsAndCounting #JusticeForVictims #FalseImprisonment

This week, Emily Bazelon, John Dickerson, and David Plotz discuss yesterday's oral arguments in the monumentally important birthright citizenship case at the Supreme Court, Trump's primetime attempt to convince Americans that both their wallets and the Iran war are just fine, and strategy versus vibes in key Senate races in Maine and Texas.For this week's Slate Plus bonus episode, Emily, John, and David discuss the launch of NASA's Artemis II mission to the Moon. They muse poetically about space exploration, ask what NASA has been doing all this time, and discuss the benefits to humanity of such expensive missions. In the latest Gabfest Reads, David Plotz talks with journalist Gabriel Sherman about his new book Bonfire of the Murdochs: How the Epic Fight to Control the Last Great Media Dynasty Broke a Family—and the World. Sherman, who also wrote the bestselling biography of Fox News chief Roger Ailes, spent 15 years reporting on the Murdoch empire. In this book he turns his lens on the family itself — the rivalries, the wounds, and the secret Nevada courtroom battle that finally forced Rupert's hand. Email your chatters, questions, and comments to gabfest@slate.com. (Messages may be referenced by name unless the writer stipulates otherwise.) Podcast production by Nina Porzucki Research by Emily DittoYou can find the full Political Gabfest show pages here. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

This week, Emily Bazelon, John Dickerson, and David Plotz discuss yesterday's oral arguments in the monumentally important birthright citizenship case at the Supreme Court, Trump's primetime attempt to convince Americans that both their wallets and the Iran war are just fine, and strategy versus vibes in key Senate races in Maine and Texas.For this week's Slate Plus bonus episode, Emily, John, and David discuss the launch of NASA's Artemis II mission to the Moon. They muse poetically about space exploration, ask what NASA has been doing all this time, and discuss the benefits to humanity of such expensive missions. In the latest Gabfest Reads, David Plotz talks with journalist Gabriel Sherman about his new book Bonfire of the Murdochs: How the Epic Fight to Control the Last Great Media Dynasty Broke a Family—and the World. Sherman, who also wrote the bestselling biography of Fox News chief Roger Ailes, spent 15 years reporting on the Murdoch empire. In this book he turns his lens on the family itself — the rivalries, the wounds, and the secret Nevada courtroom battle that finally forced Rupert's hand. Email your chatters, questions, and comments to gabfest@slate.com. (Messages may be referenced by name unless the writer stipulates otherwise.) Podcast production by Nina Porzucki Research by Emily DittoYou can find the full Political Gabfest show pages here. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

This week, Emily Bazelon, John Dickerson, and David Plotz discuss yesterday's oral arguments in the monumentally important birthright citizenship case at the Supreme Court, Trump's primetime attempt to convince Americans that both their wallets and the Iran war are just fine, and strategy versus vibes in key Senate races in Maine and Texas.For this week's Slate Plus bonus episode, Emily, John, and David discuss the launch of NASA's Artemis II mission to the Moon. They muse poetically about space exploration, ask what NASA has been doing all this time, and discuss the benefits to humanity of such expensive missions. In the latest Gabfest Reads, David Plotz talks with journalist Gabriel Sherman about his new book Bonfire of the Murdochs: How the Epic Fight to Control the Last Great Media Dynasty Broke a Family—and the World. Sherman, who also wrote the bestselling biography of Fox News chief Roger Ailes, spent 15 years reporting on the Murdoch empire. In this book he turns his lens on the family itself — the rivalries, the wounds, and the secret Nevada courtroom battle that finally forced Rupert's hand. Email your chatters, questions, and comments to gabfest@slate.com. (Messages may be referenced by name unless the writer stipulates otherwise.) Podcast production by Nina Porzucki Research by Emily DittoYou can find the full Political Gabfest show pages here. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Hugh Hallman, Attorney, Educator, and former Mayor of Tempe, joins Seth in studio for the full hour to talk about the Supreme Court’s impending arguments over the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and whether it conveys citizenship to children born in the country of illegal parents. They delve into the history of the 14th Amendment and its interpretation, highlighting the phrase "subject to the jurisdiction thereof." Hugh shares his expertise on the Civil Rights Act of 1866 and the original intent behind the amendment. The conversation provides a nuanced exploration of the complex issue of birthright citizenship and this case's potential implications for the country.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Two arrests. Two states. Two distinct charging frameworks. The Duggar family is now navigating simultaneous criminal exposure in Florida and Arkansas — and the legal specifics of each case matter in ways that most coverage failed to separate.This week on True Crime Today, Tony Brueski and criminal defense attorney Bob Motta break down the precise legal architecture of both cases.Joseph Duggar faces two Florida life felony charges — molestation of a victim under 12 and lewd and lascivious behavior by a person 18 or older. Each count carries either a life sentence or a minimum split sentence of 25 years followed by lifetime probation and community control. The charges originate from a forensic interview in which a now-14-year-old girl alleged repeated abuse during a 2020 family vacation in Panama City Beach when she was approximately 9 years old. Per the Bay County Sheriff's Office arrest affidavit, Joseph allegedly admitted his conduct to the victim's father, and then again to a Tontitown police detective who was placed on the same call. Joseph has waived extradition and is awaiting transfer to Florida where the alleged offenses occurred.Kendra Duggar was separately arrested in Arkansas on misdemeanor charges — four counts each of endangering the welfare of a minor and false imprisonment — tied to the four Duggar children currently in the home. These charges are legally distinct from the Florida case and originated in the mandatory home study that Joseph's arrest triggered under Arkansas law. The Tontitown investigation is confirmed to be ongoing.The two cases share a family but not a charging theory, not a jurisdiction, and not a legal standard. Bob Motta walks through how defense counsel manages simultaneous multi-state exposure, what the extradition waiver signals procedurally, and how the alleged pre-arrest admissions — made without counsel present — factor into the evidentiary picture going forward.Josh Duggar's statement through counsel characterizing the allegations as sensationalized fiction — issued while Joseph had allegedly already made documented admissions — is addressed in full. As is the fact that Josh Duggar has now retained new high-profile legal counsel to challenge his own conviction, a detail that speaks directly to the behavioral pattern Robin Dreeke identifies running through this entire family system.Two cases. One legal breakdown. All of it here.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#JosephDuggar #KendraDuggar #DuggarCase #TrueCrimeLaw #FloridaFelony #BobMotta #TrueCrimeToday #HiddenKillers #ChildAbuseCases #DuggarFamily