Podcasts about ii it

AMY YOURE NOT THE ONLY TELEPATH HERE, YOU SONOFABITCH. —watch it. AMY (CON'D) “TELE”—MOTHERFUCKER. WE'VE ALLL BEEN ON TV. The ongoing and atrociously heavy beef between screen icons Amy Peoehler and Jimmy Fallon has raged on for years and reached its peak at an all time high; this war has waged on spanning nearly two decades and though ounlically masquerading as close friends are actually sworn enemies. Dang. This dude has a lot of enemies. Also this dude is not this dude. What. More on that later. Lorne Michaels was some sort of TV God—and though apparently so was I, I was almost certain that he wouldn't like me. MAYA TINA, YOU FUCKING SNITCH. MELISSA TROUT! TROUT! RACHEL TROUT. TINA WHAT?! What does that even mean?! MELISSA IT MEANS YOURE A TROUT. RACHEL TROUT! Kirstin Wiig rounds the corner belatedly, holding up the skirt of an oversized Quinceñera gown, revealing that she is wearing knee-high homeboy*/ cowboy style rain boots. The bottom of the dress and the boots are covered in a strange sludge— and what appears to be some sort of paper mache confetti. KIRSTIN Did I miss it? TINA Miss what?! Whay am I missing?! MAYA Oh, you missed it alright. KIRSTIN AH, SLAG! MAYA *face* {Enter The Multiverse} I just realized Kristen Shaal and Kristen Wiig are both in the impenetrable ten. ( No. I didn't just notice that. I wrote it that way.) Also, wtf is up with their shirts aa Ii It's so nobody gets us confused. Nobody is going to get you two confused. …eh. Which one are you again. IN THE OTHER DIMENSION: SHUT UP. WHAT'S MY POWER. Mindfuckery. YEAH IT IS. In the other other dimension: I'LL SEE YOU AT THE PEARLY GATES, MOTHERFUCKER. Agh. Alright. Good luck with your kite. Loser. Goddammn. Why are they so MEAN. K I've abandoned your proposal A wickedness that speaks with winds Untied hands And no spirit yet to grip, My heart has moved, And lest, The ties that bind are still bound by blood As never sold souls walk endlessly at diamond crossroads Kneeling in the eye at dawn, To sworn Did you want that to-go, or? You know what? I like that version of him. Me too, kind of Lets just leave him here We should. We can't. We should, though. All stand, for the irish; Some of us, scattered, Some of us lost, Return for the brotherhood Fight for us not, Nocturnal wonderer, For we have journeyed To warn Of her surplus –I do type faster with my thumbs. Marvelous. Move, mistress, I Yield ye steady truth for seized upon the wicked hands, The hard truths lie within the heart of golden warrior, Tongues roped with cattlebands, Simple thoughts, Punishable and forsaken {Enter The Multiverse} [The Festival Project.™] COPYRIGHT © THE FESTIVAL PROJECT, INC. circa 2018- 2024 | ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. © -Ū. boxed. Collection II - ‘antithesis' Prod. By Blū Tha Gürū The Collective Complex © | [The Festival Project ™]

AMY YOURE NOT THE ONLY TELEPATH HERE, YOU SONOFABITCH. —watch it. AMY (CON'D) “TELE”—MOTHERFUCKER. WE'VE ALLL BEEN ON TV. The ongoing and atrociously heavy beef between screen icons Amy Peoehler and Jimmy Fallon has raged on for years and reached its peak at an all time high; this war has waged on spanning nearly two decades and though ounlically masquerading as close friends are actually sworn enemies. Dang. This dude has a lot of enemies. Also this dude is not this dude. What. More on that later. Lorne Michaels was some sort of TV God—and though apparently so was I, I was almost certain that he wouldn't like me. MAYA TINA, YOU FUCKING SNITCH. MELISSA TROUT! TROUT! RACHEL TROUT. TINA WHAT?! What does that even mean?! MELISSA IT MEANS YOURE A TROUT. RACHEL TROUT! Kirstin Wiig rounds the corner belatedly, holding up the skirt of an oversized Quinceñera gown, revealing that she is wearing knee-high homeboy*/ cowboy style rain boots. The bottom of the dress and the boots are covered in a strange sludge— and what appears to be some sort of paper mache confetti. KIRSTIN Did I miss it? TINA Miss what?! Whay am I missing?! MAYA Oh, you missed it alright. KIRSTIN AH, SLAG! MAYA *face* {Enter The Multiverse} I just realized Kristen Shaal and Kristen Wiig are both in the impenetrable ten. ( No. I didn't just notice that. I wrote it that way.) Also, wtf is up with their shirts aa Ii It's so nobody gets us confused. Nobody is going to get you two confused. …eh. Which one are you again. IN THE OTHER DIMENSION: SHUT UP. WHAT'S MY POWER. Mindfuckery. YEAH IT IS. In the other other dimension: I'LL SEE YOU AT THE PEARLY GATES, MOTHERFUCKER. Agh. Alright. Good luck with your kite. Loser. Goddammn. Why are they so MEAN. K I've abandoned your proposal A wickedness that speaks with winds Untied hands And no spirit yet to grip, My heart has moved, And lest, The ties that bind are still bound by blood As never sold souls walk endlessly at diamond crossroads Kneeling in the eye at dawn, To sworn Did you want that to-go, or? You know what? I like that version of him. Me too, kind of Lets just leave him here We should. We can't. We should, though. All stand, for the irish; Some of us, scattered, Some of us lost, Return for the brotherhood Fight for us not, Nocturnal wonderer, For we have journeyed To warn Of her surplus –I do type faster with my thumbs. Marvelous. Move, mistress, I Yield ye steady truth for seized upon the wicked hands, The hard truths lie within the heart of golden warrior, Tongues roped with cattlebands, Simple thoughts, Punishable and forsaken {Enter The Multiverse} [The Festival Project.™] COPYRIGHT © THE FESTIVAL PROJECT, INC. circa 2018- 2024 | ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. © -Ū. boxed. Collection II - ‘antithesis' Prod. By Blū Tha Gürū The Collective Complex © | [The Festival Project ™]

AMY YOURE NOT THE ONLY TELEPATH HERE, YOU SONOFABITCH. —watch it. AMY (CON'D) “TELE”—MOTHERFUCKER. WE'VE ALLL BEEN ON TV. The ongoing and atrociously heavy beef between screen icons Amy Peoehler and Jimmy Fallon has raged on for years and reached its peak at an all time high; this war has waged on spanning nearly two decades and though ounlically masquerading as close friends are actually sworn enemies. Dang. This dude has a lot of enemies. Also this dude is not this dude. What. More on that later. Lorne Michaels was some sort of TV God—and though apparently so was I, I was almost certain that he wouldn't like me. MAYA TINA, YOU FUCKING SNITCH. MELISSA TROUT! TROUT! RACHEL TROUT. TINA WHAT?! What does that even mean?! MELISSA IT MEANS YOURE A TROUT. RACHEL TROUT! Kirstin Wiig rounds the corner belatedly, holding up the skirt of an oversized Quinceñera gown, revealing that she is wearing knee-high homeboy*/ cowboy style rain boots. The bottom of the dress and the boots are covered in a strange sludge— and what appears to be some sort of paper mache confetti. KIRSTIN Did I miss it? TINA Miss what?! Whay am I missing?! MAYA Oh, you missed it alright. KIRSTIN AH, SLAG! MAYA *face* {Enter The Multiverse} I just realized Kristen Shaal and Kristen Wiig are both in the impenetrable ten. ( No. I didn't just notice that. I wrote it that way.) Also, wtf is up with their shirts aa Ii It's so nobody gets us confused. Nobody is going to get you two confused. …eh. Which one are you again. IN THE OTHER DIMENSION: SHUT UP. WHAT'S MY POWER. Mindfuckery. YEAH IT IS. In the other other dimension: I'LL SEE YOU AT THE PEARLY GATES, MOTHERFUCKER. Agh. Alright. Good luck with your kite. Loser. Goddammn. Why are they so MEAN. K I've abandoned your proposal A wickedness that speaks with winds Untied hands And no spirit yet to grip, My heart has moved, And lest, The ties that bind are still bound by blood As never sold souls walk endlessly at diamond crossroads Kneeling in the eye at dawn, To sworn Did you want that to-go, or? You know what? I like that version of him. Me too, kind of Lets just leave him here We should. We can't. We should, though. All stand, for the irish; Some of us, scattered, Some of us lost, Return for the brotherhood Fight for us not, Nocturnal wonderer, For we have journeyed To warn Of her surplus –I do type faster with my thumbs. Marvelous. Move, mistress, I Yield ye steady truth for seized upon the wicked hands, The hard truths lie within the heart of golden warrior, Tongues roped with cattlebands, Simple thoughts, Punishable and forsaken {Enter The Multiverse} [The Festival Project.™] COPYRIGHT © THE FESTIVAL PROJECT, INC. circa 2018- 2024 | ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. © -Ū. boxed. Collection II - ‘antithesis' Prod. By Blū Tha Gürū The Collective Complex © | [The Festival Project ™]

Welcome to The Nonlinear Library, where we use Text-to-Speech software to convert the best writing from the Rationalist and EA communities into audio. This is: [Aspiration-based designs] 1. Informal introduction, published by B Jacobs on April 29, 2024 on LessWrong. Sequence Summary. This sequence documents research by SatisfIA, an ongoing project on non-maximizing, aspiration-based designs for AI agents that fulfill goals specified by constraints ("aspirations") rather than maximizing an objective function. We aim to contribute to AI safety by exploring design approaches and their software implementations that we believe might be promising but neglected or novel. Our approach is roughly related to but largely complementary to concepts like quantilization and satisficing (sometimes called "soft-optimization"), Decision Transformers, and Active Inference. This post describes the purpose of the sequence, motivates the research, describes the project status, our working hypotheses and theoretical framework, and has a short glossary of terms. It does not contain results and can safely be skipped if you want to get directly into the actual research. Epistemic status: We're still in the exploratory phase, and while the project has yielded some preliminary insights, we don't have any clear conclusions at this point. Our team holds a wide variety of opinions about the discoveries. Nothing we say is set in stone. Purpose of the sequence Inform: We aim to share our current ideas, thoughts, disagreements, open questions, and any results we have achieved thus far. By openly discussing the complexities and challenges we face, we seek to provide a transparent view of our project's progression and the types of questions we're exploring. Receive Feedback: We invite feedback on our approaches, hypotheses, and findings. Constructive criticism, alternative perspectives, and further suggestions are all welcome. Attract Collaborators: Through this sequence, we hope to resonate with other researchers and practitioners who our exploration appeals to and who are motivated by similar questions. Our goal is to expand our team with individuals who can contribute their unique expertise and insights. Motivation We share a general concern regarding the trajectory of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) development, particularly the risks associated with creating AGI agents designed to maximize objective functions. We have two main concerns: (I) AGI development might be inevitable (We assume this concern needs no further justification) (II) It might be impossible to implement an objective function the maximization of which would be safe The conventional view on A(G)I agents (see, e.g., Wikipedia) is that they should aim to maximize some function of the state or trajectory of the world, often called a "utility function", sometimes also called a "welfare function". It tacitly assumes that there is such an objective function that can adequately make the AGI behave in a moral way. However, this assumption faces several significant challenges: Moral ambiguity: The notion that a universally acceptable, safe utility function exists is highly speculative. Given the philosophical debates surrounding moral cognitivism and moral realism and similar debates in welfare economics, it is possible that there are no universally agreeable moral truths, casting doubt on the existence of a utility function that encapsulates all relevant ethical considerations. Historical track-record: Humanity's long-standing struggle to define and agree upon universal values or ethical standards raises skepticism about our capacity to discover or construct a comprehensive utility function that safely governs AGI behavior (Outer Alignment) in time. Formal specification and Tractability: Even if a theoretically safe and comprehensive utility function could be conceptualized, the challenges of formalizing such a function into a computable and tractable form are immense. This includes the dif...

Link to original articleWelcome to The Nonlinear Library, where we use Text-to-Speech software to convert the best writing from the Rationalist and EA communities into audio. This is: [Aspiration-based designs] 1. Informal introduction, published by B Jacobs on April 29, 2024 on LessWrong. Sequence Summary. This sequence documents research by SatisfIA, an ongoing project on non-maximizing, aspiration-based designs for AI agents that fulfill goals specified by constraints ("aspirations") rather than maximizing an objective function. We aim to contribute to AI safety by exploring design approaches and their software implementations that we believe might be promising but neglected or novel. Our approach is roughly related to but largely complementary to concepts like quantilization and satisficing (sometimes called "soft-optimization"), Decision Transformers, and Active Inference. This post describes the purpose of the sequence, motivates the research, describes the project status, our working hypotheses and theoretical framework, and has a short glossary of terms. It does not contain results and can safely be skipped if you want to get directly into the actual research. Epistemic status: We're still in the exploratory phase, and while the project has yielded some preliminary insights, we don't have any clear conclusions at this point. Our team holds a wide variety of opinions about the discoveries. Nothing we say is set in stone. Purpose of the sequence Inform: We aim to share our current ideas, thoughts, disagreements, open questions, and any results we have achieved thus far. By openly discussing the complexities and challenges we face, we seek to provide a transparent view of our project's progression and the types of questions we're exploring. Receive Feedback: We invite feedback on our approaches, hypotheses, and findings. Constructive criticism, alternative perspectives, and further suggestions are all welcome. Attract Collaborators: Through this sequence, we hope to resonate with other researchers and practitioners who our exploration appeals to and who are motivated by similar questions. Our goal is to expand our team with individuals who can contribute their unique expertise and insights. Motivation We share a general concern regarding the trajectory of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) development, particularly the risks associated with creating AGI agents designed to maximize objective functions. We have two main concerns: (I) AGI development might be inevitable (We assume this concern needs no further justification) (II) It might be impossible to implement an objective function the maximization of which would be safe The conventional view on A(G)I agents (see, e.g., Wikipedia) is that they should aim to maximize some function of the state or trajectory of the world, often called a "utility function", sometimes also called a "welfare function". It tacitly assumes that there is such an objective function that can adequately make the AGI behave in a moral way. However, this assumption faces several significant challenges: Moral ambiguity: The notion that a universally acceptable, safe utility function exists is highly speculative. Given the philosophical debates surrounding moral cognitivism and moral realism and similar debates in welfare economics, it is possible that there are no universally agreeable moral truths, casting doubt on the existence of a utility function that encapsulates all relevant ethical considerations. Historical track-record: Humanity's long-standing struggle to define and agree upon universal values or ethical standards raises skepticism about our capacity to discover or construct a comprehensive utility function that safely governs AGI behavior (Outer Alignment) in time. Formal specification and Tractability: Even if a theoretically safe and comprehensive utility function could be conceptualized, the challenges of formalizing such a function into a computable and tractable form are immense. This includes the dif...

Welcome to The Nonlinear Library, where we use Text-to-Speech software to convert the best writing from the Rationalist and EA communities into audio. This is: [Aspiration-based designs] 1. Informal introduction, published by B Jacobs on April 28, 2024 on The AI Alignment Forum. Sequence Summary. This sequence documents research by SatisfIA, an ongoing project on non-maximizing, aspiration-based designs for AI agents that fulfill goals specified by constraints ("aspirations") rather than maximizing an objective function. We aim to contribute to AI safety by exploring design approaches and their software implementations that we believe might be promising but neglected or novel. Our approach is roughly related to but largely complementary to concepts like quantilization and satisficing (sometimes called "soft-optimization"), Decision Transformers, and Active Inference. This post describes the purpose of the sequence, motivates the research, describes the project status, our working hypotheses and theoretical framework, and has a short glossary of terms. It does not contain results and can safely be skipped if you want to get directly into the actual research. Epistemic status: We're still in the exploratory phase, and while the project has yielded some preliminary insights, we don't have any clear conclusions at this point. Our team holds a wide variety of opinions about the discoveries. Nothing we say is set in stone. Purpose of the sequence Inform: We aim to share our current ideas, thoughts, disagreements, open questions, and any results we have achieved thus far. By openly discussing the complexities and challenges we face, we seek to provide a transparent view of our project's progression and the types of questions we're exploring. Receive Feedback: We invite feedback on our approaches, hypotheses, and findings. Constructive criticism, alternative perspectives, and further suggestions are all welcome. Attract Collaborators: Through this sequence, we hope to resonate with other researchers and practitioners who our exploration appeals to and who are motivated by similar questions. Our goal is to expand our team with individuals who can contribute their unique expertise and insights. Motivation We share a general concern regarding the trajectory of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) development, particularly the risks associated with creating AGI agents designed to maximize objective functions. We have two main concerns: (I) AGI development might be inevitable (We assume this concern needs no further justification) (II) It might be impossible to implement an objective function the maximization of which would be safe The conventional view on A(G)I agents (see, e.g., Wikipedia) is that they should aim to maximize some function of the state or trajectory of the world, often called a "utility function", sometimes also called a "welfare function". It tacitly assumes that there is such an objective function that can adequately make the AGI behave in a moral way. However, this assumption faces several significant challenges: Moral ambiguity: The notion that a universally acceptable, safe utility function exists is highly speculative. Given the philosophical debates surrounding moral cognitivism and moral realism and similar debates in welfare economics, it is possible that there are no universally agreeable moral truths, casting doubt on the existence of a utility function that encapsulates all relevant ethical considerations. Historical track-record: Humanity's long-standing struggle to define and agree upon universal values or ethical standards raises skepticism about our capacity to discover or construct a comprehensive utility function that safely governs AGI behavior (Outer Alignment) in time. Formal specification and Tractability: Even if a theoretically safe and comprehensive utility function could be conceptualized, the challenges of formalizing such a function into a computable and tractable form are immense. This inc...

Refugee Activist Detained here II Aran Mylvaganam respected community leader was handcuffed and detained for three hours during a protest at Andrew Gillies office in Thomastown on Thursday. Gillies is the minister for immigration and the demonstration was to remind him that 12,000, mostly Tamils, have been left with out permanent status in Australia. Aran talks to us today.Save Preston Market Town Hall Meeting here II The campaign to save Preston Market is holding a public meeting May 12 at Preston City Hall at 6.30pm.Driftwood the Musical here II Tania de Jong plays her grandmother in this local, true account of remarkable people surviving through art on arrival in Australia from war-torn Europe. Now running to May 20 at Chapel on Chapel.This is the week here II Kevin Healy gives us a comprehensive run through of the week with satire.Raise the Rate here II It is just before the Federal Budget, all the signs are that the rate of social security, as set now, is forcing families and individuals into poverty. We speak to Jeremy Poxton from the Australian Unemployed Workers Union (AUWU) how the Government is resisting raising the rate.

First Nation's Voice to Parliament here II It has been announced by the new Federal Government that there will be a referendum put to the Australian people around a First Nation's Voice to Parliament. A short exerpt (full)  from a recent Australia Institute event gives space fro Pat Anderson, AO and Prof Megan Davis to talk about the Uluru Statement from the Heart which is the start of the process.Acknowledgement of Archie Roach's Passing here II an interview with Archie from 1988.Zelda Grimshaw & Blockade Australia here II 3cr Radiothon event Climate, Capitalism and the Future heard from Blockade Australian Activist Zelda Grimshaw.This is the Week here II Kevin Healy curates the week with satire.National Climate Audit here II the Australian Security Climate Council has been given the go ahead to do a national climate audit after 10 years of a LNP government with its head in the sand. We hear from Dr Robert Glaser from the Australian Strategic Policy Institute (ASPI) and Admiral Chris Barrie about how quickly the nation needs to act in this emergency. A Word from the Climate Council here II a tiny word from Lesley Hughes, from the Climate Council, from a MEAA event around how journalists can report climate.

God is not done with us 1 King 19:1-9 I- It's only a time-out V3-5a - 1 Kings 19: 3-5a - Matthieu 11:28 II- It's only a knock v 5b & 7 . - 1Kings 19:5 & 7 - Daniel 10:9-11 - Acts 12:7 III- It's only a makeover V8-9 - 1 Kings19: 8-9 - Daniel 1:13-15 https://youtu.be/z_OY54RDEu8

Under His Wings -I It is a place of confidence -II It is a place of covering

John 4:27-38 King James Version 27 And upon this came his disciples, and marvelled that he talked with the woman: yet no man said, What seekest thou? or, Why talkest thou with her? 28 The woman then left her waterpot, and went her way into the city, and saith to the men, 29 Come, see a man, which told me all things that ever I did: is not this the Christ? 30 Then they went out of the city, and came unto him. 31 In the mean while his disciples prayed him, saying, Master, eat. 32 But he said unto them, I have meat to eat that ye know not of. 33 Therefore said the disciples one to another, Hath any man brought him ought to eat? 34 Jesus saith unto them, My meat is to do the will of him that sent me, and to finish his work. 35 Say not ye, There are yet four months, and then cometh harvest? behold, I say unto you, Lift up your eyes, and look on the fields; for they are white already to harvest. 36 And he that reapeth receiveth wages, and gathereth fruit unto life eternal: that both he that soweth and he that reapeth may rejoice together. 37 And herein is that saying true, One soweth, and another reapeth. 38 I sent you to reap that whereon ye bestowed no labour: other men laboured, and ye are entered into their labours. Lottie Moon Videos https://www.imb.org/lottie-moon-chris... Evangelism and Missions | The Difference Evangelism is when we are reaching people who can, will and should come to our church Missions is when we are reaching people who cannot, will not and should not come to our church I) It is sustaining and fulfilling work | Vs 32-34 Deuteronomy 8:3 which says, "Man does not live by bread alone, but on every word that proceeds from the mouth of the Lord." II) It is an urgent work | Vs 35 The world is filled with people just waiting for someone to tell them that God loves them, has a plan for their lives and will give them eternal life. III) It is a shared work | Vs 36-38 Missions is not a work one can do alone. IV) It is a joyous work | Vs 36 Jesus said: "So that he who sows and he who reaps may rejoice together" Nothing should thrill a Christian more than seeing a lost person come to Christ unless it is actually you being used of God to help that person into the kingdom. Let’s be sure we continue in His work until Jesus comes. Please pray about what you will give to the Lottie Moon Christmas offering this year. Lottie Moon Offering: Send to Midway Baptist Church (make a note that it is for Lottie Moon) or give here on line: https://www.imb.org/give-now/?project... https://www.imb.org/other-ways-to-give/ Watch us on our YouTube channel, our website or our Facebook page https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCi7C66QudDzbTDtA-DaSQBw/ https://midwaybaptistnc.org https://facebook.com/midwaybaptistnc

I God's Spirit holds authority over every single thing. His flesh with His substance, the power is still the same. God in flesh can still perform His many works to do. He simply does His Father's will. And God is Spirit, He can save all mankind, and so can God in flesh. God does His own work. II It's something that could never be dreamed or achieved by any man. God is, He is authority, but His flesh can submit to it. This is the real meaning of "Christ obeys the will of the Father." And God is Spirit, He can save all mankind, and so can God in flesh. God does His own work. III God won't disturb His own work, nor will He conflict with it. Work of the Spirit and the flesh are alike. They fulfill the same will and the same work. Despite different qualities, their substances are identical. Both have the essence and identity of God. And God is Spirit, He can save all mankind, and so can God in flesh. God does His own work. And God is Spirit, He can save all mankind, and so can God in flesh. God does His own work. from "The Substance of Christ Is Obedience to the Will of the Heavenly Father" in The Word Appears in the Flesh

I God's Spirit holds authority over every single thing. His flesh with His substance, the power is still the same. God in flesh can still perform His many works to do. He simply does His Father's will. And God is Spirit, He can save all mankind, and so can God in flesh. God does His own work. II It's something that could never be dreamed or achieved by any man. God is, He is authority, but His flesh can submit to it. This is the real meaning of "Christ obeys the will of the Father." And God is Spirit, He can save all mankind, and so can God in flesh. God does His own work. III God won't disturb His own work, nor will He conflict with it. Work of the Spirit and the flesh are alike. They fulfill the same will and the same work. Despite different qualities, their substances are identical. Both have the essence and identity of God. And God is Spirit, He can save all mankind, and so can God in flesh. God does His own work. And God is Spirit, He can save all mankind, and so can God in flesh. God does His own work. from "The Substance of Christ Is Obedience to the Will of the Heavenly Father" in The Word Appears in the Flesh

¡Salve amantes de la historia! Bienvenidos de nuevo al programa. Tras un breve descanso, volvemos de nuevo a uno de los especiales de esta temporada: la historia de las legiones romanas. Un tema que sin duda sabemos que os está gustando. Esta semana traemos la segunda entrega dedicada a las legiones con el numeral II. Así pues, os vamos a relatar la historia de tres de esas legiones, las que nos quedan: la II Itálica, la II Parthica y la II Traiana Fortis. Como veis tenemos legiones para un buen rato. Sin más, os invitamos a que os calceis las caligae, si es que no las tenéis desgastadas ya después de tanta marcha, y a que nos acompañéis de nuevo por los vastos territorios que componen nuestro querido imperio. Como siempre, estáis invitados a dejar vuestros comentarios, opiniones y sugerencias en cualquiera de nuestros canales habituales. REDES SOCIALES Y OTROS CANALES -Ivoox: http://www.ivoox.com/podcast-cliophil... -YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCY94tWHv81UixGZLXY8plOg -Twitter: https://twitter.com/HistCliophilos -Gmail: cliophilos@gmail.com - Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Cliophilos-un-paseo-por-la-historia-283924209122504/

I When doing my duty away from home, I think of You, and I pray to You. Through reading Your words, I've come to trust You more and my heart is soothed, oh. To bear witness for You, I suffer much pain, and I know even better how lovely You are. Following You, I'll walk ever on to the end. When You change Your form, we'll welcome Your return, whoa, we'll welcome Your return. II It's Your words which nurture me and give me a human life. Thinking of Your love, my heart feels enjoyment, and my whole body is filled with strength, with strength. I abandon everything and expend for You. It is You who exalts me. Following You, I'll walk ever on to the end. When You change Your form, we'll welcome Your return, whoa, we'll welcome Your return, oh. Oh, following You, I'll walk ever on to the end. When You change Your form, we'll welcome Your return, whoa, we'll welcome Your return. III Hardships and always being on the go cause me no pain, for You are with me. Though I cannot see Your face, my heart still loves You, and You are in my heart. Your love has already put down roots in my heart and I shall forever be loyal to You. Following You, I'll walk ever on to the end. When You change Your form, we'll welcome Your return, whoa, we'll welcome Your return, we'll welcome Your return, we'll welcome Your return. from Follow the Lamb and Sing New Songs

I Oh~ oh~ Satan has corrupted me so deeply, I have no human likeness at all. But now I have experienced God's work, and I have been awakened by Him. Today, I understand the truth revealed in the words of God. Truly, I am so poor, I have nothing. Oh, I am determined to follow God. Oh, I am determined to follow God. II It's Satan's nature that toys with me and makes me rebel against God. I have become a puppet of the flesh, it is such a tragedy. I resolve to practice the truth and gain back my real freedom. I'll transcend the flesh and get myself back. Oh, I am determined to follow God. Oh, I am determined to follow God. III I see the battle in the spirit world, I understand the meaning of God's work. God pays everything to save mankind, I want to cooperate with Him and be considerate of His will. I will seek to change my disposition and bear testimony for God. Oh, I am determined to follow God. Oh, I am determined to follow God. IV God has clearly pointed out the way, so I know how to live as a human. I will forsake Satan and my flesh, I will live relying on God's words. But practicing the truth is not easy, it depends on your resolution. Those who truly love His way are able. Oh, I am determined to follow God. Oh, I am determined to follow God. V God's work gets gradually deeper, and I don't know what will happen. But everything is in God's hands, and I believe that He is righteous. I must absolutely not betray God, I affirm Christ as the truth, way, and life. I must not follow false shepherds. Oh, I am determined to follow God. Oh, I am determined to follow God. Oh, I am determined to follow God. Oh, I am determined to follow God. Oh, I am determined to follow God. from Follow the Lamb and Sing New Songs

I “Truth” is the most real of life’s aphorisms, and the highest one among all humanity. It’s called “life’s aphorisms” because it’s what, because it’s what God asks of man and is work done by Him personally, God asks of man and is work done by Him personally. It’s not a saying summed up from something, nor a famous quote from someone great, someone great. But it’s an utterance to mankind from the Master of all things on earth and in heaven. II It’s not some words summed up by mankind, but the inherent life of God, God Himself. It’s thus the “highest of all life’s aphorisms.” To practice the truth is to fulfill one’s duty, and satisfy what God requires, God requires. It’s not a saying summed up from something, nor a famous quote from someone great, someone great. But it’s an utterance to mankind from the Master of all things on earth and in heaven. III The essence of this “requirement” is in fact the most real of all truths, and not some empty doctrine unachievable. It’s not a saying summed up from something, nor a famous quote from someone great, someone great. But it’s an utterance to mankind from the Master of all things on earth and in heaven. It’s not a saying summed up from something, nor a famous quote from someone great, someone great. But it’s an utterance to mankind from the Master of all things on earth and in heaven. from “Only Those Who Know God and His Work Can Satisfy God” in The Word Appears in the Flesh Recommendation: Praise and Worship "Chinese Gospel Choir Episode 18"

I God has a 6,000-year management plan, split into three phases, each called an age. Age of Law first, then Age of Grace, and the Age of Kingdom is the final phase. While God’s work differs in each, it all accords to what mankind needs, or to be more precise, it accords to the tricks used by Satan while battling Him. The purpose of God’s work is Satan’s defeat, to reveal God’s wisdom and almightiness, and to expose all of Satan’s tricks, thereby saving man from its domain, thereby saving man from its domain. II It’s to reveal God’s wisdom and almightiness, and expose Satan’s hideous depravity, teach created beings to tell good from evil, and know the Ruler of all things is God Himself, see clearly that Satan is man’s enemy, that it’s the evil one, a reprobate, so man can tell good from evil, truth from lies, holiness from filth, and great from base. The purpose of God’s work is Satan’s defeat, to reveal God’s wisdom and almightiness, and to expose all of Satan’s tricks, thereby saving man from its domain, thereby saving man from its domain. Make ignorant mankind bear witness to Him: It is not “God” who brought upon man corruption, and only God Himself, Master of creation, can bestow things to enjoy and bring man salvation. This is so they can come to know that God is the Ruler of all things, that Satan is merely a creation of His, which later chose to turn on Him. III God’s 6000-year plan is split in three phases, so that the following can be achieved: to allow His creations to be His witnesses, to know His will, and see that the truth is He. The purpose of God’s work is Satan’s defeat, to reveal God’s wisdom and almightiness, and to expose all of Satan’s tricks, thereby saving man from its domain, thereby saving man from its domain. from “The Truth Concerning the Work in the Age of Redemption” in The Word Appears in the Flesh Recommendation: Praise and Worship "Chinese Gospel Choir Episode 18"

Gordian III, The Return of the Gordians. Can this young boy of an emperor live up to the glories of Gordian I and II? It's a lot of resposibility: he would have to, for starters, last longer than three weeks; go onto not dying in his first battle or killing himself in his wardrobe. Also: Find out how a furious man named Tim saved the empire for the guitar wielding king of kings, Sharpur.