American murder on death row
POPULARITY
In a decision that has sparked widespread outrage, President Joe Biden has commuted the death sentences of 37 federal inmates, converting their punishments to life imprisonment without parole. This action, taken just weeks before the conclusion of his presidency and the inauguration of President-elect Donald Trump, has drawn fierce criticism from victims' families, advocacy groups, and members of the public. The commutations include individuals convicted of some of the most heinous crimes imaginable, including child murders, mass killings, and other acts of unimaginable violence. Critics argue that this move undermines justice, dishonors the memories of the victims, and raises serious questions about Biden's judgment as he approaches the twilight of his political career. Among those spared the death penalty is Thomas Sanders, a man convicted of the brutal kidnapping and murder of a 12-year-old girl. Sanders' crime not only ended a young life but also shattered a family, leaving scars that will never fully heal. His actions were so egregious that they drew national attention, with many calling for the harshest possible punishment. By commuting his sentence, Biden has effectively nullified the jury's decision to impose the ultimate penalty, sparking outrage among those who believe justice was already served. Another individual whose sentence was commuted is Anthony Battle, a man convicted of killing a prison guard. Battle's actions demonstrated a complete disregard for human life and authority, further highlighting the danger he posed to society. His crime, committed in a setting meant to rehabilitate or at least contain individuals who have broken the law, is a chilling reminder of the violence that can occur even in the most secure environments. By removing the possibility of execution, Biden's decision has reopened wounds for the families of the victims and those affected by his crime. The list of commuted sentences includes other names that are synonymous with terror and heartbreak. Marvin Gabrion, for example, was found guilty of the murder of Rachel Timmerman, whom he bound and drowned in a lake, leaving her infant daughter motherless. Kaboni Savage, a drug kingpin, orchestrated a firebombing that killed six people, including four children, as an act of witness intimidation. These are not isolated incidents or cases of wrongful conviction; these are cold, calculated acts of violence that tore families apart and left communities reeling. Yet, these individuals will now spend the rest of their lives in prison rather than face the ultimate punishment decreed by a jury of their peers. For the families of the victims, Biden's decision is a betrayal. These are families who have already endured unimaginable loss and have fought tirelessly for justice. The commutations feel like a dismissal of their pain and a disregard for the lives that were brutally taken. One father of a victim, speaking on the condition of anonymity, described the decision as “an insult to the memory of my child and a slap in the face to our family.” Another grieving family member questioned how someone convicted of such heinous acts could be shown mercy when they offered none to their victims. The emotional toll on these families cannot be overstated. Many have spent years attending court proceedings, reliving their trauma in the pursuit of justice. For them, the death penalty represented not only a punishment for the perpetrators but also a form of closure, a definitive end to a chapter marked by pain and loss. Biden's decision to commute these sentences has reopened old wounds and left many feeling that their suffering has been compounded by the very system they trusted to deliver justice. Critics of the decision have also pointed to Biden's age and alleged cognitive decline as factors that may have influenced this controversial move. At 82 years old, Biden has faced increasing scrutiny over his mental fitness for office. Reports have surfaced suggesting that White House aides have taken extraordinary measures to manage his schedule and public appearances, sparking concerns about his ability to make sound decisions on matters of such gravity. Some have described his recent public performances as “faltering” and “concerning,” likening them to those of a “grandfather who should be enjoying retirement rather than leading a nation.” The timing of the commutations has only added fuel to the fire. Coming just weeks before President-elect Donald Trump—a vocal advocate for expanding the use of the death penalty—takes office, the decision is seen by many as a last-minute effort to cement a legacy on criminal justice reform. Trump has made no secret of his intentions to resume federal executions and has even called for the death penalty in cases involving drug dealers and other violent criminals. By commuting these sentences, Biden has effectively tied the hands of the incoming administration, setting the stage for a potential clash over capital punishment policies. The broader implications of this decision extend beyond the individuals whose sentences were commuted. It has reignited the national debate over the death penalty, a deeply polarizing issue in American society. Advocates for capital punishment argue that it serves as a deterrent to crime and a necessary tool for delivering justice in the most egregious cases. Opponents, on the other hand, cite concerns about wrongful convictions, the high costs associated with death penalty cases, and the moral questions surrounding state-sanctioned executions. Biden's commutations have also drawn criticism from advocacy groups that support victims' rights. These organizations have long argued that the death penalty is not only a form of justice but also a way to honor the lives of the victims. By sparing the lives of those who have committed unspeakable acts, critics say Biden has sent a message that undermines the gravity of their crimes and the suffering they caused. In contrast to the backlash, Biden's supporters argue that the decision is consistent with his long-standing opposition to the death penalty. During his 2020 presidential campaign, Biden pledged to work toward ending federal executions and incentivizing states to follow suit. His administration imposed a moratorium on federal capital punishment in 2021 to review the protocols used, effectively halting executions during his term. However, even some of his supporters acknowledge that the commutations go beyond the scope of his campaign promises, particularly given the severity of the crimes involved. The political ramifications of this decision are significant. With public opinion on the death penalty evenly split—53% of Americans support it, according to recent polls—Biden's actions risk alienating a substantial portion of the electorate. For a president whose approval ratings have fluctuated throughout his term, this controversial move could have lasting impacts on his legacy and the Democratic Party's standing on criminal justice issues. Biden's commutations also come on the heels of other controversial acts of clemency. Earlier this month, he commuted the sentences of approximately 1,500 individuals who were released from prison and placed on home confinement during the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as 39 others convicted of nonviolent crimes. While these actions were praised by some as a step toward criminal justice reform, they have also been criticized as overly lenient. Adding to the controversy, Biden recently pardoned his son, Hunter Biden, for federal gun and tax charges, a move that has sparked political uproar and allegations of favoritism. The cumulative effect of these decisions has cast a shadow over Biden's final days in office. As he prepares to leave the White House, questions about his judgment, priorities, and legacy loom large. For many, the commutations of these federal death row inmates represent a tipping point, a decision that will define his presidency for better or worse. For the families of the victims, however, the focus remains on the loss they have endured and the justice they feel has been denied. As one grieving mother put it, “We trusted the system to hold these monsters accountable. Now, it feels like that trust has been shattered.” As the nation grapples with the implications of this decision, one thing is clear: the debate over capital punishment is far from over. Whether Biden's commutations will ultimately be seen as a step toward a more humane justice system or a grave misstep remains to be seen. For now, the controversy surrounding this decision serves as a stark reminder of the complexities and consequences of executive power in the United States. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
In a decision that has sparked widespread outrage, President Joe Biden has commuted the death sentences of 37 federal inmates, converting their punishments to life imprisonment without parole. This action, taken just weeks before the conclusion of his presidency and the inauguration of President-elect Donald Trump, has drawn fierce criticism from victims' families, advocacy groups, and members of the public. The commutations include individuals convicted of some of the most heinous crimes imaginable, including child murders, mass killings, and other acts of unimaginable violence. Critics argue that this move undermines justice, dishonors the memories of the victims, and raises serious questions about Biden's judgment as he approaches the twilight of his political career. Among those spared the death penalty is Thomas Sanders, a man convicted of the brutal kidnapping and murder of a 12-year-old girl. Sanders' crime not only ended a young life but also shattered a family, leaving scars that will never fully heal. His actions were so egregious that they drew national attention, with many calling for the harshest possible punishment. By commuting his sentence, Biden has effectively nullified the jury's decision to impose the ultimate penalty, sparking outrage among those who believe justice was already served. Another individual whose sentence was commuted is Anthony Battle, a man convicted of killing a prison guard. Battle's actions demonstrated a complete disregard for human life and authority, further highlighting the danger he posed to society. His crime, committed in a setting meant to rehabilitate or at least contain individuals who have broken the law, is a chilling reminder of the violence that can occur even in the most secure environments. By removing the possibility of execution, Biden's decision has reopened wounds for the families of the victims and those affected by his crime. The list of commuted sentences includes other names that are synonymous with terror and heartbreak. Marvin Gabrion, for example, was found guilty of the murder of Rachel Timmerman, whom he bound and drowned in a lake, leaving her infant daughter motherless. Kaboni Savage, a drug kingpin, orchestrated a firebombing that killed six people, including four children, as an act of witness intimidation. These are not isolated incidents or cases of wrongful conviction; these are cold, calculated acts of violence that tore families apart and left communities reeling. Yet, these individuals will now spend the rest of their lives in prison rather than face the ultimate punishment decreed by a jury of their peers. For the families of the victims, Biden's decision is a betrayal. These are families who have already endured unimaginable loss and have fought tirelessly for justice. The commutations feel like a dismissal of their pain and a disregard for the lives that were brutally taken. One father of a victim, speaking on the condition of anonymity, described the decision as “an insult to the memory of my child and a slap in the face to our family.” Another grieving family member questioned how someone convicted of such heinous acts could be shown mercy when they offered none to their victims. The emotional toll on these families cannot be overstated. Many have spent years attending court proceedings, reliving their trauma in the pursuit of justice. For them, the death penalty represented not only a punishment for the perpetrators but also a form of closure, a definitive end to a chapter marked by pain and loss. Biden's decision to commute these sentences has reopened old wounds and left many feeling that their suffering has been compounded by the very system they trusted to deliver justice. Critics of the decision have also pointed to Biden's age and alleged cognitive decline as factors that may have influenced this controversial move. At 82 years old, Biden has faced increasing scrutiny over his mental fitness for office. Reports have surfaced suggesting that White House aides have taken extraordinary measures to manage his schedule and public appearances, sparking concerns about his ability to make sound decisions on matters of such gravity. Some have described his recent public performances as “faltering” and “concerning,” likening them to those of a “grandfather who should be enjoying retirement rather than leading a nation.” The timing of the commutations has only added fuel to the fire. Coming just weeks before President-elect Donald Trump—a vocal advocate for expanding the use of the death penalty—takes office, the decision is seen by many as a last-minute effort to cement a legacy on criminal justice reform. Trump has made no secret of his intentions to resume federal executions and has even called for the death penalty in cases involving drug dealers and other violent criminals. By commuting these sentences, Biden has effectively tied the hands of the incoming administration, setting the stage for a potential clash over capital punishment policies. The broader implications of this decision extend beyond the individuals whose sentences were commuted. It has reignited the national debate over the death penalty, a deeply polarizing issue in American society. Advocates for capital punishment argue that it serves as a deterrent to crime and a necessary tool for delivering justice in the most egregious cases. Opponents, on the other hand, cite concerns about wrongful convictions, the high costs associated with death penalty cases, and the moral questions surrounding state-sanctioned executions. Biden's commutations have also drawn criticism from advocacy groups that support victims' rights. These organizations have long argued that the death penalty is not only a form of justice but also a way to honor the lives of the victims. By sparing the lives of those who have committed unspeakable acts, critics say Biden has sent a message that undermines the gravity of their crimes and the suffering they caused. In contrast to the backlash, Biden's supporters argue that the decision is consistent with his long-standing opposition to the death penalty. During his 2020 presidential campaign, Biden pledged to work toward ending federal executions and incentivizing states to follow suit. His administration imposed a moratorium on federal capital punishment in 2021 to review the protocols used, effectively halting executions during his term. However, even some of his supporters acknowledge that the commutations go beyond the scope of his campaign promises, particularly given the severity of the crimes involved. The political ramifications of this decision are significant. With public opinion on the death penalty evenly split—53% of Americans support it, according to recent polls—Biden's actions risk alienating a substantial portion of the electorate. For a president whose approval ratings have fluctuated throughout his term, this controversial move could have lasting impacts on his legacy and the Democratic Party's standing on criminal justice issues. Biden's commutations also come on the heels of other controversial acts of clemency. Earlier this month, he commuted the sentences of approximately 1,500 individuals who were released from prison and placed on home confinement during the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as 39 others convicted of nonviolent crimes. While these actions were praised by some as a step toward criminal justice reform, they have also been criticized as overly lenient. Adding to the controversy, Biden recently pardoned his son, Hunter Biden, for federal gun and tax charges, a move that has sparked political uproar and allegations of favoritism. The cumulative effect of these decisions has cast a shadow over Biden's final days in office. As he prepares to leave the White House, questions about his judgment, priorities, and legacy loom large. For many, the commutations of these federal death row inmates represent a tipping point, a decision that will define his presidency for better or worse. For the families of the victims, however, the focus remains on the loss they have endured and the justice they feel has been denied. As one grieving mother put it, “We trusted the system to hold these monsters accountable. Now, it feels like that trust has been shattered.” As the nation grapples with the implications of this decision, one thing is clear: the debate over capital punishment is far from over. Whether Biden's commutations will ultimately be seen as a step toward a more humane justice system or a grave misstep remains to be seen. For now, the controversy surrounding this decision serves as a stark reminder of the complexities and consequences of executive power in the United States. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
This week, Liza and Kara discuss the episode “Smoked” (Season 12, Episode 24), the horrific crimes of the murderer Marvin Gabrion, and interview the fantastic Hayley McFarland. SOURCES: Wikipedia - Murder of Nicole duFresne CBS News The Atlantic Oxygen Wikipedia - Marvin Gabrion Free Republic MLive Media Group 1 MLive Media Group 2 The United States Courts of Appeals Detroit Free Press WHAT WOULD SISTER PEG DO: Everytown for Gun Safety Next week's episode will be “Parents' Nightmare" (Season 16, Episode 22). Support this podcast by shopping our latest sponsor deals and promotions at this link: https://bit.ly/3yb7hqu Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Dive deep into the twisted mind of Marvin Gabrion as we explore a case that rocked the foundations of the quiet Michigan community. In this episode of Emma Kenny's True Crime Analysis, we unravel the sinister plot that led to the disappearance of Rachel Timmerman and the disturbing events that followed. Join me, Emma Kenny, as I analyze the psychological underpinnings of a man who not only committed heinous crimes but also sought to silence a federal witness in the most brutal way. From the foreboding depths of Lake Michigan to the eerie calm of the national forest, we piece together the FBI investigation, forensic evidence, and trial testimonies that brought this case to a chilling conclusion. We'll examine the impact on the justice system, the death penalty debate, and the psychological profile of a criminal mind capable of such dark deeds. This comprehensive deep dive into the Marvin Gabrion case aims to shed light on the tragic stories of the victims and the relentless pursuit of law enforcement to serve justice. As always, our goal is to tell these stories with the utmost respect and sensitivity while providing a thorough analysis for our true crime community. Stay tuned as we dissect one of Michigan's most disturbing murder cases, where the truth is more harrowing than fiction.
This Episode is sponsored by Better Help Get 10% off your first month with betterhelp.com/morningcup June 15th: Shannon Verhage Born (1996) Standing up to your abuser can be absolutely terrifying. On June 15th 1996 a baby was born to a mother who bravely reported her attacker to the police. An action that, unfortunately, placed both in grave danger. https://unsolvedmysteries.fandom.com/wiki/Shannon_Verhage, https://charleyproject.org/case/shannon-dale-verhage, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marvin_Gabrion, https://wbckfm.com/cold-case-cedar-springs-the-disappearance-of-baby-shannon/, https://www.kats-korner.com/child/verhage.html, https://www.mlive.com/news/grand-rapids/2017/01/father_of_murder_victim_rachel.html
On June 3, 1997, 19-year-old single mother Rachel Timmerman told her mom she was going on a date with a man she met at work, and that she would be taking her 11-month-old, Shannon, with her. About a month later, Rachel's chained and bound body would be pulled from Oxford Lake in Newaygo County, Michigan. As this case unfolded, it would become a significant story in the landscape of Michigan criminal justice. Join Tommy and Mick as Tommy runs us through a tumultuous investigation of a true monster in Michigan.
Marvin Gabrion was a lifetime criminal, and murderer who was given the death penalty in Michigan...except Michigan doesn't have the death penalty, but for Marvin, they made an exception. OhMyGaia.com Code: Creeper https://www.tonicvibes.com Code: Creeper EVERYTHING TRUE CRIME GUYS: https://linktr.ee/Truecrimeguysproductions Patreon.com/truecrimeguys Merch: truecrimeguys.threadless.com OhMyGaia.com Facebook Twitter/Instagram: @TrueCrimeGuys @AndImMichael @sandupodcast STICKERS CREEPER MERCH
Join your two favorite nerds as this week Zig covers the insanely irreverent, obscene, and hysterically funny, TV show, Strangers With Candy. Meanwhile Geoffrey as usual does not have a happy topic and covers the messed up case of Marvin Gabrion.For your 30 day free Audible Trial go to: Audibletrial.com/nerderyandmurderyFor 10% off with BetterHelp go to: betterhelp.com/nerderyandmurderySupport the show (https://www.patreon.com/nerdandmurd)
18 year old single mother, Rachel Timmerman, and her baby daughter Shannon went missing after a night out with a friend in 1997. Rachel would later be found dead and that discovery would lead authorities down a rabbit hole of other deaths and disappearances all tied to one awful night. Fof show notes go to www.theywillkill.com
Marvin Gabrion was a smart kid who got picked on for being smart. Not only by his peers but by his own father. Marvin's parents were horrible people. Often fighting in front of their 6 children to the point of knocking each others teeth out. That can take quite a toll on children. Marvin, grew up to be just as much a menace as his parents. Join us as we discuss Marvin Gabrion and his evil crimes. BECOME AN EVIL TRANSGRESSION PATREON TODAY! Our Links EVILTRANSGRESSION.COM
Rachel Timmerman was a young single mother who loved her daughter and in her free time enjoyed hanging out with friends. One night while leaving a small get together, she was stopped by an acquaintance named Marvin Gabrion who started insisting that he drive her home. Unfortunately for Rachel she ended up accepting the offer, leading to a horrifying series of events in which Marvin became willing to do anything to cover up what he had done.
Marvin Gabrion is a straight up slime ball. He is believed to be responsible for the murders of 5 people. Marvin's IQ is borderline genius; however, his impulses make him one of the dumbest criminals. Come learn about Marvin and how the criminal justice system failed to protect a woman named Rachel Timmerman. Sources Rachel Timmerman | Unsolved Mysteries Wiki | Fandom Rachel Timmerman | Serial Killer Murders | Crimes and Consequences (tntcrimes.com) Once 'near genius,' Marvin Gabrion's path to death row marked by abuse, mental illness, violence - mlive.com Marvin Gabrion, II v. United States – CourtListener.com
This episode includes mention of sexual assault as well as the harm of a child please use your best discretion, we know that those topics can be triggering for some listeners. https://www.instagram.com/?hl=en casualcasualtiespodcast@gmail.com https://flattr.com/@CasualCasualties https://www.patreon.com/Casual_Casualties_podcast --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/casualcasualties/message
Marvin Gabrion er nauðgari og morðingi sem drap hina 19 ára gömlu Rachel Timmerman, og er einnig bendlaður við mannshvarfið á Shannon, Wayne, John og Robert. Rachel og Shannon dóttir hennar hurfu eftir að Rachel var að fara að vitna gegn honum fyrir nauðgun sem hún varð fyrir að hálfu hans. www.facebook.com/mordskurinn www.instagram.com/mordskurinn
In 1996, Rachel Timmerman filed rape charges against a monster named Marvin Gabrion. As the trial approached, witnesses came up missing. Then Rachel disappeared along with her baby after going out on a date. She had no idea that the date was part of an elaborate murder plot by a serial killer. Three letters, written in Rachel's own handwriting, were mailed to her father and the prosecutor shortly following her disappearance. Then, a month later, Rachel's dead body was found and details revealed she died a horrific and terrifying death. What did the letters say? What happened to Rachel Timmerman and the four other victims of serial killer Marvin Gabrion? Listen to find out more!Help support our podcast by joining our Members Only Patreon Group where you can get access to all of our Online-Only episodes, early releases, ad-free episodes & more. Go to www.tntncrimes.com or patreon.com/tntcrimesFacebook & IG: @hardcoretruecrimeSources:Court recordsThe Color of Night by John Timmerman
You are correct, Michigan has not had the death penalty since 1847. However, this genius decided to discard an amazing young woman's body...ON FEDERAL PROPERTY !!!We are waiting for his execution.Your happy ending & good note: THE WAR BETWEENthewarbetween@gmail.comhttps://soundcloud.com/the-war-betweenthewarbetween instagramthe_war_between twitterthewarbetween.bandcamp.comGet your mask at Etsy: BeatRocker
You are correct, Michigan has not had the death penalty since 1847. However, this genius decided to discard an amazing young woman's body...ON FEDERAL PROPERTY !!!We are waiting for his execution.Your happy ending & good note: THE WAR BETWEENthewarbetween@gmail.comhttps://soundcloud.com/the-war-betweenthewarbetween instagramthe_war_between twitterthewarbetween.bandcamp.comMoreHomeAboutEventsPhotosLikedMessage
Crime affects all of our lives—anyone can be accused, know someone accused, or serve on a jury. Mitigation expert and author Victoria Rusk gets to the “whys” behind a crime, helping jurors, DAs, and attorneys to work for fair and appropriate punishments, in hopes of reducing the American mass incarceration crisis. Her recent book The Handbook of Mitigation has quickly become canon within the legal mitigation sphere for anyone interested in sentencing justice. How did a former broadcast journalist from Lubbock, Texas, become a leading professional advocate for fair sentencing? Find out for yourself on Episode 79 of Open Mike. Show Notes [00:27] Victoria’s background and bio. [01:31] Welcome to Victoria Rusk! [01:49] You’re a mitigation specialist — can you tell us what a mitigation specialist is? [03:06] That’s fascinating! You’re usually brought in after the conviction? [03:32] So, it’s not just death row, it’s anyone facing a serious criminal trial, and you are brought in to humanize the defendant so lawyers can argue the best they can for them? [04:55] As I mentioned in my intro, and I don’t think many people know this, Michigan has a man named Marvin Gabrion on death row. What do you do for someone like Mr. Gabrion before trial? How do you help someone facing such serious consequences? [07:27] The key in humanizing someone is to figure out how they love, and how they express and show love. [07:57] You’re dealing with some people who are hurting and killing families… how do you show their capability of love to a judge or jury? What are some examples? [09:53] Creating an atmosphere of trust and compassion with a client’s family or other loved ones will make them more inclined to freely offer up humanizing information to a jury. [12:12] We’ve talked a lot about how little resources there are for indigent defendants and you’re spending hundreds, if not thousands, of hours on an individual case. Who’s paying your bills? [13:48] The criminal justice system is broken —attorneys have hundreds and hundreds of cases… the COVID-19 pandemic has the ability to turn the criminal justice system inside out in terms of both humanizing those working within the system and those accused of a crime. [14:08] I didn’t know that anyone with a capital case was entitled to services like yours. What about in a state like Michigan that doesn’t have the death penalty unless you’re on federal land? Is there such a thing as a mitigation specialist if someone is facing life in prison without parole? [16:09] Post-conviction in mitigation is very different because there are additional politics in the process to consider and you have to really evaluate what’s going to be convincing or moving. [17:02] If you’re arguing that someone is not guilty, you may not want to be arguing mitigation… are you usually arguing mitigation when someone is likely guilty or definitely guilty? [19:41] So, it’s almost like any case… drunk driving, robbery… you can help humanize the dependent and look at the bigger picture to understand why they’re in the situation they are. You’re kind of like a social worker. [21:00] We’re talked about issues with mass incarceration and prison overcrowding in this country… how can mitigation specialization help that? [22:41] In general, besides buying your book, The Handbook for Mitigation, which every attorney in the country should get… what are your recommendations for someone who can’t afford to hire you? [23:40] There two are trainings Victoria recommends: Dr. Donna Beegle’s poverty-informed training, and Undoing Racism: The People’s Institute for Survival and Beyond. [26:06] Thank you to Victoria Rusk for being on the show and thanks for watching Open Mike Podcast!
EMAILS: A listener in Sweden got a phone call from death row inmate Marvin Gabrion asking to help prove his innocence, the nuclear water Melissa swam in might be safe after all, and a sexy guy at a club turned out to be a murderer.VOICEMAILS: Satan calls to say he’s a pretty chill guy, Sarah who’s getting a masters degree wants to reenact tearing down the Berlin Wall, two unsolved Canadian murders, a listener questions if women deserve rights, and a gender studies major calls in with some thoughts.—EMAIL US: Webcrawlerspod@gmail.comLEAVE US A VOICEMAIL: 626-604-6262—FOLLOW US: TwitterInstagramRedditFacebook—To join our Patreon click HERE—MERCH: https://webcrawlerspod.com— Support this show http://supporter.acast.com/webcrawlers. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.
When serial killer Marvin Charles Gabrion II brutally murdered a teenage mother in the shadows of Manistee National Forest, just ninety steps made the difference in jurisdiction, resulting in him becoming Michigan's first death row inmate in over half a century. Case: Rachel Timmerman and Shannon VerHageTheme Song: "Crowd Hammer" by Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com)Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 3.0 LicenseIntro/Outro Edits: Ben GoldmanRESOURCES:The Color of Night (L.C. Timmerman and John H. Timmerman)Beyond Contempt, Episode 22Already Gone, Episode 84(See full list of resources at sodeadpodcast.com)Support the show (http://patreon.com/sodeadpodcast)
19-year-old Rachel Timmerman was set to testify against the man who raped her when she mysteriously disappeared. Around that time, four other people vanished as well. The one thing they all had in common was they came into contact with Marvin Gabrion. Social Media: Website - https://beyondcontemptpodcast.com/ Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/BeyondContemptTrue Crime Twitter - https://twitter.com/BeyondCMPTPod Insta - https://www.instagram.com/beyond_contempt_podcast/ FB Group - https://www.facebook.com/groups/BeyondContemptTrueCrime/ Show Credits: Research by Haley Gray Script Writing, Editing, and Audio Production by Renee Lynn Show Sponsors: Podcorn Best Fiends Show sources here Support the show here Please Subscribe, Share, Rate, and Review the show in Apple Podcasts. Thank you so much for listening.
The murder of Rachel Timmerman. Sources include: MLive.com, 11alive, Cedarspringspost.com, thesunsentinel.com, actual case notes from United States vs. Gabrion Thanks for Listening! --- This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app
Keep up with current episodes of Morning Cup of Murder at morningcupofmurder.com On August 7th 1996 Rachel Timmerman did the incredibly brave thing of reporting her rape and turning in her attacker. She did what so many women are terrified to do. Unfortunately, her story and how it ends is one of the reasons 91.6% of rapes go unreported. Marvin Gabrion (1996) Become a supporter of this podcast on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/morningcupofmurder Follow Morning Cup of Murder on Twitter: https://twitter.com/cupofmurder @cupofmurder Follow us on Instagram: @morningcupofmurder Have a Murder or strange true crime story you want to share, email the show here: morningcupofmurder@gmail.com Morning Cup of Murder is researched, written and performed by Korina Biemesderfer. Follow Korina on Instagram: @kbiemesderfer The show is produced and edited by Dillon Biemesderfer IG: @dungeonsanddillons
On August 7th 1996 Rachel Timmerman did the incredibly brave thing of reporting her rape and turning in her attacker. She did what so many women are terrified to do. Unfortunately, her story and how it ends is one of the reasons 91.6% of rapes go unreported. Marvin Gabrion (1996) Become a supporter of this podcast on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/morningcupofmurder Follow Morning Cup of Murder on Twitter: https://twitter.com/cupofmurder @cupofmurder Follow us on Instagram: @morningcupofmurder Have a Murder or strange true crime story you want to share, email the show here: morningcupofmurder@gmail.com Morning Cup of Murder is researched, written and performed by Korina Biemesderfer. Follow Korina on Instagram: @kbiemesderfer The show is produced and edited by Dillon Biemesderfer IG: @dungeonsanddillons --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/morning-cup-of-murder/message
More about Marvin Gabrion, including a social and mental health history. The Color of Night MUSIC: Scott Holmes – Blackjack Scott Holmes – Remember the Archer Kevin MacLeod – Serpentine Trek Kevin MacLeod – Lost Frontier Kevin MacLeod - Tenebrous Brothers Intermission Cullah – No Home PURCHASE MUSIC HERE: Cullah on Amazon Cullah on iTunes Kevin MacLeod on Amazon Become a Cullah Patron
Someone who knew Marvin Gabrion talks about the body that he says he found in Twinwood ("Big Twin") Lake. This would be the body of Wayne Davis. The Color of Night - book about the murder of Rachel Timmerman and her baby, written by her father and uncle. Episode 2 MUSIC: Borrtex – See You Soon Borrtex - Blackout Kevin MacLeod – Impact Lento Kevin MacLeod – Virtutes Instrumental PURCHASE MUSIC HERE: Cullah on Amazon Cullah on iTunes Kevin MacLeod on Amazon Become a Cullah Patron
Marvin Gabrion bound Rachel Timmerman and tossed her, alive, into a lake, days before he was to go on trial for her rape. He also killed her baby - who has never been found - and three other men, two of whom have also never been found. This season covers all of those cases. The Color of Night - I recommend this book, written by Rachel's father and uncle. MUSIC: Kevin MacLeod, Incompetech - Almost in F Kevin MacLeod, Incompetech – Immersed Kevin MacLeod, Incompetech – Despair and Triumph Kevin MacLeod, Incompetech – Classic Horror Kevin MacLeod, Incompetech – Long Note One Borrtex – See You Soon Scott Holmes - Damned Cullah – Comfort To You
In 1847 Michigan became the first English speaking territory in the world to abolish the death penalty. In 2002 Marvin Gabrion was sentenced to death for the murder of Rachel Timmerman in Newaygo County, Michigan. This story starts in the early part of the 1800's, visits Michigan's last execution in 1938 and asks the heartbreaking question, where is Rachel Timmerman's 11 month old daughter? Support the show: https://www.patreon.com/AlreadyGone See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
In 1847 Michigan became the first English speaking territory in the world to abolish the death penalty. In 2002 Marvin Gabrion was sentenced to death for the murder of Rachel Timmerman in Newaygo County, Michigan. This story starts in the early part of the 1800’s, visits Michigan’s last execution in 1938 and asks the heartbreaking question, where is Rachel Timmerman’s 11 month old daughter? Support the show.