Podcasts about fbi special agent robin dreeke

Five HUGE WAYS Sandra Birchmore Was Failed by the People Meant to Protect Her Description: Sandra Birchmore thought she was joining something safe—something built to guide and empower her future. What she got was years of grooming, manipulation, and ultimately, death. At 23, Sandra was found dead in her apartment. Initially ruled a suicide, her death was almost swept away as another statistic. But when federal authorities looked deeper, they uncovered something far more disturbing: Sandra had been involved for years with Officer Matthew Farwell—a man twice her age who met her when she was just 13 through the Stoughton Police Explorer Program. Prosecutors now say he strangled her to silence her and staged the scene to look like suicide. In this episode, retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke joins us to unpack the five key failures that made this tragedy possible. From negligent oversight and toxic leadership to peer silence and institutional cowardice, we break down how Sandra was abandoned not just by one person—but by a system designed to protect her. Robin outlines how grooming works within trusted institutions, how “mentorship” becomes a mask for abuse, and why departments that prioritize convenience over ethics become complicit. He explains how fear of professional backlash often keeps good officers from speaking up—and why failing to confront one predator often empowers more. This isn't just an indictment of one cop. It's a case study in what happens when leadership fails, accountability collapses, and victims are left to fend for themselves inside a system that should've had their back. Sandra Birchmore didn't fall through the cracks. She was pushed. And in this episode, we show you who pushed her—and how we stop it from happening again. #SandraBirchmore #RobinDreeke #LawEnforcementFailure #TrueCrimePodcast #FBIBehavioralAnalysis #Grooming #InstitutionalNeglect #HiddenKillers #TonyBrueski #ExplorerProgram Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Five HUGE WAYS Sandra Birchmore Was Failed by the People Meant to Protect Her Description: Sandra Birchmore thought she was joining something safe—something built to guide and empower her future. What she got was years of grooming, manipulation, and ultimately, death. At 23, Sandra was found dead in her apartment. Initially ruled a suicide, her death was almost swept away as another statistic. But when federal authorities looked deeper, they uncovered something far more disturbing: Sandra had been involved for years with Officer Matthew Farwell—a man twice her age who met her when she was just 13 through the Stoughton Police Explorer Program. Prosecutors now say he strangled her to silence her and staged the scene to look like suicide. In this episode, retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke joins us to unpack the five key failures that made this tragedy possible. From negligent oversight and toxic leadership to peer silence and institutional cowardice, we break down how Sandra was abandoned not just by one person—but by a system designed to protect her. Robin outlines how grooming works within trusted institutions, how “mentorship” becomes a mask for abuse, and why departments that prioritize convenience over ethics become complicit. He explains how fear of professional backlash often keeps good officers from speaking up—and why failing to confront one predator often empowers more. This isn't just an indictment of one cop. It's a case study in what happens when leadership fails, accountability collapses, and victims are left to fend for themselves inside a system that should've had their back. Sandra Birchmore didn't fall through the cracks. She was pushed. And in this episode, we show you who pushed her—and how we stop it from happening again. #SandraBirchmore #RobinDreeke #LawEnforcementFailure #TrueCrimePodcast #FBIBehavioralAnalysis #Grooming #InstitutionalNeglect #HiddenKillers #TonyBrueski #ExplorerProgram Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Ret. FBI Robin Dreeke on the Culture of Fear That Let Sandra Birchmore's Abuser Operate Freely Description: How does a police officer groom a teenager for years—under supervision—and no one says a word? That's the question at the heart of the Sandra Birchmore case. In 2021, Sandra was found dead. Local authorities quickly called it a suicide. But federal prosecutors now allege that Officer Matthew Farwell, who had been intimately involved with Sandra since her teens, actually murdered her to cover up years of exploitation and control. And yet, the most chilling part of this case isn't just the alleged crime—it's how many people saw something and stayed silent. Fellow officers, supervisors, and department leaders looked the other way as red flags piled up. Some resigned. Others let their certifications quietly expire. No one stepped forward. No one sounded the alarm. In this episode, retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke explains how fear-based culture within law enforcement agencies enables predators like Farwell. Robin breaks down the psychological pressure points: why officers stay quiet, how loyalty morphs into complicity, and how departments learn to rationalize abusive behavior as just another “gray area.” We also explore the psychology of silence—how fear of losing a job, disrupting status quo, or challenging someone in power keeps people quiet. Robin gives powerful insight into what real accountability looks like, what leadership failure feels like on the inside, and why these kinds of cases don't just happen—they're built over time through neglect, denial, and fear. This isn't just about one department. It's about a culture that exists in too many places—and the consequences it leaves behind. #SandraBirchmore #RobinDreeke #PoliceCulture #CultureOfFear #TrueCrimeInvestigation #FBIBehavioralAnalysis #HiddenKillersPodcast #TonyBrueski #SystemicAbuse #GroomingInLawEnforcement

Ret. FBI Robin Dreeke on the Culture of Fear That Let Sandra Birchmore's Abuser Operate Freely Description: How does a police officer groom a teenager for years—under supervision—and no one says a word? That's the question at the heart of the Sandra Birchmore case. In 2021, Sandra was found dead. Local authorities quickly called it a suicide. But federal prosecutors now allege that Officer Matthew Farwell, who had been intimately involved with Sandra since her teens, actually murdered her to cover up years of exploitation and control. And yet, the most chilling part of this case isn't just the alleged crime—it's how many people saw something and stayed silent. Fellow officers, supervisors, and department leaders looked the other way as red flags piled up. Some resigned. Others let their certifications quietly expire. No one stepped forward. No one sounded the alarm. In this episode, retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke explains how fear-based culture within law enforcement agencies enables predators like Farwell. Robin breaks down the psychological pressure points: why officers stay quiet, how loyalty morphs into complicity, and how departments learn to rationalize abusive behavior as just another “gray area.” We also explore the psychology of silence—how fear of losing a job, disrupting status quo, or challenging someone in power keeps people quiet. Robin gives powerful insight into what real accountability looks like, what leadership failure feels like on the inside, and why these kinds of cases don't just happen—they're built over time through neglect, denial, and fear. This isn't just about one department. It's about a culture that exists in too many places—and the consequences it leaves behind. #SandraBirchmore #RobinDreeke #PoliceCulture #CultureOfFear #TrueCrimeInvestigation #FBIBehavioralAnalysis #HiddenKillersPodcast #TonyBrueski #SystemicAbuse #GroomingInLawEnforcement Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Predators in Uniform – Ret. FBI Robin Dreeke Breaks Down the Sandra Birchmore Case Description: Sandra Birchmore was 23, pregnant, and alone when she was found dead in her Canton, Massachusetts apartment in 2021. Her death was ruled a suicide. That might have been the end of it—until federal investigators got involved. What they uncovered changed everything. Prosecutors now say Sandra was groomed and exploited for years by Stoughton Police Officer Matthew Farwell—who met her when she was just 13 through the department's Explorer Program. Farwell is now federally indicted for her murder. But this case isn't just about one man. It's about a culture that allowed a predator to operate in plain sight, inside a structured, youth-focused law enforcement program, with little oversight and no accountability. In this episode, retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke—former Chief of the Bureau's Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program—joins us to break down exactly how predators like Farwell use the uniform as camouflage. He explains how authority figures manipulate young victims, how predators test boundaries through secrecy and personalization, and how organizations with rigid hierarchy and internal loyalty often become enablers without realizing it. We talk about Sandra's need for structure, the illusion of safety the Explorer program promised, and how that trust was twisted into a years-long pattern of abuse, isolation, and control. Robin also explores why no one intervened, how grooming often hides behind “mentorship,” and why even well-meaning departments fail to see the warning signs—until it's too late. This is the story of one victim. But it's also a warning for every community. Because when predators wear badges, the danger isn't just what they do—it's who helps them get away with it. #SandraBirchmore #RobinDreeke #PredatorsInUniform #LawEnforcementAbuse #ExplorerProgram #FBIBehavioralAnalysis #HiddenKillersPodcast #TonyBrueski #TrueCrimePodcast #InstitutionalFailure Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Predators in Uniform – Ret. FBI Robin Dreeke Breaks Down the Sandra Birchmore Case Description: Sandra Birchmore was 23, pregnant, and alone when she was found dead in her Canton, Massachusetts apartment in 2021. Her death was ruled a suicide. That might have been the end of it—until federal investigators got involved. What they uncovered changed everything. Prosecutors now say Sandra was groomed and exploited for years by Stoughton Police Officer Matthew Farwell—who met her when she was just 13 through the department's Explorer Program. Farwell is now federally indicted for her murder. But this case isn't just about one man. It's about a culture that allowed a predator to operate in plain sight, inside a structured, youth-focused law enforcement program, with little oversight and no accountability. In this episode, retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke—former Chief of the Bureau's Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program—joins us to break down exactly how predators like Farwell use the uniform as camouflage. He explains how authority figures manipulate young victims, how predators test boundaries through secrecy and personalization, and how organizations with rigid hierarchy and internal loyalty often become enablers without realizing it. We talk about Sandra's need for structure, the illusion of safety the Explorer program promised, and how that trust was twisted into a years-long pattern of abuse, isolation, and control. Robin also explores why no one intervened, how grooming often hides behind “mentorship,” and why even well-meaning departments fail to see the warning signs—until it's too late. This is the story of one victim. But it's also a warning for every community. Because when predators wear badges, the danger isn't just what they do—it's who helps them get away with it. #SandraBirchmore #RobinDreeke #PredatorsInUniform #LawEnforcementAbuse #ExplorerProgram #FBIBehavioralAnalysis #HiddenKillersPodcast #TonyBrueski #TrueCrimePodcast #InstitutionalFailure Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

This was recorded BEFORE Bryan Kohberger's Plea Deal Crucial Witness or Liability? The Troubled Credibility of Kohberger's DoorDash Driver The Bryan Kohberger murder trial recently introduced a new layer of complexity: the eyewitness testimony of a DoorDash driver, identified only as M.M., who delivered food to one of the victims mere moments before the brutal murders occurred. Initially viewed simply as confirmation of the timeline, this driver's role changed dramatically when new footage surfaced nearly two years after the crime. On police bodycam video from a separate arrest—where she appeared visibly distressed and impaired by prescription medication—she claimed that she saw Bryan Kohberger parked near the crime scene that fateful night. The late timing of this revelation immediately raised significant credibility concerns. Did she initially inform investigators about this critical detail, or is it a new memory influenced by extensive media coverage? Could her documented personal struggles and traumatic background—including witnessing her own husband's murder—enhance juror sympathy, or rather create doubt about her reliability? These critical questions are pivotal for prosecutors and defense alike. In this episode, retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke, a specialist in behavioral analysis and witness credibility, examines how jurors typically respond to such complex witness testimony. Robin explains the delicate psychological balance jurors must navigate when confronted with a troubled witness whose emotional vulnerability and trauma could either inspire deep empathy or lead jurors to doubt her accuracy and memory. Robin discusses real-world examples from his extensive career, illustrating how jurors subconsciously process credibility signals—timing, emotional state, consistency of statements—and the psychological dynamics behind their decision-making. With the DoorDash driver potentially playing a central role in reinforcing the prosecution's narrative, Robin outlines the hidden factors jurors weigh beyond what's explicitly stated in court. Join us for this deep dive into the complexities of witness credibility, juror psychology, and the high stakes of courtroom perceptions in one of America's most gripping murder trials. Hashtags: #BryanKohberger #DoorDashWitness #WitnessCredibility #RobinDreeke #EyewitnessTestimony #TrueCrimeCommunity #JuryPsychology #IdahoMurders #LegalAnalysis #JusticeForIdaho4 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

This was recorded BEFORE Bryan Kohberger's Plea Deal Crucial Witness or Liability? The Troubled Credibility of Kohberger's DoorDash Driver The Bryan Kohberger murder trial recently introduced a new layer of complexity: the eyewitness testimony of a DoorDash driver, identified only as M.M., who delivered food to one of the victims mere moments before the brutal murders occurred. Initially viewed simply as confirmation of the timeline, this driver's role changed dramatically when new footage surfaced nearly two years after the crime. On police bodycam video from a separate arrest—where she appeared visibly distressed and impaired by prescription medication—she claimed that she saw Bryan Kohberger parked near the crime scene that fateful night. The late timing of this revelation immediately raised significant credibility concerns. Did she initially inform investigators about this critical detail, or is it a new memory influenced by extensive media coverage? Could her documented personal struggles and traumatic background—including witnessing her own husband's murder—enhance juror sympathy, or rather create doubt about her reliability? These critical questions are pivotal for prosecutors and defense alike. In this episode, retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke, a specialist in behavioral analysis and witness credibility, examines how jurors typically respond to such complex witness testimony. Robin explains the delicate psychological balance jurors must navigate when confronted with a troubled witness whose emotional vulnerability and trauma could either inspire deep empathy or lead jurors to doubt her accuracy and memory. Robin discusses real-world examples from his extensive career, illustrating how jurors subconsciously process credibility signals—timing, emotional state, consistency of statements—and the psychological dynamics behind their decision-making. With the DoorDash driver potentially playing a central role in reinforcing the prosecution's narrative, Robin outlines the hidden factors jurors weigh beyond what's explicitly stated in court. Join us for this deep dive into the complexities of witness credibility, juror psychology, and the high stakes of courtroom perceptions in one of America's most gripping murder trials. Hashtags: #BryanKohberger #DoorDashWitness #WitnessCredibility #RobinDreeke #EyewitnessTestimony #TrueCrimeCommunity #JuryPsychology #IdahoMurders #LegalAnalysis #JusticeForIdaho4 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

This was recorded BEFORE Bryan Kohberger's Plea Deal Crucial Witness or Liability? The Troubled Credibility of Kohberger's DoorDash Driver The Bryan Kohberger murder trial recently introduced a new layer of complexity: the eyewitness testimony of a DoorDash driver, identified only as M.M., who delivered food to one of the victims mere moments before the brutal murders occurred. Initially viewed simply as confirmation of the timeline, this driver's role changed dramatically when new footage surfaced nearly two years after the crime. On police bodycam video from a separate arrest—where she appeared visibly distressed and impaired by prescription medication—she claimed that she saw Bryan Kohberger parked near the crime scene that fateful night. The late timing of this revelation immediately raised significant credibility concerns. Did she initially inform investigators about this critical detail, or is it a new memory influenced by extensive media coverage? Could her documented personal struggles and traumatic background—including witnessing her own husband's murder—enhance juror sympathy, or rather create doubt about her reliability? These critical questions are pivotal for prosecutors and defense alike. In this episode, retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke, a specialist in behavioral analysis and witness credibility, examines how jurors typically respond to such complex witness testimony. Robin explains the delicate psychological balance jurors must navigate when confronted with a troubled witness whose emotional vulnerability and trauma could either inspire deep empathy or lead jurors to doubt her accuracy and memory. Robin discusses real-world examples from his extensive career, illustrating how jurors subconsciously process credibility signals—timing, emotional state, consistency of statements—and the psychological dynamics behind their decision-making. With the DoorDash driver potentially playing a central role in reinforcing the prosecution's narrative, Robin outlines the hidden factors jurors weigh beyond what's explicitly stated in court. Join us for this deep dive into the complexities of witness credibility, juror psychology, and the high stakes of courtroom perceptions in one of America's most gripping murder trials. Hashtags: #BryanKohberger #DoorDashWitness #WitnessCredibility #RobinDreeke #EyewitnessTestimony #TrueCrimeCommunity #JuryPsychology #IdahoMurders #LegalAnalysis #JusticeForIdaho4 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

This was recorded BEFORE Bryan Kohberger's Plea Deal Crucial Witness or Liability? The Troubled Credibility of Kohberger's DoorDash Driver The Bryan Kohberger murder trial recently introduced a new layer of complexity: the eyewitness testimony of a DoorDash driver, identified only as M.M., who delivered food to one of the victims mere moments before the brutal murders occurred. Initially viewed simply as confirmation of the timeline, this driver's role changed dramatically when new footage surfaced nearly two years after the crime. On police bodycam video from a separate arrest—where she appeared visibly distressed and impaired by prescription medication—she claimed that she saw Bryan Kohberger parked near the crime scene that fateful night. The late timing of this revelation immediately raised significant credibility concerns. Did she initially inform investigators about this critical detail, or is it a new memory influenced by extensive media coverage? Could her documented personal struggles and traumatic background—including witnessing her own husband's murder—enhance juror sympathy, or rather create doubt about her reliability? These critical questions are pivotal for prosecutors and defense alike. In this episode, retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke, a specialist in behavioral analysis and witness credibility, examines how jurors typically respond to such complex witness testimony. Robin explains the delicate psychological balance jurors must navigate when confronted with a troubled witness whose emotional vulnerability and trauma could either inspire deep empathy or lead jurors to doubt her accuracy and memory. Robin discusses real-world examples from his extensive career, illustrating how jurors subconsciously process credibility signals—timing, emotional state, consistency of statements—and the psychological dynamics behind their decision-making. With the DoorDash driver potentially playing a central role in reinforcing the prosecution's narrative, Robin outlines the hidden factors jurors weigh beyond what's explicitly stated in court. Join us for this deep dive into the complexities of witness credibility, juror psychology, and the high stakes of courtroom perceptions in one of America's most gripping murder trials. Hashtags: #BryanKohberger #DoorDashWitness #WitnessCredibility #RobinDreeke #EyewitnessTestimony #TrueCrimeCommunity #JuryPsychology #IdahoMurders #LegalAnalysis #JusticeForIdaho4 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

The Hidden Strategy Behind Kohberger's Latest Courtroom Setbacks Explained Bryan Kohberger's murder trial has rapidly evolved into a chess match of legal maneuvering, and recently the defense has seen several high-profile courtroom setbacks. Judge Hippler swiftly and firmly denied motions put forth by Kohberger's lead attorney, Anne Taylor—including attempts to introduce third-party culprits and repeated requests for trial continuances. To casual observers, these repeated denials seem like significant losses for the defense, perhaps even a sign of desperation. But could these apparent setbacks actually represent a more subtle, hidden strategy? In this revealing discussion, retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke—an expert in behavioral analysis, jury psychology, and credibility assessment—breaks down the deeper reasons behind these seemingly doomed legal moves. Robin explains how the defense's strategy may not necessarily hinge on courtroom victories at this stage, but rather on influencing public perception and indirectly impacting future jurors. By publicly introducing doubt and alternative theories, even when dismissed by the judge, Anne Taylor might be attempting to plant psychological seeds in the minds of potential jurors. Robin draws on his extensive experience analyzing how jurors process information, especially when exposed to media-heavy, emotionally charged cases like this one. Could these seemingly ineffective legal motions actually succeed in subtly swaying jurors, creating doubt long before they enter the courtroom? This critical episode offers listeners unique insights into how modern legal teams use psychological tactics, how subtle messaging can influence juror perspectives, and how losing a courtroom battle doesn't necessarily mean losing the broader war. Robin expertly guides us through understanding the deeper strategic game being played—one that's as much about psychology as it is about law. Prepare to rethink what courtroom victories and defeats truly mean, and why in today's trials, the perception battle may matter just as much as legal arguments. Hashtags: #BryanKohberger #CourtroomStrategy #JuryPsychology #RobinDreeke #IdahoMurders #TrialTactics #LegalAnalysis #TrueCrimeCommunity #DefenseStrategy #JusticeForIdaho4 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872  

The Hidden Strategy Behind Kohberger's Latest Courtroom Setbacks Explained Bryan Kohberger's murder trial has rapidly evolved into a chess match of legal maneuvering, and recently the defense has seen several high-profile courtroom setbacks. Judge Hippler swiftly and firmly denied motions put forth by Kohberger's lead attorney, Anne Taylor—including attempts to introduce third-party culprits and repeated requests for trial continuances. To casual observers, these repeated denials seem like significant losses for the defense, perhaps even a sign of desperation. But could these apparent setbacks actually represent a more subtle, hidden strategy? In this revealing discussion, retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke—an expert in behavioral analysis, jury psychology, and credibility assessment—breaks down the deeper reasons behind these seemingly doomed legal moves. Robin explains how the defense's strategy may not necessarily hinge on courtroom victories at this stage, but rather on influencing public perception and indirectly impacting future jurors. By publicly introducing doubt and alternative theories, even when dismissed by the judge, Anne Taylor might be attempting to plant psychological seeds in the minds of potential jurors. Robin draws on his extensive experience analyzing how jurors process information, especially when exposed to media-heavy, emotionally charged cases like this one. Could these seemingly ineffective legal motions actually succeed in subtly swaying jurors, creating doubt long before they enter the courtroom? This critical episode offers listeners unique insights into how modern legal teams use psychological tactics, how subtle messaging can influence juror perspectives, and how losing a courtroom battle doesn't necessarily mean losing the broader war. Robin expertly guides us through understanding the deeper strategic game being played—one that's as much about psychology as it is about law. Prepare to rethink what courtroom victories and defeats truly mean, and why in today's trials, the perception battle may matter just as much as legal arguments. Hashtags: #BryanKohberger #CourtroomStrategy #JuryPsychology #RobinDreeke #IdahoMurders #TrialTactics #LegalAnalysis #TrueCrimeCommunity #DefenseStrategy #JusticeForIdaho4 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872  

The Hidden Strategy Behind Kohberger's Latest Courtroom Setbacks Explained Bryan Kohberger's murder trial has rapidly evolved into a chess match of legal maneuvering, and recently the defense has seen several high-profile courtroom setbacks. Judge Hippler swiftly and firmly denied motions put forth by Kohberger's lead attorney, Anne Taylor—including attempts to introduce third-party culprits and repeated requests for trial continuances. To casual observers, these repeated denials seem like significant losses for the defense, perhaps even a sign of desperation. But could these apparent setbacks actually represent a more subtle, hidden strategy? In this revealing discussion, retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke—an expert in behavioral analysis, jury psychology, and credibility assessment—breaks down the deeper reasons behind these seemingly doomed legal moves. Robin explains how the defense's strategy may not necessarily hinge on courtroom victories at this stage, but rather on influencing public perception and indirectly impacting future jurors. By publicly introducing doubt and alternative theories, even when dismissed by the judge, Anne Taylor might be attempting to plant psychological seeds in the minds of potential jurors. Robin draws on his extensive experience analyzing how jurors process information, especially when exposed to media-heavy, emotionally charged cases like this one. Could these seemingly ineffective legal motions actually succeed in subtly swaying jurors, creating doubt long before they enter the courtroom? This critical episode offers listeners unique insights into how modern legal teams use psychological tactics, how subtle messaging can influence juror perspectives, and how losing a courtroom battle doesn't necessarily mean losing the broader war. Robin expertly guides us through understanding the deeper strategic game being played—one that's as much about psychology as it is about law. Prepare to rethink what courtroom victories and defeats truly mean, and why in today's trials, the perception battle may matter just as much as legal arguments. Hashtags: #BryanKohberger #CourtroomStrategy #JuryPsychology #RobinDreeke #IdahoMurders #TrialTactics #LegalAnalysis #TrueCrimeCommunity #DefenseStrategy #JusticeForIdaho4 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

The Hidden Strategy Behind Kohberger's Latest Courtroom Setbacks Explained Bryan Kohberger's murder trial has rapidly evolved into a chess match of legal maneuvering, and recently the defense has seen several high-profile courtroom setbacks. Judge Hippler swiftly and firmly denied motions put forth by Kohberger's lead attorney, Anne Taylor—including attempts to introduce third-party culprits and repeated requests for trial continuances. To casual observers, these repeated denials seem like significant losses for the defense, perhaps even a sign of desperation. But could these apparent setbacks actually represent a more subtle, hidden strategy? In this revealing discussion, retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke—an expert in behavioral analysis, jury psychology, and credibility assessment—breaks down the deeper reasons behind these seemingly doomed legal moves. Robin explains how the defense's strategy may not necessarily hinge on courtroom victories at this stage, but rather on influencing public perception and indirectly impacting future jurors. By publicly introducing doubt and alternative theories, even when dismissed by the judge, Anne Taylor might be attempting to plant psychological seeds in the minds of potential jurors. Robin draws on his extensive experience analyzing how jurors process information, especially when exposed to media-heavy, emotionally charged cases like this one. Could these seemingly ineffective legal motions actually succeed in subtly swaying jurors, creating doubt long before they enter the courtroom? This critical episode offers listeners unique insights into how modern legal teams use psychological tactics, how subtle messaging can influence juror perspectives, and how losing a courtroom battle doesn't necessarily mean losing the broader war. Robin expertly guides us through understanding the deeper strategic game being played—one that's as much about psychology as it is about law. Prepare to rethink what courtroom victories and defeats truly mean, and why in today's trials, the perception battle may matter just as much as legal arguments. Hashtags: #BryanKohberger #CourtroomStrategy #JuryPsychology #RobinDreeke #IdahoMurders #TrialTactics #LegalAnalysis #TrueCrimeCommunity #DefenseStrategy #JusticeForIdaho4 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

“Telling Him I Love Him Hurts Him” — Gilgo Killer's Wife, Asa Ellerup's Most Bizarre Statement Yet In this final segment, Tony Brueski and retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke turn their focus toward the most emotionally revealing clips from the Peacock documentary, featuring Asa Ellerup's reaction to her husband Rex Heuermann's arrest—and her increasingly surreal statements in the aftermath. Asa says she doesn't want to tell Rex she loves him… because it would hurt him. She defends him against allegations with unwavering loyalty, declaring “he's a family man,” and insists that he never kept anything from her—even while describing rooms in the house she was never allowed to enter. Robin Dreeke walks us through the psychological mechanisms at play: projection, cognitive dissonance, and denial as a survival strategy. He explains why Asa isn't just refusing to believe the evidence—she's incapable of it. To accept it would be to unravel her entire life, her marriage, and the identity she's built around being the wife of a good man. Dreeke also analyzes Asa's body language, defensive responses, and deeply embedded belief system. He argues that Asa's lack of curiosity—and Rex's understanding of that trait—created a “perfect storm” for secrecy and long-term concealment. We also explore the disturbing reality that forensic evidence linked hair from Asa and her daughter to some of the victims. How does Asa rationalize this? She doesn't. She simply... doesn't ask. As the segment closes, we also address the broader forensic and behavioral implications: Was this family environment intentionally manipulated? And what mistakes may have occurred because no one was asking the hard questions? This isn't just about one woman's denial—it's about the terrifying ease with which predators can operate when no one dares to ask why. Featuring keywords: Asa Ellerup denial, Gilgo Beach murders, Rex Heuermann family, FBI behavioral analysis, secret room, emotional projection, forensic psychology, serial killer spouse, Robin Dreeke, Peacock documentary #AsaEllerup #RexHeuermann #GilgoBeach #TrueCrimePodcast #RobinDreeke #FBIProfiler #PeacockDocumentary #ForensicPsychology #FamilyDenial #HiddenKillers Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872  

“Telling Him I Love Him Hurts Him” — Gilgo Killer's Wife, Asa Ellerup's Most Bizarre Statement Yet In this final segment, Tony Brueski and retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke turn their focus toward the most emotionally revealing clips from the Peacock documentary, featuring Asa Ellerup's reaction to her husband Rex Heuermann's arrest—and her increasingly surreal statements in the aftermath. Asa says she doesn't want to tell Rex she loves him… because it would hurt him. She defends him against allegations with unwavering loyalty, declaring “he's a family man,” and insists that he never kept anything from her—even while describing rooms in the house she was never allowed to enter. Robin Dreeke walks us through the psychological mechanisms at play: projection, cognitive dissonance, and denial as a survival strategy. He explains why Asa isn't just refusing to believe the evidence—she's incapable of it. To accept it would be to unravel her entire life, her marriage, and the identity she's built around being the wife of a good man. Dreeke also analyzes Asa's body language, defensive responses, and deeply embedded belief system. He argues that Asa's lack of curiosity—and Rex's understanding of that trait—created a “perfect storm” for secrecy and long-term concealment. We also explore the disturbing reality that forensic evidence linked hair from Asa and her daughter to some of the victims. How does Asa rationalize this? She doesn't. She simply... doesn't ask. As the segment closes, we also address the broader forensic and behavioral implications: Was this family environment intentionally manipulated? And what mistakes may have occurred because no one was asking the hard questions? This isn't just about one woman's denial—it's about the terrifying ease with which predators can operate when no one dares to ask why. Featuring keywords: Asa Ellerup denial, Gilgo Beach murders, Rex Heuermann family, FBI behavioral analysis, secret room, emotional projection, forensic psychology, serial killer spouse, Robin Dreeke, Peacock documentary #AsaEllerup #RexHeuermann #GilgoBeach #TrueCrimePodcast #RobinDreeke #FBIProfiler #PeacockDocumentary #ForensicPsychology #FamilyDenial #HiddenKillers Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

“Telling Him I Love Him Hurts Him” — Gilgo Killer's Wife, Asa Ellerup's Most Bizarre Statement Yet In this final segment, Tony Brueski and retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke turn their focus toward the most emotionally revealing clips from the Peacock documentary, featuring Asa Ellerup's reaction to her husband Rex Heuermann's arrest—and her increasingly surreal statements in the aftermath. Asa says she doesn't want to tell Rex she loves him… because it would hurt him. She defends him against allegations with unwavering loyalty, declaring “he's a family man,” and insists that he never kept anything from her—even while describing rooms in the house she was never allowed to enter. Robin Dreeke walks us through the psychological mechanisms at play: projection, cognitive dissonance, and denial as a survival strategy. He explains why Asa isn't just refusing to believe the evidence—she's incapable of it. To accept it would be to unravel her entire life, her marriage, and the identity she's built around being the wife of a good man. Dreeke also analyzes Asa's body language, defensive responses, and deeply embedded belief system. He argues that Asa's lack of curiosity—and Rex's understanding of that trait—created a “perfect storm” for secrecy and long-term concealment. We also explore the disturbing reality that forensic evidence linked hair from Asa and her daughter to some of the victims. How does Asa rationalize this? She doesn't. She simply... doesn't ask. As the segment closes, we also address the broader forensic and behavioral implications: Was this family environment intentionally manipulated? And what mistakes may have occurred because no one was asking the hard questions? This isn't just about one woman's denial—it's about the terrifying ease with which predators can operate when no one dares to ask why. Featuring keywords: Asa Ellerup denial, Gilgo Beach murders, Rex Heuermann family, FBI behavioral analysis, secret room, emotional projection, forensic psychology, serial killer spouse, Robin Dreeke, Peacock documentary #AsaEllerup #RexHeuermann #GilgoBeach #TrueCrimePodcast #RobinDreeke #FBIProfiler #PeacockDocumentary #ForensicPsychology #FamilyDenial #HiddenKillers Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

“Telling Him I Love Him Hurts Him” — Gilgo Killer's Wife, Asa Ellerup's Most Bizarre Statement Yet In this final segment, Tony Brueski and retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke turn their focus toward the most emotionally revealing clips from the Peacock documentary, featuring Asa Ellerup's reaction to her husband Rex Heuermann's arrest—and her increasingly surreal statements in the aftermath. Asa says she doesn't want to tell Rex she loves him… because it would hurt him. She defends him against allegations with unwavering loyalty, declaring “he's a family man,” and insists that he never kept anything from her—even while describing rooms in the house she was never allowed to enter. Robin Dreeke walks us through the psychological mechanisms at play: projection, cognitive dissonance, and denial as a survival strategy. He explains why Asa isn't just refusing to believe the evidence—she's incapable of it. To accept it would be to unravel her entire life, her marriage, and the identity she's built around being the wife of a good man. Dreeke also analyzes Asa's body language, defensive responses, and deeply embedded belief system. He argues that Asa's lack of curiosity—and Rex's understanding of that trait—created a “perfect storm” for secrecy and long-term concealment. We also explore the disturbing reality that forensic evidence linked hair from Asa and her daughter to some of the victims. How does Asa rationalize this? She doesn't. She simply... doesn't ask. As the segment closes, we also address the broader forensic and behavioral implications: Was this family environment intentionally manipulated? And what mistakes may have occurred because no one was asking the hard questions? This isn't just about one woman's denial—it's about the terrifying ease with which predators can operate when no one dares to ask why. Featuring keywords: Asa Ellerup denial, Gilgo Beach murders, Rex Heuermann family, FBI behavioral analysis, secret room, emotional projection, forensic psychology, serial killer spouse, Robin Dreeke, Peacock documentary #AsaEllerup #RexHeuermann #GilgoBeach #TrueCrimePodcast #RobinDreeke #FBIProfiler #PeacockDocumentary #ForensicPsychology #FamilyDenial #HiddenKillers Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

“He Saved Us” — Or Did He? Gilgo Killer's Wife, Asa Ellerup's Love Story Examined by FBI Profiler In Segment 2 of our deep-dive into the Gilgo Beach case, Tony Brueski and retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke turn their focus to the beginning — the origin story of Asa Ellerup and Rex Heuermann's relationship. What started as an act of kindness during Asa's divorce quickly evolved into a lifelong partnership built, perhaps, on imbalance. She was young, vulnerable, in need of support. He was strong, stable, and offered her something she desperately craved: a sense of family and emotional safety. But beneath that surface — according to experts and prosecutors — may have been something else entirely. Robin Dreeke examines the early dynamics of Asa and Rex's bond, including key psychological indicators of emotional grooming, dependency, and how empathy can be weaponized by manipulators. Using real behavioral science and decades of field experience, Dreeke breaks down why Rex may have been drawn to Asa—not out of love, but for how perfectly she fit into the hidden life he needed to maintain. We also explore the concept of “lack of curiosity,” a recurring behavioral trait Dreeke believes allowed Rex to operate in plain sight. This episode dissects key parts of the Peacock documentary that showcase Asa's perspective on her marriage, the home they shared, and the vault of secrets that sat quietly beneath their feet. If you're interested in the psychological mechanisms predators use to stay hidden—and the painful cost to the people closest to them—this segment offers a hauntingly clear window into how it all begins.  Hashtags: #GilgoBeach #AsaEllerup #RexHeuermann #FBIProfiler #TrueCrimePodcast #RobinDreeke #EmotionalGrooming #SerialKillerPsychology #HiddenKillers #PeacockDocumentary Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872  

“He Saved Us” — Or Did He? Gilgo Killer's Wife, Asa Ellerup's Love Story Examined by FBI Profiler In Segment 2 of our deep-dive into the Gilgo Beach case, Tony Brueski and retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke turn their focus to the beginning — the origin story of Asa Ellerup and Rex Heuermann's relationship. What started as an act of kindness during Asa's divorce quickly evolved into a lifelong partnership built, perhaps, on imbalance. She was young, vulnerable, in need of support. He was strong, stable, and offered her something she desperately craved: a sense of family and emotional safety. But beneath that surface — according to experts and prosecutors — may have been something else entirely. Robin Dreeke examines the early dynamics of Asa and Rex's bond, including key psychological indicators of emotional grooming, dependency, and how empathy can be weaponized by manipulators. Using real behavioral science and decades of field experience, Dreeke breaks down why Rex may have been drawn to Asa—not out of love, but for how perfectly she fit into the hidden life he needed to maintain. We also explore the concept of “lack of curiosity,” a recurring behavioral trait Dreeke believes allowed Rex to operate in plain sight. This episode dissects key parts of the Peacock documentary that showcase Asa's perspective on her marriage, the home they shared, and the vault of secrets that sat quietly beneath their feet. If you're interested in the psychological mechanisms predators use to stay hidden—and the painful cost to the people closest to them—this segment offers a hauntingly clear window into how it all begins.  Hashtags: #GilgoBeach #AsaEllerup #RexHeuermann #FBIProfiler #TrueCrimePodcast #RobinDreeke #EmotionalGrooming #SerialKillerPsychology #HiddenKillers #PeacockDocumentary Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

“He Saved Us” — Or Did He? Gilgo Killer's Wife, Asa Ellerup's Love Story Examined by FBI Profiler In Segment 2 of our deep-dive into the Gilgo Beach case, Tony Brueski and retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke turn their focus to the beginning — the origin story of Asa Ellerup and Rex Heuermann's relationship. What started as an act of kindness during Asa's divorce quickly evolved into a lifelong partnership built, perhaps, on imbalance. She was young, vulnerable, in need of support. He was strong, stable, and offered her something she desperately craved: a sense of family and emotional safety. But beneath that surface — according to experts and prosecutors — may have been something else entirely. Robin Dreeke examines the early dynamics of Asa and Rex's bond, including key psychological indicators of emotional grooming, dependency, and how empathy can be weaponized by manipulators. Using real behavioral science and decades of field experience, Dreeke breaks down why Rex may have been drawn to Asa—not out of love, but for how perfectly she fit into the hidden life he needed to maintain. We also explore the concept of “lack of curiosity,” a recurring behavioral trait Dreeke believes allowed Rex to operate in plain sight. This episode dissects key parts of the Peacock documentary that showcase Asa's perspective on her marriage, the home they shared, and the vault of secrets that sat quietly beneath their feet. If you're interested in the psychological mechanisms predators use to stay hidden—and the painful cost to the people closest to them—this segment offers a hauntingly clear window into how it all begins.  Hashtags: #GilgoBeach #AsaEllerup #RexHeuermann #FBIProfiler #TrueCrimePodcast #RobinDreeke #EmotionalGrooming #SerialKillerPsychology #HiddenKillers #PeacockDocumentary Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

“He Saved Us” — Or Did He? Gilgo Killer's Wife, Asa Ellerup's Love Story Examined by FBI Profiler In Segment 2 of our deep-dive into the Gilgo Beach case, Tony Brueski and retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke turn their focus to the beginning — the origin story of Asa Ellerup and Rex Heuermann's relationship. What started as an act of kindness during Asa's divorce quickly evolved into a lifelong partnership built, perhaps, on imbalance. She was young, vulnerable, in need of support. He was strong, stable, and offered her something she desperately craved: a sense of family and emotional safety. But beneath that surface — according to experts and prosecutors — may have been something else entirely. Robin Dreeke examines the early dynamics of Asa and Rex's bond, including key psychological indicators of emotional grooming, dependency, and how empathy can be weaponized by manipulators. Using real behavioral science and decades of field experience, Dreeke breaks down why Rex may have been drawn to Asa—not out of love, but for how perfectly she fit into the hidden life he needed to maintain. We also explore the concept of “lack of curiosity,” a recurring behavioral trait Dreeke believes allowed Rex to operate in plain sight. This episode dissects key parts of the Peacock documentary that showcase Asa's perspective on her marriage, the home they shared, and the vault of secrets that sat quietly beneath their feet. If you're interested in the psychological mechanisms predators use to stay hidden—and the painful cost to the people closest to them—this segment offers a hauntingly clear window into how it all begins.  Hashtags: #GilgoBeach #AsaEllerup #RexHeuermann #FBIProfiler #TrueCrimePodcast #RobinDreeke #EmotionalGrooming #SerialKillerPsychology #HiddenKillers #PeacockDocumentary Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

10 Signs Alleged Gilgo Beach Killer, Rex Heuermann's Family Missed — Behavioral Analysis from the FBI In this gripping first segment, retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke—former chief of the Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program—joins Tony Brueski to explore the disturbing paradox at the center of the Gilgo Beach case: How did Rex Heuermann's family not know? Asa Ellerup, Rex's longtime wife, has become one of the most controversial figures in the case—not because she's accused of anything—but because of what she didn't see. In this episode, Dreeke walks us through her emotional profile, behavioral patterns, and the psychological traits that may have made her the perfect partner for a man allegedly living a double life. We examine key footage from Peacock's The Gilgo Beach Killer: Secrets of a Serial Killer and discuss the FBI's view of how people like Heuermann are able to manipulate those closest to them. Dreeke explains how serial predators often seek out partners who lack curiosity, who prioritize stability over questions, and who are more likely to rationalize away red flags in the name of love or loyalty. Is Asa a victim herself? Was she chosen for her trust, her dependence, or simply her desire to believe the best in someone? This segment breaks down not just her words, but her behaviors, her relationships, and the life she thought she was living—until the knock on the door that changed everything. If you've ever wondered how evil hides in plain sight, this is a conversation you don't want to miss.  Hashtags: #GilgoBeach #RexHeuermann #AsaEllerup #TrueCrimeAnalysis #FBIProfiler #HiddenKillers #RobinDreeke #SerialKillerMindset #PeacockDocumentary #DenialAndDeception Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872  

10 Signs Alleged Gilgo Beach Killer, Rex Heuermann's Family Missed — Behavioral Analysis from the FBI In this gripping first segment, retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke—former chief of the Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program—joins Tony Brueski to explore the disturbing paradox at the center of the Gilgo Beach case: How did Rex Heuermann's family not know? Asa Ellerup, Rex's longtime wife, has become one of the most controversial figures in the case—not because she's accused of anything—but because of what she didn't see. In this episode, Dreeke walks us through her emotional profile, behavioral patterns, and the psychological traits that may have made her the perfect partner for a man allegedly living a double life. We examine key footage from Peacock's The Gilgo Beach Killer: Secrets of a Serial Killer and discuss the FBI's view of how people like Heuermann are able to manipulate those closest to them. Dreeke explains how serial predators often seek out partners who lack curiosity, who prioritize stability over questions, and who are more likely to rationalize away red flags in the name of love or loyalty. Is Asa a victim herself? Was she chosen for her trust, her dependence, or simply her desire to believe the best in someone? This segment breaks down not just her words, but her behaviors, her relationships, and the life she thought she was living—until the knock on the door that changed everything. If you've ever wondered how evil hides in plain sight, this is a conversation you don't want to miss.  Hashtags: #GilgoBeach #RexHeuermann #AsaEllerup #TrueCrimeAnalysis #FBIProfiler #HiddenKillers #RobinDreeke #SerialKillerMindset #PeacockDocumentary #DenialAndDeception Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

10 Signs Alleged Gilgo Beach Killer, Rex Heuermann's Family Missed — Behavioral Analysis from the FBI In this gripping first segment, retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke—former chief of the Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program—joins Tony Brueski to explore the disturbing paradox at the center of the Gilgo Beach case: How did Rex Heuermann's family not know? Asa Ellerup, Rex's longtime wife, has become one of the most controversial figures in the case—not because she's accused of anything—but because of what she didn't see. In this episode, Dreeke walks us through her emotional profile, behavioral patterns, and the psychological traits that may have made her the perfect partner for a man allegedly living a double life. We examine key footage from Peacock's The Gilgo Beach Killer: Secrets of a Serial Killer and discuss the FBI's view of how people like Heuermann are able to manipulate those closest to them. Dreeke explains how serial predators often seek out partners who lack curiosity, who prioritize stability over questions, and who are more likely to rationalize away red flags in the name of love or loyalty. Is Asa a victim herself? Was she chosen for her trust, her dependence, or simply her desire to believe the best in someone? This segment breaks down not just her words, but her behaviors, her relationships, and the life she thought she was living—until the knock on the door that changed everything. If you've ever wondered how evil hides in plain sight, this is a conversation you don't want to miss.  Hashtags: #GilgoBeach #RexHeuermann #AsaEllerup #TrueCrimeAnalysis #FBIProfiler #HiddenKillers #RobinDreeke #SerialKillerMindset #PeacockDocumentary #DenialAndDeception Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

10 Signs Alleged Gilgo Beach Killer, Rex Heuermann's Family Missed — Behavioral Analysis from the FBI In this gripping first segment, retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke—former chief of the Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program—joins Tony Brueski to explore the disturbing paradox at the center of the Gilgo Beach case: How did Rex Heuermann's family not know? Asa Ellerup, Rex's longtime wife, has become one of the most controversial figures in the case—not because she's accused of anything—but because of what she didn't see. In this episode, Dreeke walks us through her emotional profile, behavioral patterns, and the psychological traits that may have made her the perfect partner for a man allegedly living a double life. We examine key footage from Peacock's The Gilgo Beach Killer: Secrets of a Serial Killer and discuss the FBI's view of how people like Heuermann are able to manipulate those closest to them. Dreeke explains how serial predators often seek out partners who lack curiosity, who prioritize stability over questions, and who are more likely to rationalize away red flags in the name of love or loyalty. Is Asa a victim herself? Was she chosen for her trust, her dependence, or simply her desire to believe the best in someone? This segment breaks down not just her words, but her behaviors, her relationships, and the life she thought she was living—until the knock on the door that changed everything. If you've ever wondered how evil hides in plain sight, this is a conversation you don't want to miss.  Hashtags: #GilgoBeach #RexHeuermann #AsaEllerup #TrueCrimeAnalysis #FBIProfiler #HiddenKillers #RobinDreeke #SerialKillerMindset #PeacockDocumentary #DenialAndDeception Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Living With a Serial Killer: FBI Expert Explains How Rex Heuermann Hid 7 Murders From Family Description: How does a man accused of brutally murdering seven women over three decades hide such horrific crimes from the family sleeping under the same roof? In this eye-opening interview, former FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke, who led the Bureau's Behavioral Analysis Program, breaks down the sophisticated psychological mechanisms that allow serial killers to compartmentalize their lives. Rex Heuermann, a 61-year-old Manhattan architect, allegedly maintained two completely separate existences - devoted family man in Massapequa Park by day, predator hunting vulnerable women by night. His wife of 27 years, Asa Ellerup, continues to support him, while his daughter Victoria now believes he's "most likely" guilty. This family divide offers a unique window into how deception operates in long-term relationships. Dreeke explains the concept of "truth-default state" - why spouses detect lies at only 50% accuracy, essentially no better than a coin flip. He reveals how environmental factors like suburban normalcy and professional success create cognitive dissonance that prevents family members from recognizing warning signs. The discussion covers specific patterns Heuermann allegedly used: only killing when family was out of town, using multiple burner phones, and maintaining strict operational security that ultimately failed him. Drawing parallels to other cases like BTK killer Dennis Rader, Dreeke provides crucial insights for listeners about red flags in relationships: secretive technology use, unexplained absences, compartmentalized friendships, and subtle personality shifts. He addresses the haunting question every family member asks: "How did I not know?" This episode is particularly valuable for women concerned about relationship safety, offering practical advice on when privacy becomes concerning secrecy and how to strengthen intuition without becoming paranoid. Dreeke's expertise in trust assessment and human behavior provides listeners with tools to protect themselves while understanding the complex trauma faced by families of accused killers. Hashtags: #SerialKillerPsychology #RexHeuermann #GilgoBeachMurders #FBIBehavioralAnalysis #RobinDreeke #TrueCrime #Compartmentalization #DoubleLife #FamilyTrauma #CriminalPsychology #RelationshipRedFlags #TrueCrimePodcast #AsaEllerup #VictoriaHeuermann #SerialKillerFamily #DeceptionDetection #LISK #LongIslandSerialKiller #TrueCrimeCommunity #PsychologicalManipulation #DomesticDeception #CrimeAnalysis #BehavioralProfiling #TrustYourGut #WomensSafety Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Living With a Serial Killer: FBI Expert Explains How Rex Heuermann Hid 7 Murders From Family Description: How does a man accused of brutally murdering seven women over three decades hide such horrific crimes from the family sleeping under the same roof? In this eye-opening interview, former FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke, who led the Bureau's Behavioral Analysis Program, breaks down the sophisticated psychological mechanisms that allow serial killers to compartmentalize their lives. Rex Heuermann, a 61-year-old Manhattan architect, allegedly maintained two completely separate existences - devoted family man in Massapequa Park by day, predator hunting vulnerable women by night. His wife of 27 years, Asa Ellerup, continues to support him, while his daughter Victoria now believes he's "most likely" guilty. This family divide offers a unique window into how deception operates in long-term relationships. Dreeke explains the concept of "truth-default state" - why spouses detect lies at only 50% accuracy, essentially no better than a coin flip. He reveals how environmental factors like suburban normalcy and professional success create cognitive dissonance that prevents family members from recognizing warning signs. The discussion covers specific patterns Heuermann allegedly used: only killing when family was out of town, using multiple burner phones, and maintaining strict operational security that ultimately failed him. Drawing parallels to other cases like BTK killer Dennis Rader, Dreeke provides crucial insights for listeners about red flags in relationships: secretive technology use, unexplained absences, compartmentalized friendships, and subtle personality shifts. He addresses the haunting question every family member asks: "How did I not know?" This episode is particularly valuable for women concerned about relationship safety, offering practical advice on when privacy becomes concerning secrecy and how to strengthen intuition without becoming paranoid. Dreeke's expertise in trust assessment and human behavior provides listeners with tools to protect themselves while understanding the complex trauma faced by families of accused killers. Hashtags: #SerialKillerPsychology #RexHeuermann #GilgoBeachMurders #FBIBehavioralAnalysis #RobinDreeke #TrueCrime #Compartmentalization #DoubleLife #FamilyTrauma #CriminalPsychology #RelationshipRedFlags #TrueCrimePodcast #AsaEllerup #VictoriaHeuermann #SerialKillerFamily #DeceptionDetection #LISK #LongIslandSerialKiller #TrueCrimeCommunity #PsychologicalManipulation #DomesticDeception #CrimeAnalysis #BehavioralProfiling #TrustYourGut #WomensSafety Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Living With a Serial Killer: FBI Expert Explains How Rex Heuermann Hid 7 Murders From Family Description: How does a man accused of brutally murdering seven women over three decades hide such horrific crimes from the family sleeping under the same roof? In this eye-opening interview, former FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke, who led the Bureau's Behavioral Analysis Program, breaks down the sophisticated psychological mechanisms that allow serial killers to compartmentalize their lives. Rex Heuermann, a 61-year-old Manhattan architect, allegedly maintained two completely separate existences - devoted family man in Massapequa Park by day, predator hunting vulnerable women by night. His wife of 27 years, Asa Ellerup, continues to support him, while his daughter Victoria now believes he's "most likely" guilty. This family divide offers a unique window into how deception operates in long-term relationships. Dreeke explains the concept of "truth-default state" - why spouses detect lies at only 50% accuracy, essentially no better than a coin flip. He reveals how environmental factors like suburban normalcy and professional success create cognitive dissonance that prevents family members from recognizing warning signs. The discussion covers specific patterns Heuermann allegedly used: only killing when family was out of town, using multiple burner phones, and maintaining strict operational security that ultimately failed him. Drawing parallels to other cases like BTK killer Dennis Rader, Dreeke provides crucial insights for listeners about red flags in relationships: secretive technology use, unexplained absences, compartmentalized friendships, and subtle personality shifts. He addresses the haunting question every family member asks: "How did I not know?" This episode is particularly valuable for women concerned about relationship safety, offering practical advice on when privacy becomes concerning secrecy and how to strengthen intuition without becoming paranoid. Dreeke's expertise in trust assessment and human behavior provides listeners with tools to protect themselves while understanding the complex trauma faced by families of accused killers. Hashtags: #SerialKillerPsychology #RexHeuermann #GilgoBeachMurders #FBIBehavioralAnalysis #RobinDreeke #TrueCrime #Compartmentalization #DoubleLife #FamilyTrauma #CriminalPsychology #RelationshipRedFlags #TrueCrimePodcast #AsaEllerup #VictoriaHeuermann #SerialKillerFamily #DeceptionDetection #LISK #LongIslandSerialKiller #TrueCrimeCommunity #PsychologicalManipulation #DomesticDeception #CrimeAnalysis #BehavioralProfiling #TrustYourGut #WomensSafety Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Living With a Serial Killer: FBI Expert Explains How Rex Heuermann Hid 7 Murders From Family Description: How does a man accused of brutally murdering seven women over three decades hide such horrific crimes from the family sleeping under the same roof? In this eye-opening interview, former FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke, who led the Bureau's Behavioral Analysis Program, breaks down the sophisticated psychological mechanisms that allow serial killers to compartmentalize their lives. Rex Heuermann, a 61-year-old Manhattan architect, allegedly maintained two completely separate existences - devoted family man in Massapequa Park by day, predator hunting vulnerable women by night. His wife of 27 years, Asa Ellerup, continues to support him, while his daughter Victoria now believes he's "most likely" guilty. This family divide offers a unique window into how deception operates in long-term relationships. Dreeke explains the concept of "truth-default state" - why spouses detect lies at only 50% accuracy, essentially no better than a coin flip. He reveals how environmental factors like suburban normalcy and professional success create cognitive dissonance that prevents family members from recognizing warning signs. The discussion covers specific patterns Heuermann allegedly used: only killing when family was out of town, using multiple burner phones, and maintaining strict operational security that ultimately failed him. Drawing parallels to other cases like BTK killer Dennis Rader, Dreeke provides crucial insights for listeners about red flags in relationships: secretive technology use, unexplained absences, compartmentalized friendships, and subtle personality shifts. He addresses the haunting question every family member asks: "How did I not know?" This episode is particularly valuable for women concerned about relationship safety, offering practical advice on when privacy becomes concerning secrecy and how to strengthen intuition without becoming paranoid. Dreeke's expertise in trust assessment and human behavior provides listeners with tools to protect themselves while understanding the complex trauma faced by families of accused killers. Hashtags: #SerialKillerPsychology #RexHeuermann #GilgoBeachMurders #FBIBehavioralAnalysis #RobinDreeke #TrueCrime #Compartmentalization #DoubleLife #FamilyTrauma #CriminalPsychology #RelationshipRedFlags #TrueCrimePodcast #AsaEllerup #VictoriaHeuermann #SerialKillerFamily #DeceptionDetection #LISK #LongIslandSerialKiller #TrueCrimeCommunity #PsychologicalManipulation #DomesticDeception #CrimeAnalysis #BehavioralProfiling #TrustYourGut #WomensSafety Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Big Breakdown: Karen Read on Trial: Psychologist, FBI & Defense Attorney Tear It All Down In this explosive episode of the Hidden Killers Podcast, host Tony Brueski is joined by a powerful expert panel to break down the psychological and legal layers of the Karen Read trial. Featuring licensed psychotherapist and author Shavaun Scott, retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke, and former prosecutor turned defense attorney Eric Faddis, this deep-dive explores what may really be going on behind Karen Read's statements, courtroom behavior, and post-incident interviews. This isn't just speculation. Shavaun Scott brings clinical insight into traits of narcissistic rage and borderline personality disorder, helping us understand how fear of abandonment, emotional volatility, and ego protection could explain some of Karen Read's erratic and contradictory reactions—especially after the death of John O'Keefe. Meanwhile, Dreeke and Faddis unpack how Read's public statements, contradictions, and refusal to accept accountability fit classic behavioral profiles. They also explore how her post-crash interviews and courtroom demeanor may reflect self-preservation above grief—often viewed by jurors as cold detachment. From the infamous “Did I hit him?” quote to her public targeting of alleged conspirators, the experts explain why her shifting narratives and finger-pointing may backfire legally—and signal deeper psychological distress. Is she collapsing under guilt, or masterfully manipulating perception? You decide. This video also unpacks the dwindling FKR movement, the cult-like behavior of Karen's die-hard supporters, and how social media has shaped the courtroom's atmosphere. Whether you believe Karen Read is guilty or not, this is the psychological and legal breakdown you don't want to miss. #KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #PsychologicalAnalysis #TrueCrimeExperts #HiddenKillers #NarcissisticRage #TrialBreakdown #FBIBehaviorAnalysis #KarenReadTrial #ForensicPsychology Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Big Breakdown: Karen Read on Trial: Psychologist, FBI & Defense Attorney Tear It All Down In this explosive episode of the Hidden Killers Podcast, host Tony Brueski is joined by a powerful expert panel to break down the psychological and legal layers of the Karen Read trial. Featuring licensed psychotherapist and author Shavaun Scott, retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke, and former prosecutor turned defense attorney Eric Faddis, this deep-dive explores what may really be going on behind Karen Read's statements, courtroom behavior, and post-incident interviews. This isn't just speculation. Shavaun Scott brings clinical insight into traits of narcissistic rage and borderline personality disorder, helping us understand how fear of abandonment, emotional volatility, and ego protection could explain some of Karen Read's erratic and contradictory reactions—especially after the death of John O'Keefe. Meanwhile, Dreeke and Faddis unpack how Read's public statements, contradictions, and refusal to accept accountability fit classic behavioral profiles. They also explore how her post-crash interviews and courtroom demeanor may reflect self-preservation above grief—often viewed by jurors as cold detachment. From the infamous “Did I hit him?” quote to her public targeting of alleged conspirators, the experts explain why her shifting narratives and finger-pointing may backfire legally—and signal deeper psychological distress. Is she collapsing under guilt, or masterfully manipulating perception? You decide. This video also unpacks the dwindling FKR movement, the cult-like behavior of Karen's die-hard supporters, and how social media has shaped the courtroom's atmosphere. Whether you believe Karen Read is guilty or not, this is the psychological and legal breakdown you don't want to miss. #KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #PsychologicalAnalysis #TrueCrimeExperts #HiddenKillers #NarcissisticRage #TrialBreakdown #FBIBehaviorAnalysis #KarenReadTrial #ForensicPsychology Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Big Breakdown: The Delphi Murders And The Wrongful Conviction Of Richard Allen In this eye-opening episode of Hidden Killers, we take you inside the interrogation room where Richard Allen—the man now at the center of the Delphi murders case—was questioned by investigators. Joining us are two of the top minds in behavioral science: retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke and forensic psychotherapist Shavaun Scott. Together, we dissect the interrogation footage that has sparked serious questions about the strength of the case—and whether the real killer is still out there. From the moment Allen sits down, the tension is palpable—but not in the way you might expect from a guilty man. Robin Dreeke unpacks Allen's verbal patterns, stress indicators, and behavior under pressure. Is this the posture of a man hiding a heinous crime… or someone completely out of his depth, terrified, and confused by the weight of what he's being accused of? Shavaun Scott brings her lens of clinical experience to Allen's emotional presentation and mental state. As the conversation unfolds, Allen appears increasingly distressed—making unusual religious statements, referencing his declining mental health, and wavering between confusion and fear. Could this be the unraveling of a guilty conscience, or the mental collapse of an innocent man trapped in a nightmare? Together, Dreeke and Scott explore: The lack of forensic evidence tying Allen to the crime scene Whether Allen's demeanor matches that of a deceptive subject—or a psychologically overwhelmed civilian Red flags in how the interrogation was conducted, and whether coercion or suggestibility could have played a role The possibility that investigators zeroed in on the wrong man under immense public pressure If you've watched the Richard Allen tapes and walked away unsettled—this episode will help you understand why. This isn't just about guilt or innocence. It's about how easily the justice system can make a mistake, and how we spot it before it's too late. #DelphiMurders #RichardAllen #WronglyAccused #FalseConfession #FBIProfiler #ShavaunScott #RobinDreeke #TrueCrimePodcast #HiddenKillers #InterrogationBreakdown  Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Big Breakdown: The Delphi Murders And The Wrongful Conviction Of Richard Allen In this eye-opening episode of Hidden Killers, we take you inside the interrogation room where Richard Allen—the man now at the center of the Delphi murders case—was questioned by investigators. Joining us are two of the top minds in behavioral science: retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke and forensic psychotherapist Shavaun Scott. Together, we dissect the interrogation footage that has sparked serious questions about the strength of the case—and whether the real killer is still out there. From the moment Allen sits down, the tension is palpable—but not in the way you might expect from a guilty man. Robin Dreeke unpacks Allen's verbal patterns, stress indicators, and behavior under pressure. Is this the posture of a man hiding a heinous crime… or someone completely out of his depth, terrified, and confused by the weight of what he's being accused of? Shavaun Scott brings her lens of clinical experience to Allen's emotional presentation and mental state. As the conversation unfolds, Allen appears increasingly distressed—making unusual religious statements, referencing his declining mental health, and wavering between confusion and fear. Could this be the unraveling of a guilty conscience, or the mental collapse of an innocent man trapped in a nightmare? Together, Dreeke and Scott explore: The lack of forensic evidence tying Allen to the crime scene Whether Allen's demeanor matches that of a deceptive subject—or a psychologically overwhelmed civilian Red flags in how the interrogation was conducted, and whether coercion or suggestibility could have played a role The possibility that investigators zeroed in on the wrong man under immense public pressure If you've watched the Richard Allen tapes and walked away unsettled—this episode will help you understand why. This isn't just about guilt or innocence. It's about how easily the justice system can make a mistake, and how we spot it before it's too late. #DelphiMurders #RichardAllen #WronglyAccused #FalseConfession #FBIProfiler #ShavaunScott #RobinDreeke #TrueCrimePodcast #HiddenKillers #InterrogationBreakdown  Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Criminology Turned Crime Did Kohberger Want To Teach About His Own Crime Someday Could Bryan Kohberger be telling the truth—or is he orchestrating one of the boldest courtroom manipulations we've seen in years? In this must-watch episode, retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke breaks down Kohberger's behavior following the stunning introduction of an “alternate suspect” by his defense team just weeks before trial. We explore what it means when someone shifts the narrative this late in the game. Is this a psychological tactic designed to introduce confusion and reasonable doubt? Robin weighs in on everything from body language, deception cues, emotional control, and the weaponization of silence in a courtroom setting. As Kohberger's team fights to keep graphic evidence out and his family in the room, we ask: what behaviors suggest genuine innocence, and which point to manipulation? Robin's analysis offers a rare inside look at how trained profilers decode lies, shame, and guilt—all without a single word spoken. If you're following the Idaho murders case, this episode is essential viewing. We're not just reviewing evidence—we're dissecting human behavior in the courtroom under a microscope. #BryanKohberger #BehavioralAnalysis #RobinDreeke #TrueCrimePodcast #Idaho4 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Criminology Turned Crime Did Kohberger Want To Teach About His Own Crime Someday Could Bryan Kohberger be telling the truth—or is he orchestrating one of the boldest courtroom manipulations we've seen in years? In this must-watch episode, retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke breaks down Kohberger's behavior following the stunning introduction of an “alternate suspect” by his defense team just weeks before trial. We explore what it means when someone shifts the narrative this late in the game. Is this a psychological tactic designed to introduce confusion and reasonable doubt? Robin weighs in on everything from body language, deception cues, emotional control, and the weaponization of silence in a courtroom setting. As Kohberger's team fights to keep graphic evidence out and his family in the room, we ask: what behaviors suggest genuine innocence, and which point to manipulation? Robin's analysis offers a rare inside look at how trained profilers decode lies, shame, and guilt—all without a single word spoken. If you're following the Idaho murders case, this episode is essential viewing. We're not just reviewing evidence—we're dissecting human behavior in the courtroom under a microscope. #BryanKohberger #BehavioralAnalysis #RobinDreeke #TrueCrimePodcast #Idaho4 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Criminology Turned Crime Did Kohberger Want To Teach About His Own Crime Someday Could Bryan Kohberger be telling the truth—or is he orchestrating one of the boldest courtroom manipulations we've seen in years? In this must-watch episode, retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke breaks down Kohberger's behavior following the stunning introduction of an “alternate suspect” by his defense team just weeks before trial. We explore what it means when someone shifts the narrative this late in the game. Is this a psychological tactic designed to introduce confusion and reasonable doubt? Robin weighs in on everything from body language, deception cues, emotional control, and the weaponization of silence in a courtroom setting. As Kohberger's team fights to keep graphic evidence out and his family in the room, we ask: what behaviors suggest genuine innocence, and which point to manipulation? Robin's analysis offers a rare inside look at how trained profilers decode lies, shame, and guilt—all without a single word spoken. If you're following the Idaho murders case, this episode is essential viewing. We're not just reviewing evidence—we're dissecting human behavior in the courtroom under a microscope. #BryanKohberger #BehavioralAnalysis #RobinDreeke #TrueCrimePodcast #Idaho4 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

The Psychology of Guilt Karen Read's Shifting Story Through a Behavioral Lens In this gripping episode of Hidden Killers, Tony Brueski sits down with retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke to examine the trial of Karen Read—through a behavioral lens. As the courtroom battles rage on, we dive deep into what may be the most telling evidence of all: Karen Read's own words, behavior, and emotional inconsistencies. From the moment she asked, “Could I have sideswiped him?” to her shifting narratives in interviews and text messages, Dreeke highlights patterns that suggest more than just a foggy memory. Is this self-preservation mode… or something deeper? The discussion breaks down Read's possible narcissistic behavioral traits, her inconsistent tempo during questioning, and why some of her emotional responses might actually be masking something more calculated. We also touch on the vehicle timestamp data that allegedly aligns the Lexus SUV's reverse event with the time John O'Keefe stopped using his phone—an alignment that could make or break the defense's claim of reasonable doubt. If technology and behavior both point in the same direction, the jury may not need much more. Don't miss this in-depth breakdown where law, forensics, and behavioral psychology collide. #KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #TrueCrime2025 #DigitalForensics #CourtroomPsychology #FBIProfiler #BehavioralAnalysis #NarrativeControl #LexusData #ConsciousnessOfGuilt Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

The Psychology of Guilt Karen Read's Shifting Story Through a Behavioral Lens In this gripping episode of Hidden Killers, Tony Brueski sits down with retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke to examine the trial of Karen Read—through a behavioral lens. As the courtroom battles rage on, we dive deep into what may be the most telling evidence of all: Karen Read's own words, behavior, and emotional inconsistencies. From the moment she asked, “Could I have sideswiped him?” to her shifting narratives in interviews and text messages, Dreeke highlights patterns that suggest more than just a foggy memory. Is this self-preservation mode… or something deeper? The discussion breaks down Read's possible narcissistic behavioral traits, her inconsistent tempo during questioning, and why some of her emotional responses might actually be masking something more calculated. We also touch on the vehicle timestamp data that allegedly aligns the Lexus SUV's reverse event with the time John O'Keefe stopped using his phone—an alignment that could make or break the defense's claim of reasonable doubt. If technology and behavior both point in the same direction, the jury may not need much more. Don't miss this in-depth breakdown where law, forensics, and behavioral psychology collide. #KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #TrueCrime2025 #DigitalForensics #CourtroomPsychology #FBIProfiler #BehavioralAnalysis #NarrativeControl #LexusData #ConsciousnessOfGuilt Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Did Bryan Kohberger Kill to Impress His Professor FBI Profiler Robin Dreeke Breaks It Down In this gripping episode, retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke dives into one of the most bizarre and controversial theories in the Bryan Kohberger case: the idea that Kohberger may have committed the murders of four University of Idaho students to impress his former professor, Dr. Katherine Ramsland. This theory, reported by journalist Howard Blum, has drawn comparisons to John Hinckley Jr.'s attempted assassination of President Reagan to impress actress Jodie Foster. But is it psychologically plausible? Dreeke, who once led the FBI's Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program, brings his deep expertise in motive, delusion, and high-risk behavioral patterns to break down the facts. Could Kohberger's academic obsession with serial killers have blurred the line between research and reality? Did he see his alleged crime as a twisted form of validation from a mentor he idolized? We explore how common—or rare—this type of motive actually is, what kind of psychological markers are typically present, and what kind of evidence investigators would need to verify such a theory in court. Dreeke also explains why the absence of hard proof doesn't necessarily mean the theory is wrong—it just makes it legally dangerous to rely on it without corroboration. Whether you believe the "impress the professor" theory or not, Dreeke helps cut through the noise to reveal what behaviors actually matter in assessing this case. This is a must-watch for anyone trying to understand the psychology behind one of the most confusing and disturbing alleged motives in recent true crime history. Hashtags: #BryanKohberger #RobinDreeke #KatherineRamsland #FBIProfiler #TrueCrimePsychology #IdahoMurders #CriminologyMotive #HowardBlum #MurderMotive #KohbergerTrial Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Did Bryan Kohberger Kill to Impress His Professor FBI Profiler Robin Dreeke Breaks It Down In this gripping episode, retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke dives into one of the most bizarre and controversial theories in the Bryan Kohberger case: the idea that Kohberger may have committed the murders of four University of Idaho students to impress his former professor, Dr. Katherine Ramsland. This theory, reported by journalist Howard Blum, has drawn comparisons to John Hinckley Jr.'s attempted assassination of President Reagan to impress actress Jodie Foster. But is it psychologically plausible? Dreeke, who once led the FBI's Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program, brings his deep expertise in motive, delusion, and high-risk behavioral patterns to break down the facts. Could Kohberger's academic obsession with serial killers have blurred the line between research and reality? Did he see his alleged crime as a twisted form of validation from a mentor he idolized? We explore how common—or rare—this type of motive actually is, what kind of psychological markers are typically present, and what kind of evidence investigators would need to verify such a theory in court. Dreeke also explains why the absence of hard proof doesn't necessarily mean the theory is wrong—it just makes it legally dangerous to rely on it without corroboration. Whether you believe the "impress the professor" theory or not, Dreeke helps cut through the noise to reveal what behaviors actually matter in assessing this case. This is a must-watch for anyone trying to understand the psychology behind one of the most confusing and disturbing alleged motives in recent true crime history. Hashtags: #BryanKohberger #RobinDreeke #KatherineRamsland #FBIProfiler #TrueCrimePsychology #IdahoMurders #CriminologyMotive #HowardBlum #MurderMotive #KohbergerTrial Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Did Bryan Kohberger Kill to Impress His Professor FBI Profiler Robin Dreeke Breaks It Down In this gripping episode, retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke dives into one of the most bizarre and controversial theories in the Bryan Kohberger case: the idea that Kohberger may have committed the murders of four University of Idaho students to impress his former professor, Dr. Katherine Ramsland. This theory, reported by journalist Howard Blum, has drawn comparisons to John Hinckley Jr.'s attempted assassination of President Reagan to impress actress Jodie Foster. But is it psychologically plausible? Dreeke, who once led the FBI's Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program, brings his deep expertise in motive, delusion, and high-risk behavioral patterns to break down the facts. Could Kohberger's academic obsession with serial killers have blurred the line between research and reality? Did he see his alleged crime as a twisted form of validation from a mentor he idolized? We explore how common—or rare—this type of motive actually is, what kind of psychological markers are typically present, and what kind of evidence investigators would need to verify such a theory in court. Dreeke also explains why the absence of hard proof doesn't necessarily mean the theory is wrong—it just makes it legally dangerous to rely on it without corroboration. Whether you believe the "impress the professor" theory or not, Dreeke helps cut through the noise to reveal what behaviors actually matter in assessing this case. This is a must-watch for anyone trying to understand the psychology behind one of the most confusing and disturbing alleged motives in recent true crime history. Hashtags: #BryanKohberger #RobinDreeke #KatherineRamsland #FBIProfiler #TrueCrimePsychology #IdahoMurders #CriminologyMotive #HowardBlum #MurderMotive #KohbergerTrial Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

From Student to Suspect Did Kohberger Turn Ramsland's Teachings into Murder Could Bryan Kohberger have transformed from criminology student to accused killer as a way to "show his work" to a professor he idolized? That's the chilling theory raised by journalist Howard Blum—and in this episode of Hidden Killers, retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke is here to dig into it. Dr. Katherine Ramsland, Kohberger's former professor and one of the foremost experts on serial killers, has never commented publicly on her former student. But Blum's reporting alleges that Kohberger emailed her before and after the murders—and that the killings may have been a twisted performance piece to earn her intellectual admiration. Dreeke brings his behavioral profiling expertise to dissect this theory. What kind of mindset does it take to commit a quadruple homicide as a form of symbolic achievement? And what role does ego—particularly in academically driven narcissists—play in escalating obsession into violence? Together, we examine whether Kohberger was trying to become the embodiment of what he studied. Was he staging a real-life case to rival those in Ramsland's books? Or was it something even darker—a final exam, so to speak, intended to impress the very person who taught him how to analyze the criminal mind? Hashtags: #KohbergerStudentToKiller #RobinDreeke #KatherineRamsland #FBIProfiler #BryanKohberger #TrueCrimeAnalysis #CriminologyMotive #HowardBlumTheory #MurderAsValidation #HiddenKillersPodcast Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

From Student to Suspect Did Kohberger Turn Ramsland's Teachings into Murder Could Bryan Kohberger have transformed from criminology student to accused killer as a way to "show his work" to a professor he idolized? That's the chilling theory raised by journalist Howard Blum—and in this episode of Hidden Killers, retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke is here to dig into it. Dr. Katherine Ramsland, Kohberger's former professor and one of the foremost experts on serial killers, has never commented publicly on her former student. But Blum's reporting alleges that Kohberger emailed her before and after the murders—and that the killings may have been a twisted performance piece to earn her intellectual admiration. Dreeke brings his behavioral profiling expertise to dissect this theory. What kind of mindset does it take to commit a quadruple homicide as a form of symbolic achievement? And what role does ego—particularly in academically driven narcissists—play in escalating obsession into violence? Together, we examine whether Kohberger was trying to become the embodiment of what he studied. Was he staging a real-life case to rival those in Ramsland's books? Or was it something even darker—a final exam, so to speak, intended to impress the very person who taught him how to analyze the criminal mind? Hashtags: #KohbergerStudentToKiller #RobinDreeke #KatherineRamsland #FBIProfiler #BryanKohberger #TrueCrimeAnalysis #CriminologyMotive #HowardBlumTheory #MurderAsValidation #HiddenKillersPodcast Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872 

“Murder for Mentorship FBI Profiler Explores Kohberger's Alleged Obsession with Ramsland” Was the motive for one of the most haunting mass killings in recent history not rage, not revenge—but academic admiration? In this exclusive interview, Tony Brueski sits down with former FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke to dissect the Howard Blum theory that Bryan Kohberger may have murdered four students as a twisted gesture to impress his former criminology professor, Dr. Katherine Ramsland. This theory has captivated and unsettled the public, offering a motive that feels ripped straight from a psychological thriller. But Dreeke—who specialized in decoding human behavior and threat assessments—helps bring it back down to earth. What would it take, behaviorally, for someone to develop that kind of obsessive admiration? And does Kohberger's background support such a profile? We examine Ramsland's influence in Kohberger's academic career, the behavioral patterns that suggest fixation, and how rare it actually is for a student to turn to violence in a bid for academic approval. Dreeke also weighs in on the kind of evidence—emails, journals, statements—that would be required to take this theory from “clickbait” to courtroom credibility. This episode doesn't just theorize—it dissects, challenges, and investigates. If you've been following the Kohberger case and wondering how credible the Ramsland motive theory really is, you won't want to miss this deeply informed discussion. Hashtags: #KohbergerMotive #RobinDreeke #KatherineRamsland #TrueCrimeBreakdown #HowardBlum #FBIProfiler #BryanKohberger #IdahoStudentMurders #CriminologyObsessions #HiddenKillersPodcast Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

“Murder for Mentorship FBI Profiler Explores Kohberger's Alleged Obsession with Ramsland” Was the motive for one of the most haunting mass killings in recent history not rage, not revenge—but academic admiration? In this exclusive interview, Tony Brueski sits down with former FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke to dissect the Howard Blum theory that Bryan Kohberger may have murdered four students as a twisted gesture to impress his former criminology professor, Dr. Katherine Ramsland. This theory has captivated and unsettled the public, offering a motive that feels ripped straight from a psychological thriller. But Dreeke—who specialized in decoding human behavior and threat assessments—helps bring it back down to earth. What would it take, behaviorally, for someone to develop that kind of obsessive admiration? And does Kohberger's background support such a profile? We examine Ramsland's influence in Kohberger's academic career, the behavioral patterns that suggest fixation, and how rare it actually is for a student to turn to violence in a bid for academic approval. Dreeke also weighs in on the kind of evidence—emails, journals, statements—that would be required to take this theory from “clickbait” to courtroom credibility. This episode doesn't just theorize—it dissects, challenges, and investigates. If you've been following the Kohberger case and wondering how credible the Ramsland motive theory really is, you won't want to miss this deeply informed discussion. Hashtags: #KohbergerMotive #RobinDreeke #KatherineRamsland #TrueCrimeBreakdown #HowardBlum #FBIProfiler #BryanKohberger #IdahoStudentMurders #CriminologyObsessions #HiddenKillersPodcast Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Karen Read's Fatal Assumption Why Did She Think He Was Outside Before anyone saw a body, before a single flake of snow was disturbed on the front lawn, Karen Read reportedly said, “Did I hit him?” And just like that, the prosecution's timeline had a behavioral anchor. In this episode, retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke joins us to analyze what that kind of pre-discovery assumption means — not in speculation, but in behavioral science. We break down what makes this moment so critical: no one had seen John O'Keefe at that point, yet Karen's panic went straight to the idea that he was not just outside, but already hurt — or worse, dead. Was this just anxiety spinning out of control? Or something more telling? Robin takes us inside how trained profilers evaluate guilt leakage, subconscious narrative shifts, and the crucial difference between panic and prediction. This isn't just about what was said — it's when it was said, and how the tone, timing, and instinctual phrasing could offer the jury a moment of truth hidden in chaos. If you're tracking the Karen Read trial, this is the behavioral pivot point. Don't miss it. Hashtags: #KarenReadTrial #JohnOKeefe #FBIProfiler #KarenReadCase #TrueCrime #BehavioralCues #ForensicPsychology #RobinDreeke #HiddenKillersPodcast #CriminalBehaviorWant to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Karen Read's Fatal Assumption Why Did She Think He Was Outside Before anyone saw a body, before a single flake of snow was disturbed on the front lawn, Karen Read reportedly said, “Did I hit him?” And just like that, the prosecution's timeline had a behavioral anchor. In this episode, retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke joins us to analyze what that kind of pre-discovery assumption means — not in speculation, but in behavioral science. We break down what makes this moment so critical: no one had seen John O'Keefe at that point, yet Karen's panic went straight to the idea that he was not just outside, but already hurt — or worse, dead. Was this just anxiety spinning out of control? Or something more telling? Robin takes us inside how trained profilers evaluate guilt leakage, subconscious narrative shifts, and the crucial difference between panic and prediction. This isn't just about what was said — it's when it was said, and how the tone, timing, and instinctual phrasing could offer the jury a moment of truth hidden in chaos. If you're tracking the Karen Read trial, this is the behavioral pivot point. Don't miss it. Hashtags: #KarenReadTrial #JohnOKeefe #FBIProfiler #KarenReadCase #TrueCrime #BehavioralCues #ForensicPsychology #RobinDreeke #HiddenKillersPodcast #CriminalBehaviorWant to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

The Question That Could Break the Karen Read Case 'Did I Hit Him', FBI Behavior Expert Talks   In this episode, we focus on one of the most puzzling—and potentially case-defining—moments in the Karen Read trial. When she allegedly asked, “Did I hit him?” before John O'Keefe's body had even been discovered, it sent shockwaves through the timeline and raised one chilling question: why would anyone assume that? Joined by former FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke, we take a deep dive into the psychological and behavioral implications of this question. Was it a moment of genuine fear, trauma-induced speculation, or the subconscious emergence of a truth she was trying to hide? Robin breaks down how professionals in behavioral analysis interpret spontaneous language, particularly under high stress and emotional duress. Throughout this episode, we unpack why timing is everything. Saying the wrong thing too early can reveal far more than intended—and juries notice. We look at Karen Read's overall behavior before the discovery of the body, and why her assumption that John was outside and possibly dead doesn't align with what she should have known in that moment. Whether you're watching this trial with a mind for justice, psychology, or forensic investigation, this is one of those episodes that cuts right to the core of what behavior reveals. Words matter—especially when they come too soon. This video is a must-watch for anyone following the Karen Read case and trying to separate truth from narrative. Hashtags: #KarenReadTrial #JohnOKeefe #TrueCrime #BehavioralAnalysis #RobinDreeke #KarenReadCase #MurderTrial #ForensicPsychology #CriminalBehavior #HiddenKillersPodcast Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

The Question That Could Break the Karen Read Case 'Did I Hit Him', FBI Behavior Expert Talks   In this episode, we focus on one of the most puzzling—and potentially case-defining—moments in the Karen Read trial. When she allegedly asked, “Did I hit him?” before John O'Keefe's body had even been discovered, it sent shockwaves through the timeline and raised one chilling question: why would anyone assume that? Joined by former FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke, we take a deep dive into the psychological and behavioral implications of this question. Was it a moment of genuine fear, trauma-induced speculation, or the subconscious emergence of a truth she was trying to hide? Robin breaks down how professionals in behavioral analysis interpret spontaneous language, particularly under high stress and emotional duress. Throughout this episode, we unpack why timing is everything. Saying the wrong thing too early can reveal far more than intended—and juries notice. We look at Karen Read's overall behavior before the discovery of the body, and why her assumption that John was outside and possibly dead doesn't align with what she should have known in that moment. Whether you're watching this trial with a mind for justice, psychology, or forensic investigation, this is one of those episodes that cuts right to the core of what behavior reveals. Words matter—especially when they come too soon. This video is a must-watch for anyone following the Karen Read case and trying to separate truth from narrative. Hashtags: #KarenReadTrial #JohnOKeefe #TrueCrime #BehavioralAnalysis #RobinDreeke #KarenReadCase #MurderTrial #ForensicPsychology #CriminalBehavior #HiddenKillersPodcast Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872