Podcast appearances and mentions of Tyler Robinson

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 3, 2026 9:45 Transcription Available

The October 24, 2025 hearing centered on Tyler Robinson's request to appear at future court proceedings in civilian clothing and without restraints. His attorneys argued that routinely presenting him in jail clothing and shackles would undermine the presumption of innocence, interfere with his ability to participate in his defense and create prejudicial images that could spread through extensive media coverage. They maintained that the Constitution required the court to make an individualized security assessment rather than rely upon a blanket policy, emphasizing that Robinson had surrendered, had behaved appropriately in court and had not been shown to present a specific courtroom threat. The defense also opposed suggestions that Robinson could simply attend meaningful hearings remotely, arguing that he needed to be physically present to observe witnesses, communicate with counsel and participate fully in the proceedings.Prosecutors and attorneys representing the sheriff's office argued that restraints and jail clothing were justified by transportation and courtroom-security concerns, particularly given the seriousness and public profile of the case. They proposed using virtual or hybrid proceedings for noncritical hearings and said civilian clothing could make Robinson harder to identify during an emergency, also pointing to allegations that he had changed clothes while fleeing after Charlie Kirk's shooting. The defense separately asked the judge to strike the sheriff's office's filing on the grounds that the sheriff was not a party to the criminal case, although the parties agreed the judge could still consider its security information. Judge Tony Graf questioned whether jail clothing itself could prejudice potential jurors, treated clothing and restraints as separate issues and reserved his rulings until a public WebEx hearing the following Mondayto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:tyler-robinson-redacted-hearing-transcript.pdf

hearing robinson constitution true crime breaking news appearance charlie kirk prosecutors courtroom death penalty political violence webex tyler robinson uvu legalnews crimenews

Utah's Memorandum for Binding Tyler Robinson Over for Trial (Part 2) (8/3/26)

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 3, 2026 15:32 Transcription Available

Utah prosecutors argued in their bindover memorandum that the evidence presented during Tyler Robinson's five-day preliminary hearing easily established probable cause for him to stand trial on all seven charges connected to the killing of Charlie Kirk. The state pointed to Robinson's alleged admissions to his roommate, Lance Twiggs, and several friends, including messages in which he reportedly acknowledged shooting Kirk, described planning the attack for more than a week and discussed retrieving or concealing the rifle. Prosecutors maintained that those statements were reinforced by surveillance footage allegedly tracking Robinson onto the roof of Utah Valley University's Losee Center, eyewitness testimony and DNA evidence connecting him to the rifle recovered near the campus. The memorandum emphasized that the state was not required to prove Robinson's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt at this stage, only that there was sufficient evidence to reasonably believe he committed the crimes.The state asked Judge Tony Graf Jr. to bind Robinson over for trial on aggravated murder and the remaining charges, which included felony discharge of a firearm, obstruction of justice, witness tampering and committing a violent offense in the presence of a child. Prosecutors also defended the victim-targeting enhancement, arguing that Robinson allegedly selected Kirk because of Kirk's political and religious positions, particularly his views concerning gender and sexuality. According to the state, Robinson's alleged statements showed both an intent to kill and a motive rooted in hostility toward Kirk's beliefs, while his purported efforts to hide the weapon and influence Twiggs supported the additional charges. Calling the matter one of the most straightforward bindover decisions the court was likely to encounter, prosecutors concluded that the combined admissions, forensic evidence, videos and witness accounts supported sending every count to trial.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

dna utah robinson true crime breaking news charlie kirk prosecutors death penalty binding political violence memorandum utah valley university tyler robinson trial part uvu legalnews twiggs crimenews

Transcripts From The Hearing Dealing With Tyler Robinson's Courtroom Appearance (Part 7) (8/1/26)

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 2, 2026 11:57 Transcription Available

The October 24, 2025 hearing centered on Tyler Robinson's request to appear at future court proceedings in civilian clothing and without restraints. His attorneys argued that routinely presenting him in jail clothing and shackles would undermine the presumption of innocence, interfere with his ability to participate in his defense and create prejudicial images that could spread through extensive media coverage. They maintained that the Constitution required the court to make an individualized security assessment rather than rely upon a blanket policy, emphasizing that Robinson had surrendered, had behaved appropriately in court and had not been shown to present a specific courtroom threat. The defense also opposed suggestions that Robinson could simply attend meaningful hearings remotely, arguing that he needed to be physically present to observe witnesses, communicate with counsel and participate fully in the proceedings.Prosecutors and attorneys representing the sheriff's office argued that restraints and jail clothing were justified by transportation and courtroom-security concerns, particularly given the seriousness and public profile of the case. They proposed using virtual or hybrid proceedings for noncritical hearings and said civilian clothing could make Robinson harder to identify during an emergency, also pointing to allegations that he had changed clothes while fleeing after Charlie Kirk's shooting. The defense separately asked the judge to strike the sheriff's office's filing on the grounds that the sheriff was not a party to the criminal case, although the parties agreed the judge could still consider its security information. Judge Tony Graf questioned whether jail clothing itself could prejudice potential jurors, treated clothing and restraints as separate issues and reserved his rulings until a public WebEx hearing the following Mondayto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:tyler-robinson-redacted-hearing-transcript.pdf

hearing robinson constitution true crime breaking news appearance charlie kirk prosecutors courtroom death penalty political violence webex tyler robinson uvu legalnews crimenews

Utah's Memorandum for Binding Tyler Robinson Over for Trial (Part 1) (8/2/26)

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 2, 2026 11:03 Transcription Available

Utah prosecutors argued in their bindover memorandum that the evidence presented during Tyler Robinson's five-day preliminary hearing easily established probable cause for him to stand trial on all seven charges connected to the killing of Charlie Kirk. The state pointed to Robinson's alleged admissions to his roommate, Lance Twiggs, and several friends, including messages in which he reportedly acknowledged shooting Kirk, described planning the attack for more than a week and discussed retrieving or concealing the rifle. Prosecutors maintained that those statements were reinforced by surveillance footage allegedly tracking Robinson onto the roof of Utah Valley University's Losee Center, eyewitness testimony and DNA evidence connecting him to the rifle recovered near the campus. The memorandum emphasized that the state was not required to prove Robinson's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt at this stage, only that there was sufficient evidence to reasonably believe he committed the crimes.The state asked Judge Tony Graf Jr. to bind Robinson over for trial on aggravated murder and the remaining charges, which included felony discharge of a firearm, obstruction of justice, witness tampering and committing a violent offense in the presence of a child. Prosecutors also defended the victim-targeting enhancement, arguing that Robinson allegedly selected Kirk because of Kirk's political and religious positions, particularly his views concerning gender and sexuality. According to the state, Robinson's alleged statements showed both an intent to kill and a motive rooted in hostility toward Kirk's beliefs, while his purported efforts to hide the weapon and influence Twiggs supported the additional charges. Calling the matter one of the most straightforward bindover decisions the court was likely to encounter, prosecutors concluded that the combined admissions, forensic evidence, videos and witness accounts supported sending every count to trial.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

dna utah robinson true crime breaking news charlie kirk prosecutors death penalty binding political violence memorandum utah valley university tyler robinson trial part uvu legalnews twiggs crimenews

Transcripts From The Hearing Dealing With Tyler Robinson's Courtroom Appearance (Part 8) (8/2/26)

Making the Argument with Nick Freitas

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 2, 2026 9:45 Transcription Available

The October 24, 2025 hearing centered on Tyler Robinson's request to appear at future court proceedings in civilian clothing and without restraints. His attorneys argued that routinely presenting him in jail clothing and shackles would undermine the presumption of innocence, interfere with his ability to participate in his defense and create prejudicial images that could spread through extensive media coverage. They maintained that the Constitution required the court to make an individualized security assessment rather than rely upon a blanket policy, emphasizing that Robinson had surrendered, had behaved appropriately in court and had not been shown to present a specific courtroom threat. The defense also opposed suggestions that Robinson could simply attend meaningful hearings remotely, arguing that he needed to be physically present to observe witnesses, communicate with counsel and participate fully in the proceedings.Prosecutors and attorneys representing the sheriff's office argued that restraints and jail clothing were justified by transportation and courtroom-security concerns, particularly given the seriousness and public profile of the case. They proposed using virtual or hybrid proceedings for noncritical hearings and said civilian clothing could make Robinson harder to identify during an emergency, also pointing to allegations that he had changed clothes while fleeing after Charlie Kirk's shooting. The defense separately asked the judge to strike the sheriff's office's filing on the grounds that the sheriff was not a party to the criminal case, although the parties agreed the judge could still consider its security information. Judge Tony Graf questioned whether jail clothing itself could prejudice potential jurors, treated clothing and restraints as separate issues and reserved his rulings until a public WebEx hearing the following Mondayto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:tyler-robinson-redacted-hearing-transcript.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

hearing robinson constitution true crime breaking news appearance charlie kirk prosecutors courtroom death penalty political violence webex tyler robinson uvu legalnews crimenews

What Happened in Court? Tyler Robinson hearing

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 1, 2026 47:03

Finally, after months of speculation, some of it good, some of it wild and irresponsible, we get to watch both the Prosecution and Defense make their arguments on submission of evidence. So here is the question…did Tyler Robinson's very senior defense team submit evidence or make any arguments based on any of the theories coming out of the social media space? GET YOUR MERCH HERE: https://shop.nickjfreitas.com/ BECOME A MEMBER OF THE IC: https://NickJFreitas.com Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/nickjfreitas/ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/NickFreitasVA Twitter: https://twitter.com/NickJFreitas YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@Nickjfreitas TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@nickjfreitas3.000:00:00 – Inside the Tyler Robinson pretrial hearing00:04:19 – Tyler Robinson's million-dollar defense team00:07:39 – Did the defense raise any of the conspiracy theories?00:12:52 – What the forensics showed about the 30-06 round00:17:01 – The holster, the rooftop, and the redacted testimony00:26:15 – Candace: Charlie's only friend, or his worst enemy?00:32:02 – Grief, forgiveness, and the "father of lies"00:37:01 – Debating vs. diagnosing, and outsourcing your thinking00:40:54 – Grace for the deceived, and why not everything is broken00:44:10 – The goal is the truth, not a team

grief defense court hearing debating prosecution tyler robinson

Transcripts From The Hearing Dealing With Tyler Robinson's Courtroom Appearance (Part 6) (7/31/26)

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 1, 2026 14:14 Transcription Available

The October 24, 2025 hearing centered on Tyler Robinson's request to appear at future court proceedings in civilian clothing and without restraints. His attorneys argued that routinely presenting him in jail clothing and shackles would undermine the presumption of innocence, interfere with his ability to participate in his defense and create prejudicial images that could spread through extensive media coverage. They maintained that the Constitution required the court to make an individualized security assessment rather than rely upon a blanket policy, emphasizing that Robinson had surrendered, had behaved appropriately in court and had not been shown to present a specific courtroom threat. The defense also opposed suggestions that Robinson could simply attend meaningful hearings remotely, arguing that he needed to be physically present to observe witnesses, communicate with counsel and participate fully in the proceedings.Prosecutors and attorneys representing the sheriff's office argued that restraints and jail clothing were justified by transportation and courtroom-security concerns, particularly given the seriousness and public profile of the case. They proposed using virtual or hybrid proceedings for noncritical hearings and said civilian clothing could make Robinson harder to identify during an emergency, also pointing to allegations that he had changed clothes while fleeing after Charlie Kirk's shooting. The defense separately asked the judge to strike the sheriff's office's filing on the grounds that the sheriff was not a party to the criminal case, although the parties agreed the judge could still consider its security information. Judge Tony Graf questioned whether jail clothing itself could prejudice potential jurors, treated clothing and restraints as separate issues and reserved his rulings until a public WebEx hearing the following Mondayto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:tyler-robinson-redacted-hearing-transcript.pdf

hearing robinson constitution true crime breaking news appearance charlie kirk prosecutors courtroom death penalty political violence webex tyler robinson uvu legalnews crimenews

Transcripts From The Hearing Dealing With Tyler Robinson's Courtroom Appearance (Part 8) (8/1/26)

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 1, 2026 9:45 Transcription Available

The October 24, 2025 hearing centered on Tyler Robinson's request to appear at future court proceedings in civilian clothing and without restraints. His attorneys argued that routinely presenting him in jail clothing and shackles would undermine the presumption of innocence, interfere with his ability to participate in his defense and create prejudicial images that could spread through extensive media coverage. They maintained that the Constitution required the court to make an individualized security assessment rather than rely upon a blanket policy, emphasizing that Robinson had surrendered, had behaved appropriately in court and had not been shown to present a specific courtroom threat. The defense also opposed suggestions that Robinson could simply attend meaningful hearings remotely, arguing that he needed to be physically present to observe witnesses, communicate with counsel and participate fully in the proceedings.Prosecutors and attorneys representing the sheriff's office argued that restraints and jail clothing were justified by transportation and courtroom-security concerns, particularly given the seriousness and public profile of the case. They proposed using virtual or hybrid proceedings for noncritical hearings and said civilian clothing could make Robinson harder to identify during an emergency, also pointing to allegations that he had changed clothes while fleeing after Charlie Kirk's shooting. The defense separately asked the judge to strike the sheriff's office's filing on the grounds that the sheriff was not a party to the criminal case, although the parties agreed the judge could still consider its security information. Judge Tony Graf questioned whether jail clothing itself could prejudice potential jurors, treated clothing and restraints as separate issues and reserved his rulings until a public WebEx hearing the following Mondayto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:tyler-robinson-redacted-hearing-transcript.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

news survivors hearing robinson constitution epstein appearance jeffrey epstein charlie kirk prosecutors courtroom ghislaine maxwell prince andrew webex tyler robinson epsteindidntkillhimself

Transcripts From The Hearing Dealing With Tyler Robinson's Courtroom Appearance (Part 7) (8/1/26)

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 1, 2026 11:57 Transcription Available

The October 24, 2025 hearing centered on Tyler Robinson's request to appear at future court proceedings in civilian clothing and without restraints. His attorneys argued that routinely presenting him in jail clothing and shackles would undermine the presumption of innocence, interfere with his ability to participate in his defense and create prejudicial images that could spread through extensive media coverage. They maintained that the Constitution required the court to make an individualized security assessment rather than rely upon a blanket policy, emphasizing that Robinson had surrendered, had behaved appropriately in court and had not been shown to present a specific courtroom threat. The defense also opposed suggestions that Robinson could simply attend meaningful hearings remotely, arguing that he needed to be physically present to observe witnesses, communicate with counsel and participate fully in the proceedings.Prosecutors and attorneys representing the sheriff's office argued that restraints and jail clothing were justified by transportation and courtroom-security concerns, particularly given the seriousness and public profile of the case. They proposed using virtual or hybrid proceedings for noncritical hearings and said civilian clothing could make Robinson harder to identify during an emergency, also pointing to allegations that he had changed clothes while fleeing after Charlie Kirk's shooting. The defense separately asked the judge to strike the sheriff's office's filing on the grounds that the sheriff was not a party to the criminal case, although the parties agreed the judge could still consider its security information. Judge Tony Graf questioned whether jail clothing itself could prejudice potential jurors, treated clothing and restraints as separate issues and reserved his rulings until a public WebEx hearing the following Mondayto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:tyler-robinson-redacted-hearing-transcript.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

hearing robinson constitution true crime breaking news appearance charlie kirk prosecutors courtroom death penalty political violence webex tyler robinson uvu legalnews crimenews

Transcripts From The Hearing Dealing With Tyler Robinson's Courtroom Appearance (Part 5) (7/30/26)

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 31, 2026 15:57 Transcription Available

The October 24, 2025 hearing centered on Tyler Robinson's request to appear at future court proceedings in civilian clothing and without restraints. His attorneys argued that routinely presenting him in jail clothing and shackles would undermine the presumption of innocence, interfere with his ability to participate in his defense and create prejudicial images that could spread through extensive media coverage. They maintained that the Constitution required the court to make an individualized security assessment rather than rely upon a blanket policy, emphasizing that Robinson had surrendered, had behaved appropriately in court and had not been shown to present a specific courtroom threat. The defense also opposed suggestions that Robinson could simply attend meaningful hearings remotely, arguing that he needed to be physically present to observe witnesses, communicate with counsel and participate fully in the proceedings.Prosecutors and attorneys representing the sheriff's office argued that restraints and jail clothing were justified by transportation and courtroom-security concerns, particularly given the seriousness and public profile of the case. They proposed using virtual or hybrid proceedings for noncritical hearings and said civilian clothing could make Robinson harder to identify during an emergency, also pointing to allegations that he had changed clothes while fleeing after Charlie Kirk's shooting. The defense separately asked the judge to strike the sheriff's office's filing on the grounds that the sheriff was not a party to the criminal case, although the parties agreed the judge could still consider its security information. Judge Tony Graf questioned whether jail clothing itself could prejudice potential jurors, treated clothing and restraints as separate issues and reserved his rulings until a public WebEx hearing the following Mondayto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:tyler-robinson-redacted-hearing-transcript.pdf

hearing robinson constitution true crime breaking news appearance charlie kirk prosecutors courtroom death penalty political violence webex tyler robinson uvu legalnews crimenews

Transcripts From The Hearing Dealing With Tyler Robinson's Courtroom Appearance (Part 7) (7/31/26)

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 31, 2026 11:57 Transcription Available

The October 24, 2025 hearing centered on Tyler Robinson's request to appear at future court proceedings in civilian clothing and without restraints. His attorneys argued that routinely presenting him in jail clothing and shackles would undermine the presumption of innocence, interfere with his ability to participate in his defense and create prejudicial images that could spread through extensive media coverage. They maintained that the Constitution required the court to make an individualized security assessment rather than rely upon a blanket policy, emphasizing that Robinson had surrendered, had behaved appropriately in court and had not been shown to present a specific courtroom threat. The defense also opposed suggestions that Robinson could simply attend meaningful hearings remotely, arguing that he needed to be physically present to observe witnesses, communicate with counsel and participate fully in the proceedings.Prosecutors and attorneys representing the sheriff's office argued that restraints and jail clothing were justified by transportation and courtroom-security concerns, particularly given the seriousness and public profile of the case. They proposed using virtual or hybrid proceedings for noncritical hearings and said civilian clothing could make Robinson harder to identify during an emergency, also pointing to allegations that he had changed clothes while fleeing after Charlie Kirk's shooting. The defense separately asked the judge to strike the sheriff's office's filing on the grounds that the sheriff was not a party to the criminal case, although the parties agreed the judge could still consider its security information. Judge Tony Graf questioned whether jail clothing itself could prejudice potential jurors, treated clothing and restraints as separate issues and reserved his rulings until a public WebEx hearing the following Mondayto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:tyler-robinson-redacted-hearing-transcript.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

hearing robinson constitution true crime breaking news appearance charlie kirk prosecutors courtroom death penalty political violence webex tyler robinson uvu legalnews crimenews

Transcripts From The Hearing Dealing With Tyler Robinson's Courtroom Appearance (Part 6) (7/31/26)

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 31, 2026 14:14 Transcription Available

The October 24, 2025 hearing centered on Tyler Robinson's request to appear at future court proceedings in civilian clothing and without restraints. His attorneys argued that routinely presenting him in jail clothing and shackles would undermine the presumption of innocence, interfere with his ability to participate in his defense and create prejudicial images that could spread through extensive media coverage. They maintained that the Constitution required the court to make an individualized security assessment rather than rely upon a blanket policy, emphasizing that Robinson had surrendered, had behaved appropriately in court and had not been shown to present a specific courtroom threat. The defense also opposed suggestions that Robinson could simply attend meaningful hearings remotely, arguing that he needed to be physically present to observe witnesses, communicate with counsel and participate fully in the proceedings.Prosecutors and attorneys representing the sheriff's office argued that restraints and jail clothing were justified by transportation and courtroom-security concerns, particularly given the seriousness and public profile of the case. They proposed using virtual or hybrid proceedings for noncritical hearings and said civilian clothing could make Robinson harder to identify during an emergency, also pointing to allegations that he had changed clothes while fleeing after Charlie Kirk's shooting. The defense separately asked the judge to strike the sheriff's office's filing on the grounds that the sheriff was not a party to the criminal case, although the parties agreed the judge could still consider its security information. Judge Tony Graf questioned whether jail clothing itself could prejudice potential jurors, treated clothing and restraints as separate issues and reserved his rulings until a public WebEx hearing the following Mondayto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:tyler-robinson-redacted-hearing-transcript.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

hearing robinson constitution true crime breaking news appearance charlie kirk prosecutors courtroom death penalty political violence webex tyler robinson uvu legalnews crimenews

Transcripts From The Hearing Dealing With Tyler Robinson's Courtroom Appearance (Part 5) (7/30/26)

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 31, 2026 15:57 Transcription Available

The October 24, 2025 hearing centered on Tyler Robinson's request to appear at future court proceedings in civilian clothing and without restraints. His attorneys argued that routinely presenting him in jail clothing and shackles would undermine the presumption of innocence, interfere with his ability to participate in his defense and create prejudicial images that could spread through extensive media coverage. They maintained that the Constitution required the court to make an individualized security assessment rather than rely upon a blanket policy, emphasizing that Robinson had surrendered, had behaved appropriately in court and had not been shown to present a specific courtroom threat. The defense also opposed suggestions that Robinson could simply attend meaningful hearings remotely, arguing that he needed to be physically present to observe witnesses, communicate with counsel and participate fully in the proceedings.Prosecutors and attorneys representing the sheriff's office argued that restraints and jail clothing were justified by transportation and courtroom-security concerns, particularly given the seriousness and public profile of the case. They proposed using virtual or hybrid proceedings for noncritical hearings and said civilian clothing could make Robinson harder to identify during an emergency, also pointing to allegations that he had changed clothes while fleeing after Charlie Kirk's shooting. The defense separately asked the judge to strike the sheriff's office's filing on the grounds that the sheriff was not a party to the criminal case, although the parties agreed the judge could still consider its security information. Judge Tony Graf questioned whether jail clothing itself could prejudice potential jurors, treated clothing and restraints as separate issues and reserved his rulings until a public WebEx hearing the following Mondayto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:tyler-robinson-redacted-hearing-transcript.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

news survivors hearing robinson constitution epstein appearance jeffrey epstein charlie kirk prosecutors courtroom ghislaine maxwell prince andrew webex tyler robinson epsteindidntkillhimself

Fauci's Diaries EXPOSED: Now What Are YOU Going to Do? | 7/30/26

Steve Deace Show

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 30, 2026 99:51

Steve says the outcome of this week's revelations about Dr. Anthony Fauci MUST result in "ordinary" citizens rising up and taking responsibility for their country. Then, commentator Joshua Carr joins the show to discuss his perspective from inside the courtroom in the preliminary hearing of alleged Charlie Kirk assassin Tyler Robinson. Hour Two is another round of Theology Thursday, featuring the fourth "Deadly Worldview": Darwinism. TODAY'S SPONSORS: GEVITI: https://www.gogeviti.com/deace REAL ESTATE AGENTS I TRUST: https://realestateagentsitrust.com/ RAYCON: 20% off! https://rayconglobal.com/pages/steve?utm_source=podcast&utm_medium=influencer&utm_campaign=steve&nb_platform=partner-lp&nb_ppid=podcast&nb_cpid=steve Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

exposed charlie kirk anthony fauci diaries tyler robinson raycon theology thursday

Transcripts From The Hearing Dealing With Tyler Robinson's Courtroom Appearance (Part 6) (7/29/26)

covid-19 congress anthony fauci rooftop tyler robinson travesty alex berenson

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 30, 2026 14:14 Transcription Available

The October 24, 2025 hearing centered on Tyler Robinson's request to appear at future court proceedings in civilian clothing and without restraints. His attorneys argued that routinely presenting him in jail clothing and shackles would undermine the presumption of innocence, interfere with his ability to participate in his defense and create prejudicial images that could spread through extensive media coverage. They maintained that the Constitution required the court to make an individualized security assessment rather than rely upon a blanket policy, emphasizing that Robinson had surrendered, had behaved appropriately in court and had not been shown to present a specific courtroom threat. The defense also opposed suggestions that Robinson could simply attend meaningful hearings remotely, arguing that he needed to be physically present to observe witnesses, communicate with counsel and participate fully in the proceedings.Prosecutors and attorneys representing the sheriff's office argued that restraints and jail clothing were justified by transportation and courtroom-security concerns, particularly given the seriousness and public profile of the case. They proposed using virtual or hybrid proceedings for noncritical hearings and said civilian clothing could make Robinson harder to identify during an emergency, also pointing to allegations that he had changed clothes while fleeing after Charlie Kirk's shooting. The defense separately asked the judge to strike the sheriff's office's filing on the grounds that the sheriff was not a party to the criminal case, although the parties agreed the judge could still consider its security information. Judge Tony Graf questioned whether jail clothing itself could prejudice potential jurors, treated clothing and restraints as separate issues and reserved his rulings until a public WebEx hearing the following Mondayto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:tyler-robinson-redacted-hearing-transcript.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

hearing robinson constitution true crime breaking news appearance charlie kirk prosecutors courtroom death penalty political violence webex tyler robinson uvu legalnews crimenews

The Travesty of Anthony Fauci + UVU Rooftop Video

The Charlie Kirk Show

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 29, 2026 83:36 Transcription Available

Six years after he ruined millions of lives with his made-up Covid advice, Dr. Fauci showed up before Congress and had nothing to say for himself. The show plays the clips of Fauci's pathetic display and talks to Rep. Andy Ogles and Alex Berenson about the sinister doctor's legacy. Former Army Ranger Matt Tardio reacts to leaked footage from the Tyler Robinson case and takes apart bogus "lateral crawls" and other conspiratorial slop intended to sow chaos in the case. Watch every episode ad-free on members.charliekirk.com! Get new merch at charliekirkstore.com!Support the show: http://www.charliekirk.com/supportSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Candace DROPS THE HAMMER With New Batch Of Charlie Kirk Texts! w/ Lionel

The Jimmy Dore Show

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 29, 2026 61:11

In this segment guest host Garland Nixon highlights Candace Owens' release of a new batch of texts between her and Charlie Kirk proving not only that the two were close but also that her claims of Charlie's break with the Israel lobby was real. Garland's guest, Lionel of the Lionel Nation show, breaks down the Kirk murder case, arguing that Tyler Robinson's conviction is far from certain due to a fatal lack of physical evidence. He emphasizes that ballistics tests on the bullet fragment recovered from Kirk's body were inconclusive, meaning the rifle found near the scene cannot be definitively tied to the murder. Lionel also dismisses the importance of alleged text confessions and the authenticity of online communications, noting they are unreliable under the corpus delicti rule and that people falsely confess to crimes all the time. He concludes the prosecution's case is weak, pointing out that Robinson didn't actually admit guilt when he turned himself in and that the "confessions" in texts read as absurd and uncharacteristic. Plus segments on Erika Kirk's refusal to reveal what she's done with Charlie's body and Ukraine expanding the war with an attack on an Iranian ship in the Caspian Sea. Also featuring Kurt Metzger!

israel ukraine robinson drops hammer iranians charlie kirk texts candace owens erika kirk new batch tyler robinson caspian sea kurt metzger

EXCLUSIVE: Never Before Seen Rooftop Footage. Plus, The Rookie Cop Who Found the Gun. | Ep 367

Candace

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 29, 2026 58:52

Andrew Kolvet lies about his scheduled meeting at the White House, we have a curious story to tell you about the rookie cop who found Tyler Robinson's gun, and you know that 4k zoomed in footage that people were telling you about? We've been sitting on that for a while. You should be the judge of what you see. 00:00 - Start. 02:39 - Never before seen footage. 17:10 - Who found the gun. 27:01 - The Secretary of Navy and his Epstein connection. 33:06 - Iran's new lego propaganda video. 40:53 - Comments. PDS Debt Get your free, personalized assessment TODAY at http://pdsdebt.com/candace #PDSdebt #PDSpartner Dose Get 35% off your first month subscription with promo code CANDACE at http://www.DoseDaily.co/Candace ZeroGhost Visit http://www.ZeroGhost.com/Candace and use code CANDACE for $50 off your order. American Financing NMLS 182334, http://www.nmlsconsumeraccess.org. APR for rates in the 5s start at 6.327% for well qualified borrowers. Call 800-795-1210 for details about credit costs and terms. Visit http://www.AmericanFinancing.net/Owens. Average savings based on borrowers who save over $199.99. Candace Clips Channel: https://www.youtube.com/@ClipsCandaceOwens Candace Official Website: https://candaceowens.com Candace Merch: https://shop.candaceowens.com Candace on Apple Podcasts: https://t.co/Pp5VZiLXbq Candace on Spotify: https://t.co/16pMuADXuT Candace on Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/RealCandaceO Candace en Español: https://www.youtube.com/@CandaceOwensEnEspanol Candace Owens em Português: https://www.youtube.com/@CandaceOwensemPortugues Candace Owens en Français: https://www.youtube.com/@CandaceOwensEnFrançais Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

spotify guns white house iran exclusive navy espa cops rookies secretary average epstein rumble owens footage rooftop portugu tyler robinson never before seen rookie cop

Five Guys: Avoid Their Bacon, But Seek Out the Cajun Fries

Fine Dining

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 29, 2026 53:07

america seek cards bacon chili yelp fries peanut cajun five guys steff tyler robinson scott bennett niz travis langley tony gemignani

Transcripts From The Hearing Dealing With Tyler Robinson's Courtroom Appearance (Part 4) (7/29/26)

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 29, 2026 16:32 Transcription Available

The October 24, 2025 hearing centered on Tyler Robinson's request to appear at future court proceedings in civilian clothing and without restraints. His attorneys argued that routinely presenting him in jail clothing and shackles would undermine the presumption of innocence, interfere with his ability to participate in his defense and create prejudicial images that could spread through extensive media coverage. They maintained that the Constitution required the court to make an individualized security assessment rather than rely upon a blanket policy, emphasizing that Robinson had surrendered, had behaved appropriately in court and had not been shown to present a specific courtroom threat. The defense also opposed suggestions that Robinson could simply attend meaningful hearings remotely, arguing that he needed to be physically present to observe witnesses, communicate with counsel and participate fully in the proceedings.Prosecutors and attorneys representing the sheriff's office argued that restraints and jail clothing were justified by transportation and courtroom-security concerns, particularly given the seriousness and public profile of the case. They proposed using virtual or hybrid proceedings for noncritical hearings and said civilian clothing could make Robinson harder to identify during an emergency, also pointing to allegations that he had changed clothes while fleeing after Charlie Kirk's shooting. The defense separately asked the judge to strike the sheriff's office's filing on the grounds that the sheriff was not a party to the criminal case, although the parties agreed the judge could still consider its security information. Judge Tony Graf questioned whether jail clothing itself could prejudice potential jurors, treated clothing and restraints as separate issues and reserved his rulings until a public WebEx hearing the following Mondayto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:tyler-robinson-redacted-hearing-transcript.pdf

hearing robinson constitution true crime breaking news appearance charlie kirk prosecutors courtroom death penalty political violence webex tyler robinson uvu legalnews crimenews

Transcripts From The Hearing Dealing With Tyler Robinson's Courtroom Appearance (Part 3) (7/26/26)

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 29, 2026 11:07 Transcription Available

The October 24, 2025 hearing centered on Tyler Robinson's request to appear at future court proceedings in civilian clothing and without restraints. His attorneys argued that routinely presenting him in jail clothing and shackles would undermine the presumption of innocence, interfere with his ability to participate in his defense and create prejudicial images that could spread through extensive media coverage. They maintained that the Constitution required the court to make an individualized security assessment rather than rely upon a blanket policy, emphasizing that Robinson had surrendered, had behaved appropriately in court and had not been shown to present a specific courtroom threat. The defense also opposed suggestions that Robinson could simply attend meaningful hearings remotely, arguing that he needed to be physically present to observe witnesses, communicate with counsel and participate fully in the proceedings.Prosecutors and attorneys representing the sheriff's office argued that restraints and jail clothing were justified by transportation and courtroom-security concerns, particularly given the seriousness and public profile of the case. They proposed using virtual or hybrid proceedings for noncritical hearings and said civilian clothing could make Robinson harder to identify during an emergency, also pointing to allegations that he had changed clothes while fleeing after Charlie Kirk's shooting. The defense separately asked the judge to strike the sheriff's office's filing on the grounds that the sheriff was not a party to the criminal case, although the parties agreed the judge could still consider its security information. Judge Tony Graf questioned whether jail clothing itself could prejudice potential jurors, treated clothing and restraints as separate issues and reserved his rulings until a public WebEx hearing the following Mondayto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:tyler-robinson-redacted-hearing-transcript.pdf

hearing robinson constitution true crime breaking news appearance charlie kirk prosecutors courtroom death penalty political violence webex tyler robinson uvu legalnews crimenews

Transcripts From The Hearing Dealing With Tyler Robinson's Courtroom Appearance (Part 5) (7/29/26)

Inside Sources with Boyd Matheson

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 29, 2026 15:57 Transcription Available

The October 24, 2025 hearing centered on Tyler Robinson's request to appear at future court proceedings in civilian clothing and without restraints. His attorneys argued that routinely presenting him in jail clothing and shackles would undermine the presumption of innocence, interfere with his ability to participate in his defense and create prejudicial images that could spread through extensive media coverage. They maintained that the Constitution required the court to make an individualized security assessment rather than rely upon a blanket policy, emphasizing that Robinson had surrendered, had behaved appropriately in court and had not been shown to present a specific courtroom threat. The defense also opposed suggestions that Robinson could simply attend meaningful hearings remotely, arguing that he needed to be physically present to observe witnesses, communicate with counsel and participate fully in the proceedings.Prosecutors and attorneys representing the sheriff's office argued that restraints and jail clothing were justified by transportation and courtroom-security concerns, particularly given the seriousness and public profile of the case. They proposed using virtual or hybrid proceedings for noncritical hearings and said civilian clothing could make Robinson harder to identify during an emergency, also pointing to allegations that he had changed clothes while fleeing after Charlie Kirk's shooting. The defense separately asked the judge to strike the sheriff's office's filing on the grounds that the sheriff was not a party to the criminal case, although the parties agreed the judge could still consider its security information. Judge Tony Graf questioned whether jail clothing itself could prejudice potential jurors, treated clothing and restraints as separate issues and reserved his rulings until a public WebEx hearing the following Mondayto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:tyler-robinson-redacted-hearing-transcript.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

hearing robinson constitution true crime breaking news appearance charlie kirk prosecutors courtroom death penalty political violence webex tyler robinson uvu legalnews crimenews

Utah County prosecutors request Tyler Robinson case go to trial

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 29, 2026 9:24

The preliminary hearing for Tyler Robinson -- the man accused of killing political influencer Charlie Kirk -- is on hold until September. But now, the Utah County Attorney's Office says the case needs to move forward to trial. In a new filing, the prosecution says there's more than enough evidence to go ahead. Greg tends to agree, having voiced his own frustrations with the slow speed at which this whole thing has moved.

office trial charlie kirk prosecutors tyler robinson utah county

The Travesty of Anthony Fauci + UVU Rooftop Video

The Charlie Kirk Show

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 29, 2026 83:36 Transcription Available

Six years after he ruined millions of lives with his made-up Covid advice, Dr. Fauci showed up before Congress and had nothing to say for himself. The show plays the clips of Fauci's pathetic display and talks to Rep. Andy Ogles and Alex Berenson about the sinister doctor's legacy. Former Army Ranger Matt Tardio reacts to leaked footage from the Tyler Robinson case and takes apart bogus "lateral crawls" and other conspiratorial slop intended to sow chaos in the case. Watch every episode ad-free on members.charliekirk.com! Get new merch at charliekirkstore.com!Support the show: http://www.charliekirk.com/supportSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

covid-19 congress anthony fauci rooftop tyler robinson travesty alex berenson

Chobani Zero-Sugar Class Action, eBay $56M Stalking Settlement, Charlie Kirk Case

Minimum Competence

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 29, 2026 7:11

This Day in Legal History: The First Hague ConventionOn July 29, 1899, delegates from twenty-six nations signed the first Hague Convention, the product of an international peace conference convened at the initiative of Russia's Tsar Nicholas II. It was one of the founding moments of modern international law—an attempt, at the close of a violent century, to subject the conduct of war and the resolution of disputes between nations to legal rules rather than raw power.The 1899 Convention did two enduring things. First, it began the codification of the laws and customs of war—rules on the treatment of prisoners, the protection of civilians, and limits on certain weapons—laying groundwork that would grow into the modern law of armed conflict and, eventually, the Geneva Conventions. Second, and just as important, it created the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague, the first standing international institution designed to let states resolve their disputes through neutral arbitration instead of on the battlefield. The idea was radical for its time: that sovereign nations would voluntarily submit their quarrels to a legal process.The Hague system was, of course, imperfect—the twentieth century that followed was the bloodiest in human history, and the conventions did not prevent two world wars. But the significance of July 29, 1899 is that it planted the institutional and conceptual seeds of everything that came after: the League of Nations, the United Nations, the International Court of Justice, the international criminal tribunals, and the entire architecture of treaties and adjudication that structures relations between states today. It reflects an enduring aspiration—one that runs through so much of what we cover—that disputes are better settled by law than by force. It's a fitting backdrop for a day whose stories, in their own ways, are all about turning conflict over to the legal system rather than settling it by other means.A federal appeals court has revived a proposed class action accusing Chobani of deceiving consumers by marketing some of its Greek yogurt as “zero sugar.” The Seventh Circuit in Chicago ruled that consumers can proceed with claims under state consumer-protection laws, because Chobani Zero Sugar yogurt contains about four grams per serving of allulose, a naturally occurring sweetener. Here's the wrinkle that makes this interesting. Allulose is chemically a sugar, but the body barely metabolizes it, so the FDA lets manufacturers leave it out of the “sugars” lines on the Nutrition Facts panel. Chobani leaned on exactly that, saying its panel accurately shows zero grams of total and added sugar. But the court focused on the big front-of-package promise—”Zero Sugar”—and found persuasive an FDA brief explaining that “total sugars” actually includes all monosaccharides, allulose among them. Under FDA rules, a product generally can't be labeled “zero sugar” or “sugar free” unless it has less than half a gram of sugar per serving. Writing for the court, Judge Thomas Kirsch said it was not implausible that consumers—here, a couple who bought the yogurt at a Costco near Chicago—were “fooled” by that absolute promise. The significance is a reminder that the technically-accurate fine print on the back doesn't necessarily save a bold marketing claim on the front. This is how consumer-protection law polices the gap between what a label shouts and what a product actually contains, and the ruling lets the plaintiffs try to prove that gap misled shoppers.Chobani must face lawsuit over zero-sugar yogurt claim, US appeals court rules | ReutersYahoo Finance · Insurance JournaleBay and three of its former executives have agreed to pay roughly $56 million to settle a civil suit brought by a Massachusetts couple who were the targets of one of the more disturbing corporate harassment campaigns in recent memory. The couple, Ina and David Steiner, publish an e-commerce trade newsletter, and back in 2019 several eBay employees—furious over the Steiners' coverage of the company—orchestrated a campaign to terrorize them: shipping cockroaches, live spiders and fly larvae, and a bloody pig Halloween mask to their home, sending threatening messages, and conducting covert surveillance. It grew out of internal communications in which senior executives discussed taking the couple “down.” The criminal side of this played out years ago, with multiple former employees prosecuted and sentenced. This week's news is the civil resolution: eBay will pay about $46 million to the couple plus millions more in charitable contributions, and the former executives are personally on the hook—two million dollars from former CEO Devin Wenig, and smaller sums from two others. The significance here is corporate accountability, and specifically accountability for retaliation against the press. A powerful company weaponized its resources to punish two journalists for critical coverage—the kind of retaliation that strikes at the heart of a free press—and while the criminal cases addressed the individual foot soldiers, this settlement attaches a very large price tag to the company and the executives at the top. It's a stark example of the civil justice system doing what the criminal system often can't: reaching the institution and its leadership, and making them pay.eBay, former executives to pay $56 million to settle couple's harassment case | ReutersCNN · CNBCAnd finally, prosecutors have offered their most detailed account yet of why they believe activist Charlie Kirk was killed, arguing in a new court filing that the man accused of shooting him targeted Kirk for his political and religious views. Kirk, a prominent conservative activist and ally of President Trump, was shot and killed in September 2025 at a university in Utah; Tyler Robinson, who is 23, is charged in his death. In the filing, prosecutors pointed to Kirk's opposition to gay marriage and transgender rights, and cited a letter from a board member of Kirk's organization describing him as the face of a political and religious movement. They allege Robinson's own lifestyle ran contrary to Kirk's views and that he targeted Kirk because of his “political expression.” Robinson's defense attorney pushed back, arguing that the materials the state is relying on show nothing about whether Robinson actually disagreed with Kirk or what was in his mind. And that disagreement is the legal heart of this. Motive is not, strictly speaking, an element the prosecution must prove to establish murder—but it is powerful evidence, it helps a jury make sense of a killing, and in a serious case it can bear heavily on how the crime is characterized and punished. What we're watching is the perennial challenge of proving why someone did something: the state assembling external evidence to reconstruct a defendant's internal state of mind, and the defense insisting that inference isn't proof. The significance is that a case already saturated with political meaning will now turn, in part, on a genuinely hard legal question—how, and whether, prosecutors can establish motive—and the coming proceedings will test whether their theory holds up under the rules of evidence.Prosecutors say Charlie Kirk was attacked for his politics, cite anti-LGBT views | Reuters This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

Transcripts From The Hearing Dealing With Tyler Robinson's Courtroom Appearance (Part 4) (7/29/26)

What Next | Daily News and Analysis

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 29, 2026 16:32 Transcription Available

The October 24, 2025 hearing centered on Tyler Robinson's request to appear at future court proceedings in civilian clothing and without restraints. His attorneys argued that routinely presenting him in jail clothing and shackles would undermine the presumption of innocence, interfere with his ability to participate in his defense and create prejudicial images that could spread through extensive media coverage. They maintained that the Constitution required the court to make an individualized security assessment rather than rely upon a blanket policy, emphasizing that Robinson had surrendered, had behaved appropriately in court and had not been shown to present a specific courtroom threat. The defense also opposed suggestions that Robinson could simply attend meaningful hearings remotely, arguing that he needed to be physically present to observe witnesses, communicate with counsel and participate fully in the proceedings.Prosecutors and attorneys representing the sheriff's office argued that restraints and jail clothing were justified by transportation and courtroom-security concerns, particularly given the seriousness and public profile of the case. They proposed using virtual or hybrid proceedings for noncritical hearings and said civilian clothing could make Robinson harder to identify during an emergency, also pointing to allegations that he had changed clothes while fleeing after Charlie Kirk's shooting. The defense separately asked the judge to strike the sheriff's office's filing on the grounds that the sheriff was not a party to the criminal case, although the parties agreed the judge could still consider its security information. Judge Tony Graf questioned whether jail clothing itself could prejudice potential jurors, treated clothing and restraints as separate issues and reserved his rulings until a public WebEx hearing the following Mondayto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:tyler-robinson-redacted-hearing-transcript.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

hearing robinson constitution true crime breaking news appearance charlie kirk prosecutors courtroom death penalty political violence webex tyler robinson uvu legalnews crimenews

What Next - How Charlie Kirk Went From Martyr to Meme

Trumpcast

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 27, 2026 28:32

In the immediate aftermath of Charlie Kirk's murder, the NFL was holding moments of silence, Ezra Klein was waxing about how he was ‘practicing politics the right way,” and criticizing Kirk online could get you fired. Now, as the trial of Tyler Robinson, Kirk's alleged killer, begins, something has replaced that reverence. Guest: Will Sommer, senior reporter for the Bulwark and writer of False Flag, a newsletter about the online culture and communities now running our country. Want more What Next? Subscribe to Slate Plus to access ad-free listening to the whole What Next family and across all your favorite Slate podcasts. Subscribe today on Apple Podcasts by clicking “Try Free” at the top of our show page. Sign up now at slate.com/whatnextplus to get access wherever you listen.Podcast production by Rob Gunther, Evan Campbell, Madeline Thames-Ducharme and Patrick Fort.Paige Osburn is the senior supervising producer of What Next and What Next TBD. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

nfl acast memes slate charlie kirk martyrs false flags ezra klein tyler robinson bulwark what next slate plus patrick fort evan campbell paige osburn rob gunther

How Charlie Kirk Went From Martyr to Meme

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 27, 2026 28:32

In the immediate aftermath of Charlie Kirk's murder, the NFL was holding moments of silence, Ezra Klein was waxing about how he was ‘practicing politics the right way,” and criticizing Kirk online could get you fired. Now, as the trial of Tyler Robinson, Kirk's alleged killer, begins, something has replaced that reverence. Guest: Will Sommer, senior reporter for the Bulwark and writer of False Flag, a newsletter about the online culture and communities now running our country. Want more What Next? Subscribe to Slate Plus to access ad-free listening to the whole What Next family and across all your favorite Slate podcasts. Subscribe today on Apple Podcasts by clicking “Try Free” at the top of our show page. Sign up now at slate.com/whatnextplus to get access wherever you listen.Podcast production by Rob Gunther, Evan Campbell, Madeline Thames-Ducharme and Patrick Fort.Paige Osburn is the senior supervising producer of What Next and What Next TBD. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

nfl acast memes slate charlie kirk martyrs false flags ezra klein tyler robinson bulwark what next slate plus patrick fort evan campbell paige osburn rob gunther

Live with Bobby Sauce! From Tyler Robinson to America First to Iran, with a Side of SAUCE!

Viva & Barnes: Law for the People

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 27, 2026 134:12

SPONSOR! Take Control of Your Money and claim $5 in US Stablecoin (USA₮)! Download now at http://wallet.rumble.com/viva and use the code Viva5.This is a paid advertisement for Rumble Wallet. Rumble is compensating me for this ad.Void where prohibited. No purchase necessary. Offer available to US residents only. Offer not available in New York State. Must be 18+. Offer is available for a limited time and for the first 1000 wallets activated and funded. Details and full official rules available at http://rumble.com/promoofficialrules.

iran offer void rumble sauce take control new york state america first your money tyler robinson

Ryder Lee | Mind Wars, The Charlie Kirk Assassination & Tyler Robinson Trial, Psych Warfare

Forbidden Knowledge News

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 27, 2026 60:15 Transcription Available

Ryder's linksYouTubehttps://youtube.com/@raisedbygiants?si=zmtzoD5b7az9VnnqPodcasthttps://www.spreaker.com/podcast/raised-by-giants--4895847Forbidden Knowledge Network https://forbiddenknowledge.news/ FKN Link Treehttps://linktr.ee/FKNlinksMake a Donation to Forbidden Knowledge News https://www.paypal.me/forbiddenknowledgenehttps://buymeacoffee.com/forbiddenFKN Merch!https://galactecfire.com/fkn/We are back on YouTube! https://youtube.com/@forbiddenknowledgenews?si=XQhXCjteMKYNUJSjBackup channelhttps://youtube.com/@fknshow1?si=tIoIjpUGeSoRNaEsDoors of Perception is available now on Amazon Prime!https://watch.amazon.com/detail?gti=amzn1.dv.gti.8a60e6c7-678d-4502-b335-adfbb30697b8&ref_=atv_lp_share_mv&r=webDoors of Perception official trailerhttps://youtu.be/F-VJ01kMSII?si=Ee6xwtUONA18HNLZListen to Forbidden Knowledge News on clearair.fm every Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday 12:15pm CSThttps://clearair.fm/Pick up Independent Media Token herehttps://www.independentmediatoken.com/Be prepared for any emergency with Prep Starts Now!https://prepstartsnow.com/discount/FKNStart your microdosing journey with BrainsupremeGet 15% off your order here!!https://brainsupreme.co/FKN15Book a free consultation with Jennifer Halcame Emailjenniferhalcame@gmail.comFacebook pagehttps://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=61561665957079&mibextid=ZbWKwLWatch The Forbidden Documentary: Occult Louisiana on Tubi: https://link.tubi.tv/pGXW6chxCJbC60 PurplePowerhttps://go.shopc60.com/FORBIDDEN10/or use coupon code knowledge10Johnny Larson's artworkhttps://www.patreon.com/JohnnyLarsonSign up on Rokfin!https://rokfin.com/fknplusPodcastshttps://www.spreaker.com/show/forbiddenAvailable on all platforms Support FKN on Spreaker https://spreaker.page.link/KoPgfbEq8kcsR5oj9FKN ON Rumblehttps://rumble.com/c/FKNpGet Cory Hughes books!Lee Harvey Oswald In Black and White https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0FJ2PQJRMA Warning From History Audio bookhttps://buymeacoffee.com/jfkbook/e/392579https://www.buymeacoffee.com/jfkbookhttps://www.amazon.com/Warning-History-Cory-Hughes/dp/B0CL14VQY6/ref=mp_s_a_1_1?crid=72HEFZQA7TAP&keywords=a+warning+from+history+cory+hughes&qid=1698861279&sprefix=a+warning+fro%2Caps%2C121&sr=8-1https://coryhughes.org/Our Facebook pageshttps://www.facebook.com/forbiddenknowledgenewsconspiracy/https://www.facebook.com/FKNNetwork/Instagram @forbiddenknowledgenews1@forbiddenknowledgenetworkXhttps://x.com/ForbiddenKnow10?t=uO5AqEtDuHdF9fXYtCUtfw&s=09Email Forbidden Knowledge News forbiddenknowledgenews@gmail.comsome music thanks to:https://www.bensound.com/ULFAPO3OJSCGN8LDDGLBEYNSIXA6EMZJ5FUXWYNC6WJNJKRS8DH27IXE3D73E97DC6JMAFZLSZDGTWFIBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/forbidden-knowledge-news--3589233/support.

trial amazon prime perception donations warfare assassination charlie kirk spreaker psych tubi psyops tpusa tyler robinson psychological warfare rokfin mind wars forbidden knowledge news ryder lee

What Next - How Charlie Kirk Went From Martyr to Meme

Slate Daily Feed

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 27, 2026 28:32

In the immediate aftermath of Charlie Kirk's murder, the NFL was holding moments of silence, Ezra Klein was waxing about how he was ‘practicing politics the right way,” and criticizing Kirk online could get you fired. Now, as the trial of Tyler Robinson, Kirk's alleged killer, begins, something has replaced that reverence. Guest: Will Sommer, senior reporter for the Bulwark and writer of False Flag, a newsletter about the online culture and communities now running our country. Want more What Next? Subscribe to Slate Plus to access ad-free listening to the whole What Next family and across all your favorite Slate podcasts. Subscribe today on Apple Podcasts by clicking “Try Free” at the top of our show page. Sign up now at slate.com/whatnextplus to get access wherever you listen.Podcast production by Rob Gunther, Evan Campbell, Madeline Thames-Ducharme and Patrick Fort.Paige Osburn is the senior supervising producer of What Next and What Next TBD. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

nfl acast memes slate charlie kirk martyrs false flags ezra klein tyler robinson bulwark what next slate plus patrick fort evan campbell paige osburn rob gunther

Transcripts From The Hearing Dealing With Tyler Robinson's Courtroom Appearance (Part 2) (7/27/26)

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 27, 2026 11:02 Transcription Available

The October 24, 2025 hearing centered on Tyler Robinson's request to appear at future court proceedings in civilian clothing and without restraints. His attorneys argued that routinely presenting him in jail clothing and shackles would undermine the presumption of innocence, interfere with his ability to participate in his defense and create prejudicial images that could spread through extensive media coverage. They maintained that the Constitution required the court to make an individualized security assessment rather than rely upon a blanket policy, emphasizing that Robinson had surrendered, had behaved appropriately in court and had not been shown to present a specific courtroom threat. The defense also opposed suggestions that Robinson could simply attend meaningful hearings remotely, arguing that he needed to be physically present to observe witnesses, communicate with counsel and participate fully in the proceedings.Prosecutors and attorneys representing the sheriff's office argued that restraints and jail clothing were justified by transportation and courtroom-security concerns, particularly given the seriousness and public profile of the case. They proposed using virtual or hybrid proceedings for noncritical hearings and said civilian clothing could make Robinson harder to identify during an emergency, also pointing to allegations that he had changed clothes while fleeing after Charlie Kirk's shooting. The defense separately asked the judge to strike the sheriff's office's filing on the grounds that the sheriff was not a party to the criminal case, although the parties agreed the judge could still consider its security information. Judge Tony Graf questioned whether jail clothing itself could prejudice potential jurors, treated clothing and restraints as separate issues and reserved his rulings until a public WebEx hearing the following Mondayto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:tyler-robinson-redacted-hearing-transcript.pdf

hearing robinson constitution true crime breaking news appearance charlie kirk prosecutors courtroom death penalty political violence webex tyler robinson uvu legalnews crimenews

Transcripts From The Hearing Dealing With Tyler Robinson's Courtroom Appearance (Part 4) (7/26/26)

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 27, 2026 16:32 Transcription Available

The October 24, 2025 hearing centered on Tyler Robinson's request to appear at future court proceedings in civilian clothing and without restraints. His attorneys argued that routinely presenting him in jail clothing and shackles would undermine the presumption of innocence, interfere with his ability to participate in his defense and create prejudicial images that could spread through extensive media coverage. They maintained that the Constitution required the court to make an individualized security assessment rather than rely upon a blanket policy, emphasizing that Robinson had surrendered, had behaved appropriately in court and had not been shown to present a specific courtroom threat. The defense also opposed suggestions that Robinson could simply attend meaningful hearings remotely, arguing that he needed to be physically present to observe witnesses, communicate with counsel and participate fully in the proceedings.Prosecutors and attorneys representing the sheriff's office argued that restraints and jail clothing were justified by transportation and courtroom-security concerns, particularly given the seriousness and public profile of the case. They proposed using virtual or hybrid proceedings for noncritical hearings and said civilian clothing could make Robinson harder to identify during an emergency, also pointing to allegations that he had changed clothes while fleeing after Charlie Kirk's shooting. The defense separately asked the judge to strike the sheriff's office's filing on the grounds that the sheriff was not a party to the criminal case, although the parties agreed the judge could still consider its security information. Judge Tony Graf questioned whether jail clothing itself could prejudice potential jurors, treated clothing and restraints as separate issues and reserved his rulings until a public WebEx hearing the following Mondayto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:tyler-robinson-redacted-hearing-transcript.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

hearing robinson constitution true crime breaking news appearance charlie kirk prosecutors courtroom death penalty political violence webex tyler robinson uvu legalnews crimenews

Transcripts From The Hearing Dealing With Tyler Robinson's Courtroom Appearance (Part 1) (7/26/26)

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 26, 2026 12:07 Transcription Available

The October 24, 2025 hearing centered on Tyler Robinson's request to appear at future court proceedings in civilian clothing and without restraints. His attorneys argued that routinely presenting him in jail clothing and shackles would undermine the presumption of innocence, interfere with his ability to participate in his defense and create prejudicial images that could spread through extensive media coverage. They maintained that the Constitution required the court to make an individualized security assessment rather than rely upon a blanket policy, emphasizing that Robinson had surrendered, had behaved appropriately in court and had not been shown to present a specific courtroom threat. The defense also opposed suggestions that Robinson could simply attend meaningful hearings remotely, arguing that he needed to be physically present to observe witnesses, communicate with counsel and participate fully in the proceedings.Prosecutors and attorneys representing the sheriff's office argued that restraints and jail clothing were justified by transportation and courtroom-security concerns, particularly given the seriousness and public profile of the case. They proposed using virtual or hybrid proceedings for noncritical hearings and said civilian clothing could make Robinson harder to identify during an emergency, also pointing to allegations that he had changed clothes while fleeing after Charlie Kirk's shooting. The defense separately asked the judge to strike the sheriff's office's filing on the grounds that the sheriff was not a party to the criminal case, although the parties agreed the judge could still consider its security information. Judge Tony Graf questioned whether jail clothing itself could prejudice potential jurors, treated clothing and restraints as separate issues and reserved his rulings until a public WebEx hearing the following Mondayto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:tyler-robinson-redacted-hearing-transcript.pdf

news survivors hearing robinson constitution epstein appearance jeffrey epstein charlie kirk prosecutors courtroom ghislaine maxwell prince andrew webex tyler robinson epsteindidntkillhimself

Transcripts From The Hearing Dealing With Tyler Robinson's Courtroom Appearance (Part 3) (7/26/26)

The Patriotically Correct Radio Show with Stew Peters | #PCRadio

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 26, 2026 11:07 Transcription Available

The October 24, 2025 hearing centered on Tyler Robinson's request to appear at future court proceedings in civilian clothing and without restraints. His attorneys argued that routinely presenting him in jail clothing and shackles would undermine the presumption of innocence, interfere with his ability to participate in his defense and create prejudicial images that could spread through extensive media coverage. They maintained that the Constitution required the court to make an individualized security assessment rather than rely upon a blanket policy, emphasizing that Robinson had surrendered, had behaved appropriately in court and had not been shown to present a specific courtroom threat. The defense also opposed suggestions that Robinson could simply attend meaningful hearings remotely, arguing that he needed to be physically present to observe witnesses, communicate with counsel and participate fully in the proceedings.Prosecutors and attorneys representing the sheriff's office argued that restraints and jail clothing were justified by transportation and courtroom-security concerns, particularly given the seriousness and public profile of the case. They proposed using virtual or hybrid proceedings for noncritical hearings and said civilian clothing could make Robinson harder to identify during an emergency, also pointing to allegations that he had changed clothes while fleeing after Charlie Kirk's shooting. The defense separately asked the judge to strike the sheriff's office's filing on the grounds that the sheriff was not a party to the criminal case, although the parties agreed the judge could still consider its security information. Judge Tony Graf questioned whether jail clothing itself could prejudice potential jurors, treated clothing and restraints as separate issues and reserved his rulings until a public WebEx hearing the following Mondayto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:tyler-robinson-redacted-hearing-transcript.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

news survivors hearing robinson constitution epstein appearance jeffrey epstein charlie kirk prosecutors courtroom ghislaine maxwell prince andrew webex tyler robinson epsteindidntkillhimself

July Recap: What Have We Learned?

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 25, 2026 73:18

The fake news media and the uniparty puppets thought they could bury the truth, but we aren't letting them off the hook. This month, we tore down their propaganda machine—exposing the corrupt courts, the explosive developments in the Charlie Kirk investigation and Tyler Robinson trial, the endless military-industrial complex spending through the NDAA, and the treasonous globalist agenda destroying our nation from within. Celebrate freedom while we still have it. Become an annual member of the Stew Peters Locals community and receive $17 OFF for a limited time. Your membership includes: • Exclusive members-only content • Live chats and community discussions • Behind-the-scenes access • Directly supporting independent, uncensored journalism. Don't wait, his special ends July 31.

united states america women american live health strategy work western movement modern celebrate protect oklahoma human created shop exclusive products maintaining secure cbd perspectives relief coins encouraging tax educational charlie kirk users fcc locals stew america first occupied ndaa tyler robinson shop now stew peters masterpeace igf1 zorin os freedom law school stewpeters

Transcripts From The Hearing Dealing With Tyler Robinson's Courtroom Appearance (Part 2) (7/25/26)

spotify hollywood exclusive espa average application lunch rates rumble charlie kirk text messages owens daily mail ben shapiro ethos portugu tyler robinson

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 25, 2026 11:02 Transcription Available

The October 24, 2025 hearing centered on Tyler Robinson's request to appear at future court proceedings in civilian clothing and without restraints. His attorneys argued that routinely presenting him in jail clothing and shackles would undermine the presumption of innocence, interfere with his ability to participate in his defense and create prejudicial images that could spread through extensive media coverage. They maintained that the Constitution required the court to make an individualized security assessment rather than rely upon a blanket policy, emphasizing that Robinson had surrendered, had behaved appropriately in court and had not been shown to present a specific courtroom threat. The defense also opposed suggestions that Robinson could simply attend meaningful hearings remotely, arguing that he needed to be physically present to observe witnesses, communicate with counsel and participate fully in the proceedings.Prosecutors and attorneys representing the sheriff's office argued that restraints and jail clothing were justified by transportation and courtroom-security concerns, particularly given the seriousness and public profile of the case. They proposed using virtual or hybrid proceedings for noncritical hearings and said civilian clothing could make Robinson harder to identify during an emergency, also pointing to allegations that he had changed clothes while fleeing after Charlie Kirk's shooting. The defense separately asked the judge to strike the sheriff's office's filing on the grounds that the sheriff was not a party to the criminal case, although the parties agreed the judge could still consider its security information. Judge Tony Graf questioned whether jail clothing itself could prejudice potential jurors, treated clothing and restraints as separate issues and reserved his rulings until a public WebEx hearing the following Mondayto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:tyler-robinson-redacted-hearing-transcript.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

hearing robinson constitution true crime breaking news appearance charlie kirk prosecutors courtroom death penalty political violence webex tyler robinson uvu legalnews crimenews

EXCLUSIVE: Ben Shapiro's 9/10 “Lunch” Date. More Text Messages From Charlie Kirk. | Ep 365

Candace

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 24, 2026 64:59

We receive information regarding who Ben Shapiro was with when Charlie Kirk was hit, Robert O'Neill says the screwdriver story makes no sense in the Tyler Robinson case, and we got a wild comment yesterday about another untimely death… in Hollywood. 00:00 - Start. 01:04 - The lies and zionist squeeze Charlie endured. 17:50 - Who Ben was having lunch with. 30:26 - Tracey denies being the Daily Mail source. 36:57 - Rob O'Neill discusses the screwdriver and rooftop theory. 38:55 - A familiar Hollywood untimely death story. 49:31 - Comments. PDS Debt Get your free, personalized assessment TODAY at http://pdsdebt.com/candace #PDSdebt #PDSpartner Kikoff Build credit fast and get your first month for just a dollar at http://www.getkikoff.com/candace today. Thanks to Kikoff for sponsoring us! PureTalk Make the switch to PureTalk for $15 a month for the first 3 months at http://www.PureTalk.com/Owens Ethos Protect your family with life insurance from Ethos. Get up to $3 million in coverage in as little as 10 minutes at https://ethos.com/CANDACE. Application times may vary. Rates may vary. American Financing NMLS 182334, http://www.nmlsconsumeraccess.org. APR for rates in the 5s start at 6.327% for well qualified borrowers. Call 800-795-1210 for details about credit costs and terms. Visit http://www.AmericanFinancing.net/Owens. Average savings based on borrowers who save over $199.99. Candace Clips Channel: https://www.youtube.com/@ClipsCandaceOwens Candace Official Website: https://candaceowens.com Candace Merch: https://shop.candaceowens.com Candace on Apple Podcasts: https://t.co/Pp5VZiLXbq Candace on Spotify: https://t.co/16pMuADXuT Candace on Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/RealCandaceO Candace en Español: https://www.youtube.com/@CandaceOwensEnEspanol Candace Owens em Português: https://www.youtube.com/@CandaceOwensemPortugues Candace Owens en Français: https://www.youtube.com/@CandaceOwensEnFrançais Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Tyler Robinson's Motion to Halt Further Testing of Bullet Fragment (Part 2) (7/24/26)

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 24, 2026 20:21 Transcription Available

Tyler Robinson's defense asked Judge Tony Graf to immediately prohibit prosecutors and investigators from conducting any additional testing on a bullet-jacket fragment recovered during Charlie Kirk's autopsy until the court resolves the dispute. The defense argued that further forensic work could permanently alter, consume, or destroy the fragment, preventing its experts from independently evaluating its condition and evidentiary value. Robinson's attorneys requested that a defense firearms expert first be allowed to examine and photograph the fragment. As alternatives, they asked that their expert be permitted to observe any additional testing or that the entire process be video-recorded so the defense can later scrutinize exactly what was done.The motion was filed after an ATF examination was unable to conclusively identify the damaged bullet fragment as having been fired from the rifle attributed to Robinson. The result was inconclusive rather than an exclusion, meaning the fragment did not contain enough usable markings to either match it to or rule it out as having come from the rifle. With the FBI reportedly planning additional comparative and lead analysis, the defense maintained that basic fairness and Robinson's right to challenge the prosecution's evidence required preserving the fragment before potentially destructive testing occurred. The motion does not ask the judge to declare the evidence exculpatory; it seeks to ensure that the defense has a meaningful opportunity to inspect and document the evidence before its original condition is changed forever.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:tyler-robinson-ballistics-motion.pdf

fbi testing robinson true crime motion breaking news charlie kirk halt bullet death penalty atf political violence fragment tyler robinson uvu legalnews crimenews

Tyler Robinson's Motion to Halt Further Testing of Bullet Fragment (Part 1) (7/24/26)

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 24, 2026 16:59 Transcription Available

Tyler Robinson's defense asked Judge Tony Graf to immediately prohibit prosecutors and investigators from conducting any additional testing on a bullet-jacket fragment recovered during Charlie Kirk's autopsy until the court resolves the dispute. The defense argued that further forensic work could permanently alter, consume, or destroy the fragment, preventing its experts from independently evaluating its condition and evidentiary value. Robinson's attorneys requested that a defense firearms expert first be allowed to examine and photograph the fragment. As alternatives, they asked that their expert be permitted to observe any additional testing or that the entire process be video-recorded so the defense can later scrutinize exactly what was done.The motion was filed after an ATF examination was unable to conclusively identify the damaged bullet fragment as having been fired from the rifle attributed to Robinson. The result was inconclusive rather than an exclusion, meaning the fragment did not contain enough usable markings to either match it to or rule it out as having come from the rifle. With the FBI reportedly planning additional comparative and lead analysis, the defense maintained that basic fairness and Robinson's right to challenge the prosecution's evidence required preserving the fragment before potentially destructive testing occurred. The motion does not ask the judge to declare the evidence exculpatory; it seeks to ensure that the defense has a meaningful opportunity to inspect and document the evidence before its original condition is changed forever.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:tyler-robinson-ballistics-motion.pdf

fbi testing robinson true crime motion breaking news charlie kirk halt bullet death penalty atf political violence fragment tyler robinson uvu legalnews crimenews

The Tyler Robinson Probable Cause Affidavit (Part 2) (7/24/26)