POPULARITY
Az adásban elhangzó hivatkozások: Laci itt nézhető: https://www.facebook.com/refjanosi Tomi itt nézhető: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCIXrbd5MYV1oB_4HQs2hfDg Magnus Carlsen és Max Deutsch: https://www.wsj.com/articles/magnus-carlsen-ian-nepomniachtchi-world-chess-championship-computer-analysis-11639003641 Még több Max Deutsch: https://medium.com/@maxdeutsch J Perm, avagy Dylan Wang, a YouTube legkedvesebb kockás arca: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UzHr7RZ7h-s&ab_channel=JPerm Mike Boyd legkirályabb trükkje: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L2zRLuhrwkk&ab_channel=MikeBoyd Ajánlónk: https://anchor.fm/paternoszter És az intró zene eredete: Christmas In Gliese 581 C by MusicLFiles Link: https://filmmusic.io/song/7157-christmas-in-gliese-581-c License: https://filmmusic.io/standard-license
https://anchor.fm/max-deutsch
https://open.spotify.com/show/0BvDTv9bFHAzlDCjdyId6qSponsor: https://apply.fundwise.com/minddog
這是2017年12月8日,星期五,的一集節目,介紹兩個奇特的人,而最終的目的是希望能受到他們的激勵。Max Deutsch是舊金山一個普通的電腦工作者,他求知好學。2017年的開始的時候,他立下一個志願,要在11個月的時間裡,掌握11個新的技能,全部靠自學。比如:素描、饒舌音樂、魔方紀錄(17秒完成)、希伯來語、背誦撲克牌(過目不忘)等。但他給自己設定的終極目標,是在一個月之內挑戰國際象棋世界冠軍。他挑戰自己的極限從上大學的時候開始。當時第一次聽到印度西塔琴,決定掌握這種樂器。結果15分鐘就進入狀態。他的訣竅:興趣、目標、方法、意志、睡覺、散步。Magnus Carlsen是當時世界上國際象棋等級分排第一的大師。挪威人。神童。求知慾極強。8歲學棋。13歲成為特級大師。20歲出頭,得到世界冠軍。他的故事可以從紀錄片Magnus當中了解到。當他聽到Max 要向他挑戰時,欣然接受。於是兩個奇人在棋盤上相遇。結果如何?為什麼要聽這個故事?聽了就知道。
Max Deutsch VS Magnus Carlsen: la sfida di apprendimento dell'anno.È possibile arrivare al livello di un campione del mondo studiando e facendo pratica per solamente 30 giorni?
Max Deutsch VS Magnus Carlsen: la sfida di apprendimento dell'anno.È possibile arrivare al livello di un campione del mondo studiando e facendo pratica per solamente 30 giorni?
TRAINING! Weldon's MAC training program ► https://mindgames.gg/MAC Use the $5 OFF coupon "askweldon" Ask A Question by calling in on ANCHOR: https://anchor.fm/weldongreen JOIN MY DISCORD!! Ask a question there (or use #AskWeldon on Twitter): https://discord.gg/0fmDROEblvfN4NQS Today's Questions: 1. Max Deutsch the obsessive learner 2. I adopted the persona of perfectionism to avoid losing. How can I transition from that? 3. Korea training meta? Create our own gaming culture. ---- ► Subscribe http://www.youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=MindGamesConsulting ----- The #AskWeldon show is about performance psychology and esports. Weldon Green is the sport psychology trainer for esports athletes and is focused on helping them optimize their game, learn faster, stop tilting, and get in the zone. ----- WELDON'S LIST (https://mindgames.gg/tools) Learn about:
We live in an age of acceleration. But it’s primarily the technology that’s going faster, right? Humans are still just humans. There is no Moore’s Law making us incredibly more powerful and efficient. Is there? M2M Day 1: Completing 12 ridiculously hard challenges in 12 months Here’s the list of challenges: November: Memorize the order of a deck of cards in less than 2 minutesDecember: Draw a realistic self-portraitJanuary: Solve a Rubik’s Cube in under 20 secondsFebruary: Land a standing backflipMarch: Play a 5-minute improvisational blues guitar soloApril: Hold a 30-minute conversation in Hebrew on the future of techMay: Build a self-driving carJune: Develop perfect pitch — identify 20 random musical notes in a rowJuly: Finish a Saturday NYT crossword puzzle in one sittingAugust: Complete one continuous set of 40 pull-upsSeptember: Continuously freestyle rap for 3 minutesOctober: Defeat world-champion Magnus Carlsen at a game of chess A human being should be able to change a diaper, plan an invasion, butcher a hog, conn a ship, design a building, write a sonnet, balance accounts, build a wall, set a bone, comfort the dying, take orders, give orders, cooperate, act alone, solve equations, analyze a new problem, pitch manure, program a computer, cook a tasty meal, fight efficiently, die gallantly. Specialization is for insects. -Robert A. Heinlein GEEKOUT Geekzone https://www.youtube.com/user/kscerri WT 379-690
Tech's Message: News & Analysis With Nate Lanxon (Bloomberg, Wired, CNET)
THIS WEEK ON TECH'S MESSAGE Nate and Ian discuss how Pokemon Go is sweeping the UK and what the launch has done in terms of initial download numbers across the country's mobile networks; also, in a special feature, we have not only a dramatic reading of a new Harry Potter chapter as written by artificial intelligence but also an interview with the AI's creator, Max Deutsch (read the rest on Medium); and the UK's driving tests are being trialled with a GPS navigation component and the government has launched an open consultation for how things like insurance should be dealt with in a post-human driverless car world. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.
There is a movement in contemporary philosophy known as “experimental philosophy” or “x-phi” for short. It proceeds against the backdrop of a critique of contemporary analytic philosophy. According to the Xi-phi critique, analytic philosophers rely too heavily on an unsound method which involves arguing for philosophical conclusions from premises whose force rests solely in what philosophers find “intuitive” or “obvious.” Using polling and survey methods, experimental philosophers show that claims that philosophers often take to be “intuitive” are in fact not commonly held among non-philosophers, and that individuals’ sense of what’s “obvious” varies according to factors such as ethnicity, geography, age, and gender. In light of this, X-philes claim that analytic philosophy is doomed, for it treats philosophers’ intuitions as evidence in favor of philosophical claims. But the variability of intuitions shows that intuitions have no evidentiary weight. In The Myth of the Intuitive: Experimental Philosophy and Philosophical Method (MIT, 2015), Max Deutsch defends analytic philosophy against the x-phi critique by showing that, in fact, analytic philosophers do not treat intuitions as evidence. Drawing on careful readings of the texts that are the central targets of the x-phi critique, Deutsch shows that analytic philosophers rarely appeal to intuitions as if they provided evidential support. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
There is a movement in contemporary philosophy known as “experimental philosophy” or “x-phi” for short. It proceeds against the backdrop of a critique of contemporary analytic philosophy. According to the Xi-phi critique, analytic philosophers rely too heavily on an unsound method which involves arguing for philosophical conclusions from premises whose force rests solely in what philosophers find “intuitive” or “obvious.” Using polling and survey methods, experimental philosophers show that claims that philosophers often take to be “intuitive” are in fact not commonly held among non-philosophers, and that individuals’ sense of what’s “obvious” varies according to factors such as ethnicity, geography, age, and gender. In light of this, X-philes claim that analytic philosophy is doomed, for it treats philosophers’ intuitions as evidence in favor of philosophical claims. But the variability of intuitions shows that intuitions have no evidentiary weight. In The Myth of the Intuitive: Experimental Philosophy and Philosophical Method (MIT, 2015), Max Deutsch defends analytic philosophy against the x-phi critique by showing that, in fact, analytic philosophers do not treat intuitions as evidence. Drawing on careful readings of the texts that are the central targets of the x-phi critique, Deutsch shows that analytic philosophers rarely appeal to intuitions as if they provided evidential support. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices