Podcasts about this peerview

Go online to PeerView.com/HXS860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Despite significant strides made in the surgical management of resectable NSCLC, a considerable proportion of patients face an unacceptably high risk of recurrence and poor sequelae. The swift expansion of immunotherapy into the early-stage, resectable, curative-intent setting offers them new hope, as FDA approvals in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant settings reshape standards of care and ongoing clinical trials continue to expand the role of immunotherapy-based options into this setting as well. But what do these developments mean for thoracic surgeons and the other members of the multidisciplinary lung cancer care team? How should the care team work together to utilize best practices and standards of care to guide individualized treatment selection and make the most of new immunotherapy options? This PeerView educational activity, based on a recent live symposium, addresses these questions and considers the expanding role of immunotherapies in resectable NSCLC by bringing together leading experts to evaluate the new, practice-changing research and offer a practical framework that improves interdisciplinary alliances and workflows with the goal of integrating immunotherapies into treatment plans to expand their benefits to as many patients with resectable NSCLC as possible. Are you ready to take your practice to the next level with perioperative immunotherapy? Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Assess the existing evidence guiding the use of neoadjuvant and adjuvant immunotherapy in stage I-III resectable NSCLC, including rational designs for clinical trials, novel endpoints, efficacy, safety, surgical outcomes, and other essential data; Identify patients with resectable NSCLC who are candidates for perioperative immunotherapy; and Integrate neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant immunotherapy as part of individualized treatment plans for patients with resectable NSCLC based on all the relevant factors, effective multidisciplinary collaboration, and shared decision-making.

Go online to PeerView.com/UBM860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is the most common inherited cardiac disease, with a mortality rate estimated to be about three times greater than that experienced by individuals of similar age without HCM. So far, the FDA has approved only one noninvasive treatment option indicated for the treatment of HCM—a first-in-class cardiac myosin inhibitor (CMI) called mavacamten. A second CMI, aficamten, is currently being studied. As timely diagnosis of patients with HCM may reduce or delay the need for invasive treatment, these treatment options are essential for cardiologists to understand. This PeerView activity covers what you need to know about diagnosing and managing HCM for optimal patient care. A patient case threads through each section and offers a window into real-world diagnostic and treatment challenges as our expert shares guidance and the latest evidence. By the end of this activity, you will be able to explain the underlying pathophysiology of HCM, apply your new knowledge for timely diagnosis and individualized treatment of HCM, and implement strategies for long-term patient safety and improved outcomes. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Apply current guidance and the latest evidence to support accurate differential diagnosis and encourage early treatment in patients suspected of having HCM; Evaluate the efficacy and safety evidence supporting the ability of modern targeted strategies to address the underlying pathophysiology of HCM; Individualize treatment of HCM based on patients' personal preferences and goals of care and identify opportunities to reduce inequities; and Implement strategies that encourage and support regular assessment of clinical status, LVEF, and LVOT gradient in patients with HCM, consulting with specialty colleagues as needed.

Go online to PeerView.com/HXS860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Despite significant strides made in the surgical management of resectable NSCLC, a considerable proportion of patients face an unacceptably high risk of recurrence and poor sequelae. The swift expansion of immunotherapy into the early-stage, resectable, curative-intent setting offers them new hope, as FDA approvals in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant settings reshape standards of care and ongoing clinical trials continue to expand the role of immunotherapy-based options into this setting as well. But what do these developments mean for thoracic surgeons and the other members of the multidisciplinary lung cancer care team? How should the care team work together to utilize best practices and standards of care to guide individualized treatment selection and make the most of new immunotherapy options? This PeerView educational activity, based on a recent live symposium, addresses these questions and considers the expanding role of immunotherapies in resectable NSCLC by bringing together leading experts to evaluate the new, practice-changing research and offer a practical framework that improves interdisciplinary alliances and workflows with the goal of integrating immunotherapies into treatment plans to expand their benefits to as many patients with resectable NSCLC as possible. Are you ready to take your practice to the next level with perioperative immunotherapy? Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Assess the existing evidence guiding the use of neoadjuvant and adjuvant immunotherapy in stage I-III resectable NSCLC, including rational designs for clinical trials, novel endpoints, efficacy, safety, surgical outcomes, and other essential data; Identify patients with resectable NSCLC who are candidates for perioperative immunotherapy; and Integrate neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant immunotherapy as part of individualized treatment plans for patients with resectable NSCLC based on all the relevant factors, effective multidisciplinary collaboration, and shared decision-making.

Go online to PeerView.com/UBM860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is the most common inherited cardiac disease, with a mortality rate estimated to be about three times greater than that experienced by individuals of similar age without HCM. So far, the FDA has approved only one noninvasive treatment option indicated for the treatment of HCM—a first-in-class cardiac myosin inhibitor (CMI) called mavacamten. A second CMI, aficamten, is currently being studied. As timely diagnosis of patients with HCM may reduce or delay the need for invasive treatment, these treatment options are essential for cardiologists to understand. This PeerView activity covers what you need to know about diagnosing and managing HCM for optimal patient care. A patient case threads through each section and offers a window into real-world diagnostic and treatment challenges as our expert shares guidance and the latest evidence. By the end of this activity, you will be able to explain the underlying pathophysiology of HCM, apply your new knowledge for timely diagnosis and individualized treatment of HCM, and implement strategies for long-term patient safety and improved outcomes. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Apply current guidance and the latest evidence to support accurate differential diagnosis and encourage early treatment in patients suspected of having HCM; Evaluate the efficacy and safety evidence supporting the ability of modern targeted strategies to address the underlying pathophysiology of HCM; Individualize treatment of HCM based on patients' personal preferences and goals of care and identify opportunities to reduce inequities; and Implement strategies that encourage and support regular assessment of clinical status, LVEF, and LVOT gradient in patients with HCM, consulting with specialty colleagues as needed.

Go online to PeerView.com/HXS860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Despite significant strides made in the surgical management of resectable NSCLC, a considerable proportion of patients face an unacceptably high risk of recurrence and poor sequelae. The swift expansion of immunotherapy into the early-stage, resectable, curative-intent setting offers them new hope, as FDA approvals in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant settings reshape standards of care and ongoing clinical trials continue to expand the role of immunotherapy-based options into this setting as well. But what do these developments mean for thoracic surgeons and the other members of the multidisciplinary lung cancer care team? How should the care team work together to utilize best practices and standards of care to guide individualized treatment selection and make the most of new immunotherapy options? This PeerView educational activity, based on a recent live symposium, addresses these questions and considers the expanding role of immunotherapies in resectable NSCLC by bringing together leading experts to evaluate the new, practice-changing research and offer a practical framework that improves interdisciplinary alliances and workflows with the goal of integrating immunotherapies into treatment plans to expand their benefits to as many patients with resectable NSCLC as possible. Are you ready to take your practice to the next level with perioperative immunotherapy? Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Assess the existing evidence guiding the use of neoadjuvant and adjuvant immunotherapy in stage I-III resectable NSCLC, including rational designs for clinical trials, novel endpoints, efficacy, safety, surgical outcomes, and other essential data; Identify patients with resectable NSCLC who are candidates for perioperative immunotherapy; and Integrate neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant immunotherapy as part of individualized treatment plans for patients with resectable NSCLC based on all the relevant factors, effective multidisciplinary collaboration, and shared decision-making.

Go online to PeerView.com/UBM860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is the most common inherited cardiac disease, with a mortality rate estimated to be about three times greater than that experienced by individuals of similar age without HCM. So far, the FDA has approved only one noninvasive treatment option indicated for the treatment of HCM—a first-in-class cardiac myosin inhibitor (CMI) called mavacamten. A second CMI, aficamten, is currently being studied. As timely diagnosis of patients with HCM may reduce or delay the need for invasive treatment, these treatment options are essential for cardiologists to understand. This PeerView activity covers what you need to know about diagnosing and managing HCM for optimal patient care. A patient case threads through each section and offers a window into real-world diagnostic and treatment challenges as our expert shares guidance and the latest evidence. By the end of this activity, you will be able to explain the underlying pathophysiology of HCM, apply your new knowledge for timely diagnosis and individualized treatment of HCM, and implement strategies for long-term patient safety and improved outcomes. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Apply current guidance and the latest evidence to support accurate differential diagnosis and encourage early treatment in patients suspected of having HCM; Evaluate the efficacy and safety evidence supporting the ability of modern targeted strategies to address the underlying pathophysiology of HCM; Individualize treatment of HCM based on patients' personal preferences and goals of care and identify opportunities to reduce inequities; and Implement strategies that encourage and support regular assessment of clinical status, LVEF, and LVOT gradient in patients with HCM, consulting with specialty colleagues as needed.

Go online to PeerView.com/HXS860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Despite significant strides made in the surgical management of resectable NSCLC, a considerable proportion of patients face an unacceptably high risk of recurrence and poor sequelae. The swift expansion of immunotherapy into the early-stage, resectable, curative-intent setting offers them new hope, as FDA approvals in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant settings reshape standards of care and ongoing clinical trials continue to expand the role of immunotherapy-based options into this setting as well. But what do these developments mean for thoracic surgeons and the other members of the multidisciplinary lung cancer care team? How should the care team work together to utilize best practices and standards of care to guide individualized treatment selection and make the most of new immunotherapy options? This PeerView educational activity, based on a recent live symposium, addresses these questions and considers the expanding role of immunotherapies in resectable NSCLC by bringing together leading experts to evaluate the new, practice-changing research and offer a practical framework that improves interdisciplinary alliances and workflows with the goal of integrating immunotherapies into treatment plans to expand their benefits to as many patients with resectable NSCLC as possible. Are you ready to take your practice to the next level with perioperative immunotherapy? Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Assess the existing evidence guiding the use of neoadjuvant and adjuvant immunotherapy in stage I-III resectable NSCLC, including rational designs for clinical trials, novel endpoints, efficacy, safety, surgical outcomes, and other essential data; Identify patients with resectable NSCLC who are candidates for perioperative immunotherapy; and Integrate neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant immunotherapy as part of individualized treatment plans for patients with resectable NSCLC based on all the relevant factors, effective multidisciplinary collaboration, and shared decision-making.

Go online to PeerView.com/UBM860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is the most common inherited cardiac disease, with a mortality rate estimated to be about three times greater than that experienced by individuals of similar age without HCM. So far, the FDA has approved only one noninvasive treatment option indicated for the treatment of HCM—a first-in-class cardiac myosin inhibitor (CMI) called mavacamten. A second CMI, aficamten, is currently being studied. As timely diagnosis of patients with HCM may reduce or delay the need for invasive treatment, these treatment options are essential for cardiologists to understand. This PeerView activity covers what you need to know about diagnosing and managing HCM for optimal patient care. A patient case threads through each section and offers a window into real-world diagnostic and treatment challenges as our expert shares guidance and the latest evidence. By the end of this activity, you will be able to explain the underlying pathophysiology of HCM, apply your new knowledge for timely diagnosis and individualized treatment of HCM, and implement strategies for long-term patient safety and improved outcomes. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Apply current guidance and the latest evidence to support accurate differential diagnosis and encourage early treatment in patients suspected of having HCM; Evaluate the efficacy and safety evidence supporting the ability of modern targeted strategies to address the underlying pathophysiology of HCM; Individualize treatment of HCM based on patients' personal preferences and goals of care and identify opportunities to reduce inequities; and Implement strategies that encourage and support regular assessment of clinical status, LVEF, and LVOT gradient in patients with HCM, consulting with specialty colleagues as needed.

Go online to PeerView.com/HXS860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Despite significant strides made in the surgical management of resectable NSCLC, a considerable proportion of patients face an unacceptably high risk of recurrence and poor sequelae. The swift expansion of immunotherapy into the early-stage, resectable, curative-intent setting offers them new hope, as FDA approvals in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant settings reshape standards of care and ongoing clinical trials continue to expand the role of immunotherapy-based options into this setting as well. But what do these developments mean for thoracic surgeons and the other members of the multidisciplinary lung cancer care team? How should the care team work together to utilize best practices and standards of care to guide individualized treatment selection and make the most of new immunotherapy options? This PeerView educational activity, based on a recent live symposium, addresses these questions and considers the expanding role of immunotherapies in resectable NSCLC by bringing together leading experts to evaluate the new, practice-changing research and offer a practical framework that improves interdisciplinary alliances and workflows with the goal of integrating immunotherapies into treatment plans to expand their benefits to as many patients with resectable NSCLC as possible. Are you ready to take your practice to the next level with perioperative immunotherapy? Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Assess the existing evidence guiding the use of neoadjuvant and adjuvant immunotherapy in stage I-III resectable NSCLC, including rational designs for clinical trials, novel endpoints, efficacy, safety, surgical outcomes, and other essential data; Identify patients with resectable NSCLC who are candidates for perioperative immunotherapy; and Integrate neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant immunotherapy as part of individualized treatment plans for patients with resectable NSCLC based on all the relevant factors, effective multidisciplinary collaboration, and shared decision-making.

Go online to PeerView.com/HXS860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Despite significant strides made in the surgical management of resectable NSCLC, a considerable proportion of patients face an unacceptably high risk of recurrence and poor sequelae. The swift expansion of immunotherapy into the early-stage, resectable, curative-intent setting offers them new hope, as FDA approvals in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant settings reshape standards of care and ongoing clinical trials continue to expand the role of immunotherapy-based options into this setting as well. But what do these developments mean for thoracic surgeons and the other members of the multidisciplinary lung cancer care team? How should the care team work together to utilize best practices and standards of care to guide individualized treatment selection and make the most of new immunotherapy options? This PeerView educational activity, based on a recent live symposium, addresses these questions and considers the expanding role of immunotherapies in resectable NSCLC by bringing together leading experts to evaluate the new, practice-changing research and offer a practical framework that improves interdisciplinary alliances and workflows with the goal of integrating immunotherapies into treatment plans to expand their benefits to as many patients with resectable NSCLC as possible. Are you ready to take your practice to the next level with perioperative immunotherapy? Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Assess the existing evidence guiding the use of neoadjuvant and adjuvant immunotherapy in stage I-III resectable NSCLC, including rational designs for clinical trials, novel endpoints, efficacy, safety, surgical outcomes, and other essential data; Identify patients with resectable NSCLC who are candidates for perioperative immunotherapy; and Integrate neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant immunotherapy as part of individualized treatment plans for patients with resectable NSCLC based on all the relevant factors, effective multidisciplinary collaboration, and shared decision-making.

Go online to PeerView.com/UBM860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is the most common inherited cardiac disease, with a mortality rate estimated to be about three times greater than that experienced by individuals of similar age without HCM. So far, the FDA has approved only one noninvasive treatment option indicated for the treatment of HCM—a first-in-class cardiac myosin inhibitor (CMI) called mavacamten. A second CMI, aficamten, is currently being studied. As timely diagnosis of patients with HCM may reduce or delay the need for invasive treatment, these treatment options are essential for cardiologists to understand. This PeerView activity covers what you need to know about diagnosing and managing HCM for optimal patient care. A patient case threads through each section and offers a window into real-world diagnostic and treatment challenges as our expert shares guidance and the latest evidence. By the end of this activity, you will be able to explain the underlying pathophysiology of HCM, apply your new knowledge for timely diagnosis and individualized treatment of HCM, and implement strategies for long-term patient safety and improved outcomes. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Apply current guidance and the latest evidence to support accurate differential diagnosis and encourage early treatment in patients suspected of having HCM; Evaluate the efficacy and safety evidence supporting the ability of modern targeted strategies to address the underlying pathophysiology of HCM; Individualize treatment of HCM based on patients' personal preferences and goals of care and identify opportunities to reduce inequities; and Implement strategies that encourage and support regular assessment of clinical status, LVEF, and LVOT gradient in patients with HCM, consulting with specialty colleagues as needed.

Go online to PeerView.com/HXS860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Despite significant strides made in the surgical management of resectable NSCLC, a considerable proportion of patients face an unacceptably high risk of recurrence and poor sequelae. The swift expansion of immunotherapy into the early-stage, resectable, curative-intent setting offers them new hope, as FDA approvals in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant settings reshape standards of care and ongoing clinical trials continue to expand the role of immunotherapy-based options into this setting as well. But what do these developments mean for thoracic surgeons and the other members of the multidisciplinary lung cancer care team? How should the care team work together to utilize best practices and standards of care to guide individualized treatment selection and make the most of new immunotherapy options? This PeerView educational activity, based on a recent live symposium, addresses these questions and considers the expanding role of immunotherapies in resectable NSCLC by bringing together leading experts to evaluate the new, practice-changing research and offer a practical framework that improves interdisciplinary alliances and workflows with the goal of integrating immunotherapies into treatment plans to expand their benefits to as many patients with resectable NSCLC as possible. Are you ready to take your practice to the next level with perioperative immunotherapy? Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Assess the existing evidence guiding the use of neoadjuvant and adjuvant immunotherapy in stage I-III resectable NSCLC, including rational designs for clinical trials, novel endpoints, efficacy, safety, surgical outcomes, and other essential data; Identify patients with resectable NSCLC who are candidates for perioperative immunotherapy; and Integrate neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant immunotherapy as part of individualized treatment plans for patients with resectable NSCLC based on all the relevant factors, effective multidisciplinary collaboration, and shared decision-making.

Go online to PeerView.com/UBM860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is the most common inherited cardiac disease, with a mortality rate estimated to be about three times greater than that experienced by individuals of similar age without HCM. So far, the FDA has approved only one noninvasive treatment option indicated for the treatment of HCM—a first-in-class cardiac myosin inhibitor (CMI) called mavacamten. A second CMI, aficamten, is currently being studied. As timely diagnosis of patients with HCM may reduce or delay the need for invasive treatment, these treatment options are essential for cardiologists to understand. This PeerView activity covers what you need to know about diagnosing and managing HCM for optimal patient care. A patient case threads through each section and offers a window into real-world diagnostic and treatment challenges as our expert shares guidance and the latest evidence. By the end of this activity, you will be able to explain the underlying pathophysiology of HCM, apply your new knowledge for timely diagnosis and individualized treatment of HCM, and implement strategies for long-term patient safety and improved outcomes. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Apply current guidance and the latest evidence to support accurate differential diagnosis and encourage early treatment in patients suspected of having HCM; Evaluate the efficacy and safety evidence supporting the ability of modern targeted strategies to address the underlying pathophysiology of HCM; Individualize treatment of HCM based on patients' personal preferences and goals of care and identify opportunities to reduce inequities; and Implement strategies that encourage and support regular assessment of clinical status, LVEF, and LVOT gradient in patients with HCM, consulting with specialty colleagues as needed.

Go online to PeerView.com/HXS860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Despite significant strides made in the surgical management of resectable NSCLC, a considerable proportion of patients face an unacceptably high risk of recurrence and poor sequelae. The swift expansion of immunotherapy into the early-stage, resectable, curative-intent setting offers them new hope, as FDA approvals in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant settings reshape standards of care and ongoing clinical trials continue to expand the role of immunotherapy-based options into this setting as well. But what do these developments mean for thoracic surgeons and the other members of the multidisciplinary lung cancer care team? How should the care team work together to utilize best practices and standards of care to guide individualized treatment selection and make the most of new immunotherapy options? This PeerView educational activity, based on a recent live symposium, addresses these questions and considers the expanding role of immunotherapies in resectable NSCLC by bringing together leading experts to evaluate the new, practice-changing research and offer a practical framework that improves interdisciplinary alliances and workflows with the goal of integrating immunotherapies into treatment plans to expand their benefits to as many patients with resectable NSCLC as possible. Are you ready to take your practice to the next level with perioperative immunotherapy? Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Assess the existing evidence guiding the use of neoadjuvant and adjuvant immunotherapy in stage I-III resectable NSCLC, including rational designs for clinical trials, novel endpoints, efficacy, safety, surgical outcomes, and other essential data; Identify patients with resectable NSCLC who are candidates for perioperative immunotherapy; and Integrate neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant immunotherapy as part of individualized treatment plans for patients with resectable NSCLC based on all the relevant factors, effective multidisciplinary collaboration, and shared decision-making.

Go online to PeerView.com/VWR860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Due to the rarity of Rett syndrome and overlapping symptoms with other, more common neurodevelopmental disorders, diagnosis is challenging and often missed or delayed. With one Rett-targeted therapy recently approved and others in development, clinicians now have the opportunity to offer not merely symptom management but potential clinical improvement. This PeerView case-based activity is designed to improve your ability to recognize, diagnose, and treat patients with Rett syndrome. Each session features a realistic case discussion with expert faculty panelists sharing the evidence that supports clinical decisions for timely diagnosis and early initiation of multidisciplinary management and targeted therapy as appropriate. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Apply diagnostic criteria to provide a timely diagnosis of Rett syndrome in patients demonstrating subtle signs and symptoms; Employ evidence-based, age-appropriate care for patients with Rett syndrome in alignment with consensus management guidelines; and Evaluate the evidence surrounding the safety, efficacy, and tolerability of new and emerging therapies for the treatment of Rett syndrome.

Go online to PeerView.com/VWR860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Due to the rarity of Rett syndrome and overlapping symptoms with other, more common neurodevelopmental disorders, diagnosis is challenging and often missed or delayed. With one Rett-targeted therapy recently approved and others in development, clinicians now have the opportunity to offer not merely symptom management but potential clinical improvement. This PeerView case-based activity is designed to improve your ability to recognize, diagnose, and treat patients with Rett syndrome. Each session features a realistic case discussion with expert faculty panelists sharing the evidence that supports clinical decisions for timely diagnosis and early initiation of multidisciplinary management and targeted therapy as appropriate. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Apply diagnostic criteria to provide a timely diagnosis of Rett syndrome in patients demonstrating subtle signs and symptoms; Employ evidence-based, age-appropriate care for patients with Rett syndrome in alignment with consensus management guidelines; and Evaluate the evidence surrounding the safety, efficacy, and tolerability of new and emerging therapies for the treatment of Rett syndrome.

Go online to PeerView.com/VWR860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Due to the rarity of Rett syndrome and overlapping symptoms with other, more common neurodevelopmental disorders, diagnosis is challenging and often missed or delayed. With one Rett-targeted therapy recently approved and others in development, clinicians now have the opportunity to offer not merely symptom management but potential clinical improvement. This PeerView case-based activity is designed to improve your ability to recognize, diagnose, and treat patients with Rett syndrome. Each session features a realistic case discussion with expert faculty panelists sharing the evidence that supports clinical decisions for timely diagnosis and early initiation of multidisciplinary management and targeted therapy as appropriate. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Apply diagnostic criteria to provide a timely diagnosis of Rett syndrome in patients demonstrating subtle signs and symptoms; Employ evidence-based, age-appropriate care for patients with Rett syndrome in alignment with consensus management guidelines; and Evaluate the evidence surrounding the safety, efficacy, and tolerability of new and emerging therapies for the treatment of Rett syndrome.

Go online to PeerView.com/VWR860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Due to the rarity of Rett syndrome and overlapping symptoms with other, more common neurodevelopmental disorders, diagnosis is challenging and often missed or delayed. With one Rett-targeted therapy recently approved and others in development, clinicians now have the opportunity to offer not merely symptom management but potential clinical improvement. This PeerView case-based activity is designed to improve your ability to recognize, diagnose, and treat patients with Rett syndrome. Each session features a realistic case discussion with expert faculty panelists sharing the evidence that supports clinical decisions for timely diagnosis and early initiation of multidisciplinary management and targeted therapy as appropriate. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Apply diagnostic criteria to provide a timely diagnosis of Rett syndrome in patients demonstrating subtle signs and symptoms; Employ evidence-based, age-appropriate care for patients with Rett syndrome in alignment with consensus management guidelines; and Evaluate the evidence surrounding the safety, efficacy, and tolerability of new and emerging therapies for the treatment of Rett syndrome.

Go online to PeerView.com/VWR860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Due to the rarity of Rett syndrome and overlapping symptoms with other, more common neurodevelopmental disorders, diagnosis is challenging and often missed or delayed. With one Rett-targeted therapy recently approved and others in development, clinicians now have the opportunity to offer not merely symptom management but potential clinical improvement. This PeerView case-based activity is designed to improve your ability to recognize, diagnose, and treat patients with Rett syndrome. Each session features a realistic case discussion with expert faculty panelists sharing the evidence that supports clinical decisions for timely diagnosis and early initiation of multidisciplinary management and targeted therapy as appropriate. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Apply diagnostic criteria to provide a timely diagnosis of Rett syndrome in patients demonstrating subtle signs and symptoms; Employ evidence-based, age-appropriate care for patients with Rett syndrome in alignment with consensus management guidelines; and Evaluate the evidence surrounding the safety, efficacy, and tolerability of new and emerging therapies for the treatment of Rett syndrome.

Go online to PeerView.com/VWR860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Due to the rarity of Rett syndrome and overlapping symptoms with other, more common neurodevelopmental disorders, diagnosis is challenging and often missed or delayed. With one Rett-targeted therapy recently approved and others in development, clinicians now have the opportunity to offer not merely symptom management but potential clinical improvement. This PeerView case-based activity is designed to improve your ability to recognize, diagnose, and treat patients with Rett syndrome. Each session features a realistic case discussion with expert faculty panelists sharing the evidence that supports clinical decisions for timely diagnosis and early initiation of multidisciplinary management and targeted therapy as appropriate. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Apply diagnostic criteria to provide a timely diagnosis of Rett syndrome in patients demonstrating subtle signs and symptoms; Employ evidence-based, age-appropriate care for patients with Rett syndrome in alignment with consensus management guidelines; and Evaluate the evidence surrounding the safety, efficacy, and tolerability of new and emerging therapies for the treatment of Rett syndrome.

Go online to PeerView.com/QGG860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Overactive bladder is frequently underdiagnosed and undertreated, but fortunately there's a newer treatment option with the beta-3 adrenoreceptor agonists. This class demonstrates efficacy without anticholinergic adverse effects, enabling you to provide optimal, patient-centered care for residents of long-term care facilities. This PeerView educational activity is designed to help improve your ability to accurately recognize overactive bladder, apply appropriate diagnostic criteria, and incorporate newer treatment options. Expert faculty explain the clinically relevant ways in which the newer beta-3 adrenoreceptor agonists differ from traditional antimuscarinics, as well as how they differ from each other with regard to selectivity and safety. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Recognize the individual, clinical, and economic burdens of OAB specific to patients living in long-term care facilities; Engage members of the healthcare team to routinely screen long-term care residents for symptoms of OAB; Apply recommended diagnostic criteria to differentiate OAB from other urinary conditions with shared symptomatology; and Implement individualized OAB treatment plans that minimize risks related to cardiovascular health, cognitive impairment and dementia, and polypharmacy concerns.

Go online to PeerView.com/QGG860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Overactive bladder is frequently underdiagnosed and undertreated, but fortunately there's a newer treatment option with the beta-3 adrenoreceptor agonists. This class demonstrates efficacy without anticholinergic adverse effects, enabling you to provide optimal, patient-centered care for residents of long-term care facilities. This PeerView educational activity is designed to help improve your ability to accurately recognize overactive bladder, apply appropriate diagnostic criteria, and incorporate newer treatment options. Expert faculty explain the clinically relevant ways in which the newer beta-3 adrenoreceptor agonists differ from traditional antimuscarinics, as well as how they differ from each other with regard to selectivity and safety. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Recognize the individual, clinical, and economic burdens of OAB specific to patients living in long-term care facilities; Engage members of the healthcare team to routinely screen long-term care residents for symptoms of OAB; Apply recommended diagnostic criteria to differentiate OAB from other urinary conditions with shared symptomatology; and Implement individualized OAB treatment plans that minimize risks related to cardiovascular health, cognitive impairment and dementia, and polypharmacy concerns.

Go online to PeerView.com/QGG860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Overactive bladder is frequently underdiagnosed and undertreated, but fortunately there's a newer treatment option with the beta-3 adrenoreceptor agonists. This class demonstrates efficacy without anticholinergic adverse effects, enabling you to provide optimal, patient-centered care for residents of long-term care facilities. This PeerView educational activity is designed to help improve your ability to accurately recognize overactive bladder, apply appropriate diagnostic criteria, and incorporate newer treatment options. Expert faculty explain the clinically relevant ways in which the newer beta-3 adrenoreceptor agonists differ from traditional antimuscarinics, as well as how they differ from each other with regard to selectivity and safety. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Recognize the individual, clinical, and economic burdens of OAB specific to patients living in long-term care facilities; Engage members of the healthcare team to routinely screen long-term care residents for symptoms of OAB; Apply recommended diagnostic criteria to differentiate OAB from other urinary conditions with shared symptomatology; and Implement individualized OAB treatment plans that minimize risks related to cardiovascular health, cognitive impairment and dementia, and polypharmacy concerns.

Go online to PeerView.com/QGG860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Overactive bladder is frequently underdiagnosed and undertreated, but fortunately there's a newer treatment option with the beta-3 adrenoreceptor agonists. This class demonstrates efficacy without anticholinergic adverse effects, enabling you to provide optimal, patient-centered care for residents of long-term care facilities. This PeerView educational activity is designed to help improve your ability to accurately recognize overactive bladder, apply appropriate diagnostic criteria, and incorporate newer treatment options. Expert faculty explain the clinically relevant ways in which the newer beta-3 adrenoreceptor agonists differ from traditional antimuscarinics, as well as how they differ from each other with regard to selectivity and safety. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Recognize the individual, clinical, and economic burdens of OAB specific to patients living in long-term care facilities; Engage members of the healthcare team to routinely screen long-term care residents for symptoms of OAB; Apply recommended diagnostic criteria to differentiate OAB from other urinary conditions with shared symptomatology; and Implement individualized OAB treatment plans that minimize risks related to cardiovascular health, cognitive impairment and dementia, and polypharmacy concerns.

Go online to PeerView.com/QGG860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Overactive bladder is frequently underdiagnosed and undertreated, but fortunately there's a newer treatment option with the beta-3 adrenoreceptor agonists. This class demonstrates efficacy without anticholinergic adverse effects, enabling you to provide optimal, patient-centered care for residents of long-term care facilities. This PeerView educational activity is designed to help improve your ability to accurately recognize overactive bladder, apply appropriate diagnostic criteria, and incorporate newer treatment options. Expert faculty explain the clinically relevant ways in which the newer beta-3 adrenoreceptor agonists differ from traditional antimuscarinics, as well as how they differ from each other with regard to selectivity and safety. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Recognize the individual, clinical, and economic burdens of OAB specific to patients living in long-term care facilities; Engage members of the healthcare team to routinely screen long-term care residents for symptoms of OAB; Apply recommended diagnostic criteria to differentiate OAB from other urinary conditions with shared symptomatology; and Implement individualized OAB treatment plans that minimize risks related to cardiovascular health, cognitive impairment and dementia, and polypharmacy concerns.

Go online to PeerView.com/QGG860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Overactive bladder is frequently underdiagnosed and undertreated, but fortunately there's a newer treatment option with the beta-3 adrenoreceptor agonists. This class demonstrates efficacy without anticholinergic adverse effects, enabling you to provide optimal, patient-centered care for residents of long-term care facilities. This PeerView educational activity is designed to help improve your ability to accurately recognize overactive bladder, apply appropriate diagnostic criteria, and incorporate newer treatment options. Expert faculty explain the clinically relevant ways in which the newer beta-3 adrenoreceptor agonists differ from traditional antimuscarinics, as well as how they differ from each other with regard to selectivity and safety. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Recognize the individual, clinical, and economic burdens of OAB specific to patients living in long-term care facilities; Engage members of the healthcare team to routinely screen long-term care residents for symptoms of OAB; Apply recommended diagnostic criteria to differentiate OAB from other urinary conditions with shared symptomatology; and Implement individualized OAB treatment plans that minimize risks related to cardiovascular health, cognitive impairment and dementia, and polypharmacy concerns.

Go online to PeerView.com/QGG860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Overactive bladder is frequently underdiagnosed and undertreated, but fortunately there's a newer treatment option with the beta-3 adrenoreceptor agonists. This class demonstrates efficacy without anticholinergic adverse effects, enabling you to provide optimal, patient-centered care for residents of long-term care facilities. This PeerView educational activity is designed to help improve your ability to accurately recognize overactive bladder, apply appropriate diagnostic criteria, and incorporate newer treatment options. Expert faculty explain the clinically relevant ways in which the newer beta-3 adrenoreceptor agonists differ from traditional antimuscarinics, as well as how they differ from each other with regard to selectivity and safety. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Recognize the individual, clinical, and economic burdens of OAB specific to patients living in long-term care facilities; Engage members of the healthcare team to routinely screen long-term care residents for symptoms of OAB; Apply recommended diagnostic criteria to differentiate OAB from other urinary conditions with shared symptomatology; and Implement individualized OAB treatment plans that minimize risks related to cardiovascular health, cognitive impairment and dementia, and polypharmacy concerns.

Go online to PeerView.com/SQN860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. The immune checkpoint inhibitors have started to radically transform the perioperative treatment of resectable stage I-III NSCLC, with the goals of reducing the risk of recurrence and improving cure rates in these settings. Several important phase 3 clinical trials evaluating neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant immunotherapies have already yielded impressive data, leading to regulatory approvals and new standards of care, and additional studies have recently been reported to be positive, adding to the evidence base but also increasing complexity. What do these advances mean for thoracic surgeons, medical oncologists, and other multidisciplinary specialists, and what changes in practice are needed? What challenges and unanswered questions remain? This PeerView educational activity, based on a recent live symposium, brings together top experts to evaluate the new practice-changing research, assess the implications for practice, and provide practical guidance for how to improve interdisciplinary alliances, develop real-world workflows, and optimally integrate immunotherapies into treatment plans for patients with resectable NSCLC. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Evaluate the current evidence guiding the use of neoadjuvant and adjuvant immunotherapy in resectable stage I-III NSCLC, including rational clinical trial designs, novel endpoints, and efficacy, safety, surgical outcomes, and other essential data from key clinical trials; Identify patients with resectable NSCLC who are candidates for perioperative immunotherapy; and Integrate neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant immunotherapy into individualized treatment plans for patients with resectable NSCLC based on all the relevant factors, effective multidisciplinary collaboration, and shared decision-making

Go online to PeerView.com/SQN860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. The immune checkpoint inhibitors have started to radically transform the perioperative treatment of resectable stage I-III NSCLC, with the goals of reducing the risk of recurrence and improving cure rates in these settings. Several important phase 3 clinical trials evaluating neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant immunotherapies have already yielded impressive data, leading to regulatory approvals and new standards of care, and additional studies have recently been reported to be positive, adding to the evidence base but also increasing complexity. What do these advances mean for thoracic surgeons, medical oncologists, and other multidisciplinary specialists, and what changes in practice are needed? What challenges and unanswered questions remain? This PeerView educational activity, based on a recent live symposium, brings together top experts to evaluate the new practice-changing research, assess the implications for practice, and provide practical guidance for how to improve interdisciplinary alliances, develop real-world workflows, and optimally integrate immunotherapies into treatment plans for patients with resectable NSCLC. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Evaluate the current evidence guiding the use of neoadjuvant and adjuvant immunotherapy in resectable stage I-III NSCLC, including rational clinical trial designs, novel endpoints, and efficacy, safety, surgical outcomes, and other essential data from key clinical trials; Identify patients with resectable NSCLC who are candidates for perioperative immunotherapy; and Integrate neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant immunotherapy into individualized treatment plans for patients with resectable NSCLC based on all the relevant factors, effective multidisciplinary collaboration, and shared decision-making

Go online to PeerView.com/SQN860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. The immune checkpoint inhibitors have started to radically transform the perioperative treatment of resectable stage I-III NSCLC, with the goals of reducing the risk of recurrence and improving cure rates in these settings. Several important phase 3 clinical trials evaluating neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant immunotherapies have already yielded impressive data, leading to regulatory approvals and new standards of care, and additional studies have recently been reported to be positive, adding to the evidence base but also increasing complexity. What do these advances mean for thoracic surgeons, medical oncologists, and other multidisciplinary specialists, and what changes in practice are needed? What challenges and unanswered questions remain? This PeerView educational activity, based on a recent live symposium, brings together top experts to evaluate the new practice-changing research, assess the implications for practice, and provide practical guidance for how to improve interdisciplinary alliances, develop real-world workflows, and optimally integrate immunotherapies into treatment plans for patients with resectable NSCLC. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Evaluate the current evidence guiding the use of neoadjuvant and adjuvant immunotherapy in resectable stage I-III NSCLC, including rational clinical trial designs, novel endpoints, and efficacy, safety, surgical outcomes, and other essential data from key clinical trials; Identify patients with resectable NSCLC who are candidates for perioperative immunotherapy; and Integrate neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant immunotherapy into individualized treatment plans for patients with resectable NSCLC based on all the relevant factors, effective multidisciplinary collaboration, and shared decision-making

Go online to PeerView.com/SQN860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. The immune checkpoint inhibitors have started to radically transform the perioperative treatment of resectable stage I-III NSCLC, with the goals of reducing the risk of recurrence and improving cure rates in these settings. Several important phase 3 clinical trials evaluating neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant immunotherapies have already yielded impressive data, leading to regulatory approvals and new standards of care, and additional studies have recently been reported to be positive, adding to the evidence base but also increasing complexity. What do these advances mean for thoracic surgeons, medical oncologists, and other multidisciplinary specialists, and what changes in practice are needed? What challenges and unanswered questions remain? This PeerView educational activity, based on a recent live symposium, brings together top experts to evaluate the new practice-changing research, assess the implications for practice, and provide practical guidance for how to improve interdisciplinary alliances, develop real-world workflows, and optimally integrate immunotherapies into treatment plans for patients with resectable NSCLC. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Evaluate the current evidence guiding the use of neoadjuvant and adjuvant immunotherapy in resectable stage I-III NSCLC, including rational clinical trial designs, novel endpoints, and efficacy, safety, surgical outcomes, and other essential data from key clinical trials; Identify patients with resectable NSCLC who are candidates for perioperative immunotherapy; and Integrate neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant immunotherapy into individualized treatment plans for patients with resectable NSCLC based on all the relevant factors, effective multidisciplinary collaboration, and shared decision-making

Go online to PeerView.com/SQN860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. The immune checkpoint inhibitors have started to radically transform the perioperative treatment of resectable stage I-III NSCLC, with the goals of reducing the risk of recurrence and improving cure rates in these settings. Several important phase 3 clinical trials evaluating neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant immunotherapies have already yielded impressive data, leading to regulatory approvals and new standards of care, and additional studies have recently been reported to be positive, adding to the evidence base but also increasing complexity. What do these advances mean for thoracic surgeons, medical oncologists, and other multidisciplinary specialists, and what changes in practice are needed? What challenges and unanswered questions remain? This PeerView educational activity, based on a recent live symposium, brings together top experts to evaluate the new practice-changing research, assess the implications for practice, and provide practical guidance for how to improve interdisciplinary alliances, develop real-world workflows, and optimally integrate immunotherapies into treatment plans for patients with resectable NSCLC. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Evaluate the current evidence guiding the use of neoadjuvant and adjuvant immunotherapy in resectable stage I-III NSCLC, including rational clinical trial designs, novel endpoints, and efficacy, safety, surgical outcomes, and other essential data from key clinical trials; Identify patients with resectable NSCLC who are candidates for perioperative immunotherapy; and Integrate neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant immunotherapy into individualized treatment plans for patients with resectable NSCLC based on all the relevant factors, effective multidisciplinary collaboration, and shared decision-making

Go online to PeerView.com/SQN860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. The immune checkpoint inhibitors have started to radically transform the perioperative treatment of resectable stage I-III NSCLC, with the goals of reducing the risk of recurrence and improving cure rates in these settings. Several important phase 3 clinical trials evaluating neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant immunotherapies have already yielded impressive data, leading to regulatory approvals and new standards of care, and additional studies have recently been reported to be positive, adding to the evidence base but also increasing complexity. What do these advances mean for thoracic surgeons, medical oncologists, and other multidisciplinary specialists, and what changes in practice are needed? What challenges and unanswered questions remain? This PeerView educational activity, based on a recent live symposium, brings together top experts to evaluate the new practice-changing research, assess the implications for practice, and provide practical guidance for how to improve interdisciplinary alliances, develop real-world workflows, and optimally integrate immunotherapies into treatment plans for patients with resectable NSCLC. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Evaluate the current evidence guiding the use of neoadjuvant and adjuvant immunotherapy in resectable stage I-III NSCLC, including rational clinical trial designs, novel endpoints, and efficacy, safety, surgical outcomes, and other essential data from key clinical trials; Identify patients with resectable NSCLC who are candidates for perioperative immunotherapy; and Integrate neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant immunotherapy into individualized treatment plans for patients with resectable NSCLC based on all the relevant factors, effective multidisciplinary collaboration, and shared decision-making

Go online to PeerView.com/NRG860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. HER2-low breast cancer, currently defined as HER2 IHC 1+ or 2+/ISH-, accounts for approximately 50% of all breast cancers. While older HER2-targeted therapies did not show efficacy in HER2-low breast cancers, novel antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) have demonstrated remarkable activity in this setting. Because of these advances and the FDA approval of the first HER2-targeting ADC for HER2-low breast cancer, there is an urgent need to rethink the approaches to HER2 testing so that patients with HER2-low breast cancer could be identified and get a chance to benefit from the new therapeutic approach. The understanding, definitions, and testing for HER2-low status continue to evolve, and many practical challenges and unanswered questions remain. This PeerView educational activity, based on a recent live symposium, explores the most cutting-edge information on HER2-low breast cancer, provides guidance on how to currently carry out HER2 testing to capture patients with HER2-low expression, and shares what's on the horizon that may help further refine testing and treatment in this setting. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Describe the spectrum of HER2 expression in breast cancer and the role of HER2-low expression as a new therapeutic target; Implement standard and emerging testing approaches to identify patients with HER2-low metastatic breast cancer to determine their eligibility for novel HER2-targeted therapies; Apply the latest evidence and guidelines to integrate HER2-targeted therapies into treatment plans for eligible patients with HER2-low metastatic breast cancer in the context of clinical practice or clinical trials; and Collaborate with the multidisciplinary team to ensure appropriate biomarker testing and optimal treatment selection for patients with HER2-low metastatic breast cancer.

Go online to PeerView.com/NRG860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. HER2-low breast cancer, currently defined as HER2 IHC 1+ or 2+/ISH-, accounts for approximately 50% of all breast cancers. While older HER2-targeted therapies did not show efficacy in HER2-low breast cancers, novel antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) have demonstrated remarkable activity in this setting. Because of these advances and the FDA approval of the first HER2-targeting ADC for HER2-low breast cancer, there is an urgent need to rethink the approaches to HER2 testing so that patients with HER2-low breast cancer could be identified and get a chance to benefit from the new therapeutic approach. The understanding, definitions, and testing for HER2-low status continue to evolve, and many practical challenges and unanswered questions remain. This PeerView educational activity, based on a recent live symposium, explores the most cutting-edge information on HER2-low breast cancer, provides guidance on how to currently carry out HER2 testing to capture patients with HER2-low expression, and shares what's on the horizon that may help further refine testing and treatment in this setting. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Describe the spectrum of HER2 expression in breast cancer and the role of HER2-low expression as a new therapeutic target; Implement standard and emerging testing approaches to identify patients with HER2-low metastatic breast cancer to determine their eligibility for novel HER2-targeted therapies; Apply the latest evidence and guidelines to integrate HER2-targeted therapies into treatment plans for eligible patients with HER2-low metastatic breast cancer in the context of clinical practice or clinical trials; and Collaborate with the multidisciplinary team to ensure appropriate biomarker testing and optimal treatment selection for patients with HER2-low metastatic breast cancer.

Go online to PeerView.com/NRG860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. HER2-low breast cancer, currently defined as HER2 IHC 1+ or 2+/ISH-, accounts for approximately 50% of all breast cancers. While older HER2-targeted therapies did not show efficacy in HER2-low breast cancers, novel antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) have demonstrated remarkable activity in this setting. Because of these advances and the FDA approval of the first HER2-targeting ADC for HER2-low breast cancer, there is an urgent need to rethink the approaches to HER2 testing so that patients with HER2-low breast cancer could be identified and get a chance to benefit from the new therapeutic approach. The understanding, definitions, and testing for HER2-low status continue to evolve, and many practical challenges and unanswered questions remain. This PeerView educational activity, based on a recent live symposium, explores the most cutting-edge information on HER2-low breast cancer, provides guidance on how to currently carry out HER2 testing to capture patients with HER2-low expression, and shares what's on the horizon that may help further refine testing and treatment in this setting. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Describe the spectrum of HER2 expression in breast cancer and the role of HER2-low expression as a new therapeutic target; Implement standard and emerging testing approaches to identify patients with HER2-low metastatic breast cancer to determine their eligibility for novel HER2-targeted therapies; Apply the latest evidence and guidelines to integrate HER2-targeted therapies into treatment plans for eligible patients with HER2-low metastatic breast cancer in the context of clinical practice or clinical trials; and Collaborate with the multidisciplinary team to ensure appropriate biomarker testing and optimal treatment selection for patients with HER2-low metastatic breast cancer.

Go online to PeerView.com/NRG860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. HER2-low breast cancer, currently defined as HER2 IHC 1+ or 2+/ISH-, accounts for approximately 50% of all breast cancers. While older HER2-targeted therapies did not show efficacy in HER2-low breast cancers, novel antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) have demonstrated remarkable activity in this setting. Because of these advances and the FDA approval of the first HER2-targeting ADC for HER2-low breast cancer, there is an urgent need to rethink the approaches to HER2 testing so that patients with HER2-low breast cancer could be identified and get a chance to benefit from the new therapeutic approach. The understanding, definitions, and testing for HER2-low status continue to evolve, and many practical challenges and unanswered questions remain. This PeerView educational activity, based on a recent live symposium, explores the most cutting-edge information on HER2-low breast cancer, provides guidance on how to currently carry out HER2 testing to capture patients with HER2-low expression, and shares what's on the horizon that may help further refine testing and treatment in this setting. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Describe the spectrum of HER2 expression in breast cancer and the role of HER2-low expression as a new therapeutic target; Implement standard and emerging testing approaches to identify patients with HER2-low metastatic breast cancer to determine their eligibility for novel HER2-targeted therapies; Apply the latest evidence and guidelines to integrate HER2-targeted therapies into treatment plans for eligible patients with HER2-low metastatic breast cancer in the context of clinical practice or clinical trials; and Collaborate with the multidisciplinary team to ensure appropriate biomarker testing and optimal treatment selection for patients with HER2-low metastatic breast cancer.

Go online to PeerView.com/NRG860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. HER2-low breast cancer, currently defined as HER2 IHC 1+ or 2+/ISH-, accounts for approximately 50% of all breast cancers. While older HER2-targeted therapies did not show efficacy in HER2-low breast cancers, novel antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) have demonstrated remarkable activity in this setting. Because of these advances and the FDA approval of the first HER2-targeting ADC for HER2-low breast cancer, there is an urgent need to rethink the approaches to HER2 testing so that patients with HER2-low breast cancer could be identified and get a chance to benefit from the new therapeutic approach. The understanding, definitions, and testing for HER2-low status continue to evolve, and many practical challenges and unanswered questions remain. This PeerView educational activity, based on a recent live symposium, explores the most cutting-edge information on HER2-low breast cancer, provides guidance on how to currently carry out HER2 testing to capture patients with HER2-low expression, and shares what's on the horizon that may help further refine testing and treatment in this setting. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Describe the spectrum of HER2 expression in breast cancer and the role of HER2-low expression as a new therapeutic target; Implement standard and emerging testing approaches to identify patients with HER2-low metastatic breast cancer to determine their eligibility for novel HER2-targeted therapies; Apply the latest evidence and guidelines to integrate HER2-targeted therapies into treatment plans for eligible patients with HER2-low metastatic breast cancer in the context of clinical practice or clinical trials; and Collaborate with the multidisciplinary team to ensure appropriate biomarker testing and optimal treatment selection for patients with HER2-low metastatic breast cancer.

Go online to PeerView.com/RGA860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Although the prognosis of patients with early breast cancer (EBC) has improved with earlier detection and more efficacious therapies, many patients still face poor outcomes, and there is an urgent need to prevent recurrences. An increasing number of systemic therapies have been recently approved in the perioperative settings of HR+, HER2+, and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), including immunotherapy, CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy, adjuvant PARP inhibitor therapy, and a number of HER2-targeted therapies. Other agents and combinations are undergoing evaluation in clinical trials and are likely to expand the systemic therapy arsenal for patients with EBC. With the increasing complexity of systemic and local treatment of patients with EBC, it is crucial for surgeons, medical oncologists, pathologists, and other members of the breast cancer care team to effectively collaborate and coordinate management strategies to ensure optimal treatment selection and planning with longer-term goals in mind. This PeerView educational activity, based on a recent live symposium, provides an overview of the essential evidence supporting the use of a growing number of perioperative systemic therapies for patients with different subtypes of EBC. Optimally integrating these therapies into practice with multidisciplinary collaboration is demonstrated through the use of case scenarios, highlighting the nuances of applying new data to clinical decision-making. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Analyze the latest evidence and guidelines supporting the use of standard-of-care and novel/emerging therapies for different subtypes of early-stage breast cancer and their role as part of multimodal treatment plans; Apply best practices for multidisciplinary risk assessment and predictive/prognostic testing to inform treatment planning for patients with different subtypes of early-stage breast cancer; and Implement multidisciplinary and patient-centric strategies for shared decision-making to ensure the development and implementation of optimal, individualized treatment plans in different settings of early-stage breast cancer.

Go online to PeerView.com/RGA860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Although the prognosis of patients with early breast cancer (EBC) has improved with earlier detection and more efficacious therapies, many patients still face poor outcomes, and there is an urgent need to prevent recurrences. An increasing number of systemic therapies have been recently approved in the perioperative settings of HR+, HER2+, and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), including immunotherapy, CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy, adjuvant PARP inhibitor therapy, and a number of HER2-targeted therapies. Other agents and combinations are undergoing evaluation in clinical trials and are likely to expand the systemic therapy arsenal for patients with EBC. With the increasing complexity of systemic and local treatment of patients with EBC, it is crucial for surgeons, medical oncologists, pathologists, and other members of the breast cancer care team to effectively collaborate and coordinate management strategies to ensure optimal treatment selection and planning with longer-term goals in mind. This PeerView educational activity, based on a recent live symposium, provides an overview of the essential evidence supporting the use of a growing number of perioperative systemic therapies for patients with different subtypes of EBC. Optimally integrating these therapies into practice with multidisciplinary collaboration is demonstrated through the use of case scenarios, highlighting the nuances of applying new data to clinical decision-making. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Analyze the latest evidence and guidelines supporting the use of standard-of-care and novel/emerging therapies for different subtypes of early-stage breast cancer and their role as part of multimodal treatment plans; Apply best practices for multidisciplinary risk assessment and predictive/prognostic testing to inform treatment planning for patients with different subtypes of early-stage breast cancer; and Implement multidisciplinary and patient-centric strategies for shared decision-making to ensure the development and implementation of optimal, individualized treatment plans in different settings of early-stage breast cancer.

Go online to PeerView.com/RGA860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Although the prognosis of patients with early breast cancer (EBC) has improved with earlier detection and more efficacious therapies, many patients still face poor outcomes, and there is an urgent need to prevent recurrences. An increasing number of systemic therapies have been recently approved in the perioperative settings of HR+, HER2+, and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), including immunotherapy, CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy, adjuvant PARP inhibitor therapy, and a number of HER2-targeted therapies. Other agents and combinations are undergoing evaluation in clinical trials and are likely to expand the systemic therapy arsenal for patients with EBC. With the increasing complexity of systemic and local treatment of patients with EBC, it is crucial for surgeons, medical oncologists, pathologists, and other members of the breast cancer care team to effectively collaborate and coordinate management strategies to ensure optimal treatment selection and planning with longer-term goals in mind. This PeerView educational activity, based on a recent live symposium, provides an overview of the essential evidence supporting the use of a growing number of perioperative systemic therapies for patients with different subtypes of EBC. Optimally integrating these therapies into practice with multidisciplinary collaboration is demonstrated through the use of case scenarios, highlighting the nuances of applying new data to clinical decision-making. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Analyze the latest evidence and guidelines supporting the use of standard-of-care and novel/emerging therapies for different subtypes of early-stage breast cancer and their role as part of multimodal treatment plans; Apply best practices for multidisciplinary risk assessment and predictive/prognostic testing to inform treatment planning for patients with different subtypes of early-stage breast cancer; and Implement multidisciplinary and patient-centric strategies for shared decision-making to ensure the development and implementation of optimal, individualized treatment plans in different settings of early-stage breast cancer.

Go online to PeerView.com/RGA860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Although the prognosis of patients with early breast cancer (EBC) has improved with earlier detection and more efficacious therapies, many patients still face poor outcomes, and there is an urgent need to prevent recurrences. An increasing number of systemic therapies have been recently approved in the perioperative settings of HR+, HER2+, and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), including immunotherapy, CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy, adjuvant PARP inhibitor therapy, and a number of HER2-targeted therapies. Other agents and combinations are undergoing evaluation in clinical trials and are likely to expand the systemic therapy arsenal for patients with EBC. With the increasing complexity of systemic and local treatment of patients with EBC, it is crucial for surgeons, medical oncologists, pathologists, and other members of the breast cancer care team to effectively collaborate and coordinate management strategies to ensure optimal treatment selection and planning with longer-term goals in mind. This PeerView educational activity, based on a recent live symposium, provides an overview of the essential evidence supporting the use of a growing number of perioperative systemic therapies for patients with different subtypes of EBC. Optimally integrating these therapies into practice with multidisciplinary collaboration is demonstrated through the use of case scenarios, highlighting the nuances of applying new data to clinical decision-making. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Analyze the latest evidence and guidelines supporting the use of standard-of-care and novel/emerging therapies for different subtypes of early-stage breast cancer and their role as part of multimodal treatment plans; Apply best practices for multidisciplinary risk assessment and predictive/prognostic testing to inform treatment planning for patients with different subtypes of early-stage breast cancer; and Implement multidisciplinary and patient-centric strategies for shared decision-making to ensure the development and implementation of optimal, individualized treatment plans in different settings of early-stage breast cancer.

Go online to PeerView.com/GNU860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. With the continued expansion of the cancer immunotherapy arsenal, reliable biomarkers to identify patients most likely to benefit from specific agents or combinations have become crucial. Predictive biomarkers such as measurement of PD-L1 expression and assessment of MSI/MMR or TMB status have an established role in some tumor types and settings, but a number of challenges related to testing and interpretation of results persist, and significant improvements are needed. There is also a need for ways to assess response to immunotherapies as they transition to early-stage, curative-intent settings as part of perioperative multimodal management of solid malignancies. Recently, pathologic response assessment has emerged as a potential new gold standard for measurement of impact of neoadjuvant immunotherapy. However, there has been limited guidance on how to define pathologic response, process and evaluate resected specimens, and report and apply assessment results in the settings of clinical trials and practice. This PeerView educational activity, based on a recent live symposium, focuses on current and emerging immunotherapy biomarkers, the rationale for and practicalities of biomarker testing as a guide for immunotherapy selection for different solid tumors, and the nuances of pathologic response assessment after neoadjuvant immunotherapy. Additionally, practical guidance is provided to help multidisciplinary coordination of care based on biomarker testing and pathologic response assessment so that more patients receive personalized immunotherapy and experience improved outcomes. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Explain the evidence and rationale for the role of biomarkers to predict and assess response to cancer immunotherapy in metastatic and resectable solid malignancies; Conduct cancer immunotherapy biomarker testing and pathologic response assessment congruent with the latest evidence, requirements, and recommendations; and Personalize cancer immunotherapy treatment and response assessment by collaborating with multidisciplinary care team members to optimally select and interpret biomarkers.

Go online to PeerView.com/GNU860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. With the continued expansion of the cancer immunotherapy arsenal, reliable biomarkers to identify patients most likely to benefit from specific agents or combinations have become crucial. Predictive biomarkers such as measurement of PD-L1 expression and assessment of MSI/MMR or TMB status have an established role in some tumor types and settings, but a number of challenges related to testing and interpretation of results persist, and significant improvements are needed. There is also a need for ways to assess response to immunotherapies as they transition to early-stage, curative-intent settings as part of perioperative multimodal management of solid malignancies. Recently, pathologic response assessment has emerged as a potential new gold standard for measurement of impact of neoadjuvant immunotherapy. However, there has been limited guidance on how to define pathologic response, process and evaluate resected specimens, and report and apply assessment results in the settings of clinical trials and practice. This PeerView educational activity, based on a recent live symposium, focuses on current and emerging immunotherapy biomarkers, the rationale for and practicalities of biomarker testing as a guide for immunotherapy selection for different solid tumors, and the nuances of pathologic response assessment after neoadjuvant immunotherapy. Additionally, practical guidance is provided to help multidisciplinary coordination of care based on biomarker testing and pathologic response assessment so that more patients receive personalized immunotherapy and experience improved outcomes. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Explain the evidence and rationale for the role of biomarkers to predict and assess response to cancer immunotherapy in metastatic and resectable solid malignancies; Conduct cancer immunotherapy biomarker testing and pathologic response assessment congruent with the latest evidence, requirements, and recommendations; and Personalize cancer immunotherapy treatment and response assessment by collaborating with multidisciplinary care team members to optimally select and interpret biomarkers.

Go online to PeerView.com/GNU860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. With the continued expansion of the cancer immunotherapy arsenal, reliable biomarkers to identify patients most likely to benefit from specific agents or combinations have become crucial. Predictive biomarkers such as measurement of PD-L1 expression and assessment of MSI/MMR or TMB status have an established role in some tumor types and settings, but a number of challenges related to testing and interpretation of results persist, and significant improvements are needed. There is also a need for ways to assess response to immunotherapies as they transition to early-stage, curative-intent settings as part of perioperative multimodal management of solid malignancies. Recently, pathologic response assessment has emerged as a potential new gold standard for measurement of impact of neoadjuvant immunotherapy. However, there has been limited guidance on how to define pathologic response, process and evaluate resected specimens, and report and apply assessment results in the settings of clinical trials and practice. This PeerView educational activity, based on a recent live symposium, focuses on current and emerging immunotherapy biomarkers, the rationale for and practicalities of biomarker testing as a guide for immunotherapy selection for different solid tumors, and the nuances of pathologic response assessment after neoadjuvant immunotherapy. Additionally, practical guidance is provided to help multidisciplinary coordination of care based on biomarker testing and pathologic response assessment so that more patients receive personalized immunotherapy and experience improved outcomes. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Explain the evidence and rationale for the role of biomarkers to predict and assess response to cancer immunotherapy in metastatic and resectable solid malignancies; Conduct cancer immunotherapy biomarker testing and pathologic response assessment congruent with the latest evidence, requirements, and recommendations; and Personalize cancer immunotherapy treatment and response assessment by collaborating with multidisciplinary care team members to optimally select and interpret biomarkers.

Go online to PeerView.com/GNU860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. With the continued expansion of the cancer immunotherapy arsenal, reliable biomarkers to identify patients most likely to benefit from specific agents or combinations have become crucial. Predictive biomarkers such as measurement of PD-L1 expression and assessment of MSI/MMR or TMB status have an established role in some tumor types and settings, but a number of challenges related to testing and interpretation of results persist, and significant improvements are needed. There is also a need for ways to assess response to immunotherapies as they transition to early-stage, curative-intent settings as part of perioperative multimodal management of solid malignancies. Recently, pathologic response assessment has emerged as a potential new gold standard for measurement of impact of neoadjuvant immunotherapy. However, there has been limited guidance on how to define pathologic response, process and evaluate resected specimens, and report and apply assessment results in the settings of clinical trials and practice. This PeerView educational activity, based on a recent live symposium, focuses on current and emerging immunotherapy biomarkers, the rationale for and practicalities of biomarker testing as a guide for immunotherapy selection for different solid tumors, and the nuances of pathologic response assessment after neoadjuvant immunotherapy. Additionally, practical guidance is provided to help multidisciplinary coordination of care based on biomarker testing and pathologic response assessment so that more patients receive personalized immunotherapy and experience improved outcomes. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Explain the evidence and rationale for the role of biomarkers to predict and assess response to cancer immunotherapy in metastatic and resectable solid malignancies; Conduct cancer immunotherapy biomarker testing and pathologic response assessment congruent with the latest evidence, requirements, and recommendations; and Personalize cancer immunotherapy treatment and response assessment by collaborating with multidisciplinary care team members to optimally select and interpret biomarkers.

Go online to PeerView.com/GQW860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Patients with early-stage lung cancer frequently experience disease recurrence within 1 year of receiving curative-intent surgery, representing a significant unmet medical need. Individualized management of patients with NSCLC is based on a number of considerations, including the molecular profile of the patient's tumor and the benefits and limitations of therapeutic options in the context of the latest evidence. Continued advances with targeted therapies have sparked substantial interest in expanding their use into earlier disease settings, and adjuvant EGFR-targeted therapy has demonstrated remarkable efficacy in early-stage NSCLC, leading to the first regulatory approval of osimertinib as adjuvant therapy after resection in patients with NSCLC whose tumors have EGFR exon 19 deletions or exon 21 L858R mutations. In addition, results from studies in the neoadjuvant setting are emerging now, as perioperative use of EGFR-targeted therapy continues to demonstrate improved outcomes. Thoracic surgeons are key members of the multidisciplinary care team, playing an essential role in collaborating and coordinating with other specialists to determine the best treatment plan, including incorporating EGFR-targeted therapy into multimodal management strategies. This PeerView educational activity, based on a recent live symposium, focuses on the latest clinical evidence supporting the use of EGFR-targeted therapy in perioperative settings and provides practical guidance for optimally integrating targeted therapies in practice or clinical trials. Multidisciplinary discussions on the latest practice-changing data highlight important implications of utilizing EGFR-targeted therapy as part of multimodal treatment for surgeons and the broader lung cancer care team. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Discuss the role of EGFR mutations in NSCLC, advances in EGFR-targeted therapy in earlier disease settings, and the importance of identifying patients who might benefit from these therapies in perioperative settings; Identify patients with early-stage resectable NSCLC who are candidates for adjuvant EGFR-targeted therapy or investigational targeted approaches according to the latest evidence and guidelines; and Implement multidisciplinary and patient-centric strategies to integrate EGFR-targeted therapy into multimodal treatment plans for eligible patients with early-stage resectable NSCLC

Go online to PeerView.com/YRK860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. The immunotherapy revolution has swiftly expanded from advanced lung cancer to the early-stage, resectable, curative-intent setting, and it is radically transforming the standards of care for stage I-III resectable NSCLC. Immunotherapies are now approved in both adjuvant and neoadjuvant settings, and ongoing trials are expected to propel more immunotherapy-based options into early-stage disease settings as well as clarify the best perioperative approaches. What do these developments mean for thoracic surgeons and other members of the multidisciplinary lung cancer care team? How should best practices and standards of care be modernized? What new workflows need to be established to guide individualized treatment selection and make the most of new immunotherapy options to reduce the risk of recurrence and increase the possibility of cure for more patients? This PeerView educational activity, based on a recent live symposium, brings together top experts to answer these questions. The faculty panel discusses new, practice-changing evidence, implications and applicability of these advances to practice, and how to best facilitate the incorporation of perioperative immunotherapy into new standards of care to improve outcomes and quality of life for patients with resectable NSCLC. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Analyze the current evidence supporting the use of neoadjuvant and adjuvant immunotherapy approaches in stage I-III NSCLC, including the biologic and mechanistic rationale, novel endpoints, and data from key clinical trials; Identify patients with resectable NSCLC who are candidates for perioperative immunotherapy; and Implement neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant immunotherapy as part of individualized treatment plans for patients with resectable stage I-III NSCLC based on all the relevant factors, effective multidisciplinary collaboration, and shared decision-making

Go online to PeerView.com/GQW860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Patients with early-stage lung cancer frequently experience disease recurrence within 1 year of receiving curative-intent surgery, representing a significant unmet medical need. Individualized management of patients with NSCLC is based on a number of considerations, including the molecular profile of the patient's tumor and the benefits and limitations of therapeutic options in the context of the latest evidence. Continued advances with targeted therapies have sparked substantial interest in expanding their use into earlier disease settings, and adjuvant EGFR-targeted therapy has demonstrated remarkable efficacy in early-stage NSCLC, leading to the first regulatory approval of osimertinib as adjuvant therapy after resection in patients with NSCLC whose tumors have EGFR exon 19 deletions or exon 21 L858R mutations. In addition, results from studies in the neoadjuvant setting are emerging now, as perioperative use of EGFR-targeted therapy continues to demonstrate improved outcomes. Thoracic surgeons are key members of the multidisciplinary care team, playing an essential role in collaborating and coordinating with other specialists to determine the best treatment plan, including incorporating EGFR-targeted therapy into multimodal management strategies. This PeerView educational activity, based on a recent live symposium, focuses on the latest clinical evidence supporting the use of EGFR-targeted therapy in perioperative settings and provides practical guidance for optimally integrating targeted therapies in practice or clinical trials. Multidisciplinary discussions on the latest practice-changing data highlight important implications of utilizing EGFR-targeted therapy as part of multimodal treatment for surgeons and the broader lung cancer care team. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Discuss the role of EGFR mutations in NSCLC, advances in EGFR-targeted therapy in earlier disease settings, and the importance of identifying patients who might benefit from these therapies in perioperative settings; Identify patients with early-stage resectable NSCLC who are candidates for adjuvant EGFR-targeted therapy or investigational targeted approaches according to the latest evidence and guidelines; and Implement multidisciplinary and patient-centric strategies to integrate EGFR-targeted therapy into multimodal treatment plans for eligible patients with early-stage resectable NSCLC

Go online to PeerView.com/YRK860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. The immunotherapy revolution has swiftly expanded from advanced lung cancer to the early-stage, resectable, curative-intent setting, and it is radically transforming the standards of care for stage I-III resectable NSCLC. Immunotherapies are now approved in both adjuvant and neoadjuvant settings, and ongoing trials are expected to propel more immunotherapy-based options into early-stage disease settings as well as clarify the best perioperative approaches. What do these developments mean for thoracic surgeons and other members of the multidisciplinary lung cancer care team? How should best practices and standards of care be modernized? What new workflows need to be established to guide individualized treatment selection and make the most of new immunotherapy options to reduce the risk of recurrence and increase the possibility of cure for more patients? This PeerView educational activity, based on a recent live symposium, brings together top experts to answer these questions. The faculty panel discusses new, practice-changing evidence, implications and applicability of these advances to practice, and how to best facilitate the incorporation of perioperative immunotherapy into new standards of care to improve outcomes and quality of life for patients with resectable NSCLC. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Analyze the current evidence supporting the use of neoadjuvant and adjuvant immunotherapy approaches in stage I-III NSCLC, including the biologic and mechanistic rationale, novel endpoints, and data from key clinical trials; Identify patients with resectable NSCLC who are candidates for perioperative immunotherapy; and Implement neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant immunotherapy as part of individualized treatment plans for patients with resectable stage I-III NSCLC based on all the relevant factors, effective multidisciplinary collaboration, and shared decision-making