Podcasts about emerging therapies

In this episode of the Radical Health Rebel podcast, Helen Taylor, shares her extensive journey in understanding the connection between gut health, hormonal imbalances, and skin conditions. Helen discusses her personal experiences with health challenges, the importance of holistic approaches to wellness, and the often-overlooked impact of diet and environmental toxins on skin health. The conversation delves into the gut-skin connection, the role of sugar and hormones, and the significance of addressing root causes rather than just symptoms in conventional medicine. In this conversation, Helen and Leigh delve into the evolving landscape of functional medicine, focusing on the intricate relationship between gut health and skin conditions. They discuss advanced testing methods, the importance of individualized treatment, and the impact of lifestyle changes on skin health. The conversation also highlights the role of toxicity in health issues, emerging therapies in gut and skin health, and effective detoxification techniques. They emphasize the need for a personalized approach to health, acknowledging the unique biochemical makeup of each individual.We discussed:00:00 Introduction to Gut Health and Personal Journey02:59 The Impact of Hormonal Imbalances06:02 Aging and Body Care08:57 The Gut-Skin Connection11:46 Understanding Skin Conditions15:03 The Role of Sugar and Hormones18:02 Toxins in Our Environment20:58 Overlooked Sources of Toxicity23:51 Conventional Medicine vs. Root Causes27:01 Finding Solutions to Skin Issues31:51 Exploring Advanced Testing Methods34:43 The Importance of Individualized Treatment36:44 Lifestyle Changes for Skin Health40:43 Understanding Toxicity and Its Effects44:42 Emerging Therapies in Gut and Skin Health49:33 Detoxification Techniques and Their Importance54:37 Addressing Fungal Overgrowth and Parasites58:39 Questioning Dietary Norms and Microbiome HealthYou can find Helen @:Website: http://thewellness-concierge.comFacebook: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=61568193574841Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/thewellness_concierge/Send us a textSupport the showDon't forget to leave a Rating for the podcast!You can find Leigh @: Leigh's website - https://www.bodychek.co.uk/Leigh's books - https://www.bodychek.co.uk/books/ Chronic Pain Breakthrough Blueprint - https://bit.ly/ChronicPainValuableTips Substack - https://substack.com/@radicalhealthrebelYouTube Channel - https://www.youtube.com/@radicalhealthrebelpodcast Rumble Channel - https://rumble.com/user/RadicalHealthRebel Leigh's courses: StickAbility - https://stickabilitycourse.com/ Mastering Client Transformation (professional course) - https://www.functionaldiagnosticnutrition.com/mastering-client-transformation/ Eliminate Adult Acne Programme - https://eliminateadultacne.com/

In this episode of the Radical Health Rebel Podcast, I'm joined by Jason Ott for a powerful conversation exploring our personal journeys through chronic pain and healing. We dive deep into the limitations of conventional medicine and unpack the complex, multifaceted nature of chronic pain—highlighting the often-overlooked role of mental and emotional health in the healing process.Together, we discuss why a holistic approach is essential, the importance of mindset and awareness, and how subconscious patterns influence our health behaviors. We also explore emerging therapies, strategies for breaking the pain cycle, and the critical need to find purpose beyond simply alleviating pain. If you're ready to reclaim control over your health and well-being, this episode is for you.We discussed:00:00 Personal Journey and Health Background07:19 Understanding Chronic Pain12:22 The Impact of Personal Experience on Healing19:49 The Role of Mental and Emotional State25:56 Limitations of Conventional Medical Approaches34:52 The Mind-Body Connection in Healing44:20 Awareness and Mindset in Healing47:01 The Importance of Education and Understanding47:50 Mental State and Pain Perception50:03 Subconscious Influences on Behavior51:48 Feedback and Learning from Experiences52:46 Finding Purpose Beyond Pain56:07 The Role of Intentionality in Change59:03 Repetition and Positive Reinforcement01:00:52 Stepping Outside Comfort Zones01:05:55 Emerging Therapies for Chronic Pain01:13:56 Breaking the Pain Cycle01:17:58 Future Projects and Sharing StoriesYou can find Jason @:https://empoweredprevention.comSend us a textSupport the showDon't forget to leave a Rating for the podcast!You can find Leigh @: Leigh's website - https://www.bodychek.co.uk/Leigh's books - https://www.bodychek.co.uk/books/ Chronic Pain Breakthrough Blueprint - https://bit.ly/ChronicPainValuableTips Substack - https://substack.com/@radicalhealthrebelYouTube Channel - https://www.youtube.com/@radicalhealthrebelpodcast Rumble Channel - https://rumble.com/user/RadicalHealthRebel Leigh's courses: StickAbility - https://stickabilitycourse.com/ Mastering Client Transformation (professional course) - https://www.functionaldiagnosticnutrition.com/mastering-client-transformation/ Eliminate Adult Acne Programme - https://eliminateadultacne.com/

To subscribe to our podcast and YouTube channel visit: https://www.youtube.com/@davisphinneyfdn/podcasts In this episode, we're sharing an excerpt from our May 2025 Live Well Today webinar about Emerging Therapies for Parkinson's, which features Dr. Soania Mathur and Dr. Michael Okun. In this excerpt, Dr. Mathur and Dr. Okun discuss three emerging treatments for Parkinson's that are designed for continuous under-the-skin infusion. These treatments have all been found to increase the amount of time Parkinson's symptoms are well managed throughout the day. You can learn more about these and other emerging therapies by watching the entire May 2025 Live Well Today webinar recording. Watch the full webinar here: https://youtu.be/zqdXgoyVHT8 Medications discussed in this episode: Vyalev, the first 24-hour infusion of foslevodopa and foscarbidopa: https://davisphinneyfoundation.org/continuous-infusion-levodopa-approved-usa/ ONAPGO, an apomorphine infusion that offers rapid relief from OFF episodes: https://davisphinneyfoundation.org/continuous-infusion-apomorphine-approved/ And NeuroDerm ND0612, an investigational levodopa/carbidopa infusion, now in late-stage trials: https://neuroderm.com/our-solution/about/what-is-nd0612/ Season 6 Episode 9

Nicholas J. Silvestri, MD, FAAN - From Established to Emerging Therapies: Expert Perspectives on the Latest Evidence Base on FcRn Inhibitors for gMG

Nicholas J. Silvestri, MD, FAAN - From Established to Emerging Therapies: Expert Perspectives on the Latest Evidence Base on FcRn Inhibitors for gMG

Nicholas J. Silvestri, MD, FAAN - From Established to Emerging Therapies: Expert Perspectives on the Latest Evidence Base on FcRn Inhibitors for gMG

Nicholas J. Silvestri, MD, FAAN - From Established to Emerging Therapies: Expert Perspectives on the Latest Evidence Base on FcRn Inhibitors for gMG

Nicholas J. Silvestri, MD, FAAN - From Established to Emerging Therapies: Expert Perspectives on the Latest Evidence Base on FcRn Inhibitors for gMG

Nicholas J. Silvestri, MD, FAAN - From Established to Emerging Therapies: Expert Perspectives on the Latest Evidence Base on FcRn Inhibitors for gMG

In this powerful episode, Marnie and Stephanie sit down with Robby Besner, founder and Chief Science Officer of Therasage, to explore cutting-edge wellness tools designed to support detoxification, reduce pain, and boost vitality. Robby shares the personal journey that led him to create Therasage, sparked by his daughter's battle with chronic Lyme disease. From infrared saunas and red light therapy to PEMF (Pulsed Electromagnetic Field) technology, he breaks down the science behind these natural healing tools and how they help mobilize toxins, support circulation, and enhance overall well-being. You'll learn: How daily sauna use supports detox and immune health The key differences and benefits of red light vs. PEMF therapy Why mimicking nature's frequencies is essential for healing The emerging role of nitric oxide in vascular health How portable, affordable tech can empower your wellness journey Plus, for a limited time, enjoy 25% off sitewide at Therasage.com with code ARTOFLIVINGWELL — valid for 72 hours after this episode drops! Chapters 05:41 The Genesis of Therisage 12:51 Exploring Popular Wellness Products 26:40 Diving into Red Light Therapy 39:03 Understanding PEMF Technology 42:00 The Science Behind Pulsing Frequencies 46:04 Enhancing Blood Flow and Circulation 47:29 Comparing PEMF and Red Light Therapy 49:56 Emerging Therapies and Innovations 53:55 The Future of Health Technologies Helpful links and resources: https://therasage.com FB: https://www.facebook.com/Therasage IG: @therasageinfared --------------------------------------------------------- 7-Day Vitality Reboot: Start anytime! Revitalize your body and turn inward this winter with our self-guided 7-Day Vitality Reboot designed to leave you feeling refreshed, energized, and ready to embrace the season ahead! We now have a program where you can do it on your own schedule but still receive all the wonderful support and recipes of the full program.  Register here! --------------------------------------------------------- Thanks to our amazing Sponsor, Good Health Saunas.  Good Health Saunas is proud to provide top-of-the-line infrared saunas that deliver the most impactful results for overall health and wellness. For more information and for your special discount please visit, www.goodhealthsaunas.com and mention The Art of Living Well Podcast. --------------------------------------------------------- Thanks to our amazing Sponsor, ZBiotics ZBiotics Pre-Alcohol Probiotic is the world's first genetically engineered probiotic. It was invented by PhD scientists to tackle rough mornings after drinking. Just remember to drink ZBiotics before drinking alcohol, drink responsibly, and get a good night's sleep to feel your best tomorrow. ZBiotics is backed with 100% money back guarantee so if you're unsatisfied for any reason, they'll refund your money, no questions asked.  Go to ZBiotics to get 15% off your first order when you use code AOLW at checkout.   --------------------------------------------------------- Need more protein and energy in your day? Check out these amazing, high quality products from Kion, especially their essential amino acids, creatine and protein powders, which we both use daily.   Use code 'ARTOFLIVING' for a discount off your purchase. ----------------------------------------------------------- Ask us a question/make a recommentation We'd love to hear from you! Click here to share your feedback and suggestions. ----------------------------------------------------------- Sign-up for your 15 minute Health Transformation Audit - Click here. ----------------------------------------------------------- Let us help you get to the root cause of your unwanted symptoms. Schedule a 15 minute consultation to discuss at-home functional medicine lab testing here. ----------------------------------------------------------- How can you support our podcast? Apple users, please subscribe and review our show on Apple Podcasts,we make sure to read them all. Android users, please be sure to subscribe to our show on Google Podcasts so that you don't miss any of the action. Tell a friend about The Art of Living Well Podcast® and our community programs. Share your favorite episode on social media and don't forget to tag us @theartofliving_well. Subscribe to our Youtube channel Shop our Favorite Products: https://www.theartoflivingwell.us/products Connect with us on social media: IG: @theartofliving_well FB: theartoflivingwell Get on our list so you don't miss out on announcements, programs and events. You can download our guests' favorite reads here. Learn more about your hosts: Marnie Dachis Marmet Stephanie May Potter  

In this episode, we dive into the complexities of IgG4-Related Disease (IgG4-RD), a mysterious and multi-organ condition that continues to challenge both patients and physicians. Back in January 2024, Dr. John Stone introduced us to the emerging landscape of treatments for IgG4-RD, and today, Dr. Matthew Baker joins us to provide an exciting update. With new therapies on the horizon, we explore the role of B and T cell pathogenesis, the limitations of traditional steroid treatments, and the off-label use of rituximab. We also take a closer look at the promising results from the “Mitigate Trial,” which offers hope for future strategies in managing this enigmatic disease. Join us as we discuss the evolving treatment landscape and what lies ahead for those affected by IgG4-RD. 

Eva Feldman, MD, PhD, joins us this week to examine recent research on individuals in academic medicine who felt unprepared for leadership responsibilities, and she helps us explore ways to better prepare faculty for success in those positions. With Michigan Medicine in Ann Arbor, Dr. Feldman is the James W. Albers Distinguished University Professor and Russell N. DeJong Professor of Neurology. She also serves as Professor of Neurosurgery and is the Director of the NeuroNetwork for Emerging Therapies and the ALS Center of Excellence at Michigan Medicine. “I would say that my main takeaway is this: if you are a mid-level professional aspiring to a leadership position, seek a mentor and sponsor immediately, and ensure you are trained to be ready for that role,” Dr. Feldman told us. The article she co-authored, titled “Leadership Experiences and Perceptions of Mid-Career to Senior Clinician-Scientists: A Qualitative Exploration,” highlighted key leadership challenges and opportunities that we explore in-depth with Dr. Feldman in this interview. You can learn more about the report here: https://journals.lww.com/academicmedicine/abstract/9900/leadership_experiences_and_perceptions_of.877.aspx?utm_source=sfmc&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=amexpress&utm_content=newsletter You can also visit FacultyFactory.org here: https://facultyfactory.org/

In this episode of The Syneos Health Podcast, we continue our exploration of Project Optimus and the evolution of dose optimization in oncology drug development. Following our discussion on regulatory expectations in the previous episode, we now turn to the operational challenges and strategies required to implement optimized dosing in real-world settings.Host Dr. Wael Harb is joined by Patrick Melvin, Vice President, Oncology & Hematology and Global Head, Novel and Emerging Therapies at Syneos Health, to discuss the complexities of operationalizing Project Optimus. Together, they examine how drug developers, investigator sites and patients are affected by these changes, the role of adaptive study designs, and how AI-driven technologies and digital health innovations are helping to streamline dose optimization.Tune in to gain valuable insights into the future of precision dosing and the long-term benefits of this industry shift, from improving patient outcomes to enhancing drug development efficiency.The views expressed in this podcast belong solely to the speakers and do not represent those of their organization. If you want access to more future-focused, actionable insights to help biopharmaceutical companies better execute and succeed in a constantly evolving environment, visit the Syneos Health Insights Hub. The perspectives you'll find there are driven by dynamic research and crafted by subject matter experts focused on real answers to help guide decision-making and investment. You can find it all at insightshub.health. Like what you're hearing? Be sure to rate and review us! We want to hear from you! If there's a topic you'd like us to cover on a future episode, contact us at podcast@syneoshealth.com.

This guideline was created as an educational tool to guide qualified physicians through a series of diagnostic and treatment decisions to improve the quality and efficiency of care for adult patients with Brain Metastases treated with Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy (LITT). J. Bradley Elder, MD Mark E. Linskey, M.D., FAANS Kristin Huntoon, PhD, DO Brandon Lucke-Wold, MD, PhD

Dr. Tania Small joined Bristol Myers Squibb as Senior Vice President, Global Medical Affairs in January 2024. Tania brings a strong scientific track record leading Medical Affairs teams in driving innovation that improves the experience and supports better outcomes of people living with cancer and rare diseases. She has successfully built and led global and regional medical organizations in Drug Development and Medical Affairs, advancing access to Oncology, Rare Disease and Hematology patients globally.Tania is a board-certified pediatric hematology, oncology, and bone marrow transplant specialist with deep experience in clinical research and drug development. She has extensive research experience in oncology, hematology, gene therapy and stem cell transplantation, receiving NIH grants for her translational research in gene therapy and regenerative medicine.Most recently, Tania served as Head of Global Medical Oncology and was the sponsor of the Global R&D Inclusion Diversity Council at GSK. Prior to GSK, Tania worked for IPSEN as Vice President, Head of Oncology and Rare Disease Global Drug Development.She is energized by revolutionizing the experience and outcomes for people with cancer, and has worked closely with the US FDA, Congress, and the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) to improve the diversity of enrollment in oncology clinical trials and elderly programs."I'm passionate about partnering to create programs that treat the person - not just the disease. Producing groundbreaking solutions that can change the trajectory of serious diseases and help write the next chapter of patient-driven science is what motivates me every day."Tania received her medical degree from Albert Einstein College of Medicine. She has a long-standing affiliation with the Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital of New York Presbyterian/Columbia University where she completed her residency and hematology/oncology fellowship with an academic research appointment in heme and bone marrow transplant.Currently, Tania serves on the ASCO Membership Advisory Committee and is a Board Member of Accreditation Council for Medical Affairs (ACMA).

Dr. John Sweetenham and Dr. James Foran discuss the evolving treatment landscape in acute myeloid leukemia, including new targeted therapies, advances in immunotherapy, and the current role for allogeneic transplantation. TRANSCRIPT Dr. John Sweetenham: Hello, I'm Dr. John Sweetenham, the host of the ASCO Daily News Podcast. There has been steady progress in the therapies for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in recent years, largely based on an increasing understanding of the molecular mechanisms which underlie the disease. On today's episode, we'll be discussing the evolving treatment landscape in AML. We'll explore risk group stratification, new targeted therapies, advances in immunotherapy for AML, and also a little about the current role for allogenic transplantation in this disease.  I'm delighted to welcome Dr. James Foran to this discussion. Dr. Foran is a professor of medicine and chair of the Myeloid Malignancies and Blood and Marrow Transplant Disease Group at the Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center. He's based in Jacksonville, Florida.  Our full disclosures are available in the transcript of this episode.  James, it's great to have you join us on the podcast today, and thanks so much for being here. Dr. James Foran: I'm delighted and thank you for the invitation. Thank you very much. Dr. John Sweetenham: Sure, James, let's get right into it. So, our understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying AML has resulted not only in new methods for risk stratification in this disease, which have added refinement to cytogenetics, but also has resulted in the development of many new targeted agents. Understanding that this is a complex area of investigation, and our time is somewhat limited, can you give us a high-level update on the current state of the art in terms of how risk factors are being used for treatment selection now? Dr. James Foran: Absolutely. I think in the past, you know, we had things broken down pretty simply into make a diagnosis based on morphology, do cytogenetics, break patients into the groups of those who were more likely to benefit from therapy – so-called favorable risk – those where the intensive therapies were less likely to work – so-called poor adverse risk, and then this large intermediate group that really had variable outcomes, some better, some worse. And for a long time, the progress was in just identifying new subtle cytogenetic risk groups. And then, late 1990s, we began to understand that FLT3 mutations or NRAS mutations may be more adverse than others that came along. In the first part of this millennium, in the, you know, 2000-2010 range, a lot of work was being done to understand better or worse risk factors with single genes. The ability to do multiplex PCR, and then more recently NGS platforms, have allowed us to really look at many genes and identify many mutations in patients. At the beginning that was used just to sort of refine – who did a little better, who did a little worse with intensive therapy – helped us decide who may benefit more from an allogeneic transplanter for whom that would not be necessary.  But the good news is that really, we're now starting to target those mutations. One of the first molecularly targeted treatments in leukemia was FLT3 mutations, where we knew they were adverse. Then along came targeted treatments. I was involved in some of those early studies looking at sunitinib, sorafenib, more recently midostaurin, now quizartinib, FDA approved, and gilteritinib in the relapse refractory setting.  So we're moving into a state where we're not just refining prognosis, we're identifying targets. You know, it's been slow progress, but definite incremental progress in terms of outcomes by looking for FLT3 mutations, then looking for IDH mutations, and more recently, mutations involving NPM1 or rearrangement of what we used to call the MLL gene, now the lysine methyltransferase 2A or KMT2A rearrangement, where we now have targets. And it's not just for refinement of prognosis, but now we're identifying therapeutic targets for patients and ways to even look for measurable residual disease which is impacting our care. Dr. John Sweetenham: That's great, James. And I'm going to expand on that theme just a little bit and perhaps ask you to elaborate a little bit more on how the introduction of these new therapies have specifically impacted frontline therapy. And a couple of ancillary questions maybe to go along with that: First of all, is ‘7+3' a standard therapy for anybody in 2025? And maybe secondly, you know, could you comment also maybe briefly on older patients with AML and how you think maybe the treatment landscape is changing for them compared with, say, 5 or 10 years ago? Dr. James Foran: I'll start with the therapy and then work my way back. So we've had ‘7+3' cytarabine daunorubicin or cytarabine anthracycline since 1976, and we're still using it as the backbone of our intensive therapy. There is still an important role for it, particularly in younger or fitter patients, and particularly for those with intermediate or favorable risk genetic groups or cytogenetic risk groups just because we achieve high rates of remission. Our 30-day induction mortality rates are lower now than they were 10 and 20 years ago. Our supportive care is better. And we still have a busy inpatient hospital service here at Mayo Florida and my colleagues in Rochester and Arizona as well giving intensive therapy. So that remains the backbone of curative therapy for younger adults. We are trying to be a little more discriminating about who we administer that to. We are trying to add targeted agents. We know from, now, two different randomized trials that the addition of a FLT3 inhibitor, either midostaurin or more recently quizartinib, has a survival advantage in patients with a FLT3 mutation, or for quizartinib, a FLT3/ITD mutation. And so yes, ‘7+3' remains important.  Off protocol for somebody who just comes in with acute leukemia in a 40-year-old or 30-year-old or even early 60s and fit, we would still be considering ‘7+3' therapy and then waiting for an expedited gene mutation panel and an expedited cytogenetics panel to come back to help us discriminate is that a patient for whom we should be giving a FLT3 inhibitor? I think there's a little more nuance about when we do a day 14 bone marrow, do they really matter as much anymore? I still do them. Some of my colleagues find them less important. But we're still giving intensive therapy. We're still giving high-dose ARA-C consolidation for younger patients who achieve complete remission.  In older adults, it's a different story. You know, it was only in the early part of the 2000s – 2004, 2007 range – where we really got buy-in from randomized studies that low-dose therapy was better than no therapy. There was a lot of nihilism before then about therapy for older adults, especially over age 75. We know that low-dose ARA-C is better than nothing. It looked like azacitidine was better than ARA-C or at least equivalent or slightly better. But with the advent of venetoclax it was a game changer. I ran a national randomized study of intensive therapy in AML. It was the last national randomized study of intensive therapy in older patients right before venetoclax got approved. And we were very excited about our results, and we thought we had some really interesting clinical results. And suddenly that's a little bit obsolete in patients over 70 and particularly over age 75 because of the high remission rates with azacytidine venetoclax or hypomethylating agents, so-called HMAs and venetoclax and the survival advantage. Now, it's not a home run for everybody. We quote 60% to 70% remission rates, but it's a little different based on your cytogenetics and your mutation profile. You have to continue on therapy so it's continuous treatment. It's not with curative intent, although there are some people with long-term remission in it. And the median survival went from 10 months to 15 months. So home run? No, but definitely improved remissions, meaningful for patients off transfusions and better survival. So right now it's hard to find an older adult who you wouldn't give azacitidine and venetoclax or something similar, decitabine, for instance, and venetoclax, unless somebody really was moribund or had very poor performance status or some reason not to. And so ‘7+3' is still relevant in younger adults. We're trying to get better results with ‘7+3' by adding targeted agents and azacitine and venetoclax in older adults.  I think the area of controversy, I guess there are two of them, is what to do in that overlap age between 60 and 75. Should people in that age still get intensive therapy, which we've used for years – the VIALE-A trial of aza-venetoclax was age 75 plus – or with cardiac comorbidities? And I think if you're 68 or 72, many of us are starting to bias towards aza-venetoclax as generally being better tolerated, generally being more outpatient, generally being slow and steady way to get a remission. And it doesn't stop you from going to transplant for somebody who might still be a candidate.  The other area of controversy is somebody under 60 who has adverse cytogenetics where we don't do very well with ‘7+3,' we still give it and we might do just as well with decitabine venetoclax. A lot of us feel that there's equipoise in the 60 to 75 group where we really can ask a question of a randomized study. Retrospective studies might suggest that intensive therapy is a little better, but there are now a couple of randomized studies happening saying, “Can we replace ‘7+3' in that intermediate age with aza-venetoclax?” And for younger adults similarly, we're looking to see how we apply that technology. Those are the areas where we're really trying to investigate what's optimal for patients and that's going to require randomized trials. Dr. John Sweetenham: Oh, that's great, thank you. And I'll just extend that question a little bit more, particularly with respect to the new targeted therapies. How much are they impacting the treatment of these patients in the relapse and refractory setting now? Dr. James Foran: Oh, they're definitely impacting it. When I trained and probably when you trained, AML was still a medical emergency. But that was the thing that you admitted to the hospital immediately, you started therapy immediately. The rule was always that's the one thing that brings the fellow and the consultant in at night to see that new patient on a Friday or Saturday. Now, we'll still admit a patient for monitoring, but we try not to start therapy for the first three or five or seven days if they're stable, until we get those genetics and those genomics back, because it helps us discriminate what therapy to pursue. And certainly, with FLT3 mutations, especially FLT3/ITD mutations, we're adding FLT3 inhibitors and we're seeing a survival advantage. Now, on the surface, that survival advantage is in the range of 7% or 10%. But if you then pursue an allogeneic transplant in first remission, you're taking disease where we used to see 30%, 40% long-term survival, maybe less, and you're pushing that to 60%, 70% in some studies. And so we're now taking a disease that– I don't want to get off topic and talk about Ph+ ALL. But that's a disease where we're actually a little excited. We have a target now, and it used to be something really adverse and now we can do a lot for it and a lot about it.  The other mutations, it's a little more subtle. Now, who knew until 2010 that a mutation in a sugar metabolism gene, in isocitrate dehydrogenase, or IDH was going to be so important, or even that it existed. We know that IDH1 and IDH2 mutations are still a minority of AML, certainly less than 10% to 15%, maybe overall. But we're able to target those with specific IDH1 and IDH2 inhibitors. We get single-agent responses. There are now two approved IDH1 inhibitors on the market. We don't yet have the randomized data that adding those to intensive therapy is better, but we're getting a very strong hint that it might be better in older adults who have an IDH mutation, maybe adding those is helpful and maybe adding those to low-intensity therapy is helpful. Those studies are ongoing, and we're also trying with low-intensity treatments to add these agents and get higher remission rates, deeper remissions, longer remissions. I think a lot of work has to be done to delineate the safety of that and the long-term efficacy. But we're getting hints it's better, so I think it is impacting.  The other area it's impacting is when you pick up adverse mutations and those have crept into our classification systems like an ASXL1 mutation or RUNX1 mutation for instance, or some of the secondary AML mutations like BCOR and others, where that's helping us discriminate intermediate-risk patients who we think aren't going to do as well and really helping us select a group who's more likely to get benefit from allogeneic transplant or for whom at least our cure rates without allo transplant are low. And so I think it's impacting a lot. Dr. John Sweetenham: Great. And I'm going to pick up now, if I may, on a couple of things that you've just mentioned and continue the theme of the relapsed and refractory setting. We've started to see some reports which have looked at the role of immune strategies for patients with AML, in particular CAR T or NK cells. Can you comment a little on this and let us know whether you think either these two strategies or other immune strategies are likely to have a significant role in AML in the future? Dr. James Foran: They are, but I think we're still a step behind finding the right target or the right way to do it. If you think of allogeneic transplantation as the definitive immune therapy, and we know for adverse AML we can improve survival rates and cure rates with an allotransplant, then we know inherently that immune therapy matters. And so how do we do what they've done in large cell lymphoma or in CD19 targeting for B cell malignancies? How do we bring that to acute myeloid leukemia? There have been a number of efforts. There have been at least 50 trials looking at different targets. CD33, CD123, CD7, others, CLL-1. So, there have been a number of different trials looking at how to bind a CAR T or a CAR T construct that can be active. And we have hints of efficacy. There was kind of a provocative paper in the New England Journal of Medicine a year ago in April of last year from a Chinese group that looked at a CD7-based CAR T and it was 10 patients, but they used CD7 positive acute leukemia, AML or ALL and had a CD7-targeted CAR T and they actually incorporated that with a haploidentical transplant and they had really high remission rates. People tolerated it quite well. It was provocative. It hasn't yet been reproduced on a larger scale, but the strong hints that the strategy is going to work.  Now, CD33 is a little tricky to have a CAR T when CD33 is expressed on normal hematopoietic cells. CD123 likewise. That's been something where there's, I think, still promise, but we've struggled to find the trials that make that work. Right now, there's a lot of interest in leveraging NK cells and looking, for a couple of reasons, but NK cells are attractive and NK cell markers might be attractive targets. NK cells might have similar degrees of immune efficacy. It's speculative, but they are likely to have less cytokine release syndrome and less neurotoxicity than you see with CAR T. And so it's kind of attractive to leverage that. We have had some ongoing trials looking at it with bispecifics and there certainly are trials looking at it with CAR NK-based strategies. One of the antigens that people looked at is the NK group 2D. NK group 2D or NKG2D is overexpressed in AML and its ligands overexpressed. And so that's a particular potential target. So, John, it's happening and we're looking for the hints of efficacy that could then drive a pivotal trial to get something approved.  One of the other areas is not restricting yourself just to a single antigen. For instance, there is a compound that's looking at a multi-tumor-associated antigen-specific T-cell therapy, looking at multiple antigens in AML that could be overexpressed. And there were some hints of activity and efficacy and actually a new trial looking at a so-called multi-tumor associated antigen-specific T cell therapy. So without getting into specific conflicts of interest or trials, I do think that's an exciting area and an evolving area, but still an investigational area. I'll stop there and say that we're excited about it. A lot of work's going there, but I'm not quite sure which direction the field's going to pivot to there. I think that's going to take us some time to sort out. Dr. John Sweetenham: Yeah, absolutely. But as you say, exciting area and I guess continue to watch this space for now.  So you've mentioned allogeneic stem cell transplants two or three times during this discussion. Recognizing that we don't have an imatinib for AML, which has kind of pushed transplant a long way further back in the treatment algorithm, can you comment a little on, you know, whether you think the role of stem cell transplantation is changing in AML or whether it remains pretty much as it was maybe 10 years ago? Dr. James Foran: By the way, I love that you use imatinib as an introduction because that was 6 TKIs ago, and it tells you the evolution in CML and you know, now we're looking at myristoyl pocket as a target, and so on. That's a great way to sort of show you the evolution of the field.  Allogeneic transplant, it remains a core treatment for AML, and I think we're getting much smarter and much better about learning how to use it. And I'm just going to introduce the topic of measurable residual disease to tell you about that. So I am a little bit of a believer. Part of my job is I support our allogeneic transplant program, although my focus is acute myeloid leukemia, and I've trained in transplant and done it for years and did a transplant fellowship and all that. I'm much more interested in finding people who don't need a transplant than people who do. So I'm sort of looking for where can we move away from it. But it still has a core role. I'll sidestep and tell you there was an MDS trial that looked at intermediate or high-risk MDS and the role of allogeneic transplant that shows that you about double your survival. It was a BMT CTN trial published several years ago that showed you about double your three-year survival if you can find a donor within three months and get to a transplant within six months. And so it just tells you the value of allotransplant and myeloid malignancy in general. In AML we continue to use it for adverse risk disease – TP53 is its own category, I can talk about that separately – but adverse risk AML otherwise, or for patients who don't achieve a really good remission. And I still teach our fellows that an allotransplant decreases your risk of relapse by about 50%. That's still true, but you have to have a group of patients who are at high enough risk of relapse to merit the non-relapse mortality and the chronic graft versus host disease that comes with it. Now, our outcomes with transplant are better because we're better at preventing graft versus host disease with the newer strategies such as post-transplant cyclophosphamide. There are now new FDA-approved drugs for acute and chronic graft versus host disease, ruxolitinib, belumosudil, axatilimab now. So we have better ways of treating it, but we still want to be discriminating about who should get it.  And it's not just a single-minded one-size-fits-all. We learned from the MORPHO study that was published in the JCO last year that if you have FLIT3-positive AML, FLIT3/IDT-positive AML, where we would have said from retrospective studies that your post-transplant survival is 60% give or take, as opposed to 15% or 20% without it, that we can discriminate who should or shouldn't get a transplant. Now that trial was a little bit nuanced because it did not meet its primary endpoint, but it had an embedded randomization based upon MRD status and they used a very sensitive test of measurable residual disease. They used a commercial assay by Invivoscribe that could look at the presence of a FLT3/ITD in the level of 10 to the minus 5th or 10 to the minus 6th. And if you were MRD-negative and you went through a transplant, you didn't seem to get an advantage versus not. That was of maintenance with gilteritinib, I'll just sort of put that on there. But it's telling us more about who should get a transplant and who shouldn't and who should get maintenance after transplant and who shouldn't.  A really compelling study a year ago from I don't know what to call the British group now, we used to call them the MRC and then the NCRI. I'm not quite sure what to call their studies at the moment. But Dr. Jad Othman did a retrospective study a year ago that looked at patients who had NPM1 mutation, the most common mutation AML, and looked to see if you were MRD positive or MRD negative, what the impact of a transplant was. And if you're MRD negative there was not an advantage of a transplant, whereas if you're MRD positive there was. And when they stratified that by having a FLT3 mutation that cracked. If you had a FLT3 mutation at diagnosis but your NPM1 was negative in remission, it was hard to show an advantage of a transplant. So I think we're getting much more discriminating about who should or should not get a transplant by MRD testing for NPM1 and that includes the patients who have a concomitant FLT3 mutation. And we're really trying to learn more and more. Do we really need to be doing transplants in those who are MRD-negative? If you have adverse risk genetics and you're MRD-negative, I'll really need good data to tell me not to do a transplant, but I suspect bit by bit, we'll get that data. And we're looking to see if that's really the case there, too. So measurable residual disease testing is helping us discriminate, but there is still a core role of allogeneic transplant. And to reassure you, compared to, I think your allotransplant days were some time ago if I'm right. Dr. John Sweetenham: Yes. Dr. James Foran: Yeah. Well, compared to when you were doing transplants, they're better now and better for patients now. And we get people through graft versus host disease better, and we prevent it better. Dr. John Sweetenham: That's a great answer, James. Thanks for that. It really does help to put it in context, and I think it also leads us on very nicely into what's going to be my final question for you today and perhaps the trickiest, in a way. I think that everything you've told us today really emphasizes the fact that the complexity of AML treatment has increased, primarily because of an improved understanding of the molecular landscape of the disease. And it's a complicated area now. So do you have any thoughts on what type of clinical environment patients with AML should be evaluated and treated in in 2025? Dr. James Foran: Yeah, I want to give you a kind of a cautious answer to that because, you know, I'm a leukemia doctor. I work at a leukemia center and it's what we focus on. And we really pride ourselves on our outcomes and our diagnostics and our clinical trials and so on. I am very aware that the very best oncologists in America work in private practice and work in community practice or in networks, not necessarily at an academic site. And I also know they have a much harder job than I have. They have to know lung cancer, which is molecularly as complicated now as leukemia, and they have to know about breast cancer and things that I don't even know how to spell anymore. So it's not a question of competence or knowledge. It's a question of infrastructure. I'll also put a little caveat saying that I have been taught by Rich Stone at Dana-Farber, where I did a fellowship a long time ago, and believe Rich is right, that I see different patients than the community oncologists see with AML, they're seeing different people. But with that caveat, I think the first thing is you really want to make sure you've got access to excellence, specialized hematopathology, that you can get expedited cytogenetics and NGS testing results back. There was a new drug, approved just a few months ago, actually, for relapsed AML with a KMT2A rearrangement, revumenib. We didn't talk about the menin inhibitors. I'll mention them in just a second. That's a huge area of expansion and growth for us. But they're not found on NGS platforms. And normal cytogenetics might miss a KMT2A-rearrangement. And we're actually going back to FISH panels, believe it or not, on AML, to try to identify who has a KMT2A-rearrangement. And so you really want to make sure you can access the diagnostic platforms for that.  I think the National Referral Labs do an excellent job. Not always a really fast job, but an excellent job. At my institution, I get NGS results back within three days or four days. We just have an expedited platform. Not everybody has that. So that's the key, is you have to be able to make the diagnosis, trust the pathologist, get expedited results. And then it's the question of trying to access the targeted medications because a lot of them are not carried in hospital on formulary or take time to go through an insurance approval process. So that's its own little headache, getting venetoclax, getting gilteritinib, getting an IDH1 inhibitor in first line, if that's what you're going for. And so I think that requires some infrastructure. We have case managers and nurses who really expedite that and help us with it, but that's a lot of work. The other piece of the puzzle is that we're still with AML in the first month and maybe even the second month. We make everybody worse before we make them better. And you have to have really good blood bank support. I can give an outpatient platelet transfusion or red cell transfusion seven days a week. We're just built for that. That's harder to do if you're in a community hospital and you have to be collaborating with a local blood bank. And that's not always dead easy for somebody in practice. So with those caveats, I do find that my colleagues in community practice do a really good job making the diagnosis, starting people on therapy, asking for help. I think the real thing is to be able to have a regional leukemia center that you can collaborate with, connect with, text, call to make sure that you're finding the right patients who need the next level of diagnostics, clinical trial, transplant consults, to really get the best results.  There was some data at ASH a couple of years ago that looked at – the American Society of Hematology and ASCOs had similar reports – that looked at how do we do in academic centers versus community practice for keeping people on therapy. And on average, people were more likely to get six cycles of therapy instead of three cycles of therapy with azacitidine venetoclax at an academic center. Now, maybe it's different patients and maybe they had different cytogenetics and so on, but I think you have to be patient, I think you have to collaborate. But you can treat those patients in the community as long as you've got the infrastructure in place. And we've learned with virtual medicine, with Zoom and other platforms that we can deliver virtual care more effectively with the pandemic and beyond. So I think we're trying to offer virtual consults or virtual support for patients so they can stay in their home, stay in their community, stay with their oncologists, but still get access to excellent diagnostics and supportive care and transplant consults, and so on. I hope that's a reasonable answer to that question. It's a bit of a nuanced answer, which is, I think there's an important role of a leukemia center, and I think there's a really fundamental role of keeping somebody in the community they live in, and how we collaborate is the key to that. And we've spent a lot of time and effort working with the oncologists in our community to try to accomplish that.  John, I want to say two other things. I didn't mention in the molecular platforms that NPM1 mutations, we can now target those on clinical trials with menin inhibitors. We know that NPM1 signals through the Hoxa9/Meis1 pathway. We know that similar pathways are important in KMT2A rearrangements. We know that there are some other rare leukemias like those with NUP98 rearrangement. We can target those with menin inhibitors. The first menin inhibitor, revuminib, was approved by the FDA for KMT2A. We have others going to the FDA later this year for NPM1. There are now pivotal trials and advanced expanded phase 1/2 studies that are showing 30% response rates. And we're looking to see can we add those into the first-line therapy. So, we're finding more targets.  I'll say one last thing about molecular medicine. I know I'm a little off topic here, but I always told patients that getting AML was kind of like being struck by lightning. It's not something you did. Now, obviously, there are risk factors for AML, smoking or obesity or certain farm environments, or radioactive exposures and so on. But bit by bit, we're starting to learn about who's predisposed to AML genetically. We've identified really just in the last five or eight years that DDX41 mutations can be germline half the time. And you always think germline mutations are going to cause AML in a younger patient, but the median age is 60 to 70 just like other AMLs. They actually might do pretty well once they get AML. We've reported that in several papers. And so we're trying to understand who that has a RUNX1 mutation needs germline testing, who with a DDX41 needs germline testing. And we're trying to actually come up with a cleaner pathway for germline testing in patients to really understand predisposition, to help with donor selection, to help with family counseling. So I think those are other areas where a leukemia center can contribute for somebody in who's community practice to understand genomic or genetic complexity in these patients. And we're starting to develop the databases that support that. Dr. John Sweetenham: Yeah, great. Thanks, James. I loved your answer about the clinical environment too. And I know from a patient-centric perspective that I know that patients would certainly appreciate the fact that we're in a situation now where the folks taking care of them will make every effort to keep them close to home if they possibly can.  I want to thank you, James, for an incredible review of a very complex subject and I think you did a great job. I think we all will have learned a lot. And thanks again for being willing to share your insights with us today on the ASCO Daily News Podcast. Dr. James Foran: John, it's my pleasure. And as you know, I'll do anything for a latte, so no problem at all. Dr. John Sweetenham: Okay. I owe you one, so thank you for that.  And thank you to our listeners for your time today. You'll find links to the studies we've discussed today in the transcript of this episode. And finally, if you value the insights that you hear on the ASCO Daily News Podcast, please take a moment to rate, review and subscribe wherever you get your podcasts. Disclaimer: The purpose of this podcast is to educate and to inform. This is not a substitute for professional medical care and is not intended for use in the diagnosis or treatment of individual conditions. Guests on this podcast express their own opinions, experience and conclusions. Guest statements on the podcast do not express the opinions of ASCO. The mention of any product, service, organization, activity or therapy should not be construed as an ASCO endorsement. Find out more about today's speakers:  Dr. John Sweetenham  Dr. James Foran Follow ASCO on social media: @ASCO on Twitter ASCO on Bluesky ASCO on Facebook  ASCO on LinkedIn  Disclosures:    Dr. John Sweetenham:    No relationships to disclose Dr. James Foran: Stock and Other Ownership Interests: Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Consulting or Advisory Role: Peerview, CTI BioPharma Corp, Remix Therapeutics, Cardinal Health, Medscape, Syndax, Autolus Therapeutics Research Funding (Inst.): Chordia Therapeutics, Abbvie, Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Kura Oncology, Sellas Life Sciences, Novartis, Roivant, Celgene/Bristol-Myers Squibb, Astellas Pharma, SERVIER Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Peerview

In this episode of Conversations in Lung Cancer Research, A/Prof Mel Moore, along with thoracic oncologists Dr. Malinda Itchins and A/Prof Surein Arulananda, delve into the characteristics, detection, and treatment of EGFR exon 20 insertion mutant non-small cell lung cancer. The podcast discusses recent advances, the efficacy of various treatments including small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors and monoclonal antibodies, and the potential future of targeted therapies. Special focus is given to the Phase 3 Papillon study and the drug Amivantamab, highlighting the need for next generation sequencing in clinical settings. Key challenges and questions in the field are also addressed, including the impact of co-mutations and optimal therapy sequencing.This episode is sponsored by: Johnson & Johnson(00:00) Introduction and Acknowledgements(00:48) Introducing the Experts(01:29) Understanding EGFR Exon 20 Insertion Mutations(05:04) Challenges with Current Treatments(06:30) Emerging Therapies and Clinical Trials(11:03) Papillon Study Insights(21:27) Future Directions and Unanswered Questions(29:34) Conclusion and Final Thoughts

Dr. Shaalan Beg and Dr. David Wang discuss key abstracts in GI cancers from the 2025 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium, including major advances in CRC, neoadjuvant approaches in esophageal cancer, and innovative studies on ctDNA. TRANSCRIPT Dr. Shaalan Beg: Hello and welcome to the ASCO Daily News Podcast. I'm Dr. Shaalan Beg. I'm a medical oncologist and an adjunct associate professor at UT Southwestern Medical Center in Dallas. Today, we're bringing you some key highlights from the 2025 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium, and I'm delighted to be joined by the chair of GI25, Dr. David Wang. Dr. Wang is a GI medical oncologist at the University of Michigan. Our full disclosures are available in the transcript of this episode.  Dr. Wang, thanks for coming on the podcast today. Dr. David Wang: Well, thank you. It's a pleasure to be here. Dr. Shaalan Beg: GI25 featured major therapeutic advances across the spectrum of GI malignancies, and it was exciting to hear about innovations and novel approaches that are shaping the future of our field. Before we start talking about specific abstracts, could you share some of your key highlights from the meeting? Dr. David Wang: Sure. Our theme this year was “Breaking Boundaries to Enhance Patient Centered Care.” Past years' themes have focused more on precision oncology, but we wanted to broaden our focus on patients and to be more holistic, which kind of led us into some of the Intersection [sessions] that we had. Each day started with a different Intersection. The first one was “Emerging Therapies in GI Cancers”, where invited speakers talked about bispecific antibody drug conjugates, theranostics, CAR T and other cell-based therapies. The second day was on “Personalized Risk Assessment for GI Cancers,” and this included looking at polygenic risk scores for colorectal cancer, microRNAs and liquid biopsies such as exosomes and pancreatic cancer and non-endoscopic screening modalities in esophageal cancer. And on our final day, we wanted to talk about “Integrative Oncology and Integrative Medicine,” looking at evidence-based uses of acupuncture and supplements in patients who are receiving treatment for cancer, mindfulness-based practices and exercise. And of course, we had a fantastic keynote talk by Dr. Pamela Kunz from the Yale School of Medicine titled, “Disrupting Gastrointestinal Oncology: Shattering Barriers with Inclusive Science.” She highlighted the intersection of science, patient care, and health and gender equity. And I would encourage your podcast listeners to access the lecture in ASCO's Meeting Library if they haven't yet had a chance to hear Dr. Kunz's wonderful lecture.  We were really happy this year because the attendance hit a new record. We had over 5,000 people attend either in person or virtually from their home or office, and we had almost 1,000 abstracts submitted to the meeting, so these were either record or near record numbers. We offered a lot of different networking opportunities throughout the meeting, and attending found these to be incredibly rewarding and important and this will continue to be an area of emphasis in future meetings. Dr. Shaalan Beg: Let's take a deeper dive into the exciting studies presented at GI25. The late breaking abstract LBA143 was CheckMate-8HW. This was the first results of NIVO + IPI versus NIVO monotherapy for MSI-high metastatic colorectal cancer. What are your thoughts about this study? Dr. David Wang: Yeah, so we know that colorectal cancer patients with MSI-high tumors don't necessarily respond well to chemotherapy. And we were fortunate because last year CheckMate-8HW actually looked at two different arms – so this was NIVO + IPI compared to standard of care chemotherapy and showed its very significant improvement in median progression-free survival. And that was actually published in the New England Journal of Medicine back in November of 2024. This year's presentation actually focused now on NIVO + IPI versus NIVO monotherapy. And as you know IPI+NIVO can be quite toxic. So this was an important analysis to be done. So we know that NIVO is definitely more easily tolerated. So what was interesting was that the 2-year and 3-year progression-free survival not surprisingly favored IPI+NIVO and this was statistically significant. And the overall response rate was also better with IPI+NIVO versus NIVO alone. I know we're always concerned about toxicities and there were higher grade 3 and 4 toxicity incidences in the combination arm versus the monotherapy arm, but overall, only about 28 additional events in several hundred patients treated. So I think that's well-tolerated. Our discussant Dr. Wells Messersmith actually said that, with this new data, he would consider doing combination immunotherapy in any patient that presented in the front line with MSI-high or deficient mismatch repair colorectal cancer that was metastatic. Dr. Shaalan Beg: One of the focuses for directing first-line therapy for colorectal cancer has been right and left sided colon cancer because we know these are two different cancers with their own unique molecular subtypes. We heard on Abstract 17, the DEEPER trial, the final analysis of modified FOLFOXIRI plus cetuximab versus bevacizumab for RAS wild-type and left sided metastatic colorectal cancer. How do you summarize the findings of this study and what should our readers be aware of? Dr. David Wang: Interestingly, this was a phase 2 study and the emphasis of the abstract was actually a subgroup analysis of those patients with RAS wild-type and BRAF wild-type as well as left sided cancers. So, I think the entire study enrolled 359 patients, but the analysis that was discussed at the meeting really focused on 178 patients that fit that characteristic. Very similar to what we've seen in prior studies, left-sided tumors have better response to cetuximab versus bevacizumab. And if you flip it so that you now are looking at right sided tumors, targeting EGFR is actually detrimental. The depth of response was better with cetuximab in these left sided RAS and BRAF mutant tumors. And so the lead author actually suggested that this could be a new first-line standard of care. And the question is, is there a benefit of doing this triple agent regimen with modified FOLFIRINOX? We know there's a lot more toxicity with that. Not clear that there's a benefit for that over FOLFOX, maybe in younger patients that could tolerate it. When our discussant, again Dr. Wells Messersmith, spoke about this, he said that, in his practice he would, again, favor cetuximab over bevacizumab in combination with chemo, these left-sided RAS and BRAF wild-type tumors, but that he would actually prefer a doublet versus a triplet chemo regimen, and that is consistent with the current NCCN guidelines. Dr. Shaalan Beg: Another area where colorectal cancer has been a wonderful model to study new technology has been in the area of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). And the BESPOKE CRC trial is looking to see if ctDNA can inform adjuvant treatment decisions for stage II and III colorectal cancer. And in Abstract 15, we heard final results of the BESPOKE CRC sub-cohort. What were the findings there? Dr. David Wang: BESPOKE CRC is another one of these important ctDNA studies. It was an observational study, not a randomized trial, but it did provide a lot of different insights to us. We know that there were over 1,700 patients enrolled, and so it was reported that this is the largest ctDNA study in colorectal cancer performed in the United States. And they were able to analyze over 1,100 patients.  Some of the key findings were that postoperative adjuvant therapy management decisions actually changed in 1 out of 6 patients, so that's pretty significant. In terms of surveillance, we know that patients who have ctDNA positivity, this is prognostic of recurrence. In terms of patients who have positive ctDNA post-surgery, it looked like, at least in this observational study, the majority of patients who received any benefit were those who had positive ctDNA. So adjuvant therapy, even in stage II and stage III patients seemed to only benefit those patients who have positive ctDNA. I think that does raise the question, and this also was brought up in the discussion, which is “Can we de-escalate adjuvant therapy in terms of patients who are ctDNA-negative post-op?” And Dr. Richard Kim from Moffitt felt that we are not yet there. Obviously, we need randomized control trials where we are taking ctDNA results and then randomizing patients to receive adjuvant or non-adjuvant to really know the difference.  Other questions that come up with use of ctDNA include: What do you do with these patients who turn positive? This study for BESPOKE actually followed patients out to two years after surgery. So what you do with a positive ctDNA result wasn't really clear. It seems to suggest that once you turn positive, patients go on to more intensive surveillance. You know, again as an observation, patients who did turn positive were able to go to metastasis-directed therapy much more quickly. And again, this was supposedly to improve their curative intent therapy. And I think the other question that has been brought up all the time is, is this really cost effective? Patients want to know, and we want to give patients that information, but I think we're still stuck with what to do with a positive ctDNA level in a patient that's on surveillance because no randomized control studies have actually suggested that we need to start systemic therapy right away. Dr. Shaalan Beg: Yeah. And I guess in terms of practice informing or practice changing, these results may not give us a clear answer. But because a lot of patients are asking for these tests, it does give us some real world experiences on what to expect in terms of conversion of these positive into negative and the outcome so we can have a shared decision making with our patients in the clinic and then come up with a determination on whether ctDNA for molecular residual disease is something which would be worthwhile for the care of our patient. But more to come, I guess, in coming years to answer different problems around this challenge. Dr. David Wang: Yes, I agree. Dr. Shaalan Beg: The BREAKWATER trial looked at the use of encorafenib, cetuximab and chemotherapy for BRAF V600E-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer. We've covered this combination for a second- third-line treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer previously. Abstract 16 from GI25 was evaluating the use of this regimen in the first-line space. Everyone was looking forward to these results, and what did the investigators present? Dr. David Wang: I think this is, as you mentioned, a nice follow up to later lines of therapy where Dr. Kopetz from MD Anderson pioneered use of encorafenib, cetuximab and binimetinib in the BEACON trial. Everybody was kind of curious what would happen now if you use encorafenib plus cetuximab plus chemotherapy in the first-line setting. And so this is an interim analysis that was pre-planned in the phase 3 open label BREAKWATER trial. And even though there were three arms, and so the three arms were encorafenib plus cetuximab, encorafenib plus cetuximab plus FOLFOX, or standard of care chemo, only two arms were presented in the abstract. So basically looking at encorafenib plus cetuximab and FOLFOX-6 versus standard of care therapy, and the overall response rate was statistically significant with a 60.9% overall response rate encorafenib plus cetuximab plus chemo arm versus standard of care chemo was only 40%. The interim overall survival also was different. It was 92% versus 87% at 6 months and 79% versus 66% at 12 months, again favoring the chemotherapy plus encorafenib plus cetuximab. In terms of the statistics, the p was 0.0004. However, the pre-plan analysis required the p-value to be 1x10 to the -8. And so even though this looks really good, it hasn't quite met its pre-specified significance level. The good thing is that this is only interim analysis and the study is ongoing with future analysis planned.  So the real question is: Does it matter when we actually use this regimen? We know that the regimen's approved in the second third-line setting. What about in the first line? And there was some preclinical data that the discussant reviewed that shows that patients actually benefit if this is done in the first-line setting. For example, there was some preclinical data showing that even FOLFIRI, for example, can upregulate RAS, which would make tumors more resistant to this combination. This was thought to be practice-changing in a patient that has B600E showing up treatment naive that we should probably consider this regimen. And actually this did receive accelerated FDA approval about a month ago. Dr. Shaalan Beg: Yeah, and for what it's worth, I put up a Twitter poll asking my Twitter followers on how the BREAKWATER trial results will change their approach for newly diagnosed BRAF mutated colorectal cancer. We got 112 responses; 72% said that they will incorporate encorafenib, cetuximab, FOLFOX for their frontline BRAF mutated patients. But 23% said that they would like to wait for overall survival results. Dr. David Wang: Wow, that's interesting. They really want that 1x10 to the -8. Dr. Shaalan Beg: I guess so. All right. Let's change gears and talk about esophageal cancer. LBA329 was the SCIENCE study which presented preliminary results from a randomized phase 3 trial comparing sintilimab and chemoradiotherapy plus sintilimab versus chemoradiotherapy for neoadjuvant resectable locally advanced squamous esophageal cancer. Where are we in this space? Dr. David Wang: Okay. So, yeah, this was an interesting trial. Again, just to set the context, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma is more prevalent in Asia. And the study sites as well as the patients were mostly from Asia. So this was again a phase 3 trial with interim results. They only rolled 146 out of the planned 420 for this interim analysis. And yeah, they're using immune checkpoint inhibitor that we don't use in the United States, sintilimab, combined with their two standards of neoadjuvant therapy, either chemotherapy, which is more common in Asia, or or chemoradiation, which is more common in the US and Western Europe, versus chemoradiation. And so they actually had two primary endpoints, but only were reporting one. So their two primary endpoints were pathCR and the other one was event-free survival. The event-free survival, again, was not reported at the meeting.  What they found was that in terms of pathCR rate, if you take the two arms that are really informative about that, chemoradiation plus sintilimab versus chemoradiation alone, the pathCR rate was 60% versus 47%. We know that chemo alone doesn't induce as much of a pathCR rate, and that was 13%. So it was found that the delta in terms of pathCR between the chemoradiation arms, one with sintilimab and one without, was significant. And this actually confirms data again from Asia, like for the ESCORT-NEO trial where it used another immune checkpoint inhibitor pembrolizumab in addition to neoadjuvant chemo.  So as our discussant for this abstract said, yes, we know that radiation combined with chemotherapy improves pathCR rates, but we have recent data from the ESOPEC trial, we don't know that that necessarily will translate to overall survival. So again, waiting for additional enrollments and longer term follow up before incorporating this into clinical care here. Dr. Shaalan Beg: So David, how do the results of the SCIENCE trial compare with our practice in the United States and ongoing studies asking questions for neoadjuvant therapy for esophageal carcinoma in the United States? Dr. David Wang: I think obviously immune checkpoint inhibitor in the new adjuvant setting is important. Jennifer Eads at UPenn is running that EA2174 which is looking at chemoradiation plus or minus nivolumab, and then in non-pathCR responders randomized to adjuvant nivolumab per CheckMate 577 or nivolumab with intensification adding ipilimumab. We know that the ESOPEC trial just came out, and was published actually during the meeting, and that really focuses on adenocarcinomas. So adenocarcinomas of the GE junction, distal esophagus, now, we would probably treat very similarly to gastric using perioperative FLOT. However, the standard in the US for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma remains neoadjuvant chemoradiation. We know that squamous cell carcinomas are more exquisitely sensitive to radiotherapy. And then obviously in those patients who don't achieve a pathologic complete response, the expectation would be that they would go on to receive nivolumab per CheckMate 577. Again, the thought is that these tumors are more sensitive to immunotherapy given their higher incidences of mutational changes. And so again, this kind of goes along with the positive results seen in the SCIENCE trial that we just discussed with sintilimab but also EFFECT-neo with pembrolizumab. Obviously, we await the results of Jennifer's trial. Dr. Shaalan Beg: And the last abstract I was hoping we could get your perspective on was Abstract 652, which is a Phase 3 study of everolimus plus lanreotide versus everolimus monotherapy for unresectable or recurrent gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, the STARTER-NET trial. What were the results of this study? Dr. David Wang: So, I just want to give a shout out because we did have a session at this year's GI ASCO that looked at more rare tumors. So appendiceal tumors, neuroendocrine tumors, those kinds of things. So again, I would encourage your listeners to listen to that session if they have interest in that. Another type of rare tumor was adenosquamous tumors.  But in terms of the STARTER-NET trial, this was again an interim analysis of his phase 3trial and it was looking at combining everolimus plus lanreotide versus everolimus. So we know that in pancreatic-gastric neuroendocrine tumors, if you have low Ki-67, a well differentiated tumor, that the standard of care really is a somatostatin analog, and sometimes if they're more aggressive, we kind of consider molecular targeted therapy with everolimus. This was asking the question of whether we should do the combination on the frontline. And what was interesting is in this study, the patients were actually more of a poor prognostic set. So they had Ki-67 up to 20% or these were patients that actually had multiple liver lesions. And what they found was a median for progression free survival was improved with a combination out to 29.7 months versus 11.5 months with the somatostatin analog alone, and that the overall response rate was 23% versus 8.3%, again, favoring the combination. If you looked at subgroup analysis, it was actually those patients who had Ki-67 greater than 10%, so the more aggressive tumors, or those with diffuse liver lesions that had the most benefit. So I think that would be the patient population I would consider this new combination with using would be those patients again with poorer prognosis neuroendocrine tumor phenotype. Dr. Shaalan Beg: Thank you very much, Dr. Wang, for sharing your insights with us today and your great work to build a robust GI Cancers Symposium this year. Dr. David Wang: Well, thank you. I mean that really is a cooperative effort. We appreciate all the members of the GI25 Program Committee as well as the ASCO staff that just made it an outstanding meeting. Dr. Shaalan Beg: And thank you to all our listeners for your time today. You'll find links to the abstracts discussed today on the transcript of this episode.  Finally, if you value the insights that you hear on the ASCO Daily News Podcast, please take a moment to rate, review and subscribe wherever you get your podcasts. Disclaimer: The purpose of this podcast is to educate and to inform. This is not a substitute for professional medical care and is not intended for use in the diagnosis or treatment of individual conditions.  Guests on this podcast express their own opinions, experience and conclusions. Guest statements on the podcast do not express the opinions of ASCO. The mention of any product, service, organization, activity or therapy should not be construed as an ASCO endorsement. Find out more about today's speakers:  Dr. Shaalan Beg @ShaalanBeg  Dr. David Wang Follow ASCO on social media:   @ASCO on Twitter  @ASCO on BlueSky ASCO on Facebook   ASCO on LinkedIn   Disclosures:  Dr. Shaalan Beg:  Employment: Science 37  Consulting or Advisory Role: Ipsen, Array BioPharma, AstraZeneca/MedImmune, Cancer Commons, Legend Biotech, Foundation Medicine  Research Funding (Inst.): Bristol-Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca/MedImmune, Merck Serono, Five Prime Therapeutics, MedImmune, Genentech, Immunesensor, Tolero Pharmaceuticals  Dr. David Wang: Honoraria:  Novartis Consulting or Advisory Role: Novartis, Cardinal Health, Bristol-Myers Squibb, BeiGene, Eisai  

Did you know that estrogen receptor-targeting therapies could help reduce chemotherapy exposure and its associated toxicities in advanced HER2-positive disease?   Credit available for this activity expires: 1/29/2026 Earn Credit / Learning Objectives & Disclosures: https://www.medscape.org/viewarticle/1002178?ecd=bdc_podcast_libsyn_mscpedu

CME credits: 1.50 Valid until: 30-12-2025 Claim your CME credit at https://reachmd.com/programs/cme/the-evolving-treatment-landscape-for-mbc-emerging-therapies/29831/ Treatment decision-making in breast cancer is complex and incorporates several factors including disease- and patient-related characteristics. The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines are regularly updated to provide the most accurate recommendations based on recent scientific evidence and drug approvals. This activity has been designed to review the current NCCN guidelines and the supporting data and explore best practices for selecting therapy based on these recommendations. Explore guideline-based strategies and clinical data to optimize guideline-adherent care for patients with CLL/SLL and MCL.

Clinical gaps in the treatment of pruritus in primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) remain. In this episode, taken from a recent symposium, Marlyn J. Mayo, MD; Stuart C. Gordon, MD; and Pam Rivard, RN, a person living with PBC, discuss emerging therapies currently in clinical trials for the management of this disease that can dramatically affect patients' quality of life.Listen as they discuss:Gaps in current managementPatient perspectives: why we should not dismiss itching as an underlying psychologic problemPPAR agonists and how they affect pruritusBEZURSO and FITCH ELATIVEENHANCE and RESPONSEIBATs (inhibitors of bile acid transport)GLIMMERCommon questionsPresenters:Marlyn J. Mayo, MDProfessor of Internal MedicineDivision of Digestive & Liver DiseasesUT Southwestern Medical CenterDallas, TexasStuart C. Gordon, MDProfessor of MedicineWayne State University School of MedicineDirector, Division of HepatologyHenry Ford HealthDetroit, MichiganPam Rivard, RNPerson living with PBCLink to full program: https://bit.ly/3Dnfb2E

Clinical gaps in the treatment of pruritus in primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) remain. In this episode, taken from a recent symposium, Marlyn J. Mayo, MD; Stuart C. Gordon, MD; and Pam Rivard, RN, a person living with PBC, discuss emerging therapies currently in clinical trials for the management of this disease that can dramatically affect patients' quality of life.Listen as they discuss:Gaps in current managementPatient perspectives: why we should not dismiss itching as an underlying psychologic problemPPAR agonists and how they affect pruritusBEZURSO and FITCH ELATIVEENHANCE and RESPONSEIBATs (inhibitors of bile acid transport)GLIMMERCommon questionsPresenters:Marlyn J. Mayo, MDProfessor of Internal MedicineDivision of Digestive & Liver DiseasesUT Southwestern Medical CenterDallas, TexasStuart C. Gordon, MDProfessor of MedicineWayne State University School of MedicineDirector, Division of HepatologyHenry Ford HealthDetroit, MichiganPam Rivard, RNPerson living with PBCLink to full program: https://bit.ly/3Dnfb2E

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma is the most common subtype of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Tune in as we chat with Dr. Yasmin… The post Emerging Therapies and Hope: Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma first appeared on The Bloodline with LLS.

CME credits: 0.50 Valid until: 13-12-2025 Claim your CME credit at https://reachmd.com/programs/cme/the-shifting-attr-cm-landscape-early-diagnosis-emerging-therapies-personalized-care/27090/ Achieving optimal outcomes in patients with transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM) remains a challenge as diagnosis is often delayed. Patients have a reduced life expectancy and experience debilitating pain and poor quality of life. Hear from the experts as they review the latest information on new and emerging treatment options for transthyretin amyloidosis and how this condition affects patients with cardiomyopathy.=

In this episode, Dr. G dives deep into the fascinating science of mitochondrial health—your body's ultimate power source. Learn how these tiny cellular powerhouses influence energy, immunity, aging, and overall well-being. Discover actionable steps to optimize your mitochondria and unlock your vitality, all while understanding the connections between nutrition, exercise, and environmental factors. #health #energy #wellness === Thank You To Our Sponsors! Puori  Click here https://puori.com/drg and use code DRG for 20% off the already discounted subscription prices. SiPhox Health Visit siphoxhealth.com/healthyself to get 20% off your first at-home blood test and start your journey toward optimal health. === Show Notes: 00:00:30 - Welcome to Heal Thyself 00:00:48 - Understanding Mitochondria and Aging 00:01:06 - The Role of Mitochondria in Energy and Immunity 00:01:47 - Importance of Mitochondria for Overall Health 00:02:15 - Mitochondria: Powerhouses of the Cell 00:03:03 - Mitochondria's Functions Beyond Energy Production 00:04:25 - Analogy: Mitochondria as a Power Plant 00:05:05 - Mitochondria's Connection to Cancer 00:07:07 - Factors Disruptting Mitochondrial Health 00:09:44 - Join the Dr. G Healys Health Community 00:10:12 - Environmental Disruptors Affect on Mitochondria 00:10:44 - Understanding Mitochondrial Vulnerability to UV Radiation 00:11:05 - The Impact of Diet on Mitochondrial Function 00:11:24 - Key Nutrients for Mitochondrial Health 00:11:38 - The Role of Hormones in Mitochondrial Biogenesis 00:11:58 - The Effects of Stress on Mitochondrial Function 00:12:54 - Exploring the Connection Between Trauma and Mitochondrial Dysfunction 00:13:55 - Importance of Mitochondrial Autophagy 00:14:35 - Enhancing Lifespan Through Mitophagy 00:15:21 - Exercise as a Key Factor for Mitochondrial Health 00:16:06 - Nutritional Strategies to Support Mitochondria 00:17:02 - Emerging Therapies for Mitochondrial Optimization 00:18:10 - The Role of Sleep in Mitochondrial Function 00:19:05 - Managing Stress for Better Mitochondrial Health 00:20:09 - Recap: Key Factors Influencing Mitochondrial Health 00:20:40 - Actionable Steps to Improve Mitochondrial Function 00:21:10 - Upcoming Topic: Circadian Rhythms and Health 00:21:16 - Closing Remarks and Call to Action

This guideline was created as an educational tool to guide qualified physicians through a series of diagnostic and treatment decisions to improve the quality and efficiency of care for adult patients with Brain Metastases treated with Immunotherapy. J. Bradley Elder, MD Jeffrey J. Olson, MD D. Ryan Ormond, MD, Phd

In this podcast, we spoke with Fran Gregory, Vice President of Emerging Therapies at Cardinal Health about the cell and gene therapy landscape, innovative solutions to reduce cost, the regulatory environment, and reimbursement. Fran Gregory brings extensive experience in the biologic drug sector. As a pharmacist, she has worked across various areas, including payer PBM, pharmaceutical manufacturing, and now at Cardinal Health. Gregory oversees the advanced therapy solutions and biosimilars business units, which focus on cell and gene therapies and cost-saving biologics, respectively. Cell and Gene Therapy Landscape In the cell and gene therapy landscape, there are about 25 FDA-approved products in the U.S., split into 35% cell therapies and 65% gene therapies (at the time of the interview, now 38). This field has rapidly evolved since the approval of the first CAR-T cell therapies in 2017, and the FDA continues to support innovation, with a pipeline of around 1,500 products under development. The agency aims to approve over 100 products by 2030, potentially benefiting more than 100,000 patients. Therapeutic areas include oncology, hematology, neurology, diabetes, and even conditions affecting vision and hearing. Gregory notes the unique challenges in this field, such as conducting clinical trials with small patient populations, complex manufacturing processes, and stringent cold chain logistics for distribution. The high cost of these therapies also poses a challenge, as some treatments can cost millions. However, opportunities abound as the healthcare system innovates to improve regulatory processes, distribution methods, and patient experiences. Reducing Cost She explains that the high cost of cell and gene therapies is due to the intensive research, development, and manufacturing requirements, particularly for treatments targeting rare diseases. Although the upfront cost is high, these therapies can offer long-term savings by reducing ongoing medical expenses for patients. New payment models, such as outcomes-based agreements, annuities, and warranties, are being developed to increase patient access and manage costs. One innovative approach is the Cell and Gene Therapy Access Model, inspired by President Biden's 2022 executive order on lowering prescription costs. This model enables CMS to negotiate with manufacturers on behalf of states, enhancing access for patients and encouraging manufacturer participation. The first products under this model, aimed at sickle cell disease, are expected to launch in early 2025. Gregory expresses optimism about the future of these therapies and their potential to drive further healthcare innovation. Regulatory Environment The regulatory environment for cell and gene therapies is evolving quickly as the FDA is committed to expediting the market availability of these products. The agency offers pathways like accelerated approval, where manufacturers can bring products to market based on indicative clinical outcomes and continue gathering real-world evidence post-approval. The FDA's regenerative medicine advanced therapy (RMAT) designation also addresses the small patient populations in cell and gene therapy trials, focusing less on traditional statistical significance. Looking ahead, the FDA will increasingly emphasize outcome measures and closely monitor manufacturing processes to ensure safety and efficiency as technologies evolve. Reimbursement Organizations like the Institute for Clinical and Economic Review (ICER) will also play a significant role in evaluating both clinical and economic outcomes, influencing pricing and reimbursement discussions between manufacturers, governments, and insurers. As the landscape grows, these evaluations will guide not only regulatory decisions but also payment models, ensuring that gene therapies offer value and affordability. Cardinal Health is deeply involved in the commercialization of cell and gene therapies,

CME credits: 1.25 Valid until: 15-10-2025 Claim your CME credit at https://reachmd.com/programs/cme/aad-treatment-evolution-the-future-of-emerging-therapies/27103/ This series of bite-sized episodes contains important information on diagnosing and treating agitation in Alzheimer's disease (AAD). Drs. Anton Porsteinsson and Brendan Montano discuss best practices for recognizing early symptoms, diagnosing patients, and treating their AAD.

Please visit answersincme.com/UYY860 to participate, download slides and supporting materials, complete the post test, and obtain credit. In this activity, an expert in psychiatry discusses novel treatment options being investigated for patients with Alzheimer's disease psychosis (ADP). Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Recognize the unmet therapeutic needs in managing patients with Alzheimer's disease psychosis (ADP); Review the rationale for using therapies with novel mechanisms for the treatment of patients with ADP; Describe the implications of the latest data on novel therapies for managing patients with ADP.

In the newest installment of Your Next Mission ® video podcast and final episode recognizing National Suicide Prevention Month, SMA Tilley discusses with Marcus Capone, Co-Founder of Veterans Exploring Treatment Solutions (VETS), groundbreaking emerging therapies and treatments for Veterans battling PTSD, TBI and other Mental Health Challenges. Discover how VETS is making a difference for those who have tried traditional treatments without success.

In this episode, listen to Alice T. Shaw, MD, PhD, and Jessica J. Lin, MD, share their thoughts on the available and emerging clinical data for second-line and beyond treatments in patients with recurrent ROS1-altered advanced NSCLC including:Assessing ROS1-TKI resistance mutations with tumor and liquid biopsies in patients with ROS1-altered advanced NSCLCPrevious TKI-treated cohort from the TRIDENT-1 study: efficacy of repotrectinib in patients with recurrent ROS1-altered NSCLC and measurable baseline brain metastases   Phase II TRUST-1 trial of taletrectinib: activity in patients with known ROS1 G2032R resistance mutation ROS1-altered advanced NSCLCThe global phase I/II ARROS-1 study of zidesamtinib (NVL-520): safety summary in patients with ROS1-altered advanced NSCLC  Program faculty:Jessica J. Lin, MDAttending PhysicianMassachusetts General HospitalAssociate Professor of MedicineHarvard Medical SchoolBoston, MassachusettsAlice T. Shaw, MD, PhDChief, Strategic PartnershipsAttending Physician, Thoracic OncologyDana-Farber Cancer InstituteHarvard Medical SchoolBoston, MassachusettsResources:To download the slides associated with this podcast discussion, please visit the program page.

CME credits: 1.25 Valid until: 16-08-2025 Claim your CME credit at https://reachmd.com/programs/cme/the-challenge-of-bcl-2-resistance-in-cll-treatment-strategies-and-emerging-therapies/26503/ Determining the optimal treatment regimen for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) has been a clinical challenge, especially since most patients are older than 70 years, present with significant coexisting comorbidities, and exhibit one or more common chromosomal alterations. However, outcomes in CLL are improving with the availability of non-chemotherapy options with fewer toxicities. Fixed-duration therapy has emerged as an even more attractive approach for the frontline treatment of CLL and is associated with mild toxicities, improved treatment adherence and monitoring, and reduced financial burden. Embark on a journey through this educational series to achieve a better understanding of the rationale and supporting clinical data for fixed-duration therapy, monitoring strategies, the role of MRD-guided treatment selection, and approaches to overcome relapsed/refractory CLL.

This content has been developed for healthcare professionals only. Patients who seek health information should consult with their physician or relevant patient advocacy groups.For the full presentation, downloadable Practice Aids, slides, and complete CME/MOC/NCPD/CPE/AAPA/IPCE information, and to apply for credit, please visit us at PeerView.com/NZV865. CME/MOC/NCPD/CPE/AAPA/IPCE credit will be available until July 23, 2025.The Itch We Could Never Scratch: Incorporating New and Emerging Therapies to Alleviate the Burden of Prurigo Nodularis With a Team-Based Approach In support of improving patient care, PVI, PeerView Institute for Medical Education, is jointly accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE), and the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC), to provide continuing education for the healthcare team.SupportThis activity is supported by an educational grant from Sanofi and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals.Disclosure information is available at the beginning of the video presentation.

This content has been developed for healthcare professionals only. Patients who seek health information should consult with their physician or relevant patient advocacy groups.For the full presentation, downloadable Practice Aids, slides, and complete CME/MOC/NCPD/CPE/AAPA/IPCE information, and to apply for credit, please visit us at PeerView.com/NZV865. CME/MOC/NCPD/CPE/AAPA/IPCE credit will be available until July 23, 2025.The Itch We Could Never Scratch: Incorporating New and Emerging Therapies to Alleviate the Burden of Prurigo Nodularis With a Team-Based Approach In support of improving patient care, PVI, PeerView Institute for Medical Education, is jointly accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE), and the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC), to provide continuing education for the healthcare team.SupportThis activity is supported by an educational grant from Sanofi and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals.Disclosure information is available at the beginning of the video presentation.

Featuring perspectives from Dr Jonathan W Goldman, Dr Corey J Langer, Dr Joel W Neal, Dr Zofia Piotrowska, Dr Joshua K Sabari and Dr Helena Yu, moderated by Dr Yu, including the following topics: Introduction (0:00) Contemporary Care for Patients with Nonmetastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) with an EGFR Mutation — Dr Langer (2:08) Evolving First-Line Treatment for Metastatic NSCLC with an EGFR Mutation — Dr Goldman (22:37) Biological Rationale for and Emerging Role of Antibody-Drug Conjugates in the Management of NSCLC with an EGFR Mutation — Dr Yu (43:23) Other Emerging Strategies for Relapsed Metastatic NSCLC with an EGFR Mutation — Dr Sabari (1:03:33) Current and Future Management of NSCLC with an EGFR Exon 20 Insertion Mutation — Dr Piotrowska (1:20:15) Management of Toxicities Associated with Available and Emerging Therapies for NSCLC with an EGFR Mutation — Dr Neal (1:38:44) CME information and select publications

Discover the untold truth about metformin, intermittent fasting and weight management in this follow-up Q&A session from last week's podcast "New Emerging Therapies for Obesity and Weight Loss".  Dr. Darlene Bartilucci breaks down the misconceptions surrounding metformin, shedding light on its role in improving insulin.  Unravel the complex relationship between obesity, insulin resistance, and hunger, and learn why a slow and sustainable approach to weight loss is crucial for long-term success. Intrigued by intermittent fasting? Dr. Bartilucci highlighted the recent New England Journal article challenging the conventional wisdom of strict eating windows, showing you how to tailor intermittent fasting to fit your lifestyle. Discover the 5:2 approach that allows you to eat normally for five days and limit your intake to 500-600 calories for two days, all while reaping the incredible health advantages of intermittent fasting. Prepare to transform your relationship with food and fasting with these actionable insights that go beyond the typical diet rhetoric. The program is a rebroadcast for a live presentation at WJCT Studios on April 3, 2024. Be a part of advancing science by participating in clinical researchShare with a friend. Rate, Review, and Subscribe to the MedEvidence! podcast to be notified when new episodes are released.Follow us on Social Media:FacebookInstagramTwitterLinkedInWant to learn more checkout our entire library of podcasts, videos, articles and presentations at www.MedEvidence.com Powered by ENCORE Research GroupMusic: Storyblocks - Corporate InspiredThank you for listening!

Ever find yourself looking for the real scoop on obesity and weight loss? Join Dr. Darlene Bartilucci and Janet Garvey, ARNP, DNP, for a riveting exploration of the latest treatment breakthroughs and a reflective moment on the most profound weight management advice we've ever received. We'll tackle the intricacies of obesity definitions and classifications and explain why understanding your BMI can be a pivotal moment in your health journey.Our conversation takes a serious turn as we confront the stark realities of the obesity epidemic, with its health implications casting a long shadow across the United States and beyond. We discuss the sobering disparities among racial groups and the unexpected weight trends that emerged during the COVID-19 pandemic. Moreover, we examine obesity's lesser-known connection to increased cancer risk, stressing the urgent need for a unified front in this health battle—a call to action for medical professionals and individuals alike.Wrapping up the episode, we share heartfelt stories, including one of a patient's success with semaglutide. We unpack the history and dual roles of weight loss medications, their impact on diabetes management, and the potential of weight loss surgeries, always emphasizing the critical importance of sustainable lifestyle changes. It's a candid dialogue on the necessity of education, motivation, and intentional living for a healthier tomorrow.Check back on April 24, 2024 for Part 2 Q&A with Dr. BartilucciFood for Thought:Understanding Obesity and Weight LossObesity Crisis and Health ImplicationsSupporting Health Through Education and ActionMotivation for Weight LossWeight Loss Medications and Lifestyle ChangesThe program is a rebroadcast for a live presentation at WJCT Studios on April 3, 2024Be a part of advancing science by participating in clinical researchShare with a friend. Rate, Review, and Subscribe to the MedEvidence! podcast to be notified when new episodes are released.Follow us on Social Media:FacebookInstagramTwitterLinkedInWant to learn more checkout our entire library of podcasts, videos, articles and presentations at www.MedEvidence.com Powered by ENCORE Research GroupMusic: Storyblocks - Corporate InspiredThank you for listening!

Tune into our podcast for a deep dive into the 2023 Veterinary Pain Management Workshop recording, where Dr. Mark Epstein discusses groundbreaking techniques and guidelines to significantly improve practice outcomes in veterinary care. Quick Summary of the Episode In this episode, we present a crucial workshop hosted by us on Veterinary Pain Management, led by Dr. Mark Epstein which was recorded in late 2023 wherein he delves into innovative strategies and the latest guidelines for managing pain in pets, aiming to elevate the standards of veterinary care. Guest Information Speaker: Dr. Mark Epstein, Senior Partner and Medical Director at TotalBond Veterinary Hospitals and a recognized authority in veterinary pain management. Main Talking Points Innovative Pain Management Strategies: Insights into new approaches and therapies for alleviating pain in pets. Guideline Updates: An overview of the most recent pain management guidelines and their significance for veterinary professionals. Safety and Efficacy of NSAIDs: Discussion on the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in treating pets, with a focus on recent findings and recommendations. Emerging Therapies and Technologies: Exploration of cutting-edge treatments and how they're reshaping pain management in veterinary medicine. Interesting Quotes From the Episode "Effective pain management transcends traditional methods, embracing new science and compassion." - Dr. Mark Epstein Shownotes 00:00: Introduction to the workshop 02:50: Overview of new pain management guidelines - NSAIDs 06:40: Discussing Opioids and their evolving role 11.35: Opioids comparison chart   Love Veterinary Dentistry? The VDP Program is What You Have Been Looking For https://ivdi.org/  

In today's episode, Grandpa Bill delves into the ever-evolving landscape of healthcare. We explore the long history and established role of traditional medicine, while also examining the emerging fields of PEMF therapy and various holistic modalities. Join us as we discuss the strengths and limitations of each approach, and explore a balanced perspective on optimizing human health and well-being. Beyond the labels of "traditional" and "emerging," what specific healthcare practices have been most beneficial in your personal journey towards well-being? Do you believe there's room for a blend of traditional medicine and other modalities in healthcare? If so, how can we navigate this blend effectively? #holistichealth,#traditionalmedicine,#PEMFtherapy,#integrativemedicine,#wellbeing,#GrandpaBill, Leave your thoughts and experiences in a voicemail message on The BH Sales Kennel Kelp Holistic Healing Hour voicemail board. We'd love to hear from you! Please be respectful when incorporating your unique perspective and insights.Holistic Health Secrets and Life-Sales Strategies with Grandpa Bill Nourish Your Soul, Boost Your Business: The BH Sales Kennel Kelp Holistic Healing Hour Experience Website: https://www.7kmetals.com/grandpabill Website:https://www.myctfo.com/index.html YouTube: Bill Holt@billholt8792 Social Media: https://www.facebook.com/bill.sales.524 Social Media:https://www.instagram.com/bradybrodyboy12/ Voicemail Message Board: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/bhsales BH Sales Kennel Kelp Holistic Healing Hour Retired holistic health enthusiast, Grandpa Bill, shares his wisdom and experiences in the realms of health, wealth, and well-being. Join Grandpa Bill on his journey of holistic health and personal growth. With over 45 years of experience in the industry, he has a wealth of knowledge to share on topics ranging from nutrition and supplements, to meditation and spirituality. In his retirement, Grandpa Bill is dedicated to sharing his insights and helping others to achieve their full potential. He is an intuitive thinker, humorist, star seed, poetry fan, with a passion for history and coins. Hosted by Grandpa Bill, 45 year career now retired Disclaimer:This podcast site content is provided for informational purposes only, and does not intend to substitute professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. JOIN US EVERY TUESDAY AT 6PM. EST. https://freedomsnap.org/Seth/ BH Sales Kennel Kelp Holistic Virtual Mall Patriot Supply Link:  ⁠⁠https://mypatriotsupply.com/?rfsn=5615494.137cb6⁠⁠ Health Ranger Link: ⁠⁠https://www.healthrangerstore.com/?⁠⁠rfsn=301296.96452b2&utm_source=HR_Affiliate&utm_campaign=14708&utm_affiliate=301296⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠Healer.com⁠⁠⁠: ⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.HealerCBD.com/?ref=11⁠ --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/bhsales/message

This content has been developed for healthcare professionals only. Patients who seek health information should consult with their physician or relevant patient advocacy groups.For the full presentation, downloadable Practice Aids, slides, and complete CME/MOC/AAPA information, and to apply for credit, please visit us at PeerView.com/ZZA865. CME/MOC/AAPA credit will be available until January 2, 2025.Harnessing the Power of the Latest Clinical and Research Advances in SCLC: How to Accelerate Progress and Improve Patient Outcomes With Current and Emerging Therapies In support of improving patient care, PVI, PeerView Institute for Medical Education, is jointly accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE), and the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC), to provide continuing education for the healthcare team.SupportThis activity is supported by an independent educational grant from AstraZeneca.Disclosure PolicyAll relevant conflicts of interest have been mitigated prior to the commencement of the activity.Faculty/Planner DisclosuresChair/PlannerTaofeek K. Owonikoko, MD, PhD, has a financial interest/relationship or affiliation in the form of:Consultant and/or Advisor for Abbvie Inc.; Amgen Inc.; AstraZeneca; Bayer Corporation; BeiGene, Inc.; Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Bristol Myers Squibb; Coherus BioSciences; Daiichi Sankyo, Inc.; Eisai Inc.; EMD Serono, Inc.; Exelixis, Inc.; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd/Genentech, Inc.; G1 Therapeutics, Inc.; GenCART; Heat Biologics Inc.; Ipsen Pharma; Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Lilly; Merck & Co., Inc.; Meryx Inc.; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation; Oncocyte Corporation; PharmaMar; Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited; Xcovery; and Zentalis Pharmaceuticals.Grant/Research Support from Aeglea BioTherapeutics; Amgen Inc.; AstraZeneca; Bayer Corporation; Bristol Myers Squibb; Cardiff Oncology, Inc.; Eisai Inc.; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd/Genentech, Inc.; FUJIFILM Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc.; G1 Therapeutics, Inc.; Incyte; Ipsen Pharma; Loxo Oncology/Lilly; Merck & Co., Inc.; Mersana Therapeutics; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation; Oncorus, Inc.; Pfizer; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc.; Turning Point Therapeutics, Inc.; United Therapeutics Corporation; and Y-mAbs Therapeutics, Inc.Faculty/PlannerHossein Borghaei, DO, MS, has a financial interest/relationship or affiliation in the form of:Consultant and/or Advisor for Amgen Inc.; AstraZeneca; Axiom; Bayer Corporation; BeiGene, Inc.; BerGenbio; BioNTech SE; Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Bristol Myers Squibb; Da Volterra; Daiichi Sankyo, Inc.; EMD Serono, Inc.; Genentech, Inc.; Genmab A/S; Grid Therapeutics; Guardant Health; IO Biotech, Inc.; iTeos Therapeutics; Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Lilly; Merck & Co., Inc.; Mirati Therapeutics, Inc.; Natera; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation; Oncocyte Corporation; Pfizer; PharmaMar; Puma Biotechnology; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc.; and Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited.Grant/Research Support from Amgen Inc.; Bristol Myers Squibb; and Lilly.Data Safety Monitoring Board for Incyte; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation; SpringWorks Therapeutics, Inc.; Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited; and University of Pennsylvania: CAR T Program.Faculty/PlannerAnne Chiang, MD, PhD, FASCO, has a financial interest/relationship or affiliation in the form of:Consultant and/or Advisor for AstraZeneca; Daiichi Sankyo, Inc.; Genentech, Inc.; and Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Grant/Research Support from AbbVie Inc.; Amgen Inc.; AstraZeneca; Bristol Myers Squibb; Flatiron Health; and Genentech, Inc.Planning Committee and Reviewer DisclosuresPlanners, independent reviewers, and staff of PVI, PeerView Institute for Medical Education, do not have any relevant financial relationships related to this CE activity unless listed below.

This content has been developed for healthcare professionals only. Patients who seek health information should consult with their physician or relevant patient advocacy groups.For the full presentation, downloadable Practice Aids, slides, and complete CME/MOC/AAPA information, and to apply for credit, please visit us at PeerView.com/ZZA865. CME/MOC/AAPA credit will be available until January 2, 2025.Harnessing the Power of the Latest Clinical and Research Advances in SCLC: How to Accelerate Progress and Improve Patient Outcomes With Current and Emerging Therapies In support of improving patient care, PVI, PeerView Institute for Medical Education, is jointly accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE), and the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC), to provide continuing education for the healthcare team.SupportThis activity is supported by an independent educational grant from AstraZeneca.Disclosure PolicyAll relevant conflicts of interest have been mitigated prior to the commencement of the activity.Faculty/Planner DisclosuresChair/PlannerTaofeek K. Owonikoko, MD, PhD, has a financial interest/relationship or affiliation in the form of:Consultant and/or Advisor for Abbvie Inc.; Amgen Inc.; AstraZeneca; Bayer Corporation; BeiGene, Inc.; Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Bristol Myers Squibb; Coherus BioSciences; Daiichi Sankyo, Inc.; Eisai Inc.; EMD Serono, Inc.; Exelixis, Inc.; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd/Genentech, Inc.; G1 Therapeutics, Inc.; GenCART; Heat Biologics Inc.; Ipsen Pharma; Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Lilly; Merck & Co., Inc.; Meryx Inc.; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation; Oncocyte Corporation; PharmaMar; Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited; Xcovery; and Zentalis Pharmaceuticals.Grant/Research Support from Aeglea BioTherapeutics; Amgen Inc.; AstraZeneca; Bayer Corporation; Bristol Myers Squibb; Cardiff Oncology, Inc.; Eisai Inc.; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd/Genentech, Inc.; FUJIFILM Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc.; G1 Therapeutics, Inc.; Incyte; Ipsen Pharma; Loxo Oncology/Lilly; Merck & Co., Inc.; Mersana Therapeutics; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation; Oncorus, Inc.; Pfizer; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc.; Turning Point Therapeutics, Inc.; United Therapeutics Corporation; and Y-mAbs Therapeutics, Inc.Faculty/PlannerHossein Borghaei, DO, MS, has a financial interest/relationship or affiliation in the form of:Consultant and/or Advisor for Amgen Inc.; AstraZeneca; Axiom; Bayer Corporation; BeiGene, Inc.; BerGenbio; BioNTech SE; Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Bristol Myers Squibb; Da Volterra; Daiichi Sankyo, Inc.; EMD Serono, Inc.; Genentech, Inc.; Genmab A/S; Grid Therapeutics; Guardant Health; IO Biotech, Inc.; iTeos Therapeutics; Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Lilly; Merck & Co., Inc.; Mirati Therapeutics, Inc.; Natera; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation; Oncocyte Corporation; Pfizer; PharmaMar; Puma Biotechnology; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc.; and Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited.Grant/Research Support from Amgen Inc.; Bristol Myers Squibb; and Lilly.Data Safety Monitoring Board for Incyte; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation; SpringWorks Therapeutics, Inc.; Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited; and University of Pennsylvania: CAR T Program.Faculty/PlannerAnne Chiang, MD, PhD, FASCO, has a financial interest/relationship or affiliation in the form of:Consultant and/or Advisor for AstraZeneca; Daiichi Sankyo, Inc.; Genentech, Inc.; and Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Grant/Research Support from AbbVie Inc.; Amgen Inc.; AstraZeneca; Bristol Myers Squibb; Flatiron Health; and Genentech, Inc.Planning Committee and Reviewer DisclosuresPlanners, independent reviewers, and staff of PVI, PeerView Institute for Medical Education, do not have any relevant financial relationships related to this CE activity unless listed below.

This content has been developed for healthcare professionals only. Patients who seek health information should consult with their physician or relevant patient advocacy groups.For the full presentation, downloadable Practice Aids, slides, and complete CME/MOC/AAPA information, and to apply for credit, please visit us at PeerView.com/ZZA865. CME/MOC/AAPA credit will be available until January 2, 2025.Harnessing the Power of the Latest Clinical and Research Advances in SCLC: How to Accelerate Progress and Improve Patient Outcomes With Current and Emerging Therapies In support of improving patient care, PVI, PeerView Institute for Medical Education, is jointly accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE), and the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC), to provide continuing education for the healthcare team.SupportThis activity is supported by an independent educational grant from AstraZeneca.Disclosure PolicyAll relevant conflicts of interest have been mitigated prior to the commencement of the activity.Faculty/Planner DisclosuresChair/PlannerTaofeek K. Owonikoko, MD, PhD, has a financial interest/relationship or affiliation in the form of:Consultant and/or Advisor for Abbvie Inc.; Amgen Inc.; AstraZeneca; Bayer Corporation; BeiGene, Inc.; Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Bristol Myers Squibb; Coherus BioSciences; Daiichi Sankyo, Inc.; Eisai Inc.; EMD Serono, Inc.; Exelixis, Inc.; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd/Genentech, Inc.; G1 Therapeutics, Inc.; GenCART; Heat Biologics Inc.; Ipsen Pharma; Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Lilly; Merck & Co., Inc.; Meryx Inc.; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation; Oncocyte Corporation; PharmaMar; Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited; Xcovery; and Zentalis Pharmaceuticals.Grant/Research Support from Aeglea BioTherapeutics; Amgen Inc.; AstraZeneca; Bayer Corporation; Bristol Myers Squibb; Cardiff Oncology, Inc.; Eisai Inc.; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd/Genentech, Inc.; FUJIFILM Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc.; G1 Therapeutics, Inc.; Incyte; Ipsen Pharma; Loxo Oncology/Lilly; Merck & Co., Inc.; Mersana Therapeutics; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation; Oncorus, Inc.; Pfizer; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc.; Turning Point Therapeutics, Inc.; United Therapeutics Corporation; and Y-mAbs Therapeutics, Inc.Faculty/PlannerHossein Borghaei, DO, MS, has a financial interest/relationship or affiliation in the form of:Consultant and/or Advisor for Amgen Inc.; AstraZeneca; Axiom; Bayer Corporation; BeiGene, Inc.; BerGenbio; BioNTech SE; Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Bristol Myers Squibb; Da Volterra; Daiichi Sankyo, Inc.; EMD Serono, Inc.; Genentech, Inc.; Genmab A/S; Grid Therapeutics; Guardant Health; IO Biotech, Inc.; iTeos Therapeutics; Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Lilly; Merck & Co., Inc.; Mirati Therapeutics, Inc.; Natera; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation; Oncocyte Corporation; Pfizer; PharmaMar; Puma Biotechnology; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc.; and Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited.Grant/Research Support from Amgen Inc.; Bristol Myers Squibb; and Lilly.Data Safety Monitoring Board for Incyte; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation; SpringWorks Therapeutics, Inc.; Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited; and University of Pennsylvania: CAR T Program.Faculty/PlannerAnne Chiang, MD, PhD, FASCO, has a financial interest/relationship or affiliation in the form of:Consultant and/or Advisor for AstraZeneca; Daiichi Sankyo, Inc.; Genentech, Inc.; and Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Grant/Research Support from AbbVie Inc.; Amgen Inc.; AstraZeneca; Bristol Myers Squibb; Flatiron Health; and Genentech, Inc.Planning Committee and Reviewer DisclosuresPlanners, independent reviewers, and staff of PVI, PeerView Institute for Medical Education, do not have any relevant financial relationships related to this CE activity unless listed below.

This content has been developed for healthcare professionals only. Patients who seek health information should consult with their physician or relevant patient advocacy groups.For the full presentation, downloadable Practice Aids, slides, and complete CME/MOC/AAPA information, and to apply for credit, please visit us at PeerView.com/ZZA865. CME/MOC/AAPA credit will be available until January 2, 2025.Harnessing the Power of the Latest Clinical and Research Advances in SCLC: How to Accelerate Progress and Improve Patient Outcomes With Current and Emerging Therapies In support of improving patient care, PVI, PeerView Institute for Medical Education, is jointly accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE), and the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC), to provide continuing education for the healthcare team.SupportThis activity is supported by an independent educational grant from AstraZeneca.Disclosure PolicyAll relevant conflicts of interest have been mitigated prior to the commencement of the activity.Faculty/Planner DisclosuresChair/PlannerTaofeek K. Owonikoko, MD, PhD, has a financial interest/relationship or affiliation in the form of:Consultant and/or Advisor for Abbvie Inc.; Amgen Inc.; AstraZeneca; Bayer Corporation; BeiGene, Inc.; Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Bristol Myers Squibb; Coherus BioSciences; Daiichi Sankyo, Inc.; Eisai Inc.; EMD Serono, Inc.; Exelixis, Inc.; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd/Genentech, Inc.; G1 Therapeutics, Inc.; GenCART; Heat Biologics Inc.; Ipsen Pharma; Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Lilly; Merck & Co., Inc.; Meryx Inc.; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation; Oncocyte Corporation; PharmaMar; Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited; Xcovery; and Zentalis Pharmaceuticals.Grant/Research Support from Aeglea BioTherapeutics; Amgen Inc.; AstraZeneca; Bayer Corporation; Bristol Myers Squibb; Cardiff Oncology, Inc.; Eisai Inc.; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd/Genentech, Inc.; FUJIFILM Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc.; G1 Therapeutics, Inc.; Incyte; Ipsen Pharma; Loxo Oncology/Lilly; Merck & Co., Inc.; Mersana Therapeutics; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation; Oncorus, Inc.; Pfizer; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc.; Turning Point Therapeutics, Inc.; United Therapeutics Corporation; and Y-mAbs Therapeutics, Inc.Faculty/PlannerHossein Borghaei, DO, MS, has a financial interest/relationship or affiliation in the form of:Consultant and/or Advisor for Amgen Inc.; AstraZeneca; Axiom; Bayer Corporation; BeiGene, Inc.; BerGenbio; BioNTech SE; Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Bristol Myers Squibb; Da Volterra; Daiichi Sankyo, Inc.; EMD Serono, Inc.; Genentech, Inc.; Genmab A/S; Grid Therapeutics; Guardant Health; IO Biotech, Inc.; iTeos Therapeutics; Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Lilly; Merck & Co., Inc.; Mirati Therapeutics, Inc.; Natera; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation; Oncocyte Corporation; Pfizer; PharmaMar; Puma Biotechnology; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc.; and Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited.Grant/Research Support from Amgen Inc.; Bristol Myers Squibb; and Lilly.Data Safety Monitoring Board for Incyte; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation; SpringWorks Therapeutics, Inc.; Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited; and University of Pennsylvania: CAR T Program.Faculty/PlannerAnne Chiang, MD, PhD, FASCO, has a financial interest/relationship or affiliation in the form of:Consultant and/or Advisor for AstraZeneca; Daiichi Sankyo, Inc.; Genentech, Inc.; and Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Grant/Research Support from AbbVie Inc.; Amgen Inc.; AstraZeneca; Bristol Myers Squibb; Flatiron Health; and Genentech, Inc.Planning Committee and Reviewer DisclosuresPlanners, independent reviewers, and staff of PVI, PeerView Institute for Medical Education, do not have any relevant financial relationships related to this CE activity unless listed below.

This content has been developed for healthcare professionals only. Patients who seek health information should consult with their physician or relevant patient advocacy groups.For the full presentation, downloadable Practice Aids, slides, and complete CME/MOC/AAPA information, and to apply for credit, please visit us at PeerView.com/ZZA865. CME/MOC/AAPA credit will be available until January 2, 2025.Harnessing the Power of the Latest Clinical and Research Advances in SCLC: How to Accelerate Progress and Improve Patient Outcomes With Current and Emerging Therapies In support of improving patient care, PVI, PeerView Institute for Medical Education, is jointly accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE), and the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC), to provide continuing education for the healthcare team.SupportThis activity is supported by an independent educational grant from AstraZeneca.Disclosure PolicyAll relevant conflicts of interest have been mitigated prior to the commencement of the activity.Faculty/Planner DisclosuresChair/PlannerTaofeek K. Owonikoko, MD, PhD, has a financial interest/relationship or affiliation in the form of:Consultant and/or Advisor for Abbvie Inc.; Amgen Inc.; AstraZeneca; Bayer Corporation; BeiGene, Inc.; Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Bristol Myers Squibb; Coherus BioSciences; Daiichi Sankyo, Inc.; Eisai Inc.; EMD Serono, Inc.; Exelixis, Inc.; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd/Genentech, Inc.; G1 Therapeutics, Inc.; GenCART; Heat Biologics Inc.; Ipsen Pharma; Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Lilly; Merck & Co., Inc.; Meryx Inc.; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation; Oncocyte Corporation; PharmaMar; Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited; Xcovery; and Zentalis Pharmaceuticals.Grant/Research Support from Aeglea BioTherapeutics; Amgen Inc.; AstraZeneca; Bayer Corporation; Bristol Myers Squibb; Cardiff Oncology, Inc.; Eisai Inc.; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd/Genentech, Inc.; FUJIFILM Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc.; G1 Therapeutics, Inc.; Incyte; Ipsen Pharma; Loxo Oncology/Lilly; Merck & Co., Inc.; Mersana Therapeutics; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation; Oncorus, Inc.; Pfizer; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc.; Turning Point Therapeutics, Inc.; United Therapeutics Corporation; and Y-mAbs Therapeutics, Inc.Faculty/PlannerHossein Borghaei, DO, MS, has a financial interest/relationship or affiliation in the form of:Consultant and/or Advisor for Amgen Inc.; AstraZeneca; Axiom; Bayer Corporation; BeiGene, Inc.; BerGenbio; BioNTech SE; Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Bristol Myers Squibb; Da Volterra; Daiichi Sankyo, Inc.; EMD Serono, Inc.; Genentech, Inc.; Genmab A/S; Grid Therapeutics; Guardant Health; IO Biotech, Inc.; iTeos Therapeutics; Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Lilly; Merck & Co., Inc.; Mirati Therapeutics, Inc.; Natera; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation; Oncocyte Corporation; Pfizer; PharmaMar; Puma Biotechnology; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc.; and Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited.Grant/Research Support from Amgen Inc.; Bristol Myers Squibb; and Lilly.Data Safety Monitoring Board for Incyte; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation; SpringWorks Therapeutics, Inc.; Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited; and University of Pennsylvania: CAR T Program.Faculty/PlannerAnne Chiang, MD, PhD, FASCO, has a financial interest/relationship or affiliation in the form of:Consultant and/or Advisor for AstraZeneca; Daiichi Sankyo, Inc.; Genentech, Inc.; and Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Grant/Research Support from AbbVie Inc.; Amgen Inc.; AstraZeneca; Bristol Myers Squibb; Flatiron Health; and Genentech, Inc.Planning Committee and Reviewer DisclosuresPlanners, independent reviewers, and staff of PVI, PeerView Institute for Medical Education, do not have any relevant financial relationships related to this CE activity unless listed below.

This content has been developed for healthcare professionals only. Patients who seek health information should consult with their physician or relevant patient advocacy groups.For the full presentation, downloadable Practice Aids, slides, and complete CME/MOC/AAPA information, and to apply for credit, please visit us at PeerView.com/ZZA865. CME/MOC/AAPA credit will be available until January 2, 2025.Harnessing the Power of the Latest Clinical and Research Advances in SCLC: How to Accelerate Progress and Improve Patient Outcomes With Current and Emerging Therapies In support of improving patient care, PVI, PeerView Institute for Medical Education, is jointly accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE), and the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC), to provide continuing education for the healthcare team.SupportThis activity is supported by an independent educational grant from AstraZeneca.Disclosure PolicyAll relevant conflicts of interest have been mitigated prior to the commencement of the activity.Faculty/Planner DisclosuresChair/PlannerTaofeek K. Owonikoko, MD, PhD, has a financial interest/relationship or affiliation in the form of:Consultant and/or Advisor for Abbvie Inc.; Amgen Inc.; AstraZeneca; Bayer Corporation; BeiGene, Inc.; Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Bristol Myers Squibb; Coherus BioSciences; Daiichi Sankyo, Inc.; Eisai Inc.; EMD Serono, Inc.; Exelixis, Inc.; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd/Genentech, Inc.; G1 Therapeutics, Inc.; GenCART; Heat Biologics Inc.; Ipsen Pharma; Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Lilly; Merck & Co., Inc.; Meryx Inc.; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation; Oncocyte Corporation; PharmaMar; Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited; Xcovery; and Zentalis Pharmaceuticals.Grant/Research Support from Aeglea BioTherapeutics; Amgen Inc.; AstraZeneca; Bayer Corporation; Bristol Myers Squibb; Cardiff Oncology, Inc.; Eisai Inc.; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd/Genentech, Inc.; FUJIFILM Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc.; G1 Therapeutics, Inc.; Incyte; Ipsen Pharma; Loxo Oncology/Lilly; Merck & Co., Inc.; Mersana Therapeutics; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation; Oncorus, Inc.; Pfizer; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc.; Turning Point Therapeutics, Inc.; United Therapeutics Corporation; and Y-mAbs Therapeutics, Inc.Faculty/PlannerHossein Borghaei, DO, MS, has a financial interest/relationship or affiliation in the form of:Consultant and/or Advisor for Amgen Inc.; AstraZeneca; Axiom; Bayer Corporation; BeiGene, Inc.; BerGenbio; BioNTech SE; Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Bristol Myers Squibb; Da Volterra; Daiichi Sankyo, Inc.; EMD Serono, Inc.; Genentech, Inc.; Genmab A/S; Grid Therapeutics; Guardant Health; IO Biotech, Inc.; iTeos Therapeutics; Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Lilly; Merck & Co., Inc.; Mirati Therapeutics, Inc.; Natera; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation; Oncocyte Corporation; Pfizer; PharmaMar; Puma Biotechnology; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc.; and Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited.Grant/Research Support from Amgen Inc.; Bristol Myers Squibb; and Lilly.Data Safety Monitoring Board for Incyte; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation; SpringWorks Therapeutics, Inc.; Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited; and University of Pennsylvania: CAR T Program.Faculty/PlannerAnne Chiang, MD, PhD, FASCO, has a financial interest/relationship or affiliation in the form of:Consultant and/or Advisor for AstraZeneca; Daiichi Sankyo, Inc.; Genentech, Inc.; and Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Grant/Research Support from AbbVie Inc.; Amgen Inc.; AstraZeneca; Bristol Myers Squibb; Flatiron Health; and Genentech, Inc.Planning Committee and Reviewer DisclosuresPlanners, independent reviewers, and staff of PVI, PeerView Institute for Medical Education, do not have any relevant financial relationships related to this CE activity unless listed below.

Our Monday Re-Release series on Emerging Therapies for Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis in Children concludes with the first of two Townhall podcasts. Listen to hear distinguished faculty in pediatric dermatology and allergy/immunology answer questions about new and emerging treatments and important research issues for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis in children. Special guests Dr. Emma Guttman-Yassky and Dr. Eric Simpson. This program originally aired in January of 2021.

This the final episode of the 6-part series on Emerging Therapies for Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis in Children. Join Dr. Dawn Davis from the Mayo Clinic in this final episode on Systemic Therapies for Moderate-to-Severe AD in children, for a conversation with Wendy Smith-Begolka, MBS from the National Eczema Association and Korey Capozza, MPH from Global Parents for Eczema Research. Together they answer questions and discuss the importance and value of research. This program originally aired in January of 2021.www.nationaleczema.orgwww.parentsforeczemaresearch.comwww.pedraresearch.org

Join Dr. Dawn Davis from the Mayo Clinic for a conversation with two patient advocates as they discuss the patient experience with new and traditional AD therapies and share thoughts on how patients and providers can best work together. This program originally aired in December of 2020.

Monday Re-release continues with the first of two podcasts from the Emerging Therapies for Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis in Children series. Listen as distinguished faculty in pediatric dermatology and allergy/immunology talk about new and emerging treatments and important research issues for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis in children. This program originally aired in November of 2020.

In this episode, Dr. Soania Mathur interviews Dr. Michael Okun to discuss the latest therapies for Parkinson's, including RT-QUIC (Parkinson's biomarker), subcutaneous dopamine pumps, vibrating gloves, rescue medications, DBS, and more.  Dr. Mathur and Dr. Okun discuss: New discoveries in diagnosing Parkinson's What do certain biological markers mean for diagnosis? What's new on the horizon for Parkinson's treatments? The subcutaneous delivery of dopamine replacement Transdermal treatment Microbiome in Parkinson's Vibration therapy The importance of individualized care plans How to sort through all the information about Parkinson's and more. We hope you enjoy!