POPULARITY
Good morning from Pharma Daily: the podcast that brings you the most important developments in the pharmaceutical and biotech world. Recent weeks have been a whirlwind of activity in the pharmaceutical and biotech sectors, showcasing significant strides in scientific breakthroughs, regulatory advancements, and strategic industry maneuvers. Replimune's Vusolimogene Oderparepvec has emerged as a beacon of hope in the fight against advanced melanoma. This gene therapy, utilizing an oncolytic virus, has recently received a positive nod from an advisory committee for its Phase 1/2 trial. When combined with PD-1 checkpoint inhibitors, it holds promise for enhancing immune responses against tumors—a critical development in cancer treatment that may redefine therapeutic strategies. This advancement follows two prior FDA rejections, underscoring the multifaceted evaluation process drugs undergo before approval and demonstrating that perseverance can eventually lead to success. Meanwhile, AstraZeneca and Daiichi Sankyo have achieved a milestone with the European Union's approval of Datopotamab Deruxtecan for treating unresectable or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). As an antibody-drug conjugate targeting the Trop-2 protein, it offers new hope to TNBC patients who often have limited options. This approval underscores the potential of antibody-drug conjugates in oncology, supported by promising Phase 3 trial data. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals is enjoying notable revenue growth thanks to Dupixent, a monoclonal antibody addressing autoimmune and respiratory diseases. Such financial success underscores the expanding role of biologics in tackling chronic illnesses, reflecting a broader industry trend towards biologically-based treatments. In business news, Pharmanovia's licensing deal with Impact Therapeutics for Senaparib signifies strategic expansion in oncology therapeutics. Similarly, Kaigene's agreement with Taisho Pharmaceutical highlights ongoing interest in autoimmune therapies, illustrating how companies are leveraging partnerships to broaden their therapeutic horizons. Pfizer is on the brink of expanding its label for Ritlecitinib (Litfulo), a JAK3 inhibitor that showed positive results in Phase 3 trials for nonsegmental vitiligo. By targeting autoimmune pathways, this small molecule could offer new hope to vitiligo patients seeking effective treatments. Litfulo is advancing through regulatory stages following successful trials, poised to provide an oral alternative for non-segmental vitiligo—a potential game-changer that could improve patient compliance and expand treatment options beyond Incyte's Opzelura. However, not all news is positive. Novo Nordisk faced disappointment when its Ziltivekimab failed a Phase 3 trial for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease with chronic kidney disease. Despite this setback, Novo Nordisk remains optimistic about ongoing trials Artemis and Hermes as potential lifelines for their CKD program. Success could diversify their portfolio and introduce novel therapeutic options for CKD patients. Additionally, financial hurdles surfaced as Daiichi Sankyo saw an 11% share drop due to an accounting error, and Alnylam Pharmaceuticals' market value took a hit following a lowered revenue forecast for its TTR drug. On a global scale, the Trump administration has allocated $600 million to GAVI for childhood immunizations worldwide. This funding reversal emphasizes ongoing efforts to ensure vaccine accessibility across the globe—an essential component of public health initiatives. The dynamic nature of these developments reflects both the potential and challenges within the pharmaceutical landscape. The promising avenues presented by gene therapy, antibody-drug conjugates, and JAK inhibitors are tempered by clinical setbacks and financial volatility, underscoring the rigorous demands faced by industry stakeholders. In other industry news, AbbVie's Skyrizi continues to thrive despite increasing competition in the psoriasis market. With sales reaching $5.55 billion in Q2 2026, Skyrizi demonstrates the sustained demand for innovative biologics that enhance treatment efficacy and safety profiles. Karyopharm Therapeutics remains committed to its XPO1 inhibitor Xpovio despite setbacks in other indications like endometrial cancer. Their focus on myelofibrosis illustrates a strategic pivot towards hematologic malignancies where unmet needs persist. Oral GLP-1 receptor agonists are gaining ground as Novo Nordisk's Wegovy pill and Eli Lilly's Foundayo vie for dominance in weight management solutions. These oral formulations promise increased accessibility over traditional injectables. Regulatory arenas continue to evolve with AbbVie's Rinvoq gaining European clearance for alopecia and vitiligo. Such approvals highlight regulatory bodies' critical role in expanding market access across diverse therapeutic areas. Strategic partnerships also abound as WellSpan Health collaborates with Hippocratic AI to integrate artificial intelligence into healthcare solutions—a growing trend aimed at enhancing clinical decision-making capabilities. Meanwhile, Apnimed's $192 million IPO success indicates strong investor confidence in novel therapeutics like its sleep apnea treatment—a reflection of biopharma's financing dynamics where targeted therapies draw significant interest. Overall, these updates paint a vivid picture of an industry characterized by relentless innovation through scientific research, strategic alliances, and regulatory progress—all aimed at improving patient outcomes amidst evolving market demands. The industry's focus on breakthrough technologies continues to shape global health initiatives by offering new opportunities for patient care across various conditions. As companies navigate this dynamic environment marked by both promise and challenge—their ability to innovate scientifically while engaging strategically with regulators will be crucial to bringing novel therapies effectively into clinical practice where they can make meaningful impacts on patients' lives worldwide.Support the show
In today's episode, we spoke with Sara M. Tolaney, MD, MPH, about the FDA approval of sacituzumab govitecan plus pembrolizumab (Keytruda) or pembrolizumab and berahyaluronidase alfa-pmph (Keytruda Qlex) for the first-line treatment of adult patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) whose tumors express PD-L1 as determined by an FDA-authorized test. Dr Tolaney is chief of the Division of Breast Oncology and associate director of the Susan F. Smith Center for Women's Cancers and a senior physician at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, as well as an associate professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School in Boston, Massachusetts.This regulatory decision was backed by findings from the phase 3 ASCENT-04/KEYNOTE-D19 trial (NCT05382286), in which the median progression-free survival among patients in the sacituzumab govitecan arm was 11.2 months (95% CI, 9.3-16.7) vs 7.8 months (95% CI, 7.3-9.3) among patients who received physician's choice of chemotherapy plus pembrolizumab (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.51-0.84; P = .0009).In our exclusive interview, Dr Tolaney highlighted the significance of this approval, key data from ASCENT-04, and how the TNBC paradigm is shifting to accommodate this new regimen.
Listen in to learn from Thomas Bachelot, MD, PhD, and Mafalda Oliveira, MD, PhD, about recent advances and the integration of anti-TROP2 antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) into the management of patients with triple-negative breast cancer, including as first-line therapy for those who are not eligible for immunotherapy. Experts will cover: The evolving role of TROP2-directed antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), including sacituzumab govitecan and datopotamab deruxtecan, in addressing unmet needs in the frontline treatment of TNBC. Treatment sequencing, reimbursement barriers to recent approvals, and toxicity-informed treatment selection considerations. How to monitor and manage ocular and pulmonary toxicities and care-team readiness for implementing ADC-based therapy in routine practice. Presenters:Thomas Bachelot, MD, PhD Medical Oncology Department of Oncology Léon Bérard Center Lyon, France Mafalda Oliveira, MD, PhD Senior Consultant Medical Oncology Department Vall d'Hebron University Hospital Senior Clinical Investigator Breast Cancer Group Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO) Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus Barcelona, Spain Get access to all of our new podcasts by subscribing to the Decera Clinical Education Oncology Podcast on Apple Podcasts, YouTube Music, or Spotify. Visit the program page for more content associated with this discussion. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.
Immune checkpoint inhibitors have rapidly reshaped care for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC)—but surgical teams increasingly encounter their downstream perioperative consequences. In this episode, we define immunotherapy through the lens of checkpoint biology, review the landmark evidence supporting pembrolizumab in metastatic PD‑L1–positive TNBC (KEYNOTE‑355) and curative-intent stage II–III TNBC (KEYNOTE‑522), and translate immune-related adverse events (irAEs) into practical periop recognition, triage, and timing decisions—especially for endocrine, pulmonary, hepatic, dermatologic, and GI toxicities. Hosts:- Rashmi Kumar, MD, PhDResident, University of Michigan General Surgery Residency Program Twitter/X: @RashmiJKumar- Melissa Pilewskie, MDAttending Breast Surgical Oncologist, Co-Director of the Weiser Family Center for Breast Cancer, Michigan MedicineTwitter/X: @MPilewskie- Stephanie Downs-Canner, MDAttending Breast Surgical Oncologist & Physician-Scientist, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Program Director of the Breast Surgical Oncology Fellowship Training ProgramTwitter/X: @SDownsCannerLearning Objectives: Define immunotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibition in breast cancer Summarize current clinical indications and pivotal evidence for pembrolizumab in TNBC Equip perioperative clinicians to identify and manage immune-related adverse events (irAEs) or side effects of immunotherapy. Rationale for Immunotherapy in Breast Cancer ReviewSelecting Triple Negative Breast Cancer Patients for Immunotherapy: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37714640/Landmark Clinical Trials Discussed in this Episode KEYNOTE-355: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33232653/ KEYNOTE-522: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33232642/ IMpassion130: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30345906/ IMpassion131: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33930478/ Assessment of Surgical Outcomes in patients receiving chemoimmunotherapySurgical outcomes after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38332314/Immune Related Adverse Events and Management Schneider BJ, et al. Management of immune-related adverse events: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34724392/ Brahmer JR, et al. SITC clinical practice guideline: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34177534/ Please visit https://behindtheknife.org to access other high-yield surgical education podcasts, videos and more. If you liked this episode, check out our recent episodes here: https://behindtheknife.org/listenBehind the Knife Premium: https://behindtheknife.org/premiumOral Board Review: https://behindtheknife.org/oral-boardOral Board Simulator: https://behindtheknife.org/oral-board/simulatorGeneral Surgery Oral Board Review Course: https://behindtheknife.org/premium/general-surgery-oral-board-reviewTrauma Surgery Video Atlas: https://behindtheknife.org/premium/trauma-surgery-video-atlasDominate Surgery: A High-Yield Guide to Your Surgery Clerkship: https://behindtheknife.org/premium/dominate-surgery-a-high-yield-guide-to-your-surgery-clerkshipDominate Surgery for APPs: A High-Yield Guide to Your Surgery Rotation: https://behindtheknife.org/premium/dominate-surgery-for-apps-a-high-yield-guide-to-your-surgery-rotationVascular Surgery Oral Board Review Course: https://behindtheknife.org/premium/vascular-surgery-oral-board-reviewColorectal Surgery Oral Board Review Course: https://behindtheknife.org/premium/colorectal-surgery-oral-board-reviewSurgical Oncology Oral Board Review Course: https://behindtheknife.org/premium/surgical-oncology-oral-board-reviewCardiothoracic Oral Board Review Course: https://behindtheknife.org/premium/cardiothoracic-surgery-oral-board-reviewOBGYN Oral Board Review Coures: https://behindtheknife.org/course/obgyn-oral-board-reviewEPA Playbook: https://behindtheknife.org/course/epa-playbookSurgical Instrument Flashcards: https://behindtheknife.org/course/surgical-instrument-flashcardsABSITE Review: https://behindtheknife.org/course/absite-2026-exam-reviewDownload our App:Apple App Store: https://apps.apple.com/us/app/behind-the-knife/id1672420049Android/Google Play: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.btk.app&hl=en_US
Highlights from the PER® CME activity "Show Me the Data™: Redefining Treatment Paradigms in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Across the Disease Continuum" — this podcast is not certified for credit. To participate in the full accredited activity and earn CME credit, use the link below.In this podcast, experts Hope S. Rugo, MD, FASCO; Neil M. Iyengar, MD; Heather McArthur, MD, MPH; and Jason Aboudi Mouabbi, MD; discuss the latest data to inform management of patients with early-stage triple negative breast cancer (TNBC).Earn CME credit by completing the full accredited activity (available through June 30, 2027): https://www.gotoper.com/courses/show-me-the-data-redefining-treatment-paradigms-in-triple-negative-breast-cancer-across-the-disease-continuum-h5knThis podcast, including the narration, was developed by PER® (Physicians' Education Resource®, LLC) editorial staff from the full online CME activity developed with these faculty. The narration was voiced by a PER staff member or by an AI tool. The podcast contains no product advertising. The full activity is supported by educational grants from AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals; BioNTech; Daiichi Sankyo, Inc.; and Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC.This content is for educational purposes only and is not a substitute for the independent clinical judgment of a health care professional. Faculty may discuss investigational or off-label uses; consult prescribing information for any products discussed.
Good morning from Pharma Daily: the podcast that brings you the most important developments in the pharmaceutical and biotech world. Today, we explore the dynamic shifts and breakthroughs shaping the industry, from major acquisitions to groundbreaking scientific advancements. Merck KGaA has made headlines with its bold $11.3 billion acquisition of Bio-Techne Corporation. This marks Merck's most significant deal since purchasing Sigma-Aldrich in 2015, reinforcing its strategic focus on expanding its life sciences tools portfolio. The acquisition aims to accelerate innovation in drug development and diagnostics, highlighting Merck's commitment to enhancing its capabilities in biotechnology under the leadership of CEO Kai Beckmann. Such strategic moves underscore a broader trend towards bolstering biotech portfolios through mergers and acquisitions as companies aim to remain competitive in an ever-evolving market landscape. In regulatory news, the FDA has approved a pioneering combination therapy involving Gilead's Trodelvy and Merck & Co.'s Keytruda for the first-line treatment of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). This aggressive cancer subtype has historically had limited treatment options, making this approval particularly significant. The combination therapy leverages an antibody-drug conjugate targeting Trop-2 alongside a PD-1 inhibitor, offering a promising new strategy that could substantially improve patient survival outcomes. This development also highlights the growing role of antibody-drug conjugates in oncology, illustrating how innovative therapeutic combinations can enhance treatment efficacy. Meanwhile, Pfizer's Ibrance has received FDA approval for label expansion to treat HR-positive, HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. As a CDK4/6 inhibitor crucial in cell cycle regulation, Ibrance's expanded use reflects ongoing advancements in targeted therapies that personalize cancer treatment based on specific molecular characteristics. Such expansions demonstrate the importance of continuous clinical evaluation and regulatory engagement in extending the lifecycle and applications of existing drugs. Ionis Pharmaceuticals has gained FDA approval for Tryngolza for severe hypertriglyceridemia, marking a significant milestone for antisense oligonucleotide therapies. By targeting apolipoprotein C-III, Tryngolza offers a novel approach to managing metabolic conditions linked to pancreatitis risks. This approval underscores the growing importance of antisense technology in addressing complex lipid disorders and highlights Ionis' strategic efforts to expand market reach through global partnerships. On the business development front, Boehringer Ingelheim's partnership with Immunai aims to leverage artificial intelligence in T-cell target discovery for cancer and autoimmune diseases. The integration of AI/ML technologies into drug discovery processes is increasingly seen as essential for enhancing precision and efficiency. This collaboration reflects an industry-wide shift towards embracing technology to improve research and development outcomes. In clinical trials, Otsuka's centanafadine shows promise for adults with ADHD and comorbid anxiety following successful Phase 3b trials. As a small molecule reuptake inhibitor, centanafadine could provide dual therapeutic benefits for patients with these overlapping conditions. Such developments highlight ongoing innovation in neuropsychiatric treatments aimed at addressing mental health conditions with greater precision. Financially, Oblenio Bio's $62 million Series B funding round will support advancing its tri-specific autoimmune T-cell engager into trials, potentially offering new solutions for autoimmune diseases through innovative immunotherapy approaches. These financial movements illustrate how companies are strategically positioning themselves to capitalize on emerging therapeutic opportunities. Amid these developments, regulatory dynamics continue to evolve, as seen with the FDA's pilot program aimed at streamlining drug approval processes. Initiatives like these are pivotal in restoring confidence in regulatory frameworks while adapting to new scientific insights and technological advancements. Overall, these developments underscore the pharmaceutical and biotech sectors' dynamic nature, characterized by strategic collaborations, regulatory milestones, and innovative treatment options poised to enhance patient care and strengthen drug development pipelines. The ongoing integration of cutting-edge technologies such as AI signifies an evolution towards more personalized and efficient healthcare solutions. Thank you for tuning into Pharma Daily, where we bring you the latest insights from the forefront of pharmaceutical and biotech innovation. Join us next time as we continue to explore the trends shaping the future of healthcare globally.Support the show
This week we discuss a new approval for pabociclib in HER2-positive disease based on the PATINA trial as well as the use of sacituzumab govitecan + pembrolizumab in TNBC, recently approved based on the ASCENT04/KEYNOTED19 trial. And the concept of T-cell "stemless" is intriguing with possibilities: DOI: 10.1056/NEJMcibr2601002 Learning Oncology Companion: https://www.kelleycpharmd.com/learning-oncology-companion-oncopharm
In this episode of Oncology Unplugged, host Chandler Park, MD, a medical oncologist at Norton Cancer Institute in Louisville, Kentucky, was joined by Neil M. Iyengar, MD, an associate professor and co-director of Breast Medical Oncology in the Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology at the Emory University School of Medicine, as well as the director of Survivorship Services at the Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University in Atlanta, Georgia.Their conversation focused on the rapidly evolving treatment paradigm for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), the integration of metabolic health strategies, the clinical emergence of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) in the frontline metastatic setting, and the management of treatment-related toxicities.Drs Park and Iyengar examined data from the phase 3 TROPION-Breast02 trial (NCT05374512), which evaluated first-line datopotamab deruxtecan-dlnk (Dato-DXd; Datroway) in patients with PD-L1-negative metastatic TNBC. The trial demonstrated improvements in both progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) with Dato-DXd compared with standard chemotherapy. Notably, the experts also highlighted a remarkable ORR with Dato-DXd, showing that the ADC may be a robust treatment option for symptomatic patients or those experiencing rapid progression.They also discussed individualizing treatment between Dato-DXd and sacituzumab govitecan-hziy (Trodelvy) based on biomarker status, dosing schedules, and distinct toxicity profiles. Furthermore, the experts emphasized the importance of proactive management of unique ADC-associated toxicities. For Dato-DXd, they recommended prophylactic dexamethasone mouthwash and lubricating eye drops to mitigate mucositis and corneal surface events. For sacituzumab govitecan, they noted the necessity of growth factor support for neutropenia and loperamide for diarrhea.Regarding early-stage disease, they reaffirmed the phase 3 KEYNOTE-522 trial (NCT03036488) regimen of pembrolizumab (Keytruda) plus chemotherapy as the standard of care, with adjuvant escalation using capecitabine or PARP inhibitors for patients with residual disease.Drs Park and Iyengar concluded by spotlighting metabolic health interventions for patients with breast cancer. Although GLP-1 receptor agonists show promise in breast cancer survivors, Dr Iyengar cautioned against their initiation during active neoadjuvant immunotherapy due to their potential effects on pathologic complete response rates. He advocated for lifestyle interventions, including resistance training and a plant-forward, high-protein diet, to maintain lean muscle mass and improve OS outcomes.
For more information regarding this CME/CE activity and to complete the CME/CE requirements and claim credit for this activity, visit:https://www.mycme.com/courses/the-evolving-role-of-antibody-drug-conjugates-in-metastatic-triple-negative-breast-cancer-10800SummaryThis CME/CE-certified podcast will provide multidisciplinary clinicians with an evidence-based update on the evolving role of TROP2-directed antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) in the frontline treatment of metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. A medical and an ocular oncology specialist review the latest efficacy and safety data from pivotal clinical trials evaluating ADCs, their integration into contemporary treatment algorithms, and guideline recommendations based on PD-L1 status, BRCA mutation status, and immunotherapy eligibility. Learners will explore key factors influencing treatment selection, compare the benefits and limitations of more established therapeutic options, and examine practical strategies for preventing, recognizing, and managing ADC-associated toxicities. Special emphasis will be placed on multidisciplinary approaches to the management of ocular adverse events and other clinically significant toxicities to optimize patient outcomes and support safe implementation of these therapies in clinical practice.Learning ObjectivesEvaluate the current and emerging clinical evidence surrounding the use of trophoblast cell-surface antigen 2 (TROP2)-directed antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) in the first-line treatment of metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC)Integrate TROP2-directed ADCs into frontline treatment regimens for metastatic TNBC based on the latest clinical evidence, guidelines, and patient- and tumor-specific factorsApply multidisciplinary and patient-centric strategies for the prevention, recognition, and management of toxicities associated with the use of TROP2-directed ADCs in patients with metastatic TNBCThis activity is accredited for CME/CE CreditThe National Association for Continuing Education is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) to provide continuing medical education for physicians.The National Association for Continuing Education designates this enduring material for a maximum of 0.50 AMA PRA Category 1 Credits™. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.The National Association for Continuing Education is accredited by the American Association of Nurse Practitioners as an approved provider of nurse practitioner continuing education. Provider number: 121222. This activity is approved for 0.50 contact hours (which includes 0.50 hours of pharmacology). For additional information about the accreditation of this program, please contact NACE at info@naceonline.com.Faculty and Moderator Aditya Bardia, MDProgram Director, Breast Medical Oncology, UCLAProfessor of Medicine, UCLALos Angeles, CADr. Bardia has disclosed the following financial relationships:Consultant: Alyssum, AstraZeneca/Daiichi, BMS, Eli Lilly, Genentech, Gilead, Menarini, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, VyomeAdvisor/Advisory Board: Alyssum, AstraZeneca/Daiichi, Eli Lilly, Genentech, Gilead, Menarini, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, VyomeContracted Research: AstraZeneca/Daiichi, Eli Lilly, Genentech, Gilead, Menarini, Merck, Novartis, PfizerStock options: Vyome (immuno-inflammatory and rare diseases)All of his consultant, advisor/advisory board, and contracted research disclosures are related to cancer.Maura Di Nicola, MDAssistant Professor of OphthalmologyBascom Palmer Eye InstituteMedical Director of Imaging and EchographyBascom Palmer Eye InstituteMiami, FLDr. Di Nicola has disclosed the following financial relationships:Consultant: AbbVie (ophthalmology), SpringWorks Therapeutics (oncology)Advisor/Advisory Board: AbbVie (ophthalmology)Research Grant: Castle Biosciences (ocular oncology)Please review additional planner disclosures here.Disclosure of Commercial SupportThis educational activity is supported by a medical education grant from AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals and a medical education grant from Daiichi Sankyo, Inc.Please visit http://naceonline.com to engage in more live and on demand CME/CE content.
Dan, Manny, & Billy welcome Actor, Producer, and Musician Alisa Reyes to discuss how she went from being on Nickelodeon's All That, to evolving into a high-powered multi-hyphenate talent, and being the voice of LaCienega Boulevardez on the award-winning show The Proud Family. “It is all about uplifting humanity during Mother Earth's ascension right now, and we just gotta ride this wave gracefully, and we all gotta just stay connected and keep uplifting the vibration of humanity [...] that's why we all do what we do.” -Alisa Reyes This is a special episode of Nostalgia 101, because Alisa Reyes has been part of so many of the pop-culture moments in all our lives, so it was an honor to have her on the podcast to talk about her time on All That, Teen NBC's One World, what it's like to keep evolving and transitioning so successfully in such an ever-changing industry, and her recent time on the award-winning show The Proud Family. We also got to hear about some of the fun things she's been able to do, like being on Celebrity Family Feud with Soleil Moon Frye, Keke Palmer, Paula Jai Parker, and Kyla Pratt, to face Salt-N-Pepa and Kid 'n Play, producing documentaries like The Orange Years and Butterfly in the Sky, being on Reading Rainbow, and what it was like to be on one of the most unhinged soap operas ever, Passions. The guys also got to ask some fun Nostalgia Test Podcast pop-culture questions, and Alisa reveals that she watched a very random sitcom that floored Dan because he's never heard anyone, ANYONE, say they watched this show. Email us (thenostalgiatest@gmail.com) your thoughts, opinions, and topics for our next Nostalgia Test! Suggest A Test & Be Our Guest! We're always looking for a fun new topic for The Nostalgia Test. Hit the link above, tell us what you'd like to see tested, and be our guest for that episode! Alisa Reyes is a born and raised New Yorker who is Irish, Italian and Dominican and now resides in California. She is known for her role on Nickelodeon's "All That" as a series regular season (1-3) & season 11 where she played herself and multiple roles. Alisa is also a series regular on the Emmy & NAACP Award Winning Disney Plus cartoon "The Proud Family: Louder & Prouder" with new episodes airing now. Alisa plays the bossy, but oh so lovable "La Cienega Boulevardez". You can also check out Alisa as "Lacienega" on Disney's "Broken Karaoke" & "Theme Song Take Over". She has also starred in NBC's "One World" as the Cuban-born entrepreneur of the group. Peter Engel created the TNBC show. Alisa received the coveted Hollywood Young Star Award for her role of Marci Blake in "One World". Thinking you may recognize her from some other show? Well check out her credits on "Without A Trace" (CBS), "Strong Medicine" (LIFETIME), "NYPD Blue" (ABC), "ER" (NBC), as well as the controversial Trina on "Boston Public" (FOX) and "Six Feet Under" (HBO) and on the Emmy nominated PBS series "The American Family", portraying the younger Vangie. The list is endless, with lots more to come. Alisa was also on NBCs "Passions", where she joined the cast as the beautiful and exotic singer Sydney Valentine causing nothing but heartache for the lovelorn super couple Chad and Whitney, but also making her mark as a strong recording artist. She also was a recurring on CBS's "The Bold & the Beautiful" as the sassy Ginger. Check out Alisa's latest film "Sisters" written and directed by Jahmar Hill. She plays the role of Elise in this crime/thriller airing currently on BET and BET Plus. You can also see Alisa star in "Break Even" which is out now. The film is written by CJ Walley and directed by Shane Stanley. This will be Alisa's 4th project with Shane Stanley. Alisa plays Rosie in the film. "Break Even" is an action, adventure, love story you will not want to miss. Alisa also starred in films such as "Daze", "The Biz" and "FreezerBurn"to name a few. Along with other films such as "A Trip to the Dark Side" and "My Trip Back to the Dark Side" directed by Shane Stanely. Alisa is also in a film called "Heavenly Deposit" which is supported by The Dove Foundation as the role of Jenny. You can also make it a movie night and watch her movie "Players" she stars in with Freddie Rodriguez. Along with her latest documentary that she is producing alongside Scott Barber and Bill Parks starring as herself called "The Orange Years" about 80s & 90s Nickelodeon nostalgia which is out on Hulu and most platforms. You can also see Alisa in a documentary called "Butterfly in the Sky" which premiered at Tribeca Film Festival and is now streaming on Netflix Alisa's latest music single " Back & Forth" featuring and produced by Linnie King Twigg and mixed & mastered by DJ EVIL DEE, along with her single "Sexy Hot" are now available on all media platforms through TuneCore, iTunes, Amazon Music, Spotify and more. Alisa prior to her solo music career was in a girls group called "3G's" signed with Hollywood Records. The group had a song on "The Princess Diaries Soundtrack" called "Second Chance". Approximate Rundown 00:00 Back to School Intro 01:54 Meet Elisa Reyes 03:00 New York Roots 04:13 Elisa's Career Snapshot 05:50 All That Origins 08:39 Auditions and Set School 10:46 Mom's Support System 13:13 Parenting and Balance 16:03 From All That to One World 20:28 Big Roles and Industry Legends 22:17 Winning An Award for One World 24:22 Voice Acting and Self Tapes 31:17 Proud Family Reboot and Relevance 34:37 Celebrity Family Feud Stories 36:43 Blossom Hats Influence 38:47 Soap Opera Wildness 42:29 Reading Rainbow Memories 47:16 Nickelodeon Nostalgia Shift 49:02 Phones Algorithms Parenting 51:55 Social Media Cringe Culture 55:07 Cartoon Universe Picks 57:46 90s Fashion Comeback 59:38 TGIF Favorites Trauma TV 01:03:06 Kids Shows Vibes Wrap 01:05:10 Plugs Farewell Outro Book The Nostalgia Test Podcast Bring The Nostalgia Test Podcast's high energy fun and comedy on your podcast, to host your themed parties & special events! The Nostalgia Test Podcast will create an unforgettable Nostalgic experience for any occasion because we are the party! We bring it 100% of the time! Email us at thenostalgiatest@gmail.com or fill out the form at this link. LET'S GET NOSTALGIC! Keep up with all things The Nostalgia Test Podcast on Instagram | Substack | Discord | TikTok | Bluesky | YouTube | Facebook The intro and outro music ('Neon Attack 80s') is by Emanmusic. The Lithology Brewing ad music ("Red, White, Black, & Blue") is by PEG and the Rejected
Dr. Monty Pal shares highlights from the final day of ASCO26, including new research on treating anemia in myelofibrosis, advances in RAS-mutated mCRC, novel therapies for AML, and a potentially practice-changing trial in TNBC. LINK TO FULL TRANSCRIPT
Good morning from Pharma Daily: the podcast that brings you the most important developments in the pharmaceutical and biotech world. Today, we're diving into a series of noteworthy advancements and challenges that are shifting the landscape of drug development and patient care. Starting with AstraZeneca and Daiichi Sankyo, their Trop2-directed antibody-drug conjugate, Datroway, has secured FDA approval for first-line treatment in triple-negative breast cancer. This form of cancer is notoriously aggressive and offers limited treatment options, making this approval a significant milestone. It positions Datroway as a key player in the ADC market targeting TNBC, highlighting the increasing role of antibody-drug conjugates in oncology. This advancement not only expands therapeutic options for patients but also emphasizes the growing importance of ADCs in effectively targeting cancer cells while sparing healthy tissues. In another exciting development, Merck and Kelun Biotech have reported on their SAC-TMT ADC, which when paired with Keytruda, shows a profound impact on PD-L1-positive non-small cell lung cancer patients. Their combination therapy demonstrated a remarkable 65% reduction in disease progression or death compared to Keytruda alone. Presented at the ASCO annual meeting, these findings could potentially revolutionize first-line treatments for NSCLC, further underscoring the promising therapeutic potential of combining ADCs with immunotherapies. However, AstraZeneca faced a setback with a novel breast cancer drug as an FDA advisory committee recommended against its approval. Interestingly, the European Medicines Agency provided a favorable opinion, illustrating the divergent regulatory landscapes across continents. Such discrepancies highlight the complex regulatory environment pharmaceutical companies must navigate and could influence strategic decisions regarding market focus. On the legal front, Eli Lilly is embroiled in controversy over an alleged $200 million rebate fraud scheme involving its diabetes drug, Trulicity. This situation sheds light on ongoing issues within pharmaceutical distribution channels and raises questions about compliance and oversight mechanisms necessary to prevent such financial misconduct. Meanwhile, industry dynamics continue to evolve as AbbVie announced workforce reductions in its Allergan Aesthetics unit. This move reflects broader trends where companies streamline operations to prioritize core competencies and promising therapeutic areas. From a regulatory perspective, Maat Pharma's decision to seek re-examination for its graft-versus-host disease medication underscores the iterative nature of drug approval processes. Persistence in addressing regulatory feedback remains crucial as companies strive for successful market entry. In obesity management, Novo Nordisk's oral GLP-1 receptor agonist, Wegovy, gains traction as a convenient treatment option. The shift towards oral medications could significantly improve patient adherence and outcomes by offering an easier alternative to injections. Biogen's decision to terminate its collaboration with Denali Therapeutics after unsuccessful phase 2 trials for a Parkinson's disease candidate highlights the inherent risks in neurological drug development. Rigorous clinical evaluation remains essential to ensure efficacy before advancing therapies further. Despite these advancements, challenges persist as Biogen and Denali's BIIB122 failed in phase 2b trials for idiopathic Parkinson's disease. This underscores the complexity of neurological disorders and emphasizes the need for continued innovation targeting LRRK2 kinase inhibitors. In the realm of CAR-T therapies, Novartis' T-Charge platform faces competition from emerging in vivo technologies. This competitive landscape demonstrates rapid evolution within cell therapy domains, aiming to enhance efficacy and accessibility for patients. Meanwhile, strategic mergers and acquisitions continue as Liminatus Pharma acquires CAR-T biotech Innocsai for $320 million, underscoring sustained interest in oncology cell therapies. Switching gears to Eli Lilly's recent Phase 3 TRIUMPH-1 trial results for retatrutide, they reveal promising weight loss outcomes comparable to bariatric surgery. As a triple hormone receptor agonist targeting GLP-1, retatrutide holds significant potential in addressing obesity—a condition with profound public health implications. Medtronic's acquisition of SPR Therapeutics to enhance its chronic pain portfolio reflects a focus on minimally invasive treatments. Financially, Research Alliance III raised $75 million through a SPAC IPO targeting mergers with China-based biotech firms, signaling increased global collaboration within the sector. Dandelion Health's $14 million Series A funding aims to advance clinical intelligence platforms that could transform drug development through data analytics. Finally, Moderna's mRNA-based flu vaccine is set for review by the FDA's vaccine advisory committee after overcoming initial regulatory hurdles. This scrutiny highlights ongoing challenges faced by novel vaccine technologies within rigorous regulatory environments. In summary, these developments illustrate an industry at the forefront of scientific innovation while grappling with regulatory complexities and operational challenges. From antibody-drug conjugates and immunotherapy combinations to gene editing and advanced cell therapies, there's a clear commitment to improving patient outcomes through novel scientific approaches. As these trends evolve, they promise to redefine treatment landscapes across various therapeutic areas—offering new opportunities for scientific advancements and enhanced patient care worldwide.Support the show
Send us Fan MailIn this episode of The Oncology Journal Club, the team cover one of the most talked-about pancreatic cancer papers of the year, unpacking the promising early results for daraxonrasib in previously treated RAS-mutated pancreatic cancer and the science behind new RAS(ON) therapeutics. The team also discuss a fascinating phase II study of single-cycle neoadjuvant pembrolizumab in MMR-deficient colon cancer, new recommendations from the Prostate Cancer Working Group 4 and why the terminology we use in prostate cancer matters.Along the way, there's discussion of Bob Marley's acral melanoma, multidisciplinary lung cancer meetings, androgen receptor-positive TNBC, HER2-mutant lung cancer and whether oxybutynin could help men experiencing androgen deprivation-related hot flushes.The Oncology Journal Club Podcast is hosted by Professor Craig Underhill, Dr Kate Clarke and Professor Chris Jackson, and proudly produced by The Oncology NetworkVisit oncologynetwork.com.au for Show Notes, to send us Voice Notes and more information.
Linoleic acid (LA), a ubiquitous omega-6 fat in Western diets, may directly influence aggressive cancer growth by activating specific cellular pathways, according to recent animal research High levels of LA, found predominantly in ultraprocessed foods, vegetable oils, and many packaged snacks, may contribute to cancer risk The research shows that triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) cells in animal models thrive on LA because it appears to trigger mTOR signaling, a pathway linked to rapid tumor growth To support cellular health, consider reducing your daily LA intake by less than 5 grams per day by limiting ultraprocessed foods, nuts, seeds, and conventionally raised meats Swapping high-LA foods for more stable, healthier fats and targeted carbohydrates may support energy production and may help lower the inflammatory load that research associates with cancer progression
CME credits: 0.25 Valid until: 11-05-2027 Claim your CME credit at https://reachmd.com/programs/cme/chairpersons-perspective-trop2-targeted-adcs-in-tnbc-and-hr-mbc/54128/ Dr. Adam Brufsky reviews the clinical role of TROP2-targeted antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) in hormone receptor–positive (HR+) and metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), emphasizing areas of unmet need following CDK4/6 inhibitor progression. He outlines the mechanisms of ADCs and summarizes key phase 3 trial data, highlighting improvements in progression-free survival and, in some cases, overall survival compared with standard chemotherapy. The evolving role of TROP2 ADCs in both later-line and first-line settings is emphasized, underscoring the expanding use of TROP2-directed therapies. Dr. Brufsky also highlights current NCCN guideline recommendations and addresses considerations such as patient selection, sequencing, and trial limitations. =
Breast Cancer Briefing, hosted by Sara Nunnery, MD, MSCI, a breast medical oncologist and the director of Breast Cancer Research at Tennessee Oncology in Nashville, is a podcast series that breaks down the latest news in breast cancer research, one conversation at a time.In part 2 of this conversation, filmed live onsite at the 43rd Annual Miami Breast Cancer Conference, Dr Nunnery sat down with Irene Morae Kang, MD, an assistant professor in the Department of Medical Oncology & Therapeutics Research and the medical director of Women's Health Medical Oncology at City of Hope Orange County in Irvine, California.Their discussion focuses on the rapidly evolving treatment paradigm for first-line metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), including the emergence of new data that is shifting standards of care. Dr Kang explained that TNBC is defined by the absence of estrogen, progesterone, and HER2 receptors, which historically restricted treatment options to non-targeted chemotherapy. A primary focus of the conversation was the role of PD-L1 expression and the use of immunotherapy. Dr Kang described PD-L1 as a checkpoint inhibitor protein on cancer cells that shuts off the immune system. By blocking this protein, oncologists can keep the body's T-cells vigilant to fight the cancer. However, she noted that immunotherapy is typically reserved for the approximately 40% of patients who express PD-L1 and may be contraindicated for those with active autoimmune diseases or a history of severe immune-related toxicities.The dialogue transitioned into the use of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs). Dr Kang reviewed data from major trials using TROP2-targeting ADCs in the first-line setting. Dr Kang emphasized the importance of using these highly effective agents early, as many patients with TNBC do not survive to receive a second line of therapy.Finally, Dr Kang highlighted the distinct toxicity profiles and administration schedules that guide clinical decision-making. Although sacituzumab govitecan-hziy (Trodelvy) is frequently associated with neutropenia and alopecia, the primary toxicities associated with datopotamab deruxtecan-dlnk (Dato-DXd; Datroway) are stomatitis and ocular adverse effects like dry eye. Using Dato-DXd in practice requires a rigorous prophylactic regimen, including steroid mouthwash and lubricating eye drops. Ultimately, Dr Kang noted that because efficacy appears similar between the 2 ADCs, the choice often rests on the patient's lifestyle, their ability to adhere to preventative AE protocols, and infusion schedule preference.
In this podcast, experts Adam Brufsky, MD, PhD; Kamel Abou Hussein, MD; and Priyanka Sharma, MD, FASCO, discuss personalizing care in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and the evolving first-line strategies and their implications for downstream sequencing in metastatic TNBC.
Did you know that antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) targeting Trop2 have demonstrated significant clinical potential for patients with TNBC? Credit available for this activity expires: 4/8/27 Earn Credit / Learning Objectives & Disclosures: https://www.medscape.org/viewarticle/front-antibody-drug-conjugates-shifting-paradigm-metastatic-2026a1000a9z?ecd=bdc_podcast_libsyn_mscpedu
This CEO Is Creating A Vaccine To Cure Breast Cancer - Meet Dr. Amit Kumar, Chairman/CEO of Anixa Biosciences $ANIXGuestDr. Amit Kumar, Chairman and CEO of Anixa BiosciencesAnixa Biosciences, www.Anixa.com, NASDAQ:ANIXCompany InfoAnixa BiosciencesNASDAQ:ANIXhttps://www.Anixa.com/Amit's Bio:AMIT KUMAR, PH.D.Chairman & Chief Executive OfficerDr. Kumar has been an investor, founder, director and CEO of several technology enterprises, both public and private. As CEO, he took CombiMatrix Corporation public and ran it for a decade while listed on the NASDAQ Global Market.He has worked in venture capital with OAK Investment Partners, and has been an advisor to investment funds, venture capital firms, and Fortune 500 companies. He was on the Board of Directors of Acacia Research Corporation from 2002-2008. Dr. Kumar is currently Chairman and CEO of Anixa Biosciences and he sits on the Board of other public and private companies.He has served on the Board of the American Cancer Society since 2016. He received his AB in Chemistry from Occidental College. After graduate studies at Stanford University and Caltech, he received his Ph.D. from Caltech and followed that with a post-doctoral fellowship at Harvard.Company Bio:Anixa is a biotechnology company focused on the treatment and prevention of cancer. Anixa's therapeutics portfolio consists of a cancer immunotherapy program which uses a novel type of CAR-T, known as chimeric endocrine receptor T-cell (CER-T) technology.Anixa's vaccine portfolio consists of technology focused on the immunization against specific “retired” proteins associated with breast cancer, specifically triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), and ovarian cancer. Further, Anixa is developing additional “retired tissue specific protein” vaccines to address many intractable cancers, including high incidence malignancies in lung, colon, and prostate. Retired proteins are proteins that are expressed at certain times in life and then are no longer expressed in healthy people.Anixa continually examines emerging technologies in complementary fields for further development and commercialization.
Being diagnosed with triple negative breast cancer while pregnant is a reality few can imagine. In this episode, Allie Kubik, triple negative breast cancer survivor and creator of @allieaftercancer, shares her journey of undergoing chemotherapy at 11 weeks pregnant after previously completing IVF, long before she knew she would face cancer. She opens up about fear, grief, fertility, and fighting for both her life and her unborn child. Now years out from treatment, Allie reflects on survivorship and how she supports others facing aggressive or high-risk breast cancers through honest storytelling and community on Instagram. This conversation honors resilience, motherhood, and life after TNBC.
Welcome to the Oncology Brothers podcast! In this episode we continue our series on breast cancer treatment algorithms, focusing specifically on triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). We welcomed Dr. Tiffany Traina, a breast medical oncologist from the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, to discuss the latest advancements in the management of TNBC. We dived deep into the treatment algorithm for early-stage disease, including the criteria for adjuvant chemotherapy, the use of neoadjuvant therapies like KEYNOTE-522, and the importance of balancing risk and benefit in treatment decisions. Listen us on: Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/31BXhY9FM4gPWG10WgE11o Follow us on social media: • X/Twitter: https://twitter.com/oncbrothers • Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/oncbrothers • Website: https://oncbrothers.com/ Key topics covered in this episode included: * Criteria for adjuvant chemotherapy in early-stage TNBC * The role of pembrolizumab in neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings * Management of residual disease with capecitabine and olaparib * Insights into the latest clinical trials, including ASCENT-03, ASCENT-04, and TROPION-Breast02 * Side effect management strategies for new therapies Don't forget to subscribe for more episodes in our breast cancer series, and feel free to send us your questions and cases! Listen now and stay informed on the evolving landscape of triple negative breast cancer treatment! #TripleNegativeBreastCancer, #TNBC, #Pembrolizumab, #ADC, #OncologyBrothers
Surf's Up, DizRadio Fam! Dust off your flannel shirts and grab your Walkmans, because The DizRadio Show is taking a total time-machine trip back to the 90s! This week, we are catching a wave with the ultimate TNBC heartthrob, Jay Anthony Franke, better known as Jake Sommers from the TNBC cult classic California Dreams! We're diving deep into the surf, sand, and secrets of the 90s, including The Dreams Legacy, What it's like being part of a show that defined a generation's Saturday mornings. His Music and Voice Over as we covers Jay's journey from the beach house to the recording booth. The Great Soundtrack Heist and the wild story behind his lost copy of the California Dreams soundtrack and his Missing Leather! What exactly happened to that iconic, cherished leather jacket? The D-Team's own Jonathan stops by to vent about the interesting fashion choices of 90s teens. From oversized everything to the teen series that made us all want to move to a beach-side high school, no memory is safe! It's a week of pure nostalgia, music, and hanging ten with one of our favorites. Enjoy the Nostalgia, the Magic, the Wonder, and the Memories with The DizRadio Show "A Pop Culture Celebrity Guest Show"!
Secreted frizzled-related protein 2 is a protein that helps cancers grow by supporting the formation of new blood vessels, stopping cancer cells from dying, and weakening immune cells that should recognize and attack cancer cells. Dr. Nancy Klauber-DeMore is developing an antibody that blocks this protein. Early research suggests the antibody may halt the growth of triple-negative breast cancer. Listen to the episode to hear Dr. Klauber-DeMore explain: what secreted frizzled-related protein 2 does and why she thought blocking it might help treat breast cancer why she's focusing her work on triple-negative breast cancer the next steps for the antibody she and her team have developed
Welcome to the Oncology Brothers podcast! In this episode, we dived into the evolving frontline treatment landscape for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Listen us on: Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/31BXhY9FM4gPWG10WgE11o Follow us on social media: • X/Twitter: https://twitter.com/oncbrothers • Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/oncbrothers • Website: https://oncbrothers.com/ Join us as we welcomed Dr. Sherene Loi, a leading breast medical oncologist from Australia, to discuss the challenges of treating TNBC and the exciting new treatment options available. We explored the significance of PD-L1 scoring in metastatic TNBC, the implications of recent trials like ASCENT-04, and the potential of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) such as sacituzumab govitecan and datopotamab deruxtecan. Key topics included: • The role of PD-L1 positivity in treatment decisions • Insights from the ASCENT-04 trial and its findings • Common side effects associated with sacituzumab and strategies for management • The future of immunotherapy and ADCs in TNBC treatment Whether you're a healthcare professional or someone interested in the latest advancements in oncology, this episode is packed with valuable information and clinical pearls. Don't forget to subscribe for more insightful discussions on cancer treatment! #TNBC, #PDL1positive, #ASCENT04, #Immunotherapy, #OncBrothers
In this week's podcast episode in the Nutrition After Breast Cancer: Just the Facts series, I bring up the study that sparked that concern. I don't ignore things like this. I don't pretend they don't exist. If there's research being talked about, I want you to know about it. But here are the actual facts. The study was done in mice. The mice were made to consume about 40% of their diet in olive oil. And the rest of their diet was an obesogenic, high-carbohydrate diet designed to promote weight gain and metabolic dysfunction. That is not a Mediterranean diet. That is not olive oil drizzled over vegetables and salmon. That is not real life. It was a laboratory model designed to stress metabolism. Context matters. Deeply. Resources Mentioned: Guide to Essential Fatty Acids: https://www.thebreastcancerrecoverycoach.com/oil Episode #326 Simplifying Seed Oils and Fatty Acids After Breast Cancer https://www.thebreastcancerrecoverycoach.com/326 Work with Laura: https://www.thebreastcancerrecoverycoach.com/health REFERENCES: Obesity and Low-Fat Diet History Trends in Obesity Among Adults in the United States, 2005 to 2014 (CDC) https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/su6001a15.htm Documents obesity prevalence: 15.0% (1976-1980), 23.3% (1988-1994) Adult Obesity Prevalence Maps (CDC) https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9611578/ 30.9% obesity prevalence (1999-2000) Adult Obesity Prevalence, 2021-2023 (CDC) https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db508.htm Current obesity prevalence: 40.3% How the Ideology of Low Fat Conquered America https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18296750/ Historical analysis of the low-fat movement Heart Disease Mortality Explaining the Decrease in U.S. Deaths from Coronary Disease, 1980–2000 (Ford et al., NEJM 2007) https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMsa053935 ~51% decline in men, ~49% decline in women 47% from medical treatments, 44% from risk factor changes Obesity and diabetes offset gains by 8% and 10% Heart Disease Mortality in the United States, 1970 to 2022 https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.124.038644 89% decrease in heart attack deaths 81% increase in heart failure and other heart disease deaths Omega-3s, Inflammation, and Cancer Omega-6/Omega-3 Ratios and Modern Diets Ancestral ratios: 1:1 to 4:1 Modern Western diet: 15:1 to 20:1 Impact on eicosanoid metabolism and cellular inflammation DHA and Triple Negative Breast Cancer (Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry, 2019) DHA induced cell death in TNBC cells Mechanism: altered membrane composition, increased oxidative stress in cancer cells High-Fat Diets and TNBC Metastasis (Preclinical Studies) CD36-mediated fatty acid uptake in TNBC Oleic acid-rich diets promoting metastasis in mouse models Importance of tumor phenotype and metabolic flexibility Let's Connect! If this episode helped you breathe a little easier, please share it with a friend or leave a review. Every share helps spread this message of hope, healing, and whole-person wellness.
In today's episode, we sat down with Sarah Sammons, MD. Dr Sammons is associate director of the Metastatic Breast Cancer Program and a senior physician at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, as well as an assistant professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School, both in Boston, Massachusetts.In our exclusive interview, Dr Sammons discussed the rationale for and findings from a phase 2 study (NCT06449222) evaluating the PD-L1– and VEGF-A–directed bispecific antibody pumitamig (BNT327/BMS986545) in patients with locally advanced or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), as well as what these data may mean for the TNBC treatment paradigm.
This content has been developed for healthcare professionals only. Patients who seek health information should consult with their physician or relevant patient advocacy groups.For the full presentation, downloadable Practice Aids, slides, and complete CME/MOC/NCPD/AAPA/IPCE information, and to apply for credit, please visit us at PeerView.com/WWQ865. CME/MOC/NCPD/AAPA/IPCE credit will be available until February 12, 2027.TROP2-Targeting ADCs in the Forefront: Changing Standards and Best Practices in TNBC and HR+, HER2- Breast Cancer Care In support of improving patient care, PVI, PeerView Institute for Medical Education, is jointly accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE), and the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC), to provide continuing education for the healthcare team.SupportThis activity is supported by an educational grant from Gilead Sciences, Inc.Disclosure information is available at the beginning of the video presentation.
This content has been developed for healthcare professionals only. Patients who seek health information should consult with their physician or relevant patient advocacy groups.For the full presentation, downloadable Practice Aids, slides, and complete CME/MOC/NCPD/AAPA/IPCE information, and to apply for credit, please visit us at PeerView.com/WWQ865. CME/MOC/NCPD/AAPA/IPCE credit will be available until February 12, 2027.TROP2-Targeting ADCs in the Forefront: Changing Standards and Best Practices in TNBC and HR+, HER2- Breast Cancer Care In support of improving patient care, PVI, PeerView Institute for Medical Education, is jointly accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE), and the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC), to provide continuing education for the healthcare team.SupportThis activity is supported by an educational grant from Gilead Sciences, Inc.Disclosure information is available at the beginning of the video presentation.
This content has been developed for healthcare professionals only. Patients who seek health information should consult with their physician or relevant patient advocacy groups.For the full presentation, downloadable Practice Aids, slides, and complete CME/MOC/NCPD/AAPA/IPCE information, and to apply for credit, please visit us at PeerView.com/WWQ865. CME/MOC/NCPD/AAPA/IPCE credit will be available until February 12, 2027.TROP2-Targeting ADCs in the Forefront: Changing Standards and Best Practices in TNBC and HR+, HER2- Breast Cancer Care In support of improving patient care, PVI, PeerView Institute for Medical Education, is jointly accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE), and the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC), to provide continuing education for the healthcare team.SupportThis activity is supported by an educational grant from Gilead Sciences, Inc.Disclosure information is available at the beginning of the video presentation.
This content has been developed for healthcare professionals only. Patients who seek health information should consult with their physician or relevant patient advocacy groups.For the full presentation, downloadable Practice Aids, slides, and complete CME/MOC/NCPD/AAPA/IPCE information, and to apply for credit, please visit us at PeerView.com/WWQ865. CME/MOC/NCPD/AAPA/IPCE credit will be available until February 12, 2027.TROP2-Targeting ADCs in the Forefront: Changing Standards and Best Practices in TNBC and HR+, HER2- Breast Cancer Care In support of improving patient care, PVI, PeerView Institute for Medical Education, is jointly accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE), and the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC), to provide continuing education for the healthcare team.SupportThis activity is supported by an educational grant from Gilead Sciences, Inc.Disclosure information is available at the beginning of the video presentation.
Sarah Poland, MD, lead author of a recently published article in the journal ONCOLOGY titled Advances in Immunotherapy for Breast Cancer, highlighted key findings from her review in a conversation with CancerNetwork®.1 Throughout the discussion, she spoke about: Shifting Perspectives on Immunogenicity: Historically, breast cancer was considered a “cold,” poorly immunogenic tumor due to low tumor mutational burden (TMB) and few tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs). Poland highlighted how clinical research has shifted this perspective, particularly through the study of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), which often exhibits higher PD-L1 expression and immune infiltration.Key Clinical Milestones: The review highlighted foundational data that established immunotherapy as a standard of care: Early-Stage TNBC: The phase 3 KEYNOTE-522 trial (NCT03036488) established pembrolizumab (Keytruda) plus chemotherapy as a standard neoadjuvant treatment for stage II to III TNBC.2 Metastatic TNBC: The phase 3 KEYNOTE-355 trial (NCT02819518) demonstrated the benefit of pembrolizumab in PD-L1–positive metastatic disease.3 Managing Toxicity and Rechallenge: Poland addressed the feasibility of pembrolizumab rechallenge after an immune-related adverse effect (irAE), emphasizing that while possible, it requires a highly individualized approach based on the severity and timing of the initial toxicity.The Future Landscape: Beyond PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, the discussion covered emerging technologies that are poised to redefine treatment: Antibody-Drug Conjugates (ADCs): Exploration of novel combinations of ADCs with immunotherapy. Emerging Modalities: The potential role of bispecific antibodies and vaccine trials utilizing tumor antigens. Subtype Expansion: Emerging evidence supporting the efficacy of immunotherapy in hormone receptor–positive and HER2-positive subtypes, moving beyond the traditional focus on TNBC. Unmet Educational Needs: Poland emphasized the importance of resources that connect providers and patients, particularly in translating complex trial data into clinical practice and addressing patient concerns regarding the newest therapies and trials.Poland is from the Department of Medicine in the Section of Hematology/Oncology at The University of Chicago.References1. Poland S, de Oliveira Andrade M, Nanda R. Advances in immunotherapy for breast cancer. Oncology (Williston Park). 2026;40(1):8-15. doi:10.46883/2026.259210612. Schmid P, Cortes J, Pusztai L, et al. Pembrolizumab for early triple-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(9):810-821. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa19105493. Cortes J, Rugo HS, Cescon DW, et al. Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in advanced triple-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2022;387(3):217-226. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2202809
Please visit answersincme.com/860/29264-replay to participate, download slides and supporting materials, complete the post test, and get a certificate. Presented by Aditya Bardia, MD and Tiffany A. Traina, MD, FASCO. In this activity, experts in breast cancer share evidence-based insights on integrating current and emerging TROP2-directed antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) into real-world triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) care. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Identify the role of TROP2-directed antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) treatment; Compare the latest clinical data on available and emerging TROP2-targeting ADCs for the first-line treatment of patients with TNBC; and Discuss evidence-based strategies to optimize the selection of appropriate patients for first-line treatment with TROP2-targeting ADCs.
We review the recent ASCENT-04/Keynote-D19 publication of sacituzuab govitecan + pembrolizumab for PD-L1 CPS of 10% and above TNBC compared to chemo + pembrolizumab alone. Also, a quick recap of ASCO GI earlier this month with mentions of zanidatamab and zolbetuximab. Finally, a check-in on The Pitt.
Featuring perspectives from Dr Javier Cortés, Dr Rita Nanda, Prof Peter Schmid and Dr Priyanka Sharma, including the following topics: Introduction (0:00) Case: A woman in her early 80s with multiple comorbidities and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) develops bone-only metastases 4 months after declining capecitabine for post-neoadjuvant residual disease — Justin Favaro, MD, PhD (1:50) Case: A woman in her mid 70s with ER-negative, HER2-low (IHC 1+), PIK3CA-mutated, PD-L1-positive metastatic breast cancer (mBC) after receiving 3 cycles of neoadjuvant paclitaxel/carboplatin/pembrolizumab, which was discontinued — Alan Astrow, MD (6:47) Previously Untreated Metastatic TNBC (mTNBC) — Prof Schmid (10:47) Case: A woman in her early 80s with multiregimen-recurrent ER-positive, HER2-low (IHC 1+) ESR1-mutant mBC receives sacituzumab govitecan — Jennifer Yannucci, MD (27:19) Case: The role of datopotamab deruxtecan (Dato-DXd) for patients with ER-positive, HER2-low mBC who experienced disease progression on prior trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) — Ranju Gupta, MD; Case: A woman in her late 70s with bilateral recurrence in the lungs of ER-negative, HER2-low (IHC 1+) breast cancer (PD-L1 TPS 20%) receives Dato-DXd with durvalumab on protocol — Yanjun Ma, MD, PhD (31:35) Integrating Antibody-Drug Conjugates (ADCs) into the Management of Endocrine-Resistant Hormone Receptor-Positive mBC — Dr Sharma (36:31) Case: A woman in her early 70s with recurrent ER-negative, HER2-low (IHC 2+) mBC receives sacituzumab govitecan and achieves complete remission — Dr Gupta; Case: Management of neutropenia associated with sacituzumab govitecan — Gigi Chen, MD (50:30) Case: A woman in her late 60s with recurrent ER-negative, HER2-low (IHC 1+) mBC (HER2 V69L mutation) receives T-DXd and achieves a complete response but develops Grade 1 interstitial lung disease — Dr Gupta; Case: Management of T-DXd-related side effects — Laila Agrawal, MD (54:10) Selection and Sequencing of Therapy for Relapsed/Refractory mTNBC — Dr Nanda (58:59) Case: A woman in her early 40s with multiregimen-recurrent ER-positive, HER2-low mBC who has experienced severe nausea with past treatments is about to initiate T-DXd — Atif M Hussein, MD, MMM (1:12:40) Tolerability and Other Practical Considerations with ADCs and Other Cytotoxic Agents for mBC — Dr Cortés (1:18:10) CME information and select publications
Dr. Monty Pal and Dr. Hope Rugo discuss advances in antibody-drug conjugates for various breast cancer types as well as treatment strategies in the new era of oral SERDs for HR-positive breast cancer. TRANSCRIPT Dr. Monty Pal: Hello, and welcome to the ASCO Daily News Podcast. I'm your host, Dr. Monty Pal. I'm a medical oncologist and vice chair of academic affairs here at the City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles. Today, I'm thrilled to be joined by Dr. Hope Rugo, an internationally renowned breast medical oncologist and my colleague here at City of Hope, where she leads the Women's Cancers Program and serves as division chief of breast medical oncology. Dr. Rugo is going to share with us exciting advances in antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) that are expanding treatment options in various breast cancer types. She'll also address some of the complex questions arising in the new era of oral SERDs (selective estrogen receptor degraders) that are revolutionizing treatment in the hormone receptor-positive breast cancer space. Our full disclosures are available in the transcript of this episode. Dr. Rugo, welcome, and thanks so much for being on the podcast today. Dr. Hope Rugo: Thank you. Pleasure to be here. Dr. Monty Pal: So, I'm going to switch to first names if you don't mind. The first topic is actually a really exciting one, Hope, and this is antibody-drug conjugates. I don't know if I've ever shared this with you, but I actually started my training at UCLA, I was a med student and resident there, and it was in Dennis Slamon's lab. I worked very closely with Mark Pegram and a handful of others. This is right around the time I think a lot of HER2-directed therapies were really evolving initially in the clinics. Now we've got antibody-drug conjugates. Our audience is well-familiar with the mechanism there but tell us about how ADCs have really started to reshape therapy for HER2-positive breast cancer. Dr. Hope Rugo: Yeah, I mean, this is a really great place to start. I mean, we have had such major advances in breast cancer just this year, I think really changing the paradigm of treating patients. But HER2-positive disease, we've been used to having sequenced success of new agents. And I think the two biggest areas where we've made advances in HER2-positive disease, which were remarkably advanced this year in 2025, have been in antibody-drug conjugates with trastuzumab deruxtecan and with new oral tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) that have less of a target on EGFR and more on HER2, so they have an overall more tolerable toxicity profile and therefore a potentially better efficacy in the clinic. At least that's what we're seeing with these new strategies that we couldn't really pursue in the past because of toxicities of the oral TKIs. So, although our topic is ADCs, I'm going to include the TKI because it's so important in our thinking about treating HER2-positive disease. In the metastatic setting, we've seen these remarkable improvements in progression-free and overall survival in the second-line setting with T-DXd, or trastuzumab deruxtecan, compared to T-DM1. And then sequencing ADCs with giving T-DXd after T-DM1 was better than an oral tyrosine kinase or a trastuzumab combination with standard chemotherapy. That was DESTINY-Breast03 and DESTINY-Breast02. So, then we've had other trials since then, and T-DXd has moved into the early-stage setting, which I'll talk about in just a moment. But the next big trial for T-DXd in HER2-positive disease was moving it to the first-line setting to supplant what has become an established treatment for now quite a long time: the so-called CLEOPATRA regimen, which used the combined antibodies trastuzumab, pertuzumab with a taxane as first-line therapy. And then we've proceeded on with maintenance with ongoing HP for patients with responding or stable disease. And we'd seen long-term data showing, you know, at 8 years there was a group of patients whose cancers had never progressed and continued improved overall survival. So, T-DXd was studied in DESTINY-Breast09, either alone or in combination with pertuzumab compared to THP. The patient population had received a little bit more prior treatment, but interestingly, not a lot compared to CLEOPATRA. And they designed the trial to be T-DXd continued until progression with or without pertuzumab versus THP, which would go for six cycles and then stop around six cycles, and then stop and continue HP. Patients who had hormone receptor-positive disease could use hormone therapy, and this is one of the issues with this dataset because, surprisingly in this dataset and one other I'll mention, very few patients took hormone therapy. And even in the maintenance trial, the HER2CLIMB-05, less than 50% took hormone therapy as maintenance. This is kind of shocking to me and highlights an area of really important education, that outcome is improved when you add endocrine therapy for hormone receptor-positive HER2-positive metastatic disease in the maintenance phase, and it's a really important part of treatment. But suffice it to say, you know, you're kind of studying continued chemo versus stopping chemo in maintenance. And T-DXd, as we all expected, in combination with pertuzumab was superior to THP in terms of progression-free survival, really remarkably improved. And you could stop the chemo with toxicity, but most people continued it with T-DXd. Again, not a lot of people got hormone therapy, which is an issue, and you stop the chemo in the control arm. So, this has brought up a lot of interest in trying to use T-DXd as an induction and then go to maintenance, much as we do with the CLEOPATRA regimen with hormone therapy. But it brings up another issue. So first, T-DXd is superior; it's a great treatment. Not everybody needs to have it because we don't know whether it's better to give T-DXd first or second with progression - that we need a little bit longer follow-up. But just earlier this week, interestingly, the third week of December, the U.S. FDA approved T-DXd in the DESTINY-Breast09 approach with pertuzumab. So as I mentioned earlier, there was a T-DXd-alone arm; that arm has not yet reported. So very interesting, we don't know if you need pertuzumab or not. So what about the maintenance? That's the other area where we've made a huge advance here. So, we all want to stop chemo and we want to stop T-DXd. You don't want somebody being nauseated for two years while they're on treatment, and also there's a small number of patients with mostly de novo metastatic HER2-positive disease who are cured of their disease. We'd like to expand that, and I think these new drugs give us the opportunity to improve the number of patients who might be cured from metastatic disease. So the first maintenance study we saw was adding palbociclib, the CDK4/6 inhibitor, to endocrine therapy and HP, essentially. There, we had a remarkable improvement in progression-free survival difference of 15.2 months: 29 to 44 months, really huge. At San Antonio this year, we saw data with this oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor tucatinib, already showed it was great in a triplet, but as maintenance in combination with HP, it showed also a remarkable improvement in progression-free survival. But the numbers were all shifted down. So in PATINA, the control arm was in the 24-month range; here it was the tucatinib-HP arm that was in the 25 months and 16 months for control. So there was a differential benefit in ER-negative and ER-positive disease. So I think we're all thinking that our ideal approach moving forward would be to give T-DXd to most patients, we see how they do, and treat to best response. And then, stop the T-DXd, start HP, trastuzumab, pertuzumab for ER-negative, with tucatinib for ER-positive with palbociclib. We also have early data that suggests that both approaches may reduce the development of brain metastases, an issue in HER2-positive disease, and delay time to progression of brain metastases as seen in HER2CLIMB-05 in very early data - small numbers, but still quite intriguing that you might delay progression of brain metastases with tucatinib that clearly has efficacy in the brain. So, I think that this is a hugely exciting advance for our patients, and these approaches are quickly moving into the early stage setting. T-DXd compared to standard chemo, essentially followed by THP, so a sequenced approach resulted in more pathologic complete responses than a standard THP-AC-type neoadjuvant therapy. T-DXd alone for eight cycles wasn't better, and that's interesting. We still need the sequenced non-cross-resistant chemo. But I think even more importantly, the data from DESTINY-Breast05 looking at T-DXd versus T-DM1 in patients with residual disease after neoadjuvant HER2-targeted therapy showed a remarkable improvement in invasive disease-free survival with T-DXd versus T-DM1, and quite early. It was a high-risk population, higher risk than the T-DM1 trial with KATHERINE, but earlier readout with a remarkable improvement in outcome. We expect to be FDA approved sometime in the first half of 2026. So then we'll get patients who've already had T-DXd who get metastatic disease. But my hope is that with T-DXd, maybe with tucatinib in the right group of patients or even sequenced in very high-risk disease, that we could cure many more patients with early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer and cure a subset, a greater subset of patients with de novo metastatic disease. Dr. Monty Pal: That's brilliant. And you tackled so many questions that I was going to follow up with there: brain metastases, etc. That was sort of looming in my mind. I mean, general thoughts on an ADC versus a TKI in the context of brain mets? Dr. Hope Rugo: Yeah, it's an interesting question because T-DXd has shown quite good efficacy in this setting. And tucatinib, of course, had a trial where they took patients with new brain mets, so a larger population than we've seen yet for the T-DXd trials, and saw that not only did they delay progression of brain metastases and result in shrinkage of existing untreated brain mets, but that patients who develop a new brain met, they could stay on the same assigned treatment. They got stereotactic radiation, and then the patients who were on tucatinib with trastuzumab and capecitabine had a further delay in progression of brain mets compared to those on the placebo arm, even after treatment of a new one that developed on treatment. So, I think it's hard. I think most of us for a lot of brain mets might start with the tucatinib approach, but T-DXd is also a very important treatment. You know, you're kind of trading off a diarrhea, some liver enzyme elevations with tucatinib versus nausea, which you really have to work on managing because it can be long-delayed nausea, and this risk of ILD, interstitial lung disease, that's about 12%, with most but not all trials showing a mortality rate from interstitial lung disease of just under 1 percent. In the early-stage setting, it was really interesting to see that with T-DXd getting four cycles in the neoadjuvant setting, a lot less ILD noted than the patients who got up to 14 cycles, as I think they got a median of 10 cycles in the post-surgical setting, there was a little bit more ILD. But I think we're going to be better and better at finding this earlier and preventing mortality by just stopping drug and treating earlier with steroids. Dr. Monty Pal: And this ILD issue, it always seems to resurface. There are drugs that I use in my kidney cancer clinic, everolimus, common to perhaps the breast cancer clinic as well, pembrolizumab, where I think the pattern of pneumonitis is quite different, right? What is your strategy for recognizing pneumonitis early in this context? Dr. Hope Rugo: Well, it is, and you know, having done the very early studies in everolimus where we gave it in the neoadjuvant setting and we're like, "Hmm, the patient came in with a cough. What's going on?" You know, we didn't know. And you have mouth sores, you know, we were learning about the drug as we were giving it. What we don't do with everolimus and CDK4/6 inhibitors, for example, is grade 1 changes like radiation pneumonitis, we don't stop, we don't treat it. We only treat for symptoms. But because of the mortality associated with T-DXd, albeit small, we stop drug for grade 1 imaging-only asymptomatic pneumonitis, and some of us treat with a half dose of steroids just to try and hasten recovery. We've actually now published or presented a couple of datasets from trials, a pooled analysis and a real-world analysis, that have looked at patients who were retreated after grade 1 pneumonitis or ILD and tolerated drug very well and none of them died of interstitial lung disease, which was really great to see because you can retreat safely and some of these patients stayed on for almost a year benefiting from treatment. So, there's a differential toxicity profile with these drugs and there are risk factors which clearly have identified those at higher risk: prior ILD, for example. A French group said smoking; other people haven't found that, maybe because they smoked more in France, I don't know. And being of Japanese descent is quite interesting. The studies just captured that you were treated in Japan, but I think it's probably being of Japanese descent with many drugs that increases your risk of ILD. And, you know, older patients, people who have hypoxia, those are the patients. So, how do we do this? With everolimus, we don't have specific monitoring. But for T-DXd we do; we do every nine weeks to start with and then every 12 weeks CT scans because most of the events occur relatively early. Somebody who's older and at higher risk now get the first CT at six weeks. Dr. Monty Pal: This is super helpful. And I have to tell you, a lot of these drugs are permeating the bladder cancer space which, you know, is ultimately going to be a component of my practice, so thank you for all this. We could probably stay on this topic of HER2-positive disease forever. I'm super interested in that space still. But let me shift gears a little bit and talk about triple-negative breast cancer and this evolving space of HR-positive, HER2-low breast cancer. I mean, tell us about ADCs in that very sort of other broad area. Dr. Hope Rugo: So triple-negative disease is the absolute hardest subset of disease that we have to treat because if you don't have a great response in the early stage setting, the median survival is very short, you know, under two years for the majority of TNBCs, with the exception of the small percentage of low proliferative disease subsets. The co-question is what do we do for these patients and how do we improve outcome? And sacituzumab govitecan has been one strategy in the later line setting that was shown to improve progression-free and overall survival, the Trop-2 ADC. We had recently three trials presented with the two ADCs, sacituzumab govitecan and the other Trop-2 ADC that's approved for HR-positive disease, datopotamab deruxtecan. And they were studied in the first-line setting. Two trials with SG, sacituzumab govitecan, those trials, one was PD-L1 positive, ASCENT-04. That showed that SG with a checkpoint inhibitor was superior, so pembrolizumab was superior to the standard KEYNOTE-355 type of treatment with either a taxane or gemcitabine and carboplatin with pembrolizumab for patients who have a combined positive score for PD-L1, 10 or greater. So, these are patients who are eligible for a checkpoint inhibitor, and SG resulted in an improved progression-free survival. The interesting thing about that dataset is that few patients had received adjuvant or neoadjuvant checkpoint inhibitor, which is fascinating because we give it to everybody now. But access is an issue and timing of the study enrollment was an issue. The other thing which I think we've all really applauded Gilead for is that there was automatic crossover. So, you could get from the company, to try and overcome some of the enormous disparities worldwide in access to these life-saving drugs, you could get SG through the company for free once you had blinded independent central review confirmation of disease progression. Now, a lot of the people who got the SG got it through their insurance, they didn't bill the company, but 80 percent of patients in the control arm received SG in the second-line setting. So that impacts your ability to look at overall survival, but it's an incredibly important component of these trials. So then at ESMO, we saw the data from SG and Dato-DXd in the first-line metastatic setting for patients who either had PD-L1-negative disease or weren't eligible for an immunotherapy. For the Dato study, TROPION-Breast02, that was 10 percent of the patients who had PD-L1-positive disease but didn't get a checkpoint inhibitor, and for the ASCENT-03 trial population it was only 1 percent. Importantly, the trials allowed patients who relapsed within a year of receiving their treatment with curative intent, and the Dato study, TB-02, allowed patients who relapsed while on treatment or within the first six months, and that was 15 percent of the 20 percent of early relapsers. The ASCENT trial, ASCENT-03, had 20 percent who relapsed between 6 and 12 months. The drugs were better than standard of care chemotherapy, the ADCs in both trials, which is very nice. Different toxicity profiles, different dosing intervals, but better than standard of care chemotherapy in the disease that's hardest for us to treat. And importantly, when you looked at the subset of early relapsers, those patients also did better with the ADC versus chemotherapy, which is incredibly important. And we were really interested in that 15 percent of patients who had early relapse. I actually think that six months thing was totally contrived, invented, you know, categorization and doesn't make any sense, and we should drop it. But the early relapsers were 15 percent of TB-02 and Dato was superior to standard of care chemo. We like survival, but the ASCENT trial again allowed the crossover to an approved ADC that improved survival and 80 percent of patients crossed over. In the Dato trial, they did not allow crossover, they didn't provide Dato, which isn't approved for TNBC but is for HR-positive disease, and they didn't allow, of course, pay for SG. So very few patients actually crossed over in their post-treatment data and in that study, they were able to show a survival benefit. So actually, I think in the U.S. where we can use approved drugs already before there's a fixed FDA approval, that people are already switching to use SG or Dato in the first-line setting for metastatic TNBC that's both PD-L1 positive for SG and PD-L1 negative for both drugs. And I think understanding the toxicity profiles of the two drugs is really important as well as the dosing interval to try and figure out which drug to use. Dr. Monty Pal: Brilliant. Brilliant. Well, I'm going to shift gears a little bit. ADCs are a topic, again, just like HER2-positive disease we could stay on forever. Dr. Hope Rugo: Huge. Yes. Dr. Monty Pal: But we're going to shift gears to another massive topic, which is oral SERDs. In broad strokes, right, this utilization of CDK4/6 inhibitors in the context of HR-positive breast cancer is obviously, you know, a paradigm that's been well established at this point. Where do we sequence in oral SERDs? Where do they fit into this paradigm? Dr. Hope Rugo: Ha! This is a rapidly changing area; we keep changing what we're saying every other minute. And I think that there are three areas of great interest. So one is patients who develop ESR1 mutations that allow constitutive signaling through the estrogen receptor, even when there's not estrogen around, and that is a really important mutation that is subclonal; it develops under the pressure of treatment in about 40 percent of patients. And it doesn't happen when you first walk in the door. And what we've seen is that oral SERDs as single agents are better than standard single-agent endocrine therapy in that setting. The problem that we've had with that approach is that we're now really interested in giving targeted agents with our endocrine therapies, not just in the first-line setting where CDK4/6 inhibitors are our standard of care with survival benefit for ribociclib and, you know, survival benefit in subsets with other CDK4/6 inhibitors, and abemaciclib with a numeric improvement. So we give it first line. The question is, what do you do in the second-line setting? Because of the recent data, we now believe that oral SERDs should be really given with a targeted agent. And some datasets which were recently presented, which I think have helped us with that, have been EMBER-3 and then the most recently evERA BC, or evERA Breast Cancer, that looked at the oral SERD giredestrant with everolimus compared to standard of care endocrine therapy with everolimus, where 100 percent of patients received prior CDK4/6 inhibitor and showed a marked improvement in progression-free survival, including in the subsets of patients with a short response, 6-12 months of prior response to CDK4/6 inhibitor and in those who had a PIK3CA pathway mutation. The thing is that the benefit looks like it's much bigger in the ESR1 mutant population, although response was better, PFS wasn't better in the wild type. So, we're still trying to figure that out. We also saw EMBER-3 with imlunestrant and abemaciclib as a second line. Not everybody had had a prior CDK4/6 inhibitor; they compared it to imlunestrant alone, but still the data was quite striking and seemed to cross the need for ESR1 mutations. And then lastly, we saw data from the single arms of the ELEVATE trial looking at elacestrant with everolimus and abemaciclib and showed these really marked progression-free survival data, even though single-arm, that crossed the mutation status. At least for the everolimus combination, abemaciclib analysis is still to come in the mutated subgroups. But really remarkable PFS, much longer. Single-agent fulvestrant after CDK4/6 inhibitor AI has a PFS in like the three-month range and in some studies, maybe close to five months. These are all at 10-plus months and really looking very good. And so those questions are, is it ESR1 mutation alone? Is it all comers? We'd like all comers, right? We believe in the combination approach and we're learning more about combinations with drugs like capivasertib and other drugs as we move forward. Everybody now wants to combine their targeted agent with an oral SERD because they're clearly here to stay with quite remarkable data. The other issue, so the second issue in the metastatic setting is, does it make a difference if we change to an oral SERD before radiographic imaging evidence of progression? And that was the question asked in the SERENA-6 trial where patients had serial monitoring for the presence of ESR1 mutations in ctDNA. And those who had them without progression on imaging could be randomized to switch to camizestrant with the same CDK4/6 inhibitor or stay on their same AI CDK4/6 inhibitor. And they showed a difference in progression-free survival that markedly favored camizestrant. But interestingly, the people who were on the standard control arm had an ESR1 mutation, we think AIs don't work, they stayed on for nine more months. The patients who were on the camizestrant stayed on for more than 16 months. And they presented some additional subset data which showed the same thing: follow-up PFS data, PFS2, all beneficial in SERENA-6 at the San Antonio [Breast Cancer Symposium]. So, we're still a little bit unclear about that. They did quality of life, and pain was markedly improved. They had a marked delayed time to progression of pain in the camizestrant arm. So this is all a work in progress, trying to understand who should we switch without progression to an oral SERD based on this development of this mutation that correlates with resistance. And, you know, it's interesting because the median time to having a mutation was 18 months and the median time to switch was almost 24 months. And then there were like more than 3,000 patients who hadn't gotten a mutation, hadn't switched, and were still okay. So screening everybody is the big question, and when you would start and who you would change on and how this affects outcome. Patients didn't have access to camizestrant in the control arm, something we can't fix but we have experimental drugs. We're actually planning a trial, I hope in collaboration with the French group Unicancer, and looking at this exact question. You know, if you switch and you change the CDK4/6 inhibitor and then you also allow crossover, what will we see? Dr. Monty Pal: We're coming right to the tail end of our time here, and I could probably go on for another couple of hours with you here. But if you could just give us maybe one or two big highlights from San Antonio, any thoughts to leave our audience with here based on this recent meeting? Dr. Hope Rugo: Yeah, I mean, I talked about a lot of those new data already from San Antonio, and the one that I'd really like to mention which I think was, you know, there were a lot of great presentations including personalized screening presented from the WISDOM trial by my colleague Laura Esserman, fascinating and really a big advance. But lidERA was the big highlight, I think, outside of the HER2CLIMB-05 which I talked about earlier in HER2-positive disease. And this study looked at giredestrant, the oral SERD versus standard of care endocrine therapy as treatment for medium and high-risk early-stage breast cancer. And what they showed, which I think was really remarkable with just about a three-year median follow-up, was an improvement in invasive disease-free survival with a hazard ratio of 0.7. I mean, really quite remarkable and so early. It looked as though this was all driven by the high-risk group, which makes sense, not the medium risk, it's too early. And also that there was a bigger benefit in patients who were on tamoxifen compared to giredestrant versus AI, but for both groups, the confidence intervals didn't cross 1. There's even a trend towards overall survival, even though it's way too early. I think that, you know, really well-tolerated oral drug that could improve outcome in early-stage disease, this is the first advance we've seen in over two decades in the treatment of early-stage hormone receptor-positive disease with just endocrine therapy. I think we think that we don't want to give up CDK4/6 inhibitors because we saw a survival benefit with abemaciclib and a trend with giving ribociclib in the NATALEE trial. So we're thinking that maybe one approach would be to give CDK4/6 inhibitors and then switch to an oral SERD or to have enough data to be able to give oral SERDs with these CDK4/6 inhibitors for early-stage disease. And that's all in the works, you know, lots of studies going on. We're going to see a lot of data with both switching 8,000 patients with an imlunestrant switching trial, an elacestrant trial going on, and safety data with giredestrant with abemaciclib and soon to come ribociclib. So, this is going to change everything for the treatment of early-stage breast cancer, and I hope cure more patients of the most common subset of the most common cancer diagnosed in women worldwide. Dr. Monty Pal: Super exciting. It's just remarkable to hear how this has evolved since 25 years ago, which is really the last time I sort of dabbled in breast cancer. Thank you so much, Hope, for joining us today. These were fantastic insights. Appreciate you being on the ASCO Daily News Podcast and really want to thank you personally for your remarkable contribution to the field of breast cancer. Dr. Hope Rugo: Thank you very much, and thanks for talking with me today. Dr. Monty Pal: You got it. And thanks a lot to our listeners today as well. You'll find links to all the studies we discussed today in the transcript of this episode. Finally, if you value the insights that you hear today on the ASCO Daily News Podcast, please rate, review, and subscribe wherever you get your podcasts. Disclaimer: The purpose of this podcast is to educate and to inform. This is not a substitute for professional medical care and is not intended for use in the diagnosis or treatment of individual conditions. Guests on this podcast express their own opinions, experience, and conclusions. Guest statements on the podcast do not express the opinion of ASCO. The mention of any product, service, organization, activity, or therapy should not be construed as an ASCO endorsement. Follow today's speakers: Dr. Monty Pal @montypal Dr. Hope Rugo @hoperugo Follow ASCO on social media: ASCO on X ASCO on Bluesky ASCO on Facebook ASCO on LinkedIn Disclosures: Dr. Monty Pal: Speakers' Bureau: MJH Life Sciences, IntrisiQ, Peerview Research Funding (Inst.): Exelixis, Merck, Osel, Genentech, Crispr Therapeutics, Adicet Bio, ArsenalBio, Xencor, Miyarsian Pharmaceutical Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Crispr Therapeutics, Ipsen, Exelixis Dr. Hope Rugo: Honoraria: Mylan/Viatris, Chugai Pharma Consulting/Advisory Role: Napo Pharmaceuticals, Sanofi, Bristol Myer Research Funding (Inst.): OBI Pharma, Pfizer, Novartis, Lilly, Merck, Daiichi Sankyo, AstraZeneca, Gilead Sciences, Hoffman La-Roche AG/Genentech, In., Stemline Therapeutics, Ambryx
In this episode of the Oncology Brothers podcast, we were joined by Dr. Rebecca Shatsky, a breast medical oncologist and director of the Inflammatory and Triple Negative Breast Cancer Program at UC San Diego. We dived into the latest findings from the SABCS 2025 conference, focusing on key studies related to triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). Join us as we discussed: * The RJBC 1501 study, which explored the role of carboplatin in high-risk early-stage TNBC and its impact on disease-free survival. * Insights from the CITRIN study, which questions the carboplatin paradigm and highlights modern treatment approaches. * The TBCRC-056 and OlympiaN trials, investigating the combination of PARP inhibitors and immunotherapy in patients with germline BRCA and PALB2 mutations. We unpacked the implications of these studies for clinical practice, including the potential benefits and challenges of incorporating carboplatin and novel therapies into treatment regimens. Tune in for an informative discussion that aims to keep you updated on the evolving landscape of breast cancer treatment! Follow us on social media: • X/Twitter: https://twitter.com/oncbrothers • Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/oncbrothers • Website: https://oncbrothers.com/ Don't forget to like, subscribe, and check out our other episodes for more insights from the world of oncology! #SABCS2025 #TNBC #PARPinhibitors #BRCAmutation #ChemoFree #OncologyBrothers #BreastCancer #SABCS25
At the 2025 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, Justin Johnson, PhD, presented a poster detailing the final results from three groups of people in a phase I trial on a vaccine to prevent triple-negative breast cancer. Listen to the episode to hear Dr. Johnson explain: why the vaccine targets the alpha-lactalbumin protein the safety and dose results of the study what's next for the research
Featuring an interview with Dr Priyanka Sharma, including the following topics: Endocrine therapy for hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative high-risk localized breast cancer (0:00) Johnston SR et al. monarchE: Primary overall survival (OS) results of adjuvant abemaciclib + endocrine therapy (ET) for HR+, HER2-, high-risk early breast cancer (EBC). ESMO 2025;Abstract LBA13. Durvalumab in combination with neoadjuvant chemotherapy for localized triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) (3:25) Loibl S et al. Durvalumab in combination with neoadjuvant chemotherapy in early triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) – Long-term analysis from the GeparNuevo trial. ESMO 2025;Abstract 292MO. Efficacy and safety findings with TROP2-directed antibody-drug conjugates for metastatic TNBC (5:11) Cortés JC et al. Primary results from ASCENT-03: A randomized phase III study of sacituzumab govitecan (SG) vs chemotherapy (chemo) in patients (pts) with previously untreated advanced triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) who are unable to receive PD-(L)1 inhibitors (PD-[L]1i). ESMO 2025;Abstract LBA20. de Azambuja E et al. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) with sacituzumab govitecan (SG) + pembrolizumab (pembro) vs chemotherapy (chemo) + pembro in patients (pts) with previously untreated PD-L1+ metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) in the phase III ASCENT-04/KEYNOTE-D19 study. ESMO 2025;Abstract LBA22. Dent R et al. First-line (1L) datopotamab deruxtecan (Dato-DXd) vs chemotherapy in patients with locally recurrent inoperable or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) for whom immunotherapy was not an option: Primary results from the randomised, phase III TROPION-Breast02 trial. ESMO 2025;Abstract LBA21. CME information and select publications
Dr. Andrei Goga and his colleagues found that triple-negative breast cancer cells build molecular tunnels called gap junctions into nearby fat cells and use the fat cells' energy for fuel. When the scientists blocked the gap junctions, the tumors stopped growing. Listen to the episode to hear Dr. Goga explain: how the study came about how the cancer cells connect to the fat cells how the process could work in metastatic TNBC what the results could mean for treating triple negative disease.
Dr. Jay Lalezari, CEO of CytoDyn, is focused on solid tumor immunology, particularly in triple-negative breast cancer, where their lead drug, leronlimab, is showing significant long-term survival benefits. This monoclonal antibody targets the CCR5 receptor, converting cold tumors into hot tumors and making them more susceptible to immunotherapy checkpoint inhibitors. Work with leronlimab for 20 years has demonstrated the potential for use in colorectal cancer as well as TNBC, and to vastly expand the patient population that could benefit from immunotherapy. Jay explains, "When I became CEO back in November of 2023, my first order of business was to figure out where CytoDyn should go with this intriguing monoclonal antibody called leronlimab that targets CCR5. And we looked at a number of indications, and by far and away, the data that we found in solid tumor oncology is clearly the place CytoDyn will go to create the most benefit for patients and the most benefit for our shareholders. We recently presented some data in triple-negative breast cancer that is truly remarkable and potentially paradigm-shifting in the world of solid tumor oncology." "Over the years, it became clear that CCR5 was not just for the virus to get inside the cell, but was playing a key role in setting up the tumor microenvironment in a variety of solid tumors that were CCR5 positive. That included typically triple-negative breast cancer, colon cancer, prostate cancer, pancreatic cancer, sarcoma, glioblastoma, and the urothelial cancers in particular. So CCR5 helps the cancer set up a tumor microenvironment that helps it both build blood vessels to provide nourishment for the cancer and attract suppressor cells that keep the host immune system at bay." #CytoDyn #Oncology #Leronlimab #TNBC #ColorectalCancer #CCR5 cytodyn.com Download the transcript here
Dr. Jay Lalezari, CEO of CytoDyn, is focused on solid tumor immunology, particularly in triple-negative breast cancer, where their lead drug, leronlimab, is showing significant long-term survival benefits. This monoclonal antibody targets the CCR5 receptor, converting cold tumors into hot tumors and making them more susceptible to immunotherapy checkpoint inhibitors. Work with leronlimab for 20 years has demonstrated the potential for use in colorectal cancer as well as TNBC, and to vastly expand the patient population that could benefit from immunotherapy. Jay explains, "When I became CEO back in November of 2023, my first order of business was to figure out where CytoDyn should go with this intriguing monoclonal antibody called leronlimab that targets CCR5. And we looked at a number of indications, and by far and away, the data that we found in solid tumor oncology is clearly the place CytoDyn will go to create the most benefit for patients and the most benefit for our shareholders. We recently presented some data in triple-negative breast cancer that is truly remarkable and potentially paradigm-shifting in the world of solid tumor oncology." "Over the years, it became clear that CCR5 was not just for the virus to get inside the cell, but was playing a key role in setting up the tumor microenvironment in a variety of solid tumors that were CCR5 positive. That included typically triple-negative breast cancer, colon cancer, prostate cancer, pancreatic cancer, sarcoma, glioblastoma, and the urothelial cancers in particular. So CCR5 helps the cancer set up a tumor microenvironment that helps it both build blood vessels to provide nourishment for the cancer and attract suppressor cells that keep the host immune system at bay." #CytoDyn #Oncology #Leronlimab #TNBC #ColorectalCancer #CCR5 cytodyn.com Listen to the podcast here
Janice Cowden, retired nurse and patient advocate, shares her remarkable triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) story. Five years following successful treatment for stage one breast cancer in 2011, Janice was diagnosed with a stage 4 metastatic TNBC recurrence. As of today she has 8 years of no evidence of disease (NED) under her belt. She shares how she stumbled upon the cancer community that inspired her to become the advocate she is today and the uncertainty that comes with NED. She also shares how she copes with losing friends in the cancer community through her patient advocacy work. We also have a rapid fire Q&A where she answers questions surrounding various medical terminologies, diagnoses, and more to keep you in the loop. NOTE: There is one clarification from the rapid fire Q&A session. The definition of disease free survival (DFS) is the time from random assignment (used in clinical trials and research studies to assign participants to different groups) to cancer recurrence or death from any cause (Gutman SI, Piper M, Grant MD, et al. 2013).Key Highlights:1. Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is stage four breast cancer that has spread to distant sites in the body.2. Finding events and communities centered around cancer not only supports cancer patients emotionally and socially, but can also serve as informational hubs. Being proactive in learning about your diagnosis, whether it's through community and/or research on your own time, can help you feel confident with the choices you make. 3. While finding a community of other cancer patients can help, unfortunately this disease means that you will lose friends you make in these settings. It doesn't necessarily get easier, but finding an outlet to cope with such losses is vital to your wellbeing.About our guest:Diagnosed with Stage IV triple negative breast cancer in 2016, five years after an early-stage breast cancer diagnosis, Janice launched into patient advocacy following training through Living Beyond Breast Cancer's (LBBC) Hear My Voice Outreach program in 2017. As a peer-to-peer support and research patient advocate, Janice is passionate about supporting others with metastatic breast cancer, in addition to continually furthering her scientific knowledge base of this disease, treatments, and clinical trials, which she acquires through attending scientific breast cancer conferences and webinars. Janice is involved with several patient-founded and led organizations including PCDI, GRASP, and Project Life MBC. As a trained peer support volunteer, she is founder of an international online peer support group for patients newly diagnosed with MBC. She serves on the Board of Directors for METAvivor Research and Support Inc., and is an Advisory Board member for Project Life MBC. She is an individual member of the Metastatic Breast Cancer Alliance. When she's not busy with advocacy work, Janice enjoys traveling, reading, outdoor activities, and spending time with family, including her husband, two adult children and three grandchildren.Disclaimer: This podcast is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute the practice of medicine, nursing or other professional health care services, including the giving of medical advice, and no doctor/patient relationship is formed. The use of information on this podcast or materials linked from this podcast is at the user's own risk. The content of this podcast is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Users should not disregard, or delay in obtaining, medical advice for any medical condition they may have, and should seek the assistance of their health care professionals for any such conditions.
This is a bonus episode of the audio of a Breastcancer.org webinar. Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an invasive subtype of breast cancer that can be harder to treat and is more likely to come back. But new research into understanding TNBC is helping some patients find more precise treatment options. Learn about innovations in immunotherapy, genetic testing, and targeted therapies, why TNBC is different compared to other types of breast cancer, and what gives doctors hope about the future of care for people with TNBC. You'll also hear from two inspiring breast cancer advocates who created TNBC resources for patients after their own diagnosis. Read more about triple-negative breast cancer. Featured Speakers: Maimah KarmoBreast Cancer Advocate and Founder, Tigerlily Roberto Leon-Ferre, MDCo-Leader of the Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Working Group and Associate Professor at Mayo Clinic Evelyn Taiwo, MDHematology and Oncology at New York Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital and Associate Professor at Cornell University Kelly ThomasBreast Cancer Advocate and Founder, TNBC Thrivers Marisa Weiss, MDChief Medical Officer, Breastcancer.org
Featuring perspectives from Dr Ana C Garrido-Castro and Prof Peter Schmid, including the following topics: Introduction: Legendary Figures in Breast Cancer Research (0:00) Case: A woman in her early 80s, a current smoker with a history of myocardial infarction and stroke, who develops recurrent triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) — Justin Favaro, MD, PhD (6:44) Case: A woman in her late 60s with metastatic TNBC and a PD-L1 level of 20% who receives chemotherapy/pembrolizumab followed by sacituzumab govitecan — Priya Rudolph, MD, PhD (25:08) Case: A woman in her late 60s with localized TNBC who develops myocarditis while receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy/pembrolizumab — Richard Zelkowitz, MD (33:53) Case: A woman in her mid 60s with recurrent ER-negative, HER2-low, PI3K-mutant TNBC — Ranju Gupta, MD (37:49) Case: A woman in her early 60s with recurrent TNBC confined to contralateral neck nodes — Eric H Lee, MD, PhD (42:10) Case: A woman in her early 40s with metastatic TNBC who receives sacituzumab govitecan after multiple lines of chemotherapy — Estelamari Rodriguez, MD, MPH (48:10) Case: A woman in her mid 70s with ER-negative, HER2-low breast cancer who develops an isolated brain metastasis — Dr Gupta (55:02) CME information and select publications
In this podcast, experts Aditya Bardia, MD, MPH, FASCO, Erika P. Hamilton, MD, and Virginia Kaklamani, MD, DSc, discuss frequently asked questions regarding the use of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC).
In this podcast, experts Virginia Kaklamani, MD, DSc, and Tiffany A. Traina, MD, FASCO, discuss the rationale for and data to support combining TROP2-targeting antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) to treat triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC).
In this podcast, experts Filipa Lynce, MD, and Rita Nanda, MD, discuss recent clinical trial and real-world data for antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) used to treat triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC).
In this podcast, experts Aditya Bardia, MD, MPH, FASCO; Erika P. Hamilton, MD; and Tiffany A. Traina, MD, FASCO; discuss navigating between currently available therapies for patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). They also discuss the potential ramifications of ongoing clinical trials on future treatment paradigms.
In this podcast, experts Aditya Bardia, MD, MPH, FASCO; and Erika P. Hamilton, MD, discuss recent efficacy and safety data of TROP2-targeted antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) plus immune checkpoint inhibitor combinations for advanced triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC).