Podcasts about blamestorming

BLAMESTORMING. What a wonderful word—BLAMESTORMING. When we spend our time going round-and-round, trying to determine who to assign the blame to. Never mind a solution, never mind thinking about the questions. You've seen a lot of blamestorming going on in the labor and hiring market recently—staff can't be hired, staff aren't reliable, no one wants to work, why should you work from home when I have offices. What an awful lot of assigning blame, and not so much as a whiff of analysis. Seems like an awful lot of emotion for what should be technical questions. What have our experts got to say?

If I were to ask which one you spend your time doing the most, "blamestorming or brainstorming" (a great phrase I first heard from Integrative Medicine Expert, Dr. Keesha Ewers), what would your answer be? My question of the day to you: What are some options that you can brainstorm to solve conflicts instead of blaming? If you have any questions, comments or want to learn more about me, you can do so at https://cherylpatterson.ca. Yours, Cheryl Patterson UNSTUCK: Stay Busy or Get Real https://cherylpatterson.ca

As most of America is focused on uniting to get through this trying time, Pelosi and her democratic pals are focused on dividing and destroying the country & the President.

This week on Blamestorming, Maryssa Smith chats with comic's Alex Fossella, Peter Brocker, and filmmaker Chinisha Scott. What self care is helping you cope? Will the feud between Warren and Bernie negatively effect the race? Can Reagan Republicans and Evangelicals move the Senate towards hearing additional evidence and witness testimony?If you enjoy the show please rate, review and subscribe!Follow us on Twitter!@theblamestorm @DaveSirus @MaryssaSmith

This week on Blamestorming, Maryssa Smith chats with comic's Alex Fossella, Peter Brocker, and filmmaker Chinisha Scott. What self care is helping you cope? Will the feud between Warren and Bernie negatively effect the race? Can Reagan Republicans and Evangelicals move the Senate towards hearing additional evidence and witness testimony?If you enjoy the show please rate, review and subscribe!Follow us on Twitter!@theblamestorm @DaveSirus @MaryssaSmith

What is a blamestorm and how do we tame it?  Tune in today for a dispatch from the middle of a blamestorm in sunny Portugal.  

We have the co- host of the very popular podcast “Blamestorming”, Comedian Maryssa Smith ( twitter: @MaryssaSmith), as our guest. Maryssa talks about her trip to Portugal and the speical treatment she received as “Tina Turner’s Daughter” in this episode. We also talk politics, the racial enviorment outside of New York City and her experiences volunteering after Hurricane Katrina.https://maryssasmith.com/instagram: @FashionablyFunnyNYC/ https://theblamestorm.com/ See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

Dave Sirus and Maryssa Smith continue Blamestorming with comics Joel Walkowski and James Pontillo. Are we living in the Age of brinkmanship?They discuss their ideas about Police reform and the government lost 1500 children. Does the GOP's stance on immigration rooted in racism? They chat about weed dispensaries, microdosing and the war on drugs. Does legalizing pot make it more inconvenient? Can you shower too much? SD Rep. Michael Clark (R) thinks it should be legal to deny service to people of color. Does white privilege not exist if there are poor white people?Follow us on Twitter!@theblamestorm @DaveSirus @MaryssaSmith

Dave Sirus and Maryssa Smith continue Blamestorming with comics Joel Walkowski and James Pontillo. Are we living in the Age of brinkmanship?They discuss their ideas about Police reform and the government lost 1500 children. Does the GOP's stance on immigration rooted in racism? They chat about weed dispensaries, microdosing and the war on drugs. Does legalizing pot make it more inconvenient? Can you shower too much? SD Rep. Michael Clark (R) thinks it should be legal to deny service to people of color. Does white privilege not exist if there are poor white people?Follow us on Twitter!@theblamestorm @DaveSirus @MaryssaSmith

In this bonus episode of Blamestorming, Dave Sirus and Maryssa Smith chat with comics Walker Hays and Raanan Hershberg. Stan Lee has been accused of sexual misconduct. Why is there a gender gap at massage parlors? How do you show gratitude in a glory hole. Michael Cohen is the worst fixer. Follow us on Twitter!@theblamestorm @DaveSirus @MaryssaSmith

In this bonus episode of Blamestorming, Dave Sirus and Maryssa Smith chat with comics Walker Hays and Raanan Hershberg. Stan Lee has been accused of sexual misconduct. Why is there a gender gap at massage parlors? How do you show gratitude in a glory hole. Michael Cohen is the worst fixer. Follow us on Twitter!@theblamestorm @DaveSirus @MaryssaSmith

Dave Sirus and Maryssa Smith continue Blamestorming with with Roast Battle comics Maddy Smith and Christopher Crespo. We discuss the departure of Dan Schneider from Nickelodeon. Trump's hair and other musings. Follow us on Twitter!@theblamestorm @DaveSirus @MaryssaSmith

Dave Sirus and Maryssa Smith continue Blamestorming with with Roast Battle comics Maddy Smith and Christopher Crespo. We discuss the departure of Dan Schneider from Nickelodeon. Trump's hair and other musings. Follow us on Twitter!@theblamestorm @DaveSirus @MaryssaSmith

Welcome to Blamestorming. On their first Blamestorming journey, Dave Sirus and Maryssa Smith welcome comic and writer David Feldman. We blamestorm about what's appropriate to say in the heat of passion, Trump, Hope Hicks ,porn and more.Follow us on Twitter! @theblamestorm @DaveSirus @MaryssaSmith

Dave Sirus and Maryssa Smith continue to Blamestorming with comic and writer David Feldman. We blamestorm about the kleptocracy, Omarosa, taxes, the draft and more!Follow us on Twitter! @theblamestorm @DaveSirus @MaryssaSmith

Dave Sirus and Maryssa Smith continue to Blamestorming with comic and writer David Feldman. We blamestorm about the kleptocracy, Omarosa, taxes, the draft and more!Follow us on Twitter! @theblamestorm @DaveSirus @MaryssaSmith

Welcome to Blamestorming. On their first Blamestorming journey, Dave Sirus and Maryssa Smith welcome comic and writer David Feldman. We blamestorm about what's appropriate to say in the heat of passion, Trump, Hope Hicks ,porn and more.Follow us on Twitter! @theblamestorm @DaveSirus @MaryssaSmith

On this episode, Kurt and Steve interview Rob Kendall, of www.conversationexpert.com.  Rob has devoted his life to understanding how humans converse with one another and what makes them go wrong...and right.  Rob its the author of BlameStorming and WorkStorming. If you know that you need to have a challenging conversation, it’s worth preparing thoroughly for it. The preparation time may be disproportionate to the length of the conversation itself, but if the conversation’s important enough, your preparation will rarely be wasted. As a friend of mine was always told, ‘Prepare thoroughly and deviate with confidence’. There are a number of things to consider: 1. Time and place. What’s the appropriate time and place for the conversation? If you squash it in between other meetings, you have no leeway for it to overrun. Is it best to have it now or later? And is it best to stay in the office or would it be more conducive to have it outside? 2. Set it up to succeed. Would it be beneficial for the other person to know (broadly) in advance what it’s about, or not? At a minimum, you may want to make sure that they’ve cleared enough time in their diary, so they don’t arrive and say they only have 15 minutes free. 3. Set the context. Once you meet up, make clear to them what you want to speak about. If you beat about the bush too much, the other person will wonder what on earth’s going on, and may not even be clear what you’ve said. 4. Make your commitment clear. This is vital and can often be missed. When you start a difficult conversation, you need to set the context. Take this example of Mia, who’s given some feedback by her boss. She’s highly regarded at work and is seen as someone with the potential for promotion in the coming year, but her boss assumes she knows this and starts their conversation by saying: As you know, we’ve gathered some feedback from your colleagues and there are a few areas that have come to light that I want to discuss.’ Mia’s immediately on the defensive, while her boss is surprised that she’s not being more constructive. It would help if he began by saying: ‘Mia, you’re highly valued and we’re really keen for you to progress to a more senior role. You’re already exceptionally strong in some areas, and need to develop in others.’ 5. Make the distinction between ‘facts’ and ‘stories’ or ‘opinions’. A fact may be: ‘You’ve been late 3 times in the last 10 working days’. A story or opinion would be: ‘You’re unreliable.’ There is nothing intrinsically wrong with having opinions, but it’s better to state it this way: ‘I have an opinion that you’re unreliable.’ 6. Acknowledge their perspective. Ask them questions so that you can understand their perspective (this doesn’t mean you have to agree with it). And then listen. If you’re not prepared to listen, don’t bother asking, but don’t expect much engagement from them either. Prior to a meeting most people spend their time thinking about what they want to say, but it may be even more important to consider what questions you want to ask. 7. Get clear what’s going to happen next. Obviously this depends on the situation, but it’s worth agreeing together a clear action or a date to review things after some reflection time. 8. Be aware. Lastly, be aware that – however well you conduct the conversation – what you say might come as a shock to the other person. In her 1969 book, On Death and Dying, Elizabeth Kübler-Ross introduced a hypothesis based on her work with terminally ill patients. In the majority of cases she found that patients went through a spectrum of different emotional states: beginning with denial then leading to anger, bargaining, depression and acceptance. Her model has since been adapted to fit a broader set of situations where someone receives unwelcome news. The instinctive response is often to deny it, followed by feelings of anger, withdrawing to lick their wounds, and finally coming round to acceptance.

Heute habe ich einen Interviewgast aus Österreich: Wilhelm Geisbauer. Er beschäftigt sich seit vielen Jahren mit Teamprozessen. Wie können diese gelingen und was gilt es auf alle Fälle in der Teamarbeit zu vermeiden. Er hat das Verfahren des Reteamings im deutschsprachigen Raum bekannt gemacht und gilt als einer der führenden Köpfen in diesem Bereich. Unsere Themen sind: ... welche Problem-Teufelskreise gibt es in Teams und was versteht man unter Blamestorming ... welche Rolle spielt Wertschätzung im Führungsalltag ... wieso sind Probleme verkleidete Ziele ... Welche Rolle spielen "Zweifler" und "Skeptiker" im Teamprozess ... welche Rollen hat eine Führungskraft inne ... Buchtipps Ben Furman & Tapani Ahola: Twin Star - Lösungen von anderen Stern Peter Röhrig (Hrsg): Solution Tools Wilhelm Geisbauer: Reteaming: Methodenhandbuch zur lösungsorientierten Beratung ... Wilhelm Geisbauer im Internet www.reteaming.org www.geisbauer.at Deine Kommentare und Anregungen unter www.kommunikationsverbessserer.com/podcast helfen mir, diesen Podcast noch passgenauer für Dich zu gestalten. Wenn Dir der KommunikationsVerbesserer-Podcast gefällt, würde ich mich über eine Rezension oder Bewertung auf iTunes freuen. Vielen Dank im Voraus!

In der heutigen Episode geht es um das Thema "Problemorientierung vs. Lösungsfokussierung". Wir werden uns anschauen, dass bei einfachen und komplizierten Systemen eine Fehleranalyse durchaus sinnvoll sein kann. Das ist zum Beispiel bei technischen Geräten wie einem Auto oder einer Bohrmaschine der Fall. Bei den komplexen Systemen herrschen andere Spielregeln. Bei sozialen Gefügen, mit denen Du es im Führungsalltag zu tun hast (wenn Du z.B. ein Team führst) ist ein solches Herangehen nicht nur wenig hilfreich sondern eventuell sogar schädlich. Häufig führt nämlich eine Ursachensuche oder Fehleranalyse in derartigen Systemen zum sog. "BlameStorming", also dem Spiel von wechselseitiger Schuldzuweisung und Rechtfertigung. Eine lösungsorientierte Vorgehensweise kann das verhindern und ist zeitlich häufig deutlich effizienter. Inhalt der Episode 1. Die Geschichte der Lösungsorientierung 2. Wann macht eine Problemorientierung, wann eine Lösungsfokussierung Sinn? 3. So kommunizierst Du lösungsorientiert