Podcast appearances and mentions of john carlisle

The cabins scattered throughout the Porcupine Mountains each holds a logbook for guests to complete. Since the 1940s, parks staff have collected about 200 completed books full of decades of stories. Special thanks to John Carlisle and Ryan Garza of The Detroit Free Press for their coverage of the Porcupine Mountains' logbooks. GUEST: Katie Urban, Park Interpreter for the Porcupine Mountains Wilderness State Park Looking for more conversations from Stateside? Right this way. If you like what you hear on the pod, consider supporting our work. Music in this episode by Blue Dot Sessions. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

With major (alleged!) misconduct cases happening at some of the biggest US universities, scientific fraud has been in the news a lot recently. If you're a scientist you're supposed to be discovering the truth - so why do some scientists (allegedly - please don't sue us!) just make all their results up?In this episode of The Studies Show, Tom and Stuart discuss some outrageous instances of scientific fraud, and how they were discovered. They look at all the reasons a scientist might decide to break the rules and falsify or fabricate their data - and talk about ways we might try and prevent these scientific crimes in future.*EDIT 22 October 2023: In the podcast we say that Eric Stewart's papers were retracted for “fraudulent data”. Whereas he has been accused of fraud by at least one of his co-authors (and others), and whereas he claims to have lost all the original data files so they can't be checked, it's not correct to say this is why his studies were retracted, as per the publishers' retraction notes. They were retracted for gross errors and incompetence rather than fraud.The Studies Show is sponsored by the i, the UK's smartest daily newspaper. You can get a money-off deal on digital subscriptions—which include full access to all Stuart's science writing—by following this special podcast link.The Studies Show is also sponsored by Works in Progress, an online magazine about science, technology, and human progress. Did you know that, in addition to the main magazine, Works in Progress has a Substack called Notes on Progress, with shorter pieces on the same themes? You can find Notes on Progress right here.Show notes* Big New Yorker article about Dan Ariely and Francesca Gino* Data Colada article on Dan Ariely's study; and the first of several articles on Francesca Gino's research* New York Times article on the fallout from the Gino case* GoFundMe page for Data Colada's legal defence* 2009 review of surveys asking scientists whether they've committed fraud, and how much fraud they think there is* Example studies asking questions on fraud as well as sub-fraud “questionable research practices”: psychologists, economists, biomedical statisticians* The Retraction Watch Leaderboard of the most-retracted scientists* Story of anaesthesiologist Joachim Boldt, current leader in number of papers retracted from the literature* Book on the fraudulent semiconductor physicist Jan-Hendrik Schön* News of recent retractions by a superconductor physicist at the University of Rochester* Article on John Carlisle, fake RCT-spotter extraordinaire* Article on Elisabeth Bik, expert on spotting fake scientific images; Bik's paper on the prevalence of problematic images* Description of the GRIM test by Nick Brown and James Heathers* BBC Radio 4 programme by Michael Blastland about scientific fraud-spotters, featuring Bik, Brown, and Heathers (and also Stuart)* Recent article on using Benford's Law to discover fraud* Story of Hwang Woo-Suk, the audacious cloning fraudster at Seoul National University* Story of Eric Stewart, researcher of systematic racism at Florida State University* Story of Paolo Macchiarini, windpipe surgery fraudster and convicted criminal* Stuart's article on why we need to actually punish fraudstersCreditsThe Studies Show is produced by Julian Mayers at Yada Yada Productions. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.thestudiesshowpod.com/subscribe

An escape artist dog adopts a bunch of codgers, and John Carlisle tells ML, Marc and Shawn the inside story, […]

There is a worrying amount of fraud in medical research. As many as one in 50 research papers may be unreliable because of fabrication, plagiarism or serious errors. Fabricated data can influence the guidelines which doctors use to treat patients. Misguided clinical guidelines could cause serious illness and death in patients. Fraudulent studies can also influence further research programmes—recent findings suggest that manipulated images may have resulted in scientists wasting time and money following blind alleys in Alzheimer's research for decades. What can be done to combat scientific malpractice? Dorothy Bishop, a retired professor of psychology at the University of Oxford, explores the motivation behind fraudsters in research. John Carlisle, an anaesthetist and an editor of the journal Anaesthesia, explains the impact of fraud and how to detect it in research papers. Also, Elisabeth Bik, a former microbiologist and a full-time scientific image detective, discusses the consequences of whistle-blowing on both sleuths and the fraudsters. Plus, The Economist's health-care correspondent, Slavea Chankova, investigates how to overcome the worrying unwillingness on all sides to do anything about fraud in research. Alok Jha hosts.For full access to The Economist's print, digital and audio editions subscribe at economist.com/podcastoffer and sign up for our weekly science newsletter at economist.com/simplyscience. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

There is a worrying amount of fraud in medical research. As many as one in 50 research papers may be unreliable because of fabrication, plagiarism or serious errors. Fabricated data can influence the guidelines which doctors use to treat patients. Misguided clinical guidelines could cause serious illness and death in patients. Fraudulent studies can also influence further research programmes—recent findings suggest that manipulated images may have resulted in scientists wasting time and money following blind alleys in Alzheimer's research for decades. What can be done to combat scientific malpractice? Dorothy Bishop, a retired professor of psychology at the University of Oxford, explores the motivation behind fraudsters in research. John Carlisle, an anaesthetist and an editor of the journal Anaesthesia, explains the impact of fraud and how to detect it in research papers. Also, Elisabeth Bik, a former microbiologist and a full-time scientific image detective, discusses the consequences of whistle-blowing on both sleuths and the fraudsters. Plus, The Economist's health-care correspondent, Slavea Chankova, investigates how to overcome the worrying unwillingness on all sides to do anything about fraud in research. Alok Jha hosts.For full access to The Economist's print, digital and audio editions subscribe at economist.com/podcastoffer and sign up for our weekly science newsletter at economist.com/simplyscience. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Governor Roupp and his ex-wife Lorna Rios drive to Gamote Point General Hospital to deal with the damage caused by John Carlisle and Arthur Klint. Miguel Rios is arrested, again. Uriah Roupp stuns his grandfather.

Miguel Rios and his new bride Lorna Roupp Rios are living in the Governor's Mansion, just not with each other. Governor Milton Roupp keeps a surreptitious eye on John Carlisle and Arthur Klint. "Operation Moonshot" get underway. Alan Woodward and Dr. Lily Belo, really?

In this episode, we're talking about adapting to the changes forced by COVID on both a personal and professional level. Discussing Specsavers pivot to B2C to ensure they could service their customers and its impacts on the supply chain. I am joined by John Carlisle, the Head of European Logistics Operations at Specsavers. John is an incredible leader and provides some great insights into managing the changes focusing on the human element. In the episode, we are going to dive into: The human impact of COVID both personally and professionallyHow the perception of the supply chain has changed since the Pandemic Switching to direct to consumer model while in lockdown

A U.P. resident's personal mission to help spread the joy of reading is the latest story from Detroit Free Press writer John Carlisle.

"Shared decision making and risk prediction in the emergency setting: Can we achieve it?" is a talk originally given at the 8th Australian and New Zealand Symposium of Perioperative Medicine Special Interest Group: “Updates in Perioperative Medicine 360” which took place between November 7th-9th 2019. This talk discusses survival after admission to intensive care. How do we incorporate concepts like shared decision making and value based care into this high stress, time limited environment? Presented by Dr John Carlisle, anaesthetist, Torbay and South Devon NHS Foundation Trust. He also works as an intensivist in the intensive care unit, as well as the preoperative assessment clinic. -- EBPOM 2020 - Live from London - is on! For those who have listened to Desiree's special announcement go now to: https://ebpom.org/EBPOM2020 If you liked this podcast and want more, our speaker mentions the excellent journal Anaesthesia, there's an interview with the editor here: https://www.topmedtalk.com/topmedtalk-andy-klien-editor-in-chief-of-anaesthesia/

Victory at Georgia Tech!  The Citadel runs over the historic ACC institution in downtown Atlanta and prevails with a Jacob Godek game-winning field goal in overtime.  Plus, Citadel Football Association executive director John Carlisle ('64) returns to the show to discuss his organization's important role in advancing Bulldogs football.

John Carlisle meets Miguel Rios face-to-face. Elise Geltz and Regina Miranda discuss events of the last couple of days. Uriah Roupp tries drowning his misery at an illegal poker table. Please consider making a donation on Patreon, the arts membership platform. Support the show (http://www.patreon.com/marshahinton)

The exposure of fabricated numbers in published papers by eagle-eyed readers has been due to sporadic serendipity. I am going to describe a semi-automated method that you can take away with you to do some sleuthing. I am going to describe what I found when I analysed over 4500 papers.

Without a doubt the most socially conscious episode to date.  Bill speaks with John Carlisle from the Maine Department of Highway Safety to discuss the dangers of slow driving.  Travis delivers a "golden" bit for the show. Bill has a horse update and talks chimps and email.

For our Christmas special we're delighted to be joined by numbers guru and journal editor John Carlisle. John helps us look at the latest from the Surviving Sepsis Campaign, interpret the recent guidance from NICE regarding depth of anaesthesia monitoring and teaches us all how to make the perfect pancake. We've also got discoveries, rants and a festive themed Biology or Bunkum.

Corps Day 2012 and the Blue-White Spring Football Game take place at The Citadel this weekend.  Citadel Football Association president John Carlisle ('64) talks about his group's events this week, including the "Beautiful Bulldog Contest."   PostandCourier.com's Jeff Hartsell reports on the injury to all-SoCon defensive lineman Derek Douglas, as well as the departure of defensive coordinator Josh Conklin to the Tennessee Vols.

The Dogs are chomped in The Swamp. We recap the '08 season; plus chat with Jason Cline ('93) about his opportunity to lead The Citadel to the Rose Bowl. Also, Citadel Football Association president John Carlisle ('64) discusses the fine work his volunteer organization performs to help out Coach Higgins and the gridiron team. It's a Turkey Week edition of GrayLine.